Significance
V-ATPases are ion pumps consisting of two rotary motor proteins, Vo and V1, that actively transport ions across the cell membrane using the chemical energy of ATP. To understand how V-ATPases transduce the energy in the presence of a structural symmetry mismatch between Vo and V1, we simultaneously visualized the rotational pauses and forward and backward steps of Vo and V1 coupled with ion transport and ATP hydrolysis reactions, respectively. Our results suggest that V-ATPases with multiple peripheral stalks are more rigidly coupled than F-ATPases that have only one peripheral stalk and work as ATP synthases. Our high-speed/high-precision single-molecule imaging of rotary ATPases in action will pave the way for a comprehensive understanding of their energy transduction mechanisms.
Keywords: V-ATPase, single-molecule analysis, molecular motors
Abstract
V-ATPases are rotary motor proteins that convert the chemical energy of ATP into the electrochemical potential of ions across cell membranes. V-ATPases consist of two rotary motors, Vo and V1, and Enterococcus hirae V-ATPase (EhVoV1) actively transports Na+ in Vo (EhVo) by using torque generated by ATP hydrolysis in V1 (EhV1). Here, we observed ATP-driven stepping rotation of detergent-solubilized EhVoV1 wild-type, aE634A, and BR350K mutants under various Na+ and ATP concentrations ([Na+] and [ATP], respectively) by using a 40-nm gold nanoparticle as a low-load probe. When [Na+] was low and [ATP] was high, under the condition that only Na+ binding to EhVo is rate limiting, wild-type and aE634A exhibited 10 pausing positions reflecting 10-fold symmetry of the EhVo rotor and almost no backward steps. Duration time before the forward steps was inversely proportional to [Na+], confirming that Na+ binding triggers the steps. When both [ATP] and [Na+] were low, under the condition that both Na+ and ATP bindings are rate limiting, aE634A exhibited 13 pausing positions reflecting 10- and 3-fold symmetries of EhVo and EhV1, respectively. The distribution of duration time before the forward step was fitted well by the sum of two exponential decay functions with distinct time constants. Furthermore, occasional backward steps smaller than 36° were observed. Small backward steps were also observed during three long ATP cleavage pauses of BR350K. These results indicate that EhVo and EhV1 do not share pausing positions, Na+ and ATP bindings occur at different angles, and the coupling between EhVo and EhV1 has a rigid component.
Rotary ATPases are ubiquitously expressed in living organisms and play important roles in biological energy conversions (1–6). These rotary ATPases are classified into F-, V-, and A-ATPases based on their amino acid sequences and physiological functions (6). Eukaryotic and bacterial F-ATPases (FoF1) and archaeal A-ATPases (AoA1) mainly function as ATP synthases driven by the electrochemical potential of ions across the cell membrane, although they can also act as active ion pumps driven by ATP hydrolysis depending on the cellular environment. In contrast, V-ATPases (VoV1) in eukaryotes primarily function as active ion pumps. V-ATPases are also found in bacteria, and some of them are termed V/A-ATPases based on their origin and physiological function in ATP synthesis (6–8).
To date, numerous studies have been conducted to understand how the two motor proteins (i.e., F1/A1/V1 and Fo/Ao/Vo) of the rotary ATPases couple their rotational motions and functions. Single-molecule studies using fluorescent probes (9–12), gold nanoparticle (AuNP) or nanorod probes (13–21), and Förster resonance energy transfer (16, 22, 23) have revealed the rotational dynamics of rotary ATPases for both ATP hydrolysis/synthesis directions. Furthermore, recent cryo–electron microscopic (cryo-EM) single-particle analyses have revealed entire architectures of the rotary ATPases with different structural states at atomic resolutions (24–35). In particular, several studies have demonstrated elastic coupling of FoF1 due to large deformations of the peripheral stalk connecting Fo and F1 (25, 29, 35). However, few studies on other types of rotary ATPases with different functions and subunit compositions have been performed, and a comprehensive understanding of the energy transduction mechanism remains elusive.
Enterococcus hirae V-ATPase (EhVoV1) works as an ATP-driven sodium ion (Na+) pump to maintain Na+ concentrations ([Na+]) inside the cell (Fig. 1A) (37–41). Note that we use the term V-ATPase or VoV1 because its physiological function is not ATP synthesis but active ion transport. EhVoV1 is a multisubunit complex composed of nine different subunits, namely, ac10dE2G2 and A3B3DF complexes in EhVo and EhV1, respectively. In the EhV1 A3B3DF complex, three pairs of the A and B subunits form a heterohexameric A3B3 stator ring, and the central rotor DF subcomplex is inserted into the A3B3 ring (Fig. 1B, Bottom) (42, 43). The EhVo ac10dE2G2 complex transports Na+ across the cell membrane. The membrane-embedded rotor ring is formed by a decamer of the tetrahelical transmembrane c subunit (c10 ring; Fig. 1B, Top) connected with the central DF stalk via the d subunit (26, 44). The stator a subunit works as an ion channel, and two EG peripheral stalks interact with the a subunit and A3B3 ring to assure rotary coupling between EhVo and EhV1.
Fig. 1.
(A) Overall architecture of EhVoV1. The dotted circular arcs represent the rotation direction driven by ATP hydrolysis. (B) (Top) Top view of the a subunit (cyan) and c10 ring (brown) of EhVo and (Bottom) A (yellow), B (orange), D (green), and F subunits (pink) of EhV1. The black arrow in Top indicates the path of Na+ movement during ATP-driven rotation. The arcs in Bottom represent the catalytic AB pairs. (C) Side view of the a subunit viewed from the c subunit. This structure was constructed by the SWISS-MODEL server (36) using a structure of the a subunit of V-ATPase from T. thermophilus. The black arrows represent the path of Na+ movement during ATP-driven rotation. The mutated residue, aGlu634, is located on the surface of the entry half-channel of the a subunit as highlighted in red letters and a circle.
In EhV1, the ATP hydrolysis reaction is catalyzed at the interfaces of three A and B subunits. It drives a counterclockwise rotation of the DF rotor subunits as viewed from the EhVo side (Fig. 1B, Bottom). Like other F1/A1/V1 (11, 45), EhV1 is a stepping motor that rotates 120° per one ATP hydrolysis (46). We previously revealed that the 120° step of isolated EhV1 is further divided into 40 and 80° substeps by using high-speed and high-precision single-molecule imaging analysis with AuNP as a low-load probe (47). A main pause before the 40° substep involves ATP cleavage, phosphate release, and ATP binding events. The ATP binding triggers the 40° substep because the duration time is inversely proportional to [ATP]. The 80° substep is triggered by ADP release after a subpause with [ATP]-independent duration time. While the chemomechanical coupling scheme in EhV1 has been revealed, because our previous single-molecule observation of EhVoV1 did not clearly resolve the pauses and steps (17), the elementary steps in the rotation of EhVoV1 have not been revealed.
Although the mechanism of ion transport in Fo/Ao/Vo is not fully understood, the so-called “two-channel” model has been widely accepted (48–54). In this model, the a-subunit has two half-channels for ion entry/exit into/from the ion-binding sites of the rotor c ring. In the case of EhVo, Na+ enters the half-channel from the cytoplasmic side and binds to the negatively charged Na+-binding sites of the c subunit (44, 55). Then, the charge-neutralized c subunit can move into the hydrophobic lipid membrane (53, 56). The rotational torque generated by ATP hydrolysis in EhV1 is transmitted to EhVo via the rotor d subunit, allowing the c10 ring to rotate unidirectionally in the lipid membrane. Na+ translocated by a nearly single turn of the c10 ring reaches another half-channel of the a subunit, which connects the Na+-binding site of the c subunit to the extracellular side. Then, Na+ is pumped out of the cell by a hydrated microenvironment (57) and/or electrostatic repulsion with the positively charged residues in the a subunit, aArg573 and aArg629, located at the interface between the two half-channels (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S1) (26). Because EhVoV1 has the c10 ring, 10 Na+ are transported per single turn. Therefore, the step size of EhVo is expected to be 36° (360°/10), similar to Escherichia coli and yeast FoF1, which also have c10 rings (13, 14, 22, 35).
The ion-to-ATP ratio is a central issue in the coupling mechanism of rotary ATPases. All known F1/A1/V1 have three catalytic sites and threefold structural symmetry and hydrolyze or synthesize three ATP molecules per single turn. In contrast, the number of protomers forming the rotor c ring of Fo/Ao/Vo varies from 8 to 17 depending on the species, suggesting wide variations in the ion-to-ATP ratio of rotary ATPases (58, 59). In EhVoV1, because the rotor c ring of EhVo has a 10-fold structural symmetry (Fig. 1B, Top), this enzyme has a structural symmetry mismatch and a noninteger ratio between transported Na+ and hydrolyzed ATP (10/3 = 3.3). If the rotational coupling between EhVo and EhV1 is elastic, as reported for E. coli and yeast FoF1, the symmetry mismatch is relieved by large deformations of the peripheral stalk and/or the central rotor (25, 29, 35, 60). On the other hand, if the coupling is rather rigid due to the multiple peripheral stalks of EhVoV1, the pausing positions of both EhVo and EhV1 would be observed independently in a single-molecule observation. To address this issue, it is required to directly visualize the rotational pauses and steps of EhVoV1 under conditions where the elementary steps of the rotation such as the bindings of Na+ and ATP to EhVo and EhV1, respectively, are both rate-limiting.
Here we carried out high-speed and high-precision single-molecule imaging of the rotation of detergent-solubilized EhVoV1 by using 40-nm AuNP as a low-load probe. To resolve the rotational pauses and steps of EhVo, a glutamate residue in the stator a subunit (aGlu634) was replaced with alanine. Since the mutated aGlu634 is located on the surface of the Na+ entry half-channel (Fig. 1C and SI Appendix, Fig. S2), Na+ binding to the c subunit in the EhVoV1(aE634A) mutant (hereinafter referred to as aE634A) is expected to become slower than in the wild type. The rotation rate of aE634A decreased about 10 times compared with that of the wild type, allowing us to clearly resolve the rotational pauses and steps in EhVo. Under the condition that only Na+ binding is rate-limiting, aE634A showed 10 pausing positions per single turn and a step size of about 36°, consistent with 10 protomers in the c10 ring of EhVo. The duration time before the forward step was inversely proportional to [Na+], indicating that the dwell corresponds to the waiting time for Na+ binding. On the other hand, under the condition that both Na+ and ATP bindings are rate-limiting, 13 pausing positions per single turn were observed. Furthermore, backward steps smaller than 36° were occasionally observed only when ATP binding is also rate-limiting, indicating that EhVoV1 undergoes Brownian motion between adjacent pausing positions of EhVo and EhV1 when no torque is applied from EhV1. Backward steps of 36° or larger than 36° were rarely observed, suggesting the suppression of reverse Na+ transport. Small backward steps were also frequently observed during three long ATP cleavage pauses of another mutant, EhVoV1(BR350K), in which ATP hydrolysis is rate-limiting for the rotation (47). From these results, we conclude that EhVo and EhV1 do not share their pausing positions, Na+ and ATP bindings occur at different angles, and their coupling has a rigid component.
Results
[ATP] and [Na+] Dependence of Rotation Rate of Wild Type and aE634A.
To clearly visualize the ATP-driven rotation rate-limited by Na+ transport, site-directed mutagenesis was conducted on the a subunit of EhVo (aE634A). The purified aE634A solubilized with n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM) exhibited subunit stoichiometry similar to the wild type in SDS-PAGE (SI Appendix, Fig. S3), indicating intactness of the complex.
Fig. 2A draws a schematic illustration of single-molecule observation. In this system, the ATP-driven rotation of VoV1, immobilized on a glass surface, was probed by AuNPs attached to the A subunit via biotin–streptavidin conjugation (SI Appendix). The localization precision in this system was 0.6 nm at 3,000 frames per second (fps) (0.33 ms temporal resolution) as determined by centroid analysis of the scattering images of single AuNPs nonspecifically attached to the glass surface (SI Appendix, Fig. S4).
Fig. 2.
(A) Schematic model of the single-molecule rotation assay of EhVoV1 probed with AuNP. Each letter represents the name of the subunits. EhVoV1 was fixed on Ni2+-NTA–coated cover glass via His3 tags added to the C terminus of the c subunit. A streptavidin-coated gold nanoparticle (40 nm in diameter) was attached to the N terminus of the A subunit, which was biotinylated by adding an Avi-tag. Solid and dotted red lines indicate the center axis of EhVoV1 and the centroid of the attached AuNP, respectively. Because the rotor c10 ring was fixed on a glass surface, the stator subunits rotate counterclockwise against the rotor subunits as shown by red arrows. (B) [ATP] dependence of the rotation rate of wild type and aE634A at 300 mM NaCl. Red open circles and blue open squares indicate the data from individual molecules of wild type and aE634A, respectively. The closed symbols are averages, and error bars represent SDs. Data were fitted with the Michaelis–Menten equation: V = VmaxATP · [ATP]/(KmATP + [ATP]). The obtained kinetic parameters are summarized in Table 1. (C) [Na+] dependence of rotation rate of wild type and aE634A at 5 mM ATP. The correspondence of colored symbols is the same as in B. The black lines show the fit with the sum of two independent Michaelis–Menten equations: V = Vmax1Na · [Na+]/(Km1Na + [Na+]) + Vmax2Na · [Na+]/(Km2Na + [Na+]). The obtained kinetic parameters are summarized in Table 2. The contaminating Na+ in the observation buffers was taken into account as shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S6. Namely, 50 mM Bis-Tris (pH 6.5) was used for 0.09 mM Na+, and 20 mM potassium phosphate (pH 6.5) was used for the other [Na+] values as buffers.
The rotation rates of the wild type and aE634A at various substrate concentrations were examined from the slope of the time course of rotation (Fig. 2 B and C and SI Appendix, Fig. S5). [ATP] dependences of the rotation rate for the wild type and aE634A in the presence of 300 mM Na+ are shown in Fig. 2B. Under this high-[Na+] condition, Na+ binding is fast and not rate-limiting, and consequently, [ATP] dependence obeyed Michaelis–Menten kinetics. Obtained kinetic parameters, the Michaelis constant (KmATP) and the maximum velocity (VmaxATP), are summarized in Table 1. The value of KmATP for the wild type was 60.4 ± 2.1 μM (fitted value ± SE of the fit). This value was comparable to that for the isolated EhV1 (43 ± 6 μM), indicating that the apparent affinity of ATP was not significantly affected by EhVo. On the other hand, the value of VmaxATP (40.0 ± 0.3 rps, fitted value ± SE of the fit) was significantly smaller than that of the isolated EhV1 (117 ± 3 rps) (47). As a result, the binding rate constant of ATP (konATP) as estimated by 3 × VmaxATP/KmATP was smaller than that of the isolated EhV1 (Table 1). We attributed this difference to the intact interaction between the rotor c10 ring and stator a subunit of EhVo and concluded that Na+ transport in EhVo limits the VmaxATP of EhVoV1, as discussed in our previous single-molecule study (17). In aE634A, the values of KmATP and VmaxATP were 6.6 ± 0.3 μM and 4.58 ± 0.04 rps, respectively, and both were approximately one-tenth of those of the wild type (Table 1). Thus, the konATP for aE634A (2.1 × 106 M−1 s−1) was in close agreement with that for the wild type (2.0 × 106 M−1 s−1) (Table 1). These results indicate that the mutation in aGlu634 affects only Na+ transport and not ATP binding in the EhVoV1 complex.
Table 1.
Kinetic parameters for [ATP] dependence of rotation rate of EhVoV1 and EhV1
Protein | NaCl (mM) | KmATP (μM) | VmaxATP (rps) | konATP* (M−1 s−1) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
EhVoV1 wild type | 300 | 60.4 ± 2.1 | 40.0 ± 0.3 | 2.0 × 106 | This study (single molecule) |
EhVoV1 aE634A | 300 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 4.58 ± 0.04 | 2.1 × 106 | This study (single molecule) |
EhVoV1 wild type | 300 | 134 ± 12 | 59 ± 1 | 1.3 × 106 | Ref. 17 (biochemical) |
EhV1 wild type | 0 (50 mM KCl) | 43 ± 6 | 117 ± 3 | 8.2 × 106 | Ref. 47 (single molecule) |
*The binding rate constant of ATP estimated by konATP = 3 × VmaxATP/KmATP.
Fig. 2C shows [Na+] dependence of the rotation rate at saturated [ATP] (5 mM). Here contaminating Na+ in the observation buffers was estimated by an inductivity coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) (SI Appendix, Fig. S6), and total [Na+] including contamination was used for the plot. Under this condition, [ATP] is sufficiently high, ATP binding is not rate-limiting (Fig. 2B and Table 1), and the effect of [Na+] on the rotation rate becomes obvious. As a result, both the wild type and aE634A showed biphasic responses to [Na+]. As reported in our previous studies, data were fitted by a summation of two independent Michaelis–Menten equations assuming two Na+ binding sites (17, 61). The obtained kinetic parameters are shown in Table 2. Both values of Vmax1Na and Vmax2Na for aE634A (1.1 ± 0.3 and 4.4 ± 0.5 rps, fitted value ± SE of the fit) were about 10 times smaller than those for the wild type (15.7 ± 1.6 and 35.0 ± 7.1 rps) (Table 2). On the other hand, considering the large fitting error, especially in the wild type, the values of Km1Na and Km2Na do not seem to be significantly different between aE634A (0.32 ± 0.28 and 58.3 ± 26.5 mM, fitted value ± SE of the fit) and the wild type (0.29 ± 0.09 and 160.2 ± 88.8 mM). Then, the binding rate constant of Na+ (konNa) as estimated by 10 × VmaxNa/KmNa largely decreased in aE634A, notably more than 10 times for the high-affinity site (kon1Na; Table 2). The significant decrease in the Vmax2Na for aE634A compared with that of the wild type also suggests that the rate of elementary reaction steps other than Na+ binding also decreased in EhVo. Because Na+ binding to EhVo is certainly rate-limiting at low [Na+] for both the wild type and aE634A, we then conducted a detailed analysis of the rotational pauses and steps at low [Na+].
Table 2.
Kinetic parameters for [Na+] dependence of rotation rate of wild type and aE634A
Protein | Km1Na (mM) | Vmax1Na (rps) | kon1Na* (M−1 s−1) | Km2Na (mM) | Vmax2Na (rps) | kon2Na* (M−1 s−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EhVoV1 wild type | 0.29 ± 0.09 | 15.7 ± 1.6 | 5.4 × 105 | 160.2 ± 88.8 | 35.0 ± 7.1 | 2.2 × 103 |
EhVoV1 aE634A | 0.32 ± 0.28 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 3.4 × 104 | 58.3 ± 26.5 | 4.4 ± 0.5 | 7.5 × 102 |
[ATP] was 5 mM.
*The binding rate constant of Na+ estimated by kon1(2)Na = 10 × Vmax1(2)Na/Km1(2)Na.
Pauses and Steps of EhVo and EhV1 in ATP-Driven Rotation of Wild Type and aE634A.
Fig. 3A and SI Appendix, Fig. S7 show typical time courses of the rotational trajectory (pink line) of the wild type observed at 0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP with 3,000 fps (0.33 ms temporal resolution). An enlarged trajectory for a single revolution and corresponding x–y trajectory (Fig. 3A, Inset, pink line) are also shown. Under this condition, not ATP binding but Na+ binding is rate-limiting of ATP-driven rotation (Fig. 2 B and C and Table 2). The rotational trajectory showed transient pauses and steps in a forward, counterclockwise direction. Then, the pauses and steps were objectively detected with a step-finding algorithm (62) (black line on the trajectory) applied to median-filtered traces (current ± 4 frames, red line), as in our previous studies on other motor proteins (63, 64). As indicated by the numbers in the trajectories, 10 pauses were mainly detected in a single turn (Fig. 4A), reflecting the number of protomers in the rotor c10 ring (Fig. 1B, Top). In addition, numbers of pauses smaller or larger than 10 per single turn were also detected (Fig. 4A). A number of pauses smaller than 10 can be attributed to undetectable short pauses due to the limited time resolution because the stepping behavior is a stochastic process. A number of pauses larger than 10 is presumably due to occasional detection of the subpauses of EhV1 for ADP release, which has a time constant of 2.5 ms and is independent of [ATP] (47). Furthermore, a small fraction of underfitting or overfitting of the step-finding algorithm would also be included (64). The distribution of the step size revealed that backward steps were rarely observed (0.8%; Fig. 3B), the average value of the forward step was 36.6°, and a Gaussian function fitted the distribution well with a peak at 33.8 ± 14.2° (peak ± SD). These values show excellent agreement with the step size expected from the structural symmetry of the c10 ring (360°/10 = 36°). The distribution of duration time before the forward step was fitted well by a single exponential decay function with a time constant of 13.5 ± 0.3 ms (fitted value ± SE of the fit), indicating a single rate-limiting step of the rotation (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
(A) Typical trajectory of ATP-driven rotation of wild-type EhVoV1 at 5 mM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ recorded at 3,000 fps (0.33 ms time resolution). (Right) Enlarged view of one revolution (360°). Pink, red, and black traces represent raw, median-filtered (current ± 4 frames), and fitted trajectories, respectively. (Inset) The corresponding x–y trajectory. Pink lines and red dots represent the raw and median-filtered (current ± 4 frames) coordinates, respectively. We collected 1,352 steps from 15 molecules. Other examples of trajectories are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S7. (B) Distribution of the step size fitted with a single Gaussian assuming a single peak. The values at the top right are the fitted parameter (peak ± SD) and average. The ratio of backward steps was 0.8%. (C) Distribution of the duration time before the forward step fitted with a single exponential decay function. The value at the top right is the obtained time constant (fitted value ± SE of the fit).
Fig. 4.
Number of detected pauses per single turn of (A) wild type at 5 mM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ corresponding to Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Fig. S7; (B) aE634A at 5 mM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ corresponding to Fig. 5 and SI Appendix, Fig. S8; and (C) aE634A at 1 μM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ corresponding to Fig. 7 and SI Appendix, Fig. S10.
Rotational trajectories of aE634A observed at 0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP with 1,000 fps are shown in Fig. 5A and SI Appendix, Fig. S8. In aE634A, the median filtering of current ± 7 frames was applied for the step-finding algorithm (62). As in the wild type, the number of pauses per single turn was mainly 10 (Fig. 4B), and the step size was 37.1° (average) or 34.9 ± 12.8° (peak ± SD) (Fig. 5B), consistent with the structural symmetry of the c10 ring, and the ratio of backward steps was minor (1.2%). The distribution of duration time before the forward steps for aE634A was fitted well by a single exponential decay function with a time constant of 137 ± 6 ms (Fig. 5C), which is 10 times larger than that of the wild type, consistent with the analysis of the rotation rate (Fig. 2C and Table 2). For aE634A, we also examined [Na+] dependence, and SI Appendix, Fig. S9 shows rotational trajectories at 0.09 or 1.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP. Distributions of the step size and the duration before the forward step at 0.09 and 1.3 mM Na+ are shown in Fig. 6 A–D, respectively. As with 0.3 mM Na+, step sizes of about 36° were obtained, indicating that the 36° step is independent of [Na+]. In contrast, although distributions of duration time before the forward step were also fitted well by a single exponential decay function as with 0.3 mM Na+, the time constants changed greatly. Fig. 6E shows [Na+] dependence of the time constant. The slope was −1.1 when the data point at 1.3 mM Na+ was excluded because it is the first saturating concentration observed in the rotation rate analysis (Fig. 2C and Table 2). If this data point was included, the slope was −1.0. Therefore, the time constant is almost inversely proportional to [Na+], indicating that Na+ binding is rate-limiting for the rotation. Furthermore, this result indicates that ATP hydrolysis in EhV1 is tightly coupled with Na+ transport in EhVo in the EhVoV1 complex solubilized with DDM.
Fig. 5.
(A) Typical trajectory of ATP-driven rotation of aE634A at 5 mM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ recorded at 1,000 fps (1 ms time resolution). (Right) Enlarged view of one revolution (360°). Pink, red, and black traces represent raw, median-filtered (current ± 7 frames), and fitted trajectories, respectively. (Inset) The corresponding x–y trajectory. Pink lines and red dots represent the raw and median-filtered (current ± 7 frames) coordinates, respectively. We collected 1,718 steps from 23 molecules. Other examples of trajectories are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S9. (B) Distribution of the step size fitted with a single Gaussian assuming a single peak. The values at the top right are the fitted parameter (peak ± SD) and average. The ratio of backward steps was 1.2%. (C) Distribution of the duration time before the forward step fitted with a single exponential decay function. The value at the top right is the obtained time constant (fitted value ± SE of the fit).
Fig. 6.
Single-molecule analysis of aE634A at saturated [ATP] (5 mM). Experimental conditions are described on the left. Examples of trajectories are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S10. (A and B) Distribution of the step size at 0.09 and 1.3 mM Na+. Black lines represent fitting with single Gaussians. The values at the top right are the fitted parameters (peak ± SD) and averages. (C and D) Distribution of the duration time before the forward step. Black lines represent fitting with single exponential decay functions. The value at the top right is the obtained time constant (fitted value ± SE of the fit). (E) Plot between [Na+] (0.09, 0.3, and 1.3 mM) and time constant obtained by the fitting at 5 mM ATP. The solid red line represents a straight line connecting two data points at 0.09 and 0.3 mM Na+, and its slope is −1.1. The solid blue line is the result of linear fitting among all three data points. The obtained slope is −1.0.
Next, we observed the rotation of aE634A at 0.3 mM Na+ and 1 μM ATP at 1,000 fps (Fig. 7A and SI Appendix, Fig. S10). Under this condition, both Na+ and ATP bindings were rate-limiting for rotation (Fig. 2 B and C). The step-finding algorithm was applied to the median-filtered trace (current ± 7 frames, red line). As a result, the number of detected pauses in a single turn was mainly 13, reflecting 10 pausing positions of EhVo and 3 pausing positions of EhV1 (Fig. 4C). This result indicates that the pausing positions waiting for Na+ and ATP bindings are different in the EhVoV1 complex. The distribution of the step size is shown in Fig. 7B. The average value for the forward step was 29.9°, which is distinctly smaller than 36°. When we superimposed the two histograms in Fig. 5B (0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP) and Fig. 7B (0.3 mM Na+ and 1 μM ATP) after normalizing the maximum values, the difference was obvious (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). Furthermore, interestingly, in contrast to the condition in which Na+ binding was the sole rate-limiting factor, the ratio of the backward step increased to 6.1%. Therefore, we fitted the distribution with the sum of three Gaussians: one peak in the backward (minus) direction and two peaks in the forward (plus) direction. Note that one of the forward peaks was fixed at 36°, which is assumed as the step of EhVo. Then, we obtained three peaks at −14.2 ± 6.8, 23.1 ± 10.4, and 36.0 ± 12.8° (peak ± SD; Fig. 7B). For comparison, the fitting with two Gaussians with peaks in minus and plus directions is shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S12A. The distribution of duration time before the forward step fitted better with the sum of two exponential decay functions (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.98; Fig. 7C) than with a single exponential decay function (R2 = 0.94; SI Appendix, Fig. S12B), and time constants of 135 ± 24 and 642 ± 322 ms (fitted value ± SE of the fit) were obtained. These values presumably correspond to the time constants for Na+ and ATP bindings, respectively, because the time constant for Na+ binding was 137 ms at 0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP (Fig. 5C), and that for ATP binding was 476 ms at 1 μM ATP as estimated from konATP (2.1 × 106 M−1 s−1; Table 1). These results are consistent with the notion that both Na+ and ATP bindings are rate-limiting for rotation.
Fig. 7.
(A) Typical trajectory of ATP-driven rotation of aE634A at 1 μM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ recorded at 1,000 fps (1 ms time resolution). (Right) Enlarged view of one revolution (360°). Pink, red, and black traces represent raw, median-filtered (current ± 7 frames), and fitted trajectories, respectively. (Inset) The corresponding x–y trajectory. Pink lines and red dots represent the raw and median-filtered (current ± 7 frames) coordinates, respectively. We collected 920 steps from 21 molecules. Other examples of trajectories are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S11. (B) Distribution of the step size fitted with the sum of three Gaussians: one peak in backward (minus) direction and two peaks in forward (plus) direction, one of which was fixed at 36°, assuming that it was the step of EhVo. The ratio of backward steps was 6.1%. (C) Distribution of the duration time before the forward step fitted with the sum of two exponential decay functions. The values at the top right are obtained time constants (fitted value ± SE of the fit) and the coefficient of determination (R2) of fitting.
Backward and Recovery Steps between Adjacent Pauses of EhVo and EhV1.
As described above, occasional backward steps (6.1% of total steps) were observed under conditions where both Na+ and ATP bindings were rate-limiting for rotation (Fig. 7B). Typical examples of backward steps are shown in Fig. 8A. Green, cyan, and purple lines indicate the forward step just before the backward step, the backward step, and the forward step after the backward step (recovery step), respectively. Fig. 8 B–D shows the step size distributions for these events. The average value of a backward step size was −18.8° (Fig. 8C), which is smaller than the expected step size (36°) of EhVo. Because backward steps were observed when not only Na+ binding but also ATP binding was rate-limiting for rotation, it is reasonable to assume that backward steps occur during the pauses waiting for ATP binding. A backward step size smaller than 36° is also consistent with the notion that the pausing positions waiting for Na+ and ATP bindings are different in the EhVoV1 complex, and backward steps occur at the intermediate pausing position of EhV1 between pausing positions of EhVo. The forward steps just before the backward and recovery steps seemed to show two kinds of step sizes, smaller than 36° and close to 36° (Fig. 8 B and D). The backward and forward steps smaller than 36° suggest Brownian motion between the adjacent pausing positions waiting for ATP and Na+ bindings. Furthermore, the 36° forward steps just before the backward steps suggest a standard forward step in EhVo followed by the Brownian backward step to the adjacent pausing position of EhV1, and the 36° recovery steps after the backward steps suggest a resumption of the rotation after ATP binding to EhV1.
Fig. 8.
Backward steps of aE634A observed at 1 μM ATP and 0.3 mM Na+ with 1,000 fps (1 ms time resolution). (A) Examples of trajectories showing the backward steps. The pink, red, and black traces represent the raw, median-filtered (current ± 7 frames), and fitted trajectories of the median-filtered data identified by the algorithm, respectively. The green, cyan, and purple lines indicate forward steps just before backward steps, backward steps, and forward steps just after backward steps (recovery steps), respectively. An asterisk indicates a backward step that is not detected as a step by the algorithm (underfitting). (B–D) Distributions of step size for forward steps just before backward steps, backward steps, and recovery steps, respectively. In B and D, the distributions seemed to show two peaks at <36° and 36°. In C, the peak position was larger than −36°, and the average value was −18.8°.
Then, to test the hypothesis that the backward steps occur equally at three pausing positions of EhV1, we prepared other mutants, isolated EhV1(BR350K) and EhVoV1(BR350K). Because an arginine residue in the B subunit (BArg350) of EhV1 plays a crucial role in ATP hydrolysis (SI Appendix, Fig. S13) (42), the rotation rate of the EhV1(BR350K) mutant decreases about 100 times compared to that of the wild-type EhV1 (47). This property makes ATP cleavage pauses of EhV1 much longer in EhVoV1(BR350K) even at high [ATP], and the pauses of EhVo and EhV1 become distinguishable. The rotations of EhV1(BR350K) and EhVoV1(BR350K) observed at 0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP with 1,000 fps are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S14. Note that in the isolated EhV1(BR350K), a His6 tag was introduced to the N terminus of the A subunit to immobilize the stator A3B3 ring, and a 40-nm AuNP probe was attached to the rotor D subunit (SI Appendix, Fig. S13). Three long pauses were observed in both mutants, attributed to ATP cleavage pauses. Similar to our previous study, EhV1(BR350K) did not show clear backward steps during the long ATP cleavage pauses under this condition (SI Appendix, Fig. S14A) (47). On the other hand, EhVoV1(BR350K) exhibited frequent backward and recovery steps during the long ATP cleavage pauses (SI Appendix, Fig. S14B). The distribution of the step size showed two peaks at −11 and 11°, the sizes were smaller than 36° (SI Appendix, Fig. S14C), and these small backward and recovery steps occurred equally in all three ATP cleavage pauses of EhV1.
Discussion
ATP-Driven Rotation of EhVoV1 Is Tightly Coupled with Na+ transport.
In the present study, we directly visualized ATP-driven rotation of EhVoV1, which is rate-limited by ion transport. EhVoV1 used in this study transports Na+, while most rotary ATPases transport H+. This property of EhVoV1 has advantages for resolving the stepping rotation, which is rate-limited by ion transport in Vo. First, H+ transport in rotary ATPases is thought to be achieved by a Grotthuss mechanism (15, 65) in which H+ transfer is not a rate-limiting process. Indeed, the duration time of transient dwells of Fo in E. coli FoF1 does not exhibit pH dependence ranging from pH 5 to 9, although the frequency of pause occurrence is highly affected by pH (15). In addition, changes in pH can largely affect protein stabilities and enzymatic reactions, whereas changes in [Na+] would mildly affect them. Here we resolved the pauses and steps of EhVoV1 by using a mutant in which the aGlu634 residue in the stator a subunit of EhVo was substituted with alanine (aE634A) and found that the duration time before the forward steps is inversely proportional to [Na+] (Fig. 6E). We previously confirmed that the coupling in EhVoV1 is retained by using DCCD (N, N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide) modification assays (17). [Na+] dependency of the rotation rate in both the wild type and aE634A (Fig. 2C) is also strong evidence for the intact coupling. The present study demonstrates ATP-driven rotation of a rotary ATPase rate-limited by ion transport and tight coupling between ion binding and the rotational step, although single-molecule studies of ATP-driven rotation of H+-transporting rotary ATPases have been reported (13–15, 66–69).
We found that both the wild type and aE634A mainly have 10 pauses per single turn and 36° steps (Figs. 3 and 5), which reflect the structural symmetry of the c10 ring under conditions in which only Na+-binding is rate-limiting for rotation (0.3 mM Na+ and 5 mM ATP). In addition, numbers of pauses larger or smaller than 10 per single turn were also observed (Fig. 4). From the time constants for the elementary steps of the ATP hydrolysis reaction in EhV1 and the time resolution of measurement (0.33 and 1 ms for the wild type and aE634A, respectively), we can consider the case where more than 10 pauses are detected (Fig. 4). From the konATP of the wild type and aE634A (2.0 × 106 and 2.1 × 106 M−1 s−1, respectively; Table 1), the time constants for ATP binding are estimated to be about 0.1 ms at 5 mM ATP. In addition, by using isolated EhV1, we previously reported that the time constants for ATP cleavage and phosphate release are smaller than 1 ms, and that for ADP release is 2.5 ms. Furthermore, ADP release occurs at a different angle from that of ATP binding, while ATP cleavage and phosphate release occur at the same angle as ATP binding (47). Considering the stochastic nature of the pause duration and current time resolution, these elementary events, especially ADP release, can be also detected. If the time resolution and the localization precision are further improved, detection of 16 pauses (10, 3, and 3 pauses for Na+ binding, ATP binding, and ADP release, respectively) would become possible and give us further insight into the energy transduction mechanism of the EhVoV1 complex. Similarly, a number of pauses fewer than 10 can also occur stochastically due to Na+ binding events with shorter duration times than the time resolution. Another possible explanation is stochastic H+ transport instead of Na+ in EhVoV1 at low [Na+]. It has been reported that H+ can bind to the ion-binding site of the EhVo c subunit when [Na+] is sufficiently low (44). Because H+ binding will not be the rate-limiting factor as described above, the pauses could not be detected at the current time resolution (14). In the present study, we could not distinguish Na+ and H+ bindings and assumed that steps are triggered by Na+ bindings. Whether or not EhVoV1 really transports H+ under low-[Na+] conditions will be addressed elsewhere. Furthermore, we need to mention that the step-finding algorithm we used cannot perfectly eliminate overfittings and underfittings (62, 64). Due to these experimental and analytical limitations, we cannot confidently identify which dwells correspond to EhV1 or EhVo.
The VmaxATP of the wild-type EhVoV1 (40.0 ± 0.3 rps) at 300 mM Na+ was smaller than that of the isolated EhV1 (117 ± 3 rps) (Fig. 2B and Table 1) (47). The difference is presumably caused by the elementary steps of Na+ transport in EhVo, especially by Na+ release, and/or the interaction (molecular friction) between the rotor c10 ring and stator a subunit. If we assume that Na+ release is rate-limiting, we can estimate the time constant for Na+ release to be 1.6 ms from the difference of the VmaxATP between EhVoV1 and EhV1. Note that in the present study, both entry and exit half-channels of the a subunit were exposed to the solution with 300 mM Na+ because we used detergent-solubilized EhVoV1. The effect of Na+ rebinding from the exit half-channel on the rotation rate of EhVoV1 is an interesting question that needs to be clarified. On the other hand, the VmaxATP of aE634A (4.58 ± 0.04 rps) at 300 mM Na+ was approximately one-tenth that of the wild type (40.0 ± 0.3 rps) (Fig. 2B and Table 1). Michaelis–Menten kinetics analysis showed that the konATP of aE634A was similar to that of the wild type, although the konNa of aE634A was significantly decreased compared with that of the wild type (Tables 1 and 2). These results indicate that the aE634A mutation has little effect on ATP binding to EhV1. The mutated glutamate residue is located on the surface of entry half-channel of the a subunit (Fig. 1C), and the decrease in konNa is likely caused by the loss of a negative charge. Interestingly, this glutamate residue is completely conserved among Na+- and H+-transporting V-ATPases (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S2) (24, 26, 70, 71). Therefore, it may have a common role in efficient ion uptake for both Na+ and H+. Consistent with this notion, ion selectivity seems to be determined by the ion-binding site of the c ring rather than the half-channels in the a subunit (72, 73).
The rotation rate of both the wild type and aE634A showed a biphasic response to [Na+] (Fig. 2C and Table 2). This biphasic response was also reported previously for the ATPase activity of detergent-solubilized EhVoV1 (17, 61). The Michaelis–Menten parameters obtained in this study are slightly different from those in previous studies, presumably due to differences in experimental conditions, especially pH and [Na+] contaminating the observation buffer. Regarding the Na+ contamination in the experimental system, it should be noted that it is difficult to determine affinity at the submicromolar range since the observation buffer contains at least 90 μM Na+ (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). The biphasic response to [Na+] strongly suggests two different Na+-binding sites of EhVoV1 with largely different affinities. One possible explanation is that these sites are related to the entry and exit half-channels of the a subunit. The high-affinity binding site may correspond to Na+ binding to the c ring from the entry site because the dissociation constant of Na+ to the c subunit in the EhVoV1 complex has been reported as 12 μM in the absence of ATP (44). On the other hand, the low-affinity Na+ binding site corresponding to Km2Na has not been identified yet. We assume that the low-affinity site would be physiologically important because the intracellular [Na+] in E. hirae has been reported to be several tens of millimolar (38, 41, 74). To clarify the mechanism of the biphasic response of EhVoV1 to [Na+], it will be required to embed EhVoV1 in the lipid membrane and change the [Na+] in the entry and exit sides independently (75). Alternatively, mutagenesis in the Na+ exit half-channel of the a subunit will provide insights into the biphasic response. Recently, Yanagisawa and Frasch (15) investigated E. coli FoF1 mutants by replacing charged or polar residues in the entry and exit half-channels with nonpolar leucine residues and successfully revealed that these residues possess optimal pKa values for unidirectional H+ transfer. A similar approach would be also helpful for EhVoV1.
Rigid Component in Coupling between EhVo and EhV1 in the EhVoV1 Complex.
By using single-molecule imaging of aE634A under conditions where both Na+ and ATP bindings are rate-limiting for rotation, we visualized the pauses of EhVo and EhV1 simultaneously. We found that aE634A mainly shows 13 pauses per single turn under this condition (Figs. 4C and 7A and SI Appendix, Fig. S10). Furthermore, occasional backward and recovery steps smaller than 36° were observed (Fig. 8), not only in aE634A but also during the three long ATP cleavage pauses of EhVoV1(BR350K) (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). These results indicate that the pausing positions waiting for Na+ and ATP bindings are different, and transitions occur between adjacent pausing positions of EhVo and EhV1. These results also indicate that the ATP hydrolysis reaction in EhV1 is tightly coupled with Na+ transport in EhVo, and this coupling has a rigid component. Considering our observation system where the c ring of EhVo is immobilized on the glass surface and the AuNP probe is attached to the A subunit of EhV1 (Fig. 2A), if the complex shows a fully elastic coupling, the pausing positions of EhVo and EhV1 would be superimposed by deformation of the peripheral E2G2 stalks or the central DF shaft. In this case, a single turn (360° revolution) would be divided into two 108° (36° × 3) and one 144° (36° × 4) rotations with extensive deformation. However, our results clearly showed 10 pauses per single turn (36° step) at high [ATP] and 13 pauses at low [ATP], suggesting rigid coupling in which the 120° steps in EhV1 are retained in the presence of a structural symmetry mismatch between EhVo and EhV1. However, we should mention that with our observation system, even if elastic deformation of the peripheral stalks causes the motion of the a subunit of EhVo to move to forward or backward Na+ binding angle during the pause of EhV1 waiting for ATP binding, it cannot be detected as a step because we attached the AuNP probe to the A subunit of EhV1. Therefore, the present results do not completely rule out the possibility of elastic deformation in EhVoV1 (SI Appendix, Fig. S15).
Different pausing positions between Vo and V1 have also been reported by a single-molecule study of detergent-solubilized H+-transporting Thermus thermophilus V/A-ATPase, which acts as an ATP synthase (20). Here we denote this enzyme as TtVoV1 following previous studies (20, 24), although it is believed to have been introduced by horizontal gene transfer from a habitat sharing archaea (8). During rotation in the ATP hydrolysis direction, TtVoV1 showed 30° steps derived from the c12 ring of TtVo and extra pauses between two adjacent pauses of TtVo. These extra pauses were attributed to catalytic dwells of TtV1. Furthermore, corresponding structures were also recently revealed by a cryo-EM study of nanodisc-embedded TtVoV1 (24). Zhou and Sazanov (24) resolved the structures of two substates in addition to three main states, which reflect the threefold structural symmetry of TtV1. Those substates, 1L and 1R, which differ in the relative positions of TtVo and TtV1, exhibited a slight twist of the central shaft and deformation of the peripheral stalks against state 1. It remains uncertain which pauses found in the single-molecule study correspond to those substates. It is intriguing that the angles of TtVo and TtV1 do not coincide although TtVo has a c12 ring and no symmetry mismatch with TtV1.
The rigid component in EhVoV1 coupling is distinct from E. coli, Bacillus PS3, and yeast mitochondrial F-ATPases, in which cryo-EM studies have indicated an elastic coupling (25, 29, 35). These F-ATPases have c10 rings (34, 76) and the same structural symmetry mismatches as EhVoV1. Structural analysis of E. coli or Bacillus PS3 FoF1 has revealed three rotational steps that are classified into two 108° steps and one 144° step. This significant mismatch is tolerated by the flexible peripheral stalk rather than the central shaft (25, 29, 77). Actually, a very recent cryo-EM study of yeast mitochondrial FoF1 revealed extensive deformation of the peripheral stalk during catalysis (35). In rotary ATPases, the number of peripheral stalks varies from one to three, depending on the enzymes (6, 78, 79). E. coli, Bacillus PS3, and yeast FoF1 possess only one peripheral stalk (25, 29), whereas EhVoV1 has two peripheral stalks that can strongly connect two motor domains (Fig. 1A) (26). As a result, EhVoV1 would rotate rigidly without large, elastic deformations. Consistent with this notion, a cryo-EM study of yeast VoV1, which has three peripheral stalks, showed three almost uniform 120° steps despite having a c10 ring (27), although the possibility of uniform steps due to asymmetry in the c ring of yeast VoV1 should be considered as proposed by the author.
In addition to the number of peripheral stalks, the number of c subunits in the rotor ring also varies widely from 8 to 17 among species (58, 59). This makes the issue more complicated because a different number of c subunits will change the step size and the ion-to-ATP ratio. Furthermore, the number of transmembrane helices in a c subunit monomer also differs among species. For example, although both EhVoV1 and E. coli FoF1 have c10 rings, each c subunit consists of tetratransmembrane and double-transmembrane helices, respectively (25, 55). This results in largely different diameters of the c10 ring, 8 and 5 nm for EhVoV1 and E. coli FoF1, respectively (26). Obviously, larger rings would require larger deformations to adjust the relative angles between Vo/Fo and V1/F1 if elastic coupling is assumed. Another interesting feature of EhVoV1 with the large c ring is its off-axis rotation, which may affect the coupling between EhVo and EhV1 (26). However, the off-axis rotation was not resolved in the present single-molecule experiments. To understand the common and diverse mechanisms of energy transduction in rotary ATPases, a comprehensive study of various ATPases with rotor c rings of different c subunit numbers and sizes will be required.
Brownian Ratchet Rotation of EhVo.
Fig. 9 shows a schematic model of the stepping rotation of EhVoV1 at high [ATP] and low [Na+] (Fig. 9A) and at low [ATP] and low [Na+] (Fig. 9B). In the present study, backward steps were rarely observed when [ATP] is high (5 mM) in both the wild type and aE634A (Figs. 3B, 5B, and 6 A and B). In EhVoV1, the torque for ATP-driven rotation is generated by ATP binding and ADP release in EhV1 (47), and the value has been estimated to be 20 pNnm (17). When [ATP] is high, time constants for ATP binding and ADP release are both small, and the torque from EhV1 will be applied to EhVo almost constantly. Therefore, EhVoV1 will show unidirectional rotation without backward steps (Fig. 9A). On the other hand, when [ATP] is low (1 μM) and where the time constant for ATP binding is large (476 or 642 ms; Table 1 and Fig. 7C), backward steps were observed occasionally (Fig. 8A). The size of the backward steps was much smaller than 36° (14.2 or 18.8°; Figs. 7B and 8C). Because no torque is applied when EhVoV1 is waiting for ATP binding at the pausing position of EhV1 (Fig. 9B, dark green), it can move to the adjacent backward (and also forward) pausing position of EhVo by Brownian motion (Fig. 9B, blue arrows). Backward and recovery steps smaller than 36° were more frequently observed in EhVoV1(BR350K), in which ATP cleavage pauses are prominently longer than in the wild type (SI Appendix, Fig. S14). Importantly, backward steps occurred equally during the three ATP cleavage pauses of EhV1, consistent with the notion that backward steps are driven by thermal fluctuation, not by elastic strain accumulation. These results support a Brownian ratchet model of EhVo rotation in addition to the rigid coupling component of EhVoV1. However, it should be noted that the elastic deformations at the transitions between EhV1 and EhVo pausing angles cannot be detected by the current observation system (SI Appendix, Fig. S15). Also, note that the size of backward steps occurring at the three pausing positions of EhV1 will not be uniform in the model shown in Fig. 9B. However, it was difficult for us to resolve any difference under the current experimental setup.
Fig. 9.
Schematic models of the stepping rotation and rigid coupling of EhVoV1. The orange circles and dark green squares indicate the pausing positions waiting for Na+ binding to EhVo and ATP binding to EhV1, respectively. The red arrows indicate the 36° steps between adjacent pausing positions for the EhVo. The blue arrows indicate the backward and forward steps smaller than 36° between adjacent pausing positions for EhVo and EhV1. (A) Condition in which only Na+ binding to EhVo is rate-limiting. In this condition, the pauses waiting for ATP binding to EhV1 are too short to be detected, and EhVoV1 rotates unidirectionally without backward steps. (B) Condition in which both Na+ and ATP bindings are rate-limiting. The pausing positions waiting for ATP binding are visualized, and then 13 pausing positions are detected per single turn. Because no torque is generated during the pauses waiting for ATP binding to EhV1, EhVoV1 rotates to the backward and forward pausing positions of EhVo driven by Brownian motion. As a result, backward and forward steps smaller than 36° are observed. A detailed model is shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S15.
In our previous study using isolated EhV1, no backward steps were observed in ATP-driven rotation except under extreme experimental conditions (47). Therefore, backward and forward steps smaller than 36° observed in EhVoV1 are caused by EhVo and are presumably coupled with Na+ binding/release to/from the c subunit through the two half-channels of the a subunit. A recent single-molecule study observed similar small backward steps of 11° in E. coli FoF1 during ATP-driven rotation and successfully revealed that backward steps are related to H+ translocation between the c ring and half-channels of the a subunit (15). In a study of E. coli FoF1, the small backward step was attributed to the fact that E. coli FoF1 functions as an ATP synthase. In the case of EhVoV1, because backward steps of 36° or larger than 36° rarely occur, the backward flow of Na+ seems to be suppressed. The detailed mechanisms of the backward step may be different by ATP synthesis capacity, size of the c ring, and ion species being transported. In the present study, however, the electrochemical potential of Na+ could not be applied because detergent-solubilized EhVoV1 was used. To address the question of whether the electrochemical potential of Na+ can drive the rotation of EhVoV1 in the opposite direction and synthesize ATP, our next projects will be single-molecule imaging and biochemical assays of EhVoV1 embedded in a lipid membrane.
Materials and Methods
Sample Preparation.
The construction of the expression plasmid for the wild-type EhVoV1 (pTR19-EhVoV1) was reported previously (17). For the plasmid construction of aE634A, EhVoV1(BR350K), and EhV1(BR350K), PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis was performed by KOD one PCR Master Mix (Toyobo) with pTR19-EhVoV1 as a template. For expression and purification of the wild type, aE634A, EhVoV1(BR350K), and EhV1(BR350K), the procedures described in our previous study were used with some modifications (17, 47). Details are described in SI Appendix.
Single-Molecule Imaging.
AuNPs with a diameter of 40 nm (EMGC40, BBI) were biotinylated with biotin-alkane-thiol (HS-C11-EG3, Surfmods) and coated by streptavidin (PRO791, PROSPEC) as described in previous reports (47, 80). We followed the setting of a total internal reflection dark-field microscope system based on a high-speed complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera and an inverted microscope as described in our previous studies with some modifications (47). Details are described in SI Appendix.
ICP-OES Measurement.
To estimate the concentrations of contaminating Na+ in the observation buffers, we measured emission spectra using an ICP-OES (5100 ICP-OES, Agilent Technologies). The emission signal at λ = 589.592 nm was used for analysis. The flow rates of the plasma and assist gas (Ar) were 14 and 1.2 L/min, respectively. The standard addition method was used to avoid physical and ionization interferences. Namely, a sodium standard solution (FUJIFILM Wako) was added to the observation buffers in a range of 0.1 to 10 mg/L (4.3 to 430 μM) as a final concentration of Na+. The calibration curve was extrapolated, and the absolute value of the X intercept was taken as the concentration of contaminating Na+.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Monique Honsa for advice about data analysis; Kazuyoshi Murata, Chihong Song, and Raymond N. Burton-Smith for providing us with the structural data and for their fruitful discussions; Yayoi Kon for her technical support; and all laboratory members for helpful discussions and technical advice. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Molecular Engine” (JP19H05380 to H.U., JP18H05425 to T.M., and JP18H05424 to R.I.); Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JP21H02454 to R.I. and JP21K15060 and JP20J01316 to A.O.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan; and the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) program for cross-disciplinary study (Grant 01312001 to A.O.). A part of this work was performed with the aid of the Instrument Center of the Institute for Molecular Science.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. S.W. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2210204119/-/DCSupplemental.
Data, Materials, and Software Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.
References
- 1.Yasuda R., Noji H., Yoshida M., Kinosita K. Jr., Itoh H., Resolution of distinct rotational substeps by submillisecond kinetic analysis of F1-ATPase. Nature 410, 898–904 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Forgac M., Vacuolar ATPases: Rotary proton pumps in physiology and pathophysiology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 917–929 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walker J. E., The ATP synthase: The understood, the uncertain and the unknown. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 41, 1–16 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boyer P. D., The ATP synthase—A splendid molecular machine. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 717–749 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vasanthakumar T., Rubinstein J. L., Structure and roles of V-type ATPases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 295–307 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stewart A. G., Sobti M., Harvey R. P., Stock D., Rotary ATPases: Models, machine elements and technical specifications. Bioarchitecture 3, 2–12 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Grüber G., Manimekalai M. S. S., Mayer F., Müller V., ATP synthases from archaea: The beauty of a molecular motor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 940–952 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gogarten J. P., et al. , Evolution of the vacuolar H+-ATPase: Implications for the origin of eukaryotes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6661–6665 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sielaff H., et al. , Domain compliance and elastic power transmission in rotary F(O)F(1)-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 17760–17765 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sielaff H., Rennekamp H., Engelbrecht S., Junge W., Functional halt positions of rotary FOF1-ATPase correlated with crystal structures. Biophys. J. 95, 4979–4987 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yasuda R., Noji H., Kinosita K. Jr., Yoshida M., F1-ATPase is a highly efficient molecular motor that rotates with discrete 120° steps. Cell 93, 1117–1124 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Noji H., Yasuda R., Yoshida M., Kinosita K. Jr., Direct observation of the rotation of F1-ATPase. Nature 386, 299–302 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ishmukhametov R., Hornung T., Spetzler D., Frasch W. D., Direct observation of stepped proteolipid ring rotation in E. coli F0F1-ATP synthase. EMBO J. 29, 3911–3923 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yanagisawa S., Frasch W. D., Protonation-dependent stepped rotation of the F-type ATP synthase c-ring observed by single-molecule measurements. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 17093–17100 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yanagisawa S., Frasch W. D., pH-dependent 11° F1FO ATP synthase sub-steps reveal insight into the FO torque generating mechanism. eLife 10, e70016 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sielaff H., Yanagisawa S., Frasch W. D., Junge W., Börsch M., Structural asymmetry and kinetic limping of single rotary F-ATP synthases. Molecules 24, 504 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ueno H., et al. , Torque generation of Enterococcus hirae V-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 31212–31223 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Martin J., Hudson J., Hornung T., Frasch W. D., Fo-driven rotation in the ATP synthase direction against the force of F1 ATPase in the FoF1 ATP synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 10717–10728 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Martin J. L., Ishmukhametov R., Hornung T., Ahmad Z., Frasch W. D., Anatomy of F1-ATPase powered rotation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3715–3720 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Furuike S., et al. , Resolving stepping rotation in Thermus thermophilus H(+)-ATPase/synthase with an essentially drag-free probe. Nat. Commun. 2, 233 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lau W. C. Y., Rubinstein J. L., Structure of intact Thermus thermophilus V-ATPase by cryo-EM reveals organization of the membrane-bound V(O) motor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 1367–1372 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Düser M. G., et al. , 36° step size of proton-driven c-ring rotation in FoF1-ATP synthase. EMBO J. 28, 2689–2696 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zimmermann B., Diez M., Zarrabi N., Gräber P., Börsch M., Movements of the epsilon-subunit during catalysis and activation in single membrane-bound H(+)-ATP synthase. EMBO J. 24, 2053–2063 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhou L., Sazanov L. A., Structure and conformational plasticity of the intact Thermus thermophilus V/A-type ATPase. Science 365, eaaw9144 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sobti M., et al. , Cryo-EM structures provide insight into how E. coli F1Fo ATP synthase accommodates symmetry mismatch. Nat. Commun. 11, 2615 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tsunoda J., et al. , Off-axis rotor in Enterococcus hirae V-ATPase visualized by Zernike phase plate single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Sci. Rep. 8, 15632 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Khan M. M., et al. , Oxidative stress protein Oxr1 promotes V-ATPase holoenzyme disassembly in catalytic activity-independent manner. EMBO J. 41, e109360 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kishikawa J., et al. , Structural snapshots of V/A-ATPase reveal the rotary catalytic mechanism of rotary ATPases. Nat. Commun. 13, 1213 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Guo H., Suzuki T., Rubinstein J. L., Structure of a bacterial ATP synthase. eLife 8, e43128 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou A., et al. , Structure and conformational states of the bovine mitochondrial ATP synthase by cryo-EM. eLife 4, e10180 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Roh S.-H., et al. , The 3.5-Å CryoEM structure of nanodisc-reconstituted yeast vacuolar ATPase Vo proton channel. Mol. Cell 69, 993–1004.e3 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Roh S.-H., et al. , Cryo-EM and MD infer water-mediated proton transport and autoinhibition mechanisms of Vo complex. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb9605 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abbas Y. M., Wu D., Bueler S. A., Robinson C. V., Rubinstein J. L., Structure of V-ATPase from the mammalian brain. Science 367, 1240–1246 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Murphy B. J., et al. , Rotary substates of mitochondrial ATP synthase reveal the basis of flexible F1-Fo coupling. Science 364, eaaw9128 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guo H., Rubinstein J. L., Structure of ATP synthase under strain during catalysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 2232 (2022). Correction in: Nat Commun. 13, 2849 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Waterhouse A., et al. , SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W296–W303 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Heefner D. L., Harold F. M., ATP-driven sodium pump in Streptococcus faecalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 2798–2802 (1982). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ikegami M., Takahashi H., Igarashi K., Kakinuma Y., Sodium ATPase and sodium/proton antiporter are not obligatory for sodium homeostasis of Enterococcus hirae at acid pH. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 64, 1088–1092 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kakinuma Y., Yamato I., Murata T., Structure and function of vacuolar Na+-translocating ATPase in Enterococcus hirae. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 31, 7–14 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kakinuma Y., Igarashi K., Electrogenic Na+ transport by Enterococcus hirae Na(+)-ATPase. FEBS Lett. 359, 255–258 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kakinuma Y., Igarashi K., Amplification of the Na+-ATPase of Streptococcus faecalis at alkaline pH. FEBS Lett. 261, 135–138 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Arai S., et al. , Rotation mechanism of Enterococcus hirae V1-ATPase based on asymmetric crystal structures. Nature 493, 703–707 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Suzuki K., et al. , Crystal structures of the ATP-binding and ADP-release dwells of the V1 rotary motor. Nat. Commun. 7, 13235 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murata T., et al. , Ion binding and selectivity of the rotor ring of the Na+-transporting V-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 8607–8612 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Imamura H., et al. , Evidence for rotation of V1-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 2312–2315 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Minagawa Y., et al. , Basic properties of rotary dynamics of the molecular motor Enterococcus hirae V1-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 32700–32707 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Iida T., et al. , Single-molecule analysis reveals rotational substeps and chemo-mechanical coupling scheme of Enterococcus hirae V1-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 17017–17030 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Allegretti M., et al. , Horizontal membrane-intrinsic α-helices in the stator a-subunit of an F-type ATP synthase. Nature 521, 237–240 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hahn A., Vonck J., Mills D. J., Meier T., Kühlbrandt W., Structure, mechanism, and regulation of the chloroplast ATP synthase. Science 360, eaat4318 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Angevine C. M., Herold K. A. G., Vincent O. D., Fillingame R. H., Aqueous access pathways in ATP synthase subunit a. Reactivity of cysteine substituted into transmembrane helices 1, 3, and 5. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 9001–9007 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Junge W., ATP synthase and other motor proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 4735–4737 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Vik S. B., Antonio B. J., A mechanism of proton translocation by F1F0 ATP synthases suggested by double mutants of the a subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30364–30369 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Junge W., Lill H., Engelbrecht S., ATP synthase: An electrochemical transducer with rotatory mechanics. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 420–423 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.von Ballmoos C., Dimroth P., Two distinct proton binding sites in the ATP synthase family. Biochemistry 46, 11800–11809 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Murata T., Yamato I., Kakinuma Y., Leslie A. G. W., Walker J. E., Structure of the rotor of the V-Type Na+-ATPase from Enterococcus hirae. Science 308, 654–659 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bai C., Warshel A., Revisiting the protomotive vectorial motion of F0-ATPase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 19484–19489 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Matthies D., et al. , High-resolution structure and mechanism of an F/V-hybrid rotor ring in a Na+-coupled ATP synthase. Nat. Commun. 5, 5286 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Noji H., Ueno H., Kobayashi R., Correlation between the numbers of rotation steps in the ATPase and proton-conducting domains of F- and V-ATPases. Biophys. Rev. 12, 303–307 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cheuk A., Meier T., Rotor subunits adaptations in ATP synthases from photosynthetic organisms. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 49, 541–550 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Junge W., Sielaff H., Engelbrecht S., Torque generation and elastic power transmission in the rotary F(O)F(1)-ATPase. Nature 459, 364–370 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Murata T., Takase K., Yamato I., Igarashi K., Kakinuma Y., Properties of the V0V1 Na+-ATPase from Enterococcus hirae and its V0 moiety. J. Biochem. 125, 414–421 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kerssemakers J. W. J., et al. , Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution. Nature 442, 709–712 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ando J., et al. , Small stepping motion of processive dynein revealed by load-free high-speed single-particle tracking. Sci. Rep. 10, 1080 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Nakamura A., Okazaki K.-I., Furuta T., Sakurai M., Iino R., Processive chitinase is Brownian monorail operated by fast catalysis after peeling rail from crystalline chitin. Nat. Commun. 9, 3814 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Spikes T. E., Montgomery M. G., Walker J. E., Structure of the dimeric ATP synthase from bovine mitochondria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 23519–23526 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nishio K., Iwamoto-Kihara A., Yamamoto A., Wada Y., Futai M., Subunit rotation of ATP synthase embedded in membranes: a or β Subunit rotation relative to the c subunit ring. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 13448–13452 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ueno H., Suzuki T., Kinosita K. Jr., Yoshida M., ATP-driven stepwise rotation of FoF1-ATP synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 1333–1338 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yokoyama K., Nakano M., Imamura H., Yoshida M., Tamakoshi M., Rotation of the proteolipid ring in the V-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 24255–24258 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Hirata T., et al. , Subunit rotation of vacuolar-type proton pumping ATPase: Relative rotation of the G and C subunits. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 23714–23719 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schep D. G., Zhao J., Rubinstein J. L., Models for the a subunits of the Thermus thermophilus V/A-ATPase and Saccharomyces cerevisiae V-ATPase enzymes by cryo-EM and evolutionary covariance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 3245–3250 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Vasanthakumar T., et al. , Structural comparison of the vacuolar and Golgi V-ATPases from Saccharomyces pcerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 7272–7277 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Leone V., Pogoryelov D., Meier T., Faraldo-Gómez J. D., On the principle of ion selectivity in Na+/H+-coupled membrane proteins: Experimental and theoretical studies of an ATP synthase rotor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, E1057–E1066 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Schlegel K., Leone V., Faraldo-Gómez J. D., Müller V., Promiscuous archaeal ATP synthase concurrently coupled to Na+ and H+ translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 947–952 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Murata T., Takase K., Yamato I., Igarashi K., Kakinuma Y., The ntpJ gene in the Enterococcus hirae ntp operon encodes a component of KtrII potassium transport system functionally independent of vacuolar Na+-ATPase. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 10042–10047 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Watanabe R., et al. , Biased Brownian stepping rotation of FoF1-ATP synthase driven by proton motive force. Nat. Commun. 4, 1631 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Jiang W., Hermolin J., Fillingame R. H., The preferred stoichiometry of c subunits in the rotary motor sector of Escherichia coli ATP synthase is 10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4966–4971 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wächter A., et al. , Two rotary motors in F-ATP synthase are elastically coupled by a flexible rotor and a stiff stator stalk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3924–3929 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Colina-Tenorio L., Dautant A., Miranda-Astudillo H., Giraud M.-F., González-Halphen D., The peripheral stalk of rotary ATPases. Front. Physiol. 9, 1243 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Walker J. E., Dickson V. K., The peripheral stalk of the mitochondrial ATP synthase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 286–296 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ando J., et al. , Single-nanoparticle tracking with angstrom localization precision and microsecond time resolution. Biophys. J. 115, 2413–2427 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix.