Abstract
The link between cancer and aberrant glycosylation has recently become evident. Glycans and their altered forms, known as tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs), are diverse, complex and difficult to target therapeutically. Lectins are naturally occurring glycan-binding proteins that offer a unique opportunity to recognise TACAs. T cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have proven to be a successful immunotherapy against leukaemias, but so far have shown limited success in solid tumours. We developed a panel of lectin-CARs that recognise the glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), which is overexpressed in various cancers, such as Burkitt's lymphoma, colorectal, breast and pancreatic. We have selected the following lectins: Shiga toxin's B-subunit from Shigella dysenteriae, LecA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the engineered lectin Mitsuba from Mytilus galloprovincialis as antigen-binding domains and fused them to a well-known second-generation CAR. The Gb3-binding lectin-CARs have demonstrated target-specific cytotoxicity against Burkitt's lymphoma-derived cell lines as well as solid tumour cells from colorectal and triple-negative breast cancer. Our findings reveal the big potential of lectin-based CARs as therapeutical applications to target Gb3 and other TACAs expressed in haematological malignancies and solid tumours.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00018-022-04524-7.
Keywords: Lectin, CAR T cells, Cancer, Cell death, Tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens, Glycosphingolipid targeting, Globotriaosylceramide, Killing, Glycans, Gb3, Carbohydrates Immunotherapy Aberrant glycans
Introduction
The successful treatment of B-cell malignancies with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has demonstrated the therapeutical potential of cell-based immunotherapies against cancer [1, 2]. CARs are engineered receptors that redirect and activate T cells upon encountering a tumour-specific antigen to eventually eliminate cancer cells. CAR T cells combine an antigen-binding domain, traditionally a single-chain variable fragment (scFv), with a transmembrane domain and an intracellular signalling domain [3]. To date, CAR T cells primarily use scFv derived from antibodies targeting cell surface proteins, such as CD19 on B lymphocytes. However, one of the main mechanisms to overcome CAR recognition of cell surface proteins is antigen escape, which leads to recurrence after treatment [4, 5].
In humans, cell membrane is often decorated with surface proteins and lipids which are known or predicted to be glycosylated. Cell surface glycans participate in critical cellular processes such as cell–cell communication, signalling, host-pathogen interactions and disease development and progression. Given the importance of glycosylation, it is not surprising that minor changes in this process profoundly impact cell biology [6, 7]. The dysregulation of the glycan biosynthetic pathway is reflected as aberrant glycosylation and leads to malignant transformation [8, 9]. Altered glycan profiles include the appearance of truncated or novel structures, accumulation of precursors, and loss or overexpression of specific glycan structures on cancer cell surfaces named tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) [10, 11]. Therefore, targeting glycans could be a broader and more effective anti-cancer strategy than targeting subjacent core proteins [12]. Glycan-binding proteins, namely antibodies and lectins, which recognise altered glycan profiles in malignant cells, might provide an instrumental basis for tumour-targeted immunotherapy [13, 14]. On the one hand, carbohydrate-binding antibodies have been investigated for several decades to target TACAs. However, only a few were approved for clinical use due to reduced antibody recognition as a consequence of the wide variety of glycan epitopes [11, 15, 16]. On the other hand, lectins are proteins that recognise and bind carbohydrate moieties present in lipids and proteins, being valuable tools in biotechnology and medicine. Lectins have been used for cancer diagnosis, imaging [17, 18], and are currently explored as drug delivery systems [19–21]. Thus, lectins represent a promising addition to antibody-based applications. Most TACAs, particularly glycosphingolipids (GSLs) are poor immunogens [22], and it is not easy to generate high-affinity antibodies that could be applied in immunotherapy. For this reason, novel non-antibody-based approaches should be developed to target TACAs.
Most human cancers exhibit alterations in GSLs composition and metabolism, including those from the globo-series. The association of GSLs with cancer was first reported more than 50 years ago [23]. Among the globo-series, the globotriaosylceramide (Gb3, also known as CD77 or Pk antigen) [24, 25] was first identified as a fibrosarcoma-associated antigen [26]. Gb3 is present in the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane [27, 28]. It is composed of a ceramide backbone linked to a neutral trisaccharide made of galactose (Gal) and glucose (Glc) (Galα1-4Galβ1-4Glc) [24, 29]. The ceramide consists of sphingosine and a fatty acyl chain with different lengths, degrees of saturation and hydroxylation [29–31], determining how single Gb3 molecules are embedded in the plasma membrane and the presentation of the trisaccharide head group of Gb3. Gb3 is highly expressed in Burkitt's lymphoma [32], colorectal carcinoma [33], breast [34], ovary, and pancreatic cancer [35], as well as gliomas [36] and acute non-lymphocytic leukaemia (ANLL) [37]. Furthermore, Gb3 has been correlated with invasiveness, metastasis, angiogenesis and multi-drug resistance [38–42]. Overall, Gb3 might be an attractive target for engineered CAR T cells. Indeed, numerous lectins from unique origins have specificity for Gb3 [43], such as LecA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa [44], the non-toxic B-subunit of Shiga toxin (StxB), produced by Shigella dysenteriae and enterohemorrhagic strains of Escherichia coli (EHEC) [45], and the computationally redesigned Mitsuba [46] from the shellfish lectin MytiLec-1 [47].
In the present study, we successfully generated a panel of CARs, each of them with a Gb3-binding lectin as antigen-binding domain linked to the intracellular signalling domains from 41BB and CD3ζ. Lectins with different molecular weights and architectures but a common specificity towards Gb3 were chosen. In vitro analyses revealed that lectin-CAR T cells specifically recognised Gb3+ cancer cells and were cytotoxically active against cell lines from Burkitt's lymphoma, colorectal and breast cancer.
Material and methods
Cell lines
Ramos, Raji and Namalwa cells were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 medium. HT-29, HCT-116, LS-174 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) with 4.5 g L−1 glucose, l-glutamine and non-essential aminoacids (NEAA). MDA-MB-231 and JIMT1 cells were grown in DMEM with 1 g L−1 glucose. MDCK Gb3+ and MDCK WT were cultured in DMEM with 4.5 g L−1 glucose, L-glutamine. Media were supplemented either with 5% (for MDCK cell lines) or 10% (other cell lines) fetal calf serum (FCS) and antibiotics; the cells were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 MDCK cells expressing Gb3 were established by stable overexpression of Gb3 synthase as described earlier [21, 44]. Daudi cells were grown in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (IMDM) and HEK293T cells in DMEM, both media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics; cells were cultured at 37 °C and 7.5% CO2.
Antibodies
The following antibodies were applied for activation: anti-CD28.2 (BioLegend #302902), anti-mouse CD3ε (145-2C11, here named 2C11, from J. Bluestone, San Francisco, CA, USA). An anti-ζ antiserum 449 and a secondary antibody anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated (Cell Signaling #7076S) were used for immunoblotting. The following antibodies were utilised for flow cytometry: APC-labeled anti-FLAG (#637307), Alexa Fluor 488-labelled anti-CD3 (#300415), PE-labeled anti-hCD25 (#302606) all from BioLegend. APC-labelled anti-hCD69 (#MHCD6905) from Invitrogen, APC-labeled anti-hCD8 (#IM2469) from Beckman Coulter and PE-Cy7-labeled anti-CD137 (#25-1371-82) from eBioscience.
Generation of CAR constructs
To generate CARs targeting Gb3, the sequences encoding the B-subunit of Shiga toxin (StxB) from S. dysenteriae, LecA from P. aeruginosa, and Mitsuba, a variant of the shellfish lectin MytiLec-1, were cloned in frame with the lentiviral vector pCDH-EF1-19BBζ-T2A-copGFP. The lectin amino acid sequences were obtained from Uniprot or PDB, and the synthesised gene from Integrated DNA Technologies. The lentiviral vector was a gift from TCR2 Therapeutics. This second-generation CAR consists of the scFv from murine anti-hCD19 (FMC63) fused to the extracellular and transmembrane region of human CD8α, the 41BB endodomain and the ζ cytoplasmic tail signalling domain under the control of an EF-1α promoter. The sequence of each cloned CAR was verified by Sanger sequencing.
Lentivirus production and lentiviral transduction
A total of 107 HEK293T cells were plated and incubated overnight. After the medium exchange, the HEK293T cells were transfected with the packaging plasmid pMD2.G, the gag/pol pCMVR8.74 and the respective construct using PEI (Polysciences) transfection. The medium containing lentiviral particles was collected at 24 and 48 h post-transfection and concentrated by a 10% sucrose gradient. After 4 h of centrifugation at 10,000 rpm and 6 °C, the supernatant was discarded, and the virus pellet was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to be stored at − 80 °C.
Activation of primary human T cells, transduction and expansion
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from fresh blood of healthy donors using density centrifugation (Pancoll). PBMCs were resuspended in RPMI medium with 1000 U mL−1 of recombinant IL-2 (Prepotech) and activated with anti-CD3/CD28 (1 mg mL−1) antibodies. After 48–72 h, the remaining cells, mostly T cells, were lentivirally transduced using spin transfection (1800 rpm for 90 min and 30 °C) in the presence of 5 mg mL−1 protamine sulfate (Sigma) and 1000 U mL−1 IL-2 with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 4. Cells were maintained in a medium supplemented with 100 U mL−1 IL-2 for a maximum of 6–7 days after transduction and before using them for the indicated experiments. Activated but non-lentiviral transduced cells (NT) were included as a control.
CAR expression
Transduction efficiency was monitored by BFP expression after 4–6 days. The CAR surface expression was verified with an anti-FLAG antibody by flow cytometry. Samples were analysed using a GALLIOS flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter), and data analysis was performed using FlowJo V.10. The presence of the CARs after transduction was also confirmed by immunoblotting. A total of 5 × 105 transduced cells were resuspended in 20 µL of 200 mM Tris. The samples were split into two equal parts, and cells were lysed either with reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) buffer or non-reducing buffer plus 5 µL of urea. The samples were boiled for 5 min at 95 °C. Then the proteins were separated on 8% Tris–glycine gels and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibody anti-ζ chain (1:1000) was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C, and the corresponding-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000) was incubated with the membrane for an hour at room temperature (RT). Finally, ClarityTM Western ECL Chemiluminescent Substrate (Bio-Rad) was used to detect the luminescence signal by a Vilber Lourmat Fusion FX chemiluminescence imager.
Cytotoxicity assay
For the bioluminescence-based cytotoxicity assay, luciferase-expressing tumour cells (Ramos, Daudi, Raji, Namalwa, HT-29, HCT-116, LS-174, MDA-MB-231, JIMT1, MDCK Gb3+ or MDCK WT, as indicated) were plated at a concentration of 5 × 104 cells mL−1 (adherent cells, day before) or 1 × 105 cells mL−1 (suspension cells, day of the assay) in 96-well flat-bottom plates in triplicates. Then, 75 μg mL−1 of D-firefly luciferin potassium salt (Biosynth) were added to the tumour cells, and bioluminescence (BLI) was measured in the luminometer (Tecan infinity M200 Pro) to establish the BLI baseline. Subsequently, CAR T cells were added in a 5:1 effector to the target (E:T) cells ratio and incubated for 12, 17, 24 or 48 h (as indicated) at 37 °C. BLI was measured as relative light units (RLUs). RLU signals from cells treated with 1% Triton X-100 indicate maximal cell death. RLU signals from tumour cells incubated with non-transduced T cells determine baseline cell death. Percent specific lysis (specific killing) was calculated with the following formula: % specific lysis = 100 × (average baseline death RLU − test RLU) / (average baseline death RLU − average maximal death RLU).
For the live imaging cytotoxicity assay, GFP-expressing tumour cells (HT-29 and LS-174) were plated at a concentration of 104 cells per well one day before in a 96-well flat microtiter plate (Corning, #3595) in quadruplicates. When indicated, cells were stained with the C.LIVE Tox Red dye (CYTENA, #12144) to a final concentration of 0.5 µM on the day of the experiment. Then, CAR T cells were added in a 5:1 E:T cells ratio and monitored every 3 h for 48 h using the live cell imaging system CELLCYTE X (CYTENA). The total area of GFP and C.LIVE Tox Red fluorescence was quantified using the analysis feature in CELLCYTE Studio.
Cytokine detection
Cytokine release was tested using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) kit for tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interferon γ (IFN-γ) (Invitrogen). ELISAs were conducted according to the manufacturer's instructions. All CAR T cells were co-cultured with Ramos or Namalwa cells to a 5:1 effector to target (E:T) ratio for 48 h in triplicate wells. The supernatant was collected, and the TNF-α and IFN-γ concentrations were measured in a microplate reader (Synergy H4, Biotek Instruments).
Activation of CAR T cells
Activation of CAR T cells was assessed by co-culturing CAR T cells with target cells for 48 h to a 5:1 E:T ratio in triplicate wells. T cells were stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD25, anti-CD8 and anti-CD137 antibodies. Samples were analysed using the Attune NxT flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher), and data analysis was performed using FlowJo V.10.
Gb3 inhibition by PPMP treatment
Ramos cells, 2 × 105 cells per well, were seeded into a six-well plate and exposed to 1 and 2 μM of 1-phenyl-2-palmitoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PPMP from Enzo Life Sciences) for 48 h. At this time point, cells were washed with PBS, and fresh PPMP was added. 24 h later, Gb3 was detected by staining the cells with labelled StxB (Sigma Aldrich) and analysed using the GALLIOS flow cytometer. The data were analysed using FLowJo V.10. To verify cell viability after PPMP treatment, we used a cell proliferation and viability kit (Millipore Sigma) and followed the manufacturer's instructions. 1 × 104 Ramos cells were seeded and supplemented with 10 µL of the MTT labelling reagent. After 4 h, 100 µL of solubilisation solution were added and incubated overnight at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cell viability was measured at the microplate reader (Synergy HT, Biotek Instruments).
Gb3 profiling by LC/MS analysis
One day before the analysis, Ramos, Namalwa, HT-29, LS-174 and MDA-MB-231 cells were seeded in six-well plates. Gb3 composition analysis was done as described previously [48]. In brief, cells were washed with 0.9% NaCl and quenched with 1 mL methanol:water (1:1, v/v). Then, the cells were detached or collected and transferred to a new tube and lysed with 500 µL of a chloroform solution with 2 µg mL−1 heptadecanoic acid by vigorous vortexing. 200 µL of the lower phase were evaporated and analysed by targeted LC–MS analysis. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a BEH-C18 column (waters, 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm). It was used with A, a gradient acetonitrile:H2O 6:4, 10 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid, and B, isopropanol:acetonitrile 9:1, 10 mM ammonium formate, 0.1% formic acid [49]. A triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, G6460A) was operated in dynamic multiple reaction monitoring. Three experimental replicates were analysed in one LC–MS sequence. Samples were injected randomly, and a pooled quality control sample was regularly injected. Gb3 species were normalised to the internal standard and peak sum of detected sphingolipids. MetaboAnalyst 5.0 [50] was used for visualisation. Data were range-scaled for the heat map.
Composition and preparation of giant unilamellar vesicles
Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) were composed of 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), cholesterol (both Avanti Polar Lipids) Atto 647N 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE, Sigma Aldrich), and Gb3 (Matreya) at a molar ratio of 59.7: 30: 0.3: 10 mol%, respectively. GUVs were prepared by the electroformation method described by Madl et al. 2016. Shortly, lipids dissolved in chloroform with a total concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1 were spread on indium tin oxid-covered (ITO) glass slides and dried in a vacuum for at least one hour or overnight. Two ITO slides were assembled to make a chamber filled with sucrose solution adapted to the osmolarity of the imaging buffer Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then, an alternating electrical field with a strength of 1 V mm−1 was applied for 2.5 h at RT. Later, we observed the GUVs in chambers manually built as described elsewhere [51].
Live-cell imaging
On the day of the experiment, BFP-sorted cells were stained with a green CellTrace™CFSE proliferation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer's instructions and rested in standard culture conditions, for at least 2 h, before starting the experiment. Cells were pre-washed with and kept in HBSS supplemented with 1% (v/v) FCS, 1 mM l-glutamine, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids (NEAA), 10 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 0.55% (w/v) d-glucose while imaging. GUVs were added to the CAR T cell samples and imaged at 37 °C using an incubator stage (Okolab) mounted onto a confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ti-E inverted microscope equipped with Nikon A1R confocal laser scanning system, 60 × oil immersion objective, NA = 1.49, with three lasers: 488 nm, 561 nm, and 640 nm). Image acquisition and processing were performed using the NIS-Elements software (version 4.5, Nikon). The assembly of the videos (Online Resource 1–2) was done with Fiji Image J 2.1.0 software.
Image analysis
The captured time series were analysed for GUVs and CAR T cells contact. First, image segmentation was performed using ilastik [52], and then GUVs, cells and co-localised pixels were quantified. The percent of contact between GUVs and cells was calculated using the following formula: % contact = 100 × (co-localised pixels)/(GUVs pixels + cells pixels). The percentage was estimated for each time point and monitored area.
Quantification and statistical analysis
Statistical parameters are reported in figures and figure legends, including the exact value of n, precision measures (mean ± SEM or median ± SEM) and statistical significance. Data were judged to be statistically significant when p < 0.05. In figures, asterisks denote statistical significance as calculated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way ANOVA as indicated (∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p< 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001; ns, not significant). Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism8.
Results
Engineered T cells express lectin-based CARs
We aimed herein to target Gb3 in tumours with genetically engineered T cells. Previous studies have demonstrated that Gb3 is overexpressed in leukaemia, colorectal, breast, lung, pancreatic, ovarian, and testicular cancer, among other malignancies [53, 54]. Recently, enhanced expression of Gb3 has been described as correlating with the development of metastasis in colon cancer [33, 42] and multi-drug resistance in breast [55], lung, ovarian [56] and myeloid leukaemias [57]. Gb3 was also observed in the neovasculature adjacent to and within the tumor for ovarian carcinomas and their metastases [58], neuroblastomas and astrocytomas [59]. The generation of new vasculature favours tumour development; thus, targeting neovascular cells is an approach to inhibit tumour growth by depriving blood flow. Taken together, these data suggest an exceptionally attractive perspective for the direct targeting of Gb3. However, antibody-mediated targeting of glycosphingolipids appeared difficult [60]. To overcome this limitation, we alternatively designed a novel group of lectin-based CARs. We introduced the sequences of Gb3-binding lectins into a well-characterised second-generation CAR [61]. These novel lectin-CARs have as antigen-binding domain the StxB from S. dysenteriae, the LecA from P. aeruginosa or Mitsuba, an engineered variant of MytiLec-1 from M. galloprovincialis [46]. Sequences encoding these Gb3-binding lectins were cloned in frame into a lentivirus vector to express a second-generation CAR including 41BB and CD3ζ as signalling domains and a fluorescence protein (blue fluorescent protein, BFP) to assay for transduction efficiencies. All CARs in this study share the same transmembrane and signalling domain and include a FLAG-tag for detection (Fig. 1a). As a control, a well-characterised anti-CD19-CAR was used in this study [61].
Activated human PBMCs were lentivirally transduced to express the different lectin-CARs (named Shiga-CAR, LecA-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR), the anti-CD19-CAR or an empty vector, indicated as mock. The transduction efficiency was monitored by BFP expression, and the presence of the CARs on the cell surface was confirmed by FLAG-tag staining and flow cytometry. The BFP expression levels were similar in all cases, indicating similar transduction efficiencies. In contrast, CAR expression levels differed between CARs suggesting differences in folding or transport to the cell surface among the constructs or inaccessibility to the FLAG-tag. The frequency of cells expressing the CARs on the cell surface ranged from 36 to 85% (Fig. 1b, c). The FLAG-tag geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in CAR T cells revealed that the LecA-CAR had the highest T cell surface expression, followed by anti-CD19-CAR, Shiga-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR, among independent donors (Fig. 1b, d). We next confirmed the CAR expression by immunoblotting (Fig. S1a-b). All CARs exhibited the expected sizes under reducing conditions. In non-reducing gels, higher molecular weight complexes were observed. Despite identical cysteines located in the hinge and transmembrane regions of all CARs, each CAR construct presented a unique oligomerisation pattern (Fig. S1b). The LecA-CAR presented two clear bands that might correspond to a monomeric and tetrameric conformation, which is the native state of LecA. For the Shiga-CAR, two bands were detected, which correspond to that of a dimer or a trimer. The Mistuba-CAR exposed one band corresponding to a monomer. Finally, the anti-CD19-CAR revealed two bands: monomers and higher degree oligomers. Thus, the observed specific pattern of oligomerisation most probably results from the natural tendency of lectins to oligomerise [43]. Each lectin-CAR bears different intrinsic properties, influencing its expression on the cell surface.
Lectin-based CAR T cells mediate the lysis of tumour cells in vitro
The anti-tumour functionality of engineered CARs was assayed in a panel of Burkitt's lymphoma-derived cell lines. Cell lines assayed by flow cytometry using fluorescently labelled StxB include three cell lines expressing Gb3 (Ramos, Raji, Daudi) and one cell line that was Gb3− (Namalwa) (Fig. 2a). Importantly, all the cell lines expressed CD19, which is targeted by the anti-CD19-CAR T cells, here used as the positive control. Gb3 expression varied among the cell lines. Ramos cells expressed Gb3 the most (> 99%), followed by Raji (88.3%) and Daudi (36.2%). By contrast, Gb3 was not detected in Namalwa cells. The amount of Gb3 on the cell surface also differed among the studied cell lines (Fig. 2a).
We next co-cultured lectin-CAR T cells with our selection of target cells (Ramos, Raji, Daudi and Namalwa) to assess the efficacy of tumour cell lysis. We implemented a cytotoxicity assay previously described [62] and adjusted the effector to target (E:T) ratio 5:1. We included three controls: activated but untransduced T cells, T cells that were activated and transduced with an empty vector (mock), and T cells that were activated and transduced with an anti-CD19-CAR. Shiga-CAR T cells performed best against all Gb3-expressing tumour cells. In particular, Ramos cells, which presented the highest Gb3 expression, were most efficiently eliminated, followed by Daudi and Raji cells (Figs. 2b, c, S2). After 48 h, the Shiga-CAR T cells achieved 70% specific killing of Ramos cells, and the anti-CD19-CAR T cells 90%, which served as the reference control in this and further experiments. Moreover, Shiga-CAR T cells achieved efficient killing of Gb3+ Daudi cells since 36% of Daudi cells were Gb3+, and on average, 40% of cells were killed in 48 h (Fig. 2b).
On the contrary, Raji cells seemed to be partially resistant to being targeted with Shiga-CAR T cells regardless expressing high levels of Gb3 (99.8%) among the cells studied. Interestingly, Mitsuba-CAR T cells presented killing against Raji cells (26%, Fig. 2b,c), while the cytotoxicity against Ramos and Daudi was very low (< 7.7%). LecA-CAR T cells displayed poor or no activity against this panel of cell lines. Importantly, none of the lectin-CAR T cells presented activity against the Gb3− Namalwa cells, demonstrating the specificity of the lectin-CARs and the lack of off-target toxicity. Anti-CD19-CAR T cells showed up to 95% cytotoxicity to all the CD19-expressing cell lines after 48 h (Fig. 2b, c).
T cells must actively and specifically recognise foreign antigens to mount an effective immune response. The antigen-induced signal over tonic signal can be used to determine effective T cell stimulation. Thus, we next analysed lectin-CAR T cell activation upon co-culturing with Gb3+ and CD19+ Ramos cells in a 5:1 effector to target cells ratio for 48 h. We then determined the expression of the T cell activation markers CD137 and CD25 in BFP+CD3+ lectin-CAR T cells by flow cytometric analysis. Both CD8+ and CD4+ Shiga-CAR T cells displayed a substantial and significant increase in CD25 expression after exposure to Gb3+ Ramos cells (Fig. 3a–c). CD8+ and CD4+ LecA-CAR T cells slightly increased CD25 expression upon contact with Gb3+ Ramos cells, while Mitsuba-CAR T cells failed to recognise or establish a sustained binding to target cells and maintained similar CD25 expression compared to mock cells. Anti-CD19-CAR T cells exhibited strong CD25 expression after CD19 stimulation (Fig. 3a–c).
Conversely to CD25, none of the lectin-CAR T cells upregulated CD137 upon contact with Gb3+ Ramos cells (Fig. 3d–f). These results are in sharp contrast with the behaviour of the anti-CD19-CAR T cells, which strongly increased the expression of CD137 upon incubation with CD19+ Ramos cells (Fig. 3d–f). Despite having identical signalling domains, these data suggest differences in signal strength and quality between the lectin-CARs and the anti-CD19 CAR. Differential behaviour could be explained mechanistically by differences in clustering geometry, ligand density, affinity or all of them.
Improving activation and cytotoxicity of lectin-CAR T cells
To assess potential confounding effects imparted by the different proportions of primary T cells expressing each lectin-CAR, we sorted BFP+ cells to obtain homogeneous transduced populations. Upon sorting, cells were maintained in culture for 48 h to recover. The sorted CAR T cells were then co-incubated with Gb3+ Ramos and Gb3− Namalwa cells, as described earlier. After 48 h, Shiga-CAR T cells achieved 75% of specific killing against Ramos cells, similar to unsorted cells, 69.6% (Figs. 2b, 4a). Surprisingly, enrichment of Mitsuba-CAR T cells and LecA-CAR T cells allowed a remarkable increase in anti-tumour activity compared to unsorted cells (7.7% vs 27.8% and 2.2% vs 55.%, respectively; Figs. 2b, 4a), demonstrating that these CAR constructs were indeed functional. Moreover, sorting of the lectin-CAR T cells did not alter their specificity since their cytotoxic activity towards Namalwa cells was very poor or absent. The cytotoxicity of sorted anti-CD19-CAR T cells against Ramos and Namalwa was slightly higher compared to unsorted cells (90.3% (unsorted) vs 98.3% (sorted); Figs. 2b, 4a). Taken together, sorted lectin-CAR T cells were accurately recognised and killed Gb3+ cells lacking undesired off-target effects. The Shiga-CAR T cells were the best in targeting Gb3+ cells among the lectin-CAR T cells.
One of the hallmarks of activated T lymphocytes is the production of cytokines, which in turn activate efficient immune responses. In contrast to anti-CD19-CAR, lectin-CARs efficiently drove upregulation of CD25 but not of CD137 (Fig. 3). Therefore, it was essential to evaluate whether lectin-CARs induced the secretion of cytokines. We co-cultured BFP+-sorted cells with Ramos or Namalwa cells for 48 h and collected the supernatants to analyse cytokine release by ELISA. We tested the secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α in response to co-cultures with Gb3+ Ramos cells and Gb3− Namalwa cells. Shiga-CAR T cells efficiently and specifically secreted IFN-γ to the supernatant upon incubation with Ramos leukaemia cells (340 pg mL−1, Fig. 4b) compared to incubation with Gb3− Namalwa cells (Fig. 4b). However, LecA-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR T cells did not secrete IFN-γ above the background levels when stimulated with Gb3+ Ramos or Gb3− Namalwa cells (Fig. 4b). The anti-CD19-CAR T cells released IFN-γ to the same extent as Shiga-CAR T cells when incubated with Ramos cells (390 pg mL−1, Fig. 4b). TNF-α secretion by lectin-CAR T cells that were co-incubated with Gb3+ Ramos cells was lower, 78 pg mL−1 for the Shiga-CAR, 45 pg mL−1 for the LecA-CAR T cells, and Mitsuba-CAR T cells failed to produce TNF-α (Fig. 4c). TNF-α secretion by Shiga-CAR T cells was specific to recognising Gb3 since it was absent upon incubation with Gb3− Namalwa leukaemia cells. Anti-CD19-CAR T cells released considerably higher amounts of TNF-α (217 pg mL−1) upon incubation with Ramos cells. The affinity of the antigen binding domain can influence TNF-α release. Indeed, lowering the affinity of an anti-CD19 scFv led to lower TNF-α release in a recent study. The anti-CD19 scFv FMC63 used in this study has a binding affinity in the nanomolar order [63], while the affinity/avidity of the lectins for Gb3 ranges from the nanomolar to milimolar order [64]; these differences may help to understand disparities in TNF-α release.
In summary, these data indicate that Shiga-CAR T cells specifically produced cytokines upon recognition of Gb3 on the surface of target leukaemic cells. While Shiga-CAR T cells secreted as much IFN-γ as anti-CD19-CAR T cells, they secreted less TNF-α, which could be indeed beneficial to reduce the risk of cytokine release syndrome, a well-described life-threatening secondary effect in patients treated with anti-CD19-CAR T cells [65, 66].
Specificity of lectin-CAR T cells
Shiga-CAR T cells displayed the best anti-tumour activity against high Gb3+ Ramos leukaemic cells. To formally demonstrate that the Shiga-CAR T cells specifically target Gb3, Ramos cells were treated with PPMP to inhibit the synthesis of glucosyl-ceramide-based glycosphingolipids. PPMP is a ceramide analogue designed to inhibit the glycosyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of glucosylceramides [67], primary reducing the expression of Gb3 [103]. Ramos cells were exposed to 1 µM and 2 µM of PPMP for 3 days. On the third day, the levels of Gb3 on the cell surface were assessed by staining the cells with fluorescently labelled StxB. Flow cytometric analysis showed that PPMP treatment efficiently reduced the levels of Gb3 on the cell surface of Ramos cells, similar to unstained cells (Fig. S3a). Cells treated with PPMP or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) were co-cultured with Shiga-CAR T cells and controls, mock and anti-CD19-CAR T cells. PPMP-treated Ramos cells were significantly less killed by Shiga-CAR T cells after 12 h (36%, 1 µM, and 26%, 2 µM) and 24 h (54% and 46%, respectively) compared to untreated or vehicle-treated Ramos cells (both > 56% at 12 h and both > 75% at 24 h, Fig. 5a, and Fig. S3b). The reduction was dose-dependent with decreased cytotoxicity at higher concentrations of PPMP. Cytotoxicity was detected to some extent, as it cannot be excluded that Gb3 is present on cell surface at levels that are below the detection threshold in flow cytometry, but still being recognised by Shiga-CAR T cells. Furthermore, the treatment with PPMP did not affect the viability of Ramos cells or the presence of CARs on the T cell surface (Fig. S3c-d), and the cytotoxic activity of controls, mock and anti-CD19-CAR T cells, remained unaffected.
To further support the specificity of the lectin-CAR T cells, we transfected the non-tumorigenic Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line with Gb3 synthase (α1,4-galactosyltransferase), creating MDCK Gb3+ cells and comparing them to their wild type counterparts (MDCK WT). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that the MDCK Gb3+ cells heterogeneously expressed Gb3, with 62% positive cells (Fig. S4a), while Gb3 was not detected in the parental MDCK WT cells (Fig. S4b). The Shiga-CAR T cells efficiently killed MDCK Gb3+ cells (Fig. S4c); at 17 h, the Shiga-CAR T cells reached 54% killing. In contrast, the MDCK WT cells were not targeted (Fig. S4d). Taken together, these data strongly argue for a specific cytotoxic effect following Gb3-dependent activation of lectin-CARs.
Gb3 recognition in cell-sized giant unilamellar vesicles by Shiga-CAR T cells
Next, we applied a simplified and controlled membrane system to demonstrate that the presence of Gb3 is sufficient for recognition by Shiga-CAR T cells. Giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) are synthetic cell-sized spherical lipid bilayers resembling the size of human cells that can be glyco-decorated with diverse glycans [68, 69]. They have been explored to rebuild and, therefore, to better understand cellular processes, e.g., adhesion [70] and endocytosis [68, 71]. We produced GUVs containing 10 mol% Gb3 within the chosen lipid mixture (DOPC, cholesterol, Atto 647N-DOPE, and Gb3; 59.7:30:0.3:10 mol%, respectively) by electroformation [51]. On the day of the experiment, sorted Shiga-CAR T cells or mock T cells were stained with the CellTrace™ CFSE reagent for visualisation by confocal microscopy. The GUVs were visible in far-red and CAR T cells in green. GUVs and T cells were co-incubated and monitored for 30 min at 37 °C. We acquired distinct areas using a live cell imaging setting by confocal microscopy. The Shiga-CAR T cells and mock T cells continuously approached GUVs and surrounded them. The interactions between Shiga-CAR T cells and GUVs were more likely than with mock T cells (Online Resource-1–2). Over time, more and more cells enriched the areas around the GUVs as trying to build contacts. In some cases, the Gb3-containing GUVs were deformed exclusively during the interactions with Shiga-CAR T cells. Such events were not observed upon incubation with mock cells (Fig. 5b). Inward bending of Gb3+ GUVs probably indicates tight interactions of Shiga-CAR T cells with Gb3-functionalised vesicles, related to membrane invaginations induced by StxB [72, 73] or LecA in Gb3+ GUVs and HEK cells [44, 74]. More recently, a molecular dynamics simulation also proposed the induction of negative membrane curvature triggered by StxB and LecA after binding to and clustering Gb3 [75].
We analysed the contact between GUVs and T cells to quantify these interactions using the Ilastik software [52]. For this purpose, a protocol for machine learning was developed, and time series were analysed after image segmentation. The contact between GUVs and cells was estimated using the percent of contact. The quantification of pixels in green (cells), red (GUVs), and co-localised were considered to calculate the percent of contact, which was determined for each monitored area and time point. The analysis revealed cell interactions in both conditions, but the percent of contact was higher for the Shiga-CAR T cells than for the mock T cells (Fig. 5c). These results suggest that Gb3 drives the interactions with the Shiga-CAR T cells. This interaction might occur independently of any additional protein on the surface of target cells, as we used a synthetic system lacking additional proteins or active cellular machinery.
As briefly mentioned above, the interactions between the homopentameric StxB and Gb3 in synthetic membrane systems and living cells are well documented in the literature [72, 76–78]. Considering that only a single StxB monomer was part of the CAR construct, it was somewhat surprising to observe that StxB monomers in the framework of CARs might facilitate these interactions. Additionally, Shiga-CARs showed dimers and trimers in primary T cells (Fig. S1b), which might increase the avidity for Gb3 on the GUV and host cell membrane. Taken together, we successfully demonstrated that Gb3 and the GUV environment were sufficient to drive the interactions with the carbohydrate-binding domain of the Shiga-CAR, strongly supporting the selectivity of our approach.
Lectin-CAR T cells efficiently target solid tumour cell lines
One major obstacle for using CAR T cell technology against solid tumours is the lack of tumour-specific antigens [79–81]. Since Gb3 is overexpressed in colorectal carcinoma [33], breast [34], ovary and pancreatic cancer [35], as well as gliomas [36], we decided to test the anti-tumour activity of the lectin-CARs against cell lines derived from colon and breast cancer. First, we checked the expression of Gb3 in a panel of cells by staining them with fluorescently labelled StxB (Fig. 6a). Flow cytometry analysis revealed that colorectal cancer cell lines HT-29 and HCT-166 expressed Gb3 (> 95% positive cells). MDA-MB-231 cells heterogeneously expressed Gb3, with 83% positive cells overall. In contrast, Gb3 was not detected in LS-174 colorectal cancer cell and JIMT1 breast cancer cell lines.
Next, we performed cytotoxic assays using our complete panel of primary lectin-CAR T cells. Similar to the results obtained for leukaemia cells, Shiga-CAR was the best at targeting Gb3 (Fig. 6b, c and Fig. S7). Shiga-CAR T cells showed the highest anti-tumour activity against HT-29 (74%) and HCT-166 (90%) colorectal cancer cells and MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast tumour cells (60%). The possibility of targeting triple-negative breast cancer cells with lectin-CAR T cells is remarkable. Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive and lethal breast cancer subtype, for which no targeted treatment options are currently available [82]. Mitsuba-CAR T cells displayed cytotoxic activities varying between 40 and 60% among the cell lines expressing Gb3, namely HT-29, HCT-166 and MDA-MB-231. Meanwhile, the cytotoxicity exhibited by LecA-CAR T cells was the lowest (10–24%) compared to other lectin-CARs and showed a high intrinsic variation among individual donors. Taken together, lectin-CARs efficiently targeted Gb3+ colorectal and breast cancer cells while lacking cytotoxicity against Gb3− tumour cells, further supporting the specificity of Gb3 recognition. The recognition of cell lines derived from solid tumours by lectin-CAR T cells appears to be even more efficient than the recognition of leukaemic cells.
Furthermore, we have checked the killing activity of the Shiga-CAR T cells in Gb3+ GFP+ HT-29 and Gb3− GFP+ LS-174 colon cancer cell lines using live cell imaging. On the one hand, we monitored the total amount of cells by quantifying the GFP signal and determining the total GFP area. On the other hand, we stained the cells with C.LIVE Tox Red, a sensitive dye that binds to DNA, which is non-permeable to viable cells and non-fluorescent outside of the cells. After entering dead cells through damaged plasma membranes and binding to DNA, the reagent emits a bright red fluorescence. We monitored the GFP and C.LIVE Tox Red signals of the cells with live cell imaging for 48 h, taking images every 3 h. Shiga-CAR T cells drastically reduced the numbers of HT-29 cells (Figs. 7a, S5a), whereas the LS-174 cells, which are Gb3−, continued growing (Figs. 7b, S6a). The NT and mock T cells did not affect cell proliferation in either cell line. The red fluorescence of the HT-29 cells, indicative of cell death, increased when co-incubated with Shiga-CAR T cells (Figs. 7c, S5b). In contrast, the red signal from the LS-174 Gb3− cells remained unaffected (Figs. 7d, S6b). NT and mock T cells did not trigger fluorescence changes in both cell lines. This live image analysis allowed us to observe that the proliferation of HT-29 cells slowed down between 18 and 21 h (Fig. 7a), while the Tox Red signal notably increased whitin this time window (Fig. 7c). HT-29 cells continued proliferating when co-incubated with NT and Mock cells (Fig. S5a), instead they were almost completely eliminated after 48 h when co-incubated with Shiga-CAR T cells (Fig. S5b). Taken all together, the results strongly uphold the killing ability and specificity of the Shiga-CAR T cells.
Next, we sorted BFP+ CAR T cells and investigated whether the killing activity could be enhanced when working with pure CAR T cell populations as previously observed (Fig. 4). Using pure populations, Mitsuba-CAR (92% and 84%) and LecA-CAR T cells (85% and 79%) achieved similar killing activity as Shiga-CAR T cells (99.8% and 83%) when co-incubated with HT-29 and HCT-116 tumour cells (Fig. 8). In this way, anti-tumour activity was also enhanced, and the percentage of killed cells increased at the endpoint of the experiment. The anti-tumour activity of the LecA-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR in solid tumours appears to be vastly improved. The performance of lectin-CARs against cell lines derived from colorectal and breast cancer is promising, considering the lack of cancer-specific targets.
Lectin-CARs recognise a wide variety of Gb3 isoforms
Membrane lipids are not homogenously distributed, leading to membrane domains of specific composition and order [83, 84]. Glycosphingolipids so do Gb3 segregates into different domains. The membrane microenvironment and the Gb3 fatty acyl chains determine how Gb3 molecules are embedded in the lipid bilayer and, consequently, how the carbohydrate head of Gb3 will be exposed [30, 85, 86]. StxB and LecA have shown preference to recognise Gb3 isoforms distributed in different membrane domains in which the carbohydrate head group of Gb3 is differently exposed. [76]. Therefore, to better understand the influence of Gb3 abundance and diversity on the recognition by lectin-CAR T cells, we characterised the amount of Gb3 isoforms, which can vary in fatty acyl chain length, degree of saturation and hydroxylation, in several of the target cells used in this study (HT-29, Ramos, MDA-MB-231, Namalwa and LS-174). Cells were lysed in a mixture of methanol and water 1:1, followed by chloroform purification, allowing lipid isolation for later targeted liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. The normalised intensities indicate the total abundance of Gb3 (Fig. 9a). HT-29 cells (0.028) exhibited the highest total amount of Gb3, followed by Ramos (0.018) and MDA-MB-231 (0.015) cells. Namalwa (0.002) had little Gb3 content, and Gb3 was not detected in LS-174 cells (Fig. 9a), confirming our flow cytometric data (Fig. 2a and Fig. 6a). We next performed a Pearson correlation between the total Gb3 abundance detected by MS analysis in each cell line and the cytotoxicity of the lectin-CAR T cells. We aimed to understand whether the abundance of Gb3 influences the efficacy of the lectin-CAR T cells in lysing cells. The analysis revealed a solid Gb3 dependency for the Shiga-CAR T cell-induced cytotoxicity (rShiga-CAR = 0.9742) and a moderate dependency for LecA-CAR T cells (rLecA-CAR = 0.7274) and Mitsuba-CAR T cells (rMitsuba-CAR = 0.6197). In general, the higher is the abundance of Gb3 on the target cells, the higher is the cytotoxicity (Fig. S7). However, a deeper analysis of the dominantly present Gb3 species revealed that the studied model cells lines contain many Gb3 isoforms. In HT-29 colorectal cancer cells, the isoform C16:0-OH and C16:0 each made up 25% of the Gb3 species present. The saturated species C24:0 represented 19%, and its hydroxylated isoform C24:0-OH 13%. Additionally, 6% of C22:0 and small traces of C18:1; C18:0, C20:0, C24:1-OH, C22:0-OH and C24:1 were detected (Fig. 9b). Interestingly, hydroxylated Gb3 isoforms, which have been little reported so far, were present in HT-29 cells. These isoforms have been, in previous studies, associated with augmented binding affinity of StxB [87] and seemed to be highly relevant for the scission of StxB-induced tubular membrane invaginations [88]. In Ramos leukaemic cells, the non-saturated isoform C24:1 constituted 39% of the total Gb3. The saturated C16:0 and 24:0 isoforms represented around 20% each, the C22:0 isoform only 9% and the C18:0 isoform around 5% of the total Gb3 amount. Small traces of other isoforms included C16:0-OH, C18:1, C20:0, C24:1-OH, C22:0-OH and C24:0-OH (Fig. 9c). In MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells, 42% of the isoforms were designated to C24:0 and 26% to its unsaturated form C24:1. About 22% were matched to the C16:0 and only 7% to the C22:0 Gb3 isoform. The remaining C16:0-OH, C18:1, C20:0, C24:1-OH, C22:0-OH and C24:0-OH were detected only in trace amounts (Fig. 9d). In Namalwa and LS-174 cells, hardly any Gb3 isoform was detected (Fig. S8). These results are alternatively depicted as a heat map in Fig. S8, clearly showing that each model cell line has a unique profile of Gb3 isoforms.
It has been reported that the length and degree of saturation of different Gb3 isoforms affect the binding of StxB and LecA in their native conformation [48, 87, 89, 90]. However, the influence of the structure of each Gb3 isoform on lectin-CAR T cell binding is entirely unknown. Thus, we performed a correlation analysis between the abundance of each Gb3 isoform and the cytotoxicity of different lectin-CAR T cells. We aimed to identify Gb3 isoforms that might be preferentially recognised by a given lectin-CAR. The correlation coefficients are represented as a heat map (Fig. 9e). According to this, the Shiga-CAR T cells seemed to prefer the C18:1, C16:0, and C22:0 isoforms. Hydroxylated Gb3 isoforms reduced recognition by nearly 50%. In contrast, the hydroxylation of the C24:1 isoform increased 3 times the recognition (0.50) by Shiga-CAR T cells compared to the non-hydroxilated (0.17). LecA-CAR T cells correlation values suggest a better recognition of the C24:0, C16:0 and the C18:1. Again, the hydroxylated isoforms were less preferred, reducing the specific killing almost to half. The Mitsuba-CAR T cells equally favoured C18:1, C22:0 and C24:0, and recognition of hydroxylated forms were also reduced. Taken together, we observed that the C18:1, C24:0, C16:0, and C22:0 have the highest correlation coefficients and may be the best-recognised isoforms. Strikingly, the C18:1 is present in very low amounts in the three model cell lines. In summary, the correlation analysis indicates that the specific recognition of Gb3 by lectin-CARs is robust as they could target a wide variety of Gb3 isoforms present in the target cells.
Discussion
One of the biggest challenges in oncology is to find novel molecular targets and strategies to selectively target and eliminate cancer cells. Therapies targeting tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens in combination with the anti-cancer efficacy of CAR T cells may unlock attractive and powerful treatment options hitherto underutilised. In light of this, we explored a strategy to target the glycosphingolipid Gb3 using novel lectin-based CARs. Our study demonstrates that lectin-CAR T cells, which specifically recognise Gb3, induced the killing of several cancer types. Our approach serves as proof of concept for developing specific lectin-CARs targeting other tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens. Moreover, targeting of TACAs could be relevant in combinatorial therapies, as they target glycans on the cell surface or in the tumour vasculature, thus, facilitating or enhancing the anti-cancer activity of other immunotherapeutics or drugs as it has been carried out with therapies targeting GD2 and MUC1 [91, 92].
We created a collection of lectin-CARs that employed distinct Gb3-binding lectins as binding domains, such as the lectin LecA from P. aeruginosa, the B-subunit of Shiga toxin mainly produced by S. dysenteriae and Escherichia coli strains, and the computationally designed lectin Mitsuba [43, 45]. The successful use of StxB for in vivo targeting of Gb3+ xenografts [40, 93–95] and the study of LecA as a drug delivery system [21, 96] in Gb3+ cells inspired the design of the lectin-CARs.
Lectin-CAR T cells, in particular those expressing Shiga-CARs, exhibited cytotoxicity against the Burkitt's lymphoma-derived cell lines [Ramos (75.5%), Raji (26%) and Daudi (40%)], which, like other B-lymphoma cell lines, also express and accumulate Gb3 at their cell surfaces [32]. Lectin recognition of the different Gb3 isoforms expressed in a cell determines the killing efficiency of the lectin-CAR T cells. It has been shown that SxtB and LecA have different preferences to recognise specific Gb3 isoforms [75, 76]. Cell lines with poorly recognised Gb3 isoforms are unlikely to be eliminated, which may be the case of the Raji cells.
Interestingly, Shiga-CAR T cells showed that they could reach a cytotoxic activity comparable to anti-CD19-CAR T cells (> 75%). CAR-T cell therapy has achieved good objective responses in diffuse large B cell lymphoma, although their efficacy in adult Burkitt's lymphoma remains limited to a few reports with variable response rates. In these case reports, anti-CD19-CAR T cells have been used to target malignant and healthy B cells, often leaving the patients with long-term B-cell aplasia and hypogammaglobulinemia. Hypogammaglobulinemia is a pathological decrease in antibody production which renders patients susceptible to potentially life-threatening infections [97, 98]. Studies have demonstrated that anti-CD19-CAR T cells could persist for years in patients requiring expensive and recurrent treatments to reconstitute their immunoglobulin levels and protect against opportunistic infections [99, 100]. Lectin-CARs might thus represent an alternative and a potential treatment for haematological malignancies to overcome limitations such as life-threatening-associated toxicities, poor responses to anti-CD19-CAR T cells, antigen escape and resistance in B cell malignancies.
Besides B cell malignancies, the lectin-CAR T cells displayed anti-tumour activity towards the colorectal cancer cell lines HT-29 and HTC-116. A killing efficacy of up to 99.8% was achieved by Shiga-CAR and 92% by Mitsuba-CAR, respectively. Colorectal cancer is the cancer type with the highest number of patients analysed for Gb3 expression. These studies showed an increase in Gb3 expression compared to normal or benign colonic tissue [33, 35, 42]. Also, it has been reported that colon cancer metastasis is Gb3-dependent [42]; therefore, targeting Gb3 can inhibit the progression of these tumours.
We have also investigated the cytotoxicity of lectin-CAR T cells toward the MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells. Triple-negative breast cancer is the most aggressive and lethal breast cancer subtype, for which, to date, we are lacking successful targeted treatments [82, 101]. Lectin-CAR T cells, particularly the LecA-CAR, effectively recognised and lysed MDA-MB-231 cells with a killing efficacy of 59.7%. Most primary breast cancer tumours and breast cancer cell lines (70–80%) overexpress Gb3 compared to normal tissue [38, 102, 103]. Notably, the lectin-CAR T cells were specific for Gb3 and did not exhibit off-target cytotoxicity as demonstrated using Gb3− tumour cells such as LS-174 and JIMT1.
The notable performance of the lectin-CAR T cells against cells derived from solid tumours and haematological malignancies promises a comprehensive application. Gb3 is present in many additional tumour types such as lung, testicular, and ovarian cancer [40, 54]. In addition to directly targeting the tumour cells, lectin CAR-T cells might provide a benefit by targeting the tumour vasculature because Gb3 has been predominantly found in tumour blood vessels [104, 105]. In fact, a neuroblastoma study demonstrated that Gb3 targeting prevented tumour angiogenesis [106]. Gb3 has also been associated with multi-drug resistance in lung and breast cancer and chronic myeloid leukaemias [55, 57, 107]. Gb3 is co-expressed and interplays with efflux transporters such as the ATP-binding cassette, resulting in the active efflux of several chemotherapeutic agents. These anti-cancer agents simultaneously enhance the expression of Gb3 and multi-drug resistance-related proteins, resulting in a severely reduced effectivity of chemotherapeutic drugs [55, 108, 109]. Lectin-CAR T cells could be used as second-line therapy in the treatment of drug-resistant cancers.
There are many scenarios in which the Gb3-binding lectin-CARs could be applied, considering that the number of effective treatments for solid tumours is still very limited. The feasibility of the application of lectin-CAR T cells against cancer depends on at least two Gb3-related factors: the relative abundance of Gb3 on the cell surface of normal and cancer cells and the heterogenicity in the structure of Gb3, which defines its distribution within the cell membrane, the exposure of the carbohydrate head of Gb3, and as a consequence, the degree of recognition by different lectin-CAR T cells. Firstly, our MS analysis revealed that Gb3 abundance varied between model tumour cell lines; Gb3 is at least 30% more abundant in HT-29 cells than in Ramos and MDA-MB-231 cells. In comparison, Gb3 was barely detected in Namalwa and not detected in the LS-174 cells. Our analysis exposed a strong-to-moderate dependency between Gb3 abundance and specific killing by the lectin-CAR T cells, especially when pure populations of lectin-CAR T cells were employed. Thus, Gb3 abundance determines lectin binding, as previously reported [90], thereby the recognition and cytotoxic activity of the lectin-CAR T cells. Secondly, the natural heterogenicity of Gb3 regarding chain length, degree of saturation and hydroxylation of its fatty acyl chain also impact lectin binding [30, 76, 83, 87, 90]. To identify whether the structural variability of Gb3 also influences the ability of the lectin-CAR T cells to target Gb3+ cancer cell lines, we performed an MS screening to characterise the Gb3 isoforms in each of the selected cells lines. We then completed a correlation analysis between Gb3 isoforms and the cytotoxicity of lectin-CAR T cells. The MS analysis brought to light the heterogeneity of Gb3 and revealed distinct Gb3 isoform profiles for the different model cell lines. In Ramos and MDA-MB-231 cells, the most abundant Gb3 isoforms were Gb3(d18:1/C16:0), Gb3(d18:1/C24:0) and Gb3(d18:1/C24:1), in line with a previous report [110]. In contrast, the most common isoforms present in the HT-29 cell line were Gb3(d18:1/C16:0), Gb3(d18:1/C24:0) and, unexpectedly, Gb3(d18:1/C16:0-OH). Additional species with little presence, e.g., Gb3(d18:1/C22:0) and Gb3(d18:1/C18:1), were also detected and considered in further analysis. These species, although marginally expressed, may play a critical role in lectin-CAR recognition. On the one hand, the highest correlation coefficient with the cytotoxicity of Shiga-CAR T cells was obtained for Gb3(d18:1/C18:1), Gb3(d18:1/C16:0), and Gb3(d18:1/C22:0), which probably are the preferred Gb3 isoforms. Following these results, it has been reported that C18:1 and C22:0 were the most effective fatty acyl chains for StxB binding, in particular at lower receptor concentrations [87, 90]. According to the calculated correlation coefficients, it seems that the hydroxylated Gb3 species, which were not yet very often described, also play a role in the binding and activation of Shiga-CAR T cells. In line with Schütte et al. and Römer et al., who have shown that hydroxylated species are important for the scission of StxB-induced membrane tubules [88, 111]. On the other hand, the highest correlation coefficient for the LecA-CAR T cells was registered for the Gb3(d18:1/C24:0) isoform. This result is consistent with a recent report, suggesting that Gb3(d18:1/C24:0) is indeed the preferred Gb3 isoform of LecA [48]. Taken together, the Shiga-CAR and LecA-CAR T cells well reflected the Gb3 preferences previously described for StxB and LecA in their native forms. In contrast, the preferences of the engineered Mitsuba lectin for the different Gb3 isoforms have not been studied yet. The highest correlation coefficients for the Mitsuba-CAR T cells were found for Gb3(d18:1/C18:1), Gb3(d18:1/C24:0) and Gb3(d18:1/C22:0). These data may thus give a hint to the preferred species of this lectin for future studies. Interestingly, each of the lectin-CAR T cells studied herein recognised several Gb3 species. This ability could be an advantage since the heterogeneous expression of an antigen is a major limitation for effective tumour targeting by CAR T cells [112].
In our study, the recognition of the Gb3 isoforms might also be influenced by the efficiency of the lectin-CAR constructs to be expressed on the T cell surface. The LecA-CAR was detected at high levels on the cell surface of primary T cells, while the Shiga-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR were detected at lower levels. The low detection could be due to different reasons, e.g., an alternative protein folding preventing the binding of the anti-FLAG antibody; it might also be the consequence of CAR degradation or less efficient export to the plasma membrane due to the lectin domain of bacterial or artificial origin, as well as their molecular weight and native conformation, e.g. Mitsuba. Regardless little is known about the expression of bacterial proteins in mammalian cells, it has been reported that some degree of glycosylation, specifically N-glycosylation, is required for the correct folding of bacterial proteins destined for the extracellular space [113]. We must also consider that human glycosylation patterns can modify the lectin domains. Additionally, the cryptic signals present in bacterial gene sequences might negatively impact the intracellular trafficking pathways of mammalian cells [114]. Altogether, this might explain the lower detection level of Gb3-binding lectin-CARs on the cell surface. A similar phenomenon has been observed for the expression of the cholera toxin B-subunit and the tetanic toxin C in mammalian cells [115, 116]. Despite that, the expression levels were enough to perform efficient CAR T cell recognition, activation and elimination of the target cells.
The use of lectins as a binding motif in CAR T cells can be complementary or alternative to other therapeutic approaches such as antibodies targeting TACAs. On one side, generating antibodies with a high affinity for TACAs can be challenging due to the low immunogenicity and immune tolerance of these structures. On the other side, lectins naturally and specifically recognise TACAs [16, 117, 118]. The engineering of lectins opens up a world of possibilities with lectins of tailored valency and affinity [119], a different number of subunits [120] or reduced immunogenicity, e.g., Mitsuba [46], that would allow broader use of these carbohydrate-binding proteins.
Conclusions and outlook
In summary, we demonstrate that Gb3-binding lectin-CAR T cells recognise multiple Gb3 isoforms present in different cancer types. The cytotoxicity of Shiga-CAR T cells against several Burkitt's lymphoma and solid tumour cells was the most prominent among the panel of studied lectin-CARs. However, LecA-CAR and Mitsuba-CAR T cells also showed promising activity in specific cases, possibly due to a delimited recognition of Gb3 species.
In vivo studies will be conducted in the near future to investigate the behaviour of Gb3-binding lectin-CAR T cells in model organisms. They would also help to clarify open questions regarding which specific lectin to best use, and which Gb3 isoform is safest and most effective for targeting. In addition, unanswered questions regarding the off-targeting toxicities of the lectin-CAR T cells could be addressed. Although tumour imaging studies in mice with StxB did not show extensive off-targeting [93–95, 121], still there is a reasonable risk of targeting normal tissue in which Gb3 is also expressed, e.g. kidney [122], nervous system [123], liver or intestine [53, 124]. The clinical translation of these findings remains to be done; our study is designed as a proof-of-concept, and it has herewith demonstrated the feasibility of targeting cancer cells by using novel and innovative lectin-CAR constructs. Other TACAs and lectins should be studied, pointing to tailor-made lectin tools with improved affinity, specificity and immunogenicity [46, 125, 126]. Lectin engineering is a great opportunity to discover and develop innovative therapeutic tools.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Lighthouse Core Facility staff of the Medical Center—University of Freiburg for their help with their cell sorting resources and excellent support. In addition, we would like to express our gratitude to the Life Imaging Center (LIC) of the University of Freiburg for its support. We also wish to thank Dr. Pavel Salavei of the CIBSS Signaling Factory, University of Freiburg, Germany, for his support in flow cytometry. Ana Valeria Meléndez and Oliver S. Thomas are grateful for support from the Spemann Graduate School of Biology and Medicine (SGBM).
Abbreviations
- BLI
Bioluminescence
- CAR
Chimeric antigen receptors
- DMEM
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium
- DOPC
1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
- DOPE
1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
- ELISA
Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay
- E:T
Effector to target
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- Gb3
Globotriaosylceramide
- GSL
Glycosphingolipid
- GUV
Giant unilamellar vesicles
- HBSS
Hanks' balanced salt solution
- IFN-γ
Interferon γ
- IMDM
Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium
- IS
Internal standard
- ITO
Indium tin oxid
- LC
Liquid chromatography
- MFI
Mean fluorescence intensity
- MOI
Multiplicity of infection
- MS
Mass spectrometry
- NT
Non-transduced cells
- NEAA
Non-essential amino acids
- PBMC
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell
- PPMP
1-Phenyl-2-palmitoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol
- RLU
Relative light units
- RPMI
Roswell Park Memorial Institute
- scFv
Single-chain variable fragment
- SDS
Sodium dodecyl sulfate
- StxB
Shiga toxin B-subunit
- TACAs
Tumour-associated carbohydrate antigens
- TNF-α
Tumour necrosis factor α
Author contributions
Conception and design of the research: AVM, SM and WR. Funding acquisition: WW, BK, SM and WR. Investigation: AVM, RM-HVC, SL, OST, JS, JT and LS. Methodology: RM-HVC, AVM, SL, JS, OST and LS. Supervision: WW, BK, SM and WR. Writing-original draft: AVM. Writing—review and editing: RM-HVC, SL, OST, LS. WR and SM. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding is enabled and organised by Projekt DEAL. This project was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy (GSC-4, EXC-294 and EXC-2189) and the German Research Foundation grant Major Research Instrumentation (project number: 438033605), by the Ministry for Science, Research and Arts of the State of Baden-Württemberg (Az: 33-7532.20; and partial funding of SGBM PhD thesis) and by the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (FRIAS). Moreover, this research was funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement synBIOcarb (No. 814029). The lab of SM is supported by the German Research Foundation with the projects SFB1160 (B01), SFB1479 (Project ID: 441891347-P15) and FOR2799 (MI1942/3-1).
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Ethical approval
Buffy coats used as blood sources were purchased from the blood bank of the University Medical Centre Freiburg (approval of the University Freiburg Ethics Committee: 147/15).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Winfried Römer, Email: winfried.roemer@bioss.uni-freiburg.de.
Susana Minguet, Email: susana.minguet@biologie.uni-freiburg.de.
References
- 1.Kochenderfer JN, Wilson WH, Janik JE, Dudley ME, Stetler-Stevenson M, Feldman SA, Maric I, Raffeld M, Nathan DAN, Lanier BJ, Morgan RA, Rosenberg SA. Eradication of B-lineage cells and regression of lymphoma in a patient treated with autologous T cells genetically engineered to recognize CD19. Blood. 2010 doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-281931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Batlevi CL, Matsuki E, Brentjens RJ, Younes A. Novel immunotherapies in lymphoid malignancies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(1):25–40. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Maher J, Brentjens RJ, Gunset G, Rivière I, Sadelain M. Human T-lymphocyte cytotoxicity and proliferation directed by a single chimeric TCRζ/CD28 receptor. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:70–75. doi: 10.1038/nbt0102-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Majzner RG, Mackall CL. Tumor antigen escape from CAR T-cell therapy. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(10):1219–1226. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sterner RC, Sterner RM. CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021;11(4):69. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Varki A. Biological roles of glycans. Glycobiology. 2017;27(1):3–49. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cww086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Costa AF, Campos D, Reis CA, Gomes C. Targeting glycosylation: a new road for cancer drug discovery. Trends Cancer. 2020;6(9):757–766. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kobata A, Amano J. Altered glycosylation of proteins produced by malignant cells, and application for the diagnosis and immunotherapy of tumours. Immunol Cell Biol. 2005;83(4):429–439. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stowell SR, Ju T, Cummings RD. Protein glycosylation in cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10(1):473–510. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Colley KJ, Varki A, Kinoshita T. Cellular organization of glycosylation. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, editors. Essentials of glycobiology. 3. Cold Spring Harbor (NY), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2015. pp. 41–49. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dingjan T, Spendlove I, Durrant LG, Scott AM, Yuriev E, Ramsland PA. Structural biology of antibody recognition of carbohydrate epitopes and potential uses for targeted cancer immunotherapies. Mol Immunol. 2015;67(2PtA):75–88. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Christiansen MN, Chik J, Lee L, Anugraham M, Abrahams JL, Packer NH. Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer. Proteomics. 2014;14(4–5):525–546. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201300387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ghazarian H, Idoni B, Oppenheimer SB. A glycobiology review: carbohydrates, lectins and implications in cancer therapeutics. Acta Histochem. 2011;113(3):236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Feizi T. Carbohydrate antigens in human cancer. Cancer Survey. 1985;4(1):245–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ozkaynak MF, Gilman AL, Lodon WB, Naranjo A, Diccianni MB, Tenney SC, Smith M, Messer KS, Seeger R, Reynolds CP, Smith LM, Shulkin BL, Parisi M, Maris JM, Park JR, Sondel PM, Yu AL. A comprehensive safety trial of chimeric antibody 14.18 with GM-CSF, IL-2, and isotretinoin in high-risk neuroblastoma patients following myeloablative therapy: children’s oncology group study ANBL0931. Front Immunol. 2018;16(9):1641. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heimburg-Molinaro J, Lum M, Vijay G, Jain M, Almogren A, Rittenhouse-Olson K. Cancer vaccines and carbohydrate epitopes. Vaccine. 2011;29(48):8802–8826. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bialecki ES, Di Bisceglie AM. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB. 2005;7(1):26–34. doi: 10.1080/13651820410024049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pervin M, Koyama Y, Isemura M, Nakamura Y. Plant lectins in therapeutic and diagnostic cancer research. Int J Plant Biol Res. 2015;3(2):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lyu SY, Kwon YJ, Joo HJ, Park WB. Preparation of alginate/chitosan microcapsules and enteric coated granules of mistletoe lectin. Arch Pharmacal Res. 2004;27(1):118–126. doi: 10.1007/BF02980057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Coulibaly S, Youan C. Current status of lectin-based cancer diagnosis and therapy. AIMS Mol Sci. 2017;4(1):1–27. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2017.1.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Müller SK, Wilhelm I, Schubert T, Zittlau K, Imberty A, Madl J, Eierhoff T, Thuenauer R, Römer W. Gb3-binding lectins as potential carriers for transcellular drug delivery. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2017;14(2):141–153. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2017.1266327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Okuda T. Application of the antibody-inducing activity of glycosphingolipids to human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3776. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hakomori SI, Murakami WT. Glycolipids of hamster fibroblasts and derived malignant-transformed cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1968;59(1):254. doi: 10.1073/pnas.59.1.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hakomori S. Structure, organization, and function of glycosphingolipids in membrane. Curr Opin Hematol. 2003;10(1):16–24. doi: 10.1097/00062752-200301000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hakomori S. Tumor malignancy defined by aberrant glycosylation and sphingo(glyco)lipid metabolism1. Can Res. 1996;56(23):5309–5318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ito M, Suzuki E, Naiki M, Sendo F, Arai S. Carbohydrates as antigenic determinants of tumor-associated antigens recognized by monoclonal anti-tumor antibodies produced in a syngeneic system. Int J Cancer. 1984;34(5):689–697. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910340517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hakomori S. Glycosphingolipids in cellular interaction, differentiation, and oncogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1981;50:733–764. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.50.070181.003505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kannagi R, Fukuda MN, Hakomori S. A new glycolipid antigen isolated from human erythrocyte membranes reacting with antibodies directed to globo-N-tetraosylceramide (globoside) J Biol Chem. 1982;257(8):4438–4442. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)34741-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schnaar RLT, Kinoshita T. Chapter 11 glycosphingolipids. In: Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, editors. Essentials of glycobiology [Internet] 3. NY: Cold Spring Harbor, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2017. pp. 2015–2017. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Pellizzari A, Pang H, Lingwood CA. Binding of verocytotoxin 1 to its receptor is influenced by differences in receptor fatty acid content. Biochemistry. 1992;31(5):1363–1370. doi: 10.1021/bi00120a011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Merrill AH. Sphingolipid and glycosphingolipid metabolic pathways in the era of sphingolipidomics. Chem Rev. 2011;111(10):6387–6422. doi: 10.1021/cr2002917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.LaCasse EC, Saleh MT, Patterson B, Minden MD, Gariépy J. Shiga-like toxin purges human lymphoma from bone marrow of severe combined immunodeficient mice. Blood. 1996;88(5):1561–1567. doi: 10.1182/blood.v88.5.1561.bloodjournal8851561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Falguières T, Maak M, Von Weyhern C, Sarr M, Sastre X, Poupon MF, Janssen KP. Human colorectal tumors and metastases express Gb3 and can be targeted by an intestinal pathogen-based delivery tool. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(8):2498–2508. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.LaCasse EC, Bray MR, Patterson B, Lim WM, Perampalam S, Radvanyi LG, Keating A, Stewart AK, Buckstein R, Sandhu JS, Miller N, Banerjee d, Singh D, Belch AR, Pilarski LM, Gariépy J. Shiga-like toxin-1 receptor on human breast cancer, lymphoma, and myeloma and absence from CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells: implications for ex vivo tumor purging and autologous stem cell transplantation. Blood. 1999;94(8):2901–2910. doi: 10.1182/blood.V94.8.2901.420k36_2901_2910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Distler U, Souady J, Hülsewig M, Drmić-Hofman I, Haier J, Friedrich AW, Karch H, Senninger N, Dreisewerd K, Berkenkamp S, Schmidt MA, Peter-Katalinić J, Müthing J. Shiga toxin receptor Gb3Cer/CD77: tumor-association and promising therapeutic target in pancreas and colon cancer. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(8):e6813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Johansson D, Johansson A, Grankvist K, Andersson U, Henriksson R, Bergström P, Behnam-Motlagh P. Verotoxin-1 induction of apoptosis in Gb3-expressing human glioma cell lines. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5(9):1211–1217. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.9.3173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cooling LLW, Zhang DS, Naides SJ, Koerner TAW. Glycosphingolipid expression in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia: common expression of shiga toxin and parvovirus B19 receptors on early myeloblasts. Blood. 2003;101(2):711–721. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stimmer L, Dehay S, Nemati F, Massonnet G, Richon S, Decaudin D, Klijanienko J, Johannes L. Human breast cancer and lymph node metastases express Gb3 and can be targeted by STxB-vectorized chemotherapeutic compounds. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:916. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gupta V, Bhinge KN, Hosain SB, Xiong K, Gu X, Shi R, Liu YY. Ceramide glycosylation by glucosylceramide synthase selectively maintains the properties of breast cancer stem cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(44):37195–37205. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.396390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Engedal N, Skotland T, Torgersen ML, Sandvig K. Shiga toxin and its use in targeted cancer therapy and imaging. Microb Biotechnol. 2011;4(1):32–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00180.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Skotland T, Kavaliauskiene S, Sandvig K. The role of lipid species in membranes and cancer-related changes. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2020;39(2):343–360. doi: 10.1007/s10555-020-09872-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kovbasnjuk O, Mourtazina R, Baibakov B, Wang T, Elowsky C, Choti MA, Kane A, Donowitz M (2005) The glycosphingolipid globotriaosylceramide in the metastatic transformation of colon cancer. 102(52):19087–19082. 10.1073/pnas.0506474102. Accessed 12 June 2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Siukstaite L, Imberty A, Römer W. Structural diversities of lectins binding to the glycosphingolipid Gb3. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:704685. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.704685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eierhoff T, Bastian B, Thuenauer R, Madl J, Audfray A, Aigal S, Juillot S, Rydell GE, Müller S, De Bentzmann S, Imberty A, Fleck C, Römer W. A lipid zipper triggers bacterial invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(35):12895–12900. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402637111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Johannes L, Römer W. Shiga toxins—from cell biology to biomedical applications. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(2):105–116. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Terada D, Voet ARD, Noguchi H, Kamata K, Ohki M, Addy C, Fujii Y, Yamamoto D, Ozeki Y, Tame JRH, Zhang KYJ. Computational design of a symmetrical β-trefoil lectin with cancer cell binding activity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5943. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06332-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hasan I, Sugawara S, Fujii Y, Koide Y, Terada D, Iimura N, Fujiwara T, Takahashi KG, Kojima N, Rajia S, Kawsar SMA, Kanaly RA, Uchiyama H, Hosono M, Ogawa Y, Fujita H, Hamako J, Matsui T, Ozeki Y. Mytilec, a mussel R-type lectin, interacts with surface glycan GB3 on burkitt’s lymphoma cells to trigger apoptosis through multiple pathways. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(2):7377–7389. doi: 10.3390/md13127071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Brandel A, Aigal S, Lagies S, Schlimpert M, Meléndez AV, Xu M, Lehmann A, Hummel D, Fisch D, Madl J, Eierhoff T, Kammerer B, Römer W. The Gb3-enriched CD59/flotillin plasma membrane domain regulates host cell invasion by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Mol Life Scien. 2021;78(7):3637–3656. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03766-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lagies S, Schlimpert M, Neumann S, Wäldin A, Kammerer B, Borner C, Peintner L. Cells grown in three-dimensional spheroids mirror in vivo metabolic response of epithelial cells. Commun Biol. 2020;3:246. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0973-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pang Z, Chong J, Zhou G, De Lima Morais DA, Chang L, Barrette M, Gauthier C, Jacques PE, Li S, Xia J. MetaboAnalyst 5.0: narrowing the gap between raw spectra and functional insights. Nucl Acids Res. 2021 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Madl J, Villringer S, Römer W. Delving into lipid-driven endocytic mechanisms using biomimetic membranes. In: Shukla AK, editor. Chemical and synthetic approaches in membrane biology. Springer Protocols Handbooks, Humana Press; 2016. pp. 17–36. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Berg S, Kutra D, Kroeger T, Straehle CN, Kausler BX, Haubold C, Schiegg M, Ales J, Beier T, Rudy M, Eren K, Cervantes JI, Xu B, Beuttenmueller F, Wolny A, Zhang C, Koethe U, Hamprecht FA, Kreshuk A. ilastik: interactive machine learning for (bio)image analysis. Nat Methods. 2019;16(12):1226–1232. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0582-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Celi AB, Goldstein J, Rosato-Siri MV, Pinto A. Role of globotriaosylceramide in physiology and pathology. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:813637. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.813637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Signevenica CD, ČikešČulić D, Vuica V, Markotić A. Biochemical, pathological and oncological relevance of Gb3Cer receptor. Med Oncol. 2011;28(Suppl 1):675–684. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9732-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liu YY, Gupta V, Patwardhan GA, Bhinge K, Zhao Y, Bao J, Mehendale H, Cabot MC, Li YT, Jazwinski SM. Glucosylceramide synthase upregulates MDR1 expression in the regulation of cancer drug resistance through cSrc and β-catenin signaling. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:145. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kiguchi K, Iwamori Y, Suzuki N, Kobayashi Y, Ishizuka B, Ishiwata I, Kita T, Kikuchi Y, Iwamori M. Characteristic expression of globotriaosyl ceramide in human ovarian carcinoma-derived cells with anticancer drug resistance. Cancer Sci. 2006;97(12):1321. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00326.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Salustiano EJ, da Costa KM, Freire-De-Lima L, Mendonça-Previato L, Previato JO. Inhibition of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis reverts multidrug resistance by differentially modulating ABC transporters in chronic myeloid leukemias. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(19):6457–6471. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Farkas-Himsley H, Hill R, Rosen B, Arab S, Lingwood CA. The bacterial colicin active against tumor cells in vitro and in vivo is verotoxin 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(15):6996–7000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lingwood CA. Verotoxin/globotriaosyl ceramide recognition: angiopathy, angiogenesis and antineoplasia. Biosci Rep. 1999;19:345–354. doi: 10.1023/A:1020299819637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Portoukalian J. Immunogenity of glycolipids. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2000;19(1):73–78. doi: 10.1385/CRIAI:19:1:73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Imai C, Mihara K, Andreansky M, Nicholson IC, Pui CH, Geiger TL, Campana D. Chimeric receptors with 4-1BB signaling capacity provoke potent cytotoxicity against acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2004;18(4):676–684. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hartl FA, Beck-Garcìa E, Woessner NM, Flachsmann LJ, Cárdenas RMHV, Brandl SM, Taromi S, Fiala GJ, Morath A, Mishra P, Yousefi OS, Zimmermann J, Hoefflin N, Köhn M, Wöhrl BM, Zeiser R, Schweimer K, Günther S, Schamel WW, Minguet S. Noncanonical binding of Lck to CD3ε promotes TCR signaling and CAR function. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(8):902–913. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0732-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wutti-in Y, Sujjitjoon J, Sawasdee N, Panya A, Kongkla K, Yuti P, Yongpitakwattana P, Thepmalee C, Junking M, Chieochansin T, Poungvarin N, Yamabhai M, Yenchitsomanus PT. Development of a novel anti-CD19 CAR containing a fully human scFv and three costimulatory domains. Front Oncol. 2022 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.802876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Varki A, Kannagi R, Toole BP. Chapter 44 glycosylation changes in cancer. In: Varki A, editor. Essentials of glycobiology. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2009. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Maude SL, Barrett D, Teachey DT, Grupp SA. Managing cytokine release syndrome associated with novel T cell-engaging therapies. Cancer J (United States) 2014;20(2):119–122. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hay KA. Cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified (CAR-) T cell therapy. British journal of haematology . 2018;183(3):364–374. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Alam S, Fedier A, Kohler RS, Jacob F. Glucosylceramide synthase inhibitors differentially affect expression of glycosphingolipids. Glycobiology. 2015;25(4):351–356. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwu187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Omidvar R, Römer W. Glycan-decorated protocells: novel features for rebuilding cellular processes. Interface Focus. 2019;9(2):20180084. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2018.0084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bhatia T, Husen P, Brewer J, Bagatolli LA, Hansen PL, Ipsen JH, Mouritsen OG. Preparing giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) of complex lipid mixtures on demand: mixing small unilamellar vesicles of compositionally heterogeneous mixtures. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1842(12):3175–3180. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Villringer S, Madl J, Sych T, Manner C, Imberty A, Römer W. Lectin-mediated protocell crosslinking to mimic cell-cell junctions and adhesion. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20230-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schubert T, Römer W. How synthetic membrane systems contribute to the understanding of lipid-driven endocytosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta Mol Cell Res. 2015;1853(11 Pt B):2992–3005. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Römer W, Berland L, Chambon V, Gaus K, Windschiegl B, Tenza D, Aly MRE, Fraisier V, Florent JC, Perrais D, Lamaze C, Raposo G, Steinem C, Sens P, Bassereau P, Johannes L. Shiga toxin induces tubular membrane invaginations for its uptake into cells. Nature. 2007;450:670–675. doi: 10.1038/nature05996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pezeshkian W, Hansen AG, Johannes L, Khandelia H, Shillcock JC, Kumar PBS, Ipsen JH. Membrane invagination induced by Shiga toxin B-subunit: from molecular structure to tube formation. Soft Matter. 2016;12(23):5164–5171. doi: 10.1039/c6sm00464d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Darkow E, Rog-Zielinska EA, Madl J, Brandel A, Siukstaite L, Omidvar R, Kohl P, Ravens U, Römer W, Peyronnet R. The lectin LecA sensitizes the human stretch-activated channel TREK-1 but not Piezo1 and binds selectively to cardiac non-myocytes. Front Physiol. 2020;11:457. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kociurzynski R, Makshakova ON, Knecht V, Römer W. Multiscale molecular dynamics studies reveal different modes of receptor clustering by Gb3-binding lectins. J Chem Theory Comput. 2021;17(52488):2488–2501. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Schubert T, Sych T, Madl J, Xu M, Omidvar R, Patalag LJ, Ries A, Kettelhoit K, Brandel A, Mely Y, Steinem C, Werz DB, Thuenauer R, Römer W. Differential recognition of lipid domains by two Gb3-binding lectins. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66522-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Nyholm PG, Magnusson G, Zheng Z, Norel R, Binnington-Boyd B, Lingwood CA. Two distinct binding sites for globotriaosyl ceramide on verotoxins: identification by molecular modelling and confirmation using deoxy analogues and a new glycolipid receptor for all verotoxins. Chem Biol. 1996;3(4):263–275. doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90106-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Birklé S, Desselle A, Chaumette T, Gaugler M, Cochonneau D, Fleurence J, Dubois N, Hulin P, Aubry J, Paris F. Two distinct binding sites for globotriaosyl ceramide on verotoxins: identification by molecular modelling and confirmation using deoxy analogues and a new glycolipid receptor for all verotoxins. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2(4):e23700. doi: 10.4161/onci.23700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Steentoft C, Migliorini D, King TR, Mandel U, June CH, Posey AD. Glycan-directed CAR-T cells. Glycobiology. 2018;28(9):656–669. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwy008/4821293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Durrant LG, Noble P, Spendlove I. Immunology in the clinic review series; focus on cancer: glycolipids as targets for tumour immunotherapy. Clin Exp Immunol. 2012;167(2):206–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04516.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Rabu C, McIntosh R, Jurasova Z, Durrant L. Glycans as targets for therapeutic antitumor antibodies. Future oncology (London, England) 2012;8(8):943–960. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bianchini G, Balko JM, Mayer IA, Sanders ME, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(11):674–690. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Lingwood D, Simons K. Lipid rafts as a membrane-organizing principle. Science (New York, N.Y.) 2010;327(5961):46–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1174621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.D’Angelo G, Capasso S, Sticco L, Russo D. Glycosphingolipids: synthesis and functions. FEBS J. 2013;280(24):6338–6353. doi: 10.1111/febs.12559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lingwood CA, Binnington B, Manis A, Branch DR. Globotriaosyl ceramide receptor function—where membrane structure and pathology intersect. FEBS Lett. 2010;589(9):1879–1886. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.11.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mahfoud R, Manis A, Lingwood CA. Fatty acid-dependent globotriaosyl ceramide receptor function in detergent resistant model membranes. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(9):1744–1755. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M800385-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Binnington B, Lingwood D, Nutikka A, Lingwood CA. Effect of globotriaosyl ceramide fatty acid α-hydroxylation on the binding by verotoxin 1 and verotoxin 2. Neurochem Res. 2002;27(7-8):807–813. doi: 10.1023/A:1020261125008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Römer W, Pontani LL, Sorre B, Rentero C, Berland L, Chambon V, Johannes L. Actin dynamics drive membrane reorganization and scission in clathrin-independent endocytosis. Cell. 2010;140(4):540–553. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Schütte OM, Ries A, Orth A, Patalag LJ, Römer W, Steinem C, Werz DB. Influence of Gb3 glycosphingolipids differing in their fatty acid chain on the phase behaviour of solid supported membranes: chemical syntheses and impact of Shiga toxin binding. Chem Sci. 2014;5:3104–3114. doi: 10.1039/c4sc01290a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Kiarash A, Boyd B, Lingwood CA. Glycosphingolipid receptor function is modified by fatty acid content. Verotoxin 1 and verotoxin 2c preferentially recognize different globotriaosyl ceramide fatty acid homologues. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(15):11138–11146. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9258(19)78102-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rashidijahanabad Z, Huang X. Recent advances in tumor associated carbohydrate antigen based chimeric antigen receptor T cells and bispecific antibodies for anti-cancer immunotherapy. Semin Immunol. 2020;47:101390. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2020.101390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Berois N, Pittini A, Osinaga E. Targeting tumor glycans for cancer therapy: successes, limitations, and perspectives. Cancers. 2022;14(3):645. doi: 10.3390/cancers14030645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Viel T, Dransart E, Nemati F, Henry E, Thézé B, Decaudin D, Lewandowski D, Boisgard R, Johannes L, Tavitian B. In vivo tumor targeting by the B-subunit of shiga toxin. Mol Imaging. 2008 doi: 10.2310/7290.2008.00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Janssen KP, Vignjevic D, Boisgard R, Falguières T, Bousquet G, Decaudin D, Dollé F, Louvard D, Tavitian B, Robine S, Johannes L. In vivo tumor targeting using a novel intestinal pathogen-based delivery approach. Can Res. 2006;66(14):7230–7236. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Couture O, Dransart E, Dehay S, Nemati F, Decaudin D, Johannes L, Tanter M. Tumor delivery of ultrasound contrast agents using shiga toxin B subunit. Mol Imaging. 2011;10(2):135–143. doi: 10.2310/7290.2010.00030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Luginbuehl V, Meier N, Kovar K, Rohrer J. Intracellular drug delivery: potential usefulness of engineered Shiga toxin subunit B for targeted cancer therapy. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(3):613–623. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOTECHADV.2018.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Porter DL, Hwang WT, Frey NV, Lacey SF, Shaw PA, Loren AW, Bagg A, Marcucci KT, Shen A, Gonzalez V, Ambrose D, Grupp SA, Chew A, Zheng Z, Milone MC, Levine BL, Melenhorst JJ, June CH. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells persist and induce sustained remissions in relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):139. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac5415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Avigdor A, Shouval R, Jacoby E, Davidson T, Shimoni A, Besser M, Nagler A. CAR T cells induce a complete response in refractory Burkitt lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2018;53(12):1583–1585. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hill JA, Giralt S, Torgerson TR, Lazarus HM. CAR-T—and a side order of IgG, to go? Immunoglobulin replacement in patients receiving CAR-T cell therapy. Blood Rev. 2019;38:100596. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.100596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang Y, Cao J, Zhiling Y, Qiao J, Li D, Li Z, Xu K. Kinetics of immune reconstitution after CD19 CAR-T cell therapy in ALL patients. Blood. 2019 doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-127808. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Yin L, Duan JJ, Bian XW, Yu SC. Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress. Breast Cancer Res. 2020;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-01296-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Liang YJ, Ding Y, Levery SB, Lobaton M, Handa K, Hakomori SI. Differential expression profiles of glycosphingolipids in human breast cancer stem cells vs. cancer non-stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(3):4968–4973. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302825110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Johansson D, Kosovac E, Moharer J, Ljuslinder I, Brännström T, Johansson A, Behnam-Motlagh P. Expression of verotoxin-1 receptor Gb3 in breast cancer tissue and verotoxin-1 signal transduction to apoptosis. BMC Cancer. 2009;9:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Arab S, Russel E, Chapman WB, Rosen B, Lingwood CA. Expression of the verotoxin receptor glycolipid, globotriaosylceramide, in ovarian hyperplasias. Oncol Res. 2003;9(102):553–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Heath-Engel HM, Lingwood CA. Verotoxin sensitivity of ECV304 cells in vitro and in vivo in a xenograft tumour model: VT1 as a tumour neovascular marker. Angiogenesis. 2003;6(2):129–141. doi: 10.1023/B:AGEN.0000011799.47529.fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Desselle A, Chaumette T, Gaugler MH, Cochonneau D, Fleurence J, Dubois N, Hulin P, Aubry J, Birklé S, Paris F. Anti-Gb3 monoclonal antibody inhibits angiogenesis and tumor development. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e45423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Wegner MS, Gruber L, Mattjus P, Geisslinger G, Grösch S. The UDP-glucose ceramide glycosyltransferase (UGCG) and the link to multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4084-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Wu CP, Hsieh CH, Wu YS. The emergence of drug transporter-mediated multidrug resistance to cancer chemotherapy. Mol Pharm. 2011;8(6):1996–2011. doi: 10.1021/mp200261n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Behnam-Motlagh P, Tyler A, Grankvist K, Johansson A. Verotoxin-1 treatment or manipulation of its receptor globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) for reversal of multidrug resistance to cancer chemotherapy. Toxins. 2010;2(10):2467–2477. doi: 10.3390/toxins2102467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Sandvig K, Bergan J, Kavaliauskiene S, Skotland T. Lipid requirements for entry of protein toxins into cells. Prog Lipid Res. 2014;54:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2014.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Schütte OM, Patalag LJ, Weber LMC, Ries A, Römer W, Werz DB, Steinem C. 2-Hydroxy fatty acid enantiomers of Gb3 impact shiga toxin binding and membrane organization. Biophys J. 2015;108(12):2775–2778. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Rossig C, Kailayangiri S, Jamitzky S, Altvater B. Carbohydrate targets for CAR T cells in solid childhood cancers. Front Oncol. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Anelli T, Sitia R. Protein quality control in the early secretory pathway. EMBO J. 2008;27(2):315–327. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Muir E, Raza M, Ellis C, Burnside E, Love F, Heller S, Elliot M, Daniell E, Dasgupta D, Alves N, Day P, Fawcett J, Keynes R. Trafficking and processing of bacterial proteins by mammalian cells: insights from chondroitinase ABC. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0186759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hamorsky KT, Kouokam JC, Jurkiewicz JM, Nelson B, Moore LJ, Husk AS, Kajiura H, Fujiyama K, Matoba N. N-glycosylation of cholera toxin B subunit in Nicotiana benthamiana: impacts on host stress response, production yield and vaccine potential. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8003. doi: 10.1038/srep08003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Wang N, Wang KY, Xu F, Li GQ, Liu DH. The effect of N-glycosylation on the expression of the tetanus toxin fragment C in Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif. 2020;166:105503. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2019.105503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Amon R, Reuven EM, Leviatan Ben-Arye S, Padler-Karavani V. Glycans in immune recognition and response. Carbohydr Res. 2014;389:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Danishefsky SJ, Shue YK, Chang MN, Wong CH. Development of Globo-H cancer vaccine. Acc Chem Res. 2015;48(3):643–652. doi: 10.1021/ar5004187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Arnaud J, Claudinon J, Tröndle K, Trovaslet M, Larson G, Thomas A, Varrot A, Römer W, Imberty A, Audfray A. Reduction of lectin valency drastically changes glycolipid dynamics in membranes but not surface avidity. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(9):1918–1924. doi: 10.1021/cb400254b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Arnaud J, Tröndle K, Claudinon J, Audfray A, Varrot A, Römer W, Imberty A. Membrane deformation by neolectins with engineered glycolipid binding sites. Angew Chemie Int Ed. 2014;53(35):9267–9270. doi: 10.1002/anie.201404568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Ishitoya S, Kurazono H, Nishiyama H, Nakamura E, Kamoto T, Habuchi T, Terai A, Ogawa O, Yamamoto S. Verotoxin induces rapid elimination of human renal tumor xenografts in scid mice. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1309–1313. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000100110.11129.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.O’Loughlin EV, Robins-Browne RM. Effect of Shiga toxin and Shiga-like toxins on eukaryotic cells. Microbes Infect. 2001;3(6):493–507. doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01405-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Ren J, Utsunomiya I, Taguchi K, Ariga T, Tai T, Ihara Y, Miyatake T. Localization of verotoxin receptors in nervous system. Brain Res. 1999;825(1-2):183–188. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01196-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Jacewicz MS, Acheson DWK, Binion DG, West GA, Lincicome LL, Fiocchi C, Keusch GT. Responses of human intestinal microvascular endothelial cells to Shiga toxins 1 and 2 and pathogenesis of hemorrhagic colitis. Infect Immunity. 1999;67(3):1439–1444. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.3.1439-1444.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Romano PR, Mackay A, Vong M, DeSa J, Lamontagne A, Comunale MA, Hafner J, Block T, Lec R, Mehta A. Development of recombinant Aleuria aurantia lectins with altered binding specificities to fucosylated glycans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;414(1):84–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Sato T, Tateno H, Kaji H, Chiba Y, Kubota T, Hirabayashi J, Narimatsu H. Engineering of recombinant Wisteria floribunda agglutinin specifically binding to GalNAcβ1,4GlcNAc (LacdiNAc) Glycobiology. 2017;27(8):743–754. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwx038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.