Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2000 Jan;182(1):135–142. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.1.135-142.2000

Identification of a New Class of 5′-Adenylylsulfate (APS) Reductases from Sulfate-Assimilating Bacteria

Julie Ann Bick 1, Jonathan J Dennis 1, Gerben J Zylstra 1, Jason Nowack 1, Thomas Leustek 1,*
PMCID: PMC94249  PMID: 10613872

Abstract

A gene was cloned from Burkholderia cepacia DBO1 that is homologous with Escherichia coli cysH encoding 3′-phosphoadenylylsulfate (PAPS) reductase. The B. cepacia gene is the most recent addition to a growing list of cysH homologs from a diverse group of sulfate-assimilating bacteria whose products show greater homology to plant 5′-adenylylsulfate (APS) reductase than they do to E. coli CysH. The evidence reported here shows that the cysH from one of the species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, encodes APS reductase. It is able to complement an E. coli cysH mutant and a cysC mutant, indicating that the enzyme is able to bypass PAPS, synthesized by the cysC product. Insertional knockout mutation of P. aeruginosa cysH produced cysteine auxotrophy, indicating its role in sulfate assimilation. Purified P. aeruginosa CysH expressed as a His-tagged recombinant protein is able to reduce APS, but not PAPS. The enzyme has a specific activity of 5.8 μmol · min−1 · mg of protein−1 at pH 8.5 and 30°C with thioredoxin supplied as an electron donor. APS reductase activity was detected in several bacterial species from which the novel type of cysH has been cloned, indicating that this enzyme may be widespread. Although an APS reductase from dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria is known, it shows no structural or sequence homology with the assimilatory-type APS reductase reported here. The results suggest that the dissimilatory and assimilatory APS reductases evolved convergently.


Archaea, bacteria, cyanobacteria, fungi, and plants reduce sulfate to sulfide, but they do so for different purposes. One form of the reduction pathway, termed “assimilation,” is carried out by aerobic organisms and is necessary for cysteine synthesis. Another type, termed “sulfate dissimilation,” is carried out by anaerobic prokaryotes, which in the absence of molecular oxygen use sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor for respiration. In assimilation, sulfide is incorporated into the thiol group of cysteine, while in dissimilation, it is released as a waste product in the form of hydrogen sulfide. Both reduction pathways, illustrated in Fig. 1, are similar in outline but different in detail. First, sulfate is activated by adenylation in a reaction catalyzed by ATP sulfurylase. In sulfate dissimilators and plants, the adenylation product, 5′-adenylylsulfate (APS), is reduced to sulfite, which is then further reduced to sulfide. In sulfate-assimilatory microorganisms, the initial substrate for reduction is not APS, but rather, it is the phosphorylated derivative 3′-phosphoadenylylsulfate (PAPS), formed after ATP-dependent phosphorylation of APS by APS kinase.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Sulfate reduction pathways. The chemical name or acronym is indicated below or above the structure. The enzyme name is indicated below the arrow.

The enzymes that catalyze the first reduction step distinguish sulfate dissimilation from assimilation. In dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria and archaea, an enzyme termed APS reductase (EC 1.8.99.2) (Apr) has been characterized (14, 29). It is heteromeric, composed of a flavin-containing subunit related to fumarate and succinate dehydrogenases and an iron-sulfur subunit resembling the 7Fe-type ferredoxins (14). The genes encoding the subunits have been named aprA and aprB. The source of electrons is uncertain, but may be a low potential cytochrome c3 (11). A similar enzyme exists in sulfide-oxidizing phototrophic and chemotrophic bacteria that are able to extract electrons from sulfide for carbon dioxide fixation or ATP synthesis. In these organisms, APS reductase operates in the reverse direction, producing APS from sulfite and 5′-AMP.

Sulfate-assimilating microorganisms like Escherichia coli contain an enzyme termed “PAPS reductase” (EC 1.8.99.4) encoded by cysH, which does not share sequence homology with dissimilatory APS reductase. Because of the absolute substrate requirement of PAPS reductase, the product of the cysC gene (APS kinase) is necessary for E. coli to assimilate sulfate (17). The electron donor for PAPS reductase is thought to be thioredoxin (Trx) or glutaredoxin (Grx) (19), protein cofactors that transfer electrons from NADPH or reduced glutathione (GSH), respectively. Functional homologs of PAPS reductase have been characterized from enteric bacteria, a chemoautotrophic bacterium, fungi, and cyanobacteria (13, 26). The cysH family of enzymes was recently expanded with the identification by cDNA cloning of homologs in plants (3). However, the plant enzyme differs in that it uses APS as a substrate and is able to directly use GSH as a reductant. The determinant for sulfonucleotide specificity is uncertain, but the ability to directly use GSH is probably mediated by a domain of the enzyme that functions as Grx (2, 28). PAPS reductase lacks such a domain and so requires Trx or Grx as an accessory protein.

The present study was prompted by five recent accessions to the GenBank database of bacterial cysH homologs that show greater amino acid sequence homology with plant APS reductase than with PAPS reductase. The cysH homologs from Bacillus subtilus (20), Burkholderia cepacia (this study), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (5), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6), and Rhizobium tropici (18) were identified as cysH homologs, based on homology analysis, and none had yet been functionally characterized. Thus, the presence of APS or PAPS reductase activity was examined in a range of bacterial species, and the cysH homolog from P. aeruginosa was chosen for detailed analysis. The study revealed that a diverse group of sulfate-assimilating bacteria exist that use APS as the substrate for sulfate reduction. Until now, only the dissimilatory APS reductase was known in bacteria, but this type is structurally unlike the assimilatory-type APS reductase described here. These enzymes carry out similar reactions, but appear to have evolved separately.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, growth media, and general methods.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The growth media include Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.) and M9 minimal medium (22) with glucose as a carbon source, mannitol for R. tropici, or succinate where indicated. Molecular biology techniques were performed as generally described by Sambrook et al. (23). Nucleotide sequencing was performed with the ABI PRISM DyeDeoxy Termination Cycle Sequencing System with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Corp.) and an ABI 373 or 377 DNA sequencer. Nucleotide and protein sequence analyses were performed with programs from the Genetics Computer Group, Inc., package, as specified in the figure legends.

TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Strain or plasmid Relevant characteristic Source or referencea
Strains
Bacillus subtilis 168 Prototroph BGSC
Burkholderia cepacia DBO1 Prototroph 30
Escherichia coli
  JM221 (CGSC 5745) cysD91 CGSC
  JM81A (CGSC 5744) cysC92 CGSC
  JM96 (CGSC 5746) cysH56 CGSC
  CBK103 (CGSC 7055) cysG98::Tn5 CGSC
  AT2427 (CGSC 4502) cysJ43 CGSC
  JM39 (CGSC 5043) cysE51 CGSC
  JM109 lacIq Laboratory stock
  BL21(DE3)/pLysS pET expression Novagen, Inc.
Mycobacterium sp. strain PYO1 Prototroph Zylstrab
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  PAO1 Prototroph 15
  JJDCD cysH::Tc This study
Rhizobium tropici USDA9030 Prototroph NRGC (21)
Plasmids
 pMB1-BcysH B. cepacia cysH on a 9-kbp PstI fragment in pMB1 This study
 pUC-PaAPR 0.9-kbp cysH gene from P. aeruginosa cloned into pUC19 This study
 pUC-PaAPRΔ P. aeruginosa cysH insertional mutation plasmid This study
 pET-APR1 Arabidopsis thaliana APR1 cDNA cloned into pET30a 2
 pUCP22-APR1 A. thaliana APR1 cDNA cloned into pUCP22 This study
 pUCP22 Broad-host-range vector 31
 pB-PaAPR P. aeruginosa cysH cloned into pBluescript SK(+) This study
 pBluescript SK(+) Cloning and expression Stratagene, Inc.
 pET-PaAPR P. aeruginosa cysH cloned into pET30a This study
a

NRGC, Peter B. van Berkum, USDA-ARS National Rhizobium Germplasm Collection, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Soybean and Alfalfa Research Laboratory, Beltsville, Md.; CGSC, E. coli Genetic Stock Center, Yale University, New Haven, Conn.; BGSC, Daniel R. Zeigler, Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. 

b

Gerben Zylstra laboratory strain. 

Cloning of B. cepacia cysH.

The B. cepacia cysH gene was isolated in a random screen during preliminary testing of plasposons (9). Because the complete open reading frame (ORF) was not recovered during this screen, a genomic DNA fragment downstream from B. cepacia cysH was ligated to a kanamycin resistance marker and the pMB1 origin of replication from pTnMod-OKm (8). This plasmid DNA was transformed into B. cepacia and allowed to integrate into the chromosome by homologous recombination. An ∼9.0-kb PstI DNA fragment containing the complete B. cepacia cysH gene was rescued by procedures previously described (9). A partial nucleotide sequence of the rescued fragment revealed that it contains the full-length ORFs for cysH and cysD. The nucleotide sequence of both strands of the B. cepacia cysH gene was determined by a primer walking strategy.

Cloning and deletion of the cysH gene from P. aeruginosa.

The P. aeruginosa cysH gene was amplified from genomic DNA by using the following PCR primers designed from the published sequence (6) and with the inclusion of HindIII and SacI recognition sites 5′-GCAAGCTTACGCCGGCTTATTCCTGG-3′ and 5′-CCGAGCTCTATCGACGGTTTCAGGCC-3′, respectively. The amplified 0.9-kb DNA fragment was cloned into pUC19 and also digested with HindIII and SacI to produce the plasmid pUC-PaAPR. The clone insert was confirmed by restriction digests and partial sequence analysis.

The P. aeruginosa cysH locus was disrupted by digesting pUC-PaAPR with PinA1, which bisects the cysH ORF. The 1.1-kb tetracycline resistance cassette from p34S-Tc (9) was digested with XmaI, and the complementary PinA1-XmaI ends were ligated, placing the tetracycline resistance marker within the cysH gene. The plasmid was introduced into P. aeruginosa PAO by electroporation (7). After an extended outgrowth period at 42°C, the transformed cells were plated on LB medium containing 80 μg of tetracycline per ml and incubated at 30°C overnight. Since the narrow-host-range plasmid pUC-PaAPR is unable to replicate in P. aeruginosa, it must integrate into the chromosome in order to produce Tcr. The recovered colonies were streaked onto M9 minimal medium, without or with cysteine. Three colonies resulting from double crossover events were isolated that proved to be cysteine auxotrophs.

The Arabidopsis thaliana APR1 gene was tested for the ability to complement P. aeruginosa PAO1 cysH::Tc. The APR1 cDNA was subcloned from pET-APR1 (2) as a 1.6-kbp XbaI-HindIII DNA fragment and ligated into the broad-host-range plasmid pUCP22 (31) which was similarly digested. The resulting plasmid, pUCP22-APR1, was constructed and maintained in E. coli JM109. Tight control of the lac promoter by lacIq in this strain was found to be necessary due to the toxicity of the APR1 gene product in E. coli. P. aeruginosa PAO1 cysH::Tc was electroporated with pUCP22-APR1 or the parent vector pUCP22, and transformants were selected on LB medium containing 200 μg of gentamicin per ml. Both types of transformants were tested for the ability to grow at 30°C on M9-succinate medium with 80 μg of tetracycline per ml with or without cysteine. All of the pUC22-APR1 transformants were found to be prototrophic for cysteine.

Preparation of constructs for heterologous expression of CysH from P. aeruginosa and purification of the recombinant enzyme.

The P. aeruginosa cysH coding sequence was amplified from pUC-PaAPR by using the following primers with BamHI and HindIII sites incorporated: 5′-GGGGATCCGCCCTTTGCTACCATTCCCGCC-3′ and 5′-GGAAGCTTCAGGCCTTGCTGATCAGGTTGC-3′. The PCR product was cloned into the same sites of pBluescript SK(+) to produce pB-PaAPR. One clone was completely sequenced on both strands. Nine nucleotide substitutions were found, resulting from either PCR-derived changes or due to sequence polymorphisms. All of the nucleotide differences were silent with respect to the reported amino acid sequence of the gene product (6). pB-PaAPR was tested for the ability to complement a range of E. coli cys mutants. Electrotransformed colonies were isolated on LB medium containing 100 μg of ampicillin per ml. Growing colonies were then replica plated onto M9-glucose medium with or without cysteine and incubated for 48 h at 30°C.

The gene insert from pB-PaAPR was subcloned into pET30b with BamHI and HindIII. The resulting plasmid, pET-PaAPR, was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS, and colonies were selected in LB medium with 40 μg of kanamycin per ml and 34 μg of chloramphenicol per ml. A transformed 1-liter culture was grown in liquid LB medium with 40 μg of kanamycin per ml and 34 μg of chloramphenicol per ml at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.6. The culture was then induced with 1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside), followed by overnight incubation. All subsequent procedures were carried out at 4°C, and all centrifugations were at 13,800 × g for 10 min. The cell suspension was harvested by centrifugation and was resuspended in 100 ml of 50 mM Tris HCl (pH 8.0). The culture was sonicated on ice and centrifuged, and the supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter. Solid ammonium sulfate was added to 20% (wt/vol) saturation, and the mixture was stirred on ice for 20 min followed by centrifugation. The supernatant was collected, solid ammonium sulfate was added to 80% saturation, and the solution was stirred for 20 min. The precipitate was collected as before, and the pellet was dissolved in 50 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) with 1 M ammonium sulfate. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation and then passage of the supernatant through a 0.45-μm-pore-size filter before loading onto a 50-ml phenyl Sepharose column at a flow rate of 2 ml per min. The proteins were eluted with a 250-ml linear gradient of ammonium sulfate from 1.0 to 0 M, prepared in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and at the same flow rate. The peak of enzyme activity, collected between 0.2 and 0.1 M ammonium sulfate (∼25 ml), was pooled, and the buffer was changed to 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)–100 mM NaCl (buffer A) by several rounds of ultrafiltration with a YM10 Amicon membrane. The sample (∼50 ml) was stirred with 2 ml (bed volume) of Ni-agarose (Talon; New England Biolabs, Inc.) for 2 h. The resin was washed twice with 20 ml of buffer A and then again with buffer A containing 10 mM imidazole. The protein was eluted in buffer A with 125 mM imidazole. The imidazole was removed by buffer exchange with an Amicon YM10 membrane. The typical yield was ∼15 mg of protein from 1 liter of culture.

Enzyme assays.

APS and PAPS reductase activities were measured as described previously (28). [35S]PAPS (New England Nuclear, Inc.; 57.7 × 103 Bq · nmol−1; 0.45 nmol · μl−1) was used to produce [35S]APS by dephosphorylation with 3′ nucleotidase (Sigma, Inc.; N8630). Unless stated otherwise, the reductase assays were done with a volume of 100 μl containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 10 μM E. coli Trx, 25 μM [35S]APS or [35S]PAPS, and experimental enzyme. In some experiments, the reductant or sulfonucleotide substrates were varied as described in the figure and table legends. Sulfonucleotides were used in enzyme assays at a specific activity of 500 Bq · nmol−1 when present in the reaction mixture at greater than 0.66 μM or at a specific activity of 2,500 Bq · nmol−1 when present at between 0.10 and 0.66 μM. Initial rate conditions were maintained by varying the incubation times so that the amount of product formed was at least fivefold above the background, but no more than 10% of the substrate in the reaction. A reaction without added reductant served as the background rate. All enzyme assays and kinetic experiments were repeated at least three times. Kinetic data sets were analyzed by least-squares nonlinear regression (4). E. coli thioredoxin reductase was provided by C. Williams (Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Mich.). E. coli Grx1 and plant APS reductase APR1 were prepared as described previously (2). Other components were purchased from Sigma, Inc., including E. coli Trx (T3658), ferredoxin (F3013), and ferredoxin-NADP+ oxidoreductase (F0628). The activities of ferredoxin and ferredoxin-NADP+ oxidoreductase were measured as described previously (32).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The GenBank accession number of the sequence reported in this publication is AF170343.

RESULTS

Identification of a cysH homolog from B. cepacia and analysis of homology.

During optimization of a plasposon tagging method (9), a randomly isolated DNA clone from B. cepacia was identified with two tandem ORFs. The upstream ORF showed homology to E. coli cysH, and the downstream ORF showed homology to E. coli cysD, a subunit of ATP sulfurylase. The relative positions of the ORFs suggested that they could be part of an operon. A similar arrangement of genes has been reported in R. tropici (18). The cysH gene contains 250 codons, predicted to produce a 27,881-Da protein. A BLASTP search of the GenBank database revealed that the amino acid sequence encoded by B. cepacia cysH is most similar (67% over a 172-amino-acid stretch) to that encoded by the cysH homolog from R. tropici (18). B. cepacia cysH is the most recent GenBank accession of bacterial cysH homologs that show greater homology with plant APS reductase (28) than with PAPS reductase. A dendrogram constructed with different members of this group illustrates the sequence relationships between the enzymes (Fig. 2). PAPS reductases from fungi, cyanobacteria, enterobacteria, and a chemolithotroph, Thiocapsa roseopersicina, cluster in the top portion of the diagram. Clustered at the bottom are the uncharacterized bacterial cysH gene products and the APS reductases from plants.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Dendrogram showing the amino acid sequence relationship between different CysH homologs. The sequences were aligned by using the PileUp program, and the tree was constructed with the Paup program. The sequences were obtained from the following GenBank accession numbers: Arabidopsis thaliana, AF016282 (APR1) and AF016283 (APR2); Enteromorpha intestinalis, AF069951; Catheranthus roseus, U63784; Rhizobium tropici, AJ001223; Burkholderia cepacia, AF170343; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, U95379; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Z81368; Bacillus subtilis, U76751; Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J05591; Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Z69729; Thiocapsa roseopersicina, Z23169; Salmonella typhimurium, M23007; Escherichia coli, M23008; Emericella nidulans, X82555; Synechococcus sp., M84476; and Synechocystis sp. strain PCC6803, P72794.

An amino acid sequence alignment of PAPS reductases from E. coli and yeast, plant APS reductase, and the B. cepacia and P. aeruginosa CysH homologs illustrates the primary structural similarities between these enzymes (Fig. 3). All five show dispersed homology over their lengths and contain conserved motifs known as a modified PP motif (indicated with dots in Fig. 3) and a carboxyl-terminal stretch with the sequence ECGLH (indicated with asterisks in Fig. 3). The PP motif is a version of the P loop and is thought to function in nucleotide binding (24). The carboxyl-terminal motif was shown to be essential for catalytic function of the E. coli CysH enzyme (1). The B. cepacia and P. aeruginosa CysH enzymes and plant APS reductase show subtle differences from the PAPS reductases. Most notable are two areas that include four cysteine residues (indicated with circles in Fig. 3). The CysH homologs from the other bacteria, R. tropici, B. subtilis, and M. tuberculosis, are also conserved at these positions, as are all of the plant APS reductases that have been cloned to date. It should be noted that the plant enzyme contains a carboxyl-terminal extension, not shown in Fig. 3, that functions as a Grx (2). Neither the PAPS reductases nor the novel class of CysH homologs contain this domain.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Amino acid sequence alignment of several CysH homologs. GenBank accession numbers of the sequences are given in Fig. 2. The sequences were aligned with the PileUp program, and the alignment was embellished with the PrettyBox program to show homologous residues. Each sequence was given an equal vote weight for derivation of a consensus sequence. Solid boxes indicate amino acid residues that are identical to the consensus at that position. Boxes with intermediate and light shading represent amino acids with similarity to the consensus at that position. ar, A. thaliana APR2; pa, P. aeruginosa CysH; bc, B. cepacia CysH; ec, E. coli CysH; sc, S. cerevisiae Met16. Conserved motifs are indicated with dots and asterisks. Residues conserved with plant APS reductase are indicated with circles. Only the B. cepacia CysH sequence is shown from the initiator methionine. The amino terminus of each of the others is not shown for the sake of brevity, nor is the carboxyl-terminal domain of APR2.

Analysis of the substrate specificity of bacterial cysH homologs.

The finding that the products of some bacterial cysH homologs are closely related to plant APS reductase prompted an exploration of the catalytic function of these enzymes. A survey was carried out to determine the type of sulfonucleotide reductase present in various prokaryotic species and focusing on those from which cysH homologs have been cloned. Cell lysates were assayed for APS or PAPS reductase activity from cultures grown on minimal medium with sulfate as the sole sulfur source. The results are shown in Table 2. As has been reported (17), E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium reduce PAPS, and the activity is stimulated by addition of Trx to the assay. In contrast, a cysH mutant of E. coli expressing plant APS reductase shows APS reductase activity that is not stimulated by Trx, also as previously reported (28). Extracts from most of the experimental bacteria reduced APS primarily, the exceptions being B. subtilis and Mycobacterium sp., which have both activities. In each case, the activity is stimulated by Trx. None of the bacterial species showed significant sulfonucleotide reductase activity when grown on cysteine-containing medium, indicating that the cysH gene is probably repressed by cysteine as it is in E. coli (17).

TABLE 2.

P(APS) reductase activity in several bacterial speciesa

Species or strain Activity (pmol · min−1 · mg−1) with substrate(s):
PAPS PAPS + Trx APS APS + Trx
Escherichia coli 37 178 1 8
Salmonella typhimurium 12 88 2 2
E. coli cysH/APR1 3 5 221 225
E. coli cysH/PaAPR 4 7 207 336
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 5 11 20 204
Pseudomonas putida 23 32 22 104
Burkholderia cepacia 2 5 15 117
Ralstonia pickettii 5 7 21 169
Rhizobium tropici 23 25 35 278
Mycobacterium sp. 17 38 33 105
Bacillus subtilis 14 67 4 10
a

Bacterial cultures were grown on M9 minimal medium with only sulfate as the sulfur source. APR1 is an A. thaliana cDNA (28). PaAPR is the P. aeruginosa cysH gene expressed from pB-PaAPR. P(APS) reductase activity was measured with 5 mM DTT ± 200 μM Trx as the electron donor and ∼0.5 μg of cell lysate protein. Incubation was at 30°C for 20 min. 

In vivo analysis of P. aeruginosa CysH.

Since P. aeruginosa CysH is most closely related to plant APS reductase, it was chosen for detailed analysis. The question of whether P. aeruginosa CysH is involved in assimilatory sulfate reduction was addressed by creating a gene knockout mutant. The strain carrying the deletion was auxotrophic for cysteine, confirming the identity of P. aeruginosa CysH as an assimilatory-type APS reductase. The cysH::Tc mutant could be functionally complemented with the APR1 cDNA encoding a plant APS reductase (not shown), further illustrating the functional similarity of the plant and P. aeruginosa enzymes.

P. aeruginosa cysH was tested for the ability to complement E. coli mutations in each of the genes required for sulfate reduction, including cysD encoding a subunit of ATP sulfurylase, cysC encoding APS kinase, cysH encoding PAPS reductase, cysJ encoding a subunit of sulfite reductase, and cysG encoding an enzyme required for synthesis of siroheme, the prosthetic group of sulfite reductase. The P. aeruginosa gene was able to complement both cysC and cysH, but none of the others (not shown). The complementation result is consistent with the idea that the P. aeruginosa cysH product uses APS rather than PAPS, since it is able to bypass the cysC step in E. coli. The hypothesis is further supported by the sulfonucleotide reductase activity in the E. coli cysH mutant expressing P. aeruginosa cysH, which showed APS reductase activity dependent on Trx (Table 2). The growth rates on minimal medium of E. coli cysH and cysC mutants expressing P. aeruginosa cysH were similar, irrespective of whether cysteine was provided in the medium (not shown). This verifies the role of these enzymes in cysteine biosynthesis and confirms that cysteine auxotrophy is effectively complemented by the P. aeruginosa cysH product.

In vitro analysis of P. aeruginosa CysH.

The P. aeruginosa cysH gene was amplified by PCR and cloned for expression as a heterologous protein. The affinity-purified preparations were extremely pure, as determined by staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis electropherograms with Coomassie blue (not shown). The pure enzyme showed Trx-dependent APS reductase activity, but no activity was detected with PAPS (Fig. 4A). The enzyme was most active with Trx as an electron donor (Table 2), showing a Vmax of 5.8 μmol · min−1 · mg of protein−1. The activity was ∼5-fold lower with DTT, ∼70-fold lower with E. coli Grx1 or dithionite, and 580-fold lower with lipoic acid. No activity could be detected with ferredoxin.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Activity of pure P. aeruginosa CysH. (A) Activity with APS (●) or PAPS (○). The reaction mixtures contained 0.02 ng of enzyme and were incubated at 30°C for various times. (B) Activity of P. aeruginosa CysH (●) or plant APS reductase (○) at various pH values. The reactions were carried out at the specified pH with 50 mM MesNaOH at pH 5.5 and lower and 50 mM Tris-HCl between pH 6.0 and 10.0. The reaction mixtures with plant APS reductase also contained 500 mM sodium sulfate. All contained 0.35 ng of protein and were incubated at 30°C for 20 min. (C) Activity of P. aeruginosa CysH (●) or plant APS reductase (○) with various sodium sulfate concentrations. The reactions were carried out with the specified sodium sulfate concentration. The reaction mixtures contained 0.35 ng of protein and were incubated at 30°C for 20 min. The vertical axis in panel C is identical to that in panel B.

The conditions for optimal activity of P. aeruginosa CysH were studied. PAPS reductase and plant APS reductase have different requirements. For example, plant APS reductase has a pH optimum of ∼8.5, while PAPS reductase has a pH optimum of ∼8.0. Also, plant APS reductase activity is markedly enhanced by sodium sulfate. Testing of P. aeruginosa CysH revealed that its pH optimum is ∼8.5 (Fig. 4B) and its activity is not stimulated by sodium sulfate (Fig. 4C). Thus, P. aeruginosa CysH resembles plant APS reductase with respect to pH optimum, but not with respect to salt preference.

Initial velocity measurements of P. aeruginosa CysH were carried out to determine the kinetic constants and to compare its activity with that of E. coli CysH. Figure 5A shows the plots of 1/v versus 1/[APS] at various fixed concentrations of Trx. From the vertical and horizontal intercepts of the line obtained with saturating Trx, the apparent Vmax was 5.8 μmol · min−1 · mg of protein−1 and the Km[APS] was 1.75 μM. From the vertical intercepts of the lines in Fig. 5A and an independent, Trx titration experiment (Fig. 5B), the apparent Km for Trx is 19.6 μM. The reaction product 5′-AMP was found to be a competitive inhibitor with respect to APS at a saturating Trx concentration, as shown by the intersection of lines on the vertical axis of the reciprocal plot (Fig. 5C). The Ki[5′-AMP] value, calculated from the slopes of the reciprocal plot, is 1.0 mM (Fig. 5D). Although a comprehensive analysis of the kinetic mechanism of P. aeruginosa APS reductase has yet to be carried out, it is evident from this study that the P. aeruginosa APS reductase has kinetic properties similar to those described for E. coli PAPS reductase (1). It is therefore possible that these enzymes function via a similar catalytic mechanism.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5

Reciprocal plot analysis of P. aeruginosa CysH (y axis represents 1/v [micromoles per minute per milligram of protein] in plots A, B and C). (A) The concentration of APS was varied at different fixed concentrations of Trx: 50 μM (●), 10 μM (○), and 5 μM (▾). (B) The concentration of Trx was varied with APS fixed at 25 μM. (C) The concentration of APS was varied without 5′-AMP (●) or with different fixed concentrations of 5′-AMP: 0.5 mM (○), 2.0 mM (▾), 4.0 mM (▿), and 10.0 mM (■). (D) Replot of slope1/APS versus [5′-AMP], with data taken from panel C. The reductant in these reactions was a combination of 200 μM Trx, 1 U of thioredoxin reductase, and 0.2 mM NADPH. All reaction mixtures contained 0.35 ng of P. aeruginosa CysH and were incubated at 30°C. Incubation times were varied, as described in Materials and Methods.

DISCUSSION

In this study, the catalytic function of the CysH enzyme from P. aeruginosa was studied. The genetic and enzymological evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that this enzyme functions as a Trx-dependent APS reductase involved in sulfate assimilation.

That P. aeruginosa CysH catalyzes APS reduction is supported by the in vitro activity of the purified recombinant enzyme. The specificity of the enzyme for APS explains why the P. aeruginosa cysH gene is able to complement E. coli cysH and cysC mutant strains. The simplest explanation for complementation of cysC is that it is able to bypass APS kinase due to its altered substrate specificity. Plant APS reductase is also able to complement E. coli cysC (28). Another hypothesis is that the enzyme is a bifunctional APS kinase/PAPS reductase. However, this is unlikely, because Mg ATP, necessary for APS phosphorylation, is not supplied in the in vitro reaction mixture.

Mutation of P. aeruginosa cysH produced cysteine auxotrophy. Moreover, a plant APS reductase cDNA was able to complement the mutant. These results indicate that P. aeruginosa cysH is necessary for the synthesis of cysteine. Since the gene product catalyzes a reaction in sulfate assimilation necessary for cysteine synthesis, it can be concluded that P. aeruginosa cysH encodes an assimilatory APS reductase. The P. aeruginosa cysH gene exists as a lone ORF and does not appear to exist in an operon. A cysB homolog is located downstream, but it is located on the opposite strand and is transcribed convergently with cysH (6). Therefore, it is unlikely that polar effects resulting from the insertional mutation can account for cysteine auxotrophy. Moreover, there are no other ORFs with strong homology to E. coli cysH in the genome of P. aeruginosa PAO, which has been nearly completely sequenced, indicating that PAPS reductase or another alternate route for sulfate assimilation probably does not exist in P. aeruginosa.

The species survey presented in Table 2 suggests that the ability to reduce APS is widespread among aerobic, sulfate-assimilating bacteria. Until now, this activity was known with certainty only from anaerobic sulfate-dissimilating bacteria. The dissimilatory-type APS reductase shows homology with succinate and fumerate reductases (14), while the assimilatory type described here is related to the CysH superfamily. It is therefore likely that the two classes of enzyme, which carry out similar catalytic reactions, may have very different evolutionary origins. Insight into the structure and function of the CysH superfamily comes from the crystal structure of E. coli PAPS reductase (Protein Data Bank ID code 1SUR [24]), showing that it belongs to the adenine nucleotide α-hydrolase family, which includes ATP pyrophosphatase and the CysD-type ATP sulfurylases (24). The adenine nucleotide α-hydrolases, including assimilatory APS reductase, contain a PP motif involved in nucleotide binding. Thus, the CysH superfamily appears to consist of closely related enzymes with different substrate specificities. The finding that prompted this study was that the sequences of several newly accessioned CysH homologs are more closely related to plant APS reductase than to the known PAPS reductases. The sequence analysis in Fig. 3 showed that all of the enzymes in the CysH superfamily are remarkably similar. The only major obvious differences are two short stretches containing four cysteine residues in the plant APS reductase-type sequences that are lacking in E. coli, S. cerevisiae, and other confirmed PAPS reductases. It was initially tempting to speculate that these sequences are the determinants for APS as a substrate. However, this idea is not certain, because PAPS reductase activity was measured from B. subtilis (Table 2), an organism with a CysH resembling plant APS reductase. Further analysis is required to determine whether the CysH of B. subtilis is an APS or PAPS reductase and what role the conserved cysteine residues play in catalysis.

A comparison of P. aeruginosa CysH, E. coli PAPS reductase, and plant APS reductase revealed that other than substrate specificity, the bacterial enzymes are very similar. Both the E. coli and P. aeruginosa enzymes are not stimulated by sodium sulfate, and both lack the Grx-like carboxyl domain of the plant enzyme. Therefore, both require Trx as a source of electrons and display very similar Km[Trx] values (1). Based on kinetic studies similar to those carried out with P. aeruginosa APS reductase and reported here (Table 3), a ping-pong mechanism has been proposed for E. coli PAPS reductase (1). It was proposed that the electrons from Trx are transferred to and stored by the enzyme for use in the second reaction step, PAPS reduction. Since PAPS reductase does not contain prosthetic groups or chromophores, the mechanism for electron storage is enigmatic, but was proposed to involve the reduction of a cysteine residue. The finding that P. aeruginosa and E. coli CysH enzymes share similar kinetic properties suggests that they may function via a similar catalytic mechanism. In contrast, the sulfonucleotide specificity, pH optimum, and 5′-AMP inhibition are properties that P. aeruginosa CysH has in common with plant APS reductase. This is a significant finding, since until now, APS reductase activity in bacteria was thought to be limited to the dissimilatory type from sulfate reducers and archaea that use it for anaerobic sulfate respiration.

TABLE 3.

APS reductase activity of P. aeruginosa CysH with various reductantsa

Reductant Activity (μmol · min−1 · mg−1)
10 mM DTT 1.2
10 mM DTT + 1 μg of E. coli Trx 5.8
10 mM GSH 0
10 mM GSH + 10 μg of Grx1 0.09
10 mM Lipoic acid 0.01
10 mM Dithionite 0.08
10 μg of ferredoxin + 1 U of FNRb + 0.2 mM NADPH 0
a

APS reductase activity was measured with the indicated reductants. The reaction mixtures contained 0.35 ng of protein and were incubated at 30°C for 20 min. 

b

FNR, ferredoxin NADP+ oxidoreductase. 

Although yeast, E. coli, and S. typhimurium use PAPS for sulfate reduction, other studies have shown that APS is used for assimilatory sulfate reduction in red, brown, and green algae and vascular plants. This was thought to indicate a correlation between APS reduction and organisms containing chloroplasts. The finding that P. aeruginosa, a nonphotosynthetic bacterium, uses APS rather than PAPS for reduction indicates an important evolutionary divergence of bacterial CysH enzymes. A comparison of the E. coli and P. aeruginosa CysH enzyme sequences and biochemical characteristics suggests that they probably have a common structure and function via similar kinetic mechanisms. The divergent substrate requirement may be mediated by only a few amino acid residues. A future focus will be to identify these residues. A further question to be addressed is the reason for the adaptation of a PAPS-Trx system in some classes of bacteria and the prevalence of an APS-dependent reduction pathway in others.

The finding of an APS reductase in some sulfate-assimilating bacteria—P. aeruginosa in particular—suggests that these organisms do not require PAPS for sulfate assimilation. P. aeruginosa, R. tropici, and M. tuberculosis contain ORFs homologous with nodP and nodQ of Rhizobium meliloti (10, 16; GenBank accession no. CAA97752). These genes encode the subunits of a bifunctional ATP sulfurylase/APS kinase capable of APS and PAPS synthesis from sulfate and ATP (25). If APS is required for sulfate assimilation, what could be the function of PAPS in these organisms? The question has been most carefully studied with R. meliloti and R. tropici, where PAPS is known to be involved in the synthesis of sulfated oligosaccharides necessary for formation of a symbiotic root nodule with legumes (10, 25). Thus, some of the activated sulfate in these species is channeled into a separate pathway that leads to incorporation of sulfate into organic compounds. In this regard, it may be significant to note that M. tuberculosis produces sulfated glycolipids known as sulfatides (12). Thus, APS reductase may represent a key enzyme for the division of the reduction and sulfation pathways.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants IBN96-01145 (to T.L.) and MCB97-23921 (to G.J.Z.) and by a gift from Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.

We thank Charles Williams for providing purified thioredoxin reductase; Mitch Tarczynski for sequencing the PaAPR PCR product; and the E. coli, Bacillus, and Rhizobium Culture Collections for providing strains.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Berendt U, Haverkamp T, Prior A, Schwenn J D. Reaction mechanism of thioredoxin: 3′-phospho-adenylylsulfate reductase investigated by site-directed mutagenesis. Eur J Biochem. 1995;233:347–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.347_1.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bick J A, Åslund F, Chen Y, Leustek T. Glutaredoxin function for the carboxyl terminal domain of the plant-type 5′-adenylylsulfate (APS) reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8404–8409. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bick J A, Leustek T. Plant sulfur metabolism—the reduction of sulfate to sulfite. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1998;1:240–244. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5266(98)80111-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brooks S P. A simple computer program with statistical tests for the analysis of enzyme kinetics. BioTechniques. 1992;13:906–911. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cole S T, Brosch R, Parkhill J, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Gordon S V, Eiglmeier K, Gas S, Barry III C E, Tekaia F, Badcock K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies R, Devlin K, Feltwell T, Gentles S, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Krogh A, McLean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver S, Osborne J, Quail M A, Rajandream M A, Rogers J, Rutter S, Seeger K, Skelton S, Squares S, Sqares R, Sulston J E, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Barrell B G. Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence. Nature. 1998;393:537–544. doi: 10.1038/31159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delic-Attre I, Toussaint B, Garin J, Vignais P M. Cloning, sequence and mutagenesis of the structural gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa CysB, which can activate algD transcription. Mol Microbiol. 1997;24:1275–1284. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.4121799.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dennis J J, Sokol P A. Electrotransformation of Pseudomonas. Methods Mol Biol. 1995;47:125–133. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-310-4:125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dennis J J, Zylstra G J. Improved antibiotic-resistance cassettes through restriction site elimination using Pfu DNA polymerase PCR. BioTechniques. 1998;25:772–774. doi: 10.2144/98255bm04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dennis J J, Zylstra G J. Plasposons: modular self-cloning minitransposon derivatives for rapid genetic analysis of gram-negative bacterial genomes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:2710–2715. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.7.2710-2715.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Folch-Mallol J L, Marroqui S, Sousa C, Manyani H, Lopez-Lara I, van der Drift K M G M, Haverkamp J, Quinto C, Gil-Serrano A, Thomas-Oates J, Spaink H P, Megias M. Characterization of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 nodulation factors: the role of nodH and nodPQ genes in their sulfation. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 1996;9:151–163. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-9-0151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hansen T. Metabolism of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. Antonie Leeuwenhoek. 1994;66:165–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00871638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hatfull G F. The molecular genetics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1994;215:29–47. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-80166-2_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haverkamp T, Schwenn J D. Structure and function of a cysBJIH gene cluster in the purple sulphur bacterium Thiocapsa roseopersicina. Microbiology. 1999;145:115–125. doi: 10.1099/13500872-145-1-115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hipp W M, Pott A S, Thum-Schmitz N, Faath I, Dahl C, Trüper H G. Towards the phylogeny of APS reductases and sirohaem sulfite reductases in sulfate-reducing and sulfur-oxidizing prokaryotes. Microbiology. 1997;143:2891–2902. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-9-2891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Holloway B W, Krishnapillai V, Morgan A F. Chromosomal genetics of Pseudomonas. Microbiol Rev. 1979;43:73–102. doi: 10.1128/mr.43.1.73-102.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hummerjohann J, Kuttel E, Quadroni M, Ragaller J, Leisinger T, Kertesz M A. Regulation of the sulfate starvation response in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: role of cysteine biosynthetic intermediates. Microbiology. 1998;144:1375–1386. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-5-1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kredich N M. Biosynthesis of cysteine. In: Neidhardt F C, Curtiss III R, Ingraham J L, Lin E C C, Low K B, Magasanik B, Reznikoff W S, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger H E, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: American Society for Microbiology; 1996. pp. 514–527. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Laeremans T, Martinez-Romero E, Vanderleyden J. Isolation and sequencing of a second Rhizobium tropici CFN299 locus that contains genes homologous to amino acid sulphate genes. DNA Sequence. 1998;9:65–70. doi: 10.3109/10425179809050027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lillig C H, Prior A, Schwenn J D, Åslund F, Ritz D, Vlamis-Gardikas A, Holmgren A. New thioredoxins and glutaredoxins as electron donors of 3′-phosphoadenylylsulfate reductase. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:7695–7698. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.12.7695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mansilla M C, de Mendoza D. l-Cysteine biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: identification, sequencing, and functional characterization of the gene coding for phosphoadenylylsulfate sulfotransferase. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:976–981. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.3.976-981.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Martínez-Romero E, Segovia L, Mercante F M, Franco A A, Graham P, Pardo M A. Rhizobium tropici, a novel species nodulating Phaseolus vulgaris L. beans and Leucaena sp. trees. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991;41:417–426. doi: 10.1099/00207713-41-3-417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller J H. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Savage H, Montoya G, Svensson C, Schwenn J D, Sinning I. Crystal structure of phosphoadenylyl sulphate (PAPS) reductase—a new family of adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases. Structure. 1997;5:895–906. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(97)00244-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schwedock J S, Liu C, Leyh T S, Long S R. Rhizobium meliloti NodP and NodQ form a multifunctional sulfate-activating complex requiring GTP for activity. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:7055–7064. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.22.7055-7064.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Schwenn J D. Assimilatory reduction of inorganic sulphate. In: Cram W J, De Kok L J, Stulen I, Brunold C, Rennenberg H, editors. Sulphur metabolism in higher plants. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers; 1997. pp. 39–58. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Segel I H. Enzyme kinetics. Behavior and analysis of rapid equilibrium and steady-state enzyme systems. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1975. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Setya A, Murillo M, Leustek T. Sulfate reduction in higher plants: molecular evidence for a novel 5′-adenylylphosphosulfate (APS) reductase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:13383–13388. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.23.13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Speich N, Dahl C, Heisig P, Klein A, Lottspeich F, Stetter K O, Trüper H G. Adenylylsulphate reductase from the sulphate-reducing archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus: cloning and characterization of the genes and comparison of the enzyme with other iron-sulphur flavoproteins. Microbiology. 1994;140:1273–1284. doi: 10.1099/00221287-140-6-1273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Walsh T A, Ballou D P. Halogenated protocatechuates as substrates for protocatechuate dioxygenase from Pseudomonas cepacia. J Biol Chem. 1983;258:14413–14421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.West S E, Schweizer H P, Dall C, Sample A K, Runyen-Janecky L J. Construction of improved Escherichia-Pseudomonas shuttle vectors derived from pUC18/19 and sequence of the region required for their replication in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Gene. 1994;148:81–86. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zanetti G, Curti B. Ferredoxin-NADP+ oxidoreductase. Methods Enzymol. 1980;69:250–252. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES