Skip to main content
Cell Proliferation logoLink to Cell Proliferation
. 2022 Apr 25;55(5):e13234. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13234

METTL3‐m6 A methylase regulates the osteogenic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in osteoporotic rats via the Wnt signalling pathway

Tianli Wu 1,2,3, Hui Tang 3, Jianghua Yang 3,4, Zhihao Yao 3, Long Bai 1,3, Yuping Xie 1, Qing Li 3,, Jingang Xiao 1,2,3,
PMCID: PMC9136513  PMID: 35470497

Abstract

Objectives

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) hold a high osteogenic differentiation potential, but the mechanisms that control the osteogenic ability of BMSCs from osteoporosis (OP‐BMSCs) need further research. The purpose of this experiment is to discuss the osteogenic effect of Mettl3 on OP‐BMSCs and explore new therapeutic target that can enhance the bone formation ability of OP‐BMSCs.

Materials and Methods

The bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) method was used to establish the SD rat OP model. Dot blots were used to reveal the different methylation levels of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs. Lentiviral‐mediated overexpression of Mettl3 was applied in OP‐BMSCs. QPCR and WB detected the molecular changes of osteogenic‐related factors and Wnt signalling pathway in vitro experiment. The staining of calcium nodules and alkaline phosphatase detected the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs. Micro‐CT and histological examination evaluated the osteogenesis of Mettl3 in OP rats in vivo.

Results

The OP rat model was successfully established by OVX. Methylation levels and osteogenic potential of OP‐BMSCs were decreased in OP‐BMSCs. In vitro experiment, overexpression of Mettl3 could upregulate the osteogenic‐related factors and activate the Wnt signalling pathway in OP‐BMSCs. However, osteogenesis of OP‐BMSCs was weakened by treatment with the canonical Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf‐1. Micro‐CT showed that the Mettl3(+) group had an increased amount of new bone formation at 8 weeks. Moreover, the results of histological staining were the same as the micro‐CT results.

Conclusions

Taken together, the methylation levels and osteogenic potential of OP‐BMSCs were decreased in OP‐BMSCs. In vitro and in vivo studies, overexpression of Mettl3 could partially rescue the decreased bone formation ability of OP‐BMSCs by the canonical Wnt signalling pathway. Therefore, Mettl3 may be a key targeted gene for bone generation and therapy of bone defects in OP patients.


In this study, the osteoporosis rat model was successfully established by OVX. OP‐BMSCs were successfully isolated and cultured from the femur of OP rat. Lentiviral‐mediated overexpression of Mettl3 could partially rescue the impaired osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs by activating the canonical Wnt signalling pathway in vitro and in vivo .

graphic file with name CPR-55-e13234-g008.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

As the worldwide population is rapidly aging, osteoporosis (OP) could become a global health‐care challenge. 1 , 2 OP has low bone mineral density and structural degradation of bones and increases the risk of fracture in OP patients. 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 Postmenopausal women suffer from OP due to the rapid decline in oestrogen levels. 6 , 7 At the same time, the bone loss caused by menopause usually precedes age‐related bone loss, so postmenopausal women may develop osteoporotic fractures earlier than men of the same age. 1 , 8 , 9 , 10 Treatments for osteoporotic fractures include drug, non‐drug and stem cell therapies. 11 , 12 , 13 However, medical treatment has the disadvantages of not reversing the existing bone loss and potentially causing serious side effects. 14 Therefore, stem cell therapy is a research hotspot amongst treatments for OP‐related bone defects. 15 , 16

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) are one of the most effective mesenchymal stem cell types for treating OP. 17 Pino et al. found enhanced adipogenic differentiation and weakened osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs in postmenopausal OP patients (OP‐BMSCs), 18 resulting in an imbalance between osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, which disrupts the activity and microenvironment of OP‐BMSCs. 19 Therefore, it is essential to find ways to reactivate the bone formation of OP‐BMSCs and inactivate the formation of adipocytes. This issue is a key and difficult aspect of treating osteoporotic fractures with autologous OP‐BMSCs transplantation.

Since its discovery in the 1970s, N6‐methyl‐adenosine (m6A) has been recognized as the most common internal chemical modification of mRNAs in eukaryotes. The m6A methyltransferase complex includes Wilms tumour 1‐associating protein (WTAP), methyltransferase‐like 3 (METTL3), methyltransferase‐like 14 (METTL14) and m6A demethylase, including fat mass and obesity‐associated protein (FTO) and ALKB homologue 5 (ALKBH5). 20 , 21 M6A is dynamically regulated by methylases and demethylases and controls cellular processes, and the translation of mRNAs involved in cell metabolism, cell growth and disease development. 22 It is well known that the m6A modification has multiple biological functions. Furthermore, METTL3 is an important m6A methylase that can catalyse the conversion of adenosine to m6A. METTL3 is a 70‐kDa protein containing methylation‐active catalytic residues. 23 The expression ratios of the components of the m6A methyltransferase complex vary greatly amongst tissues or cell types, indicating that they have different biological functions and methylation activities. Studies have shown that METTL3 deficiency decreases m6A levels, attenuating the normal lineage and disrupting cell cycle progression. 24 , 25 However, the role of Mettl3 in bone homeostasis is little known.

The Wnt signalling pathway is a pivotal regulator of bone differentiation, development and homeostasis of BMSCs. 26 , 27 , 28 Todd et al. found that Wnt16 was significantly reduced in the BMSCs of ovariectomized (OVX) mice. 29 Wnt signalling pathway activation can enhance Wnt‐related genes, restore the osteogenic potential of BMSCs and attenuate bone loss. 30 Similarly, Dickkopf‐1 (DKK1) can reduce the osteogenic potential of BMSCs and cause bone loss. 31 , 32 Previous studies have shown that Mettl3 could regulate the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. 33 , 34 However, the regulatory mechanism of Mettl3 influences the bone differentiation of OP‐BMSCs through the canonical Wnt pathway is unknown.

The experiment was to establish an OP model in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats with the OVX method, detect Mettl3 expression in OP‐BMSCs from the OP model and control SD rats at molecular levels and then assess the effects of lentiviral‐mediated Mettl3 overexpression. Finally, the Wnt signalling pathway was blocked by DKK1. Changes of the runt‐related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) and osteopontin (Opn); the canonical Wnt target genes β‐Catenin (β‐Catenin), lymphoid enhancing factor 1 (Lef1) and glycogen synthase kinase‐3β (Gsk‐3β); and the phosphorylation of glycogen synthase kinase‐3β (P‐Gsk‐3β) were observed.

We investigated the mechanism of Mettl3 on the osteogenesis of OP‐BMSCs on the transcriptional level by overexpressing Mettl3 and explored further methods of enhancing the osteogenic capacity of OP‐BMSCs. Moreover, we examined the potential of Mettl3 to be a therapeutic target for OP‐related bone defects.

2. MATERIAL AND METHODS

2.1. The OP animal model

Thirty four‐week‐old SD female rats were purchased from Southwest Medical University (Luzhou, China). About 1% of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) was used to anaesthetize the rats, and OVX was performed to establish the OP SD rat model. Southwest Medical University Ethical Committee (20180391222) reviewed and approved experiment. The experiment was conducted under the guideline of the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Ministry of Science and Technology of China, 2006).

2.2. Micro‐computed tomography analysis, Haematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson staining

Femurs were dissected from the OVX and control rats 3 months after OVX. The entire femur was scanned using an instrument (SCANCO Medical). Then, femurs samples were stained by haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Masson reagents after the decalcification was completed.

2.3. Isolation and culture of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs

A sterile syringe filled in culture medium contained 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS; Schaumburg) was used to repeatedly flush the bone marrow cavity of the femur until the bone marrow cavity turned white and no bone marrow tissue remained. Finally, the culture medium containing bone marrow tissue was cultured in 25 cm2 culture flasks. The liquid was 50% changed on the first 3 days and then completely changed on day 4. The cells were passaged to third passage for experiments.

2.4. Characterization of isolated OP‐BMSCs by flow cytometry

Third passage OP‐BMSC suspension was resuspended in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). One group was incubated with fluorophore‐conjugated anti‐CD29, ‐CD90, ‐CD44, ‐CD31, ‐CD45 and ‐CD34 antibodies, and another group was used as controls without fluorophore antibodies. We used FITC anti‐rat CD29, and CD44, APC anti‐rat CD45, PE anti‐rat CD31, and CD34, and PECY7 anti‐rat CD90 antibodies (BioLegend) to conjugate with the CD29, CD44, CD45, CD31, CD34 and CD90 of cells. Fluorescence‐activated cell sorter (FACS Calibur) was used to detect cells after incubating in the dark for 30 min.

2.5. Alkaline phosphatase and alizarin red staining

Third passage BMSCs were cultured in a 12‐well plate, and osteogenic induction fluid (10% FBS, 1% β‐glycerophosphate, 1% penicillin–streptomycin, 1% glutamine, 0.2% ascorbate and 0.01% dexamethasone, Cyagen) was added when the cell confluence reached 80%. After 3 and 5 days of osteogenic induction, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was detected with the BCIP/NBT Alkaline Phosphatase Kit (Shenggong, Shanghai, China). The calcium nodules were stained by Alizarin Red Staining (Cyagen) on the 21st day of osteogenic induction.

2.6. Dot blot of m6 A RNA modification levels

Briefly, total RNA was collected by TRIzol reagent (Ambion), then a Dynabeads® mRNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to extract mRNA, which was heat extracted at 95°C for 3 min. Then, 2 μl of mRNA was directly dropped onto a Hybond‐N+ (Sigma‐Aldrich) membrane optimized for nucleic acid transfer. The spotted mRNA was crosslinked to the membrane using a Stratalinker 2400 UV Crosslinker in the autocrosslink mode (1200 μJ [×100]; 25–50 s). PBS was used to rinse the membrane for 5 min to wash away unbound mRNA. Anti‐m6A antibody (Synaptic Systems) was incubated with the membrane overnight at 4°C after blocking the bands. Next, the membrane was incubated with goat anti‐rabbit IgG‐HRP (Signalway Antibody) for 1 h, then submerged in chemiluminescence liquid, and an ECL chemiluminescence detection system (iBrightCL1000, Singapore) was used to obtain images.

2.7. Immunofluorescence staining

Third‐passage BMSCs were incubated in a 20‐cm glass bottom cell culture dish. After 3 days of osteogenic induction, cells were fixed, washed, blocked and incubated in anti‐RUNX2 and anti‐OPN (both 1:100, Abcam) for 12 h. The rest of the experimental procedures were performed in a dark environment. Next day, the goat antibody (1:200, Beyotime) was incubated with the cells for 1 h. The cytoskeleton was stained with phalloidin (1:100, cytoskeleton, America) for 30 min. The nuclei were stained by 4′6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI, Beyotime, China) for 15 min, and the images were captured by microscope (Leica).

2.8. Determination of the MOI of the Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus

Heyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd completed the construction of Mettl3 lentivirus vectors. For Mettl3 overexpression, the Mettl3 sequence ((forward) 5′‐CGCAAATGGGCGGTAGGCGTG‐3′ and (reverse) 5′‐AAGAACGGAGCCGGTTGGCG‐3′) was amplified and subcloned into the GL119 pSLenti‐CMV‐MCS‐3xFLAG‐PGK‐Puro‐WPRE lentiviral vector to get pSLenti‐CMV‐Mettl3‐3xFLAG‐PGK‐Puro‐WPRE lentivirus. There were CON group (no lentivirus), Mettl3(−) group (lentivirus without Mettl3 sequence) and Mettl3(+) group (lentivirus with Mettl3 sequence) according to whether transfected with Mettl3 lentivirus. The MOI value was 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100. A fluorescence microscope was used to observe and record the cell morphologies and fluorescence intensities to determine the optimal MOI of the lentivirus after transduction for 72 h.

2.9. Real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

First, RZ lysate (Tiangen) was used to get RNA, and then the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo) turned total RNA into cDNA. Shenggong Bioengineering. Co., Ltd synthesized the gene primers and the sequences are shown in Table 1. All quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) reactions were carried out in 96‐well plates according to PrimeScript RT‐PCR Kit (Takara Bio).

TABLE 1.

The specific gene primer sequences

Genes Primers Sequence (5′ → 3′)
Gapdh Forward TTTGAGGGTGCAGCGAACTT
Reverse ACAGCAACAGGGTGGTGGAC
Mettl3 Forward CTCAGATCTCGCCTTAACCTTGCC
Reverse GACAGCTTGGAGTGGTCAGCATAG
Wtap Forward AGAACATCCTTGTCATGCGGCTAG
Reverse CGGCTTCAAGCTGTGCAATACG
Fto Forward AATGAAGACGCTGTGCCGTT
Reverse GAAGCTGGACTCGTCATCGC
Mettl14 Forward AGTTTGGGAGCTGAGAGTG
Reverse GTATCATAGGAAGCCCTGCA
Ythdf1 Forward TTGGTGGCACAGTTGTTGAT
Reverse ACCATTGCCAGAAAGGACAC
Opn Forward CACTCCAATCGTCCCTACA
Reverse CTTAGACTCACCGCTCTTCAT
Lef‐1 Forward CAGACCTGTCACCCTTCAGC
Reverse GTGAGACGGATTGCCAAACG
Runx2 Forward GAACCAAGAAGGCACAGAC
Reverse AATGCGCCCTAAATCACTG
β‐Catenin Forward ACTCTAGTGCAGCTTCTGGGTTCTG
Reverse CTCGGTAATGTCCTCCCTGTCA

2.10. Western blot assay

Total protein extraction of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs was processed by the Protein Extraction Kit (Keygen Biotech). The proteins were migrated to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes and combined with specific antibodies to GAPDH (ab181602), OPN (ab8448), RUNX2 (ab92336), β‐CATENIN (ab32572), METTL3 (ab195352) (all Abcam), LEF1 (C12A5) GSK (9832S) and P‐GSK (9323S) (Cell Signalling Technology). Then, goat anti‐rabbit or anti‐mouse antibodies (Signalway Antibody) were combined with the specific antibodies for 1 h. An Affinity ECL western blotting substrate (Affinity) was used to develop the immunoreactive bands and visualized by the ECL system.

2.11. Cell Counting Assay and scanning electron microscopy

The proliferation of OP‐BMSCs seeded on BCP was detected by cell counting kit‐8 (CCK‐8, APExBIO) according to the supplied protocols after co‐cultured for days. Then, the BCP samples were observed by SEM after dehydration.

2.12. BCP seeded with OP‐BMSCs transplanted into a critical‐sized calvarial defect OP rat model

OP‐BMSCs transduced with Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus, untransduced with lentivirus and transduced with Mettl3 overexpression control lentivirus were cultured. Then, a 2‐ml cell suspension (5 × 105 cells/ml) was cultured with BCP in a 12‐well plate and incubated for 3 days. OP rats were fixed prone, the skin was prepared and the skull was disinfected, resulting in a full‐thickness defect of 8 mm. BCP incubated with OP‐BMSCs was implanted in the skull defect area. After 8 weeks, skull specimens were taken after the rats were euthanized.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

The representative data are provided as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software (IBM). It is statistically significant at p < 0.05.

3. RESULTS

3.1. The OP rats were successfully constructed

Twelve weeks after OVX, 3‐D renderings of high‐resolution Micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT) scans of the proximal femur showed that compared with sham‐operated rats, the trabecular bone of the femur of OVX rats was broken, the number was reduced, the arrangement was sparse and irregular and the bone marrow cavity was enlarged (Figure 1A). The results of the morphological analysis show a decrease in trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), bone tissue volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), and trabecular number (Tb.N) and an increase in trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) in OVX rats (Figure 1B). H&E staining was used to analyse the trabecular bone morphology. The trabecular thickness of the control group was uniformly increased, and trabecular fractures were rarely observed. In comparison, Masson staining showed that femurs of OVX rats were characterized by thinning of the trabecular bone fracture area, perforation, loss of normal arcuate structure, and changes in the continuity and enlargement of the bone marrow cavity, all of which indicated bone resorption and defects in bone formation (Figure 1C). These results indicated the successful establishment of the OP rat model.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The OP rats were successfully constructed and the successful isolation and culture of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs. (A, B) Micro‐CT analysis of the femur showed that OVX femoral trabecular number was reduced and a trabecular fracture was observed. (C) H&E staining and Masson staining showed that the OVX femoral trabecular number had decreased, bone thinning, areas of trabecular bone fracture, perforations, loss of the normal arch‐like structure, altered continuity and expanded bone marrow cavity. (D) Primary culture and subculture of OP‐BMSCs and BMSCs. The cell morphology was uniformly long spindle‐like. (E) The expression of the surface markers CD 29, CD 90, CD 44, CD 31, CD 45 and CD 34 in OP‐BMSCs were shown by FACS. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

3.2. Successful isolation and culture of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs

We obtained femurs of sham‐operated and OP rats to culture BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs, respectively. The primary generation of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs was passaged to the P3 generations. The cells were uniformly long spindle‐like (Figure 1D). Third‐generation OP‐BMSCs were analysed by flow cytometry. The haematopoietic lineage markers CD 34, CD 45 and endothelial cell marker CD 31 of OP‐BMSCs were approximately 95% negative, and the mesenchymal markers CD 29, CD 90 and CD 44 were approximately 95% positive (Figure 1E). These results confirmed that OP‐BMSCs had self‐renewal capacity and were of mesenchymal lineages.

3.3. Decreased osteogenic differentiation potential in OP‐BMSCs

We next assessed the bone formation differences of BMSCs and OP‐BMSCs by culturing them in osteogenic induction medium. After induction, ALP staining showed reduced ALP activity in OP‐BMSCs. (Figure 2A,C). Alizarin red staining showed that calcium nodules had formed in both cell types, but OP‐BMSCs had fewer calcium nodules than BMSCs did (Figure 2B,C). These results tested that OP‐BMSCs had impaired osteogenic ability. Next, we used immunofluorescence staining to detect the level of RUNX2 and OPN in OP‐BMSCs and BMSCs. These results showed decreased nuclear RUNX2 expression in OP‐BMSCs compared with BMSCs (Figure 2D,F). Moreover, there was reduced cytoplasmic OPN staining in OP‐BMSCs compared with BMSCs (Figure 2E,F).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

The osteogenic differentiation potential was decreased in OP‐BMSCs. (A) ALP staining showed less alkaline phosphatase activity in OP‐BMSCs after osteogenic induction for 3 and 5 days. (B) Alizarin red staining showed fewer mineralized nodules after osteogenic induction for 21 days. (C) Semi‐quantitative analysis of ALP staining, Alizarin red staining by utilizing ImageJ. (D) Immunofluorescence staining for RUNX2 after osteogenic induction for 3 days. (E) Immunofluorescence staining for OPN after osteogenic induction for 3 days. (F) Semi‐quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence staining by utilizing ImageJ. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

3.4. Downregulation of m6 A methylation level and Wnt signalling pathway in OP‐BMSCs

We detected m6A methylation in OP‐BMSCs and BMSCs using an m6A mRNA dot blot and by measuring the RNA expression of related m6A RNA methylation factors. The dot blot results showed reduced levels of m6A methylated mRNA in OP‐BMSCs. The RNA expression levels of Mettl3, Mettl14 and Wtap in OP‐BMSCs were all decreased, levels of the demethylase Fto were decreased and expression of reader Ythdf1 was decreased (Figure 3A). Together, these data showed reduced levels of m6A methylation in OP‐BMSCs compared with BMSCs and significantly decreased Mettl3 expression in OP‐BMSCs. Next, we detected the expression of Mettl3, osteogenic‐related genes and Wnt target genes in OP‐BMSCs after culture in osteogenic differentiation media for 3 and 5 days. Meanwhile, the protein and mRNA level of Mettl3, Opn, Runx2, β‐Catenin, Lef1, and P‐Gsk‐3β were decreased in OP‐BMSCs compared with BMSCs after culture in osteogenic induction medium for 3 days (Figure 3B). The molecular changes after 5 days of osteogenic induction were consistent with the changes after 3 days (Figure 3C). Thus, the overall levels of m6A during the osteogenic differentiation of OP‐BMSCs were decreased along with the downregulation of the methylating enzyme METTL3.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Expression of m6A methylation level and Wnt signalling pathway were downregulated in OP‐BMSCs. (A) The mRNA methylation level of OP‐BMSCs was lower than that of BMSCs, methylene blue staining (MB) was used as a loading control. The gene expression of Mettl3, Mettl14, Wtap, Fto and Ythdf1 was lower in OP‐BMSCs compared to BMSCs. (B) Gene and protein expression of Mettl3, Runx2, Opn, Lef1, P‐Gsk‐3β and β‐Catenin were decreased after osteogenic induction for 3 days in OP‐BMSCs. (C) Gene and protein expression of Mettl3, Runx2, Opn, Lef1, P‐Gsk‐3β and β‐Catenin were also decreased after osteogenic induction for 5 days in OP‐BMSCs. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

3.5. Overexpression of Mettl3 improved the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs by activating Wnt signalling pathway in vitro

To determine whether METTL3‐mediated regulation of osteogenic differentiation in OP‐BMSCs was dependent on the m6A modification, a Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus was generated by Heyuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The fluorescence signal was strongest in the Mettl3 (+) groups after transduction for 72 h at a MOI value of 60. Thus, the Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus was used for subsequent experiments at a MOI of 60 (Figure 4A). Next, qPCR and WB were used to confirm that Mettl3 had good overexpression efficiency. The expression of Mettl3 in Mettl3 lentivirus‐transduced OP‐BMSCs was upregulated. Additionally, we used DKK1 to detect whether the osteogenic differentiation capacity of BMSCs is related to Wnt signalling pathway. The results showed that DKK1 did not change Mettl3 expression in the Mettl3 overexpression group (Figure 4B).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Overexpression of Mettl3 improved the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs by activating the canonical Wnt signalling pathway in vitro. (A) Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus transfected into OP‐BMSCs for 72 h with an MOI value of 60. (B) Relative gene and protein expression of Mettl3, Runx2, Opn, Lef1, P‐Gsk‐3β and β‐Catenin were increased after Mettl3 overexpressing in OP‐BMSCs for osteogenic induction of 3 days. (C) After Mettl3 was overexpressed in OP‐BMSCs, the relative gene and protein expression of Mettl3, Runx2, Opn, Lef1, P‐Gsk‐3β and β‐Catenin were increased after osteogenic induction for 5 days. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Next, we detected the bone‐related regulatory effect of Mettl3 of OP‐BMSCs. After transduction with the Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus for 3 days, Opn and Runx2 were enhanced, the weakened osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs was rescued and P‐Gsk‐3β, Lef1 and β‐Catenin were increased, suggesting activation of Wnt signalling pathway. In contrast, DKK1 inhibited the canonical Wnt signalling pathway, as evidenced by decreased levels of P‐Gsk‐3β, Lef1, β‐Catenin, Opn and Runx2. Therefore, there was also decreased osteogenic ability (Figure 4B). Similar results were found after osteogenic induction for 5 days (Figure 4C).

Subsequently, we used ALP, Alizarin red and immunofluorescence staining to detect the role of Mettl3‐overexpressing. After osteogenesis induction for 3 days, ALP staining showed increased ALP activity in the Mettl3(+) group and weakened ALP activity in the Mettl3(+) + DKK1 group (Figure 5A,F). After osteogenesis induction for 5 days, there was more intense ALP staining than after 3 days (Figure 5B,F). Alizarin red staining showed increased numbers of calcium nodules in the Mettl3(+) group, whilst calcium nodules were chronically reduced in the Mettl3(+) + DKK1 group (Figure 5C,F). Moreover, the protein expression of OPN and RUNX2 increased in the Mettl3(+) group, whilst both were decreased in the Mettl3(+) + DKK1 group (Figure 5D–F).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

The upregulated osteogenesis of OP‐BMSCs after overexpression of Mettl3 in vitro. (A, B) ALP staining showed that alkaline phosphatase activity of the Mettl3(+) group was higher than that of CON, Mettl3(−) and Mettl3(+) + DKK1 groups after osteogenic induction for 3 and 5 days. (C) Alizarin red staining showed that the bone differentiation potential of the Mettl3(+) group was increased compared to that of CON, Mettl3(−) and Mettl3(+) + DKK1 groups after osteogenic induction for 21 days. (D) Immunofluorescence staining for RUNX2 after osteogenic induction for 3 days. (E) Immunofluorescence staining for OPN after osteogenic induction for 3 days. (F) Semi‐quantitative analysis of ALP staining, Alizarin red staining and immunofluorescence staining by utilizing ImageJ. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

In summary, the methylase METTL3 had a positive bone‐related regulatory effect of OP‐BMSCs through the canonical Wnt signalling pathway.

3.6. Overexpression of Mettl3 upregulated the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs in vivo

In vivo, we implanted BCP with OP‐BMSCs into critical‐sized calvarial defects of OP model rats. First, the CCK‐8 showed that OP‐BMSCs could grow and proliferate on BCP (Figure 6A). Next, we used DAPI staining to confirm that OP‐BMSCs were seeded on BCP. The results showed DAPI‐stained nuclei on BCP seeded with OP‐BMSCs, whilst there was no staining on BCP without OP‐BMSCs (Figure 6B). Furthermore, we used SEM to observe the morphology and growth of OP‐BMSCs on BCP. The results showed that OP‐BMSCs adhered to BCP after co‐culture for 3 days (Figure 6C). Finally, BCP seeded with OP‐BMSCs was transplanted to the critical‐sized calvarial defects of OP rats.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

OP‐BMSCs could proliferate and seed on BCP. (A) CCK‐8 detected the proliferation of OP‐BMSCs on BCP at different times. (B) DAPI staining for OP‐BMSCs on BCP. (C) SEM of OP‐BMSCs and BCP for co‐culture of 3 days. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Eight weeks after transplantation, micro‐CT results showed significantly increased levels of bone matrix in the Mettl3(+) group, the BV/TV, Tb. Th and Tb.N increased in the Mettl3(+) group, whilst Tb.Sp was decreased (Figure 7A,B). The new bone matrix was red and more intense staining in the Mettl3(+) group than in the Mettl3(−) group by H&E. Moreover, the Masson staining detected new bone matrix was blue and more intense in the Mettl3(+) group than in the Mettl3(−) group results (Figure 7C,D).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Overexpression of Mettl3 upregulated the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs in vivo. (A) Micro‐CT showed overexpression of Mettl3 increased the BV/TV, Tb.Th and Tb.N, whilst Tb.Sp was decreased in Mettl3(+) group after transplantation of OP‐BMSCs‐seeded BCP for 8 w. (B) H&E and Masson staining showed that the amount of fibrotic and mineralized new bone in Mettl3(+) group was more than that in CON, Mettl3(−) groups after transplantation of OP‐BMSCs‐seeded BCP for 8 w. (C) Semi‐quantitative analysis of H&E staining and Masson staining by utilizing ImageJ. Data represent the mean ± SD (n ≥ 3). (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Taken together, overexpression of Mettl3 can activate the Wnt signalling pathway and increase the osteogenic potential of OP‐BMSCs. Thus, Mettl3 plays an indispensable role and could be an important target for treating OP‐associated bone defects.

4. DISCUSSION

OP is a chronic systemic bone disease in postmenopausal women that has become a serious public health problem. 35 , 36 The pathological features of OP include increased bone turnover, decreased bone mass, destroyed bone microstructure and decreased bone mineral density (BMD). According to previous reports, hundreds of millions of people worldwide suffer from OP‐related fractures. 13 , 37 , 38 The current methods for treating osteoporotic bone defects include autologous bone transplantation, allogeneic bone transplantation and tissue‐engineered bone treatment. Currently, the role of allogeneic MSCs in various orthopaedic conditions is prospective. A cell bank has been established for regenerative medicine, and cell therapy has become a hot spot in current research. 39 BMSCs play an important part in bone formation as a precursor of osteoblasts and are the gold standard for MSC tissue engineering treatment. 26 , 40 , 41 However, studies have also shown that the bone formation capability of OP‐BMSCs is more worse than that of BMSCs. 42 , 43 We obtained the same results in our experiments. Therefore, it is a worthy research topic to search for important target genes in OP‐BMSCs and promote treatment effect in the bone defect area after OP‐BMSCs implantation.

M6A plays important role in the differentiation and development of cell lineages. 44 , 45 M6A is a bidirectional process that is regulated by methylases and demethylases. METTL3 was identified as an important ingredient of the methyltransferase complex in mammalian cells. 46 Wu et al. reported that loss of Mettl3 activity leads to impaired bone formation, and Mettl3 overexpression in MSCs could protect OP mice. 47 In this study, the mRNAs of OP‐BMSCs and BMSCs were extracted for dot blot experiments, which revealed decreased methylation levels in OP‐BMSCs compared with those in BMSCs. At the same time, the Mettl3 was decreased in OP‐BMSCs compared with those in BMSCs. OPN and RUNX2 were also decreased in OP‐BMSCs, as was the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs. Therefore, we hypothesized that the decreased bone differentiation of OP‐BMSCs was related to the downregulation of Mettl3. However, the molecular mechanism through which downregulated the bone activity of OP‐BMSCs was related to Mettl3 knockdown remains unclear and is worthy of our further study and discussion. Wu et al. found that knocking out Mettl3 reduced Pth1r in MSCs, resulting in a decrease in the overall methylation level of m6A and the destruction of parathyroid hormone‐induced osteogenic ability. 47 Song et al. found that Metttl3 could activate the MAPK signalling pathway to enhance the osteogenic differentiation of hASCs. 48 Hong et al. found that Mettl3 was a bone repair stimulating factor. 49 Overexpressing Mettl3 promotes the osteogenic differentiation and migration ability of BMSCs, whilst silencing Mettl3 directly reduces m6A methylation levels, downregulates the expression of osteogenic genes and aggravates OP. However, there are few studies on the mechanism of the osteogenic effects of Mettl3 in OP‐BMSCs, and further research is needed.

The Wnt signalling pathway is closely related to bone formation and widely known. 50 , 51 Our results showed that the expression of β‐catenin, P‐Gsk‐3β and Lef1 was reduced in OP‐BMSCs. Therefore, we speculated that Mettl3 might upregulate the canonical Wnt signalling pathway and increase bone regeneration of OP‐BMSCs. Thus, we transduced OP‐BMSCs with a Mettl3 overexpression lentivirus to detect changes of methylation levels, osteogenic factors and Wnt‐related molecules. Our results showed that overexpressing Mettl3 partially restored the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs, activated the Wnt signalling pathway and increased the expression of Opn, Runx2, P‐Gsk‐3β, β‐catenin and Lef1. Furthermore, this canonical Wnt signalling pathway was inhibited by the canonical Wnt inhibitor DKK1, 52 which caused reduced mRNA and protein expression of P‐Gsk‐3β, β‐catenin and Lef1 and diminished osteogenic ability. After 3 and 5 days of osteogenic induction, ALP staining showed increased ALP activity after overexpressing Mettl3, whilst ALP activity was weakened in the DKK1 group. Alizarin red staining showed a significant increase in mineralization nodules after overexpressing Mettl3, and these calcium nodules were weakened by DKK1 treatment. Therefore, Mettl3 may explain the reason for the decline in the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs and provide a potential therapeutic target for cell therapy to treat OP fractures.

However, the role of Mettl3 in regulating the osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs needs to be further verified in vivo. The rat critical‐sized calvarial defect model can be used for in vivo experiment. 53 , 54 , 55 A critical‐sized defect is defined as the smallest size wound that does not heal spontaneously within the natural lifespan. 56 Therefore, we established an OP rat model with a critical‐sized skull defect to study the effect of Mettl3 on OP‐BMSCs in vivo. BMSCs transplantation is a promising method of treating various diseases, including neurological diseases, fractures and many other types of diseases. 57 , 58 Yin Tang et al. used the critical size cranial bone defect model implanted with a scaffold seeded with BMSCs, which could enhance local bone formation and be used to treat patients with OP bone defects and fractures. 59 BCP is porous calcium phosphate ceramic similar to natural bone and has good biocompatibility. 60 , 61 , 62 In this study, we transplanted BCP seeded with OP‐BMSCs into a rat calvarial defect model for in vivo validation. Reconstructed micro‐CT and histological results showed that the Mettl3(+) group had the greatest amount of new bone at 8 weeks. The results indicated that overexpressing Mettl3 could rescue the impaired osteogenic ability of OP‐BMSCs. These results were consistent with in vitro experiments.

In summary, the methylation levels and osteogenic potential of OP‐BMSCs were decreased in OP‐BMSCs. Overexpression of Mettl3 could promote the osteogenic potential of OP‐BMSCs by activating the Wnt signalling pathway. Mettl3 has the potential to be an important regulatory gene related to the osteogenesis of OP‐BMSCs, providing a new direction for the treatment of bone defects in OP patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no competing interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Tianli Wu established the OP rat model, performed in vitro and in vivo experiments, executed the analysis of the data and drafted the manuscript. Hui Tang, Jianghua Yang and Zhihao Yao collected the data. Long Bai and Yuping Xie assisted in the in vivo experiments. Qing Li designed the experimental project and revised the manuscript. Jingang Xiao initiated the study, designed the experimental project, analysed data, revised the manuscript and provided funding. All authors have seen and approved the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870746), Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease Research (SKLOD2021OF08), Joint Project of Luzhou Municipal People's Government and Southwest Medical University (2020LZXNYDZ09), Key Program of Southwest Medical University (2021ZKZD009) and Project of Stomatological Institute of Southwest Medical University (2021XJYJS01).

Wu T, Tang H, Yang J, et al. METTL3‐m6 A methylase regulates the osteogenic potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in osteoporotic rats via the Wnt signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(5):e13234. doi: 10.1111/cpr.13234

Funding information Joint project of Luzhou Municipal People's Government and Southwest Medical University, Grant/Award Number: 2020LZXNYDZ09; Key Program of Southwest Medical University, Grant/Award Number: 2021ZKZD009; National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Number: 81870746; Open Project of the State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease Research, Grant/Award Number: SKLOD2021OF08; Project of Stomatological Institute of Southwest Medical University, Grant/Award Number: 2021XJYJS01; State Key Laboratory of Oral Disease

Contributor Information

Qing Li, Email: 709032518@qq.com.

Jingang Xiao, Email: drxiaojingang@163.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data included in this article can be obtained from corresponding author upon reasonable requirements.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Barron RL, Oster G, Grauer A, Crittenden DB, Weycker D. Determinants of imminent fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31:2103‐2111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Wang Y, Tao Y, Hyman ME, Li J, Chen Y. Osteoporosis in China. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20:1651‐1662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Liu C, Kuang X, Li K, Guo X, Deng Q, Li D. Effects of combined calcium and vitamin D supplementation on osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Food Funct. 2020;11:10817‐10827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wang L, Huang C, Li Q, et al. Osteogenic differentiation potential of adipose‐derived stem cells from ovariectomized mice. Cell Prolif. 2017;50(2):e12328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Noh JY, Yang Y, Jung H, et al. Molecular mechanisms and emerging therapeutics for osteoporosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:7623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kanis JA. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group Osteoporos Int. 1994;4(6):368‐381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Jiang LS, Zhang ZM, Jiang SD, Chen WH, Dai LY. Differential bone metabolism between postmenopausal women with osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(4):475‐483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Paik J, Scott LJ. Romosozumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2020;37(11):845‐855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Eastell R, O'Neill TW, Hofbauer LC, et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aspray TJ, Hill TR. Osteoporosis and the ageing skeleton. Subcell Biochem. 2019;91:453‐476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhu J, Yang S, Cai K, et al. Bioactive poly (methyl methacrylate) bone cement for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Theranostics. 2020;10(14):6544‐6560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mathavan N, Tägil M, Isaksson H. Do osteoporotic fractures constitute a greater recalcitrant challenge for skeletal regeneration? Investigating the efficacy of BMP‐7 and zoledronate treatment of diaphyseal fractures in an open fracture osteoporotic rat model. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(2):697‐707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Zhang Z, Zhao Q, Liu T, et al. Effect of Vicenin‐2 on ovariectomy‐induced osteoporosis in rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Pang R, Xia W, et al. Pharmacological treatment of bone loss. Curr Pharm des. 2017;23:6298‐6301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Sui BD, Chen J, Zhang XY, et al. Gender‐independent efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in sex hormone‐deficient bone loss via immunosuppression and resident stem cell recovery. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(12):1‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Arjmand B, Sarvari M, Alavi‐Moghadam S, et al. Prospect of stem cell therapy and regenerative medicine in osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jiang Y, Zhang P, Zhang X, Lv L, Zhou Y. Advances in mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of osteoporosis. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(1):e12956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Pino AM, Rosen CJ, Rodríguez JP. In osteoporosis, differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) improves bone marrow adipogenesis. Biol Res. 2012;45(3):279‐287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nuttall ME, Gimble JM. Controlling the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis and the consequent therapeutic implications. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2004;4(3):290‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Mi B, Xiong Y, Yan C, et al. Methyltransferase‐like 3‐mediated N6‐methyladenosine modification of miR‐7212‐5p drives osteoblast differentiation and fracture healing. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(11):6385‐6396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Sun T, Wu R, Ming L. The role of m6A RNA methylation in cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Yan G, Yuan Y, He M, et al. m6A methylation of precursor‐miR‐320/RUNX2 controls osteogenic potential of bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:421‐436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Niu Y, Zhao X, Wu YS, Li MM, Wang XJ, Yang YG. N6‐methyl‐adenosine (m6A) in RNA: an old modification with a novel epigenetic function. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013;11(1):8‐17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wang G, Dai Y, Li K, et al. Deficiency of Mettl3 in bladder cancer stem cells inhibits bladder cancer progression and angiogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:627706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wang Q, Geng W, Guo H, et al. Emerging role of RNA methyltransferase METTL3 in gastrointestinal cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Jing H, Su X, Gao B, et al. Epigenetic inhibition of Wnt pathway suppresses osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs during osteoporosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(2):176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):179‐192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Peng S, Shi S, Tao G, et al. JKAMP inhibits the osteogenic capacity of adipose‐derived stem cells in diabetic osteoporosis by modulating the Wnt signaling pathway through intragenic DNA methylation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Todd H, Galea GL, Meakin LB, et al. Wnt16 is associated with age‐related bone loss and estrogen withdrawal in murine bone. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Chen M, Han H, Zhou S, Wen Y, Chen L. Morusin induces osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by canonical Wnt/β‐catenin pathway and prevents bone loss in an ovariectomized rat model. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Canalis E. Wnt signalling in osteoporosis: mechanisms and novel therapeutic approaches. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9(10):575‐583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Song HB, Jiang Y, Liu JX, et al. Stimulation of osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells via Wnt/β‐catenin pathway by Qili Jiegu‐containing serum. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:1664‐1668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ma X, Long C, Wang F, et al. METTL3 attenuates proliferative vitreoretinopathy and epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of retinal pigment epithelial cells via wnt/β‐catenin pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25(9):4220‐4234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Wu H, Xu H, Jia D, Li T, Xia L. METTL3‐induced UCK2 m6A hypermethylation promotes melanoma cancer cell metastasis via the WNT/β‐catenin pathway. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(14):1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Shen CL, Chyu MC, Wang JS. Tea and bone health: steps forward in translational nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(6 Suppl):1694S‐1699S. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Jaul E, Barron J. Age‐related diseases and clinical and public health implications for the 85 years old and over population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Yang X, Zheng H, Liu Y, Hao D, He B, Kong L. Puerarin for OVX‐induced postmenopausal osteoporosis in murine model: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;15(1):37‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhang F, Xie J, Wang G, Zhang G, Yang H. Anti‐osteoporosis activity of Sanguinarine in preosteoblast MC3T3‐E1 cells and an ovariectomized rat model. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(6):4626‐4633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Rosset P, Deschaseaux F, Layrolle P. Cell therapy for bone repair. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(1 Suppl):S107‐S112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Slynarski K, Deszczynski J, Karpinski J. Fresh bone marrow and periosteum transplantation for cartilage defects of the knee. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(1):318‐319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bionaz M, Monaco E, Wheeler MB. Transcription adaptation during in vitro Adipogenesis and osteogenesis of porcine mesenchymal stem cells: dynamics of pathways, biological processes, up‐stream regulators, and gene networks. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Shen G, Ren H, Shang Q, et al. Foxf1 knockdown promotes BMSC osteogenesis in part by activating the Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway and prevents ovariectomy‐induced bone loss. EBioMedicine. 2020;52:102626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Yang W, Li HY, Wu YF, et al. ac4C acetylation of RUNX2 catalyzed by NAT10 spurs osteogenesis of BMSCs and prevents ovariectomy‐induced bone loss. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2021;26:135‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tian C, Huang Y, Li Q, Feng Z, Xu Q. Mettl3 regulates osteogenic differentiation and alternative splicing of Vegfa in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(3):551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Linder B, Grozhik AV, Olarerin‐George AO, Meydan C, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Single‐nucleotide‐resolution mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome. Nat Methods. 2015;12(8):767‐772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Luo GZ, MacQueen A, Zheng G, et al. Unique features of the m6A methylome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wu Y, Xie L, Wang M, et al. Mettl3‐mediated m6A RNA methylation regulates the fate of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and osteoporosis. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Song Y, Pan Y, Wu M, et al. METTL3‐mediated lncRNA m6A modification in the osteogenic differentiation of human adipose‐derived stem cells induced by NEL‐like 1 protein. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2021;17(6):2276‐2290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Lei H, He M, He X, et al. METTL3 induces bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation and migration through facilitating M1 macrophage differentiation. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):4376‐4388. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cawthorn WP, Bree AJ, Yao Y, et al. Wnt6, Wnt10a and Wnt10b inhibit adipogenesis and stimulate osteoblastogenesis through a β‐catenin‐dependent mechanism. Bone. 2012;50(2):477‐489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Cui X, Wang Z, Li J, et al. Cross talk between RNA N6‐methyladenosine methyltransferase‐like 3 and miR‐186 regulates hepatoblastoma progression through Wnt/β‐catenin signalling pathway. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(3):e12768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Janda CY, Dang LT, You C, et al. Surrogate Wnt agonists that phenocopy canonical Wnt and β‐catenin signalling. Nature. 2017;545(7653):234‐237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Wei JQ, Liu Y, Zhang XH, et al. Enhanced critical‐sized bone defect repair efficiency by combining deproteinized antler cancellous bone and autologous BMSCs. Chin Chem Lett. 2017;28:845‐850. [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Spicer PP, Kretlow JD, Young S, Jansen JA, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect. Nat Protoc. 2012;7(10):1918‐1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Zhang H, Mao X, Du Z, et al. Three dimensional printed macroporous polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for promoting bone formation in a critical‐size rat calvarial defect model. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2016;17(1):136‐148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Cooper GM, Mooney MP, Gosain AK, Campbell PG, Losee JE, Huard J. Testing the critical size in calvarial bone defects: revisiting the concept of a critical‐size defect. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(6):1685‐1692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kim HK, Lee JS, Kim JH, et al. Bone‐forming peptide‐2 derived from BMP‐7 enhances osteoblast differentiation from multipotent bone marrow stromal cells and bone formation. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(5):e328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93(3):341‐349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Tang Y, Zhang L, Tu T, et al. MicroRNA‐99a is a novel regulator of KDM6B‐mediated osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(4):2162‐2176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Wu J, Chen T, Wang Z, et al. Joint construction of micro‐vibration stimulation and BCP scaffolds for enhanced bioactivity and self‐adaptability tissue engineered bone grafts. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(19):4278‐4288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Zhu XD, Zhang HJ, Fan HS, Li W, Zhang XD. Effect of phase composition and microstructure of calcium phosphate ceramic particles on protein adsorption. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(4):1536‐1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Zhi W, Wang X, Sun D, et al. Optimal regenerative repair of large segmental bone defect in a goat model with osteoinductive calcium phosphate bioceramic implants. Bioact Mater. 2021;11:240‐253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in this article can be obtained from corresponding author upon reasonable requirements.


Articles from Cell Proliferation are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES