ABSTRACT
Metabolic and growth arrest are primary drivers of antibiotic tolerance and persistence in clinically diverse bacterial pathogens. We recently showed that adenosine (ADO) suppresses bacterial growth under nutrient-limiting conditions. In the current study, we show that despite the growth-suppressive effect of ADO, extracellular ADO enhances antibiotic killing in both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria by up to 5 orders of magnitude. The ADO-potentiated antibiotic activity is dependent on purine salvage and is paralleled with a suppression of guanosine tetraphosphate synthesis and the massive accumulation of ATP and GTP. These changes in nucleoside phosphates coincide with transient increases in rRNA transcription and proton motive force. The potentiation of antibiotic killing by ADO is manifested against bacteria grown under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and it is exhibited even in the absence of alternative electron acceptors such as nitrate. ADO potentiates antibiotic killing by generating proton motive force and can occur independently of an ATP synthase. Bacteria treated with an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation and NADH dehydrogenase-deficient bacteria are refractory to the ADO-potentiated killing, suggesting that the metabolic awakening induced by this nucleoside is intrinsically dependent on an energized membrane. In conclusion, ADO represents a novel example of metabolite-driven but growth-independent means to reverse antibiotic tolerance. Our investigations identify the purine salvage pathway as a potential target for the development of therapeutics that may improve infection clearance while reducing the emergence of antibiotic resistance.
KEYWORDS: E. coli, Salmonella, antibiotic resistance, nucleosides, persistence, tolerance
INTRODUCTION
The immense clinical and economic burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is projected to worsen. The rate at which AMR emerges outpaces the development of novel antibiotics, presenting a need for strategies to combat this growing global health threat (1–3). Antibiotic stewardship is a key component to targeting the development of AMR itself, but there is a need for novel therapeutic approaches as well. Subpopulations of antibiotic tolerant bacteria known as persisters play a critical role in the acquisition of AMR (4–6). Targeting antibiotic tolerant or persister bacteria could delay and combat the emergence of AMR (5). Stimulation with specific metabolites represents a fruitful strategy for the eradication of persisters (7).
Suppression of cellular energetics has been identified as one of the dominant mechanisms by which bacterial persistence develops in phylogenetically diverse bacteria (8–11). Disruption or decoupling of the proton motive force (PMF) from ATP synthesis increases the fraction of persistent bacteria in human pathogens (8–10). Perturbation of cellular energetics stimulates tolerance or persistence through multiple mechanisms. For example, inhibition of energetics decreases antibiotic uptake while suppressing replication, transcription, translation, cell division, and cell wall synthesis (8–13). Depletion of intracellular ATP also results in protein aggregation, promoting the less susceptible state of dormancy that has been shown to influence antibiotic tolerance (11). Conversely, chloramphenicol-treated, growth-arrested Salmonella demonstrates both increased ATP levels and antibiotic tolerance (14). It appears that under different conditions, metabolism or growth rate may provide a greater contribution toward antibiotic tolerance, and ultimately, the two may be uncoupled in certain conditions (15). Metabolite supplementation to potentiate antibiotic killing has been demonstrated against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (7). Identification of specific metabolites that reverse growth-related antibiotic tolerance and persistence provides an opportunity to better understand the mechanisms of tolerance and persistence, which ultimately contribute to treatment-refractory infections and antibiotic resistance (6).
Adenosine (ADO) is involved in conserved and functionally diverse cellular processes. In the lumen of the human gut, ADO is generated in large quantities at the mucosal surface through the degradation of ATP by ectonucleotidases of epithelial cells (16). Enteric bacteria nearly universally transport extracellular ADO to the cytoplasm, where it is converted via phosphorolytic cleavage of the N-glycosyl bond to adenine or deaminated to inosine, which undergoes conversion to hypoxanthine and inositol monophosphate (17). We recently observed that exogenous ADO inhibits growth of nutritionally stressed Salmonella (16). Based on these observations, we tested whether ADO influences antibiotic killing of nutritionally stressed bacteria. Here, we report that salvage of extracellular ADO suppresses the stringent response, increases ATP and GTP levels, and promotes PMF and respiration, which together enhance killing of antibiotic tolerant and persister bacteria through growth-independent mechanisms.
RESULTS
ADO alters nucleotide metabolism during nutrient stress in E. coli.
Exogenous ADO delays the growth of Salmonella (16) and E. coli (Fig. 1A) grown in glucose-containing M9 minimal media, suggesting that exogenous ADO has a significant influence on bacterial physiology. Casamino Acids rescue both Salmonella (16) and E. coli from the ADO-induced growth delay (Fig. S1A in the supplemental material), suggesting that ADO may interfere with the bacterial stringent response, a broadly conserved adaptive program that is required for bacterial growth during nutritional starvation (18–21). We measured the impact of ADO on the generation of the stringent response alarmones guanosine tetraphosphate and guanosine pentaphosphate [(p)ppGpp] in E. coli (18, 22). The stringent response was induced through downshift of 32P-labeled E. coli grown in amino acid-supplemented morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) minimal medium into amino acid-free M9 minimal medium. Guanosine tetraphosphate accumulated after 5 min of the downshift. In contrast, E. coli shifted from 32P-containing amino acid-supplemented MOPS minimal media into nutrient-rich LB broth did not accumulate ppGpp (Fig. 1B). During amino acid starvation, ppGpp accumulates more than pppGpp (23). The downshift did not trigger the accumulation of pppGpp, as has been published in response to other stressors (24). Addition of 100 μM or 1 mM ADO attenuated ppGpp accumulation for at least 60 min after downshift. Though (p)ppGpp is hydrolyzed to GDP/GTP and PPi, we did not observe an increase in PPi in the ADO-treated groups (Fig. 1B), suggesting that ADO does not reduce ppGpp accumulation through enhanced hydrolysis.
The stringent response activates transcription of amino acid biosynthesis genes (18). We hypothesized that inhibition of the stringent response would result in dysregulation of amino acid biosynthesis. To investigate this, we measured concentrations of free amino acids in bacterial lysates after downshift into amino acid-free media (25). The addition of ADO resulted in significant decreases in the intracellular concentrations of arginine, isoleucine, and phenylalanine. Aspartate, glutamate, histidine, leucine, lysine, and methionine also decreased; however, these decreases did not achieve statistical significance (P < 0.05) (Table S1). Together with our observation that amino acid supplementation complements the ADO-induced growth defect, our data suggest that ADO treatment promotes amino acid dysregulation and depletes select amino acids, which may delay bacterial growth (23).
In addition to suppressing ppGpp accumulation, 32P autoradiography revealed that the addition of ADO resulted in concomitant and sustained increases in ATP and GTP (Fig. 1B and C). The observed ATP and GTP accumulation raised the possibility that the phenotypes noted after the addition of ADO may involve purine salvage. After uptake, ADO is first metabolized to inosine or adenine by adenosine deaminase (Add) or purine nucleoside phosphorylase (DeoD), respectively (Fig. 1D) (17). To disrupt ADO salvage, we generated an E. coli strain deficient in add and deoD (Δadd ΔdeoD). Unlike the wild-type strain, this purine salvage-deficient mutant was immune to the growth delay effects of ADO in glucose-containing M9 minimal media (Fig. S1B). Neither ATP nor GTP accumulated in this salvage-deficient strain when exposed to ADO, demonstrating that purine salvage is necessary for ADO-elicited increases in ATP and GTP (Fig. 1E). Unlike the salvage-deficient mutant, a (p)ppGpp-null ΔrelA ΔspoT strain experienced significant increases in ATP and GTP following treatment with ADO (Fig. 1F). Thus, extracellular ADO fundamentally impacts nucleotide metabolism.
ADO antagonizes markers of persister bacteria.
Physiologic markers important for bacterial tolerance and persistence have been previously described (10). Shan et al. showed that several amino acid auxotrophs were less tolerant to gentamicin because of increases in the PMF (26). Accumulation of (p)ppGpp and depletion of ATP have both been associated with persister formation (8, 27). Because ADO suppresses the stringent response while concurrently increasing intracellular ATP and GTP, we suspected that ADO might influence phenotypes that are characteristic of persister bacteria. To test this, we examined multiple markers associated with persister bacteria.
The expression of 16S rRNA promoter rrnB P1, which is negatively regulated by (p)ppGpp and positively regulated by ATP, has been inversely correlated with both antibiotic tolerance and bacterial persistence (8, 28–30). To investigate the influence of ADO on rrnB P1 promoter activity, an E. coli strain harboring an rrnB:gfp reporter plasmid was grown in LB broth to mid-log phase and then downshifted into phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Instead of M9, we used PBS to maintain equal numbers of bacteria over the extent of the experiment, as ADO can cause growth delay in M9 (Fig. 1A) (16). Upon downshift of the reporter strain into PBS, there was a rapid decrease in promoter activity (Fig. 2A), consistent with either a rise in (p)ppGpp or a decrease in ATP (Fig. 1B). In contrast, downshift in the presence of 1 mM ADO resulted in a rapid increase in promoter activity (Fig. 2A). To determine whether the increase in reporter activity was due to changes in ATP or (p)ppGpp, we used Δadd ΔdeoD rrnB:gfp and ΔrelA ΔspoT rrnB:gfp reporter strains. ADO did not induce rrnB:gfp expression in the Δadd ΔdeoD reporter strain (Fig. 2A), suggesting that rrnB P1 promoter activity is dependent upon synthesis of ATP through the purine salvage pathway. In sharp contrast, downshift of the (p)ppGpp-null reporter strain in the presence of ADO resulted in a large increase in rrnB P1 promoter activity (Fig. 2B). These findings are consistent with known antagonistic roles of ATP and (p)ppGpp in ribosomal promoter activity: whereas ATP is the initiating nucleotide at six of the seven rrn P1 promoters (including rrnB), ppGpp shortens the half-life of open complexes at the rrn P1 promoter (30). We also examined the influence of ADO on transcription of the rrnD P1 promoter, whose activity is increased by GTP (30). As expected, ADO stimulated rrnD P1 promoter activity, although the changes in activity were smaller in magnitude than the rrnB P1 promoter (Fig. S2A), possibly due to inherent differences in promoter strength or differences in absolute nucleotide concentrations (Fig. S2B). Together, these observations suggest that the ADO-induced increase in ribosomal promoter activity is primarily due to the observed increases in ATP and GTP.
Antibiotic tolerance of persister cells has been linked to decreased cellular respiration (9). To determine whether ADO influences aerobic cellular respiration in E. coli, we measured O2 consumption using PreSens OxoDish (31). Baseline dissolved O2 concentrations in the media were low because measurements were taken at approximately 5,391 feet above sea level. Bacteria downshifted from LB broth to PBS did not deplete O2 from the media (Fig. 2C). In stark contrast, ADO-treated E. coli depleted O2 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2C). We then examined the effect that upstream and downstream ADO metabolites have on respiration. Strikingly, 1 mM adenine, 5′-AMP, d-ribose, or a combination of adenine and d-ribose did not stimulate aerobic respiration (Fig. 2D).
We then assessed O2 consumption in the purine salvage and (p)ppGpp-null mutants. Unlike the wild-type strains, the Δadd ΔdeoD mutant did not deplete O2 in the presence of 100 μM or 1 mM ADO, suggesting that purine salvage is necessary for promotion of cellular respiration by ADO (Fig. 2E). In contrast, when the (p)ppGpp-null mutant was treated with ADO, there was a dose-dependent increase in respiration, similar to that seen in the wild-type strain (Fig. 2F).
To see if ADO-induced O2 consumption correlates with increased PMF and oxidative phosphorylation, we examined electron transport chain (ETC) activity using the tetrazolium salt XTT {2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-((phenylamino)carbonyl)-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide} (32). Reduction of XTT to the colorimetric formazan product occurs in the setting of increased ETC activity (33). Bacteria were downshifted from LB broth to PBS and treated with vehicle or 1 mM ADO in the presence of XTT. The downshift revealed a low basal level of XTT conversion in untreated E. coli, supporting our previous finding that minimal O2 consumption occurs in starvation conditions (Fig. 2G). When controls were downshifted in the presence of 1 mM ADO, a significant >50-fold increase in XTT conversion was noted (Fig. 2G) (P < 0.01). The magnitude of XTT conversion was significantly lower in the Δadd ΔdeoD mutant than the wild-type control (Fig. 2G) (P < 0.05). A ΔrelA ΔspoT E. coli strain sustained significant increases in XTT conversion, although to a lower extent than wild-type controls (Fig. 2H). The increased XTT reduction seen after ADO suggests stimulation of aerobic respiration.
In summary, exogenous ADO treatment of nutritionally starved E. coli decreases ppGpp accumulation and increases ATP and GTP. These changes in nucleotide metabolism correlate with antagonism of multiple markers of persister cells, including increased rRNA transcription, increased ETC activity, and increased O2 consumption. Based on this experimental evidence and the role that PMF and energetics play in antibiotic killing (8–10, 12, 34), we tested whether ADO treatment influences antibiotic lethality.
ADO potentiates the bactericidal activity of different classes of antibiotics against E. coli.
Following our observations that ADO counters markers of persister cells such as respiration and ETC activity, we examined the effects of ADO on the susceptibility of persister cells to antibiotics. Persister cells form stochastically, can be induced in response to environmental stimuli (35), and are also found in relatively high numbers during the stationary phase (3). Thus, to characterize the influence of ADO under conditions enriched for persisters, we determined the survival of stationary-phase E. coli cultures after addition of antibiotics at ≥20 times the MIC (Table S2A) (3). The minimum duration for killing (MDK) curve is the preferred metric for quantifying antibiotic tolerant and persister bacteria in a population, with a biphasic kill curve indicating the presence of persisters (36). The minimum duration for killing 99.99% of the population (MDK99.99) curves demonstrated that the addition of 1 mM ADO together with 80 μg/mL gentamicin (GEN) or 3 μg/mL ciprofloxacin (CIP) resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) more killing of stationary-phase E. coli than antibiotics alone (Fig. 3A). GEN-treated bacteria experienced a relatively constant kill rate from 0 to 18 h and a slower kill rate from 18 to 24 h. The slower killing phase may represent the antibiotic activity against a persister subpopulation (36). The addition of ADO caused a dramatic leftward shift in the GEN kill curve (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, ADO treatment suppressed a second lower rate of killing in the GEN kill curve, suggesting this nucleoside promotes killing of the persister population. The CIP MDK99.99 curves revealed markedly different killing kinetics from GEN. CIP and CIP-ADO groups experienced similar killing rates in the population during the first 4 h (Fig. 3A). The kill curves then shallow out, indicative of biphasic killing. The MDK99.99 was not reached in the CIP-treated group, but with ADO treatment, the MDK99.99 shifted left to 18 h, suggesting enhanced killing of persisters (Fig. 3A). Importantly, ADO alone did not alter growth or survival of the stationary cultures, so the major effect of ADO on antibiotic killing was likely not due to stimulation of growth by ADO or inherent antimicrobial activity of ADO. Together, these results indicate that ADO potentiates GEN- and CIP-mediated killing of persister cells.
Having shown that ADO enhances antibiotic-mediated killing under conditions enriched for persister cells, we turned to conditions that would promote antibiotic tolerance. Specifically, E. coli cells grown to exponential phase in LB broth were downshifted to PBS to induce a growth-restricted starvation state. Accumulation of ppGpp inhibits cell growth; however, E. coli can continue to divide for 90 min after induction of ppGpp (37). Growth can be an important determinant of tolerance and antibiotic killing. Therefore, we assessed the impact of ADO on growth under the PBS-downshifted conditions used in our investigations. ADO did not significantly increase growth or compromise survival compared to untreated controls over a 24-h period (Fig. 3B). To further assess the effects ADO has on growth and killing, we assessed survival of E. coli after 18 h of treatment with 40 μg/mL ampicillin because β-lactam killing is proportional to growth rate (38). The combination of ADO with ampicillin slightly improved survival compared to ampicillin alone, suggesting that the primary mechanism of ADO-driven antibiotic potentiation is unrelated to growth stimulation (Fig. S3).
In the presence of 1 mM ADO, treatment with 5 μg/mL GEN or 500 ng/mL CIP resulted in a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in survival compared to controls treated with only antibiotics. ADO enhanced GEN and CIP killing of E. coli by 105-fold and 103-fold, respectively (Fig. 3C and D). Both 5′-AMP and d-ribose enhanced killing by GEN and CIP (P < 0.05); however, the magnitude was substantially smaller than ADO. The combination of adenine and d-ribose did not further decrease survival (Fig. 3C and D). Yang et al. investigated the enhancement of antibiotic lethality against E. coli using purines and pyrimidines, including adenine but not ADO (39). While adenine reduces O2 consumption and fails to potentiate antibiotic lethality (39), our investigations here show that ADO greatly enhances both aerobic respiration and lethality of GEN and CIP. The differences between adenine and ADO might be related to the PMF and respiration-enhancing activity of the latter.
Bacteria encounter a gradient of O2 concentrations within tissue microenvironments (40, 41). To assess whether the influence of ADO on GEN- and CIP-mediated killing is an O2-dependent process, we performed the killing assays under anaerobic conditions in the presence or absence of the alternative terminal electron acceptor nitrate (NO3−). ADO treatment alone did not influence survival in anaerobic conditions (Fig. S4A). GEN reduced survival of anaerobic E. coli to 75%, while the addition of NO3− reduced survival to 47%. In sharp contrast, ADO enhanced GEN killing roughly 1,000-fold regardless of the presence of NO3− (Fig. 3E). The addition of NO3− to CIP significantly (P < 0.05) reduced survival of anaerobic E. coli from 9% to 0.5%. The addition of ADO to CIP significantly reduced survival to 0.08% and 0.1% in the absence and presence of NO3−, respectively (Fig. 3F). To further characterize the impact of ADO under anaerobic conditions, we examined XTT conversion and intracellular ATP and succinate concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Treatment of E. coli with 1 mM ADO in the absence or presence of NO3− significantly increased XTT conversion over a 2-h period (Fig. S4B). Following a 15-min treatment with 1 mM ADO, ATP levels increased but did not reach statistical significance in the absence of NO3− (P = 0.072) (Fig. S4C). However, in the presence of NO3−, ATP levels significantly increased (P < 0.05) (Fig. S4C). We observed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in succinate concentrations in the absence but not in the presence of NO3−, suggesting that fumarate may serve as an alternative electron acceptor when NO3− is absent (Fig. S4C). Together, these results indicate that reactive oxygen and nitrogen species are not primary mechanisms by which ADO enhances antibiotic killing. In addition, these findings indicate that under anaerobic conditions, ADO increases ETC activity and can potentiate GEN and CIP killing independently of O2 or NO3− respiration.
Next, we tested whether ADO promotes increased killing through increased PMF and cellular respiration. We utilized the protonophore carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) to uncouple oxidative phosphorylation and abolish PMF. The addition of CCCP abolished the lethality-enhancing effect of ADO for GEN and CIP (Fig. 3G and H). We also found that ADO increases uptake of GEN (Fig. S5). These results, along with XTT observations, support that ADO enhances antibiotic lethality by enhancing ETC activity and PMF.
The minimum duration for killing in E. coli increases with the loss of purine salvage or the stringent response.
To establish MDK99.99 curves, we examined E. coli survival over time with antibiotic treatments in growth-restricted PBS conditions. We observed 80% survival of E. coli after exposure to 5 μg/mL GEN for 24 h; no viable bacteria were detectable at 24 h when 100 μM or 1 mM ADO was included with GEN (Fig. 4A). Coadministration of ADO with GEN resulted in a dramatic shift of the MDK99.99 for both wild-type control strains (Fig. 4B and D). The dose-dependent shift in the kinetics of bacterial killing for GEN suggests that exogenous ADO reduces starvation-induced antibiotic tolerance.
To investigate the role of purine salvage and the stringent response on ADO-potentiated GEN killing, we measured survival of an Δadd ΔdeoD mutant after GEN treatment. ADO was less effective at potentiating GEN in the Δadd ΔdeoD mutant than the wild type (Fig. 4B and C). Moreover, the MDK99.99 for GEN and ADO was approximately 3 h in the wild-type control strain but did not achieve 99.99% killing of the mutant strain after 24 h under the same conditions (Fig. 4B). These dramatic shifts in MDK99.99 suggest that purine salvage is a major determinant of the influence of ADO on GEN lethality. Significant ADO-potentiated GEN killing was observed in the Δadd ΔdeoD mutant at 24 h (Fig. 4B). The delayed killing kinetics suggest that ADO may be salvaged less efficiently through redundant purine salvage enzymes. The rihC gene encodes a low expressed, constitutive ribonucleoside hydrolase that converts ADO to adenine (17, 42). This alternative pathway may be responsible for the intermediate ADO phenotype seen in the purine salvage mutant at 24 h. To verify that the observed loss of phenotype in the purine salvage mutant was specific to the disruption of add or deoD, we complemented the mutant with the low-copy-number pWSK29 vector expressing the add or deoD genes under the control of their native promoters. Based on the MDK killing kinetics (Fig. 4B and C), the mutants were challenged with 5 μg/mL GEN in the presence or absence of 1 mM ADO for 6 h in PBS. The Δadd ΔdeoD pWSK29 empty vector and the Δadd ΔdeoD pWSK29::add mutants demonstrated comparable survival to the Δadd ΔdeoD mutant. However, the expression of deoD restored the susceptibility of Δadd ΔdeoD E. coli to the effects of GEN and ADO to levels recorded in the wild-type strain (Fig. S6). Conversion of ADO to inosine through add is the predominant initial step in ADO salvage (42). The pathway then relies on DeoD to convert inosine to hypoxanthine and ADO to adenine (17). Our investigations indicate that the conversion of these nucleosides to the corresponding nucleobases is critical for the potentiation of GEN killing by ADO.
When the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant was treated with GEN and ADO, the MDK99.99 was achieved at 17 h compared to 3 h for the wild-type control strain (Fig. 4D). The MDK99.99 findings highlight an important role for the stringent response in ADO-driven enhanced lethality of GEN against growth-arrested tolerant bacteria. However, it appears that the ability of ADO to potentiate GEN may be more dependent on purine salvage than the stringent response (Fig. 4C and E).
Building on our observation that ADO enhances CIP killing at 18 h, we established CIP MDK99.99 curves. Addition of 100 μM or 1 mM ADO to 500 ng/mL CIP resulted in significant (P < 0.05) killing after 24 h compared to CIP-treated controls (Fig. 4F). The Δadd ΔdeoD mutant had improved survival when treated with CIP and ADO compared to the control strain (Fig. 4G). These observations indicate that ADO enhanced lethality is partially, but not fully, dependent on the purine salvage pathway. The ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant was less susceptible to CIP than its isogenic E. coli, which may be due to experimental conditions. The MDK99.99 of the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant treated with CIP and ADO was 6 h compared to 2 h in the wild-type control strain (Fig. 4H). The prolonged MDK99.99 observed in the ΔrelA ΔspoT mutant suggests that ADO-driven disruption of stringent response contributes to enhanced CIP lethality.
ADO potentiates antibiotic lethality against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.
To examine whether the impact of ADO on antibiotic lethality could be applied to other Gram-negative bacteria, we subjected Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain 14028s to GEN or CIP in the presence of ADO. ADO treatment had similar enhancement of GEN and CIP MDK99.99 values (Fig. S7).
To further investigate the role of the ETC in the ADO-dependent increased antibiotic killing phenotype, we examined an ΔatpB S. Typhimurium mutant that lacks a critical subunit of the ATP synthase (43) and a small colony variant that bears mutations in the nuo operon (Δnuo::km) and ndh gene (Δndh::FRT) encoding NDH-I and NDH-II NADH dehydrogenases, respectively (44). Addition of ADO significantly (P < 0.01) increased GEN killing of the ΔatpB mutant, though the effect was less than in the wild-type strain. In contrast, ADO did not increase GEN killing of the Δnuo Δndh mutant (Fig. 5A). Moreover, whereas ADO enhanced lethality of CIP in stationary-phase Salmonella, ADO did not significantly (P < 0.05) potentiate CIP killing of ΔatpB or Δnuo Δndh mutants (Fig. 5B). These results highlight the importance of an intact ETC for the full impact of ADO on antibiotic killing. The inability of ADO to enhance antibiotic killing of Salmonella deficient in NDH-I and NDH-II NADH dehydrogenases suggests that electron flux through this complex of the ETC is critical for the potentiation of antibiotic killing by ADO. On the other hand, ADO-driven enhanced killing of the ΔatpB mutant suggests a mechanism independent of oxidative phosphorylation.
ADO alters nucleotide metabolism and antibiotic killing in S. aureus.
We then expanded our investigations to the Gram-positive bacterium Staphylococcus aureus. Amino acid deprivation of S. aureus results in a rapid consumption of the substrate GTP and a concomitant accumulation of (p)ppGpp by RSH (RelA/SpoT homolog) (45). To examine ATP and GTP in S. aureus following ADO treatment, S. aureus cultures were subjected to a nutrient downshift into glucose-free M9 minimal media supplemented with ADO for 15 min. Treatment of S. aureus with ADO significantly increased ATP and GTP levels (Fig. 6A). Conlon et al. demonstrated that decreased ATP levels in S. aureus correlates with increased persister formation (46).
We tested antibiotic lethality against S. aureus using several classes of antibiotics. For these experiments, S. aureus was shifted from exponential-phase growth into M9 minimal media supplemented with nicotinic acid, thiamine, and Casamino Acids. Unlike E. coli and S. Typhimurium, this medium composition allowed the bacteria to grow over 18 h. Even in the absence of antibiotics, inclusion of 1 mM ADO resulted in decreased CFU at 6 h, but the numbers of S. aureus increased by 18 h (Fig. 6B). The addition of ADO together with either GEN, ampicillin, or ceftriaxone increased killing activity compared to control groups treated with antibiotics only. Accordingly, ADO shortened the MDK99.99 for these antibiotic classes (Fig. 6C to E). We did not observe significant changes for vancomycin-treated groups (Fig. 6F). Unexpectedly, the combination of CIP and ADO provided a protective effect at both time points compared to the CIP-only group (Fig. 6G). Overall, these data indicate that ADO can enhance antibiotic lethality against S. aureus for multiple classes of antibiotics. However, ADO can also play a protective role in the case of a fluoroquinolone. Under a more complex medium, the opposing effects of ADO on survival depend on the antibiotic class. Identifying and understanding antibiotic class-specific mechanisms may provide insights for developing improved therapies. While the magnitude of impact ADO has on antibiotic lethality in S. aureus is not as large as the impact seen in E. coli or S. Typhimurium, it does demonstrate that ADO can enhance antibiotic lethality in an important Gram-positive human pathogen.
DISCUSSION
Our investigations demonstrate that ADO significantly alters nucleotide metabolism in E. coli to suppress the stringent response, increase PMF, promote cellular respiration, and drive cellular energetics in starving bacteria. An important consequence of this ADO-induced metabolic shift is a dramatic increase in antibiotic lethality against starvation-triggered tolerant and stationary-phase persister bacteria in the absence of significant growth. These effects suggest that during starvation, ADO induces a state that has been called “persister awakening” (10).
In the present work, we focused on the ADO-driven shifts in nucleotide metabolism, the consequences of which drive potentiation of GEN, CIP, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone killing of several Gram-positive and Gram-negative human pathogens. (p)ppGpp deficiency, defective purine salvage, loss of complex I, or ATP synthase partially protects bacteria from ADO-driven potentiation of antibiotic killing, suggesting that exogenous ADO influences two pathways of persister formation, the stringent response and energy-producing pathways. Disruption of the stringent response dysregulates cell metabolism, while concurrent increases in PMF and respiration by ADO play a more profound role in potentiating antibiotic lethality. Recent work highlighted the importance of purine nucleotide pools and de novo purine biosynthesis in antibiotic lethality (39). We observe that metabolically engaging purine salvage potentiates the toxicity of different classes of antibiotics against diverse species of bacteria. Our research suggests that the effects that ADO exerts on cellular processes and the corresponding resensitization to antibiotics may be evolutionarily conserved.
Allison et al. have shown that metabolites such as glucose, mannitol, fructose, and pyruvate can enhance GEN-mediated killing of E. coli in minimal media by fueling central bacterial metabolism (7). They found that these metabolites drove PMF and respiration to potentiate killing by GEN specifically. There are important differences to consider between their work and ours. First, we observe that ADO enhances killing by GEN and CIP, whereas the carbon sources used by Allison et al. specifically potentiate GEN killing. Similar to the metabolites reported by Allison et al., we do not observe potentiation of antibiotic killing by ADO in the presence of CCCP, suggesting that it is dependent on PMF. Our data support the conclusion that the influence of ADO on antibiotic killing is ETC dependent and can occur in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. However, unlike the previously reported metabolites, potentiation of antibiotic killing by ADO is not dependent on the presence of a terminal electron acceptor such as O2 or nitrate. Thus, our work supports a model wherein ADO metabolism not only activates central metabolism but also stimulates ETC activity. The specific mechanism by which activation of ADO salvage potentiates GEN and CIP and the electron donors and acceptors generated through ADO metabolism are under investigation.
A novel finding in the current study is that ADO enhances antibiotic killing without stimulating bacterial growth. Compelling arguments have been made that the reduction in growth rate alone accounts for antibiotic tolerance in persistent bacteria and that other metabolic shifts, including activation of (p)ppGpp-mediated signaling and depletion of ATP, are not sufficient to maintain tolerance if the rate of growth is increased (14, 38). It is clear from these and other studies that an increase in growth rate correlates with resensitization to antibiotics. In contrast, the reversion of antibiotic tolerance by ADO is not the result of stimulation of growth. In this context, our findings are even more remarkable considering the observation that ADO potentiates antibiotic lethality even though it suppresses growth of Salmonella and E. coli (16) (Fig. 1A). Under the conditions of the antibiotic survival assays presented here, we saw no significant increase in growth in the presence ADO with or without antibiotics, even though ADO reduced survival in antibiotics by up to 5 orders of magnitude. Though the literature on ADO as a sole carbon and nitrogen source for E. coli is limited, our data show that the growth rate in our conditions is below our limits of detection and is incongruent with the magnitude of bacterial killing reported herein. Intuitively, increased growth rate generally requires increased cellular metabolism. On the other hand, increased metabolism does not necessarily lead to cellular replication. In fact, others have shown that metabolism and growth rate can be uncoupled (8, 10, 14, 15, 47). Our evidence shows that ADO activates cellular metabolism while not permitting or, in some instances, slowing growth. This leads to the conclusion that growth is not the dominant mechanism underlying potentiation of antibiotics by ADO over the time period examined. More broadly, our data provide evidence that activation of cellular metabolism without stimulation of growth can be sufficient to reduce antibiotic tolerance.
We anticipate that each antibiotic will be potentiated through class-specific mechanisms, some of which have been previously described. For example, ADO-driven increases in PMF drive GEN uptake, effectively delivering more drug to its ribosomal target (9, 48). CIP-induced double-strand DNA breaks are known to activate the SOS response, an adaptive program associated with antibiotic tolerance (49). While there is evidence that the stringent response regulates expression of the SOS response (50), further investigation is necessary to determine whether ADO could inhibit the latter stress program independently of its actions on the stringent response to abrogate CIP tolerance. The global enhancement of cellular energetics following ADO may allow for awakening of persisters, thus improving the bactericidal activity of various classes of antibiotics against clinically diverse bacteria. It is noteworthy that mucosal surfaces generate large amounts of extracellular ADO (16). Host-derived ADO may sensitize bacteria to antibiotic killing. However, ADO itself is likely not a feasible antimicrobial adjuvant due to its rapid uptake by host tissues and potentially detrimental cardiovascular side effects (51). Rather, approaches to increase host extracellular ADO or alter bacterial nucleotide salvage and metabolism to promote cellular respiration and awaken persister populations may provide opportunities to decrease the formation of antimicrobial resistance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Microbial strains.
E. coli K-12 BW25113 wild type and E. coli K-12 BW25113 ΔdeoD were obtained from the commercially available Keio collection (Horizon Discovery). E. coli K-12 MG1655 ΔrelA ΔspoT and its isogenic control have previously been described (52). S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028s and Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus ATCC 12600 were obtained from ATCC. S. Typhimurium mutants were obtained from the selected publications (43, 44). Strains are listed in Table S2B in the supplemental material; plasmids are listed in Table S2C. Unless otherwise specified, for each experiment, strains were cultured and maintained in LB broth and LB agar under aerobic conditions at 37°C and 250 rpm agitation for liquid cultures. Appropriate antibiotic selection was used for each strain in both LB broth and LB agar. Stock strains were stored at −80°C with 15% glycerol. All experiments were performed with bacteria subcultured 1:50 from 3 mL overnight cultures prepared in 14 mL round-bottom snap-cap culture tubes, unless otherwise specified. Bacteria were washed and pelleted at 4000g for 5 min in 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes. For all experiments, bacteria were diluted in respective media using OD600 to determine culture density.
Defined minimal media.
M9 medium (48 mM Na2HPO4 · 7H2O, 22 mM KH2PO4, 8.56 mM NaCl, 18.69 mM NH4Cl, 1 mM MgSO4, 100 μM CaCl2, and 50 μM FeSO4 · 7H2O, pH 7.1) was also purchased through Teknova (catalog no. M8005). M9 used with S. aureus is the M9 listed above with 0.2% Casamino Acids, 2 μg/mL nicotinic acid, and 5 μg/mL thiamine MOPS [40 mM MOPS buffer, 4 mM tricine, 0.4% d-glucose, 40 μg/mL of each amino acid except serine, 2 mM K2HPO4, 10 μM FeSO4 · 7H2O, 9.5 mM NH4Cl, 276 μM K2SO4, 500 nM CaCl2, 50 mM NaCl, 525 μM MgCl2, 2.9 nM (NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O, 400 nM H3BO3, 30 nM CoCl2, 9.6 nM CuSO4, 80.8 nM MnCl2, and 9.74 nM ZnSO4, pH 7.2]. PBS, pH 7.4, was purchased from Gibco (catalog no. 10010023). PBS was used in many experiments to eliminate confounding growth influence of ADO in M9 minimal medium.
Growth curve assay.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~3.5 hours until late exponential phase, as described above. At an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of ~0.4, 1 mL of cells were isolated in a 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube and washed three times with M9 minimal medium; centrifugation was for 5 min at 4,000 × g. Bacteria were then diluted in M9 medium to an OD600 of 0.001, and 135 μL of culture was applied to a 96-well ultralow binding plate with 15 μL of vehicle or treatment. OD600 was taken every 10 min, and plates were maintained at 37°C with 768 rpm agitation.
32P TLC purine nucleotide assay.
Bacteria grown overnight in LB broth were washed 3 times in MOPS minimal medium containing 40 μg/mL of all amino acids and subcultured 1:100 in MOPS medium containing all amino acids at 40 μg/mL; cells were then labeled with 32P orthophosphate at 10 μCi/mL overnight. The next day, bacteria were washed 3 times in M9 medium and resuspended into respective conditions, which are defined in figure legends. Nucleotides were then extracted using ice-cold 3.5-M formic acid; 500 μL culture was added to 200 μL formic acid for a final concentration of 1 M formic acid. Extraction was performed on ice for 20 min. Cell debris was pelleted in a tabletop centrifuge at 13,000 rpm for 5 min. We applied 2-μL spots 4 times to a polyethyleneimine (PEI)-cellulose plate, with 8 μL total volume per spot. (p)ppGpp-null bacteria and nutrient-rich conditions were used as negative controls; amino acid starvation conditions were used as positive controls. Plates were resolved in 1.5 M KH2PO4, pH 3.4, for ~80 min. Plates were exposed to a phosphorimage screen for 24 h and subsequently analyzed on a Bio-Rad phosphorimager with 50 μm resolution.
GFP promoter assay.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~2 to 3 h until exponential phase. Bacteria were then washed three times in PBS and then resuspended into PBS until an OD600 of 0.2 was reached. We added 150 μL of culture to each well of a 96-well black wall clear-bottom plate containing respective treatment conditions. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) signal and OD600 were analyzed every 5 min using a BioTek Instruments Synergy H1 microplate reader at 37°C with agitation.
Respiration assay.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~2 to 3 h until exponential phase. One milliliter of bacteria was then washed three times in PBS and then resuspended into PBS to an OD600 of 0.2. One milliliter of culture was added to each well of a 12-well OxoDish plate containing respective treatment conditions. Plates were analyzed every minute using PreSens OxoDish at 37°C with agitation.
XTT assay.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~2 to 3 h until exponential phase. One milliliter of bacteria was then washed three times in PBS and then resuspended into PBS to an OD600 of 0.05. For anaerobic cultures, an overnight stationary culture was washed three times in PBS prior to treatment. Cells were suspended in PBS containing 200 μg/mL XTT {2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-5-((phenylamino)carbonyl)-2H-tetrazolium hydroxide} with 5.5 μg/mL menadione. We added 100 μL of culture to a 96-well plate containing respective treatment conditions. Plates were analyzed with OD460 to OD660 to measure XTT product accumulation. Anaerobic samples were brought to the plate reader in an airtight anaerobic case. For kinetic assays, plates were maintained at 37°C with 768 rpm agitation and read every 9 min.
HPLC and LC-MS assays.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~2 to 3 h until exponential phase. One milliliter of bacteria was then washed three times in PBS and then resuspended into PBS to an OD600 of 0.4. For anaerobic cultures, an overnight stationary culture was washed three times in PBS prior to treatment, and samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Samples were then extracted using ice-cold 3.5 M formic acid, and 500 μL culture was added to 200 μL formic acid for a final concentration of 1 M formic acid. Extraction was performed on ice for 20 min. Samples were frozen to −80°C and then thawed and dried at room temperature using a SpeedVac centrifuge. Samples were then suspended in 150 μL mobile-phase buffer (75 mM monobasic potassium phosphate, 10 mM tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate, pH 6.25, with triethylamine). Samples were then ultrafiltered using Sartorius Vivaspin 500 5,000-Da molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) polyethersulfone (PES) filters. We injected 75 μL of sample, and metabolites were quantitated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) as previously described (53) with ATP and GTP absorbance spectra and retention times verified by coinjection with authentic standards. The metabolites were quantitated from calibration curves ranging from 100 nM to 5 mM. LC-MS samples were quantitated as previously described (54). Metabolites were detected by the masses of their negatively charged ions (ATP, 346 m/z; succinate, 117 m/z). Retention times and m/z were verified by coinjection with authentic standards. Analysis of samples and curves was performed blind. An Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity system was used for HPLC analysis. LC-MS was performed on an Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity II LC/MSD iQ with electrospray ionization (ESI) mass detection.
CFU antibiotic killing assay.
Bacteria were subcultured 1:50 from an overnight stock. Subcultures were grown for ~2 to 3 h until the exponential phase. One milliliter of bacteria was then washed three times with PBS and then resuspended into PBS or M9 medium to an OD600 of 0.05. We added 3 mL of culture to 14-mL round-bottom culture tubes, and respective treatments were applied. For the persister assay, cells were grown to stationary phase overnight in LB broth and used the following morning. All treatment groups for a given strain were established from the same inoculum to minimize starting cell density variability between treatment groups. For all experiments, individual replicate experiments were normalized to starting inoculum to account for variability between experiments. Bacteria were cultured for the desired amount of time at 37°C with 250 rpm agitation. Culturing in minimal versus nutrient-rich media influenced the MIC for a bacterial strain. Based on this, we did not use fold increase over MIC as determined by standard microplate dilution in nutrient-rich LB broth for every experiment (Table S2A). For some experiments, the antibiotic concentrations used were determined empirically based on specific experimental conditions and durations. Following treatment, 500 μL of bacterial culture was added to 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes containing 500 μL of PBS. Cells were washed three or four times (depending on antibiotic concentration) with PBS to remove antibiotics and then suspended in PBS to the initial culture volume of 500 μL. For zero-hour CFU, bacteria were serial diluted in PBS at 1:5, 10-μL spots were applied to LB agar to enumerate CFU. For antibiotic killing conditions, bacteria were serial diluted in PBS 1:3, and 10-μL spots were applied to LB agar to enumerate CFU. Plates were incubated overnight at 37°C. CFU were counted manually the following day and held for at least 2 more days to allow for possible emergence of slow-growing persister bacteria, which were added to initial counts. Survival assays using 50 μM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) (Sigma; catalog no. C2759) were performed aerobically as described above. CCCP was administered simultaneously with the ADO and antibiotic (ABX) treatments. For anaerobic survival assays, bacteria were introduced into the anaerobic chamber 1 week prior to the experiment and serial passaged in LB broth. Anaerobic survival was conducted in the anaerobic chamber with the same approach as described above. All reagents were stored under anaerobic conditions to eliminate the introduction of O2. Colorimetric O2 indicators were kept in the anaerobic chamber during experiments to confirm anaerobic conditions.
Statistical analysis.
Statistical tests and sample sizes are indicated within the figure legends. A minimum of three biological experimental repeats were conducted for all experiments. Blinding was used to minimize bias during HPLC and LC-MS analysis. No data points were excluded from analysis. All statistical tests were performed with a two-tailed analysis unless otherwise indicated. Significance threshold for α was set at 0.05. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean unless otherwise indicated. Microsoft Excel was used to organize raw data sets. GraphPad Prism 8 was used for statistical analysis and figure generation. Bio-Rad Image Lab was used for phosphorimage analysis.
ACKOWLEDGEMENTS
These studies were funded by NIH grants R01 AI54959, R01 AI136520, R01 DK095491, R01 DK104713, K08 DK120809-02, and T32 AI052066 and VA merit grant BX0002073.
We thank Sarah Gehrke of the University of Colorado School of Medicine Metabolomics Core for performing amino acid quantification.
Conceptualization, D.A.K., S.P.C., A.V.-T., and D.J.K.; Methodology, D.A.K., J.-S.K., K.B.M., L.L., A.V.-T., J.S.L., and D.J.K.; Investigation, D.A.K., J.S.L., K.B.M., L.L., and J.-S.K.; Formal Analysis, D.A.K. and D.J.K.; Visualization, D.A.K.; Writing, D.A.K., S.P.C., A.V.-T., and D.J.K.; Resources, D.J.K., A.V.-T., and S.P.C., Funding Acquisition, D.J.K., A.V.-T., and S.P.C.
We have no competing interests.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Andres Vazquez-Torres, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Brian Conlon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Mark Brynildsen, Princeton University.
Contributor Information
Daniel J. Kao, Email: daniel.kao@cuanschutz.edu.
Alejandro Aballay, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Martens E, Demain AL. 2017. The antibiotic resistance crisis, with a focus on the United States. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 70:520–526. doi: 10.1038/ja.2017.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ventola CL. 2015. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P T 40:277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rowe SE, Conlon BP, Keren I, Lewis K. 2016. Persisters: methods for isolation and identifying contributing factors—a review, p 17–28. In Michiels J, Fauvart M (ed), Bacterial persistence: methods and protocols. Springer, New York, NY. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Windels EM, Michiels JE, Van Den Bergh B, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2019. Antibiotics: combatting tolerance to stop resistance. mBio 10:e02095-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02095-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Windels EM, Michiels JE, Fauvart M, Wenseleers T, Van Den Bergh B, Michiels J. 2019. Bacterial persistence promotes the evolution of antibiotic resistance by increasing survival and mutation rates. ISME J 13:1239–1251. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0344-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Levin-Reisman I, Ronin I, Gefen O, Braniss I, Shoresh N, Balaban NQ. 2017. Antibiotic tolerance facilitates the evolution of resistance. Science 355:826–830. doi: 10.1126/science.aaj2191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Allison KR, Brynildsen MP, Collins JJ. 2011. Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides. Nature 473:216–220. doi: 10.1038/nature10069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shan Y, Brown Gandt A, Rowe SE, Deisinger JP, Conlon BP, Lewis K. 2017. ATP-dependent persister formation in Escherichia coli. mBio 8:e02267-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02267-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lobritz MA, Belenky P, Porter CBM, Gutierrez A, Yang JH, Schwarz EG, Dwyer DJ, Khalil AS, Collins JJ. 2015. Antibiotic efficacy is linked to bacterial cellular respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:8173–8180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509743112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wilmaerts D, Windels EM, Verstraeten N, Michiels J. 2019. General mechanisms leading to persister formation and awakening. Trends Genet 35:401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Van Den Bergh B, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2017. Formation, physiology, ecology, evolution and clinical importance of bacterial persisters. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:219–251. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.McCollister BD, Hoffman M, Husain M, Vazquez-Torres A. 2011. Nitric oxide protects bacteria from aminoglycosides by blocking the energy-dependent phases of drug uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2189–2196. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01203-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jones-Carson J, Yahashiri A, Kim J-S, Liu L, Fitzsimmons LF, Weiss DS, Vázquez-Torres A. 2020. Nitric oxide disrupts bacterial cytokinesis by poisoning purine metabolism. Sci Adv 6:eaaz0260. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz0260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pontes MH, Groisman EA. 2019. Slow growth determines nonheritable antibiotic resistance in Salmonella enterica. Sci Signal 12:eaax3938. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax3938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lopatkin AJ, Stokes JM, Zheng EJ, Yang JH, Takahashi MK, You L, Collins JJ. 2019. Bacterial metabolic state more accurately predicts antibiotic lethality than growth rate. Nat Microbiol 4:2109–2117. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0536-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kao DJ, Saeedi BJ, Kitzenberg D, Burney KM, Dobrinskikh E, Battista KD, Vazquez-Torres A, Colgan SP, Kominsky DJ. 2017. Intestinal epithelial ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) regulates intestinal colonization and infection by nontyphoidal Salmonella. Infect Immun 85:e01022-16. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01022-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jensen K, Dandanell G, Hove-Jensen B, WillemoËs M. 2008. Nucleotides, nucleosides, and nucleobases. EcoSal Plus 3. doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.3.6.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dalebroux ZD, Swanson MS. 2012. ppGpp: magic beyond RNA polymerase. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:203–212. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fitzsimmons LF, Liu L, Kant S, Kim J-S, Till JK, Jones-Carson J, Porwollik S, McClelland M, Vazquez-Torres A. 2020. SpoT induces intracellular Salmonella virulence programs in the phagosome. mBio 11:e03397-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.03397-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fitzsimmons LF, Liu L, Kim JS, Jones-Carson J, Vazquez-Torres A. 2018. Salmonella reprograms nucleotide metabolism in its adaptation to nitrosative stress. mBio 9:e00211-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00211-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Boutte CC, Crosson S. 2013. Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Trends Microbiol 21:174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. 2006. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol 2:2006.0008. doi: 10.1038/msb4100050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Potrykus K, Cashel M. 2008. (p)ppGpp: still magical? Annu Rev Microbiol 62:35–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mechold U, Potrykus K, Murphy H, Murakami KS, Cashel M. 2013. Differential regulation by ppGpp versus pppGpp in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 41:6175–6189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nemkov T, D’Alessandro A, Hansen KC. 2015. Three-minute method for amino acid analysis by UHPLC and high-resolution quadrupole orbitrap mass spectrometry. Amino Acids 47:2345–2357. doi: 10.1007/s00726-015-2019-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shan Y, Lazinski D, Rowe S, Camilli A, Lewis K. 2015. Genetic basis of persister tolerance to aminoglycosides in Escherichia coli. mBio 6:e00078-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00078-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Pacios O, Blasco L, Bleriot I, Fernandez-Garcia L, Ambroa A, López M, Bou G, Cantón R, Garcia-Contreras R, Wood TK, Tomás M. 2020. (p)ppGpp and its role in bacterial persistence: new challenges. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e01283-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01283-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schneider DA, Gourse RL. 2004. Relationship between growth rate and ATP concentration in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 279:8262–8268. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311996200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schneider DA, Gourse RL. 2003. Changes in Escherichia coli rRNA promoter activity correlate with changes in initiating nucleoside triphosphate and guanosine 5' diphosphate 3'-diphosphate concentrations after induction of feedback control of ribosome synthesis. J Bacteriol 185:6185–6191. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.20.6185-6191.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schneider DA, Gaal T, Gourse RL. 2002. NTP-sensing by rRNA promoters in Escherichia coli is direct. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8602–8607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.132285199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marques MPC, Walshe K, Doyle S, Fernandes P, De Carvalho CCCR. 2012. Anchoring high-throughput screening methods to scale-up bioproduction of siderophores. Process Biochem 47:416–421. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.11.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Berridge MV, Herst PM, Tan AS. 2005. Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnol Annu Rev 11:127–152. doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(05)11004-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Roslev P, King GM. 1993. Application of a tetrazolium salt with a water-soluble formazan as an indicator of viability in respiring bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 59:2891–2896. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.9.2891-2896.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Fung DKC, Chan EWC, Chin ML, Chan RCY. 2010. Delineation of a bacterial starvation stress response network which can mediate antibiotic tolerance development. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:1082–1093. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01218-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Verstraeten N, Knapen WJ, Kint CI, Liebens V, Van den Bergh B, Dewachter L, Michiels JE, Fu Q, David CC, Fierro AC, Marchal K, Beirlant J, Versees W, Hofkens J, Jansen M, Fauvart M, Michiels J. 2015. Obg and membrane depolarization are part of a microbial bet-hedging strategy that leads to antibiotic tolerance. Mol Cell 59:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Balaban NQ, Helaine S, Lewis K, Ackermann M, Aldridge B, Andersson DI, Brynildsen MP, Bumann D, Camilli A, Collins JJ, Dehio C, Fortune S, Ghigo J-M, Hardt W-D, Harms A, Heinemann M, Hung DT, Jenal U, Levin BR, Michiels J, Storz G, Tan M-W, Tenson T, Van Melderen L, Zinkernagel A. 2019. Definitions and guidelines for research on antibiotic persistence. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:441–448. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0196-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schreiber G, Ron EZ, Glaser G. 1995. ppGpp-mediated regulation of DNA replication and cell division in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 30:27–32. doi: 10.1007/BF00294520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Tuomanen E, Cozens R, Tosch W, Zak O, Tomasz A. 1986. The rate of killing of Escherichia coli by beta-lactam antibiotics is strictly proportional to the rate of bacterial growth. J Gen Microbiol 132:1297–1304. doi: 10.1099/00221287-132-5-1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang JH, Wright SN, Hamblin M, McCloskey D, Alcantar MA, Schrübbers L, Lopatkin AJ, Satish S, Nili A, Palsson BO, Walker GC, Collins JJ. 2019. A white-box machine learning approach for revealing antibiotic mechanisms of action. Cell 177:1649–1661.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Colgan SP, Furuta GT, Taylor CT. 2020. Hypoxia and innate immunity: keeping up with the HIFsters. Annu Rev Immunol 38:341–363. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-100819-121537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Taylor CT, Colgan SP. 2017. Regulation of immunity and inflammation by hypoxia in immunological niches. Nat Rev Immunol 17:774–785. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Petersen C, Møller LB. 2001. The RihA, RihB, and RihC ribonucleoside hydrolases of Escherichia coli: substrate specificity, gene expression, and regulation. J Biol Chem 276:884–894. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008300200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fitzsimmons L, Liu L, Porwollik S, Chakraborty S, Desai P, Tapscott T, Henard C, McClelland M, Vazquez-Torres A. 2018. Zinc-dependent substrate-level phosphorylation powers Salmonella growth under nitrosative stress of the innate host response. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007388. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Husain M, Bourret TJ, McCollister BD, Jones-Carson J, Laughlin J, Vazquez-Torres A. 2008. Nitric oxide evokes an adaptive response to oxidative stress by arresting respiration. J Biol Chem 283:7682–7689. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708845200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Geiger T, Goerke C, Fritz M, Schafer T, Ohlsen K, Liebeke M, Lalk M, Wolz C. 2010. Role of the (p)ppGpp synthase RSH, a RelA/SpoT homolog, in stringent response and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 78:1873–1883. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01439-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Conlon BP, Rowe SE, Gandt AB, Nuxoll AS, Donegan NP, Zalis EA, Clair G, Adkins JN, Cheung AL, Lewis K. 2016. Persister formation in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with ATP depletion. Nat Microbiol 1:16051. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pontes MH, Groisman EA. 2020. A physiological basis for nonheritable antibiotic resistance. mBio 11:e00817-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00817-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bryan LE, Kwan S. 1983. Roles of ribosomal binding, membrane potential, and electron transport in bacterial uptake of streptomycin and gentamicin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 23:835–845. doi: 10.1128/AAC.23.6.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Dörr T, Lewis K, Vulić M. 2009. SOS response induces persistence to fluoroquinolones in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 5:e1000760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Durfee T, Hansen AM, Zhi H, Blattner FR, Jin DJ. 2008. Transcription profiling of the stringent response in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190:1084–1096. doi: 10.1128/JB.01092-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Belhassen B, Pelleg A. 1984. Electrophysiologic effects of adenosine triphosphate and adenosine on the mammalian heart: clinical and experimental aspects. J Am Coll Cardiol 4:414–424. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(84)80233-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xiao H, Kalman M, Ikehara K, Zemel S, Glaser G, Cashel M. 1991. Residual guanosine 3',5'-bispyrophosphate synthetic activity of relA null mutants can be eliminated by spoT null mutations. J Biol Chem 266:5980–5990. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)67694-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lee JS, Wang RX, Alexeev EE, Lanis JM, Battista KD, Glover LE, Colgan SP. 2018. Hypoxanthine is a checkpoint stress metabolite in colonic epithelial energy modulation and barrier function. J Biol Chem 293:6039–6051. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wang RX, Henen MA, Lee JS, Vogeli B, Colgan SP. 2021. Microbiota-derived butyrate is an endogenous HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. Gut Microbes 13:1938380. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1938380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.