Abstract
The progressive motor neuropathy (PMN) mouse is a model of an inherited motor neuropathy disease with progressive neurodegeneration. Axon degeneration associates with homozygous mutations of the TBCE gene encoding the tubulin chaperone E protein. TBCE is responsible for the correct dimerization of alpha and beta-tubulin. Strikingly, the PMN mouse also develops a progressive hearing loss after normal hearing onset, characterized by degeneration of the auditory nerve and outer hair cell (OHC) loss. However, the development of this neuronal and cochlear pathology is not fully understood yet. Previous studies with pegylated insulin-like growth factor 1 (peg-IGF-1) treatment in this mouse model have been shown to expand lifespan, weight, muscle strength, and motor coordination. Accordingly, peg-IGF-1 was evaluated for an otoprotective effect. We investigated the effect of peg-IGF-1 on the auditory system by treatment starting at postnatal day 15 (p15). Histological analysis revealed positive effects on OHC synapses of medial olivocochlear (MOC) neuronal fibers and a short-term attenuation of OHC loss. Peg-IGF-1 was able to conditionally restore the disorganization of OHC synapses and maintain the provision of cholinergic acetyltransferase in presynapses. To assess auditory function, frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were recorded in animals on p21 and p28. However, despite the positive effect on MOC fibers and OHC, no restoration of hearing could be achieved. The present work demonstrates that the synaptic pathology of efferent MOC fibers in PMN mice represents a particular form of “efferent auditory neuropathy.” Peg-IGF-1 showed an otoprotective effect by preventing the degeneration of OHCs and efferent synapses. However, enhanced efforts are needed to optimize the treatment to obtain detectable improvements in hearing performances.
Keywords: cochlea, microtubules, MOC fibers, hearing loss, pegylated insulin-like growth factor 1, outer hair cell (OHC), motor neuropathy
Introduction
Sensorineural hearing loss is the most frequent sensory disease in humans. So far, no causative therapies exist. Prospective therapeutic options for auditory dysfunction need to be based on profound knowledge about the organization and function of the cochlea. For this purpose, animal models with genetic hearing defects play an important role (1). The homozygous progressive motor neuropathy (PMN) mouse, which has been originally described as a model for a fast-developing motoneuron disorder the non-5q- spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) (2, 3), represents such a model. The motoneuron disease of non-5q-SMA patients is caused by a spontaneous point mutation (c.1682T>G) in the tubulin-specific chaperone E (TBCE) gene on chromosome 13 (4), where tryptophan is exchanged to glycine (W524G) at the C-terminal of the protein (5, 6). The corresponding phenotype in the PMN mouse becomes apparent at 2 weeks after birth as progressive paralysis starting in hind limbs. Histological sections showed a subsequent retrograde axonal degeneration of peripheral nerves and loss of motoneuron cell bodies in the spinal cord and brainstem. Respiratory failure at 5 weeks of age corresponds to the relatively early death of the mice (3, 7). On cellular and molecular level, the mutation in the TBCE gene leads to incorrect dimerization of microtubules, which results in an impairment of axonal elongation (5, 8) and coincides with microtubule loss (6). Functional analyses of the auditory system revealed a progressive hearing loss by disturbed or absent auditory brainstem response (ABR) and otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) with a progressive loss of OHCs (9). Primary cultured spiral ganglion neurons showed reduced neurite growth (10). Analysis of the auditory nerve revealed an unaltered quantity of spiral ganglia in the modiolus, but a reduction of microtubules in the axons (9), consistent with expression of modiolus in other mutants (11). Therefore, the PMN mouse is an interesting model for investigating auditory neuropathy.
Several neurotrophic factors (12) and other therapeutic molecules and approaches have been studied to counteract neuronal degeneration in the PMN animal model (8, 13–20). Among them, polyethylene glycol-modified IGF-1 variant (peg-IGF-1) is a stabilized form of IGF-1 (8, 21). The neurotrophic effects of IGF-1 have been shown in various studies and were explained by the prolongation of neuronal survival (22–25) and the enhancement of axonal elongation (26, 27). This prevented muscle atrophy in motor neuropathies (28). In addition, studies have been conducted to test the therapeutic effects of IGF-1 in the sensory epithelium of the cochlea. IGF-1 and its receptor were highly expressed in the organ of Corti during embryonic development, but the levels of expression dropped sharply after birth (29). Knockout of IGF-1 and its receptor resulted in high-level sensorineural hearing loss that is caused by deformation of the otic capsule during embryonic development and disturbed differentiation of the cochlea postnatally (30–32). In addition, the auditory neurons exhibited aberrant innervation, as well as defective myelination (33). Therapeutic local application of recombinant IGF-1 into the middle ear resulted in a reduction of noise-induced hearing loss in gerbils (34). Intratympanic application of recombinant IGF-1 in humans had also been shown to improve threshold after hearing loss refractory to corticosteroid therapy (35, 36). Peg-IGF-1 has been developed by the addition of a polyethylene glycol chain to improve the pharmacokinetics and applicability by reducing rapid clearing through the bloodstream and kidneys and reducing acute side effects by IGF-1. This modification resulted in prolongation of the half-time with full maintenance of the activity (21).
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of peg-IGF-1 administration for potential otoprotective effects in the PMN mice. Detailed histological examinations of the organ of Corti and electrophysiological investigations of the hearing function were performed. Analysis evidenced structural improvement in efferent synapses and transient OHC rescue, even though without functional benefit. However, further investigations of the organ of Corti during development must be carried out to understand the pathology of the efferent fibers leading to OHC loss in the PMN mouse.
Materials and Methods
Animals, Treatment, and Anesthesia
Heterozygous PMN mice (NMRI background) were genotyped as described (8). Animals were fostered and housed under controlled conditions (20–22°C, 55–65% humidity, 12:12-h light/dark cycle, food and water ad libitum) and received injections of 0.15 mg/kg body weight peg-IGF-1 [Roche, Basel (21)] subcutaneously from postnatal day (p) 15 on every second day. Mice were controlled for vitality and health daily. All mice used for audiometry were carefully matched for age and sex to minimize the confounding effects on the measurement outcomes. The experimental procedures were performed according to German regulations on animal welfare in agreement with and under control of the local veterinary authority and Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments (license number 55.2-DMS-2532-2-80).
Audiological examinations were performed in homozygous PMN and homozygous wildtype mice (NMRI) at the age of postnatal days 21 and 28. For anesthesia, a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (75 mg/kg body weight, Ketavet 100, Pharmacia) and xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg body weight, Rompun 290, Bayer) was injected intraperitoneal with an injection volume of 1 ml/kg body weight. Anesthesia was maintained by application of 10% of the initial dose, typically in 30-min intervals. Body temperature was maintained by a temperature-controlled heating pad to 37°C.
Audiometric Assessment
Hearing function assessment was performed via Tucker-Davis Technologies Inc. (TDT, USA) setup using the programming SigGenRZ software and the TDT BioSigRZ performing platform. The equipment loudspeaker control, microphone (378C01, PCB Pieztronics Inc., N.Y., USA), acquisition, processing, averaging, and data management were further coordinated using the RZ6 Multi I/O Processor System.
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions
A total of two pure tones (f1 and f2, f2/f1 = 1.2) were used to measure distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The primary tone f1 is 0.894 times and the primary tone f2 is 1.118 times the fundamental frequency. Through a low noise recording microphone, primary tones produced by two separate loudspeakers were introduced into the closed ear canal of the animal and emissions were recorded. If a peak in the spectrum at 2(f1–f2) exceeded the background noise by 3 dB μV, then it was defined as a positive DPOAE. Fixed test frequencies ranged from 4 to 24 kHz in 4kHz steps and a stimulus level of 90 to 30 dB sound pressure level (SPL) in 5 dB steps were performed and averaged from 128 responses. DPOAEs were always performed prior to ABR, since the reverse procedure can result in a temporary reduction of DPOAEs (37).
Auditory Brainstem Response
For recording of monaural bioelectrical auditory brainstem potentials, subdermal stainless-steel electrodes (27GA 12 mm, Rochester Electro-Medical, USA) were inserted subcutaneously to the ventrolateral side of the ear (active), on the vertex (negative), and on the body (neutral) and connected to a preamplifier (RA4PA, TDT, USA) with 20-fold amplification. To verify proper electrode positioning or conductivity, impedance measurements of all electrodes (<5 kΩ) were taken prior to each ABR recording. The bioelectrical ABR signals recorded from the subdermal electrodes were transferred to a head stage (RA4LI, TDT, USA). The sounds were applied via a microphone that was inserted into the external auditory canal (active ear). For ABR threshold recordings and wave latency, click stimuli and tone bursts between 4 and 24 kHz were applied. The stimuli started at a sound pressure level of 90 dB and decreased in 5 dB steps to 30 dB. The responses were amplified 20-folds and filtered with a bandpass filter set at 0.3–3.0 kHz. Responses were sampled over a 10-ms period and averaged from 512 responses to determine the minimum threshold. The responses were sampled over a period of 10 ms and averaged from 512 responses. The minimum threshold was assumed to be the last wave that could still be reproduced. Wave I represents the distal part of the auditory nerve, whereas wave II portions the proximal of the auditory nerve (AN) in the cochlear nucleus (NC) in the brainstem. The superior olivocochlear (SOC) is presented by wave III, respectively. Waves IV and V are produced by evoked neural responses in the inferior colliculus (IC) and the nucleus lemniscus lateralis (NLL) (38, 39).
Tissue Preparation and Whole-Mount Dissection
Mice were deeply anesthetized with CO2 and intracardially perfused with 4% PFA in 1M PBS pH 7.4 by the force of gravity. After decapitation and removing the brain, the temporal bones were identified and the cochleae were encapsulated, post-fixated for 1 h and decalcified in 125 mM EDTA overnight on a 3D rotator at room temperature. Once decalcification was complete, the cochleae were stored in 1M PBS pH 7.4 until use or immediately dissected for whole-mount staining. Cochleae were simultaneously stained, embedded, and imaged microscopically at the same conditions.
Immunohistochemistry
After dissection, cochlear turns were separated in a 24-well plate submerged with 1% PFA in 1M PBS pH 7.4. For the following steps, the tissue was always covered in liquid and rotated on a 3D incubator. After blocking or permeabilization with 10% normal horse serum (NHS), 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 1% Triton X100, and 0.1% Tween20 in 1M PBS pH 7.4 for 1 h, the cochlear tissue was incubated with antibody solution (3% NHS, 1% BSA, 0.3% TritonX100, 0.1% Tween20) containing primary antibodies against ChAT (anti-rabbit, PA529653, Invitrogen, 1:1000) and ßIII-tubulin (anti-mouse, MAB1192, R&D System, Tuj1, 1:1000) for 3 h at room temperature. Cochlear turns were washed three times with 0.3% TritonX100 and 0.1% Tween20 in 1M PBS pH 7.4. Primary antibodies were detected with secondary Alexa-555 (anti-rabbit, Invitrogen, A32794, 1:1000) or Alexa-647 (anti-mouse, Invitrogen, A32773, 1:1000) conjugated antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. In addition, labeling with phalloidin-conjugated Alexa-488 (A-12379, Invitrogen, 1:800) was performed.
Confocal Microscopy
Immunolabeling was analyzed using an Olympus IX81 microscope equipped with an Olympus FV1000 confocal laser scanning system, an FVD10 SPD spectral detector, and diode lasers of 473, 559, and 651 nm. The images were acquired with an Olympus UPLSAPO 40X objective (oil, numerical aperture: 1.3). For high-resolution confocal scanning, a pinhole aperture setting was used, which represented a diffraction disk. Whole-mount images of the organ of Corti were taken in about 300-nm steps in the z-axis. Z-stacks, brightness, and contrast of the images were adjusted using ImageJ for better visualization.
Data Analysis and Statistics
The values of the DPOAE measurements were converted before analysis. The RZ6 processor is a +/– 10V device, and therefore, the described levels of the TDT system are inherently interpreted as dB Volt (dBV). The following equation after TDT is used to convert dBV to dB SPL:
Hearing thresholds of DPOAEs are defined as the last positive SPL value. Outer hair cell function at 8 kHz was assessed by linear regression of the data points and DP-gram of 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 kHz.
Auditory brainstem response thresholds were set at the last reproducible waveform. Values of all animals of each group were averaged and are presented as hearing thresholds ± standard errors of mean, respectively. ABR analysis included latency and the maximum height of wave I and II of click ABR.
Examination of outer hair cells and ßIII-positive neurons was performed with ImageJ in portions of 100 μm. Analysis of the cholinergic synapses of the MOC fibers was evaluated via choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) immunostaining with ImageJ ROI manager. Confocal images were 16-bit images with 1,024 pixel × 1,024 pixel in 317.44 μm × 317.44 μm. The synapse area is defined and calculated by the number of contained pixels divided by 3.23 pixel/μm. The mean gray value is the average of the values of all pixels divided by the number of pixels of the selected area. The gray scale range is from 0 (black) to 4,095 (white), where the latter was expected as saturated. Colors were set virtually for visualization.
For quantification of synapse entropy, the center of the synapses was manually annotated with ImageJ. Based on graph theory, neighboring synapses were connected to create a weighted undirected cyclic graph. For each annotated synapse, the angles between the connection were determined. Synapses with good organization should have angles close to (or multiple of) 90 degrees. Therefore, the mean absolute deviation (MAD) from 90 degree was determined for each image as a measure of synapse entropy. The analysis was performed with python. Data were normal distributed, as tested with the Shapiro test, and analyzed for significant changes with the t-test.
The remaining statistical analysis and graphic display were performed in GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA). A column analysis was performed to determine normal distribution. In the case of a Gaussian distribution, an ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test or Holm-Sidak's multiple comparisons test was performed, where mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) were determined. A p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant. Significances were always determined by comparison with wildtype animals, if not otherwise noted. All data are presented in mean ± SEM unless otherwise noted. Wildtype mice are illustrated in black (n = 7), untreated PMN mice in dark red (n = 4), and treated PMN mice (n = 4) with 0.15 mg/kg peg-IGF-1 in light red for p21 and p28. Final processing of images was performed with ImageJ and Photoshop CS9 (Adobe).
Results
Synapses Formation and Intensity of Cholinergic Acetyltransferase
Outer hair cells are primarily innervated by efferent cholinergic and afferent non-cholinergic nerve fibers. Since PMN mice undergo a severe OHC loss, the presynapses of these neurons were examined via ChAT staining. At p21, the area of the OHC synapse of treated PMN mice (1.58 ± 0.06 μm2) was significantly (p < 0.001) smaller compared to the wildtype (2.13 ± 0.02 μm2) and untreated PMN littermates (2.12 ± 0.03 μm2) (Figure 1A). The mean gray value of the synapse (2,728 ± 36) of peg-IGF-1-treated PMN mice was significantly (p < 0.001) higher compared to wildtype (2,455 ± 14) and untreated PMN mice (2,231 ± 13). Additionally, the mean gray value of PMN mice was significantly (p < 0.05) higher compared to the wildtype (Figure 1B). In the linear plot of area to mean gray value of MOC fiber synapses, the larger average synapses of PMN mice (slope: 8.71 ± 3.37) expressed a higher value of ChAT than synapses of the same size in wildtype mice (slope: −89.06 ± 4.79), which expressed a decreasing value of ChAT (Figure 1C). Treated PMN mice had smaller synapses in comparison, but the trend shows that a reduced ChAT intensity is to be expected with larger synapses (slope: −14.14 ± 6.97). The different arrangement of efferent synapses of PMN animals and control animals was striking (Figure 1D). To quantify synaptic entropy, we generated plots in which adjacent synapses were connected (Figure 1D). The mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 90-degree angles between synapses of treated and untreated PMN mice is significantly increased compared with wildtype mice (p < 0.001) (Figure 1E).
At p28, ChAT-positive synapses of peg-IGF-1-treated (1.9 ± 0.07 μm2) and untreated PMN mice (1.79 ± 0.02 μm2) were significantly smaller (p < 0.01) compared to the wildtype animals (2.15 ± 0.02 μm2). There was no significant difference between treated and untreated PMN mice (Figure 1F). The mean gray value of the OHC synapse of PMN mice (1,960 ± 15) was significantly (p < 0.001) lower compared to the wildtype (2,127 ± 16) and treated PMN mouse littermates (2,927 ± 36) (Figure 1G). The synapses of the treated PMN mouse had an overall high proportion of ChAT (slope: 19.84 ± 11.33), which was also seen in the large synapses. Untreated PMN mice showed a strong tendency of low ChAT values as the size of the synapse increases (slope: −64.14 ± 7.83). In contrast, linear regression showed an almost equal amount of ChAT in the synapses of the wildtype mice regardless of size (slope: −9.8 ± 5.11) (Figure 1H). Immunohistochemical analysis pointed out a partially restored alignment of synapses (Figure 1I), but the MAD of PMN mice was still highly disorganized (p < 0.01) (Figure 1J).
Immunohistological Evaluation of the Cochlea—Outer Hair Cells and Neuronal Fibers
Based on the beneficial impression of peg-IGF-1 on MOC synapses, the morphology of the organ of Corti was processed by immunohistochemistry. At the age of p21, wildtype animals had 52 ± 1 OHCs per 100 μm, which were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in untreated (22 ± 2) and treated (30 ± 1) PMN littermates. A significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of OHC was seen in treated PMN mice compared to untreated littermates (Figure 2A). In the wildtype animals, 13 ± 1 neuronal fibers crossed the tunnel of Corti, which were significantly (p < 0.001) reduced in untreated (8 ± 1) and in treated (9 ± 1) PMN animals. However, synapses and OHCs of PMN animals were still present with absent axonal connection (white arrow) (Figure 2B).
At p28, 51 ± 2 OHCs per 100 μm were counted in wildtype mice, whereas in PMN mice without peg-IGF-1 application (20 ± 2) and in treated PMN mice (20 ± 1), a significantly (p < 0.001) reduced number of OHCs per 100 μm was analyzed (Figure 2C). A number of 13 ± 1 per 100 μm neuronal fibers crossing the tunnel of Corti were counted in wildtype mice. Treated and untreated PMN littermates had a significantly (p < 0.001) reduced number of fibers (both 8 ± 1) crossing the tunnel of Corti (Figure 2D).
DPOAEs– Thresholds and Linear Regression
Since peg-IGF-1 had a positive effect on cellular levels in synapses of MOC fibers by ChAT immunolabeling and delayed temporary OHC loss, the question arose whether the hearing performance would improve under peg-IGF-1 treatment. For this purpose, otoacoustic emissions were evaluated to investigate the electromotility of the OHCs. At p21, PMN mice with or without peg-IGF-1 treatment did not exhibit significant differences in DPOAE thresholds compared to controls at 4 and 8 kHz. Independent of peg-IGF-1 treatment, PMN mice showed a significantly increased DPOAE threshold at 12, 16, 20, and 24 kHz (p < 0.01) (Figure 3A). No differences between treated and untreated PMN mice were detected by DPOAE measurements. At 8 kHz, no significant different slope function was observed between the three groups (Figure 3B). At this age, peg-IGF-1 had no effect on the DPOAE level of PMN mice.
By the age of p28, all PMN mice showed significantly increased DPOAE threshold compared to wildtype mice at 12, 16, 20, and 24 kHz, and now also at 8 kHz (p < 0.001) (Figure 3C). The data showed no difference between treated and untreated PMN mice. However, PMN treated (p < 0.01) and untreated mice (p < 0.05) had a significantly lowered slope of DPOAEs at 8 kHz compared to the wildtype animals (Figure 3D). Taken together, the data suggested no effect of peg-IGF-1 on the DPOAE level of PMN mice.
Click and Frequency-Specific ABR Thresholds
In addition, ABR analysis was performed to investigate hearing threshold. At p21, click-ABR threshold in wildtype animals was elicited at 43 ± 2 dB SPL. PMN mice showed an ABR threshold at 58 ± 2 dB SPL. PMN mice treated from p14 to p21 with peg-IGF-1 showed an ABR threshold at 59 ± 3 dB SPL (Figure 4A), indicating that this treatment did not change this threshold. All PMN mice had a significantly (p < 0.01) higher ABR threshold compared to control littermates. Frequency-specific evaluation showed a significant (p < 0.01) increase in ABR thresholds at 20 and 24 kHz in treated and untreated PMN mice compared to wildtype (Figure 4B). The treatment had no effect on ABR-thresholds in PMN mice at this age.
At p28, the click-ABR threshold of wildtype mice was 46 ± 3 dB SPL, whereas ABR thresholds of PMN mice further increased to 84 ± 2 dB SPL, and in peg-IGF-1-treated PMN mice at 85 ± 2 dB SPL (Figure 4C). Again, all PMN mice had a significantly (p < 0.001) higher ABR threshold compared to the wildtype littermates. Both untreated and treated PMN mice had a significantly (p < 0.05) higher ABR threshold at 8 kHz, and at 12, 16, 20, and 24 kHz (p < 0.001) compared to wildtype animals (Figure 4D). These data indicate that peg-IGF-1 treatment had no effect on the hearing level of PMN mice.
Neuronal Latency and Amplitudes of the Auditory Nerve
Furthermore, amplitudes and latencies were assessed of distal and proximal regions of the auditory nerve. The latency of wave I in p21 PMN mice was significantly longer (p < 0.05) compared to the wildtype mice, but no different amplitude was recorded (Figure 5A). After 1 week, the latency of wave I of PMN mice was also significantly (p < 0.05) longer, but also treated PMN mice had a significantly (p < 0.001) increased latency compared to the wildtype littermates and untreated PMN mice (Figure 5B). In addition, in untreated PMN mice, a significantly (p < 0.001) lower amplitude of wave I compared to wildtype littermates was recorded.
Regarding wave II at p21, PMN mice had no latency shift, but a significantly (p < 0.05) lower amplitude, compared to the wildtype and untreated PMN littermates (Figure 5C). At p28 in both PMN groups, a significantly (p < 0.001) increased latencies and decreased amplitudes were evaluated compared to the wildtype animals (Figure 5D).
Discussion
Progressive motor neuropathy mice are a model of hearing loss characterized by an auditory neuropathy accompanied by loss of outer hair cells (9). These mice have been primarily described as a model of motor neuropathy with progressive dysfunction and loss of spinal motoneurons (9). A previous study has shown that peg-IGF-1 treatment can improve the motoric symptoms in this animal model (8). IGF-1 belongs to the insulin family of proteins, which controls cell proliferation, differentiation, and cell survival. The effects are mediated through PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK pathway activation, which also were exhibited in cells of the sensory epithelium in the inner ear (40, 41). In the past, IGF-1 application has demonstrated protective effects on hair cells (34, 35, 41–43). Moreover, clinical trials have shown that IGF-1 is also effective in treatment for sensorineural hearing loss in humans (36, 44, 45). A stabilized form of IGF-1 was generated by the addition of a 40 kDa polyethylene glycol chain to lysine 68. This modification caused a prolonged half-life of the agent in the blood, resulting in detectable increased levels in the periphery and brain, and additionally reduced hypoglycemia in humans (21, 46). Previous study of peg-IGF-1 in PMN mice showed enhanced survival, higher body weight, greater axon length, higher neuron number, improved motor coordination, and raised muscle force (8). The positive results of the above studies raised the hypotheses that peg-IGF-1 could also have an otoprotective effect on the auditory pathology of the PMN mice.
Positive Otoprotective Effects of peg-IGF-1 on the Innervation of the Outer Hair Cells
Cholinergic efferent neuron fibers represent 95% of the axons crossing the tunnel of Corti (47, 48). The rest consists of type 2 spiral ganglion neurons (49, 50). Therefore, OHCs are mainly innervated by myelinated MOC fibers, which belong to the descending neural auditory pathway (47). Since PMN mice showed a progressive outer hair cell loss, the innervation of OHCs was further examined. This pathway begins at the superior nucleus olivaris of the medulla oblongata and divides into the lateral pathway (LOC: lateral olivocochlear) by innervating inner hair cells, and the medial (MOC: medial olivocochlear) pathway, which innervates exclusively outer hair cells by efferent cholinergic neurons (51–53). The MOC synapses were analyzed via ChAT immunostaining.
At p21, the synaptic area of PMN animals was not significantly different to control animals, but the range of the area's size was enhanced, probably reflecting a disorganization of the synapse. In addition, there was a higher ChAT intensity compared to the control animals. The treatment of peg-IGF-1 resulted in comparison with the other two groups in a reduction of the synapse area, but also to an enhancement of the ChAT intensity. At p28, both PMN groups showed a reduction of the synaptic area, with a reduced ChAT activity in the untreated PMN mice, but a rescue to normal level by peg-IGF-1 treatment. However, the alignment of synapses of treated and untreated PMN mice was significantly disturbed at both time points.
The positive effect of peg-IGF-1 might be explained by the fact that IGF-1 stimulates exocytosis in presynapses by activation proteins of the SNARE complex (54–57), especially synaptotagmin 10 (56). Therefore, IGF-1 was already used therapeutically in several models of sensory defects, for example, in the visual or olfactory field. In these studies, IGF-1 also induced a regrowth and formation of axons and their terminals, but in contrast to our study, it was not able to recover the sensory function (58, 59).
Reduced ChAT intensity was depicted before in facial neurons of the PMN mice (18), which are induced by axonal swelling (5) and slowed retrograde axonal transport (18, 60). Axonal swellings, called spheroids, are defined as local and timely varicosities in axons containing disorganized filaments and deformed mitochondria due to the TBCE mutation (60). In this work, we could show disorganized synapse alignment, too. However, peg-IGF1 was not able to restore the rganization of efferent synapses. Spheroids were found in long sensory axons repeatedly starting distal. Thus, sensory nerve fibers demonstrated multifocal degeneration processes such as the motor neurons of the PMN mouse (2, 60).
A loss of neurons crossing the tunnel of Corti was detected at p21 and p28. The numbers of neuronal fibers in the auditory nerve depicted no beneficial improvement by peg-IGF-1 treatment. The loss of axons in the tunnel of Corti can be explained by the degeneration of MOC fibers. These neurons, which are the longest in the auditory pathway, are affected by the TBCE mutation in PMN animals, especially at their peripheral synapses (5, 6). Similar findings have been reported in Wobbler mice, another model of progressive neuronal degeneration (61). These mice also have a defective axonal transport (62) and a progressive axonal degeneration (63) due to the downregulation of the tubulin chaperone TBCA and α3-tubulin (64).
The defect in the MOC fibers can be described as a special phenotype of auditory neuropathy, thus termed “efferent auditory neuropathy.” This phenotype has been rarely shown before. According to our knowledge, there is only one described mouse model, the ISLET1 transgenic mice, which is also characterized by an altered cholinergic efferent innervation of the OHC with decreased volume of ChAT in its terminals (65). Further studies are needed to fully prove an efferent neuropathy. In this regard, afferent neuropathy should be refuted by immunohistochemical analysis with appropriate synaptic markers (66). Furthermore, in vivo and/or in vitro electrophysiological experiments on the auditory nerve are required (67).
Attenuation of Outer Hair Cell Loss Without Functional Effect by peg-IGF-1 Treatment
Since peg-IGF-1 treatment leads to a positive effect on the synapsis of the OHCs, their function was additionally investigated by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), which are direct electrophysiological responses of the outer hair cells. The DPOAE thresholds of p21 PMN mice were higher than the control group. A further increase of DPOAE thresholds was detected at p28 in both PMN groups compared to the wildtype. In addition, the number of OHCs was similarly reduced at both ages in PMN animals, but the increasing DPOAE thresholds at p28 indicated that there is also a loss of function in the remaining OHCs. Interestingly, peg-IGF-1 had a significant positive influence on the number of the outer hair cells at p21, but no effect on the DPOAE threshold. At p28, the positive effect of peg-IGF-1 on the numbers of outer hair cells was dismissed.
In a previous study (9), similar pathology regarding the number of OHC and the DPOAEs was shown in the PMN mouse. This contrasts to most of the auditory neuropathy models, which are normally characterized by detectable OAEs, due to the persistent function of the OHCs (67, 68). However, some mouse models for auditory neuropathy have also shown DPOAE abnormalities due to sporadic OHC loss or dysfunction of the cochlear amplifier (69–71), especially in the case of synaptic disorders (65, 72). The PMN mouse, which is primarily described as a solely neuropathy model based on microtubule disorders in the peripheral nervous system (2, 3), represents a new type of mouse models for auditory neuropathy, characterized by a more pronounced progressive OHC loss compared to the classical auditory neuropathy models.
A transient otoprotective effect of peg-IGF-1 was seen at p21. Similar effects of IGF-1 have been demonstrated before in in vitro experiments of cochlear explants (73–75). The effect was explained by the activation of the supporting cells in the organ of Corti, since the IGF-1 receptor is highly expressed in these cells (42). Protein phosphorylation of downstream targets of IGF-1 might also play an important role, as it has been shown in other tissues (76). Phosphorylated (p-)AKT was found on the inner sulcus cells, whereas p-ERK was activated in Claudius and Hensen's cells, which are located close to the OHCs (42). However, how the phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt and MEK/ERK in the supporting cells contribute to the otoprotective effect of IGF-1 on the hair cells is still unknown (77). Furthermore, other neurotrophic factors were tested in animal models of hearing loss. For example, NGF or NT3 application prevents the OHC loss in mouse models of early-onset progressive hearing loss (78–80).
Latency Shift and Decreased Amplitude With peg-IGF-1 Treatment
Different waves in the ABR spectrum reflect sound stimulation-evoked neural responses in different parts of the auditory pathway. A latency shift of untreated PMN mice were measured at p21 in wave I, but amplitudes of the animals showed no altered values. At p28, peg-IGF-1 treated PMN mice had a latency shift of wave I compared to untreated and wildtype animals. The latency of untreated PMN mice was also shifted compared to wildtype animals. Amplitudes of wave I were reduced in treated animals. Wave II measurements showed amplitude discrepancies of untreated PMN compared to the wildtype and treated PMN mice at p21 with unaffected latency values. At p28, treated and untreated PMN mice had decreased amplitude values and a latency shift in ABR wave II.
Alterations in electrophysiological properties have been described in a previous study in the facial and the ischiatic nerve of the PMN mice (7). These were explained by the subsequent retrograde axonal degeneration of the peripheral neurons characterized by prominent axonal caliber irregularities and axonal swelling with spheroids and formation of myelin ovoids, small cellular chambers containing myelin debris and disrupted axons (60). Disturbed TBCE function impaired microtubule-dependent axonal transport. Similar morphological findings have also been displayed in other studies of neurodegenerative diseases (81–83) accompanied by electrophysiological alterations such as latency shifts and altered amplitudes like in Map1b heterozygous mutation mice (84).
The pronounced latency shift of peg-IGF-1-treated mice was also detected in a previous study in the phrenic nerve of PMN mice (8). This effect might be explained by the distinct (side) effect of IGF-1 to slow down neuronal communication (85, 86). This can be explained by the stimulation of the number of myelinated axons and the thickness of myelin sheaths (87–89), which is induced by stimulating myelin-specific protein gene expression like protein zero (89, 90) promoting oligodendrocyte proliferation, neuronal outgrowth, and survival (91, 92). Consequently, the thickened myelin might be the cause of the electrophysiological changes.
No Effect on the ABR Thresholds by peg-IGF-1 Treatment
Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) are EEG signals in response to an auditory stimulus. In this study, the thresholds of ABR recordings of treated PMN mice showed no significant differences compared to untreated PMN mice. Both PMN groups showed a hearing loss in the high frequencies (20 and 24 kHz) at p21 which proceeded to a complete hearing loss over all recorded frequency spectrum at p28. Peg-IGF-1 was not able to prevent the progressive hearing loss or improve the auditory function.
A comparable progressive course of hearing loss was detected in PMN animal in a previous study (9). In addition, there are other mice models of auditory neuropathy, which also exhibited a similar progression of ABR thresholds (67, 93). These mouse models can be divided into subcategories. One group includes abnormal myelination (94–98), whereas others show complete loss of SGN (99, 100) or contain dysfunctional neurons (70, 84). This should be investigated in additional examinations. Another important category of neuropathy includes regulation of synaptic transmission (101–104).
Neurotrophic factors such as BDNF, CNTF, NT3, and NGF have been tested in animal models of auditory neuropathy in different studies (105). A single application of these factors leading to an overexpression of factors had no effect on ABR threshold (106, 107). Interestingly, simultaneous application of neurotrophic factors together with electrical stimulation has been shown to be otoprotective by improving ABR thresholds (108, 109). This combination might be beneficial in the treatment of hearing loss.
Conclusion
This study described for the first time that peg-IGF-1 carries the potential for a therapy of hearing loss. The PMN mouse has been chosen as an auditory model, since beneficial effects of peg-IGF-1 have been observed in this mouse before. The application of peg-IGF-1 starting at the second week after birth leads to a detectable otoprotective effect on the efferent cholinergic neurons and the synapses of the OHC. In addition, peg-IGF-1 attenuated the degeneration of the OHC, however, without functional benefit. This is of highest interest, as the otoprotective effect of IGF-1 on the synapse in the organ of Corti already might have beneficial effects in other forms of auditory synaptopathy, e.g., noise or age induced (53, 109). Thus, an application of peg-IGF-1 may be effective and should be tested in a clinical trial, although it must be considered, that in these cases, the afferent synapse is mainly affected.
The late start of the treatment in PMN mice might explain the missing functional effect of peg-IGF-1. The treatment could achieve a better effect by earlier application, which also means that the application must start before the onset of hearing in mice.
The described “efferent auditory neuropathy” of the MOC fibers and the OHC synapsis is an outstanding new phenotype in the PMN mouse. However, it needs to be further investigated whether during the development of the organ of Corti, the pathology of the efferent fibers and the OHC synapse leads to OHC loss in the PMN mouse. For this purpose, a postsynaptic analysis of OHC should be performed, in which the Ach receptor (110) and the calcium homeostasis (111) should be investigated.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by Regierung von Unterfranken.
Author Contributions
KR contributed to conception, the design of the study, and provided supervision. LB and KR wrote the manuscript. LB, JS, and JV performed audiological assessment. LB, BK, and JS organized and performed immunohistochemistry, microscopy, and statistical analysis. LB and AS initiated and created quantification of synapse entropy. LB, SJ, JV, AS, RH, and KR contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This project was funded by DFG (RA 281/-2-1). The Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg supported the publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Prof. Sendtner, head of the Institute of Clinical Neurobiology at University Hospital Würzburg, for his participation, support, and help in this project. We also thank Regine Sendtner for mouse breeding and excellent care. Special thank to Philipp Sodmann for his technical help in programming synapse graphs and Dr. Barbara Vona at the University of Göttingen for rigorous critiques and suggestions for improvement.
References
- 1.Friedman LM, Dror AA, Avraham KB. Mouse models to study inner ear development and hereditary hearing loss. Int J Dev Biol. (2007) 51:609–31. 10.1387/ijdb.072365lf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schaefer MKE, Schmalbruch H, Buhler E, Lopez C, Martin N, Guénet J-L, et al. Progressive motor neuronopathy: a critical role of the tubulin chaperone TBCE in axonal tubulin routing from the golgi apparatus. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:8779–89. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1599-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schmalbruch H, Jensen HJ, Bjaerg M, Kamieniecka Z, Kurland L. A new mouse mutant with progressive motor neuronopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (1991) 50:192–204. 10.1097/00005072-199105000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sferra A, Baillat G, Rizza T, Barresi S, Flex E, Tasca G, et al. TBCE mutations cause early-onset progressive encephalopathy with distal spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. (2016) 99:974–83. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bommel H, Xie G, Rossoll W, Wiese S, Jablonka S, Boehm T, et al. Missense mutation in the tubulin-specific chaperone E (Tbce) gene in the mouse mutant progressive motor neuronopathy, a model of human motoneuron disease. J Cell Biol. (2002) 159:563–9. 10.1083/jcb.200208001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin N, Jaubert J, Gounon P, Salido E, Haase G, Szatanik M, et al. A missense mutation in Tbce causes progressive motor neuronopathy in mice. Nature genetics. (2002) 32:443–7. 10.1038/ng1016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Holtmann B, Zielasek J, Toyka KV, Sendtner M. Comparative analysis of motoneuron loss and functional deficits in PMN mice: implications for human motoneuron disease. J Neurol Sci. (1999) 169:140–7. 10.1016/S0022-510X(99)00237-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jablonka S, Holtmann B, Sendtner M, Metzger F. Therapeutic effects of PEGylated insulin-like growth factor I in the pmn mouse model of motoneuron disease. Exp Neurol. (2011) 232:261–9. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rak K, Frenz S, Radeloff A, Groh J, Jablonka S, Martini R, et al. Mutation of the TBCE gene causes disturbance of microtubules in the auditory nerve and cochlear outer hair cell degeneration accompanied by progressive hearing loss in the pmn/pmn mouse. Exp Neurol. (2013) 250:333–40. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Volkenstein S, Brors D, Hansen S, Berend A, Mlynski R, Aletsee C, et al. Auditory development in progressive motor neuronopathy mouse mutants. Neurosci Lett. (2009) 465:45–9. 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mao Y, Reiprich S, Wegner M, Fritzsch B. Targeted deletion of Sox10 by Wnt1-cre defects neuronal migration and projection in the mouse inner ear. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e94580. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang T, Kersigo J, Jahan I, Pan N, Fritzsch B. The molecular basis of making spiral ganglion neurons and connecting them to hair cells of the organ of Corti. Hearing Res. (2011) 278:21–33. 10.1016/j.heares.2011.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sendtner M, Schmalbruch H, Stockli KA, Carroll P, Kreutzberg GW, Thoenen H. Ciliary neurotrophic factor prevents degeneration of motor neurons in mouse mutant progressive motor neuronopathy. Nature. (1992) 358:502–4. 10.1038/358502a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Selvaraj BT, Frank N, Bender FL, Asan E, Sendtner M. Local axonal function of STAT3 rescues axon degeneration in the pmn model of motoneuron disease. J Cell Biol. (2012) 199:437–51. 10.1083/jcb.201203109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Haase G, Pettmann B, Bordet T, Villa P, Vigne E, Schmalbruch H, et al. Therapeutic benefit of ciliary neurotrophic factor in progressive motor neuronopathy depends on the route of delivery. Ann Neurol. (1999) 45:296–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Perrelet D, Ferri A, MacKenzie AE, Smith GM, Korneluk RG, Liston P, et al. IAP family proteins delay motoneuron cell death in vivo. Eur J Neurosci. (2000) 12:2059–67. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2000.00098.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sagot Y, Rossé T, Vejsada R, Perrelet D, Kato AC. Differential effects of neurotrophic factors on motoneuron retrograde labeling in a murine model of motoneuron disease. J Neurosci. (1998) 18:1132–41. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-01132.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sagot Y, Dubois-Dauphin M, Tan SA, de Bilbao F, Aebischer P, Martinou JC, et al. Bcl-2 overexpression prevents motoneuron cell body loss but not axonal degeneration in a mouse model of a neurodegenerative disease. J Neurosci. (1995) 15:7727–33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07727.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wagey R, Lurot S, Perrelet D, Pelech SL, Sagot Y, Krieger C. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in murine motoneuron disease: the progressive motor neuropathy mouse. Neuroscience. (2001) 103:257–66. 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00551-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sendtner M. Neurotrophic factors: effects in modulating properties of the neuromuscular endplate. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. (1998) 9:1–7. 10.1016/S1359-6101(97)00033-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Metzger F, Sajid W, Saenger S, Staudenmaier C, van der Poel C, Sobottka B, et al. Separation of fast from slow anabolism by site-specific PEGylation of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). J Biol Chem. (2011) 286:19501–10. 10.1074/jbc.M110.172189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Krieger F, Elflein N, Saenger S, Wirthgen E, Rak K, Frantz S, et al. Polyethylene glycol-coupled IGF1 delays motor function defects in a mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy with respiratory distress type 1. Brain. (2014) 137:1374–93. 10.1093/brain/awu059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hsieh J, Aimone JB, Kaspar BK, Kuwabara T, Nakashima K, Gage FH. IGF-I instructs multipotent adult neural progenitor cells to become oligodendrocytes. J Cell Biol. (2004) 164:111–22. 10.1083/jcb.200308101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Schertzer JD, Lynch GS. Comparative evaluation of IGF-I gene transfer and IGF-I protein administration for enhancing skeletal muscle regeneration after injury. Gene Ther. (2006) 13:1657–64. 10.1038/sj.gt.3302817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lepore AC, Haenggeli C, Gasmi M, Bishop KM, Bartus RT, Maragakis NJ, et al. Intraparenchymal spinal cord delivery of adeno-associated virus IGF-1 is protective in the SOD1G93A model of ALS. Brain Res. (2007) 1185:256–65. 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lewis ME, Neff NT, Contreras PC, Stong DB, Oppenheim RW, Grebow PE, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-I: potential for treatment of motor neuronal disorders. Exp Neurol. (1993) 124:73–88. 10.1006/exnr.1993.1177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Özdinler PH, Macklis JD. IGF-I specifically enhances axon outgrowth of corticospinal motor neurons. Nat Neurosci. (2006) 9:1371–81. 10.1038/nn1789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rommel C, Bodine SC, Clarke BA, Rossman R, Nunez L, Stitt TN, et al. Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat Cell Biol. (2001) 3:1009–13. 10.1038/ncb1101-1009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murillo-Cuesta S, Rodríguez-de La Rosa L, Lassaleta L, Cediel R, Varela-Nieto I. The role of insulin-like growth factor-I in the physiopathology of hearing. Front Mol Neurosci. (2011) 4:11. 10.3389/fnmol.2011.00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Camarero G, Avendaño C, Fernández-Moreno C, Villar A, Contreras J, de Pablo F, et al. Delayed inner ear maturation and neuronal loss in postnatal < em>Igf-1 < /em>-deficient mice. J Neourosci. (2001) 21:7630–41. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-19-07630.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Camarero G, Villar MA, Contreras J, Fernández-Moreno C, Pichel JG, Avendaño C, et al. Cochlear abnormalities in insulin-like growth factor-1 mouse mutants. Hearing Res. (2002) 170:2–11. 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00447-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Varela-Nieto I, Morales-Garcia JA, Vigil P, Diaz-Casares A, Gorospe I, Sánchez-Galiano S, et al. Trophic effects of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in the inner ear. Hearing Res. (2004) 196:19–25. 10.1016/j.heares.2003.12.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Frank MM, Goodrich LV. Talking back: development of the olivocochlear efferent system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. (2018) 7:e324. 10.1002/wdev.324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lee KY, Nakagawa T, Okano T, Hori R, Ono K, Tabata Y, et al. Novel therapy for hearing loss: delivery of insulin-like growth factor 1 to the cochlea using gelatin hydrogel. Otol Neurotol. (2007) 28:976–81. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31811f40db [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Iwai K, Nakagawa T, Endo T, Matsuoka Y, Kita T, Kim TS, et al. Cochlear protection by local insulin-like growth factor-1 application using biodegradable hydrogel. Laryngoscope. (2006) 116:529–33. 10.1097/01.mlg.0000200791.77819.eb [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kashiwaya K, Nakagawa H, Hosokawa M, Mochizuki Y, Ueda K, Piao L, et al. Involvement of the tubulin tyrosine ligase-like family member 4 polyglutamylase in PELP1 polyglutamylation and chromatin remodeling in pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. (2010) 70:4024–33. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mhatre AN, Tajudeen B, Welt EM, Wartmann C, Long GR, Lalwani AK. Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR). Hear Res. (2010) 269:180–5. 10.1016/j.heares.2010.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Young A, Cornejo J, Spinner A. Auditory brainstem response. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; (2020). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Davies RA. Chapter 11 - audiometry and other hearing tests. In: Furman JM, Lempert T, Editors. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. London, UK: Elsevier; (2016) p. 157–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Varela-Nieto I, Hartl M, Gorospe I, León Y. Anti-apoptotic actions of insulin-like growth factors: lessons from development and implications in neoplastic cell transformation. Curr Pharm Des. (2007) 13:687–703. 10.2174/138161207780249164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.García-Mato Á, Cervantes B, Murillo-Cuesta S, Rodríguez-de la Rosa L, Varela-Nieto I. Insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling in mammalian hearing. Genes. (2021) 12:1553. 10.3390/genes12101553 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hayashi Y, Yamamoto N, Nakagawa T, Ito J. Insulin-like growth factor 1 inhibits hair cell apoptosis and promotes the cell cycle of supporting cells by activating different downstream cascades after pharmacological hair cell injury in neonatal mice. Mol Cell Neurosci. (2013) 56:29–38. 10.1016/j.mcn.2013.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fujiwara T, Hato N, Nakagawa T, Tabata Y, Yoshida T, Komobuchi H, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 treatment via hydrogels rescues cochlear hair cells from ischemic injury. NeuroReport. (2008) 19:1585–88. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e328311ca4b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nakagawa T, Ogino-Nishimura E, Hiraumi H, Sakamoto T, Yamamoto N, Ito J. Audiometric outcomes of topical IGF1 treatment for sudden deafness refractory to systemic steroids. Otol Neurotol. (2012) 33:941–6. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f251a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nakagawa T, Yamamoto M, Kumakawa K, Usami S, Hato N, Tabuchi K, et al. Prognostic impact of salvage treatment on hearing recovery in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss refractory to systemic corticosteroids: a retrospective observational study. Auris Nasus Larynx. (2016) 43:489–94. 10.1016/j.anl.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Saenger S, Goeldner C, Frey JR, Ozmen L, Ostrowitzki S, Spooren W, et al. PEGylation enhances the therapeutic potential for insulin-like growth factor I in central nervous system disorders. Growth Horm IGF Res. (2011) 21:292–303. 10.1016/j.ghir.2011.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Simmons DD. Development of the inner ear efferent system across vertebrate species. J Neurobiol. (2002) 53:228–50. 10.1002/neu.10130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Elliott KL, Kersigo J, Lee JH, Jahan I, Pavlinkova G, Fritzsch B, et al. Developmental changes in peripherin-eGFP expression in spiral ganglion neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. (2021) 15:678113. 10.3389/fncel.2021.678113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maison SF, Adams JC, Liberman MC. Olivocochlear innervation in the mouse: immunocytochemical maps, crossed versus uncrossed contributions, transmitter colocalization. J Comp Neurol. (2003) 455:406–16. 10.1002/cne.10490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Fuchs PA, Lauer AM. Efferent inhibition of the cochlea. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Med. (2019) 9:a033530. 10.1101/cshperspect.a033530 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Guinan JJ, Warr Jr WB, Norris BE. Topographic organization of the olivocochlear projections from the lateral and medial zones of the superior olivary complex. J Comp Neurol. (1984) 226:21–7. 10.1002/cne.902260103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Warren EH, 3rd, Liberman MC. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res. (1989) 37:89–104. 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90032-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Liberman MC, Liberman LD, Maison SF. Efferent feedback slows cochlear aging. J Neurosci. (2014) 34:4599–607. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4923-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cao P, Maximov A, Südhof TC. Activity-dependent IGF-1 exocytosis is controlled by the Ca(2+)-sensor synaptotagmin-10. Cell. (2011) 145:300–11. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Laurino L, Wang XX, de la Houssaye BA, Sosa L, Dupraz S, Cáceres A, et al. PI3K activation by IGF-1 is essential for the regulation of membrane expansion at the nerve growth cone. J Cell Sci. (2005) 118:3653–62. 10.1242/jcs.02490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Grassi D, Plonka FB, Oksdath M, Guil AN, Sosa LJ, Quiroga S. Selected SNARE proteins are essential for the polarized membrane insertion of igf-1 receptor and the regulation of initial axonal outgrowth in neurons. Cell Discovery. (2015) 1:15023. 10.1038/celldisc.2015.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Parker K, Berretta A, Saenger S, Sivaramakrishnan M, Shirley SA, Metzger F, et al. PEGylated insulin-like growth factor-I affords protection and facilitates recovery of lost functions post-focal ischemia. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:241. 10.1038/s41598-017-00336-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bei F, Lee HHC, Liu X, Gunner G, Jin H, Ma L, et al. Restoration of visual function by enhancing conduction in regenerated axons. Cell. (2016) 164:219–32. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Scolnick JA, Cui K, Duggan CD, Xuan S, Yuan X-b, Efstratiadis A, et al. Role of IGF signaling in olfactory sensory map formation and axon guidance. Neuron. (2008) 57:847–57. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Schafer MK, Bellouze S, Jacquier A, Schaller S, Richard L, Mathis S, et al. Sensory neuropathy in progressive motor neuronopathy (pmn) mice is associated with defects in microtubule polymerization and axonal transport. Brain Pathol. (2017) 27:459–71. 10.1111/bpa.12422 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Schmitt-John T, Drepper C, Mussmann A, Hahn P, Kuhlmann M, Thiel C, et al. Mutation of Vps54 causes motor neuron disease and defective spermiogenesis in the wobbler mouse. Nat Genetics. (2005) 37:1213–5. 10.1038/ng1661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mitsumoto H, Gambetti P. Impaired slow axonal transport in wobbler mouse motor neuron disease. Ann Neurol. (1986) 19:36–43. 10.1002/ana.410190108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mitsumoto H, Bradley WG. Murine motor neuron disease (the wobbler mouse): degeneration and regeneration of the lower motor neuron. Brain. (1982) 105:811–34. 10.1093/brain/105.4.811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Perrin FE, Boisset G, Lathuilière A, Kato AC. Cell death pathways differ in several mouse models with motoneurone disease: analysis of pure motoneurone populations at a presymptomatic age. J Neurochem. (2006) 98:1959–72. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04024.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Chumak T, Bohuslavova R, Macova I, Dodd N, Buckiova D, Fritzsch B, et al. Deterioration of the medial olivocochlear efferent system accelerates age-related hearing loss in Pax2-Isl1 transgenic mice. Mol Neurobiol. (2016) 53:2368–83. 10.1007/s12035-015-9215-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:14077–85. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Moser T, Starr A. Auditory neuropathy — neural and synaptic mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurol. (2016) 12:135–49. 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Starr A, Picton TW, Sininger Y, Hood LJ, Berlin CI. Auditory neuropathy. Brain. (1996) 119:741–53. 10.1093/brain/119.3.741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Liu K, Ji F, Yang G, Hou Z, Sun J, Wang X, et al. SMAD4 defect causes auditory neuropathy via specialized disruption of cochlear ribbon synapses in mice. Mol Neurobiol. (2016) 53:5679–91. 10.1007/s12035-015-9454-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Harris SL, Kazmierczak M, Pangršič T, Shah P, Chuchvara N, Barrantes-Freer A, et al. Conditional deletion of pejvakin in adult outer hair cells causes progressive hearing loss in mice. Neuroscience. (2017) 344:380–93. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.12.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Li D, Henley CM, O'Malley Jr BW. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and outer hair cell defects in the hyt/hyt mutant mouse. Hear Res. (1999) 138:65–72. 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00150-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Maison SF, Yin Y, Liberman LD, Liberman MC. Perinatal thiamine deficiency causes cochlear innervation abnormalities in mice. Hear Res. (2016) 335:94–104. 10.1016/j.heares.2016.02.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Malgrange B, Rigo JM, Coucke P, Thiry M, Hans G, Nguyen L, et al. Identification of factors that maintain mammalian outer hair cells in adult organ of Corti explants. Hear Res. (2002) 170:48–58. 10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00451-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jayakumar C, Mohamed R, Ranganathan PV, Ramesh G. Intracellular kinases mediate increased translation and secretion of netrin-1 from renal tubular epithelial cells. PLoS ONE. (2011) 6:e26776. 10.1371/journal.pone.0026776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Battaglia A, Pak K, Brors D, Bodmer D, Frangos JA, Ryan AF. Involvement of ras activation in toxic hair cell damage of the mammalian cochlea. Neuroscience. (2003) 122:1025–35. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Laviola L, Natalicchio A, Giorgino F. The IGF-I signaling pathway. Curr Pharm Des. (2007) 13:663–9. 10.2174/138161207780249146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Yamahara K, Yamamoto N, Nakagawa T, Ito J. Insulin-like growth factor 1: a novel treatment for the protection or regeneration of cochlear hair cells. Hearing Res. (2015) 330:2–9. 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gao L, Ge R, Xie G, Yao D, Li P, Wang O, et al. Hearing improvement in A/J mice via the mouse nerve growth factor. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. (2017) 10:303–8. 10.21053/ceo.2016.01354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wang Q, Zhao H, Zheng T, Wang W, Zhang X, Wang A, et al. Otoprotective effects of mouse nerve growth factor in DBA/2J mice with early-onset progressive hearing loss. J Neurosci Res. (2017) 95:1937–50. 10.1002/jnr.24056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Shoji F, Miller AL, Mitchell A, Yamasoba T, Altschuler RA, Miller JM. Differential protective effects of neurotrophins in the attenuation of noise-induced hair cell loss. Hear Res. (2000) 146:134–42. 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00106-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ferreirinha F, Quattrini A, Pirozzi M, Valsecchi V, Dina G, Broccoli V, et al. Axonal degeneration in paraplegin-deficient mice is associated with abnormal mitochondria and impairment of axonal transport. J Clin Invest. (2004) 113:231–42. 10.1172/JCI200420138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Stokin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL, Brusch RG, Rockenstein E, Mount SL, et al. Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. Science. (2005) 307:1282–8. 10.1126/science.1105681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Gregory R, Mills K, Donaghy M. Progressive sensory nerve dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a prospective clinical and neurophysiological study. J Neurol. (1993) 240:309–14. 10.1007/BF00838169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cui L, Zheng J, Zhao Q, Chen J-R, Liu H, Peng G, et al. Mutations of MAP1B encoding a microtubule-associated phosphoprotein cause sensorineural hearing loss. JCI Insight. (2020) 5:e136046. 10.1172/jci.insight.136046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Narducci R, Baroncelli L, Sansevero G, Begenisic T, Prontera C, Sale A, et al. Early impoverished environment delays the maturation of cerebral cortex. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:1187. 10.1038/s41598-018-19459-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Gao WQ, Shinsky N, Ingle G, Beck K, Elias KA, Powell-Braxton L. IGF-I deficient mice show reduced peripheral nerve conduction velocities and decreased axonal diameters and respond to exogenous IGF-I treatment. J Neurobiol. (1999) 39:142–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Ye P, Li L, Richards RG, DiAugustine RP, D'Ercole AJ. Myelination is altered in insulin-like growth factor-I null mutant mice. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:6041–51. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-14-06041.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.O'Kusky J, Ye P. Neurodevelopmental effects of insulin-like growth factor signaling. Front Neuroendocrinol. (2012) 33:230–51. 10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Russell JW, Cheng HL, Golovoy D. Insulin-like growth factor-I promotes myelination of peripheral sensory axons. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. (2000) 59:575–84. 10.1093/jnen/59.7.575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Stewart HJ, Bradke F, Tabernero A, Morrell D, Jessen KR, Mirsky R. Regulation of rat Schwann cell Po expression and DNA synthesis by insulin-like growth factors in vitro. Eur J Neurosci. (1996) 8:553–64. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01240.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Ye P, Carson J, D'Ercole AJ. In vivo actions of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on brain myelination: studies of IGF-I and IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) transgenic mice. J Neurosci. (1995) 15:7344–56. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07344.1995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Carson MJ, Behringer RR, Brinster RL, McMorris FA. Insulin-like growth factor I increases brain growth and central nervous system myelination in transgenic mice. Neuron. (1993) 10:729–40. 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90173-O [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang L, Guan J, Wang H, Lan L, Zhang Q, Zong L, et al. Understanding auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: a systematic review in transgenic mouse models. Science China. Life Sci. (2016) 59:480–6. 10.1007/s11427-015-4985-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Wan G, Corfas G. Transient auditory nerve demyelination as a new mechanism for hidden hearing loss. Nat Communi. (2017) 8:14487. 10.1038/ncomms14487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Moore S, Meschkat M, Ruhwedel T, Trevisiol A, Tzvetanova ID, Battefeld A, et al. A role of oligodendrocytes in information processing. Nat Communic. (2020) 11:5497. 10.1038/s41467-020-19152-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Starr A, Michalewski HJ, Zeng FG, Fujikawa-Brooks S, Linthicum F, Kim CS, et al. Pathology and physiology of auditory neuropathy with a novel mutation in the MPZ gene (Tyr145->Ser). Brain. (2003) 126:1604–19. 10.1093/brain/awg156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kilfoyle DH, Dyck PJ, Wu Y, Litchy WJ, Klein DM, Dyck PJB, et al. Myelin protein zero mutation His39Pro: hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with variable onset, hearing loss, restless legs and multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2006) 77:963–6. 10.1136/jnnp.2006.090076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tang W, Zhang Y, Chang Q, Ahmad S, Dahlke I, Yi H, et al. Connexin29 is highly expressed in cochlear Schwann cells, and it is required for the normal development and function of the auditory nerve of mice. J Neurosci. (2006) 26:1991–9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5055-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Katayama K, Zine A, Ota M, Matsumoto Y, Inoue T, Fritzsch B, et al. Disorganized innervation and neuronal loss in the inner ear of Slitrk6-deficient mice. PLoS ONE. (2009) 4:e7786. 10.1371/journal.pone.0007786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Lang H, Li M, Kilpatrick LA, Zhu J, Samuvel DJ, Krug EL, et al. Sox2 up-regulation and glial cell proliferation following degeneration of spiral ganglion neurons in the adult mouse inner ear. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. (2011) 12:151–71. 10.1007/s10162-010-0244-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Delmaghani S, del Castillo FJ, Michel V, Leibovici M, Aghaie A, Ron U, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding pejvakin, a newly identified protein of the afferent auditory pathway, cause DFNB59 auditory neuropathy. Nat Genet. (2006) 38:770–8. 10.1038/ng1829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Surel C, Guillet M, Lenoir M, Bourien J, Sendin G, Joly W, et al. Remodeling of the inner hair cell microtubule meshwork in a mouse model of auditory neuropathy AUNA1. eNeuro. (2016) 3:6. 10.1523/ENEURO.0295-16.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Roux I, Safieddine S, Nouvian R, Grati M, Simmler MC, Bahloul A, et al. Otoferlin, defective in a human deafness form, is essential for exocytosis at the auditory ribbon synapse. Cell. (2006) 127:277–89. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Gilels F, Paquette ST, Zhang J, Rahman I, White PM. Mutation of Foxo3 causes adult onset auditory neuropathy and alters cochlear synapse architecture in mice. J Neurosci. (2013) 33:18409–24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2529-13.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Kersigo J, Fritzsch B. Inner ear hair cells deteriorate in mice engineered to have no or diminished innervation. Front Aging Neurosci. (2015) 7:33. 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Blakley BW, Seaman M, Alenezi A. Brain-derived nerve growth factor in the cochlea - a reproducibility study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. (2020) 49:37. 10.1186/s40463-020-00432-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wan G, Gómez-Casati ME, Gigliello AR, Liberman MC, Corfas G. Neurotrophin-3 regulates ribbon synapse density in the cochlea and induces synapse regeneration after acoustic trauma. Elife. (2014) 3:e03564. 10.7554/eLife.03564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Shinohara T, Bredberg G, Ulfendahl M, Pyykkö I, Olivius NP, Kaksonen R, et al. Neurotrophic factor intervention restores auditory function in deafened animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2002) 99:1657–60. 10.1073/pnas.032677999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Synaptopathy in the noise-exposed and aging cochlea: primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res. (2015) 330:191–9. 10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zuo J, Treadaway J, Buckner TW, Fritzsch B. Visualization of alpha9 acetylcholine receptor expression in hair cells of transgenic mice containing a modified bacterial artificial chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1999) 96:14100–5. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.14100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Herranen A, Ikäheimo K, Lankinen T, Pakarinen E, Fritzsch B, Saarma M, et al. Deficiency of the ER-stress-regulator MANF triggers progressive outer hair cell death and hearing loss. Cell Death Dis. (2020) 11:100. 10.1038/s41419-020-2286-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.