Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2022 Aug 17;13:912296. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.912296

Genome-wide analysis of the Thaumatin-like gene family in Qingke (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum) uncovers candidates involved in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses

Le Wang 1, Zepeng Xu 2, Wei Yin 1, Kai Xu 2, Shuai Wang 1, Qianhan Shang 1, Wei Sa 1, Jian Liang 1,*, Li Wang 3,*
PMCID: PMC9428612  PMID: 36061804

Abstract

Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) participate in the defense responses of plants as well as their growth and development processes, including seed germination. Yet the functioning of TLP family genes, in addition to key details of their encoded protein products, has not been thoroughly investigated for Qingke (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum). Here, a total of 36 TLP genes were identified in the genome of Qingke via HMM profiling. Of them, 25 TLPs contained a signal peptide at the N-terminus, with most proteins predicted to localize in the cytoplasm or outer membrane. Sequence alignment and motif analysis revealed that the five REDDD residues required for β-1,3-glucanase activity were conserved in 21 of the 36 Qingke TLPs. Phylogenetically, the TLPs in plants are clustered in 10 major groups. Our analysis of gene structure did not detect an intron in 15 Qingke TLPs whereas the other 21 did contain 1–7 introns. A diverse set of cis-acting motifs were found in the promoters of the 36 TLPs, including elements related to light, hormone, and stress responses, growth and development, circadian control, and binding sites of transcription factors, thus suggesting a multifaceted role of TLPs in Qingke. Expression analyses revealed the potential involvement of TLPs in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses. Taken together, the findings of this study deepen our understanding of the TLP family genes in Qingke, a staple food item in Tibet, which could strengthen future investigations of protein function in barley and its improved genetic engineering.

Keywords: Tibetan hulless barley, plant immunity, Thaumatin-like protein, expression profile, stress response

Introduction

Due to their sessile nature, plants have evolved a sophisticated immune system to overcome challenges from potential pathogenic microorganisms. Current immune theory argues for a two-tiered system for how plants engage in a defense response against pathological invaders, in which plant innate immunity is defined as a two-layered model consisting of pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI) (Jones and Dangl, 2006). As the primary barrier of plant defense, activation of PTI triggers the early response of host’s immune system, resulting in a burst of ROS (reactive oxygen species) production and the coordinated expression of defense-related genes (Jwa and Hwang, 2017). However, virulent pathogens could breach the defense of the PTI layer and thereby initiate ETI-level immunity, which entails a stronger and more sustained response to invading pathogens (Yuan et al., 2021b). Recent findings have revealed that pattern-recognition receptors are also required for NLR-mediated ETI, highlighting the interaction between the PTI and ETI modules (Ngou et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2021a). Activating PTI and ETI often releases signaling molecules from the site of infection, and thus potentiate resistance against incoming pathological threats in distal uninfected tissues (Durrant and Dong, 2004). This resistance mechanism, which is accompanied by the expression and accumulation of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, is termed systematic acquired resistance (SAR).

Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs), also known as the PR-5 family protein, are so named because of their high similarity to thaumatin, a sweet-tasting protein originally isolated from Thaumatococcus danielli (Wel and Loeve, 1972). The existence of TLPs has since been confirmed in a diverse range of species, including those of fungi, animals, and plants. Not surprisingly, the functions of TLP proteins are also diversified and their involvement in various processes has been demonstrated. For example, in fungi, homologues of TLP can exhibit β-1,3-glucanase activity, playing active roles in cell wall degradation and spore diffusion of the fruiting body (Sakamoto et al., 2006). Through structural modeling, animal TLPs were also found to contain the structure responsible for putative glucanase activity (Brandazza et al., 2004). The existence of TLPs has been confirmed in the secretome of the pine wood nematode, which could facilitate its parasitism by inducing hypersensitive responses in the host tree (Kirino et al., 2020). In plants, TLPs have been detected in a wide variety of species, ranging from algae to angiosperms (Shatters et al., 2006). Recent report of TLPs in wheat confirmed their involvement in development and defense, and recombinant expression of TaTLP2-B conferred enhanced tolerance to salt, cold, osmotic and heat stresses for Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sharma et al., 2022).

Typical TLPs share common structural features of the PR-5 family, possessing an acidic cleft that enables their binding of β-1,3-glucan (Grenier et al., 1999). This cleft, formed by five well-conserved amino acid residues—one glutamic acid, one arginine, and three aspartic acid residues (REDDD)—is the crucial structure for conferring antifungal activity. When grouped by their molecular weight (MW), TLPs may be categorized into two types: large and small (Liu et al., 2020). For large TLPs, their MW spans 21 to 26 kDa, and they harbor 16 cysteine residues paired into eight disulfide bonds. Small TLPs have a MW of 16–17 kDa, containing 10 cysteine residues forming five disulfide bridges. These intramolecular disulfide bonds stabilize the structure of TLPs, enabling them to endure unfavorable conditions (such as extreme pH levels and high temperatures) and resist protease degradation (Sharma et al., 2022).

Thaumatin-like proteins are associated with plant defense responses against both biotic and abiotic stresses. The transcription of TLP genes can be induced significantly after exposure to drought (Misra et al., 2016), freezing (Kuwabara et al., 2002), and salinity (Su et al., 2021) treatments, and transgenic lines overexpressing TLP genes could simultaneously exhibit resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses (Chowdhury et al., 2017). When expressed in vitro, TLPs inhibited the growth of fungal pathogens by lysing spores, impeding spore germination, and hindering hyphal growth (Abad et al., 1996; Rajam et al., 2007). In barley plants, HvTLP8, a malting-quality-associated QTL (quantitative trait locus), was implicated in β-glucan transformation in a redox-dependent manner (Singh et al., 2017).

Tibetan hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare L. var. nudum), known as “Qingke” in Chinese, is the only crop plant capable of a yield in regions lying above 4500 m elevation under natural conditions (Lin et al., 2018). As the staple food of Tibetanese, Qingke is tightly linked to food security and feed production in high-elevation areas. Recent developments in sequencing technology have propelled gene analysis forward, making it now feasible to comprehensively analyze a gene family using its transcriptomic or genomic sequencing data (Wang et al., 2021). In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the TLP family genes in Qingke, by considering their pleiotropic role. Our study uncovered the genetic characteristics of TLPs in Qingke, and revealed the potential roles they play in this barley’s defense against pathogenic infections and drought and cold stresses.

Materials and methods

Identification and analysis Thaumatin-like proteins genes from Qingke

The genomic data of Tibetan hulless barley was downloaded from the Qingke genome database1 (Zeng et al., 2020). Preliminary identification of Qingke TLP sequences was performed by a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) search using the HMMER 3.0 program (Finn et al., 2011), for which the thaumatin domain (PF00314) served as the query term and a predefined E-value cutoff of 1e–5 was used. Positive hits were further aligned using the BioEdit tool to remove any redundancies. Sequences were then submitted to Pfam2, SMART3, and CCD4 databases for reconfirmation of the thaumatin domain (Mistry et al., 2020); only those possessing a complete thaumatin domain were classified as TLPs in the Qingke genome. Theoretical computation of the molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) was done using the ProtParam tool5. To predict the signal peptides and sites of cleavage, the sequences were submitted to the SignaIP 5.0 server6 (Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019), while the proteins’ subcellular localization was determined with Plant-mPLoc (Wu et al., 2011) and Plant-mSubP (Sahu et al., 2019).

Gene structure and motif analysis

Conserved motifs in the Qingke TLPs were identified using the MEME (Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation) suite v5.4.17 (Bailey et al., 2015). The following parameters were applied for motif search: number of repetitions, any; maximum number of motifs, 10; and the minimum and the maximum motif length were configured as 6 and 100 residues respectively. To analyze and visualize the gene structure of TLPs, their CDS sequences and corresponding genomic fragments were uploaded to the Gene Structure Display Server8 (Hu et al., 2015).

Phylogenetic analysis and homologous modeling of Qingke Thaumatin-like proteins

Sequence information of TLPs in the Arabidopsis thaliana, Cucumis melo, Hordeum vulgare, Oryza sativa, andBrachypodium distachyon genomes were obtained from previous reports (Iqbal et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021; Sharma et al., 2022). The phylogenic relationships among TLPs of the six species was inferred from a tree built in MEGA 119 using the maximum likelihood (ML) method (Tamura et al., 2021). The constructed phylogeny was then visualized in EvolView10 (Subramanian et al., 2019). The three-dimensional structure of each TLP was predicted via homologous modeling, using the 3D structure of the cherry allergen Pru av 2 protein (2ahn.1.A) as a template (Huet et al., 2013).

Prediction of cis-elements in the promoter region of Qingke Thaumatin-like proteins

For each TLP gene, the sequence of a genomic fragment located 2 kb upstream of the ATG start codon was extracted, and this used as a query for motif prediction. The cis-elements present in the promoter region were predicted by uploading the sequences to the PlantCARE server11 (Lescot et al., 2002). To visualize the cis-elements, the Gene Structure Display Server was used.

Expression analysis of Thaumatin-like protein genes in response to biotic and abiotic stresses

The raw data from three published studies (Liang et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2017, 2018) were downloaded from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA), and used for the expression analysis of Qingke TLP genes in response to powdery mildew infection and drought and cold stresses. Detailed information of this transcriptomic data appears in Supplementary Table 1. Data analysis was done using the pipeline provided by TBtools (Chen et al., 2020). First, any sequencing adaptors were filtered out using Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014), then the resulting clean data was aligned to the Qingke reference genome by Hisat2 (Kim et al., 2019), and finally quantified by StringTie (Pertea et al., 2015). After transforming them logarithmically, the transcripts per million (TPM) data were used to compare the transcription levels of the TLP genes in response to the different treatments.

Plant materials, RNA isolation, and qRT-PCR

Seeds of the Tibetan hulless barley variety ‘Dulihuang’ were used as the material for the qPCR. Seeds were first sterilized with 10% bleach for 5 min, then rinsed thrice with deionized water. Next, soaked seeds were transferred to Petri dishes filled with wet filter papers and allowed to incubate for 48 h at 22°C to germinate. Sprouted seeds were planted into peat moss-containing pots (9.5 cm in diameter), and cultivated under controlled conditions (at 55% relative humidity and 22°C under a 16-h/8-h light/dark photoperiod with a light intensity of 20 000 lx) in growth chambers. For their treatment with phytohormones, seedlings at the 4-leaf stage were subjected to foliar spraying of a methyl jasmonate (20 mM) or sodium salicylate (10 mM) solution. Leaves were sampled at 0, 2, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h post-treatment, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and kept at –80°C until used. To isolate the total RNA, the RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, China) was used according to its manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted RNA was first treated with DNase I to eliminate possible contamination by DNA, and all samples then subjected to 1% agarose gel electrophoresis to check their integrity. The concentration of total RNA isolated from a given sample was determined using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. To quantify the transcript levels of Qingke TLP genes by qPCR, total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA, using the HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR kit (+ gDNA wiper) (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). Then, using the AceQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China), the qPCR’s 20-μL reaction mixture was prepared for each test. Thermal cycling reactions were run in the MX3000P qPCR thermo-cycler (Stratagene, United States). The Qingke HSP gene served as the internal reference (Cai et al., 2018). The relative expression software tool (REST) 2009 was used to derive the relative expression levels of genes (Pfaffl et al., 2002). Detailed information of the primers used can be found in Supplementary Table 2.

Results

Genome-wide identification of Thaumatin-like proteins in Qingke

To identify TLPs in the Qingke genome, we performed a thorough search using the HMM profile of the thaumatin domain (PF00314) as a query. After redundancy removal, candidate sequences were submitted to the SMART, CCD, and Pfam databases to reconfirm the thaumatin domain, and a total of 36 Qingke TLPs thus identified. Details about their physical and biochemical properties are presented in Table 1. Consisting of 153 to 728 amino acids, Qingke TLPs had molecular weights (MW) ranging from 16.21 to 79.97 kDa. According to their calculated theoretical isoelectric point, 12 of the 36 TLPs were basic while the other 24 were acidic; GRAVY values were below 0 for 17 TLPs, implying these proteins’ strong hydrophilicity whereas they were greater than 0 for the other 19 TLPs, indicating their hydrophobicity; and 25 TLPs harbored a signal peptide at the N-terminus, whose length spanned 17 to 34 amino acids. Details concerning their sites of cleavage are in Table 1. We predicted the subcellular localization of all 36 TLPs. These results showed that most of these proteins localized to the extracellular or periplasmic spaces, with only four localizing to the cytoplasm or outer membrane.

TABLE 1.

Physical and biochemical properties of the TLPs identified in Qingke.

Sequence ID Length (aa) MW (kD) pI SP SL GRAVY
HOVUSG4889300 330 34.17027 5.19 31-32 Extracellular –0.085
HOVUSG1548800 325 32.66853 4.64 – Extracellular 0.098
HOVUSG2056400 320 32.03172 4.51 30-31 Extracellular 0.204
HOVUSG2715500 324 32.24737 5.03 24-25 Extracellular 0.306
HOVUSG2403700 356 35.39969 4.80 – Extracellular 0.034
HOVUSG5777800 360 37.07682 5.93 24-25 Extracellular 0.034
HOVUSG5063300 438 45.90470 6.23 19-20 Extracellular –0.068
HOVUSG3013000 248 25.42904 8.78 23-24 Extracellular 0.109
HOVUSG2714800 360 37.56808 5.48 – Extracellular –0.098
HOVUSG3359300 259 25.74488 4.79 20-21 Extracellular 0.241
HOVUSG6064000 258 27.09720 8.43 23-24 Periplasmic 0.267
HOVUSG2056300 340 34.12019 4.76 27-28 Extracellular 0.188
HOVUSG5482900 264 27.80845 6.68 – Extracellular –0.124
HOVUSG1461300 352 35.36611 4.71 – Extracellular –0.198
HOVUSG6545900 571 61.86448 5.63 – Cytoplasmic 0.001
HOVUSG6188700 261 26.08608 5.18 34-35 Extracellular 0.207
HOVUSG1336900 316 33.50597 7.30 – Extracellular 0.045
HOVUSG3726900 279 27.80427 6.83 – Extracellular 0.259
HOVUSG6245400 250 26.03168 7.47 24-25 Periplasmic 0.044
HOVUSG6558000 227 23.64379 7.36 24-25 Periplasmic –0.030
HOVUSG5063500 226 23.72595 7.33 24-25 Periplasmic –0.022
HOVUSG5062800 472 51.36320 5.47 – Periplasmic –0.203
HOVUSG3036500 728 79.96609 6.82 24-25 OuterMembrane –0.237
HOVUSG0169900 563 61.27101 7.44 18-19 Periplasmic –0.129
HOVUSG3036300 641 71.00618 6.38 28-29 Cytoplasmic –0.224
HOVUSG0170500 527 57.91669 5.95 – Cytoplasmic –0.297
HOVUSG0170200 572 63.75936 7.94 30-31 Cytoplasmic –0.177
HOVUSG3065300 173 17.54947 4.51 20-21 Extracellular 0.050
HOVUSG5062900 268 27.92257 7.50 22-23 Periplasmic –0.030
HOVUSG3036800 427 46.47299 8.13 – Periplasmic –0.253
HOVUSG5063600 171 17.82000 6.52 22-23 Extracellular –0.019
HOVUSG6418000 184 18.35486 8.02 26-27 Periplasmic 0.149
HOVUSG5872500 229 23.81215 4.90 21-22 Periplasmic 0.121
HOVUSG4917800 240 24.63917 7.52 27-28 Periplasmic 0.129
HOVUSG2829200 175 18.04821 5.02 22-23 Extracellular 0.112
HOVUSG5063200 153 16.21212 6.52 17-18 Extracellular –0.039
Open in a new tab

MW, molecular weight; pI, isoelectric point; SP: Signal peptide cleavage site; SL: Subcellular localization; GRAVY, grand average of hydropathicity.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis of Qingke Thaumatin-like proteins

Multiple alignments of Qingke TLPs’ sequences confirmed the conservatism of their feature structures. Cysteines are considered crucial for structure formation and protein stability of TLPs. A total of 16 cysteines were found highly conserved in 22 of the 36 Qingke TLPs (Supplementary Figure 1). For the remaining 14 proteins, intra-molecular disulfide bridges could still be formed, though the number and location of the cysteine residues changed. The five conserved REDDD residues formed the acidic cleft responsible for the β-1,3-glucanase activity of TLPs. The complete set of these five residues was detected in 21 Qingke TLPs. This meant that for the other 15 TLPs their glucanase activity might be impaired or even gone. A conserved CQTGDCGG motif, it involved in β-glucan binding in a redox-dependent manner, was observed in six TLPs (HOVUSG6418000, HOVUSG3065300, HOVUSG0170500, HOVUSG0169900, HOVUSG3036500, and HOVUSG1461300).

The evolutionary relationships among TLPs were explored via phylogenic inference with homologs from Qingke, Hordeum vulgare, Cucumis melo, Oryza sativa, Brachypodium distachyon, and Arabidopsis thaliana. TLPs of these three species were classified into 10 major groups, with each clade containing at least two TLP from Qingke (Figure 1). Clade IX was the largest group identified, comprising 11 Qingke TLPs, 8 HvTLPs, 8 OsTLPs and 7 BdTLPs. By contrast, clade III was the smallest, formed by one OsTLP, one AtTLP, One CmTLP, two BdTLPs and two Qingke TLPs. The 21 Qingke TLPs containing the five complete REDDD residues were mainly distributed in seven groups: clade I, clade II, clade III, and clade V. The TLPs from these groups tended to possess the β-1,3-glucanase activity; hence, they might be primary candidates involved in Qingke’s resistance to disease.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic relationships of TLPs from Qingke, Hordeum vulgare, Cucumis melo, Oryza sativa, Brachypodium distachyon, and Arabidopsis thaliana. The phylogeny was constructed by MEGA 11, using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The inferred phylogeny was visualized in the Evolview online server. TLPs were classified into 10 groups, these indicated by different background colors.

Analysis of domain composition, motif pattern and gene structure of the Thaumatin-like proteins family in Qingke

The functional properties of proteins depend largely on domain composition. All the 36 identified Qingke TLPs possessed a characteristic thaumatin domain (with lengths ranged from 129 to 234 AAs), confirming their identity as TLPs (Supplementary Table 3). A protein kinase domain was detected in six TLPs (HOVUSG3036500, HOVUSG0169900, HOVUSG3036300, HOVUSG0170500 and HOVUSG0170200), demonstrating features of typical thaumatin-like protein kinases (TLPKs). A cyclin N-terminal domain was found in HOVUSG6545900, but whether this thaumatin-domain-containing protein is involved in cell cycle control still await to be verified.

To identify and analyze the distribution of the conserved motifs, their corresponding TLP sequences were submitted to the MEME server. As Figure 2A shows, a total of 10 conserved motifs were detected in Qingke TLPs; details for these identified motifs appear in Figure 2B. Two motifs, motif 2 and motif 4, were highly conserved across the 36 Qingke TLPs. But for some motifs, such as motif 5 and motif 6, their presence was only detected in six TLPKs, in which these two motifs correspond to the conserved sequences of the protein kinase domain (Supplementary Figure 2). Concerning the other 6 motifs, they were found present in most of the TLP members. These results suggested the Qingke TLP family proteins shared highly conserved structural basis.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Open in a new tab

Conserved motifs identified in the Qingke TLP proteins. (A) Distribution of conserved motifs. (B) Sequence logo of motifs identified. The height of a symbol reflects the relative frequency of the amino acid at that position.

Gene structure analysis revealed that the number of introns varied from 0 to 7 in the Qingke TLPs. Of the 36 TLP genes, 15 contained no introns (Figure 3), and among the other 21 intron-containing genes, HOVUSG6545900 had the most introns. Our results of exon-intron analysis echoed previous findings for melon and maize TLPs, for which a significant proportion of genes are intron-free. Analysis of intron phase revealed that the majority of the introns were phase 0 (28 out of 38), and phase-1 and phase-2 introns were 6 and 4, respectively.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Open in a new tab

Exon–intron structure of the Qingke TLP genes. Yellow boxes and black lines respectively indicate the exons and introns. The numbers (0, 1, and 2) indicate phases of introns.

Tertiary structure of Thaumatin-like proteins in Qingke

Typical TLPs harbored an acidic cleft structure formed by the five conserved REDDD residues. We generated the surface electrostatic potential and the 3D structure of three selected Qingke TLPs (Figure 4), and a typical acidic cleft was observed (indicated by the arrow), which were formed by the five REDDD residues (Figures 4D-F, red circle). Residues located at the bottom of the acidic cleft forming regions were also highly conserved (Figures 4D-F, yellow circle). Through structure modeling, we found that Qingke REDDD-containing TLPs probably possessed the antifungal traits of typical TLPs.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Open in a new tab

The electrostatic surface and the 3D structure of three Qingke TLPs. (A–C) The electrostatic surface of HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG5063500 and HOVUSG5062800, respectively. Surfaces where the electrostatic potential is positive are colored blue, while those negatively charged are colored red. The arrows point to the acidic clefts formed by five conserved residues (REDDD). (D–F) The 3D structure of HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG5063500 and HOVUSG5062800, with residues of the REDDD motif (red circles) and the bottom of acidic cleft forming regions (yellow circles) shown.

Cis-elements in the promoters of Qingke Thaumatin-like proteins genes

To investigate the cis-acting motifs controlling TLPs’ expression, the 2-kb promoter sequence of each of Qingke TLP was submitted to the PlantCARE database. For the 36 TLPs, a total of 2092 cis-regulatory elements were identified in their promoters, these belonging to 7 categories based on which biological processes they are involved in Figure 5. Hormone-responsive motifs were the most abundant type, constituting 34.08% of the total number of elements identified (Supplementary Figure 3). Motifs controlling ABA (ABRE), SA (as-1, TCA-element), MeJA (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif), and ET (ERE) responses were the major types of the hormone-responsive elements (Supplementary Figure 4B). Cis-elements identified as transcription factor binding sites were also significantly enriched, accounting for 17.78% of all motifs identified (Supplementary Figure 3). Overall, 22 types of light-responsive elements were detected, demonstrating high diversity in the motif composition. Also discernible were cis-elements that participate in the transcription regulation of plants’ stress responses, their growth and development processes, as well as circadian control (Supplementary Figure 3). The presence of these regulatory motifs in the promoter suggested that TLPs’ expression is influenced by a diverse set of regulatory factors.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Open in a new tab

Distribution of cis-elements in the promoters of Qingke TLP genes. Black lines indicate the promoters. Cis-elements differing in function are color-coded accordingly.

Expression profile of Thaumatin-like proteins in Qingke plant under biotic stress

For the expression profiles of TLPs in response to biotic stress, the RNA-Seq data from a previous study was reanalyzed here. As seen in Figure 6, HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG5063500, HOVUSG5062800, and HOVUSG5062900 were distinguished as the major responsive genes to powdery mildews infection, in both the G7 resistant cultivar and the Z13 susceptible cultivar. However, these four genes were more rapidly induced in the G7 than Z13 cultivar, implying their possible role in TLP-mediated resistance. Expression profile results revealed that four other TLPs, namely HOVUSG4889300, HOVUSG1548800, HOVUSG2715500, and HOVUSG3036300, might also contribute importantly to plant defense in the G7 resistant cultivar. In the Z13 susceptible cultivar, only the expression of HOVUSG3065300 and HOVUSG5063600 was detected. By reanalyzing the transcriptomic data, we succeeded in identifying the major biotic stress-responsive TLPs in Qingke. With further functional analyses, these genes could prove useful for improving barley resistance traits via genetic engineering.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Open in a new tab

Expression of Qingke TLP genes in response to powdery mildew infection. Their expression levels at 0, 6, 36, 72, and 168 h post-inoculation (hpi) (A) in the powdery mildew-resistant cultivar Gannongda7 (G7) and (B) the powdery mildew-sensitive cultivar Zangqing13 (Z13). The RNA-seq data was downloaded from SRA database, and aligned to the Qingke genome to calculate the expression levels of TLP genes. Bars are colored according to the log2 (TPM + 1) values.

Expression patterns of Qingke Thaumatin-like proteins under abiotic stress

Our reanalysis of the expression data indicated that most TLPs of Qingke were unresponsive to drought (Figure 7A). Drought did, however, induce the expression of HOVUSG1548800, HOVUSG2056400, and HOVUSG5062900, in the drought-tolerant Z772 cultivar as well as the drought-sensitive Z013 cultivar. But a lack of water exerted a negative impact on the transcription of HOVUSG5062800, whose expression is maintained at high level under normal conditions. At 5 h after the stress treatment, HOVUSG2056300’s expression was significantly upregulated in the drought-tolerant Z772. The drought-inducibility of TLPs, albeit a few, nonetheless suggested these genes figure prominently in drought adaption in Qingke.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Open in a new tab

Expression of Qingke TLP genes in response to drought and cold stresses. (A) Expression of Qingke TLP genes in drought-tolerant cultivar Z772 and drought-sensitive cultivar Z013 at 0, 1, and 5 h post-stress treatment. (B) Expression of Qingke TLP genes in the cold-tolerant cultivar Tibet148 subjected to 20/15°C (day/night), 3/1°C (day/night), –2°C (for 4 h) and –8°C (for 18 h) stress treatments. The RNA-seq data was downloaded from SRA database, and aligned to the Qingke genome to calculate the expression levels of TLP genes. Bars are colored according to the log2 (TPM + 1) values.

With respect to cold stress, nine TLPs—HOVUSG4889300, HOVUSG1548800, HOVUSG2715500, HOVUSG6558000, HOV USG5063500, HOVUSG5062800, HOVUSG3036500, HOV USG5062900, and HOVUSG5063600—were identified as major responsive genes (Figure 7B). Their expression levels were strongly induced by cold stress, especially under the subzero –2°C and –8°C treatments. Some of these TLPs were also identified as major participants of powdery mildews infection. Our results suggested that members of the TLP family might play multiple roles in how Qingke’s defense response against biotic and abiotic stresses.

Expression patterns of Thaumatin-like proteins under the hormone treatments

Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) exert direct but antagonistic effects on the expression of some TLP genes, suggesting differential roles of TLPs in the defense response against biotrophic vis-à-vis necrotrophic pathogens. Five Qingke TLPs were selected to characterize their expression patterns in response to SA and JA treatments. As illustrated in Figure 8, most of the selected TLPs showed strong and acute induction by SA, especially HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG3036300, HOVUSG0170200, and HOVUSG5063600, all of which peaked at 2 h post-treatment. Transcription of HOVUSG3065300 also exhibited strong inducibility, in that its expression level reached 21.26 times of the untreated control (0 h) at 8 h after the SA treatment. Acting antagonistically, MeJA exerted negative effects on the expression of most Qingke TLPs, such as HOVUSG3065300, HOVUSG5063600, HOVUSG6558000 and HOVUSG0170200. Intriguingly, HOVUSG3036300 was the only TLP induced by both MeJA and SA, suggesting it could have dual roles in SA- and JA-mediated defense signaling. Altogether, these results indicated that Qingke TLPs are active in the SA pathway, but their inducibility (i.e., sensitivity and intensity) is differentiated.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Open in a new tab

Relative expression levels of TLP genes responding to sodium salicylate (SA) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. (A) Expression patterns of HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG3036300, HOVUSG0170200, HOVUSG3065300 and HOVUSG5063600 in response to the SA treatment. (B) Expression patterns of HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG3036300, HOVUSG0170200, HOVUSG3065300 and HOVUSG5063600 in response to the MeJA treatment. The expression level of the untreated control (0 h) was used to calculate the relative expression levels at different time-points after imposing the hormone treatments. Bars are the mean ± SD of expression levels obtained from three independent biological replicates.

Discussion

Thaumatin-like proteins (TLPs) are pivotal components of plant defense against both biotic and abiotic stresses. Genome-wide identification has verified the widespread presence of TLPs in a variety of fungal, plants, and animal species (Liu et al., 2010). Considering the profound roles of TLPs in plants’ defense and development (Munis et al., 2010), a comprehensive analysis conducted at the genome-wide scale would advance research on Qingke in several respects. Qingke has been relied upon as a major food source by Tibetans, having been domesticated from wild barley relatives some 4,500 to 3,500 years ago according to its extensive genome sequencing (Zeng et al., 2018). In the present study, we performed a genome-wide identification of TLP genes in Qingke, and analyzed their expression in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

HMM profiling of thaumatin-domain-containing proteins facilitated our identification of 36 TLPs in Qingke. Most of the TLPs contained a signal peptide (SP) at the N-terminus, and were predicted to locate extracellularly (Faillace et al., 2019). In a previous study, Irfan et al. (2020) identified a total of 19 TLPs in the genome of barley, of which four HvTLPs contained the conserved CQTGDCGG motif. Expansion of the TLP family protein, as well as the CQTGDCGG-containing TLPs, was evident in Qingke. This suggests the TLP family has expanded significantly during the domestication and evolution process, despite differing identification procedures and cut-off values having been applied. The carbohydrate-binding motif (CQTGDCGG) of HvTLP8 binds to β-glucan in a redox-dependent manner, thereby altering the transformation of β-glucan during the germination and malting process (Singh et al., 2017). It is highly likely that the six CQTGDCGG-containing TLPs—HOVUSG6418000, HOVUSG3065300, HOVUSG0170500, HOVUSG0169900, HOVUSG3036500, and HOVUSG1461300—also have the β-glucan binding ability, and could regulate β-glucan transformation in Qingke in a similar way.

Cysteines are recognized for being crucial to the structure formation and protein stability of TLPs. Sequence alignments revealed that 22 of the 36 Qingke TLPs were highly conserved at 16 disulfide bond-formation cysteine residues (Supplementary Figure 1). The intra-molecular disulfide bridges formed by cysteines are known to be critical for not only TLPs but also for proteins of other PRs (such as PR1 and PR4) (Wang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022). These cysteines augment the stability of PRs, especially when challenged by unfavorable conditions such as an extreme pH or protease degradation (Ghosh and Chakrabarti, 2008).

The anti-fungal property of TLPs is mainly ascribed to their glucanase activity. For most of the TLPs, the acidic cleft, a conserved structure formed by the REDDD motif, is responsible for binding of the β-1,3-glucan substrate (Liu et al., 2010). But the REDDD motif was not consistently conserved in all the TLPs (Faillace et al., 2019), hinting at differences in substrate binding affinity and antifungal activity. What makes the situation more complicated is that some TLPs possessing the electronegative acidic cleft are devoid of an antifungal property (Menu-Bouaouiche et al., 2003). In fruit plants such as banana (Xiao et al., 2019), grape (Tattersall et al., 1997), and cherry (Fils-Lycaon et al., 1996), an accumulation of TLPs was related to the softening of pulp or flesh. Some fruit TLPs, though with moderate β-1,3-glucanase activity, were found incapable of antifungal activity (Menu-Bouaouiche et al., 2003). Considering the complexity and the multifaceted role of TLPs in plant defense and development, further research is warranted to elaborate their function in Qingke.

The expression of TLPs can respond to a variety of stimuli, including salt, drought (Su et al., 2021), SA, MeJA, ABA, and ethephon (Singh et al., 2013), as well as host infections from a pathogenic virus (Cornelissen et al., 1986) or fungus (Wang et al., 2010). The fact that TLPs’ expression was inducible by multiple signals suggests their respective transcription is under the control of a diverse set of cis-regulatory elements. Sequence querying confirmed that the motifs regulating the transcription of Qingke TLPs were divergent in composition, with cis-elements involved in the hormone response being the most abundant type found. Motifs controlling ABA (ABRE), SA (as-1, TCA-element), ET (ERE), and MeJA (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif) responses were frequently identified in promoters of Qingke TLPs. Being among those genes recognized as a marker for SA-mediated systematic acquired resistance (SAR), the expression of TLPs exhibited strong induction when treated with exogenous SA (Ali et al., 2017). Existence of the as-1 and TCA-element in Qingke TLP promoters provides recognition sites for SA-mediated transcription regulation, implying the involvement of TLPs in this plant’s SA-mediated defense response. Given these findings, it is reasonable to conclude that TLPs function in the stress response and phytohormone-mediated signal transduction in Qingke. We also found cis-acting motifs involved in light response, stress response, growth and development processes, and circadian control; this strongly suggests the transcription of TLPs was concomitantly regulated by multiple stimuli.

Reanalyzing the RNA-seq data enabled us to examine the expression profiling of TLPs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Four TLPs (HOVUSG6558000, HOVUSG5063500, HOVUSG5062800 and HOVUSG5062900), whose expression was significantly upregulated in both the G7 resistant cultivar and the Z13 susceptible cultivar, were identified as the major powdery mildew-responsive genes of the TLP family in Qingke. However, a more rapid induction of these four genes was observed in the G7 resistant cultivar, highlighting the involvement of TLPs in disease resistance. Further, the expression levels of TLPs were differentially regulated, depending on the stressing factor incurred. In Rosa chinensis, seven RcTLPs exhibited greater expression when exposed to drought or salinity stress. Three RcTLPs showed specific expression in leaves infected with Botrytis cinerea for 48 h (Su et al., 2021). In wheat, 50 TaTLPs were differentially expressed when exposed to Blumeria graminis or Puccinia striiformis infection (Sharma et al., 2022). More TaTLPs are characterized by responsiveness to abiotic stimuli, such as salt, heat, and osmotic stresses. Here, we found that different members of TLP family genes were differentially regulated when subjected to differing stresses. Our study unraveled the genetic characteristics of TLP family genes in Qingke, and helped to distinguish the core participants functioning in this plant’s mitigation of stressful conditions.

Conclusion

A total of 36 TLPs were identified from the Qingke genome via HMM profiling, and our analyses of gene expression and bioinformatic properties shed light on the functioning of TLP in plant defenses against biotic and abiotic stresses (Figure 9). Four TLPs, all exhibiting strong inducibility to powdery mildews infection, were identified as major members of the PR-5 family participating in the plant’s response to biotic stress. Yet more TLPs were found actively involved in mitigating abiotic stresses, especially cold. In systemically characterizing the genetic features of the TLP family gene, we anticipate our findings will spur and inform subsequent investigations into protein functions and enzymatic properties of barley and closely related plant species.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Open in a new tab

Proposed working model for TLP-mediated plant defense response in Qingke. Blue arrows indicate the promotion of gene transcription, while the red arrow indicates its negative regulation.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

LeW, JL, and LiW designed and performed the experiments. ZX, WY, and KX devised the experiments. SW, QS, and WS helped with the data analysis and writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Footnotes

Funding

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Project of Qinghai Province (grant no. 2019-ZJ-962Q). LeW was supported by the ‘Kunlun Elite-Innovation & Carving Out Talent’ program of Qinghai Province, China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.912296/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (2.5MB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, docx)
Click here for additional data file. (31KB, XLS)
Click here for additional data file. (13.3KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (17.3KB, DOCX)

References

  1. Abad L. R., D’Urzo M. P., Liu D., Narasimhan M. L., Reuveni M., Zhu J. K., et al. (1996). Antifungal activity of tobacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant. Sci. 118 11–23. 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali S., Mir Z. A., Tyagi A., Bhat J. A., Chandrashekar N., Papolu P. K., et al. (2017). Identification and comparative analysis of Brassica juncea pathogenesis-related genes in response to hormonal, biotic and abiotic stresses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 39:268. 10.1007/s11738-017-2565-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Almagro Armenteros J. J., Tsirigos K. D., Sønderby C. K., Petersen T. N., Winther O., Brunak S., et al. (2019). SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37 420–3. 10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bailey T. L., Johnson J., Grant C. E., Noble W. S. (2015). The MEME suite. Nucl. Acids Res. 43 W39–49. 10.1093/nar/gkv416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolger A. M., Lohse M., Usadel B. (2014). Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30 2114–20. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandazza A., Angeli S., Tegoni M., Cambillau C., Pelosi P. (2004). Plant stress proteins of the thaumatin-like family discovered in animals. FEBS Lett. 571 3–7. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cai J., Li P., Luo X., Chang T., Li J., Zhao Y., et al. (2018). Selection of appropriate reference genes for the detection of rhythmic gene expression via quantitative real-time PCR in Tibetan hulless barley. PLoS One 13:e0190559. 10.1371/journal.pone.0190559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen C., Chen H., Zhang Y., Thomas H. R., Frank M. H., He Y., et al. (2020). TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol. Plant 13 1194–202. 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chowdhury S., Basu A., Kundu S. (2017). Overexpression of a new osmotin-like protein gene (SindOLP) confers tolerance against biotic and abiotic stresses in sesame. Front. Plant Sci. 8:410. 10.3389/fpls.2017.00410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornelissen B. J., Hooft van Huijsduijnen R. A., Bol J. F. (1986). A tobacco mosaic virus-induced tobacco protein is homologous to the sweet-tasting protein thaumatin. Nature 321 531–2. 10.1038/321531a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Durrant W. E., Dong X. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 42 185–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Faillace G. R., Turchetto-Zolet A. C., Guzman F. L., de Oliveira-Busatto L. A., Bodanese-Zanettini M. H. (2019). Genome-wide analysis and evolution of plant thaumatin-like proteins: a focus on the origin and diversification of osmotins. Mol. Genet. Genom. 294 1137–57. 10.1007/s00438-019-01554-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Fils-Lycaon B. R., Wiersma P. A., Eastwell K. C., Sautiere P. (1996). A cherry protein and its gene, abundantly expressed in ripening fruit, have been identified as thaumatin-like. Plant Physiol. 111 269–73. 10.1104/pp.111.1.269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finn R. D., Clements J., Eddy S. R. (2011). HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucl. Acids Res. 39 W29–37. 10.1093/nar/gkr367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ghosh R., Chakrabarti C. (2008). Crystal structure analysis of NP24-I: a thaumatin-like protein. Planta 228 883–90. 10.1007/s00425-008-0790-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grenier J., Potvin C., Trudel J., Asselin A. (1999). Some thaumatin-like proteins hydrolyse polymeric beta-1,3-glucans. Plant J. 19 473–80. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00551.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hu B., Jin J., Guo A. Y., Zhang H., Luo J., Gao G. (2015). GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 31 1296–7. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu817 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huet J., Teinkela Mbosso E. J., Soror S., Meyer F., Looze Y., Wintjens R., et al. (2013). High-resolution structure of a papaya plant-defense barwin-like protein solved by in-house sulfur-SAD phasing. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 69(Pt 10), 2017–26. 10.1107/s0907444913018015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Iqbal I., Tripathi R. K., Wilkins O., Singh J. (2020). Thaumatin-like protein (TLP) gene family in barley: Genome-wide exploration and expression analysis during germination. Genes 11:1080. 10.3390/genes11091080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones J. D. G., Dangl J. L. (2006). The plant immune system. Nature 444 323–9. 10.1038/nature05286 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jwa N. S., Hwang B. K. (2017). Convergent evolution of pathogen effectors toward reactive oxygen species signaling networks in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 8:1687. 10.3389/fpls.2017.01687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kim D., Paggi J. M., Park C., Bennett C., Salzberg S. L. (2019). Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 37 907–15. 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kirino H., Yoshimoto K., Shinya R. A.-O. (2020). Thaumatin-like proteins and a cysteine protease inhibitor secreted by the pine wood nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus induce cell death in Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 15:241613. 10.1371/journal.pone.0241613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kuwabara C., Takezawa D., Shimada T., Hamada T., Fujikawa S., Arakawa K. (2002). Abscisic acid- and cold-induced thaumatin-like protein in winter wheat has an antifungal activity against snow mould, Microdochium nivale. Physiol. Plant 115 101–10. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1150112.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lescot M., Dehais P., Thijs G., Marchal K., Moreau Y., Van de Peer Y., et al. (2002). PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucl. Acids Res. 30 325–7. 10.1093/nar/30.1.325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang J., Chen X., Deng G., Pan Z., Zhang H., Li Q., et al. (2017). Dehydration induced transcriptomic responses in two Tibetan hulless barley (Hordeum vulgare var. nudum) accessions distinguished by drought tolerance. BMC Genom. 18:775. 10.1186/s12864-017-4152-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin S., Guo H., Gong J., Lu M., Lu M.-Y., Wang L., et al. (2018). Phenolic profiles, β-glucan contents, and antioxidant capacities of colored Qingke (Tibetan hulless barley) cultivars. J. Cereal Sci. 81 69–75. 10.1016/j.jcs.2018.04.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu J.-J., Sturrock R., Ekramoddoullah A. K. M. (2010). The superfamily of thaumatin-like proteins: its origin, evolution, and expression towards biological function. Plant Cell Rep. 29 419–36. 10.1007/s00299-010-0826-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu Y., Cui J., Zhou X., Luan Y., Luan F. (2020). Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the TLP gene family in melon (Cucumis melo L.). Genomics 112 2499–509. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Menu-Bouaouiche L., Vriet C., Peumans W. J., Barre A., Van Damme E. J. M., Rougé P. (2003). A molecular basis for the endo-β1,3-glucanase activity of the thaumatin-like proteins from edible fruits. Biochimie 85 123–31. 10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00058-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Misra R. C., Sandeep, Kamthan M., Kumar S., Ghosh S. (2016). A thaumatin-like protein of Ocimum basilicum confers tolerance to fungal pathogen and abiotic stress in transgenic Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep. 6:25340. 10.1038/srep25340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mistry J., Chuguransky S., Williams L., Qureshi M., Salazar, Gustavo A., et al. (2020). Pfam: the protein families database in 2021. Nucl. Acids Res. 49 D412–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Munis M. F. H., Tu L., Deng F., Tan J., Xu L., Xu S., et al. (2010). A thaumatin-like protein gene involved in cotton fiber secondary cell wall development enhances resistance against Verticillium dahliae and other stresses in transgenic tobacco. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 393 38–44. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.01.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ngou B. P. M., Ahn H.-K., Ding P., Jones J. D. G. (2021). Mutual potentiation of plant immunity by cell-surface and intracellular receptors. Nature 592 110–5. 10.1038/s41586-021-03315-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pertea M., Pertea G. M., Antonescu C. M., Chang T. C., Mendell J. T., Salzberg S. L. (2015). StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33 290–5. 10.1038/nbt.3122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pfaffl M. W., Horgan G. W., Dempfle L. (2002). Relative expression software tool (REST) for group-wise comparison and statistical analysis of relative expression results in real-time PCR. Nucl. Acids Res. 30:e36. 10.1093/nar/30.9.e36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rajam M. V., Chandola N., Saiprasad Goud P., Singh D., Kashyap V., Choudhary M. L., et al. (2007). Thaumatin gene confers resistance to fungal pathogens as well as tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic tobacco plants. Biol. Plant. 51 135–41. 10.1007/s10535-007-0026-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sahu S. S., Loaiza C. D., Kaundal R. (2019). Plant-mSubP: a computational framework for the prediction of single- and multi-target protein subcellular localization using integrated machine-learning approaches. AoB Plants 12:lz068. 10.1093/aobpla/plz068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sakamoto Y., Watanabe H., Nagai M., Nakade K., Takahashi M., Sato T. (2006). Lentinula edodes tlg1 encodes a thaumatin-like protein that is involved in lentinan degradation and fruiting body senescence. Plant Physiol. 141 793–801. 10.1104/pp.106.076679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sharma A., Sharma H., Rajput R., Pandey A., Upadhyay S. K. (2022). Molecular characterization revealed the role of thaumatin-like proteins of bread wheat in stress response. Front. Plant Sci. 12:807448. 10.3389/fpls.2021.807448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shatters R. G., Boykin L. M., Lapointe S. L., Hunter W. B., Weathersbee A. A. (2006). Phylogenetic and structural relationships of the pr5 gene family reveal an ancient multigene family conserved in plants and select animal taxa. J. Mol. Evolut. 63 12–29. 10.1007/s00239-005-0053-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Singh N. K., Kumar K. R., Kumar D., Shukla P., Kirti P. B. (2013). Characterization of a pathogen induced thaumatin-like protein gene AdTLP from Arachis diogoi, a wild peanut. PLoS One 8:e83963. 10.1371/journal.pone.0083963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Singh S., Tripathi R. K., Lemaux P. G., Buchanan B. B., Singh J. (2017). Redox-dependent interaction between thaumatin-like protein and β-glucan influences malting quality of barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 114 7725–30. 10.1073/pnas.1701824114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Su L., Zhao X., Geng L., Fu L., Lu Y., Liu Q., et al. (2021). Analysis of the thaumatin-like genes of Rosa chinensis and functional analysis of the role of RcTLP6 in salt stress tolerance. Planta 254:118. 10.1007/s00425-021-03778-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Subramanian B., Gao S., Lercher M. J., Hu S., Chen W. H. (2019). Evolview v3: a webserver for visualization, annotation, and management of phylogenetic trees. Nucl. Acids Res. 47 W270–5. 10.1093/nar/gkz357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evolut. 38 3022–7. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Tattersall D. B., van Heeswijck R., Høj P. B. (1997). Identification and characterization of a fruit-specific, thaumatin-like protein that accumulates at very high levels in conjunction with the onset of sugar accumulation and berry softening in grapes. Plant Physiol. 114 759–69. 10.1104/pp.114.3.759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang L., Guo Z. H., Zhang Y. B., Wang Y. J., Yang G., Yang L., et al. (2017). Isolation and characterization of two distinct Class II PR4 genes from the oriental lily hybrid Sorbonne. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 64 707–17. 10.1134/S1021443717050132 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wang L., Zhang C., Yin W., Wei W., Wang Y., Sa W., et al. (2021). Single-molecule real-time sequencing of the full-length transcriptome of purple garlic (Allium sativum L. cv. Leduzipi) and identification of serine O-acetyltransferase family proteins involved in cysteine biosynthesis. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021:11627. 10.1002/jsfa.11627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang X., Tang C., Deng L., Cai G., Liu X., Liu B., et al. (2010). Characterization of a pathogenesis-related thaumatin-like protein gene TaPR5 from wheat induced by stripe rust fungus. Physiol. Plant 139 27–38. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01338.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wel H. V. D., Loeve K. (1972). Isolation and characterization of thaumatin I and II, the sweet-tasting proteins from Thaumatococcus daniellii Benth. Eur. J. Biochem. 31 221–5. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1972.tb02522.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu Z. C., Xiao X., Chou K. C. (2011). iLoc-Plant: a multi-label classifier for predicting the subcellular localization of plant proteins with both single and multiple sites. Mol. Biosyst. 7 3287–97. 10.1039/c1mb05232b [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Xiao L., Li T., Jiang G., Jiang Y., Duan X. (2019). Cell wall proteome analysis of banana fruit softening using iTRAQ technology. J. Proteom. 209:103506. 10.1016/j.jprot.2019.103506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Yuan H., Zeng X., Ling Z., Wei Z., Wang Y., Zhuang Z., et al. (2017). Transcriptome profiles reveal cold acclimation and freezing tolerance of susceptible and tolerant hulless barley genotypes. Acta Physiol. Plant. 39:275. 10.1007/s11738-017-2566-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yuan H., Zeng X., Yang Q., Xu Q., Wang Y., Jabu D., et al. (2018). Gene coexpression network analysis combined with metabonomics reveals the resistance responses to powdery mildew in Tibetan hulless barley. Sci. Rep. 8:14928. 10.1038/s41598-018-33113-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Yuan M., Jiang Z., Bi G., Nomura K., Liu M., Wang Y., et al. (2021a). Pattern-recognition receptors are required for NLR-mediated plant immunity. Nature 592 105–9. 10.1038/s41586-021-03316-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yuan M., Ngou B. P. M., Ding P., Xin X.-F. (2021b). PTI-ETI crosstalk: an integrative view of plant immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 62:102030. 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zeng X., Guo Y., Xu Q., Mascher M., Guo G., Li S., et al. (2018). Origin and evolution of qingke barley in Tibet. Nat. Commun. 9:5433. 10.1038/s41467-018-07920-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Zeng X., Xu T., Ling Z., Wang Y., Li X., Xu S., et al. (2020). An improved high-quality genome assembly and annotation of Tibetan hulless barley. Sci. Data 7:139. 10.1038/s41597-020-0480-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhang Q., Guo N., Zhang Y., Yu Y., Liu S. (2022). Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis of pathogenesis-related 1 (PR-1) gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) in response to blister-blight disease stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:1292. 10.3390/ijms23031292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang Y., Chen W., Sang X., Wang T., Gong H., Zhao Y., et al. (2021). Genome-Wide identification of the thaumatin-like protein family genes in gossypium barbadense and analysis of their responses to verticillium dahliae infection. Plants 10:10122647. 10.3390/plants10122647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (2.5MB, PDF)
Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, docx)
Click here for additional data file. (31KB, XLS)
Click here for additional data file. (13.3KB, DOCX)
Click here for additional data file. (17.3KB, DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES