Abstract
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), encoded by Nppa, is a vasodilatory hormone that promotes salt excretion. Genome-wide association studies identified Nppa as a causative factor of blood pressure development, and in humans, ANP levels were suggested as an indicator of salt sensitivity. This study aimed to provide insights into the effects of ANP on cardiorenal function in salt-sensitive hypertension. To address this question, hypertension was induced in SSNPPA–/– (KO of Nppa in the Dahl salt-sensitive [SS] rat background) or SSWT (WT Dahl SS) rats by a high-salt (HS) diet challenge (4% NaCl for 21 days). Chronic infusion of ANP in SSWT rats attenuated the increase in blood pressure and cardiorenal damage. Overall, the SSNPPA–/– strain demonstrated higher blood pressure and intensified cardiac fibrosis (with no changes in ejection fraction) compared with SSWT rats. Furthermore, SSNPPA–/– rats exhibited kidney hypertrophy and higher glomerular injury scores, reduced diuresis, and lower sodium and chloride excretion than SSWT when fed a HS diet. Additionally, the activity of epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) was found to be increased in the collecting ducts of the SSNPPA–/– rats. Taken together, these data show promise for the therapeutic benefits of ANP and ANP-increasing drugs for treating salt-sensitive hypertension.
Keywords: Nephrology
Keywords: Hypertension, Sodium channels
Introduction
Hypertension is a significant public health concern; the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 1 in every 3 Americans suffers from high blood pressure (BP) (1). While high dietary salt intake is a common risk factor for all types of hypertension, a subset of patients exhibits BP changes dependent on salt intake (2). Salt sensitivity is associated with a higher risk of pathological cardiometabolic events and organ damage. The mechanisms of salt-sensitive (SS) hypertension are not fully clear, and there are no specific treatments available for the SS subpopulation (3). Existing pharmacology is insufficient to properly control BP in SS patients (4), and there is a need to develop more effective therapies.
Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) has been proposed to play a role in the susceptibility to SS hypertension. Elevated ANP levels have been considered a hallmark for heart failure (HF) and nephrotic syndrome (5). ANP, encoded by the Nppa gene, is a hormone known to promote salt excretion, vasodilation, and BP reduction (6), in part through its antagonism of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) (7). Nppa–/– mice displayed an SS phenotype (8). Furthermore, aldosterone-induced glomerular injury and proteinuria were more severe in Nppa–/– mice (9). In rats, Nppa is located on the Agtrap-Plod1 locus on chromosome 5, which has been associated with BP alterations and renal disease in several studies (10–12). In humans, ANP levels were suggested as a clinical marker of salt sensitivity (13, 14), and some studies show that SS hypertensive patients manifest a counterintuitive decrease in plasma ANP (15, 16).
In clinics, acute ANP infusion may improve cardiac function in HF patients (17). In 2015, the FDA approved a HF treatment drug featuring a combination of valsartan (an angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), and sacubitril (a neprilysin inhibitor, NEPi) (18). Sacubitril increases the circulating level of ANP by inhibiting the enzyme responsible for its degradation (neprilysin).
While the pathophysiology of SS hypertension is not completely clear, sodium imbalance resulting from renal pathology is crucial for developing this disease (19). The epithelial Na+ channels (ENaC) in the distal nephron are the limiting step of sodium reabsorption, and it was shown that inhibiting ENaC can attenuate salt sensitivity in animal models (20–22). There is a variety of endogenous stimuli that can regulate ENaC, including ANP (23–25). Importantly, the SS phenotype in Nppa–/– mice was rescued by an ENaC inhibitor amiloride (26).
We hypothesized that deficient ANP signaling plays a role in the development of electrolyte imbalance and cardiorenal damage in SS hypertension. The study was designed 2-fold; first, we tested if ANP supplementation can alleviate renal and cardiac lesions in WT Dahl SS rats (SSWT) fed a high-salt diet (HS diet) to induce hypertension. Secondly, we tested the effects of the lack of ANP in an SS context using the Nppa KO generated in a Dahl SS rat background (SSNPPA–/–). This was achieved by precise analyses of the ANP-dependent BP changes, renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and natriuresis and diuresis, as well as by probing ENaC activity in the collecting ducts. These studies provide mechanistic insights into the effects of ANP on electrolyte homeostasis and cardiorenal function in the condition of SS hypertension.
Results
Continuous infusion of ANP ameliorates hypertension, renal fibrosis, and protein cast formation in the SSWT rats.
According to the protocols shown in Figure 1, A and C, we continuously infused ANP i.v. into male SSWT rats together with the administration of a HS (4% NaCl) diet for 21 days (Figure 1A) or starting on day 14 of the HS diet (Figure 1C). ANP infusion resulted in a protective effect in attenuating the mean arterial pressure (MAP) increase compared with the vehicle-infused group (Figure 1B). Furthermore, ANP infusion had a therapeutic effect, since it lowered MAP even when it was given when rats had already started to develop salt-induced hypertension (Figure 1D). ANP attenuated the increase in the kidney/body weight and heart/body weight ratios when ANP was administered during the last 7 days of the HS diet (Figure 1, E and F) and alleviated the organs’ hypertrophy further when ANP was delivered throughout the whole 21-day HS diet challenge (please note that, since the organs were not dehydrated, total body water could alter conclusions drawn from organ weights). Plasma ANP levels were significantly elevated in the infused group, confirming successful delivery of ANP (Figure 1G). Histological analysis (Figure 2) showed alleviation of the fibrosis, protein cast formation, and glomerular injury score (Figure 2, A and B) by ANP delivery during days 14–21 of the HS diet, and these parameters were further improved when ANP was infused for 21 days. Interestingly, cardiac fibrosis and heart hypertrophy were only alleviated when ANP was infused for the whole duration of the dietary challenge (Figure 1F and Figure 2C). Urine flow, electrolyte excretion, and plasma electrolyte levels were mostly similar among the groups, except for an increase in Na+ and Cl– excretion on day 21 in the group of rats infused with ANP during days 0–21 (Supplemental Table 1; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.148682DS1).
SSNPPA–/– rats exhibit higher BP, lower urine output and less sodium excretion compared with SSWT.
First, we assessed if lack of ANP changed the baseline BP or the development of hypertension compared with SSWT animals. The experimental protocol is shown in Figure 3A. Before the initiation of the HS challenge, SSNPPA–/– rats already exhibited elevated MAP in comparison with controls (123.4 ± 3.0 versus 110.3 ± 6.0 mmHg; P < 0.05; Figure 3B). During the HS challenge, the SSNPPA–/– rats demonstrated a significantly higher MAP compared with SSWT; after 21 days on a HS diet, MAP was 185.8 ± 9.0 and 144.6 ± 4.0 mmHg for SSNPPA–/– rats and SSWT rats, respectively. Systolic and diastolic BP were both higher in the SSNPPA–/– rats, while the circadian rhythms were largely undisturbed (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B). To examine if Nppa deficiency affects the circadian rhythm of BP, cosinor analysis of BP on the last 3 days of the normal salt (NS) and HS diets was performed. SSNPPA–/– rats exhibited increased mesor on NS and HS, as expected due to their elevated MAP on both diets, while acrophase was similar between SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats or between NS and HS. Amplitude was significantly increased in SSNPPA–/– rats on HS, likely due to the already exacerbated MAP in this group.
When survival rates of the SSWT versus SSNPPA–/– rats were considered (Figure 3C), we observed an 18% lower survival of the KO animals on HS. It can be speculated that overall end-organ damage, HF (see below), or stroke contributed to a significant decline in survival. Interestingly, although we observed a small but statistically significant increase in plasma BNP level in the SSNPPA–/– rats versus SSWT rats on NS diet (Supplemental Figure 1C), this compensatory change was not present in the HS diet–fed animals. Therefore, it can be surmised that compensatory BNP increase was not a significant contributory factor to the changes observed during a HS challenge.
To test the involvement of ANP in fluid volume control, we compared diuresis and urinary electrolyte levels of 8-week-old SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats on a NS diet, and again 21 days after the switch to a HS diet (Figure 3, D and E). The SSNPPA–/– rats exhibited a lower 24-hour urine flow compared with SSWT following the HS challenge. The SSWT rats and SSNPPA–/– on HS diet had an average 24-hour urine output of 11.32 ± 0.67 and 4.69 ± 0.85 mL, respectively (Figure 3D). Additionally, SSNPPA–/– rats after the HS diet challenge exhibited decreased sodium and chloride excretion (Figure 3E). We report higher Ca2+ excretion on a HS diet (perhaps attributable to higher urine flow), but no differences were recorded between the genotypes (Supplemental Table 2). Creatinine excretion is reported in Supplemental Table 2. Body weights were similar between SSWT and SSNPPA–/– groups when fed the same diet (Supplemental Table 2). Furthermore, water consumption was assessed, and similar values were observed between the genotypes, while HS diet induced a significant increase in the amount of water the animals drink, as expected (for age-matched SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats on NS, respectively: 19.4 ± 1.4 and 20.1 ± 1.4 mL/day, and for age-matched SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats on HS, respectively: 37.9 ± 1.4 and 35.6 ± 2.2 mL/day; P value for dietary challenge < 0.001 for both genotypes).
Plasma electrolytes and metabolic parameters.
Plasma levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (Alk.Ptase) (Supplemental Table 2) were decreased by a HS diet in the SSWT rats, while in the SSNPPA–/– rats, these values were higher at baseline and not changed by the HS diet. In addition, we report an increase in cholesterol in the SSWT animals on a HS diet, not observed in the SSNPPA–/– rats (Supplemental Table 2). Plasma Na+ level was significantly increased in the SSNPPA–/– rats on both NS and HS diets, and in SSWT rats on a HS diet, in comparison with SSWT rats fed NS diet, indicating retention that accompanies BP increase in SSWT rats on a HS diet and SSNPPA–/– rats on either diet (Supplemental Table 3). Cl– and K+ plasma levels were similar among all groups. At 11 weeks of age, plasma creatinine was elevated in SSNPPA–/– rats fed a NS diet, while blood urine nitrogen (BUN) was similar across the groups diet (Supplemental Table 3). Hematocrit was tested in 8-week-old animals at baseline, on NS as an indicator of intravascular fluid volume; interestingly, SSNPPA–/– rats had hematocrit of 43.2% ± 1.6% versus 46% ± 1.2% in SSWT animals (P < 0.05).
Glomerular lesions and proteinuria-related changes in SSNPPA–/– versus SSWT rats.
Injury scoring revealed exacerbated glomerular damage in the SSNPPA–/– rats on either diet versus SSWT animals (Figure 4A). Despite the higher glomerular injury score, protein casts formation and microalbuminuria were not different in SSNPPA–/– rats compared with SSWT, although the HS diet augmented these parameters in both genotypes (Figure 4, B and C). In line with the findings for the microalbuminuria and protein casts, when fed a HS diet, both SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats exhibit decreases in plasma albumin (Figure 4G) and plasma total protein levels, as well as changes in albumin-globulin ratio and plasma globulin (Supplemental Table 2). To further characterize these findings, we assessed megalin expression in the renal cortex using IHC (Figure 4D) and Western blot (Figure 4E). Furthermore, we assessed the intensity profiles for megalin along a line drawn from the basolateral membrane to the apical (Figure 4F). Western blotting revealed overall higher megalin levels in SSNPPA–/– rats. When changes in the slopes of the intensity plots in Figure 4F were quantified along the brush border (reflecting the apical distribution of megalin), we observed that the slope at the brush border is much steeper in the SSNPPA–/– rats fed a HS diet, compared with the other groups, which is consistent with the example images in Figure 4D. The slope of the curve quantifying megalin distribution at the brush border, in the SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats on NS, respectively, was 1.32 ± 0.23 and 1.89 ± 0.11. The slopes in the SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats on HS, respectively, were 1.42 ± 0.27 and 3.95 ± 0.2 (P value for dietary challenge < 0.05 when SSNPPA–/– rats on either diet were compared with SSWT). These data indicate that, in SSNPPA–/– rats, sorting of megalin is more apical than in SSWT rats. As expected, GFR declined in the SSWT rats after a HS challenge; however, no pronounced decrease was found in the SSNPPA–/– group (Supplemental Figure 2).
Cardiac function in the SSNPPA–/– rats with the HFpEF phenotype.
First, we assessed the hypertrophy of the cardiac tissues. As seen in representative scans shown in Figure 5A, and summarized in Figure 5B, there is a significant increase in heart size in the SSWT rats fed a HS dies (versus NS), as well as in the SSNPPA–/– rats at baseline versus SSWT. The most prominent hypertrophy was observed at the end of the HS diet challenge in the SSNPPA–/– group, where the heart/body weight ratio reached 5.5 ± 0.1 mg/g (versus 3.8 ± 0.1 mg/g in the HS diet–fed SSWT group; please note that, since the organs were not dehydrated, total body water could alter conclusions drawn from organ weights). Continuous heart rate (HR) measurement via telemetry demonstrated a significantly lower HR in the SSNPPA–/– group at baseline compared with the SSWT group (431 ± 6 versus 465 ± 4 bpm), which persisted until day 7 of the HS diet challenge, when this compensatory effect was lost (Figure 5C). Shown in Supplemental Figure 3 are the circadian rhythms of the HRs. Masson trichrome staining showed a remarkable increase in the percentage of interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in the SSNPPA–/– group versus all other groups (Figure 5, D–F). Echocardiography analysis demonstrated that, most notably, there were no changes in the ejection fraction and fractional shortening, irrespective of the diet or genotype (Figure 6 and Supplemental Table 4). Other significant differences were detected in echocardiography; for instance, genotype-dependent increase in the left ventricle (LV) systolic and diastolic ventral wall thickness, LV systolic and diastolic dorsal wall thickness, and right ventricle (RV) systolic and diastolic chamber diameters in the SSNPPA–/– rats versus SSWT rats. Analysis of the cardiac α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) staining revealed an increase in vessel media thickness in the SSNPPA–/– group, independent of the diet (Figure 7A). Interestingly, the same vascular damage pattern was observed in the renal vessels (Figure 7B).
RAAS profile and cGMP levels in the absence of ANP.
We tested the levels of aldosterone and angiotensin (Ang) metabolites in plasma of SSWT versus SSNPPA–/– rats fed a NS and HS diets. As summarized in Figure 8A, SSWT rats displayed relatively low levels of plasma Ang II, which was reduced (not significantly) by a HS diet. A similar trend was observed for all other tested Ang metabolites (Ang I, Ang II, Ang 1–7, Ang 1–5, and Ang IV; Supplemental Table 3). As expected, at baseline (on NS diet), the Nppa KO resulted in a significant increase in all these RAAS components (Figure 8A and Supplemental Table 3), but RAAS metabolites were remarkably suppressed after the HS diet challenge. RAAS suppression in the SSNPPA–/– rats on the HS diet was further confirmed by measuring urinary aldosterone, which exhibited a similar increase in the SSNPPA–/– rats on NS (versus SSWT) and suppression on a HS diet (Figure 8B). RAAS and nitric oxide pathways are very closely interlinked, mutually regulated, and share many downstream effectors and cascades (27). Furthermore, ANP receptors are membrane-bound guanylyl cyclase receptors; thus, it was interesting to test if the lack of ANP leads to changes in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) accumulation. As shown in Figure 8C, cGMP level is significantly lower in the SSNPPA–/– rats, both on HS and NS diets.
ENaC activity is affected by the KO of Nppa.
We applied single-channel patch-clamp electrophysiology in the isolated split opened cortical collecting ducts (CCD) from SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats fed a NS diet and directly measured the activity of the ENaC in CCD. As shown in Figure 8, D–F, Nppa KO caused a significant increase in single-channel open probability of ENaC (Po); however, the NPo of the channel was not different between the SSWT and SSNPPA–/– groups. This implicates sodium reabsorption via ENaC channels in the sodium retention and BP increase in the SSNPPA–/– rats. Observed changes in ENaC are likely mediated by the channels’ activity rather than the number of the channels in the plasma membrane of the CCD. Thus, we conclude that, in the distal nephron, lack of ANP results in higher sodium reabsorption via ENaC.
Discussion
Our data demonstrate that the KO of Nppa exacerbates renal disease progression and hypertension development in Dahl SS rats, while a chronic i.v. infusion of ANP attenuated the hypertensive phenotype. These results suggest that supplementation of ANP may be a means to improve renal function and BP control in SS hypertension. It should be emphasized that, although chronic (21-day) ANP infusion in our study resulted in alleviation of BP and renal hypertensive lesions in the SS rats, direct translation of these findings into a clinical setting is controversial, although it was reported that, in response to HS intake, secretion of ANP may be blunted in African American/Black SS hypertensive individuals (8, 15, 28, 29). The Dallas Heart study showed that African American/Black individuals had lower natriuretic peptide levels than White and Non-Black Hispanic patients, concluding that this may lead to greater susceptibility to hypertension (30). Information derived from the Framingham Offspring Cohort was able to predict SS hypertension by lower levels of circulating N-terminal ANP (31). We have reported earlier that a valsartan/sacubitril combination may be beneficial for SS hypertension (32), as its administration to Dahl SS rats resulted in somewhat beneficial effects on renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis and protein cast formation; however, sacubitril and other NEPi can affect the level of many peptides other than ANP, including bradykinin, Ang II, and endothelin-1 (33–36). In 2015, a clinical trial tested the effects of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan in Asian patients with SS hypertension (37). The authors reported that, over a 4-week period, sacubitril/valsartan combination resulted in more effective natriuresis and diuresis, better BP control, and significantly reduced N-terminal proBNP levels than valsartan alone. In summary, although there is some promise, great care should be exercised before using NEPi or ANP infusion in hypertensive patients, and more specific pharmacology should be developed to target ANP levels with higher precision.
We demonstrated that cGMP level is decreased in the SSNPPA–/– rats fed a HS diet, versus control animals; we hypothesize that this decrease is an important contributor to the observed phenotype. The role of cGMP and ANP in salt sensitivity has been studied (38–41), and impairment in cGMP generation was reported in the Dahl SS rats (42, 43). Administration of ANP, its derivatives, or L-arginine were shown to attenuate SS hypertension (44). Thus, our results support the notion that the renal ANP/cGMP axis has a crucial role in SS hypertension.
Next, we report reduced sodium excretion in the SSNPPA–/– rats compared with SSWT. Natriuretic and diuretic actions of ANP affect a variety of renal channels and transporters along the nephron. In CCD, ANP was shown to reduce sodium reabsorption by inhibiting transient receptor potential-vanilloid 4 channel (TRPV4) and polycystin 2, and by decreasing vasopressin-induced water reabsorption (23). ENaC in the CCD also can be regulated by ANP and/or cGMP (39); however, the mechanism for this regulation is not fully characterized (24). Guo et al. have shown in Xenopus 2F3 cells that ANP, via a cGMP-mediated pathway, can inhibit ENaC, which is consistent with the natriuretic effect of ANP. However, Yamada et al. (45, 46) demonstrated that ANP and cGMP activated ENaC-dependent sodium transport in frog epithelial cells. On the other hand, Poschet et al. (47) reported that intracellular cGMP inhibited ENaC activity in human bronchial cells; Zhao et al. (6) have shown that ANP increased sodium delivery in the distal nephron. In our study, in the SS hypertension context, ENaC Po, but not the number of channels, was increased in the SSNPPA–/– versus SSWT rats. Our data led us to hypothesize that decreased levels of ANP or a lack of ANP result in lower cGMP production, which stimulates ENaC activity in the CCD, thus increasing sodium reabsorption and leading to sodium retention.
In some studies, ANP was shown to antagonize the effects of RAAS (48), cooperate with the dopaminergic system (49), and affect vasopressin (23), endothelin-1 (50), and kallikrein (51) functions. To our knowledge, we provide the first direct evidence of changes in RAAS in the absence of ANP. At baseline, lack of ANP resulted in an increase in RAAS components; however, HS diet suppressed RAAS both in the SSWT and in the SSNPPA–/– animals. Interestingly, SS hypertension in Nppa-KO mice was prevented by AT1 receptor antagonists (52, 53); however, ARBs are considered inferior in efficacy for treatment of SS patients (54). Taking into consideration that RAAS components were significantly blunted in both SSWT and the SSNPPA–/– rats fed a HS diet, this might explain the low efficacy of ARBs in SS hypertension. Ang II is known to stimulate the activity of ENaC in the distal nephron (55, 56). Indeed, we observed increased ENaC activity in the SSNPPA–/– rats versus SSWT rats. However, long-term Ang II administration induces translocation of ENaC toward the apical membrane (55), and we did not record changes in ENaC number.
In addition, our results should be considered in the context of the cardiac effects of ANP. Our data show that, while there is an elevation in cardiac interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in SSNPPA–/– animals in comparison with SS controls, there was no evidence of changes in fractional shortening and ejection fraction. The data point toward a HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenotype in the SSNPPA–/– rats. Interestingly, the majority of patients with a HFpEF diagnosis are hypertensive (57). As a new animal model of HFpEF, the SSNPPA–/– rat presents a unique opportunity to study the complex cardiorenal interaction in hypertension (58). According to a recent metaanalysis that compared sacubitril/valsartan (ARNi) combination with traditional drugs, ARNi significantly improved echocardiography and HF biomarkers, and it reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia and renal dysfunction in patients with chronic HF (59). However, it is important to emphasize that caution should be exercised when prescribing NP-based drugs to HF patients, especially in the context of the available B-type natriuretic peptide–related (BNP-related) data. When BNP and its analogs, such as nesiritide, were administered to HF patients, they were reported to potentially worsen renal function and increase the risk of short-term mortality (60–62).
We would like to acknowledge the limitations of this study. Here, we used a KO of Nppa; however, it might not be entirely an ANP-specific loss-of-function approach, since ANP level changes are closely linked to other components of the NP system such as BNP (encoded by Nppb) and should be considered in the context of potential compensatory changes. Nppb KO in the Dahl SS rat background resulted in adult-onset hypertension, increased left ventricular mass with hypertrophy, and progressive nephropathy with proteinuria, fibrosis, and glomerular alterations (63). This manuscript confirmed the critical role of BNP in the development of systemic hypertension. As demonstrated in our experiments, there is a subtle compensatory increase in BNP level in the SSNPPA–/– group versus WT rats on NS; however, values were similar between the groups fed a HS diet. Therefore, it can be surmised that the compensatory BNP increase is not a significant contributory factor to the changes observed during a HS challenge.
The putative defects leading to the development of SS hypertension involve a variety of pathways, including impaired mechanisms that assist in excreting a salt load (e.g., NPs, renal eicosanoids, endothelin system, nitric oxide bioavailability) or, conversely, lack of suppression of an antinatriuretic system (for instance, RAAS or abnormal activity of renal channels and transporters) or involvement of the SNS and epigenetics (2, 64). Oxidative stress and immune cell infiltration are among the widely discussed mechanisms important for SS hypertension (65, 66). ANP has been reported to lead to production of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) through intracellular signaling pathways involving DAG and cGMP (67, 68). It can be thus surmised, given the lower level of cGMP that we report in the SSNPPA–/– rats, that a shift in ROS balance toward free radical production and a decrease in NO bioavailability may be an important contributing factor to the amplification of the hypertensive disease when ANP levels are low. Furthermore, evidence suggests that there is a mechanistic connection between NPs and mitochondrial bioenergetics (69), which — given the established role of mitochondria in SS hypertension and renal function — allows for the proposal of future studies of the ANP/mitochondria axis. Although there are limited data to support the direct involvement of ANP in the immune response, NPRA (receptor for ANP and BNP) has been shown to be important for the inflammatory processes during tumorigenesis (70). Some studies proposed ANP to be a cardiovascular cytokine rather than a hormone, since it is able to contribute to innate immunity by stimulating the host defense against extracellular microbes, inhibition of the synthesis and release of proinflammatory markers, and inhibition of the expression of adhesion molecules (71). ANP has also been reported to contribute to the adaptive immunity by reducing the number of CD4+CD8+ lymphocytes, increasing the CD4–CD8– cells and stimulating the differentiation of naive CD4+ cells toward the Th2 and/or Th17 phenotypes (71). Although we have not explored the immune system–related ramifications of the Nppa KO in this study, it is a plausible future avenue of research in the context of SS hypertension, which is a disease accompanied with renal infiltration of immune cells (66, 72–74).
Overall, our data allow us to conclude that ANP infusion is beneficial for the alleviation of renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis, protein cast formation, and BP in the condition of salt sensitivity. Mechanistically, we report that, in SS hypertension, ANP deficiency as a result of a KO of Nppa led to lower production of cGMP. We can surmise from these findings that decreased cGMP levels failed to inhibit ENaC activity in the CCD, which in turn increased sodium reabsorption and resulted in more pronounced hypertension. These findings suggest that medications that increase ANP levels, or specific NPRA agonists, may improve renal function in SS individuals with hypertension. A recent manuscript by Chen et al. introduced a first-in-human study of MANP (an ANP analog) in human hypertension (75). The authors reported that MANP was safe, was well-tolerated, activated cGMP, induced natriuresis, reduced aldosterone, and decreased BP at or below the maximal tolerated dose. These exciting results support further investigations of ANP and its analogs as BP-lowering, natriuretic medications for hypertensive patients. As Volpe et al. noticed in their Commentary, “the clinical development of this innovative ANP-based, cGMP stimulating therapy, targeting a key mechanism in hypertension may provide a progress in ANP-based therapies and offer a new tool for the treatment of hypertension and its sequelae” (76). However, although these findings are encouraging, the mechanisms that underlie the potential effectiveness of ANP-based therapies require further studies.
Methods
Supplemental Methods are available online with this article.
Animals.
SSNPPA–/– rats were generated at the Medical College of Wisconsin (12); the model was created on a Dahl SS rat background, which was used as a control (SSWT). Only male animals were used. Animals were kept on a AIN-76A based 0.4% NaCl, normal-salt diet (NS, Dyets Inc., 113755) unless otherwise indicated; food and water were provided ad libitum.
Experimental protocols.
To induce SS hypertension, 8-week-old male SSWT or SSNPPA–/– rats were switched to a HS diet (4% NaCl; Dyets) for 21 days. In Protocol 1, infusion of ANP (100 ng/kg/day; continuous infusion at the rate of 10 mL/day through a venous catheter in saline) or vehicle (saline) was administered throughout the 21 days via an i.v. catheter, together with the HS diet. In Protocol 2, i.v. ANP or vehicle infusion was initiated at day 14 of the HS challenge. In order to install an i.v. catheter for ANP infusion and an arterial line for BP recording, polyvinyl catheters were implanted in the femoral artery and vein, tunneled s.c., and exteriorized at the back of the neck (77). BP was recorded throughout the protocol. Metabolic cage urine collections were done at days 0, 14, and 21 of the dietary challenge. In Protocol 2, to induce SS hypertension at the age of 8 weeks, male SSWT and SSNPPA–/– rats were switched to a HS diet for 21 days. An additional control group was kept on a NS diet. BP was recorded with telemetry (TA11 PA-C40, DSI) as done previously (78). MAP and HR were obtained daily continuously and are reported as 3-hour BP averages spanning from 9 a.m. until 12 p.m. All animals were euthanized on day 21 of the HS challenge by kidney flush via an abdominal aorta followed by a thoracotomy. Weights of nondehydrated organs were collected at the point of euthanasia.
Metabolic cage balance studies, urinalysis, plasma electrolyte, and cGMP level measurements.
Urinary output was measured in metabolic cages for 24 hours. Urine and plasma electrolytes and creatinine were evaluated with a blood gas and electrolyte analyzer (ABL 800 Flex; Radiometer). Plasma was also sent for analysis to Marshfield Labs and Attoquant Diagnostic GmBH (Austria, RAAS metabolites panel). Urinary albumin, plasma ANP, and tissue cGMP were assessed with commercial kits (Ethos Biosciences, Nephrat ELISA, NR002; Ab108797, Abcam; no. 581021, Cayman Chemical).
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement.
GFR was measured in unrestrained conscious rats using a FITC-labeled inulin (TdB Consultancy AB). The method was adapted from a protocol previously described (79). Animals were anesthetized briefly, and 2 μL/g of body weight of predialyzed 2% FITC-inulin was injected into a tail vein; inulin clearance from blood was quantified by FITC fluorescence intensity. GFR was then calculated using the previously described equations (80).
Endpoint surgery and tissue isolations.
After the experimental protocol, rats were anesthetized, and the descending aorta was catheterized as done previously (81). Kidneys were flushed via the catheter with PBS until blanched; they were then excised and decapsulated. Tissues were immediately snap-frozen, fixed in 10% formalin, or used fresh in functional experiments.
Histology, IHC, and tissue damage scoring.
Tissues (heart, kidney) were routinely fixed, embedded, and processed as done previously (82). Organs were randomized and coded before being submitted for blocking, sectioning, and staining, and researchers were blinded to groups when performing the analysis. Analysis of the tissue damage (protein casts, tubulointerstitial fibrosis) was assessed in FIJI (NIH; https://imagej.net) using the Color Deconvolution and Threshold tools used to calculate the percentage the total tissue area of a specific color (pertaining to protein casts [red/purple] or blue [fibrosis]). One whole organ section obtained in the middle of the organ stained with Masson trichrome was quantified per animal. IHC staining of the renal tissue for Megalin (antibodies were provided by F. Theilig, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany; ref. 83) and αSMA (DAKO, M0851) was performed as described (77, 80) and analyzed in FIJI using color deconvolution and Intensity Profile plugins.
Echocardiography.
Animals were weighed and anesthetized by isoflurane for transthoracic echocardiography. Echocardiography image acquisition and measurements will be made using a VIVID7 (GE Healthcare) ultrasound machine optimized for rodent imaging (84). Values from a 4 beat average were used as a data point for each animal.
Patch-clamp electrophysiology.
Electrophysiological recordings were performed in the cell-attached patch-clamp mode of the voltage-clamp configuration. ENaC activity was measured in split-open collecting ducts isolated manually as described previously (21, 85). Recording solutions were as follows: extracellular (in mM) 150 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES (pH 7.35); pipette solution (in mM): 140 LiCl, 2 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.35).
Western blotting.
Cortical kidney pieces were lysed and subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad) for probing with antibodies, and subsequently visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using standard protocols (ECL; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The following antibodies were used: BNP (Invitrogen, PA5-96084, 1:500), Megalin/LRP2 (Proteintech, 19700-1-AP, 1:1000), and goat anti–rabbit IgG secondary antibody HRP (Invitrogen, 31460). Total protein was assayed using Pierce stain.
Statistics.
Differences among the experimental groups were measured using 1- or 2-way ANOVA, with Holm-Sidak post hoc, repeated measures ANOVA or 1- or 2-tailed Student’s t test, and log-rank test, as appropriate. Normality was tested in every experiment with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test or equal variance (Levene’s homogeneity test). Data are presented as means ± SEM in full and analyzed in Excel and OriginPro software 2019b. In the box plot graphs, the box represents the mean ± SEM, and the mean value is marked by a horizontal line inside the box. The whiskers represent ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant. During histological analysis, investigators have been blinded to the sample group allocation during the analysis of the experimental outcome.
Study approval.
Animal use and welfare adhered to the ARRIVE guidelines and Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, 2011) following a protocol reviewed and approved by the IACUC of the Medical College of Wisconsin.
Author contributions
DVI and AS conceived the study and were responsible for the experimental design. DVI, VL, KW, GRB, DRS, ES, IP, AZ, MP, AJK, and AS took part in performing experiments, analyzing and interpreting data, and drafting and editing the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the article.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Andrey Ilatovskiy for developing the software used to schedule GFR experiments; Histology Core at the Medical College of Wisconsin for their help with the histological needs; and Attoquant Diagnostics GmbH for RAAS panel analysis. The study was supported by the NIH grants R35 HL135749 (AS), P01 HL116264 (AS), R01 HL148114 (DVI), American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship no. 903584 (DRS), Department of Veteran Affairs I01 BX004024 (AS), and the American Physiological Society Lazaro J Mandel award (DVI).
Version 1. 04/05/2022
In-Press Preview
Version 2. 05/09/2022
Electronic publication
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists
Copyright: © 2022, Ilatovskaya et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: JCI Insight. 2022;7(9):e148682.https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.148682.
Contributor Information
Daria V. Ilatovskaya, Email: dilatovskaya@augusta.edu.
Vladislav Levchenko, Email: vlevchenko@usf.edu.
Kristen Winsor, Email: kristen.winsor@unchealth.unc.edu.
Gregory R. Blass, Email: gblass@lanecollege.edu.
Denisha R. Spires, Email: despires@augusta.edu.
Elizaveta Sarsenova, Email: elizaveta.sarsenova@spcpu.ru.
Iuliia Polina, Email: polin066@umn.edu.
Adrian Zietara, Email: azietara@mcw.edu.
Mark Paterson, Email: Mark.Paterson@cuw.edu.
Alison J. Kriegel, Email: akriegel@mcw.edu.
Alexander Staruschenko, Email: staruschenko@usf.edu.
References
- 1.Virani SS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139–e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Elijovich F, et al. Salt sensitivity of blood pressure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2016;68(3):e7–e46. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.D’Elia L. Salt-sensitivity of blood pressure: is it time to customize the antihypertensive therapy? Am J Hypertens. 2018;31(7):772–773. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ellison DH. Treatment of disorders of sodium balance in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24(5):332–341. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brandt RR, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(4 suppl a):86A–92A. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90468-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhao D, et al. ANP-mediated inhibition of distal nephron fractional sodium reabsorption in wild-type and mice overexpressing natriuretic peptide receptor. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;298(1):F103–F108. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00479.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harris PJ, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits angiotensin-stimulated proximal tubular sodium and water reabsorption. Nature. 1987;326(6114):697–698. doi: 10.1038/326697a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.John SW, et al. Genetic decreases in atrial natriuretic peptide and salt-sensitive hypertension. Science. 1995;267(5198):679–681. doi: 10.1126/science.7839143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ogawa Y, et al. Natriuretic peptide receptor guanylyl cyclase-A protects podocytes from aldosterone-induced glomerular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(7):1198–1209. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011100985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Newton-Cheh C, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):666–676. doi: 10.1038/ng.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wakui H, et al. Enhanced angiotensin receptor-associated protein in renal tubule suppresses angiotensin-dependent hypertension. Hypertension. 2013;61(6):1203–1210. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.00572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Flister MJ, et al. Identifying multiple causative genes at a single GWAS locus. Genome Res. 2013;23(12):1996–2002. doi: 10.1101/gr.160283.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Franco V, Oparil S. Salt sensitivity, a determinant of blood pressure, cardiovascular disease and survival. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006;25(3 suppl):247S–255S. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kato N, et al. Proposition of a feasible protocol to evaluate salt sensitivity in a population-based setting. Hypertens Res. 2002;25(6):801–809. doi: 10.1291/hypres.25.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Campese VM, et al. Salt intake and plasma atrial natriuretic peptide and nitric oxide in hypertension. Hypertension. 1996;28(3):335–340. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.28.3.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Daniels LB, et al. Influence of age, race, sex, and body mass index on interpretation of midregional pro atrial natriuretic peptide for the diagnosis of acute heart failure: results from the BACH multinational study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2012;14(1):22–31. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wang P, et al. Efficacy and safety of short-term administration of recombinant human atrial natriuretic peptide (rhANP) for congestive heart failure: a phase II, multicentre randomized controlled dose-finding study. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013;38(5):388–393. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.[No authors listed] Sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) for heart failure. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2015;57(1474):107–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cowley AW., Jr Long-term control of arterial blood pressure. Physiol Rev. 1992;72(1):231–300. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1992.72.1.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kakizoe Y, et al. Aberrant ENaC activation in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. J Hypertens. 2009;27(8):1679–1689. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32832c7d23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pavlov TS, et al. NOX4-dependent regulation of ENaC in hypertension and diabetic kidney disease. FASEB J. 2020;34(10):13396–13408. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000966RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pavlov TS, Staruschenko A. Involvement of ENaC in the development of salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2017;313(2):F135–F140. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00427.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Theilig F, Wu Q. ANP-induced signaling cascade and its implications in renal pathophysiology. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;308(10):F1047–F1055. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00164.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Guo LJ, et al. ENaC is regulated by natriuretic peptide receptor-dependent cGMP signaling. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;304(7):F930–F937. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00638.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang W, et al. Biphasic effects of ANP infusion in conscious, euvolumic rats: roles of AQP2 and ENaC trafficking. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(2):F530–F541. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00070.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang W, et al. Impaired sodium excretion and salt-sensitive hypertension in corin-deficient mice. Kidney Int. 2012;82(1):26–33. doi: 10.1038/ki.2012.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yan C, et al. Functional interplay between angiotensin II and nitric oxide: cyclic GMP as a key mediator. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(1):26–36. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000046231.17365.9D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rutledge DR, et al. Polymorphisms within the atrial natriuretic peptide gene in essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1995;13(9):953–955. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199509000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Patel N, et al. Race, natriuretic peptides, and high-carbohydrate challenge: a clinical trial. Circ Res. 2019;125(11):957–968. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.119.315026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gupta DK, et al. Racial differences in natriuretic peptide levels: the Dallas heart study. JACC Heart Fail. 2015;3(7):513–519. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lieb W, et al. Higher aldosterone and lower N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide as biomarkers of salt sensitivity in the community. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18(4):664–673. doi: 10.1177/1741826710389406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Polina I, et al. Differential effects of low-dose sacubitril and/or valsartan on renal disease in salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020;319(1):F63–F75. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00125.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Campbell DJ, et al. Effects of neutral endopeptidase inhibition and combined angiotensin converting enzyme and neutral endopeptidase inhibition on angiotensin and bradykinin peptides in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;287(2):567–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Campbell DJ. Long-term neprilysin inhibition — implications for ARNIs. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017;14(3):171–186. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2016.200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Campbell DJ. Neprilysin inhibitors and bradykinin. Front Med (Lausanne) 2018;5:257. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Salazar J, et al. Neprilysin: a potential therapeutic target of arterial hypertension? Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16(1):25–35. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666190625160352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wang TD, et al. Effects of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) on natriuresis, diuresis, blood pressures, and NT-proBNP in salt-sensitive hypertension. Hypertension. 2017;69(1):32–41. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zeidel ML. Renal actions of atrial natriuretic peptide: regulation of collecting duct sodium and water transport. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990;52:747–759. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.003531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Light DB, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits a cation channel in renal inner medullary collecting duct cells. Science. 1989;243(4889):383–385. doi: 10.1126/science.2463673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zeidel ML, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptides inhibit conductive sodium uptake by rabbit inner medullary collecting duct cells. J Clin Invest. 1988;82(3):1067–1074. doi: 10.1172/JCI113663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nonoguchi H, et al. ANF inhibits NaCl and fluid absorption in cortical collecting duct of rat kidney. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(1 pt 2):F179–F186. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.1989.256.1.F179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Simchon S, et al. Impaired renal vasodilation and urinary cGMP excretion in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 1996;27(3 pt 2):653–657. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.27.3.653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lin KF, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide gene delivery reduces stroke-induced mortality rate in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 1999;33(1 pt 2):219–224. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oishi S, et al. Sustained activation of guanylate cyclase-A with TDT, a natriuretic peptide derivative, exhibits cardiorenal protection in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;363(3):402–410. doi: 10.1124/jpet.117.244459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yamada T, et al. Frog atrial natriuretic peptide and cGMP activate amiloride-sensitive Na(+) channels in urinary bladder cells of Japanese tree frog, Hyla japonica. J Comp Physiol B. 2007;177(5):503–508. doi: 10.1007/s00360-007-0148-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yamada T, et al. Frog ANP increases the amiloride-sensitive Na(+) channel activity in urinary bladder cells of Japanese tree frog, Hyla japonica. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2007;152(2–3):286–288. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Poschet JF, et al. Pharmacological modulation of cGMP levels by phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors as a therapeutic strategy for treatment of respiratory pathology in cystic fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2007;293(3):L712–L719. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00314.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Schweda F. Salt feedback on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Pflugers Arch. 2015;467(3):565–576. doi: 10.1007/s00424-014-1668-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kouyoumdzian NM, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide stimulates dopamine tubular transport by organic cation transporters: a novel mechanism to enhance renal sodium excretion. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0157487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.O’Tierney PF, et al. A potential role for the endothelin ETA receptor in salt-sensitive hypertension of the proANP gene-disrupted mouse. Mol Cell Biochem. 2005;275(1–2):57–66. doi: 10.1007/s11010-005-7716-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chao J, et al. Human kallikrein gene delivery attenuates hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and renal injury in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9(1):21–31. doi: 10.1089/hum.1998.9.1-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Melo LG, et al. Salt-sensitive hypertension in ANP knockout mice is prevented by AT1 receptor antagonist losartan. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(3):R624–R630. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1999.277.3.R624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Angelis E, et al. Effect of AT2 blockade on cardiac hypertrophy as induced by high dietary salt in the proatrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) gene-disrupted mouse. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2006;84(6):625–634. doi: 10.1139/y06-016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Qi H, et al. Comparative efficacy of antihypertensive agents in salt-sensitive hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2018;31(7):835–846. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpy027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mamenko M, et al. Angiotensin II increases activity of the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC) in distal nephron additively to aldosterone. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(1):660–671. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.298919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mamenko M, et al. Compromised regulation of the collecting duct ENaC activity in mice lacking AT 1a receptor. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(9):7217–7225. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Oktay AA, Shah SJ. Current perspectives on systemic hypertension in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(12):545. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0545-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hicklin HE, et al. Hypertension as a road to treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020;22(10):82. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01093-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Zheng C, et al. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(11):12114–12128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Dontas ID, et al. Impact of nesiritide on renal function and mortality in patients suffering from heart failure. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2009;23(3):221–233. doi: 10.1007/s10557-009-6167-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.O’Connor CM, et al. Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(1):32–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sackner-Bernstein JD, et al. Short-term risk of death after treatment with nesiritide for decompensated heart failure: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2005;293(15):1900–1905. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.15.1900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Holditch SJ, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide deletion leads to progressive hypertension, associated organ damage, and reduced survival: novel model for human hypertension. Hypertension. 2015;66(1):199–210. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kawarazaki W, Fujita T. Kidney and epigenetic mechanisms of salt-sensitive hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(5):350–363. doi: 10.1038/s41581-021-00399-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Fehrenbach DJ, Mattson DL. Inflammatory macrophages in the kidney contribute to salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020;318(3):F544–F548. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00454.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Mattson DL, et al. Amplification of salt-sensitive hypertension and kidney damage by immune mechanisms. Am J Hypertens. 2021;34(1):3–14. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpaa124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.De Vito P, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide and oxidative stress. Peptides. 2010;31(7):1412–1419. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2010.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Della Penna SL, et al. Role of angiotensin II and oxidative stress in renal inflammation by hypernatremia: benefits of atrial natriuretic peptide, losartan, and tempol. Free Radic Res. 2015;49(4):383–396. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2015.1006216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Domondon M, et al. Regulation of mitochondria function by natriuretic peptides. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(5):F1164–F1168. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00384.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Zhang J, et al. NPR-A: a therapeutic target in inflammation and cancer. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2015;25(1):41–46. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2015012447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.De Vito P. Atrial natriuretic peptide: an old hormone or a new cytokine? Peptides. 2014;58:108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Elijovich F, et al. Immune mechanisms of dietary salt-induced hypertension and kidney disease: Harry Goldblatt Award for Early Career Investigators 2020. Hypertension. 2021;78(2):252–260. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.16495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ren J, Crowley SD. Role of T-cell activation in salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;316(6):H1345–H1353. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00096.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Harrison DG. The immune system in hypertension. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2014;125:130–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Chen HH, et al. First-in-human study of MANP: a novel ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide) analog in human hypertension. Hypertension. 2021;78(6):1859–1867. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Volpe M, et al. Novel ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide)-based therapy for hypertension: the promising role of a disease mechanism targeted approach. Hypertension. 2021;78(6):1868–1870. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Golosova D, et al. Role of opioid signaling in kidney damage during the development of salt-induced hypertension. Life Science Alliance. 2020;3(12):e202000853. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202000853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Cowley AW, Jr, et al. Evidence of the importance of Nox4 in production of hypertension in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. 2016;67(2):440–450. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Rieg T. A high-throughput method for measurement of glomerular filtration rate in conscious mice. J Vis Exp. 2013(75):e50330. doi: 10.3791/50330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ilatovskaya DV, et al. Salt-deficient diet exacerbates cystogenesis in ARPKD via epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) EBioMedicine. 2019;40:663–674. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ilatovskaya DV, et al. Single-channel analysis and calcium imaging in the podocytes of the freshly isolated glomeruli. J Vis Exp. 2015;100(100):e52850. doi: 10.3791/52850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ilatovskaya DV, et al. Podocyte injury in diabetic nephropathy: implications of angiotensin II-dependent activation of TRPC channels. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17637. doi: 10.1038/srep17637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Grahammer F, et al. mTOR regulates endocytosis and nutrient transport in proximal tubular cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(1):230–241. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015111224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Paterson MR, et al. miR-146b-5p has a sex-specific role in renal and cardiac pathology in a rat model of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2019;96(6):1332–1345. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2019.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Isaeva E, et al. Vibrodissociation method for isolation of defined nephron segments from human and rodent kidneys. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(5):F1398–F1403. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00448.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.