Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2022 Aug 29;29(47):70674–70685. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22764-9

Effects of air pollution on myopia: an update on clinical evidence and biological mechanisms

Tianyi Yuan 1, Haidong Zou 1,2,3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC9515022  PMID: 36031679

Abstract

Myopia is one of the most common forms of refractive eye disease and considered as a worldwide pandemic experienced by half of the global population by 2050. During the past several decades, myopia has become a leading cause of visual impairment, whereas several factors are believed to be associated with its occurrence and development. In terms of environmental factors, air pollution has gained more attention in recent years, as exposure to ambient air pollution seems to increase peripheral hyperopia defocus, affect the dopamine pathways, and cause retinal ischemia. In this review, we highlight epidemiological evidence and potential biological mechanisms that may link exposure to air pollutants to myopia. A thorough understanding of these mechanisms is a key for establishing and implementing targeting strategies. Regulatory efforts to control air pollution through effective policies and limit individual exposure to preventable risks are required in reducing this global public health burden.

Keywords: Myopia, Air pollution, Peripheral hyperopia defocus, Dopamine, Retinal ischemia

Introduction

Myopia (short-sightedness or near-sightedness) is defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) ≤  − 0.5diopters (D)(Baird et al. 2020). The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes that individuals with myopia are at a substantially increased risk of potentially blinding myopic pathologies that are not prevented by optical correction (Morgan et al. 2012). The pathologic complications include myopic macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, cataract, and glaucoma (Pan et al. 2012). For more than one third of adults, myopia can progress during the third decade of life (Lee et al. 2022). The continuous progression of myopia may result in significant reductions in work, educational productivity, and overall quality of life. However, approximately 2 billion individuals (28.3% of the global population) are diagnosed with myopia worldwide, and its prevalence is estimated to increase to 4.76 billion individuals (49.8% of the global population) by 2050 (Baird et al. 2020; Morgan et al. 2018). The cumulative incidence of myopia among Chinese school-aged children and adolescents has increased consistently, reaching 91.3% (minimum to maximum: 83.7–96.7%) upon graduation from high school (Chen et al. 2021). The causes of this pandemic remain unclear. The commonly agreed underlying mechanisms are peripheral hyperopia defocus, dopamine (DA) pathway, and retinal ischemia (Fig. 1). Such mechanisms are affected by air pollutants and may potentially link myopia to air pollution.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

The underlying pathways of myopia pathogenesis. The clear “123” indicates the vision of emmetropia, while the blurred one represents myopia. When the peripheral hyperopia defocus occurs, the incoming light rays are focused behind the retina surface and axial growth is lengthened owing to the tissue remodeling of the sclera. The axial elongation can also be promoted by the hypoxia marker upregulated by retinal ischemia, while inhibited by the release of retinal dopamine. DA dopamine

Air pollution is a complex mixture of gaseous components and particulate matter (PM) suspended in air (Miyazaki et al. 2020). Gaseous pollutants include carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and ozone (O3) (Ruan et al. 2019). Ambient PMs are emitted by the combustion of fossil fuels or natural sources, such as volcanic eruptions and wildfires (Miyazaki et al. 2020). PMs are categorized by their diameter: particulate matter 10 (PM10), particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5), and ultrafine PMs (Miyazaki et al. 2020; Gao et al. 2019). A report from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development indicated that outdoor air pollution could cost $2.6 trillion a year, by 2060 (Bai et al. 2018). According to the WHO, approximately seven million individuals die from air pollution annually (Areal et al. 2022). There are regions of the world, notably in Asia, that bear the greatest disease burden from air pollution (The 2017). Exposure to air pollution has been associated with asthma, cognitive functioning, neurodegenerative diseases, dry eye disease, blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and cataracts (Orru et al. 2017; Schraufnagel et al. 2019). In fact, many epidemiological evidences have proved greater air pollutant concentrations to be strongly associated with an increased likelihood of myopia (Yang et al. 2021; Ruan et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2019; Dadvand et al. 2017).

In this review, we summarize the currently available data on the association between air pollution and myopia for the lack of a comprehensive review on this topic so far. We aim to explore the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms hoping to inspire future research and provide more insights into the clean-air regulation efforts for governments.

Epidemiological evidence of ambient air pollutant exposure on myopia

Several air pollutants are positively correlated with the incidence of myopia (Ruan et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2019; Dadvand et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2021), as shown in Table 1. PM2.5, particles ≤ 2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter, are primarily produced by motor vehicles, power plants, and other combustion sources (Adar et al. 2010). The small size of PM2.5 makes them particularly deleterious to health, causing respiratory and cardiovascular morbidity. Wei et al. (2019) conducted a retrospective cohort study including 97,306 children aged 6–12 years and found that those who were exposed to higher PM2.5 concentrations had a higher cumulative incidence of myopia. A cohort study of 61,995 children in 7 Chinese provinces/municipalities reported the associations of PMs between prevalent visual impairment and visual acuity levels (Yang et al. 2021). Similar observations made by Dadvand et al. (2017) suggested that there was an increase in the likelihood of myopia (as surrogated by spectacle use) associated with exposure to residential PM2.5 absorbance. To confirm the relationship between PM2.5 and myopia, Wei et al. (2019) treated 3-week-old hamsters with 100 μg/mL PM2.5 twice a day. After 3 weeks, the hamsters developed myopia (change in refractive error =  − 1.513 ± 2.092 D), whereas the hamsters in the control and PM2.5 + resveratrol groups did not (change in refractive error = 0.913 ± 1.772 D and 0.65 ± 1.36 D, respectively).

Table 1.

Summary of clinical studies on the effects of ambient air pollutant exposure on myopia

Study Type of study Study period and location Sample size Age (years) Environmental exposure measured Outcome measured Findings
Wei et al. (2019) Retrospective cohort study 2000–2012, Taiwan, China 97,306 children 6–12 Daily average concentrations of PM2.5 and NOx calculated from the air quality-monitoring data Myopia mentioned at least two times by an ophthalmologist The incidence rate of myopia increased with exposure to PM2.5 and NOx from 15.8 to 24.5 and from 13.7 to 34.4 per 1000 person-years
Ruan et al. (2019) Cross-sectional survey 2007–2010, South Africa, Ghana, Mexico, China, India, and the Russian Federation 33,626 adults  ≥ 50 Annual concentrations of fine PM2.5 and O3 estimated with the satellite data and chemical transport model At least one of the following three standards: (1) have been diagnosed as myopia by a medical professional; (2) have a good near vision but distant objects appear blurred; (3) must wear contact lenses or eyeglasses to see distant object

J-shaped associations between PM2.5 and O3 concentrations with myopia

The adjusted prevalence ratio identified as 1.12 and 1.26 for each standard deviation increase in PM2.5 and O3 concentrations above their threshold
Dadvand et al. (2017) Cross-sectional analyses 2012–2015, Barcelona, Spain 2727 schoolchildren 7–10

NO2 and PM2.5 light absorbance at home predicted by land-use regression models

NO2 and black carbon at school light absorbance measured by monitoring campaigns

 The use of spectacles An IQR increase in NO2 level at home and school associated with 16% and 32% increase in spectacle use
Longitudinal analyses 1812 schoolchildren The residential exposure to PM2.5 absorbance and school exposure to BC absorbance getting stronger compared to those of cross-sectional analyses
Yang et al. (2021) Cross-sectional study 2013, 7 provinces or municipalities in China 61,995 children 6–18 PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 estimated at a 0.1° × 0.1° resolution using machine learning methods Visual impairment defined the unaided distance visual acuity lower than or equal to 4.9 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.10 or Snellen 5/6 equivalent) in the worse eye The IQR increase in PM2.5, PM10, and NO2 associated with a 1.267-, 1.142-, and 1.276-fold increased odds of visual impairment
Open in a new tab

PM2.5 particulate matter 2.5, PM10 particulate matter 10, NOx nitrogen oxides, O3 ozone, NO2 nitrogen dioxide, BC black carbon, IQR interquartile range.

NOx is a collective expression of nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which transform into each other in the atmosphere. They are primarily emitted from power stations, motor vehicles, and other industrial combustion processes (Gao et al. 2022). Yang et al. reported that long-term exposure to NO2 was associated with increased odds of visual impairment (Yang et al. 2021). The cross-sectional analyses conducted by Dadvand et al. (2017) observed that an increase in NO2 levels at home and school was associated with an increase in spectacle use and a higher risk of myopia. Similar conclusions were drawn for NOx concentrations (Wei et al. 2019).

Ground-level O3 is a typical secondary pollutant produced by photochemical reactions and is a potent greenhouse gas with both direct and indirect effects on human health (Luo et al. 2021; Xu et al. 2022; Montes et al. 2022). Ruan et al. (2019) discovered a synergistic interaction of two air pollutants on myopia, and the joint effect of high PM2.5 and high O3 on myopia (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23, 1.73) was greater than the sum of their individual effects with a synergistic index of 1.81 (95% CI: 0.92, 4.94).

Although current studies are limited and include different air pollutants, they have all revealed a strong correlation between air pollution and myopia.

Potential biological mechanisms of air pollutants on myopia

Eyes are exposed to ambient air pollution, making them prime vulnerable targets for the adverse effects of such exposure. O3 is linked to the overexpression of conjunctival interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Jung et al. 2018), which are two typical inflammatory cytokines that initiate ocular inflammation. PM and NOx can stimulate the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals, which lead to oxidative stress (Lasagni Vitar et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2019). Prolonged elevated levels of ROS can result in redox disruption of metabolic, signaling, and transcription processes, which cause oxidative damage to macromolecules in both the cornea and retina (Lasagni Vitar et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2020; Ying et al. 2021).

In this case, the potential pathophysiology of air pollutants on myopia is classified into direct and indirect ways. The direct pathway refers to the direct distribution and concentration of pollutants on the eye and airway, leading to enhanced inflammation which is closely related to peripheral hyperopic scatter and retinal ischemia. The indirect one refers to the decreased release of DA in the eyes caused by less outdoor light and more air pollution.

Indirect pathway: the DA pathway

DA is a neurotransmitter used by a class of amacrine cells that plays an important role in the retina, mediating eye functions such as visual signaling, ocular development, and refractive adjustment (Zhang and Deng 2020; Norton 2016; Zhou et al. 2017). Previous experiments in multiple species have suggested that DA acts as a “stop” signal in progression of myopia. Animal models, including chicks, mice, and primates, have demonstrated that dopaminergic compound administration can retard ocular growth by slowing vitreal chamber elongation and significantly inhibit the development of myopia in a similar dose-dependent manner (Thomson et al. 2020b, 2020a). In mice, this regulation may involve D2 receptors, a DA receptor subtype located in the retina (Huang et al. 2022; Thomson et al. 2020b). The release of retinal DA can participate in the retina-to-sclera signaling cascade, which induces scleral remodeling in response to sunlight stimuli (Grzybowski et al. 2020).

As the main component of sunlight, cumulative ultraviolet (UV) exposure can influence the presence of myopia (Kearney et al. 2019; Williams et al. 2017) through the DA pathways, particularly in adolescence and young adulthood (Williams et al. 2017). In rabbits, the abnormal elongation of the myopic eye was effectively controlled 1 month after ultraviolet A (UVA; a band of UV whose wavelengths range from 315 to 400 nm (Bajgar et al. 2021)) irradiation and almost halted 3 months after treatment (Rong et al. 2017). Similarly, posterior scleral cross-linking induced by riboflavin-UVA can slow the progression of myopia (Han et al. 2021; Lai et al. 2021; Dotan et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017). Serum metabolomic and lipidomic studies carried out by Du et al. (2020) revealed five pathways showing regulatory relationships with D2Rs in myopia: steroid biosynthesis, arginine and proline metabolism, linoleic acid metabolism, alpha-linolenic acid metabolism, and sphingolipid metabolism. Kato et al. (2019) suggested that UVA absorption had a direct effect on fibroblasts of the sclera and cornea. Consequently, solar UV radiation can be related to a change in layer thickness and/or rearrangement inside axons in the nerve fiber layer, as well as the connectivity between several different cell types in the retina to slow down myopic eye growth (Landis et al. 2021; Wirz-Justice et al. 2021; Lingham et al. 2020; Swiatczak et al. 2019).

The reduction in UV exposure that reaches the Earth’s surface occurs during the synthesis and emission of air pollutants (Borysov et al. 2020; Kalluri et al. 2021; Manisalidis et al. 2020, United Nations Environment Programme 2016). It is acknowledged that PM2.5 in the atmosphere can directly reflect solar radiation back into space because the physical properties of particles are strongly curved interfaces (Riva et al. 2021). Black carbon (BC) emitted by wildfires across the globe can persist in the atmosphere for days to weeks owing to its highly adhesive surface (Borysov et al. 2020). Such persistent increases in carbonaceous aerosols would significantly reduce UV radiation by chemical processes, such as oxidation and light-catalyzed reaction (Manisalidis et al. 2020; Guo et al. 2021; United Nations Environment Programme 2016). Owing to the impact of air pollution on UV exposure, it is reasonable to assume that air pollution can lead to myopia through the DA pathways affected by reduced UV exposure.

Direct pathways

Peripheral hyperopia defocus

Peripheral hyperopia defocus indicates that peripheral images are focused behind the retinal surface, whereas the foveal image falls exactly on the retina (Rotolo et al. 2017). Animal experiments have proposed a mechanism in which the retina can “read” the direction of focus of incoming light rays on the retina and affect the choroid to actively change its thickness to move the retina towards the image plane via changes in retinal homeostasis mediated by neurotransmitters (Kubota et al. 2021). If the focal plane is behind the retina in areas of the visual field, axial growth is promoted owing to thinning of the subfoveal choroid (Schaeffel 2017; Kubota et al. 2021). Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that alterations of the focal plane can be related to ocular surface diseases, and the biophysical property changes of corneal cells involved in these diseases may reflect myopia progression, as the cornea contributes more than 60% of the focusing power (Xin et al. 2021).

Previous investigations have revealed a significant association between continuously increasing air pollution and ocular surface disorders, such as uveitis (Bai et al. 2021), keratitis (Sendra et al. 2021), and conjunctivitis (Antonini et al. 2021; Nucci et al. 2017). NO is converted to NO2, followed by the generation of O3 (Miyazaki et al. 2019). NO2 and O3 can directly damage the ocular surface by oxidation (Hong et al. 2016), acidification of tears, allergic sensitization, and chemical modification of aeroallergens (Lu et al. 2021). Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common ocular surface disease that causes dry eye, itching, and burning sensations, and may lead to sight-threatening conditions (Lu et al. 2021). Reports from highly prevalent regions of AC suggest that air pollutants may be associated with increased sensitization (Miyazaki et al. 2020) and can induce or aggravate AC symptoms. Lu et al. (2021) found that the incidence of AC was positively correlated with PM2.5, PM10, CO, NO2, and O3. The number of outpatient visits with AC increased as the concentrations of NO2 (Hong et al. 2016; Wei et al. 2019; Miyazaki et al. 2020), O3 (Hong et al. 2016; Miyazaki et al. 2020), PM2.5 (Mu et al. 2020; Miyazaki et al. 2020), and PM10 (Miyazaki et al. 2020) changed. A correlation between allergic inflammation and subsequent myopia risk has also been established (Lin et al. 2016).

In patients with AC, immune-mediated destruction of the conjunctival epithelium is triggered when the ocular surface encounters environmental antigens. Subsequently, activated T cells and mast cells would specifically target sensitized ocular surface tissues, reduce mucin-secreting cells and break down integrity (Jung et al. 2018; Wei et al. 2018). Additionally, PM and NOx have been suggested to alter the barrier integrity of the cornea due to the induced increase in ROS (Wei et al. 2019; Lasagni Vitar et al. 2019). Overloading of the antioxidative defense system in the conjunctiva leads to the production of inflammatory cytokines (Wolkoff 2017). Wei et al. (2018) verified that TNF-α and IL-6 reduced the levels of claudin-1 and zonula occludens-1 tight junction proteins in the barrier of corneal epithelial cells. Consequently, elevated inflammatory mediator release and corneal injury caused by AC have been proposed as possible mechanisms for increased corneal curvature. Wei et al. (2018) performed a cohort study and confirmed that children with AC had a 2.35-fold higher incidence of myopia than those without AC. They also observed that the rats with AC developed myopia. Additionally, the axial lengths of the eyes with AC were significantly longer than those of the control eyes (Wei et al. 2018). A case–control study conducted by Wang et al. (2021a) reported that patients with AC had an increased risk of keratoconus, which is mainly characterized by progressive corneal thinning and cone-shaped corneal protrusion (Wang et al. 2021a, 2021b; Ahmed et al. 2021). This implies a steeper central cornea and a flatter periphery. The relatively negative spherical aberration in the periphery causes peripheral hyperopia defocus and stimulates eyeball growth (Atchison and Rosén 2016), which, in turn, promotes the development of myopia.

Retinal ischemia

Vascular densities are reported to be significantly negatively correlated with axial length, including the capillaries in the superficial and deep macula, peripapillary area, and choroid (Wang et al. 2021c; Zheng et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2021). Quantitatively measured alterations in retinal vascular diameter may imply a retina abnormality (Chen et al. 2017). The decrease in microvascular density could conceivably lead to reduced metabolic demands in the local retinal region because it serves as a direct source of oxygen and nutrients for retinal pigment epithelium cells and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL). The hypoxic microenvironment has been shown to upregulate the expression of tissue hypoxia marker (Liu et al. 2021) and reduce the density of retinal pigment epithelium cells in the retro-equatorial region, causing a stretch of axial elongation (Wu et al. 2019). Grudzińska et al. (2022, Zheng et al. 2015) found a positive correlation between peak systolic velocity and end-diastolic velocity in the central retinal artery and mean thickness of the RNFL, ganglion cell, and inner plexus layer, and size of the rim area (the area located between the edge of the disc and the physiological cup containing the neural elements). Consequently, it can induce parapapillary RNFL thinning and impair retinal neuroactivity, which regulates the axial growth of eyes early in life. Additionally, special attention has been paid to the less tortuous retinal vessels, which can also cause hypoperfusion of the retina (Zheng et al. 2015).

Clinical investigations (Table 2) showed an inverse association between air pollution concentrations (measured as PM2.5, PM10, BC, O3, and NO2 concentrations) and central retinal arteriolar diameter, one of the first branches of the ophthalmic artery (Zhang et al. 2018; Baldoncini et al. 2019; La Spina et al. 2016). As for PM2.5, 4607 participants were examined in the analysis conducted by Adar et al. (2010), who found that central retinal artery diameter was negatively associated with increased long- and short-term levels of PM2.5. Provost et al. (2017) confirmed that each 10-µg/m3 increase in same-day exposure to PM2.5 was associated with 0.62 μm (95% CI: − 1.12, − 0.12) narrower retinal arterioles in school-aged children in Belgium. PM10 is a 2.5–10-μm-sized aerosol that contains coarse suspended materials, including pollen, fungal spores, and dust, which can serve as allergens or adjuvants (Miyazaki et al. 2020). Louwies et al. (2016, Louwies et al. 2013) suggested that PM10 exposure was associated with retinal arteriolar narrowing and venular widening. BC, a by-product of fuel combustion and one of the most toxic components of PM (Witters et al. 2021; Rabito et al. 2020), is associated with systemic inflammation and oxidative stress (Louwies et al. 2015). Louwies et al. (2013) indicated that there was a decrease in retinal artery diameter for each 1-µg/m3 increase in BC. They also observed a positive association between retinal venules and BC exposure (Louwies et al. 2015). Additionally, Korsiak et al. (2021) indicated that Ox (the combined oxidant capacity of O3 and NO2 using a redox-weighted average) was inversely associated with retinal arteriolar diameter, and the strongest association was observed for a 7-day mean exposure.

Table 2.

Summary of clinical studies on the effects of ambient air pollutant exposure on retinal vessels

Study Study period and location Sample size Age (years) Environmental exposure measured Outcome measured Findings
Adar et al. (2010) 2002–2003, America 4607 adults 45–84 Long-term outdoor concentrations of PM2.5 estimated at each participant’s home using a spatio-temporal model CRAE and CRVE With − 0.8- and − 0.4-µm decreases in CRAE per interquartile increases in long- (3 µg/m3) and short-term (9 µg/m3) PM2.5 levels, respectively
Louwies et al. (2013) January–May 2012, Belgium 84 adults 22–63 PM10 and BC levels measured at a nearby official monitoring station CRAE and CRVE

Each 10-µg/m3 increase in PM10 associated with a 0.93-µm decrease in CRAE and a 0.86-µm decrease in CRVE

Each 1-µg/m3 increase in BC associated with a 1.84-µm decrease in CRAE
Louwies et al. (2015) 1 week between April and May 2013, the north of Belgium 55 healthy nurses 22–59 Personal subchronic BC exposure measured continuously with a portable MicroAeth Model AE51 CRAE and CRVE Increased exposure of 631-ng/m3 BC associated with 5.65-μm increase in CRAE
Louwies et al. (2016) December 2014–April 2015, Flanders, Belgium 50 healthy adults 23–58 PM10 data measured at a nearby monitoring station CRAE and CRVE Each short-term increase of 10 µg/m3 PM10 during the 24 h preceding the study visit associated with a 0.58-µm decrease in CRAE, a 0.99-µm increase in CRVE
Provost et al. (2017) 2012–2014, Flanders, Belgium 221 children 8–12 Recent (same and previous day) and chronic (yearly mean) exposure modeled at the child’s residence using a high-resolution interpolation model Retinal vessel diameters Each 10-µg/m3 increment in same-day exposure to PM2.5 at school associated with 0.35-µm narrower retinal arterioles and 0.35-µm wider venules
Korsiak et al. (2021) 2018–2020, Vancouver Island, Canada 64 children 4–12 Daily mean outdoor PM2.5 concentrations measured by the provincial air monitoring station and Partisol 2025i sequential air sampler; O3 and NO2 measured at the provincial air monitoring site CRAE and CRVE

Ox inversely associated with retinal arteriolar diameter

The strongest association observed for 7-day mean exposures, where each 10-ppb increase in Ox associated with a 2.63-μm decrease in arteriolar diameter

Weak inverse associations observed between PM2.5 and arteriolar diameter only at higher concentrations of Ox
Open in a new tab

PM2.5 particulate matter 2.5, PM10 particulate matter 10, BC black carbon, O3 ozone, NO2 nitrogen dioxide, Ox the combined oxidant capacity of O3 and NO2 using a redox-weighted average, CRAE central retinal artery equivalent, CRVE central retinal vein equivalent.

The biological mechanisms underlying the impact of air pollution on the retinal microvasculature are thought to be related to inflammation and oxidative stress pathways. We propose two possible explanations for this finding.

One mechanism is that systemic microvascular endothelium-dependent dilation affected by pulmonary air pollutant exposure, particularly PM, can be related to changes in retinal blood vessels, as they share great similarities in development and anatomy with the microvasculature of the heart, lungs, and brain (Louwies et al. 2013). There is rapidly developing evidence supporting the role of exposure to air pollution in pulmonary inflammation and subsequent low-grade, systemic inflammation (Marchini et al. 2020; Gao et al. 2020; Li et al. 2019). Louwies et al. (2016) suggested a possible role for PM10 in downregulating the expression of microRNAs extracted from venous blood. Differential regulation of microRNAs involved in oxidative stress and inflammatory processes may have contributed to arteriolar narrowing and venular widening. Animals exposed to different types of particles exhibit thickening of alveolar walls, neutrophil recruitment, and macrophage activation, thus increasing systemic oxidative stress and inflammation response, as well as stimulating the generation of ROS and pro-inflammatory cytokines, which finally enter circulation (de Souza Xavier Costa et al. 2020). The substances involved in these systemic reactions may take some time to affect the reactivity of retinal blood vessels, even several hours after exposure, according to Louwies et al. (2013). For instance, ROS that flows to the retina in the bloodstream leads to endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling and reduces the bioavailability of the vasodilator NO, which contributes to endothelial dysfunction and vasoconstriction (Korsiak et al. 2021; Louwies et al. 2013). These alterations in retinal microcirculation, including arteriolar damage and endothelial dysfunction, create a situation of diminished blood flow and impair retinal neuroactivity consequently (Dadvand et al. 2017; De Boever et al. 2014). In turn, it is a source of chronic oxidative stress and inflammation (Chan et al. 2020).

Another hypothesis is that air pollutants can directly affect ocular development and retinal activity owing to their water solubility, concentration, and ability to oxidize tissues. Ultrafine PMs that can pass through the capillary membrane are readily picked up by cells and induce cellular damage (Schikowski 2022). CO emitted from diesel engine exhaust fumes and traffic congestion (Supharakonsakun et al. 2020) is highly soluble, non-irritating, and readily passes through the bloodstream. The toxicity of CO results from its successful competition with oxygen in binding with hemoglobin, decreasing blood oxygen delivery, and resulting in acute tissue hypoxia (Schikowski 2022; Bertrand et al. 2020), whereas NO also attaches to the hemoglobin and other iron-containing proteins because of its binding affinity (Schikowski 2022). Moreover, as gaso-transmitters in vivo, CO and NO transgress cells and tissues rapidly and react with reactive chemical species causing abnormal biochemical reactions (Mahan 2020). However, whether air pollutants directly participate in hypoxic vasoconstriction requires further investigation.

Additionally, air pollution exposure may trigger an autonomic imbalance that favors a sympathetic response to the smooth muscles surrounding the blood vessels and affects retinal vascular densities (Korsiak et al. 2021; Koch et al. 2020). However, it is still controversial because it does not consider that retinal blood vessels lack functional sympathetic innervations (Louwies et al. 2013).

Other evidence linking air pollution to myopia

Other evidence, in addition to the current studies, suggests that the inflammatory response caused by long-term exposure to air pollution induces local biochemical reactions, resulting in direct tissue remodeling and progression of myopia. For example, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) is a scleral extracellular matrix degradation enzyme, and its activation induces collagen fiber I degradation, followed by loss of scleral connective tissue, together with scleral thinning and weakening, which leads to axial elongation and myopia (Ikeda et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2016). Inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α in the retina may serve as triggers to initiate MMP-2 activity in the retina, followed by sclera (Yuan et al. 2019), causing progressive scleral remodeling and myopia. Moreover, resveratrol, a naturally occurring antioxidant, has been shown to ameliorate myopia development by blocking the relevant signaling pathways of inflammatory effects above (Hsu et al. 2021; Jiang et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2019).

Conclusion

Exposure to ambient air pollution has a significant impact on the development of myopia. Although peripheral hyperopia defocus, the DA pathway, and retinal ischemia are all suggested to play a role (Fig. 2), the detailed mechanisms by which air pollutants interfere with myopia remain unclear and require further investigation. As most of the current epidemiological evidence is cross-sectional in nature, longitudinal studies that comprise a larger scale and quantified measurement of air pollution exposure are required in the future to elucidate the exact impact and provide proof of causality.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Potential mechanisms linking air pollution to myopia. Ambient air pollution may aggravate allergic conjunctivitis symptoms and cause corneal injury, which lead to peripheral hyperopia defocus and stimulate eyeball growth. The synthesis and emission of air pollutants lead to the reduction in ultraviolet exposure and retinal dopamine release. The pulmonary inflammatory factors and reactive oxygen species induced by air pollution can enter the blood circulation, resulting in systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, thus causing retinal ischemia and myopia. Furthermore, several air pollutants may directly induce hypoperfusion of the retina through ocular surface. PM2.5 particulate matter 2.5, CO carbon monoxide, NOx nitrogen oxides, NO nitric oxide, O3 ozone, IL-6 interleukin-6, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α, ROS reactive oxygen species, UV ultraviolet, DA dopamine

As aforementioned, air quality is far worse in Asia, and the severity of air pollution may have a substantial role in the etiology of myopia in these countries. Therefore, efforts to address air pollution are required to prevent the incidence and progression of myopia. For policymakers, methods such as establishing and strictly enforcing air quality standards and adopting policies against heavily polluting industries are advised. For the public, it is critical to raise awareness and limit individual exposure to preventable risks such as taking public transportation more.

Author contribution

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. T. Y. made the tables and figure and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. H. Z. reviewed the manuscript and designed the figure. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Chinese National Key Research and Development Program (Project number 2021YFC2702100); Chinese National Nature Science Foundation (Project number 82071012); The Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Project No. 20DZ1100200); Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health (Public Health System Three-Year Plan-Key Subjects) (Project No. GWV10.1-XK7); The Project of Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Centre (Grant Nos. SHDC2020CR30538, SHDC2018110); Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Eye Diseases, Shanghai, China (Project No. 19DZ2250100); and Shanghai General Hospital, Clinical Research CTCCR-2018Z01.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Declarations

Ethics approval

No ethical issue is to be declared in this article.

Consent to participate

No consent of participation is to be claimed.

Consent for publication

All of the authors have read and approved the paper for publication. We confirmed that it has not been published previously nor is it being considered by any other peer-reviewed journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Adar SD, Klein R, Klein BE, et al. Air pollution and the microvasculature: a cross-sectional assessment of in vivo retinal images in the population-based multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA) PLoS Med [j] 2010;7:e1000372 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed AS, El-Agha MH, Khaled MO, et al. The prevalence of keratoconus in children with allergic eye disease in an Egyptian population. Eur J Ophthalmol [j] 2021;31:1571–1576. doi: 10.1177/1120672120942691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonini M, Gaudenzi D, Spelta S et al (2021) Ocular surface failure in urban syndrome. J Clin Med [j] 10. 10.3390/jcm10143048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Areal AT, Zhao Q, Wigmann C, et al. The effect of air pollution when modified by temperature on respiratory health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ [j] 2022;811:152336 . doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Atchison DA, Rosén R. The possible role of peripheral refraction in development of myopia. Optom vis Sci [j] 2016;93:1042–1044. doi: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bai L, Wang J, Ma X et al (2018) Air pollution forecasts: an overview. Int J Environ Res Public Health [j] 15. 10.3390/ijerph15040780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Bai YC, Wang CY, Lin CL, et al. Association between air pollution and the risk of uveitis: a nationwide, population-based cohort study. Front Immunol [j] 2021;12:613893 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.613893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baird PN, Saw SM, Lanca C, et al. Myopia. Nat Rev Dis Primers [j] 2020;6:99. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-00231-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bajgar R, Moukova A, Chalupnikova N et al (2021) Differences in the effects of broad-band UVA and narrow-Band UVB on epidermal keratinocytes. Int J Environ Res Public Health [j] 18. 10.3390/ijerph182312480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  10. Baldoncini M, Campero A, Moran G, et al. Microsurgical anatomy of the central retinal artery. World Neurosurg [j] 2019;130:e172–e187. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertrand L, Dawkins L, Jayaratne R, et al. How to choose healthier urban biking routes: CO as a proxy of traffic pollution. Heliyon [j] 2020;6:e04195 . doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Boever P, Louwies T, Provost E, et al. (2014) Fundus photography as a convenient tool to study microvascular responses to cardiovascular disease risk factors in epidemiological studies. J Vis Exp [J] e51904. doi:10.3791/51904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Borysov A, Tarasenko A, Krisanova N, et al. Plastic smoke aerosol: nano-sized particle distribution, absorption/fluorescent properties, dysregulation of oxidative processes and synaptic transmission in rat brain nerve terminals. Environ Pollut [j] 2020;263:114502 . doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chan TC, Wilkinson Berka JL, Deliyanti D, et al. The role of reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis and treatment of retinal diseases. Exp Eye Res [j] 2020;201:108255 . doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen P, Cai X, Xu L, et al. Assessing oxygen saturation in retinal vessels in high myopia patients pre- and post-implantable collamer lens implantation surgery. Acta Ophthalmol [j] 2017;95:576–582. doi: 10.1111/aos.13368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J, He XG, Wang JJ, et al. Forcasting the prevalence of myopia among students aged 6–18 years in China from 2021 to 2030. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi [j] 2021;57:261–267. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20201228-000851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dadvand P, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Basagaña X, et al. Traffic-related air pollution and spectacles use in schoolchildren. PLoS One [j] 2017;12:e0167046 . doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. De Souza Xavier Costa N, Ribeiro Júnior G, Dos Santos Alemany A A, et al. Air pollution impairs recovery and tissue remodeling in a murine model of acute lung injury. Sci Rep [J] 2020;10:15314. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72130-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dotan A, Kremer I, Gal-Or O, et al. (2016) Scleral cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-A radiation for prevention of axial myopia in a rabbit model. J Vis Exp [J] e53201. doi:10.3791/53201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  20. Du B, Jin N, Zhu X, et al. A prospective study of serum metabolomic and lipidomic changes in myopic children and adolescents. Exp Eye Res [j] 2020;199:108182 . doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao ZF, Long HM, Dai B, et al. Investigation of reducing particulate matter (PM) and heavy metals pollutions by adding a novel additive from metallurgical dust (MD) during coal combustion. J Hazard Mater [j] 2019;373:335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gao N, Xu W, Ji J, et al. Lung function and systemic inflammation associated with short-term air pollution exposure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in Beijing, China. Environ Health [j] 2020;19:12. doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-0568-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gao P, Wu Y, He L, et al. Acute effects of ambient nitrogen oxides and interactions with temperature on cardiovascular mortality in Shenzhen, China. Chemosphere [j] 2022;287:132255 . doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grudzińska EM, Zaborski D, Modrzejewska M. Correlation between retrobulbar blood flow parameters and retinal nerve fiber, ganglion cell and inner plexus layer thickness in myopia. Eur J Ophthalmol [j] 2022;32:643–650. doi: 10.1177/1120672121992007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P, Tsubota K, et al. A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide. BMC Ophthalmol [j] 2020;20:27. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1220-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo J H, Dao X Y, Sun W Y (2021) An iron-nitrogen doped carbon and CdS hybrid catalytic system for efficient CO(2) photochemical reduction. Chem Commun (Camb) [J], 57: 2033–2036. doi:10.1039/d0cc07692a [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Han D, He MN, Zhu Y, et al. Protective effects of riboflavin-UVA-mediated posterior sclera collagen cross-linking in a guinea pig model of form-deprived myopia. Int J Ophthalmol [j] 2021;14:333–340. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.03.01. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hong J, Zhong T, Li H, et al. Ambient air pollution, weather changes, and outpatient visits for allergic conjunctivitis: a retrospective registry study. Sci Rep [j] 2016;6:23858. doi: 10.1038/srep23858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hsu YA, Chen CS, Wang YC, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of resveratrol on human retinal pigment cells and a myopia animal model. Curr Issues Mol Biol [j] 2021;43:716–727. doi: 10.3390/cimb43020052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Huang F, Shu Z, Huang Q, et al. Retinal dopamine D2 receptors participate in the development of myopia in mice. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci [j] 2022;63:24. doi: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ikeda SI, Kurihara T, Toda M et al (2020) Oral bovine milk lactoferrin administration suppressed myopia development through matrix metalloproteinase 2 in a mouse model. Nutrients [j] 12. 10.3390/nu12123744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  32. Jiang T, Gu J, Chen W, et al. Resveratrol inhibits high-glucose-induced inflammatory “metabolic memory” in human retinal vascular endothelial cells through SIRT1-dependent signaling. Can J Physiol Pharmacol [j] 2019;97:1141–1151. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jung SJ, Mehta JS, Tong L. Effects of environment pollution on the ocular surface. Ocul Surf [j] 2018;16:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kalluri ROR, Gugamsetty B, Tandule CR, et al. Impact of aerosols on surface ozone during COVID-19 pandemic in southern India: a multi-instrumental approach from ground and satellite observations, and model simulations. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys [j] 2021;212:105491 . doi: 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kato M, Sato K, Habuta M, et al. Localization of the ultraviolet-sensor Opn5m and its effect on myopia-related gene expression in the late-embryonic chick eye. Biochem Biophys Rep [j] 2019;19:100665 . doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2019.100665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kearney S, O’Donoghue L, Pourshahidi LK, et al. Conjunctival ultraviolet autofluorescence area, but not intensity, is associated with myopia. Clin Exp Optom [j] 2019;102:43–50. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12825. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Koch S, Zelembaba A, Tran R, et al. Vascular effects of physical activity are not modified by short-term inhaled diesel exhaust: results of a controlled human exposure study. Environ Res [j] 2020;183:109270 . doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Korsiak J, Perepeluk KL, Peterson NG, et al. Air pollution and retinal vessel diameter and blood pressure in school-aged children in a region impacted by residential biomass burning. Sci Rep [j] 2021;11:12790. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92269-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kubota R, Joshi NR, Samandarova I, et al. Effect of short-term peripheral myopic defocus on ocular biometrics using Fresnel “press-on” lenses in humans. Sci Rep [j] 2021;11:22690. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02043-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. La Spina C, Corvi F, Bandello F, et al. Static characteristics and dynamic functionality of retinal vessels in longer eyes with or without pathologic myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol [j] 2016;254:827–834. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3122-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lai L, Lv X, Wu X, et al. (2021) Comparing the differences in slowing myopia progression by riboflavin/ultraviolet A scleral cross-linking before and after lens-induced myopia in guinea pigs. Curr Eye Res [J] 1–9.doi:10.1080/02713683.2021.2011324 [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Landis EG, Park HN, Chrenek M, et al. Ambient light regulates retinal dopamine signaling and myopia susceptibility. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci [j] 2021;62:28. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.1.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lasagni Vitar RM, Hvozda Arana AG, Janezic NS, et al. Urban air pollution induces redox imbalance and epithelium hyperplasia in mice cornea. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol [j] 2019;384:114770. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2019.114770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee S S, Lingham G, Sanfilippo P G, et al. (2022) Incidence and progression of myopia in early adulthood. JAMA Ophthalmol [J]. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.5067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  45. Li X, Wu M, Zhang L, et al. Riboflavin and ultraviolet A irradiation for the prevention of progressive myopia in a guinea pig model. Exp Eye Res [j] 2017;165:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Li X, Zhang X, Zhang Z, et al. Air pollution exposure and immunological and systemic inflammatory alterations among schoolchildren in China. Sci Total Environ [j] 2019;657:1304–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lin HJ, Wei CC, Chang CY, et al. Role of chronic inflammation in myopia progression: clinical evidence and experimental validation. EBioMedicine [j] 2016;10:269–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lingham G, Mackey DA, Lucas R, et al. How does spending time outdoors protect against myopia? A review. Br J Ophthalmol [j] 2020;104:593–599. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu H, Gambino F, Jr, Algenio CS, et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress induced by lipid peroxidation metabolite 4-hydroxynonenal in human corneal epithelial cells. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol [j] 2020;258:1717–1725. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04647-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu Y, Wang L, Xu Y, et al. The influence of the choroid on the onset and development of myopia: from perspectives of choroidal thickness and blood flow. Acta Ophthalmol [j] 2021;99:730–738. doi: 10.1111/aos.14773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Louwies T, Panis LI, Kicinski M, et al. Retinal microvascular responses to short-term changes in particulate air pollution in healthy adults. Environ Health Perspect [j] 2013;121:1011–1016. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Louwies T, Nawrot T, Cox B, et al. Blood pressure changes in association with black carbon exposure in a panel of healthy adults are independent of retinal microcirculation. Environ Int [j] 2015;75:81–86. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Louwies T, Vuegen C, Panis LI, et al. miRNA expression profiles and retinal blood vessel calibers are associated with short-term particulate matter air pollution exposure. Environ Res [j] 2016;147:24–31. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Lu CW, Fu J, Liu XF, et al. Air pollution and meteorological conditions significantly contribute to the worsening of allergic conjunctivitis: a regional 20-city, 5-year study in Northeast China. Light Sci Appl [j] 2021;10:190. doi: 10.1038/s41377-021-00630-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Luo H, Zhao K, Yuan Z, et al. Emission source-based ozone isopleth and isosurface diagrams and their significance in ozone pollution control strategies. J Environ Sci (China) [J] 2021;105:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2020.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mahan VL. Cardiac function dependence on carbon monoxide. Med Gas Res [j] 2020;10:37–46. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.279982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Manisalidis I, Stavropoulou E, Stavropoulos A, et al. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: a review. Front Public Health [j] 2020;8:14. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Marchini T, Zirlik A, Wolf D. Pathogenic role of air pollution particulate matter in cardiometabolic disease: evidence from mice and humans. Antioxid Redox Signal [j] 2020;33:263–279. doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Miyazaki D, Fukagawa K, Fukushima A, et al. Air pollution significantly associated with severe ocular allergic inflammatory diseases. Sci Rep [j] 2019;9:18205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54841-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Miyazaki D, Fukagawa K, Okamoto S, et al. Epidemiological aspects of allergic conjunctivitis. Allergol Int [j] 2020;69:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Montes CM, Demler HJ, Li S, et al. Approaches to investigate crop responses to ozone pollution: from O(3) -FACE to satellite-enabled modeling. Plant J [j] 2022;109:432–446. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Morgan IG, Ohno-Matsui K, Saw SM. Myopia. Lancet [j] 2012;379:1739–1748. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60272-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Morgan IG, French AN, Ashby RS, et al. The epidemics of myopia: aetiology and prevention. Prog Retin Eye Res [j] 2018;62:134–149. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Mu JF, Zeng D, Yu SY, et al. Time-series analysis on the relationship between ambient PM2.5 and daily outpatient visits due to allergic conjunctivitis among children in Shenzhen. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi [j] 2020;56:608–614. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20191203-00623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Norton TT. What do animal studies tell us about the mechanism of myopia-protection by light? Optom vis Sci [j] 2016;93:1049–1051. doi: 10.1097/opx.0000000000000917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Nucci P, Sacchi M, Pichi F, et al. Pediatric conjunctivitis and air pollution exposure: a prospective observational study. Semin Ophthalmol [j] 2017;32:407–411. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2015.1115088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Orru H, Ebi KL, Forsberg B. The interplay of climate change and air pollution on health. Curr Environ Health Rep [j] 2017;4:504–513. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0168-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Pan CW, Ramamurthy D, Saw SM. Worldwide prevalence and risk factors for myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt [j] 2012;32:3–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00884.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Provost EB, Int Panis L, Saenen ND, et al. Recent versus chronic fine particulate air pollution exposure as determinant of the retinal microvasculature in school children. Environ Res [j] 2017;159:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Rabito FA, Yang Q, Zhang H, et al. The association between short-term residential black carbon concentration on blood pressure in a general population sample. Indoor Air [j] 2020;30:767–775. doi: 10.1111/ina.12651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Riva M, Sun J, McNeill VF, et al. High pressure inside nanometer-sized particles influences the rate and products of chemical reactions. Environ Sci Technol [j] 2021;55:7786–7793. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Rong S, Wang C, Han B, et al. Iontophoresis-assisted accelerated riboflavin/ultraviolet A scleral cross-linking: a potential treatment for pathologic myopia. Exp Eye Res [j] 2017;162:37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2017.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Rotolo M, Montani G, Martin R. Myopia onset and role of peripheral refraction. Clin Optom (Auckl) [J] 2017;9:105–111. doi: 10.2147/opto.S134985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ruan Z, Qian ZM, Guo Y, et al. Ambient fine particulate matter and ozone higher than certain thresholds associated with myopia in the elderly aged 50 years and above. Environ Res [j] 2019;177:108581 . doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schaeffel F. Biological mechanisms of myopia. Ophthalmologe [j] 2017;114:5–19. doi: 10.1007/s00347-016-0388-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schikowski T. Indoor and outdoor pollution as risk factor for allergic diseases of the skin and lungs. Handb Exp Pharmacol [j] 2022;268:359–366. doi: 10.1007/164_2021_503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schraufnagel DE, Balmes JR, Cowl CT, et al. Air pollution and noncommunicable diseases: a review by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies’ Environmental Committee, Part 2: air pollution and organ systems. Chest [j] 2019;155:417–426. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Sendra VG, Tau J, Zapata G, et al. Polluted air exposure compromises corneal immunity and exacerbates inflammation in acute herpes simplex keratitis. Front Immunol [j] 2021;12:618597 . doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.618597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Supharakonsakun Y, Areepong Y, Sukparungsee S. The performance of a modified EWMA control chart for monitoring autocorrelated PM2.5 and carbon monoxide air pollution data. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10467. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Swiatczak B, Feldkaemper M, Schaeffel F. Changes in fundus reflectivity during myopia development in chickens. Biomed Opt Express [j] 2019;10:1822–1840. doi: 10.1364/boe.10.001822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. The L. UK air pollution and public health. Lancet [j] 2017;389:1860. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31271-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Thomson K, Karouta C, Ashby R. Form-deprivation and lens-induced myopia are similarly affected by pharmacological manipulation of the dopaminergic system in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci [j] 2020;61:4. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.12.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Thomson K, Morgan I, Karouta C, et al. Levodopa inhibits the development of lens-induced myopia in chicks. Sci Rep [j] 2020;10:13242. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70271-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. United Nations Environment Programme Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: progress report, 2015. Photochem Photobiol Sci [J] 2016;15:141–174. doi: 10.1039/c6pp90004f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wang Q, Deng Y, Li S, et al. Corneal biomechanical changes in allergic conjunctivitis. Eye Vis (Lond) [J] 2021;8:17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00241-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang Q, Yu F, Feng Z, et al. Changes in anterior and posterior corneal elevation in patients with allergic conjunctivitis. Front Med (Lausanne) [J] 2021;8:788302. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021b.788302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang T, Li H, Zhang R, et al. Evaluation of retinal vascular density and related factors in youth myopia without maculopathy using OCTA. Sci Rep [j] 2021;11:15361. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94909-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wei CC, Kung YJ, Chen CS, et al. Allergic conjunctivitis-induced retinal inflammation promotes myopia progression. EBioMedicine [j] 2018;28:274–286. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wei CC, Lin HJ, Lim YP, et al. PM2.5 and NOx exposure promote myopia: clinical evidence and experimental proof. Environ Pollut [J] 2019;254:113031. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Williams KM, Bentham GC, Young IS, et al. Association between myopia, ultraviolet B radiation exposure, serum vitamin D concentrations, and genetic polymorphisms in vitamin D metabolic pathways in a multicountry European study. JAMA Ophthalmol [j] 2017;135:47–53. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wirz-Justice A, Skene DJ, Münch M. The relevance of daylight for humans. Biochem Pharmacol [j] 2021;191:114304. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Witters K, Dockx Y, Op’tRoodt J, et al. Dynamics of skin microvascular blood flow in 4–6-year-old children in association with pre- and postnatal black carbon and particulate air pollution exposure. Environ Int [J] 2021;157:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wolkoff P. External eye symptoms in indoor environments. Indoor Air [j] 2017;27:246–260. doi: 10.1111/ina.12322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wu PC, Chuang MN, Choi J, et al. Update in myopia and treatment strategy of atropine use in myopia control. Eye (Lond) [J] 2019;33:3–13. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0139-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Xin Y, Kang BS, Zheng YP, et al. Biophysical properties of corneal cells reflect high myopia progression. Biophys J [j] 2021;120:3498–3507. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Xu D, Yuan Z, Wang M, et al. Multi-factor reconciliation of discrepancies in ozone-precursor sensitivity retrieved from observation- and emission-based models. Environ Int [j] 2022;158:106952 . doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Yang BY, Guo Y, Zou Z et al (2021) Exposure to ambient air pollution and visual impairment in children: a nationwide cross-sectional study in China. J Hazard Mater [j] 407. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124750 [DOI] [PubMed]
  98. Ying G, Tang Z, Zhang J, et al. (2021) Long noncoding RNA CASC2 protect ROS-induced oxidative stress in myocardial infarction by miR-18a/SIRT2. Biotechnol Appl Biochem [J]. doi:10.1002/bab.2252 [DOI] [PubMed]
  99. Yuan J, Wu S, Wang Y, et al. Inflammatory cytokines in highly myopic eyes. Sci Rep [j] 2019;9:3517. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39652-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang J, Deng G. Protective effects of increased outdoor time against myopia: a review. J Int Med Res [j] 2020;48:300060519893866. doi: 10.1177/0300060519893866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang Q, Jan C, Guo CY, et al. Association of intraocular pressure-related factors and retinal vessel diameter with optic disc rim area in subjects with and without primary open angle glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol [j] 2018;46:389–399. doi: 10.1111/ceo.13042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zheng Q, Zong Y, Li L, et al. Retinal vessel oxygen saturation and vessel diameter in high myopia. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt [j] 2015;35:562–569. doi: 10.1111/opo.12223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhou X, Pardue MT, Iuvone PM, et al. Dopamine signaling and myopia development: what are the key challenges. Prog Retin Eye Res [j] 2017;61:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES