Skip to main content
Cells logoLink to Cells
. 2022 Sep 23;11(19):2965. doi: 10.3390/cells11192965

Stage-Dependent Activity and Pro-Chondrogenic Function of PI3K/AKT during Cartilage Neogenesis from Mesenchymal Stromal Cells

Felicia A M Klampfleuthner 1, Benedict Lotz 2, Tobias Renkawitz 2, Wiltrud Richter 1, Solvig Diederichs 1,*
Editor: Alexander V Ljubimov
PMCID: PMC9563299  PMID: 36230927

Abstract

Differentiating mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into articular chondrocytes (ACs) for application in clinical cartilage regeneration requires a profound understanding of signaling pathways regulating stem cell chondrogenesis and hypertrophic degeneration. Classifying endochondral signals into drivers of chondrogenic speed versus hypertrophy, we here focused on insulin/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1)-induced phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling. Aware of its proliferative function during early but not late MSC chondrogenesis, we aimed to unravel the late pro-chondrogenic versus pro-hypertrophic PI3K/AKT role. PI3K/AKT activity in human MSC and AC chondrogenic 3D cultures was assessed via Western blot detection of phosphorylated AKT. The effects of PI3K inhibition with LY294002 on chondrogenesis and hypertrophy were assessed via histology, qPCR, the quantification of proteoglycans, and alkaline phosphatase activity. Being repressed by ACs, PI3K/AKT activity transiently rose in differentiating MSCs independent of TGFβ or endogenous BMP/WNT activity and climaxed around day 21. PI3K/AKT inhibition from day 21 on equally reduced chondrocyte and hypertrophy markers. Proving important for TGFβ-induced SMAD2 phosphorylation and SOX9 accumulation, PI3K/AKT activity was here identified as a required stage-dependent driver of chondrogenic speed but not of hypertrophy. Thus, future attempts to improve MSC chondrogenesis will depend on the adequate stimulation and upregulation of PI3K/AKT activity to generate high-quality cartilage from human MSCs.

Keywords: mesenchymal stromal cells, chondrogenesis, cartilage, chondrocyte hypertrophy, PI3K, AKT, PKB, LY294002, insulin

1. Introduction

Large focal cartilage injuries in the knee are routinely treated with autologous articular chondrocytes (ACs), although their harvest creates novel non-regenerating cartilage defects. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a promising alternative since they are readily available from regenerative tissues like bone marrow and can differentiate into chondrocytes that deposit cartilage tissue rich in proteoglycans and type II collagen [1,2]. However, instead of developing an AC-like phenotype, MSCs undergo endochondral development in vitro and phenocopy hypertrophic growth plate chondrocytes with characteristic markers like type X collagen, Indian hedgehog (IHH), parathyroid hormone 1 receptor (PTH1R), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and integrin-binding bone sialoprotein (IBSP), and with the capacity to induce ectopic bone formation [1,3,4]. Importantly, ACs under identical culture conditions generate permanent cartilage that is not remodeled into bone in vivo [4].

Analyzing the deviant responses of MSCs and ACs to identical culture conditions has revealed signaling pathways that drive MSCs into the endochondral lineage. Stimulated with transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), MSCs reduce TGFβ receptor expression, upregulate bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) and IHH, and maintain a high cell-autonomous WNT activity while ACs show an opposite regulation. TGFβ receptors, BMP antagonists, and the natural IHH inhibitor PTHrP (parathyroid hormone-related protein) are upregulated, and WNT activity is silenced [3,5,6,7]. Since they upregulate both chondrocyte and hypertrophy markers [1,2,7,8,9], we consider TGFβ and BMPs to be pro-chondrogenic regulators of the speed of MSC chondrogenesis, while WNT and IHH/PTHrP are regulators of hypertrophy that leave chondrocyte markers largely unaffected [3,8,10]. In this context, the role of one of the most prominent stimulators of chondrocyte hypertrophy in the growth plate, the insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1)-triggered phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway [11] remained so far uninvestigated.

Chondrogenic MSC and AC cultures are standardly treated with serum-free medium containing high doses of insulin (5–10 µg/mL) that activate PI3K/AKT signaling upon binding to its cognate insulin receptor IR (reviewed by [12]) but can also activate the IGF1 receptor, IGF1R [13,14]. However, whether this continuous stimulation of PI3K/AKT via IR and IGF1R mainly regulates the speed of MSC chondrogenesis by equally stimulating chondrocyte and hypertrophy markers or whether PI3K/AKT signaling drives chondrocyte hypertrophy remains so far unaddressed.

Importantly, in the growth plate, chondrocyte markers and cartilage matrix deposition were largely independent of PI3K/AKT signaling according to a variety of knockout models. Neither a deficiency in IGF1, the receptors IGF1R or IR, nor a single or double knockout of AKT1 and AKT2 delayed or reduced chondrocyte markers, including proteoglycan deposition in the zones of resting and proliferating chondrocytes [15,16,17,18,19]. Moreover, IGF1 infusion did not increase chondrocyte matrix production in the growth plates of hypophysectomized rats [20]. Cultured chondrocytes and cartilage tissue, by contrast, appeared more dependent on PI3K/AKT signaling, and treatment with insulin or IGF1 is important for their matrix production and chondrocyte marker expression [21,22,23,24,25,26]. Overexpression and inhibitor studies showed that PI3K/AKT signaling stimulated proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition along with ACAN and SOX9 expression in human AC alginate and monolayer cultures, bovine ACs, and rat nucleus pulposus cells [27,28,29,30]. Altogether, these studies suggested that the importance of PI3K/AKT signaling for chondrocyte markers and cartilage matrix production may be context-dependent.

In the context of MSC in vitro chondrogenesis, we have previously shown that PI3K/AKT activity was important for cell proliferation only during the first two weeks but not later on [31], and cell proliferation was in turn required for proper chondrogenesis and type II collagen deposition [32]. Whether in the later phase of MSC chondrogenesis, PI3K/AKT signaling may drive chondrocyte hypertrophy remains so far uninvestigated.

A major pro-hypertrophic activity of PI3K/AKT signaling was demonstrated by a large variety of developmental animal studies. The knockout of IGF1 or IGF1R, or the combined knockout of AKT1 and AKT2 severely affected the zone of hypertrophic growth plate chondrocytes which was reduced in length and contained less hypertrophic (i.e., smaller in size) chondrocytes [16,17,33,34], which ultimately reduced bone length, delayed ossification, and impaired skeletal mineralization [15,17,19,35,36,37]. For knockouts of the insulin receptor, similar but less severe effects were reported [18,38]. Conversely, IGF1 or insulin stimulation enlarged the hypertrophic zone and the hypertrophic chondrocytes in embryonic mouse or rat metatarsal explants, and juvenile rabbit tibiae [39,40,41,42] and increased the expression of Ihh, Col10a1, and other hypertrophic markers in monolayer cultures of chicken growth plate chondrocytes and a chondrogenic rat cell line [43,44,45]. Given such strong evidence, it appears important to consider a potential pro-hypertrophic role of PI3K/AKT signaling also during MSC chondrogenesis in vitro.

Interestingly, in osteogenic human MSC cultures, ALP enzyme activity, osteopontin, and osteocalcin protein levels, matrix mineralization and other characteristics that osteoblasts share with hypertrophic chondrocytes depended on PI3K/AKT activity [46,47,48,49]. Thus, although a strong body of literature demonstrated that PI3K/AKT signaling is strongly associated with chondrocyte hypertrophy and pro-osteogenic cues, its exact contribution to the chondrogenesis and hypertrophic development of human MSCs remains largely unclear.

The aim of this study was therefore to unravel the role of PI3K/AKT signaling for MSC chondrogenesis with a special focus on its putative pro-chondrogenic versus pro-hypertrophic function during the later phase of chondrogenesis. The activation of PI3K/AKT signaling in chondrogenic 3D MSC pellet cultures was compared with ACs, and its regulation by signaling pathways that drive either the speed of chondrogenesis (TGFβ, BMP) or hypertrophy (WNT) was assessed. To categorize the function of PI3K/AKT signaling, the dose–response of chondrocyte markers, proteoglycan deposition, and hypertrophy markers under PI3K inhibition was investigated. Better knowledge of the importance and function of PI3K/AKT signaling for MSC chondrogenesis and hypertrophy may improve our ability to guide MSCs between chondral versus endochondral pathways and improve cell-based cartilage and bone regeneration strategies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Expansion of MSCs and ACs

All procedures were approved by the local Ethics Committee on human experimentation of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University and in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 in its latest version. MSCs were isolated from human bone marrow aspirates obtained with informed consent from patients (age 21–83 years) undergoing total hip replacement. Mononuclear cells were isolated via Ficoll-PaqueTM (Cytiva, Freiburg, Germany) as described previously [2] and expanded for three passages in medium composed of high glucose-containing Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 12.5% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco, Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Biochrom, Bioswisstec, Schaffhausen, Switzerland), 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, 1% β-mercaptoethanol (all Gibco, Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and 4 ng/mL human fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2, Active Bioscience, Hamburg, Germany). Cells were cultured at 37 °C and 6% CO2, and the medium was exchanged three times a week.

ACs were isolated from human articular cartilage obtained with informed consent from patients (age 49–77) undergoing total knee replacement. Cartilage from phenotypically healthy regions was minced and digested overnight at 37 °C with 1.5 mg/mL collagenase B (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) and 0.1 mg/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Chondrocytes were expanded for two passages with medium comprising low-glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin.

2.2. Cartilage Neogenesis from MSCs and ACs

MSCs and ACs were cultured as 3D pellets (5 × 105 cells/pellet) in chondrogenic medium consisting of high-glucose DMEM, 0.1 µM dexamethasone, 0.17 mM ascorbic acid-2 phosphate, 4 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.35 mM proline, 5 µg/mL transferrin, 5 ng/mL selenous acid, 1.25 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% ITS+ premix (Corning Life Sciences, New York City, NY, USA) or similar amounts of insulin (Lantus, Sanofi-Aventis, Frankfurt, Germany), and 10 ng/mL recombinant human TGFβ1 (Biomol, Hamburg, Germany) for up to 6 weeks with medium changes three times a week.

For the indicated time points during MSC chondrogenesis, the chondrogenic medium was supplemented with the BMP inhibitor LDN-212854 (LDN-21; 500 nM in DMSO solvent, day 0–42; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), the WNT-inhibitor IWP-2 (2 μM in DMSO solvent, day 14–42), or LY294002 (LY; 0.25 µM–25 µM in DMSO, day 21–42; both from Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, United Kingdom). When appropriate, the controls were treated with DMSO. Where indicated, TGFβ1 was withdrawn from day 21 onward. For the Western blot detection of phosphorylated AKT, pellets were harvested at the designated days 48 h after the last medium exchange.

2.3. Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was isolated by phenol/guanidine isothiocyanate extraction using peqGOLD Trifast (PEQLAB, Erlangen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Complementary DNA was synthesized from 500 ng of total RNA using Omniscript R reverse transcriptase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Transcript levels were determined by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis using SybrGreen (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the LightCycler R 96 system (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) with the gene-specific primers shown in Supplemental Table S1. Gene expression was normalized to the Ct value of the reference genes RPL13 and CPSF6, and the relative gene expression was calculated as 100% × 1.8−ΔCt.

2.4. Western Blotting

Two pellets per time point and group were pooled in 120 µL PhosphoSafe Extraction Reagent (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) supplemented with 1 mM Pefabloc® SC (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and minced in a mixer mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) for 2 × 2 min at 30 Hz. After centrifugation for 20 min at 13,000× g and 4 °C, the supernatants were transferred to clean reaction tubes, mixed with Laemmli buffer (33.2% (w/v) glycerine (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 249mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 8.0% (w/v) SDS, 0.02% bromphenol blue (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in distilled water), and heated for 5 min at 95 °C. The samples were separated by denaturing sodium-dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted on nitrocellulose (AmershamTM, GE Healthcare, Chalfont St Giles, United Kingdom). To probe for several proteins of interest in a sample, the membrane was cut horizontally at 50 kDa. The following antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-pAKT antibody (Ser473, 1:500, #9271), rabbit polyclonal anti-AKT antibody (1:1000, #9272), rabbit monoclonal anti-pSMAD2 antibody (Ser465/467, 1:500, #3108, clone 138D4), monoclonal anti-SMAD2/3 antibody (1:1000, #8685, clone DFG7), monoclonal anti-pSMAD1/5/9 antibody (Ser463/465, Ser463/465, Ser465/467, 1:250, #13820, all from Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), monoclonal anti-SMAD1/5 (SMAD1: 1:500, ab33902; SMAD5: 1:1000, ab40771; both from Abcam, Berlin, Germany), rabbit polyclonal anti-SOX9 antibody (1:2000, AB5535, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), or mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (1:10,000, GTX26276, clone AC-15, GeneTex, Irvine, CA, USA). Bands were detected by peroxidase-coupled goat anti-mouse antibody (1:5000, #115-035-071) or peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:10,000, #111-035-046, both from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland).

2.5. ALP Enzyme Activity

Culture supernatants from four to five replicate pellets per group and time point were pooled, and 100 µL was incubated with 100 µL of substrate solution [10 mg/mL p-nitrophenyl phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 0.1 M Glycin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM ZnCl2 (both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), pH 9.6]. After 120 min, the absorbance was recorded at 405/490 nm (FLUOStar OMEGA, BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany). The substrate conversion was referred to a p-nitrophenol-derived standard curve (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and calculated as ALP enzyme activity (ng/mL/min).

2.6. GAG and DNA Quantification

For the measurement of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and DNA content, two pellets per group were pooled and digested with 3 U/mL proteinase K (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) dissolved in 0.05 M Tris (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and 1 mM CaCl2 (pH 8.0, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) overnight at 60 °C. The DNA content of the digest was determined with the Quant iT PicoGreen ds DNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For GAG quantification, 30 μL of the 1:2 diluted proteinase K digest was mixed with 200 μL of 1,9-dimethyl-methylene blue (DMMB, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) dye solution (pH 3.0) [50], the absorbance was measured at 530 nm, and it was referred to a chondroitin sulfate standard curve.

2.7. Histology

The pellets were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 2 h, dehydrated, and paraffin-embedded. Sections of 5 µm thickness were deparaffinized, rehydrated, stained with Safranin O (0.2% in 1% acetic acid; Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and counterstained with Fast Green (0.04% in 0.2% acetic acid; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) according to standard histological protocols. Immunohistological staining of type II collagen was performed as described previously [2]. In brief, sections were treated with 4 mg/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) followed by 1 mg/mL pronase (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), and unspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin. Type II collagen was detected with a monoclonal mouse anti-human type II collagen antibody (1:1000, 0863171-CF, clone II-4C11, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) and visualized with biotinylated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:500, Dianova, BIOZOL, Hamburg, Germany), streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase (Dako, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and Fast Red (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analyses

The number of independent experiments performed for each analysis is given in the figure captions. For all values, the mean and the standard error of the mean were calculated, and differences between groups were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test (MWU) or LSD-corrected ANOVA for multiple comparisons, as specified in the figure captions. A two-tailed significance value of p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The data were analyzed using SPSS-25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Inverse Regulation of PI3K/AKT Activation in MSC versus AC Chondrogenic Cultures

To document the chondrogenic capacity of MSCs and the phenotypic differences between hypertrophic MSC-derived chondrocytes and ACs, we compared matrix deposition and specific marker expression of human MSC versus AC 3D pellet cultures in standard serum-free chondrogenic medium containing 10ng/mL TGFβ1 and 6.25 µg/mL insulin. Histological analyses revealed a similar accumulation of cartilage extracellular matrix rich in proteoglycans and type II collagen in both groups after 6 weeks and a round cell morphology that is characteristic of chondrocytes (Figure 1A,B). The ACs started with significantly higher expression of the chondrocyte marker COL2A1 but differentiating MSCs reached COL2A1 levels of ACs at days 21 and 42 of differentiation (Figure 1C). Of note, MSC-derived chondrocytes expressed COL10A1 and IBSP at significantly higher levels than AC samples on days 21 and 42 (Figure 1D) along with significantly higher ALP enzyme activity from day 21 on (Figure 1E). Taken together, these data confirmed the successful differentiation of MSCs and ACs with the important difference that MSCs but not ACs followed the endochondral route and developed into hypertrophic chondrocytes.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Inverse AKT regulation in hypertrophic MSC versus AC chondrogenic cultures. Pellets of expanded MSCs and ACs were subjected to chondrogenic culture for 6 weeks in the presence of TGFβ1 and insulin. Samples were harvested at the indicated time points 48 h after medium exchange. (A,B) Paraffin sections of MSC and AC pellets at day 42 stained with Safranin O/Fast Green to visualize proteoglycan deposition and for type II collagen by immunohistochemistry. Scale bars: 100 µm. MSCs: n = 8, ACs: n = 5. (C,D) Gene expression analysis of the chondrogenic marker COL2A1, the hypertrophic marker COL10A1, and the osteogenic marker IBSP at days 0, 21, and 42 of MSC chondrogenesis and AC re-differentiation. RPL13 and CPSF6 were used as reference genes; n = 3. (E) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity at weekly intervals was determined in culture supernatants pooled from four MSC or AC pellets for each independent experiment. MSCs: n = 6–7, ACs: n = 4. (F) Western blot analysis of pAKT and AKT protein using β-actin as loading control. One representative of n = 6–7 for MSCs from six independent donors and n = 4 for ACs is shown. (G) Densitometric analysis of Western blots shown in (F). (H) Densitometric analysis of Western blots: pAKT/β-actin protein levels in MSCs and ACs at indicated time points were compared on the same membrane; n = 3. Given n-numbers refer to the number of experiments performed with independent MSC or AC donor populations. Means ± SEM are shown. * p ≤ 0.05 MSCs vs. ACs, Mann–Whitney U test (MWU).

Next, we investigated PI3K/AKT activity over the course of the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs in comparison to ACs. The protein levels of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) were compared at weekly intervals via Western blotting using β-actin as a reference. Interestingly, the pAKT levels rose during the first three weeks of chondrogenesis in all seven investigated MSC donor samples and peaked in a donor-dependent manner between days 14 and 28 (Figure 1F,G), which was independent of donor age. In one out of the seven donor samples, the pAKT levels were already high at day 7. In six out of the seven MSC donor samples, the pAKT levels then declined until day 42. In strong contrast, AKT phosphorylation in ACs declined donor-dependently from day 7 or day 14 of re-differentiation on and remained at low levels further on (Figure 1F,G). Importantly, a direct comparison of the pAKT/β-actin ratio in MSC and AC samples on the same membrane demonstrated significantly higher AKT phosphorylation in MSC cultures throughout days 21 to 42, although the pAKT levels declined again in MSC-derived chondrocytes (Figure 1H). Taken together, an inverse PI3K/AKT regulation was evident during endochondral MSC development versus chondral AC re-differentiation and showed a characteristic high level in the middle phase of MSC chondrogenesis.

3.2. Elevated AKT Activation Is Independent of TGFβ and Cell-Autonomous BMP and WNT Activity

The PI3K/AKT pathway is a central signaling hub that can be influenced by many other signaling pathways, and we next asked whether signaling pathways that are known to deviate between chondrogenic MSC and AC cultures could be responsible for elevated pAKT levels in MSC pellets. Specifically, we considered pro-chondrogenic TGFβ and BMP activity as well as pro-hypertrophic WNT signaling and tested whether their reduction would decrease AKT phosphorylation in MSC pellets. Discontinuing the TGFβ1 treatment of MSC cultures in the phase of high AKT activation from day 21 (no TGFβ in Figure 2A–C) still allowed high proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition, according to the histological assessment of the day 42 samples in line with previous data [51], albeit some reduction in proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition was apparent (Figure 2A). Surprisingly, the pAKT protein levels were elevated in samples from four out of five independent MSC donor populations compared to controls at all investigated time points after TGFβ1 withdrawal (Figure 2B,C). Samples from a fifth donor showed no consistent response. This indicated that TGFβ reduced AKT phosphorylation in MSC-derived chondrocytes.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Elevated AKT activation is independent of TGFβ and cell-autonomous BMP and WNT activity. MSC pellets were subjected to chondrogenic culture for 6 weeks and the effects of TGFβ, BMP, and WNT signaling on AKT activation were investigated. (AC) TGFβ1 treatment was discontinued from day 21 on in the treatment groups (no TGFβ1), whereas control pellets received 10 ng/mL TGFβ1 throughout 6 weeks of pellet culture (CTRL). (DF) 500 nM of the BMP inhibitor LDN-212854 (LDN-21) or 0.02% DMSO solvent (CTRL) was applied from day 0 on. (GI) MSC pellets were treated with 2 µM IWP-2 or 0.04% DMSO solvent (CTRL) from day 14 on. (A,D,G) Paraffin sections of day 42 MSC pellets were stained with Safranin O/Fast Green to visualize proteoglycan deposition and by immunohistochemistry to visualize type II collagen (insets). Scale bars: 100 µm for proteoglycans and 200 µm for type II collagen. (B,C,E,F,H,I) Western blot detection of pAKT and AKT protein levels using β-actin as loading control. Medians ± 95% confidence intervals are shown; n = 3–5.

We next inhibited endogenous BMP activity with 500 nM LDN-212854 (LDN-21), a concentration that was capable to block BMP-induced SMAD1/5/9 phosphorylation and that significantly reduced ALP activity at day 42 (Supplemental Figure S1A,B), whereas proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition during MSC chondrogenesis was largely maintained (Figure 2D). Importantly, the upregulation of the pAKT protein levels remained unchanged, indicating that AKT activity was independent of endogenous BMP signaling (Figure 2E,F). WNT inhibition with 2 µM IWP-2 starting at day 14 of MSC chondrogenesis, as previously established [3,52], strongly reduced ALP activity at maintained proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition (Figure 2G, Supplemental Figure S1C) but did also not affect AKT phosphorylation (Figure 2H,I). Overall, none of the investigated pro-chondrogenic or pro-hypertrophic signaling pathways that discriminate chondrogenic MSC from AC cultures appeared to be directly responsible for the increased AKT activation in the MSC cultures, thus leaving the classification of AKT signaling in one or the other pathway category undetermined.

3.3. Elevated PI3K/AKT Activation Is Essential for High Proteoglycan Deposition

To elucidate whether PI3K/AKT signaling is a pro-chondrogenic or a pro-hypertrophic pathway during MSC chondrogenesis, we inhibited PI3K with 25 µM LY294002 (LY) starting at day 21. According to our previous data, cell survival and proliferation were not affected by this LY dose between days 14 and 28 of MSC differentiation [31] Control pellets were treated with the respective amount of the solvent DMSO. Western blotting confirmed a strong reduction in AKT phosphorylation under LY treatment compared to controls at all investigated time points (Figure 3A, Supplemental Figure S2A). Of note, 25 µM LY reduced the gene expression of the hypertrophy marker COL10A1 by 81% compared to the control samples at day 42, and IHH and PTH1R were significantly lowered by 95% and 76%, respectively (Figure 3B, Supplemental Figure S2). Additionally, 25 µM LY significantly reduced the osteogenic marker IBSP mRNA by 94% compared to the control and fully suppressed ALP activity in culture supernatants from day 28 on (Figure 3C,D). However, this strong anti-hypertrophic effect of 25 µM LY came at the expense of a diminished proteoglycan and type II collagen content in the pellets (Figure 3E, Supplemental Figure S2). Proteoglycan quantification revealed a 70% reduction by 25 µM LY compared to control pellets (Figure 3F). The histologically apparent smaller pellet size was reflected by a reduced cell content according to DNA quantification (Figure 3G) after three weeks of LY treatment. Importantly, also the expression of the chondrogenic markers COL2A1 and ACAN was suppressed in the day 42 samples (Figure 3H). Altogether, this demonstrated that PI3K suppression was strongly anti-chondrogenic rather than specifically anti-hypertrophic and that PI3K/AKT activity was essential in the late phase of MSC chondrogenesis to maintain chondrocyte marker expression and high cartilage matrix production. Since ACs were capable to maintain high cartilage matrix production despite low AKT activation, we next asked whether reducing instead of strongly suppressing pAKT levels in MSC-derived chondrocytes would allow to maintain cartilage matrix production and decrease hypertrophic markers.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

AKT suppression impairs chondrogenesis of MSCs. MSC pellets were subjected to chondrogenic culture for 6 weeks and treated with 25 µM LY294002 (LY) or 0.1% DMSO solvent (CTRL) starting from day 21 of chondrogenesis. Samples were harvested at indicated time points. (A) Western blot analysis for pAKT and AKT using β-actin as loading control. Shown is one representative of three independent experiments. All samples were loaded on the same gel and detected on the same membrane. (B,C) Gene expression analysis by qPCR for COL10A1 and IBSP at days 0, 21, and 42 using CPSF6 and RPL13 as reference genes. (D) Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was determined in culture supernatants pooled from four pellets per group and time point. (E) Paraffin sections of MSC pellets at day 42 were stained for proteoglycans with Safranin O/Fast Green or for type II collagen by immunohistochemistry. Scale bars: 100 µm for enlarged sections and 1 mm for overviews. Shown is one representative of three independent experiments. (F) GAG content at day 42 was assessed by DMMB assay and referred to DNA quantity. (G) DNA amount per pellet at day 42 was quantified by Pico Green assay. (H) Gene expression analysis of COL2A1 and ACAN by qPCR at days 0, 21, and 42 using CPSF6 and RPL13 as reference genes. Experiments were performed in three independent MSC donor populations (n = 3). Graphs show means ± SEM. * p ≤ 0.05 compared to CTRL at the same time point, MWU.

Briefly, 0.25–2.5 µM LY dose-dependently reduced AKT phosphorylation in differentiating MSCs at all investigated time points according to Western blotting (Figure 4A, Supplemental Figure S3A). The expression of the hypertrophy markers COL10A1, IHH, and PTH1R remained unchanged with 0.25 µM and was slightly but not significantly reduced by 1.25 µM and 2.5 µM LY at day 42 (Figure 4B, Supplemental Figure S3B). Osteogenic markers IBSP, ALPL, and ALP enzyme activity in culture supernatants remained, however, unaffected by all of these LY concentrations (Figure 4C,D, Supplemental Figure S3C). Importantly, 0.25–2.5 µM LY allowed homogeneous proteoglycan and type II collagen deposition according to the histological assessment of the day 42 samples (Figure 4E, Supplemental Figure S3D). However, proteoglycan staining appeared increasingly weaker than in solvent controls, and the GAG/DNA levels were significantly reduced by 1.25 µM and 2.5 µM LY (−19% and −27%, resp., Figure 4F) at unchanged DNA content (Figure 4G). Like hypertrophy markers, COL2A1 and ACAN mRNAs were also dose-dependently reduced (2.5 µM: −50% COL2A1, −46% ACAN, Figure 4H), albeit this remained a trend. Thus, the reduction in chondrocyte hypertrophy by decreasing PI3K/AKT activation came only at the expense of chondrogenic power. This indicated that the observed elevated PI3K/AKT activation in late MSC chondrogenesis was an essential pro-chondrogenic driver of chondrocyte markers and cartilage matrix deposition.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pro-chondrogenic instead of pro-hypertrophic function of PI3K/AKT activity. MSC pellets were subjected to chondrogenic culture for 6 weeks and treated with 0.25 µM, 1.25 µM, or 2.5 µM LY294002 (LY) or 0.01% DMSO solvent (CTRL), starting from day 21 of chondrogenesis. (A) Western blot analysis for pAKT and AKT protein levels using β-actin as loading control. Shown is one representative of three independent experiments. (B,C) Gene expression analysis by qPCR for the hypertrophy marker COL10A1 and the osteogenic marker IBSP using CPSF6 and RPL13 as reference genes. (D) ALP enzyme activity was determined in pooled supernatants from four pellets per group and time point. (E) Paraffin sections of day 42 MSC pellets were stained with Safranin O/Fast Green to visualize proteoglycan deposition. Scale bars: 100 µm for enlarged sections and 1mm for overviews. (F) GAG content at day 42 was assessed via DMMB assay and referred to the DNA amount. (G) DNA content per pellet at day 42 was quantified via Pico Green assay. (H) Gene expression analysis by qPCR for the chondrogenic markers COL2A1 and ACAN using CPSF6 and RPL13 as reference genes. n = 3 independent MSC donor populations for each experiment. Graphs show means ± SEM. * p ≤ 0.05.

3.4. PI3K/AKT Activity Is Important for TGFβ Signaling and High SOX9 Protein Levels

To further substantiate the pro-chondrogenic PI3K/AKT function and elucidate a potential underlying mechanism, we next assessed the importance of PI3K/AKT for TGFβ/SMAD2 signaling and the chondrogenic master transcription factor SOX9, which are both crucial for chondrocyte marker expression and cartilage matrix synthesis. Western blotting revealed a strong reduction in pSMAD2 levels under treatment with 25 µM LY compared to the controls (Figure 5A, Supplemental Figure S4A) and a dose-dependent pSMAD2 reduction by 0.25–2.5 µM LY (Figure 5B, Supplemental Figure S4B). Thus, TGFβ-induced SMAD2 signaling was impaired by AKT inhibition, indicating that high PI3K/AKT activity was necessary for proper TGFβ signaling in differentiating MSC cultures.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

PI3K/AKT signaling is important for TGFβ activity and SOX9 protein accumulation. MSC pellets were subjected to chondrogenic culture for 6 weeks and treated with the indicated concentration of LY or DMSO (0.1% for A, C; 0.01% for B, D) from day 21 of chondrogenesis on. Western blot analyses for pSMAD2 and total SMAD2/3 (A,B) as well as SOX9 protein (C,D) using β-actin as loading control. All samples were loaded on the same gel and detected on the same membrane. Shown is one representative of three independent experiments.

In addition, 25 µM LY strongly reduced SOX9 protein levels in differentiating MSC cultures at all tested time points (Figure 5C, Supplemental Figure S4C), and a SOX9 reduction was also observed with 2.5 µM but not with lower LY doses (Figure 5D, Supplemental Figure S4D). Conclusively, our data demonstrated that elevated PI3K/AKT activity in MSC-derived chondrocytes was crucial for two pro-chondrogenic factors, the SMAD2-dependent canonical TGFβ activity and the chondrogenic master transcription factor SOX9, and thus for their downstream targets, including COL2A1 gene expression and proteoglycan production.

4. Discussion

To re-direct MSC chondrogenesis from the intrinsic endochondral into the desired chondral lineage that gives rise to phenotypically stable AC-like chondrocytes and articular cartilage neogenesis requires a profound knowledge of the signaling pathways that regulate chondrocyte differentiation and drive hypertrophy. Surprisingly, the contribution of the PI3K/AKT pathway to these two processes inherent to MSC in vitro chondrogenesis has not been addressed yet, even though the IGF1/PI3K/AKT axis is important for cartilage matrix deposition by chondrocytes and is a prominent driver of chondrocyte hypertrophy in the growth plate. We here showed for the first time that an inverse regulation of PI3K/AKT activation discriminated MSC chondrogenesis from AC re-differentiation in vitro, which demonstrated a chondrocyte lineage or differentiation stage-dependent response of chondrogenic cultures to PI3K/AKT stimulation. Interestingly, rising PI3K/AKT activation in differentiating MSCs appeared independent of TGFβ treatment and endogenous BMP or WNT activity, and was thus not driven by these lineage-dependent signals with known differential regulation in chondrogenic MSC and AC cultures. Importantly, our data demonstrated for the first time, that in the later phase of MSC chondrogenesis, PI3K/AKT equally drives chondrocyte and hypertrophy markers and is important for activating the pro-chondrogenic mediator SMAD2, as well as for the protein accumulation of the transcription factor SOX9, a master enhancer of cartilage matrix gene expression. Thus, our data demonstrated that PI3K/AKT signaling is a pro-chondrogenic rather than a pro-hypertrophic pathway in TGFβ-stimulated chondrogenic cultures.

A very interesting and novel discovery of our study was the so far undetected inverse regulation of PI3K/AKT stimulation by MSCs and ACs under identical chondrogenic culture conditions. Apparently, upregulated PI3K/AKT activity was not specific for endochondral differentiation because on the one hand, major endochondral signaling pathways did not upregulate AKT phosphorylation, and on the other hand, PI3K/AKT was not pro-hypertrophic. Chronologically, the phase of high PI3K/AKT activity appeared to coincide with cells in the stage of proliferating chondroblasts, which, according to our previous data, is reached between days 10 and 21 of MSC differentiation, when the cells re-entered the cell cycle and started to deposit type II collagen [31,32]. This indicated that the regulation of PI3K/AKT signaling was differentiation stage-dependent rather than chondrocyte lineage-dependent. This interpretation is consistent with developmental mouse studies that reported immune histochemical pAKT detection in proliferating and pre-hypertrophic chondrocytes and strongly diminished levels in the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone of the growth plate [53,54]. Moreover, this assumption was also consistent with previous observations in the ATDC5 cell line, where the insulin-induced recruitment of PI3K to the membrane and downstream AKT phosphorylation were high at the proliferative stage but low at the differentiated, hypertrophic chondrocyte stage [42]. Based on a reduced IR abundance upon insulin treatment, the authors suggested a ligand-induced receptor downregulation as a potential mechanism. While this mechanism was in line with the here observed repression of PI3K/AKT activity in ACs, it was not in line with the transiently upregulated PI3K/AKT response observed during MSC chondrogenesis. We therefore suggest a differentiation stage-dependent mechanism with a high PI3K/AKT response characteristic for proliferating chondroblasts.

Of note, not only PI3K/AKT activity but also its function appeared to be differentiation stage-dependent. In a previous study, we showed that PI3K/AKT activity was initially required for cell proliferation during the early phase (first 14 days) of MSC chondrogenesis [31]. Our current data now showed that PI3K/AKT activity remained essential throughout later MSC differentiation but with a pro-chondrogenic instead of a proliferative function. Overall, PI3K/AKT signaling functions as a required stimulator of the speed of chondrogenesis in vitro. This pro-chondrogenic role of PI3K/AKT was not expected from the IGF1/IGF1R/IR/PI3K/AKT knockout animal models, where authors described growth plate defects but did not report proteoglycan amounts to be affected [15,16,17,18,19,33,34,35,55]. However, in the complex in vivo system, the knockout of a single gene can easily be compensated by alternative receptors, ligands, or effector isoforms. Interestingly, when the insulin receptor was knocked out in cultured mouse chondrocytes in vitro, SOX9 expression and proteoglycan deposition were reduced compared to the controls, even though in the same study, a cartilage matrix phenotype in IR-deficient chondrocytes in the growth plate was not apparent [38]. Additionally, in vitro, LY treatment reduced alcian blue-stained proteoglycans along with the Col2a1 expression of mesenchymal mouse limb bud cells cultured in serum-containing medium [56]. Together with our results and the well-documented regulation of PI3K/AKT downstream of either IGF1 or insulin for proteoglycan deposition in chondrocyte cultures, these studies suggest that the pro-chondrogenic effects of PI3K/AKT deficiency can be compensated in the growth plate.

We here further substantiated the pro-chondrogenic PI3K/AKT function by the discovery of its requirement for TGFβ-induced SMAD2 phosphorylation and for the accumulation of the SOX9 protein. Crosstalk between PI3K/AKT and the TGFβ signaling pathways has been reported in various different cells and tissues, and both stimulatory and inhibitory effects were reported depending on the cell context [57,58]. While ours is the first report of an AKT-dependent SMAD2 activation in TGFβ-stimulated chondrocytes, further mechanistic studies are needed to illuminate whether this was mediated by supporting SMAD2 localization to the TGFβ receptor as suggested for a mouse epithelial cell line and HeLa cells [59,60,61]. A stimulation of SOX9 gene expression and protein accumulation by PI3K/AKT signaling similar to our observations has previously been reported for human ACs, human fetal growth plate chondrocytes, and nucleus pulposus cells [29,30,62]. Importantly, Yin et al. demonstrated that constitutively active AKT was capable to stimulate SOX9 and COL2A1 expression in human ACs in the absence of TGFβ treatment [30], thus indicating pro-chondrogenic AKT function beyond being a mere mediator of TGFβ signaling.

Although a pro-hypertrophic role of PI3K/AKT is well-established in the growth plate, and despite all parallels between MSC and growth plate chondrocyte differentiation, our data demonstrated that PI3K/AKT did not contribute to hypertrophy during MSC in vitro chondrogenesis. This was convincingly substantiated by three main findings in our study. First, the pro-hypertrophic signaling network that comprises WNT upstream of IHH and BMP activity [3] was not directly responsible for the elevated AKT response during MSC chondrogenesis. Secondly, PI3K/AKT inhibition reduced the hypertrophic phenotype solely at the expense of chondrogenic power. Thirdly, AKT strongly contributed to TGFβ/SMAD2 signaling and SOX9 accumulation, which are all pro-chondrogenic factors. Thus, PI3K/AKT inhibition was no means to uncouple cartilage neogenesis from the hypertrophic degeneration of MSC-derived chondrocytes. In line, while IGF1 was previously reported to upregulate hypertrophy markers in MSC-derived chondrocytes, chondrocyte markers were always increased simultaneously [63,64], which further supported a pro-chondrogenic rather than a pro-hypertrophic role for PI3K/AKT in MSC cultures. With this in mind, it may appear surprising that for MSCs under osteogenic instead of chondrogenic stimulation, PI3K/AKT was reported to stimulate ALP levels, mineralizing activity, osteopontin, and osteocalcin protein levels, which are all characteristics that osteoblasts share with hypertrophic chondrocytes [46,47,48,49]. A main difference between the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs is the application of TGFβ, whose activity is enhanced by PI3K/AKT according to our data. Without TGFβ, PI3K/AKT could well be expected to affect differentiating MSCs differently. In contrast to our culture model, TGFβ signaling in the hypertrophic chondrocyte zone of the growth plate is low according to diminished TGFβR1 protein levels along with the reduced activation of SMAD2/3 [65]. This invites the speculation that the pro-hypertrophic activity of PI3K/AKT could become obvious in the absence of external TGFβ. Since the stimulation of chondrocyte hypertrophy was undesired here and in the greater context of cartilage regeneration, we did not test this hypothesis by inhibiting AKT during the stimulation of MSC-derived chondrocytes with TGFβ-free hypertrophic medium. Taken together, we believe that the PI3K/AKT effects in the later phase of MSC chondrogenesis are attributed to stimulating known pro-chondrogenic factors, which explains its importance for cartilage matrix production and the virtual absence of pro-hypertrophic activity.

One limitation of our study was that ACs were isolated from cartilage samples of osteoarthritic joints. Although we only harvested cartilage tissue that was macroscopically intact, we cannot exclude that the tissue source affected the chondrocyte phenotype. As a quality control, however, we demonstrated by careful characterization that re-differentiated ACs did not exhibit a hypertrophic phenotype. Therefore, we are convinced that the here used ACs represented fully adequate populations of non-hypertrophic chondrocytes.

Another important point to consider is our use of an artificial inhibitor for studying the importance of PI3K/AKT instead of reducing or discontinuing insulin treatment. However, potential compensation by cell-autonomous IGF1 secretion and possible further influences by numerous pathways, including TGFβ, as shown here, could result in the underestimation of the PI3K/AKT importance. Of course, disregarded off-target effects could potentially compromise the validity of attributing an LY effect to the sole reduction in PI3K activity. However, for LY, the described off-targets are either AKT downstream targets (mTOR1, GSK3β) [66,67], which we anyway expected to affect, or regulators of cell cycle progression (CK2, PLK1, PIM1, PIM3) [67,68], which would be inconsistent with our previous observation that LY was not mitogenic in the late stage of MSC chondrogenesis [31].

In conclusion, we here described for the first time that the insulin-stimulated PI3K/AKT activation in chondrogenic cultures was differentiation-stage dependent and upregulated in proliferating chondroblasts but repressed in differentiated chondrocytes. Having previously shown that PI3K/AKT activity stimulates cell proliferation during early MSC chondrogenesis, we here revealed that it was later required for SMAD2 phosphorylation and SOX9 accumulation and thus a pro-chondrogenic stimulator of cartilage matrix deposition. Our data identified PI3K/AKT signaling in the presence of TGFβ as a required stimulator of the speed of chondrogenesis and not a regulator of hypertrophy like in the growth plate. This new knowledge underscores how strongly cartilage neogenesis in vitro can depend on a highly potent insulin formulation. Future attempts to improve cartilage neogenesis from MSCs in vitro, to overcome the undesired hypertrophic cartilage degeneration, and to bring MSCs closer to clinical application for cartilage regeneration, will depend on an adequate stimulation and upregulation of PI3K/AKT activity to generate high-quality cartilage from human MSCs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Malina Krueger for critical raw data inspection and Carina Binder, Barbara Koenig and Birgit Frey for their excellent technical help. The authors thank the patients for donation of their cells and physicians for coordination of sample provision.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11192965/s1, Table S1: Primer pairs for qPCR in alphabetical order; Figure S1: Reduction in ALP enzyme activity during MSC chondrogenesis by the BMP inhibitor LDN-21 or the WNT inhibitor IWP-2; Figure S2: AKT inhibition impairs MSC chondrogenesis; Figure S3: Dose-dependent effects of PI3K/AKT inhibition on gene expression of IHH, PTH1R, and ALPL as well as type II collagen deposition; Figure S4: PI3K/AKT signaling is important for TGFβ activity and SOX9 protein accumulation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.D., W.R. and F.A.M.K.; validation and data curation, S.D. and F.A.M.K.; formal analysis, F.A.M.K.; funding acquisition, W.R., S.D. and T.R.; investigation, methodology, F.A.M.K.; project administration, S.D. and W.R.; resources, W.R., S.D., T.R. and B.L.; supervision, S.D. and W.R.; visualization, original draft preparation, F.A.M.K. and S.D.; review and editing, W.R., T.R. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Heidelberg Orthopaedic University Hospital. For the publication fee we acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the funding programme “Open Access Publikationskosten“ as well as by Heidelberg University.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Yoo J.U., Barthel T.S., Nishimura K., Solchaga L., Caplan A.I., Goldberg V.M., Johnstone B. The chondrogenic potential of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1998;80:1745–1757. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199812000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Winter A., Breit S., Parsch D., Benz K., Steck E., Hauner H., Weber R.M., Ewerbeck V., Richter W. Cartilage-like gene expression in differentiated human stem cell spheroids: A comparison of bone marrow-derived and adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:418–429. doi: 10.1002/art.10767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Diederichs S., Tonnier V., Marz M., Dreher S.I., Geisbusch A., Richter W. Regulation of WNT5A and WNT11 during MSC in vitro chondrogenesis: WNT inhibition lowers BMP and hedgehog activity, and reduces hypertrophy. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019;76:3875–3889. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03099-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pelttari K., Winter A., Steck E., Goetzke K., Hennig T., Ochs B.G., Aigner T., Richter W. Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3254–3266. doi: 10.1002/art.22136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fischer J., Dickhut A., Rickert M., Richter W. Human articular chondrocytes secrete parathyroid hormone-related protein and inhibit hypertrophy of mesenchymal stem cells in coculture during chondrogenesis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2696–2706. doi: 10.1002/art.27565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leijten J.C., Emons J., Sticht C., van Gool S., Decker E., Uitterlinden A., Rappold G., Hofman A., Rivadeneira F., Scherjon S., et al. Gremlin 1, frizzled-related protein, and Dkk-1 are key regulators of human articular cartilage homeostasis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:3302–3312. doi: 10.1002/art.34535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dexheimer V., Gabler J., Bomans K., Sims T., Omlor G., Richter W. Differential expression of TGF-β superfamily members and role of Smad1/5/9-signalling in chondral versus endochondral chondrocyte differentiation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36655. doi: 10.1038/srep36655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dreher S.I., Fischer J., Walker T., Diederichs S., Richter W. Significance of MEF2C and RUNX3 Regulation for Endochondral Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2020;8:81. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Franco R.A.G., McKenna E., Robey P.G., Shajib M.S., Crawford R.W., Doran M.R., Futrega K. Inhibition of BMP signaling with LDN 193189 can influence bone marrow stromal cell fate but does not prevent hypertrophy during chondrogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 2022;17:616–632. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.01.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fischer J., Ortel M., Hagmann S., Hoeflich A., Richter W. Role of PTHrP(1-34) Pulse Frequency Versus Pulse Duration to Enhance Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2016;231:2673–2681. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Beier F., Loeser R.F. Biology and pathology of Rho GTPase, PI-3 kinase-Akt, and MAP kinase signaling pathways in chondrocytes. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010;110:573–580. doi: 10.1002/jcb.22604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Manning B.D., Toker A. AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating the Network. Cell. 2017;169:381–405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Steele-Perkins G., Turner J., Edman J.C., Hari J., Pierce S.B., Stover C., Rutter W.J., Roth R.A. Expression and characterization of a functional human insulin-like growth factor I receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:11486–11492. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)37983-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Denley A., Cosgrove L.J., Booker G.W., Wallace J.C., Forbes B.E. Molecular interactions of the IGF system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2005;16:421–439. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang Y., Cheng Z., Elalieh H.Z., Nakamura E., Nguyen M.T., Mackem S., Clemens T.L., Bikle D.D., Chang W. IGF-1R signaling in chondrocytes modulates growth plate development by interacting with the PTHrP/Ihh pathway. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:1437–1446. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ulici V., Hoenselaar K.D., Agoston H., McErlain D.D., Umoh J., Chakrabarti S., Holdsworth D.W., Beier F. The role of Akt1 in terminal stages of endochondral bone formation: Angiogenesis and ossification. Bone. 2009;45:1133–1145. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peng X.D., Xu P.Z., Chen M.L., Hahn-Windgassen A., Skeen J., Jacobs J., Sundararajan D., Chen W.S., Crawford S.E., Coleman K.G., et al. Dwarfism, impaired skin development, skeletal muscle atrophy, delayed bone development, and impeded adipogenesis in mice lacking Akt1 and Akt2. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1352–1365. doi: 10.1101/gad.1089403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Louvi A., Accili D., Efstratiadis A. Growth-promoting interaction of IGF-II with the insulin receptor during mouse embryonic development. Dev. Biol. 1997;189:33–48. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heilig J., Paulsson M., Zaucke F. Insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) signaling regulates osterix expression and cartilage matrix mineralization during endochondral ossification. Bone. 2016;83:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hunziker E.B., Wagner J., Zapf J. Differential effects of insulin-like growth factor I and growth hormone on developmental stages of rat growth plate chondrocytes in vivo. J. Clin. Investig. 1994;93:1078–1086. doi: 10.1172/JCI117058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luyten F.P., Hascall V.C., Nissley S.P., Morales T.I., Reddi A.H. Insulin-like growth factors maintain steady-state metabolism of proteoglycans in bovine articular cartilage explants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1988;267:416–425. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(88)90047-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Osborn K.D., Trippel S.B., Mankin H.J. Growth factor stimulation of adult articular cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 1989;7:35–42. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100070106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yaeger P.C., Masi T.L., de Ortiz J.L., Binette F., Tubo R., McPherson J.M. Synergistic action of transforming growth factor-beta and insulin-like growth factor-I induces expression of type II collagen and aggrecan genes in adult human articular chondrocytes. Exp. Cell Res. 1997;237:318–325. doi: 10.1006/excr.1997.3781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chubinskaya S., Hakimiyan A.A., Rappoport L., Yanke A., Rueger D.C., Cole B.J. Response of human chondrocytes prepared for autologous implantation to growth factors. J. Knee Surg. 2008;21:192–199. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maor G., Hochberg Z., Silbermann M. Insulin-like growth factor I accelerates proliferation and differentiation of cartilage progenitor cells in cultures of neonatal mandibular condyles. Acta Endocrinol. 1993;128:56–64. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.1280056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cigan A.D., Nims R.J., Albro M.B., Esau J.D., Dreyer M.P., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Hung C.T., Ateshian G.A. Insulin, ascorbate, and glucose have a much greater influence than transferrin and selenous acid on the in vitro growth of engineered cartilage in chondrogenic media. Tissue Eng. Part. A. 2013;19:1941–1948. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Starkman B.G., Cravero J.D., Delcarlo M., Loeser R.F. IGF-I stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis by chondrocytes requires activation of the PI 3-kinase pathway but not ERK MAPK. Biochem. J. 2005;389:723–729. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ahmed N., Iu J., Brown C.E., Taylor D.W., Kandel R.A. Serum- and growth-factor-free three-dimensional culture system supports cartilage tissue formation by promoting collagen synthesis via Sox9-Col2a1 interaction. Tissue Eng. Part. A. 2014;20:2224–2233. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cheng C.C., Uchiyama Y., Hiyama A., Gajghate S., Shapiro I.M., Risbud M.V. PI3K/AKT regulates aggrecan gene expression by modulating Sox9 expression and activity in nucleus pulposus cells of the intervertebral disc. J. Cell. Physiol. 2009;221:668–676. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yin W., Park J.I., Loeser R.F. Oxidative stress inhibits insulin-like growth factor-I induction of chondrocyte proteoglycan synthesis through differential regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Akt and MEK-ERK MAPK signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:31972–31981. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.056838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fischer J., Knoch N., Sims T., Rosshirt N., Richter W. Time-dependent contribution of BMP, FGF, IGF, and HH signaling to the proliferation of mesenchymal stroma cells during chondrogenesis. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018;233:8962–8970. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dexheimer V., Frank S., Richter W. Proliferation as a Requirement for In Vitro Chondrogenesis of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:2160–2169. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cooper K.L., Oh S., Sung Y., Dasari R.R., Kirschner M.W., Tabin C.J. Multiple phases of chondrocyte enlargement underlie differences in skeletal proportions. Nature. 2013;495:375–378. doi: 10.1038/nature11940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang J., Zhou J., Bondy C.A. Igf1 promotes longitudinal bone growth by insulin-like actions augmenting chondrocyte hypertrophy. FASEB J. 1999;13:1985–1990. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.13.14.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liu J.P., Baker J., Perkins A.S., Robertson E.J., Efstratiadis A. Mice carrying null mutations of the genes encoding insulin-like growth factor I (Igf-1) and type 1 IGF receptor (Igf1r) Cell. 1993;75:59–72. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80084-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang Y., Nishida S., Sakata T., Elalieh H.Z., Chang W., Halloran B.P., Doty S.B., Bikle D.D. Insulin-like growth factor-I is essential for embryonic bone development. Endocrinology. 2006;147:4753–4761. doi: 10.1210/en.2006-0196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baker J., Liu J.P., Robertson E.J., Efstratiadis A. Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell. 1993;75:73–82. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhang F., He Q., Tsang W.P., Garvey W.T., Chan W.Y., Wan C. Insulin exerts direct, IGF-1 independent actions in growth plate chondrocytes. Bone Res. 2014;2:14012. doi: 10.1038/boneres.2014.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mushtaq T., Bijman P., Ahmed S.F., Farquharson C. Insulin-like growth factor-I augments chondrocyte hypertrophy and reverses glucocorticoid-mediated growth retardation in fetal mice metatarsal cultures. Endocrinology. 2004;145:2478–2486. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-1435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Abbaspour A., Takata S., Matsui Y., Katoh S., Takahashi M., Yasui N. Continuous infusion of insulin-like growth factor-I into the epiphysis of the tibia. Int. Orthop. 2008;32:395–402. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0336-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Phornphutkul C., Wu K.Y., Auyeung V., Chen Q., Gruppuso P.A. mTOR signaling contributes to chondrocyte differentiation. Dev. Dyn. 2008;237:702–712. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Phornphutkul C., Wu K.Y., Gruppuso P.A. The role of insulin in chondrogenesis. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2006;249:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leach R.M., Jr., Richards M.P., Praul C.A., Ford B.C., McMurtry J.P. Investigation of the insulin-like growth factor system in the avian epiphyseal growth plate. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2007;33:143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choukair D., Hügel U., Sander A., Uhlmann L., Tönshoff B. Inhibition of IGF-I-related intracellular signaling pathways by proinflammatory cytokines in growth plate chondrocytes. Pediatr. Res. 2014;76:245–251. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ciarmatori S., Kiepe D., Haarmann A., Huegel U., Tönshoff B. Signaling mechanisms leading to regulation of proliferation and differentiation of the mesenchymal chondrogenic cell line RCJ3.1C5.18 in response to IGF-I. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2007;38:493–508. doi: 10.1677/jme.1.02179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang J., Liu X., Li H., Chen C., Hu B., Niu X., Li Q., Zhao B., Xie Z., Wang Y. Exosomes/tricalcium phosphate combination scaffolds can enhance bone regeneration by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 2016;7:136. doi: 10.1186/s13287-016-0391-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baker N., Sohn J., Tuan R.S. Promotion of human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis by PI3-kinase/Akt signaling, and the influence of caveolin-1/cholesterol homeostasis. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 2015;6:238. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0225-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Xia P., Gu R., Zhang W., Shao L., Li F., Wu C., Sun Y. MicroRNA-200c promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells through activating the AKT/β-Catenin signaling pathway via downregulating Myd88. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:22675–22686. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ye C., Zhang W., Hang K., Chen M., Hou W., Chen J., Chen X., Chen E., Tang L., Lu J., et al. Extracellular IL-37 promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:753. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1904-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Farndale R.W., Buttle D.J., Barrett A.J. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1986;883:173–177. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(86)90306-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mueller M.B., Fischer M., Zellner J., Berner A., Dienstknecht T., Prantl L., Kujat R., Nerlich M., Tuan R.S., Angele P. Hypertrophy in mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis: Effect of TGF-beta isoforms and chondrogenic conditioning. Cells Tissues Organs. 2010;192:158–166. doi: 10.1159/000313399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Narcisi R., Cleary M.A., Brama P.A., Hoogduijn M.J., Tüysüz N., ten Berge D., van Osch G.J. Long-term expansion, enhanced chondrogenic potential, and suppression of endochondral ossification of adult human MSCs via WNT signaling modulation. Stem Cell Rep. 2015;4:459–472. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.01.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kita K., Kimura T., Nakamura N., Yoshikawa H., Nakano T. PI3K/Akt signaling as a key regulatory pathway for chondrocyte terminal differentiation. Genes Cells. 2008;13:839–850. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2008.01209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ikegami D., Akiyama H., Suzuki A., Nakamura T., Nakano T., Yoshikawa H., Tsumaki N. Sox9 sustains chondrocyte survival and hypertrophy in part through Pik3ca-Akt pathways. Development. 2011;138:1507–1519. doi: 10.1242/dev.057802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fukai A., Kawamura N., Saito T., Oshima Y., Ikeda T., Kugimiya F., Higashikawa A., Yano F., Ogata N., Nakamura K., et al. Akt1 in murine chondrocytes controls cartilage calcification during endochondral ossification under physiologic and pathologic conditions. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:826–836. doi: 10.1002/art.27296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ulici V., Hoenselaar K.D., Gillespie J.R., Beier F. The PI3K pathway regulates endochondral bone growth through control of hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation. BMC Dev. Biol. 2008;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-8-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Luo K. Signaling Cross Talk between TGF-β/Smad and Other Signaling Pathways. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2017;9:a022137. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a022137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Danielpour D., Song K. Cross-talk between IGF-I and TGF-beta signaling pathways. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2006;17:59–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bakin A.V., Tomlinson A.K., Bhowmick N.A., Moses H.L., Arteaga C.L. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase function is required for transforming growth factor beta-mediated epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cell migration. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:36803–36810. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M005912200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Thien A., Prentzell M.T., Holzwarth B., Kläsener K., Kuper I., Boehlke C., Sonntag A.G., Ruf S., Maerz L., Nitschke R., et al. TSC1 activates TGF-β-Smad2/3 signaling in growth arrest and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Dev. Cell. 2015;32:617–630. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Tsukazaki T., Chiang T.A., Davison A.F., Attisano L., Wrana J.L. SARA, a FYVE domain protein that recruits Smad2 to the TGFbeta receptor. Cell. 1998;95:779–791. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81701-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fernandez-Cancio M., Esteban C., Carrascosa A., Toran N., Andaluz P., Audi L. IGF-I and not IGF-II expression is regulated by glucocorticoids in human fetal epiphyseal chondrocytes. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2008;18:497–505. doi: 10.1016/j.ghir.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Steinert A.F., Palmer G.D., Pilapil C., Nöth U., Evans C.H., Ghivizzani S.C. Enhanced in vitro chondrogenesis of primary mesenchymal stem cells by combined gene transfer. Tissue Eng. Part. A. 2009;15:1127–1139. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2007.0252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Frisch J., Venkatesan J.K., Rey-Rico A., Schmitt G., Madry H., Cucchiarini M. Influence of insulin-like growth factor I overexpression via recombinant adeno-associated vector gene transfer upon the biological activities and differentiation potential of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell. Res. Ther. 2014;5:103. doi: 10.1186/scrt491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wang W., Chun H., Baek J., Sadik J.E., Shirazyan A., Razavi P., Lopez N., Lyons K.M. The TGFβ type I receptor TGFβRI functions as an inhibitor of BMP signaling in cartilage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:15570–15579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902927116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gharbi S.I., Zvelebil M.J., Shuttleworth S.J., Hancox T., Saghir N., Timms J.F., Waterfield M.D. Exploring the specificity of the PI3K family inhibitor LY294002. Biochem. J. 2007;404:15–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bain J., Plater L., Elliott M., Shpiro N., Hastie C.J., McLauchlan H., Klevernic I., Arthur J.S., Alessi D.R., Cohen P. The selectivity of protein kinase inhibitors: A further update. Biochem. J. 2007;408:297–315. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Davies S.P., Reddy H., Caivano M., Cohen P. Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem. J. 2000;351:95–105. doi: 10.1042/bj3510095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Cells are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES