An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A
.gov website belongs to an official
government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you've safely
connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
information only on official, secure websites.
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with,
the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more:
PMC Disclaimer
|
PMC Copyright Notice
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2022 Mar 16;603(7902):667–671. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04507-5
Cortical ensembles orchestrate social competition via hypothalamic outputs
4The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
4The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
6Neurobiology Section, Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, and Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
1Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
2University of California San Diego, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
3Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Electronics, Information and Electrical Engineering, Department of Computer Science, Shanghai, China
4The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
5Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
6Neurobiology Section, Center for Neural Circuits and Behavior, and Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
7Neurobiology Section, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
8University of Texas at Austin, Department of Psychology, Austin, TX, USA
9McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
10Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China
ŧ
These authors contributed equally
Author Contributions:
K.M.T., N.P.C. and K.B. conceptualized the project. N.P.C. and K.M.T. designed the experiments and supervised all experiments and data analyses. R.W. provided additional supervision of experiments. N.P.C. drafted the manuscript. N.P.C., K.M.T., M.P., R.R.R., F.M., S.M. and K.B. contributed to writing the manuscript and creating the figures. N.P.C., M.P., J.W., R.R.R., S.H., R.P., M.B., S.M., J.R., D.O.D., R.P., H.L. collected and analyzed data. K.B. created the HMM-GLM model and assisted with additional machine learning analyses in the manuscript. Z.C. and H.F. created AlphaTracker and assisted in the implementation of tracking and behavioral clustering under the supervision of C.L. R.Z. wrote code and implemented AlphaTracker behavioral clustering. Y.E.Z., L.R.K., F.H.T. and A.B. contributed to data analyses. N.P.C., K.B., G.M., J.P.C., I.R.F., C.L., A.L., R.Z., and K.M.T. made significant intellectual contributions.
*
To Whom Correspondence Should be Addressed: Kay M. Tye, PhD, Wylie Vale Professor, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA, tye@salk.edu, @kaymtye, Cewu Lu, PhD, Research Professor, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan RD. Minhang District, Shanghai, China, lucewu@sjtu.edu.cn
The publisher's version of this article is available at Nature
Abstract
How do individuals know their social rank? Most social species self-organize into dominance hierarchies1,2 which decreases aggression and conserves energy3–5. We have only begun to learn how the brain represents social rank6–9 and guides behavior based on this representation. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is involved in social dominance in rodents7,8 and humans10,11. Yet precisely how the mPFC encodes relative social rank and which circuits mediate this computation is not known. We developed a social competition assay in which mice compete for rewards, as well as a computer vision tool (AlphaTracker) to track multiple, unmarked animals. A hidden Markov model combined with generalized linear models (HMM-GLM) was able to decode social competition behavior from mPFC ensemble activity. Population dynamics in the mPFC were predictive of social rank and competitive success. Finally, we demonstrate that mPFC cells that project to the lateral hypothalamus promote dominance behavior during reward competition. Thus, we reveal a cortico-hypothalamic circuit by which mPFC exerts top-down modulation of social dominance.
The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is best known for its role in higher cognitive functions, with theoretical emphasis on mPFC integration of sensory and limbic information to flexibly guide behavior based on task rules12. Notably, mPFC circuitry has also been implicated in social cognition, social memory, and dominance7,8,11,13,14. We hypothesized that mPFC neurons encode social rank and are part of top-down circuits to guide behavior based on social rank15.
We designed a novel reward competition assay wherein mice that were linearly-ranked among their cagemates competed for a liquid reward delivered during a tone. This task design optimized rigorous statistical examination of ethologically-relevant behaviors in a trial structure (Fig. 1a). We considered relative social ranks within each competing pair, enabling a within-subject comparison for intermediate-ranked animals. After individually learning that the tone predicted reward delivery (Extended Data Fig. 1a), mice competed for rewards with a cagemate. Dominant mice, as defined by the tube test8, obtained more rewards, spent more time at the reward port, and were more successful at displacing competitors (Fig. 1b–c and Extended Data Fig. 1).
To automatically track the behavior of multiple, unmarked mice we developed a new deep-learning computer vision tool AlphaTracker. AlphaTracker combines two neural networks, one to create a bounding box for each subject, another for pose estimation to detect multiple, unmarked animals (Fig. 1d–e). AlphaTracker also applies an additional algorithm to track animal identity across frames considering animal positions from the previous frame (Fig. 1e; see methods). AlphaTracker performance surpasses human accuracy when tracking 2 or 4 mice (Extended Data Fig. 2) and includes unsupervised clustering of high-dimensional tracking output data to aid in the identification of novel behavioral motifs (Extended Data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Video 1).
mPFC neurons encode competition behavior
To investigate whether mPFC neurons encode competition behaviors, we used wireless head-mounted devices to record cellular-resolution activity during the social competition (Fig. 1f–g, Extended Data Figs. 4 and 5a–g). After AlphaTracker facilitated identification of 9 different behavioral labels (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 5h–i), we asked whether the mPFC predicted specific behavioral outputs. Given the ability of mPFC neurons to be selective for different stimulus features under different contexts16, we posited that mPFC neural activity could be dynamic, that representations may be hierarchical, and influenced by internal hidden states. We turned to an unsupervised method to identify hidden states by combining a hidden Markov model (HMM) with generalized linear models (GLMs)17,18 and adapted it to use mPFC neural activity to predict behavior. In our HMM-GLM, one set of multinomial GLMs predicts the transition probabilities between hidden states, additionally, each hidden state is paired with another multinomial GLM that describes the relationship between neural activity and behavior (Fig. 1h).
An HMM-GLM model with 6 hidden states decoded behavioral labels from neural activity with superior cross-validated performance to static models (Fig. 1i, Extended Data Fig. 5j and Supplementary Video 2). The model performed equally well when training for one relative rank and testing on the other (Extended Data Fig. 5k–l), suggesting that mPFC encoding of social competition behavior is generalizable across relative ranks. Given this finding, we wanted to consider whether there is a stable and simple encoding of rank in mPFC neural representations, and whether these variables could themselves predict behavior.
mPFC reflects rank and winning
We next investigated whether mPFC neural activity could be used to decode relative social rank, and if the neural representation of relative social rank is triggered by discrete task-relevant events (cued competition trials or port entries) or stably represented throughout the task. To visualize population activity, we plotted the population activity vector for task-relevant events (Extended Data Fig. 6a and Supplementary Video 3) in a lower dimensional firing rate space using principal component analysis (PCA). Neural trajectories during the cue and port entries of the self or other (competitor) for win or lose trials occupied segregated neural activity subspaces even before the cue onset, suggesting separable brain states preceding each trial (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 6), consistent with primate studies19. Relative subordinates had longer neural trajectories compared to relative dominants (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 6b–f). Indeed, our analyses revealed larger firing rate variance, but not faster firing rate changes, for relative subordinate mice (Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 6c). Importantly, we ruled out the possible contributions of potential confounds (e.g. subject location, distance to reward port, and identity) to the differences in neural trajectories across ranks (Extended Data Fig. 7).
mPFC predicts future wins
To directly test the hypothesis that mPFC encodes relative rank and competitive success at the population level, we trained an SVM classifier to decode these binary states from single-trial data (Extended Data Fig. 8a). An SVM was able to decode both competitive success and relative rank – even prior to cue onset (Fig. 2c and Extended Data Fig. 8b–e), consistent with the notion that state differences in mPFC correlate with future winning7. Social rank was more accurately decoded than competition outcome from mPFC neural activity (Fig. 2c), perhaps reflecting the relative stability of rank versus competitive success. While our data are consistent with the idea of a “winning effect” or a “losing streak”,7,20 the decoding accuracy across the trial was consistently above chance. Remarkably, PFC neural activity could predict whether the next trial would be a win or a loss ~30 seconds before the competition trial began, providing cellular evidence supporting the psychological concept of “a winning mindset.”
Notably, we can decode the absolute social rank of individuals from mPFC activity, even when alone (Extended Data Fig. 8f–h). To visualize differences between tone responses to the reward while alone vs in competition we plotted the neural trajectories across tasks in the same PCA subspace (Fig. 2d). Subordinate mice (rank 4) had larger changes induced by competition with longer tone trajectory lengths during competition (Fig. 2e). In contrast, dominants (rank 1) showed the smallest differences between the alone and competition state. To confirm that population dynamics differed between receiving the reward alone vs winning, we recorded the same neurons while animals performed the reward task alone vs in competition and found that an SVM could decode trial type from mPFC population dynamics (Extended Data Fig. 8i–j). Importantly, relative rank could be predicted in intermediate ranking animals (Extended Data Fig 8e). However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the representation may reflect social identity and the associated social history with that individual rather than relative rank alone, indeed it is yet unclear whether the brain is capable of separably representing rank and identity. Altogether, these data demonstrate that the mPFC has a dynamic, but consistent, representation of social rank and competitive success despite having multiple, rank-independent hidden states for encoding behavior during social competition.
Rank-dependent mPFC representations
Given that the mPFC encodes social rank and competitive success, we posited that specific ensembles of cells might encode distinct task relevant events in a rank-dependent manner to provide a distributed representation of social rank and competitive success. To investigate whether social rank is represented within the mPFC at the single-cell level, we analyzed the firing rate of individual mPFC neurons during discrete reward competition events. mPFC single units showed diverse responses to the tone for win or lose trials and to port entries performed by self or the other (i.e. competitor) that differed by social rank (Fig. 3a; Extended Data Fig. 9a). We quantified the ensemble sizes and magnitude of responses to the task-relevant events while animals were alone vs in social competition (Fig. 3b–d and Extended Data Fig. 9b–d). During competition, but not while alone, relative dominants had more cells that were responsive to self port entries while subordinates had larger responses to win trials and port entries of the other (Fig. 3b–d and Extended Data Fig. 9b–d). Furthermore, the mPFC neurons of relative subordinates displayed larger phasic responses in response to task events, consistent with the longer neural trajectories observed (Fig 2).
mPFC-LH neurons modulate dominance
Given the functional diversity of neural responses from individual mPFC neurons, we next wanted to investigate how information was routed out of the mPFC during social competition to downstream subcortical targets.
The lateral hypothalamus (LH) is comprised of a diversity of cell types and has been shown to drive hypersocial behavior and social investigation21, and to modulate social defensive behaviors22,23. Further, the LH plays a critical role in energy balance homeostasis24 – demonstrating the capacity to serve as a homeostatic control center25. Based on the conceptual framework for social homeostasis, after social information is detected and evaluated in a rank-dependent manner, it would be sent to a control center for comparison to a social homeostatic set point15,26.
We also investigated the mPFC projection to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) because recent evidence suggests that BLA firing rates correlate with the social rank of conspecific faces in non-human primates27 and the BLA is an important point of convergence for socially-derived information28 to be associated with emotional valence28–30.
To identify mPFC cells that project monosynaptically to the LH or BLA, we used an intersectional viral strategy to express ChrimsonR in each projection, validated with ex vivo recordings (Fig. 4a and Extended Data Fig. 10a–b). We then wirelessly-recorded mPFC neural activity while animals were alone or competing and delivered red light pulses at the end of the competition session to photoidentify mPFC-LH or mPFC-BLA neurons. We found that mPFC-LH neurons had stronger excitation to reward delivery than mPFC-BLA neurons during reward competition, but not when performing the task alone (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 10c).
Given the selective unmasking of a robust mPFC-LH response to the reward-predictive tone only in the context of social competition (Fig. 4b), we hypothesized that mPFC-LH neurons could modulate reward-related social competition. To directly test the hypothesis that mPFC-LH neurons have a causal relationships with social dominance-related behavior, we expressed either Channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) or eYFP in mPFC-LH neurons and implanted an optic fiber in the mPFC (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 10d). ChR2-expressing mice won more rewards during the entire competition, had greater reward port occupation, and spent less time being displaced when they received optical stimulation (Fig. 4d). Importantly, stimulating mPFC-LH neurons did not affect reward-seeking behavior while performing the reward competition assay alone, feeding in the home cage, anxiety, sociability, place preference or general effort (Extended Data Fig. 10e–k).
Conclusion
Taken together, these data demonstrate that the mPFC neural activity predicts future competitive success, can be decoded to predict both relative and absolute social rank, and uses cortico-hypothalamic circuits to guide social competition behavior. Development of an ethologically-relevant social competition task that incorporates a trial structure allowed us to reveal how related variables updated on different timescales might be parsed and represented separately. Indeed, social rank and competitive success representations occupied orthogonal activity spaces (Fig. 2a), which we speculate is an adaptive strategy that the PFC can use to parse related variables updated on different timescales.
Importantly, the way that mPFC ensembles encode behavior is dynamic, which suggests a model in which internal states influence how mPFC modulates behavior, consistent with a role in flexibly guiding behavior. Our data demonstrate that cortico-hypothalamic circuits carry social rank information which could potentially modulate the many different neuropeptide and hormone expressing subpopulations in the hypothalamus to achieve behavioral modulation. Indeed, we speculate that the mPFC serves as a rank identification node that works in concert with the ACC to function as a “detector” to extract signals from social agents and that downstream projections to the hypothalamus may function as the detector node output to a social homeostatic “control center,” within a purported social homeostatic circuit15.
This study not only unveils a number of technological advances that together provide a platform for the investigation of social hierarchies, but also begins to integrate evidence that together support the notion that there is a neural circuit for social homeostasis.
We thank Craig Wildes, Radames Revilla Orellano, Sunny Luo and Crystal Chang for technical support. Adam Calhoun and Mala Murthy for useful feedback on our HMM-GLM model. We thank Ziv Williams and William Lee for comments on our manuscript. K.M.T. is an HHMI Investigator and the Wylie Vale Professor at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, and this work was supported by funding from the JPB Foundation, Dolby Family Fund, R01-MH115920 (NIMH), and Pioneer Award DP1-AT009925 (NCCIH). N.P.C. was supported by the Simons Center for the Social Brain, Ford Foundation, L’Oreal For Women In Science, Burroughs Wellcome Fund and K99 MH124435–01. C.L was supported by AI Institute, SJTU, Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute, Meta Technology Group.
Footnotes
Competing interest statement:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information:
Requests for additional information or materials should be made to K.M.T and C.L.
Data will be made available upon reasonable request to authors.
References:
1.Chiao JY
Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20, 803–809 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Wang F, Kessels HW & Hu H
The mouse that roared: neural mechanisms of social hierarchy. Trends Neurosci. 37, 674–682 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Bernstein IS
Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. Behav. Brain Sci. 4, 419–457 (1981). [Google Scholar]
4.Dewsbury DA
Dominance Rank, Copulatory Behavior, and Differential Reproduction. Q. Rev. Biol. 57, 135–159 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Karamihalev S, Brivio E, Flachskamm C, Stoffel R, Schmidt MV & Chen A
Social dominance mediates behavioral adaptation to chronic stress in a sex-specific manner. eLife
9, e58723 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Hou XH, Hyun M, Taranda J, Huang KW, Todd E, Feng D, Atwater E, Croney D, Zeidel ML, Osten P & Sabatini BL
Central Control Circuit for Context-Dependent Micturition. Cell
167, 73–86.e12 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Zhou T, Zhu H, Fan Z, Wang F, Chen Y, Liang H, Yang Z, Zhang L, Lin L, Zhan Y, Wang Z & Hu H
History of winning remodels thalamo-PFC circuit to reinforce social dominance. Science
357, 162–168 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Wang F, Zhu J, Zhu H, Zhang Q, Lin Z & Hu H
Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex. Science
334, 693–697 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.So N, Franks B, Lim S & Curley JP
A Social Network Approach Reveals Associations between Mouse Social Dominance and Brain Gene Expression. PLOS ONE
10, e0134509 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Zink CF, Tong Y, Chen Q, Bassett DS, Stein JL & Meyer-Lindenberg A
Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron
58, 273–283 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Ligneul R, Obeso I, Ruff CC & Dreher J-C
Dynamical Representation of Dominance Relationships in the Human Rostromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Curr. Biol. 26, 3107–3115 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Miller EK & Cohen JD
An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 167–202 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Murugan M, Jang HJ, Park M, Miller EM, Cox J, Taliaferro JP, Parker NF, Bhave V, Hur H, Liang Y, Nectow AR, Pillow JW & Witten IB
Combined Social and Spatial Coding in a Descending Projection from the Prefrontal Cortex. Cell
171, 1663–1677.e16 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Levy DR, Tamir T, Kaufman M, Parabucki A, Weissbrod A, Schneidman E & Yizhar O
Dynamics of social representation in the mouse prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 2013–2022 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Lee CR, Chen A & Tye KM
The neural circuitry of social homeostasis: Consequences of acute versus chronic social isolation. Cell
184, 1500–1516 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Rigotti M, Barak O, Warden MR, Wang X-J, Daw ND, Miller EK & Fusi S
The importance of mixed selectivity in complex cognitive tasks. Nature
497, 585–590 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Escola S, Fontanini A, Katz D & Paninski L
Hidden Markov models for the stimulus-response relationships of multistate neural systems. Neural Comput. 23, 1071–1132 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Calhoun AJ, Pillow JW & Murthy M
Unsupervised identification of the internal states that shape natural behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 2040–2049 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Piva M, Velnoskey K, Jia R, Nair A, Levy I & Chang SW
The dorsomedial prefrontal cortex computes task-invariant relative subjective value for self and other. eLife
8, e44939 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Dugatkin LA
Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav. Ecol. 8, 583–587 (1997). [Google Scholar]
21.Nieh EH, Vander Weele CM, Matthews GA, Presbrey KN, Wichmann R, Leppla CA, Izadmehr EM & Tye KM
Inhibitory Input from the Lateral Hypothalamus to the Ventral Tegmental Area Disinhibits Dopamine Neurons and Promotes Behavioral Activation. Neuron
90, 1286–1298 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Rangel MJ, Baldo MVC, Canteras NS & Hahn JD
Evidence of a Role for the Lateral Hypothalamic Area Juxtadorsomedial Region (LHAjd) in Defensive Behaviors Associated with Social Defeat. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 10, 92 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Li Y, Zeng J, Zhang J, Yue C, Zhong W, Liu Z, Feng Q & Luo M
Hypothalamic Circuits for Predation and Evasion. 20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Burton MJ, Rolls ET & Mora F
Effects of hunger on the responses of neurons in the lateral hypothalamus to the sight and taste of food. Exp. Neurol. 51, 668–677 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Matthews GA & Tye KM
Neural mechanisms of social homeostasis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1457, 5–25 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Munuera J, Rigotti M & Salzman CD
Shared neural coding for social hierarchy and reward value in primate amygdala. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 415–423 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Allsop SA, Wichmann R, Mills F, Burgos-Robles A, Chang C-J, Felix-Ortiz AC, Vienne A, Beyeler A, Izadmehr EM, Glober G, Cum MI, Stergiadou J, Anandalingam KK, Farris K, Namburi P, Leppla CA, Weddington JC, Nieh EH, Smith AC, Ba D, Brown EN & Tye KM
Corticoamygdala Transfer of Socially Derived Information Gates Observational Learning. Cell
173, 1329–1342.e18 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Felix-Ortiz AC, Burgos-Robles A, Bhagat ND, Leppla CA & Tye KM
Bidirectional modulation of anxiety-related and social behaviors by amygdala projections to the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience
321, 197–209 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]