Abstract
Artificial cells are minimal structures constructed from biomolecular building blocks designed to mimic cellular processes, behaviors, and architectures. One near-ubiquitous feature of cellular life is the spatial organization of internal content. We know from biology that organization of content (including in membrane-bound organelles) is linked to cellular functions and that this feature is dynamic: the presence, location, and degree of compartmentalization changes over time. Vesicle-based artificial cells, however, are not currently able to mimic this fundamental cellular property. Here, we describe an artificial cell design strategy that addresses this technological bottleneck. We create a series of artificial cell architectures which possess multicompartment assemblies localized either on the inner or on the outer surface of the artificial cell membrane. Exploiting liquid–liquid phase separation, we can also engineer spatially segregated regions of condensed subcompartments attached to the cell surface, aligning with coexisting membrane domains. These structures can sense changes in environmental conditions and respond by reversibly transitioning from condensed multicompartment layers on the membrane surface to a dispersed state in the cell lumen, mimicking the dynamic compartmentalization found in biological cells. Likewise, we engineer exosome-like subcompartments that can be released to the environment. We can achieve this by using two types of triggers: chemical (addition of salts) and mechanical (by pulling membrane tethers using optical traps). These approaches allow us to control the compartmentalization state of artificial cells on population and single-cell levels.
Keywords: artificial cells, phospholipids, compartments, organelles, vesicles
In recent decades there has been growing interest in developing artificial cells that possess desired functions and behaviors that are easier to predict and control than those of naturally occurring biological cells.1−3 This bottom-up approach to synthetic biology involves constructing artificial cells using well-characterized biomolecular building blocks. Artificial cells can be used as cell models to study fundamental biological processes and as programmable micromachines for industrial and clinical applications.1,3−8
The development of a fully functioning artificial cell that can replicate all key aspects of their living counterparts is considered one of the ultimate goals of synthetic biology. In particular, there have been significant efforts to recapitulate various architectural features of biological cells. Beyond simple biomimetics, a cell’s size, shape, and level of compartmentalization is tightly related to its behavior, performance, and capabilities;9−11 form and function are intertwined. For this reason, designing artificial cells which exhibit different levels of spatial organization is a particularly active research area.
Artificial cell compartmentalization has been used to mimic nuclei,12−14 for energy generation,15 carbon fixation,16 and metabolism.17,18 Compartmentalization has also been used as a design principle in responsive cell-mimetic microsystems, where internal processes are initiated following the breakdown/permeabilisation of compartments,17,19,20 in microreactor development20−22 and in recreating signaling cascades.19 Unlike in biological cells, the localization of vesicle-based subcompartments in artificial cells is static and nondynamic. Here, we describe higher order lipid membrane-based arrangements that allow control over the presence, location, and distribution of internal substructures, with the architectural arrangement modulated by the cell’s environment.
Subcompartmentalization is a ubiquitous feature in biological cells, and segregating cellular biochemical processes is crucial for optimal activity. Biological cells achieve this in various ways including through organelles and membraneless phase separated structures.23−25 Crucially, the spatial arrangements of cellular components are usually well-defined. Examples of this are interactions of specific organelle membrane sites with proteins or substrate pools in the cytoplasm26 or direct interactions between different organelles that are required for vital cellular functions.27−29 Various mechanisms are involved in enriching these contact sites with proteins and phospholipids required to maintain these organelle interactions.30,31 Changes in cell state (cellular stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and reactive oxygen species) can also influence cellular spatial organization, for example, through the formation of membraneless organelles.28
Through these and other examples, it is evident that (i) there are biological consequences to how cell compartments are arranged in space, (ii) that cellular subcompartmentalization is dynamic, often changing in response to endogenous and exogenous triggers, and (iii) that control of subcompartmentalization is vital for efficient cellular processes. In most artificial cell systems, however, where compartments do exist, they are uniformly dispersed in the cell lumen; spatial organization is uncontrolled and fixed, unlike the dynamic level of organization that cells possess. Developing artificial cell strategies that implement this functionality is key in order to mimic their biological counterparts more closely, and to create artificial cells with higher degrees of functionality with the incorporation of dynamic compartmentalized motifs.
In this work, we develop an artificial cell design strategy where the spatial organization of subcompartments can be modulated in response to the cell’s chemical environment or mechanical triggers. Our cells are based on nested vesicle assemblies, where subcompartments (and the artificial cell itself) are delineated by lipid membranes. The nested structure involves the encapsulation of many smaller vesicles (100 nm diameter) within giant ones (5–50 μm diameter). We engineer our system so that the arrangement of subcompartments can switch between a condensed state (where they are associated with the cell membrane) and a dispersed state (where they dissociate from the membrane and are freely diffusing). Our design strategy is underpinned by the electrostatic interactions between subcompartments and the cell membrane, which are oppositely charged.32−34 We also explore these interactions in phase separated artificial cells, where subcompartments associate with charged membrane domains. The presence of salt, which screens the attractive forces, is used to modulate the strength of the interaction. Using this principle, we can form an array of different multilayered architectures. Depending on the arrangement, subcompartments can be disassembled by increasing the outer solution salt concentration resulting in (i) controllable changes of inner compartment spatial localization or (ii) the reversible release of compartments into the environment. In the latter case, this yields a synthetic analogue of extracellular vesicles. Changing the valency of the salt used, we can control the response rate of assembly/disassembly, conferring another degree of control over the artificial cell compartment spatial organization. We can also achieve this response by applying mechanical stimuli: pulling tethers from the artificial cell membrane induces the dispersal of the inner subcompartment layer. These approaches allow us to create artificial cells that can respond to two different types of stimuli by changing their compartmentalization on a population and single-cell level.
Results and Discussion
Assembling Localized Multicompartment Structures for Artificial Cells
We use variations in salt concentration in the artificial cell’s environment as a trigger for assembling and disassembling compartments outside and inside an artificial cell, this way controlling their spatial organization. We have chosen 5–50 μm positively charged giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) as the artificial cell chassis and organelle-like negatively charged 100 nm large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) as their subcompartments. Unless otherwise stated, the positive GUVs were composed of 10 mol % 1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP) and the negative LUVs were composed of 5 mol % 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1-rac-glycerol) (DOPG) (Figure 1a). Apart from charged lipids, our vesicles contained neutral bilayer forming lipids 90 mol % 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) and 95 mol % 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) for GUVs and LUVs, respectively. Where fluorescently labeled lipids were used (Rh-PE or Cy5-PE), they were present at 1 mol %. We use these phospholipid formulations to produce nested vesicle structures where negatively charged compartments are attracted to positively charged artificial cell membranes (Figure 1b). At 5% DOTAP GUVs were not sufficiently charged for the compartment layers to form (Figure S1) and at 10% DOPG for LUVs there is a possibility of rare fusion events (vesicles become more fusogenic as the charged phospholipid concentration is increased). The compositions used are such that the vesicles have a low, nonfusogenic charged lipid concentration and their interactions should mainly lead to association, not fusion.33,34
We show that negatively charged compartments can coat the outer and inner surface of the positively charged membrane of the artificial cell in layers. Using this principle, we were able to engineer compartmentalized vesicle-based artificial cell chassis with several different architectures. By adding labeled LUVs to the external solution, we were able to generate artificial cells with vesicle compartments assembled on the external face of the membrane (Figure 1c). The high fluorescence intensity of encapsulated calcein indicates that the subcompartments are condensed and stable as there is no observed content leakage. By loading the GUVs with LUVs inside, we generated artificial cells with subcompartments layered on the internal face of the membrane (Figure 1d). We were able to manufacture artificial cells possessing two oppositely charged vesicle layers on the outward facing part of the artificial cell membrane by subjecting the artificial cell to two sequential layering events, first to deposit negatively charged compartments, followed by positively charged ones (Figure 1e). Finally, we produced artificial cells with vesicle compartments coating on both the internal and external faces of the membrane by having negatively charged LUVs both in the artificial cell interior and exterior (Figure 1f). The external compartment assemblies were created by mixing solutions of negative LUVs with solutions of positive GUVs followed by excess LUV removal via centrifugation. The inner compartment layers were created by encapsulating negative LUVs into GUVs using the phase transfer method.35 Details of methods used are described in the Experimental and Supporting Information sections. The negatively charged subcompartments formed layers in a uniform manner. When layering a positively charged LUV layer on negative LUV layers, it was noticed that the 10% DOTAP compartment layers distributed in a patchy manner due to vesicle interaction with negatively charged BSA coating the imaging chambers (Figure 1e).36,37
Fluorescently labeled subcompartments became associated with the artificial cell surface through electrostatic interactions and ∼99% (n > 100 GUVs observed) of the artificial cells were coated with oppositely charged compartment layers. Next, we compare the fluorescence intensities of the GUV membrane to the fluorescence intensity of associated LUV layers (Figure S2). We show that the fluorescence intensity of the subcompartment layer is ∼4 times higher than the fluorescence intensity of the uncoated GUV membrane. In both cases 1 mol % Rh-PE was used to label the vesicles. This suggests that the subcompartments form a shell composed of interlinked LUV building blocks around the GUV.
To add further complexity to our structures, we have also incorporated this architectural motif into charged phase separated GUVs composed of a fluorescently labeled quaternary mixtures of 33 mol % DPPC (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), 38 mol % DOPC, 10 mol % DOTAP, 16.7 mol % cholesterol, and 2% NBD-PE. Partitioning of fluorescent lipids in different domains allows us to visualise them.38 This way, we assemble charged giant vesicles with coexisting liquid ordered and liquid disordered domains, reminiscent of the lipid rafts that are theorized to exist in biological cell membranes.39 In our case the membrane domains form before any interactions with charged vesicles and the liquid disordered domains appear as dark spots on the GUV surface (Figure S3). When negatively charged subcompartments are added to these phase separated GUVs, they associate with the domains, thus creating a patterned subcompartment layering architecture (Figure 2). On the basis of the positioning of associated oppositely charged subcompartments clusters, we can infer that the charged phospholipids in these giant vesicles membranes pool into the phase seperated domains (Figure 2b). When we focus in and out of the artificial cell focal plane, we observe that the subcompartments are colocalized on the dark nonlabeled artificial cell membrane domains (Figure 2b). The imperfect subcompartment and domain localization during imaging is due to fast domain diffusion across the membrane.
Salt-Mediated Reversible Outer Subcompartment Layer Disassembly
The electrostatic nature of the membrane/membrane interactions enabled us to controllably disperse the externally layered structures by increasing the surrounding salt concentration. When we increase the outer KCl concentration from 1 to 100 mM, the compartment layers disassociate from the outer artificial cell membrane due to electrostatic screening of the attractive forces (Figure 3a and Figure S4). In order to assess if the drastic change in fluorescence localization was due to interaction of the dye with salt, we evaluated calcein fluorescence intensity for the salt conditions we used (Figure S5a). We found that when KCl concentration is above 100 mM, the fluorescence intensity only decreased by 20%. We also found that fluorescence intensity of the lipid probes remain stable when in the presence of 0–400 mM KCl and 0–20 mM CaCl2 (Figure S5). We thus conclude that these fluorescent dyes are suitable for our experiments. This dispersal process is reversible: multicompartment layers can be built up again by lowering the outer salt concentration back to ∼0.1 mM (Figure 3b,c). This way, the coated artificial cell is restored and can be used for repeated salt-triggered outer compartment layer dispersal and reassembly
Dependence of Inner Subcompartment Layer Assembly on Salt
Next, we demonstrate that inner compartment layer assembly was influenced by the salt concentration in the GUV lumen (Figure 3d–g, Figures S6 and S7). We generated positively charged GUVs with negatively charged LUVs encapsulated inside, with a sweep of different salt concentrations coencapsulated in the GUV. We tested the effect of KCl (10–400 mM KCl; Figure 3d and Figure S6) and 0.1–20 mM CaCl2 (Figure 3e and Figure S7). We found that as the concentration of salt increased, the proportion of GUVs with assembled LUVs layers decreased (Figure 3f). Selected examples of this gradual disassembly are shown in Figure 3g. Both K+ and Ca2+ influence the inner layer formation by screening the electrostatic attractive forces. However, as Ca2+ ions are divalent, the salt concentration threshold at which layering was not observed (20 mM) was lower than for monovalent K+ ions (200 mM). At these concentrations, the majority of the artificial cells had compartments homogeneously distributed in their interiors (96 ± 7.1% for 20 mM Ca2+; 87 ± 12.7% for 200 mM K+). Potentially, these differences could also be attributed to the ability of Ca2+ to strongly interact with the slightly negative POPC phospholipids comprising the artificial cell membrane (90%) shielding the inner artificial cell membrane from negatively charged compartments.40 It is important to note that calcium ions have been associated with vesicle fusion in PC/PS (phosphatidylserine) vesicles and not PG/PC vesicles, therefore we rule out the possibility of calcium-induced vesicle fusion in our system.40−46
Salt-Mediated Inner Subcompartment Layer Disassembly
We next demonstrated that by changing the artificial cell outer salt concentration we can trigger the release of their inner compartment layers (Figure 4, Figure S8). This showed that changes in the external environment led to a reconfiguration of the spatial arrangements of internal subcompartments. When artificial cells with inner compartment layers were transferred from low to high KCl or CaCl2 concentration solutions, the inner compartment layers disassembled and dispersed in the artificial cell lumen (Figure 4a,b and Figure S8). The subcompartment layers (external and internal) disassemble within a minute after the artificial cells are transferred into a higher salt concentration solution. Next, we tested if subcompartments could switch back to their original spatial organization once the external solution salt concentration was back to low salt conditions. We found that with KCl, reorganization was not reversible: once the layers were disassembled through the addition of external salt, they could not be reassembled when the concentration of external salt was reduced. When CaCl2 was used to modulate the subcompartment spatial organization, we achieved improved results compared to KCl: a higher fraction of artificial cells reversed to an inner compartment condensed phase, although, the statistical difference between high salt and low salt was not significant (Figure 4b,c and Figures S8 and S9).
We investigated if ion exchange during artificial cell transfer from low to high salt concentration solutions was responsible for inner LUV layer disassembly. We used a membrane-impermeable Fluo-3 pentapotassium salt and MQAE (N-(ethoxycarbonylmethyl)-6-methoxyquinolinium bromide) ion indicators for the detection of Ca2+ ions and Cl–, respectively47,48 (Figure S10). We show that when GUVs are transferred from low to high CaCl2 concentration solutions, the fluo-3 fluorescence does not increase, meaning that there was not a detectible influx of Ca2+ into the GUV. Moreover, MQAE fluorescence intensity did not decrease significantly when GUVs were transferred from low to high KCl concentration solutions, showing there was no detectable Cl– influx that would quench the fluorescent probe significantly. These results show that the influx of CaCl2 or KCl into the GUV did not initiate the inner LUV layer disassembly. A calcein leakage assay was conducted where calcein-loaded GUVs were transferred from low to high salt concentration solutions (Figure S10). The GUV inner calcein fluorescence intensity did not change significantly during this experiment. For high salt concentration solutions, we used the maximum KCl concentration of 200 mM at which the GUVs are stable after transfer, demonstrating that GUVs were not leaky during our experiments. For CaCl2 we used 20 mM, as at this concentration, the GUV-LUV layers disassemble completely. We thus conclude that the inner salt concentration does not change during GUV transfer from low to high salt concentration solutions, suggesting that there is a different mechanism at play here. We speculate that this could be related to the GUV membrane capacitance: a change in the electrostatic charge characteristics of the outer leaflet upon addition of salt could potentially lead to altered vesicle electrostatic interactions with the inner leaflet.49
We observed that LUV fluorescence intensity decreased with decreasing LUV concentration meaning we could quantify the degree of compartment layering by comparing the fluorescence of LUVs in layers to the LUVs in the lumen (Figure S9a). The higher the salt concentration, the closer the fluorescence intensity mean ratio values are to 1, meaning that LUVs are being dispersed into the artificial cell lumen (Figure S9b,c). We use this membrane/lumen fluorescence ratio to evaluate how successfully the artificial cell changed states between assembled and disassembled compartments.
Comparing KCl and CaCl2 Influence on Inner Artificial Cell Subcompartment Layering
Artificial cells with inner compartment layers are more sensitive to environmental changes of CaCl2 concentration than KCl which we attribute to the increased valency of Ca2+ compared to K+. If we compare LUV fluorescence intensity ratios to the fractions of artificial cells with layers at each described condition, we find the compartment layers reform more effectively in CaCl2 environments that in KCl (Figure S8), but the recoated compartment layers are not as uniform as before the salt concentrations changes (Figure 4a,c and Figure S9d,e). The difference on how both KCl and CaCl2 can modulate the layering of negatively charged compartments can be analyzed by comparing the change in membrane/lumen (M/L) fluorescence ratio with increasing KCl/CaCl2 concentration (Figure S11). We observe a plateauing of M/L ratio toward 1 at significantly decreased CaCl2 concentrations compared to KCl, in a similar manner to results shown in Figure 3d,e and Figure S8, indicating increased sensitivity of artificial cell compartment organization to the presence of external Ca2+ versus K+, respectively. By applying four-parameter logistic fits (commonly used to model the response of a biological system to a drug50) to both data sets, a dose–response relationship can be established between external salt concentration and M/L ratio (compartment layering) that estimates the onset salt concentration for disassembly. This allows us to quantify the difference in artificial cell layering response to different salts, using the salt concentration that produces a 50% reduction in M/L ratio (EC50) as a comparative measure. We have found that the system shifts from LUV layer assembly to disassembly at 59.46 ± 9.49 mM and 6.24 ± 7.1 mM for KCl and CaCl2, respectively. Here, the salt acts as a repressor (for compartment layer formation) and comparing EC50K+ with EC50Ca2+ indicates that the multicompartment artificial cells designed here are 10 times more sensitive to changes of environmental CaCl2 concentrations than KCl. These findings could relate to the reported ability of Ca2+ ions to restrict lipid mobility and become integral parts of negatively charged membranes composed of PS or PG phospholipids as these ions have nonspecific binding sites with charged phospholipid moieties (phosphate group in particular).40,51 It is reported that monovalent ions such as Na+ do not have a tendency to insert themselves into the membrane.51 This could explain why negatively charged compartment membranes are more sensitive to Ca2+ local concentrations than K+ or Na+. Our findings support using CaCl2 to rapidly switch between compartment layer assembly/disassembly and indicate that similar artificial cells could respond even more sensitively to higher valency metal salts. As artificial cell response here is determined by electrostatic interactions between the GUV and LUV membranes, varying the composition of GUV and LUVs and using different ions (e.g., Fe3+, Mn5+) should enable the generation of artificial cells with distinct onset conditions, facilitating simple methods to control different artificial cell populations present in the same environment with a single external ionic trigger.52
Mechanical Switch for Inner Subcompartment Layer Disassembly
Next, we will consider using mechanical forces to gain control over artificial cell compartmentalization. We show that mechanical stimuli can be used to switch the artificial cell compartmentalization from a layered state to a dispersed state (Figure 5). Mechanical changes across the artificial cell membrane are induced by pulling a membrane tether (Figure 5a) using optical tweezers.53 Tethers are formed by pulling the vesicles away from a surface to which they adhere (Figure 5a,b). Interestingly, the fluorescently labeled subcompartments colocalize not only on the inner artificial cell surface but also within the membrane tether (Figure 5b). Further pulling of the tether results in the disassembly of inner artificial cell subcompartment layers. In Figure 5b,c fluorescently labeled subcompartment distribution within the cell during tether pulling is shown in selected fluorescence microscopy images. After tether pulling, the sharp fluorescence peaks representing the layers on the artificial cell inner surface decrease while the subcompartment fluorescence intensity in the artificial cell lumen grows, indicating subcompartment disassociation (Figure 5c).
To better evaluate how tether length influences subcompartment dissociation, we have tested another way to form membrane tethers. Because of electrostatic interactions, GUVs that have been brought together using optical tweezers can adhere to one another and form a double bilayer at their contact site, also known as a VIM (vesicle interface membrane).54 When the vesicles are being pulled away from one another a membrane tether between them forms.54 In our case, we used optical tweezers to detach a small part of the GUV, thus creating a membrane tether in between these two structures (Figure 5a,d). In both tether formation scenarios, the formed membrane tether is composed purely of the lipid bilayers of the artificial cell (Figure 5a). We evaluated how increasing the membrane tether length affected the subcompartment inner distribution, expressed by their fluorescence M/L ratio as described previously. When the membrane tether length is increased from 5 to 13 μm the artificial cell compartmentalization state is switched from layered to disperse subcompartments (Figure 5e). This process was irreversible and pulling the tether further did not impact artificial cell stability. This switchable feature creates an additional level of control over subcompartment spatial organization. It has been previously reported that tether immobilization on the GUV surface alone can cause rearrangements of its membrane domains suggesting that tether pulling could have an impact on GUV membrane phospholipid arrangements.55 With that in mind, we speculate that during tether pulling charged phospholipids might segregate to the tether away from the artificial cell membrane. This process could occur with the help of tether bound charged subcompartments strongly interacting with the cell membrane lipids. As the tether is pulled, the subcompartments sequester the charged membrane lipids and as a result lowering their concentration across the artificial cell membrane. Charge depletion across the inner artificial cell membrane in turn would cause the gradual disassembly of artificial cell subcompartments layers. An alternative hypothesis is that assembly/disassembly is dictated by changes in membrane tension as the membrane is being pulled.56,57
Further Characterization of Artificial Cells with Compartment Layers
We have investigated how negatively charged compartment layers influence the artificial cell membrane fluidity. For this purpose, we have measured the generalized polarization (GP) of Laurdan (6-dodecanoyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene)58 incorporated into the artificial cell membrane when the artificial cell has associated compartments on its outer membrane. This probe changes its fluorescence emission wavelengths in response to changes in phospholipid packing (435 nm for ordered packing in a gel state and 500 nm for unordered packing in a fluid state) and this is used for Laurdan GP value calculations.58 We have shown that the Laurdan GP value for artificial cell membranes does significantly (p < 0.05) decrease once in the presence of negative vesicle layers, suggesting that the artificial cell membrane becomes more fluid (Figure S12). This suggests that the compartment layers interact with the membrane. These results are in accordance with previous findings where LUVs with a higher mol % of charged lipids led to a strong LUV association with the GUV outer membrane that promoted GUV bursting.34 In our system, we use a charged lipid fraction that enables electrostatic interactions that are strong enough for association but too weak to disrupt the integrity of the artificial cell chassis. This is critical to using dynamic compartment condensation in future applications: disruption of subcompartment membranes would lead to uncontrolled content leakage or destruction of the spatial organization of the artificial cell.
Conclusion
We describe an artificial cell system that allows the spatial organization of artificial cell subcompartments to be modulated in response to chemical and mechanical triggers. Depending on the setup, subcompartments can switch between condensed layers on the membrane surface, to being dispersed in the cell interior or the surrounding environment. Our system relies on electrostatic interactions between membranes, which means that it can be modulated using salts. We show that switching from a condensed to a dispersed state can be modulated by using both KCl or CaCl2, with a concentration dependent relationship. The greater amount of salt present, the more the screening, and the more the dispersed state is favored. We also find that divalent cations are more effective at shielding the charge and are therefore better modulators of this phenomenon. With CaCl2, the assembly and disassembly has potential to be reversible, with the cells able to switch between the two states. KCl was found to be sufficient for reversible outer layer release from the artificial cell surface leading to compartments released to the environment. Tether pulling using optical tweezers- can act as a mechanical stimulus and trigger artifical cell inner subcompartment layer disassembly on a single-cell level. This is likely due to a charged lipid depletion occurring during membrane tether pulling which results in reduced attractive forces favoring subcompartment association. These findings show that we can control artificial cell dynamic compartmentalization using chemical and mechanical stimuli on a population and single-cell levels.
Our work describes ways to achieve closer mimicking of dynamic compartmentalization events in biological cells (e.g., modulation of organelle contact sites with other organelles, proteins or substrate pools, and membraneless organelle formation in response to cellular stress). This design concept can also be used as a signal transduction module in artificial cell engineering, for example to regulate the internal biochemistry in the cell in response to environmental cues (e.g., if a change in the level of compartmentalization can be coupled to change in function or behavior). Moreover, layered structures we generate can be exploited as a platform for cell–cell communication (e.g., through the release of exosome-like structures from the cell surface), and for localized release of therapeutic cargo in delivery applications.
Control over compartment spatial organization could enable researchers to create artificial cells with compartments arranged in the most optimal way for desired product production, for example by pooling the compartments with related functions together, this way lowering the distance for bioactive molecule transport from one compartment to another. An analogy can be drawn with phase separated structures (both in membranes59 and in the cytosol60,61) that have biological importance and have been exploited to give artificial cells extended functionality.60,62,63 Importantly, our system does not rely on protein machinery. Instead, it relies on biomembrane design principles for dynamic remodelling of compartment organization, which is further evidence that membrane biophysical principles can be a useful tool in the arsenal for the construction of functional synthetic cell systems.
Experimental Section
Materials
All lipids were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL) as powders and used without further purification. Lipids used include DOTAP (catalog number 890890), DOPG (catalog number 840475), DOPC (catalog number 850375), POPC (catalog number 850457), DPPC (catalog number 850355), cholesterol (catalog number 700100), 18:1 Rh-PE (catalog number 810150), 18:1 Cy5-PE (catalog number 810335), and 16:0 NBD-PE (catalog number 810144). Lipid mixtures were prepared by codissolving the required molar ratios of lipids in chloroform. Fluorescence probes Fluo-3 (catalog number F3715) and MQAE (catalog number E3101) was purchased from Thermofisher scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Also, 150 nm AuNPs (catalog number 746649), BSA (≥99% assay, catalog number A4161), calcein (catalog number C0875), Sephadex G-50 affinity column (catalog number G5080), and all buffer reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, UK).
Generating Artificial Cells with Different Hierarchical Architectures
Lipid films for compartment (large unilamellar vesicle (LUV)) and artificial cell (giant unilamellar vesicle (GUV)) formation were prepared by dissolving DOTAP, POPC, DOPG, and DOPC in chloroform to a stock concentration of 25 mg/mL. For each desired phospholipid composition aliquots of these stocks were transferred into glass vials followed by evaporating the chloroform with a nitrogen stream and desiccation overnight. For LUV extrusion DOPG:DOPC mol % 5:95 lipid films were rehydrated with 0.5 M glucose (for outer layering) or 0.5 M sucrose (for inner layering) and different salt concentration solutions to a lipid concentration of 10 mg/mL. The solutions were gently vortexed for 2 min and extruded through a 100 nm membrane. In the case where calcein was encapsulated into LUVs, the solutions underwent 4 freeze–thaw cycles followed by extrusion. The unencapsulated calcein was then removed using a Sephadex G50 affinity column.
GUVs were prepared using the phase transfer method. Ten milligrams of DOTAP:POPC mol % 10:90 were sonicated in 1 mL of mineral oil for 1 h. When GUVs were used to compare their membrane fluorescence intensity to LUV layer fluorescence intensity, 1 mol % Rh-PE was added to the phospholipid film. In the case of phase separated GUVs 10 mg mol % 33:38:10:16.7:2 of DPPC, DOPC, DOTAP, cholesterol, and NBD-PE was used. In an Eppendorf tube 200 μL of a lipid in mineral oil solution was layered on top of 20 μL of 0.5 M sucrose or 4 mg/mL LUVs in 0.5 M sucrose if inner LUV layers are formed. The mixture was gently pipetted up and down up to 20 times. The created water-in-oil emulsion was layered on 300 μL of 0.5 M glucose. The sample was centrifuged for 30 min at 10,000 rfc. The formed GUVs formed a pellet on the bottom of the Eppendorf tube and the supernatant and mineral oil layer were removed. The GUV pellet was washed with 300 μL of 0.5 M glucose and centrifuged again for 10 min at 9,000 rcf speed. The supernatant was removed, and the washed GUVs were resuspended in 200–300 μL of a glucose solution.
For LUV layer formation on the GUV surface, 30 μL of negative LUVs (DOPG:DOPC:18:1 Liss Rhod PE mol % 5:94:1) was mixed with 150 μL of positive GUVs (DOTAP:POPC mol % 10:90) and incubated for 5 min (all in 0.5 M glucose). The excess LUVs were removed by pelleting the GUVs by centrifugation and removing the supernatant. The GUV pellet was then dissolved in 0.5 M glucose.
For the LUV layer comprising negative and positive LUVs formation on the GUV surface, 300 μL of 10% DOTAP GUVs was mixed with 60 μL of negative LUVs (DOPG:DOPC:18:1 Cy5-DOPE mol % 5:94:1) and incubated for 5 min followed by excess LUV removal by centrifugation. The GUVs with DOPG LUV layers were then mixed with 30 μL of positive LUVs (DOTAP:DOPC:18:1 Liss Rhod PE mol % 10:89:1) and incubated for 30 min. The excess LUVs were removed using centrifugation and the pelleted GUVs were resuspended in 0.5 M glucose. A summarized scheme of the procedures used is shown in Figure S13.
For LUV layer formation on both inner and outer GUV membranes, 4 mg/mL LUVs (DOPG:DOPC:18:1 Liss Rhod PE mol % 5:94:1) were encapsulated into GUVs using the phase transfer method. Here, 150 μL of the formed GUVs with inner negative LUV layers was mixed with 30 μL of negative LUVs (DOPG:DOPC:18:1 Cy5-DOPE mol % 5:94:1) and incubated for 5 min. The excess LUVs were removed using centrifugation.
The prepared samples with different artificial cell architectures were loaded into BSA-coated imaging chambers and visualized using a Leica TCS SP5 II inverted confocal microscope. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software.
The Release and Relayering of Outer Artificial Cells Compartment Layers
For 18:1 Cy5-DOPE labeled or calcein loaded LUV disassociation from the GUV outer membrane, the GUV and LUV mixture was diluted up to 1.5 mL with 100 mM KCl 0.5 M glucose solution and centrifuged for 10 min at 6,000 rfc speed. After GUVs sediment to the bottom of the Eppendorf tube, the supernatant is removed, and the GUVs are dispersed into 100 mM KCl 0.5 M glucose solution to its original volume (180 μL). For LUVs to be relayered on the GUV surface, the same procedure is applied with 0.5 M glucose. To test if LUV layer release corresponds to increasing outer solution salt concentration, the described process was repeated using an outer solution KCl concentration range of 1–100 mM in 0.5 M glucose. The LUV layer fluorescence intensity was evaluated by confocal microscopy (Cy5 651/670 nm, calcein 495/515 nm). The summary of the procedures is depicted in Figure S14.
The Release and Relayering of Inner Artificial Cells Compartment Layers
For 18:1 Liss Rhod PE labeled LUV disassociation from the GUV inner membrane, the GUVs with LUV layers were transferred from their primary low salt 0.5 M glucose solution (20 mM KCl or 0.1 mM CaCl2) to high salt glucose solutions (0.32 mM glucose and 200 mM KCl or 0.5 M glucose and 20 mM CaCl2). After we recorded the inner LUV layering changes, the GUVs were then transferred from high salt glucose solution back to a low salt 0.5 M glucose solution (20 mM KCl or 2 mM CaCl2). Artificial cells and compartment layers were visualized using confocal microscopy (556/580 nm) and the images were analyzed using ImageJ software.
Artificial Cell Tether Pulling for Inner Subcompartment Release
The GUV tether experiments were conducted using an inverted Nikon fluorescence microscope. 150 nm AuNPs were added to the vesicles at a 1:9 ratio. Vesicle’s membrane tethers were formed using procedures described in Bolognesi et al.54 GUVs were moved by focusing a laser of 100 mW (at trap) or lower on their interface. Membrane tethers were formed with 0.1 M NaCl in the external glucose solution. The membrane tether length was measured by ImageJ.
AC Compartment Fluorescence Intensity Profile Measurements
Using ImageJ software, fluorescence intensity profiles and means were measured. First, the image background fluorescence was subtracted, and then 8 μm length (image scale) and 20 arbitrary units’ thick lines were drawn on 5 different areas of the LUV fluorescent shell. Using these lines, the fluorescence intensity profiles were produced. ImageJ tools were also used to measure the fluorescence intensity means of LUV layer and LUVs in the lumen.
Estimating the Partitioning of Subcompartments in the Artificial Cell
After confirming that LUV fluorescence (1% 18:1 Liss rhod PE) in the GUV lumen varied linearly with concentration in the ranges encapsulated (Figure S9a), we compared fluorescence values at the membrane (defined by a measurement range of x μm) to those in the center of the vesicle lumen for KCl and CaCl2 gradients (10–100 mM and 0.1–20 mM, respectively). The membrane/lumen ratio parameter is then defined as
1 |
where an M/L ratio >1 indicates localization of LUVs at the GUV membrane compared to bulk fluorescence in the GUV lumen, an M/L ratio ∼1 indicates equal fluorescence at the membrane and in the GUV lumen, while an M/L ratio <1 would indicate partitioning of the LUVs to the core of the GUV. In this study, we expect the M/L ratios to vary between >1 to ∼1 due to the electrostatic interaction between the GUV and LUV membranes employed.
Ca2+ and Cl– Influx/Outflux Evaluation with Fluoresceent Probes Fluo-3 and MQAE
These experiments were conducted using an inverted Nikon fluorescence microscope. GUVs were loaded with 4 mg/mL LUVs and 100 μM Fluo-3 or 10 mM MQAE for either Ca2+ or Cl– detection. A control of GUVs with 100 μM Fluo-3 and 20 mM CaCl2 was included. The Fluo-3, 4 mg/mL LUVs and 500 mM sucrose loaded GUVs were transferred from 500 mM glucose to 20 mM CaCl2 500 mM glucose solutions and the fluorescence intensity of Fluo-3 (λex = 506 nm, λem = 526 nm) inside GUVs was imaged before and after 1 h of incubation using a FITC filter. MQAE and 4 mg/mL LUVs and 500 mM sucrose loaded GUVs were transferred from a 500 mM glucose solution to a 200 mM KCl 300 mM glucose solution, and MQAE fluorescence intensity (λex = 319 nm, λem = 462 nm) within GUVs was imaged using the DAPI filter. The vesicles were imaged inside a quartz imaging chamber, and a control of GUV loaded with MQAE and 200 mM KCl was added for comparison. The fluorescent ion probe fluorescence intensities were measures using ImageJ.
Calcein-Leakage Assay in GUVs
These experiments were conducted using an inverted Nikon fluorescence microscope. GUVs were loaded with 4 mg/mL LUVs, 20 mM KCl, 500 mM sucrose, and 10 mM calcein. The GUVs were transferred from a 500 mM glucose solution to a 200 mM KCl in 300 mM glucose solution. Fluorescence images of calcein-loaded GUVs (λex = 495 nm, λem = 515 nm) were taken (FITC filter), and the GUV inner calcein fluorescence intensity was measured using ImageJ.
Subcompartment Influence to AC Fluidity Using Laurdan Reagent
For the Laurdan assay, previously published methods49 were used as references. Laurdan stock in dimethylsulfoxide was mixed with a 0.3 mM 10% DOTAP GUV solution in 0.5 M glucose to a final dye concentration of 0.45 μM. The mixture was incubated for 10 min, during which Laurdan incorporates into the GUV membrane with a molar ratio of 1:670 of Laurdan molecules to GUV phospholipids. Laurdan-labeled GUVs were mixed with 5% DOPG LUVs and incubated for 10 min. The fluorescence measurements were performed in a Cary Eclipse Fluorimeter (Agilent Technologies, USA). The Laurdan fluorescence intensities at 435 and 500 nm were measured by exciting the probe with a 350 nm wavelength. The generalized polarization (GP) of Laurdan in GUVs with and without outer LUV layers was calculated as follows
2 |
where I435 is the Laurdan fluorescence intensity when the probe is in an ordered lipid packing environment in gel-phase and I500 is the Laurdan fluorescence intensity in an unordered lipid packing in fluid-phase. An increase of the Laurdan GP value corresponds to a shift toward the physical properties of a gel-like membrane, while a decrease represents a shift toward properties of a fluid-like membrane.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.2c02195.
Additional confocal microscopy images of LUV coated GUVs, phase separated GUVs; analysis on how different salts affect the LUV coating on the inner/outer GUV; results on the LUV influence on GUV membrane fluidity; schemes depicting experimental methods (PDF)
Sub-compartment disassociation initiated by pulling a tether from the artificial cell surface (AVI)
This work was supported by a Cellular Bionics Leverhulme Trust Doctoral Scholarship awarded to G.Z., an EPSRC Doctoral Prize Fellowship awarded to J.W.H., a UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship MR/S031537/1 awarded to Y.E., and an EPSRC New Horizons grant EP/V048651/1.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Gaut N. J.; Adamala K. P. Reconstituting Natural Cell Elements in Synthetic Cells. Advanced Biology 2021, 5 (3), 2000188. 10.1002/adbi.202000188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elani Y. Interfacing Living and Synthetic Cells as an Emerging Frontier in Synthetic Biology. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60 (11), 5602–5611. 10.1002/anie.202006941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buddingh’ B. C.; van Hest J. C. M. Artificial Cells: Synthetic Compartments with Life-like Functionality and Adaptivity. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50 (4), 769–777. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu C.; Hu S.; Chen X. Artificial cells: from basic science to applications. Mater. Today (Kidlington) 2016, 19 (9), 516–532. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.02.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salehi-Reyhani A.; Ces O.; Elani Y. Artificial cell mimics as simplified models for the study of cell biology. Experimental Biology and Medicine 2017, 242 (13), 1309–1317. 10.1177/1535370217711441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boyd M. A.; Kamat N. P. Designing Artificial Cells towards a New Generation of Biosensors. Trends Biotechnol 2021, 39, 927. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ganzinger K. A.; Schwille P.. More from less – bottom-up reconstitution of cell biology. J. Cell Sci. 2019, 132 ( (4), ). 10.1242/jcs.227488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen Z.; Wang J.; Sun W.; Archibong E.; Kahkoska A. R.; Zhang X.; Lu Y.; Ligler F. S.; Buse J. B.; Gu Z. Synthetic beta cells for fusion-mediated dynamic insulin secretion. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018, 14 (1), 86–93. 10.1038/nchembio.2511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cantwell H.; Nurse P. Unravelling nuclear size control. Curr. Genet 2019, 65 (6), 1281–1285. 10.1007/s00294-019-00999-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Satori C. P.; Henderson M. M.; Krautkramer E. A.; Kostal V.; Distefano M. D.; Arriaga E. A. Bioanalysis of eukaryotic organelles. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113 (4), 2733–811. 10.1021/cr300354g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cole L. W.The Evolution of Per-cell Organelle Number. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 4 ( (85), ). 10.3389/fcell.2016.00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niederholtmeyer H.; Chaggan C.; Devaraj N. K. Communication and quorum sensing in non-living mimics of eukaryotic cells. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 5027. 10.1038/s41467-018-07473-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deng N. N.; Yelleswarapu M.; Zheng L.; Huck W. T. Microfluidic Assembly of Monodisperse Vesosomes as Artificial Cell Models. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (2), 587–590. 10.1021/jacs.6b10977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zubaite G.; Simutis K.; Galinis R.; Milkus V.; Kiseliovas V.; Mazutis L. Droplet Microfluidics Approach for Single-DNA Molecule Amplification and Condensation into DNA-Magnesium-Pyrophosphate Particles. Micromachines (Basel) 2017, 8 (2), 62. 10.3390/mi8020062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Berhanu S.; Ueda T.; Kuruma Y. Artificial photosynthetic cell producing energy for protein synthesis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 1325. 10.1038/s41467-019-09147-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller T. E.; Beneyton T.; Schwander T.; Diehl C.; Girault M.; McLean R.; Chotel T.; Claus P.; Cortina N. S.; Baret J.-C.; Erb T. J. Light-powered CO2 fixation in a chloroplast mimic with natural and synthetic parts. Science 2020, 368 (6491), 649–654. 10.1126/science.aaz6802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elani Y.; Law R. V.; Ces O. Protein synthesis in artificial cells: using compartmentalisation for spatial organisation in vesicle bioreactors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17 (24), 15534–15537. 10.1039/C4CP05933F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elani Y.; Law R. V.; Ces O. Vesicle-based artificial cells as chemical microreactors with spatially segregated reaction pathways. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5305. 10.1038/ncomms6305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hindley J. W.; Zheleva D. G.; Elani Y.; Charalambous K.; Barter L. M. C.; Booth P. J.; Bevan C. L.; Law R. V.; Ces O. Building a synthetic mechanosensitive signaling pathway in compartmentalized artificial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116 (34), 16711–16716. 10.1073/pnas.1903500116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hindley J. W.; Elani Y.; McGilvery C. M.; Ali S.; Bevan C. L.; Law R. V.; Ces O. Light-triggered enzymatic reactions in nested vesicle reactors. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 1093. 10.1038/s41467-018-03491-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoo C. Y.; Seong J. S.; Park S. N. Preparation of novel capsosome with liposomal core by layer-by-layer self-assembly of sodium hyaluronate and chitosan. Colloids Surf., B 2016, 144, 99–107. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandrawati R.; Hosta-Rigau L.; Vanderstraaten D.; Lokuliyana S. A.; Städler B.; Albericio F.; Caruso F. Engineering Advanced Capsosomes: Maximizing the Number of Subcompartments, Cargo Retention, and Temperature-Triggered Reaction. ACS Nano 2010, 4 (3), 1351–1361. 10.1021/nn901843j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murat D.; Byrne M.; Komeili A. Cell biology of prokaryotic organelles. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010, 2 (10), a000422. 10.1101/cshperspect.a000422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gabaldón T.; Pittis A. A. Origin and evolution of metabolic sub-cellular compartmentalization in eukaryotes. Biochimie 2015, 119, 262–8. 10.1016/j.biochi.2015.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bracha D.; Walls M. T.; Brangwynne C. P. Probing and engineering liquid-phase organelles. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37 (12), 1435–1445. 10.1038/s41587-019-0341-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Compan V.; Pierredon S.; Vanderperre B.; Krznar P.; Marchiq I.; Zamboni N.; Pouyssegur J.; Martinou J. C. Monitoring Mitochondrial Pyruvate Carrier Activity in Real Time Using a BRET-Based Biosensor: Investigation of the Warburg Effect. Mol. Cell 2015, 59 (3), 491–501. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.06.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scorrano L.; De Matteis M. A.; Emr S.; Giordano F.; Hajnóczky G.; Kornmann B.; Lackner L. L.; Levine T. P.; Pellegrini L.; Reinisch K.; Rizzuto R.; Simmen T.; Stenmark H.; Ungermann C.; Schuldiner M. Coming together to define membrane contact sites. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 1287. 10.1038/s41467-019-09253-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Leeuwen W.; Rabouille C. Cellular stress leads to the formation of membraneless stress assemblies in eukaryotic cells. Traffic 2019, 20 (9), 623–638. 10.1111/tra.12669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vance J. E. Phospholipid synthesis in a membrane fraction associated with mitochondria. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265 (13), 7248–7256. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39106-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaskovic S.; Blanc M.; van der Goot F. G. What does S-palmitoylation do to membrane proteins?. FEBS j 2013, 280 (12), 2766–74. 10.1111/febs.12263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selitrennik M.; Lev S. The role of phosphatidylinositol-transfer proteins at membrane contact sites. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44 (2), 419–24. 10.1042/BST20150182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunami T.; Caschera F.; Morita Y.; Toyota T.; Nishimura K.; Matsuura T.; Suzuki H.; Hanczyc M. M.; Yomo T. Detection of Association and Fusion of Giant Vesicles Using a Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorter. Langmuir 2010, 26 (19), 15098–15103. 10.1021/la102689v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biner O.; Schick T.; Müller Y.; von Ballmoos C. Delivery of membrane proteins into small and giant unilamellar vesicles by charge-mediated fusion. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590 (14), 2051–62. 10.1002/1873-3468.12233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lira R. B.; Robinson T.; Dimova R.; Riske K. A. Highly Efficient Protein-free Membrane Fusion: A Giant Vesicle Study. Biophys. J. 2019, 116 (1), 79–91. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pautot S.; Frisken B. J.; Weitz D. A. Production of unilamellar vesicles using an inverted emulsion. Langmuir 2003, 19 (7), 2870–2879. 10.1021/la026100v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fologea D.; Ledden B.; McNabb D. S.; Li J. Electrical characterization of protein molecules by a solid-state nanopore. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 91 (5), 053901. 10.1063/1.2767206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu G.; Hao C.; Zhang L.; Sun R. The interaction between BSA and DOTAP at the air-buffer interface. Sci. Rep 2018, 8 (1), 407. 10.1038/s41598-017-18689-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stillwell W.; Jenski L. J.; Zerouga M.; Dumaual A. C. Detection of lipid domains in docosahexaenoic acid-rich bilayers by acyl chain-specific FRET probes. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 104 (2), 113–132. 10.1016/S0009-3084(99)00122-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- George K. S.; Wu S. Lipid raft: A floating island of death or survival. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012, 259 (3), 311–319. 10.1016/j.taap.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melcrová A.; Pokorna S.; Pullanchery S.; Kohagen M.; Jurkiewicz P.; Hof M.; Jungwirth P.; Cremer P. S.; Cwiklik L. The complex nature of calcium cation interactions with phospholipid bilayers. Sci. Rep 2016, 6, 38035. 10.1038/srep38035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Papahadjopoulos D.; Poste G.; Schaeffer B. E.; Vail W. J. Membrane fusion and molecular segregation in phospholipid vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1974, 352 (1), 10–28. 10.1016/0005-2736(74)90175-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Findlay E. J.; Barton P. G. Phase behavior of synthetic phosphatidylglycerols and binary mixtures with phosphatidylcholines in the presence and absence of calcium ions. Biochemistry 1978, 17 (12), 2400–2405. 10.1021/bi00605a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boettcher J. M.; Davis-Harrison R. L.; Clay M. C.; Nieuwkoop A. J.; Ohkubo Y. Z.; Tajkhorshid E.; Morrissey J. H.; Rienstra C. M. Atomic view of calcium-induced clustering of phosphatidylserine in mixed lipid bilayers. Biochemistry 2011, 50 (12), 2264–73. 10.1021/bi1013694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biner O.; Schick T.; Müller Y.; von Ballmoos C. Delivery of membrane proteins into small and giant unilamellar vesicles by charge-mediated fusion. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590 (14), 2051–2062. 10.1002/1873-3468.12233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lira R. B.; Robinson T.; Dimova R.; Riske K. A. Highly Efficient Protein-free Membrane Fusion: A Giant Vesicle Study. Biophys. J. 2019, 116 (1), 79–91. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.11.3128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey A. L.; Cullis P. R. Membrane fusion with cationic liposomes: effects of target membrane lipid composition. Biochemistry 1997, 36 (7), 1628–34. 10.1021/bi961173x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Novak E. J.; Rabinovitch P. S. Improved sensitivity in flow cytometric intracellular ionized calcium measurement using fluo-3/Fura Red fluorescence ratios. Cytometry 1994, 17 (2), 135–141. 10.1002/cyto.990170205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koncz C.; Daugirdas J. T. Use of MQAE for measurement of intracellular [Cl-] in cultured aortic smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1994, 267 (6 Pt 2), H2114–23. 10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.6.H2114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aranda-Espinoza H.; Chen Y.; Dan N.; Lubensky T. C.; Nelson P.; Ramos L.; Weitz D. A. Electrostatic Repulsion of Positively Charged Vesicles and Negatively Charged Objects. Science 1999, 285 (5426), 394–397. 10.1126/science.285.5426.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gadagkar S. R.; Call G. B. Computational tools for fitting the Hill equation to dose–response curves. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 2015, 71, 68–76. 10.1016/j.vascn.2014.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pedersen U. R.; Leidy C.; Westh P.; Peters G. H. The effect of calcium on the properties of charged phospholipid bilayers. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2006, 1758 (5), 573–582. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deleers M.; Servais J. P.; Wülfert E. Micromolar concentrations of Al3+ induce phase separation, aggregation and dye release in phosphatidylserine-containing lipid vesicles. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1985, 813 (2), 195–200. 10.1016/0005-2736(85)90233-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y.; Kumar A.; Jin H.; Zhang Y. Single-molecule manipulation of macromolecules on GUV or SUV membranes using optical tweezers. Biophys. J. 2021, 120 (24), 5454–5465. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.2884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bolognesi G.; Friddin M. S.; Salehi-Reyhani A.; Barlow N. E.; Brooks N. J.; Ces O.; Elani Y. Sculpting and fusing biomimetic vesicle networks using optical tweezers. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9 (1), 1882. 10.1038/s41467-018-04282-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sarmento M. J.; Prieto M.; Fernandes F. Reorganization of lipid domain distribution in giant unilamellar vesicles upon immobilization with different membrane tethers. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2012, 1818 (11), 2605–2615. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.05.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Köster D. V. Pulling of Tethers from the Cell Plasma Membrane Using Optical Tweezers. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2169, 167–174. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0732-9_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuvelier D.; Chiaruttini N.; Bassereau P.; Nassoy P. Pulling long tubes from firmly adhered vesicles. Europhysics Letters (EPL) 2005, 71 (6), 1015–1021. 10.1209/epl/i2005-10173-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Harris F. M.; Best K. B.; Bell J. D. Use of laurdan fluorescence intensity and polarization to distinguish between changes in membrane fluidity and phospholipid order. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 2002, 1565 (1), 123–128. 10.1016/S0005-2736(02)00514-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sezgin E.; Levental I.; Mayor S.; Eggeling C. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18 (6), 361–374. 10.1038/nrm.2017.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crowe C. D.; Keating C. D. Liquid-liquid phase separation in artificial cells. Interface Focus 2018, 8 (5), 20180032. 10.1098/rsfs.2018.0032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banani S. F.; Lee H. O.; Hyman A. A.; Rosen M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18 (5), 285–298. 10.1038/nrm.2017.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Love C.; Steinkühler J.; Gonzales D. T.; Yandrapalli N.; Robinson T.; Dimova R.; Tang T. D. Reversible pH-Responsive Coacervate Formation in Lipid Vesicles Activates Dormant Enzymatic Reactions. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59 (15), 5950–5957. 10.1002/anie.201914893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karamdad K.; Hindley J. W.; Bolognesi G.; Friddin M. S.; Law R. V.; Brooks N. J.; Ces O.; Elani Y. Engineering thermoresponsive phase separated vesicles formed via emulsion phase transfer as a content-release platform. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (21), 4851–4858. 10.1039/C7SC04309K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.