Abstract
Tauopathies such as progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD) exhibit characteristic neuronal and glial inclusions of hyperphosphorylated Tau (pTau). Although the astrocytic pTau phenotype upon neuropathological examination is the most guiding feature in distinguishing both diseases, regulatory mechanisms controlling their transitions into disease-specific states are poorly understood to date. Here, we provide accessible chromatin data of more than 45,000 single nuclei isolated from the frontal cortex of PSP, CBD, and control individuals. We found a strong association of disease-relevant molecular changes with astrocytes and demonstrate that tauopathy-relevant genetic risk variants are tightly linked to astrocytic chromatin accessibility profiles in the brains of PSP and CBD patients. Unlike the established pathogenesis in the secondary tauopathy Alzheimer disease, microglial alterations were relatively sparse. Transcription factor (TF) motif enrichments in pseudotime as well as modeling of the astrocytic TF interplay suggested a common pTau signature for CBD and PSP that is reminiscent of an inflammatory immediate-early response. Nonetheless, machine learning models also predicted discriminatory features, and we observed marked differences in molecular entities related to protein homeostasis between both diseases. Predicted TF involvement was supported by immunofluorescence analyses in postmortem brain tissue for their highly correlated target genes. Collectively, our data expand the current knowledge on risk gene involvement (e.g., MAPT, MAPK8, and NFE2L2) and molecular pathways leading to the phenotypic changes associated with CBD and PSP.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00401-022-02483-8.
Keywords: Progressive supranuclear palsy, Corticobasal degeneration, Tauopathy, snATAC-seq, Astrocytes, Neurodegeneration
Introduction
Most neurodegenerative disorders are characterized by misfolded, intracellular protein aggregates that can disrupt neuronal and glial homeostasis. Among these, tauopathies represent a group of diseases in which deposits of hyperphosphorylated tau (pTau) protein can be seen upon neuropathological examination [25]. Examples of tauopathies are Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) as well as the less common Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD). Because clinical symptoms of those three diseases can overlap, definite diagnosis requires postmortem neuropathological examination [2, 38, 64]. Besides the distribution pattern of pTau inclusions throughout the central nervous system, two histological features are used to distinguish tauopathies: affected cell types and the immunohistochemical ratio of isoform-specific Tau antibodies [18, 64].
In regard to the latter, the Tau harboring gene MAPT, located on chromosome 17q21.23, gives rise to six isoforms by differential splicing involving exons 2, 3, and 10 [18, 21]. The microtubule-binding domain, consisting of 3 or 4 repeats (3R/4R) depending on inclusion of exon 10, not only defines the affinity of Tau to microtubules, but also its aggregation properties [25]. While AD can be regarded a mixed 3R/4R tauopathy, 4R isoforms predominate in PSP and CBD. As for affected cell types, AD, PSP, and CBD all share neuronal pTau inclusions such as neurofibrillary tangles or neuropilic threads. Glial inclusions are rare in AD, but common in CBD or PSP [16]. The most prominent immunoreactive feature to discriminate PSP from CBD is the astrocytic pTau phenotype: with tufted astrocytes (TA) being a hallmark for PSP and astrocytic plaques (AP) for CBD as shown in Fig. 1 [11, 38, 64].
Postmortem transcriptome studies can help in identifying disease-associated signatures and, when performed in single-cell resolution, even quantify the degree of cell type-specific involvement. This has been achieved primarily in the context of AD, and through integration of multiple “omics” studies such as single-cell and genome-wide association studies (GWAS), it is now believed that microglia are key players in AD pathogenesis [22, 40, 46, 54]. This insight is already being translated in a therapeutic context, with studies underway that seek to restore microglial fitness [26]. In contrast, postmortem “omics”-studies are sparse in PSP and CBD [1, 7, 22, 24, 34], and to date non-existent in single-cell resolution.
The lack of cell type-resolved molecular data for PSP and CBD compelled us to perform this study. We hypothesized that their neuropathological phenotype would be mirrored by molecular changes in specific cell types, and we wondered whether we could find molecular features that distinguished both diseases. We chose an epigenetic assay—the single-nucleus assay for transposase accessible chromatin sequencing (snATAC-seq) as compared to a transcriptomic assay (snRNA-seq). The read-out of snATAC-seq corresponds to regions of open chromatin in the genome, and these are commonly associated with loci of active transcription or epigenetic regulation [8, 33]. This assay relies on DNA instead of RNA as input material; hence, degradation of RNA, which is commonly associated with long postmortem intervals and agony phases, is not a cause of concern. Furthermore, since the coordinated expression of genes has been shown to be regulated by effects of transcription factors (TFs) on the compaction of chromatin [33, 60], altered TF dynamics might have an impact on pathogenesis in these diseases. This can be explored optimally with an open chromatin assay such as snATAC-seq. Direct TF effects are usually guided by DNA sequence motifs, so-called TF binding sites, which are located in non-coding cis-regulatory elements (CREs) like enhancers, silencers, or promoters [57]. Their interaction is perturbed in diseases with a complex genetic background [31], probably explaining the large contribution of non-coding mutations to pathogenesis. More precisely, mutations in CREs can affect TF binding dynamics to varying degrees [12]. Thus, viewed from a higher perspective, the TF interplay within a given cell type can be regarded as an integration point of genetic background, epigenetic information, and as effector of intra- and extracellular signaling pathways. Because TF binding sites within CREs outnumber genes and their transcripts by several orders of magnitude, the feature space is larger in snATAC-seq compared to snRNA-seq data, which can be leveraged for increased discriminatory power.
Figure 1 outlines our discovery-driven approach: first, we demonstrate the importance of astrocytes to CBD and PSP disease pathology by combining tauopathy-associated genes and GWAS risk variants with our data. Then we explore their transition into a tauopathy state via TF profiling. Incorporating separate analyses such as pseudotemporal imputations, group-wise comparisons of TF information, external data, and machine learning models, we ultimately attempt to delineate disease-specific astrocytic TF signatures in a comprehensive data integration part. To validate these findings, we finally detect protein expression alterations of highly correlated target genes in archival brain tissue of PSP and CBD cases using an immunofluorescent staining approach.
Materials and methods
Neuropathological assessment and case selection
The complete brain was prepared at autopsy. Hemispheres were treated differently: the left hemisphere was fixed in formalin for a duration of two weeks or longer before coronal slicing of 1 cm step size, while the right hemisphere was snap-frozen immediately. From the former, paraffin-embedded specimen sampled across the whole cerebrum, brain stem, cerebellum, and spinal cord were used for diagnostic examination.
Cases (4 PSP, 4 CBD) and controls (5 Ctrls) were selected based on the amount of additional co-pathology and matched by age (PSP 72.8 ± 4.8, CBD 56.5 ± 2.9, Ctrl 69.4 ± 14), postmortem interval (PSP 41.2 ± 34.2, CBD 33.8 ± 20.2, Ctrl 26.2 ± 6.8), and sex (males, PSP = 50%, CBD = 50%, Ctrl = 60%) at its best (see Table 1). Ctrl cases were chosen based on the absence of neurologic or psychiatric disease history. Those Ctrl or tauopathy cases exhibiting substantial co-pathology (i.e., Aβ42, α-synuclein, TDP-43, pTau (AT8), Aging-related Tau-Astrogliopathy (ARTAG), Primary Aging-related Tauopathy (PART), 3R Tau (RD3), or 4R Tau (RD4; in case of Ctrl)) in study-relevant regions were excluded.
Table 1.
Case ID | Neuropathological diagnosis | Neurological diagnosis (last ante mortem) | Age at death [years] |
PMI [hours] | Sex | Disease duration [years] | Brain weight [g] | Tau isoform# [IHC: 4R/3R] | AGD | Braak&Braak (NFT) | CERAD-plaque density | Thal-Phase | Aβ42 (4G8) | α-synuclein (Braak; LBs) | TDP-43 | FUS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP1 | PSP | PSP-RS | 68 | 38 | Male | 6.0 | 1460 | ± | − | 1 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | neg | neg | |
PSP2 | PSP | PSP-ns | 77 | 78 | Female | 2.5 | 1112 | ± | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | neg | neg | |
PSP3 | PSP | PSP-ns | 78 | 42 | Male | 9.0 | NA | ± | + | 1 | 0 | 1* | Yes* | 0 | neg | neg | |
PSP4 | PSP | bvFTD-tauopathy | 68 | 7 | Female | 7.0 | 1005 | ± | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | neg | neg | |
CBD1 | CBD | PSP-RS | 52 | 14 | Female | 4.5 | 1260 | ± | − | 0 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | neg | neg | |
CBD2 | CBD | bvFTD | 56 | 44 | Male | 2.5 | NA | ± | + | 1 | 0 | 0 | No | 0 | neg | neg | |
CBD3 | CBD | bvFTD-CBS | 59 | 23 | Female | 7.0 | 1220 | ± | − | 1 | – | 1* | Yes* | 0 | pos | neg | |
CBD4 | CBD | bvFTD-MND | 59 | 54 | Male | 1.5 | 1330 | ± | + | 1 | 0 | 3* | Yes* | 0 | neg | neg | |
C1 | Ctrl | − | 58 | 22 | Male | − | NA | −/− | − | 1 | − | 0 | − | 0 | pos | − | |
C2 | Ctrl | − | 82 | 27 | Male | − | 1230 | −/− | − | 2 | − | 1* | − | 0 | neg | neg | |
C3 | Ctrl | − | 86 | 20 | Female | − | 1035 | −/− | − | 1 | − | 0 | − | 0 | − | − | |
C4 | Ctrl | − | 64 | 33 | Female | − | NA | −/− | − | 1 | − | 0 | − | 0 | neg | neg | |
C5 | Ctrl | − | 53 | 29 | Male | − | 1792 | −/− | − | 0 | − | 2* | − | 0 | neg | neg |
Aβ42 amyloid beta 42, AGD Argyrophilic Grain Disease, bvFTD behavioral variant Frontotemporal Dementia, CBS Corticobasal Syndrome, CERAD Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease, Ctrl control, IHC immunohistochemistry, LBs Lewy bodies, MND motor neuron disease, NA not assessable, neg negative, NFT neurofibrillary tangles, ns not specified, PMI postmortem interval, RS Richardson Syndrome. See also comprehensive data (Supplementary Data, T0, online resource)
#In study-relevant region. *No 4G8/Aβ42-positivity or Aβ-plaques in the study-relevant region
Region of interest
Approximately 1 cm3-thick tissue blocks of grey and appending white matter were excised from snap-frozen coronal cerebral slices using a diamond band saw. The regions of interest were parts of the medial and superior frontal gyrus at the level of the anterior striatum (MFG, SFG) in the coronal view corresponding to Brodmann areas 6/8/9. The corresponding regions were sampled from the contralateral formalin-fixed hemisphere for validation studies.
Single-nucleus ATAC-sequencing
Nuclei preparation and quantification
To isolate nuclei, 200 mg of brain tissue was homogenized in 3.75 mL of chilled lysis buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0, 0.32 M sucrose, 0.34 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF, 3 mM MgAc2, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Igepal, and 1 protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (complete mini protease inhibitor cocktail, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) per 50 mL) using a Dounce homogenizer and transferred to 15 mL-ultracentrifugation tubes (Seton Open-top polyallomer centrifuge Tubes) with additional 2.25 mL lysis buffer. Homogenates were underlaid with 6.75 ml sucrose buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, 1.8 M sucrose, 0.34 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF, 3 mM MgAc2, and 1 protease inhibitor cocktail tablet per 50 mL) and centrifuged for 1 h at 24,000 rpm at 4 °C. The nuclei pellet was resuspended in 1 × nuclei buffer (10 × Genomics) and nuclei were quantified using a Neubauer haemocytometer.
Single nuclei partitioning and snATAC-Seq library construction
Single nuclei partitioning and subsequent snATAC-Seq library construction were performed using the Chromium Next GEM Single Cell ATAC Reagent Kit v1.1 (10 × Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, following incubation with ATAC Enzyme for 1 h at 37 °C, nuclei were loaded onto a Chromium Next GEM Chip H for a targeted recovery of 5000 or 10,000 nuclei per PSP/CBD and Ctrl sample, respectively. After partitioning of the nuclei and DNA cleanup, sample indices were added, and double-sided size selection was performed. Finally, libraries were eluted in 20 µl Buffer EB (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and stored at − 20 °C. Correct fragment size distribution of the libraries was checked via the Agilent Bioanalyzer System using an Agilent bioanalyzer High-sensitivity DNA chip (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Library concentrations were determined using the KAPA library Quantification Kit for Illumina Platforms (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Sequencing of snATAC-seq libraries
Quantified and quality-controlled snATAC libraries were pooled at equimolar concentrations, denaturized, and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 platform according to the 10 × Genomics sequencing requirements for single-indexed snATAC-Seq libraries, aiming at a minimum sequencing depth of 25,000 read pairs per nucleus.
Analysis of snATAC-seq data
The main bioinformatical workflow is illustrated in Fig. 1 and consists of 8 parts (a detailed description of bioinformatical analyses is included separately as a Supplementary Methods section, online resource). Initially, sequencing data were subjected to the 10 × Genomics™ cellranger-atac-1.2.0 pipeline and Snaptools/SnapATAC packages [14] for preprocessing and quality control (QC), respectively. Barcodes were filtered for mapping quality, fragment sizes, and correct alignment flags. SnapATAC’s representations of chromatin accessibility as either bins (equally sized genomic windows of 1,000 bp overlapping with sequenced DNA-fragments) or peaks (exact genomic ranges of cluster-aggregated DNA-fragments) were the basis for all downstream single-nucleus analyses. Gene accessibility (GA) as a surrogate of a gene’s transcriptional activity was calculated as a z score-based metric in SnapATAC [14].
The cell-by-bin matrix was used for clustering (Supplementary Fig. 1, online resource) and barcode embedding using uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) metrics. Technical covariates were identified, and batch effect correction applied to the primary UMAP embedding (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2, online resource). Furthermore, graph-based cell type inference was conducted in the UMAP embedding, while RNA- and ATAC-seq data-derived marker gene lists from McKenzie et al. [41] and Lake et al. [35] served as references (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4, Supplementary Data, T01, online resource).
The cell-by-peak matrix was leveraged for identifying GWAS risk variants in ATAC peaks [28], differential gene accessibility analysis, gene ontology (GO) analysis, and TF motif enrichment (TFME) analysis. To assess cell type enrichment of GWAS risk variants, publicly available disease-specific GWAS [24, 34] summary statistics were downloaded from https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/ for PSP (Orphanet_683), CBD (Orphanet_278), AD (EFO_0000249), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD, Orphanet_282), Parkinson Disease (PD, EFO_0002508), Multiple System Atrophy (MSA, EFO_1001050), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD, EFO_0006792), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS, EFO_0000253).
Quantification of alterations assigned to biological pathway terms was enabled by the amiGO2 database (http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/search/bioentity) filtered for the terms ‘chaperon-mediated autophagy’ (CMA), ubiquitin–proteasome-system (UPS), and unfolded-protein-response (UPR) or ‘microglial cell activation’ in Homo sapiens.
The subsequent steps were exclusively conducted with the astrocytic cluster: first, we assessed group-wise differences of TFME using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and the Bonferroni method to adjust for multiple hypothesis testing.
Employing the package Cicero [49], we constructed pseudotime trajectories on the re-embedded astrocyte cluster, which was filtered for Ctrl- and CBD-derived astrocytic nuclei. High TFME levels of an epigenetic indicator of astrocytic immaturity (i.e., the TF EMX2) served to define the origin of the trajectory. To evaluate GA and TFME changes along these trajectories, tradeSeq [3], its modeling framework, and Wald-test-based functions were used.
To identify features that are most distinctive in predicting the group entity (Ctrl, PSP, or CBD), a supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm called extreme gradient boosting tree (XGB) was trained on the astrocytic TFME. Train-test set splits consisted of 80% or 20% of the complete astrocytic population, respectively. The model’s predictive performance was primarily measured by overall accuracy and Cohen’s kappa in the test set; further classification performance indicators (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values) were reported for a more detailed characterization. To interpret the model’s predictive process and to weigh its input features (i.e., TFs) by their importance for a particular prediction, the ML explanation framework Lime was used [52].
We identified TFs associated with the classical neuropathological phenotype in PSP (tufted astrocyte, TA) by applying the Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks. To this end, we utilized a public transcriptomic data set derived from temporal cortices of 176 PSP cases [1]. Using gene-set enrichment analysis (GSEA), the inferred transcriptional regulatory network was integrated with differentially expressed genes as well as covariate-adjusted neuropathology-gene expression correlation coefficients, which both were reported in the original study. The unit of a given TF with all the genes regulated by it was termed regulon.
To ultimately distill a set of shared and disease-specific pTau-associated TF candidates, we integrated the results of all previous analyses. These multidimensional overlaps were visualized as upset plots.
The Supplementary Methods, online resource, offer a more detailed description of the bioinformatical workflow.
TF target gene validation—bioinformatics, immunofluorescence staining and data analysis
To retrieve the most important target genes of JUNB and TFEB TFs in this astrocyte dataset, correlations between TFME and the GA of all genes in the dataset were computed group-wise. Significant correlations in the Ctrl data were excluded in the following step to reduce false positive, thus unspecific findings. Next, potential target genes were ranked per disease by BH-adjusted p values and Pearson R before searching for genomic overlaps of Cicero CRE links and each specific gene locus (± 10 kb). Visual inspection of co-accessibility plots at highly correlated and overlapping gene loci guided identification of the top candidate genes.
Ten micrometer-thick sections were prepared from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain samples of the MFG, which were deparaffinized with Histoclear (VWR Life science, #H103-4L) and rehydrated in descending ethanol series. Antigen retrieval was performed with 1 × Sodium citrate solution, pH 6 in a pressure cooker for 20 min. Autofluorescence quenching/photobleaching was applied using 25,000 Lux LED lights for 2 × 45 min with slides submerged in quenching solution (4.5% H2O2 and 20 mM NaOH in 1X PBS). Blocking was performed with 5% Goat Serum (GS) and 0.3% Triton X-100 in 1X PBS. Primary antibodies raised in rabbit against the candidate gene products MAP3K8 (1:500, abcam, #ab137589), or CTSD (1:200, abcam, #ab75852) were incubated together with mouse anti-AT8 (1:500, ThermoFisher Scientific, #MN1020) and guinea pig anti-GFAP (in combination with MAP3K8, 1:500, SynapticSystems, #173,004) or chicken anti-GFAP (in combination with CTSD, 1:500, EMD Millipore AB5541), respectively, over night at 4 °C. After washing, secondary antibody incubation followed (1:1000, goat anti-guinea pig /anti-chicken AlexaFluor®488, anti-mouse AlexaFluor®568, anti-rabbit AlexaFluor®647) with an incubation period of 60 min. Finally, slides were covered with mounting medium containing DAPI (#S302380-2, Agilent Dako, Germany) and #1.5H high-precision imaging coverslips.
Images were acquired from the MFG cortex with a Leica Stellaris 5 confocal microscope. pTau + astrocytes were identified based on the prototypical morphology and cellular distribution of aggregates. TAs were defined by bush-like, soma-proximally arranged pTau conglomerate with processes of different thickness. APs were defined by corona-like, soma-distantly arranged fine pTau processes. Then, z-stacks were acquired, using an HC Plan Apochromat CS2 63x/NA 1.40 Oil objective (2048 × 2048 pixels, 181.932 μm height/width, 8–9 μm depth). Images were preprocessed including min and max pixel value cut-offs using custom macro scripts (see also GitHub repository).
Marker-positive (CTSD + , MAP3K8 +) and -negative astrocytes with detectable signal after standardized thresholding were counted using the CellCounter tool provided with ImageJ/Fiji. Ratios of GFAP + [Marker] + and GFAPonly + cells were compared with ratios of AT8 + (TA/AP) [Marker] + and AT8only + cells.
General statement: computing environment and statistics
Preprocessing was run in RStudio Server with R3.6 and Python2.7 for Debian Server. The subsequent bioinformatical analysis including statistical testing was conducted within RStudio Desktop running on R3.6.3 (SnapATAC) and R4.0.4 (remaining analyses) for Linux (Ubuntu 20.04 LTS). To determine the applicability of hypothesis testing methods, the Shapiro–Wilk method was used to test for normal distributions. Consequently, Welch's t-test was used in normally distributed and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test in non-normally distributed populations. Welch and Wilcoxon tests were conducted as two-tailed versions, unless otherwise stated. For multiple comparison correction, the BH method to obtain the false discovery rate (FDR), or the Bonferroni method to report family-wise errors were applied to unadjusted p values. Significant distribution differences as estimated by the tradeSeq-gene models along pseudotime were determined based on their Wald-statistic and corrected according to the Bonferroni method, unless otherwise stated.
Results
Characterization of PSP and CBD frontal lobe brain nuclei via snATAC-seq
Isolated nuclei from fresh-frozen frontal cortex tissue from 13 samples underwent single-nucleus library preparation and short-read sequencing, yielding open chromatin profiles for 45,205 nuclei. After quality control and dimensionality reduction, clusters were defined from the snATAC-seq data to assess cell type identity (Fig. 2a). The total number of clusters and their respective sizes were found to be robust to downsampling, indicating appropriate clustering metrics (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2, online resource). We detected a total of 11 major clusters, with negligible confounding effects by PMI, sex, age at death, Thal phase or Braak & Braak stage. Nevertheless, divergent regional atrophy patterns between PSP and CBD cases cannot completely be excluded. For cell type annotations, we gathered canonical marker genes from the literature and aggregated their gene accessibility (GA) score per cluster (Fig. 2d; Supplementary Fig. 3; Supplementary Data, T01, online resource). The GA score is derived from the sum of open chromatin loci overlapping a gene and its respective regulatory elements and can thus be understood as a proxy for gene transcription.
While neurons were represented by 5 and oligodendrocytes by 3 distinct clusters, microglia (Mic), astrocytes (Ast), and oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC) were each assigned to a single cluster. Neuronal subtypes were classified as (i) excitatory upper-layer neurons (Exc. ULN) with increased GA of CBLN2, CUX2, and RASGRF2, (ii) excitatory deep-layer neurons (Exc. DLN) with RORB, FOXP2, and TSHZ2, (iii) NEFM- and BCL11B-positive excitatory neurons (Exc. N. NEFM|BCL11B) as well as (iv) inhibitory neurons with either PVALB and TAC1 or SST GA (Inh. N. SST|PVALB), and (v) inhibitory neurons with high VIP, TAC3, and CALB2 GA. Oligodendrocytes were identified based on high GA for MOBP (Oli #1 MOBP) and numbered consecutively (Oli #2, Oli #3). Across all cells, Oli #1 MOBP was the most and Oli #3 the least abundant cell type (Fig. 2b, c). Because visual inspection of the Thal phase projection in UMAP suggested an uneven distribution across cell types, we performed a post hoc correlation analysis. This revealed only a positive association (R = 0.65, p = 0.017) between microglia and the cerebral distribution of Aβ + plaques (i.e., Thal phases) in our dataset (Supplementary Fig. 4, online resource), an association that has been described in the context of AD [20].
Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses supported cluster identities by recapitulation of known, commonly ascribed biological functions (Supplementary Fig. 5, online resource). Interestingly, microglial and astrocytic annotations were largely overlapping, hinting at an immune-regulatory role also for astrocytes in PSP/CBD. Transcription factor motif enrichment (TFME) comparisons demonstrated cluster-specific TF patterns, e.g., for Mic (SPI, RUNX2, IRF family), neurons in general (ZBTB18, RORA), and Ast (UNCX, LMX1A/B, HOXB2/3) (Supplementary Fig. 6A, online resource). Finally, cross-correlation of TFME matrices showed strong overlap within the major glial and neuronal cell types (Supplementary Fig. 6B, online resource), altogether indicating a technically and biologically consistent definition of clusters.
The frontal cortex is frequently affected by neurodegeneration and glial pathology in CBD and PSP [64]. Thus, we hypothesized that cell type proportions might appear shifted towards more glial cells in such areas and sought to calculate cell type frequencies per case (Fig. 2b). Comparing disease groups after normalization to Ctrl indicated a statistically significant decrease of neurons, OPCs, and oligodendrocytes in CBD, whereas there was only a reduction of Exc. ULN in PSP (Welch t test, Fig. 2c). However, we noted a greater cell type proportion variance in the CBD group. Because it is generally believed that qualitative immunohistochemical changes in tauopathies can be observed in both hemispheres, cases in this study were evaluated for inclusion with immunohistochemistry on the contralateral side. Thus, we cannot exclude the possibility that neurodegeneration or gliosis differed between hemispheres for certain cases. While only few reports regarding the asymmetry of immunohistochemical changes in PSP exist, this was previously described in the context of CBD [18, 64].
Broad chromatin changes at tauopathy-associated and protein degradation-related gene loci
To gain insight into disease-specific epigenetic alterations, we retrieved tauopathy-associated genes from DisGeNET, a database that integrates GWAS results, animal model experiments, and literature references [47]. We assessed their z-scored accessibilities in the disease and Ctrl groups (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Bonferroni correction). We found altered GA scores of the top 50-ranked tauopathy-associated genes in all primary cell types except for the Mic cluster, which showed no significant changes at the selected genes in both disease entities (Fig. 3a). Due to the prominent involvement of microglia in AD [42, 45, 46]—another tauopathy—this finding was unexpected. Nevertheless, we could additionally show that there was no GA difference between groups when aggregating scores for all genes associated with the GO term “microglial activation”, supporting the notion that this phenomenon is not driven by epigenetic mechanisms in CBD or PSP (Fig. 3b).
Of note, MAPT showed reduced GA scores in one oligodendroglial and one neuronal cluster (Oli #1 MOBP and Exc. DLN) for both diseases, with a more pronounced reduction in CBD and unchanged conditions in Ast. The most significant positive GA change was observed in NFE2L2 (Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2) in excitatory neurons, with a stronger gain in CBD compared to PSP. While in PSP, most significant hits were attributed to Exc. DLN, Exc. ULN were affected by the most extensive changes in CBD (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 7A&B, online resource).
Many tauopathy-related genes, including MAP-kinases and lysosomal enzymes, are associated with protein homeostasis [29, 66]. Thus, we aggregated GA scores for three molecular entities known to be involved in protein degradation (Fig. 3c): the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS), the unfolded protein response (UPR), and chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA). All three pathways were downregulated in oligodendrocytic populations in CBD with primarily downregulated CMA and UPS in PSP-derived Oli #2. We observed concordant UPS reductions in CBD and PSP Ast (p < 0.005) with simultaneously reduced microglial UPR (p < 0.001). Contrarily, PSP Mic exhibited a marked activation of both CMA and UPS (p < 0.001). With respect to the neuronal populations, downregulation of all three systems was apparent. However, in CBD-derived Exc. ULN, the UPR system was induced, reflecting neuronal heterogeneity also in terms of degradative pathways.
On the DNA sequence level, GWAS risk variants associated with neurodegenerative diseases might be linked to ATAC-seq peaks, which are several hundred bp long regions of open chromatin, aggregated by cluster. Assuming that this relation would likewise affect certain cell types more than others, we compiled GWAS summary statistics for tauopathies and related neurodegenerative syndromes, namely PSP, CBD, AD, Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), Parkinson Disease (PD), Multiple System Atrophy (MSA), Lewy Body Dementia (LBD), and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). We then inferred cell type-associated risk variants in our dataset (as pooled tauopathy nuclei) segregated by disease-specific peaks (Fig. 3d, see Methods). This analysis showed pairs of high z scores and highly significant enrichment for FTD- and PSP-associated risk variants in astrocyte-specific peaks. We were unable to calculate cell type enrichments for CBD risk variants due to the sparsity of CBD GWAS (the significance-filtered CBD GWAS list consisted of only 6 SNPs). Strikingly, we did not observe GWAS enrichments for any of the above neurodegenerative diseases in microglia-specific peaks—not even AD, for which other studies have clearly attributed a large genetic risk proportion to microglia [42, 45, 46], suggesting that PSP- and CBD-specific microglial peaks are distinct from AD-specific ones.
Collectively, this investigation demonstrates that genetic risk variants previously associated with the clinical spectrum of primary tauopathies (i.e., PSP and FTD) are tightly linked to astrocytic chromatin accessibility profiles in the brains of PSP and CBD patients. Nonetheless, systematic cell type and pathway annotations also point to inherent differences between these diseases.
Tracking epigenetic transition states of tauopathy astrocytes supports a context of neuroinflammation
Integrating the previous findings with the knowledge that the astrocytic phenotype constitutes a major neuropathological feature to distinguish CBD from PSP impelled us to focus our downstream investigations on the Ast cluster. Thus, we subjected all 4425 astrocyte-derived nuclei from both tauopathies and Ctrl to subclustering and annotation procedures. One astrocytic subcluster exclusively consisted of tauopathy-derived nuclei (mainly CBD) and exhibited higher accessibility at genes involved in ‘stimulus detection’ or ‘signal transduction’ (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 8A, online resource). A triangular disease-wise comparison of TF motif enrichment (TFME) values (Supplementary Data, T02-T03, online resource, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, BH-corrected) revealed that the most significant candidates were those TFs associated with immunological terms (Supplementary Fig. 9A-E, online resource), while TF deviations were stronger in CBD than in PSP astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. 9F, online resource).
To gather insight into how astrocytes derived from tauopathy brains might evolve from a physiological towards a diseased state, we hypothesized this transition to be a continuous process paralleled by changes in open chromatin and mirrored by differential accessibilities for specific TFs along a shared time constant. Hence, we sought to understand TFME dynamics with pseudotemporal models, though in separate UMAP embeddings for each disease entity.
We reasoned that high accessibility for the TF EMX2, which is specific for and active in early differentiating astrocytes, would be a suitable starting point for an assumed astrocytic transition path [58] (Fig. 4b–d). For CBD, we obtained a trajectory that terminated in a population of CBD-derived astrocytes, while only few of them were embedded in proximity to Ctrl cells in the EMX2HIGH population. This is consistent with the presence of unaffected astrocytes in the tauopathy brain. In PSP brains, however, no disease-defined astrocytic subcluster was evident (Supplementary Fig. 8B, online resource).
The pseudotime inference itself does not allow for statistical evaluation of single-cell feature values over pseudotemporal trajectories. Thus, a framework called tradeSeq [3] was employed to test for TFME changes along the astrocytic transition axis. In a first step, generative additive models were fit to the feature distributions as a function of pseudotime. Subsequently, Wald-statistic-based hypothesis testing allowed to discern TFMs whose respective TFME values were either associated with the trajectory course or differed significantly from starting to terminating points.
This analysis showed a diverging pattern: The immediate early response (IER)-related FOS and JUN family members as well as their co-transcriptional factors NFE2, JDP2, and MAF, known to co-act as the AP-1 complex in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, inflammation, and apoptosis [50, 61] (Fig. 4e–g, Supplementary Fig. 10A, Supplementary Fig. 11A&B, online resource), showed significantly higher and highly correlated TFME values (Wald-statistic start-vs.-end comparison, BH-corrected p value < 0.05). In contrast, TFs related to the early stages of astrocyte differentiation (LHX9, SHOX, RFX4, HESX1, and EMX2), showed a gradual loss of their enrichment (Fig. 4g, Supplementary Fig. 10A, Supplementary Fig. 11C–E, online resource). Focusing on pseudotime-aligned GA changes, protein homeostasis-related genes (e.g., APOE, HSPB8, LRP1) were upregulated, while many synaptic candidates (e.g., SNCA, BDNF, NRXN3) gradually decreased in their GA in CBD astrocytes (Supplementary Fig. 10B, online resource).
This analysis demonstrated that in CBD astrocytes, chromatin accessibility of TFs implicated in early astroglial development appears to be reduced in favor of a neuroinflammatory response.
Reconstructing disease-specific representations of astrocytic TF networks and a phenotype-associated regulon activity profile
We wondered whether we could leverage TFME information in a more unbiased way to decipher signatures delineating PSP and CBD brains specifically from a non-diseased condition. Thus, we modeled disease-specific TF patterns by exploiting the discriminatory power of a machine-learning algorithm in a supervised classification task. Concretely, an extreme gradient boosting tree algorithm was trained on the cell-specific TFME of an 80%-split of the astrocyte subset, including data from PSP, CBD, and Ctrl astrocytes (n = 3540). Assessing the model’s performance with unseen nuclei of the remaining 20% of the astrocyte subset (n = 885, Fig. 5a, b) yielded reliable classification regarding accuracy (overall 82.6%, balanced 84.0%), positive predictive value (82.3%), and negative predictive value (90.6%). Furthermore, when dividing by the a priori expected likelihood of predicting the correct group entity, the model’s predictive ability can be considered ‘substantial’ with a Cohen kappa of 70.2% [10]. The differentiated prediction performance was most accurate for CBD vs. Ctrl tasks, followed by PSP vs. CBD, and PSP vs. Ctrl distinctions (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 12A, online resource).
In a subsequent step, overall feature importance assessment highlighted IER- and cellular immunity-related TFs (FOS, JUN, NFATC2/3, STAT1) as most useful in predicting the tauopathy or Ctrl state (Fig. 5c). Since this did not sufficiently inform about disease-specific importance, we used local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (Lime) [52] to understand the model’s decision-making process in more detail. For a given astrocytic nucleus, Lime evaluated the contributions of TFME ranges to support or contradict the respective disease label (depicted as bar length in Fig. 5d–f). Consequently, we selected the top 10 candidates ranked by their feature weight in all test set astrocytes, which were assumed to be most helpful in predicting astrocytic identity of either PSP, CBD, or Ctrl origin specifically. Interestingly, the ‘importance’ metric was not only determined by the TFME deviations with the highest changes, but also by the discriminatory power of subtle TFME changes across the compared groups (Supplementary Fig. 12B, online resource).
The previous analyses highlighted changes in astrocyte TF dynamics without any respect to the underlying neuropathological phenotype. To link this information (i.e., pTau inclusions in astrocytes) with TF activities, we used the Reconstruction of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks approach [9] (Fig. 5g). Enabled by the availability of bulk gene expression data and correlations thereof with tufted astrocyte quantitation data (i.e., adjusted semiquantitative TA density) from the temporal cortex (TCX) of 176 PSP patients [1], we assessed genetic regulators and their target genes as so-called regulon units (Fig. 5g).
Utilizing these neuropathological-transcriptomic correlations, we assigned TA-related values to the given regulons (two-tailed GSEA, differential enrichment score, Fig. 5h), which we termed tufted astrocyte-associated regulon activity profile (TA-RAP). Unsupervised clustering of regulons indicated sets with lower (top branch), mixed (mid branch), and increased (bottom branch) activity in PSP cases when compared to Ctrls. Again, IER-related and immunologically relevant TF transcripts such as JUNB, NFATC2, NFE2L3, or IKZF5 were present among the set of activity enhanced regulons, while those related to developmental processes exhibited lower scores (e.g., FOXF2, NRL). Genes assigned to the TA-associated regulons shown in Fig. 5h were also enriched in biological pathways related to autophagy, peroxisomes, and (de-)ubiquitination (Supplementary Fig. 13, online resource).
These analyses highlight the importance of TF networks related to the IER or neuroinflammation in PSP and CBD astrocytes alike. Furthermore, external bulk transcriptomic data supports this notion independently from our snATAC-seq data for PSP. Nevertheless, an unbiased machine learning model also predicted discriminatory features between the two disease groups.
Definition of tauopathy signatures in astrocytes of PSP and CBD brains
The primary objective of this study was to define epigenetic signatures for PSP and CBD based on TF networks. Hence, we finally integrated the results of the four disjoint analysis branches into consensus lists (Fig. 6, for concept see also Fig. 1). The first set contained the names of all TFs that showed significant TFME changes in disease-wise statistical comparisons within the entire astrocyte population. The second set consisted of TFs whose accessibility profiles aligned tightly with the pseudotime trajectory. ML model explanations indicated the TF candidates contributing to the third set. Lastly, those TFs resulting from TA-RAP extraction in the external PSP dataset represented the members of the fourth set. To determine the consensus of candidates nominated by these different approaches, we used upset plots. We first describe a common PSP and CBD “pTau” signature that likely represents the regulatory state of pTau-positive astrocytes (Fig. 6a, b). Through hierarchical ordering by (i) the number of branches that overlap and (ii) the extent of overlap in terms of TF candidate counts, 4 ranks of confidence were assigned to TF sets with > = 3 set intersections. Guiding in discerning a tauopathy (PSP and/or CBD) from a Ctrl frontal cortex was the proposed astrocytic tauopathy signature depicted in Fig. 6b, with increased accessibilities for TF binding sites related to the IER such as JUN, FOS, and its ligands FOSL1 and FOSL2.
When directly comparing CBD and PSP TF binding site accessibilities, it became apparent that their changes followed almost exclusively the same direction, with the exception of TFEB and NFIC::TLX1, which showed lower accessibilities in PSP but greater ones in CBD. Meanwhile, we observed relatively strong differences in the extent of accessibility alterations. Thus, to discriminate the two tauopathies, we hereby propose JUN(B,D)HIGH, FOS(L1,L2)HIGH as well as the involvement of DUX4, KLF5, MAX::MYC, PAX6, and PPARG to support the identity of CBD-originated astrocytes (Fig. 6c–e). PSP astrocytes exhibited a signature with additionally decreased TFEB and CREB1 accessibilities. Interestingly, subsequent pathway enrichment analyses of the PSP and CBD signatures incorporating the logic of TFME changes suggested MAPK-dependent signaling and infectious agent defense terms to play important biological roles in primary tauopathy astrocytes (Fig. 6f, g). In addition, the RELA and JUN TFs link back to protein homeostasis pathways (i.e., ‘ubiquitin protein ligase binding’), which is reflected in the gradual accessibility increments of tauopathy- and degradation system-associated genes (Supplementary Fig. 14, online resource).
Collectively, the integration of a variety of analytic approaches resulted in the identification of an astrocytic pTau signature that is strongly reminiscent of an immediate-early response. Notwithstanding, distinct molecular states of astrocytes in PSP and CBD were identified as well.
Since a conceivable confounder—case CBD3—might have introduced a sampling bias through its relatively high proportion of astrocytes, we performed a separate re-analysis without that case. Even with this approach, the major results of our study remain unaffected; however, we detected a significant increase in relative astrocyte frequencies (likely due to the lack of the outlier sample CBD3) and a more comprehensive list of TFs supporting a pTau phenotype (Supplementary Fig. 15–18, online resource).
Altered JUNB and TFEB activity influences target protein expression
Finally, we wondered whether the altered TF regulatory networks in tauopathies would manifest themselves in altered protein levels that could be observed by immunohistochemistry in post-mortem brains. We therefore identified target genes of the prominent TF candidates JUN(B) and TFEB, both of which are master regulators of essential homeostatic pathways.
To this end, we selected the top gene candidates resulting from correlating JUN(B)/TFEB TFME and GA, and which overlapped with Cicero co-accessibility links on the genomic level (see Methods). This approach highlighted MAP3K8 as JUN(B)- and CTSD as TFEB-targeted genes (Supplementary Fig. 19, online resource). We performed immunofluorescence labeling of those candidates’ gene products in postmortem PSP and CBD samples (i.e., MFG) to validate JUNB and TFEB network dysregulation though their predicted target genes (Fig. 7a, b).
The mitogen-activated protein kinase MAP3K8 (also known as TPL2) can transduce pro-inflammatory stimuli (i.e., IL17-receptor signaling in astrocytes) through the JUN(B)/FOS TF complex, which itself can enhance MAP3K8 and interleukin expression [43, 63, 65]. We observed a significantly higher rate of pTau-positive astrocytes (TAs and APs) with MAP3K8 expression compared to GFAP positives in both tauopathies (PSP: 0.83 vs. 0.42, ncells = (118; 23), ncases = 4; CBD: 0.79 vs. 0.37, n = (83; 34), ncases = 4) (Fig. 7a). In contrast, when investigating the expression of Cathepsin D, a lysosomal hydrolase and marker of lysosomal degradation [48], we found an inverse association with CTSD + TAs (in PSP), while the fraction of CTSD + APs (in CBD) was not significantly higher than their GFAP + counterparts (PSP 0.44 vs. 0.84, ncells = (65; 18), ncases = 3; CBD 0.91 vs. 0.85, ncells = (87; 36), ncases = 4) (Fig. 7b). Notably, protein expression was also visible in neuronal somata and other non-astrocytic cells. Together, we conclude that tauopathy astrocytes show signs of a JUN(B)-mediated pro-inflammatory state, while TAs in PSP additionally display a TFEB-mediated downregulation of lysosomal degradation.
Collectively, our findings are summarized in a flow chart (Fig. 7c) that can be used as an informative reference for epigenetic signatures that play a role in PSP and CBD.
Discussion
In this study, we applied an integrative systems biology approach to capture single-nucleus chromatin accessibilities in PSP and CBD frontal cortices. By combining latent characteristics of TF information and external transcriptome data, we shed light on the regulatory identity of pTau-affected astrocytes in these neurodegenerative diseases. Previous studies in bulks of brain cells repeatedly highlighted tauopathy-associated genes, or genes harboring genetic risk variants in their proximity [1, 27, 34]. However, cell type-resolved data sets have only been published for AD, where a role for microglia in its pathogenesis is now relatively well established. To our surprise, we did neither find microglia-associated accessibility changes, nor did we see an association of neurodegeneration-specific genetic risk loci with microglial specific peaks in the PSP or CBD datasets. In contrast, our data highlight astrocyte-relevant epigenetic alterations (Fig. 7c) [6, 55, 62]. Responses to pathological stimuli associated with the occurrence of pTau are likely related to astrocytic subpopulations, as delineated by differential use of TF binding sites in our study [15, 17, 30]. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that accessibility changes in astrocytes are secondary in nature, without any direct effect of pTau on the compaction of chromatin, even though this has been described before in Tau transgenic Drosophila [19].
We propose that such TF signatures are meaningful (i) descriptively as indicators of disease entity, and (ii) biologically as the representation of a pathogenetically relevant gene expression program. The diagnostic value of this analysis might aid future TF-based studies with latent or missing phenotype data in a priori trait mapping. Together with the proposed TF signature-based disease description, the underlying biology might even elicit candidates worth targeting pharmacologically. For example, one concept in AD aims at promoting lysosomal biogenesis and degradative enzyme expression. Astrocyte-specific conditional knock-out experiments in mouse models and neuronal cultures previously suggested to target TFEB, a transcriptional inductor of autophagic lysosomal degradation [5, 39]. This lysosomal master regulator significantly reduced the load of neuronal pTau and shifted extracellular Tau fibrils into astrocytes for lysosomal degradation. In our data, increased TFME values of TFEB in CBD astrocytes were paired with autophagy activation without significant rise in CTSD protein levels (in APs), while reduced TFEB activity and CTSD expression (in TAs) was evident in PSP astrocytes. This adds the notion of deficient activity in the latter and potentially defective or inefficient lysosomal pathways in the former disease context. TFEB could thereby activate antioxidative and autophagy processes in synergy with NFE2 [32], a TF which featured increased motif enrichment in CBD astrocytes and whose deficiency is associated with exacerbation of Tau and amyloid pathology [53]. In turn, NFE2 family members are dependent on co-regulators and the AP-1 complex, a regulatory machinery implicated in neuroinflammation, apoptosis, gliotic remodeling, and axonal repair [50, 61]. This heterodimeric regulator complex exhibits cell type-specific composition and response profiles but has merely been in the focus of tauopathy research.
Immunohistochemical analysis in postmortem brain tissue of individuals with the very rare 3R tauopathy Pick's disease revealed colocalization of AP-1 components such as FOS, JUN, and MYC with the disease-defining intraneuronal pTau deposits (Pick bodies) and neuronal cytoplasms [44]. PSP and CBD astrocytes seem to acquire a pathological state of reactivity, cellular stress, and potentially apoptosis upon AP-1 activation (Fig. 6h). To our knowledge, an IER signature, comprising the AP-1 subunits, NFKB2, and NR4A2, has not been described in 4R tauopathies.
AP-1 itself might be induced by MAP kinases, as suggested by the simultaneous increase in the GA of MAPK8/JNK1 and protein levels of MAP3K8/TPL-2 in (pTau +) astrocytes of both tauopathies. In parallel, activated MAPK8/JNK1 in astrocytes might perpetuate Tau hyperphosphorylation, thereby contributing to a persistent cellular stress response [19, 51]. In neurons, the reduced GA of MAPKs (isoforms 1,8,14) and increased GA of their downstream target GSK3B suggest a potential target point by means of therapeutic kinase inhibition. Unfortunately, previous clinical trials with unspecific kinase inhibitors (valproic acid, lithium) and the selective GSK3B-inhibitor tideglusib failed to achieve considerable clinical improvements in AD or PSP patients [23, 36, 59]. Complicating the kinase modulation concept, increased GA of MAPK8/JNK1 was evident in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes alike, again highlighting the importance of cell type-resolved analyses.
Intriguingly, the GWAS risk variant enrichment analysis revealed enrichments only in astrocyte-specific chromatin peaks. Microglial-driven alterations in genes participating in protein homeostasis, which are commonly believed to be a hallmark of AD [13, 22, 56], seemed to be confined to PSP in our analysis (Fig. 3b), consistent with the pronounced microglial transcriptional networks observed by Allen et al. [1]. The lack of risk variant enrichment as well as the significant GA increase in genes associated with UPS and CMA suggest that microglial activation in PSP is rather unlikely determined by sequence alterations as defined in GWAS. Unlike other tauopathies such as AD or Pick's Disease, the pTau-laden astrocytic phenotype is considered a hallmark of PSP and CBD, where loss of synapse support and concurrent inflammation can exert deleterious effects [4, 6, 37]. Our results therefore suggest that future experiments should prioritize the investigation of astrocytes over microglia in PSP and CBD.
In summary, comparing these two 4R tauopathies from an epigenetic perspective demonstrates broad overlap in terms of disease-associated regulatory processes. Nevertheless, our analysis also suggests distinct pathogenetic properties, particularly with regard to the phenotype of astrocytes. The proposed tauopathy signatures should be contextualized with different data sets and more diverse disease populations to define their specificity as well as overlapping features with related disease entities. Future research might also benefit from integrating our data in multi-omic projects or when studying pathomechanisms and causal relationships in suitable disease models.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
We would like to address thanks to the patients and their families for making this research possible. Beyond that, we thank the associates of the Neurobiobank Munich for their structural support. Moreover, we thank Dr. E. Beltran, Dr. J. Fischer-Sternjak, and Prof. Dr. Kerschensteiner for granting access to the Chromium controller and laboratory facilities. We thank Dr. N. Buresch for providing technical support and Dr. E. Bauerschmidt for proof reading. Finally, we are grateful for Prof. Dr. A. Danek’s and Prof. Dr. J. Levin’s professional input as clinical professionals.
Abbreviations
- (bv)FTD
(Behavioral variant) frontotemporal dementia
- (q)PCR
(Quantitative) polymerase chain reaction
- AD
Alzheimer’s disease
- ALS
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- ARTAG
Aging-related Tau-astrogliopathy
- Ast
Astrocytes
- ATAC-seq
Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing
- BH
Benjamini–Hochberg
- bp
Base pairs
- BP
Biological process
- CBD
Corticobasal degeneration
- CBS
Corticobasal syndrome
- CC
Cellular compartment
- CMA
Chaperon-mediated autophagy
- CRE
cis-Regulatory element
- CTSD
Cathepsin D
- DAR
Differentially accessible region
- DEG
Differentially expressed gene
- DLN
Deep-layer neurons
- DNA
Desoxyribonucleic acid
- Exc.
Excitatory
- FDR
False discovery rate
- GA
Gene accessibility
- Gb
Giga bases
- GEM
Gel-bead in emulsion
- GO
Gene ontology
- GSEA
Gene-set enrichment analysis
- GWAS
Genome-wide association study
- Inh.
Inhibitory
- LB(D)
Lewy body (dementia)
- Lime
Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations
- Log2-FC
Binary logarithm fold-change
- MAP(3)K8
Mitogen-activated protein (3) kinase 8
- MAPT
Microtubule-associated protein Tau
- MF
Molecular function
- Mic
Microglia
- ML
Machine learning
- MND
Motor neuron disease
- MSA
Multiple system atrophy
- NFT
Neurofibrillary tangles
- Oli
Oligodendrocytes
- OPC
Oligodendrocytic precursor cells
- PART
Primary aging-related tauopathy
- PD
Parkinson disease
- PMI
Postmortem Interval
- PSP(-RS)
Progressive supranuclear palsy-(Richardson syndrome)
- pTau
Hyperphosphorylated tau
- RAP
Regulon activity profile
- RNA-seq
Ribonucleotide acid sequencing
- RTN
Reconstruction of transcriptional regulatory networks
- sn*
Single nuclei
- SNP
Single nucleotide polymorphism
- TA
Tufted astrocyte
- TF(M)(E)
Transcription factor (motif) (enrichment)
- ULN
Upper-layer neurons
- UMAP
Uniform manifold approximation and projection
- UPR
Unfolded protein response
- UPS
Ubiquitin proteasome system
- XGB
Extreme gradient boosting
Author contributions
Neuropathological evaluation was conducted by SR and supported by TA and JH. Cases were selected by SR, OW, and supported by TA and JH. Material preparation and data collection was performed by NB and VCR. Biological quality control was performed by VCR and JM. NB conducted the bioinformatical analysis with help from FLS and input from MMD. Immunofluorescence staining and imaging was conducted by FLS, KP, and JW. The manuscript was written by NB and FLS with significant input from VCR, OW, TA, and JH; FLS, VCR, and JH supervised all aspects of the work. All authors have read and approved the final and revised manuscript.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. Funding of this project was realized by the Munich Cluster of Systems Neurology (SyNergy), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. N.B. holds a scholarship from the German Academic Scholarship Foundation, F.L.S.’s research is supported by European Union Marie-Curie Actions (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017: NOJUNKDNA; 792832). K.P. receives funding by the Marie Sklodowska-Curie actions grant, ITN SynDegen (721802). This work was funded by Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant nos. STR 1573/3-1, EXC 2145).
Data availability
All scripts for pre-processing and analyzing the snATAC-seq data from PSP/CBD frontal cortex and the Allen et al. bulkRNA-seq data from PSP TCX are available on GitHub (https://github.com/nes-b/snATAC-seq_psp_cbd). Raw data that support the findings of this study are available in the European Bioinformatics Institute—European Nucleotide Archive (EBI-ENA) under the accession: PRJEB54978.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Human brain tissue samples were collected and provided by the Neurobiobank Munich (NBM) in accordance with Institutional Review Board protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of the LMU Munich (#345-13). Written informed consent was obtained from the donors or their next of kin. Ethical approval for this particular study was also granted by the Ethics Committee of the LMU Munich (#19-442). All procedures were performed in line with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jochen Herms and Felix L. Struebing contributed equally.
Change history
1/29/2023
The original article has been corrected. Supplementary materials were missing from this article and have now been uploaded.
Contributor Information
Jochen Herms, Email: Jochen.Herms@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Felix L. Struebing, Email: Felix.Struebing@med.uni-muenchen.de
References
- 1.Allen M, Wang X, Serie DJ, Strickland SL, Burgess JD, Koga S, Younkin CS, Nguyen TT, Malphrus KG, Lincoln SJ, Alamprese M, Zhu K, Chang R, Carrasquillo MM, Kouri N, Murray ME, Reddy JS, Funk C, Price ND, Golde TE, Younkin SG, Asmann YW, Crook JE, Dickson DW, Ertekin-Taner N. Divergent brain gene expression patterns associate with distinct cell-specific tau neuropathology traits in progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:709–727. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1900-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, Bak TH, Bhatia KP, Borroni B, Boxer AL, Dickson DW, Grossman M, Hallett M, Josephs KA, Kertesz A, Lee SE, Miller BL, Reich SG, Riley DE, Tolosa E, Tröster AI, Vidailhet M, Weiner WJ. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. Neurology. 2013;80:496–503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Van den Berge K, Roux de Bézieux H, Street K, Saelens W, Cannoodt R, Saeys Y, Dudoit S, Clement L. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14766-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bigio EH, Vono MB, Satumtira S, Adamson J, Sontag E, Hynan LS, White CL, Baker M, Hutton M. Cortical synapse loss in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001;60:403–410. doi: 10.1093/jnen/60.5.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Binder JL, Chander P, Deretic V, Weick JP, Bhaskar K. Optical induction of autophagy via transcription factor EB (TFEB) reduces pathological tau in neurons. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0230026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Briel N, Pratsch K, Roeber S, Arzberger T, Herms J. Contribution of the astrocytic tau pathology to synapse loss in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. Brain Pathol. 2020 doi: 10.1111/bpa.12914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bryois J, Skene NG, Sullivan PF, et al. Genetic identification of cell types underlying brain complex traits yields insights into the etiology of Parkinson’s disease. Nat Genet. 2020;52:482–493. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0610-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Buenrostro JD, Giresi PG, Zaba LC, Chang HY, Greenleaf WJ. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat Methods. 2013;10:1213–1218. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Castro MAA, De Santiago I, Campbell TM, Vaughn C, Hickey TE, Ross E, Tilley WD, Markowetz F, Ponder BAJ, Meyer KB. Regulators of genetic risk of breast cancer identified by integrative network analysis. Nat Genet. 2015;48:12–21. doi: 10.1038/ng.3458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dickson DW, Bergeron C, Chin SS, Duyckaerts C, Horoupian D, Ikeda K, Jellinger K, Lantos PL, Lippa CF, Mirra SS, Tabaton M, Vonsattel JP, Wakabayashi K, Litvan I. Office of rare diseases neuropathologic criteria for corticobasal degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61:935–946. doi: 10.1093/jnen/61.11.935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dunham I, Kundaje A, Lochovsky L, et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:57–74. doi: 10.1038/nature11247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Eckenweber F, Medina-Luque J, Blume T, Sacher C, Biechele G, Wind K, Deussing M, Briel N, Lindner S, Boening G, Von Ungern-Sternberg B, Unterrainer M, Albert NL, Zwergal A, Levin J, Bartenstein P, Cumming P, Rominger A, Höglinger GU, Herms J, Brendel M. Longitudinal TSPO expression in tau transgenic P301S mice predicts increased tau accumulation and deteriorated spatial learning. J Neuroinflam. 2020 doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01883-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fang R, Preissl S, Li Y, Hou X, Lucero J, Wang X, Motamedi A, Shiau AK, Zhou X, Xie F, Mukamel EA, Zhang K, Zhang Y, Behrens MM, Ecker JR, Ren B. Comprehensive analysis of single cell ATAC-seq data with SnapATAC. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21583-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferrer I. Diversity of astroglial responses across human neurodegenerative disorders and brain aging. Brain Pathol. 2017;27:645–674. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ferrer I, Ferrer I. Astrogliopathy in tauopathies. Neuroglia. 2018;1:126–150. doi: 10.3390/neuroglia1010010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Filipcik P, Cente M, Zilka N, Smolek T, Hanes J, Kucerak J, Opattova A, Kovacech B, Novak M. Intraneuronal accumulation of misfolded tau protein induces overexpression of Hsp27 in activated astrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2015;1852:1219–1229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Forrest SL, Kril JJ, Halliday GM. Cellular and regional vulnerability in frontotemporal tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:705–727. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-02035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Frost B, Hemberg M, Lewis J, Feany MB. Tau promotes neurodegeneration through global chromatin relaxation. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:357–366. doi: 10.1038/nn.3639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gerrits E, Brouwer N, Kooistra SM, Woodbury ME, Vermeiren Y, Lambourne M, Mulder J, Kummer M, Möller T, Biber K, de Dunnen WFA, De Deyn PP, Eggen BJL, Boddeke EWGM. Distinct amyloid-β and tau-associated microglia profiles in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:681–696. doi: 10.1007/S00401-021-02263-W/FIGURES/4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Goedert M. The ordered assembly of tau is the gain-of-toxic function that causes human tauopathies. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2016;12:1040–1050. doi: 10.1016/J.JALZ.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Grubman A, Chew G, Ouyang JF, Sun G, Choo XY, McLean C, Simmons RK, Buckberry S, Vargas-Landin DB, Poppe D, Pflueger J, Lister R, Rackham OJL, Petretto E, Polo JM. A single-cell atlas of entorhinal cortex from individuals with Alzheimer’s disease reveals cell-type-specific gene expression regulation. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:2087–2097. doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0539-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hampel H, Ewers M, Bürger K, Annas P, Mörtberg A, Bogstedt A, Frölich L, Schröder J, Schönknecht P, Riepe MW, Kraft I, Gasser T, Leyhe T, Möller HJ, Kurz A, Basun H. Lithium trial in Alzheimer’s disease: A randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter 10-week study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:922–931. doi: 10.4088/JCP.08m04606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Höglinger GU, Melhem NM, Dickson DW, Sleiman PMA, Wang L-S, Klei L, Rademakers R, de Silva R, Litvan I, Riley DE, van Swieten JC, Heutink P, Wszolek ZK, Uitti RJ, Vandrovcova J, Hurtig HI, Gross RG, Maetzler W, Goldwurm S, Tolosa E, Borroni B, Pastor P, Cantwell LB, Han MR, Dillman A, van der Brug MP, Gibbs JR, Cookson MR, Hernandez DG, Singleton AB, Farrer MJ, Yu C-E, Golbe LI, Revesz T, Hardy J, Lees AJ, Devlin B, Hakonarson H, Müller U, Schellenberg GD. Identification of common variants influencing risk of the tauopathy progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Genet. 2011;43:699–705. doi: 10.1038/ng.859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Höglinger GU, Respondek G, Kovacs GG. New classification of tauopathies. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2018;174:664–668. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2018.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huang LK, Chao SP, Hu CJ. Clinical trials of new drugs for Alzheimer disease. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27:18–18. doi: 10.1186/s12929-019-0609-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jabbari E, Koga S, et al. Genetic determinants of survival in progressive supranuclear palsy: a genome-wide association study. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:107–116. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30394-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jc U, Ca L, El B, Ls L, Mh G. Interrogation of human hematopoiesis at single-cell and single-variant resolution. Nat Genet. 2019;51:683–693. doi: 10.1038/S41588-019-0362-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jiang S, Bhaskar K. Degradation and transmission of tau by autophagic-endolysosomal networks and potential therapeutic targets for tauopathy. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:199. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.586731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kang SG, Eskandari-Sedighi G, Hromadkova L, Safar JG, Westaway D. Cellular biology of tau diversity and pathogenic conformers. Front Neurol. 2020;11:2. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.590199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kelley DR, Snoek J, Rinn JL. Basset: Learning the regulatory code of the accessible genome with deep convolutional neural networks. Genome Res. 2016;26:990–999. doi: 10.1101/gr.200535.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim S, Choi KJ, Cho SJ, Yun SM, Jeon JP, Koh YH, Song J, Johnson GVW, Jo C. Fisetin stimulates autophagic degradation of phosphorylated tau via the activation of TFEB and Nrf2 transcription factors. Sci Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1038/srep24933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Klemm SL, Shipony Z, Greenleaf WJ. Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:207–220. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0089-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kouri N, Ross OA, Dickson DW, et al. Genome-wide association study of corticobasal degeneration identifies risk variants shared with progressive supranuclear palsy. Nat Commun. 2015;6:1–7. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lake BB, Ai R, Kaeser GE, Salathia NS, Yung YC, Liu R, Wildberg A, Gao D, Fung H-L, Chen S, Vijayaraghavan R, Wong J, Chen A, Sheng X, Kaper F, Shen R, Ronaghi M, Fan J-B, Wang W, Chun J, Zhang K. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science. 2016;352:1586–1590. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Leclair-Visonneau L, Rouaud T, Debilly B, Durif F, Houeto JL, Kreisler A, Defebvre L, Lamy E, Volteau C, Nguyen JM, Le DS, Damier P, Boutoleau-Bretonnière C, Lejeune P, Derkinderen P. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of sodium valproate in progressive supranuclear palsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016;146:35–39. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lipton AM, Munro Cullum C, Satumtira S, Sontag E, Hynan LS, White CL, Bigio EH. Contribution of asymmetric synapse loss to lateralizing clinical deficits in frontotemporal dementias. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1233–1239. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.8.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Litvan I, Hauw JJ, Bartko JJ, Lantos PL, Daniel SE, Horoupian DS, McKee A, Dickson D, Bancher C, Tabaton M, Jellinger K, Anderson DW. Validity and reliability of the preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for progressive supranuclear palsy and related disorders. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1996;55:97–105. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199601000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Martini-Stoica H, Cole AL, Swartzlander DB, Chen F, Wan Y-W, Bajaj L, Bader DA, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Liu Z, Sardiello M, Zheng H. TFEB enhances astroglial uptake of extracellular tau species and reduces tau spreading. J Exp Med. 2018;215:2355–2377. doi: 10.1084/jem.20172158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mathys H, Davila-Velderrain J, Peng Z, Gao F, Mohammadi S, Young JZ, Menon M, He L, Abdurrob F, Jiang X, Martorell AJ, Ransohoff RM, Hafler BP, Bennett DA, Kellis M, Tsai LH. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2019;570:332–337. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1195-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McKenzie AT, Wang M, Hauberg ME, Fullard JF, Kozlenkov A, Keenan A, Hurd YL, Dracheva S, Casaccia P, Roussos P, Zhang B. Brain cell type specific gene expression and co-expression network architectures. Sci Rep. 2018;8:8868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27293-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mukherjee S, Klaus C, Pricop-Jeckstadt M, Miller JA, Struebing FL. A microglial signature directing human aging and neurodegeneration-related gene networks. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:2. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Myers RM, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Risk B, et al. A User’s Guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE) PLOS Biol. 2011;9:e1001046. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.1001046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nieto-Bodelón M, Santpere G, Torrejón-Escribano B, Puig B, Ferrer I. Expression of transcription factors c-Fos, c-Jun, CREB-1 and ATF-2, and caspase-3 in relation with abnormal tau deposits in Pick’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;111:341–350. doi: 10.1007/s00401-005-0013-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nott A, Holtman IR, Coufal NG, Schlachetzki JCM, Yu M, Hu R, Han CZ, Pena M, Xiao J, Wu Y, Keulen Z, Pasillas MP, O’Connor C, Nickl CK, Schafer ST, Shen Z, Rissman RA, Brewer JB, Gosselin D, Gonda DD, Levy ML, Rosenfeld MG, McVicker G, Gage FH, Ren B, Glass CK. Brain cell type-specific enhancer–promoter interactome maps and disease-risk association. Science. 2019;366:1134–1139. doi: 10.1126/science.aay0793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Olah M, Menon V, Habib N, Taga MF, Ma Y, Yung CJ, Cimpean M, Khairallah A, Coronas-Samano G, Sankowski R, Grün D, Kroshilina AA, Dionne D, Sarkis RA, Cosgrove GR, Helgager J, Golden JA, Pennell PB, Prinz M, Vonsattel JPG, Teich AF, Schneider JA, Bennett DA, Regev A, Elyaman W, Bradshaw EM, De Jager PL. Single cell RNA sequencing of human microglia uncovers a subset associated with Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–18. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19737-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Piñero J, Ramírez-Anguita JM, Saüch-Pitarch J, Ronzano F, Centeno E, Sanz F, Furlong LI. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D845–D855. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Piras A, Collin L, Grüninger F, Graff C, Rönnbäck A. Autophagic and lysosomal defects in human tauopathies: analysis of post-mortem brain from patients with familial Alzheimer disease, corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:22. doi: 10.1186/s40478-016-0292-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pliner HA, Packer JS, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Cusanovich DA, Daza RM, Aghamirzaie D, Srivatsan S, Qiu X, Jackson D, Minkina A, Adey AC, Steemers FJ, Shendure J, Trapnell C. Cicero predicts cis-regulatory DNA interactions from single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Mol Cell. 2018;71:858–871.e8. doi: 10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2018.06.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Raivich G, Bohatschek M, Da Costa C, Iwata O, Galiano M, Hristova M, Nateri AS, Makwana M, Riera-Sans L, Wolfer DP, Lipp HP, Aguzzi A, Wagner EF, Behrens A. The AP-1 transcription factor c-Jun is required for efficient axonal regeneration. Neuron. 2004;43:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Reynolds CH, Betts JC, Blackstock WP, Nebreda R, Anderton BH (2000) Phosphorylation sites on tau identified by nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry: differences in vitro between the mitogen-activated protein kinases ERK2, c-Jun N-terminal kinase and P38, and glycogen synthase kinase-3 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 52.Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C (2016) “Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 1135–1144
- 53.Rojo AI, Pajares M, Rada P, Nuñez A, Nevado-Holgado AJ, Killik R, Van Leuven F, Ribe E, Lovestone S, Yamamoto M, Cuadrado A. NRF2 deficiency replicates transcriptomic changes in Alzheimer’s patients and worsens APP and TAU pathology. Redox Biol. 2017;13:444–451. doi: 10.1016/J.REDOX.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Schwartzentruber J, Cooper S, Liu JZ, Barrio-Hernandez I, Bello E, Kumasaka N, Young AMH, Franklin RJM, Johnson T, Estrada K, Gaffney DJ, Beltrao P, Bassett A. Genome-wide meta-analysis, fine-mapping and integrative prioritization implicate new Alzheimer’s disease risk genes. Nat Genet. 2021;53:392–402. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-00776-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz M, Gerber YN, Ries M, Sastre M, Tolkovsky AM, Spillantini MG. Astrocytes in mouse models of tauopathies acquire early deficits and lose neurosupportive functions. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2017;5:89. doi: 10.1186/s40478-017-0478-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Spangenberg EE, Green KN. Inflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: Lessons learned from microglia-depletion models. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;61:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Thurman RE, Rynes E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, et al. (2012) The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nat. 2012;4897414(489):75–82. doi: 10.1038/nature11232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tiwari N, Pataskar A, Pé S, Ló Pez-Mascaraque L, Tiwari VK, Correspondence BB. Stage-specific transcription factors drive astrogliogenesis by remodeling gene regulatory landscapes. Stem Cell. 2018;23:557–571.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tolosa E, Litvan I, Ven Gerpen J, et al. A phase 2 trial of the GSK-3 inhibitor tideglusib in progressive supranuclear palsy. Mov Disord. 2014;29:470–478. doi: 10.1002/mds.25824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vaquerizas JM, Kummerfeld SK, Teichmann SA, Luscombe NM. A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:252–263. doi: 10.1038/nrg2538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vukic V, Callaghan D, Walker D, Lue LF, Liu QY, Couraud PO, Romero IA, Weksler B, Stanimirovic DB, Zhang W. Expression of inflammatory genes induced by beta-amyloid peptides in human brain endothelial cells and in Alzheimer’s brain is mediated by the JNK-AP1 signaling pathway. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;34:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang C, Xiong M, Gratuze M, Bao X, Shi Y, Andhey PS, Manis M, Schroeder C, Yin Z, Madore C, Butovsky O, Artyomov M, Ulrich JD, Holtzman DM. Selective removal of astrocytic APOE4 strongly protects against tau-mediated neurodegeneration and decreases synaptic phagocytosis by microglia. Neuron. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Xiao Y, Jin J, Chang M, Nakaya M, Hu H, Zou Q, Zhou X, Brittain GC, Cheng X, Sun SC. TPL2 mediates autoimmune inflammation through activation of the TAK1 axis of IL-17 signaling. J Exp Med. 2014;211:1689–1702. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Yoshida M. Astrocytic inclusions in progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration. Neuropathology. 2014;34:555–570. doi: 10.1111/neup.12143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zarrin AA, Bao K, Lupardus P. Vucic D (2020) Kinase inhibition in autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;201(20):39–63. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-0082-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Zhou YY, Li Y, Jiang WQ, Zhou LF. MAPK/JNK signalling: a potential autophagy regulation pathway. Biosci Rep. 2015;35:1–10. doi: 10.1042/BSR20140141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All scripts for pre-processing and analyzing the snATAC-seq data from PSP/CBD frontal cortex and the Allen et al. bulkRNA-seq data from PSP TCX are available on GitHub (https://github.com/nes-b/snATAC-seq_psp_cbd). Raw data that support the findings of this study are available in the European Bioinformatics Institute—European Nucleotide Archive (EBI-ENA) under the accession: PRJEB54978.