Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Medicina logoLink to Medicina
. 2022 Jun 7;58(6):772. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060772

Pattern of Antibiotic Use in the Perinatal Period in a Public University Hospital in Romania

Viviana Hodoșan 1, Cristian Marius Daina 2,*, Dana Carmen Zaha 3,*, Petru Cotrău 1, Adriana Vladu 4, Carmen Pantiș 4, Florica Ramona Dorobanțu 3, Marcel Negrău 4, Adriana Maghiar 3, Lucia Georgeta Daina 2
PMCID: PMC9228515  PMID: 35744035

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Antibiotics are the most frequently prescribed drugs in hospitals and their prescription is increased during pregnancy and labor. There are limited data about this issue, and the safe use of antibiotics in pregnancy and antibiotic resistance remains a concern. The aim of the study is to evaluate the use of antibiotics among pregnant women attending hospital for five years. Materials and Methods: Antibiotic consumption and treatment information of patients were retrospectively collected from a hospital software program and expressed as defined daily dose (DDD) according to the World Health Organization (WHO) methodology for inpatients between 2017 and 2021. We evaluated antibiotic prescription by name, classes, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) categories. Results: Antibiotic consumption shows a decreasing trend between 2017 and 2019, but an increasing one between 2020 and 2021. Ceftriaxone was the most prescribed antibiotic in each year, followed by cefixime, amoxicillin, metronidazole, cefuroxime, ampicillin, and ciprofloxacin. We noticed that first- and fourth-generation cephalosporins were not prescribed to these patients. A very small percentage of women in this study received antibiotics such as aminoglycosides; fluoroquinolones were generally contraindicated in the perinatal period. A large percentage of prescriptions were antibiotics classified as category B by the FDA. The most common infections that occurred in the perinatal period were those of the kidney and urinary tract in a higher number than in other studies. Conclusions: Our study shows that many classes of antibiotics used in perinatal women belong to category B antibiotics, the most prescribed being cephalosporins. Because of insufficient safety evidence and the potential for teratogenic effects on the fetus, restricted use among the category C and D antibiotic classes was seen and anticipated. Improving maternal health requires the involvement of healthcare experts in risk assessment and evaluation of existing data for appropriate antibiotic selection, dose, duration of medication, and monitoring.

Keywords: pregnancy, labor, antibiotics, fetal, risk

1. Introduction

Antibiotic safety is essential when considering its use during the perinatal period. Antibiotics can have short- or long-term effects on the fetus [1]. The degree of teratogenicity depends on the gestational time of the pregnancy, the dose and duration of therapy, and the degree of drug transfer across the placenta. In addition, there are important genetic and environmental factors involved.

Although pregnancy is a physiological condition, hormone fluctuations and changes in immunity are responsible for the predisposition to infection during pregnancy. The most frequent antibiotic prescriptions during pregnancy are for the treatment of urinary and respiratory tract infections [2]. Infections that occur during pregnancy can affect the mother and baby and are considered risk factors for health complications. It is estimated that antibiotics are among the most prescribed medications during pregnancy for urinary infections. However, urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common diseases in the population and during pregnancy contributing to the increase in antibiotic use [3]. UTIs in the perinatal period, including asymptomatic bacteriuria, are associated with exposure of the fetus to antibiotics, at the same time with maternal morbidity and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Some infections that develop during pregnancy can be followed by miscarriage, preterm labor, or birth issues [4].

The most common diagnostics for prescription of antibiotics in the perinatal period are chorioamnionitis, genital, and urinary infections, but there are some prophylactic purposes for their administration such as prevention of neonatal sepsis by group B streptococcus (GBS) and prophylaxis in cesarean deliveries. Antibiotics are prescribed also to prevent preterm labor, but there is no evidence supporting this in the absence of signs of infections [5]. Current clinical practices highlight the identification of women with GBS colonization to prevent the transmission of bacteria to the newborn infant [6].

There are data about increasing antibiotic prescriptions in pregnancy, and antibiotics represent a higher percentage of all medication prescribed in pregnancy: one in four pregnant women is prescribed an antimicrobial [7,8]. Irrational antibiotic use is significant in perinatal medicine for numerous reasons. Pregnant women and their fetuses/infants are in their most vulnerable time in gestation and neonatal period, and during this time and the first year after delivery antibiotic abuse is at its highest level. Antibiotic overuse is linked to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as well as to changes in the immune system. The intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in the immune system’s development and external stimuli can easily disturb the establishment of the intestinal microbiota [9]. Disruption of the intestinal microbiota during this sensitive stage could have a significant impact on immunological development. Numerous studies have linked the makeup of the gut microbiota to a variety of immune and non-immune disorders, including sepsis [10] and neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, and it has a potential role in the development of chronic inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes mellitus, and allergy illnesses in children [11,12,13].

There is insufficient evidence about the safety of antibiotics administration during pregnancy because of many reasons. First, clinical trials in pregnant women are limited, and the teratogenicity of certain drugs is unknown [14]. Second, there are not so many reports. Only around 10% of antibiotics used during pregnancy are supported by safety data, according to a review [15]. The FDA in the United States amended and issued the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule in 2014, a useful tool for other countries also [16], and antibiotics were classified into ‘A to X’ safety categories.

There is currently no standardized way of using antibiotics in pregnant women that is sensible, safe, and successful. The availability of clinical evidence in this population is limited due to ethical constraints. Prescribers treat pregnant women based on the trimester of pregnancy, the severity of the disease, and potential fetal harm using a risk–benefit assessment. Antibiotic use during pregnancy is being impacted by the rising challenge of antibiotic resistance, with overuse and misuse of these medications being the primary causes of AMR. The AMR epidemic is changing how antibiotics are used, increasing death and morbidity while also driving up healthcare costs. Antibiotic management and use have clinical, economic, and environmental consequences [17].

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of antibiotics and trends profile among pregnant women attending a public hospital, as well as conditions treated. Evaluation can indicate the measures that are required in order to maintain the safety of antibiotic treatments for both newborns and mothers.

2. Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted for five years from 2017 to 2021 in the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea, Romania. Data about pregnant inpatients treated with J01 class antibiotics were collected from the hospital software program InfoWorld which electronically stores patient files and treatment information. Details about antibiotic use and diagnosis were analyzed. Antibiotic name, dose, route of administration, and diagnosis were recorded. Individual patients’ written informed consent for the data collection was not needed, but it was obtained at admission. Antibiotic prescription pattern was expressed in grams and defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed days according to the WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, ATC/DDD Index 2022 [18]. Hospital consumption of antimicrobials was evaluated by calculation of the total number of grams of each antimicrobial used during the period of interest and the result was divided by the WHO-assigned DDD resulting in the number of DDD (DDDs). Antimicrobial use density was expressed as DDDs/100 bed days, for each antibiotic, class, route of administration, and risk categories described by FDA, A, B, C, D, and X as can be seen in the Table 1 [19].

Table 1.

Antibiotic FDA categories.

Category Evidence Classes or Antibiotics
A There is no evidence of risk to the fetus in the first and later trimesters.
B In case of animals and pregnant women there is no evidence to demonstrate risk to the fetus. Penicillin and beta-lactam inhibitors, carbapenems (except imipenem/cilastatin), glycopeptides, imidazole, lincosamides, macrolides, third-generation cephalosporins
C Although there is evidence of detrimental effects on the fetus in animals and no adequate and well-controlled studies in humans, potential advantages may justify the drug’s usage in pregnant women despite potential dangers. Fluoroquinolones, polymixyns, rifamycins, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamycin
D Based on adverse reaction data from investigational or marketing experience or human trials, there is positive evidence of human fetal risk, although possible benefits may justify use of the medicine in pregnant women despite potential hazards. Aminoglycosides—except gentamycin
Tetracyclines
X There has been evidence of fetal abnormalities in animals or humans, and/or there is positive evidence of human fetal risk based on adverse reaction data from experimental or marketing experience, and the dangers of using the medicine in pregnant women clearly outweigh the possible benefits.
Open in a new tab

Descriptive statistics were performed using Excel. The Mann–Kendall test was used to express (upward or downward) trends. A null hypothesis was considered if there was no trend in the series and an alternative hypothesis if there was a trend. The null hypothesis cannot be rejected if the estimated p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Oradea.

3. Results

The antibiotics prescribed to the patients enrolled in our study as well as their amounts converted to DDD during the evaluated period can be seen in Table 2. Antibiotic consumption shows a decreasing trend between 2017 and 2019, but with an increasing one in 2020–2021. Most prescribed antibiotics were ceftriaxone, cefixime, amoxicillin, metronidazole, cefuroxime, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, cefaclor, gentamicin, clindamycin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, representing 98.17%.

Table 2.

Prescribed antibiotics expressed in DDD/100 bed days during the five years evaluated.

ATC Antibiotic DDD/100 Bed Days
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 p-Value
J01GB06 Amikacin 0.61 0.37 0.13 0.10 8.55 1
J01GB03 Gentamicin 7.41 2.56 1.80 2.21 24.74 0.73
J01CA04 Amoxicillin 24.71 33.04 15.88 31.48 145.88 0.73
J01CA01 Ampicillin 28.77 15.17 4.06 7.83 62.78 0.73
J01CR02 Amoxicillin/clavulanate 15.36 1.55 1.15 0.84 5.87 1
J01DH02 Meropenem 0.55 1.00 0.44 0.83 6.34 0.33
J01DH51 Imipenem/cilastatin - - - 0.01 0.13 0.14
J01DC04 Cefaclor 19.72 18.51 4.32 2.95 0.00 0.08
J01DC02 Cefuroxime 40.42 47.28 27.49 21.41 1.97 0.08
J01DD04 Ceftriaxone 129.72 117.06 113.90 127.98 346.86 0.30
J01DD12 Cefoperazone 0.01 - 0.001 - 0.00 -
J01DD02 Ceftazidime 0.53 0.24 0.10 0.33 0.11 0.53
J01DD08 Cefixime 33.06 16.93 12.63 22.69 401.63 0.30
J01DD62 Cefoperazone/
sulbactam		 0.02 0.01 0.008 - 0.12 1
J01XD01 Metronidazol 13.58 12.34 15.80 9.39 176.21 0.73
J01MA02 Ciprofloxacin 2.89 1.17 0.49 2.36 108.69 0.33
J01MA01 Ofloxacin 0.80 0.33 0.32 1.16 3.54 0.30
J01MA14 Moxifloxacin 0.03 - 0.032 - 0.00 1
J01CF04 Oxacillin 0.88 0.34 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.73
J01FF01 Clindamycin 6.45 2.97 2.27 1.66 12.04 1
J01FA09 Clarithromycin 1.02 1.16 2.45 1.02 2.00 1
J01FA10 Azithromycin 0.33 0.18 0.006 0.078 0.79 0.73
J01FA01 Erythromycin - - 0.35 1.058 2.66 0.08
J01CE01 Benzyl penicillin 0.14 0.08 0.104 0.069 0.04 0.30
J01XA01 Vancomycin 0.03 0.10 0.12 0.040 0.58 0.73
J01XB01 Colistin 0.11 0.039 - - - 0.37
Total 327.30 272.54 204.05 235.61 1311.77
Open in a new tab

Less prescribed were oxacillin, azithromycin, ceftazidime, vancomycin, benzyl penicillin, cefoperazone/sulbactam, colistin, imipenem/cilastatin, moxifloxacin, and cefoperazone. The first ten prescribed antibiotics are relatively the same in the five years evaluated. Ceftriaxone was the most prescribed followed by cefuroxime between 2017 and 2020, while cefixime and ceftriaxone were the most prescribed in 2021. Among the ten most prescribed antibiotics, amoxicillin/clavulanate was replaced by clarithromycin in 2019, ciprofloxacin in 2020, and meropenem in 2021 (Figure 1). More than 86% of the antibiotics were administrated by the oral route.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The first ten antibiotics prescribed from 2017–2021.

Assessment of antibiotic use by class shows a high consumption of third-generation cephalosporins, followed by aminopenicillins, imidazoles, second-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, lincosamide, macrolides, and carbapenems. Less prescribed were penicillins (natural and izoxazolilpenicillins), glycopeptides, polypeptides, and rifampicins for the same five years (Table 3). About half or more of cephalosporins third-generation, aminopenicillin, imidazoles, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and lincosamides were prescribed in 2021 at the same time with a decrease in the administration of second-generation cephalosporins. Third-generation cephalosporins and imidazoles were prescribed in close quantities between 2017 and 2020, but with a significant increase in 2021. The same aspect, i.e., a marked increase in the prescription in 2021, also presented fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, macrolides, and carbapenems. The prescription of second-generation cephalosporins and natural penicillins, on the other hand, showed a pronounced decreasing trend or have not been prescribed at all (polypeptides, rifampicins).

Table 3.

Prescribed antibiotics by class expressed in DDD/100 bed days during the five years evaluated.

Antibiotics
by Class		 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total p-Value
Cephalosporins
(third generation)		 163.37 134.26 126.65 151.01 748.73 1324.02 1
Aminopenicillins 68.85 49.77 21.10 40.17 214.53 394.41 0.73
Imidazoles 13.59 12.34 15.80 9.39 176.21 227.33 0.72
Cephalosporins
(second generation)		 60.15 65.80 31.82 24.37 1.97 184.12 0.08
Fluoroquinolones 3.74 1.51 0.86 3.53 112.22 121.86 0.30
Aminoglycosides 8.03 2.94 1.95 2.32 33.29 48.53 0.73
Lincosamide 6.45 2.97 2.27 1.67 12.04 25.40 1
Macrolides 1.36 1.35 2.82 2.17 5.46 13.16 0.30
Carbapenems 0.56 1.01 0.45 0.84 6.47 9.33 0.73
Izoxazolilpenicillins
(oxacillin)		 0.89 0.35 0.05 0.03 0.23 1.55 0.73
Glycopeptides 0.03 0.11 0.12 0.04 0.58 0.88 0.73
Natural penicillins 0.14 0.08 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.44 0.30
Polypeptides 0.11 0.04 - - - 0.15 0.37
Rifampicins 0.03 0.00 0.06 - - 0.09 1
Open in a new tab

A large percentage (92.34%) of prescriptions were antibiotics classified as category B by the FDA with the remaining 7.66% being categories C and D. As can be seen in Table 4, the consumption of FDA category B antibiotics remains almost constant between 2018 and 2020 with a decrease in 2021, while the consumption of category C antibiotics shows an increasing trend. Although overall category D antibiotics showed low values for prescriptions and included only amikacin, the downward trend between 2018 and 2020 is followed by a significant increase in 2021.

Table 4.

Prescribed antibiotics by FDA category expressed in DDDs/100 bed days.

Category of
Antibiotics		 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total p-Value
B 313.48 (95.77) 266.53
(97.79)		 198.69
(97.37)		 228.69
(97.06)		 1163.88
(88.82)		 2171.27
(92.34)		 0.73
C 4.88
(1.49)		 2.71
(0.99)		 3.31
(1.62)		 4.57
(1.93)		 139.09
(10.60)		 168.57
(7.16)		 0.30
D 0.61
(0.18)		 0.37
(0.13)		 0.13
(0.06)		 0.10
(0.04)		 8.55
(0.65)		 9.79
(0.41)		 1
Open in a new tab

Cephalosporins (third and second generation), aminopenicillins, and imidazoles were the most frequent class of FDA category B antibiotics prescribed to pregnant women followed by lincosamides, carbapenems, and macrolides. Natural penicillins, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, cefoperazone/sulbactam, azithromycin, and glycopeptides were slightly less prescribed from the same FDA category B antibiotics. No first and fourth-generation cephalosporins were prescribed (Table 5).

Table 5.

FDA category B antibiotics commonly prescribed expressed in DDDs/100 bed days.

ATC Antibiotic 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
J01DD04 Ceftriaxone 129.73 117.06 113.90 127.98 346.86 835.54
J01DD08 Cefixime 33.07 16.94 12.63 22.69 401.63 486.96
J01CA04 Amoxicillin 24.72 33.04 15.88 31.49 145.88 251.01
J01XD01 Metronidazole 13.59 12.34 15.80 9.39 176.21 227.33
J01DC02 Cefuroxime 40.42 47.29 27,50 21.42 1.97 138.60
J01CA01 Ampicillin 28.77 15.17 4,06 7.84 62.78 118.62
J01DC04 Cefaclor 19.73 18.52 4.32 2.95 - 45.52
J01FF01 Clindamycin 6.45 2.97 2.27 1.67 12.04 25.40
J01CR02 Amoxicillin/
clavulanate		 15.36 1.55 1.16 0.85 5.87 24.78
J01DH02 Meropenem 0.56 1.01 0.45 0.83 6.34 9.18
J01FA01 Erythromycin - - 0.36 1.06 2.66 4.07
J01FA10 Azithromycin 0.34 0.19 0.01 0.08 0.79 1.41
J01DD02 Ceftazidime 0.54 0.25 0.11 0.34 0.11 1.35
J01XA01 Vancomycin 0.03 0.11 0.12 0,04 0.58 0.88
J01CE01 Benzyl penicillin 0.14 0,08 0.10 0,07 0.04 0.44
J01DD62 Cefoperazone/
sulbactam		 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.12 0.17
J01DD12 Cefoperazone 0.01 - - - - 0.01
Open in a new tab

Table 6 shows the prescribed category C antibiotics, containing those drugs for which animal studies may or may not have been undertaken to reveal adverse effects, but for which there are no suitable and well-controlled trials in pregnant women. Gentamycin, fluoroquinolones, and clarithromycin were the most prescribed category C drug classes. Amikacin (FDA antibiotic category D) was used less than gentamicin (FDA antibiotic category B).

Table 6.

FDA category C antibiotics commonly prescribed expressed in DDDs/100 bed days.

ATC Antibiotic 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
J01GB03 Gentamycin 7.41 2.56 1.81 2.22 24.74 38.74
J01DH51 Imipenem/
cilastatin		 - - - 0.01 0.13 0.14
J01MA02 Ciprofloxacin 2.90 1.17 0.50 2.37 108.69 115.62
J01MA01 Ofloxacin 0.81 0.34 0.32 1.17 3.54 6.17
J01MA14 Moxifloxacin 0.04 - 0.03 - - 0.07
J01FA09 Clarithromycin 1.02 1.16 2.46 1.03 2.00 7.68
J01XB01 Colistin 0.11 0.04 - - - 0.15
Open in a new tab

The incidence of infections during the evaluated period was 25.86% (4090 infections reported in 17,146 births). Table 7 shows the main categories of infections and their incidence.

Table 7.

Number of patients and infections occurred in between 2017 and 2021.

Diagnostic 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total p-Value
Number
(%)
Renal and urinary tract infections 813
(22.38)		 1050
(29.47)		 604
(18.78)		 241
(7.27)		 470
(13.72)		 3178
(18.53)		 0.30
Chorioamnionitis 69
(1.89)		 48
(1.34)		 74
(2.30)		 69
(2.08)		 87
(2.54)		 347
(2.02)		 0.30
Surgical wound infections of obstetric origin 0
(0)		 4
(0.11)		 4
(0.12)		 7
(0.21)		 36
(1.05)		 51
(0.29)		 0.14
Other genito-urinary tract infections after birth 76
(2.09)		 97
(2.72)		 128
(3.98)		 111
(3.35)		 78
(2.27)		 490
(2.85)		 0.73
Mastitis 2
(0.05)		 4
(0.11)		 1
(0.03)		 10
(0.30)		 7
(0.20)		 24
(0.13)		 0.73
Total number of births 3632 3562 3216 3311 3425 17,146
Open in a new tab

It is noted that the main infections encountered are those of the urinary tract including asymptomatic and symptomatic bacteriuria; the values are higher than those reported by international studies. There is also a decrease in the incidence of this status in 2020 compared to 2017–2019, possibly by limiting the possibilities of travel and performing consultations and excessive medical maneuvers, due to pandemic restrictions. In our study, the incidence of chorioamnionitis shows an almost constant trend except for 2018, when it registered a decrease; but overall, during the four years evaluated, it remained low (1.89%). Surgical wound infections, and mastitis had a low incidence in the analyzed period.

4. Discussion

The gestational period is an important factor that complicates antibiotic therapy. Multiple studies advise against the use of drugs in the first trimester as the fetus is still developing [8]. An analysis of antibiotic usage in the second and third trimesters performed by Thinkhamrop et al. found no difference in the likelihood of congenital abnormalities between the two trimesters, but the same authors concluded that there was insufficient evidence to fully evaluate possible fetal harm [20].

The literature indicates that beta-lactams remain widely prescribed in pregnancy representing approximately 65% of all antibiotics, with penicillins accounting for 30% [8]. Similar results were obtained from our study, indicating that 81.4% of all antibiotics prescribed to pregnant women belonged to a beta-lactam class. The available data on the use of cephalosporins during pregnancy do not suggest an increased risk of spontaneous miscarriage or congenital abnormalities at therapeutic doses, and few studies identified a possible association with cardiovascular defects in exposed offspring, low birth weight, and preterm delivery [21]. A higher percentage (64.14%) was identified in women being treated with cephalosporins and aminopenicillins (16.77%) during pregnancy; consistent with the current trends of antibiotic therapy in pregnancy [22]. Pregnancy increased the levels of estrogens and deposition of glycogen in the vaginal microbiota including the community of microorganisms that reside in the lower reproductive tract. Pregnancy increases Candida colonization which causes vaginal infections and could be involved in spontaneous preterm birth [23,24,25]. Imidazole (only metronidazole in our study), cephalosporins, and aminopenicillins are the most used antibiotics in pregnancy in our study. Although metronidazole is classified as pregnancy category B and is guideline-recommended therapy for bacterial vaginosis and Trichomonas infections in pregnancy, it should be avoided in the first trimester of pregnancy [26,27].

The prescribed antibiotics were classified by class of active substance and FDA safety categories B, C, and D. As expected, more than 92.34% of pregnant women received category B of antibiotics according to the FDA because there is no evidence to demonstrate a risk to the fetus. The studies show a long record of safety data and represent 17.3% of all prescriptions expressed in DDD/100 bed days during the five years evaluated. We noticed that the most used were amoxicillin followed by ampicillin, while amoxicillin/clavulanate was only 5.87% of prescriptions expressed in DDD/100 bed days with a decreasing trend; therefore, aminopenicillins are the second more prescribed in our hospital. Aminoglycosides cross the placenta and should be administrated if the benefits outweigh the risks. Between 2018 and 2020, aminoglycosides followed a downward trend, with an increasing prescription in 2021 consumption. Amikacin (FDA antibiotic category D) was used less than gentamicin. Quinolones are antibiotics that are routinely used to treat a wide range of infections. There are reports showing that quinolones are not associated with unfavorable pregnancy outcomes, but their safety profile in pregnant women remains debatable [28].

Yefet et al. conducted a systematic evaluation of the safety of quinolones in pregnancy and found no serious congenital abnormalities. Although fluoroquinolones have been proven to have potentially hazardous effects in several animal models, the research suggests that it is usually at higher dosages. The FDA, on the other hand, amended its cautions for fluoroquinolones, both oral and injectable, in 2016 [29]. The authors showed that when the medicine is taken systemically, it might cause severe and perhaps irreversible side effects on the fetus, such as disruption of tendons, joints, muscles, and nerves. It may also cause type 2 diabetes, in addition to the previously listed consequences. Quinolones are classified as FDA category C, with significant restrictions to their use. Ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and moxifloxacin together accounted for 5.18% of all antibiotics expressed in DDD/100 bed days during the five years evaluated. The most prescribed were ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, and less prescribed was moxifloxacin.

Clindamycin is classified as pregnancy category B, and it was the only lincosamide antibiotic used for pregnant women in our hospital. Clindamycin prescription displayed a decreasing trend during the first four years evaluated, but with a significant increase in 2021.

Macrolides are pregnancy category A prescribed in 0.55% of all antibiotics expressed in DDD/100 bed days during the five years evaluated. Prescribing macrolide during pregnancy is not uncommon as similar results have been reported elsewhere [30,31]. The use of macrolides (category B) in pregnancy is, however, a growing concern. Significantly, a recent study by Fan et al. followed 104605 children from birth to 14 years of age and it was concluded that prescribing macrolides in any trimester was associated with an increased risk of genital malformation, whereas a previous cohort of 1033 women exposed to macrolides (erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, or roxithromycin) reported that there was no association with this drug and the development of major abnormalities in the fetus [32].

Carbapenems are extended-spectrum beta-lactams and are typically reserved for severe infections and/or in case of pathogens resistant to penicillins and cephalosporins. Meropenem and imipenem/cilastatin (category C) were administrated to patients enrolled in this study. The use of these antibiotics during pregnancy was minimal, but it displays a significant and worrying increasing trend in 2021, in contrast to the colistin which belongs to the same category of reserve antibiotics as FDA category C. Pregnancy causes many changes to a woman’s body that result in an increased risk of developing urinary tract infections. E. coli is the common cause of urinary tract infections followed by Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Chlamydia. The difference between pregnant and non-pregnant women is the increase in the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women. The incidence of urinary tract infections in pregnant women is 0.3–1.3%, similar to that in non-pregnant women, but recurrent bacteriuria is more common in pregnant women than non-pregnant women [32]. A study in Israel of 200,000 pregnant women showed a 2.5% incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and 2.3% of symptomatic urinary tract infections. In this population, bacteriuria was associated with complications: hypertension, diabetes, intrauterine growth retardation, and premature birth [33]. In our study, the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic bacteria in pregnant women who gave birth at our hospital was higher compared to the average observed from international studies [34,35]. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) during pregnancy are the most common causes of antibiotic prescriptions. Even in asymptomatic bacteriuria, patients are treated with antibiotics because they can lead to complications such as cystitis, pyelonephritis, and preterm birth [35,36]. In our study, nitrofurantoin (category B), an antibiotic specific for urinary tract infections, was not prescribed. Some studies reported nitrofurantoin might increase the risk of hemolytic anemia in pregnant patients with severe glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency [37], an association between nitrofurantoin use during pregnancy, and cleft lip and palate, while other studies did not demonstrate any link between nitrofurantoin exposure in women and major congenital malformation [14]. For these reasons, nitrofurantoin use as an option for the treatment of urinary tract infections in pregnant women should be reconsidered, and the hospital has evaluation and decision-making tools, respectively [38,39]. In recent years, the epidemiology of many diseases has changed both with regard to the host as well as to the bacteria’s spectrum and susceptibility to antibiotics [40]. Chorioamnionitis is an ascending infectious and inflammatory process of the membrane that surrounds the fetus due to bacterial, fungal, or viral agents originating from the genitourinary tract and is associated with a risk of preterm labor, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonatal sepsis, or neonatal death [41,42,43]. Chorioamnionitis can also occur hematogenously by maternal bacteremia or by contamination of the amniotic cavity because of an invasive procedure (amniocentesis). A 2014 study described an incidence of 9.7 per 1000 births [44]. In developed countries (Canada, Western Europe, Australia), the incidence is equal to or slightly lower compared to the United States. In poorly developed countries, premature rupture of membranes is closely correlated with chorioamnionitis, premature births, and increased mortality. The most common antibiotics recommended in the primary management of chorioamnionitis were ampicillin and gentamicin, and alternative antibiotics were clindamycin [45]. During the five years evaluated, the number of chorioamnionitis remains low (1.89%) compared with other results from other studies showing an almost double incidence [46]. Postpartum infections are pathological entities that occur after a vaginal birth or by cesarean section or during breastfeeding. Many studies show an incidence of postpartum infectious complications ranging from 5.5 to 7.4%. The range for endometritis is 1.6 (0.9–2.5), for surgical wound infection 1.2% (1.0–1.5), and for maternal peripartum infection 1.1 (0.3–2.4) [46]. It should be noted that in our study, only the first three (wounds, genitourinary infections, and mastitis) were the most common postpartum complications noted and their incidence is similar to the data reported by Woodd et al. Our study has a few limitations. It was conducted in one hospital and included only inpatients for five years. Neither the duration of therapy nor the exposure to adverse effects of therapy and recurrences was assessed. There was insufficient follow-up on those patients to identify whether their children were affected by the antibiotic therapy received. Despite these limitations, this study contributes to knowledge in this special patient group and builds on the evidence that currently exists. Long-term reliance on antibiotics considered safe to use could be followed by the development of resistance, requiring the use of broad-spectrum or alternative medicines whose safety has already been completely established [47].

5. Conclusions

There is currently a relative scarcity of data regarding antibiotic use in pregnancy and our research should improve the knowledge in this field. Our study shows that many classes of antibiotics used in perinatal women belong to category B antibiotics, the most prescribed being cephalosporins. Because of insufficient safety evidence and the potential for teratogenic effects on the fetus, restricted use among the category C and D antibiotic classes was seen and anticipated. A very small percentage of women in this study received antibiotics such as aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones were generally contraindicated in the perinatal period unless the benefit of the drug exceeded the risk. Improving maternal and child health requires the involvement of healthcare experts in risk assessment and evaluation of existing data for appropriate antibiotic selection, dose, duration of medication, and monitoring. It is also essential that more studies follow up on the side effects that drugs have on pregnant women.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.H. and L.G.D.; methodology, C.M.D.; software, P.C.; validation, D.C.Z., L.G.D. and V.H.; formal analysis, M.N.; investigation, A.M.; resources, A.V. and F.R.D.; writing—original draft preparation, V.H. and. F.R.D.; writing—review and editing, D.C.Z.; visualization, C.P.; supervision, L.G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Oradea (protocol code 25322/12.10.2018).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vidal A.C., Murphy S.K., Murtha A.P., Schildkraut J.M., Soubry A., Huang Z., Neelon S.E.B., Fuemmeler B., Iversen E., Wang F., et al. Associations between antibiotic exposure during pregnancy, birth weight, and aberrant methylation at imprinted genes among offspring. Int. J. Obes. 2013;37:907–913. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2013.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andrikopoulou M., Huang Y., Duffy C.R., Stern-Ascher C.N., Wright J.D., Goffman D., D’Alton M.E., Friedman A.M. Antibiotic Use Without Indication During Delivery Hospitalizations in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019;134:718–725. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee A.C., Mullany L.C., Koffi A.K., Rafiqullah I., Khanam R., Folger L.V., Rahman M., Mitra D.K., Labrique A., Christian P., et al. Urinary tract infections in pregnancy in a rural population of Bangladesh: Population-based prevalence, risk factors, etiology, and antibiotic resistance. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2665-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Micle O., Antal L., Naghi P., Țica O., Zaha D.C., Zdrînca M.M., Dobjanchi L., Sabău M., Mureșan M. The prevalence of urinary tract infections in pregnancy and implications on fetal development. Farmacia. 2020;68:32. doi: 10.31925/farmacia.2020.3.11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Flenady V., Hawley G., Stock O.M., Kenyon S., Badawi N. Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;12:CD000246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000246.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Puopolo K.M., Lynfield R., Cummings J.J., American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Infectious Diseases Management of Infants at Risk for Group B Streptococcal Disease. Pediatrics. 2019;144:e20191881. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuperman A.A., Koren O. Antibiotic use during pregnancy: How bad is it? BMC Med. 2016;14:91. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0636-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bookstaver P.B., Bland C.M., Griffin B., Stover K.R., Eiland L.S., McLaughlin M. A Review of Antibiotic Use in Pregnancy. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35:1052–1062. doi: 10.1002/phar.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zimmermann P., Curtis N. Factors Influencing the Intestinal Microbiome During the First Year of Life. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2018;37:e315–e335. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Madan J.C., Salari R.C., Saxena D., Davidson L., O’Toole G.A., Moore J.H., Sogin M.L., Foster J.A., Edwards W.H., Palumbo P., et al. Gut microbial colonisation in premature neonates predicts neonatal sepsis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 2012;97:F456–F462. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Knip M., Siljander H. The role of the intestinal microbiota in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2016;12:154–167. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zimmermann P., Messina N., Mohn W.W., Finlay B.B., Curtis N. Association between the intestinal microbiota and allergic sensitization, eczema, and asthma: A systematic review. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019;143:467–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.09.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zimmermann P., Curtis N. Effect of intrapartum antibiotics on the intestinal microbiota of infants: A systematic review. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal. Ed. 2020;105:201–208. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Crider K.S., Cleves M.A., Reefhuis J., Berry R.J., Hobbs C.A., Hu D.J. Antibacterial medication use during pregnancy and risk of birth defects: National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2009;163:978–985. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Adam M.P., Polifka J.E., Friedman J.M. Evolving knowledge of the teratogenicity of medications in human pregnancy. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet. 2011;157:175–182. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meek C. The Food and Drug Administration’s Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule. Embryo Project Encyclopedia; Tempe, AZ, USA: 2014. [(accessed on 3 March 2022)]. Available online: http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/13100. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zaha D.C., Bungau S., Uivarosan D., Tit D.M., Maghiar T.A., Maghiar O., Pantis C., Fratila O., Rus M., Vesa C.M. Antibiotic consumption and microbiological epidemiology in surgery departments: Results from a single study center. Antibiotics. 2020;9:81. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9020081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology ATC/DDD Index. 2022. [(accessed on 8 March 2022)]. Available online: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/
  • 19.Food and Drug Administration Content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products: Requirements for pregnancy and lactation labeling. Fed. Regist. 2014;79:72064–72103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thinkhamrop J., Hofmeyr G.J., Adetoro O., Lumbiganon P., Ota E. Antibiotic prophylaxis during the second and third trimester to reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015;1:CD002250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Czeizel A.E., Rockenbauer M., Sørensen H.T., Olsen J. Use of cephalosporins during pregnancy and in the presence of congenital abnormalities: A population-based, case-control study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;184:1289–1296. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.113905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anitha B., Malavika S., Kumar B., Ramesh Y. Current trends in drugs avoided in pregnancy. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2018;8:342–350. doi: 10.22270/jddt.v8i6.2035. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sule-Odu A.O., Akadri A.A., Oluwole A.A., Osinupebi O.A., Andu B.A., Akiseku A.K., Lawal A.I. Vaginal Candida infection in pregnancy and its implications for fetal well-being. Afr. J. Reprod. Health. 2020;24:33–40. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2020/v24i3.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Roberts C.L., Algert C.S., Rickard K.L., Morris J.M. Treatment of vaginal candidiasis for the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:31. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0018-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Brocklehurst P., Gordon A., Heatley E., Milan S.J. Antibiotics for treating bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;1:CD000262. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000262.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klebanoff M.A., Carey J.C., Hauth J.C., Hillier S.L., Nugent R.P., Thom E.A., Ernest J.M., Heine R.P., Wapner R.J., Trout W., et al. Failure of metronidazole to prevent preterm delivery among pregnant women with asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;345:487–493. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kazy Z., Puho E., Czeizel A.E. Teratogenic potential of vaginal metronidazole treatment during pregnancy. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005;2:174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yefet E., Schwartz N., Chazan B., Salim R., Romano S., Nachum Z. The safety of quinolones and fluoroquinolones in pregnancy: A meta-analysis. BJOG. 2018;125:1069–1076. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Acar S., Keskin-Arslan E., Erol-Coskun H., Kaya-Temiz T., Kaplan Y.C. Pregnancy outcomes following quinolone and fluoroquinolone exposure during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2019;85:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bahat Dinur A., Koren G., Matok I., Wiznitzer A., Gorodischer R.U.E., Levy A. Fetal safety of macrolides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013;57:3307–3311. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01691-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fan H., Gilbert R., O’Callaghan F., Li L. Associations between macrolide antibiotics prescribing during pregnancy and adverse child outcomes in the UK: Population based cohort study. BMJ. 2020;368:m331. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sarah Jestin Kilpatrick . American Academy of Pediatrics. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Washington, DC, USA: 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mazor-Dray E., Levy A., Schlaeffer F., Sheiner E. Maternal urinary tract infection: Is it independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcome? J. Maternal. Fetal Neonatal. Med. 2009;22:423–427. doi: 10.1080/14767050802488246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hooton T.M. Clinical practice. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:1028–1037. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1104429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Habak P.J., Griggs R.P., Jr. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2021. Urinary Tract Infection In Pregnancy. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Smaill F.M., Vazquez J.C. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015;8 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000490.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van de Mheen L., Smits S.M., Terpstra W.E., Leyte A., Bekedam D.J., van den Akker E.S. Haemolytic anaemia after nitrofurantoin treatment in a pregnant woman with G6PD deficiency. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013010087. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-010087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Daina L.G., Sabău M., Daina C.M., Neamțu C., Tit D.M., Buhaș C.L., Bungau C., Aleya L., Bungau S. Improving performance of a pharmacy in a Romanian hospital through implementation of an internal management control system. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;675:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Daina L., Carp G., Neamțu C., Venter A., Armean P. Antibiotherapy in hospital—Between the efficiency and quality of medical services. The role of the drug committee. Farmacia. 2015;63:3. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zaha D.C., Bungau S., Aleya S., Tit D.M., Vesa C.M., Popa A.R., Pantis C., Maghiar O.A., Bratu O.G., Furau C., et al. What antibiotics for what pathogens? The sensitivity spectrum of isolated strains in an intensive care unit. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;687:118–127. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fowler J.R., Simon L.V. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. Chorioamnionitis. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Park J.Y., Park C.W., Moon K.C., Park J.S., Jun J.K., Lee S.J., Kim J.H. Retinopathy of prematurity in infants without fetal growth restriction is decreased with the progression of acute histologic chorioamnionitis: New observation as a protective factor against retinopathy of prematurity. Placenta. 2021;104:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Maki Y., Fujisaki M., Sato Y., Sameshima H. Candida Chorioamnionitis Leads to Preterm Birth and Adverse Fetal-Neonatal Outcome. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;2017:9060138. doi: 10.1155/2017/9060138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Malloy M.H. Chorioamnionitis: Epidemiology of newborn management and outcome United States 2008. J. Perinatol. 2014;34:611–655. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Committee Opinion No. 712: Intrapartum Management of Intraamniotic Infection. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;130:e95–e101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Woodd S.L., Montoya A., Barreix M., Pi L., Calvert C., Rehman A.M., Chou D., Campbell O.M.R. Incidence of maternal peripartum infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLOS Med. 2019;16:e1002984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Vică M.L., Glevitzky M., Tit D.M., Behl T., Heghedűş-Mîndru R.C., Ursu F., Popa M., Glevitzky I., Bungău S. The antimicrobial activity of honey and propolis extracts from the central region of Romania. Food Biosci. 2021;41:101014. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicina are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES