Abstract
Background and objective
A proportion of patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) follow a progressive disease course despite immunosuppressive treatment. Little is known about predictors of mortality in fHP. We aimed to investigate the impact of short‐term lung function changes in fHP on mortality.
Methods
Baseline demographics for 145 consecutive patients with a multi‐disciplinary team diagnosis of fHP, as well as baseline and 1‐year follow‐up of lung function, baseline echocardiographic findings, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cellularity and all‐cause mortality were recorded. Changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 5% and ≥10%, and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 10% and ≥15% at 1 year were calculated. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to test for associations with mortality.
Results
Baseline lung function severity, age, presence of honeycombing on computed tomography (CT) and echocardiographic pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) ≥ 40 mm Hg were associated with early mortality, while BAL lymphocytosis was associated with improved survival. A decline in FVC ≥ 5% (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.10, 95% CI: 2.00–4.81, p < 0.001), FVC ≥ 10% (HR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.94–4.99, p < 0.001), DLCO ≥ 10% (HR: 2.80, 95% CI: 1.78–4.42, p < 0.001) and DLCO ≥ 15% (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.18–4.72, p < 0.001) at 1 year was associated with markedly reduced survival on univariable and multivariable analyses after correcting for demographic variables, disease severity, honeycombing on CT and treatment, as well as BAL lymphocytosis and PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg on echocardiography, in separate models.
Conclusion
Worsening in FVC and DLCO at 1 year, including a marginal decline in FVC ≥ 5% and DLCO ≥ 10%, is predictive of markedly reduced survival in fHP.
Keywords: DLCO, fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, FVC, mortality, predictor, short‐term lung function change
A proportion of patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis have high mortality, and short‐term predictors of poorer survival are needed. Declines from baseline at 1 year in forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥ 10% and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 15%, but also marginal declines in FVC ≥ 5% and DLCO ≥ 10%, are predictive of increased mortality.
See related editorial
INTRODUCTION
The majority of patients with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) presenting to specialist centres have a chronic fibrotic form. Within the population of fibrotic HP (fHP) patients, a subgroup of patients display an accelerated rate of progression comparable to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). 1 , 2 The overlap with IPF is also evident in the often‐challenging differentiation of fHP from IPF in a multi‐disciplinary team (MDT) setting. 3 The early identification of a rapidly progressive fibrosing lung disease is increasingly relevant in an era of anti‐fibrotic therapies, in which treatment guidelines are likely to increasingly broaden the spectrum of diagnoses for which anti‐fibrotic treatments are indicated. 4
At the moment, known predictors of fHP mortality are the presence of traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing on thoracic computed tomography (CT), 1 , 5 , 6 , 7 lower baseline lung function, 5 , 8 lack of antigen identification/avoidance, and forced vital capacity (FVC) decline ≥ 10% within 6–12 months of follow‐up. 8
The main aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of short‐term changes in FVC, including a marginal change of ≥5%, and in diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO), including marginal change of ≥10%, on survival in patients with fHP.
METHODS
Patient selection and baseline characterization
Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of fHP presenting at the Royal Brompton Hospital (RBH) Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Unit from January 2010 to December 2014 were considered for this study. A diagnosis of fHP was made through MDT discussion, following integration of clinical, exposure history, CT, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and histology data, when available, as per current guidelines. 9
All‐cause mortality was collected for all patients until death, transplant, loss to follow‐up or end of the study period (30 March 2021).
Patients were included in this study if they had lung function measurements at first presentation to our unit (baseline), and at least one further lung function at 12 months (range: 6–18 months) from baseline. Patients who died within 12 months of baseline, without a follow‐up lung function test, were included in the baseline analysis but excluded from the lung function trends analysis. A categorical change in FVC was computed as a relative change of ≥5% or ≥10% from the absolute values at baseline, while a categorical change in DLCO was defined as a relative change of ≥10% or ≥15% from absolute values at baseline. Further details on clinical findings are available in Appendix S1 in the Supporting Information.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using STATA15.1 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA). Determinants of mortality were assessed by Cox proportional hazards analysis. Covariates in multivariable analysis included demographic variables, the composite physiological index (CPI), 10 used as a continuous variable to adjust for disease severity, presence of honeycombing on CT, and treatment (active treatment vs. no treatment, see Appendix S1 in the Supporting Information). The additional impact of BAL lymphocytosis and, in separate models, of raised pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) ≥ 40 mm Hg on echocardiography was assessed in separate multivariable models which included demographic variables and CPI. A p‐value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Baseline characteristics
Baseline characteristics of the 145 patients satisfying inclusion criteria for this study are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, mean age was 64.4 years (range: 33.0–87.2), 82 (56.6%) were female and 48 (33.1%) were ever smokers. Median baseline FVC was 67.5% (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.1–82.9) and DLCO was 37.4% (IQR: 29.5–47.2), while the median CPI was 54.7 (IQR: 43.9–60.6) (Table 1). FVC decline ≥ 5% in the first year was observed in 45 patients (31.0%), FVC ≥ 10% in 30 patients (20.7%), DLCO decline ≥ 10% in 43 (29.7%) and DLCO ≥ 15% in 35 (24.1%) patients. More than half of the cohort (83 [57.2%]) reported no obvious exposure history. The most frequently reported exposures included: avian (24 [16.6%]), mould or damp damage (18 [12.4%]) and feather bedding (2 [1.4%]). Of the 62 patients with reported exposures, all but two avoided further exposure to the potential antigen(s). Of the 141 patients tested for the presence of antibodies against common antigens, 46 (32.6%) showed positivity (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). One hundred and thirty (89.7%) patients were on active treatment (Table S2 in the Supporting Information). BAL at baseline was available for 100 (69.0%) patients. Histological confirmation of fHP was available for 36 (24.8%) patients. Diagnosis was reached by typical/compatible CT findings and evidence of exposure and/or BAL lymphocytosis ≥ 20% in 80 (55.2%) patients. In 29 (20%) patients, diagnosis was mainly based on CT findings, as BAL was not performed because of frailty/fHP severity, or patient choice. Echocardiogram within 12 months of baseline was available for 104 (71.7%) patients.
TABLE 1.
n = 145 | |
---|---|
Age, years (range) | 64.3 (33.0–87.2) |
Gender, female (%) | 82 (56.6) |
Ethnicity, European (%) | 76 (52.4) |
Smoking status, never %) | 97 (66.9) |
Honeycombing on CT | 19 (13.1) |
Reported exposures a , n (%) | |
Avian | 24 (16.6) |
Mould/damp | 18 (12.4) |
Feather bedding | 2 (1.4) |
Other | 24 (16.6) |
None | 83 (57.2) |
Baseline lung function | |
DLCO % predicted | 37.4 (29.5–47.2) |
FVC % predicted | 67.5 (55.1–82.9) |
KCO % predicted | 70.45 (60.3–86.3) |
FEV1% predicted | 68.2 (56.7–81.9) |
CPI | 54.7 (43.9–60.6) |
BAL cellularity b | |
Macrophages, % | 55 (44–69) |
Lymphocytes, % | 23 (11.3–39) |
Lymphocytes ≥ 20% | 44 (44) |
Lymphocytes ≥ 30% | 32 (32) |
Lymphocytes ≥ 40% | 19 (19) |
Neutrophils, % | 6.3 (3.7–15.3) |
Eosinophils, % | 4 (1.7–6) |
PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg c , n (%) | 41 (39.4) |
Note: Data are presented as mean (range) for age; all other data are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (percentage value) as appropriate.
Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CPI, composite physiological index; CT, computed tomography; DLCO, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, forced vital capacity; KCO, carbon monoxide transfer coefficient; PASP, pulmonary arterial systolic pressure.
Some patients had more than one reported exposure.
BAL was available for 100 patients.
Echocardiographic assessment within 12 months of baseline was available for 104 patients.
Prognostic significance of baseline variables
There were 92 deaths (63.4%) during a median follow‐up of 4.8 years (range: 0.5–10.9). Baseline predictors of mortality included FVC % predicted (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98, p < 0.001), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % predicted (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96–0.98, p < 0.001), DLCO % predicted (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–0.98, p < 0.001) and CPI (HR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03–1.07, p < 0.001). Age at baseline (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06, p = 0.002) and ethnicity (non‐Caucasian) (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.07–2.44, p = 0.02) were also associated with mortality. The presence of honeycombing on CT, observed in 19 (13.1%) patients, was associated with mortality (HR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.22–3.74, p = 0.008). In patients with an echocardiogram (n = 104), estimated PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg was predictive of mortality (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.18–3.12, p = 0.008). In the 100 patients with BAL, lymphocyte percentage counts were associated with better survival, both when assessed as a continuous variable (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95–0.98, p < 0.001) and as different lymphocytosis cut‐offs (Table S3 in the Supporting Information). However, gender, smoking status, reported antigenic exposure or avoidance, and active treatment, were not observed to have prognostic value (Table S3 in the Supporting Information).
Prognostic significance of lung function trends at 1 year
On univariable analysis, a decline in FVC ≥ 10% at 1 year from baseline was highly predictive of mortality (HR: 3.11, 95% CI: 1.94–4.99, p < 0.001), with a median survival of 2.2 years compared to 6.7 years in those without FVC decline ≥ 10% (Figure 1B). Similarly, a decline in DLCO ≥ 15% at 1 year correlated with mortality (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.18–4.72, p < 0.001), with a median survival of 2.5 years compared to 6.7 years in those without DLCO decline of ≥ 15% (Figure 1D). Even a marginal decline in FVC ≥ 5% was significantly predictive of mortality (HR: 3.10, 95% CI: 2.00–4.81, p < 0.001), with a median survival of 2.9 years compared to 7.0 years (Figure 1A). A marginal decline in DLCO ≥ 10% was also predictive of mortality (HR: 2.80 95% CI: 1.78–4.42, p < 0.001), with a median survival of 2.9 years compared to 6.7 years (Figure 1C).
All the above‐mentioned associations were confirmed as highly significant after adjusting for age, ethnicity, treatment (active or no treatment), presence of honeycombing on CT, and CPI (Table 2), and, in separate models, adjusting for alternative measure of ILD severity, baseline DLCO or FVC (Table S4 in the Supporting Information). The associations also remained significant when PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg was included in the multivariable analysis (Table S5 in the Supporting Information).
TABLE 2.
Univariable | Multivariable a | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p‐value | HR (95% CI) | p‐value | |
FVC decline ≥ 5% | 3.10 (2.00–4.81) | <0.001 | 3.44 (2.12–5.59) | <0.001 |
FVC decline ≥ 10% | 3.11 (1.94–4.99) | <0.001 | 3.31 (1.97–5.56) | <0.001 |
DLCO decline ≥ 10% | 2.80 (1.78–4.42) | <0.001 | 3.45 (2.14–5.57) | <0.001 |
DLCO decline ≥ 15% | 2.92 (1.18–4.72) | <0.001 | 3.61 (2.19–5.96) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: CPI, composite physiological index; CT, computed tomography; DLCO, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity; HR, hazard ratio.
Multivariable analysis correcting for age, ethnicity, treatment (active vs. no treatment as defined in Methods section), presence of honeycombing on CT and CPI.
To assess whether the link with worsening lung function was confounded by the presence of BAL lymphocytosis, we analysed the relationship between FVC decline (both ≥5% and ≥10%) and DLCO decline (≥10% and ≥15%), adjusting in separate analyses for different lymphocyte percentage cut‐offs (Table 3). The association with decline in FVC ≥ 5% and ≥10%, and with decline in DLCO ≥ 10% and ≥ 15% all remained highly significant, independent of the BAL lymphocyte thresholds of 20%, 30% and 40%, even after correcting for age, ethnicity, treatment, honeycombing on CT and CPI (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Multivariable a lymphocytes ≥ 20% | Multivariable a lymphocytes ≥ 30% | Multivariable a lymphocytes ≥ 40% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HR (95% CI) | p‐value | HR (95% CI) | p‐value | HR (95% CI) | p‐value | |
FVC decline ≥ 5% | 2.92 (1.63–5.21) | <0.001 |
2.70 (1.49–4.88) |
0.001 | 2.69 (1.49–4.85) | 0.001 |
FVC decline ≥ 10% | 2.22 (1.15–4.30) | 0.017 |
2.16 (1.13–4.11) |
0.019 | 2.15 (1.15–4.05) | 0.017 |
DLCO decline ≥ 10% | 2.61 (1.47–4.62) | 0.001 |
4.42 (1.36–4.30) |
0.003 | 2.38 (1.34–4.23) | 0.003 |
DLCO decline ≥ 15% | 2.87 (1.54–5.33) | 0.001 |
2.60 (1.34–5.01) |
0.004 | 2.71 (1.46–5.04) | 0.002 |
Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CPI, composite physiological index; CT, computed tomography; DLCO, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide; FVC, forced vital capacity; HR, hazard ratio.
Multivariable analysis correcting for age, ethnicity, honeycombing on CT, treatment (active vs. no treatment as defined in Methods), CPI and different BAL lymphocyte percentage cut‐offs.
We also performed a sensitivity analysis in which we excluded the 29 patients for whom diagnosis was mainly based on typical/compatible CT findings. In the remaining 116 patients, all four measures of lung function worsening remained significant on both univariable and multivariable analyses (Table S6 in the Supporting Information), including when PASP ≥ 40 mm Hg (Table S7 in the Supporting Information) and BAL lymphocyte thresholds (Table S8 in the Supporting Information) were included in separate multivariable analyses.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we find that early lung function decline is predictive of an IPF‐like survival in patients with fHP, confirming the finding by Gimenez et al. 8 that a decline in FVC ≥ 10% in the first year is an indicator of poor prognosis. In addition, we observe that even a marginal decline in FVC ≥ 5% within the first year is predictive of a markedly worse survival, with a median survival of only 2.9 years (HR: 3.10, 95% CI: 2.00–4.81, p < 0.001), highlighting the severity of outlook for this subgroup of patients. This is similar to the published findings in IPF, where a marginal decline (5%–10%) in FVC is associated with higher mortality. 11 Furthermore, we find that a decline in DLCO within the first year also provides prognostic information, observing a similar impact on survival of a decline by ≥10% or ≥15%.
A decline in FVC approximating the 5% threshold is very close to the known SD for this measurement, safely stated at 5%, and may therefore represent either real progression of ILD or technical measurement variation. 12 The higher the pre‐test probability of disease progression, the more likely it is that marginal decline reflects true deterioration. The fact that a threshold of 5% in FVC change is sufficient to predict survival suggests that in fHP the likelihood of progression is higher than in less progressive ILDs, where such a threshold is not predictive. 11 That said, in individual cases, a change in FVC close to the 5% threshold could still represent measurement variation. However, our data suggest that, in fHP, even this marginal change should be taken seriously because of outcome significance, although corroboration with other variables suggestive of worsening could aid in determining whether change is real in the individual patient.
A median survival of only 26.0 months in patients with FVC decline of ≥10% within the first year is worse than the equivalent figure in the Gimenez et al.'s study (median survival of 53 months). This could be related to worse baseline severity in our cohort, although the absence of DLCO measurements in the Gimenez et al.'s study does not allow direct comparisons. Additionally, there were a greater proportion of patients without identifiable exposures in our cohort, a subgroup which is known to have a worse outcome. 13 We did not however observe a difference in survival according to the history of exposure. The fact that a substantial percentage of patients with radiological and/or histological findings of fHP lack an identifiable exposure despite exhaustive investigation is well recognized. 9 Indeed, some authors have suggested the term ‘cryptogenic HP’ to acknowledge this cohort, which may have many similarities with IPF. In this cohort, it was not possible to ascertain whether antigen avoidance allowed better survival than patients who did not subsequently avoid the identified exposure after diagnosis, as only two patients fell into the latter group. Finally, we cannot exclude the possibility that our results may have been confounded by the inclusion of IPF patients misclassified as fHP. However, the finding of an equally strong relationship between early lung function decline and mortality even after excluding the minority of patients in whom the diagnosis was mainly based on CT findings is reassuring and makes this possibility less likely.
A third of our cohort had a positive smoking history, although only two out of 48 were current smokers at their baseline visit. Although there is thought to be an inverse relationship between smoking history and development of HP, 14 similar, or even greater, proportions (up to 57.9%) of HP patients with a positive smoking history have been reported. 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 Furthermore, the protective effect of smoking may not be applicable to ex‐smokers. 19 , 20
The majority of patients in this cohort were treated with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressants. As ours was a retrospective study, it is not possible to accurately assess response to treatment. However, there was clearly a large proportion of patients with stable lung function at 1 year on corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive treatment, a finding that was associated with a significantly better survival. Immunosuppression has been associated with stabilization of lung function in fHP, 21 , 22 although corticosteroid treatment was not associated with a survival benefit in a cohort of fHP patients. 23 It is possible that anti‐inflammatory/immunosuppressive treatment has an adverse effect on a proportion of fHP patients, including those with shorter telomeres, while having a positive impact on survival in those with normal telomere lengths, as suggested by Adegunsoye et al. 24 This possibility would require confirmation with a prospective study, as telomere studies were not available in this cohort. Early identification of fHP patients likely to have poor responses to immunosuppression is crucial, particularly now that anti‐fibrotic treatments have been shown to reduce FVC decline in patients with a progressive fibrotic phenotype regardless of the ILD entity. 25 , 26
One of the strengths of this study is the high proportion of patients with BAL at baseline. BAL lymphocytosis has been reported as a potential marker of a better outcome in patients with fHP. BAL lymphocytosis was associated with stabilization in FVC in response to immunosuppression, 27 while De Sadeleer et al. reported better survival in patients with BAL lymphocytosis > 20%, with a marginal impact on early response of FVC following corticosteroid treatment. 28 In this cohort, we confirm the association between BAL lymphocytosis and better outcomes in fHP. However, the association with early lung function change remained highly significant regardless of the BAL lymphocytosis thresholds analysed, suggesting an independent powerful impact of early lung function changes on outcome.
This study does have some limitations, mainly due to its retrospective nature. An echocardiogram within 12 months of baseline was not available for all patients. However, short‐term lung function worsening remained predictive of poor survival even after adjustment for PASP echocardiographic measurements available within a year from baseline. Although a detailed exposure history is routinely investigated in all new ILD patients referred to our unit, we do not employ a standardized written questionnaire, nor do we have availability of environmental hygienists to probe potential exposures in the patient's home or work environment. This could have missed potential exposures, as questionnaires and home/work visits may be better at identifying possible HP exposures than clinical history or specific IgG serologies. 29 However, a number of large studies on HP have reported an identified exposure in less than 50% of the patients, a similar proportion to this cohort. 16 , 30 , 31 Also, all‐cause mortality rather than respiratory cause‐only mortality was used, although this is a widely used outcome. 1 , 7 , 8
In summary, in this cohort of consecutive patients with fHP, even a marginal decline in FVC by ≥5% and/or a marginal decline in DLCO by ≥10% is associated with a major increase in risk of death. In light of the very poor survival in a substantial subgroup of patients with fHP, there is a clear need to develop biomarkers of response to treatment (immunosuppressive) without having to wait for worsening. Furthermore, studies exploring the earliest time point from baseline at which change in lung function parameters is associated with survival are needed. There is a clear unmet need to identify this subgroup of patients with fHP much earlier in the course of their illness, by performing large well‐designed prospective studies to evaluate the role of early lung function decline in treatment decisions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Caudio Macaluso: Data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Cristina Boccabella: Data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Maria Kokosi: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Nishanth Sivarasan: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Vasilis Kouranos: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Peter M. George: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). George Margaritopoulos: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Philip L. Molyneaux: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Felix Chua: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Toby M. Maher: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Gisli R. Jenkins: Data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Andrew G. Nicholson: Investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Sujal R. Desai: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Anand Devaraj: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); investigation (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Athol U. Wells: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Elisabetta A. Renzoni: Conceptualization (equal); data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Carmel J.W. Stock: Data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal).
HUMAN ETHICS APPROVAL DECLARATION
This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This human study was approved by Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals (approval: IRAS: 236745). Adult participant consent was not required as the research was based on retrospective review of previously collected non‐identifiable information, and patient consent was not required for institutional approval.
Supporting information
Macaluso C, Boccabella C, Kokosi M, Sivarasan N, Kouranos V, George PM, et al. Short‐term lung function changes predict mortality in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Respirology. 2022;27:202–208. 10.1111/resp.14204
Elisabetta A. Renzoni and Carmel J. W. Stock contributed equally to this study.
This study was previously presented, in part, at the 2018 Annual Congress of the European Respiratory Society and at the 2021 Winter Meeting of the British Thoracic Society.
Associate Editor: Helen Whitford and Senior Editor: Yuben Moodley
See related Editorial
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Jacob J, Bartholmai BJ, Egashira R, Brun AL, Rajagopalan S, Karwoski R, et al. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: identification of key prognostic determinants using automated CT analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;1:81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kouranos V, Jacob J, Nicholson A, Renzoni E. Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: key issues in diagnosis and management. J Clin Med. 2017;6:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Takemura T, Akashi T, Kamiya H, Ikushima S, Ando T, Oritsu M, et al. Pathological differentiation of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis/usual interstitial pneumonia. Histopathology. 2012;6:1026–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wells AU. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the setting of definite IPF: does the current study undermine IPF guideline recommendations? Lancet Respir Med. 2013;9:664–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Walsh SL, Sverzellati N, Devaraj A, Wells AU, Hansell DM. Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: high resolution computed tomography patterns and pulmonary function indices as prognostic determinants. Eur Radiol. 2012;8:1672–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Jacob J, Bartholmai BJ, Brun AL, Egashira R, Rajagopalan S, Karwoski R, et al. Evaluation of visual and computer‐based CT analysis for the identification of functional patterns of obstruction and restriction in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Respirology. 2017;8:1585–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Salisbury ML, Gu T, Murray S, Gross BH, Chughtai A, Sayyouh M, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: radiologic phenotypes are associated with distinct survival time and pulmonary function trajectory. Chest. 2019;4:699–711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gimenez A, Storrer K, Kuranishi L, Soares MR, Ferreira RG, Pereira CAC. Change in FVC and survival in chronic fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Thorax. 2018;4:391–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Raghu G, Remy‐Jardin M, Ryerson CJ, Myers JL, Kreuter M, Vasakova M, et al. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in adults. An official ATS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;3:e36–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wells AU, Desai SR, Rubens MB, Goh NS, Cramer D, Nicholson AG, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a composite physiologic index derived from disease extent observed by computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;7:962–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Zappala CJ, Latsi PI, Nicholson AG, Colby TV, Cramer D, Renzoni EA, et al. Marginal decline in forced vital capacity is associated with a poor outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2010;4:830–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wells AU. Forced vital capacity as a primary end point in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment trials: making a silk purse from a sow's ear. Thorax. 2013;4:309–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nogueira R, Melo N, Novais EBH, Martins N, Delgado L, Morais A, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: antigen diversity and disease implications. Pulmonology. 2019;2:97–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Vassallo R, Ryu JH. Smoking‐related interstitial lung diseases. Clin Chest Med. 2012;1:165–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ley B, Newton CA, Arnould I, Elicker BM, Henry TS, Vittinghoff E, et al. The MUC5B promoter polymorphism and telomere length in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: an observational cohort‐control study. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;8:639–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fisher JH, Kolb M, Algamdi M, Morisset J, Johannson KA, Shapera S, et al. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities in the CAnadian REgistry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;1:223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Wang LJ, Cai HR, Xiao YL, Wang Y, Cao MS. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a population‐based study in China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2019;11:1283–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Santos V, Martins N, Sousa C, Jacob M, Padrao E, Melo N, et al. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: main features characterization in a Portuguese cohort. Pulmonology. 2020;3:130–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Cormier Y, Belanger J, Durand P. Factors influencing the development of serum precipitins to farmer's lung antigen in Quebec dairy farmers. Thorax. 1985;2:138–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Reynolds SP, Edwards JH, Jones KP, Davies BH. Immunoglobulin and antibody levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from symptomatic and asymptomatic pigeon breeders. Clin Exp Immunol. 1991;2:278–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Adegunsoye A, Oldham JM, Fernandez Perez ER, Hamblin M, Patel N, Tener M, et al. Outcomes of immunosuppressive therapy in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. ERJ Open Res. 2017;3:00016‐02017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Morisset J, Johannson KA, Vittinghoff E, Aravena C, Elicker BM, Jones KD, et al. Use of mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine for the management of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest. 2017;3:619–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. De Sadeleer LJ, Hermans F, De Dycker E, Yserbyt J, Verschakelen JA, Verbeken EK, et al. Effects of corticosteroid treatment and antigen avoidance in a large hypersensitivity pneumonitis cohort: a single‐centre cohort study. J Clin Med. 2018;1:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Adegunsoye A, Morisset J, Newton CA, Oldham JM, Vittinghoff E, Linderholm AL, et al. Leukocyte telomere length and mycophenolate therapy in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur Respir J. 2021;3:2002872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Flaherty KR, Wells AU, Cottin V, Devaraj A, Walsh SLF, Inoue Y, et al. Nintedanib in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. N Engl J Med. 2019;18:1718–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Behr J, Prasse A, Kreuter M, Johow J, Rabe KF, Bonella F, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with progressive fibrotic interstitial lung diseases other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (RELIEF): a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;5:476–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Raimundo S, Pimenta AC, Cruz‐Martins N, Rodrigues MC, Melo N, Mota PC, et al. Insights on chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis' treatment: factors associated with a favourable response to azathioprine. Life Sci. 2021;272:119274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. De Sadeleer LJ, Hermans F, De Dycker E, Yserbyt J, Verschakelen JA, Verbeken EK, et al. Impact of BAL lymphocytosis and presence of honeycombing on corticosteroid treatment effect in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;4:1901983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jenkins AR, Chua A, Chami H, Diaz‐Mendoza J, Duggal A, Knight S, et al. Questionnaires or serum immunoglobulin G testing in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis among patients with interstitial lung disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;1:130–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fernandez Perez ER, Swigris JJ, Forssen AV, Tourin O, Solomon JJ, Huie TJ, et al. Identifying an inciting antigen is associated with improved survival in patients with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest. 2013;5:1644–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mooney JJ, Elicker BM, Urbania TH, Agarwal MR, Ryerson CJ, Nguyen MLT, et al. Radiographic fibrosis score predicts survival in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Chest. 2013;2:586–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.