Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Jan 9;37(4):853–857. doi: 10.1002/mds.28897

Adenosine A2A Receptor Occupancy by Caffeine After Coffee Intake in Parkinson's Disease

Kenji Ishibashi 1,2,, Yoshiharu Miura 2, Kei Wagatsuma 1,3, Jun Toyohara 1, Kiichi Ishiwata 1,4,5, Kenji Ishii 1
PMCID: PMC9306703  PMID: 35001424

ABSTRACT

Background

Coffee intake can decrease the risk for Parkinson's disease (PD). Its beneficial effects are allegedly mediated by caffeine through adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) antagonist action.

Objective

We aimed to calculate occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs by caffeine after coffee intake in PD.

Methods

Five patients with PD underwent 11C‐preladenant positron emission tomography scanning at baseline and after intake of coffee containing 129.5 mg (n = 3) or 259 mg (n = 2) of caffeine. Concurrently, serum caffeine levels were measured.

Results

The mean serum caffeine level (μg/mL) was 0.374 at baseline and increased to 4.48 and 8.92 by 129.5 and 259 mg of caffeine, respectively. The mean occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs by 129.5 and 259 mg of caffeine were 54.2% and 65.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

A sufficient A2AR occupancy can be obtained by drinking a cup of coffee, which is equivalent to approximately 100 mg of caffeine. © 2022 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Keywords: adenosine A2A receptor, coffee, caffeine, Parkinson's disease, 11C‐preladenant PET


Epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated that coffee intake can decrease the risk for development of Parkinson's disease (PD).1, 2 Because decaffeinated coffee is not protective against PD, 1 caffeine in coffee is believed to be the essential pharmacological factor contributing to its beneficial effects in PD. Caffeine mainly works as a nonselective blocker of all four adenosine receptor subtypes: A1 (KD = 12 μM), A2A (KD = 2.4 μM), A2B (KD = 13 μM), and A3 (KD = 80 μM). 3 Of these subtypes, adenosine A2A receptors (A2ARs) are believed to underlie most of the beneficial effects of caffeine in PD, 4 although its mechanism is unclear.

A2ARs are predominantly distributed in the putamen, caudate, nucleus accumbens, and external globus pallidus, and they interact with dopamine D2 receptors in the indirect basal ganglia pathway.5, 6, 7 Because of these features, A2ARs have been recognized as a therapeutic target to modulate motor symptoms in PD. Istradefylline, a selective A2AR antagonist (Ki = 12.4 nM), 8 was then launched in Japan in 2013 as an adjunct to levodopa to alleviate off episodes in PD and was subsequently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2019.9, 10 Currently, once‐daily oral administration of istradefylline 20 or 40 mg is recommended. We found that occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs after single administration of istradefylline 20 and 40 mg were 39.5% and 52.1%, respectively, 11 and that the corresponding rates after long‐term administration of istradefylline 20 and 40 mg increased to 72.1% and 86.5%, respectively. 12

We hypothesized that if the beneficial effects of coffee in PD are mediated by caffeine through A2AR antagonist action, a substantial amount of A2AR should be occupied by caffeine after coffee intake, similar to that observed after administration of istradefylline.11, 12 This study aimed to test the hypothesis by calculating occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs after coffee intake in patients with PD using 11C‐preladenant positron emission tomography (PET) for measurement of A2AR availability. Concurrently, the amount of caffeine in coffee was verified, and the serum caffeine levels were measured.

Materials and Methods

Research Participants

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (R19‐19). Written informed consent was obtained from all five patients with PD (three men and two women) aged 61 to 76 years (Table 1). All patients were taking at least one antiparkinsonian drug other than istradefylline. Two patients regularly consumed at least one cup of coffee per day. Two other patients occasionally drank coffee. The remaining one patient rarely drank coffee. None of the patients had a history of smoking after middle age.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the patients with Parkinson's disease

Patient No.
Characteristics 1 2 3 4 5
Dose of caffeine, mg 259 259 129.5 129.5 129.5
Age, y 74 61 71 69 61
Sex Male Male Male Female Female
Weight, kg 60.1 47.5 61.5 52.3 48.2
Coffee consumption 1 cup/day 1 cup/day Occasionally Occasionally Rarely
Duration, y 6 13 3 5 3
Hoehn & Yahr stage 3 3 3 3 2
Medication l‐Dopa pramipexole l‐Dopa pramipexole l‐Dopa l‐Dopa pramipexole Ropinirole
Serum caffeine level, μg/mL
Baseline 0.56 0.29 0.06 0.96 0.00
Caffeine loading 8.94 8.90 4.51 4.58 4.36
BPND in the striatum a
Baseline 4.34 3.89 3.16 3.06 4.16
Caffeine loading 1.68 1.21 1.50 1.42 1.79
Occupancy, % 61.3 68.9 52.4 53.4 57.0

Patients 1–5 correspond to Fig. 1A–E, respectively.

l‐Dopa, levodopa.

a

Binding potential (BPND) was calculated using the volume‐of‐interest‐based method. 11

Study Protocol, Coffee Intake, and Serum Caffeine Level

Commercially available “canned coffee” (Suntory Premium Boss; Suntory Holdings Limited, Osaka, Japan) was used for caffeine loading by drinking coffee. One can of coffee (185 g) contained 129.5 mg of caffeine (70 mg/100 g). The five patients with PD were classified into either the low‐caffeine‐loading group or the high‐caffeine‐loading group according to their requests. The two patients in the high‐caffeine‐loading group consumed two cans of coffee containing 259 mg of caffeine. The other three patients in the low‐caffeine‐loading group consumed one can of coffee containing 129.5 mg of caffeine. To calculate A2AR occupancy rates by caffeine after coffee intake, each patient underwent a total of two 11C‐preladenant PET scans in two conditions: caffeine restricted (ie, baseline) and caffeine loading. The interval between the two PET scans was less than 3 months.

In both caffeine‐restricted and caffeine‐loading conditions, all patients were instructed to avoid consuming caffeine‐containing products such as coffee, tea, energy drinks, or chocolate from the evening before undergoing PET. We also instructed them not to withhold any antiparkinsonian drugs before the PET scan. On the day of the examination, all patients visited the PET center after taking breakfast and their antiparkinsonian drugs. In the caffeine‐restricted condition, the PET scan began at about 13:00 after blood samples were collected immediately before the injection of 11C‐preladenant. In the caffeine‐loading condition, each patient drank one can or two cans of coffee at about 12:15. The PET scan was then started at about 13:00 immediately after the collection of blood samples.

The collected blood samples were transferred to the Tsukuba Research Institute (BoZo Research Center, Tokyo, Japan), and serum caffeine levels were measured using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetics of caffeine have been established. 13 After oral administration of a single 250‐mg dose of caffeine, the peak plasma caffeine level reaches approximately 10 μg/mL in an hour, and the plasma elimination half‐lives (t1/2) range from 3 to 7 hours. Therefore, the 11C‐preladenant PET scan in the caffeine‐loading condition was performed approximately 45 minutes after coffee intake; as such, serum caffeine level reached a peak during PET scanning.

PET and Data Analysis

11C‐preladenant PET scanning and image processing were conducted basically as described previously.11, 12 In brief, after a bolus injection of approximately 500 MBq of 11C‐preladenant, emission data were acquired for 60 minutes. Binding potential (BPND) in the whole striatum was calculated to measure A2AR availability using the Simplified Reference Tissue Model, 14 after the cerebellum was set as a reference region. In addition, BPND maps were generated using the Simplified Reference Tissue Model 2. 15

The A2AR occupancy was calculated using the following equation: Occupancy (%) = 100 × [(BPND in caffeine restricted) − (BPND in caffeine loading)]/(BPND in caffeine restricted). The relationships between A2AR occupancy and serum caffeine levels (μg/mL) or dose of caffeine (mg) were modeled using the following equation: occupancy (%) = α × [D/(D + ED50)], where α refers to the maximal receptor occupancy, D refers to serum caffeine levels or dose of caffeine, and ED50 refers to the level resulting in 50% of maximal receptor occupancy.16, 17, 18 The two parameters, α and ED50, were estimated with a nonlinear regression analysis, using SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results

The serum caffeine levels and striatal BPND values are shown in Table 1. The mean serum caffeine level (μg/mL) was 0.374 in the caffeine‐restricted condition (n = 5) and increased to 4.48 and 8.92 in the low‐caffeine‐loading (129.5 mg: n = 3) and high‐caffeine‐loading (259 mg: n = 2) conditions, respectively. The mean A2AR occupancy rates in the low‐caffeine and high‐caffeine groups were 54.2% and 65.1%, respectively. The changes in the striatal BPND values after coffee intake are displayed in BPND maps (Fig. 1A–E).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Changes in binding potential (BPND) maps after caffeine intake in five patients with Parkinson's disease (AE) and the relationships between adenosine A2A receptor occupancy and serum caffeine levels (F) or caffeine dose (G). BPND maps of adenosine A2A availability in patients 1 (A), 2 (B), 3 (C), 4 (D), and 5 (E) are displayed on structural magnetic resonance imaging as follows: at baseline (A1, B1, C1, D1, and E1) and after intake of coffee containing 259 mg (A2 and B2) or 129.5 mg (C2, D2, and E1) of caffeine. The rainbow‐colored scale represents the magnitude of BPND values. Patients 1–5 correspond to the numbers of the five patients in Table 1. The dashed curve was modeled using the following equation: occupancy (%) = α × [D/(D + ED50)], where α refers to the maximal receptor occupancy, D refers to serum caffeine levels (F) or caffeine dose (G), and ED50 refers to the level resulting in 50% of maximal receptor occupancy. L, left; R, right. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The relationships between A2AR occupancy and serum caffeine levels or doses of caffeine are depicted (Fig. 1F,G). The two estimated parameters, maximal receptor occupancy and ED50, in the relationship between A2AR occupancy and serum caffeine levels were 81.1% (standard error [SE], 10.0%) and 2.2 μg/mL (SE, 1.0 μg/mL), respectively. The corresponding values in the relationship between A2AR occupancy and dose of caffeine were 81.3% (SE, 9.4%) and 64.7 mg (SE, 27.2 mg), respectively.

Discussion

This study found that the mean occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs by 129.5 and 259 mg of caffeine were 54.2% and 65.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, the corresponding rates after single administration of istradefylline 20 and 40 mg are 39.5% and 52.1%, respectively, 11 and those after long‐term administration of istradefylline 20 and 40 mg are 72.1% and 86.5%, respectively. 12 These findings suggest that striatal A2AR occupancy by caffeine after coffee intake is comparable with that by the administration of the approved dose of istradefylline (20–40 mg) and strongly support the hypothesis that a substantial amount of A2AR is occupied by caffeine after coffee intake.

Zhou et al. 19 assessed the suitability of 11C‐preladenant PET for the quantification of striatal A2ARs and calculated occupancy rates of striatal A2AR by caffeine in conscious monkeys. They demonstrated that occupancy rates after intravenous injections of caffeine at doses of 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg/kg were 64%, 74%, and 81%, respectively. Meanwhile, the average body weight of five patients in our study was 54 kg. Applying this mean value to 129.5 and 259 mg of caffeine, our results restated that occupancy rates of striatal A2ARs after administration of 2.4 and 4.8 mg/kg caffeine were 54.2% and 65.1%, respectively. Given the methodological differences, our results from human patients seem to agree well with those carried out by Zhou et al. 19 involving animals.

The ED50 values were estimated to be 2.2 μg/mL for serum caffeine levels and 64.7 mg for doses of caffeine. A cup of coffee generally contains approximately 100 mg of caffeine. Therefore, after drinking a cup of coffee (ie, intake of 100 mg of caffeine), serum caffeine level can exceed its ED50 value (ie, 2.2 μg/mL). According to the National Coffee Association, USA, the average American coffee drinker drinks about three cups per day, which is equivalent to approximately 300 mg of caffeine per day. Considering the ED50 (64.7 mg) and t1/2 (3–7 hours) of caffeine, it is quite possible that at least approximately 50% of striatal A2ARs is constantly blocked by caffeine in coffee drinkers. This estimated occupancy rate is novel and is an important finding to help understand the impact of caffeine on health and disease in coffee drinkers.4, 20

Recently, a randomized controlled trial reported that compared with administration of placebo, consumption of caffeine‐containing capsules 200 mg twice daily did not improve motor manifestations in PD. 21 This result appears to conflict with epidemiological links between coffee intake and lower PD risk.1, 2 One possible reason for this contradiction is that in the placebo group, daily intake of 92.17 ± 50.30 mg of caffeine was allowed during the trial. 21 Considering the ED50 (64.7 mg) and t1/2 (3–7 hours) of caffeine, 92.17 mg of caffeine can occupy a substantial amount of A2ARs, and it is possible that daily caffeine intake in the placebo group 21 might already exert some symptomatic effects in PD. Therefore, further studies are required to investigate the symptomatic effects of caffeine in patients with PD who have no or less caffeine consumption. In addition, this study recommends measuring blood caffeine concentration or at least avoiding the consumption of caffeine‐containing products when investigating human A2ARs.

In conclusion, this study shows that caffeine binds to striatal A2ARs in a dose‐dependent manner. A sufficient A2ARs occupancy can be obtained by drinking one cup of coffee, which is equivalent to approximately 100 mg of caffeine.

Author Roles

K. Ishibashi, and K. Ishii designed the study. K. Ishibashi, Y.M., K.W., J.T., K. Ishiwata, and K. Ishii obtained the data. K. Ishibashi carried out the data processing. K. Ishibashi, and K. Ishii interpreted the data. K. Ishibashi drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Financial Disclosures of All Authors (for the Preceding 12 Months)

Kenji Ishibashi: Nothing to report.

Yoshiharu Miura: Nothing to report.

Kei Wagatsuma: Nothing to report.

Jun Toyohara: Nothing to report.

Kiichi Ishiwata: Nothing to report.

Kenji Ishii: Nothing to report.

Acknowledgments

We thank the people of Research Team for Neuroimaging at the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology. This study was funded by Research Grant 2020 of All Japan Coffee Association (to K. Ishibashi).

Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.

Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Palacios N, Gao X, McCullough ML, et al. Caffeine and risk of Parkinson's disease in a large cohort of men and women. Mov Disord 2012;27(10):1276–1282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Hernan MA, Takkouche B, Caamano‐Isorna F, Gestal‐Otero JJ. A meta‐analysis of coffee drinking, cigarette smoking, and the risk of Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol 2002;52(3):276–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Froestl W, Muhs A, Pfeifer A. Cognitive enhancers (nootropics). Part 1: drugs interacting with receptors. Update 2014. J Alzheimer's Dis 2014;41(4):961–1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rivera‐Oliver M, Diaz‐Rios M. Using caffeine and other adenosine receptor antagonists and agonists as therapeutic tools against neurodegenerative diseases: a review. Life Sci 2014;101(1–2):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Svenningsson P, Hall H, Sedvall G, Fredholm BB. Distribution of adenosine receptors in the postmortem human brain: an extended autoradiographic study. Synapse 1997;27(4):322–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mori A. International review of neurobiology. Adenosine receptors in neurology and psychiatry.Preface. Int Rev Neurobiol 2014;119:xv–xvi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Pinna A, Serra M, Morelli M, Simola N. Role of adenosine A2A receptors in motor control: relevance to Parkinson's disease and dyskinesia. J Neural Transm 2018; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kase H, Aoyama S, Ichimura M, et al. Progress in pursuit of therapeutic A2A antagonists: the adenosine A2A receptor selective antagonist KW6002: research and development toward a novel nondopaminergic therapy for Parkinson's disease. Neurology 2003;61(11 Suppl 6):S97–S100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mizuno Y, Kondo T. Japanese Istradefylline study G. adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline reduces daily OFF time in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2013;28(8):1138–1141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen JF, Cunha RA. The belated US FDA approval of the adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline for treatment of Parkinson's disease. Purinergic Signal 2020;16(2):167–174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ishibashi K, Miura Y, Wagatsuma K, Toyohara J, Ishiwata K, Ishii K. Occupancy of adenosine A2A receptors by istradefylline in patients with Parkinson's disease using (11)C‐preladenant PET. Neuropharmacology 2018;143:106–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ishibashi K, Miura Y, Wagatsuma K, Toyohara J, Ishiwata K, Ishii K. Adenosine A2A receptor occupancy by long‐term Istradefylline Administration in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2021;36(1):268–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Nehlig A. Interindividual differences in caffeine metabolism and factors driving caffeine consumption. Pharmacol Rev 2018;70(2):384–411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage 1996;4(3 Pt 1):153–158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22(12):1440–1452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kapur S, Zipursky RB, Jones C, et al. The D2 receptor occupancy profile of loxapine determined using PET. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996;15(6):562–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Remington G, Mamo D, Labelle A, et al. A PET study evaluating dopamine D2 receptor occupancy for long‐acting injectable risperidone. Am J Psychiatry 2006;163(3):396–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ishikawa M, Ishiwata K, Ishii K, et al. High occupancy of sigma‐1 receptors in the human brain after single oral administration of fluvoxamine: a positron emission tomography study using [11C]SA4503. Biol Psychiatry 2007;62(8):878–883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Zhou X, Boellaard R, Ishiwata K, et al. In vivo evaluation of (11)C‐Preladenant for PET imaging of adenosine A2A receptors in the conscious monkey. J Nucl Med 2017;58(5):762–767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Nieber K. The impact of coffee on health. Planta Med 2017;83(16):1256–1263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Postuma RB, Anang J, Pelletier A, et al. Caffeine as symptomatic treatment for Parkinson disease (cafe‐PD): a randomized trial. Neurology 2017;89(17):1795–1803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Movement Disorders are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES