Skip to main content
PLOS Genetics logoLink to PLOS Genetics
. 2022 Apr 4;18(4):e1009638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009638

Systems genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose

Anna N Senko 1,2, Rupert W Overall 1,2, Jan Silhavy 3, Petr Mlejnek 3, Hana Malínská 4, Martina Hüttl 4, Irena Marková 4, Klaus S Fabel 1,2, Lu Lu 5, Ales Stuchlik 3, Robert W Williams 5, Michal Pravenec 3, Gerd Kempermann 1,2,*
Editor: Wayne N Frankel6
PMCID: PMC9060359  PMID: 35377872

Abstract

Neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus contributes to learning and memory in the healthy brain but is dysregulated in metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. The molecular relationships between neural stem cell activity, adult neurogenesis, and global metabolism are largely unknown. Here we applied unbiased systems genetics methods to quantify genetic covariation among adult neurogenesis and metabolic phenotypes in peripheral tissues of a genetically diverse family of rat strains, derived from a cross between the spontaneously hypertensive (SHR/OlaIpcv) strain and Brown Norway (BN-Lx/Cub). The HXB/BXH family is a very well established model to dissect genetic variants that modulate metabolic and cardiovascular diseases and we have accumulated deep phenome and transcriptome data in a FAIR-compliant resource for systematic and integrative analyses. Here we measured rates of precursor cell proliferation, survival of new neurons, and gene expression in the hippocampus of the entire HXB/BXH family, including both parents. These data were combined with published metabolic phenotypes to detect a neurometabolic quantitative trait locus (QTL) for serum glucose and neuronal survival on Chromosome 16: 62.1–66.3 Mb. We subsequently fine-mapped the key phenotype to a locus that includes the Telo2-interacting protein 2 gene (Tti2)—a chaperone that modulates the activity and stability of PIKK kinases. To verify the hypothesis that differences in neurogenesis and glucose levels are caused by a polymorphism in Tti2, we generated a targeted frameshift mutation on the SHR/OlaIpcv background. Heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- mutants had lower rates of hippocampal neurogenesis and hallmarks of dysglycemia compared to wild-type littermates. Our findings highlight Tti2 as a causal genetic link between glucose metabolism and structural brain plasticity. In humans, more than 800 genomic variants are linked to TTI2 expression, seven of which have associations to protein and blood stem cell factor concentrations, blood pressure and frontotemporal dementia.

Author summary

Metabolic and neurological disorders are often comorbid, suggesting that biological pathways which orchestrate peripheral homeostasis and the integrity of the nervous system intersect. The genetic architecture behind these relationships is still poorly described, in part because molecular processes in the human brain are very difficult to study. We thus used a rodent genetic reference population to investigate links between adult hippocampal neurogenesis—a cellular plasticity mechanism important for learning flexibility—and metabolism. We measured adult neurogenesis in the family of 30 HXB/BXH rat recombinant inbred strains, who are characterised by stable differences in metabolism, behaviour, and gene expression levels.

Because DNA variants affecting distinct traits segregated into different members of the family, it was possible to determine which of the previously published phenotypes correlated to adult neurogenesis due to shared genomic sequence. We found that expression levels of Tti2—a part of a specialised protein chaperone complex regulating stability of PIKK kinases—were concomitantly influencing adult neurogenesis and serum glucose levels. In human populations hundreds of genomic variants regulate TTI2 expression, potentially affecting brain function and glucose homeostasis.

Introduction

Epidemiological studies link components of the metabolic syndrome—a complex disorder characterised by the coexistence of obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension—to cognitive impairment and dementia [1]. Defective brain function is often seen as a consequence of longstanding metabolic dysregulation. The full picture, however, is more complex. Several human phenome-wide association studies identified causal genetic loci that are shared between metabolic and neurological phenotypes [28], suggesting some degree of pleiotropy—a phenomenon whereby one gene variant affects multiple traits. Pleiotropy is widespread among model organisms [914] and humans [2,1519] with an estimated median number of around six traits per locus [13]. Pleiotropic mutations can result in genetic covariance among phenotypes [10,12,20]. Cognition and metabolic homeostasis are both achieved through multiple elementary mechanisms at molecular, cellular, tissue, and inter-organ levels, some of which might be shared. To understand the biology underlying correlations between such complex functions, it is necessary to identify which exact processes are simultaneously affected by shared genetic variation.

Adult neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus is required for cognitive flexibility of learning, efficient pattern separation and emotional processing in mammals [21], and thus embodies a functionally relevant and readily quantifiable parameter of hippocampal plasticity. In humans, according to the best available calculation, one third of dentate granule cells are born during adulthood [22]. The generation of new granule neurons in the DG is a complex multistep process, in the course of which neural precursor cell proliferation, as well as survival, maturation, and integration of newly born postmitotic cells are under the control of multiple genetic loci. Remarkably, cellular metabolism has been identified as a regulator of neural stem and progenitor cell maintenance, proliferation, and differentiation [23], yet the interactions of adult neurogenesis with systemic metabolism are far from being understood. Given the overall significance of metabolism for brain function in health and disease, there is a high likelihood that direct causal links exist between structural brain plasticity and metabolic traits and states.

Natural genetic variation present in genetically diverse mouse populations contributes to up to ten-fold differences in the net production of new neurons [24,25]—values much larger than the induction achieved by environmental interventions within a single genetic background. This enormous genetic potential inherent in rodent strains can be utilised to dissect the molecular interaction networks not only underlying adult neurogenesis as such, but also its connections with homeostatic mechanisms in peripheral tissues.

We thus employed a family of 30 fully inbred recombinant HXB/BXH rat strains, which have been derived by reciprocal mating of a spontaneously hypertensive rat line (SHR/OlaIpcv, hereafter referred to as SHR) with the normotensive BN-Lx/Cub—a Brown Norway (BN) congenic rat with a mutation that causes a polydactyly-luxate phenotype [26,27]. Besides hypertension, SHR manifests other hallmarks of metabolic syndrome [2830], as well as cognitive deficits [31,32], and brain morphological changes [33,34]. The HXB/BXH family was developed to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) for hypertension and morphological abnormalities associated with polydactyly-luxate syndrome [26,27], but they are of great utility for genetic mapping of a much wider spectrum of phenotypes. The HXB/BXH family have become the most thoroughly characterised rat reference population within the Rat Hybrid Diversity Panel [35]. Over 200 metabolic, endocrinological, behavioural and developmental phenotypes, along with gene expression profiles in peripheral tissues, are publicly accessible in a FAIR-compliant format at the GeneNetwork database [36,37]. The stable genetic background of these recombinant inbred lines enables truly systemic integration of phenotypic and omics data [35]. Accordingly, the HXB/BXH family have been used to clone genes associated with several disease quantitative trait loci (QTL) and discover gene regulatory networks relevant for human diseases [29,30,3844]. Genome sequencing of both founder strains revealed 3.2 million single nucleotide variants, 425,924 small insertions and deletions, 907 copy number changes, and 1,094 large structural genetic variants segregating within the HXB/BXH family [45,46]. This level of genetic diversity allows for the separation of phenotypes modulated by different sets of gene variants. Correlations between phenotypes, in turn, suggest shared genetic causality [10,20,47].

In the present study, we quantified adult hippocampal neurogenesis in all existing HXB/BXH family members and parents. We aimed at finding out the extent of genetic correlations between neurogenesis and peripheral metabolism, and sought to identify common loci that cause these correlations. The data reported here were submitted into public databases as a part of the HXB/BXH phenome resource.

Results

Adult neurogenesis in HXB/BXH strains

We quantified adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the DG of young male rats from all 30 HXB/BXH family members, as well as the parental founder strains BN and SHR. Numbers of proliferating stem and progenitor cells were estimated using immunohistochemistry against the Ki67 antigen (Fig 1A and 1D). Dividing cells were also labelled with BrdU at 10 weeks of age and surviving progeny were quantified four weeks later (Fig 1B and 1E), after which time point new cells are likely to persist for very long periods of time [48,49]. Newborn cells were identified as neurons by double labelling with neuronal marker, NeuN (Rbfox3, Fig 1C). Among 3814 BrdU+ cells in 38 individuals, we detected only a single BrdU+/S100β+ astrocyte. We conclude that either astrogliogenesis is negligible in the DG of young HXB/BXH rats, or S100β (the standard marker in mice in this case) is not expressed in newly-born astrocytes in these lines. Notably, over 90% of BrdU-positive cells were neurons (Fig 1F). Hence, we used the numbers of surviving BrdU-positive cells as an approximation of net neurogenesis within the HXB/BXH family. The majority of dividing cells in the DG are transient amplifying progenitors, which remain tightly clustered together (Fig 1A–1A”). We quantified the number of such clusters of proliferating cells, assuming that each cluster arises from an activated stem cell. The number of clusters tightly correlated to counts of individual cells (Pearson’s r2 = 0.92; Fig 1G). Such high correlation suggested that the numbers of proliferating cells were determined by the numbers of activated stem cells rather than differences in lineage progression or cell cycle dynamics in these animals, and pointed to a stereotyped pattern of lineage progression.

Fig 1. Adult neurogenesis in the HXB/BXH family.

Fig 1

(A) Proliferating precursor cells were stained for Ki67, a marker of actively cycling cells. (A’-A”) Proliferating cells occur in tightly packed clusters, which are likely to arise from single activated stem cells. (A’) High power view of two clusters indicated by arrows in (A). (A”) An example of a single large cluster of Ki67+ cells. (B) New cells in the DG were identified by DAB-immunostaining for BrdU 4 weeks after the last BrdU injection. (B’) High power view of cells indicated by an arrow. (C) BrdU-positive cells (magenta, arrowhead) were identified as neurons by confocal microscopy after co-labelling with a neuronal marker, NeuN (green). (D-E) The number of proliferating (D) and surviving (E) cells in the DG of HXB/BXH, BN (red) and SHR (blue) strains. (F) Distribution of neuronal percentages among newborn cells across HXB/BXH family confirms that more than 90% of newborn cells are neurons. Box and whisker plot: centre line—median; upper and lower hinges—first and third quartiles; whiskers—highest and lowest values within 1.5 times the interquartile range outside hinges; dots—outlying data points. (G) Correlation between number of clusters and individual counts of proliferating cells. (H-I) Quantile-quantile plots of neurogenesis traits indicate normal distribution of strain means. (J) Rates of precursor cell proliferation are not predicting the number of surviving cells. r, Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. Scale bar, 100 and 20 μm in A and B, 20 μm in A’, A”, B” and C.

Proliferation and survival differed between 2- and 3-fold across the strains (Fig 1D and 1E) and were normally distributed (Fig 1H and 1I; BrdU: W = 0.983, p = 0.88; Ki67: W = 0.976, p = 0.67; Shapiro-Wilk test), consistent with the polygenic regulation of adult neurogenesis. Transgressive segregation was observed for both traits, indicating that genes with positive effects on neurogenesis were distributed between the parental strains. The heritability was estimated as 0.41 and 0.29 for survival and proliferation, respectively. Interestingly, proliferation levels did not predict the rates of survival, as these measures did not correlate with each other (r2 = 0.026; Fig 1J). This finding implies that, under standard laboratory conditions, these two aspects of neurogenesis are influenced by largely separate sets of genes.

Shared QTL for neurogenesis and serum glucose

The search for genetic associations between adult neurogenesis and physiological traits was performed in several steps. First, we identified QTL for both neurogenic traits (Fig 2A and 2B). We detected a suggestive QTL for net neurogenesis on chromosome 16 (LOD = 3.12, genome-wide corrected p value = 0.14), and a weak suggestive QTL for proliferation on chromosome 17 (LOD = 2.39, p = 0.52). Second, we identified phenotypes from the GeneNetwork database [37] that significantly correlated to both traits (Table 1). We then used these phenotypes as covariates in conditional QTL scans to screen for potential interactions at the genomic level. A substantial change in the LOD score after using another phenotype as a covariate indicates that genetic variation within a QTL may have pleiotropic effects on these two phenotypes [50]. Among pairs of correlating phenotypes, we detected only one such association: QTL mapping for net neurogenesis revealed a LOD drop below suggestive level to 0.43 after conditioning on serum glucose levels. Accordingly, an overlapping significant QTL for serum glucose was found on chromosome 16 (LOD = 5.13, p = 0.0065; Fig 2C). This locus explained 37% of the genetic variance in adult neurogenesis and 61% of the genetic variance in serum glucose. The SHR allele was associated with an average decrease in numbers of BrdU-positive cells by 584 and in serum glucose by 0.656 mmol/L.

Fig 2. Tti2 is a candidate gene for common net neurogenesis and serum glucose quantitative trait locus (QTL).

Fig 2

(A-E) Whole-genome quantitative trait locus mapping for indicated traits. The genome-wide significant (p < 0.05) and suggestive (p < 0.63) thresholds of the logarithm of the odds (LOD) score (green and grey horizontal dashed lines, respectively) were calculated using permutations and corrected p-values are shown adjacent to the highest association in (A-C). Suggestive threshold corresponds to an average of one false positive per genome scan [51,52]. QTL for net adult neurogenesis and a positively correlating phenotype, serum glucose level, have an overlapping pattern on chromosome 16. (D) An eigenvector of the two phenotypes (an eigenphenotype–the first principal component) was used to calculate a common confidence interval for the shared QTL (shaded areas in D and E). (E) Tti2 gene, whose genomic position is indicated by an orange triangle, has a local expression QTL within the eigenphenotype QTL confidence interval on chromosome 16 in all tested tissues. For clarity, in (D) and (E) only fragments of the chromosome 16 were plotted. (F) Tti2 expression in the hippocampus or tissues relevant for regulation of glucose homeostasis, as indicated in the figure, is correlated to net neurogenesis and serum glucose. Colour specifies parental genotypes at the marker, which had the highest LOD score association with the eigenphenotype.

Table 1. Published phenotypes correlating to adult neurogenesis in HXB/BXH family.

Phenotype r N p-value ID
Net neurogenesis (BrdU+ cells)
 Glucose concentrations 0.57 24 0.0031 10003
 Serum triglyceride concentrations 0.46 24 0.023 10014
 Liver triglycerides 0.41 29 0.026 10119
 Relative kidney weight -0.40 28 0.034 10025
 Serum chromogranin A levels 0.37 30 0.043 10132
Proliferation (Ki67+ cells)
 Adrenal phenyletanolamine-N-mythyltransferase 0.58 30 0.0006 10151
 Adrenal dopamine 0.52 30 0.0031 10106
 Adrenal epinephrine 0.47 30 0.0081 10105
 Relative kidney weight -0.45 28 0.015 10025
 Insulin stimulated lipogenesis in epididymal fat -0.44 31 0.012 10148
 Adrenal chromogranin A levels 0.43 30 0.016 10133
 Serum corticosterone levels after immobilization stress -0.42 23 0.043 10064
 Serum triglyceride concentrations, fed high fructose diet for 2 weeks 0.42 24 0.039 10016
 Adrenal norepinephrine 0.40 30 0.029 10107
 Urine calcium 0.39 28 0.041 10179
 Basal lipogenesis in epididymal fat -0.38 31 0.033 10146

All phenotypes were measured in male rats aged between 6 to 10 weeks. Details can be found in the GeneNetwork database (www.genenetwork.org). r, Pearson’s product correlation coefficient; N, number of overlapping strains; ID, GeneNetwork HXB/BXH Published Phenotypes identifier.

Finally, to derive a confidence interval for the joint survival-serum glucose QTL, we combined the variance from both traits using their first principal component, here referred to as an eigenphenotype (Fig 2D). The eigenphenotype QTL (LOD = 4.62, p = 0.014) spanned 4.2 Mb from genomic position 62.1 to 66.3 Mb and contained 10 protein-coding and 4 non-coding RNA genes (S1 Table). The QTL covered 4983 single nucleotide variations and 1803 small insertions/deletions (≤ 10 base pairs).

Tti2 is a candidate quantitative trait gene

Genetic correlations between phenotypes can result from variation in shared regulatory genes or from linkage disequilibrium. In linkage disequilibrium, distinct genes governing each phenotype co-segregate together in a limited population of recombinant strains due to their physical proximity in the genome. To distinguish these scenarios and prioritise candidate genes for each phenotype, we used transcriptional profiles in tissues relevant for adult neurogenesis and metabolic regulation to cross-correlate with phenotypes and genetic markers. To that end, we profiled gene expression data from hippocampi of HXB/BXH and parental strains using microarrays. We also used published gene expression data sets from the soleus muscle, liver, perirenal fat, kidney, adrenal gland, left ventricle and aorta. We identified 2893 genes whose expression correlated to net neurogenesis in the hippocampus or to serum glucose in at least one peripheral tissue with an absolute value of Pearson’s r equal to or larger than 0.4. Among these genes, 3 were located within the common neurogenesis-glucose QTL interval on chromosome 16: Telo2-interacting protein 2 (Tti2), Neuregulin 1 (Nrg1), and Mak16. Serum glucose correlated to expression of Nrg1 in the muscle (r = 0.47), and fat (r = 0.44), and to Mak16 in the muscle (r = -0.59), aorta (-0.56), and adrenal gland (r = -0.53). Tti2 was the only gene from the entire transcriptome whose expression correlated significantly to both traits across all data sets (Fig 2F). Finally, Tti2 mRNA expression was linked to a multi-tissue cis-eQTL mapping within the neurogenesis-glucose QTL (Fig 2E). Other genes that had cis-eQTL within the joint QTL interval were Mak16 in the muscle (LOD = 6.11), and Saraf in the kidney (LOD = 4.4) (S2 Table). The Saraf gene itself is located outside of the phenotype QTL, and its expression did not correlate to physiological phenotypes.

We thus carried out conditional mapping for neurogenesis and serum glucose using expression of Tti2, and Mak16 as covariates (S2 Table). A substantial drop in the LOD score between unconditioned and conditioned scans strongly suggests that the QTL effect is mediated by the gene expression—consistent with the flow of causation from genes to phenotypes [50,53,54]. Using Tti2 expression in the hippocampus as a covariate decreased the LOD score for adult neurogenesis by 2.34 (LOD = 0.78). To investigate the effect of Tti2 expression in peripheral tissues on serum glucose mapping, we first summarised Tti2 expression levels in these data sets as an eigengene (the first principal component). Using the Tti2 eigengene as a covariate in QTL mapping decreased the LOD score for serum glucose by 2.76 (LOD = 2.37). The conditional LOD values for both phenotypes were below suggestive level. Using Mak16 expression in the muscle as a covariate also decreased the LOD score for serum glucose by 2.31 (LOD = 2.82), but not for net neurogenesis (LOD = 3.16). The genomic locus of Mak16 partly overlaps Tti2 gene (S1 Table), so it is plausible they share some of the regulatory elements. Based on the multi-tissue cis-eQTL and correlation of Tti2 expression to neurogenesis and serum glucose in all data sets, we concluded it is the strongest candidate gene responsible for observed variation in both phenotypes within the joint phenotype QTL. The Tti2 SHR allele was associated with higher levels of Tti2 mRNA, which we verified using quantitative RT-PCR in RNA isolated from the hippocampus, liver, muscle, kidney and pancreas (S3 Table).

The allelic variation underlying a QTL can either change the expression level of a gene, or the function of its product by altering its structure. We inspected the genes located within the eigenphenotype QTL confidence interval for non-synonymous amino acid substitutions. Interestingly, only Tti2 carried several missense mutations, including one at a highly conserved position, although none of the substitutions were predicted as damaging by Polymorphism Phenotyping 2 (Polyphen 2) [55] or Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [56] (S4 Table). Together, these data support Tti2 as a causal candidate gene for the combined serum glucose and net neurogenesis QTL.

Reduced Tti2 expression impairs adult neurogenesis and metabolic homeostasis

To evaluate whether expression of Tti2 might be indeed causally linked to regulation of net adult neurogenesis and serum glucose, we derived heterozygous Tti2 knockout rats on the SHR background. Using zinc finger nuclease, we introduced an 8-bp deletion in the first exon of Tti2. The deletion resulted in a frameshift mutation Glu82Gly, which generated 9 premature stop codons within the N-terminal portion of the protein, truncating Tti2 from 502 to 112 amino acids. Heterozygous male rats were compared to wild type littermates to assess consequences of the reduction of available Tti2 for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and metabolism.

Net adult neurogenesis decreased by 21% in the DG of three-month-old SHR-Tti2+/- compared to their wild-type SHR littermates (Fig 3A and Table 2). Concomitantly, heterozygous animals exhibited extensive alterations in metabolic parameters (Figs 3 and S1 and Tables 2 and 3). Heterozygous knock-out of Tti2 resulted in lower plasma glucose and insulin levels (Fig 3B and 3C). SHR-Tti2+/- rats had also elevated plasma triglycerides (TG; Fig 3D) and non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA; Fig 3F) compared to SHR control. Changes in plasma lipid profile were accompanied by a decrease in liver TG and cholesterol content (Fig 3G and 3H). However, we did not observe an effect on total or HDL-bound fraction of plasma cholesterol (Figs 3E and S1H). In SHR-Tti2+/- animals we observed changes in body composition and organ sizes, including lipogenic tissues: they had smaller livers and epididymal fat deposits and increased perirenal fat weights (S1B–S1D Fig). On the other hand, knock-out of Tti2 did not affect the weight of brown adipose tissue (BAT; S1E Fig). While the heterozygous rats were slightly larger compared to the control animals (S1A Fig), this difference was not statistically significant.

Fig 3. Knock-down of Tti2 leads to decreased hippocampal neurogenesis and impaired glucose homeostasis.

Fig 3

(A-H) Three-month-old heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR-Tti2+/+ littermates (denoted as SHR) were assessed for the phenotypes indicated in the figure. (I-K) Glucose and lipid metabolism were measured ex vivo in diaphragm or epididymal adipose tissue in absence (basal conditions) or presence of 250 μU/mL insulin (stimulated condition) in the incubation media. (L) Basal and adrenaline-stimulated lipolysis were measured in the epididymal adipose tissue in absence or presence of 250 μg/ml adrenaline. Number of animals: (A) 18 rats of each genotype; (B-L) 8 SHR-Tti2+/-, 6 SHR. p values were derived from Student’s t-test (A-H) or linear mixed effect model (I-L). Full details of statistical analysis are in Tables 2 and 3. Raw data can be found in S1 Data. Abbreviations: NEFA, non-esterified free fatty acids; TG, triglycerides.

Table 2. Statistical comparison of neurogenesis and metabolic traits between SHR-Tti2+/- rats and SHR wild type littermates.

Phenotype Unit SHR SHR-Tti2+/- p value
Neurogenesis BrdU+ cells/DG 4143 ± 79 3266 ± 55 0.04 *
Body and organ weights
Body weight g 296.47 ± 2.62 308.41 ± 1.37 0.12
Relative weight of epid. fat g/100 g bwt 0.69 ± 0.003 0.63 ± 0.005 0.0049 *
Relative weight of perirenal fat g/100 g bwt 0.52 ± 0.01 0.58 ± 0.01 0.022 *
Relative weight of BAT g/100 g bwt 0.09 ± 0.002 0.08 ± 0.002 0.71
Relative weight of liver g/100 g bwt 3.48 ± 0.01 3.3 ± 0.01 0.0061 *
Relative weight of heart g/100 g bwt 0.36 ± 0.003 0.35 ± 0.001 0.14
Relative weight of kidney g/100 g bwt 0.69 ± 0.004 0.67 ± 0.002 0.028 *
Blood chemistry
Non-fasting glucose mmol/l 7.53 ± 0.07 6.94 ± 0.03 0.0057 *
Insulin nmol/l 0.38 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.005 9.6E-5 *
Serum TG mmol/l 0.36 ± 0.01 0.43 ± 0.01 0.048 *
Total cholesterol mmol/l 1.13 ± 0.03 1.07 ± 0.01 0.39
HDL-C mmol/l 1.04 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.01 0.27
NEFA mmol/l 0.50 ± 0.01 0.61 ± 0.01 3.8E-4 *
Adiponectin μg/ml 2.63 ± 0.36 2.33 ± 0.35 0.589
Leptin ng/ml 3.20 ± 0.23 3.31 ± 0.12 0.692
Tissue composition
TG in liver μmol/g 6.49 ± 0.24 4.7 ± 0.12 0.016 *
Cholesterol in liver μmol/g 10.93 ± 0.16 9.27 ± 0.07 0.0014 *
TG in heart μmol/g 2.29 ± 0.08 0.71 ± 0.03 2.8E-6 *
TG in kidney μmol/g 5.33 ± 0.21 5.57 ± 0.12 0.69
TG in muscle μmol/g 1.35 ± 0.09 1.29 ± 0.06 0.80
Glucose and lipid metabolism
Glucose oxidation in BAT nmol glucose/g/2h 441.78 ± 19.17 386.76 ± 14.01 0.39
Basal lipogenesis in BAT nmol glucose/g/2h 294.37 ± 11.14 262.82 ± 6.63 0.34
Basal lipogenesis in epid. fat nmol glucose/g/2h 481.05 ± 18.1 417 ± 8.62 0.80
Insulin-stimulated lipogenesis in epid. fat nmol glucose/g/2h 717.14 ± 27.08 581.48 ± 23.12 0.23
Basal lipolysis in epid. fat μmol NEFA/g 3.01 ± 0.05 3.51 ± 0.05 0.58
Adrenaline-stimulated lipolysis in epid. fat μmol NEFA/g 6.09 ± 0.16 5.25 ± 0.13 0.15
Basal glycogenesis in diaphragm nmol glucose/g/2h 892.26 ± 43.12 688.17 ± 30.06 0.37
Insulin-stimulated glycogenesis in diaphragm nmol glucose/g/2h 1554.32 ± 35.04 701.84 ± 41.14 < 1E-4 *
Glucose oxidation in diaphragm nmol glucose/g/2h 488.38 ± 20.66 343.98 ± 8.29 0.0042 *
Oxidative stress in the liver
SOD activity U/mg 0.16 ± 0.004 0.12 ± 0.003 0.026 *
GPx activity μmol GSH/min/mg 293.14 ± 6.48 234.57 ± 5.26 0.021 *
GR activity μmol NADPH/min/mg 132.14 ± 4.51 112.57 ± 2.52 0.18
CAT activity μmol H2O2/min/mg 1260 ± 45.18 1522.14 ± 50.8 0.17
GSH/GSSG 39.64 ± 1.25 25.56 ± 0.97 0.0051*
GSH μmol/mg 75.19 ± 1.18 72.94 ± 0.61 0.49
GSSG μmol/mg 1.96 ± 0.07 3.15 ± 0.15 0.039 *
Conjugated dienes nM/mg 35.29 ± 0.88 42.86 ± 0.71 0.027 *
TBARS nM/mg 1.73 ± 0.06 1.36 ± 0.05 0.095

Table 3. Statistical analysis of response to insulin and adrenaline stimulation in tissues isolated from SHR-Tti2+/- rats and SHR wild type littermates.

Phenotype Term/Contrast Statistic (d.f.) p.value
Glycogenesis in diaphragm Genotype Χ2 (1) = 28.25 1.1E-7 *
Insulin Χ2 (1) = 9.72 0.0018 *
Genotype:Insulin Χ2 (1) = 11.03 9E-4 *
SHR:250 –SHR:0 t(12) = 4.55 <1E-4 *
SHR-Tti2+/-:250 –SHR-Tti2+/-:0 t(11) = 0.1 1
Glucose oxidation in diaphragm Genotype Χ2 (1) = 7.82 0.0052 *
Insulin Χ2 (1) = 1.34 0.25
Genotype:Insulin Χ2 (1) = 3.07 0.08
SHR:250 –SHR:0 t(12) = 2.08 0.13
SHR-Tti2+/-:250 –SHR-Tti2+/-:0 t(12) = -0.27 0.99
Lipogenesis in epididymal fat Genotype Χ2 (1) = 2.21 0.14
Insulin Χ2 (1) = 34.59 4.1E-9 *
Genotype:Insulin Χ2 (1) = 1.14 0.29
SHR:250 –SHR:0 t(12) = 4.66 <1E-4 *
SHR-Tti2+/-:250 –SHR-Tti2+/-:0 t(12) = 3.75 7.7E-4 *
Lipolysis in epididymal fat Genotype Χ2 (1) = 0.35 0.56
Adrenaline Χ2 (1) = 62.01 3.4E-15 *
Genotype:Adrenaline Χ2 (1) = 5.08 0.024 *
SHR:250 –SHR:0 t(12) = 6.86 <1E-4 *
SHR-Tti2+/-:250 –SHR-Tti2+/-:0 t(12) = 4.48 < 1E-4 *

Table 2 reports means ± standard errors of the mean. p values were derived from Student’s t-test or post-hoc Tukey test following two-way mixed effect model with an interaction between genotype and stimulation as a fixed factor. Asterisks denote significance at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: BAT, brown adipose tissue; CAT, catalase; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein bound cholesterol; epid., epididymal; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidised glutathione; NEFA, non-esterified fatty acids; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances; TG, triglycerides. Raw data can be found in S1 Data.

Glucose and lipid metabolism were measured ex vivo in tissues isolated from SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates under basal and induced conditions (without or with 250 μU/ml insulin or 250 mg/ml adrenaline). Table 3 shows results of two-way linear mixed effect models with Insulin, Genotype and Insulin:Genotype interaction or Adrenaline, Genotype and Adrenaline:Genotype as fixed effects and individual intercepts as a random effect. Statistical significance was evaluated by likelihood ratio test. Adjusted p values for comparisons within each genotype were obtained from post-hoc Tukey test for the interaction. Means and SEM for each group and the comparison between genotypes are shown in Table 2. Asterisks denote significance at p < 0.05; d.f., degrees of freedom. Raw data can be found in S1 Data.

Next, we investigated rates of glucose and lipid metabolism ex vivo in the skeletal muscle and adipose tissues from SHR-Tti2+/- and SHR control rats under basal conditions and upon stimulation. In the diaphragm, knock-out of Tti2 abolished stimulatory effect of insulin on both glucose incorporation into glycogen, and glucose oxidation (Fig 3I and 3J and Tables 2 and 3). However, the basal rates of glucose oxidation and glycogenesis in heterozygous rats were not significantly different from wildtype littermates. Similarly, basal glucose oxidation in BAT was not different between genotypes (S1M Fig). In contrast to glucose utilisation in the skeletal muscle, incorporation of glucose into lipids in epididymal adipose tissue was significantly stimulated by insulin in both genotypes (Fig 3K) and we did not detect differences between heterozygous and control rats in basal nor stimulated condition. De novo lipogenesis also did not differ between SHR-Tti2+/- and control rats in BAT (S1N Fig). Furthermore, both SHR-Tti2+/- and SHR animals upregulated lipolysis in the presence of adrenaline (Fig 3L). However, a significant interaction between genotype and adrenaline stimulation suggested a different response to stimulation depending on the expression level of Tti2.

Metabolic deregulation and dyslipidaemia are often associated with elevated oxidative stress. We thus examined the hallmarks of the hepatic oxidative status. Indeed, significantly upregulated conjugated dienes in livers from heterozygous rats compared to control littermates (Fig 4A) suggested increased oxidative stress. Increased oxidation was indicated also by decreased ratio of reduced to oxidised glutathione (GSH/GSSG; Fig 4G), mostly due to increased concentrations of oxidised glutathione (GSSG; Fig 4H). In contrast, the content of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) showed a decreasing trend (p = 0.095; Fig 4B). The changes in lipid peroxidation were accompanied by decreased activity of the antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD; Fig 4C) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx; Fig 4E). Glutathione reductase (GR; Fig 4F) and catalase (CAT, Fig 4D) were not significantly different between SHR-Tti2+/- and control littermates.

Fig 4. Knock-down of Tti2 alters oxidative status in the liver.

Fig 4

Liver extracts prepared from three-month-old heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- rats (N = 7) and wild type SHR littermates (N = 7) were used to measure markers of oxidative stress as indicated in the figure. p values were derived from Student’s t-test. Raw data can be found in S1 Data. Abbreviations: GSH, glutathione; GSSG, oxidised glutathione; TBARS, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances.

Together, these results indicate that lowering expression of functional full-length Tti2 affected adult neurogenesis and metabolism, in particular glucose and insulin homeostasis, in agreement with Tti2 being a causal gene underlying the joint neurogenesis and serum glucose QTL.

Gene expression profiles indicate glucose intolerance in SHR-Tti2+/- rats

The Tti2 protein, together with its binding partners, telomere maintenance 2 (Telo2) and Tti1, form a chaperone complex that assists folding and tertiary assembly of functional phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK): mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR), suppressor of morphogenesis in genitalia (SMG1), transformation/transcription domain-associated protein (TRRAP) and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) [57]. To get an insight into the molecular consequences of downregulation of Tti2 expression, we performed transcriptional profiling of the hippocampus and three tissues essential for metabolic regulation in SHR-Tti2+/- rats and their wild-type littermates. We detected 326 differentially expressed transcripts in the liver, 52 in the soleus muscle, 41 in the perirenal fat, and 10 in the hippocampus. In addition, the analysis confirmed reduction of Tti2 mRNA in the heterozygous rats (S5 Table). We next carried out functional annotations using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA), which infers shifts in activity of canonical pathways and potential upstream regulators from the direction and magnitude of gene expression changes using curated knowledge databases. Furthermore, IPA can link differentially expressed genes to downstream outcomes.

We first checked whether observed gene expression changes could be connected to altered activity of any of the PIKK. Among canonical pathways, IPA indicated enrichment for genes associated with ATM signalling in the liver, muscle, and fat, and with mTOR signalling in the muscle (S2B–S2D Fig and S2 Data). Additionally, IPA predicted SMG1 as a potential upstream regulator in the liver and hippocampus (S3 Data). The majority of changes in gene expression were not directly connected to PIKK activity.

In agreement with the metabolic phenotype of SHR-Tti2+/- rats, the transcriptional profile of the liver pointed to dysglycemia, specifically to decreased glucose tolerance and increased insulin resistance (Fig 5A and 5B). IPA suggested four upstream regulators that could be linked to glucose intolerance: interleukin 6 (IL6), tuberous sclerosis complex 2 (Tsc2), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1-beta (Ppargc1b), and lysine (K)-specific histone demethylase 1A (Kdm1a) (S3 Fig). In addition, IPA indicated inhibition of insulin signalling as the most significant upstream regulator (S3 Data). The functional analysis also predicted a broad range of other metabolic changes, for example hepatic steatosis, decreased fatty acid metabolism and lipid synthesis (Fig 5A and 5C and S4 Data). Even though only few differentially expressed genes were detected in the hippocampus of SHR-Tti2+/- rats, these genes indicated decreased cellular homoeostasis (Fig 5A and 5D) and increased apoptosis. Very strong upregulation (24-fold) of sphingosine1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 3 (S1pr3) and downregulation of alkaline ceramidase 2 (Acer2) suggested de-regulation of S1P signalling pathway in the hippocampus (S2A Fig).

Fig 5. Functional analysis of gene expression changes indicates insulin resistance and loss of cellular homeostasis in SHR-Tti2+/- rats.

Fig 5

Differentially expressed genes between SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates in the liver, muscle, perirenal adipose tissue and hippocampus were analysed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). IPA predicts activation or inhibition of functions, pathological processes and molecular pathways from the direction and magnitude of expression changes using curated databases. (A) Graph depicts activation (positive Z-score) or inhibition (negative Z-score) of top functions and diseases in each of the analysed tissues. Full list of significantly affected functions can be found in S4 Data. (B-D) Edges in each network illustrate predicted relationships between upregulated (magenta) and downregulated (green) genes and downstream functions (centre nodes; orange, activating effect; blue, inhibitory effect). (E) Colour key. Asterisks in network graphs denote multi-protein complexes.

Human genomic variation links TTI2 expression with genome-wide phenotype associations

Our results indicated that changes in expression levels of Tti2 can affect both neural and metabolic homeostases. The majority of disease-associated variants in humans are likely to be involved in regulation of transcription [58,59]. Therefore, to link our findings to genomic variation in the human population, we searched the human eQTL catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eqtl/) for variants associated with changes in TTI2 mRNA expression. We extracted 821 variants underlying 2177 eQTL (p < 1e-4) in 28 different tissues and cell types (S5 Data). Out of these, 214 variants were associated with the TTI2 eQTL in at least 3 distinct tissue types (S4 Fig). The multi-tissue eQTL are more likely to represent true associations as well as being consequential for a wide range of phenotypes [17,18]. We next used all TTI2 eQTL variants to query the GWAS databases (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/) for known phenotypic associations. We found 7 variants with reported associations to protein and stem cell factor blood concentrations, blood pressure and frontotemporal dementia (Table 4).

Table 4. Human genomic variants with overlapping associations to TTI2 expression and phenotypes.

Variant ID eQTL beta direction eQTL data sets Associated trait Trait ID GWAS p value GWAS beta direction Risk Frequency*
rs10094645 increase Artery_Aorta, Muscle_Skeletal, Testis, Thyroid, Whole_Blood blood protein measurement EFO_0007937 4E-23 decrease 0.594
rs2732317 increase Artery_Aorta, Testis, Thyroid, Whole_Blood blood protein measurement EFO_0007937 3E-77 decrease 0.612
rs2732260 increase Monocyte frontotemporal dementia, memory impairment Orphanet_282 EFO_0001072 1E-6 NA 0.03
rs2732259 increase Esophagus_Muscularis, Muscle_Skeletal, Testis, Whole_Blood hypoxanthine measurement EFO_0010500 7E-6 increase 0.619*
rs6996562 increase Artery_Aorta, Testis, Whole_Blood pulse pressure measurement EFO_0005763 2E-10 increase 0.473
rs7845722 increase Artery_Aorta, Muscle_Skeletal, Testis, Whole_Blood pulse pressure measurement EFO_0005763 1E-9 increase 0.4
rs1568119 decrease Monocyte stem cell factor measurement EFO_0008291 1E-7 increase 0.08*

821 variants linked to TTI2 eQTLs (p < 1E-4) were used to search human genome-wide association studies (GWAS) catalogue. Data sets column lists tissues and cell types in which significant eQTLs were detected for a given variant. For GWAS studies for which risk frequencies were not reported, we included variant frequencies from phase 3 1000 Genomes Project combined population (denoted with asterisks).

Discussion

In this study we used systems genetics methods to i) discover a number of metabolic and endocrine genetic correlates of the two critical parameters of adult hippocampal neurogenesis—precursor cell proliferation and net neurogenesis; and ii) identify Tti2 as a molecular link between brain cellular plasticity and peripheral metabolism.

The HXB/BXH family is well-suited to discover genetic physiological correlates of cognitive endophenotypes

The HXB/BXH family of 30 members has only modest statistical power to detect QTL, as the majority of loci have only small effects on phenotypes and variants behind a substantial part of heritability fall below stringent significance levels (power calculations to detect a QTL for a population of 30 strains for different heritability and effect size values are presented in S5 Fig). Nonetheless, the chief advantage of recombinant inbred strains is their suitability to measure the tendency of traits to co-segregate [47]. Because each inbred line can supply an indefinite number of isogenic individuals, multiple phenotypes can be measured in the same genotype, the collected data are cumulative and comparable across time and laboratories. Use of separate cohorts of animals to assess different phenotypes avoids intra-individual correlations (which may, for example, be due to the health status of a particular animal) and ensures that any associations between traits are due to shared genetic variation. Genetic correlations, therefore, may suggest the presence of allelic variants with pleiotropic effects on correlating phenotypes [12,20]. Here we show that, under baseline laboratory conditions, precursor cell proliferation and the final outcome of the process of adult neurogenesis—the numbers of surviving and functionally integrated neurons—are under the control of largely distinct sets of genes. Accordingly, each of these traits correlated to non-overlapping collections of metabolic and endocrine parameters. Because adult neurogenesis—although a complex process in itself—represents one specific aspect of hippocampal plasticity, these correlations advance our understanding of interactions between global metabolic features and brain function. Here we proceeded to dissect in-depth the correlation between serum glucose and net neurogenesis, which could both be mapped to a common overlapping QTL. The majority of discovered correlations, however, could not be explained by such a strong genetic association, in agreement with the polygenic nature of quantitative traits. Other methods, such as gene co-expression analyses, have the potential to integrate available data and elucidate mechanisms underlying remaining relationships [35].

Tti2 as a pleiotropic gene regulating net neurogenesis and metabolic homeostasis

Using transcriptional profiles from peripheral tissues and the hippocampus as intermediate phenotypes between complex physiological outcomes and genomic variation we were able to narrow down the ‘serum glucose-neurogenesis’ QTL interval to the Tti2 candidate gene. Tti2, together with its binding partners, Tti1 and telomere maintenance 2 (Telo2) protein, form the Triple T (TTT) complex [60], which associates with a number of molecular chaperones, including Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp40, and the R2TP/prefoldin-like complex [61,62]. Interaction of TTT with R2TP modifies ATPase activity of R2TP components, RUVBL1-RUVBL2 [63,64]. TTT binds to nascent peptides of PI3K-related protein kinases (PIKK) and delivers them to the R2TP chaperone, thereby acting as a scaffold adaptor and a critical regulator of PIKK abundance in mammalian and yeast cells [60,6267]. In mammals, the PIKK family consists of ATM, ATR, mTOR, TRAPP, SMG1, and DNA-PKcs. These proteins play strategic roles in multiple cellular functions, such as genome stability, DNA repair, regulation of gene and protein expression, nonsense-mediated RNA decay, cell growth and cell cycle progression, and regulation of responses to nutrient availability [6871]. All PIKK are also an important part of stress responses [72].

In our present study, we generated a heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- line carrying a frame-shift mutation, which resulted in a series of premature stop codons in the N-terminal domain of Tti2. Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the human R2TP-TTT complex has revealed that α-helical regions in the N-terminal domain of Tti2 form an interface for interaction with Tti1 and RUVBL, and are essential for the formation and function of TTT [63,64]. Accordingly, mutational screens in yeast produced viable cells only when truncations were located at the very end of the C-terminus of Tti2 [73]. Therefore, we predicted that this modification results in a non-functional protein. Tti2 mRNA levels in the heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- rats were reduced by half compared to wild type littermates, as established by RNA sequencing, implicating nonsense-mediated decay of the mutated mRNA. We used heterozygous animals because our aim was to mirror the eQTL effect and reduce the amount of available Tti2 rather than remove it completely. The SHR background had been chosen because the SHR allele is associated with higher Tti2 expression. Although antibodies recognising rodent Tti2 were not available, experiments in yeast have suggested that Tti2 protein abundance is directly correlated to mRNA expression [60]. SHR-Tti2+/- rats had similar body weights, gross morphology and general cage behaviour as the wild-type littermates. However, reducing Tti2 expression by half led to a reduction of the number of new neurons in the DG, a concomitant lowering of serum glucose and insulin concentrations, and to hallmarks of insulin resistance in skeletal muscles. Metabolic alterations in SHR-Tti2+/- rats went beyond glucose homeostasis: we also found changes in lipid metabolism and elevated oxidative stress in the liver. Together, these findings support Tti2 as a causal gene within the joint ‘serum glucose-neurogenesis’ QTL.

Expression of Tti2 correlated negatively to adult neurogenesis and serum glucose concentrations in the HXB/BXH family, yet in the SHR rats with only one functional copy of the Tti2 gene we saw a further decrease of each trait value. This disparity would imply that the SHR allele is associated with decrease of the Tti2 protein function despite higher Tti2 mRNA abundance. The SHR allele carries six amino-acid substitutions, including Glu247Asp within the highly conserved Tti2 family super-helical central domain (conservation score 1.0; S1 Table) and Lys198Glu at a moderately conserved residue (score 0.57) in the N-terminal portion of the protein. Although all substitutions were scored as benign by prediction algorithms SIFT and PolyPhen, it cannot be excluded that they have an impact on protein stability or interactions with any of the binding partners. Most of Tti2 consists of α-helical HEAT repeats and large regions of the protein are involved in interactions with Tti1, RUVBL and PIKKs [63,64]. Higher mRNA expression could evolve independently or as a compensation of reduced function. For example, in the duplicated maize genome, the number of copies of genes encoding TTT complex members and PIKK have all reverted to one, suggesting evolutionary pressure to maintain gene dosage balance [74].

Transcriptome profiling of SHR-Tti2+/- rats revealed extensive changes in gene expression in the liver, and to a lesser degree in skeletal muscle, perirenal fat and hippocampus compared to SHR wild type littermates. Liver, together with skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, are decisive organs in maintaining glucose homeostasis and, hence, the development of insulin resistance [75]. Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes in the liver identified networks of genes and potential regulators whose activation and inhibition could explain insulin resistance and dysglycemia in the heterozygous animals. We also recorded significant upregulation of Insr in the muscle, which IPA interpreted as consistent with hypoglycaemia and insulin resistant diabetes (S4 Data).

We also used IPA to predict which upstream regulators could be activated or inhibited in a manner consistent with observed gene expression changes. The vast majority of differentially expressed genes were not linked to PIKK activity. Thus far only PIKK peptides were identified as clients of the TTT complex despite attempts to capture other target proteins [73]. Therefore it is unlikely that another, yet unknown, pathway contributes to the observed phenotypes. Depletion of Tti2 destabilises all PIKK proteins and impairs nuclear localisation of ATM, ATR and TRRAP, but does not affect their mRNA abundance [60,73]. Notwithstanding the lack of direct evidence, reduction of Tti2 expression in SHR-Tti2+/- rats may destabilise the TTT complex and consequently impair signalling of PIKK. It has been reported that reduced PIKK signalling due to tissue-specific targeting of selected genes in the mouse led to impaired adipogenesis (reduced fat deposits), insulin resistance with lower insulin-stimulated glucose transport, reduced antilipolytic effects of insulin (increased NEFA levels), and ectopic fat accumulation [7680]. These results are similar to metabolic disturbances observed in SHR-Tti2+/- rats suggesting involvement of the same molecular pathways. Our data also do not allow differentiating whether all or only some of the PIKK are compromised in the SHR-Tti2+/- rats. Destabilisation of the TTT complex has strongest effects on ATM and ATR protein levels and to a lesser extent on other PIKK [60,67,73,81]. Interestingly, in SHR-Tti2+/- rats IPA detected enrichment of differentially expressed genes related to ATM signalling in the liver, muscle and fat and mTOR signalling in the muscle. While these results do not imply that other PIKK were not affected, ATM might be the most sensitive to Tti2 downregulation also in rats used in our study.

Direct vs. metabolic Tti2-dependent regulation of neurogenesis

Pleiotropy occurs when a single genomic variation, or more broadly a change in a function of a single gene, has multiple consequences at the phenotypic level [9]. Because metabolic diseases can, to some extent, be modified by lifestyle interventions in order to prevent or dampen cognitive decline, but genes cannot, it is clinically crucial to understand which correlations between metabolic and cognitive phenotypes arise from genetic predisposition due to pleiotropic genes. Because we used targeted mutagenesis at the Tti2 locus rather than tissue specific approaches to confirm association with target phenotypes, we cannot exclude that Tti2 affects neurogenesis through circulating metabolites or hormones. Correlations between traits in the absence of genetic variation indicate indirect effects [10].

Hippocampal plasticity and neurogenesis are intricately related to nutrient availability and insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signalling [8285]. Glucose is the primary energy source for the nervous system. Hyperglycemia and insulin resistance are detrimental to the brain and negatively influence adult hippocampal neurogenesis [8689]. In addition, caloric restriction, which lowers plasma insulin and glucose levels, resulted in increased survival of new neurons and higher net neurogenesis [90]. These associations have the opposite effect to the genetic correlation recorded in the HXB/BXH family and hint that, as such, lower serum glucose measured in SHR-Tti2+/- rats may not necessarily lead to lower survival of adult-born neurons. In the HXB/BXH family, neurogenesis correlated positively to serum insulin (Pearson’s r = 0.35, p = 0.09). However, we did not detect any consistent associations with measures of insulin resistance, suggesting that peripheral insulin resistance is also unlikely a sole cause of neurogenesis impairment in SHR-Tti2+/- rats. Furthermore, transcriptional profiling of the hippocampus from heterozygous animals did not indicate brain insulin resistance.

Metabolic tissues in heterozygous rats also manifested deregulated lipid metabolism. Higher levels of circulating triglycerides and free fatty acids could further contribute to disrupted glucose metabolism and neurogenesis. For example, high fat diets, which increase circulating plasma lipids and lipid peroxidation, have been documented as detrimental to neurogenesis and cognition [91,92]. On the other hand, serum concentrations of two major adipose tissue hormones—leptin and adiponectin—were similar in SHR-Tti2+/- and intact animals.

The support in favour of direct effects of Tti2 reduction on neurogenesis comes from the severe neural deficits in individuals carrying loss-of-function mutations in TTI2 in the absence of serious metabolic insufficiencies. In humans, homozygous and compound heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in TTI2 cause microcephaly, severe intellectual disability, dysmorphic facial features, short stature, speech and movement disorders, and skeletal deformations [81,9395]. Similar abnormalities were observed in children carrying TELO2 mutations [96,97]. Particularly, failures of DNA repair pathways downstream of the TTT complex have detrimental effects on development and maintenance of the central nervous system. Recessive mutations in ATM cause ataxia telangiectasia, a disease characterised by progressive neuronal degeneration [98,99]; while loss of ATR leads to Seckel syndrome characterised by postnatal dwarfism, microcephaly, intrauterine growth defects, and mental retardation [100]. ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs are essential to preserving the genome integrity during replication [101] and thus their function is particularly important in dividing precursor cells in the course of neurogenesis [102], also in the adult hippocampus [103]. Knock-out of ATM or ATR in mice has detrimental effects on brain development, with pronounced loss of hippocampal neurons [104]. ATM-deficient mice have abnormally increased rates of proliferation with concomitantly lowered survival of new neurons [103]. In human neural stem cells, ATM suppresses excessive retrotransposition [105], the process which contributes to neural diversity and plasticity during hippocampus development, and then in the adult stem cells [106].

mTOR also plays multiple roles in the development and function of the brain [107], including maintenance of neural progenitor cell pools. During embryonic development, conditional knockout of mTOR in neural stem cells dramatically reduced their proliferation thereby reducing production of postmitotic neurons and brain size [108]. Similarly, inhibition of mTORC1 signalling in the neural stem cells in the neonatal subventricular zone (SVZ) of the lateral ventricle, which also harbours a population of neural stem cells that persist throughout life, reduced generation of transient amplifying precursor cells and thus decreased the abundance of their differentiated progeny [109]. mTOR signalling promoted survival of neural stem cells isolated from SVZ in vitro downstream of EGFR signalling [110]. In addition, transient systemic inhibition of the mTOR pathway by rapamycin in early postnatal life resulted in abnormal proliferation, reduced progenitor cell numbers, and eventually decreased the volume of the adult dentate gyrus [111]. Similarly, treatment with rapamycin in adult mice also reduced proliferation of hippocampal progenitor cells and net neurogenesis [112]. Rapamycin also prevented increase of neurogenesis by physical activity, which is a known pro-neurogenic stimulus [112].

ATM and mTOR are both downstream targets of insulin and IGF1 signalling [98]. Insulin and IGF1 provide trophic signals that can both stimulate and inhibit proliferation and survival of adult precursor cells in vivo [83,113118]. Insulin is also expressed directly in neuronal progenitors [119]. The massive upregulation of S1pr3 and downregulation of Acer2 in the hippocampus of SHR-Tti2+/- rats suggested changes in the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signalling pathway, which is implicated in the control of cell death and survival, as well as synaptic plasticity via interactions with multiple cellular signalling cascades [120123]. Interestingly, S1pr3 potentiates IGF1 signalling [124], and cross-links with the mTOR-AKT nutrient sensing pathway [125]. Although our analysis of differentially expressed genes did not suggest changes in PIKK activity in the hippocampus of heterozygous animals, the precursor cells and immature neurons are only a minor fraction of the entire hippocampus and therefore we might not have captured genes affected specifically in these cells. For example, Ka and colleagues [108] found that in the developing cerebral cortex mTOR signalling was detected mostly in the radial neural stem cells, the principal precursor cells of the developing central nervous system. mTOR activity in the postmitotic neuronal layers was very low. In the early postnatal and adult SVZ, mTOR activity was also concentrated in actively proliferating transient amplifying progenitor cells [109,126]. Compared to dividing precursor cells, expression of ATM and ATR is also downregulated in post-mitotic neurons, where these proteins are involved in clathrin-mediated endocytosis at synapses [127].

All told, the interwoven relationships between peripheral metabolism, insulin and PIKK signalling pathways point to complex responses to intracellular deficits in PIKK and extracellular signals in the brain of SHR-Tti2+/- rats, and lend support for truly pleiotropic roles of Tti2 in the regulation of glucose homeostasis and structural brain plasticity.

Limitations

In our study we used only male rats and thus we do not know whether any of the identified associations interacts with sex. Adult neurogenesis has a strong environmental component, where variability between individuals depends on the experience and life history. To avoid interference of systemic environmental errors with genetic sources of variation and obtain reliable estimates of neurogenesis in the HXB/BXH family, we sampled several individuals per strain from at least 3 independent litters born at different time points throughout the data collection period. Inclusion of both sexes may have increased within-strain variation, therefore decreasing power to detect genetic associations. To use sex as a covariate would require a larger number of experimental animals, which was not logistically feasible. Under these circumstances, we chose to use males for compatibility with existing data, as the vast majority of published HXB/BXH phenotypes were measured in young male rats to avoid inter-individual variation due to oestrous cycle. The inbred status of the HXB/BXH family enables integration of additional data at later time points.

Another limitation of our study was the use of a general rather than tissue-specific Tti2 knockout. This choice was dictated by the complexity of both processes under study. Glucose homeostasis is achieved by interactions between many cell types in several tissues. Adult neurogenesis is not only regulated intrinsically in neural stem cells, but is also influenced by the niche in which they are harboured, and network activity of the entire hippocampus. A classical knockout approach also reflected the presence of Tti2 cis-eQTL in all examined tissues. Although we cannot unequivocally claim that the effect of Tti2 knockout on neurogenesis is independent of metabolism, we have discussed literature that support the hypothesis of a direct, horizontal pleiotropic effect of Tti2 dosage on these distinct phenotypes.

Conclusion

Understanding of the molecular events by which a genomic variation leads to physiological consequences for the organism across many functions provides a foundation for effective precision medicine. Our study exemplifies the power of rodent genetic reference populations not only to identify associations between phenotypes that are difficult or even impossible to assess in humans, but also to give insights into the cell biology behind these associations. Our experiments showed that manipulating the abundance of a single component of the protein folding machinery had relatively subtle yet significant effects on a broad range of phenotypes. Mining human data sets revealed more than 800 genomic variants that are linked to TTI2 expression, seven of which refer to associations with protein and blood stem cell factor concentrations, blood pressure, and frontotemporal dementia. Given the dose-dependent effects of Tti2 on adult hippocampal neurogenesis and glucose homeostasis, we speculate that human variants that affect TTI2 expression or function may also have quantitative effects on these phenotypes.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

All experiments were performed in agreement with the Animal Protection Law of the Czech Republic and were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague (Permit number: 66/2014).

Animals

Brown Norway BN-Lx/Cub, spontaneously hypertensive SHR/OlaIpcv (referred to as BN and SHR, respectively) and 30 HXB/BXH recombinant inbred strains, as well as SHR-Tti2+/- knockout heterozygous rats used in the current study were housed in an air-conditioned animal facility at the Institute of Physiology, Czech Academy of Sciences. HXB/BXH strains are inbred for more than 80 generations. Animals were maintained on a 12 h light/dark cycle in standard laboratory cages provided with standard laboratory chow and water ad libitum. To assess survival of new-born cells in the dentate gyrus, 10-week-old animals were given 3 daily intraperitoneal injections of 50 mg/kg bromodeoxyruidine (BrdU; Sigma) and perfused 28 days later. We studied 5–9 male rats from each strain derived from at least 3 independent litters (total 243 rats). To isolate tissues for RNA and protein isolation, rats were anaesthetised with ketamine and decapitated. Tissues were placed in RNA later (microarray) or snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. For the microarray analysis, one male and one female 10-week-old rat from each parental and HXB/BXH strains were used (total 64 rats). Biochemical, metabolic and hemodynamic phenotypes were assessed in three-month-old non-fasted male SHR-Tti2+/- rats and their wild-type littermates (N = 8 per strain).

Generation of Tti2 knockout SHR rats

Tti2 knockout rats were generated by microinjecting fertilized ova of SHR rats with the ZFN (Zinc Finger Nuclease) construct from Sigma-Aldrich. The construct was designed to target the first exon using the following sequence of ZFN binding (capital letters) and cutting site (small letters): TCTGACCCGGATCCAAGCaccaagGGTGGGTGGCAGGGC. DNA samples isolated from 452 rats born after microinjection with ZFN construct were amplified using primers flanking the target sequence: ZFN F: 5’-TACACTGTGATTGGCTGGGA-3’ and ZFN R: 5’-GGCGCAGTGGAGTGATC-3’. Altogether 4 positive animals were detected. An SHR-Tti2tm1/Ipcv line no.14 (referred to as SHR-Tti2+/-) with an 8 bp deletion (NM_001013883.1(Tti2):c.243_250delCGAGATCC; on the protein level: NP_001013905.1:p.Glu82Glyfs) has been selected for further analyses. The heterozygous founder was crossed with SHR and F1 rats were intercrossed. SHR-Tti2+/- heterozygotes were selected for breeding and phenotyping while their wild type littermates were used as controls.

Histology

Histology was carried out using standard procedures [48]. Rats were deeply anaesthetised with a mixture of ketamine/xylazine and intracardially perfused with 0.9% NaCl, followed by ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), pH 7.4. The brains were removed, post-fixed overnight in 4% PFA and equilibrated in 30% w/v sucrose in 0.1 M phosphate buffer. 40 μm frozen coronal sections were cut on a sliding microtome (Leica) and stored in a cryo-protective solution (25% ethylene glycol, 25% glycerol in 0.1 M PB) at –20°C.

For immunohistochemistry, every sixth section was washed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and pretreated in 3% H2O2 and 10% methanol in TBS for 15 min. After several washes in TBS and NaCl, DNA was denatured with 2.5 M HCl for 30 min at 37°C. Multiple washes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were performed between each subsequent step. The sections were incubated in a blocking solution containing 10% donkey serum and 0.3% Triton-X100 in PBS for 1 h and then with primary antibodies (rat anti-BrdU, 1:500, OBT0030, AbD Serotec; or rabbit anti-Ki67, 1:500, NCL-Ki67p, Novocastra) diluted in the blocking solution for 48–72 h at 4°C. Sections were incubated for 2.5 h with biotinylated secondary antibodies (1,500, Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted in the blocking solution containing 3% donkey serum. Immunocomplexes were detected using the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) and 0.02% diaminobenzidine (D5905, Sigma) enhanced with NiCl2. After mounting in 0.1 M PB onto gelatine-coated glass slides, the sections were air dried, cleared in the alcohol gradient series, and coverslipped with Entellan New (Merck).

Cells were quantified using a simplified optical fractionator method as discussed before [48,128]. BrdU positive cells were quantified along the rostro-caudal axis in the granule cell layer (GCL) and subgranular zone (SGZ) defined as a two-cell wide band below the GCL. Ki67 cells were quantified in the three-cell wide zone below the GCL and in the inner third of the GCL. Clusters of cells were defined as at least three cells not further apart than two-cell diameter. The cells in the uppermost focal plane were ignored to avoid oversampling errors. The counts from left and right sides of the DG in each sample were averaged and multiplied by 6 (section sampling interval) to obtain total numbers of newborn (BrdU) or proliferating (Ki67) cells per dentate gyrus.

To assess the identity of BrdU-positive cells and estimate the range of neuronal and astrocyte survival across the HXB/BXH family, sections from three randomly selected individuals from each parental strain and one from each HXB/BXH member were processed for fluorescent staining with BrdU, NeuN and S100β. Every twelfth section was washed twice in NaCl, pretreated in 2 M HCl for 30 min at 37°C and washed in PBS. After blocking, sections were incubated for 48 h at 4°C with primary antibodies (rat anti-BrdU, 1:500, OBT Serotec; mouse anti-NeuN, 1:200, MAB377, Millipore; rabbit anti-S100β, 1:2000, Ab41548, Abcam) diluted in the blocking solution. After washing in PBS, sections were incubated for 4 h with secondary antibodies (anti-rat Cy3, anti-mouse DyLight 488, anti-rabbit Cy5, 1:500, Jackson Immunoresearch) diluted in the blocking solution, washed in PBS and mounted onto glass slides using fluorescence mounting medium Aqua-Poly/Mount (Polysciences). 100 randomly selected BrdU-positive cells from each animal along the rostro-caudal axis of the DG were imaged at 400× magnification with spectral confocal microscope (TCS SP2, Leica) and examined for NeuN and S100β immunoreactivity.

Microarray analysis

Hippocampi were dissected from brains stored in RNA later and RNA was isolated using RNA STAT-60 kit (Tel-Test Inc). RNA was purified using standard sodium acetate-ethanol precipitation method. RNA purity and concentration was evaluated using 260/280 nm absorbance ratio and the quality was checked using Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 prior to hybridisation. Samples were hybridised onto GeneChip Rat Exon 1.0 ST microarrays (Affymetrix) using manufacturers protocols.

Along with the hippocampus gene expression data, we analysed published data sets from parental and 29 recombinant inbred strains from adrenal gland, liver, skeletal muscle, perirenal fat, kidney, aorta, and ventricle [40,41,43]. These data sets consisted of microarray analysis on Affymetrix Rat230_2 (muscle, liver, aorta and ventricle) and RAE230A (adrenal gland, fat and kidney) chips. Unprocessed microarray expression data were retrieved from ArrayExpress, (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress; adrenal gland, E-TABM-457; liver, E-MTAB-323; muscle, E-TABM-458; fat and kidney, E-AFMX-7; aorta, E-MTAB-322; left ventricle, E-MIMR-222).

Probes from each data set were assembled into probesets mapped to Ensemble gene identifiers from Rnor_5.0 rat genome release using Version 10 custom cell definition files from the Brain Array (University of Michigan) website [129]. Probes that mapped to regions containing insertions, deletions or single nucleotide polymorphisms in the SHR/Ola or BN-Lx/Cub strains compared to the reference genome [46] were removed prior the analysis to avoid spurious linkage due to differential hybridisation. Probesets which after filtering contained less than 3 probes were removed. Gene expression summaries were derived using robust multichip average (RMA) algorithm [130] in the R Affy package [131].

Heritability

In repeated sampling of isogenic individuals, the variance observed within the genotype can be attributed to environmental influences, whereas differences between strains are primarily due to differences in genotypes. Thus, we defined narrow sense heritability as the intraclass correlation coefficient obtained from a mixed linear model employing restricted maximum likelihood approach using function lmer from lme4 R package [132,133].

QTL mapping

Phenotype QTL were calculated using strain means for surviving (BrdU+) and proliferating (Ki67+) cells in the DG as well as for phenotypes correlating to neurogenesis traits. Expression QTL (eQTL) were calculated for all genes in each data set. Marker regression against SNP-based genotype markers mapped to Rnor_5.0 genome assembly with 2049 unique strain distribution patterns in 29 HXB/BXH strains [134] was performed using the QTLReaper program [135], which reports likelihood ratio statistic (LRS) score at each marker. LRS was converted to logarithm of odds ratio (LOD) by dividing by 4.61, where LOD ≈–log10(p). Empirical genome-wide significance of linkage was determined by a permutation test as previously described [40]. Genome wide significance was defined as the 95th percentile of the maximum LOD score and less stringent suggestive threshold as the 37th percentile, which on average yields one false positive per genome scan [51,52]. The 95% confidence intervals for QTL were calculated in R/qtl using Bayesian method [136]. Traits with overlapping QTL were summarised as their first principal component, an eigenphenotype (adult neurogenesis and serum glucose) or eigengene (Tti2 expression), using WGCNA R package [137]. eQTL were defined as local when position of a QTL mapped within 10 Mb from the physical location of the gene [40]. Conditional genome scans were carried out in R/qtl as described previously [50,53,54] to establish relationships between genomic loci, gene expression and phenotypes using function scanone with parameter addcovar. The gene was considered causal when the LOD score of the phenotype QTL fell below suggestive level after conditioning on its expression. QTL power analysis was carried out with R/qtlDesign R package using function powercalc [138]. Analysis of mutations of candidate genes was performed using tools in Rat Genome Database [139]. All genomic positions were mapped to Rnor_5.0 genome assembly.

RNA isolation and quantitative PCR

RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) following manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA was removed by on-column DNase digestion. Frozen tissues were homogenised in QIAzol with TissueRuptor (Qiagen). cDNA was synthesised with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) using oligo(dT) primers and 1 μg of total RNA. Quantitative PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen) on cDNA corresponding to 25 ng of total RNA using the following conditions: 95°C for 15 min, and 40 cycles at 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. Gene-specific primer pairs were designed using Primer3 software [140]. Dissociation analysis from 55°C to 90°C of the end product was performed to ensure specificity. Cycle of threshold (CT) values were normalised to the GAPDH reference to calculate the relative level of gene expression on the log2 scale (ΔCT). Mean ΔCT values from BN rats were then subtracted from each sample ΔCT to obtain ΔΔCT values.

RNA sequencing and analysis

RNA was isolated as described above from the frozen hippocampus, liver, soleus muscle and perirenal adipose tissue samples isolated from SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild-type SHR-Tti2+/+ littermates. RNA integrity was confirmed using BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Germany). Sequencing libraries were prepared using NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina from 300 ng of total RNA, with mRNA enrichment by poly-dT pull down using the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were then directly subjected to the workflow for strand-specific RNA-Seq library preparation (Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep, NEB). For ligation custom adaptors were used (Adaptor-Oligo 1: 5’-ACA CTC TTT CCC TAC ACG ACG CTC TTC CGA TCT-3’, Adaptor-Oligo 2: 5’-P-GAT CGG AAG AGC ACA CGT CTG AAC TCC AGT CAC-3’). After ligation, adapters were depleted by an XP bead purification (Beckman Coulter) adding the beads solution in a ratio of 1:0.9. Dual indexing was done during the following PCR enrichment (12 cycles, 65°C) using custom amplification primers carrying the same sequence for i7 and i5 index (Primer 1: AAT GAT ACG GCG ACC ACC GAG ATC TAC AC NNNNNNNN ACA TCT TTC CCT ACA CGA CGC TCT TCC GAT CT, Primer 2: CAA GCA GAA GAC GGC ATA CGA GAT NNNNNNNN GTG ACT GGA GTT CAG ACG TGT GCT CTT CCG ATC T). After two more XP bead purifications (1,0.9), libraries were quantified using the Fragment Analyzer (Agilent). For Illumina flowcell production, samples were equimolarly pooled and sequenced 75bp single-end on multiple Illumina NextSeq 500 flowcells, aiming for approximately 30 million sequencing reads per sample.

Expression levels of individual transcripts were estimated by kallisto (ver. 0.46.1) [141] using Ensembl cDNA database (release 97) [142] as a reference. The software was executed with sequence-based bias correction, 100 bootstrap samples, an average fragment length of 200 bp and standard deviation set to 20. Differential expression analysis was carried out using an R package sleuth (ver. 0.30.0) [143]. A single outlier hippocampus sample was identified by examining a principal component projection and removed from further analysis. Samples obtained from each tissue were used to fit independent statistical models, with genotype as a single covariate, using 5 or 4 replicates per genotype. Statistical significances of changes in transcript abundances were computed using a Wald test. A 10% FDR (false discovery rate) cut-off and an absolute value of fold change of 1.5 were used to identify differentially expressed genes. Functional enrichment analysis was performed with Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software (IPA; Qiagen) at default settings [144].

Basal and insulin stimulated glycogen synthesis in skeletal muscle

For measurement of insulin stimulated incorporation of glucose into glycogen, diaphragmatic muscles were incubated for 2 h in 95% O2 + 5% CO2 in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 μCi/ml of 14C-U glucose, 5 mmol/L of unlabelled glucose, and 2.5 mg/ml of bovine serum albumin (Armour, Fraction V), with or without 250 μU/ml insulin. Glycogen was extracted, and basal and insulin stimulated incorporation of glucose into glycogen was determined.

Glucose utilization in isolated epididymal adipose tissue and brown adipose tissue

Distal parts of epididymal adipose tissue or interscapular brown adipose tissue were rapidly dissected and incubated for 2 hours in Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer with 5 mmol/L glucose, 0.1 μCi 14C-U-glucose/mL (UVVR, Prague, Czech Republic) and 2% bovine serum albumin, gaseous phase 95% O2 and 5% CO2 in the presence (250 μU/mL) or absence of insulin in incubation media. All incubations were performed at 37°C in sealed vials in a shaking water bath. Then we estimated incorporation of 14C-glucose into neutral lipids. Briefly, adipose tissue was removed from incubation medium, rinsed in saline, and immediately put into chloroform. The pieces of tissue were dissolved using a Teflon pestle homogenizer, methanol was added (chloroform:methanol 2:1), and lipids were extracted at 4°C overnight. The remaining tissue was removed, KH2PO4 was added and a clear extract was taken for further analysis. An aliquot was evaporated, reconstituted in scintillation liquid, and the radioactivity measured by scintillation counting. Incremental glucose utilization was calculated as the difference between the insulin stimulated and basal incorporation of glucose into neutral lipids.

Lipolysis in isolated epididymal adipose tissue

For measurement of basal and adrenaline stimulated lipolysis, the distal parts of epididymal adipose tissue were incubated in Krebs-Ringer phosphate buffer containing 3% bovine serum albumin (Armour, Fraction V) at 37°C, pH 7.4 with or without adrenaline (0.25 μg/ml). The tissue was incubated for 2 hours and the concentrations of NEFA and glycerol in the medium were determined.

Tissue triglyceride and cholesterol measurements

For determination of triglycerides in liver, gastrocnemius muscle, kidney, and heart, tissues were powdered under liquid N2 and extracted for 16 hours in chloroform:methanol, after which 2% KH2PO4 was added and the solution was centrifuged. The organic phase was removed and evaporated under N2. The resulting pellet was dissolved in isopropyl alcohol, and triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations were determined by enzymatic assay (Pliva-Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic).

Biochemical analyses

Blood glucose levels were measured by the glucose oxidase assay (Pliva-Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic) using tail vein blood drawn into 5% trichloracetic acid and promptly centrifuged. NEFA levels were determined using an acyl-CoA oxidase-based colorimetric kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations were measured by standard enzymatic methods (Pliva-Lachema, Brno, Czech Republic). Glycerol was determined using an analytical kit from Sigma. Serum insulin concentrations were determined using a rat insulin ELISA kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden).

Parameters of oxidative stress

Activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and glutathione reductase (GR) were analysed using Cayman Chemicals assay kits (MI, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Catalase (CAT) activity measurement was based on the ability of H2O2 to produce with ammonium molybdate a colour complex detected spectrophotometrically. The level of reduced glutathione (GSH) was determined in the reaction of SH-groups using Ellman reagent. The level of reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) form of glutathione was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography method with fluorescent detection according to HPLC diagnostic kit (Chromsystems, Munich, Germany). Lipoperoxidation products were assessed by the levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) determined by assaying the reaction with thiobarbituric acid. The levels of conjugated dienes were analysed by extraction in the media (heptane:isopropanol = 2:1) and measured spectrophotometrically in heptane’s layer.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in R [145]. Normality of distribution of strain means for neurogenesis phenotypes was checked using Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences between groups were tested using Student’s t-test. Responses to insulin were analysed with a two-way linear mixed effect models using the lme4 R package [133]. Genotype, insulin treatment and interaction between genotype and treatment were used as fixed effects and individual intercepts were used as a random effect. Significance of main terms was evaluated by likelihood ratio test using function Anova from the car package [146], followed by Tukey post hoc test using multcomp package [147]. Values are represented as means +/- standard error of the mean. Plots were generated using the ggplot2 package [148].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Metabolic phenotyping of three-month-old heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR- Tti2+/+ littermates (denoted as SHR).

Details of statistical analysis are in Table 2. Abbreviations: BAT, brown adipose tissue; GSH, glutathione; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Top canonical pathways enriched among differentially expressed genes between SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates.

Analysis was performed with Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), which, in addition to calculating enrichment, predicts activation (positive Z-score, red) or inhibition (negative Z-score, blue) of molecular pathways from the direction and magnitude of expression changes using curated database. Grey bars depict enriched pathways for which activation status could not be predicted. Vertical green dashed line indicates p value threshold of 0.05.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Predicted regulator networks effects involved in glucose homeostasis in livers of SHR-Tti2+/- rats.

Differentially expressed genes in livers of SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates were analysed using IPA. Up- (magenta) and downregulated genes (green; middle tier) connect the potential upstream regulators (upper tier) to downstream outcomes (bottom tier). Edges represent relationships derived from curated databases.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Frequencies of single- and multi-tissue human TTI2 eQTL.

821 genomic variants underlying 2177 eQTL (p < 1e-4) extracted from eQTL EBI catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eqtl/) were clustered according to the number of distinct tissues or cell types in which eQTL were detected. Multiple eQTL from different data sets derived from the same cell or tissue type were scored as a single-tissue eQTL.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Power to detect QTL in a population of recombinant inbred strains.

Graphs depict theoretical calculations of power to detect a QTL with a minimum LOD value of 3 with various genetic effect sizes of a locus and heritability ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. Effect size is a difference in mean trait value between homozygous animals with different parental allele at this locus expressed as a proportion of the total genetic variance. Effect size of 1 implies a Mendelian trait. The calculations were performed for 25 and 30 lines with 5 biological replicates each, because several of the published traits used in our study, including serum glucose levels, were not measured in the entire family.

(TIF)

S1 Data. Neurogenesis and metabolism in Tti2 heterozygous KO rats.

Individual measurements of hippocampal neurogenesis and metabolic parameters in SHR-Tti2+/- and wild type SHR rats.

(CSV)

S2 Data. Ingenuity canonical pathways.

IPA canonical pathways enriched in differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. Ingenuity upstream regulators.

Affected upstream regulators predicted by IPA from differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue. Activation Z-score sis deduced from the direction and magnitude of the gene expression changes.

(XLSX)

S4 Data. Ingenuity downstream functions and diseases.

Functions enriched among differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue. IPA deduces the activation Z-scores from the direction and magnitude of the gene expression changes.

(XLSX)

S5 Data. Human TTI2 eQTL.

Human eQTL catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eqtl/) was queried for variants associated with changes in the TTI2 mRNA expression. Significant eQTL were defined by p value < 1e-4.

(TXT)

S1 Table. Genes located within the confidence interval of the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL on Chromosome 16. RGD ID, Rat Genome Database gene identifier.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Genes with cis-eQTL within the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL, and neurogenesis QTL intervals.

Expression of genes whose cis-eQTL were located within the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL interval on Chromosome 16 (Chr 16: 62.1–66.3 Mb), or within neurogenesis-specific QTL interval (Chr 16: 56.8–74.3), were used for conditional mapping for these phenotypes. Although Saraf gene is located outside the joint phenotype QTL interval, it has a cis-eQTL within the QTL region. Conditional LOD scores and the respective difference in phenotype LOD scores for each gene are noted. Pearson’s correlation coefficient values denote correlation between a phenotype and gene expression in listed tissues.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Tti2 mRNA expression in BN and SHR rats.

Expression values were normalised to the mean expression of Tti2 in BN. Note that lower cycle of threshold (ΔΔCT) values indicate higher relative expression of a gene. Data is shown as means ± standard error of the mean; t, Student’s t-test statistic; df, degrees of freedom.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Non-synonymous amino acid substitutions in the SHR Tti2 coding sequence.

Genomic sequence of SHR rats between positions 62.1 and 66.3 Mb on chromosome 16, which cover neurogenesis-glucose QTL, was scanned for non-synonymous amino-acid substitutions compared to reference genome using Variant Visualiser in Rat Genome Database. Within this interval, missense mutations were present only in the Tti2 gene. Conservation score ranges from 1 (highly conserved) to 0 (not conserved). SIFT score ranges from 0 (damaging) to 1 (non-damaging). Positions are according to Rnor_5.0 genome assembly.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. RNAseq confirmed reduction of Tti2 mRNA expression in SHR-Tti2+/- rats compared to wild type SHR littermates.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Karel Vales, Michaela Radostna, Hana Brozka, Jan-Hendrik Claasen, Perla Leal-Galicia, Tara L. Walker, and Sara Zocher for assistance with perfusions; Anna Rumiantseva for help with histological staining; Vladimir Landa for microinjecting fertilised ova with the ZFN construct; Olena Oliyarnyk for oxidative stress analysis; Edwin Cuppen, Marieke Simonis, Kathrin Saar, and Oliver Hummel for SHR genomic variants and genotype information.

Data Availability

Neurogenesis data was deposited in the HXB/BXH Published Phenotypes Database at the GeneNetwork (www.genenetwork.org) under Record IDs: HRP_10193 (BrdU+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10193&dataset=HXBBXHPublish), HRP_10194 (Ki67+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10194&dataset=HXBBXHPublish), HRP_10195 (clusters of Ki67+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10195&dataset=HXBBXHPublish). Hippocampal gene expression dataset was deposited at GeneNetwork under GN Accession GN231 (http://gn1.genenetwork.org/webqtl/main.py?FormID=sharinginfo&GN_AccessionId=231&InfoPageName=UT_HippRatEx_RMA_0709). RNA sequencing of SHR and SHR-Tti2+/- rats was deposited to Gene Ontology Omnibus under the accession number GSE160361 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160361).

Funding Statement

This work was supported by DFG (KE 615/9-1) (ANS, GK), Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft EnergI (ANS, GK). MP and HM were supported by the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic under the conceptual development of research organizations program (Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine – IKEM, IN 00023001 (HM) and by the Academic Premium (Praemium academiae) (AP1502) (MP); AS was supported by Czech Science Foundation (GACR) project 20-00939S. RWW received support from the NIGMS Systems Genetics and Precision Medicine Project (R01 GM123489, 2017-2026) and NIDA NIDA Core Center of Excellence in Transcriptomics, Systems Genetics, and the Addictome (P30 DA044223, 2017-2022). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Logroscino G, Maggi S, Santamato A, Seripa D, et al. Current epidemiological approaches to the metabolic-cognitive syndrome. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. IOS Press; 2012. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-111496 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Watanabe K, Stringer S, Frei O, Umićević Mirkov M, de Leeuw C, Polderman TJC, et al. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat Genet. 2019;51: 1339–1348. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0481-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lumsden AL, Mulugeta A, Zhou A, Hyppönen E. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype-associated disease risks: a phenome-wide, registry-based, case-control study utilising the UK Biobank. EBioMedicine. 2020;59. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nikpay M, Mohammadzadeh S. Phenome-wide screening for traits causally associated with the risk of coronary artery disease. J Hum Genet. 2020;65: 371–380. doi: 10.1038/s10038-019-0716-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Andreassen OA, Djurovic S, Thompson WK, Schork AJ, Kendler KS, O’Donovan MC, et al. Improved detection of common variants associated with schizophrenia by leveraging pleiotropy with cardiovascular-disease risk factors. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92: 197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang T, Goodman M, Zhu F, Healy B, Carruthers R, Chitnis T, et al. Phenome-wide examination of comorbidity burden and multiple sclerosis disease severity. Neurol Neuroimmunol neuroinflammation. 2020;7. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000864 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thomassen JQ, Tolstrup JS, Benn M, Frikke-Schmidt R. Type-2 diabetes and risk of dementia: Observational and Mendelian randomisation studies in 1 million individuals. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mollon J, Curran JE, Mathias SR, Knowles EEM, Carlisle P, Fox PT, et al. Neurocognitive impairment in type 2 diabetes: evidence for shared genetic aetiology. Diabetologia. 2020;63: 977–986. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05101-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Stearns FW. One hundred years of pleiotropy: A retrospective. Genetics. Genetics; 2010. pp. 767–773. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.122549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geiler-Samerotte KA, Li S, Lazaris C, Taylor A, Ziv N, Ramjeawan C, et al. Extent and context dependence of pleiotropy revealed by high-throughput single-cell phenotyping. PLoS Biol. 2020;18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.White JK, Gerdin AK, Karp NA, Ryder E, Buljan M, Bussell JN, et al. XGenome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell. 2013;154: 452. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McGuigan K, Collet JM, McGraw EA, Ye YH, Allen SL, Chenoweth SF, et al. The nature and extent of mutational pleiotropy in gene expression of male Drosophila serrata. Genetics. 2014;196: 911–921. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.161232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wagner GP, Zhang J. The pleiotropic structure of the genotype-phenotype map: The evolvability of complex organisms. Nature Reviews Genetics. Nat Rev Genet; 2011. pp. 204–213. doi: 10.1038/nrg2949 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang X, Pandey AK, Mulligan MK, Williams EG, Mozhui K, Li Z, et al. Joint mouse-human phenome-wide association to test gene function and disease risk. Nat Commun. 2016;7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10464 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sivakumaran S, Agakov F, Theodoratou E, Prendergast JG, Zgaga L, Manolio T, et al. Abundant pleiotropy in human complex diseases and traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;89: 607–618. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pickrell JK, Berisa T, Liu JZ, Ségurel L, Tung JY, Hinds DA. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat Genet. 2016;48: 709–717. doi: 10.1038/ng.3570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shikov AE, Skitchenko RK, Predeus A V., Barbitoff YA. Phenome-wide functional dissection of pleiotropic effects highlights key molecular pathways for human complex traits. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jordan DM, Verbanck M, Do R. HOPS: A quantitative score reveals pervasive horizontal pleiotropy in human genetic variation is driven by extreme polygenicity of human traits and diseases. Genome Biol. 2019;20. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1628-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chesmore K, Bartlett J, Williams SM. The ubiquity of pleiotropy in human disease. Hum Genet. 2018;137: 39–44. doi: 10.1007/s00439-017-1854-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bulik-Sullivan B, Finucane HK, Anttila V, Gusev A, Day FR, Loh PR, et al. An atlas of genetic correlations across human diseases and traits. Nat Genet 2015 4711. 2015;47: 1236–1241. doi: 10.1038/ng.3406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Toda T, Gage FH. Review: adult neurogenesis contributes to hippocampal plasticity. Cell and Tissue Research. Springer Verlag; 2018. pp. 693–709. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2735-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spalding KL, Bergmann O, Alkass K, Bernard S, Salehpour M, Huttner HB, et al. XDynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell. 2013;153: 1219. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Knobloch M, Jessberger S. Metabolism and neurogenesis. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. Elsevier Ltd; 2017. pp. 45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2016.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kempermann G, Chesler EJ, Lu L, Williams RW, Gage FH. Natural variation and genetic covariance in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103: 780–785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510291103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. Genetic influence on neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94: 10409–10414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.19.10409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Printz MP, Jirout M, Jaworski R, Alemayehu A, Kren V. Invited review: HXB/BXH rat recombinant inbred strain platform: A newly enhanced tool for cardiovascular, behavioral, and developmental genetics and genomics. Journal of Applied Physiology. American Physiological Society; 2003. pp. 2510–2522. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00064.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Liska F, Peterkovaa R, Peterka M, Landa V, Zõadek V, Mlejnek P, et al. Targeting of the Plzf gene in the rat by transcription activator-like Effector nuclease results in caudal regression syndrome in spontaneously hypertensive rats. PLoS One. 2016;11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mondon CE, Reaven GM. Evidence of abnormalities of insulin metabolism in rats with spontaneous hypertension. Metabolism. 1988;37: 303–305. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(88)90127-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pravenec M, Zídek V, Landa V, Šimáková M, Mlejnek P, Kazdová L, et al. Genetic Analysis of “Metabolic Syndrome” in the Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat. Physiol Res. 2004;53: 15–22. Available: http://www.biomed.cas.cz/physiolres [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pravenec M. Use of rat genomics for investigating the metabolic syndrome. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;597: 415–426. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-389-3_28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Terry A V., Hernandez CM, Buccafusco JJ, Gattu M. Deficits in spatial learning and nicotinic-acetylcholine receptors in older, spontaneously hypertensive rats. Neuroscience. 2000;101: 357–368. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00377-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grünblatt E, Bartl J, Iuhos D-I, Knezovic A, Trkulja V, Riederer P, et al. Characterization of cognitive deficits in spontaneously hypertensive rats, accompanied by brain insulin receptor dysfunction. J Mol Psychiatry. 2015;3. doi: 10.1186/s40303-015-0010-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sabbatini M, Strocchi P, Vitaioli L, Amenta F. The hippocampus in spontaneously hypertensive rats: A quantitative microanatomical study. Neuroscience. 2000;100: 251–258. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00297-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mignini F, Vitaioli L, Sabbatini M, Tomassoni D, Amenta F. The cerebral cortex of spontaneously hypertensive rats: A quantitative microanatomical study. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens; 2004. pp. 287–303. doi: 10.1081/ceh-120034135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tabakoff B, Smith H, Vanderlinden LA, Hoffman PL, Saba LM. Networking in Biology: The Hybrid Rat Diversity Panel. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc.; 2019. pp. 213–231. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9581-3_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IjJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016;3: 1–9. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mulligan MK, Mozhui K, Prins P, Williams RW. Genenetwork: A toolbox for systems genetics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press Inc.; 2017. pp. 75–120. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6427-7_4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Aitman TJ, Critser JK, Cuppen E, Dominiczak A, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flint J, et al. Progress and prospects in rat genetics: A community view. Nature Genetics. Nat Genet; 2008. pp. 516–522. doi: 10.1038/ng.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morrissey C, Grieve IC, Heinig M, Atanur S, Petretto E, Pravenec M, et al. Integrated genomic approaches to identification of candidate genes underlying metabolic and cardiovascular phenotypes in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Physiol Genomics. 2011;43: 1207–1218. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00210.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hubner N, Wallace CA, Zimdahl H, Petretto E, Schulz H, Maciver F, et al. Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37: 243–253. doi: 10.1038/ng1522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Petretto E, Mangion J, Dickens NJ, Cook SA, Kumaran MK, Lu H, et al. Heritability and tissue specificity of expression quantitative trait loci. PLoS Genet. 2006;2: 1625–1633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Adriaens ME, Lodder EM, Moreno-Moral A, Silhavý J, Heinig M, Glinge C, et al. Systems genetics approaches in rat identify novel genes and gene networks associated with cardiac conduction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Heinig M, Petretto E, Wallace C, Bottolo L, Rotival M, Lu H, et al. A trans-acting locus regulates an anti-viral expression network and type 1 diabetes risk. Nature. 2010;467: 460–464. doi: 10.1038/nature09386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pravenec M, Churchill PC, Churchill MC, Viklicky O, Kazdova L, Aitman TJ, et al. Identification of renal Cd36 as a determinant of blood pressure and risk for hypertension. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 952–954. doi: 10.1038/ng.164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Atanur SS, Birol I, Guryev V, Hirst M, Hummel O, Morrissey C, et al. The genome sequence of the spontaneously hypertensive rat: Analysis and functional significance. Genome Res. 2010;20: 791–803. doi: 10.1101/gr.103499.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Simonis M, Atanur SS, Linsen S, Guryev V, Ruzius FP, Game L, et al. Genetic basis of transcriptome differences between the founder strains of the rat HXB/BXH recombinant inbred panel. Genome Biol. 2012;13. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Nadeau JH, Burrage LC, Restivo J, Pao YH, Churchill G, Hoit BD. Pleiotropy, homeostasis, and functional networks based on assays of cardiovascular traits in genetically randomized populations. Genome Res. 2003;13: 2082–2091. doi: 10.1101/gr.1186603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kempermann G, Gast D, Kronenberg G, Yamaguchi M, Gage FH. Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. Development. Development; 2003. pp. 391–399. doi: 10.1242/dev.00203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zocher S, Schilling S, Grzyb AN, Adusumilli VS, Lopes JB, Günther S, et al. Early-life environmental enrichment generates persistent individualized behavior in mice. Sci Adv. 2020;6. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb1478 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li R, Tsaih SW, Shockley K, Stylianou IM, Wergedal J, Paigen B, et al. Structural model analysis of multiple quantitative traits. PLoS Genet. 2006;2: 1046–1057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abiola O, Angel JM, Avner P, Bachmanov AA, Belknap JK, Bennett B, et al. The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: A community’s view. Nature Reviews Genetics. Nat Rev Genet; 2003. pp. 911–916. doi: 10.1038/nrg1206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lander E, Kruglyak L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat Genet. 1995;11: 241–247. doi: 10.1038/ng1195-241 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Leduc MS, Blair RH, Verdugo RA, Tsaih SW, Walsh K, Churchill GA, et al. Using bioinformatics and systems genetics to dissect HDL-cholesterol genetics in an MRL/MpJ x SM/J intercross. J Lipid Res. 2012;53: 1163–1175. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M025833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Leduc MS, Hageman RS, Verdugo RA, Tsaih SW, Walsh K, Churchill GA, et al. Integration of QTL and bioinformatic tools to identify candidate genes for triglycerides in mice. J Lipid Res. 2011;52: 1672–1682. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M011130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Adzhubei IA, Schmidt S, Peshkin L, Ramensky VE, Gerasimova A, Bork P, et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods. 2010;7: 248–249. doi: 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ng PC, Henikoff S. SIFT: Predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31: 3812–3814. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Sugimoto K. Branching the Tel2 pathway for exact fit on phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases. Current Genetics. Springer Verlag; 2018. pp. 965–970. doi: 10.1007/s00294-018-0817-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ardlie KG, DeLuca DS, Segrè A V., Sullivan TJ, Young TR, Gelfand ET, et al. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science (80-). 2015;348: 648–660. doi: 10.1126/science.1262110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nicolae DL, Gamazon E, Zhang W, Duan S, Dolan ME, Cox NJ. Trait-Associated SNPs Are More Likely to Be eQTLs: Annotation to Enhance Discovery from GWAS. Gibson G, editor. PLoS Genet. 2010;6: e1000888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000888 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hurov KE, Cotta-Ramusino C, Elledge SJ. A genetic screen identifies the Triple T complex required for DNA damage signaling and ATM and ATR stability. Genes Dev. 2010;24: 1939–1950. doi: 10.1101/gad.1934210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hořejší Z, Takai H, Adelman CA, Collis SJ, Flynn H, Maslen S, et al. CK2 phospho-dependent binding of R2TP complex to TEL2 is essential for mTOR and SMG1 stability. Mol Cell. 2010;39: 839–850. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Takai H, Xie Y, De Lange T, Pavletich NP. Tel2 structure and function in the Hsp90-dependent maturation of mTOR and ATR complexes. Genes Dev. 2010;24: 2019–2030. doi: 10.1101/gad.1956410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim Y, Park J, Joo SY, Kim B-G, Jo A, Lee H, et al. Structure of the Human TELO2-TTI1-TTI2 Complex. J Mol Biol. 2022;434: 167370. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2021.167370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pal M, Muñoz-Hernandez H, Bjorklund D, Zhou L, Degliesposti G, Skehel JM, et al. Structure of the TELO2-TTI1-TTI2 complex and its function in TOR recruitment to the R2TP chaperone. Cell Rep. 2021;36. doi: 10.1016/J.CELREP.2021.109317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stirling PC, Bloom MS, Solanki-Patil T, Smith S, Sipahimalani P, Li Z, et al. The complete spectrum of yeast chromosome instability genes identifies candidate cin cancer genes and functional roles for astra complex components. PLoS Genet. 2011;7. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Takai H, Wang RC, Takai KK, Yang H, de Lange T. Tel2 Regulates the Stability of PI3K-Related Protein Kinases. Cell. 2007;131: 1248–1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kaizuka T, Hara T, Oshiro N, Kikkawa U, Yonezawa K, Takehana K, et al. Tti1 and Tel2 are critical factors in mammalian target of rapamycin complex assembly. J Biol Chem. 2010;285: 20109–20116. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.121699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yamashita A. Role of SMG-1-mediated Upf1 phosphorylation in mammalian nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes to Cells. Genes Cells; 2013. pp. 161–175. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cimprich KA, Cortez D. ATR: An essential regulator of genome integrity. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2008. pp. 616–627. doi: 10.1038/nrm2450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Shimobayashi M, Hall MN. Making new contacts: The mTOR network in metabolism and signalling crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15: 155–162. doi: 10.1038/nrm3757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Murr R, Vaissière T, Sawan C, Shukla V, Herceg Z. Orchestration of chromatin-based processes: Mind the TRRAP. Oncogene. Oncogene; 2007. pp. 5358–5372. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Abraham RT. PI 3-kinase related kinases: “Big” players in stress-induced signaling pathways. DNA Repair. Elsevier; 2004. pp. 883–887. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Hoffman KS, Duennwald ML, Karagiannis J, Genereaux J, McCarton AS, Brandl CJ. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tti2 regulates PIKK proteins and stress response. G3 Genes, Genomes, Genet. 2016;6: 1649–1659. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.029520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Garcia N, Messing J. TTT and PIKK complex genes reverted to single copy following polyploidization and retain function despite massive retrotransposition in maize. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of insulin action and insulin resistance. Physiological Reviews. American Physiological Society; 2018. pp. 2133–2223. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00063.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Shan T, Zhang P, Jiang Q, Xiong Y, Wang Y, Kuang S. Adipocyte-specific deletion of mTOR inhibits adipose tissue development and causes insulin resistance in mice. Diabetologia. 2016;59: 1995–2004. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4006-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kumar A, Harris TE, Keller SR, Choi KM, Magnuson MA, Lawrence JC. Muscle-Specific Deletion of Rictor Impairs Insulin-Stimulated Glucose Transport and Enhances Basal Glycogen Synthase Activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28: 61–70. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01405-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kumar A, Lawrence JC, Jung DY, Ko HJ, Keller SR, Kim JK, et al. Fat cell-specific ablation of rictor in mice impairs insulin-regulated fat cell and whole-body glucose and lipid metabolism. Diabetes. 2010;59: 1397–1406. doi: 10.2337/db09-1061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Takagi M, Uno H, Nishi R, Sugimoto M, Hasegawa S, Piao J, et al. ATM Regulates Adipocyte Differentiation and Contributes to Glucose Homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2015;10: 957–967. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Mao Z, Zhang W. Role of mTOR in glucose and lipid metabolism. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. MDPI AG; 2018. doi: 10.3390/ijms19072043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Langouët M, Saadi A, Rieunier G, Moutton S, Siquier-Pernet K, Fernet M, et al. Mutation in TTI2 reveals a role for triple T complex in human brain development. Hum Mutat. 2013;34: 1472–1476. doi: 10.1002/humu.22399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Mainardi M, Fusco S, Grassi C. Modulation of hippocampal neural plasticity by glucose-related signaling. Neural Plasticity. Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/657928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Fernandez AM, Torres-Alemán I. The many faces of insulin-like peptide signalling in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci; 2012. pp. 225–239. doi: 10.1038/nrn3209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.van Praag X, Fleshner M, Schwartz MW, Mattson MP. Exercise, energy intake, glucose homeostasis, and the brain. J Neurosci. 2014;34: 15139–15149. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2814-14.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Rafalski VA, Brunet A. Energy metabolism in adult neural stem cell fate. Progress in Neurobiology. Prog Neurobiol; 2011. pp. 182–203. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Marissal-Arvy N, Campas MN, Semont A, Ducroix-Crepy C, Beauvieux MC, Brossaud J, et al. Insulin treatment partially prevents cognitive and hippocampal alterations as well as glucocorticoid dysregulation in early-onset insulin-deficient diabetic rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;93: 72–81. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.04.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Sun P, Knezovic A, Parlak M, Cuber J, Karabeg M, Deckert J, et al. Long-Term Effects of Intracerebroventricular Streptozotocin Treatment on Adult Neurogenesis in the Rat Hippocampus. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2015;12: 772–784. doi: 10.2174/1567205012666150710112147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Stranahan AM, Arumugam T V., Cutler RG, Lee K, Egan JM, Mattson MP. Diabetes impairs hippocampal function through glucocorticoid-mediated effects on new and mature neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11: 309–317. doi: 10.1038/nn2055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhang WJ, Tan YF, Yue JTY, Vranic M, Wojtowicz JM. Impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis in streptozotocin-treated diabetic rats. Acta Neurol Scand. 2008;117: 205–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00928.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Lee J, Seroogy KB, Mattson MP. Dietary restriction enhances neurotrophin expression and neurogenesis in the hippocampus of adult mice. J Neurochem. 2002;80: 539–547. doi: 10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00747.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Park HR, Park M, Choi J, Park KY, Chung HY, Lee J. A high-fat diet impairs neurogenesis: Involvement of lipid peroxidation and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Neurosci Lett. 2010;482: 235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.07.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Klein C, Jonas W, Iggena D, Empl L, Rivalan M, Wiedmer P, et al. Exercise prevents high-fat diet-induced impairment of flexible memory expression in the water maze and modulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis in mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016;131: 26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ziegler A, Bader P, McWalter K, Douglas G, Houdayer C, Bris C, et al. Confirmation that variants in TTI2 are responsible for autosomal recessive intellectual disability. Clin Genet. 2019;96: 354–358. doi: 10.1111/cge.13603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wang R, Han S, Liu H, Khan A, Xiaerbati H, Yu X, et al. Novel compound heterozygous mutations in tti2 cause syndromic intellectual disability in a chinese family. Front Genet. 2019;10. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Picher-Martel V, Labrie Y, Rivest S, Lace B, Chrestian N. Whole-exome sequencing identifies homozygous mutation in TTI2 in a child with primary microcephaly: A case report. BMC Neurol. 2020;20. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1550-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.You J, Sobreira NL, Gable DL, Jurgens J, Grange DK, Belnap N, et al. A Syndromic Intellectual Disability Disorder Caused by Variants in TELO2, a Gene Encoding a Component of the TTT Complex. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98: 909–918. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Moosa S, Altmüller J, Lyngbye T, Christensen R, Li Y, Nürnberg P, et al. Novel compound heterozygous mutations in TELO2 in a patient with severe expression of You-Hoover-Fong syndrome. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5: 580–584. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Choy KR, Watters DJ. Neurodegeneration in ataxia-telangiectasia: Multiple roles of ATM kinase in cellular homeostasis. Developmental Dynamics. John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 2018. pp. 33–46. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.24522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Shiloh Y, Ziv Y. The ATM protein kinase: Regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol; 2013. pp. 197–210. doi: 10.1038/nrm3546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.O’Driscoll M, Ruiz-Perez VL, Woods CG, Jeggo PA, Goodship JA. A splicing mutation affecting expression of ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR) results in Seckel syndrome. Nat Genet. 2003;33: 497–501. doi: 10.1038/ng1129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Branzei D, Foiani M. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. Nature Publishing Group; 2008. pp. 297–308. doi: 10.1038/nrm2351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Enriquez-Rios V, Dumitrache LC, Downing SM, Li Y, Brown EJ, Russell HR, et al. DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR interplay maintains genome integrity during neurogenesis. J Neurosci. 2017;37: 893–905. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4213-15.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Allen DM, Van Praag H, Ray J, Weaver Z, Winrow CJ, Carter TA, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated is essential during adult neurogenesis. Genes Dev. 2001;15: 554–566. doi: 10.1101/gad.869001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lee Y, Shull ERP, Frappart PO, Katyal S, Enriquez-Rios V, Zhao J, et al. ATR maintains select progenitors during nervous system development. EMBO J. 2012;31: 1177–1189. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Coufal NG, Garcia-Perez JL, Peng GE, Marchetto MCN, Muotri AR, Mu Y, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) modulates long interspersed element-1 (L1) retrotransposition in human neural stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 20382–20387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100273108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Singer T, McConnell MJ, Marchetto MCN, Coufal NG, Gage FH. LINE-1 retrotransposons: Mediators of somatic variation in neuronal genomes? Trends Neurosci. 2010;33: 345–354. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2010.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Garza-Lombó C, Gonsebatt ME. Mammalian target of rapamycin: Its role in early neural development and in adult and aged brain function. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2016. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ka M, Condorelli G, Woodgett JR, Kim WY. mTOR regulates brain morphogenesis by mediating GSK3 signaling. Dev. 2014;141: 4076–4086. doi: 10.1242/dev.108282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hartman NW, Lin T V., Zhang L, Paquelet GE, Feliciano DM, Bordey A. MTORC1 Targets the Translational Repressor 4E-BP2, but Not S6 Kinase 1/2, to Regulate Neural Stem Cell Self-Renewal InVivo. Cell Rep. 2013;5: 433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cochard LM, Levros LC, Joppé SE, Pratesi F, Aumont A, Fernandes KJL. Manipulation of EGFR-Induced Signaling for the Recruitment of Quiescent Neural Stem Cells in the Adult Mouse Forebrain. Front Neurosci. 2021;15. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.621076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Raman L, Kong X, Kernie SG. Pharmacological inhibition of the mTOR pathway impairs hippocampal development in mice. Neurosci Lett. 2013;541: 9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Zhang T, Ding H, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Zhang Y, Chen G, et al. Akt3-mTOR regulates hippocampal neurogenesis in adult mouse. J Neurochem. 2021;159: 498–511. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Åberg MAI, Åberg ND, Palmer TD, Alborn AM, Carlsson-Skwirut C, Bang P, et al. IGF-I has a direct proliferative effect in adult hippocampal progenitor cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2003;24: 23–40. doi: 10.1016/s1044-7431(03)00082-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Trejo JL, Carro E, Torres-Alemán I. Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates exercise-induced increases in the number of new neurons in the adult hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2001;21: 1628–1634. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01628.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lichtenwalner RJ, Forbes ME, Bennett SA, Lynch CD, Sonntag WE, Riddle DR. Intracerebroventricular infusion of insulin-like growth factor-I ameliorates the age-related decline in hippocampal neurogenesis. Neuroscience. 2001;107: 603–613. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00378-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Cheng CM, Cohen M, Tseng V, Bondy CA. Endogenous IGF1 enhances cell survival in the postnatal dentate gyrus. J Neurosci Res. 2001;64: 341–347. doi: 10.1002/jnr.1084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Agis-Balboa RC, Fischer A. Generating new neurons to circumvent your fears: The role of IGF signaling. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014. pp. 21–42. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1316-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Chaker Z, Aïd S, Berry H, Holzenberger M. Suppression of IGF-I signals in neural stem cells enhances neurogenesis and olfactory function during aging. Aging Cell. 2015;14: 847–856. doi: 10.1111/acel.12365 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kuwabara T, Kagalwala MN, Onuma Y, Ito Y, Warashina M, Terashima K, et al. Insulin biosynthesis in neuronal progenitors derived from adult hippocampus and the olfactory bulb. EMBO Mol Med. 2011;3: 742–754. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Van Brocklyn JR, Williams JB. The control of the balance between ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate by sphingosine kinase: Oxidative stress and the seesaw of cell survival and death. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—B Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Elsevier Inc.; 2012. pp. 26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Ghasemi R, Dargahi L, Ahmadiani A. Integrated sphingosine-1 phosphate signaling in the central nervous system: From physiological equilibrium to pathological damage. Pharmacological Research. Academic Press; 2016. pp. 156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2015.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Karunakaran I, van Echten-Deckert G. Sphingosine 1-phosphate–A double edged sword in the brain. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Biomembranes. Elsevier B.V.; 2017. pp. 1573–1582. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.03.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kanno T, Nishizaki T, Proia RL, Kajimoto T, Jahangeer S, Okada T, et al. Regulation of synaptic strength by sphingosine 1-phosphate in the hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2010;171: 973–980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Martin JL, Lin MZ, McGowan EM, Baxter RC. Potentiation of growth factor signaling by insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 in breast epithelial cells requires sphingosine kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284: 25542–25552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.007120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Jęśko H, Stępień A, Lukiw WJ, Strosznajder RP. The Cross-Talk Between Sphingolipids and Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling: Significance for Aging and Neurodegeneration. Molecular Neurobiology. Humana Press Inc.; 2019. pp. 3501–3521. doi: 10.1007/s12035-018-1286-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Paliouras GN, Hamilton LK, Aumont A, Joppé SE, Barnab-Heider F, Fernandes KJL. Mammalian target of rapamycin signaling is a key regulator of the transit-amplifying progenitor pool in the adult and aging forebrain. J Neurosci. 2012;32: 15012–15026. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2248-12.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Akagawa R, Nabeshima YI, Kawauchi T. Alternative Functions of Cell Cycle-Related and DNA Repair Proteins in Post-mitotic Neurons. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.753175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Williams RW, Rakic P. Three-dimensional counting: an accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material. J Comp Neurol. 1988;278: 344–352. doi: 10.1002/cne.902780305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Sandberg R, Larsson O. Improved precision and accuracy for microarrays using updated probe set definitions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4: 249–264. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA. Affy—Analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 2004;20: 307–315. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Mhyre TR, Chesler EJ, Thiruchelvam M, Lungu C, Cory-Slechta DA, Fry JD, et al. Heritability, correlations and in silico mapping of locomotor behavior and neurochemistry in inbred strains of mice. Genes, Brain Behav. 2005;4: 209–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2004.00102.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67: 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Saar K, Beck A, Bihoreau MT, Birney E, Brocklebank D, Chen Y, et al. SNP and haplotype mapping for genetic analysis in the rat. Nat Genet. 2008;40: 560–566. doi: 10.1038/ng.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Wang J, Williams RW, Manly KF. WebQTL: Web-Based Complex Trait Analysis. Neuroinformatics. Neuroinformatics; 2003. pp. 299–308. doi: 10.1385/NI:1:4:299 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Broman KW, Sen S. A guide to QTL mapping with R/qtl. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9: 559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sen Ś, Satagopan JM, Broman KW, Churchill GA. R/qtlDesign: inbred line cross experimental design. Mamm Genome. 2007;18: 87. doi: 10.1007/s00335-006-0090-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Smith JR, Hayman GT, Wang SJ, Laulederkind SJF, Hoffman MJ, Kaldunski ML, et al. The Year of the Rat: The Rat Genome Database at 20: A multi-species knowledgebase and analysis platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48: D731–D742. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, et al. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40: e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34: 525–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Cunningham F, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Allen J, Amode MR, Armean IM, et al. Ensembl 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47: D745–D751. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Pimentel H, Bray NL, Puente S, Melsted P, Pachter L. Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nat Methods. 2017;14: 687–690. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30: 523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2002. Available: https://www.r-project.org/.
  • 146.Fox J. An R Companion to Applied Regression. Third. Sage, Thousand Oaks CA; 2019. Available: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/ [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal. Biom J; 2008. pp. 346–363. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200810425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Wickham H. ggplot2—Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer; 2016. Available: https://www.springer.com/de/book/9780387981413 [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Gregory S Barsh, Wayne N Frankel

9 Jul 2021

Dear Dr Kempermann,

Thank you very much for submitting your Research Article entitled 'System genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose' to PLOS Genetics.

The manuscript was fully evaluated at the editorial level and by independent peer reviewers. The reviewers were appreciative of the effort involved and the quality of the manuscript, but raised concerns (some significant) that need to be addressed. As a result, we will not be able to accept this version of the manuscript, but we would be willing to review a revised version.  Your revisions would have to satisfy the reviewers before we would consider the manuscript for publication.

Should you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration here, your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer.  Reviewer #1 had several major points that require attention, including one consistent with that of Reviewer #2 (degree to which use of the heterozygous ko strain addresses the nature and impact of the natural variant in Tti2; does protein made in the low expressing allele function normally).  We will require a detailed list of your responses to all review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.  

If you decide to revise the manuscript for further consideration at PLOS Genetics, please aim to resubmit within the next 60 days, unless it will take extra time to address the concerns of the reviewers, in which case we would appreciate an expected resubmission date by email to plosgenetics@plos.org.

If present, accompanying reviewer attachments are included with this email; please notify the journal office if any appear to be missing. They will also be available for download from the link below. You can use this link to log into the system when you are ready to submit a revised version, having first consulted our Submission Checklist.

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying graphs or summary statistics are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this upon resubmission if not already present. In addition, we do not permit the inclusion of phrases such as "data not shown" or "unpublished results" in manuscripts. All points should be backed up by data provided with the submission.

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool.  PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

PLOS has incorporated Similarity Check, powered by iThenticate, into its journal-wide submission system in order to screen submitted content for originality before publication. Each PLOS journal undertakes screening on a proportion of submitted articles. You will be contacted if needed following the screening process.

To resubmit, use the link below and 'Revise Submission' in the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder.

[LINK]

We are sorry that we cannot be more positive about your manuscript at this stage. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any concerns or questions.

Yours sincerely,

Wayne N. Frankel

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: SUMMARY

The authors used a recombinant inbred rat GRP (HXB/BXH; 30 strains) derived from SHR and BN rats in a systems genetic analysis of precursor cell proliferation, neuronal survival, and gene expression to map a strong candidate gene underlying hippocampal neurogenesis (dentate gyrus) and metabolic phenotypes. The QTL contained Tti2 (telo2-interacting protein 2) for which there was an eQTL and expression that correlated with both sets of traits. They made a frameshift rat KO mutant in the N-terminus of Tti2 via ZFNs on SHR background (higher Tti2 expression) and these rats showed slower CNS neurogenesis and a peripheral metabolic phenotype. Thus, they identified a gene influencing both brain plasticity and peripheral glucose metabolism.

STRENGTHS

• Efficient use of resources with this GRP (eQTLs, correlated traits in database) to unbiasedly identify correlated traits (neurogenesis, metabolic) and validate these directly in the gene mutants they generated.

• N=5-9 rats per strain for 30 or so inbred strains over 3 independent litters. 3 IP injections of BRDU (50 mg/kg), sac’ed 28 days later, histological analysis.

• Het-het breeding and Littermate controls for the KO study. 50% knockdown more closely mimics the likely human condition. Why, however, were homozygous mutants not tested? Were they not viable?

• Conditioning on gene expression (Rather than markers) is a more direct, causal assessment of the eQTL and gene in trait variation.

• Extensive analysis of Tti2 mutants at multiple levels of intermediate phenotypes that were informed by the correlations identified in the GRP – gene expression (legacy and new microarray; RNA-seq in mutants), glucose utilization, oxidative stress markers (enzyme activity), basal and insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis, biochemical (glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, glycerol, insulin)

• Dose-dependent effects of Tti2 on HC neurogenesis and glucose homeostasis

• Striking degree of co-mapping of metabolic, neurogenesis, and Tti2 expression strengthens the case for Tti2.

• Importantly, proliferation did not map to chr. 16, indicating some degree of specificity for neurogenesis.

• Neat that conditioning on glucose levels decreased the LOD score below significance. Strengthens the argument that a shared genetic factor in chr. 16 QTL mediates both phenotypes. Although not slam-dunk evidence (even if they’re separate QTLs, there will be a high degree of local LD), it is complementary evidence. Are there any other transcripts with cis-eQTLs within the chr.16 region? Have you tried conditioning on those?

MAJOR COMMENTS

• The word pleiotropy is used to describe the findings but is it possible that the metabolic phenotype leads to changes in neurogenesis; in this case it would be pleiotropy or would it be more of a linear causal chain of events. Do the authors have any insight as to whether there is independent, concomitant regulation of both traits (pleiotropy) or whether is a causal sequence?

• Is Tti2 the only eQTL within the 4 Mb interval? If not, the other cis-eQTLs could be provided for all tested tissues, along with the effect of conditioning on expression of those genes on the chr.16 QTL.

• The 11 protein-coding genes and 4 noncoding RNA genes within the QTL interval should be listed somewhere as well.

• Interesting that neg. correl was observed for Tti2 exp vs. neurogenesis in the GRP, yet decreased exp in the Tti2 mutants resulted in decreased neurogenesis. Could there be a dominant negative effect with one or more of the coding polymorphisms that explains this discrepancy between the GRP and the mutants?

• If the only missense mutations within this entire 4+Mb interval are within one gene – Tti2, then I don’t think this GRP is as representative of human genetic diversity as the authors claim in the Introduction. How many polymorphisms segregate in this GRP?

• Testing males-only is a major limitation of the study as there are known sex differences in neurogenesis. “Compatibility” with prior data and “estrus variation” are not valid scientific reasons to exclude half the population. Covariates can be included in the statistical models if necessary. If not females now for these reasons, then when?

• Line 254: “…presumably generating a non-functional protein”. That is a big presumption. Is there a decrease in TTI2 protein in the mutants? Is there a decrease (or potentially increase?) in TTI2 protein in BN vs. SHR?

MINOR

• QTL interval should be provided in the abstract, if possible.

• Power analysis for QTL detection of various effect sizes with 30 strains could be provided.

• Line 228: “expression of only one gene…” – do they mean one gene within the chr.16 QTL interval? Or only one gene in the entire genome?

• Line 698: PMID listed. needs to have the reference inserted.

• Figure legends could be located closer to the figures.

Reviewer #2 SUMMARY

This is an interesting and thorough manuscript that uses rat RI strains to map a trait locus for adult neurogenesis and identify a strong candidate gene by testing a rat knockout strain generated for this purpose.  The primary genetic association is not the strongest, and this particular RI panel has only modest detection power and resolution, but the authors brought sophisticated conditional and expression QTL mapping into the mix to obtain convincing evidence that a candidate gene – Tti2 - is the likely culprit, and then introduced several levels of characterization to examine the relationship between neurogenesis and serum glucose.

The “proof” that Tti2 gene is the causal gene is almost, but not quite ironclad – more ideal would have been to knockin the most likely (or multiple) missense variants rather than to use the knockout, because of the possibility that loss-of-function is not the sole molecular consequence of the strain variation in Tti2.  I do understand, on balance, since there is a clear expression difference in Tti2 between the progenitor strains, that using the ko to test it is reasonable. However, if the authors have or would make compound heterozygotes between the knockout allele and representative RI lines for each progenitor allele (an approach previously referred to as RIST, recombinant inbred segregation testing) this would further strengthen their conclusions and the manuscript.

One minor point – the authors adoption of the p < 0.63 guideline as “suggestive” bothers me. Although I realize it has historical context from earlier QTL rigor standard-seeking guidelines, outside of the QTL world I do not think anyone in their right mind would think that this is suggestive or trending.  Depicting p<0.1 and/or p<0.25 levels seem more realistic ways to report less-than-statistically-significant effects.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Camron D. Bryant

Reviewer #2: No.

Decision Letter 1

Gregory S Barsh, Wayne N Frankel

7 Mar 2022

Dear Dr Kempermann,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "System genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose" has been editorially accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics. Congratulations!

Before your submission can be formally accepted and sent to production you will need to complete our formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email.

Also please do consider Reviewer I's comment regarding use of male-only studies, and if there is something you would like to alter in the text accordingly, you are welcome to do so.

Please be aware that it may take several days for you to receive this email; during this time no action is required by you. Please note: the accept date on your published article will reflect the date of this provisional acceptance, but your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until the required changes have been made.

Once your paper is formally accepted, an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you’ve already opted out via the online submission form. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online or are unsure if you have already indicated as such, please let the journal staff know immediately at plosgenetics@plos.org.

In the meantime, please log into Editorial Manager at https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgenetics/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production and billing process. Note that PLOS requires an ORCID iD for all corresponding authors. Therefore, please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field.  This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager.

If you have a press-related query, or would like to know about making your underlying data available (as you will be aware, this is required for publication), please see the end of this email. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming article at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. Inform journal staff as soon as possible if you are preparing a press release for your article and need a publication date.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Genetics!

Yours sincerely,

Wayne N. Frankel

Associate Editor

PLOS Genetics

Gregory Barsh

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Genetics

www.plosgenetics.org

Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

----------------------------------------------------

Comments from the reviewers (if applicable):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Authors:

Please note here if the review is uploaded as an attachment.

Reviewer #1: Appreciatively, the authors thoroughly responded to my critiques, with one notable exception. The reasons provided for excluding females are not valid scientific reasons. 1) it's too much work; 2) it's too much variance; 2) we wouldn't be able to compare females to historical male-only data; 4) it's a GRP, we can do it later. I encourage the authors to check out DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw7570 and key references within. I chose "accept" but note that the field has rapidly and rightly moved on from male-only studies.

**********

Have all data underlying the figures and results presented in the manuscript been provided?

Large-scale datasets should be made available via a public repository as described in the PLOS Genetics data availability policy, and numerical data that underlies graphs or summary statistics should be provided in spreadsheet form as supporting information.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Camron D Bryant

----------------------------------------------------

Data Deposition

If you have submitted a Research Article or Front Matter that has associated data that are not suitable for deposition in a subject-specific public repository (such as GenBank or ArrayExpress), one way to make that data available is to deposit it in the Dryad Digital Repository. As you may recall, we ask all authors to agree to make data available; this is one way to achieve that. A full list of recommended repositories can be found on our website.

The following link will take you to the Dryad record for your article, so you won't have to re‐enter its bibliographic information, and can upload your files directly: 

http://datadryad.org/submit?journalID=pgenetics&manu=PGENETICS-D-21-00750R1

More information about depositing data in Dryad is available at http://www.datadryad.org/depositing. If you experience any difficulties in submitting your data, please contact help@datadryad.org for support.

Additionally, please be aware that our data availability policy requires that all numerical data underlying display items are included with the submission, and you will need to provide this before we can formally accept your manuscript, if not already present.

----------------------------------------------------

Press Queries

If you or your institution will be preparing press materials for this manuscript, or if you need to know your paper's publication date for media purposes, please inform the journal staff as soon as possible so that your submission can be scheduled accordingly. Your manuscript will remain under a strict press embargo until the publication date and time. This means an early version of your manuscript will not be published ahead of your final version. PLOS Genetics may also choose to issue a press release for your article. If there's anything the journal should know or you'd like more information, please get in touch via plosgenetics@plos.org.

Acceptance letter

Gregory S Barsh, Wayne N Frankel

30 Mar 2022

PGENETICS-D-21-00750R1

Systems genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose

Dear Dr Kempermann,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "Systems genetics in the rat HXB/BXH family identifies Tti2 as a pleiotropic quantitative trait gene for adult hippocampal neurogenesis and serum glucose" has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Genetics! Your manuscript is now with our production department and you will be notified of the publication date in due course.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, unless you have opted out or your manuscript is a front-matter piece, the early version of your manuscript will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting PLOS Genetics and open-access publishing. We are looking forward to publishing your work!

With kind regards,

Anita Estes

PLOS Genetics

On behalf of:

The PLOS Genetics Team

Carlyle House, Carlyle Road, Cambridge CB4 3DN | United Kingdom

plosgenetics@plos.org | +44 (0) 1223-442823

plosgenetics.org | Twitter: @PLOSGenetics

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Metabolic phenotyping of three-month-old heterozygous SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR- Tti2+/+ littermates (denoted as SHR).

    Details of statistical analysis are in Table 2. Abbreviations: BAT, brown adipose tissue; GSH, glutathione; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; TG, triglycerides.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Top canonical pathways enriched among differentially expressed genes between SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates.

    Analysis was performed with Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), which, in addition to calculating enrichment, predicts activation (positive Z-score, red) or inhibition (negative Z-score, blue) of molecular pathways from the direction and magnitude of expression changes using curated database. Grey bars depict enriched pathways for which activation status could not be predicted. Vertical green dashed line indicates p value threshold of 0.05.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Predicted regulator networks effects involved in glucose homeostasis in livers of SHR-Tti2+/- rats.

    Differentially expressed genes in livers of SHR-Tti2+/- rats and wild type SHR littermates were analysed using IPA. Up- (magenta) and downregulated genes (green; middle tier) connect the potential upstream regulators (upper tier) to downstream outcomes (bottom tier). Edges represent relationships derived from curated databases.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Frequencies of single- and multi-tissue human TTI2 eQTL.

    821 genomic variants underlying 2177 eQTL (p < 1e-4) extracted from eQTL EBI catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eqtl/) were clustered according to the number of distinct tissues or cell types in which eQTL were detected. Multiple eQTL from different data sets derived from the same cell or tissue type were scored as a single-tissue eQTL.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Power to detect QTL in a population of recombinant inbred strains.

    Graphs depict theoretical calculations of power to detect a QTL with a minimum LOD value of 3 with various genetic effect sizes of a locus and heritability ranging from 0.2 to 0.7. Effect size is a difference in mean trait value between homozygous animals with different parental allele at this locus expressed as a proportion of the total genetic variance. Effect size of 1 implies a Mendelian trait. The calculations were performed for 25 and 30 lines with 5 biological replicates each, because several of the published traits used in our study, including serum glucose levels, were not measured in the entire family.

    (TIF)

    S1 Data. Neurogenesis and metabolism in Tti2 heterozygous KO rats.

    Individual measurements of hippocampal neurogenesis and metabolic parameters in SHR-Tti2+/- and wild type SHR rats.

    (CSV)

    S2 Data. Ingenuity canonical pathways.

    IPA canonical pathways enriched in differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Data. Ingenuity upstream regulators.

    Affected upstream regulators predicted by IPA from differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue. Activation Z-score sis deduced from the direction and magnitude of the gene expression changes.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Data. Ingenuity downstream functions and diseases.

    Functions enriched among differentially expressed genes in SHR-Tti2+/- vs. wild type SHR rats in the hippocampus, liver, muscle and perirenal adipose tissue. IPA deduces the activation Z-scores from the direction and magnitude of the gene expression changes.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Data. Human TTI2 eQTL.

    Human eQTL catalogue (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/eqtl/) was queried for variants associated with changes in the TTI2 mRNA expression. Significant eQTL were defined by p value < 1e-4.

    (TXT)

    S1 Table. Genes located within the confidence interval of the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL on Chromosome 16. RGD ID, Rat Genome Database gene identifier.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Genes with cis-eQTL within the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL, and neurogenesis QTL intervals.

    Expression of genes whose cis-eQTL were located within the joint neurogenesis-serum glucose QTL interval on Chromosome 16 (Chr 16: 62.1–66.3 Mb), or within neurogenesis-specific QTL interval (Chr 16: 56.8–74.3), were used for conditional mapping for these phenotypes. Although Saraf gene is located outside the joint phenotype QTL interval, it has a cis-eQTL within the QTL region. Conditional LOD scores and the respective difference in phenotype LOD scores for each gene are noted. Pearson’s correlation coefficient values denote correlation between a phenotype and gene expression in listed tissues.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of Tti2 mRNA expression in BN and SHR rats.

    Expression values were normalised to the mean expression of Tti2 in BN. Note that lower cycle of threshold (ΔΔCT) values indicate higher relative expression of a gene. Data is shown as means ± standard error of the mean; t, Student’s t-test statistic; df, degrees of freedom.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Non-synonymous amino acid substitutions in the SHR Tti2 coding sequence.

    Genomic sequence of SHR rats between positions 62.1 and 66.3 Mb on chromosome 16, which cover neurogenesis-glucose QTL, was scanned for non-synonymous amino-acid substitutions compared to reference genome using Variant Visualiser in Rat Genome Database. Within this interval, missense mutations were present only in the Tti2 gene. Conservation score ranges from 1 (highly conserved) to 0 (not conserved). SIFT score ranges from 0 (damaging) to 1 (non-damaging). Positions are according to Rnor_5.0 genome assembly.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. RNAseq confirmed reduction of Tti2 mRNA expression in SHR-Tti2+/- rats compared to wild type SHR littermates.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 220201_PLoS Genetics_ResponseLetter.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Neurogenesis data was deposited in the HXB/BXH Published Phenotypes Database at the GeneNetwork (www.genenetwork.org) under Record IDs: HRP_10193 (BrdU+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10193&dataset=HXBBXHPublish), HRP_10194 (Ki67+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10194&dataset=HXBBXHPublish), HRP_10195 (clusters of Ki67+ cells; http://genenetwork.org/show_trait?trait_id=10195&dataset=HXBBXHPublish). Hippocampal gene expression dataset was deposited at GeneNetwork under GN Accession GN231 (http://gn1.genenetwork.org/webqtl/main.py?FormID=sharinginfo&GN_AccessionId=231&InfoPageName=UT_HippRatEx_RMA_0709). RNA sequencing of SHR and SHR-Tti2+/- rats was deposited to Gene Ontology Omnibus under the accession number GSE160361 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE160361).


    Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES