Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, can affect almost all systems and organs of the human body, including those responsible for reproductive function in women. The multisystem inflammatory response in COVID-19 shows many analogies with mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS), and MCAS may be an important component in the course of COVID-19. Of note, the female sex hormones estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) significantly influence mast cell (MC) behavior. This review presents the importance of MCs and the mediators from their granules in the female reproductive system, including pregnancy, and discusses the mechanism of potential disorders related to MCAS. Then, the available data on COVID-19 in the context of hormonal disorders, the course of endometriosis, female fertility, and the course of pregnancy were compiled to verify intuitively predicted threats. Surprisingly, although COVID-19 hyperinflammation and post-COVID-19 illness may be rooted in MCAS, the available clinical data do not provide grounds for treating this mechanism as significantly increasing the risk of abnormal female reproductive function, including pregnancy. Further studies in the context of post COVID-19 condition (long COVID), where inflammation and a procoagulative state resemble many aspects of MCAS, are needed.
1. Short Introduction: Signaling the Problem
COVID-19, a pandemic disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, can affect virtually all systems and organs of the human body, including those responsible for reproductive function in women [1]. Considering COVID-19 as a multisystem inflammatory response, the disease may reveal close analogy with conditions related to upregulation of the secretory activity of mast cells (MCs) with increased susceptibility to degranulation or mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) [2]. The relationship between COVID-19 and reproductive function in women becomes clearer after taking into account the fact that female sex hormones, including estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4), significantly influence mast cell (MC) behavior [3].
2. MCs and MC-Derived Mediators in a Woman's Reproductive System and Placenta
MCs are very special cells of the immune system derived from pluripotent cells of the myeloid lineage and are widely distributed in connective tissues throughout the body, including the reproductive system and placental tissue of women [4–6]. Unlike other white blood cells, MCs present in blood are immature in the form of MC progenitors generated from CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, and these cells become fully competent after recruitment into the tissue at target localization [7]. Terminal differentiation of MCs occurs under the influence of c-kit ligand (CD117) and cytokine stem cell factor (SCF) in the local site microenvironment containing other distinct cytokines (e.g., IL-3 and IL-33), especially growth factors [8]. Thus, heterogeneity of the population of MCs is decisively observed because they reach their full maturity at the target site. This heterogeneity includes significant differences in the cell ultrastructure, morphology, mediator content, and surface receptors [9]. For example, based on the secretory granule content, human MCs are described as either MCTC, which contains two serine proteases (tryptase and chymase) together with carboxypeptidase and cathepsin G, or MCT, which contain only tryptase [10, 11]. The release of key mediators during the activation and degranulation of MCs, including COVID-19-related MC activation, may significantly affect the course of many physiological and pathological reproductive processes in the human body, primarily influencing the permeability of vessels and vascular tone and indirectly modulating electrolyte and water balance or contents of the extracellular matrix [12, 13]. Interestingly, the majority of the key physiological processes in the female reproductive tract, including menstruation, follicle development, ovulation, implantation, pregnancy, labor, and postpartum remodeling, consist of a readily visible inflammatory background [14]. Research successively provides new data. At present, the demonstrated roles of MCs and MC-derived mediators in the human female reproductive system in health and disease are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
MC localization | Modulated physiological or pathological process | Characteristic features: MC number/distribution, MC mediators/receptors involved | Related complication, condition, or disease | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ovary | Folliculogenesis, ovarian follicle selection, growth and ovulation | ↑ MC number in the human ovarian medulla/stroma during the proliferative phase; ovarian MCs correspond with interleukin 8 (IL-8) staining cells; exogenous IL-8 induces a similar increase in follicular growth to that produced by the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge; MC-derived histamine may regulate the development of ovarian follicles by apoptosis | Numerous primary or undeveloped ovarian follicles, anovulation | Goto et al. 1997 [15]; Szukiewicz et al. 2007 [16]; Field et al. 2014 [17]; Szukiewicz et al. 2007 [18] |
Ovulation | MCs-derived histamine stimulates ovarian contractility, ovulation and follicular progesterone secretion; ↑ expressions of histamine H1 and H2 receptors in the preovulatory period within the growing ovarian follicles | Ovulatory disorders | Krishna et al. 1989 [19]; Szukiewicz et al. 2006 [20] | |
Ovulation and luteinization | Histamine and TNF-α release from degranulating stores (MCs within follicular wall) during ovulation | Ovulatory disorders and/or corpus luteum dysfunction | Field et al. 2014 [17]; Galvão et al. 2018 [21] | |
Altered neuroimmune communication | ↓ MC number in polycystic and ↓↓↓ MC number in postmenopausal ovaries with accompanying increase in nerve fibers in the corticomedullary region; more tryptase-positive MCs than chymase-positive MCs in the interstitial cortex and the medulla of polycystic ovaries (PCO) compared to normal cyclic ovaries; nerve growth factor (NGF) production by MCs suggests an interaction between MCs and nerve fibers via high affinity NGF tyrosine kinase receptor TrkA and low affinity receptor p75NTR | Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); menopause | Heider et al. 2001 [22]; Krishna et al. 2001 [23]; Chang et al. 2019 [24] | |
Peritumoral MC infiltration | ↑ number of activated MC promotes tumor growth and spread by the release of proangiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF), degradation of the extracellular matrix (e.g., proteases), and direct and indirect immune suppression (e.g., IL-10 and TGF-β1) | Ovarian cancer progression | Chan et al. 2005 [25]; Oldford and Marshall 2015 [26]; Komi and Redegeld 2020 [27] | |
| ||||
Fallopian tube | Microcirculation of blood within fallopian tube wall | MCs regulate the microcirculatory blood stream of the fallopian tubes through release of vasoactive and angiogenic factors; volume and degree of the MC degranulation depends on the menstrual cycle phase, age and part of the fallopian tube. | Changes in the net luminal fluid secretion and absorption during the menstrual cycle | Glukhovets et al. 1980 [28] |
Foreign body inflammatory response | In contraceptive intrauterine devices (IUD) users ↑ MC number were reported both in the muscularis externa and the lamina propria of the tubal wall; most MCs of the muscularis externa were more closely related to smooth muscle cells than to blood vessels. | Increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease and the ectopic pregnancies amongst women using IUD | Sandvei R et al. 1986 [29] | |
| ||||
Peritoneal fluid | Endometriosis | ↑ MC count with increased release of chemoattractant cytokines, such as IL-8 and the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2); severity of endometriosis is positively correlated with the increase of both IL-8 and MCP-1/CCL2 in peritoneal fluid. MCs mediators may directly suppress sperm motility; sperm interaction with the MC (LAD2) surface induces MC-degranulation in the peritoneal fluid of endometriosis patients. |
Pelvic pain, endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea, growth of endometriotic foci with inflammatory response and peritoneal adhesions, infertility Endometriosis associated infertility by suppression sperm cell function including motility |
Oral et al. 1996 [30]; Broi et al. 2019 [31] Menzies et al. 2011 [13]; Borelli et al. 2019 [32]; Broi et al. 2019 [31] |
| ||||
Uterus: endometrium/decidua+myometrium | Endometrial proliferation | ↑ uterine MC counts in the menstrual and late secretory stages of the menstrual cycle; the pattern of MC cell ultrastructure is not associated with a particular tissue component in the uterine wall at any stage of the menstrual cycle; total degranulation of MCs is not observed during menstruation; in the late menstrual phase, degranulation by vacuolation and extensive invagination take place in the endometrial/myometrial junction and in the myometrium | Changes in functional status and secretory activity of MC within the endometrium during proliferative secretory and premenstrual stages of the menstrual cycle | Drudy et al. 1991 [33]; Sivridis et al. 2001 [34] |
Postmenopausal endometrium | ↓ MC number; large numbers of MCs in the myometrial side of the endometrial/myometrial junction and in the deeper layers of the myometrium; no invagination of the MC membrane and lack of MCs with particulate granules suggest no impact on the functional layer of endometrium | Postmenopausal status of the functional layer within uterine mucous membrane | Drudy et al. 1991 [33] | |
Increased endometrial proliferation | Hyperactivation of MCs; >7-fold increase in the numbers of activated MCs expressing tryptase in endometrial polyps; ↑ densities of all MC types compared to normal endometrium; ↑ numbers of chymase+ and c-Kit+ endometrial MCs | Formation of endometrial polyps and polyp-related abnormal uterine bleeding or infertility | Al-Jefout et al. 2009 [35]; El-Hamarneh et al. 2013 [36] | |
Implantation | Estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4)—governed migration of MCs from the periphery to the uterus and MC degranulation with the release of key factors (e.g., histamine, tryptase, VEGF, and metalloproteinases (MMPs)) during the embryo implantation in the posterior superior wall of the uterus; MC-derived histamine promoting trophoblast invasion, growth, and the expression of adhesion molecules; ↑ MC count within the entire layers of the endometrium with proinflammatory milieu in recurrent pregnancy loss (e.g., proven role of TNF-α excess in abortion). | Normal implantation, implantation-stage early abortion or recurrent pregnancy loss | Jensen et al. 2010 [37]; Elieh Ali Komi D et al. 2020 [38], Woidacki et al. 2014 [39]; Saito 2005 [40]; Matsuno et al. 2019 [41] | |
Implantation and placenta formation | Decidual MCs show an FcεRIα-positive (+)Kit(+)tryptase(+)chymase(+) phenotype; a larger proportion of tryptase(+); decidual MCs of parous women express a human-specific protein killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR) 2DL4 (CD158d), a receptor for human leukocyte antigen G (HLA-G) expressed on human trophoblasts; KIR2DL4 stimulation with agonistic antibodies and recombinant HLA-G protein may enhance establishment of pregnancy by induction of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) and serine proteases release from MCs, in addition to suppressing mast-cell-mediated allergic/inflammatory reactions (downregulation of the Kit-mediated and FcɛRI-mediated responses); histamine from MCs is involved in differentiation of trophoblast cells toward extravillous, endovascular trophoblasts by stimulation of integrin αV-β3 (a vitronectin receptor) expression on trophoblast cells | Establishing pregnancy via killer cell Ig-like Receptor (KIR2DL4) expressed on the surface of decidual MCs; invasion of the uterine wall and the spiral arteries by extravillous trophoblasts (interstitial and endovascular invasions, respectively) | Derbala et al. 2018 [42]; Ueshima et al. 2018 [43]; Kataoka et al. 2020 [44]; Szewczyk et al. 2005 [45] | |
Foreign body inflammatory response | ↑ density of MCs in the endometrium of contraceptive intrauterine devices (IUD) users after 3 to 24 months' use of IUD, independent of IUD type | Changed inflammatory cytokine profiles of endometrium at peri-implantation period corresponding to a contraceptive effect of IUD | Yin et al. 1993 [46]; Chou et al. 2015 [47] | |
Contractile activity | ↑ density of MCs in pregnant vs. non-pregnant myometrium; tryptase(+)/chymase(+) MCs are predominant in nonpregnant myometrium, whereas tryptase(+) MC dominate in pregnant myometrium; histamine H1 receptor antagonists partially inhibit uterine contractions; uterine MC degranulation, or the effects of their mediators, modulates contractility of pregnant uterus | Term or preterm uterine contractions including abortion and preterm/term delivery | Garfield et al. 2006 [48]; Bytautiene et al. 2004 [49]; Szukiewicz et al. 1995 [50] | |
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) production in the myometrium | MC-derived chymase is included in the chymase–ET-1 system operating in the myometrium during pregnancy; the number of MCs and production of ET-1 are significantly higher in myometrium from patients with severe preeclampsia compared to those from normal pregnant women | Chymase-dependent production of ET-1 in the myometrium during normal pregnancy and preeclampsia | Mitani et al. 2002 [51]; D'Orléans-Juste et al. 2008 [52] | |
Cervical ripening | Increased influx of MCs to the cervix during pregnancy; physiological or pathological stimulation of the secretory activity of cervical MCs may lead to the local increase in a number of MC-specific proteases, including the neutral proteases chymase, tryptase, and carboxypeptidase A. | Cervical tissue remodeling: in first trimester symptomatic miscarriage, in term/preterm pregnancy (contributing to term/preterm delivery), and in the postpartum period. | Elieh et al. 2020 [38]; Norström et al. 2019 [53]; Saito 2005 [40] | |
| ||||
Placenta | Angiogenesis | Placental MCs are an important source of potent proangiogenic factors (e.g., histamine, VEGF, bFGF, TGF-beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-8) and a source of extracellular matrix-degrading proteinases; changes in both the number of MCs and angiogenesis mediator concentrations were reported in placental tissue pathologies including diabetes and fetal growth restriction (FGR); ↑ placental expression of histamine H4 receptors in diabetes may enhance MC chemotaxis towards angiogenic sites. | Normal placental vascularization; defective and incomplete placental vascularization in IUGR; hypervascularization in diabetes mellitus | Kurihara-Shimomura et al. 2020 [54]; de Souza Junior et al. 2015 [55]; Szukiewicz et al. 1999 [56]; Szukiewicz et al. 2003 [57]; Szewczyk et al. [58] |
Trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling | MCs are important for proper development of the placental bed; ↑ chymase expression and activity in placental trophoblasts and in the maternal vascular endothelium in pregnancy induced hypertension; differential MC distribution and corresponding changes in the concentration of histamine are involved in the defective placental vascularization in preeclamptic placentas; both ↑ and ↓ MC numbers were reported in the villous part of the placenta in preeclampsia; unlike in normal placentae, in preeclamptic placentae histamine does not stimulate expression of integrin αv-β3 which is the necessary integrin to ensure trophoblast invasiveness. | Normal placental vascular bed formation; pregnancy-induced hypertension including the most prevalent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: preeclampsia and eclampsia; FGR caused by insufficient remodeling of spiral arteries | Faas and De Vos 2018 [59]; Wang and Alexander 2013 [60]; Szewczyk et al. 2012 [61]; Szukiewicz et al. 1999 [62]; Mitani et al. 2002 [51]; Szewczyk et al. 2008 [63]; Meyer et al. 2017 [64] | |
Apoptosis | MC-derived histamine inhibits the apoptotic activity in trophoblast cells via histamine H1 receptor and further influences the process of trophoblast invasion and differentiation. | Placental apoptosis and related differentiation of the trophoblast and placental turnover | Wu et al. 2012 [65]; Pyzlak et al. 2010 [66]; Szewczyk et al. 2005 [45]; Liu et al. 2004 [67] | |
Contractile activity of the uterus including initiation of labor | ↑ density of MCs near the fetal surface of the placenta and in connective tissue foci; contractile activity of the uterus during normal vaginal delivery decreases histamine concentration in the placental tissue near the maternal surface of the placenta; MC distribution in placental tissue and membranes as well the degree of their secretory activation influence contractile activity of the uterus in health and disease. | Normal initiation of labor at term and premature birth with preterm onset of the contractile activity of the uterus | Szukiewicz et al. 1995 [50]; Needham et al. 2016 [68] | |
Allergic reaction within the human placenta | ↑ MC number and/or increased level of MC activation result in high levels of MC mediators in placental tissue in allergic mothers; allergen-induced placental cytokine and chemokine release include histamine, CXCL10, CXCL11, CCL17, CCL22, IL-6, and TNF. | Allergens induce placental cytokines and chemokines distinctly in allergic and healthy mothers influencing the prenatal development of the immune system; increased rate of immune disorders in childhood including allergies should may occur | Abelius et al. 2014 [69]; Mikkelsen et al. 1994 [70]; Straubinger et al. 2014 [71], Papadogiannakis et al. 2019 [72] | |
| ||||
Endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity | Pain induction and mediation | ↑ MC number and ↑ number of degranulating MCs in endometriotic foci compared to nonaffected tissues; cross-talk between MCs and neurons is responsible for pain mediation; MCs may contribute to the development of pain and hyperalgesia in endometriosis, possibly by a direct effect on nerve structures; ↑ E2 concentrations may be a key factor for degranulation and recruitment of MCs in ovarian endometriomas with a key role in endometriosis-associated dysmenorrhea. | Endometriosis-related chronic and neuropathic pain including dysmenorrhea | Anaf et al. 2006 [73]; Zhu et al. 2019 [74]; D'Cruz et al. 2007 [75]; Zhu et al. 2018 [76] |
Fibrosis and fibrotic scarring | Invasion of MCs, degranulation, and proliferation of interstitial component are observed in endometriotic lesions; the Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) is abundantly expressed in MCs and is required for the full expression of high-affinity IgE receptor-mediated MC inflammatory sequelae including fibrosis and increased risk of adhesion development; ↑ numbers of activated MCs in endometriosis are strongly positive for corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and urocortin (Ucn)—the peptides activating MCs and contributing to the fibrosis and inflammation. | Fibrous adhesions in endometriotic lesions | Anaf et al. 2006 [73]; Kirchhoff et al. 2012 [77]; Kempuraj et al. 2004 [78] | |
Angiogenesis | Activation of MCs in situ causes local MC-mediated angiogenesis; C-C Motif Chemokine 8 (CCL8) promotes both in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis via the CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1); ↑ CCL8 in MCs was reported in the coculture with endometrial cells; ectopic endometrium and the serum of patients with endometriosis revealed ↑ CCL8 expressions; ↑ CCR1 perivascular expression was reported in the ectopic endometrium in ovarian endometriomas. | Ectopic angiogenesis in endometriotic foci | Norrby 1995 [79]; Xue et al. 2020 [80]; Li et al. 2020 [81]; Binda et al. 2017 [82] |
It is worth noting the presence of MCs in neuroendocrine organs within the female reproductive system, such as ovaries and uterus, where the role of MCs still requires a better understanding [83]. Moreover, the functional status of MCs may be modulated by the female sex hormones E2 and progesterone P4 [3]. For example, NLRP3 inflammasome activation of MCs by estrogen via the nuclear-initiated signaling pathway contributes to the immune inflammatory response in endometriosis and further spreading of the disease [84]. MCs express E2 (ERα, ERβ, and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and P4 receptors (PR-A and PR-B) and further respond to these hormones, which causes changes in MC cell number, distribution, and degranulation in ovarian tissue [3, 85]. E2 and P4 upregulate chemokine receptor expression on MCs and promote their migration into the fetal-maternal interface with subsequent increased production of MC mediators. During the process of oocyte ovulation, E2-induced MC degranulation seems to be a crucial releasing factor, whereas P4 action is required in the peri-implantation period to initiate uterine spiral artery remodeling by decidual MCs [67, 86–88].
3. Secretory Activity of MCs: Main Categories of the Mediators, the Mechanisms of Activation and Degranulation
MCs together with adjacent dendritic cells act as sentinels for tissue damage and pathogen invasion by the release of various mediators from different compartments following diverse stimuli [89]. However, the interactions of MCs with viruses and viral products can have detrimental consequences, leading to a cytokine storm, as described in SARS-CoV-2 infection [90].
Contrary to the popular belief that MC degranulation is nonspecific based on an all-or-none law process in which many mediators are released, it is now apparent that specific mediators are secreted in response to particular stimuli or pathologic states [91].
MC mediators can be divided into three overlapping categories: preformed mediators, newly synthesized lipid mediators, and cytokines, including chemokines (Table 2).
Table 2.
Mediator category | Selected overall profile of the local activities | References |
---|---|---|
Preformed in MC secretory granules | ||
Proteases: Tryptases Chymases Carboxypeptidase A Cathepsin G Renin Granzyme B |
Neutral proteases play dual roles in inflammatory states depending on immunologic context, exerting proinflammatory and protective effects by activation/inhibition of the multiple respective cytokines within the signaling pathways; these activities result from proteolytic properties including angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity, broad-spectrum antibacterial action against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria; extracellular matrix (ECM) breakdown at inflammatory sites, ability to degrade some neuropeptides and toxins (neurotoxins), cleavage of receptors, platelet activation, and induction of airway submucosal gland secretion | Galli et al. 2020 [92]; Silver et al. 2004 [93]; Maaninka et al. 2018 [94]; Heutinck et al. 2010 [95]; Peljer et al. 2007 [96]; Peljer et al. 2010 [97]; Caughey 2016 [98]; Wang et al. 2014 [99] |
Biogenic amines: | ||
Histamine | Histamine action is mediated by histamine receptors H1, H2, H3, and H4 expressed in target cells; typical effects of histamine release include increased venular permeability with cutaneous flushing (H1, H2), increased heart rate and cardiac output (H1), bronchoconstriction (H1), increased mucus production in airways, nasal (H1) or generalized (H2), increased gastric acid secretion (H2), positive chemotaxis of neutrophils, T cells and eosinophils (H1) or neutrophil and eosinophil influx inhibition (H2), autoregulation of histamine release in brain (presynaptic H3), modulation of T helper type 2 (Th2) cell responses (H4) | Tiligada and Ennis 2020 [100]; Walter & Stark 2012 [101]; Thangham et al. 2018 [102]; Hattori et al. 2017 [103] |
Serotonin (5-HT) | Serotonin is produced in human MCs during fetal development (e.g., placental MCs) and, to a lesser degree, in adult life; mastocytosis may induce 5-HT production in MCs; 5-HT signaling affects fetal brain development and placenta-derived 5-HT may be important for normal fetal brain development; 5-HT from MCs contributes to behavioral and physiological functions of the hippocampus | Bonnin and Levitt 2011 [104]; Ranzil et al. 2019 [105]; Kushnir-Sukhov et al. 2007 [106]; Ritter et al. 2012 [107]; Nautiyal et al. 2012 [108] |
Proteoglycans: | ||
Heparin Heparin sulfate Chondroitine sulfate Dermatan sulfate Serglycin proteoglycan |
The proteoglycan serglycin carries an array of glycosaminoglycan side chains, sometimes heparin, sometimes chondroitin or dermatan sulphate. The members of proteoglycan family play essential role in regulation of MC granule storage and the release of secretory granule compounds, having an impact on the fate of the respective compounds after degranulation, affect the enzymatic properties of MC proteases and may promote apoptosis. Following MC degranulation heparin is probably involved in regulation of interstitial clotting but not in clotting in the vessels | Rönnberg et al. 2012 [109]; Mulloy et al. 2017 [110]; Zehnder and Galli 1999 [111] |
| ||
De novo synthesized lipid mediators derived from arachidonic acid (eicosanoids)
Prostaglandins (PGs) Leukotrienes (LTs) Platelet activating factor (PAF) |
At a tissue level, PGD2, the major PG produced by activated MCs and cysteinyl LTs (LTC4 and its active metabolites LTD4 and LTE4, as well as far lesser amounts of LTB4) produce increased vascular permeability, inflammation, pain, bronchoconstriction, increased uterine activity and vasoconstriction or vasodilation; PAF possesses high chemoattractant activity to neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and macrophages and stimulates cytokine production by macrophages; | Sahid and Kiyoi 2020 [112]; Liu et al. 2017 [113]; Nakamura and Murata 2018 [114]; Theoharides et al. 2012 [115] |
| ||
Cytokines including chemokines (selected)
Interleukins: IL-1, IL-3 ,IL-4, IL-5, IL-8,IL-9, IL-10, IL-31, IL-33 Growth factors: TNF-α, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, NGF, SCF, PDGF, VEGF, GM-CSF Chemokines: CCL2, CXCL8 (IL-8), CX3CL1, |
MCs release multifunctional cytokines involved in recruitment and activation of other cells participating in immune and inflammatory response; the cytokine profile heterogeneity reflects the differences in the secretory granule protease phenotypes between MCs and the tissue localization; depending on the stimulus, MCs calibrate their pattern of cytokine release, and as the immunoregulatory cells, can alter their response ranging from pro-inflammatory to anti-inflammatory | Elieh Ali Komi et al. 2020 [116]; Frossi et al. 2018 [9]; Moon et al. 2014 [117] |
MC secretory granules or secretory lysosomes reveal heterogeneity, and their heterogenous nature reflects many factors, including the tissue of residence and the species, health status and, to some degree, age of the individual [117, 118]. Following MC activation, preformed mediators are rapidly (within seconds to minutes) released into the extracellular environment. Degranulation with or without de novo synthesis of the mediator dominates the secretory profile of MCs; however, other options are also described therein, including de novo synthesized mediator release without degranulation [117] Table 2.
The typical and best-known mode of MC activation with the release of their granule content is associated with allergic reactions mediated via E class immunoglobulin (IgE) binding to the high-affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E (FcεRI) expressed on the MC surface [119]. Tetrameric FcεRI consists of the IgE-binding α-chain, the multimembrane spanning the β-chain, and a disulfide-linked homodimer of the γ-subunit (FcεRγ). The signaling pathway induced after FcεRI binds with IgE includes the activation of Lyn, one of several Src-family tyrosine kinases in immune cells, which phosphorylates tyrosines in its immunoreceptor tyrosine base activation motifs (ITAMs) on the β and γ chains of FcϵRI. Next, Lyn induces Syk tyrosine kinases to phosphorylate the signaling proteins that serve as the linkers for T cell activation (e.g., LAT1 and LAT2) [120]. Hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate leads to the formation of inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), the second messengers for mobilizing intracellular calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum [121]. The influx of calcium ions produces both activation and translocation (toward the nucleus of the cell) of NF-κB with subsequent transcription of genes encoding various cytokines, including IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-13, and TNFα [122]. The zinc finger transcription factor Zeb2 (also named Sip1, Zfhx1b) regulates both early and late MC responses related to FcεRI-mediated degranulation [123]. Complementary to the Lyn signaling pathway, another member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases, Fyn, is involved in the regulation of MC degranulation upon FcϵRI activation. Fyn is involved in the phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (Akt)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway, which ultimately leads to cytokine production and MC chemotaxis [124].
MCs also express FcγR, a receptor for IgG. The signal from FcγR can crosstalk with FcϵRI because the γ-chain homodimer is identical in FcγRI and FcϵRI [119]. In addition to the mentioned FcϵRI and FcγR, MCs express other receptors involved in their activation and/or immune response. Some of the most important receptors include Fc receptors for IgA and IgG; a G protein-coupled receptor known as MRGPRX2; angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor; Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and other receptors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs); receptors for cytokines/chemokines, corticotropin releasing hormone, estrogen and progesterone; and complement receptors (e.g., C3a protein) [125–127]. Evidence indicates that the spike protein (S protein) is the main viral structure that SARS-CoV-2 uses to fuse with and enter human host cells by binding to the ACE2 receptor. This binding is followed by activation of the enzyme furin. Furin plays a vital role for the virus because the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 must be cleaved by furin or furin-like proteases to become fully functional [128, 129]. Despite the fact that ACE2 is widely expressed in many different cells, including MCs, and is the one major receptor for SARS-CoV-2, other host receptors and/or coreceptors that promote the entry of the virus into cells have been reported recently [129].
Receptors with a documented role in MC activation and degranulation in the context of possible triggering by coronavirus/COVID-19 are shown in Figure 1.
The best-known mode of MC activation with degranulation and subsequent allergic reactions is mediated via IgE binding to FcεRI expressed on the MC surface. MCs also express FcγR (not marked in the figure), a receptor for IgG. The signal from FcγR can crosstalk with FcϵRI because the γ-chain homodimer is identical in FcγRI and FcϵRI [119]
The spike protein (S protein) is the main viral structure that SARS-CoV-2 uses to fuse with and enter human host cells by binding to ACE2 [128, 130]. MCs express the renin-angiotensin system, the ectoprotease ACE2 required for SARS-CoV-2 binding, and serine proteases, including TMPRSS2, required for priming of the corona spike protein [130]. Such triggers could lead to secretion of multiple proinflammatory mediators selectively, without release of histamine or tryptase [131]
IL-33 expression in response to SARS-CoV-2 correlates with seropositivity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals [132]. IL-33 needs the specific receptor ST2L and IL-1RAcP heterodimer for its binding, which stimulates the production of different types of cytokines and chemokines that have crucial roles in the exacerbation of allergic diseases and inflammation. Moreover, IL-33 augments IgE-mediated MC activation and potently enhances the human MC reactivity to C3a and C5a (degranulation, cytokine, and chemokine release), independent of changes in C3aR or C5aR receptor expression or the level of Ca2+ influx [133]
Elevated CRH level in COVID-19 may activate CRHR on MCs influencing vascular permeability. It was demonstrated that even COVID-19-related psychological stress is capable of inducing MC-related diseases, including mastocytosis. Psychological stress, by stimulating the release of corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH) into the serum, can induce MC degranulation [134]
Circulating S1P emerged as negative biomarker of severity/mortality of COVID-19 patients [135]. S1P generation induces calcium mobilization leading to MC degranulation. S1P affects immune cell function mostly by acting through its receptor S1P2R at the cell membrane but it can also induce S1P receptor-independent responses in the cells where it is generated
Development of clinical COVID-19 involves dysfunctional MC activation and histamine release. It was suggested that histamine signaling pathway may be a potential therapeutic target to prevent COVID-19 from progressing to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [136]. All known histamine receptors are expressed on MCs, but H1 and H4 have important roles in the progression and modulation of histamine-mediated allergic/inflammatory diseases
Human MCs possess opioid receptors, which when stimulated trigger degranulation. The opioid system consists of four types of receptors: mu (Mμ), delta (δ), kappa (κ), and opioid receptor like-1 (ORL1) [137]. Opioid receptors may also be capable of modulating IgE-mediated histamine release [138]
TSLPR signaling is required for MC development and aggravates allergic reactions through the activation of mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). TSLPR is formed by the signaling complex: TSLP and IL-7Rɑ [139]
PAF is generated by cells involved in host defense in a variety of inflammatory conditions in which MCs accumulate. PAF is capable of activating MCs and inducing a chemotactic response. COVID-19 manifestations, including pulmonary microthrombosis and inflammation, are mediated via PAF receptor [140]
MRGPRX2 is a novel, low-affinity and low-selectivity receptor, to activate MCs in an IgE-independent manner [141]. This receptor has been cited as a therapeutic target for COVID-19 [142]
MCs respond to TLR ligands by secreting cytokines, chemokines, and lipid mediators, and some studies have found that TLR ligands can also cause degranulation, although this finding is contentious [143]
Several clinical investigations revealed that chemokines are directly involved in the different stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection [144]. At least nine chemokine receptors (CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR4, CX3CR1, CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5) have been described to be expressed by human MCs of different origins [145]
Tryptase released from MCs can activate PAR-2 in an autocrine or paracrine manner [146]. It was suggested that PAR by proteases plays a role in COVID-19-induced hyperinflammation [147–149]
Purinergic P2X ionotropic nucleotide receptors are ligand-gated ion channels activated by extracellular ATP and selective for monovalent and divalent cations (Na+, K+, and Ca2+), whereas purinergic G protein-coupled receptors P2Y are stimulated by nucleotides such as adenosine triphosphate, adenosine diphosphate, uridine triphosphate, uridine diphosphate, and UDP-glucose [150, 151]. Purinergic signaling is involved in the pathophysiology of several viral infections which makes the purinergic system a potential target of investigation in COVID-19 [152]
CD48 is in the CD2 subfamily of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily and shares many structural features with other Ig family members. CD48 expression increases under inflammatory conditions [153]
Abbreviations in Figure 1 are as follows: ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor; CD48: cluster of differentiation 48 also known as B-lymphocyte activation marker (BLAST-1); CRHR: corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor; CRs: C3aR, C5aR—complement receptors; FcεRI: high-affinity receptor for the Fc region of immunoglobulin E (IgE); GPER: G protein-coupled estrogen receptor; HRs: H1-H4—histamine receptors; IgE: E class immunoglobulin; IL-1RAcP: IL-1 receptor accessory protein; IL-33: interleukin-33; IL-7Rɑ: IL-7 receptor ɑ chain; ST2L: suppression of tumorigenicity 2, IL-33 receptor; MRGPRX2: Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptor X2; P2X: ligand-gated ion channels (ionotropic receptors); P2Y: metabotropic purinergic receptors; PAF receptor: platelet-activating factor receptor; PAR2: protease-activated receptor 2; S1P2R: sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2; TLRs: Toll-like receptors; TMPRSS2: transmembrane serine protease 2; TSLP: thymic stromal lymphopoietin; TSLPR: thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor.
Participating in intracellular signaling and promoting the production of proinflammatory cytokines involved in the regulation of the innate immune response, reactive oxygen species (ROS) stimulate MC degranulation via high-affinity receptors to IgE (FcεRI) [154]. Although ROS are intermediaries released during normal oxygen metabolism, deleterious effects of oxidative stress associated with an overabundance of ROS are also well documented with regard to female reproductive tissues in the context of an inflammatory background of infertility [155]. In healthy individuals, ROS and antioxidants are maintained in a balanced state, and the antioxidant systems in the ovary and endometrium are sufficient to limit the production of ROS, inactivate them, and repair cell damage [156, 157].
A local increase in the concentration of MC mediators in surroundings containing other MCs upregulates the secretory activity of these MCs, including susceptibility to degranulation. Such an activation syndrome may occur with an unchanged number of MCs as nonclonal MC activation syndrome (nc-MCAS) or together with MC hyperplasia in the form of MC activation syndrome (MCAS) [158–160]. Thus, changes in hormone and cytokine receptor expression caused by MC hyperplasia may be important when comparing MC activation in MCAS vs. nc-MCAS [160]. As proteases, mast cell tryptases are the only currently available convenient marker of human mast cell activation and burden [161]. Of note, tryptases are the most abundant proteases of the human MCs, comprising up to 20% of cellular protein [162]. Nevertheless, the major component of the granules that represents at least 30% of their dry weight is heparin, which is synthesized by MCs as a proteoglycan [109].
Notably, epigenetic mechanisms are also involved in MC activation and proliferation [163]. Numerous microRNAs (miRNAs) or small single-stranded noncoding RNA molecules containing 18 to 25 nucleotides that function in RNA silencing and posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression have been examined in the context of MC biology [164]. Acting via FcϵRI alone or together with increased levels of interleukins (IL-33, IL-10), the respective mRNAs may trigger signals for increased MC degranulation (miR-142-3p, miR-126), PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-dependent increased Ca2+ influx with degranulation (miR-155), or reduced MC migration with proliferation and increased degranulation (miR-221/222) [127, 165–167].
4. COVID-19-Related MCAS or nc-MCAS and Possible Consequences for Female Reproductive Function
As a pandemic disease, COVID-19 raises interest in many aspects of female reproductive health effects [1, 168]. Knowledge on this subject is constantly being generated, and there is evidence that MC activation together with the induction of a cytokine storm may play a vital role in the pathomechanism of some reproductive disorders accompanying COVID-19 [2, 11]. The potential sites of these disorders are pointed in Figure 2.
4.1. Hormonal Disorders
Hormonal disorders during COVID-19 vary, just as the response to SARS-CoV-2 infection varies [169, 170]. The changes in hormonal activities concern both the hormones directly regulating the menstrual cycle (luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and the female sex hormones E2 and P4) and the hormones that may indirectly modulate its course (e.g., prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), androgens, and glucocorticoids) [169, 171]. It was reported that approximately one-fifth of COVID-19 patients exhibited a menstrual volume decrease or cycle prolongation, approximately one-fifth exhibited menorrhagia, and approximately 30% experienced new dysmenorrhea [172, 173]. Considering the inflammatory background of menstruation, these last two symptoms and the worsening of already existing heavy menstrual bleeding or/and premenstrual symptoms may indicate the involvement of MC activation in the pathogenesis of cytokine storms in COVID-19 [2, 173]. Since P4, androgens, and glucocorticoids reveal natural immunosuppressive properties, it should be realized that E2 is implicated in the immune response as an enhancer, including MC activation [174–177].
Among the estrogen receptors, GPER is responsible for the various running fast nongenomic effects of estrogens, including degranulation of MCs [178].
Unlike after activation of genomic pathways by classical nuclear ERα and ERβ receptor stimulation, nongenomic cellular responses to estrogen are initiated at the plasma membrane and result in rapid activation of second messenger-triggered cytoplasmic signal transduction cascades. Ultimately, after E2 binds to GPER, it mobilizes intracellular calcium and synthesizes phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3) in the nucleus [179]. After estrogen binding, GPER may functionally cross-react with diverse cell signaling systems, such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, the Notch signaling pathway, and the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) pathway [180].
Paradoxically, despite the risk of cytokine storms following MC degranulation, the net effect of E2-related modulation of immune cells may be beneficial in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on preliminary research results, women with high levels of E2 exhibited a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19 symptoms and a lower incidence of death [181]. On the other hand, serum E2 levels in patients with COVID-19 may reflect the severity of infection, as any acute critical illness can lead to suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis, biochemically manifesting as low FSH, LH and E2 [182]. Thus, the mechanisms of E2 action in viral infections, including COVID-19, should be further comprehensively studied to provide a rationale for therapeutic strategies.
Thyroid hormones are vital for the proper functioning of the female reproductive system given that they modulate the metabolism and development of ovarian, uterine, and placental tissues. Hyperthyroidism is common in female patients with COVID-19 and coexists with thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression that seems to be related to increased levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 [183, 184]. Based on recent studies, activation of MCs with a significantly higher number of degranulated MCs and histamine-induced overexpression of glycoprotein CD86 on antigen-presenting cells within thyroid gland tissue may be responsible for hyperthyroidism [185]. Moreover, MCs can synthesize and store TSH and the thyroid hormone triiodothyronine (T3) [186]. More research is needed to determine whether MCAS-related hyperthyroidism in COVID-19 has a significant impact on reproductive function in women.
4.2. Women with Endometriosis
Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent and progesterone- (P4-) resistant inflammatory disorder of unknown etiology that affects 5–10% of women of reproductive age and is characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity [187]. Patients with endometriotic foci (lesions) constitute up to 80% of women with pelvic pain and 20-50% of women with infertility. MCs are very prevalent in endometriosis tissue, and many MCs appear to be activated and degranulated. MCs and their products, tryptase, histamine, and many other proinflammatory cytokines, could contribute significantly to several features of endometriosis [76]. It was proposed that MCs represent a therapeutic target in endometriosis to assure better control of endometriosis inhibition and symptom relief [82]. Not surprisingly, endometriosis is included in the list of symptoms and findings in MCAS [76, 84]. Despite the existence of undoubted dysfunction of the immune system in endometriosis, no evidence is available that shows that those with endometriosis are at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19. It is likely that endometriosis does not increase the susceptibility to COVID-19 infections but alters the manifestation of the disease [188]. The prevalence of the disease may depend on the interaction between the virus and the individual's immune system, but further studies are required in this regard. However, although not confirmed, women with thoracic endometriosis (in the lungs and/or diaphragm) may be at increased risk [189]. The manifestation of COVID-19 may be altered in endometriosis with a slightly decreased frequency of asymptomatic infection and fever and an increased frequency of rare symptoms (i.e., sore throat, nasal congestion, cough, shortness of breath, headache, weakness, and muscle pain, reduced sense of smell and/or taste, and ocular problems) [190]. Further studies involving a larger group of patients are needed. On the other hand, exacerbations in pelvic pain may be experienced due to high levels of inflammatory/pain mediators as well as pauses in medical or allied health treatment or postponement of surgical treatments. Evidence that COVID-19 by itself accelerates the progression/development of endometriosis is not available [190].
4.3. Female Fertility and the Course of Pregnancy
Despite the fact that fertility (including low sperm count, low sperm quality, and reduced sperm mobility) and sexual function may be disrupted in a portion of male patients as a result of SARS-CoV-2 infection [191, 192], there is no evidence that a history of asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in females may negatively affect normal female fertility or affect embryo laboratory outcomes or clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments [168, 172, 193, 194]. Moreover, to date, cohort studies of SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers, including both asymptomatic mothers and those with mild symptoms, did not reveal adverse effects on the mothers or neonates regardless of the timing of the infection (i.e., first, second, or third trimester) [194–196]. Naturally, in severe COVID-19 among pregnant women requiring critical care, higher complication rates should be expected, and these increased rates are particularly related to a higher incidence of iatrogenic prematurity due to induction of preterm delivery in the face of the threat to the mother's life [197].
This finding is puzzling considering that genes encoding the SARS-CoV-2 angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which is required for virus entry, and transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2), which is required for spike (S) protein priming, are coexpressed in the trophoblast of the blastocyst and the syncytiotrophoblast and hypoblast of the implantation stages, which develop into tissues that interact with the maternal blood supply for nutrient exchange [198, 199]. This finding may demonstrate a high risk of vertical transmission among SARS-CoV-2 infections (see later in this section). However, as data continue to accumulate, the final findings may depend on the number of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients tested. To date, there are no comprehensive reviews or completed meta-analyses that explore the association between COVID-19 and female fertility, especially in the context of MC activation. The strength of such activation should be proportional to the strength of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 coexpression.
Ongoing studies are focused on demonstrating the adverse effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on ovarian reserve function (mean AMH decline, elevation of basal FSH or LH, and abnormal FSH/LH ratio), changed uterine receptivity due to affected endometrial thickness and/or morphology, disturbed subendometrial blood flow and/or uterine spiral artery blood flow, and altered fallopian tube function and menstrual status [1].
It is crucial to identify cells simultaneously expressing ACE2 and TMPRSS2. Based on the latest results, it can be assumed that the female reproductive tract has a low concentration of SARS-CoV-2 receptors or, more precisely, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are coexpressed on the same cells [200]. These results suggest that the myometrium, uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tube are likely not susceptible to infection by SARS-CoV-2. In another study on preconceptional human endometrium, analysis of cell entry factors for SARS-CoV-2 (including ACE2 and TMPRSS2) by single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNAseq) revealed a low risk of infection [201]. In contrast to the mentioned papers, coexpression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules ACE2 and TMPRSS2 has been confirmed within the human ovarian cortex and medulla, including oocytes of different stages and granulosa cells [202]. Regarding the latter two locations, no marked difference in ACE2 or TMPRSS2 expression was observed between young and old ovaries and ovaries with low and high reserves [202]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 may potentially target specific ovarian cells and affect ovarian function. Moreover, recent research suggests the possibility of noncanonical cell entry machinery for SARS-CoV-2 based on the new putative receptors/co-factors identified [201]. For example, in vitro studies have demonstrated interactions between the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and the innate immune system, including C-lectin type receptors (CLR), Toll-like receptors (TLR) and neuropilin-1 (NRP1), and the nonimmune receptor glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), which are constantly expression in female reproductive tissues [203]. At the level of the endometrium across the menstrual cycle, alternative potential cell entry machinery components include BSG, ANPEP, CD209, CLEC4G, TMPRSS4, TMPRSS11A, FURIN, CTSB, CTSL, and IFITM1 [200]. All of the abovementioned receptors/cofactors can also be important in the context of the further mutagenic activity of SARS-CoV-2.
There are many unknowns regarding the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 through the placenta. In general, hematogenous spread as a mechanism of infection and transmission across the placenta into the fetal circulation appears unlikely due to inefficient viral replication in placental tissues. The majority of newborns delivered from SARS-CoV-2-positive mothers test negative following delivery, suggesting that protective mechanisms exist within the placenta [204]. Placental tissues showed significantly lower expression of both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 compared with adult lung tissues. Placental samples expressed low to no ACE2, whereas TMPRSS2 seemed to be present at variable levels in the chorionic villi [205]. The possibilities that a time window exists during pregnancy during which ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are coexpressed and that individual variability may influence the strength of this coexpression cannot be excluded. One possible reason for discordant results within the published literature may be the widespread presence of Fc receptors in the human placenta, as these are known to bind antibodies to varying affinities and may therefore lead to nonspecific staining [206, 207].
It was discovered that placental cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts express ACE2 from 7 weeks onward, suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 could cross into the placenta at any gestational age [208]. Studies of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 coexpression in the developing embryo up to day 14 (from surplus IVF human embryos) revealed the colocalization of these genes, raising concern about increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 fetal infection in the early stages of embryonic development [198]. Despite the clearly confirmed possibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection during the peri-implantation period, the transplacental route of viral transmission seems to be uncommon, especially in the antenatal period. It was reported that term placenta expresses low to no ACE2. Lack of this key protein for SARS-CoV-2 infection makes it difficult for the virus to pass from the maternal blood to the fetus or amniotic fluid [209]. However, in the case of vertical transmission in which the viral genome was detected in term placentas, these cases were associated with a strong maternal proinflammatory response [207, 209–211]. Local degranulation of MCs may be highly responsible for these pathologic findings [6, 13]. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 can be associated with a rare set of placental lesions that can lead to fetal demise, preterm birth, or growth restriction. The massive placental damage is indirectly induced by the virus with subsequent trophoblast necrosis and massive inflammation in the villous chamber; in a similar manner, diffuse alveolar damage is noted in adults infected by SARS-CoV-2 [210]. Again, placental MCs may represent an important source of mediators that can activate other immune cell types during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and these cells have the potential to be a major contributor to the spread of the virus in cases of vertical transmission [14, 119]. Demonstrable placental SARS-CoV-2 placentitis is an uncommon but readily recognizable complication of maternal COVID-19 with potential use as a marker of vertical transmission [211].
In contrast to term placenta, single-cell transcriptomic studies of the early placenta (6–14 weeks of gestation) revealed stable coexpression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in stromal and perivascular cells in the decidua and villous cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts. This finding may suggest that women infected early in pregnancy could potentially pass SARS-CoV-2 to the fetus through the transplacental route [207].
Interestingly, the gastrointestinal tract may also be important for the route of vertical transmission given the high coexpression of both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the human fetal intestine across the first and, particularly, the second trimester. Intrauterine infection through the gastrointestinal tract requires SARS-CoV-2 entry into the fetal gastrointestinal lumen through fetal swallowing of infected amniotic fluid [207]. Developing MCs were detected in the mucosa of the fetal gastrointestinal tract, but their possible role in vertical transmission was not investigated [212].
Although the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic in 70-80% of cases, observed symptoms in the vast majority of pregnant woman are benign, and the risk of vertical transmission is negligible, monitoring for adverse consequences of COVID-19 during pregnancy is reasonable [213]. Both the mother and especially the child may show long-term health effects of maternal immune system activation (including MCAS) in response to SARS-CoV-2 [205, 214]. The available data do not currently demonstrate an increased teratogenic potential of SARS-CoV-2, and limited evidence has not demonstrated any association between COVID-19 and an increased risk of miscarriage [215].
5. Concluding Remarks
Pregnant women do not appear to be more likely to contract SARS-CoV-2 than the general population or women of childbearing age [216]. However, intensive care admission and invasive ventilation are more common among pregnant women with COVID-19 compared with infected nonpregnant women of the same age [215, 217]. Analogous to respiratory function, it cannot be excluded that the cytokine storm accompanying SARS-CoV-2 infection and MCAS during COVID-19 may indirectly affect female reproductive function, especially in more severe cases [38, 204, 205]. The demonstrated roles of MCs and MC mediators in the human female reproductive system in health and disease have been presented elsewhere (see Table 1). Neutralization of upstream histamine, a major mediator derived from MCs, inhibits the nuclear translocation of NF-κB, thereby preventing the release of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin- (IL-) 1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 [218]. This effect has been successfully used in the MC-targeted treatment of chronic dyspareunia, vaginitis, and dysfunctional uterine bleeding [219]. Despite the fact that COVID-19 hyperinflammation and post-COVID-19 illness may be rooted in MCAS, the available clinical data do not provide grounds for treating this mechanism as a significant threat to female reproductive functions, including pregnancy [214]. Understandably, severe COVID-19 reduces female fertility and has been associated with impaired fetal growth during pregnancy, an approximate 2-fold increased risk of stillbirth, 3-fold increased risk of preterm birth (likely influenced by iatrogenic deliveries) and prematurity-related worse perinatal outcomes [215].
It should be noted that the pathophysiological spectrum of MCAS is extremely broad and heterogeneous with a strong female predilection. The above and environmental changes inducing epigenetic mechanisms may explain the increasing incidence of MCAS, which is estimated to be up to 17% [220]. Specific research in the pregnant or postpartum MCAS population related to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 has not been performed to date. Data continue to accumulate, including those regarding the long-term influence of COVID-19 on the course of both preexisting and SARS-CoV-2-induced MCAS and female fertility. This is especially true for cases of so-called long COVID or post-acute COVID-19 when females experience lingering COVID-19 symptoms for weeks and months after this initial or acute phase of the infection [221]. It is noteworthy that long COVID with high residual cardiovascular risk and persistence of blood chemistry of inflammation and procoagulative state resembles many aspects of MCAS [222]. For example, in both pathologies, NLRP3 inflammasome (hyper)activation may be crucial in the consolidation of coagulation disorders within the female reproductive organs [223, 224]. Further studies are needed to determine whether MCAS-related clotting disorders (e.g., microcoagulopathy) are subjected to long-term modulation by SARS-CoV-2 infection with possible consequences on female reproductive function.
Abbreviations
- 5-HT:
5-Hydroxytryptamine, serotonin
- αV-β3:
Member of the integrin family, also known as a vitronectin receptor
- ACE:
Angiotensin-converting enzyme
- ACE2:
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor
- Akt:
Protein kinase B
- AMH:
Anti-Mullerian hormone
- ANPEP:
Cell membrane alanyl aminopeptidase
- ART:
Assisted reproductive technology
- bFGF:
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- CCL2:
C-C motif chemokine ligand 2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)
- CCL8:
C-C motif chemokine 8
- CCL17:
C-C motif chemokine ligand 17
- CCL22:
C-C motif chemokine ligand 22
- CCR1:
C-C chemokine receptor type 1
- CD117:
The c-kit protooncogene product
- CLEC4G:
C-type lectin domain family 4 member G
- CLR:
C-type lectin receptors
- COVID-19:
Coronavirus Disease 2019
- CRH:
Corticotropin-releasing hormone
- CTSL:
Lysosomal cysteine peptidase cathepsin L
- CTSB:
Cathepsin B
- CX3CL1:
C-X3-C motif chemokine ligand 1 or fractalkine
- CXCL8:
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 8 or interleukin 8 (IL-8)
- CXCL10:
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10, also known as interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10)
- CXCL11:
C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 11
- DAG:
Diacylglycerol
- E2:
Estradiol
- ECM:
Extracellular matrix
- EGFR:
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- ERα, ERβ:
Estrogen receptors alpha, beta
- ET-1:
Endothelin 1
- FcεRIα:
High-affinity IgE receptor
- FGR:
Fetal growth restriction
- FSH:
Follicle-stimulating hormone
- GM-CSF:
Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- GPER:
G protein-coupled estrogen receptor
- GRP78:
Glucose regulated protein 78
- H1, H2, H3, H4:
Histamine receptors: H1 H2, H3 and H4, respectively
- HLA-G:
Human leukocyte antigen
- IFITM1:
Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1
- IgE:
E class immunoglobulin
- IL-1, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, IL-10, IL-31, IL-33:
Interleukins
- IP3:
Inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate
- ITAMs:
Immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs
- IUD:
Contraceptive intrauterine device
- IVF:
In vitro fertilization
- JAK3:
Janus kinase 3 of the killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR)
- LAD2:
Laboratory of allergic diseases 2 human MCs
- LAT1, LAT2:
Linkers for activation of T cells family, member 1 and 2, respectively
- LH:
Luteinizing hormone
- LIF:
Leukemia inhibitory factor
- LTs (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4, LTB4):
Leukotrienes: LTC4, LTD4, LTE4, LTB4
- MAPK:
Mitogen-activated protein kinases
- MC, MCs:
Mast cell, mast cells
- MCAS:
Mast cell activation syndrome
- MCP-1/CCL2:
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- MCT:
Tryptase+ but chymase– MC subtype
- MCTC:
Tryptase+ and chymase+ MC subtype
- miRNAs (e.g., miR-142-3p, miR-126, miR-155, and miR-221/222):
MicroRNAs
- MRGPRX2:
Mas-related G-protein coupled receptor member X2
- MMPs:
Metalloproteinases
- mTOR:
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR)
- nc-MCAS:
Nonclonal MC activation syndrome
- NGF:
Nerve growth factor
- NLRP3:
Inflammasome (NOD-, LRR-, and pyrin domain-containing protein 3)
- NRP1:
Neuropilin-1
- NF-κB:
Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
- P4:
Progesterone
- p75NTR:
Low-affinity receptor for neurotrophins
- PAF:
Platelet-activating factor
- PAMPs:
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
- PCO:
Polycystic ovaries
- PDGF:
Platelet-derived growth factor
- PGs:
Prostaglandins
- PIP3:
Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate
- PR-A, PR-B:
progesterone (P4) receptors A, B
- ROS:
Reactive oxygen species
- SARS-CoV-2:
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
- SCF:
Stem cell factor
- scRNAseq:
Single-cell RNA-sequencing
- GF-β1, TGF-β2:
Transforming growth factors: β1 and β2, respectively
- Th2 cell:
T helper type 2 cell
- TLRs:
Toll-like receptor
- TMPRSS2, TMPRSS4, TMPRSS11A:
Transmembrane serine proteases: 2, 4 and 11A, respectively
- TNF-α:
Tumor necrosis factor α
- TrkA:
Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor (NTRK1)
- TSH:
Thyroid-stimulating hormone
- Ucn:
Urocortin
- VEGF:
Vascular endothelial growth factor
- Zeb2:
Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 2 or Smad interacting protein 1 (Sip1)
Data Availability
Data availability issue does not apply to this review paper. All data are from the published papers and are included in the references.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Li F., Lu H., Zhang Q., et al. Impact of COVID-19 on female fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. . 2021;11(2, article e045524) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Theoharides T. C., Conti P. COVID-19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome, or is it mast cell activation syndrome? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents . 2020;34(5):1633–1636. doi: 10.23812/20-EDIT3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zierau O., Zenclussen A. C., Jensen F. Role of female sex hormones, estradiol and progesterone, in mast cell behavior. Front Immunol. . 2012;3:p. 169. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Valent P., Akin C., Hartmann K., et al. Mast cells as a unique hematopoietic lineage and cell system: from Paul Ehrlich's visions to precision medicine concepts. Theranostics. . 2020;10(23):10743–10768. doi: 10.7150/thno.46719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lee S. K., Kim C. J., Kim D. J., Kang J. H. Immune cells in the female reproductive tract. Immune Netw. . 2015;15(1):16–26. doi: 10.4110/in.2015.15.1.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Purcell W. M., Hanahoe T. H. A novel source of mast cells: the human placenta. Agents Actions. . 1991;33(1-2):8–12. doi: 10.1007/BF01993113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Csaba G. Mast cell, the peculiar member of the immune system: a homeostatic aspect. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. . 2015;62(3):207–231. doi: 10.1556/030.62.2015.3.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Grootens J., Ungerstedt J. S., Nilsson G., Dahlin J. S. Deciphering the differentiation trajectory from hematopoietic stem cells to mast cells. Blood Adv. . 2018;2(17):2273–2281. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Frossi B., Mion F., Sibilano R., Danelli L., Pucillo C. E. M. Is it time for a new classification of mast cells? What do we know about mast cell heterogeneity? Immunol Rev. . 2018;282(1):35–46. doi: 10.1111/imr.12636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atiakshin D., Buchwalow I., Samoilova V., Tiemann M. Tryptase as a polyfunctional component of mast cells. Histochem Cell Biol. . 2018;149(5):461–477. doi: 10.1007/s00418-018-1659-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Atiakshin D., Buchwalow I., Tiemann M. Mast cell chymase: morphofunctional characteristics. Histochem Cell Biol. . 2019;152(4):253–269. doi: 10.1007/s00418-019-01803-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Woidacki K., Jensen F., Zenclussen A. C. Mast cells as novel mediators of reproductive processes. Front Immunol. . 2013;4:p. 29. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Menzies F. M., Shepherd M. C., Nibbs R. J., Nelson S. M. The role of mast cells and their mediators in reproduction, pregnancy and labour. Hum Reprod Update. . 2011;17(3):383–396. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmq053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Negishi Y., Shima Y., Takeshita T., Morita R. Harmful and beneficial effects of inflammatory response on reproduction: sterile and pathogen-associated inflammation. Immunol Med. . 2021;44(2):98–115. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2020.1809951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goto J., Kanayama N., Asahina T., Okada Y., Kobayashi T., Terao T. Induction of follicular growth by exogenous interleukin-8. Hum Reprod. . 1997;12(12):2729–2734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Szukiewicz D., Pyzlak M., Klimkiewicz J., Szewczyk G., Maslinska D. Mast cell-derived interleukin-8 may be involved in the ovarian mechanisms of follicle growth and ovulation. Inflamm Res. . 2007;56(Suppl 1):S35–S36. doi: 10.1007/s00011-006-0517-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Field S. L., Dasgupta T., Cummings M., Orsi N. M. Cytokines in ovarian folliculogenesis, oocyte maturation and luteinisation. Mol Reprod Dev. . 2014;81(4):284–314. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Szukiewicz D., Klimkiewicz J., Pyzlak M., Szewczyk G., Maslinska D. Locally secreted histamine may regulate the development of ovarian follicles by apoptosis. Inflamm Res. . 2007;56(Suppl 1):S33–S34. doi: 10.1007/s00011-006-0516-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krishna A., Beesley K., Terranova P. F. Histamine, mast cells and ovarian function. J Endocrinol. . 1989;120(3):363–371. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1200363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Szukiewicz D., Szewczyk G., Klimkiewicz J., Pyzlak M., Maslinska D. The role of histamine and its receptors in the development of ovarian follicles in vitro. Inflamm Res. . 2006;55(Suppl 1):S49–S50. doi: 10.1007/s00011-005-0037-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galvão A. M., Skarzynski D., Ferreira-Dias G. Luteolysis and the auto-, paracrine role of cytokines from tumor necrosis factor α and transforming growth factor β superfamilies. Vitam Horm. . 2018;107:287–315. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2018.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Heider U., Pedal I., Spanel-Borowski K. Increase in nerve fibers and loss of mast cells in polycystic and postmenopausal ovaries. Fertil Steril. . 2001;75(6):1141–1147. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)01805-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Krishna A., al Rifai A., Hubner B., Rother P., Spanel-Borowski K. Increase in calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP) and decrease in mast cells in dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-induced polycystic rat ovaries. Anat Embryol (Berl). . 2001;203(5):375–382. doi: 10.1007/s004290100165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chang H. M., Wu H. C., Sun Z. G., Lian F., Leung P. C. K. Neurotrophins and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the ovary: physiological and pathophysiological implications. Hum Reprod Update. . 2019;25(2):224–242. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chan J. K., Magistris A., Loizzi V., et al. Mast cell density, angiogenesis, blood clotting, and prognosis in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. . 2005;99(1):20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.05.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Oldford S. A., Marshall J. S. Mast cells as targets for immunotherapy of solid tumors. Mol Immunol. . 2015;63(1):113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2014.02.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Komi D. E. A., Redegeld F. A. Role of mast cells in shaping the tumor microenvironment. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. . 2020;58(3):313–325. doi: 10.1007/s12016-019-08753-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Glukhovets B. I., Ukhov I. I., Lebedev S. S. Tsiklicheskie izmeneniia tuchno-kletochnoĭ reaktsii i krovenosnykh kapilliarov v stenke matochnykh trub u zhenshchin [Cyclic changes in mast cell response and capillaries in the wall of the Fallopian tubes of women] Arkh Anat Gistol Embriol. . 1980;79(9):55–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sandvei R., Wollen A. L., Flood P. R., Anker C. Mast cells in the tubal wall in women using an intrauterine contraceptive device. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. . 1986;93(7):758–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07978.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oral E., Olive D. L., Arici A. The peritoneal environment in endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. . 1996;2(5):385–398. doi: 10.1093/humupd/2.5.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Broi M. G. D., Ferriani R. A., Navarro P. A. Ethiopathogenic mechanisms of endometriosis-related infertility. JBRA Assisted Reproduction . 2019;23(3):273–280. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20190029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Borelli V., Martinelli M., Luppi S., et al. Mast cells in peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis and their possible role in modulating sperm function. Front Physiol. . 2020;10:p. 1543. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Drudy L., Sheppard B. L., Bonnar J. The ultrastructure of mast cells in the uterus throughout the normal menstrual cycle and the postmenopause. J Anat . 1991;14(1):p. 51. doi: 10.1016/0378-5122(91)90169-Q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sivridis E., Giatromanolaki A., Agnantis N., Anastasiadis P. Mast cell distribution and density in the normal uterus -- metachromatic staining using lectins. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. . 2001;98(1):109–113. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(00)00564-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Al-Jefout M., Black K., Schulke L., et al. Novel finding of high density of activated mast cells in endometrial polyps. Fertil Steril. . 2009;92(3):1104–1106. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.El-Hamarneh T., Hey-Cunningham A. J., Berbic M., Al-Jefout M., Fraser I. S., Black K. Cellular immune environment in endometrial polyps. Fertil Steril. . 2013;100(5):1364–1372. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jensen F., Woudwyk M., Teles A., et al. Estradiol and progesterone regulate the migration of mast cells from the periphery to the uterus and induce their maturation and degranulation. PLoS One. . 2010;5(12, article e14409) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Elieh Ali Komi D., Shafaghat F., Haidl G. Significance of mast cells in spermatogenesis, implantation, pregnancy, and abortion: cross talk and molecular mechanisms. Am J Reprod Immunol . 2020;83(5):p. e13228. doi: 10.1111/aji.13228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Woidacki K., Zenclussen A. C., Siebenhaar F. Mast cell-mediated and associated disorders in pregnancy: a risky game with an uncertain outcome? Front Immunol. . 2014;5:p. 231. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saito H. Role of mast cell proteases in tissue remodeling. Chem Immunol Allergy. . 2005;87:80–84. doi: 10.1159/000087572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Matsuno T., Toyoshima S., Sakamoto-Sasaki T., et al. Characterization of human decidual mast cells and establishment of a culture system. Allergol Int. . 2018;67:S18–S24. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2018.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Derbala Y., Elazzamy H., Bilal M., et al. Mast cell-induced immunopathology in recurrent pregnancy losses. Am J Reprod Immunol. . 2019;82(1, article e13128) doi: 10.1111/aji.13128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ueshima C., Kataoka T. R., Hirata M., et al. Possible involvement of human mast cells in the establishment of pregnancy via killer cell Ig-like receptor 2DL4. Am J Pathol. . 2018;188(6):1497–1508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kataoka T. R., Ueshima C., Hirata M., Minamiguchi S., Haga H. Killer immunoglobulin-like receptor 2DL4 (CD158d) regulates human mast cells both positively and negatively: possible roles in pregnancy and cancer metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. . 2020;21(3):p. 954. doi: 10.3390/ijms21030954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Szewczyk G., Szukiewicz D., Klimkiewicz J., Pyzlak M., Szewczyk A., Krajewska K. Influence of histamine on the process of human trophoblast differentiation. Inflamm Res. . 2005;54(Suppl 1):S78–S79. doi: 10.1007/s00011-004-0436-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yin M., Zhu P., Luo H., Xu R. The presence of mast cells in the human endometrium pre- and post-insertion of intrauterine devices. Contraception. . 1993;48(3):245–254. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90143-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chou C. H., Chen S. U., Shun C. T., Tsao P. N., Yang Y. S., Yang J. H. Divergent endometrial inflammatory cytokine expression at peri-implantation period and after the stimulation by copper intrauterine device. Sci Rep. . 2015;5(1):p. 15157. doi: 10.1038/srep15157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Garfield R. E., Irani A. M., Schwartz L. B., Bytautiene E., Romero R. Structural and functional comparison of mast cells in the pregnant versus nonpregnant human uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. . 2006;194(1):261–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bytautiene E., Vedernikov Y. P., Saade G. R., Romero R., Garfield R. E. Degranulation of uterine mast cell modifies contractility of isolated myometrium from pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. . 2004;191(5):1705–1710. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Szukiewicz D., Maslinska D., Stelmachów J., Wojtecka-Lukasik E. Biogenetic amines in placental tissue. Relation to the contractile activity of the human uterus. Preliminary communication. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. . 1995;22(1):66–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mitani R., Maeda K., Fukui R., et al. Production of human mast cell chymase in human myometrium and placenta in cases of normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. . 2002;101(2):155–160. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00546-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.D'Orléans-Juste P., Houde M., Rae G. A., Bkaily G., Carrier E., Simard E. Endothelin-1 (1-31): from chymase-dependent synthesis to cardiovascular pathologies. Vascul Pharmacol. . 2008;49(2-3):51–62. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Norström A., Vukas Radulovic N., Bullarbo M., Ekerhovd E. Mast cell involvement in human cervical ripening. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. . 2019;238:157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kurihara-Shimomura M., Sasahira T., Shimomura H., Bosserhoff A. K., Kirita T. Mast cell chymase promotes angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis mediated by activation of melanoma inhibitory activity gene family members in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Oncol. . 2020;56(5):1093–1100. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2020.4996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.de Souza D. A., Borges A. C., Santana A. C., Oliver C., Jamur M. C. Mast cell proteases 6 and 7 stimulate angiogenesis by inducing endothelial cells to release angiogenic factors. PLoS One. . 2015;10(12, article e0144081) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Szukiewicz D., Szukiewicz A., Maslinska D., Poppe P., Gujski M., Olszewski M. Mast cells and histamine in intrauterine growth retardation--relation to the development of placental microvessels. Inflamm Res. . 1999;48(1):41–42. doi: 10.1007/s000110050392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Szukiewicz D., Szukiewicz A., Maslinska D., Szewczyk G., Watroba M. Mast cell-derived vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvascular density in diabetic placentae. Inflamm Res. . 2003;52:s9–10. doi: 10.1007/s000110300030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Szewczyk G., Maślińska D., Szukiewicz D., Śmiertka W., Klimkiewicz J., Pyzlak M. Histamine H4 receptors in human placenta in diabetes-complicated pregnancy. Inflamm Res. . 2007;56(Suppl 1):S31–S32. doi: 10.1007/s00011-006-0515-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Faas M. M., De Vos P. Innate immune cells in the placental bed in healthy pregnancy and preeclampsia. Placenta. . 2018;69:125–133. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2018.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Wang Y., Alexander J. S. Role of chymase in preeclampsia. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. . 2013;11(5):606–615. doi: 10.2174/1570161111311050005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Szewczyk G., Pyzlak M., Klimkiewicz J., Smiertka W., Miedzińska-Maciejewska M., Szukiewicz D. Mast cells and histamine: do they influence placental vascular network and development in preeclampsia? Mediators Inflamm. . 2012;2012, article 307189:5. doi: 10.1155/2012/307189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Szukiewicz D., Szukiewicz A., Maslinska D., Gujski M., Poppe P., Mazurek-Kantor J. Mast cell number, histamine concentration and placental vascular response to histamine in preeclampsia. Inflamm Res. . 1999;48:39–40. doi: 10.1007/s000110050390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Szewczyk G., Pyzlak M., Smiertka W., Klimkiewicz J., Szukiewicz D. Does histamine influence differentiation of trophoblast in preeclampsia? Inflamm Res. . 2008;57(Suppl 1):71–72. doi: 10.1007/s00011-007-0635-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Meyer N., Woidacki K., Knöfler M., et al. Chymase-producing cells of the innate immune system are required for decidual vascular remodeling and fetal growth. Sci Rep. . 2017;7(1):p. 45106. doi: 10.1038/srep45106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wu Z. M., Yang H., Li M., et al. Pro-inflammatory cytokine-stimulated first trimester decidual cells enhance macrophage-induced apoptosis of extravillous trophoblasts. Placenta. . 2012;33(3):188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Pyzlak M., Szewczyk G., Szukiewicz D., Szczesniak A. Histamine influence on apoptosis in trophoblast cell cultures. Inflamm Res. . 2010;59(Suppl 2):S213–S215. doi: 10.1007/s00011-009-0133-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Liu Z., Kilburn B. A., Leach R. E., Romero R., Paria B. C., Armant D. R. Histamine enhances cytotrophoblast invasion by inducing intracellular calcium transients through the histamine type-1 receptor. Mol Reprod Dev. . 2004;68(3):345–353. doi: 10.1002/mrd.20082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Needham K., Fadia M., Dahlstrom J. E., Harrington K., Shadbolt B., Robson S. Significance of mast cell distribution in placental tissue and membranes in spontaneous preterm birth. J Inflamm Res. . 2016;Volume 9:141–145. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S80722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Abelius M. S., Enke U., Varosi F., et al. Placental immune response to apple allergen in allergic mothers. J Reprod Immunol. . 2014;106:100–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2014.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Mikkelsen A. L., Felding C., Larsen L. G., Andersen B., Sander P. Mast cells in the placenta. Is there a relation to the development of atopic disease in infants before 18 months of age? J Perinat Med. . 1994;22(4):273–278. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1994.22.4.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Straubinger K., Paul S., Prazeres da Costa O., et al. Maternal immune response to helminth infection during pregnancy determines offspring susceptibility to allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol . 2014;134(6):1271–1279.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Papadogiannakis N., Joerink M., Rindsjö E., Scheynius A., Alm J. Placental inflammation, lifestyle, maternal and early child sensitisation to allergens - the assessment of lifestyle and allergic disease during infancy birth cohort. Acta Paediatr. . 2019;108(5):927–932. doi: 10.1111/apa.14618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Anaf V., Chapron C., El Nakadi I., De Moor V., Simonart T., Noël J. C. Pain, mast cells, and nerves in peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. . 2006;86(5):1336–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zhu T. H., Zou G., Ding S. J., et al. Mast cell stabilizer ketotifen reduces hyperalgesia in a rodent model of surgically induced endometriosis. J Pain Res. . 2019;12:1359–1369. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S195909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.D'Cruz O. J., Uckun F. M. Targeting mast cells in endometriosis with Janus kinase 3 inhibitor, JANEX-1. Am J Reprod Immunol. . 2007;58(2):75–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2007.00502.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhu T. H., Ding S. J., Li T. T., Zhu L. B., Huang X. F., Zhang X. M. Estrogen is an important mediator of mast cell activation in ovarian endometriomas. Reproduction. . 2018;155(1):73–83. doi: 10.1530/REP-17-0457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Kirchhoff D., Kaulfuss S., Fuhrmann U., Maurer M., Zollner T. M. Mast cells in endometriosis: guilty or innocent bystanders? Expert Opin Ther Targets. . 2012;16(3):237–241. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.661415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kempuraj D., Papadopoulou N., Stanford E. J., et al. Increased numbers of activated mast cells in endometriosis lesions positive for corticotropin-releasing hormone and urocortin. Am J Reprod Immunol. . 2004;52(4):267–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2004.00224.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Norrby K. Evidence of a dual role of endogenous histamine in angiogenesis. Int J Exp Pathol. . 1995;76(2):87–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Xue S., Tang H., Zhao G., et al. C-C Motif Chemokine 8 promotes angiogenesis in vascular endothelial cells. Vascular. . 2021;29(3):429–441. doi: 10.1177/1708538120959972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Li T., Wang J., Guo X., et al. Possible involvement of crosstalk between endometrial cells and mast cells in the development of endometriosis via CCL8/CCR1. Biomed Pharmacother. . 2020;129:p. 110476. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Binda M. M., Donnez J., Dolmans M. M. Targeting mast cells: a new way to treat endometriosis. Expert Opin Ther Targets. . 2017;21(1):67–75. doi: 10.1080/14728222.2017.1260548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Theoharides T. C. Neuroendocrinology of mast cells: challenges and controversies. Exp Dermatol. . 2017;26(9):751–759. doi: 10.1111/exd.13288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Guo X., Xu X., Li T., et al. NLRP3 inflammasome activation of mast cells by estrogen via the nuclear-initiated signaling pathway contributes to the development of endometriosis. Front Immunol. . 2021;12:p. 749979. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.749979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Jaiswal K., Krishna A. Effects of hormones on the number, distribution and degranulation of mast cells in the ovarian complex of mice. Acta Physiol Hung. . 1996;84(2):183–190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Schmidt G., Owman C., Sjöberg N. O. Cellular localization of ovarian histamine, its cyclic variations, and histaminergic effects on ovulation in the rat ovary perfused in vitro. Reproduction . 1988;82(2):409–417. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0820409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hamouzova P., Cizek P., Bartoskova A., Vitasek R., Tichy F. Changes in the mast cell distribution in the canine ovary and uterus throughout the oestrous cycle. Reprod Domest Anim. . 2020;55(4):479–485. doi: 10.1111/rda.13641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schumacher A., Sharkey D. J., Robertson S. A., Zenclussen A. C. Immune cells at the fetomaternal interface: how the microenvironment modulates immune cells to foster fetal development. J Immunol. . 2018;201(2):325–334. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Marshall J. S., Portales-Cervantes L., Leong E. Mast cell responses to viruses and pathogen products. Int J Mol Sci. . 2019;20(17):p. 4241. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Conti G., Giannitto N., De Luca F. L., et al. Kawasaki disease and cardiac involvement: an update on the state of the art. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents . 2020;34:1629–1632. doi: 10.23812/20-2EDIT. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Abraham S. N., St John A. L. Mast cell-orchestrated immunity to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. . 2010;10(6):440–452. doi: 10.1038/nri2782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Galli S. J., Gaudenzio N., Tsai M. Mast cells in inflammation and disease: recent progress and ongoing concerns. Annu Rev Immunol. . 2020;38:49–77. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-071719-094903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Silver R. B., Reid A. C., Mackins C. J., et al. Mast cells: a unique source of renin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. . 2004;101(37):13607–13612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403208101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Maaninka K., Nguyen S. D., Mäyränpää M. I., et al. Human mast cell neutral proteases generate modified LDL particles with increased proteoglycan binding. Atherosclerosis. . 2018;275:390–399. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Heutinck K. M., ten Berge I. J., Hack C. E., Hamann J., Rowshani A. T. Serine proteases of the human immune system in health and disease. Mol Immunol. . 2010;47(11-12):1943–1955. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Peljer G., Abrink M., Ringvall M., Wernersson S. Mast cell proteases. Adv Immunol. . 2007;95:167–255. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(07)95006-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Peljer G., Ronnberg E., Waern I., Wernersson S. Mast cell proteases: multifaceted regulators of inflammatory disease. Blood. . 2010;115(24):4981–4990. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-257287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Caughey G. H. Mast cell proteases as pharmacological targets. Eur J Pharmacol. . 2016;778:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.04.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wang J., Sjöberg S., Tang T. T., et al. Cathepsin G activity lowers plasma LDL and reduces atherosclerosis. Biochim Biophys Acta. . 2014;1842(11):2174–2183. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tiligada E., Ennis M. Histamine pharmacology: from Sir Henry Dale to the 21st century. Br J Pharmacol. . 2020;177(3):469–489. doi: 10.1111/bph.14524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Walter M., Stark H. Histamine receptor subtypes: a century of rational drug design. Front Biosci . 2012;S4(2):461–488. doi: 10.2741/s279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Thangam E. B., Jemima E. A., Singh H., et al. The role of histamine and histamine receptors in mast cell-mediated allergy and inflammation: the hunt for new therapeutic targets. Front Immunol. . 2018;9:p. 1873. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hattori Y., Hattori K., Matsuda N. Regulation of the cardiovascular system by histamine. Handb Exp Pharmacol. . 2017;241:239–258. doi: 10.1007/164_2016_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Bonnin A., Levitt P. Fetal, maternal, and placental sources of serotonin and new implications for developmental programming of the brain. Neuroscience. . 2011;197:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ranzil S., Walker D. W., Borg A. J., Wallace E. M., Ebeling P. R., Murthi P. The relationship between the placental serotonin pathway and fetal growth restriction. Biochimie. . 2019;161:80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2018.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kushnir-Sukhov N. M., Brown J. M., Wu Y., Kirshenbaum A., Metcalfe D. D. Human mast cells are capable of serotonin synthesis and release. J Allergy Clin Immunol. . 2007;119(2):498–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Ritter M., El-Nour H., Hedblad M. A., et al. Serotonin and its 5-HT1 receptor in human mastocytosis. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. . 2012;34(4):679–685. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2011.651222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Nautiyal K. M., Dailey C. A., Jahn J. L., et al. Serotonin of mast cell origin contributes to hippocampal function. Eur J Neurosci. . 2012;36(3):2347–2359. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08138.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Rönnberg E., Melo F. R., Pejler G. Mast cell proteoglycans. J Histochem Cytochem. . 2012;60(12):950–962. doi: 10.1369/0022155412458927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Mulloy B., Lever R., Page C. P. Mast cell glycosaminoglycans. Glycoconj J. . 2017;34(3):351–361. doi: 10.1007/s10719-016-9749-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zehnder J. L., Galli S. J. Mast-cell heparin demystified. Nature. . 1999;400(6746):714–715. doi: 10.1038/23360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Sahid M. N. A., Kiyoi T. Mast cell activation markers for in vitro study. J Immunoassay Immunochem. . 2020;41(4):778–816. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2020.1769129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Liu B., Yang J., Luo W., et al. Prostaglandin D2 is the major cyclooxygenase-1-derived product in prepartum mouse uteri where it mediates an enhanced in vitro myometrial contraction. Eur J Pharmacol. . 2017;813:140–146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Nakamura T., Murata T. Regulation of vascular permeability in anaphylaxis. Br J Pharmacol. . 2018;175(13):2538–2542. doi: 10.1111/bph.14332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Theoharides T. C., Alysandratos K. D., Angelidou A., et al. Mast cells and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta. . 2012;1822(1):21–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.12.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Elieh Ali Komi D., Wöhrl S., Bielory L. Mast cell biology at molecular level: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. . 2020;58(3):342–365. doi: 10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Moon T. C., Befus A. D., Kulka M. Mast cell mediators: their differential release and the secretory pathways involved. Front Immunol. . 2014;5:p. 569. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Moon T. C., St Laurent C. D., Morris K. E., et al. Advances in mast cell biology: new understanding of heterogeneity and function. Mucosal Immunol . 2010;3(2):111–128. doi: 10.1038/mi.2009.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Sibilano R., Frossi B., Pucillo C. E. Mast cell activation: a complex interplay of positive and negative signaling pathways. Eur J Immunol. . 2014;44(9):2558–2566. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Tkaczyk C., Iwaki S., Metcalfe D. D., Gilfillan A. M. Roles of adaptor molecules in mast cell activation. Chem Immunol Allergy. . 2005;87:43–58. doi: 10.1159/000087570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ishizaka T., White J. R., Saito H. Activation of basophils and mast cells for mediator release. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. . 1987;82(3-4):327–332. doi: 10.1159/000234218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Liu T., Zhang L., Joo D., Sun S. C. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther . 2017;2:p. 17023. doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Barbu E. A., Zhang J., Berenstein E. H., Groves J. R., Parks L. M., Siraganian R. P. The transcription factor Zeb2 regulates signaling in mast cells. J Immunol. . 2012;188(12):6278–6286. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Kim M. S., Kuehn H. S., Metcalfe D. D., Gilfillan A. M. Activation and function of the mTORC1 pathway in mast cells. J Immunol. . 2008;180(7):4586–4595. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Quan P. L., Sabaté-Brescó M., Guo Y., Martín M., Gastaminza G. The multifaceted Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member X2 in allergic diseases and beyond. Int J Mol Sci. . 2021;22(9):p. 4421. doi: 10.3390/ijms22094421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Blank U., Huang H., Kawakami T. The high affinity IgE receptor: a signaling update. Curr Opin Immunol. . 2021;72:51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Lyons D. O., Pullen N. A. Beyond IgE: alternative mast cell activation across different disease states. Int J Mol Sci. . 2020;21(4):p. 1498. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Lu J., Sun P. D. High affinity binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein enhances ACE2 carboxypeptidase activity. J Biol Chem. . 2020;295(52):18579–18588. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.015303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Zhang Q., Xiang R., Huo S., et al. Molecular mechanism of interaction between SARS-CoV-2 and host cells and interventional therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. . 2021;6(1):p. 233. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00653-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Theoharides T. C. COVID-19, pulmonary mast cells, cytokine storms, and beneficial actions of luteolin. Biofactors. . 2020;46(3):306–308. doi: 10.1002/biof.1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Theoharides T. C. Potential association of mast cells with coronavirus disease 2019. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. . 2021;126(3):217–218. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Stanczak M. A., Sanin D. E., Apostolova P., et al. IL-33 expression in response to SARS-CoV-2 correlates with seropositivity in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. Nat Commun. . 2021;12(1):p. 2133. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22449-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.West P. W., Bahri R., Garcia-Rodriguez K. M., et al. Interleukin-33 amplifies human mast cell activities induced by complement anaphylatoxins. Front Immunol. . 2021;11:p. 615236. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.615236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Theoharides T. C. The impact of psychological stress on mast cells. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. . 2020;125(4):388–392. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Marfia G., Navone S., Guarnaccia L., et al. Decreased serum level of sphingosine-1-phosphate: a novel predictor of clinical severity in COVID-19. EMBO Mol Med . 2021;13(1, article e13424) doi: 10.15252/emmm.202013424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Ennis M., Tiligada K. Histamine receptors and COVID-19. Inflamm Res. . 2021;70(1):67–75. doi: 10.1007/s00011-020-01422-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Al-Hasani R., Bruchas M. R. Molecular mechanisms of opioid receptor-dependent signaling and behavior. Anesthesiology. . 2011;115(6):1363–1381. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318238bba6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Barke K. E., Hough L. B. Opiates, mast cells and histamine release. Life Sci. . 1993;53(18):1391–1399. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(93)90581-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Han N. R., Oh H. A., Nam S. Y., et al. TSLP induces mast cell development and aggravates allergic reactions through the activation of MDM2 and STAT6. J Invest Dermatol. . 2014;134(10):2521–2530. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Demopoulos C., Antonopoulou S., Theoharides T. C. COVID-19, microthromboses, inflammation, and platelet activating factor. Biofactors. . 2020;46(6):927–933. doi: 10.1002/biof.1696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Mi Y. N., Ping N. N., Cao Y. X. Ligands and signaling of Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2 in mast cell activation. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol. . 2021;179:139–188. doi: 10.1007/112_2020_53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Lam H. Y., Tergaonkar V., Kumar A. P., Ahn K. S. Mast cells: therapeutic targets for COVID-19 and beyond. IUBMB Life. . 2021;73(11):1278–1292. doi: 10.1002/iub.2552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Sandig H., Bulfone-Paus S. TLR signaling in mast cells: common and unique features. Front Immunol. . 2012;3:p. 185. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Khalil B. A., Elemam N. M., Maghazachi A. A. Chemokines and chemokine receptors during COVID-19 infection. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. . 2021;19:976–988. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Juremalm M., Nilsson G. Chemokine receptor expression by mast cells. Chem Immunol Allergy. . 2005;87:130–144. doi: 10.1159/000087640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Li J., Jubair S., Levick S. P., Janicki J. S. The autocrine role of tryptase in pressure overload-induced mast cell activation, chymase release and cardiac fibrosis. IJC Metab Endocr. . 2016;10:16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcme.2015.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Palmer H. S., Kelso E. B., Lockhart J. C., et al. Protease-activated receptor 2 mediates the proinflammatory effects of synovial mast cells. Arthritis Rheum. . 2007;56(11):3532–3540. doi: 10.1002/art.22936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Nagashima S., Dutra A. A., Arantes M. P., et al. COVID-19 and lung mast cells: the Kallikrein-Kinin activation pathway. Int J Mol Sci . 2022;23(3):p. 1714. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Subramaniam S., Ruf W., Bosmann M. Advocacy of targeting protease-activated receptors in severe coronavirus disease 2019. Br J Pharmacol. . 2022;179(10):2086–2099. doi: 10.1111/bph.15587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Gao Z. G., Wei Q., Jayasekara M. P., Jacobson K. A. The role of P2Y(14) and other P2Y receptors in degranulation of human LAD2 mast cells. Purinergic Signal. . 2013;9(1):31–40. doi: 10.1007/s11302-012-9325-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Gao Z. G., Jacobson K. A. Purinergic signaling in mast cell degranulation and asthma. Front Pharmacol. . 2017;8:p. 947. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Franciosi M. L. M., Lima M. D. M., Schetinger M. R. C., Cardoso A. M. Possible role of purinergic signaling in COVID-19. Mol Cell Biochem. . 2021;476(8):2891–2898. doi: 10.1007/s11010-021-04130-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.McArdel S. L., Terhorst C., Sharpe A. H. Roles of CD48 in regulating immunity and tolerance. Clin Immunol. . 2016;164:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Chelombitko M. A., Fedorov A. V., Ilyinskaya O. P., Zinovkin R. A., Chernyak B. V. Role of reactive oxygen species in mast cell degranulation. Biochemistry (Mosc). . 2016;81(12):1564–1577. doi: 10.1134/S000629791612018X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Donnez J., Binda M. M., Donnez O., Dolmans M. M. Oxidative stress in the pelvic cavity and its role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. . 2016;106(5):1011–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Zal F., Khademi F., Taheri R., Mostafavi-Pour Z. Antioxidant ameliorating effects against H2O2-induced cytotoxicity in primary endometrial cells. Toxicol Mech Methods. . 2018;28(2):122–129. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2017.1372540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Mancini A., Bruno C., Vergani E., d’Abate C., Giacchi E., Silvestrini A. Oxidative stress and low-grade inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome: controversies and new insights. Int J Mol Sci. . 2021;22(4):p. 1667. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Cardet J. C., Castells M. C., Hamilton M. J. Immunology and clinical manifestations of non-clonal mast cell activation syndrome. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. . 2013;13(1):10–18. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0326-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Giannetti A., Filice E., Caffarelli C., Ricci G., Pession A. Mast cell activation disorders. Medicina (Kaunas). . 2021;57(2):p. 124. doi: 10.3390/medicina57020124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Petra A. I., Panagiotidou S., Stewart J. M., Conti P., Theoharides T. C. Spectrum of mast cell activation disorders. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. . 2014;10(6):729–739. doi: 10.1586/1744666X.2014.906302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Butterfield J. H., Ravi A., Pongdee T. Mast cell mediators of significance in clinical practice in mastocytosis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. . 2018;38(3):397–410. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Schwartz L. B., Irani A. M., Roller K., Castells M. C., Schechter N. M. Quantitation of histamine, tryptase, and chymase in dispersed human T and TC mast cells. J Immunol. . 1987;138(8):2611–2615. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Molderings G. J. Transgenerational transmission of systemic mast cell activation disease-- genetic and epigenetic features. Transl Res. . 2016;174:86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Kim H. S., Kawakami Y., Kasakura K., Kawakami T. Recent advances in mast cell activation and regulation. F1000Res . 2020;9:p. 196. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.22037.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Yamada Y., Kosaka K., Miyazawa T., Kurata-Miura K., Yoshida T. miR-142-3p enhances FcεRI-mediated degranulation in mast cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. . 2014;443(3):980–986. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.12.078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Bao Y., Wang S., Gao Y., et al. MicroRNA-126 accelerates IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation associated with the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway by promoting Ca2+ influx. Exp Ther Med. . 2018;16(3):2763–2769. doi: 10.3892/etm.2018.6510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Mayoral R. J., Pipkin M. E., Pachkov M., van Nimwegen E., Rao A., Monticelli S. MicroRNA-221-222 regulate the cell cycle in mast cells. J Immunol. . 2009;182(1):433–445. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.1.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Li R., Yin T., Fang F., et al. Potential risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection on reproductive health. Reprod Biomed Online. . 2020;41(1):89–95. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Kantroo V., Bhattacharya S., Dhingra A., Kalra S. Pulmocrinology: interplay of pulmonary and endocrine diseases. J Pak Med Assoc. . 2021;71(3):1033–1038. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Ciarambino T., Para O., Giordano M. Immune system and COVID-19 by sex differences and age. Womens Health . 2021;17:p. 174550652110222. doi: 10.1177/17455065211022262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Selek A., Güçlü M., Bolu Ş. E. COVID-19 pandemic: what about the gonads? Hormones . 2021;20(2):259–268. doi: 10.1007/s42000-021-00277-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Li K., Chen G., Hou H., et al. Analysis of sex hormones and menstruation in COVID-19 women of child-bearing age. Reprod Biomed Online. . 2021;42(1):260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Phelan N., Behan L. A., Owens L. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on women's reproductive health. Front Endocrinol . 2021;12:p. 642755. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.642755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Vasiadi M., Kempuraj D., Boucher W., Kalogeromitros D., Theoharides T. C. Progesterone inhibits mast cell secretion. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. . 2006;19(4):787–794. doi: 10.1177/039463200601900408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kasperska-Zajac A., Brzoza Z., Rogala B. Dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in atopic allergy and chronic urticaria. Inflammation. . 2008;31(3):141–145. doi: 10.1007/s10753-008-9059-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Oppong E., Flink N., Cato A. C. Molecular mechanisms of glucocorticoid action in mast cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol. . 2013;380(1-2):119–126. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Cutolo M., Capellino S., Sulli A., et al. Estrogens and autoimmune diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. . 2006;1089(1):538–547. doi: 10.1196/annals.1386.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Jacenik D., Krajewska W. M. Significance of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in the pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel diseases and colorectal cancer. Front Endocrinol . 2020;11:p. 390. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Luo J., Liu D. Does GPER really function as a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in vivo? Front Endocrinol . 2020;11:p. 148. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Pupo M., Maggiolini M., Musti A. M. GPER mediates non-genomic effects of estrogen. Methods Mol Biol. . 2016;1366:471–488. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3127-9_37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Ramírez-de-Arellano A., Gutiérrez-Franco J., Sierra-Diaz E., Pereira-Suárez A. L. The role of estradiol in the immune response against COVID-19. Hormones (Athens). . 2021;20(4):657–667. doi: 10.1007/s42000-021-00300-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Pal R., Banerjee M. COVID-19 and the endocrine system: exploring the unexplored. J Endocrinol Invest. . 2020;43(7):1027–1031. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01276-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Lania A., Sandri M. T., Cellini M., Mirani M., Lavezzi E., Mazziotti G. Thyrotoxicosis in patients with COVID-19: the THYRCOV study. Eur J Endocrinol. . 2020;183(4):381–387. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Muller I., Cannavaro D., Dazzi D., et al. SARS-CoV-2-related atypical thyroiditis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. . 2020;8(9):739–741. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30266-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Zdor V. V., Geltser B. I., Eliseikina M. G., et al. Roles of thyroid hormones, mast cells, and inflammatory mediators in the initiation and progression of autoimmune thyroid diseases. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. . 2020;181(9):715–726. doi: 10.1159/000508937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Landucci E., Laurino A., Cinci L., Gencarelli M., Raimondi L. Thyroid hormone, thyroid hormone metabolites and mast cells: a less explored issue. Front Cell Neurosci . 2019;13:p. 79. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Szukiewicz D., Stangret A., Ruiz-Ruiz C., et al. Estrogen- and progesterone (P4)-mediated epigenetic modifications of endometrial stromal cells (EnSCs) and/or mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) in the etiopathogenesis of endometriosis. Stem Cell Rev Rep. . 2021;17(4):1174–1193. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10115-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Moazzami B., Chaichian S., Samie S., et al. Does endometriosis increase susceptibility to COVID-19 infections? A case-control study in women of reproductive age. BMC Womens Health. . 2021;21(1):p. 119. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01270-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Leonardi M., Horne A. W., Vincent K., et al. Self-management strategies to consider to combat endometriosis symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Reprod Open . 2020;2020(2, article hoaa028) doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoaa028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Leonardi M., Horne A. W., Armour M., et al. Endometriosis and the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: clinical advice and future considerations. Front. Reprod. Health . 2020;2 doi: 10.3389/frph.2020.00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Agolli A., Yukselen Z., Agolli O., et al. SARS-CoV-2 effect on male infertility and its possible pathophysiological mechanisms. Discoveries . 2021;9(2, article e131) doi: 10.15190/d.2021.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Ardestani Zadeh A., Arab D. COVID-19 and male reproductive system: pathogenic features and possible mechanisms. J Mol Histol. . 2021;52(5):869–878. doi: 10.1007/s10735-021-10003-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Wang M., Yang Q., Ren X., et al. Investigating the impact of asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection on female fertility and _in vitro_ fertilization outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. . 2021;38:p. 101013. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Zupin L., Pascolo L., Zito G., Ricci G., Crovella S. SARS-CoV-2 and the next generations: which impact on reproductive tissues? J Assist Reprod Genet. . 2020;37(10):2399–2403. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01917-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Cosma S., Carosso A. R., Cusato J., et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 and first-trimester spontaneous abortion: a case- control study of 225 pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2021;224(4):391.e1–391.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.la Cour Freiesleben N., Egerup P., Hviid K. V. R., et al. SARS-CoV-2 in first trimester pregnancy: a cohort study. Human Reproduction . 2020;36(1):40–47. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Khalil A., Kalafat E., Benlioglu C., et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical features and pregnancy outcomes. EClinicalMedicine. . 2020;25:p. 100446. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Weatherbee B. A. T., Glover D. M., Zernicka-Goetz M. Expression of SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and the protease TMPRSS2 suggests susceptibility of the human embryo in the first trimester. Open Biol. . 2020;10(8):p. 200162. doi: 10.1098/rsob.200162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell . 2020;181(2):271–280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Goad J., Rudolph J., Rajkovic A. Female reproductive tract has low concentration of SARS-CoV2 receptors. PLoS One. . 2020;15(12, article e0243959) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Vilella F., Wang W., Moreno I., Roson B., Quake S. R., Simon C. Single-cell RNA sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry factors in the preconceptional human endometrium. Hum Reprod. . 2021;36(10):2709–2719. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Wu M., Ma L., Xue L., et al. Co-expression of the SARS-CoV-2 entry molecules ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in human ovaries: identification of cell types and trends with age. Genomics. . 2021;113(6):3449–3460. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2021.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Gadanec L. K., McSweeney K. R., Qaradakhi T., Ali B., Zulli A., Apostolopoulos V. Can SARS-CoV-2 virus use multiple receptors to enter host cells? Int J Mol Sci. . 2021;22(3):p. 992. doi: 10.3390/ijms22030992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Rad H. S., Röhl J., Stylianou N., et al. The effects of COVID-19 on the placenta during pregnancy. Front Immunol. . 2021;12:p. 743022. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.743022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Tallarek A. C., Urbschat C., Fonseca Brito L., et al. Inefficient placental virus replication and absence of neonatal cell-specific immunity upon Sars-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Front Immunol. . 2021;12:p. 698578. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Saji F., Koyama M., Matsuzaki N. Current topic: human placental Fc receptors. Placenta. . 1994;15(5):453–466. doi: 10.1016/s0143-4004(05)80415-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Beesley M. A., Davidson J. R., Panariello F., et al. COVID-19 and vertical transmission: assessing the expression of ACE2/TMPRSS2 in the human fetus and placenta to assess the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. BJOG . 2022;129(2):256–266. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Faure-Bardon V., Isnard P., Roux N., et al. Protein expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, a SARS-CoV-2-specific receptor, in fetal and placental tissues throughout gestation: new insight for perinatal counseling. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. . 2021;57(2):242–247. doi: 10.1002/uog.22178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Li M., Chen L., Zhang J., Xiong C., Li X. The SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 expression of maternal-fetal interface and fetal organs by single-cell transcriptome study. PLoS One. . 2020;15(4, article e0230295) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Bouachba A., Allias F., Nadaud B., et al. Placental lesions and SARS-Cov-2 infection: diffuse placenta damage associated to poor fetal outcome. Placenta. . 2021;112:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.07.288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Linehan L., O'Donoghue K., Dineen S., White J., Higgins J. R., Fitzgerald B. SARS-CoV-2 placentitis: an uncommon complication of maternal COVID-19. Placenta. . 2021;104:261–266. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Chen X. Y., Jia X. M., Jia Y. S., Chen X. R., Wang H. Z., Qi W. Q. Development and distribution of mast cells and neuropeptides in human fetus duodenum. World J Gastroenterol. . 2004;10(22):3349–3352. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i22.3249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Ortiz E. I., Herrera E., De La Torre A., Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and pregnancy. Colombia Médica . 2020;51 doi: 10.25100/cm.v51i2.4271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Afrin L. B., Weinstock L. B., Molderings G. J. Covid-19 hyperinflammation and post-Covid-19 illness may be rooted in mast cell activation syndrome. Int J Infect Dis. . 2020;100:327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Allotey J., Stallings E., Bonet M., et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. The BMJ . 2021;370 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Docherty A. B., Harrison E. M., Green C. A., et al. Features of 20 133 UK patients in hospital with covid-19 using the ISARIC WHO Clinical Characterisation Protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. . 2020;369:p. m1985. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Collin J., Byström E., Carnahan A., Ahrne M. Public Health Agency of Sweden's Brief Report: pregnant and postpartum women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection in intensive care in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. . 2020;99(7):819–822. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Peddapalli A., Gehani M., Kalle A. M., Peddapalli S. R., Peter A. E., Sharad S. Demystifying excess immune response in COVID-19 to reposition an orphan drug for down-regulation of NF-κB: a systematic review. Viruses. . 2021;13(3):p. 378. doi: 10.3390/v13030378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Afrin L. B., Dempsey T. T., Rosenthal L. S., Dorff S. R. Successful mast-cell-targeted treatment of chronic dyspareunia, vaginitis, and dysfunctional uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol. . 2019;39(5):664–669. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1550475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Dorff S. R., Afrin L. B. Mast cell activation syndrome in pregnancy, delivery, postpartum and lactation: a narrative review. J Obstet Gynaecol. . 2020;40(7):889–901. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1674259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Acanfora D., Acanfora C., Ciccone M. M., et al. The cross-talk between thrombosis and inflammatory storm in acute and long-COVID-19: therapeutic targets and clinical cases. Viruses. . 2021;13(10):p. 1904. doi: 10.3390/v13101904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Chanchal S., Mishra A., Singh M. K., Ashraf M. Z. Understanding inflammatory responses in the manifestation of prothrombotic phenotypes. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology . 2020;8:p. 73. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Bazrafkan M., Hosseini E., Nazari M., Amorim C. A., Sadeghi M. R. NLRP3 inflammasome: a joint, potential therapeutic target in management of COVID-19 and fertility problems. Journal of Reproductive Immunology . 2021;148:p. 103427. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Zhang Z., Wang F., Zhang Y. Expression and contribution of NLRP3 inflammasome during the follicular development induced by PMSG. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology . 2019;7:p. 256. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data availability issue does not apply to this review paper. All data are from the published papers and are included in the references.