Abstract
The performance of commonly used assays for diagnosis of syphilis varies considerably depending on stage of infection and sample type. In response to the need for improved syphilis diagnostics, we develop assays that pair PCR pre-amplification of the tpp47 gene of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum with CRISPR-LwCas13a. The PCR-LwCas13a assay achieves an order of magnitude better analytical sensitivity than real-time PCR with equivalent specificity. When applied to a panel of 216 biological specimens, including 135 clinically confirmed primary and secondary syphilis samples, the PCR-LwCas13a assay demonstrates 93.3% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity, outperforming tpp47 real-time PCR and rabbit-infectivity testing. We further adapt this approach to distinguish Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum lineages and identify genetic markers of macrolide resistance. Our study demonstrates the potential of CRISPR-based approaches to improve diagnosis and epidemiological surveillance of syphilis.
Subject terms: Clinical microbiology, Infectious diseases, Epidemiology, CRISPR-Cas systems, Diagnosis
Clinical diagnosis of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum (TPA), the causative agent of syphilis, depends upon serological testing, which has reduced sensitivity for some stages of the disease. Accompanying methods to complement serological testing also have distinct limitations. In this work, authors develop an assay that combines PCR with CRISPR-LwCas13a, and demonstrate sensitivity and specificity on clinically confirmed syphilis samples.
Introduction
Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum (TPA) is the causative agent of syphilis, a resurgent sexually transmitted disease worldwide1,2. Syphilis can progress through multiple stages and present with a wide variety of clinical manifestations2. Laboratory testing is essential for syphilis diagnosis, but existing assays have limited clinical sensitivity, specificity, or both2–4. There is no single diagnostic test with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to identify all stages of disease3,4. Because neither TPA cultivation5 nor rabbit-infectivity testing6,7 to isolate TPA strains from patients can be done in routine clinical practice, clinical diagnosis currently relies upon serological testing2. Assays employing nontreponemal and treponemal serological tests show high sensitivity (95%) for secondary and later stages of syphilis8 but reduced sensitivity for primary syphilis4,9,10. Lifelong positivity of treponemal and nontreponemal tests (the ‘serofast’ state) further complicates the interpretation of serological results and response to syphilis treatment11–15.
Established methods for direct detection of TPA, such as darkfield microscopy (DFM)16, direct fluorescence antibody (DFA) testing17 and nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT)18,19, are often used to complement serological testing but have distinct limitations. DFM and DFA are heavily reliant upon the technologist’s expertize, and the performance of these methods and NAAT vary based on specimen type17–21. Though NAAT is well-established and accurate, the sensitivity of various NAAT assays ranges widely in different stages of disease and specimen types and is problematic for use in neurosyphilis22. For mucocutaneous lesion exudates, reported sensitivities of NAATs range from 75–95% in primary syphilis and 20–86% in secondary syphilis20. NAATs applied to whole blood reach sensitivities of only 13% in primary syphilis and 38–64% in secondary syphilis, respectively18,23. Given recent dramatic increases in the incidence of syphilis globally, the development of highly sensitive and specific TPA assays should be considered a priority.
Improved assays also are needed to clarify syphilis molecular epidemiology and disease pathogenesis24. The original and widely used treponemal typing system (CDC) could not distinguish between the dominant Nichols- and SS14-like clades until the addition of the tp0548 locus to the enhanced typing system (ECDC)25,26. However, newer multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and whole-genome sequencing approaches are providing insights into the genetic diversity of TPA strains circulating within hyper-endemic populations27–34. Azithromycin is an alternative antimicrobial for treatment of syphilis in persons with significant allergic reactions to penicillin G. However, the prevalence of TPA harboring mutations associated with resistance to macrolide antibiotics (A2058G and A2059G 23 S rRNA mutations) has increased rapidly, and these mutations are now fixed in many localities35–39. In the absence of robust in vitro cultivation systems for TPA strains in clinical samples, assessment of resistance relies upon molecular genotyping.
New technologies such as clustered, regularly interspaced palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based diagnostic assays provide exciting avenues to overcome current limitations of syphilis diagnostic tests40. Methodologies such as SHERLOCK, HOLMES, and DETECTR that leverage the highly sensitive and specific activity of CRISPR-Cas family proteins have now been applied to diagnose numerous organisms, e.g. SARS-CoV-241,42, Zika virus40,43, Dengue virus43,44, Plasmodium species45,46 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa47, and to distinguish single nucleotide variants (SNVs) for genotyping and drug-resistance monitoring40,43–45,48,49. In the present study, we developed and validated an assay for TPA that combines polymerase chain reaction (PCR) pre-amplification, CRISPR-RNA guided pairing and LwCas13a cleavage activity. This assay exhibits robust performance across different types of biological samples and improves sensitivity by an order of magnitude compared to PCR alone. We further adapted this approach for TPA lineage identification and macrolide resistance genotyping. Together, this suite of molecular assays demonstrates the potential of CRISPR-based approaches for improved diagnosis and epidemiologic surveillance for syphilis.
Results
Highly sensitive and specific detection of Treponema pallidum DNA by PCR-LwCas13a
We developed a TPA DNA diagnostic assay by pairing PCR and CRISPR-LwCas13a detection; the latter is based on cleavage of an RNA reporter following RNA-guided (crRNA) target recognition. In brief, nucleic acids are extracted from a clinical sample, and the target gene is amplified by PCR including one primer tagged with a T7 promotor sequence. PCR products then are detected in a reaction mixture containing T7 RNA polymerase, LwCas13a, a target-specific crRNA, and an RNA reporter that fluoresces when cleaved (Fig. 1). The TPA 47 kDa lipoprotein (tpp47/tp0574) and DNA polymerase I (polA/tp1021) genes, the two most common targets for PCR detection of TPA, exhibit negligible differences in detection efficiency20,50. We selected tpp47 as the target of the PCR-LwCas13a assay because, in our hands, it produced a higher level of fluorescence signal compared to polA (Fig. S1).
To evaluate the analytical sensitivity of the assay, we synthesized and purified double-stranded DNA containing tpp47 for a dilution series in which mock clinical samples contained 1 ng human DNA (to simulate human DNA background in clinical samples). The concentrations of diluted aliquots were confirmed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) (Fig. S2). The PCR-LwCas13a assay detected all replicates with >100 copies of tpp47 per reaction, equivalent to an analytical sensitivity of approximately 1 spirochete/reaction, one order of magnitude more sensitive than TaqMan PCR for tpp47 (Fig. 2a). We compared our assay to SHERLOCK, another sensitive CRISPR-based diagnostic that combines isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and CRISPR-LwCas13a detection40,42,43,45. We found the performance of SHERLOCK for TPA tpp47 detection to be inferior to that of PCR-LwCas13a assay. The PCR-LwCas13a assay achieved an order of magnitude better analytical sensitivity than SHERLOCK (single-copy versus 10 copies/reaction, respectively) (Fig. 2a and S3a) determined by comparison of both methods using serially diluted clinical samples and a small sample set (Fig. S3b and Supplementary Table 1). The PCR-LwCas13a assay also exhibited higher sensitivity than tpp47-based nested PCR for 30 whole blood samples (83% vs 63%; see Supplementary Table 2).
The analytical specificity of the PCR-LwCas13a assay was validated by testing a panel of 10 genital microorganisms (Herpes simplex virus−1, Herpes simplex virus−2, Candida albicans, Trichomonas vaginalis, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Mycoplasma humanum, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis) at high DNA concentrations (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 3). The PCR-LwCas13a assay can be optimized for rapid performance. As shown in Fig. S4, the assay could detect all serial dilutions of tpp47 dsDNA within a 75 min reaction time (60 min pre-PCR pairing with 15 min LwCas13a). We observed a correlation (R2 = 0.897) of copy numbers of TPA tpp47 synthetic dsDNA with detected fluorescence under 15 min LwCas13a detection (Fig. S5), suggesting the potential of the PCR-LwCas13a assay for DNA quantitation.
Robust performance of the PCR-LwCas13a assay for detection of Treponema pallidum in clinical specimens
To determine the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the PCR-LwCas13a assay, we collected 216 clinical specimens as shown in Fig. 2c. For evaluation of clinical sensitivity, we examined 135 syphilis specimens with known infection status based on clinical diagnosis and serological results (Supplementary Table 4). For comparison, the tpp47 PCR-LwCas13a assay and TaqMan PCR were conducted in parallel. The overall sensitivities for TPA detection were 93.33% (95% CI: 87.72–96.91%) for the PCR-LwCas13a assay and 70.37% (95% CI: 61.91–77.92%) for TaqMan PCR. Among different specimen types, the PCR-LwCas13a assay exhibited greater sensitivity than TaqMan PCR in whole blood from patients with primary (PS, 71.42% vs. 28.57%) and secondary syphilis (SS, 87.71% vs. 45.61%), skin biopsies from SS (100% vs. 97.14%), and genital swabs from PS (100% vs. 91.67%). Notably, the sensitivity of PCR-LwCas13a assay for whole blood was substantially greater than TaqMan PCR (Fig. 2d).
To determine the clinical specificity of the PCR-LwCas13a assay, we examined 81 non-syphilis samples, including 47 whole blood, 11 skin biopsies and 23 genital swabs. Since the differential diagnosis of genital chancres often includes HSV-2, the 23 genital swabs were all from HSV-2 infected patients based on clinical diagnosis and laboratory test results. Specificities of 100% (95% CI: 94.9–100.0%) were observed for both PCR-LwCas13a assay and TaqMan PCR against all three specimen types (Fig. 2d).
Rabbit-infectivity testing (RIT) has long been considered the gold standard for direct detection of TPA, but it cannot be used routinely in clinical settings due to its high cost and requirement for specialized facilities and experienced personnel6,7. To further evaluate the performance of the PCR-LwCas13a assay, we compared it to Taqman PCR and RIT for 41 of the above-described specimens (32 whole blood from secondary syphilis and 9 chancre exudates) (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Table 4). The PCR-LwCas13a assay, RIT and TaqMan PCR exhibited total sensitivities of 87.80%, 85.36% and 60.98%, respectively. The PCR-LwCas13a and TaqMan PCR assays exhibited sensitivities of 100% for chancre exudates compared to 77.78% for RIT. For whole blood, PCR-LwCas13a assay exhibited similar sensitivity to RIT (84.37% vs. 87.50%), while TaqMan PCR was far less sensitive (50.00%) (Fig. 2f). The comparable sensitivity of PCR-LwCas13a to RIT, coupled with its superiority over conventional TaqMan PCR, demonstrates its potential utility in a clinical setting.
Adapting PCR-LwCas13a for identification of Treponema pallidum lineage
TPA strains circulating worldwide have been divided into SS14 and Nichols lineages based on multi-locus analysis and genomic sequences31,32,34,51. Currently, TPA genotyping relies on sequence-based approaches27,28,52. We next adapted our PCR-LwCas13a assay for genotyping of TPA. Briefly, to enable the PCR-LwCas13a assay to distinguish the two major TPA clades, we designed two distinct crRNAs targeting a variant region in tp0548, a locus widely used for ECDC and MLST genotyping of TPA strains (Fig. 3a and S6a)26,27,51. As shown in Fig. 3b–d, each genotyping crRNA successfully identified the corresponding TPA clade without any cross-reactivity. In dilution series using synthesized tp0548 DNA for the Nichols and SS14 strains, the assay yielded genotyping data for samples containing as few as 10 copies per reaction (Fig. 3e). To validate this genotyping assay, we compared the traditional molecular typing approach (PCR followed by Sanger sequencing) with the PCR-LwCas13a assay using DNA extracted from ten skin biopsy samples and their corresponding rabbit-passaged isolates (twenty total samples). Results of the PCR-LwCas13a genotyping assay matched the Sanger sequencing clade assignments for all SS14 and Nichols clade samples tested (Fig. 3f), thereby confirming that the PCR-LwCas13a assay is capable of TPA genotyping. When applied to a larger set of 33 tpp47-positive clinical samples, the PCR-LwCas13a assay successfully identified TPA lineages for 32, a sensitivity of 96.97% (Fig. 3g).
Adapting the PCR-LwCas13a assay for macrolide resistance genotyping of T. pallidum strains
To adapt the PCR-LwCas13a assay for identification of 23S rRNA mutations associated with azithromycin resistance35–39, we first screened crRNAs targeting the 23 S rRNA gene to differentiate wildtype and mutant strains based on their collateral cleavage activities and specificity ratios (Fig. 4a and S7a); we selected the 26 nt-long crRNA#2 for further testing (Fig. S7a–c).
The analytical sensitivity of PCR-LwCas13a assay for 23 S rRNA mutation identification was evaluated by a dilution series of 23 S rRNA dsDNA (A2058G mutation). The assay detected all replicates with greater than an estimated 7.22 × 101 copies/reaction of 23 S rRNA dsDNA (A2058G mutation) (Fig. 4b). The analytical specificity of PCR-LwCas13a assay was validated using DNAs from azithromycin-sensitive TPA, TPA with known azithromycin resistance, and a panel of genital microorganisms (Supplementary Table 3). We observed collateral cleavage activity only for the 23 S rRNA mutations (A2058G and A2059G) (Fig. 4c). To further validate these results, we tested ten clinical specimens by Sanger sequencing and the PCR-LwCas13a assay in parallel; synthesized wildtype 23 S rRNA dsDNA was included as a negative control. The PCR-LwCas13a assay accurately identified the 23 S rRNA mutations from clinical samples, matching the results obtained by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 4d).
Discussion
Improved diagnostics are critical for efforts to address the alarming global increase in syphilis incidence, including adverse outcomes of pregnancy, seen during the past 20 years1,2. Herein, we describe a suite of direct detection assays for TPA that combine PCR pre-amplification and LwCas13a-based detection to improve sensitivity by an order of magnitude compared to real-time PCR alone using tpp47 as the target gene. We validated these assays using a large bank of 216 clinical samples recently collected from subjects with known infection status and from diverse anatomical sites. We further demonstrated their utility for TPA detection, lineage identification, and detection of azithromycin-resistance.
The reduced sensitivity of serological assays for primary syphilis, along with the complicated interpretation of serological testing for diagnosis and response to treatment, underscore the need for improved methods for direct detection of TPA. A recent report demonstrating high loads of TPA DNA in the saliva of syphilis patients that is reduced following treatment further highlights the potential utility of direct detection53,54. The limited sensitivity and specificity of currently available methods for direct detection of TPA precludes use of a single method for all specimen types. DFM lacks specificity in oral lesions or saliva, because it fails to distinguish TPA from T. denticola and other oral treponemes3. Real-time PCR also loses sensitivity when applied to whole blood18,20,23. In the present study, the sensitivity of our PCR-LwCas13a assay targeting TPA tpp47 across our testing sample set exceeded the performance of real-time PCR and nested PCR. The major difference between the PCR-LwCas13a assay and other PCR-based methods is cleavage of RNA reporters by the collateral activity of LwCas13a, which enhances fluorescent signal and improves sensitivity. Although a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay recently was developed for rapid diagnostic of TPA55, the reported limits of detection of LAMP (100 copies/reaction) are well below that demonstrated herein for PCR-LwCas13a assay (single-copy/reaction). Compared to other NAATs, PCR-LwCas13a assay is cheaper than SHERLOCK and LAMP and only slightly more expensive than our in-house TaqMan PCR (Supplementary Table 5), suggesting cost-effectiveness for syphilis diagnosis in the future. RIT is considered the gold standard for direct detection, with a sensitivity of 23 spirochetes56 but is rarely performed because of technical complexity and high cost. Our PCR-LwCa13a assay achieved greater sensitivity than RIT in a clinical setting.
Nontreponemal test titers are widely used to evaluate the response to syphilis treatment. However, about 20% of patients become ‘serofast’ after therapy without clear evidence of treatment failure11–15, e.g., nontreponemal antibody titers that do not completely revert to nonreactive after therapy despite an initial 4-fold decrease. The PCR-LwCas13a assay was far more sensitive than real-time PCR23 and nested PCR18 when applied to whole blood. To our knowledge, the PCR-LwCas13a assay is the most sensitive direct assay for detection of TPA DNA in whole blood reported to date. As such, the improved sensitivity of our PCR-LwCas13a assay for whole blood could aid interpretation of infection status when a ‘serofast’ state caused by low TPA burden is suspected. The quantitative potential of PCR-LwCas13a assay could be beneficial for treatment follow-up, however, further investigation is still required to optimize this assay.
We further leveraged LwCas13a’s high specificity to genotype TPA strains without the need for costly and time-consuming sequencing approaches. The ability to assign a clinical isolate to the Nichols- or SS14-like clade using PCR-LwCas13a could enhance surveillance and, more importantly, serves as proof-of-concept that evaluation of other phylogenetically informative loci with this assay is feasible. Because of multiple mismatches in the crRNAs for the tp0548 sequences compared to the closely related pathogenic treponemes responsible for bejel and yaws, Treponema pallidum subsp. endemicum (TEN) and Treponema pallidum subsp. pertenue (TPE) (Fig. S6b), respectively, the genotyping assay is expected to have robust specificity for TPA. Recombination events have been documented to occur in the tp0548 locus of T. pallidum subspecies57,58. These recombination events might negatively impact the ability of the PCR-LwCas13a assay to distinguish clades in rare cases. However, with two distinct crRNAs (one specific for the SS14 clade and the other specific for the Nichols clade), the genotyping assay is not expected to misidentify clades. In the case of a TPA strain with TEN recombination at the tp0548 locus, we would be left with an indeterminate result (negative by SS14- and Nichols-specific PCR-LwCas13a assays) that could trigger additional investigation by sequencing. While the genotyping crRNAs were designed by screening the sequences from published TPA, TPE, and TEN strains, more rigorous validation with diverse clinical samples (including bejel) is needed to determine the role of PCR-LwCas13a for distinguishing T. pallidum subspecies. Our macrolide-resistance mutation assay provides an alternative to sequencing-based approaches that have limited utility in routine clinical practice due to slow turnaround times. Persons with significant allergic reaction to penicillin G require an alternative treatment for syphilis. While high prevalence of A2058G and A2059G 23 S rRNA mutations is established in many developed countries27,28,36–38, recent reports of low prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such as Madagascar, Malawi, and Colombia, indicates preserved macrolide susceptibility in some locations29. Therefore, developing a rapid macrolide resistance genotyping method for syphilis, especially for pregnant women in LMICs, will be helpful. Our tp0548 and 23 S rRNA genotyping assays provided results in 75–240 mins, with longer duration for samples expected to have low TPA burdens, that matched confirmatory Sanger sequencing.
Our approach has several limitations. First, the PCR-LwCas13a assay cannot be performed in a single reaction tube in its current form because the PCR and LwCas13a reactions require different temperatures. Second, our PCR-LwCas13a genotyping assays for lineage identification and drug-resistance assessment are less sensitive than our TPA detection assay. The latter successfully detected TPA tpp47 target at an estimated single-molecule level. These losses in sensitivity are not unexpected because SNV-detection relies upon mismatch-designed crRNA selected from a restricted number of candidate crRNAs. Third, we did not evaluate the performance of our assays on some stages of syphilis (e.g., very early stage, latent, congenital syphilis or neurosyphilis). However, the large validation set of well-characterized and recently collected samples, including a subset subjected to RIT, provides a rare opportunity to evaluate assay performance across commonly collected clinical sample types. Fourth, the PCR-LwCas13a assay (75–240 min) takes more time than LAMP (15 min) and conventional qPCR (100 min). Despite the longer reaction time, our PCR-LwCas13a assay provides higher sensitivity and specificity than other NAATs for TPA diagnosis in clinical settings. Admittedly, the PCR-LwCas13a assay is more complicated than conventional PCR and, therefore, is not yet ready for routine clinical usage. However, towards this end, recently developed handheld detectors that combine microfluidics and PCR can achieve amplification and analysis of a target in 7.5–25 min59,60. These promising results raise the possibility that the PCR-LwCas13a assay will be utilized for point-of-care molecular diagnostics in the future. Due to the lack of a commercial PCR assay for detection of TPA, in-house qPCR was employed for comparison in the present study.
In conclusion, we developed a suite of PCR-LwCas13a syphilis assays with excellent sensitivity and specificity across multiple types of syphilis specimens. These assays have potential to overcome limitations of existing assays for TPA detection and offer a promising alternative to sequencing-based methods for molecular surveillance and drug-resistance genotyping.
Methods
Ethics statement and subjects
This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee at Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University (GDDHLS-20181202[2 R], 2020056, 2021071). Patients were selected using a hospital-based convenience sampling approach. Eligible patients who visited the Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University were invited to participate from 2019 to 2021. The diagnosis of syphilis was made according to the guidelines of the STD Association, China Centers for Disease Control61. Primary syphilis cases with positive darkfield microscopy (DFM) tests and secondary syphilis cases with characteristic rashes and positive serological results (toluidine red unheated serum test [TRUST] and Treponema pallidum particle agglutination [TPPA]/treponemal chemiluminescence immunoassay [CIA]) were enrolled (Supplementary Table 4). Healthy volunteers were invited to join as negative controls; the negative serological status for syphilis of healthy volunteers was confirmed by CIA. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Following collection of research specimens, patients were treated according to the guidelines of the STD Association, China Centers for Disease Control (guidelines did not recommend azithromycin for any enrolled subjects)61.
Acquisition and processing of clinical samples
Sterile polyester swabs (Hcy technology, Shenzhen, China; CY-98000) were used to collect genital ulcer exudates from 36 primary syphilis cases (all positive by DFM) and 23 HSV-2 infected patients (clinical diagnosis and laboratory test confirmed), then placed into 250 μL of DNA/RNA Shield buffer (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA; R1100–250) at −20 °C until DNA extraction per below. If RIT was conducted, two ulcer swabs were collected; the first was eluted into 1 mL TpCM-2 medium as previously described by Edmondson et al.5 for RIT7, and the second swab was placed in 250 μL of DNA/RNA Shield buffer and stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction. Thirty-five biopsies from secondary syphilis patients were collected by 4 mm punch and stored in 250 μL of DNA/RNA Shield buffer at −20 °C until DNA extraction. Eleven extracted DNAs of discarded surgical skin tissues from non-syphilis patients were set up as the non-syphilis-infected skin controls. Whole blood was collected by venipuncture from 64 syphilis patients and 47 volunteers, and 100 μL of whole blood was used for DNA extraction. RIT method for whole blood was described below. DNAs were extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany; 69506) according to the manufacturer’s instructions; 100 μL of nuclease-free water was used to elute the DNA, followed by −80 °C storage until use. The DNAs from 10 genital microorganisms (Supplementary Table 3) were used to assess the specificity of the PCR-LwCas13a assay.
Double-stranded DNA template preparation
The dsDNA templates (tpp47 and 23 S rRNA) were amplified by using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; M0492S). A total of 25 μL reaction volume included 1.25 μL of 10 μM tpp47-dsDNA or tp0548-dsDNA or 23 S rRNA-dsDNA primers (Supplementary Table 6), 0.5 μL of 10 mM dNTP Mix, 0.25 μL of DNA polymerase, 1 μL of TPA gDNA extracted from rabbit-passaged Nichols or azithromycin-resistant clinical strains, and 20.75 μL of Invitrogen™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 10977015). PCR was performed with the following conditions: 98 °C 30 s, and 40 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 62 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. 1.5% agarose gel was used to identify and purify the dsDNA template, and the target dsDNA was extracted by Universal DNA purification kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China; DP214-03) according to the manufacture’s instruction. The purified dsDNA was quantified by Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Q33230). The Nichols and SS14 tp0548 dsDNAs were synthesized according to Nichols (GenBank ID: CP004010.2) and SS14 (GenBank ID: CP004011.1) reference genome. The series diluted aliquots of tpp47, tp0548 and 23 S rRNA dsDNA contained 1 ng/μL human DNA (extracted from HeLa cell line, CCDCC, Wuhan, China; GDC0009) to simulate human background in clinical samples.
Determination of DNA concentration by digital droplet PCR
The concentrations of series diluted aliquots of dsDNA (tpp47) and 10 genital microorganisms DNA were evaluated by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)62. Briefly, the ddPCR was performed using 20 μL of total reaction: 10 μL ddPCR Supermix for Probes (No dUTP) (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA;186–3023), 0.9 μL of 10 μM tpp47 primers (Supplementary Table 6), 0.5 μL of 10 μM probes, 1 μL of DNA template and 6.7 μL of Invitrogen™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 10977015), followed by carrying on Droplet Digital PCR System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA; QX200) for generating droplets, sealing, PCR procedure with 95 °C 10 min, 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The ddPCR primers used in this study are available in Supplementary Table 6.
Expression and purification of LwCas13a
Expression and purification of LwCas13a were carried out according to the protocol developed by the Kellner et al.63 with some modifications. LwCas13a plasmids (NovoPro Bioscience, Shanghai, China; V010159) were transformed into Rosetta (DE3) competent cells (Tiangen, Beijing, China; CB108) and incubated at 37 °C, 5% CO2 for 16 h on LB Broth agar plate (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China; A507003) which contained 50 μg/ml Ampicillin (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China; A100339). Competent cells containing LwCas13a plasmids were grown at LB Broth media (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China; A507002) with 37 °C and 220 RPM until the value of OD600 reached 0.6. Isopropylthio-β-galactoside (IPTG; Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China; B541007) was added to media at 0.5 mM final concentration to induce protein expression for 4 h. Cells were then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 1 min at 4 °C, and cell pellets were harvested and stored at −80 °C for further purification.
Protein purification was performed on ice. Cell pellets were resuspended and supplemented with protease inhibitors, lysozyme (1 mg/ml), and benzonase (5 μg/ml) followed by ultrasonic processor for crushing and purified with a His-tag Protein Purification Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China; P2226). Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Devices (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany; UFC805096) were used to exchange the protein elution buffer with SUMO digestion buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.2% NP-40, pH8.0) and LwCas13a protein was incubated at 25 °C for 3 h with SUMO protease (Novoprotein, Suzhou, China; PE007-01A). Following exchange of the SUMO digestion buffer with protein storage buffer (50 mM Tris, 600 mM NaCl, 5% Glycerol, 2 mM DTT, pH 7.5), the purified LwCas13a were stored at −80 °C for future use. All steps were analyzed and confirmed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China; C510041). The concentration of protein was quantified by BCA Protein Assay Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China; P0012S).
Preparation of crRNAs
To prepare crRNAs, oligonucleotides with an appended T7 promoter sequence, spacers (complementary to target RNA), and a crRNA core sequence (for binding to LwCas13a) were designed using SnapGene (v4.1.9) and synthesized by Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China. Synthesized single-strand DNA (100 μM) was annealed to a short T7 primer (100 μM) previously described by Cunningham et al. and incubated at 37 °C overnight using the HiScribe T7 Quick High Yield RNA Synthesis kit (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; E2050S) to yield crRNA45. crRNAs were purified using RNAXP clean beads (Beckman, Brea, CA; A63987) with a 1.5x ratio of beads to reaction volume with manufacturer’s instructions and quantified by Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; Q32852). crRNAs were stored at −20 °C until use. All crRNAs used in this study are shown in Supplementary Table 6.
PCR-LwCas13a assay
All PCR-LwCas13a primers used in this study are available in Supplementary Table 6. Primers (tpp47-T7, tp0548-T7, and 23 S rRNA-T7) for PCR were designed using SnapGene (v4.1.9) and NCBI BLAST; for subsequent transcription, a T7 promoter was appended to the forward primer (Supplementary Table 6). Q5 High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; M0491) was used to amplify all samples in the PCR step of PCR-LwCas13a assay. The reaction mixture (25 μL total volume) consisted of 1.25 μL of 10 μM primers, 0.5 μL of 10 mM dNTP Mix, 0.25 μL of DNA polymerase, variable volumes of input DNA, and variable volumes of nuclease-free water. PCR was performed using the following conditions: 98 °C 30 s, and 40 cycles for 98 °C 10 s, 60 °C 20 s, 72 °C 30 s. The input volume of DNA in the PCR-LwCas13a assay was 1 μL/reaction, except for whole blood samples (1.67 μL/reaction). 1.25 μL of PCR product was transferred to LwCas13a detection.
The LwCas13a reaction contains 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 9 mM MgCl2, 1 mM rNTPs (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; N0466L), 2000 U/ml Murine RNase inhibitor (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; M0314L), 1500 U/ml T7 RNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, MA, USA; M0251L), 225 nM crRNA, 45 nM purified LwCas13a and 125 nM collateral RNA reporter synthesized by Sangon biotech (5'/6-FAM-UUUUU-BHQ1/3') or RNaseAlert substrate (Integrated DNA Technologies, IDT, Coralville, IA, USA; 11-04-02-03). Synthesized RNA reporters were used in most experiments, except for the crRNA screen used in TPA 23 S rRNA mutation detection which used the IDT RNaseAlert substrate (Fig. S4). The reaction mixture was allowed to incubate for 3 h (except where indicated) at 37 °C on 96 Well Half-Area Microplate (Corning, NY, USA; CLS3694-100EA) with fluorescent kinetics measured at Ex/Em = 490 nm/520 nm every 5 min. RNA reporters are described in Supplementary Table 6. Three replicates were conducted for all PCR-LwCas13a assays.
TaqMan PCR
TaqMan PCR was performed to compare with the PCR-LwCas13a assay in the detection of tpp47 with different specimen sources. Primers and probes for tpp47 are available in Supplementary Table 6 and synthesized by Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China. The TaqMan PCR was performed using a total 25 μL reaction, including 12.5 μL of TaqMan Gene Expression Master (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 4369016), 1.25 μL of 10 μM primers, 2 μL of 10 μM probe, 2 μL of 25 mM MgCl2, DNA template and Invitrogen™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 10977015), and measured on Real-Time PCR Instruments (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA; CFX96) with following PCR procedure: 95 °C 10 min, 45 cycles for 95 °C 15 s and 60 °C 1 min. The input volume of DNA of TaqMan PCR in this study is 1 μL/reaction, except for the whole blood samples (1.67 μL/reaction). Three replicates were conducted for all TaqMan PCR.
SHERLOCK
RPA primers and crRNA for tpp47 are available in Supplementary Table 6. The SHERLOCK was performed as described by Cunningham et al.45. Briefly, TwistAmp Basic (TwistDx, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK) was used to amplify all samples in the RPA step of the SHERLOCK assay. The reaction mixture (25 μL total volume) consisted of 1.2 μL of 10 μM primers, 14.75 μL of rehydration buffer,1.25 μL of magnesium acetate, DNA template and Invitrogen™ DNase/RNase-Free Distilled Water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 10977015). The input volume of DNA in this study is 1 μL/reaction, except for the whole blood samples (1.67 μL/reaction). RPA was performed at 37 °C for 2 h. 1.25 μL of RPA product was transferred to LwCas13a detection. The LwCas13a detection was performed using a fluorescence microplate reader during 3 h of incubation as described above.
Nested PCR for tpp47
Nested PCR primers for tpp47 are available in Supplementary Table 6. Nested PCR was performed to compare with the PCR-LwCas13a assay in the detection of 30 whole blood samples. The reaction mixture (25 μL total volume) consisted of 0.5 μL of 10 μM primers, 0.5 μL of 10 mM dNTP Mix, 0.25 μL of DNA polymerase, 1.67 μL of DNA extracted from whole blood samples. The nested PCR amplification conditions were described by Grange et al.18 and slightly modified as follows: 98 °C 3 min, 20 cycles (for first-round PCR) and 35 cycles (for second-round PCR) of 98 °C 1 min, 68 °C 30 s, and 72 °C 2 min followed by extension at 72 °C 10 min. The finial PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.7% agarose gel as previously described18. Three replicates were conducted.
Rabbit-infectivity testing
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of South China Agricultural University (2020c004) and conducted following the regulations of the institution. TPA strains were isolated by intratesticular inoculation of adult New Zealand White rabbits (male, 3 months of age, 2.5–3 kg) as previously described7. Briefly, each rabbit was tested for evidence of infection with TPA or Treponema paraluiscuniculi infection with TPPA before inclusion in this study. 1 mL of whole blood collected from a secondary syphilis patient or genital ulcer exudate diluted in 1 mL of TpCM-2 medium was injected into both testes of a rabbit housed at 18 °C. The rabbit’s serologic status was monitored weekly by TPPA beginning with the second month after inoculation. Seropositive rabbits were sacrificed, and their testes were aseptically removed for TPA isolation. The RIT result was further confirmed by observing motile TPA in the testicular fluid under DFM. Genomic DNAs of isolated TPA strains were extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany; 69506). Seronegative rabbits were euthanized after 3 months of inoculation, followed by passaging the testicular fluid to a second rabbit. The continued passages for seronegative rabbits were conducted twice at most.
Sanger sequencing and phylogenetic tree
TPA 23 S rRNA and tp0548 genes were amplified by nested PCR using primers (23 S rRNA-external, 23 S rRNA-internal, tp0548-external and tp0548-internal) (Supplementary Table 6) and sequenced by the Sanger as previously described27. A phylogenetic tree for tp0548 sequences was generated using MEGA-X software (version 10.0.5) with the default parameters: Maximum Likelihood algorithm, Tamura-Nei model, and 1,000 bootstrapped replicates.
Statistical analysis
Means and standard deviations were calculated by Prism 8 software (GraphPad, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Mean differences in quantification were determined by Student’s t-test. All statistical tests are two-sided, and samples with p-values < 0.05 are highlighted. Specimens were not all randomized, and experimenters were not blinded in conducting these experiments.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (A2018264 and B2019022 to W.C.), Guangdong Science and Technology Department (2017A020212008 to H.Z.), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772240 to B.Y., 82072321 to W.K.). The study was also partially supported by the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI144177 to J.D.R. and R21AI148579 to J.B.P.). We thank Dr. Dongling Li from Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University for providing DNA stocks of genital microorganisms, Dr. Dingheng Zhu from Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University for assistance with the collection of non-syphilis skin control, Ms. Feifei Zhang, Ms. Daxiang Chen, Dr. Yaohua Xue, Dr. Rui Yue and Dr. Xiaomian Lin from Dermatology Hospital of Southern Medical University for assistance with patient recruitment and sample collection.
Author contributions
H.Z. and B.Y. conceived the study. H.Z., B.Y., W.C., H.L., J.B.P., C.H.C., K.L.H. and J.D.R. designed the experiments. J.B.P. and C.H.C. provided experience with Cas13a-based diagnostic development and designed prototype experiments with W.C. and H.Z. W.C. and H.L. performed most of the experiments, data analysis, and data visualization. L.Z. and Y.P. performed DNA preparation, LwCas13a protein expression, and purification. Patient recruitment, sample collection, and the following care were carried out by W.K., L.Z., Y.P., W.C., J.Y., Y.J. and J.O., Y.J. performed RIT. W.C. and H.L. wrote the draft manuscript. W.C., H.L., L.Z., Y.P., J.B.P., Y.J., C.H.C., K.L.H., J.D.R., W.K., J.O., J.Y., B.Y., and H.Z. contributed to editing of the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks other anonymous reviewer(s) to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplementary information files. DNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession code ON776877.1-ON776886.1 and ON843723.1-ON843742.1. Nichols and SS14 reference genome were available in the GenBank database under accession code CP004010.2 and CP004011.1. Source data are provided with the paper.
Competing interests
J.B.P reports non-financial support from Abbott Diagnostics, grant support from Gilead Sciences and the World Health Organization, and an honorarium from Virology Education, all outside the scope of the current manuscript. J.D.R has licensing agreements with Biokit SA and ChemBio for recombinant TPA proteins for serodiagnosis of syphilis. All other authors declare no interest of conflicts.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Wentao Chen, Hao Luo.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Jonathan B. Parr, Kelly L. Hawley, Justin D. Radolf, Bin Yang, Heping Zheng.
Contributor Information
Bin Yang, Email: yangbin1@smu.edu.cn.
Heping Zheng, Email: zhengheping@smu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-32250-y.
References
- 1.Chen ZQ, et al. Syphilis in china: Results of a national surveillance programme. Lancet. 2007;369:132–138. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60074-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Peeling RW, et al. Syphilis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017;3:17073. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin. Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:1–21. doi: 10.1128/CMR.8.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Park IU, Tran A, Pereira L, Fakile Y. Sensitivity and specificity of treponemal-specific tests for the diagnosis of syphilis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:S13–S20. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Edmondson DG, Hu B, Norris SJ. Long-term in vitro culture of the syphilis spirochete Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum. mBio9, e01153–1818 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 6.Turner TB, Hardy PH, Newman B. Infectivity tests in syphilis. Br. J. Vener. Dis. 1969;45:183–195. doi: 10.1136/sti.45.3.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lukehart SA, Marra CM. Isolation and laboratory maintenance of Treponema pallidum. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol Chapter 12. 2007;12A:11. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc12a01s7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sena AC, White BL, Sparling PF. Novel Treponema pallidum serologic tests: A paradigm shift in syphilis screening for the 21st century. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;51:700–708. doi: 10.1086/655832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Creegan L, et al. An evaluation of the relative sensitivities of the venereal disease research laboratory test and the Treponema pallidum particle agglutination test among patients diagnosed with primary syphilis. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2007;34:1016–1018. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181124473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gratzer B, Pohl D, Hotton AL. Evaluation of diagnostic serological results in cases of suspected primary syphilis infection. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2014;41:285–289. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clement ME, Okeke NL, Hicks CB. Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312:1905–1917. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang ZS, Liu XK, Li J. Serological response to therapy following retreatment of serofast early syphilis patients with benzathine penicillin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:1348–1351. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang X, et al. Outcomes from re-treatment and cerebrospinal fluid analyses in patients with syphilis who had serological nonresponse or lack of seroreversion after initial therapy. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2021;48:443–450. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sena AC, et al. A systematic review of syphilis serological treatment outcomes in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected persons: Rethinking the significance of serological non-responsiveness and the serofast state after therapy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015;15:479. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1209-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sena AC, et al. Predictors of serological cure and serofast state after treatment in HIV-negative persons with early syphilis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011;53:1092–1099. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Garson, W. Darkfield microscopy for the detection and identification of Treponema pallidum. (US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, 1962).
- 17.Romanowski B, et al. Detection of Treponema pallidum by a fluorescent monoclonal antibody test. Sex. Transm. Dis. 1987;14:156–159. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198707000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Grange PA, et al. Evaluation of a pcr test for detection of Treponema pallidum in swabs and blood. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:546–552. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00702-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zoechling N, Schluepen EM, Soyer HP, Kerl H, Volkenandt M. Molecular detection of Treponema pallidum in secondary and tertiary syphilis. Br. J. Dermatol. 1997;136:683–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1997.tb03652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Theel ES, Katz SS, Pillay A. Molecular and direct detection tests for Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum: A review of the literature, 1964-2017. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:S4–S12. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buffet M, et al. Diagnosing Treponema pallidum in secondary syphilis by PCR and immunohistochemistry. J. Invest Dermatol. 2007;127:2345–2350. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Janier M, et al. 2014 european guideline on the management of syphilis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:1581–1593. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cruz AR, et al. Secondary syphilis in cali, colombia: new concepts in disease pathogenesis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010;4:e690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ho EL, Lukehart SA. Syphilis: Using modern approaches to understand an old disease. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:4584–4592. doi: 10.1172/JCI57173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pillay A, et al. Molecular subtyping of Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum. Sex. Transm. Dis. 1998;25:408–414. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199809000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marra C, et al. Enhanced molecular typing of Treponema pallidum: geographical distribution of strain types and association with neurosyphilis. J. Infect. Dis. 2010;202:1380–1388. doi: 10.1086/656533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Grillova L, et al. Molecular characterization of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum in switzerland and france with a new multilocus sequence typing scheme. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0200773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen W, et al. Analysis of Treponema pallidum strains from china using improved methods for whole-genome sequencing from primary syphilis chancres. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;223:848–853. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nindo F, et al. O20.4 evaluation of global Treponema pallidum genetic diversity using representative sampling and high-throughput genomic analysis. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2021;97:A63–A64. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pinto M, et al. Genome-scale analysis of the non-cultivable Treponema pallidum reveals extensive within-patient genetic variation. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;2:16190. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Arora N, et al. Origin of modern syphilis and emergence of a pandemic Treponema pallidum cluster. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;2:16245. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Beale MA, et al. Genomic epidemiology of syphilis reveals independent emergence of macrolide resistance across multiple circulating lineages. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:3255. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11216-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Grillova L, et al. Directly sequenced genomes of contemporary strains of syphilis reveal recombination-driven diversity in genes encoding predicted surface-exposed antigens. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1691. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beale MA, et al. Global phylogeny of Treponema pallidum lineages reveals recent expansion and spread of contemporary syphilis. Nat. Microbiol. 2021;6:1549–1560. doi: 10.1038/s41564-021-01000-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhu B, et al. High resistance to azithromycin in clinical samples from patients with sexually transmitted diseases in guangxi zhuang autonomous region, china. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu H, et al. High frequency of the 23S rRNA A2058G mutation of Treponema pallidum in shanghai is associated with a current strategy for the treatment of syphilis. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2015;4:e10. doi: 10.1038/emi.2015.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shuel M, Hayden K, Kadkhoda K, Tsang RSW. Molecular typing and macrolide resistance of syphilis cases in manitoba, canada, from 2012 to 2016. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2018;45:233–236. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen XS, et al. High prevalence of azithromycin resistance to Treponema pallidum in geographically different areas in china. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013;19:975–979. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lukehart SA, et al. Macrolide resistance in Treponema pallidum in the united states and ireland. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:154–158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gootenberg JS, et al. Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR-Cas13a/C2c2. Science. 2017;356:438–442. doi: 10.1126/science.aam9321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Joung J, et al. Detection of SARS-COV-2 with sherlock one-pot testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1492–1494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2026172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fozouni P, et al. Amplification-free detection of SARS-COV-2 with CRISPR-Cas13a and mobile phone microscopy. Cell. 2021;184:323–333 e329. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Myhrvold C, et al. Field-deployable viral diagnostics using CRISPR-Cas13. Science. 2018;360:444–448. doi: 10.1126/science.aas8836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Gootenberg JS, et al. Multiplexed and portable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. Science. 2018;360:439–444. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cunningham CH, et al. A novel CRISPR-based malaria diagnostic capable of Plasmodium detection, species differentiation, and drug-resistance genotyping. EBioMedicine. 2021;68:103415. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lee RA, et al. Ultrasensitive CRISPR-based diagnostic for field-applicable detection of Plasmodium species in symptomatic and asymptomatic malaria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:25722–25731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010196117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mukama O, et al. An ultrasensitive and specific point-of-care CRISPR /Cas12 based lateral flow biosensor for the rapid detection of nucleic acids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020;159:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang S, et al. Highly sensitive and specific detection of Hepatitis B virus DNA and drug resistance mutations utilizing the PCR-based CRISPR-Cas13a system. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021;27:443–450. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen JS, et al. CRISPR-Cas12a target binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded dnase activity. Science. 2018;360:436–439. doi: 10.1126/science.aar6245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gayet-Ageron A, Combescure C, Lautenschlager S, Ninet B, Perneger TV. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PCR targeting the 47-kilodalton protein membrane gene of Treponema pallidum and PCR targeting the DNA polymerase i gene: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:3522–3529. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01619-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nechvatal L, et al. Syphilis-causing strains belong to separate ss14-like or nichols-like groups as defined by multilocus analysis of 19 Treponema pallidum strains. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014;304:645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pospisilova P, et al. Multi-locus sequence typing of Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum present in clinical samples from france: Infecting treponemes are genetically diverse and belong to 18 allelic profiles. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0201068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wang C, et al. A new specimen for syphilis diagnosis: evidence by high loads of Treponema pallidum DNA in saliva. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021;73:e3250–e3258. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Towns JM, et al. Treponema pallidum detection in lesion and non-lesion sites in men who have sex with men with early syphilis: A prospective, cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2021;21:1324–1331. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30838-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Knauf S, et al. Gene target selection for loop-mediated isothermal amplification for rapid discrimination of Treponema pallidum subspecies. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018;12:e0006396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Magnuson HJ, et al. Inoculation syphilis in human volunteers. Med. (Baltim.) 1956;35:33–82. doi: 10.1097/00005792-195602000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pla-Diaz M, et al. Evolutionary processes in the emergence and recent spread of the syphilis agent, treponema pallidum. Mol. Biol. Evol.39, msab318 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Mikalova L, et al. Human treponema pallidum 11q/j isolate belongs to subsp. endemicum but contains two loci with a sequence in tp0548 and tp0488 similar to subsp. pertenue and subsp. pallidum, respectively. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017;11:e0005434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Shu B, Zhang C, Xing D. A sample-to-answer, real-time convective polymerase chain reaction system for point-of-care diagnostics. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;97:360–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shu B, Zhang C, Xing D. A handheld flow genetic analysis system (FGAS): towards rapid, sensitive, quantitative and multiplex molecular diagnosis at the point-of-care level. Lab Chip. 2015;15:2597–2605. doi: 10.1039/C5LC00139K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Centers for Disease Control. The diagnosis and treatment guidelines of syphilis, gonorrhea, genital herpes and Chlamydia trachomatis infection (2014). Chin. J. Dermatol. 47, 365–372 (2014).
- 62.Dube S, Qin J, Ramakrishnan R. Mathematical analysis of copy number variation in a DNA sample using digital PCR on a nanofluidic device. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Kellner MJ, Koob JG, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Zhang F. Sherlock: Nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nat. Protoc. 2019;14:2986–3012. doi: 10.1038/s41596-019-0210-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and supplementary information files. DNA sequencing data generated in this study have been deposited in the GenBank database under accession code ON776877.1-ON776886.1 and ON843723.1-ON843742.1. Nichols and SS14 reference genome were available in the GenBank database under accession code CP004010.2 and CP004011.1. Source data are provided with the paper.