A short review on sugarcane: its domestication, molecular manipulations and future perspectives

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a special crop plant that underwent anthropogenic evolution from a wild grass species to an important food, fodder, and energy crop. Unlike any other grass species which were selected for their kernels, sugarcane was selected for its high stem sucrose accumulation. Flowering in sugarcane is not favored since flowering diverts the stored sugar resources for the reproductive and developmental energy needs. Cultivars are vegetatively propagated and sugarcane breeding is still essentially focused on conventional methods, since the knowledge of sugarcane genetics has lagged that of other major crops. Cultivar improvement has been extremely challenging due to its polyploidy and aneuploidy nature derived from a few interspecific hybridizations between Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum, revealing the coexistence of two distinct genome organization modes in the modern variety. Alongside implementation of modern agricultural techniques, generation of hybrid clones, transgenics and genome edited events will help to meet the ever-growing bioenergy needs. Additionally, there are two common biotechnological approaches to improve plant stress tolerance, which includes marker-assisted selection (MAS) and genetic transformation. During the past two decades, the use of molecular approaches has contributed greatly to a better understanding of the genetic and biochemical basis of plant stress-tolerance and in some cases, it led to the development of plants with enhanced tolerance to abiotic stress. Hence, this review mainly intends on the events that shaped the sugarcane as what it is now and what challenges ahead and measures taken to further improve its yield, production and maximize utilization to beat the growing demands.

Introduction

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) is a robust and vigorous tropical plant, with superior growth over most other crop species partially because of its high photosynthetic efficiency as a C4 grass. Further, it contributes about 70% of the world sugar production and holds a great potential for the biomass as well as ethanol-based biofuel production. The global sugarcane production in 2018 has crossed 1,907,024,730 tons (190.7 million metric tons/MMT) with Brazil and India being as top producers (FAO 2020, 2021). Evolutionarily, the genus Saccharum has diverged from maize around 15–20 million years ago (mya) and split from sorghum as recently as 6–9 mya (Paterson et al. 2004). Molecular tracing techniques have suggested the origin of sugarcane in South-East Asia and New Guinea (Lebot 1999) and the domestication of sugarcane was happened about 10,000 years ago. Daniels and Roach (1987) has proposed S. robustum E. W. Brandes & Jeswiet ex Grassl to be the wild progenitor of S. officinarum L. (Thirugnanasambandam et al. 2018), while S. robustum itself is an introgressed hybrid of S. spontaneum L. along with species of other genera such as Erianthus and Miscanthus. Notable contributions from S. barberi, S. sinense Roxb. and species of Narenga are also involved (Daniels and Roach, 1987; Altpeter and Oraby 2010). The Dutch plant breeders in Java have also contributed for intensive sugarcane breeding to develop modern cultivars that subsequently enriched the sugarcane gene pool (D’Hont et al. 1996). Interspecific hybridization during domestication and by recent plant breeders who made the sugarcane genome much more complex than many other familiar crops (Dillon et al. 2007). Domesticated sugarcane is a vegetatively propagated, polyploid, aneuploid and an interspecific hybrid having an estimated genome size of > 10 Gb. Much of the genome contributions came from S. officinarum (80%) and S. spontaneum (10–15%), and with some recombinant chromosomes (5–10%) (Garsmeur et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018). S. robustum-derived S. officinarum that originated in New Guinea is a stout, juicy, less-fibrous with good amount of sugar and less disease resistant. Whereas S. spontaneum, which originated from India, has low sugar content but with higher stress and disease tolerance. The capability to accumulate more sucrose in the stem and the ability to tolerate variety of stress conditions are considered as the major desirable characteristics in sugarcane breeding and these two major genome contributors influence the sugarcane agronomic characters (Altpeter and Oraby 2010).

As cane sugar has been the sweetener of choice for over 2000 years, the ever-increasing demand for sugar and bioenergy raw materials for a rapidly growing population has pushed farmers to exploit the sugarcane gene pool to the maximum limits. In the modern age, conventional breeding and transgenic technologies are employed to generate sugarcane plants with higher yield and resilience against adverse abiotic and biotic factors. Intense sugarcane breeding practices by Dutch colonials in the Dutch East Indies have further expanded the gene pool of cultivated sugarcane and produced sugarcane varieties with better yield as well as more resilient characteristics (Stevenson 1965). The first transgenic sugarcane was reported in 1992 and following this, several research groups were came up with different transgenic events against various factors (Bower and Birch 1992; Nerkar et al. 2018). The arrival of high-throughput sequencing and accumulating transcriptomic data had shed light on specific genes with critical and agronomically important functions (Lovejot Kaur et al. 2017). As in any other crop, whole genome sequencing (WGS) (Garsmeur et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018) will further extend the knowledge about the crop and will lead the researchers to generate crops with better performance through functional genomics. Scientists further expose sugarcane with cutting edge genome editing technologies to tap the potential for greater extent (Jung and Altpeter 2016; Kannan et al. 2018). Unlike the model rice crop (Ramkumar et al. 2015), limited gene silencing studies were also done in sugarcane (Ingelbrecht et al. 1999). Due to the general complexity of abiotic stress tolerance and the difficulty in phenotypic selection for stress tolerance, Marker assisted selection (MAS) has been considered as an effective approach to improve plant stress tolerance (Foolad and Sharma 2005). However, the use of this approach requires identification of genetic markers that are associated with genes or QTL’s affecting whole plant stress tolerance or individual components contributing to it. Furthermore, applications of metabolomics and transcriptomics approaches will lead to a better understanding of the molecular basis of plant life, starting from signal perception to signal transduction and expression of genes and regulatory elements for combined or multiple abiotic stress as well as cross tolerance in sugarcane. In this review, we time-lined the journey of sugarcane from its wild progenitor to a modern crop plant equipped with a higher yield and well-armed against adverse factors like abiotic and biotic stress to feed the people and fuel the world.

Origin and domestication

Sugarcane has enhanced its status from an unknown wild grass plant to the world’s largest cultivated cash crop with its incredible ability to synthesize and accumulate sucrose in its stem. Sugarcane domestication was started around 8000 BC in the region of New Guinea and later it reached Southeast Asia and India. During fifth century AD, a novel strategy for crystallization of sugar was invented by an Indian scientist who facilitated the storage and transportation of crystallized sugar substances easier. Following this invention, the process of sugarcane cultivation, refining sugarcane juice and production of granulated sugar was spread to China, Persia and the Mediterranean regions. Sugarcane has started spreading across the Asia, Europe and Arab nations where people started to cultivate sugarcane, especially after they conquered Egypt. Sugarcane has reached Spain around 715 AD and certain countries (Spain, Portugal, Italy, Cyprus and Azores) have tried to stabilize their economy using sugarcane production during sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. As the New World has offered better climatic conditions for the growth and better productivity, sugarcane varieties were also quickly introduced in the United States (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Timeline of the anthropogenic intercontinental distribution of sugarcane. The major distribution routes were through India, then to the Middle East, Africa, Europe and finally to the Americas

Sugarcane belongs to the genus Saccharum, family Poaceae with the tribe Andropogoneae. Genera such as Miscanthus, Sclerostachya, Erianthus, Narenga, and Saccharum are closely related and forming the Saccharum complex. However, S. officinarum is the original sugarcane species and is supposed to have originated in the Indonesian Archipelago (Fig. 1). The species does not occur in the natural wild conditions but was grown and maintained for a long time by the island natives. The colonial Dutch workers have called S. officinarum as the ‘noble cane’ as it was used as the main source material for sugar production. The process of crossing and back-crossing was designed towards the development of hardy and disease resistance traits with sweeter noble canes is termed as ‘nobilization’ (Stevenson 1965). Present day sugarcane is a man-made hybrid clone produced from S. officinarum, and S. spontaneum with a few genes incorporated from S. barberi, and S. sinense and to a limited extent from S. robustum.

• Saccharum spontaneum is a polymorphic wild grass distributed in the tropics and sub tropics (Panje and Babu 1960)

• Saccharum robustum is a tall and thick canes spread in riverbanks of New Guinea and Indonesia (Mukherjee 1957)

• Saccharum officinarum, the noble sugarcane, is present only under domesticated conditions in New Guinea and Indonesia (Parthasarathy 1948)

• Saccharum barberi Jesw. and S. sinense Roxb. are North Indian and Chinese canes that were under cultivation for sugar production, and are believed to be produced from interspecific crosses between S. officinarum and local varieties of S. spontaneum (D’Hont et al. 2002). More recently, S. barberi and S. sinense are considered as single species with S, sinense as acccepted name and S. barberi as a synonym (World Flora online).

• Saccharum edule Hassk. is a polymorphic species with aneuploidy and is cultivated in the Pacific islands for its aborted inflorescence, which is used as a vegetable. The cane of S. edule resembles that of S. robustum, and is a natural hybrid involving S. robustum, S. officinarum and Miscanthus spp (Roach 1972). However, in the recent years S. edule has been identified as S. spontaneum var. edulis (Hassk.) K.Schum. (World Flora online). S. officinarum is evolutionarily derived from the three groups of S. robustum, namely Red fleshed, Port Moresby and Teboe Salah, which are again evolved through interspecific introgression between S. spontaneum, S. arundinaceum Retz. and M. sinensis (Daniels J and Roach BT 1987; Daniels, J et al. 1989). It is hypothesized that S. officinarum is anthropogenically selected from S. robustum in New Guinea, as a sweeter chewing plant in riverbanks and lowlands or as a sweeter fencing plant in highlands or as a plant that was selectively damaged by rats and pigs for its sweetness, which drew human attention (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Timeline of sugarcane. a. Progenitor grass species. b. Evolutionary split of maize. c. Evolutionary split of sorghum. d. Genus Saccharum pre-domestication. e. Selection and domestication. f. Breeding and improvement. g. Transgenic development. h. Omics research. i. market release of transgenic sugarcane. j. sugarcane with better traits

Sugarcane is a cross-pollinated crop with negligible selfing. Even though sugarcane flowers have reduced male fertility, they are rarely male sterile. Sugarcane pollens are very small with a half-life of just 12 min. They become non-viable beyond 35 min, when exposed to 26° C and 67% relative humidity (Moore 1976). Therefore, viable pollens are not expected to travel faraway in the field. However, they can be stored at a reduced temperature and increased relative humidity, where they retain some viability for up to 14 days. The flowering behavior of sugarcane is considerably significant for breeders to develop new varieties, whereas it is not a favorable character for farmers (Jeswiet J 1925).

Global economic importance

Sugarcane is a major industrial crop. Ever since 1961 to 2018, the global area under sugarcane cultivation has been increased from 8,911,979 hectares to 26,269,819 hectares, while the production has increased from 44.7 MMT to 190.7 MMT (FAO 2020). This increased production has significantly improved the livelihood of the sugarcane farmers worldwide. Furthermore, sugarcane stands as a major raw material for more than 75% of sugar production in the world. The worldwide demand for the cane sugar increases on each year and high demand for the sugar and sugar based products efficiently drives the sugarcane agriculture and sugar industries towards a profitable future. Sugarcane has been projected as a preferred cultivation crop for not only towards sugar production, but also for the production of bioenergy and bioethanol. Many of the European Union (EU) member states are already using some percentage of bioethanol or biodiesel in diesel or petrol fuels. Bioethanol is commonly mixed with petrol in various proportions starting from 10 to 85% along with case modification in the vehicles. In the case of Norway, nearly about 7% of bioethanol is used in standard octane petrol (Sundvor and Lopez-Aparicio 2014).

Compared to any other crop residues, the sugarcane residues are a rich source of lignocellulosic materials and most of the sugarcane residues are used for the fuel ethanol synthesis or as a source of energy. Bioethanol can be readily produced from various sugarcane residues, particularly from sugarcane juice and bagasse, as well as from the residues of the shoot system. Bioethanol production from sugarcane is a viable option for the use of huge deposits of sugarcane industry byproducts which are cost effective and can reduce the emission of greenhouse gases effectively. There are separate bioethanol producing mills that are maintained in Brazil and at given operating conditions, these ethanol distilleries can produce 82 to 85 L.t ⁻¹ (Liters per metric ton) of ethanol from freshly crushed sugarcane. At present, the transport sector accounts for about 23% of global energy consumption, which is a major cause of greenhouse gas emissions and eventually leads global warming (REN21 2019). The World Energy Council (WEC) has predicted a 200–300% rise in demand for transportation fuel, especially from China and India. Moreover, countries should achieve the mandated emission levels by 2050, which is possible only through a reduction in fossil fuel consumption. This increased demand for the transport fuel has been met with the production and utilization of bioethanol from the sugarcane by-products and this demand even increases the sugarcane production globally. Additionally, the sugarcane industries produce huge quantities of byproducts which are largely used as a major source of organic nutrients in the agricultural crop production. The direct application of these byproducts from sugarcane industries such as press mud or filter cake and bagasse in the field enhances the physical, chemical as well as biological properties of soil and increases the quality of cultivated crops and their yield. The use of these sugarcane byproducts efficiently cuts down the requirement for chemical fertilizers and reduces the recommended dose of fertilizers (Dotaniya et al. 2016). The major ten sugarcane producing countries around the globe are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Major sugarcane producing countries

Countries	Production (Tonnes)
Brazil	746,828,157
India	376,900,000
China	108,718,971
Thailand	104,360,867
Pakistan	67,173,975
Mexico	56,841,523
Colombia	36,276,860
USA	31,335,984
Philippines	24,730,820
Indonesia	21,744,000
World	1,907,024,730

The global production of sugarcane for 2019–20 is estimated to get reduced to 174 MMT, due to the reduced production in India, Brazil and US. Furthermore, the sugar consumption in India is anticipated to increase in parallel with a rising population of an anticipated 1.65 billion by 2050, demanding more sugar production. Unfortunately, the cropping area may not expand beyond 5 to 5.5 million ha in India and the increased demand must be met by improved sugarcane productivity and sugar recovery. This can be achieved by not only through practicing modern agricultural technologies and modernizing industrial sugar extraction, but also by integrating cutting edge research technologies to generate sugarcane with novel traits for better yield and resilience.

Economic importance in India

In India, Sugarcane is cultivated as a major cash crop in the tropical and sub-tropical regions. It is used as a main source of raw material for sugar production in the Indian subcontinent. With nearly about 5 million farmers involved, India ranks as the second largest producer of sugarcane (Table. 1). Sugarcane is grown in 2.57% of the total cultivated area, with a gross contribution of 1.1% to the national GDP. With respect to agricultural GDP, sugarcane contribution has jumped from a mere 5% in 1990–91 to 10% in 2010–11. Sugar industries are situated mostly in rural areas and contribute significantly to the rural economy by providing employment for nearly about 4% of the population. Alongside sugar, various by-products of the sugar industry (Jaggery, ethanol, electricity, paper and high value biomolecules) contribute to the economic growth as well. Various other byproducts of sugarcane industries such as bagasse, vinasse and molasses derived from the process of sugar production, are widely used for various purposes in rural India (Dotaniya et al. 2016; Santos et al. 2020). Bagasse is mainly utilized for heat and power production in boilers and cogeneration units during milling and distillation stages. Molasses have high energy value and are widely used as a food ingredient and as a raw material for ethanol production. Vinasse is mainly used in the irrigation process to increase the soil fertility (Steffi Formann et al. 2020). The sugar price in India is the lowest selling price in the world. The growth of sugarcane agriculture in the country has been increased from 1.17 mha in 1930–31, to 5.01 mha by 2013–14; a fourfold increase (Vision 2050, SBI, ICAR 2015). During this period, the productivity is also raised from 31 t/ha to 68 t/ha, the sugarcane production increased from 3.7 MMT to 35.5 MMT, and the sugar production increased from 0.12 MMT to 27.9 MMT. Sugar recovery has also showed an improvement from 9.05% to 10.27%. The number of sugar factories in operation has also gone up from 29 to over 527. This tremendous growth in cane and sugar production was contributed by two factors: a fourfold increase in crop area and an improvement in productivity by more than 100%. Both these became possible because of the development of new, well adapted varieties along with efficient crop production and crop protection technologies developed by the ICAR- SBI since 1912 (Vision 2050, SBI, ICAR 2015; Solomon 2016).

At present, India blends petrol with 5% of ethanol, and is targeting to reach 10% by 2022, a gross mismatch when compared with Brazil (27%). A policy shift towards higher ethanol utilization in the Indian energy sector is unavoidable. The molasses-mediated ethanol production is insufficient to meet this and it demands diverting of excess sugar production towards direct ethanol production from sugarcane juice. It is necessary to consider establishing energy plantations for ethanol and biomass production. Since expansion of cane area is not possible, such plantations must be established in marginal and underutilized lands with allied canes such as Erianthus, energy canes and recognized high biomass producing sugarcane clones. Hence to meet the increased demand for sugar, ethanol and power, the sugarcane production should be 55 MMT with 11% sugar recovery. Based on this prediction, sugarcane production has been increased by 5 million tons annually, along with increased sugar recovery. On the other hand, there are overriding concerns about the static productivity, high cost of cultivation, depletion of natural resources and climate change etc. Improving productivity against these constraints to achieve the projected production targets of 2050 is the real challenge to the sugarcane research and development establishments of the country. These challenges can be met with improved sugarcane hybrids and transgenics with agriculturally important traits.

Conventional breeding and trait improvement

The genetic bottleneck tightened by selective domestication has often reduced the gene pool of crop species. Despite a number of limitations such as narrow genetic pool, polyploid genome, poor fertility and very long breeding cycle (10–15 years), the conventional breeding approaches had significantly contributed to the crop improvement. Moreover, the recent sugarcane hybrids have a variable chromosome number (2n = 100–120) with an inhibited flowering nature. To sustain/improve sugarcane production and productivity with the limited available land, tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses, integrated nutrient as well as pest management and increased sugar recovery are standing as real challenges. Both the conventional and molecular techniques need to be integrated. Although crop tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses has been selected by conventional breeding programs, reducing the breeding cycles is the most crucial factor in developing improved varieties. The cultivated commercial sugarcane hybrids are developed by crossing Saccharum officinarum, (noble cane); with Saccharum barberi, Saccharum sinense, and clones of two other wild species such as Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum robustum. Among these plants, the genes for sucrose accumulation are inherited from Saccharum officinarum, and Saccharum barberi and Saccharum sinense as well. Whereas Saccharum spontaneum and Saccharum robustum have genetically contributed for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and higher biomass production.

During the initial period of sugarcane cultivation, the majority of sugarcane industries were totally dependent on the noble canes and a few were dependent on S. barberi and S. sinense. But these varieties were poor in yield as well as in adaptability. They are susceptible to diseases and pests. In order to overcome these constrains, the colonial Dutch plant breeders in the East Indies have played a crucial role in breeding sugarcane varieties to develop high yield varieties. Their backcross experiments (nobilization) have helped to produce resistant sugarcane varieties. These resistant interspecific sugarcane varieties are distributed throughout the world and are used as a foundation clones for many of the sugarcane breeding programs. Later, in 1912, the Imperial Sugarcane Breeding Station, Coimbatore, was established in India, where Co.205—the first generation of the commercial sugarcane variety was produced by the cross between S. officinarum and S. spontaneum. Later, clones of S. officinarum, S. spontaneum, and S. barberi were backcrossed to S. officinarum and the progenies of these species were utilized for the development of improved sugarcane varieties (Sreenivasan et al. 1987). In the Sugarcane breeding institute (SBI), more emphasis was given to the production of inter-specific hybrids (ISH) and a total of 486 ISH clones were produced using S. officinarum, S. spontaneum, S. barberi, S. sinense, S. robustum, and some indigenous as well as exotic ISH derivatives as parents. Today, over 90% of the Indian sugarcane cultivation areas are occupied by the varieties developed by the SBI as well as by the State Sugarcane Research Stations across the country.

Despite all the possibilities of improving sugarcane through introgression breeding, it is very difficult to anticipate its impact or success (Stalker 1980; Berding and Roach 1987). Hence, the introgression process in sugarcane breeding is therefore traditionally termed as a long-term and risky investment by Wang et al. 2010. Present day sugarcane cultivars are highly heterozygous, with several different alleles at each locus known as genomic redundancy, which may possess evolutionary advantage or the duplicated genes might have novel functions. However, marker-assisted selection (MAS) has arisen as a powerful tool to facilitate genetic manipulation through the identification of candidate genes for various traits of sugarcane and to develop saturated genetic maps. Molecular markers such as RAPD (al-Janabi et al. 1993), RFLP (Lu et al. 1994; da Silva et al. 1995), AFLP (Barbosa et al. 2003) and SSR (Selvi et al. 2003) have already been used in sugarcane for genotyping as well as genetic mapping and efforts have been made to develop molecular markers using these techniques (Lu et al. 1994; Glaszmann et al. 1997; Alix et al. 1998; Jannoo et al. 2007).

Genetic transformations and crop resilience

Unlike any other model or major crop species from 1983 (Ramkumar et al. 2020), a complete sugarcane genetic transformation and plant regeneration system was established a decade later (Bower and Birch 1992), even though the transformation of protoplast and cell suspension culture were reported earlier. This delay is a reflection of the lack of a plant regeneration system, which was established later. This laid down the foundation for a surge in developing sugarcane transgenics with novel traits. Though various techniques are followed for the transformation and genetic improvement of sugarcane, the Agrobacterium mediated gene transformation (Provides 85–100% of calli transformation with assured transgene integration) and Biolistic particle bombardment techniques (Shows 39% of transformation efficiency in broad range of sugarcane varieties) are considered as novel methods of gene delivery in many sugarcane varieties (Santosa et al. 2004; Ramasamy et al. 2018). Both of these methods are widely used to introduce different types of genes for the genetic improvement of sugarcane varieties. Details of various genes transferred to sugarcane, their sources and importance were listed in Table 2.

Table 2.

List of specific genes transformed to Sugarcane

Name of the genes	Functional role	References
nptII	Kanamycin resistant gene	Bower and Birch 1992
EPSPS	Glyphosate tolerant gene	Wang et al. 2017
mutated ALS	In-vitro Selectable marker gene used to identify transformed callus	van der Vyver et al. 2013
bar gene encoding a bacterial PPT acetyltransferase	Confers resistance against herbicide glufosinate ammonium and can be used as an effective selectable marker gene in sugarcane transformation	Gallo-Meagher and Irvine 1996; Falco et al. 2000; Budeguer et al. 2021
Cry1a	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis	Arencibia et al. 1997
Cry1ac	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis used against sugarcane stem borers	Weng et al. 2011; Zhou et al. 2018; Dessoky et al. 2021
Cry1ab	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis used to control Sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis	Cristofoletti et al. 2018
Cry1aa3	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis used to induce resistance against Sugarcane borer insects Chilo sacchariphagus (Internode borer) and Scripophaga excerptalis (Early shoot borer)	Kalunke et al. 2009
Cry2A	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis used against Lepidopteran insects	Qamar et al. 2021
Cry2ab	Insecticidal endotoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis used to control Sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis	Kumar and Udayasuriyan 2004; Cristofoletti et al. 2018
Snowdrop lectin (Galanthus nivalis agglutinin)	Lectin used against Woolly aphid Ceratovacuna lanigera	Zhangsun et al. 2007
Amaranthus viridis agglutinin gene and soybean Kunitz tripsin inhibitor, AVAc-SKTI	Fusion insect resistant gene construct used to induce resistant against Diatraea saccharalis and Ceratovacuna lanigera	Deng et al. 2008
Potato proteinase inhibitor II	Used to induce resistance against Antitrogus consanguineus	Nutt et al. 2001
albD gene	Albicidin detoxification gene used against against leaf scald disease causing bacterium Xanthomonas albilineans	Zhang and Birch 1997
truncated endochitinase gene	Used against red rot fungal disease causing fungus Colletotrichum falcatum	Viswanathan et al. 2006
β-1,3-glucanase gene	Used against red rot fungal disease causing fungus Colletotrichum falcatum	Nayyar et al. 2017
Coat protein gene of sugarcane mosaic virus	Used to induce resistance against Sugarcane mosaic virus	Joyce et al. 1998; Yao et al. 2017
Coat protein of Sorghum mosaic potyvirus	Used to induce resistance against Sorghum mosaic Potyvirus	Ingelbrecht et al. 1999
Bacterial betA gene (Choline dehydrogenase)	Used to produce drought tolerant Sugarcane. betA gene increases Glycine betaine which acts as an osmoprotectant and help sugarcane to acclimate in water deficit conditions	Sugiharto 2017
Trehalose synthase from Grifola frondosa	Used for the induction of drought tolerance in sugarcane	Zhang et al. 2006
AVP1		Kumar et al. 2014
DREB2		Reis et al. 2014
HSP70		Augustine et al. 2015b
Pea DNA helicase 45		Augustine et al. 2015a
Scdr2	Potential drought responsive gene in sugarcane varieties	Begcy et al. 2019
P5CS	Used for the induction of drought and salinity tolerance in sugarcane	Molinari et al. 2007
Isopentenyl transferase	Used for the induction of cold tolerance in sugarcane	Belintani et al. 2012
Sucrose Phosphate synthase (SoSPS)	Used to increase the sucrose content by overexpression	Groenewald and Botha 2008; Anur et al. 2020
pyrophosphate: fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP)	Used to increase the sucrose content by downregulation
Sucrose isomerase	Used in doubling of sucrose content by targeting to vacuoles	Wu and Birch 2007
Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT)	Down regulated via RNAi based methods for the possible reduction of lignin content in sugarcane	Jung et al. 2013; Bewg et al. 2016
ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H)
caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT)
BAHD acyltransferase	Silencing of a BAHD acyltransferase in sugarcane increases biomass digestibility	Souza et al 2019

Generally, sugarcane lacks herbicide resistance and is susceptible to commercial herbicides. Once after the transformation of sugarcane with nptII gene by Bower and Birch (1992), several other genes such as bar, EPSPS and mutated ALS genes were also introduced against selected herbicides (reviewed in Nerkar et al. 2018) (Table 2). The Initial research with transgenic sugarcane plants resistant to a specific active molecule called Phosphinothricine (PPT) of the widely used herbicide BASTA was developed by Agrobacterium mediated transformation (Enríquez-Obregón et al., 1998). These transgenic sugarcane plants showed integration of the bar gene having PPT acetyltransferase and conferred resistance against BASTA. Recent experiments with sugarcane varieties transgenic for EPSPS (The gene responsible for glyphosate tolerance) have also shown a healthy growth even though they were exposed to 0.5% of Roundup. Whereas the wild type sugarcane plants die off when treated with 0.1% of Roundup (Wang et al. 2017).

For the development of insect resistance, different genes were introduced in sugarcane. Arencibia et al. 1997 were the first to introduce Cry1A gene from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) against Diatraea saccharalis, which was then followed by various Bt gene versions such as Cry1Ab, Cry1Ac and Cry1Aa3 against insects such as Chilo infuscatellus, Diatraea saccharalis, Helicoverpa armigera, Proceras venosatus, Scirpophaga excerptalis (reviewed in Srikanth et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2017; Cristofoletti et al. 2018; Zhou et al. 2018) (Table 2). Several other genes encoding proteinase inhibitors and lectins were also used for resistance against insects, including Antitrogus consanguineous, Dermolepida albohirtum, Eoreuma loftini, Diatraea saccharalis, Ceratovacuna lanigera and Scirpophaga excerptalis (Srikanth et al. 2011). Apart from Cry1A and Cry2A, there are other Bt genes such as Cry2Aa and Cry2Ab that are found to be promising proteins towards the management of resistance development in insects. These proteins differ from the Cry1A proteins in structure and insecticidal mechanism (Kumar and Udayasuriyan 2004). However, Cry2A gene containing transgenic sugarcane plants have shown increased resistance against stem borer and comparable sugar yield (Gao et al. 2018).

Sugarcane transgenics with albicidin detoxification (albD) gene have produced resistance against the leaf scald disease causing bacterium Xanthomonas albilineans (Zhang and Birch 1997). Similarly, expression of truncated cDNA of the endochitinase gene from Trichoderma harzianum (Viswanathan et al. 2006) and β-1,3-glucanase gene from Trichoderma sp (Nayyar et al., 2017) has yielded significant resistance against red rot fungal disease caused by Colletotrichum falcatum. In the case of viral diseases, Joyce et al. (1998) have demonstrated viral resistance against sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV) by transgenic expression of SCMV coat protein (CP) gene. Yao et al. 2017 have studied the level of disease resistance and field performance of SCMV-CP expressing transgenic sugarcane lines such as B2, B36, B38, B48 and B51A. Their results showed that the transgenic sugarcanes developed from sugarcane variety ca. Badila was found to have superior disease resistant characteristics and the transgenic line B48 was found to be highly resistant to SCMV. They also confirmed the stable expression of the transgene over several generations with vegetative propagation. Similar type of result was obtained when CP gene of Sorghum mosaic potyvirus was expressed (Ingelbrecht et al. 1999) and further clarified that the resistance is post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) mediated. Recent studies on the RNA interference mediated resistance to Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV) in sugarcane was done by (Guo et al. 2015) (Table 2). They have developed a SrMV resistant transgenic sugarcane line from the disease resistant sugarcane cultivar ROC22. This transgenic ROC22 lines express a hairpin construct targeting 423 bp long conserved region of SrMV coat protein and subsequent SrMV challenge experiments by artificial inoculation showed superior level of resistance against SrMV.

Water deficit and drought are the major abiotic factor threatening sugarcane production worldwide. Recent advances in understanding drought stress biology and the use of biotechnological tools for the evaluation of specific stress related proteins against drought conditions have initiated a major development in engineering plants against drought stress (Ferreira et al. 2017). So far, specific genes such as Glycine Betaine and bacterial betA genes were successfully introduced in sugarcane for the enhancement of water stress tolerance (Sugiharto 2017). Transformation of Choline dehydrogenase gene into sugarcane is believed to be the first step for the commercial cultivation of transgenic sugarcane varieties with induced water stress tolerance. This Choline dehydrogenase gene is involved in the production of Glycine Betaine, which helps plant cells to maintain water potential by osmotic adjustment. Additionally, genes such as Trehalose synthase from the fungus Grifola frondosa, Arabidopsis vacuolar pyrophosphatase (AVP1), Sugarcane SoP5CS, Dehydration Responsive Element Binding 2 (DREB2) of Erianthus arundinaceus and Arabidopsis, Erianthus arundinaceus HSP70 (EaHSP70) and Pea DNA Helicase 45 (DH45) are introduced into sugarcane to increase the drought tolerant capacity (Ferreira et al. 2017).

Recent understanding on drought responsive genes of sugarcane has showed Scdr2 gene as a potential drought responsive gene in the sugarcane cultivars. Overexpressing Scdr2 gene in transgenic tobacco plants those subjected to drought and salinity stress has shown increased levels of photosynthesis, internal CO₂ levels, reduced hydrogen peroxide accumulation, increased stomatal conductance and resistance to both drought and salinity based stress conditions. Whereas, wild type non-transgenic plants are affected by both type of stress conditions and showed increased respiration rates (Begcy et al. 2019). Similarly, sugarcane plants transgenic for the P5CS gene showed a positive correlation with high proline content, increased photochemical efficiency in photosystem II and an increase in biomass production under drought stress conditions. Experiments shows that P5CS gene (∆1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase) from Vigna aconitifolia has conferred salinity tolerance to sugarcane transgenics. Additionally, this stress induced accumulation of proline in the transgenic plants turns into a part of the anti-oxidant defense system and ensures protection against stressful drought conditions (Molinari et al. 2007). Similarly, increased cold tolerance in sugarcane was achieved by expressing isopentenyl transferase (ipt) under a cold inducible promoter (Belintani et al. 2012).

As sugarcane becomes more and more important for the future biofuel industry, efforts to increase the sucrose content by overexpressing S. officinarum sucrose phosphate synthase (SoSPS) and RNAi-mediated down regulation of pyrophosphate: fructose 6-phosphate 1-phosphotransferase (PFP) have become successful (Groenewald and Botha 2008; Anur et al. 2020). Notably, doubling of total sugar content was achieved earlier by vacuolar targeting of Sucrose isomerase (Wu and Birch 2007). In addition to sucrose, specific bacterial genes from Ralstonia eutropha, those involved in polyhydroxybutyrate synthesis (PHAA, PHAB and PHAC) are also utilized to accumulate biopolymers in sugarcane (Petrasovits et al. 2012).

Reduction of lignin content is another approach to increase the biofuel production through biomass conversion. Genes involved in lignin biosynthesis such as caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT), ferulate 5-hydroxylase (F5H) and caffeic acid O-methyltransferase (COMT) are targeted via RNAi methods to reduce the lignin content (Jung et al. 2013; Bewg et al. 2016). Recent RNAi mediated gene silencing studies on BAHD acyltransferase in sugarcane have improved the overall biomass digestibility of sugarcane straw obtained from BAHD silenced transgenic plant lines (Souza et al. 2019). With the advent of genome editing technologies, successful editing of nearly 100 COMT gene copies using TALEN was reported (Jung and Altpeter 2016; Kannan et al. 2018). The CRISPR/Cas technology gets versatile, fine-tuned and improved day by day in model plant Arabidopsis (Arya et al. 2020). Recently, successful CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene targeted events for multi-copy ALS genes (Oz et al. 2021), and magnesium chelatase alleles (Eid et al. 2021) were reported.

Molecular approaches against drought and salinity

Under drought stress, gene expression alterations can induce cellular adaptation and the study of gene expression profiles suggests the complexity of defense mechanisms that are involved in abiotic stresses. Although, plant response to drought has been analyzed at all these levels in the past few years, focus has been shifted toward the molecular mechanisms underlying drought responses. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of drought response is important for the improvement of drought tolerance in plants using molecular techniques (Nakashima et al. 2014). Generally, water stress changes the expression of several genes that are supposed to show a vital role in stress response and tolerance. Among which, a number of stress responsive genes have also been recognized and characterized (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2007; Todaka et al. 2015). Recent molecular studies on the responses of sugarcane to drought stress conditions have shown a drought inducible protein SoDip22 in the water stress tolerant phenotype of sugarcane. It is a small 22 Kda protein, detected in the bundle sheath cells of sugarcane leaves and plays a key role in the maintenance of water molecules during water deficit conditions (Santiago et al., 2018).

For the purpose of better understanding the molecular mechanism of the physiological retorts those that happen in sugarcane during stress environments, high throughput gene expression studies have been conducted by many researchers (Flavia Stal Papini-Terzi et al. 2005; Rocha et al. 2007; Flavia S. Papini-Terzi et al. 2009; F. A. Rodrigues et al. 2011). These studies are mainly focused on the signal transduction and the role of phytohormones. Upon analyses of these high throughput gene expression data, it becomes clear that subsequent water stress conditions stimulate wide spread signal transduction networks, including several transcription factors, protein kinases and phosphatases (Zhu 2002; Xiong et al. 2002; Singh et al. 2002; Rabbani et al. 2003). Additionally, a significant part of the plant’s responses to drought stress is ABA-dependent. Both water stress and exogenous ABA treatment share a number of differentially expressed genes (Himmelbach et al. 2003; Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki 2007). Rocha et al. 2007 reported about 93 differentially expressed genes in sugarcane plants exposed to drought using macro-array technology. This includes genes such as HSP70, catalases, expansines, tyrosine phosphatases, Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase and trehalose metabolism-related proteins.

Sequencing and real-time reverse transcription-PCR profiling of selected ESTs (Expressed sequence tags) clusters identified around 25 stress related clusters with more than twofold relative expression during water deficit stress in sugarcane (Gupta et al. 2010). Specific differentially expressed genes were identified under water stress conditions in tolerant as well as sensitive sugarcane plants using the macroarray technique using ESTs from leaf libraries generated by the SUCEST project (Rodrigues et al. 2009, 2011). A suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) approach was also used to isolate ESTs from those up-regulated during water-deficit stress in sugarcane and elucidate their transcriptional regulatory mechanisms (Prabu et al. 2011). Iskandar et al. (2011) studied gene expression profiling of drought responsive genes using real time quantitative PCR during sucrose accumulation under water deficit conditions in sugarcane culms.

Differentially expressed drought responsive genes were identified using Supersage (Kido et al. 2012). Hybridization-based approaches using DNA arrays have been the most successful for large-scale gene expression profiling in sugarcane under water stress (Papini-Terzi et al. 2009; Lembke et al. 2012). M. D. da Silva et al. (2013) verified the expression profile of aquaporins in sugarcane roots under water stress and T. Kumar et al. (2014) studied drought tolerance in sugarcane through ectopic expression of AVP1 gene of Arabidopsis using an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system. By using small RNA deep sequencing (Thiebaut et al. 2012, 2014; Ferreira et al. 2012; Gentile et al. 2013, 2015), miRNA sequences are identified in the sugarcane genome during drought stress (Selvi et al. 2021). Vantini et al. (2015) have identified drought responsive genes in water stress tolerant sugarcane roots using the cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism technique. Li et al. (2016) studied the gene expression profile of sugarcane plants which are subjected to different water stress conditions using cDNA arrays.

Recently, the drought transcriptome was studied by high throughput sequencing strategies and subsequent identification of genes and pathways that are involved in drought tolerance in sugarcane (Selvi et al. 2020) was identified. Differential expression for the genes like dehydrin (D1), late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA protein), ethylene responsive transcription factor (ER1), ABA- responsive element binding factor, DREB 2, drought responsive proteins (DR1), SNF1 related protein kinase, sucrose phosphate synthase were observed in control and stressed plants. Up regulation of transcripts like ABA responsive element, SNF1 related protein kinase, DREB 2 and drought responsive proteins (DR1) were noticed in drought tolerant variety Co 06,022. The transcription factors viz., NAC, WRKY, AP2-EREBP showed higher expression on both leaves and shoots of Co 06,022 compared to control and susceptible genotype Co 8021 (Devi et al. 2019; Selvi et al. 2020). Identified potential candidate genes will be used further for developing functional markers for drought stress tolerance in sugarcane. Furthermore, a more relevant and practical approach could be a comparative analysis of the stress transcriptome between cultivated and wild plant species for the possible discovery of abiotic stress tolerant genes. This can become possible by studying Saccharum spontaneum and Erianthus arundinaceus, a wild relative of sugarcane which has mechanisms for tolerating extreme drought conditions and continues to grow even during severe long drought situations.

The other method for the identification of genes involved in abiotic stresses and widely adopted in the recent past is the comparative gene expression analysis between; (i) stressed and unstressed samples of the same species, (ii) contrasting genotypes of the same species and related species (Pandey 2015). These comparative techniques were highly successful for studying the salinity stress responsive genes through which a number of salinity responsive genes have been identified in many crop species (Kawasaki et al. 2001). Among the techniques available, SSH continues to be a highly proficient tool for species with limited genome sequence information next to RNA-Sequencing analysis.

To understand the molecular basis of salt-stress response in sugarcane, Pagariya and his coworkers have initiated physio-biochemical assays and cDNA-RAPD-based gene expression studies under high salt (2% NaCl) supply regimes. Among the 335 differentially expressed transcript-derived fragments, 156 up-regulated and 85 down-regulated transcript-derived fragments were functionally categorized as metabolism, DNA/RNA/cellular processes, signal transduction/cell rescue/defense, cell wall modifications, transcriptional regulation, transport/trafficking, and unknown/hypothetical proteins (Pagariya et al. 2012).

Molecular approaches against high temperature stress

The next generation sequencing method (RNA-Seq) was used to analyze the transcripts of sugarcane and characterized several candidate genes related to heat stress tolerance in the sugarcane variety Co 99,004, where several candidate genes were characterized during the formative stage of growth (Devi et al. 2019; Raju et al. 2020). A total of 1,42,859 transcripts were assembled and the longest sequence in the assembled transcripts was 21,435 bp. DGE analysis has revealed that a total of 1137 and 1171 transcripts were significantly up-regulated and down regulated, respectively. The functional annotation of these transcripts has revealed that they were involved in response to oxidative stress, heat shock protein and glutamate pathway. Nine transcripts were validated for their biological significance through qRT-PCR and RT-PCR for their expression in leaf tissues, and the results showed high consistency between qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq methods. The longest sequence in the assembled transcripts contains 21,435 bp which has an identity of 99% with Maturase K protein from Saccharum officinarum, the same has been submitted in NCBI and acquired an accession number (NCBI Accession no. SRR7252568—RAN-Seq of Control—Co 99,004; NCBI Accession no. SRR7252569—RAN-Seq of heat treated Co 99,004) (Raju et al. 2020).

Elucidating high temperature stress-responsive proteins as well as associated mechanisms is essential for improving heat tolerance in sugarcane. In a recent study, proteomic analysis was conducted in sugarcane varieties such as Co 99,004 (heat stress tolerant), Co 0315 (heat stress susceptible) and SES 150 (Saccharum spontaneum clone) that were subjected to high temperature stress. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) and MALDI-TOF/MS based proteomics approaches have revealed a total of 25 differentially up-regulated protein spots, out of which 22 and 3 other proteins were expressed only in Co 99,004 and SES 150, respectively. Protein profiles clearly showed the variation in protein expression between the control and heat treated sugarcane varieties. Protein identification and annotation of differentially expressed abundant proteins has revealed the involvement of several mechanisms in high temperature stress tolerance, including protein folding, sorting and degradation, transcription, translation, cell growth and death, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, DNA replication, repair and signal transduction. The high temperature stress responsive proteins were clearly identified in the sugarcane varieties viz., Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 2-B (32.11 kDa), REF/SRPP-like protein cpx (21.65 kDa), Putative F-box/kelch-repeat protein (31.56 kDa), Putative cyclin-dependent kinase F-2 (7.68 kDa), Probable F-box protein (10.51 kDa), Thioredoxin O2 (12.72 kDa), Dirigent protein (15.95 kDa), MYB family transcription factor (17.8 kDa), stress-response A/B barrel domain (11.87 kDa) and Protein TIFY 11d (9.11 kDa). These differentially expressed abundant proteins were further quantified by qRT-PCR and are relatively reliable. These proteins are identified in the study, which provides a strong basis to elucidate gene functions and to further explain the molecular mechanisms underlying the adaptation of sugarcane varieties to high temperature stress (Devi et al. 2019; Raju et al. 2020).

Research in omics era

The aneuploidy, polyploidy and complex nature of cultivated sugarcane with large genome size (> 10 Gb) makes WGS, assembly and annotation as one of the toughest tasks to accomplish, nevertheless a partial work has been done (Garsmeur et al. 2018). Zhang et al. (2012) estimated the monoploid genome sizes of S. officinarum (985 Mb) and S. spontaneum (843 Mb). However, genome sequencing has revealed the haploid genome size of S. officinarum (930 Mb) and S. spontaneum (750 Mb) (Garsmeur et al. 2018; Zhang et al. 2018), suggesting the monoploid genome size of cultivated sugarcane to be somewhere between 750 to 930 Mb. The release of WGS will kickstart gene family analysis, which is being done with conventional cDNA cloning (Li et al. 2017; Hua-ying et al. 2019) or with available EST data (Zhang et al. 2013; McIntyre et al. 2015; Li et al. 2017) from NCBI or with partially assembled genome sequences (Santiago et al. 2018; Li et al. 2020) from NCBI. A public database, GRASSIUS (https://www.grassius.org/index.php; (Yilmaz et al. 2009), with nucleotide and peptide sequences of transcription factors of selected cereal crop members, was also used to perform gene family analysis (Ramaswamy et al. 2017).

The transcriptomic analysis in sugarcane started long before the genome analysis. SUCEST (http://sucest-fun.org/; Vettore et al. 2003), a database by Brazilian consortium has made a greater contribution in pioneering large scale transcriptomic studies in sugarcane, reflecting the significance of sugarcane with Brazilian economy. Following this, several research groups have started analyzing sugarcane transcriptome data against various biotic, abiotic factors and developmental stages as well (Manners and Casu 2011; Lovejot Kaur et al. 2017; Ali et al. 2019). The NCBI SRA database has a total transcriptomic data of 973 runs, of which 750 are generated from sugarcane hybrid cultivars while 223 are generated from Saccharum officinarum (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra). A list of databases other than NCBI is summarized in Table 3, of which a few databases were discontinued in due course. Being a crop meant for carbohydrate production, studies related to metabolomics are scarce. Studies on callus development (Mahmud et al. 2014), stem development against sucrose accumulation (Glassop et al. 2007) and to understand lignin biosynthesis (Bottcher et al. 2013) were done following a generalized metabolomic study (Bosch et al. 2003).

Table 3.

Sugarcane databases

Database	Data type	Weblink
Sugarcane Genome Hub	Genome	https://sugarcane-genome.cirad.fr/
GRASSIUS	Transcription factors	https://www.grassius.org/index.php
SUCEST	Transcriptome	http://sucest-fun.org/
ISAAA	Commercial GM events	https://www.isaaa.org/default.asp
GrainGenes	Phenotypic and Molecular	Discontinued for sugarcane
SGDB	Germplasm	Discontinued
SymGRASS	Orthologous genes involved in arbuscular mycorrhiza and root nodule symbiosis	Discontinued

Sugarcane—A platform for molecular farming

Plant-based production of pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical products is gaining momentum around the world. Many plant species have become promising alternative to the traditional expression systems for producing a variety of valuable or high-value molecules of pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical products. Plants are preferred as a platform for the production of recombinant proteins because of the low costs and greater scalability of plant production systems without incurring the high costs associated with downstream processing and purification. Of the plant systems, sugarcane represents an ideal candidate for biofactory applications due to its large biomass, rapid growth rate, efficient carbon fixation pathway, a well-developed storage tissue system, minimal transgene dispersal due to the vegetative method of propagation, high quantity of extractable juice with very low protein content (0.01–0.02%), and a well-established downstream processing technology. Sugarcane as a platform for molecular farming has been of interest for nearly two decades (Birch et al. 1995). In sugarcane, the culm contributes 70% of the dry weight, which is largely made of storage parenchyma cells where the vacuoles occupy most of the cell volume. The juice stored in the vacuoles contributes to 60% of the cane weight. Therefore, it is logical to target any recombinant protein to the vacuole, so as to attain the maximum protein yield. Therefore, sugarcane can be used as an efficient platform for molecular farming. The first attempt by Gnanasambandam and Birch (2004) to localize recombinant GFP to the vacuole using the N-terminal-targeting motif NPIR from a vacuolar protein, sporamin, of sweet potato has led to mis-targeting of r-GFP to the chloroplasts. Sugar-yielding plants such as sugarcane have attracted attention because of their high biomass production, especially the storage culm from which juice is extracted. The high quantity of extractable juice with very low protein content and a well-established juice processing technology have encouraged researchers to express proteins in the sugarcane culm. Many attempts have been made to express and purify recombinant proteins from sugarcane stem and leaves (Jackson et al. 2010).

Initial studies that aimed at expressing the protein in cytoplasm and purifying it from leaves have resulted in poor yields as leaves contain many proteins other than the introduced ones, which may interfere in downstream processing (Fischer et al. 2004). In stem parenchyma, as most of the cell volume is occupied by the vacuole, vacuolar targeting is supposed to lead to higher levels of r-proteins than when the cytoplasm is targeted. Palaniswamy et al. (2016) demonstrated that targeting of r-proteins to parenchymatous lytic vacuoles of sugarcane has resulted in high yield with relatively simple purification steps. Hence, there is a possibility of using sugarcane as an efficient platform for the production of large quantities of recombinant proteins by deploying newly identified vacuolar-targeting determinants (the 78-bp or 18-bp VT determinants) along with a strong constitutive promoter (Port ubi882). In addition, a downstream purification system could be easily developed, which offers a promising solution for the extraction and purification of recombinant proteins from the sugarcane juice. Although this is a promising biofarming technology, the presence of vacuolar proteolytic enzymes and the acidic nature of lytic vacuoles need to be given due consideration for the selection of the candidate recombinant proteins. Considering the practical situations, where the purity after the affinity chromatography stage is around 50%, we would be able to get an r-protein yield of 4.8–7.2 kg/acre (40,000 canes per acre) with purity comparable to that of the commercially equivalent r-proteins. The unique aspect of sugarcane is the extraction of a large juice volume (700 mL) by crushing 1 kg of cane. Therefore, sugarcane is possibly an efficient platform for molecular farming.

Conclusions and future perspectives

Human intervention with plants through yield-oriented agricultural selection has brought directional evolution of selected wild plants into domesticated crops. This can be termed anthropogenic coevolution. Sugarcane has been modified from a wild fibrous grass into a sweet, juicy crop. Trait improvement via conventional breeding practices and cutting-edge modern research activities has further polished sugarcane into a resilient high yielding crop. Omic approaches led the researchers to understand the sugarcane crop at a molecular level with higher resolution. Tolerance to water deficit stress involves a number of gene regulatory networks and is a very complex trait. Saccharum arundinaceum Retz., a wild relative of Saccharum, is well known for its high fibre, high biomass, tolerance to drought and water logging, pest and disease resistance with multi-ratooning ability. Functional genomic analysis on these genes involved in abiotic stress would enable dissection of the complex traits into component characters and would offer sources for various parameters in breeding for abiotic stress tolerance. The reports of tight linkages between the candidate genes and the QTLs conferring abiotic stress resistance are encouraging (Francia et al. 2005). For breeders, the knowledge of the precise locations of the QTLs that has large effects, have application for integration in MAS.

Sugarcane holds an important place as it is not only the source of sugar but also an important renewable energy source. Losses caused by drought can be reduced to a great extent by using genetic engineering and genome editing tools. In the future all these developments are expected to address the problem of abiotic stresses through the integration of breeding and molecular techniques. Apart from feeding the sugar needs, this C4 crop could potentially fuel the industry, which would boost the economy and energize the environment by cutting down on carbon emissions. As sugarcane stem vacuoles provide a huge storage factory for targeting r-proteins, its easy and cost efficient purification processing, and owing to its edible nature, sugarcane can be considered as a platform for production of edible vaccines and for several other r-proteins, biomolecules, industrial and pharmaceutical products through modern biotechnological approaches. Currently, the world is facing a critical time in the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to massive global human and economic losses. The high transmission rate and the emergence of diverse SARS-CoV-2 variants demand that several COVID-19 vaccines are being developed using different production systems. A plant-based production offers several advantages, such as low cost, rapidity, scalability, and safety. Hence, sugarcane stem vacuole based vaccine production may be one of the choices for shortening the global demand. If this system becomes successful in global vaccine production rather than as a sweet feeding crop and movement crop (biofuel production), our sugarcane will also become a lifesaving crop. As food, fuel and drugs in a single crop, sugarcane is climbing the slope of enlightenment and will soon reach its goal.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

The authors declare that no research involving human participants and/or animals was conducted.