Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Sep 28;12:16194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20229-0

Differential transcriptomic responses to heat stress in surface and subterranean diving beetles

Perry G Beasley-Hall 1,2,3,✉, Terry Bertozzi 1,2, Tessa M Bradford 1,2, Charles S P Foster 4, Karl Jones 1,2, Simon M Tierney 5, William F Humphreys 6,7, Andrew D Austin 1,2, Steven J B Cooper 1,2
PMCID: PMC9519976  PMID: 36171221

Abstract

Subterranean habitats are generally very stable environments, and as such evolutionary transitions of organisms from surface to subterranean lifestyles may cause considerable shifts in physiology, particularly with respect to thermal tolerance. In this study we compared responses to heat shock at the molecular level in a geographically widespread, surface-dwelling water beetle to a congeneric subterranean species restricted to a single aquifer (Dytiscidae: Hydroporinae). The obligate subterranean beetle Paroster macrosturtensis is known to have a lower thermal tolerance compared to surface lineages (CTmax 38 °C cf. 42–46 °C), but the genetic basis of this physiological difference has not been characterized. We experimentally manipulated the thermal environment of 24 individuals to demonstrate that both species can mount a heat shock response at high temperatures (35 °C), as determined by comparative transcriptomics. However, genes involved in these responses differ between species and a far greater number were differentially expressed in the surface taxon, suggesting it can mount a more robust heat shock response; these data may underpin its higher thermal tolerance compared to subterranean relatives. In contrast, the subterranean species examined not only differentially expressed fewer genes in response to increasing temperatures, but also in the presence of the experimental setup employed here alone. Our results suggest P. macrosturtensis may be comparatively poorly equipped to respond to both thermally induced stress and environmental disturbances more broadly. The molecular findings presented here have conservation implications for P. macrosturtensis and contribute to a growing narrative concerning weakened thermal tolerances in obligate subterranean organisms at the molecular level.

Subject terms: Evolutionary genetics, Entomology, Computational biology and bioinformatics

Introduction

The transition to an obligate subterranean lifestyle can cause massive shifts in an organism’s biology1, from the acquisition of classic troglomorphies such as the elongation of appendages for sensing in an aphotic environment2, to changes in lesser-studied traits including circadian rhythm3,4, reproductive biology5, respiration6, the number of larval instars7,8 and chemosensation9,10. These changes have been attributed to the stark difference between subterranean and surface (hereafter epigean) habitats. While epigean environments can vary immensely over both time and space, subterranean environments, such as cave systems, generally possess high environmental stability with respect to light levels, temperature, humidity, and nutrient availability11–13. Animals adapted to these environments might therefore be particularly well suited for the assessment of responses to future climate change scenarios, particularly with respect to their thermal tolerances and responses to increasing temperatures. Indeed, such habitats have been labelled as undervalued natural laboratories for biological studies of global change14.

A near-universal response to temperature-induced stress across the tree of life—and therefore a method by which thermal tolerance can be gauged—is the heat shock response (hereafter HSR), which involves the synthesis of heat-shock proteins (hereafter HSPs). HSPs include those proteins that are expressed constitutively under non-stressful conditions, called heat shock cognates, or those only induced when organisms are exposed to thermal extremes, during which they assist in stabilising and refolding proteins at risk of denaturation. An inducible HSR has been observed in almost all organisms studied to date, and the proteins involved in this response, as well as the response itself, are highly conserved among different domains of life15. An estimated 50–200 genes are involved in the HSR, the most significantly induced of which are HSPs16. However, there are exceptions to this rule: a lack of an inducible HSR has been documented in a wide range of species, largely those that occupy very stable thermal environments such as Antarctic marine habitats17,18.

Knowledge of the HSR in organisms from thermally stable subterranean habitats, including their associated inducible HSPs and at which temperatures this response might be activated, is scarce, with only a few studies devoted to invertebrate taxa14,19–25. However, invertebrates overwhelmingly contribute to the biodiversity of subterranean habitats compared to vertebrates26,27. The bulk of existing studies on the thermal tolerance of subterranean invertebrates suggest such taxa can withstand temperatures above those they would encounter in nature and that they have not lost the HSR. Only a small number of these studies have examined the heat shock response directly28 and tend to focus on thermal tolerances gauged through survival experiments. Moreover, a better understanding of responses to current climate change predictions for subterranean animals has been identified as a fundamental question in subterranean biology given emerging conservation issues associated with their respective ecosystems29. To address this knowledge gap, here we make use of genomic data from Australian representatives of a group of aquatic invertebrates containing both epigean and subterranean lineages.

The Yilgarn Craton in central Western Australia (WA) houses a diverse subterranean diving beetle fauna belonging to two tribes, Bidessini and Hydroporini (Dytiscidae). While epigean species can be found practically continent-wide, subterranean taxa are isolated in calcrete aquifers (hereafter calcretes) associated with ancient palaeodrainage systems in the region. These calcretes are completely devoid of light and animals contained within them are assumed to have little to no access to air above the water’s surface6. Each calcrete houses between one and three dytiscid species, but at the time of writing only around a quarter of the ~ 200 known calcretes have been sampled30–32. Nonetheless, lineages in both tribes are known to have made independent yet parallel, repeated transitions into underground habitats from epigean ancestors during the late Miocene to early Pleistocene, likely in response to continental aridification32–35. In each case these transitions have involved the loss of eyes, pigment, and wings30 as well as the gain of a remarkable ability to respire directly from water6. Preliminary evidence suggests that subterranean members of these lineages are less tolerant of thermal extremes compared to epigean relatives36, but the molecular mechanisms underlying such tolerances—and genomic changes associated with a subterranean transition in these animals more broadly—remain unknown. An investigation into the potential link between the above-mentioned mode of respiration, oxygen delivery, and heat tolerance is also lacking37.

In the present study, we focus on two members of the Hydroporini: Paroster nigroadumbratus (Clark), an epigean species endemic to South Australia, and the subterranean Paroster macrosturtensis (Watts & Humphreys) found exclusively in a single calcrete at Sturt Meadows in the Yilgarn region of WA. As subterranean dytiscids likely descended from only a handful of epigean lineages, meaningful comparisons can be made between these taxa despite their distributions being geographically disjunct and their divergence ca. 15 Mya32. A recent study showed that P. macrosturtensis has a reduced upper critical thermal maximum (CTmax) of 38.3 °C compared to other epigean dytiscids (42–44.5 °C)36, mirroring previous results for other cave beetle species23. These findings suggest P. macrosturtensis is unlikely to reach its thermal critical maximum under current climate change predictions. However, given the thermal stability in its environment, it remains unknown as to whether P. macrosturtensis might have a modified HSR compared to its epigean relatives and if exposure to high temperatures may nonetheless induce significant stress in this subterranean species. Here, we present transcriptomic data from individuals of P. macrosturtensis and P. nigroadumbratus subjected to varying degrees of heat shock following the results of Jones et al.36. In the present study we specifically aimed (1) to generate a high-quality, near-complete reference transcriptome for P. nigroadumbratus and (2) using this dataset, characterise and compare the HSR of P. nigroadumbratus and P. macrosturtensis, specifically with respect to which genes are differentially expressed and the conditions under which this occurs.

Materials and methods

Taxon sampling, experimental design, and cDNA sequencing

Beetle specimens (P. macrosturtensis, n = 11; P. nigroadumbratus, n = 13) were sourced as described in a previous study and subjected to heat stress using an aquarium setup described therein36. Specimens were placed in one of three groups: in a controlled-temperature cabinet at 25 °C (hereafter control), in vials within the experimental setup at 25 °C, and in vials within the experimental setup ramped to 35 °C. The control temperature of 25 °C was selected by36 to reflect the approximate average groundwater temperatures of the aquifer that P. macrosturtensis is found in. Following treatment, the individuals were placed in liquid nitrogen for RNA sequencing immediately after exposure to control temperatures and thermal extremes. RNA extractions were performed using single whole bodies prior to the synthesis and sequencing of barcoded cDNA samples. Quality control of sequence data was performed using Trim Galore with default settings v.0.4.1 (http://bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore). More information regarding specimen collection and husbandry, experimental design, cDNA sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis can be found in the electronic supplementary material.

Assembly of Paroster nigroadumbratus reference transcriptome

A reference transcriptome for P. nigroadumbratus was de novo assembled using Trinity v.2.5.1 using default settings38 and derived from unpublished raw RNA-seq data from39. Resulting transcriptome completeness was validated using BUSCO v.540,41, and functional annotation was performed using TransDecoder v.5.5.042 and the Trinotate v.3.2.1 pipeline38, which employs SQLite (http://sqlite.org/index.html), BLAST v.2.7.143, and HMMER v.3.2 (http://hmmer.org). Redundancy within the transcriptome assembly was reduced by retaining only the longest isoform for each Trinity gene identifier, following10, ensuring differential expression analysis was performed at the Trinity ‘gene’ level rather than that of isoforms. This subsetted dataset was used in downstream analyses, though we note this approach limited our ability to examine alternative splice variants.

Differential expression and gene ontology enrichment analysis

The above reference transcriptome was indexed and raw reads generated in this study from both P. macrosturtensis and P. nigroadumbratus were quasi-mapped to it and normalised using Salmon v.1.1.044. Differential expression analysis was performed using edgeR v.3.32.145 alongside Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, executed using Trinity helper scripts. Differential expression and enrichment/depletion of GO terms was gauged using two comparisons per species (Fig. 1). First, for each species the group from the experimental setup at 25 °C was compared to the control group outside of the setup at 25 °C (hereafter comparison 1). Second, for each species the group in the experimental setup at 35 °C was compared to the group in the experimental setup at 25 °C (hereafter comparison 2). A diagrammatic representation of these comparisons is shown in Fig. 1. These comparisons were designed to gauge the impact of the presence of the experimental setup alone and an increase in temperature, respectively. A full description of this process can be found in the electronic supplementary material.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Paroster beetles included in this study and the experimental design used to assess differential gene expression associated with thermal extremes alone, as opposed to solely the presence of the experimental setup, following36. Only intraspecific comparisons were made when assessing differential gene expression in our analyses; interspecific comparisons were made post-hoc. Photographs by Chris Watts and Howard Hamon.

Phylogenetic analysis of putative heat shock proteins

Putative heat shock protein-encoding genes were aligned with coleopteran orthologs sourced from the OrthoDB v.10.1 catalogue46 and GenBank to confirm their identity (Table S1). Phylogenetic inference for each HSP family was performed in RAxML v.8.2.1247.

Results

A high-quality reference transcriptome for Paroster nigroadumbratus enables the characterisation of genes involved in the heat shock response

Here we present a high-quality, near-complete transcriptome for the epigean beetle P. nigroadumbratus. This dataset consisted of 75,045,266 paired-end reads (72,266,264 following quality control measures), 84% of which were incorporated into 134,246 de novo assembled transcripts representing 60,683 unique Trinity ‘genes’ and 41,979 predicted ORFs. According to the assessment using BUSCO, this transcriptome was 87.66% complete with respect to complete core arthropod genes and 96.74% complete when considering partial genes. Of these transcripts, 47,810 were able to be functionally annotated using the Trinotate pipeline. Subsetting our predicted peptide dataset to include only the longest isoforms per Trinity gene identifier, allowing us a proxy with which to perform our downstream analyses at the gene level, resulted in 14,897 predicted ORFs (with 11,609, or ~ 77%, having some level of annotation).

Differential expression analysis reveals distinct expression profiles associated with the heat shock response in Paroster

We compared expression profiles between members of the same species, subjected to different conditions, to assess genes differentially expressed in response to the presence of the experimental setup employed here (comparison 1) or an increase in temperature in that setup (comparison 2) (Fig. 2). Parallels and contrasts between P. nigroadumbratus and macrosturtensis were then assessed post-hoc. Differential expression analysis using edgeR identified a total of 723 differentially expressed (DE) genes in the epigean P. nigroadumbratus samples and 157 in the subterranean P. macrosturtensis, with the two species exhibiting complex and markedly different expression profiles (Figs. 2, 3; Figs. S2, S3). P. nigroadumbratus consistently differentially expressed a greater number of genes than P. macrosturtensis: 147 and 67 genes were differentially expressed in comparison 1 and 89 and 51 genes were differentially expressed in comparison 2, respectively. The presence of the experimental setup and an increase in water temperature caused both species to differentially express genes involved in the heat shock response. Contrasting expression profiles with respect to the genes involved were not only observed between the two species (as above) but also in the response of each species to these two different stressors (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Differentially expressed (DE) genes in Paroster macrosturtensis and nigroadumbratus in comparison 1 (the experimental setup used in this study relative to the control, black circles) or comparison 2 (35 °C within the setup relative to 25 °C in the setup, red circles). Comparisons are ordered by total number of DE genes. (A) DE genes shared (circles linked by lines) or unique to (unlinked circles) each comparison per species, summed in the bar graph above. Up- or downregulated HSPs or HSP cochaperones are shown for each group. The gene Hsp68 being named more than once in different groups refers to separate transcripts sharing the same putative annotation (see Table S2). (B) Total DE genes for each species under different conditions. HSP gene names were sourced from Trinotate annotations and orthology was validated using phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

REVIGO48 treemaps showing enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms associated with the differential expression of genes shown in Fig. 2. Treemaps are labelled as comparison 1 (the experimental setup used in this study relative to the control) or 2 (35 °C within the setup relative to 25 °C in the setup). The size of squares is proportional to the p-value associated with differential expression of respective genes. Similar GO terms share a colour and are represented in white text by the largest square per group. GO terms associated with genes involved in the heat shock response are indicated by a star.

In comparison 1, the surface species P. macrosturtensis significantly upregulated a HSP gene putatively annotated as Hsp68, encoding a major heat shock protein in the HSP70 family, relative to the control. Paroster nigroadumbratus upregulated the HSP Hsp68 downregulated the sHSP l(2)efl in the experimental setup relative to the control. None of the HSP transcripts differentially expressed by P. nigroadumbratus in response to the presence of the experimental setup only were differentially expressed by P. macrosturtensis or by P. nigroadumbratus in comparison 2.

In comparison 2, both species upregulated the HSP genes Hsc70-4 and Hsp83 as well as the putative cochaperones Samui, DnaJ, AHSA1, and Unc45a relative to groups at the lower temperature of 25 °C. Both P. nigroadumbratus and macrosturtensis also upregulated separate Trinity “genes” both annotated as Hsp68 each at 35 °C relative to the 25 °C treatment (Fig. 2), likely representing closely related loci that are yet to be comprehensively characterised in the beetles. Additional differentially expressed genes unique to each species at 35 °C relative to the 25 °C treatment included: (1) downregulation of the HSPs Hsp60A and Hsp68 in Paroster macrosturtensis, and (2) the upregulation of the sHSP l(2)efl, the HSP Hsp68, and the HSP cognate Hsc70-3 in P. nigroadumbratus. Other annotated genes potentially involved in the HSR, such as Hsc70-2, Hsc70-5, Trap1, and Hsp90b1, were not differentially expressed in either species (Fig. 4). A full list of differentially expressed genes shared between (or unique to) the two beetle species under different conditions is available in Table S2. Proteins unrelated to the HSR, yet widely differentially expressed in our dataset (i.e., with reoccurring annotations across different Trinity ‘genes’) included those involved in the transport of lipids and nutrient storage, such as vitellogenin and apolipophorins.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Phylogenies of heat shock Trinity ‘genes’ inferred using RAxML to validate the identity of putative HSP orthologs in Paroster species. Trees are as follows: (A) sHSP family, (B) HSP60, (C) HSP90, (D) HSP70. Scale bar is in substitutions/site; BS = bootstrap node support. Tip labels show transcript names/GenBank accession numbers. Tip names for P. macrosturtensis are shared with the reference P. nigroadumbratus transcript reads were assembled against. Tip names with stars specifically refer to genes differentially expressed in the presence of the experimental setup alone relative to the control (comparison 1) or at 35 °C relative to 25 °C in the experimental setup (comparison 2).

Gene Ontology enrichment analysis enables a high-order approximation of the functional consequences of differentially expressed genes. We did not observe any consistent depletion of GO terms associated with downregulated genes, but enriched terms were reflective of our differential expression results above (Fig. 3). In both species, terms associated with the HSR were enriched in association with an increased temperature at 35 °C (e.g., ATPase activator activity [GO:0001671], chaperone binding [GO:0051087], and unfolded protein binding [GO:0051082]). The most common remaining Gene Ontology terms included lipid transporter activity (GO:0005319), nutrient reservoir activity (GO:0045735), metal ion binding (GO:0046872), and zinc ion binding (GO:0008270).

Phylogenetic analyses of HSPs

Our HSP nucleotide alignments consisted of 12 sequences across 1743 bp (HSP60 family), 67 sequences across 3669 bp (HSP70 family), 29 sequences across 3741 bp (HSP90 family) and 23 sequences across 867 bp (sHSP family). Sequences clustered by gene with strong node support in our phylogeny (Fig. 4). All sequences from the Paroster species examined here were recovered as nested within these clades, confirming the orthology of annotated HSPs, with the exception of a transcript present in both species and inferred as sister to the Hsp68 + Hsc70-2 clades. This gene was not differentially expressed in response to heat shock in our dataset.

Discussion

Here, we have comprehensively characterised the heat shock response at the molecular level in the subterranean diving beetle Paroster macrosturtensis and one of its surface-dwelling relatives. Using a near-complete reference transcriptome for P. nigroadumbratus—the first such dataset for a member of the Hydroporinae—we performed differential expression and GO enrichment analysis to explore genes putatively involved in the HSR. Our results demonstrate that both the epigean P. nigroadumbratus and subterranean P. macrosturtensis have an inducible HSR, in agreement with implications of previous survival experiments for the genus36. Putative orthologs of HSP cochaperones, sHSP, HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90 genes were accounted for in our differential expression analysis. However, the conditions under which this response is activated differs between species, and P. macrosturtensis notably differentially expressed just over half of the number of genes compared to P. nigroadumbratus in response to a rise insing temperature.

Heat shock-induced gene expression in Paroster

HSPs identified as differentially expressed in this study support past results for beetle species and other insects more broadly. A major trend in our results concerned the upregulation of HSP70 genes at high temperatures, particularly Hsp68; HSP70s are highly expressed in response to heat shock in other beetle species, including cave-adapted subterranean taxa28,49,50, and work in concert with sHSPs and HSP90s51–54. In addition to the heat shock proteins, we also observed the upregulation of the heat shock cognates Hsc70-3 and Hsc70-4 and putative cochaperones Samui, DnaJ, AHSA1, and Unc45a at 35 °C relative to the 25 °C treatment. To our knowledge there has been no documentation of a coleopteran heat shock cognate being upregulated in response to increasing temperature, though evidence exists for the parasitic wasp Pteromalus, in which hsc70 is also induced by heavy metal poisoning and starvation in addition to thermal extremes55. Heat shock cognates are also upregulated during diapause in silkworm eggs56 and young bumble bee queens57, potentially playing a cryoprotective role in these species. Cochaperones are less well characterised in insects, but evidence for their upregulation in response to heat shock has been documented in hemipterans and ants58–60. We observed the downregulation of several heat shock proteins in both species in the presence of the experimental setup relative to the control, and at high temperatures relative to the 25 °C treatment. Both sHSPs and HSP70s have been documented as being downregulated during periods of heat stress in other insects, e.g. in silk moths61. In P. nigroadumbratus this was restricted to the sHSP l(2)efl in the experimental setup-only comparison. In contrast, the HSPs Hsp60A and Hsp68 were downregulated in P. macrosturtensis at high temperatures relative the 25 °C treatment.

Expression profiles reflect differing thermal tolerances

Our molecular data mirrors previously documented reduced thermal tolerances in subterranean insects such as P. macrosturtensis. The species differentially expressed far fewer genes in response to 35 °C relative to the 25 °C treatment compared to P. nigroadumbratus; similarly reduced numbers of differentially expressed genes have also been associated with lower thermal tolerances in other organisms such as fish62, lizards63, rotifers64, red algae65, and plants66,67, though we note the inverse (or alternatively, no clear pattern) has been observed in a number of cases, potentially reflecting lower levels of stress as opposed to an inability to mount a HSR68,69.

In keeping with the above findings, P. macrosturtensis also differentially expressed far fewer genes than its epigean counterpart in response to the presence of the experimental setup alone relative to the control (Fig. 2). HSPs are known to be involved in responding to a wide range of stressors70–72, and the involvement of such genes is not surprising in stress unrelated to temperature; individuals being moved into the experimental setup employed here may have induced stress from handling, for example. The greater number of genes differentially expressed by P. nigroadumbratus in this scenario may suggest P. macrosturtensis is potentially less able to robustly respond to ambient stressors more broadly (i.e., environmental disturbances). Such a scenario is supported by past work showing subterranean species are sensitive to ambient stressors under otherwise non-stressful temperatures73, and being an epigean species, P. nigroadumbratus is presumably exposed to far more dramatic environmental fluctuations (in addition to more variable temperatures) on a regular basis than a subterranean species such as P. macrosturtensis. We also note that in the presence of the experimental setup relative to the control, P. macrosturtensis upregulated the same Hsp68-annotated Trinity ‘gene’ implicated in responses to heat-induced stress in both species (Fig. 2), whereas HSPs differentially expressed by P. nigroadumbratus under the same conditions did not overlap with those in other groups.

Heat shock and the climatic variability hypothesis

The dataset we present here adds to a growing body of knowledge concerning the HSR in organisms that inhabit thermally stable environments. Central to discourse on this topic is the climatic variability hypothesis, which posits that the thermal tolerance of a taxon is positively correlated with its temperature ranges encountered in nature74. This hypothesis implies species from extremely stable thermal environments can no longer tolerate temperature extremes, and has been demonstrated in a wide variety of organisms that have either lost or possess a reduced HSR, such as cnidarians75, limpets76, amphipods and sea stars77, and midges78. In contrast, species that inhabit areas with a broader range of climatic conditions would be expected to be more robust in the face of environmental fluctuations79. While P. macrosturtensis does have a lower thermal tolerance compared to P. nigroadumbratus, in line with the above hypothesis, it nonetheless has retained a HSR at high temperatures per our transcriptomic data. Similar studies have shown certain groundwater-dwelling organisms display an inducible HSR in response to conditions far warmer than they would encounter in nature20,21. The HSR of these species, as well as P. macrosturtensis, might be retained at such high temperatures for a variety of reasons, including the fact that the species has not occupied its respective environments for a sufficient length of time in evolutionary terms for their HSR to be lost, e.g. via adaptive processes or a relaxation of purifying selection36. The latter scenario is plausible as P. macrosturtensis is also known to have retained the ability to detect light despite inhabiting an aphotic environment for over ~ 3 million years80.

Conservation implications

While the retention of a HSR in both species examined here supports the physiological findings of Jones et al.36, almost half (4 out of 10 assayed) of the P. macrosturtensis cohort did not survive 24 h after heat shock in that study. It therefore remains to be seen if the species can tolerate such extremes in the long term. Indeed, even cave beetles considered stenothermal—those that are only capable of surviving within an extremely narrow temperature range—have retained the HSR23, but nonetheless cannot survive at extreme temperatures for long periods (> 7 days) compared to epigean relatives25,28. Threatening processes that P. nigroadumbratus and macrosturtensis are both at risk of experiencing in their fragile habitats might impact the latter species far more negatively as a result.

Temperature rises of up to 5 °C by the end of the century compared to pre-industrial levels may occur in central Western Australia per current climate change projections81. Water temperatures in aquifers are generally cooler and more stable than, but are nonetheless coupled with, conditions above-ground, and are also predicted to warm as regional temperatures increase82–84. The subterranean habitat of these insects is therefore unlikely to shield them from the impacts of a warming world. The fact that P. macrosturtensis appears to be unable to mount as robust a HSR compared to P. nigroadumbratus, and therefore may experience a significantly higher amount of stress compared to epigean species in the face of high temperatures, has conservation implications for the understudied fauna of the Australian Yilgarn and beyond.

Datasets such as these are especially pertinent for subterranean invertebrates found in the Yilgarn region—including P. macrosturtensis and its subterranean relatives, in addition to crustaceans such as isopods and amphipods—as the groundwater in their calcrete habitats is heavily utilised for water extraction by industry85,86. As short-range endemics to the extreme, such species are not only at risk of habitat degradation via climate change, but from the direct intersection of shallow aquifers with e.g. mining activities and through the drawdown of groundwater beneath calcretes at greater depths87. In addition to reflecting the reduced thermal tolerances of Australian subterranean dytiscids, the molecular data we presented here for P. macrosturtensis also suggests a potentially weaker response in the face of other environmental disturbances unrelated to temperature. These factors have the potential to render P. macrosturtensis more vulnerable to both of the above threatening processes compared to epigean relatives, with implications for subterranean fauna more broadly. An increased knowledge of the assumed fragility of Australian subterranean invertebrates in the face of these stressors is therefore crucial for informing future conservation management plans for these animals and their fragile habitats.

Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate the reduced thermal tolerance of the subterranean species P. macrosturtensis compared to its epigean relatives is reflected, and further clarified by, transcriptomic data. While our data are supported by past physiological evidence that demonstrated P. macrosturtensis could survive at high temperatures, albeit not to the limits of epigean species36, the present study adds a new layer to this narrative. P. macrosturtensis might possess increased mortality in the face of high temperatures because the species differentially expresses far fewer genes in response to heat shock compared to the epigean relative P. nigroadumbratus, suggesting it may be unable to mount as robust a heat shock response. While P. macrosturtensis might be able to survive at temperatures far above those it encounters in nature for short periods, as detailed by Jones et al.36, our results suggest the species also experiences a weaker transcriptomic response to factors unrelated to temperature (i.e. the presence of the experimental setup employed here) relative to P. nigroadumbratus. As such, P. macrosturtensis may not be as well-equipped to survive higher temperatures and other threatening processes, such as disturbances to surrounding groundwater, in the long term compared to surface-dwelling members of Paroster. Future work in this system will ideally assess a far greater number of dytiscid species to further explore the trends we observe here. As the present study did not consider the role of isoforms in the heat shock response of these animals, broader studies could examine these responses to heat stress at a finer scale by conducting differential expression analysis on the transcript, as opposed to gene, level.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information. (13.1MB, docx)
Supplementary Table S2. (61.1KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We thank Flora, Peter, and Paul Axford for providing access to the Sturt Meadows calcrete and accommodation at the Sturt Meadows pastoral property. We thank Chris Watts (South Australian Museum) for helping with identification and collecting of surface dytiscids, providing beetle images, and for laying the foundation for the subterranean beetle research with WFH and Remko Leijs. We thank Rae Humphreys for assistance with field collections of P. macrosturtensis and for being a wonderful host to stygofauna catchers over many years. Finally, we would like to thank two anonymous reviewers for helping to improve the quality of the manuscript.

Author contributions

P.G.B.H., K.J., and S.J.B.C. conceived the study. K.J. performed experiments exposing beetles to heat stress. P.G.B.H. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. T.B. and C.S.P.F. provided guidance regarding bioinformatic analyses. S.T. performed molecular laboratory work. T.M.B., K.J., W.F.H., and A.D.A. helped to draft the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript and approved the final draft.

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by an Australian Research Council Discovery grant (DP180103851) to SJBC, WFH, ADA and TB.

Data availability

All raw RNA-seq data for Paroster macrosturtensis and P. nigroadumbratus used in differential expression analyses in this study are available via NCBI under BioProject PRJNA783065 (individual Sequence Read Archive accessions for samples SRR17023302-SRR17023315). HSP transcripts assembled from raw P. macrosturtensis RNA-seq data and used in phylogenetic analysis are available via GenBank (accession numbers summarized in Table S1). The reference transcriptome of P. nigroadumbratus (including all isoforms) and the annotated, subsetted dataset (only including longest isoform per Trinity ‘gene’) are available via FigShare (10.25909/17169191).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-20229-0.

References

  • 1.Tierney SM, Friedrich M, Humphreys WF, Jones TM, Warrant EJ, Wcislo WT. Consequences of evolutionary transitions in changing photic environments. Austral Entomol. 2017;56(1):23–46. doi: 10.1111/aen.12264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Culver, D. C. & Pipan, T. Shallow Subterranean Habitats: Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation [Internet]. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199646173.001.0001/acprof-9780199646173 [cited 2021 Apr 13] (Oxford University Press, 2014).
  • 3.Merritt DJ, Clarke AK. Synchronized circadian bioluminescence in cave-dwelling Arachnocampa tasmaniensis (Glowworms) J. Biol. Rhythms. 2011;26(1):34–43. doi: 10.1177/0748730410391947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Beale AD, Whitmore D, Moran D. Life in a dark biosphere: A review of circadian physiology in “arrhythmic” environments. J. Comp. Physiol. [B] 2016;186(8):947–968. doi: 10.1007/s00360-016-1000-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Walker JA, Rose HA. Oothecal structure and male genitalia of the Geoscapheinae and some Australian Panaesthia Serville (Blattodea: Blaberidae) Aust. J. Entomol. 1998;37(1):23–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.1998.tb01538.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jones KK, Cooper SJB, Seymour RS. Cutaneous respiration by diving beetles from underground aquifers of Western Australia (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) J. Exp. Biol. 2019;222(7):jeb196659. doi: 10.1242/jeb.196659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cieslak A, Fresneda J, Ribera I. Life-history specialization was not an evolutionary dead-end in Pyrenean cave beetles. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014;281(1781):20132978. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cieslak A, Fresneda J, Ribera I. Developmental constraints in cave beetles. Biol. Lett. 2014;10(10):20140712. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yang J, Chen X, Bai J, Fang D, Qiu Y, Jiang W, et al. The Sinocyclocheilus cavefish genome provides insights into cave adaptation. BMC Biol. 2016;14(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12915-015-0223-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Balart-García P, Cieslak A, Escuer P, Rozas J, Ribera I, Fernández R. Smelling in the dark: Phylogenomic insights into the chemosensory system of a subterranean beetle. Mol. Ecol. [Internet]. 2021 doi: 10.1111/mec.15921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Badino, G. Underground meteorology—“What’s the weather underground?”. Acta Carsologica [Internet] 39(3). https://ojs.zrc-sazu.si/carsologica/article/view/74 [cited 2021 Apr 13] (2010).
  • 12.Hüppop, K. Adaptation to low food. In Encyclopedia of Caves [Internet] 2nd edn (eds White, W. B. & Culver, D. C.) 1–9. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123838322000013 [cited 2022 Jun 27] (Academic Press, 2012).
  • 13.Bourges F, Genthon P, Genty D, Lorblanchet M, Mauduit E, D’Hulst D. Conservation of prehistoric caves and stability of their inner climate: Lessons from Chauvet and other French caves. Sci. Total Environ. 2014;15(493):79–91. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.05.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mammola S, Piano E, Cardoso P, Vernon P, Domínguez-Villar D, Culver DC, et al. Climate change going deep: The effects of global climatic alterations on cave ecosystems. Anthr. Rev. 2019;6(1–2):98–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jindal S, Dudani AK, Singh B, Harley CB, Gupta RS. Primary structure of a human mitochondrial protein homologous to the bacterial and plant chaperonins and to the 65-kilodalton mycobacterial antigen. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989;9(5):2279–2283. doi: 10.1128/mcb.9.5.2279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Richter K, Haslbeck M, Buchner J. The heat shock response: Life on the verge of death. Mol. Cell. 2010;40(2):253–266. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Somero GN. The cellular stress response and temperature: Function, regulation, and evolution. J. Exp. Zool. Part Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 2020;333(6):379–397. doi: 10.1002/jez.2344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tomanek L. Variation in the heat shock response and its implication for predicting the effect of global climate change on species’ biogeographical distribution ranges and metabolic costs. J. Exp. Biol. 2010;213(6):971–979. doi: 10.1242/jeb.038034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colado R, Pallarés S, Fresneda J, Mammola S, Rizzo V, Sánchez-Fernández D. Climatic stability, not average habitat temperature, determines thermal tolerance of subterranean beetles. Ecology. 2022;103:e3629. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Colson-Proch C, Morales A, Hervant F, Konecny L, Moulin C, Douady CJ. First cellular approach of the effects of global warming on groundwater organisms: A study of the HSP70 gene expression. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2010;15(3):259–270. doi: 10.1007/s12192-009-0139-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mermillod-Blondin F, Lefour C, Lalouette L, Renault D, Malard F, Simon L, et al. Thermal tolerance breadths among groundwater crustaceans living in a thermally constant environment. J. Exp. Biol. 2013;216(9):1683–1694. doi: 10.1242/jeb.081232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pallarés S, Colado R, Pérez-Fernández T, Wesener T, Ribera I, Sánchez-Fernández D. Heat tolerance and acclimation capacity in subterranean arthropods living under common and stable thermal conditions. Ecol. Evol. 2019;9(24):13731–13739. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pallarés S, Colado R, Botella-Cruz M, Montes A, Balart-García P, Bilton DT, et al. Loss of heat acclimation capacity could leave subterranean specialists highly sensitive to climate change. Anim. Conserv. [Internet]. 2020 doi: 10.1111/acv.12654. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Raschmanová N, Šustr V, Kováč Ľ, Parimuchová A, Devetter M. Testing the climatic variability hypothesis in edaphic and subterranean Collembola (Hexapoda) J. Therm. Biol. 2018;78:391–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rizzo V, Sánchez-Fernández D, Fresneda J, Cieslak A, Ribera I. Lack of evolutionary adjustment to ambient temperature in highly specialized cave beetles. BMC Evol. Biol. 2015;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12862-015-0288-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gibert J, Deharveng L. Subterranean ecosystems: A truncated functional biodiversity. Bioscience. 2002;52(6):473–481. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0473:SEATFB]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Humphreys, W. Diversity patterns in Australia. In: Encyclopedia of Caves 203–219 (2012).
  • 28.Bernabò P, Latella L, Jousson O, Lencioni V. Cold stenothermal cave-dwelling beetles do have an HSP70 heat shock response. J. Therm. Biol. 2011;36(3):206–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2011.03.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mammola S, Amorim IR, Bichuette ME, Borges PAV, Cheeptham N, Cooper SJB, et al. Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology. Biol. Rev. 2020;95(6):1855–1872. doi: 10.1111/brv.12642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cooper SJB, Hinze S, Leys R, Watts CHS, Humphreys WF. Islands under the desert: Molecular systematics and evolutionary origins of stygobitic water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) from central Western Australia. Invertebr. Syst. 2002;16(4):589–590. doi: 10.1071/IT01039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Watts CHS, Humphreys WF. Fourteen new Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) of the genera Limbodessus Guignot, Paroster Sharp, and Exocelina Broun from underground waters in Australia. Trans. R. Soc. S Aust. 2009;133(1):62–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leijs R, Nes E, Watts C, Cooper S, Humphreys W, Hogendoorn K. Evolution of blind beetles in isolated aquifers: A test of alternative modes of speciation. PLoS One. 2012;30(7):e34260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Langille BL, Hyde J, Saint KM, Bradford TM, Stringer DN, Tierney SM, et al. Evidence for speciation underground in diving beetles (Dytiscidae) from a subterranean archipelago. Evolution. 2021;75(1):166–175. doi: 10.1111/evo.14135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Leys R, Watts CHS, Cooper SJB, Humphreys WF. Evolution of subterranean diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporini, Didessini) in the arid zone of Australia. Evolution. 2003;57(12):2819–2834. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Toussaint EFA, Condamine FL, Hawlitschek O, Watts CH, Porch N, Hendrich L, et al. Unveiling the diversification dynamics of Australasian predaceous diving beetles in the Cenozoic. Syst. Biol. 2015;64(1):3–24. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jones KK, Humphreys WF, Saccò M, Bertozzi T, Austin AD, Cooper SJB. The critical thermal maximum of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): A comparison of subterranean and surface-dwelling species. Curr. Res. Insect Sci. 2021;1(1):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.cris.2021.100019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Verberk WCEP, Overgaard J, Ern R, Bayley M, Wang T, Boardman L, et al. Does oxygen limit thermal tolerance in arthropods? A critical review of current evidence. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2016;1(192):64–78. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, et al. Trinity: Reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tierney SM, Cooper SJB, Saint KM, Bertozzi T, Hyde J, Humphreys WF, et al. Opsin transcripts of predatory diving beetles: A comparison of surface and subterranean photic niches. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2015;2(1):140386. doi: 10.1098/rsos.140386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics (Oxf, Engl.) 2015;31(19):3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nishimura O, Hara Y, Kuraku S. gVolante for standardizing completeness assessment of genome and transcriptome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(22):3635–3637. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Haas, B. J., Papanicolaou, A., Yassour, M., Grabherr, M., Blood, P. D., Bowden, J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-Seq: reference generation and analysis with Trinity. Nat. Protoc. [Internet] 8(8). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3875132/ [cited 2021 May 10] (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 43.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, et al. BLAST+: Architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10(1):421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods. 2017;14(4):417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kriventseva EV, Kuznetsov D, Tegenfeldt F, Manni M, Dias R, Simão FA, et al. OrthoDB v10: Sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D807–D811. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen M, Zhang N, Jiang H, Meng X, Qiang K, Wang J. Transcriptional regulation of heat shock protein 70 genes by class I histone deacetylases in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Mol. Biol. 2020;29(2):221–230. doi: 10.1111/imb.12627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yocum GD. Differential expression of two HSP70 transcripts in response to cold shock, thermoperiod, and adult diapause in the Colorado potato beetle. J. Insect Physiol. 2001;47(10):1139–1145. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1910(01)00095-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cai, Z., Chen, J., Cheng, J. & Lin, T. Overexpression of three heat shock proteins protects Monochamusalternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) from thermal stress. J. Insect Sci. [Internet] 17(113). 10.1093/jisesa/iex082 [cited 2021 Jun 7] (2017).
  • 52.Li, M. Y., Huang, Y., Lei, X., Xu, C. T., Li, B., Chen, D. X. et al. Identification of six heat shock protein 70 genes in Lasiodermaserricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae) and their responses to temperature stress. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. [Internet]. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1226861521000674 [cited 2021 Jun 7] (2021).
  • 53.Yang WJ, Xu KK, Cao Y, Meng YL, Liu Y, Li C. Identification and expression analysis of four small heat shock protein genes in cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (Fabricius) Insects. 2019;10(5):139. doi: 10.3390/insects10050139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yuan X, Zhou WW, Zhou Y, Liu S, Lu F, Yang MF, et al. Composition and expression of heat shock proteins in an invasive pest, the rice water weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Fla Entomol. 2014;97(2):611–619. doi: 10.1653/024.097.0237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang H, Li K, Zhu JY, Fang Q, Ye GY, Wang H, et al. Cloning and expression pattern of heat shock protein genes from the endoparasitoid wasp, Pteromalus puparum in response to environmental stresses. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2012;79(4–5):247–263. doi: 10.1002/arch.21013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sasibhushan S, Ponnuvel KM, Vijayaprakash NB. Diapause specific gene expression in the eggs of multivoltine silkworm Bombyx mori, identified by suppressive subtractive hybridization. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012;161(4):371–379. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kim BG, Shim JK, Kim DW, Kwon YJ, Lee KY. Tissue-specific variation of heat shock protein gene expression in relation to diapause in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Entomol. Res. 2008;38(1):10–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00142.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Huang LH, Kang L. Cloning and interspecific altered expression of heat shock protein genes in two leafminer species in response to thermal stress. Insect Mol. Biol. 2007;16(4):491–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2007.00744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hull JJ, Geib SM, Fabrick JA, Brent CS. Sequencing and de novo assembly of the western tarnished plant bug (Lygus hesperus) transcriptome. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e55105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tonione MA, Bi K, Tsutsui ND. Transcriptomic signatures of cold adaptation and heat stress in the winter ant (Prenolepis imparis) PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sakano D, Li B, Xia Q, Yamamoto K, Fuiji H, Aso Y. Genes encoding small heat shock proteins of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2006;70(10):2443–2450. doi: 10.1271/bbb.60176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Narum SR, Campbell NR. Transcriptomic response to heat stress among ecologically divergent populations of redband trout. BMC Genom. 2015;16(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1246-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Akashi HD, Cádiz Díaz A, Shigenobu S, Makino T, Kawata M. Differentially expressed genes associated with adaptation to different thermal environments in three sympatric Cuban Anolis lizards. Mol. Ecol. 2016;25(10):2273–2285. doi: 10.1111/mec.13625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paraskevopoulou S, Dennis AB, Weithoff G, Tiedemann R. Temperature-dependent life history and transcriptomic responses in heat-tolerant versus heat-sensitive Brachionus rotifers. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):13281. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70173-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang W, Lin Y, Teng F, Ji D, Xu Y, Chen C, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis between heat-tolerant and sensitive Pyropia haitanensis strains in response to high temperature stress. Algal Res. 2018;1(29):104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2017.11.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Sun M, Lin C, Zhang A, Wang X, Yan H, Khan I, et al. Transcriptome sequencing revealed the molecular mechanism of response of pearl millet root to heat stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2021;207(4):768–773. doi: 10.1111/jac.12496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Jin J, Yang L, Fan D, Liu X, Hao Q. Comparative transcriptome analysis uncovers different heat stress responses in heat-resistant and heat-sensitive jujube cultivars. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0235763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.DeBiasse MB, Kelly MW. Plastic and evolved responses to global change: What can we learn from comparative transcriptomics? J. Hered. 2016;107(1):71–81. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esv073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Perez, R., de Souza Araujo, N., Defrance, M., Aron, S. Molecular adaptations to heat stress in the thermophilic ant genus Cataglyphis. Mol. Ecol. [Internet]. 10.1111/mec.16134 [cited 2021 Oct 29] (2021). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 70.Sørensen JG, Kristensen TN, Loeschcke V. The evolutionary and ecological role of heat shock proteins. Ecol. Lett. 2003;6(11):1025–1037. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00528.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sang W, Ma WH, Qiu L, Zhu ZH, Lei CL. The involvement of heat shock protein and cytochrome P450 genes in response to UV-A exposure in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Insect Physiol. 2012;58(6):830–836. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.King AM, MacRae TH. Insect heat shock proteins during stress and diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2015;60(1):59–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-162107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pallarés S, Sanchez-Hernandez JC, Colado R, Balart-García P, Comas J, Sánchez-Fernández D. Beyond survival experiments: using biomarkers of oxidative stress and neurotoxicity to assess vulnerability of subterranean fauna to climate change. Conserv. Physiol. 2020;8(1):coaa067. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coaa067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Stevens GC. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the tropics. Am. Nat. 1989;133(2):240–256. doi: 10.1086/284913. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Brennecke T, Gellner K, Bosch TC. The lack of a stress response in Hydra oligactis is due to reduced hsp70 mRNA stability. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998;255(3):703–709. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2550703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sanders BM, Hope C, Pascoe VM, Martin LS. Characterization of the stress protein response in two species of Collisella limpets with different temperature tolerances. Physiol. Zool. 1991;64(6):1471–1489. doi: 10.1086/physzool.64.6.30158225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Clark MS, Fraser KPP, Peck LS. Lack of an HSP70 heat shock response in two Antarctic marine invertebrates. Polar Biol. 2008;31(9):1059–1065. doi: 10.1007/s00300-008-0447-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rinehart JP, Hayward SAL, Elnitsky MA, Sandro LH, Lee RE, Denlinger DL. Continuous up-regulation of heat shock proteins in larvae, but not adults, of a polar insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103(38):14223–14227. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606840103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Hidalgo-Galiana A, Monge M, Biron DG, Canals F, Ribera I, Cieslak A. Protein expression parallels thermal tolerance and ecologic changes in the diversification of a diving beetle species complex. Heredity. 2016;116(1):114–123. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Langille BL, Tierney SM, Austin AD, Humphreys WF, Cooper SJB. How blind are they? Phototactic responses in stygobiont diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) from calcrete aquifers of Western Australia. Austral Entomol. 2019;58(2):425–431. doi: 10.1111/aen.12330. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Healy MA. It’s Hot and Getting Hotter. Australian Rangelands and Climate Change—Reports of the Rangelands Cluster Project. Ninti One Limited and CSIRO; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hemmerle, H. & Bayer, P. Climate change yields groundwater warming in Bavaria, Germany. Front. Earth Sci. [Internet]. 10.3389/feart.2020.575894 [cited 2022 Aug 22] (2020).
  • 83.Taylor CA, Stefan HG. Shallow groundwater temperature response to climate change and urbanization. J. Hydrol. 2009;375(3):601–612. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Gunawardhana LN, Kazama S. Statistical and numerical analyses of the influence of climate variability on aquifer water levels and groundwater temperatures: The impacts of climate change on aquifer thermal regimes. Glob. Planet Change. 2012;1(86–87):66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.02.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Cooper SJB, Saint KM, Taiti S, Austin AD, Humphreys WF. Subterranean archipelago: Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of stygobitic isopods (Oniscidea: Haloniscus) from the Yilgarn region of Western Australia. Invertebr. Syst. 2008;22(2):195–203. doi: 10.1071/IS07039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bradford T, Adams M, Humphreys WF, Austin AD, Cooper SJB. DNA barcoding of stygofauna uncovers cryptic amphipod diversity in a calcrete aquifer in Western Australia’s arid zone. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2010;10(1):41–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02706.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hose GC, Sreekanth J, Barron O, Pollino C. Stygofauna in Australian Groundwater Systems: Extent of Knowledge. CSIRO; 2015. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information. (13.1MB, docx)
Supplementary Table S2. (61.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All raw RNA-seq data for Paroster macrosturtensis and P. nigroadumbratus used in differential expression analyses in this study are available via NCBI under BioProject PRJNA783065 (individual Sequence Read Archive accessions for samples SRR17023302-SRR17023315). HSP transcripts assembled from raw P. macrosturtensis RNA-seq data and used in phylogenetic analysis are available via GenBank (accession numbers summarized in Table S1). The reference transcriptome of P. nigroadumbratus (including all isoforms) and the annotated, subsetted dataset (only including longest isoform per Trinity ‘gene’) are available via FigShare (10.25909/17169191).

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES