Abstract
Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary is a rare benign sex-cord stromal tumor that affects primarily young females. In a series of six patients (mean 24,6, median 19 years) findings of six MRIs and one CT were analyzed. Unilateral tumors ranging from 6 to 8 cm were found in all patients. The tumors were well encapsulated and polylobulated. The morphology was mixed solid and cystic in three and solid in three patients. In CT, a hypervascular tumor with centripetal enhancement was seen. In MRI T 2 weighted imaging showed low signal intensity of the solid tissue in all cases and low diffusion-weighted imaging signal of the solid tissue in high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in three patients. Contrast enhancement was avid with extension from the periphery in all patients. Knowledge of these distinct radiological features of sclerosing stromal tumor is important, as in the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System risk classification system this may be scored as Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System 5. Because of its non-aggressive clinical course, pre-operative imaging assists to avoid unnecessary extensive surgery and to preserve the patient’s fertility by only resecting the tumor and preserving the ovary. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary presents pathognomonic features in MRI that allow a specific pre-operative diagnosis and selecting candidates for fertility-sparing surgery.
Introduction
Sclerosing stromal tumor is a rare benign sex-cord stromal tumor of the ovary that affects primarily young females under the age of 30. 1,2 It accounts for less than 5% of all ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors 2 and was first described by Chalvarijan and Scully in 1973. 3 Patients usually present with menstrual irregularities 4 and/or abdominal pain. 2 Ascites is only found in a minority of cases. 5 It has distinct radiological features and a non-aggressive clinical course. No malignant forms have been reported in the literature so far and surgical resection is the treatment of choice. 2,6
Ultrasound findings are usually non-specific and may overlap with those of malignant ovarian tumors, therefore further imaging evaluation with CT or MRI is usually required. 2
Most published literature on sclerosing stromal tumors of the ovary focuses mainly on the histological and immunohistochemical features of this tumor entity, 7,8 and only a few published articles focus on its imaging findings, particularly on CT and MRI correlation. 1,5,6
Furthermore, to our knowledge our series of six cases is among the largest series described in the literature. 9
Case report
A 21-year-old female nullipara patient was referred to our hospital in Salzburg by her gynecologist for an incidentally detected adnexal mass on a routine examination. The patient denied any abdominal pain or menstrual irregularities. Transvaginal ultrasound depicted an adnexal mass arising from the right ovary, with mixed solid and cystic components, measuring 5,5 × 4,6 cm. Free fluid was seen in the Douglas cul-de-sac. β-HCG was negative (<1 U l−1) and no signs of inflammation were present at admission. Tumor markers were also negative (carcinoembryonic antigen = 0,6 µg l−1 and CA 12–5 = 18 U ml−1).
Hormone tests were also performed, and a slight increase in testosterone was detected (0,65 ng ml−1) (normal values range between 0,08 and 0,48). Follicle-stimulating hormone, Luteinizing hormone, prolactin, progesterone and estradiol E2 were within normal ranges.
CT in the portal venous phase showed a 6 cm polylobulated mass of the right ovary with intralesional calcifications, a central cystic component and avid peripheral contrast enhancement (Figure 1). The left ovary, uterus and rectum/sigmoid colon were slightly displaced by the tumor but were otherwise unremarkable. No pathological lymph nodes or distant metastases could be detected. Only a small amount of free fluid (<1 cm) was present.
Figure 1.
Axial contrast-enhanced CT shows a 6 cm mass in the right adnexal region with centrally located calcifications, a central cystic component and avid contrast peripheral enhancement.
Further work-up with MRI including dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences was performed (Figure 2). T 2 weighted images (T 2WI) showed a heterogenous hypointense solid tumor with a hyperintense central region and a hypointense capsule. No intralesional hemorrhage or areas of restricted diffusion were found. After intravenous contrast injection, the lesion showed early and avid peripheral contrast enhancement with centripetal progression on the following sequences. Time–intensity curve demonstrated enhancement higher than myometrium (Figure 3). The normal ovarian parenchyma was compressed laterally. No infiltration of other organs, such as the rectum/sigmoid colon, could be detected. The uterus and the left ovary were unremarkable as well.
Figure 2.

Axial T 2 weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI (b-value = 1200 s/mm2) shows a heterogenous solid mass with a cystic central area, hypointense septa, hypointense capsule and no areas of restricted diffusion.
Figure 3.
Axial T 1 weighted image with fat suppression before and after intravenous contrast injection showing no evidence of internal hemorrhage and a Type 3 intensity curve in the periphery of the tumor that is earlier and higher than the enhancement of the outer myometrium (orange vs blue graph).
Laparoscopic adnexectomy of the right ovary was performed and further histological and immunohistochemical examination confirmed the diagnosis of a sclerosing stromal tumor of the right ovary. Immunohistochemically, the sample showed typical positivity for Inhibin where else focal expression of Desmin could, among others, not be detected. No malignant cells could be detected in the sample. The patient was discharged clinically well 2 days after the surgery. Follow-up with ultrasound within 1 year was recommended.
Comparison with five other cases of sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary at our institutions
At our departments in Salzburg and Lisbon, six cases of this tumor entity were observed in the last few years.
All patients were aged between 14 and 33-years-old (mean 24,6 years, median 19 years) and had a unilateral tumor ranging between 6 and 8 cm in size (mean 7 cm, median 7 cm).
Three tumors originated from the left ovary and the others from the right ovary (Table 1).
Table 1.
The six cases of sclerosing stromal tumors in detail
| Age in years | Side | Size in cm | Morphology | Polylobulated and thin capsule | Contrast enhancement | Signal of solid parts on T 2WI and DWI (b > 800) | Pelvic fluid | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 10 | 14 | Left | 8 | Solid | Yes | Avid | Low | <1 cm | |
| Case 2 | 15 | Left | 7 | Solid-cystic | Yes | Avid | Low | >1 cm | |
| Case 3 | 18 | Left | 7 | Solid | Yes | Avid | Low | Low | No |
| Case 4 11 | 20 | Right | 8 | Solid | Yes | Avid | Low | Low | <1 cm |
| Case 5 | 21 | Right | 6 | Solid-cystic | Yes | Avid | Low | Low | <1 cm |
| Case 6 | 33 | Right | 6 | Solid-cystic | Yes | Avid | Low | No | |
MRI protocol included T 1- and T 2 weighted sequences in multiple planes as well as T 1 weighted sequences with fat-suppression after intravenous contrast injection. In three cases, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was also performed.
In all cases, tumors were polylobulated, had a well-defined capsule and showed avid contrast enhancement. Three of these tumors were mixed solid-cystic and three tumors were purely solid. Only in one case (16,6 %), pathological amount of free fluid was seen in the Douglas cul-de-sac
Pathology
In the literature, typical pathologic features are described. This tumor entity often shows a mixture of cellular and cystic areas, as well as densely packed myxoid and collagenous tissue (Figure 4). Enlarged vessels can be found in between these elements. Edematous ovarian cortical stroma usually surrounds the tumor. This combination of different types of tissue in the tumor is called a “pseudolobular pattern” resulting from alternating cellular and hypocellular areas and correlates with the typical imaging features on T 2 weighted images and the avid enhancement of contrast 1,12 (Table 2). Expression of Inhibin as it is in our patient is among others also often described in literature. 13
Figure 4.
Pathologic specimen showing a mixture of cellular areas, cystic areas as well as densely packed myxoid and collagenous tissue.
Table 2.
CT and MRI features of sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. 2,5
| Age | Females under the age of 30 |
|---|---|
| Morphologic and structural features | Polylobulated tumor Inhomogeneous T 2WI and DWI hypointense solid parts Solid-cystic or solid Centrally located intralesional calcifications |
| Contrast enhancement | Avid contrast enhancement from the periphery to the center |
| Other features | Most often unilateral, rarely bilateral Rarely associated with ascites |
DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; T 2WI, T 2 weighted imaging.
Discussion
Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary represents an extremely rare subtype of sex cord stromal tumors in young females, typically seen during the second and third decades. In contrast, the more common benign sex cord stromal tumors (fibroma and thecoma) are uncommonly encountered in this age. Patients usually present with menstrual irregularities 4 and/or abdominal pain. 2 The tumor is most likely hormone-inactive, although in some cases, androgenic effects such as virilism were described. 2
Due to their solid or solid-cystic morphology, ultrasonographic findings may mimic a malignant ovarian tumor. 2 Thus, further imaging evaluation, preferably with MRI, is warranted to pre-operatively correctly diagnose this benign tumor entity that has pathognomonic imaging features.
In the literature, only about 200 cases have been described so far. 9
To our knowledge, our series of six cases is one of the largest series described so far, 9,13,14 with only a few of them focusing on the imaging features of this tumor entity.
In the existing publications, this tumor is usually unilateral and described as a heterogenous solid tumor with septa and cystic areas (described as a “spoke-wheel pattern”), inhomogeneous T 2WI hypointense solid parts, a thin capsule and early avid contrast enhancement extending from the periphery to the center (Table 2). This centripetal enhancement pattern has been described as hemangioma-like and was seen in all our above-mentioned cases. 2,4
Our series also includes the DWI findings in three cases, with low signal intensity (SI) on high b-values, due to its benign stromal nature. In other case-reports that included DWI, no areas of restriction were also found. 15–17 According to the recently published O-RADS MRI risk classification system, Class 2 lesions (likely benign) also include solid tumors with unique features of low SI on T 2WI and on DWI, frequently related to ovarian fibromas and thecomas. Sclerosing stromal tumors do not classify as O-RADS 2 lesions as they demonstrate inhomogeneous hypointense signal on T 2WI. Furthermore, due to their contrast enhancement (higher than that of the myometrium) they have to be classified as O-RADS 5, which is associated with a high risk of malignancy (positive-predictive value 90%). However, in addition to assigning a score predictive for malignancy, O-RADS acknowledges that the final diagnosis may be suggested in cases of classical imaging findings (e.g. lymphoma, granulosa cell tumors, peritoneal pseudocysts etc.). We consider that sclerosing stromal tumors could be included in this list. 18
Because this is a benign tumor with a non-aggressive clinical course, the primary aim of pre-operative imaging is to avoid unnecessary extensive surgery and to preserve the patient’s fertility by only resecting the tumor and preserving the ovary. 19
The differential diagnosis of sclerosing stromal tumors of the ovary in young females should include other sex cord stromal tumors such as thecomas, malignant germ cell and epithelial tumors, lymphoma and metastases 6,11,20,21 (Table 3). Like in our cases, these differential diagnoses can usually be excluded due to the characteristic imaging findings of this tumor entity in CT and MRI.
Table 3.
Differential diagnostic features of solid ovarian tumors in pre-menopausal women 20,21
| Age (yrs) | Laterality | CT | MRI | Typical or additional features | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sclerosing stromal tumor | <30 | Unilateral | Solid with cystic areas, avid contrast uptake | Low on T2 and DWI*, avid contrast uptake | Rim like contrast enhancement |
| Thecoma | All ages | Unilateral | Homogenous, delayed enhancement | Low on T2 and DWI*, typically hypovascular | |
| Dysgermin-oma | 20–30 | Unilateral | Multinodular, enhancing septa, speckled calcifications | Intermediate on DWI*, high SI on DWI, enhancing septa | Often large, serum LDH elevation |
| Granulosa cell tumor | <30 | Unilateral | Variable from solid to purely cystic | Intermediate on T2, high SI on DWI*, intermediate to high contrast uptake | Sponge like appearance, estrogenic effects |
| Immature teratoma | <20 | Unilateral | Predominantly solid, large, heterogenous, small foci of fat and scattered calcifications | Tiny areas of high SI on T1 in a solid mass, high on DWI* | Serum AFP elevation, may coexist with benign teratoma |
| Ovarian cancer | >20 | Uni- or bilateral | Solid or cystic and solid | Intermediate on T2, high SI on DWI*, intermediate to high contrast uptake | Borderline tumors may precede, familial predisposition |
| Metastases | Premenopausal | Often bilateral | Multinodular surface, minimal to moderate enhancement | Intermediate on T2, high SI on DWI*, intermediate to high contrast uptake | Breast or stomach cancer, often small |
| Lymphoma | All ages | Uni- or bilateral | Well defined, hypovascular | Homogeneous, low to intermediate SI on T2, high SI on DWI*, low ADC | Mostly B cell lymphoma, extremely rare, lymphadenopathy |
ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; AFP, alpha fetoprotein; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; SI, signal intensity.
DWI*: using high b-value (800–1000 s/mm2).
Due to the young age of these patients, and in order to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure, MRI is the preferred imaging modality.
Conclusion
Sclerosing stromal tumor is a rare benign sex-cord stromal tumor of the ovary affecting mainly young females displaying characteristic imaging features on MRI and CT. 2 Because of its benign nature, pre-operative diagnosis with CT or MRI is pivotal in order to avoid extensive surgery and preserve patient’s fertility. 19
Learning points
Sclerosing stromal tumor is a rare benign sex-cord stromal tumor of the ovary affecting mainly young females displaying characteristic imaging features on MRI and CT.
This tumor is usually unilateral, a heterogenous solid tumor with septa and cystic areas (“spoke-wheel pattern”), inhomogeneous T 2WI hypointense solid parts and early avid contrast enhancement extending from the periphery to the center (hemangioma-like enhancement pattern).
Because of its benign nature, preoperative diagnosis with CT or MRI is pivotal to avoid extensive surgery and preserve patient’s fertility.
Footnotes
Patient consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report, including accompanying images.
Contributor Information
Christof Mittermair, Email: c.mittermair@salk.at.
Teresa Margarida Cunha, Email: tmargarida@gmail.com.
Romana Urbas, Email: romana.urbas@salzburg.gv.at.
Horst Koch, Email: ho.koch@salk.at.
Rosemarie Forstner, Email: r.forstner@salk.at.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tian T, Zhu Q, Chen W, Wang S, Sui W, Wu J. CT findings of sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2016; 11: 3817–20. doi: 10.3892/ol.2016.4441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Horta M, Cunha TM. Sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary: a comprehensive review and update for radiologists. Diagn Interv Radiol 2015; 21: 277–86. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.34414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chalvardjian A, Scully RE. Sclerosing stromal tumors of the ovary. Cancer 1973; 31: 664–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197303)31:3<664::AID-CNCR2820310327>3.0.CO;2-F [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Torricelli P, Caruso Lombardi A, Boselli F, Rossi G. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: US, CT, and MRI findings. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27: 588–91. doi: 10.1007/s00261-001-0096-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jung SE, Rha SE, Lee JM, Park SY, Oh SN, Cho KS, et al. CT and MRI findings of sex cord-stromal tumor of the ovary. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 207–15. doi: 10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim JY, Jung K-J, Chung DS, Kim OD, Lee JH, Youn SK. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: MR-pathologic correlation in three cases. Korean J Radiol 2003; 4: 194–9. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2003.4.3.194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Atram M. Anshu, Sharma S, Gangane N. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2014; 57: 405–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bairwa S, Satarkar RN, Kalhan S, Garg S, Sangwaiya A, Singh P. Sclerosing stromal tumor: a rare ovarian neoplasm. Iran J Pathol 2017; 12: 402–5. doi: 10.30699/ijp.2017.28321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ozdemir O, Sarı ME, Sen E, Kurt A, Ileri AB, Atalay CR. Sclerosing stromal tumour of the ovary: a case report and the review of literature. Niger Med J 2014; 55: 432–7. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.140391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Loureiro A, Cunha T, Félix A. Case 10870 - Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. Eurorad – European Radiology Online Database. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Palmeiro MM, Cunha TM, Loureiro AL, Esteves G. A rare benign ovarian tumour. BMJ Case Rep 2016; 2016: bcr2015214101. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-214101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Doi J, Kudo S, Matsuguchi K, Sugimori H. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: radiologic findings. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1335–8. doi: 10.1007/s003300050844 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zekioglu O, Ozdemir N, Terek C, Ozsaran A, Dikmen Y. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of sclerosing stromal tumours of the ovary. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282: 671–6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1373-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Qureshi A, Raza A, Kayani N. The morphologic and immunohistochemical spectrum of 16 cases of sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010; 53: 658–60. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.72017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Matsutani H, Nakai G, Yamada T, Yamamoto K, Ohmichi M, Narumi Y. Diversity of imaging features of ovarian sclerosing stromal tumors on MRI and PET-CT: a case report and literature review. J Ovarian Res 2018; 11: 101. doi: 10.1186/s13048-018-0473-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ito K, Tanaka YO, Watanabe R, Tanaka H, Takazawa Y, Matsueda K. Variable distribution of Pseudolobules in ovarian sclerosing stromal tumors: utility of diffusion-weighted imaging for differential diagnosis. Magn Reson Med Sci 2018; 17: 107–8. doi: 10.2463/mrms.ci.2016-0135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tomimatsu T, Fukuda Y, Mimura K, Yoshino K, Kato H, Tsuboyama T, et al. Intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by a benign sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 55: 893–4. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Thomassin-Naggara I, Poncelet E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Guerra A, Fournier LS, Stojanovic S, et al. Ovarian-Adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of Sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e1919896. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Furukawa S, Kanno K, Kojima M, Ohara M, Soeda S, Suzuki S, et al. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary treated with 2-incision total laparoscopic cystectomy. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 9: 72–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.02.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thomassin-Naggarra I, Fedida B, Kermarrec E. Adnexal masses: characterization of benign adnexal masses. In: Forstner R, Cunha T. M, Hamm B, eds. MRI and CT of the female pelvis. 2nd edn. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. pp. 273–86. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schlattau A, Cunha T, Forstner R. Adnexal masses: benign ovarian lesions and characterization. In: Forstner R, Cunha T. M, Hamm B, eds.MRI and CT of the female pelvis. 2nd edn. Switzerland: Springer; 2019. pp. 241–72. [Google Scholar]



