Skip to main content
Microbial Genomics logoLink to Microbial Genomics
. 2022 Aug 12;8(8):mgen000858. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000858

Shooting hoops: globetrotting plasmids spreading more than just antimicrobial resistance genes across One Health

Cian Smyth 1,, Robert J Leigh 1,, Sarah Delaney 1, Richard A Murphy 2, Fiona Walsh 1,*
PMCID: PMC9484753  PMID: 35960657

Abstract

Our study provides novel insights into the global nature of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) plasmids across the food chain. We provide compelling evidence of the globetrotting nature of AMR plasmids and the need for surveillance to sequence plasmids with a template of analyses for others to expand these data. The AMR plasmids analysed were detected in 63 countries and in samples from humans, animals and the environment. They contained a combination of known and novel AMR genes, metal resistance genes, virulence factors, phage and replicon types.

Keywords: plasmids, antimicrobial resistance, food chain, virulence, colicin

Data Summary

The genomic data files are available under BioProject PRJNA816331. The publication title is also included in the bioproject details to aid discovery.

Impact Statement.

Our study shows that it is not only the movement of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes across our food chain that are the same but the pieces of DNA carrying them are the same in chickens, food, soi, wastewater and human infections. This article adds detailed data to the field and highlights the need to look at the pieces of DNA carrying the AMR genes in addition to the AMR genes when investigating the movement of AMR across our food chain.

Introduction

The World Health Organisation (WHO), Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) identified antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as a critically important One Health problem. In 2017 WHO identified 12 global priority pathogens classified as containing important AMR, including plasmid-mediated carbapenem-resistant, extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing or fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-negative pathogens [1]. The European Union summary report on AMR in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from animals and food in 2018/19 frequently identified ampicillin-, sulfamethoxazole-, trimethoprim- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli across pig, poultry and bovine populations [2]. E. coli with ‘very high’ resistance to ciprofloxacin and chloramphenicol were identified in poultry [2]. Due to the focus of many studies on E. coli we know much less about AMR in non-pathogenic and other zoonotic bacteria present in food-producing animals. There is a dearth of information on the AMR plasmids contained within the non-pathogenic or zoonotic bacteria within food-producing animals. To date, plasmid data have mainly been limited to plasmids present in culturable pathogens.

Plasmids enable AMR gene (ARG) transfer across bacteria and biomes and through the food chain. Thus it is these plasmids that are the risk to the further spread of AMR across One Health from animals to humans or the environment and vice versa. The contribution of specific plasmids to the dissemination of ARGs across One Health is unknown. Analysis of AMR plasmids conferring AMR or multi-drug resistance (MDR) may enable us to track and understand the dynamics of the spread of these mechanisms of resistance across One Health. Through comparison of the entire plasmids will we be able to track and trace their movements across One Health and identify their risk to One Health. Our study aimed to characterize the AMR plasmids isolated from poultry that could be expressed in E. coli in the context of other resistance and virulence genes and identify their global nature by comparison with all sequenced plasmids across One Health of human, animal and the environment.

Methods

Sample collections

Broiler caecal samples (n=34) were obtained from a commercial poultry production unit in the UK. The poultry were all fed the same diet. No antimicrobials were supplemented in their diet. All animals were taken from a commercial hatchery and transported to the commercial sheds on the day of hatching. Approximately 10 000 birds were mirror imaged from the hatchery into the production sheds. The birds were raised and fed under typical commercial production conditions, receiving feed and water ad libitum. All other conditions were kept uniform for all sheds. At days 21 (D21) and 34 (D34) post-hatch, the intact caecal pouches of randomly caught birds were removed immediately after euthanization. The entire contents of each caecal pouch were removed, lyophilized and stored at −80 °C until analysis.

Exogenous plasmid isolation

Plasmids harbouring ARGs were isolated from each of the 34 caecal samples using the exogenous plasmid isolation method, as previously described [3]. Briefly, the total transferable plasmid populations from each of the ‘donor’ caecal samples (n=34) were individually transferred to the ‘recipient’ rifampicin-resistant E. coli DH5α via biparental mating. Exogenous transconjugants were selected on Eosin Methylene Blue (EMB) agar (Sigma) with rifampicin (100 mg l−1) and ampicillin, tetracycline, gentamicin, colistin, cefotaxime or ciprofloxacin at breakpoint concentrations according to CLSI guidelines [4]. From each antimicrobial selective plate with growth after exogenous isolation, a transconjugant was selected at random. If the same plate appeared to have bacteria with different features (colour, morphology), representatives of each colony type were selected.

Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on the exogenous transconjugants via the disc diffusion method according to CLSI guidelines for ampicillin, tetracycline, kanamycin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, trimethoprim, imipenem and chloramphenicol antimicrobials [4]. The presence of ESBL enzymes was investigated using the CLSI confirmatory combination disc test method [4]. The test was considered positive when an increase in the growth-inhibitory zone around the cefotaxime disc with clavulanic acid was 5 mm or greater than the diameter around the disc containing cefotaxime alone.

Plasmid sequencing

Plasmids from ESBL-positive transconjugants across D21 and D35 were selected for plasmid sequencing (n=9 exogenous transconjugant E. coli ). The plasmids were extracted from the transconjugants using the Macherey-Nagel NucleoSpin Plasmid kit following the low-copy number protocol according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Each transconjugant contained several plasmids, and thus 22 plasmids were sequenced to closed circular plasmids.

Sequencing

Extracted plasmids were sequenced using the SQK-LSK-109 Ligation Sequencing kit [Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT)] with the NBD-104 Barcoding kit used for multiplexing. No departures from standard kit protocols were made. Completed libraries were run on an ONT MinION.

Pre-assembly quality control (QC)

DNA outputs were basecalled and demultiplexed using ONT-Guppy v.1.1.alpha17-6-g5cecf99, nd this process was also used to remove any attached barcodes and adaptors. Filtlong v.0.2.0 was used to filter for any excessively short reads as well as filtering for any reads of low quality based on qQ-score [5].

Assembly

Reads were de novo assembled using Unicycler v.0.4.9 long-read only [6]. This package was run with default parameters.

Post-assembly QC

Visual assessment of assembled contigs was performed with Bandage v.0.8.1 [7]. This allowed for an easy inspection of circularized contigs and their size/depth.

Plasmid annotation

In total, 22 plasmids were observed to be circular using Bandage. One other plasmid-derived sequence was observed to be both long (41 468 bp) and of high coverage. Each plasmid sequence was annotated using Prokka v.1.14.6 using the RNA profiling flag (--rfam) and, otherwise, default settings [8]. Due to the high level of hypothetical genes arising from Prokka annotation, each plasmid sequence was further annotated using BAKTA v.1.2.1 with default settings [9]. Annotations derived from BAKTA are provided as supplementary data [10]. Plasmids were visualized using in-house software. The sample name indicates the transconjugant and the second number the specific plasmid; for example, F4_7 is transconjugant 4 with plasmid number 7.

Resistome, virulome and secondary metabolism profiling

The total plasmid DNA of each sample and each circularized plasmid was analysed for the presence of ARGs using ABRicate v.1.0.1 for AMR using the Comprehensive Antimicrobial Resistance Database (CARD) v.3.09 [11, 12]. Each circular plasmid was profiled in addition for metal and biocide resistance using BacMet v.2.0, and for virulence factors using the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) v.5 [10, 13]. As plasmids often display rapid evolutionary rates, the minimum percentage identity (--minid) flag was reduced to 50 % (from the default 80%). As ABRicate requires a nucleotide input and as BACMET is only provided in amino acid format, the amino acid database was back translated (using translation table 11) prior to annotation [14]. As resistance may arise via point mutation, PointFinder v.3.1.1 was used with all available bacterial profiles ( Campylobacter spp., Enterococcus faecalis , Enterococcus faecium , Escherichia coli , Helicobacter pylori , Klebsiella spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Neisseria gonorrhoeae , Salmonella spp. and Staphylococcus aureus ) to assess for resistance arising in chromosomally translocated genes [15]. Despite exhaustive searching, no resistance arising via point mutation was detected.

Plasmid clustering and global relatedness

Each circular plasmid was searched against each other plasmid sequenced for this study using the distance function (dist) in Mash v.2.2.2 [16]. Instances where both the distance score (D) and P-value (P)≤0.1 were considered homologous. The 0.1 score filters were chosen to replicate the cut-offs used during the construction of PLSDB v.0.1.7 [17]. Each circular plasmid analysed in this study was assessed against all plasmids in PLSDB v.0.1.7 using the distance Mash dist algorithm. Again, instances where both the distance score (D) and P-value (P)≤0.1 were retained for further inspection. Each retained hit was further annotated using the metadata provided by PLSDB. The MASH distance score is highly correlated to the average nucleotide identity (ANI; a pairwise measure of genomic similarity between two genome’s coding regions subtracted from 1 (1−ANI) and a distance score of ≤0.05 equates to a ≥95 % ANI [16, 18]. A distance score of 0.1 is assumed to equate to ≥90 % ANI.

Geographical mapping

Geocoordinates for each mapped plasmid were extracted from PLSDB metadata (where available) and converted to a representative country using the ‘Nomatim().reverse’ function in the GeoPy v.2.2.0 python library. The list of countries associated with each plasmid was used to annotate a world atlas to visualize the extent of spread.

Temporal analysis of plasmid character state evolution

Where available, dates-of-isolation were extracted for each mapped plasmid from PLSDB. Each date-of-isolation was represented in year format to standardize the data, and plasmids without dates-of-isolation were excluded from further analyses. Drug resistance, metal resistance and virulence factor profiles were established for each plasmid using ABRicate as above, and metaprofiles were constructed for each plasmid group and ranked based on year (Supplementary Data, available with the online version of this article). As F5_3 (suspected phage-plasmid) only matched two other plasmids (and none was observed to contain a resistance gene or virulence factor), these plasmids were not subjected to further temporal analysis.

Prophage detection

Each circular plasmid was assessed for prophages using Phigaro v.2.3.0 under default settings [19]. Detected prophages were individually annotated using BAKTA and assessed for resistance and virulence profiles using ABRicate with the CARD, BACMET and VFDB databases as above. A database of International Committee on the Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) exemplar virus genomes was downloaded from NCBI Assembly [20]. Each prophage was searched against the ICTV database using the Mash screen algorithm using instances where both identity ≥0.5 (50 %) and P≤0.1 are reported; hits from non-phage genomes were removed. The identity stringency score was lowered to 50 % to allow for detection of rapidly degrading or mutating phage fragments.

Results

Antimicrobial resistance profiles

Nine ESBL-positive transconjugant samples (Table 1) were resistant to ampicillin, cefotaxime and tetracycline. Transconjugants 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 were also resistant to aminoglycosides (3, 8, 9), trimethoprim (4, 8, 9), ciprofloxacin (5, 9) or imipenem (8), or a combination.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial resistance profiles and number of AMR genes within each ESBL-positive transconjugants

Sample

AMR profile

No. of genes per sample total DNA

Aminoglycosides

Bacitracin

Beta-lactamases

Lincosamides

QACs

Sulphonamides

Tetracycline

Trimethoprim

Total

1

AMP, CTX, TET

2

0

6

0

0

0

3

0

11

2

AMP, CTX, TET

0

0

1

2

1

1

2

0

7

3

AMP, CTX, KAN, CN, TET

0

2

3

0

0

0

2

2

9

4

AMP, CTX, TET, W

2

0

3

0

0

0

2

0

7

5

AMP, CTX, TET, CIP

3

0

1

0

2

1

1

1

9

6

AMP, CTX, TET

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

4

7

AMP, CTX, TET

2

0

4

0

0

0

2

0

8

8

AMP, CTX, KAN, TET, W, IMP

0

2

2

0

0

0

0

0

4

9

AMP, CTX, KAN, TET, CIP, W

3

0

5

0

0

2

3

3

16

AMP, ampicillin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CN, gentamicin; CTX, cefotaxime; I, intermediate; IMP, imipenem; KAN, kanamycin; QACs, quaternary ammonium compounds; R, resistant; S, susceptible; according to CLSI guidelines (2018).; TET, tetracycline; W, trimethoprim.

Plasmid descriptions

Both the total sequenced DNA (circularized and non-circularized) plasmid data and the circularized plasmids were analysed. The AMR genes detected across the total DNA (Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary data 1) conferred resistance to seven antimicrobial classes and quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs). However, some of the phenotypes and genotypes did not match. While blaTEM and blaSHV beta-lactamase genes were detected across all samples, only three contained the ESBL blaSHV-2 gene. Others contained blaSHV genes, which are not classified as beta-lactamases or ESBLs [21]. Two samples only contained the beta-lactamase blaTEM-1 genes. No mobile quinolone resistance genes were detected in the ciprofloxacin-resistant samples and nor were mutations in their quinolone resistance regions (QRDRs). Sample 6 contained no tetracycline resistance genes and sample 8 no imipenem or aminoglycoside resistance genes. Sample 4 was resistant to trimethoprim but contained no known resistance gene. Thus, as the phenotype was present, these isolates must contain novel resistance genes hidden within their plasmid DNA.

Table 2.

Clustering groups, replicon types and ARGs detected in each circularized plasmid

Plasmid ID

Cluster group

Replicon type

Antimicrobial resistance genes

Total number of ARGs

ANT(3'')-IIa

APH(3'')-Ib

APH(6)-Id

SHV-2

TEM-1

dfrA1

dfrA8

lnuG

sul1

tet(A)

tet(B)

dfrD

F1_2

A

IncB/O/K/Z_2

1

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F4_2

A

IncB/O/K/Z_2

1

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F6_1

A

IncB/O/K/Z_2

1

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F7_2

A

IncB/O/K/Z_2

1

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Y

F9_3

A

IncB/O/K/Z_2

1

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F1_17

B

Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F4_7

B

Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F7_6

B

Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F9_5

B

Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F3_4

C

IncN_1

2

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

F5_2

C

IncN_1

2

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

F8_22

C

IncN_1

2

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

F1_1

D

IncFIB_1

4

.

Y

Y

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

Y

.

F2_2

D

IncFIA_1, IncFIB_1, IncFIC(FII)_1

1

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F4_1

D

IncFIB_1

4

.

Y

Y

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

Y

.

F5_1

D

IncFIB_1

7

Y

Y

Y

.

Y

Y

.

.

Y

Y

.

.

F9_1

D

IncFIB_1

4

.

Y

Y

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

Y

.

F1_18

Singleton

Col440II_1

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F1_3

Singleton

IncFII(pECLA)_1, IncI1_1_Alpha

1

.

.

.

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F2_1

Singleton

IncFIA(HI1)_1_HI1, IncHI1A_1, IncHI1B(R27)_1_R27

4

Y

.

.

.

.

.

.

Y

Y

.

Y

.

F3_6

Singleton

IncX1_1, IncX3_1

2

.

.

.

.

Y

.

Y

.

.

.

.

.

F5_3

Singleton

None

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

F9_2

Singleton

IncFIB(pHCM2)_1_pHCM2

0

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Circularized plasmid descriptions

We resolved 22 circularized plasmids and one linear plasmid with a very high coverage but which could not be circularized (sample 8). The circularized plasmid sizes were highly variable (3.365–190.3 kb); five plasmids were less than 10 kb and 12 exceeded 100 kb (Supplementary Data 2). Coding proportions were stable across all samples except for plasmid F4_7, which displayed a considerably lower coding proportion (0.585). Variation in GC% variation was observed (0.448–0.552). Sixteen plasmids contained an oriC, and both F2_2 and F3_6 contained three oriC copies. Comparatively, 19 plasmids contained an oriT. The plasmids F2_1, F5_3 and F9_2 lacked both an oriT and oriC.

Plasmid clustering of circularized plasmids

Circularized plasmids (n=22) plus plasmid 8_22 clustered into one of four groups (A–D) or were singletons (Table 2, Supplementary Data 2). Group A comprised five plasmids (F1_2, F4_2, F6_1, F7_2 and F9_3); Group B four plasmids (F1_17, F4_7, F7_6 and F9_5); Group C three plasmids (F3_4, F5_2 and F8_22); and Group D five plasmids (F1_1, F2_2, F4_1, F5_1 and F9_1). All other plasmids were singletons (n=5). A range of replicons were present across the plasmids (Supplementary Data 3). Replicon types were generally consistant within cluster groups: Group A: IncB/O/K/Z_2, Group B: Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1, Group C: IncN_1 and Group D: IncFIB – within this group plasmid F2_2 also contained IncFIA and IncFIC replicons. The remaining six plasmids contained Col440II_1 (F1_18), IncFII and IncI1 (F1_3), IncFIA, IncHIA and IncHIB (F2_1), IncX1 and IncX3 (F3_6), no replicon type (F5_3), and FIB (F9_2). Col440II_1 and ColRNAI_1 plasmids were less than 7 kb. The plasmids between 40 and 50 kb were either IncN or IncW and those greater than 100 kb were IncB/O/K/2, IncF or IncH. This demonstrates the wide range of plasmid types identified across the samples and with similar AMR profiles. There was no correlation between replicon type and resistance phenotype or genotype.

Resistance profiling of circularized plasmids

Beta-lactam resistance genes were identified in 15 of 23 plasmids, ten of which (all Group D, C, and singleton plasmids F1_3, F3_4 and F3_6) contained the penicillinase blaTEM, and five (all Group A) contained ESBL blaSHV-2 (Supplementary Data 4). No plasmid contained both blaTEM and blaSHV. Tetracycline-resistant genotypes were observed in plasmids F5_1 via tetA alone, both tetA and tetB in F1_1, and in F2_1, F4_1 and F9_1 via tetB and tetC. The tetracycline resistance repressor gene tetR(B) and the tetC genes were detected beside the tetB genes and the tetR(A) gene beside the tetA gene in F5_1. Plasmid F1_1 contained only the tetR(B) gene. Plasmids F5_2 and F8_22 contained the tet(C) and tetR(A) genes and F3_4 contained only the tetR(A) repressor. Aminoglycoside resistance genes aph(3’’)-Ib and aph(6)-Id conferring streptomycin resistance were observed together (F1_1, F4_1, F5_1, F9_1). Plasmid F2_1 contained aadA22 and F5_1 also contained aadA1, both of which confer resistance to streptomycin and spectinomycin. Three singleton plasmids displayed trimethoprim resistance genotypes: F3_6 via dfrA8, F5_1 via dfrA1 and F9_2 via dfrD. However, neither of the dfrA-containing transconjugants displayed resistance to trimethoprim. Fourteen sequential point mutations were observed between nucleotides 133 and 146, followed by an 11 amino acid deletion event from sites 147–157 in dfrA1. These mutations are at the C terminus of the Dfr Pfam domain (PF00186) and, while the active site is at the N terminus of this domain, the mutations may limit binding potential. No point mutations were detected in dfrA8. Transposon-mediated lincosamide resistance (lnuG) was observed in F2_1. Sulphonamide resistance sul1 genes were observed in plasmids: F2_1 (singleton) and F5_1 (Group D). Both were adjacent to the QACs efflux SMR transporter qacEΔ1. No plasmid-mediated carbapenemase or colistin resistance genes were detected, and thus these plasmids did not confer resistance to the last line of defence antimicrobials. A multidrug (aminoglycoside, β-lactam and tetracycline) resistance genotype (via aph(3’’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, blaTEM and tetA) was observed in four Group D plasmids. The exception was plasmid F2_2, which contained only blaTEM. Plasmid F5_1 (Group D) additionally contained sulphonamide and trimethoprim resistance genes. Group B plasmids, F1_17, F4_7, F7_6, F9_5 and singletons F1_18 and F5_3 contained no AMR, metal resistance nor virulence genes.

Metal resistance and virulence genes

Metal resistance gene (MRG) abundances varied across plasmids from zero (n=17) to two (F2_1), three (Group D F2_2), four (Group D F1_1, F4_1, F9_1) or 11 (Group D F5_1) (Supplementary Data 5 and 6). Each plasmid with MRGs also contained ARGs. The Group D plasmids comprised the sitABC MRGs conferring resistance towards manganese, iron and hydrogen peroxide with the addition of the merR gene or, in the case of plasmid F5_1, all eight mercury resistance genes (merABCDEPRT) and qacEΔ1. F2_1 contained corA, which confers nickel, cobalt and manganese resistance, and qacEΔ1.

The MRG-positive plasmids also contained virulence factor genes: Group D plasmids (F1_1, F2_2, F4_1 F5_1 and F9_1) and the singleton F2_1. Plasmid F2_1 only contained the astA gene, the genotype for heat-stable enterotoxin 1 production. The Group D plasmids all contained the siderophore (salmochelin) production genotypes via the iroBCDEN cassette and displayed mammalian cell autophagy and phagosome escape protein icsA/sopA. The iss gene was identified across all Group D plasmids and the cvaC gene (colicin V) was detected in F2_2 and F5_1. The iss gene confers increased serum survival, which is important in protecting against phagocytosis. Seventeen plasmids contained no virulence factor genes.

Phage identification

An unidentifiable yet transposable prophage was detected on three Group D plasmids (F1_1, F2_2 and F4_1) (Supplementary Data 7 and 8). Three Myoviridiae phages were observed on three singleton plasmids (F2_1, F5_3 and F9_2). Plasmid F9_2 also contained two individual Siphoviridiae prophages. Containment analyses suggested that all prophages were related to Escherichia–Shigella–Salmonella (ESS) clade phages (Supplementary Data 9), specifically an stx-converting phage. Further inspection of the unidentifiable phages revealed they contained no structural component genes and consisted almost entirely of transposition elements and regulatory machinery, which may indicate a novel intragenomic phage lifecycle (similar to a permanent lysogenic lifecycle without ever entering into the lytic cycle). The phage on F2_2 contained the macrolide resistance genes macA and macB. Further inspection of the Myoviridae prophages in plasmid F5_3 suggest intact prophages with full lytic enzymatic profiles (presence of holin, endolysin and spanin). The Myoviridae phage in F5_3 encompasses 84.38 % of the entire plasmid, suggesting that this plasmid may, in fact, be a circular phage genome or a newly described phage-plasmid [22].

Global plasmid relatedness

The circularized plasmids were compared with all plasmids in PLSDB v.0.1.7 (n=34 513 plasmids) [23]. Most hits were observed to be within Enterobacteriaceae (Supplementary Data 10). E. coli was the most commonly associated host species, except for plasmid F1_18, where Salmonella enterica (n=29) was most prevalent but E. coli was next most prevalent (n=26). When metadata was complete, 15 plasmids (encompassing all of Groups A, C and D, and plasmids F5_3 and F9_2) were most commonly associated with plasmids isolated from human samples (Supplementary Data 10). Seven plasmids (encompassing all of Group B and plasmids F1_18 and F9_5) were most often associated with faecal samples from farm floors, five with pig faeces (F1_17, F1_18, F3_6, F4_7, F7_6), and one each with cow faeces (F7_6) and sheep faeces (F9_5). One plasmid was most commonly associated with river samples (F1_3). All plasmids, except plasmid F5_3, were associated with bird samples (Supplementary Data 10). Plasmid F5_3 was only associated with two human samples, a blaNDM-5 plasmid from E. coli (NZ_AP023208.1), isolated from a Japanese patient with no history of foreign travel, and the other from an Escherichia albertii isolated in the USA (NZ_CP024288) [24].

The list of countries associated with each mapped plasmid extracted from PLSDB metadata was used to annotate a world atlas to visualize the extent of spread (Fig. 1a–e). In total, 63 countries were represented across all non-Antarctic continents. Each plasmid was observed in both the USA and Japan. All plasmids except F5_3 were observed in Canada, China and the UK. These data, as with all genomic data, are biased to include only the countries with data and metadata submitted to online databases. Thus, a lack of observation in a specific country does not necessarily equate to a lack of plasmid. We suggest that this is the first sighting of plasmid F5_3 in Europe and the global dissemination of the other plasmids.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Global distribution world map of countries containing a plasmid from PLSDB associated with each plasmid extracted from the chicken samples.

Temporal analysis of plasmid character state evolution

Drug resistance genotypes seem to be temporally linked, with most prominently used antibiotics correlating with resistance genotypes for given years [25]. Plasmids isolated between 1960 and 1979 were observed to confer resistance to aminoglycosides [ANT(3'')-IIa, APH(3'')-Ib, APH(3')-Ia and APH(3'')-IIa], β-lactams (blaOXA-2, blaTEM-1, blaTEM-150), phenicols (via catI), sulfonamides (sul1 and sul2) and tetracyclines [tet(A) and tet(B)]. Comparatively, non-OXA-mediated ESBL resistance (blaCTX-M) was not observed until 2001, mirroring previous resistance profile reports.

The mercury resistance mer operon was the most prevalent MRG present across time. Resistance to silver (sil operon), to tellurite (ter operon) and to QACs were also well represented. Resistance to these heavy metals may also confer secondary oxidative stress mitigation [26].

Discussion

AMR surveillance to date has predominantly focused on culturable pathogens, monitoring their phenotypic resistance to a range of antimicrobials and the identification of the genes. Plasmids mediate AMR and MDR gene transfer across bacteria, commensals or pathogenic bacteria of humans, animals and the environment [27]. However, due to difficulties in analysing plasmids most genomic studies have focused on genes or whole genome sequences rather than resolving the plasmid sequences. Our study identified a definitive spread of AMR plasmids across One Health as they all mapped to plasmids identified from human, animal or environmental samples. The lowest coverage of the One Health triangle identified was the environment. However, the number of complete plasmids sequenced from environmental samples is relatively low. This is a large gap in our knowledge as there are few data on the AMR plasmid content of water, soil or plant samples.

Our study demonstrates that the same plasmids have already transferred globally across 63 different countries, as demonstrated by the mapping of the plasmids based on the metadata. This study demonstrates that it is not only the AMR genes or the host pathogens moving across One Health but it is entire plasmids. There was no one specific biomarker that could group the isolated plasmids. There were different AMR genes, different replicon types, and variation across metal resistance and virulence factors. Further studies of plasmids with differing resistance profiles can use our template to explore the global and One Health nature of sequenced plasmids. This will provide novel insight into the global nature of every sequenced plasmid in the future.

The plasmids analysed in this study provide novel insight into the AMR, virulence and metal resistance plasmids present. While the AMR phenotype of the transconjugants included resistance to ciprofloxacin and imipenem, no known ARGs were detected. Thus, these plasmids are a reservoir of novel fluoroquinolone and carbapenem resistance genes. Sequenced plasmids contain a large number of uncharacterized hypothetical genes. Genes conferring resistance to a range of antimicrobials were also identified on the same plasmid. Additionally, multiple plasmids conferring resistance to one or two antimicrobials were detected in the same sample. There are many studies of the ESBL profiles and known ARGs conferring resistance in E. coli globally across One Health but relatively little information about the plasmids conferring ESBL resistance or other AMR in food animals and their link to those identified in humans, other animals or the environment [2]. Comparison of our plasmid sequences with those globally identified their presence in E. coli and other pathogens isolated from humans, other food animals and the environment across time. We identified plasmids lacking AMR, virulence genes or MRGs, which were all colicin E-type plasmids, suggesting the colicin E plasmids were transferred with AMR plasmids. Therefore, the use of antimicrobials may be also selecting colicin plasmids. Colicin has long been known as a plasmid-borne bacteriocin that kills other E. coli cells lacking the same plasmid [28].

Metal resistance and virulence genes associated with human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) and avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) were present in Group D plasmids and sample F2_1 (astA). The virulence factors of APEC include hlyE, cvaC, iss, fimC, tsh, lucC and sitA [29]. However, there is no definitive list of virulence genes common to APEC and while it is the agent of coliobacilliosis it is also a commensal of the poultry gut. The plasmids identified contained only iss, sitA and cvaC (n=2), from the APEC virulence genes. Both iss and cvaC are important virulence factors in neonatal meningitis E. coli (NMEC), which are not present in uropathogenic E. coli but are present in APEC. However, they contained the core ExPEC genes present in NMEC: iroBCDEN, icsA/sopA, sitABCD and hlyF (n=4), one contained iucABCD and iutA, but none contained ompT nor bor. While the virulence factors do not definitively describe the plasmid as conferring virulence in a specific ExPEC, the genes present display the potential to confer virulence to hosts including poultry and humans.

Temporal data sampling was strongly biased towards the past decade, probably due to falling sequencing costs allowing for more frequent analyses, and strongly biased towards Enterobacteriaceae , specifically the genera Escherichia, Salmonella and Shigella . A general trend was observed across all plasmid groups whereby different resistance genes and virulence factors were transiently incorporated and lost over time, suggesting differential evolutionary pressures; however, as the plasmid network is non-transitively retained, these results suggest a highly successful, yet malleable and dynamic, plasmid backbone (Supplementary Data 13–20). Due to the aforementioned bias, the diversity and malleability of these plasmids is most noticeable is samples isolated in the past decade. Despite the global persistence of most plasmid groups, neither resistance nor virulent genotypes seem to be largely geographically enriched.

Three of four plasmid groups (Groups A, C and D) were associated with clinical isolates, and Group B was most commonly associated with agriculture, although all plasmids (except F5_3) were also associated with food products. We detected β-lactam and tetracycline resistance across all samples. These are commonly observed in agricultural isolates so this result is consistent with current knowledge [30]. The presence of Ig domain-like genes within the F9_2 Siphoviridae phage suggests an important role in virulence. These proteins function as invasins and adhesins in both enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) promoting the development of diarrhoeal disease [31].

Conclusions

Our study provides novel insights into the global nature of resistance, virulence and colicin plasmids across the food chain and time. We have provided compelling evidence of the globetrotting nature of AMR plasmids and the need for surveillance to sequence plasmids using our template of analyses for others to expand these data. The AMR plasmids analysed may contain novel ARGs, which remain to be characterized. The analysis of AMR needs to include the investigation of plasmids globally to truly identify the risk to animal, human and environmental health from AMR and potential for co-selection by the use of QACs or metals.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary material 1

Funding information

This work was supported by a Ph.D. studentship (SD) and research fellowship (RL) from Alltech.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical statement

The birds were raised and fed under typical commercial production conditions, receiving feed and water ad libitum. Animals were euthanized in accordance with humane killing protocols as set forth in European Union Council Regulation (EC) 1099/2009.

Footnotes

Abbreviations: AMR, antimicrobial resistance; ANI, average nucleotide identity; APEC, avian pathogenic E. coli; ARG, antimicrobial resistance gene; EHEC, enterohaemorrhagic E. coli; EPEC, enteropathogenic E. coli; ESBL, extended spectrum beta-lactamase; ESS, EscherichiaShigellaSalmonella; ExPEC, extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli; FAO, Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations; MDR, multi-drug resistance; MRG, metal resistance gene; NMEC, neonatal meningitis E. coli; OIE, World Organisation for Animal Health; QAC, quaternary ammonium compound; QC, quality control; QRDR, quinolone resistance region; WHO, World Health Organisation.

All supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. Supplementary material is available with the online version of this article.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization Prioritization of pathogens to guide discovery, research and development of new antibiotics for drug-resistant bacterial infections, including tuberculosis. 2017. ISBN 978-92-4-002643-8.
  • 2.European Food Safety Authority. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control The european union summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2018/2019. EFSA J. 2021;19:e06490. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Delaney S, Murphy R, Walsh F. A comparison of methods for the extraction of plasmids capable of conferring antibiotic resistance in a human pathogen from complex broiler Cecal samples. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1731. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility. CLSI Document M100S. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. M100. p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.GitHub - rrwick/Filtlong: quality filtering tool for long reads. https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong n.d.
  • 6.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schwengers O, Jelonek L, Dieckmann MA, Beyvers S, Blom J, et al. Bakta: rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification. Microb Genom. 2021;7 doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pal C, Bengtsson-Palme J, Rensing C, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. BacMet: antibacterial biocide and metal resistance genes database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D737–43. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seemann T. Abricate. Github. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate
  • 12.Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, et al. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D694–7. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Leigh RJ, McKenna C, McWade R, Lynch B, Walsh F. Comparative genomics and pangenomics of vancomycin resistant and susceptible Enterococcus faecium from Irish hospitals across 20 years. Microbiology. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.11.22.469549. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Zankari E, Allesøe R, Joensen KG, Cavaco LM, Lund O, et al. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:2764–2768. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:132. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0997-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Galata V, Fehlmann T, Backes C, Keller A. PLSDB: a resource of complete bacterial plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D195–D202. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:2567–2572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409727102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Starikova EV, Tikhonova PO, Prianichnikov NA, Rands CM, Zdobnov EM, et al. Phigaro: high-throughput prophage sequence annotation. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:3882–3884. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kitts PA, Church DM, Thibaud-Nissen F, Choi J, Hem V, et al. Assembly: a resource for assembled genomes at NCBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D73–80. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liakopoulos A, Mevius D, Ceccarelli D. A review of SHV extended-spectrum β-lactamases: neglected yet ubiquitous. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1374. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pfeifer E, Moura de Sousa JA, Touchon M, Rocha EPC. Bacteria have numerous distinctive groups of phage-plasmids with conserved phage and variable plasmid gene repertoires. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:2655–2673. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmartz GP, Hartung A, Hirsch P, Kern F, Fehlmann T, et al. PLSDB: advancing a comprehensive database of bacterial plasmids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D273–D278. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Schroeder MR, Juieng P, Batra D, Knipe K, Rowe LA, et al. High-quality complete and draft genome sequences for three Escherichia spp. and three Shigella spp. Generated with pacific biosciences and illumina sequencing and optical mapping. Genome Announc. 2018:e01384–17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01384-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ventola CL. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P T. 2015;40:277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taylor DE. Bacterial tellurite resistance. Trends Microbiol. 1999;7:111–115. doi: 10.1016/s0966-842x(99)01454-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Djordjevic SP, Stokes HW, Roy Chowdhury P. Mobile elements, zoonotic pathogens and commensal bacteria: conduits for the delivery of resistance genes into humans, production animals and soil microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:86. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cascales E, Buchanan SK, Duché D, Kleanthous C, Lloubès R, et al. Colicin biology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:158–229. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00036-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sarowska J, Futoma-Koloch B, Jama-Kmiecik A, Frej-Madrzak M, Ksiazczyk M, et al. Virulence factors, prevalence and potential transmission of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from different sources: recent reports. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:10. doi: 10.1186/s13099-019-0290-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thanner S, Drissner D, Walsh F. Antimicrobial resistance in agriculture. mBio. 2016;7:e02227–15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02227-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bodelón G, Palomino C, Fernández LÁ. Immunoglobulin domains in Escherichia coli and other enterobacteria: from pathogenesis to applications in antibody technologies. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:204–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Articles from Microbial Genomics are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES