Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Sep 29;10(5):e02567-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02567-22

Cervimycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Display Vancomycin-Intermediate Resistant Phenotypes

Alina Dietrich a, Ursula Steffens a, Mike Gajdiss a, Anna-Lena Boschert a, Jana Katharina Dröge a, Christiane Szekat a, Peter Sass b, Imran T Malik b, Jan Bornikoel b, Laura Reinke b, Boris Maček c, Mirita Franz-Wachtel c, Kay Nieselt d, Theresa Harbig d, Kirstin Scherlach e, Heike Brötz-Oesterhelt b, Christian Hertweck e,f, Hans-Georg Sahl g, Gabriele Bierbaum a,
Editor: M-N Frances Yaph
PMCID: PMC9603734  PMID: 36173303

ABSTRACT

Resistance to antibiotics is an increasing problem and necessitates novel antibacterial therapies. The polyketide antibiotics cervimycin A to D are natural products of Streptomyces tendae HKI 0179 with promising activity against multidrug-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. To initiate mode of action studies, we selected cervimycin C- and D-resistant (CmR) Staphylococcus aureus strains. Genome sequencing of CmR mutants revealed amino acid exchanges in the essential histidine kinase WalK, the Clp protease proteolytic subunit ClpP or the Clp ATPase ClpC, and the heat shock protein DnaK. Interestingly, all characterized CmR mutants harbored a combination of mutations in walK and clpP or clpC. In vitro and in vivo analyses showed that the mutations in the Clp proteins abolished ClpP or ClpC activity, and the deletion of clpP rendered S. aureus but not all Bacillus subtilis strains cervimycin-resistant. The essential gene walK was the second mutational hotspot in the CmR S. aureus strains, which decreased WalK activity in vitro and generated a vancomycin-intermediate resistant phenotype, with a thickened cell wall, a lower growth rate, and reduced cell lysis. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses revealed massive alterations in the CmR strains compared to the parent strain S. aureus SG511, with major shifts in the heat shock regulon, the metal ion homeostasis, and the carbohydrate metabolism. Taken together, mutations in the heat shock genes clpP, clpC, and dnaK, and the walK kinase gene in CmR mutants induced a vancomycin-intermediate resistant phenotype in S. aureus, suggesting cell wall metabolism or the Clp protease system as primary target of cervimycin.

IMPORTANCE Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of infections in both the community and hospital setting. Resistance development of S. aureus to various antibiotics is a severe problem for the treatment of this pathogen worldwide. New powerful antimicrobial agents against Gram-positives are needed, since antibiotics like vancomycin fail to cure vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) infections. One candidate substance with promising activity against these organisms is cervimycin, which is an antibiotic complex with a yet unknown mode of action. In our study, we provide first insights into the mode of action of cervimycins. By characterizing cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains, we revealed the Clp system and the essential kinase WalK as mutational hotspots for cervimycin resistance in S. aureus. It further emerged that cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains show a VISA phenotype, indicating a role of cervimycin in perturbing the bacterial cell envelope.

KEYWORDS: ClpC, ClpP, DnaK, TCS, WalK/WalR, antibiotic resistance, naphthoquinone, vancomycin, vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus (VISA)

INTRODUCTION

Gram-positive cocci like coagulase-negative staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus spp., are important pathogens in the hospital environment (1). S. aureus is a leading cause of bacterial infections and mortality (2). Although the number of serious infections due to resistant strains has decreased in recent years (2), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) remains a major health care issue (3). Therefore, new antibacterial agents are needed, preferably with novel modes of action to overcome resistance. Streptomyces species are a promising source of secondary metabolites, especially polyketides, with diverse biological activity (4).

Cervimycins belong to this group and the substances were named after the location of their first discovery, the cave Grotta dei Cervi in Italy. The cervimycin antibiotic complex consists of four main components A to D, and the minor components E to K, produced by the actinomycete Streptomyces tendae HKI 0179 (57). Interestingly, the color of cervimycin is pH-dependent, yellow or violet, a typical property of naphthoquinoid systems that form phenolate salts under alkaline conditions (6). The structures of cervimycins are fully resolved (8) (Fig. 1); cervimycins are bi-glycosylated polyketides, ring-substituted with either a carbamoyl or an acetyl moiety and bear either a dimethylmalonyl or a monomethylmalonyl residue attached to the longer sugar side chain. The unusual di- and tetrasaccharide chains, composed of the trideoxysugars β-d-amicetose and α-l-rhodinose are pharmacophore groups of the molecules, connected via a 1,4-O-glycosidic linkage. The common structural feature of these molecules is the quinoid system on ring D of the naphthacene core, which is inverted relative to classical tetracyclines (8). Tetracyclines, that bear some structural resemblance, are inhibitors of protein biosynthesis by preventing the attachment of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal acceptor site (9). However, the cervimycins did not inhibit protein biosynthesis in a ribosome target test assay, indicating that the mode of action of these antibiotics is different (6).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Structure of cervimycin C; relative configuration. Cervimycins are bi-glycosylated polyketides, decorated with unusual di- and tetrasaccharide chains. Cervimycin C is ring-substituted with a carbamoyl moiety and bears a dimethylmalonyl residue attached to the longer sugar side chain.

Earlier precursor incorporation tests rather indicated the DNA metabolism as a possible target, but only at high concentrations (8× MIC) and with a considerable delay (35 min), whereas cell wall biosynthesis was not affected (6). Furthermore, a selection for cervimycin-resistant Bacillus subtilis mutants revealed an efflux-mediated resistance mechanism, but did not unveil the target structure of the antibiotic complex (10).

To close this gap, we investigated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) found in cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains and the cervimycin resistance mechanisms. To this end, cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains were generated by a serial passaging experiment. Interestingly, the transporter inhibitor reserpine only marginally affected cervimycin susceptibility in these strains, indicating an efflux-independent resistance mechanism. Genome sequencing of the cervimycin-resistant (CmR) strains revealed mutations in the nonessential caseinolytic protease gene clpP and its cognate ATPase gene clpC, and in the essential histidine kinase gene walK, which is part of the cell wall regulatory two-component system WalRK. Moreover, in one strain, an additional mutation in the nonessential heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) gene dnaK was observed. Importantly, the combination of walK and clpP or clpC mutations simultaneously increased the cervimycin and the vancomycin MICs of S. aureus, indicating the ClpCP complex or the Gram-positive cell envelope as possible targets of this novel antibiotic.

RESULTS

Cervimycin C is active against MRSA and VRE.

Extended testing of cervimycin C (CmC) and cervimycin D (CmD) confirmed earlier reports on the activity of cervimycin against MRSA and VRE (5) (Table 1). Analysis of the minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) validated the bactericidal activity of CmC and CmD, with MBCs of one or two titer steps above the MIC values (Table S1). In contrast, mycobacteria and the Gram-negative bacteria Neisseria sicca and E. coli were hardly affected by the cervimycins. Even an E. coli strain with a defective outer membrane (E. coli MB5746) was not susceptible to cervimycin. The susceptibility of E. coli MB5746 was also not increased by the addition of polymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN), which induces outer membrane permeability in Gram-negative bacteria (11). In contrast, E. coli MB5746 was further sensitized toward erythromycin (2-fold) and novobiocin (4-fold) by the addition of PMBN. Of note, the activity of cervimycin turned out to be pH-responsive, as the alkalization of the medium abolished the antibacterial activity (Table 2). This loss of antibacterial activity was accompanied by a color change from yellow to red-violet.

TABLE 1.

MIC values (μg/mL) for cervimycin C (CmC) and D (CmD)a

Strain CmC CmD
Gram-positive
Bacillus subtilis 168 0.25 0.5
Corynebacterium xerosis VA 167198 0.125 4
Enterococcus faecium BM 4147-1 (vancomycin-susceptible) 2 16
E. faecium BM 4147 (vancomycin-resistant) 2 4
Listeria welshimeri DSM 20650 0.25 4
Micrococcus luteus ATCC4698 0.5 1
Mycobacterium smegmatis 32 32
Staphylococcus aureus SG511 Berlin (methicillin-susceptible) 2 32
S. aureus N315 (methicillin-resistant) 4 64
Staphylococcus haemolyticus 655-2 (vancomycin-susceptible) 1 64
S. haemolyticus 655-2 R16 (vancomycin-resistant) 1 64
S. haemolyticus 655-2 R32 (vancomycin-resistant) 1 64
Staphylococcus simulans 22 8 64
Streptococcus agalactiae B Ku 0.5 0.25
Streptococcus pyogenes Ku 0.25 4
Gram-negative
Escherichia coli MB5746 (lpxC, tolC:Tn10) >64 >64
E. coli MB5746 (lpxC, tolC:Tn10) + 4 μg/mL PMBNb >64 ND
Neisseria sicca Ku 64 64
a

Broth dilution method was used in Müller Hinton medium and samples were incubated for 24 h.

bPolymyxin B nonapeptide (PMBN) is a derivative of polymyxin B and induces outer membrane permeability in Gram-negative bacteria.

TABLE 2.

MIC values (μg/mL) of S. aureus SG511 Berlin for cervimycin C (CmC) at different pH valuesa

pH MIC (μg/mL)
5 0.5
5.5 2
6 4
6.5 16
7 32
7.5 64
8 >64
8.5 >64
a

Broth dilution method was used in Mäller Hinton medium with indicated pH values and samples were incubated for 24 h.

Also, as shown in Table 1, the methicillin-susceptible S. aureus SG511 Berlin was very susceptible toward CmC, but less susceptible toward CmD, which was generally less active than CmC. Therefore, all further tests were conducted with CmC, the major component of the antibiotic complex, unless stated otherwise. The mode of action of CmC is unknown. In B. subtilis firefly luciferase reporter strains (12) only the yorB promoter was activated, indicating a LexA-dependent DNA stress response. yorB encodes a protein of unknown function, that belongs to the LexA regulon of Bacillus and is strongly induced by substances, which produce double-strand breaks, while noncovalent DNA binding agents yield no signal induction. However, the induction level of the yorB promoter by CmC did not reach significance, remaining below a 2.5-fold increase above the baseline level (Fig. S1). Notably, the cell envelope stress reporters (ypuA and liaI) and the translation stalling reporter (bmrC) were not stimulated by cervimycin (Fig. S1).

Whole-genome sequencing of cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains reveals mutations in walK and clpCP.

To further explore, how cervimycin acts on bacterial cells, we generated cervimycin-resistant mutants by serial passaging of S. aureus SG511 with gradually increasing concentrations of CmC or CmD. In total, six cervimycin C-resistant (CmR-01 to CmR-03, resulting from 11 passages, and CmR-04 to CmR-06, from another 13 passages) and three cervimycin D-resistant S. aureus strains (CmR-07 to CmR-09, 22 passages) were isolated. Revertants (REV) were obtained by passaging of the CmR strains for several generations in nonselective medium (Fig. S2).

Sequencing of resistant mutants and their revertants showed that all CmR strains harbored a combination of mutations in the essential histidine kinase gene walK, and in the genes encoding the nonessential Clp system, either in clpP or in clpC (Table 3 and Table S4). Only one strain (CmR-02) harbored an additional mutation in the heat shock protein gene dnaK. To investigate the effects of the single mutations and their possible participation in the resistance mechanism, SNPs were introduced into the genome of the S. aureus SG511 Berlin parent strain by markerless allelic replacement. S. aureus SG511 WalKA243V was generated by reverting the clpP mutation in S. aureus CmR-01. Susceptibility testing toward commonly used antibiotics revealed a cross-resistance toward the lipopeptide daptomycin, and a reduced susceptibility of the CmR strains toward the glycopeptide antibiotics vancomycin and teicoplanin (Table 4, Fig. 2), but no further resistances toward other clinically used antibiotics, including tetracycline. In contrast, CmR-01, CmR-02, and CmR-03 were resistant toward the ClpP activating acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs). ADEPs bind to ClpP, the proteolytic core of the ClpP protease, leading to uncontrolled proteolysis, inhibition of bacterial cell division, and eventually cell death (13). As expected, the amino acid exchange in ClpP in CmR-02, which is also present in CmR-01 and CmR-03, or the deletion of the entire clpP (14), but not the mutations in the clpC gene (CmR-04 to CmR09) led to ADEP 4 resistance in S. aureus (Table 4). This suggested that the detected clpP mutations affected either the activity of ClpP or the binding of ADEPs to their target.

TABLE 3.

Comparative whole-genome sequencing of S. aureus SG511 Berlin, the cervimycin resistant mutants (CmR), and the respective cervimycin-susceptible revertants (REV)a

Strain MIC CmC clpP ClpP walK WalK
CmR-02b 128 A →T I29F C →T A243V
02REV 2 A →T; G → C I29F; M31I C →T; C →T S191L; A243V
CmR-03 128 A →T I29F C →T A243V
03REV 2 A →G I29V C →T; C →T S191L; A243V
MIC CmC clpC ClpC walK WalK
CmR-04 128 4,561 bp Del. Deletion ΔCAA ΔQ371
04REV 32 4,561 bp Del. Deletion ΔCAA; G →A ΔQ371, A554T
CmR-05 128 C →T T215I C →T A243V
05REV 16 C →T T215I C →T; C →T A243V, T217M
MIC CmD clpC ClpC walK WalK
CmR-09 107.5 C →A P204H T → G Y549D
09REV 16 C →A P204H T → G; G →A Y549D, R555H

aSequence comparisons revealed a combination of amino acid exchanges in the protease ClpP or the cognate Clp ATPase ClpC, and the essential histidine kinase WalK.

b

CmR-02 harbors an additional mutation in the heat shock protein gene dnaK (G → C), leading to the amino acid exchange A112P.

TABLE 4.

MIC values of S. aureus strains in Müller Hinton medium or brain heart infusion brotha

S. aureus strain Tet VA DAP Teico ADEP 4
SG511 0.5 1 0.25 0.5 0.25–0.5
CmR-02 0.0625 4 2 8 ND
CmR-04 0.25 4 1 4 ND
CmR-05 0.25 4 1 4 ND
CmR-09 0.25 2 1 2 ND
02REV 0.25 1 0.25 0.5 ND
04REV 0.25 1 0.125 0.5 ND
05REV 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 ND
09REV 0.25 2 0.25 2 ND
WalKA243V 0.5 4 1 4 0.5
ClpPI29F 0.125 1 0.5 1 16
ClpCT215I 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.125
USA300 JE2 0.5 2 1 2 0.5
USA300 JE2 ΔclpP 0.125 2 1–2 2 >32
a

The tetracycline (Tet) and ADEP 4 MICs were determined in MH broth; the glycopeptide MICs were determined in BHI broth (VA, vancomycin; DAP, daptomycin; Teico, teicoplanin). 1.25 mM CaCl2 was added for MIC determinations with VA and DAP. According to the EUCAST guideline (published 01/2022), breakpoints for the tested antibiotics are as follows: Tet > 2 μg/mL; VA > 2 μg/mL; DAP ≥ 1 μg/mL; and Teico > 2 μg/mL. MICs exceeding the EUCAST breakpoints and significantly elevated ADEP-MICs are shown in bold. ND, no data. Grey shading is to distinguish between CmR mutants, revertants and allelic exchange mutants.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Gradient plates with increasing concentrations of vancomycin and 1.25 mM CaCl2. The CmR strains showed a decreased susceptibility toward vancomycin (A), which probably relied on the walK mutations in these strains, because the walK mutation alone decreased the vancomycin susceptibility (B). WT, S. aureus SG511; WalK, S. aureus WalKA243V; ClpC, S. aureus SG511 ClpCT215I; ClpP, S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F.

CmR-01, CmR-02, and CmR-03 strains harbor loss-of-function mutations of ClpP.

Since MIC determinations of S. aureus SG511, CmR-02, 02REV, and 03REV revealed remarkable differences in ADEP-susceptibility, we wanted to explore this effect further. Three CmR strains showed cross-resistance to ADEP 2 (CmR-01, CmR-02, CmR-03: MIC >32 μg/mL; wild type: MIC 2 μg/mL), an effect which was alleviated in two revertants (01REV, 02REV; MIC 16 μg/mL) and reversed in one revertant (03REV; MIC 1 μg/mL). MIC determinations of clpP deletion strains in different genetic backgrounds of S. aureus revealed a 4-fold increased resistance to CmC compared to the respective wild-type S. aureus strains (Table 5). CmR-01, CmR-02, and CmR-03 carried a nucleotide exchange in clpP, yielding ClpPI29F. Interestingly, amino acid 29 is located within the hydrophobic pocket of ClpP, a major regulatory site of the protein, which is also known as the binding site of the ADEPs (15, 16). Furthermore, two different suppressor mutations were observed in the cervimycin-susceptible revertants, an additional exchange at position 31, yielding ClpPI29F/M31I, and a conservative exchange yielding ClpPI29V.

TABLE 5.

MIC values (μg/mL) for cervimycin C (CmC) in strains that contain only single exchanges in the parental background or knockout mutantsa

Strain CmC
S. aureus SG511 2
S. aureus SG511 ClpCT215I 8
S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F 4
S. aureus SG511 DnaKA112P 2
S. aureus SG511 WalKA243V 16
S. aureus NCTC 8325-4 16
S. aureus NCTC 8325-4 ΔclpP 64
S. aureus USA300 JE2 16
S. aureus USA300 JE2 ΔclpP 64
B. subtilis 168 0.25
B. subtilis 168 ΔclpP 0.25
B. subtilis 168 ΔclpC 0.125
B. subtilis 168 ΔclpX 0.125
B. subtilis JH642 1
B. subtilis JH642 Δspx 0.5
B. subtilis JH642 Δspx ΔclpP 2
a

Broth dilution method was used in Müller Hinton medium and samples were incubated for 24 h.

This together with a severe growth defect (17) of the clpP-mutation-containing strains CmR-01, CmR-02, and CmR-03 under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 3A and B) indicated a loss of ClpP function in these strains. To verify this, the intrinsic catalytic activity and ADEP-responsiveness of wild-type and ClpP variants, as well as the activity of the ClpP variants in association with the cognate Clp ATPase ClpX were characterized. In principle, ClpP alone can degrade small peptides like Suc-LY-AMC (18) and the activity of all ClpP variants was decreased with this substrate (Fig. S3). Larger substrates like FITC-casein normally cannot be degraded by ClpP alone (15), but degradation can be induced by the addition of ADEPs. ClpPI29F and ClpPI29F/M31I were not activated by ADEP 2 in the FITC-casein assays, whereas ClpPI29V retained good ADEP responsiveness (Fig. 3C and D). To further study the effect of the SNPs on the interaction of ClpP with the cognate Clp ATPase ClpX, we used eGFP-SsrA as model substrate for the natural function of ClpP together with the S. aureus ClpX ATPase. In accordance with the casein degradation data, ClpPI29F and ClpPI29F/M31I did not lead to ClpX-mediated degradation of eGFP-SsrA. In contrast, ClpPI29V nearly possessed wild-type activity. Hence, our results show that I29 of ClpP is important for ADEP- and ClpX-binding, which leads to a loss-of-function of the entire ClpP protease.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

CmR strains harbor loss-of-function mutations in clpP or clpC. (A and B) A loss-of-function mutation in clpP abolishes growth of S. aureus under anaerobic growth conditions. Stationary-phase S. aureus strains were serially diluted 10-fold in 0.9% NaCl (10−1- to 10−5-fold) and 10 μL of each dilution was spotted on TSA plates. The plates were incubated under aerobic (A) or anaerobic (B) growth conditions. (C) FITC-casein (30 μM) degradation activity of wild-type and mutant SaClpP (1 μM) with increasing concentrations of ADEP 2 (0–10 μM). ADEP responsiveness of two ClpP variants was significantly decreased (*, P value ≤ 0.027; **, P value ≤ 0.015; ***, P value ≤ 0.0004). (D) SaClpXP eGFP-SsrA assay. The natural function of four ClpP-variants (2.8 μM: ClpPWT, red line; ClpPI29F, black line; ClpPI29F/M31I, black dashed line; ClpPI29V, red dashed line) was tested with SsrA-tagged eGFP-substrate (0.36 μM) and the ClpX ATPase (2.4 μM). The decrease of the fluorescence signal indicates unfolding or degradation of the substrate. The mutated ClpP variants displayed a consistently decreased GFP degradation activity, compared to the wild type (comparison of the initial 3 min: ***, P value ≤ 0.0002). (E) A loss-of-function mutation in clpC abolishes growth of S. aureus at elevated temperatures. Cervimycin-resistant and susceptible strains were grown in TSB at 37°C until OD600 ~0.5, serially diluted 10-fold in 0.9% NaCl (10−1- to 10−5-fold), then 10 μL of each dilution was spotted on TSA plates. The plates were incubated at indicated temperatures. WalK, S. aureus WalKA243V; ClpP, S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F; ClpC, S. aureus SG511 ClpCT215I.

It may be hypothesized that cervimycin directly interferes with ClpP, leading to its deregulation, similar to ADEPs. However, we assumed this to be rather unlikely since CmC did not affect the activity of wild-type ClpXP in a GFP-SsrA assay (Fig. S4). In addition to that, MIC determination (Table 5) of a B. subtilis 168 clpP deletion mutant yielded the same susceptibility as seen in wild-type cells. However, in Bacillus the deletion of ClpP leads to an eventually toxic accumulation of the Spx protein, which is a ClpXP substrate. In order to eliminate this effect, a spx deletion mutant was also assayed. Here, the deletion of spx alone led to a sensitization of the mutant toward cervimycin because Spx activity can, by its regulatory function, also confer resistance to a wide range of stressors and thereby increase tolerance to certain antibiotics (19). The double spx clpP mutant showed an increased resistance to cervimycin and confirmed the results obtained with S. aureus.

CmR-04 to CmR-09 harbor inactive ClpC variants.

We detected a 4,561-bp deletion of the genes clpC and radA in CmR-04, and other resistant mutants carried SNPs within clpC, leading to ClpCT215I (CmR-05 and CmR-06) or ClpCP204H (CmR-07 to CmR-09) (Table S4). The amino acid exchanges were localized within (T215I) or in proximity (P204H) to the first ATP-binding Walker A motif of the ClpC ATPase. Functionality of the ClpC ATPase was tested in a heat shock assay. The loss of clpC leads to a growth defect at 45°C (20), which was true for all strains with the mutated ClpC variants, indicating a loss of ClpC function in these strains (Fig. 3E).

Effects of cervimycin resistance mutations on the essential WalK histidine kinase.

All cervimycin-resistant S. aureus strains carried mutations in the essential histidine kinase gene walK, yielding either WalKA243V, WalKΔQ371 (cervimycin C-resistant strains), or WalKY549D (cervimycin D-resistant S. aureus strains). Zymographic analysis showed that the autolysin (Atl) activity was severely restricted in the CmR strains, with the exception of CmR-04, and that Triton X-100 induced cell lysis was significantly reduced in all strains (Fig. 4B–E), which might be due to alterations of WalK activity. Electron microscopy of one cervimycin-resistant model strain (CmR-02) and its revertant (02REV), in comparison to the wild-type strain S. aureus SG511, confirmed the VISA phenotype, as CmR-02 possessed a significantly thickened cell wall (wild type: 34.91 ± 5.93 nm, CmR-02: 58.7 ± 13.93 nm, 02REV: 36.41 ± 5.64 nm) (Fig. 4B and C).

FIG 4.

FIG 4

CmR-02 exhibits phenotypic characteristics of a vancomycin-intermediate resistant S. aureus strain. (A) The autophosphorylation of WalK variants from CmR strains and revertants is significantly reduced in vitro (**, P < 0.018; ***, P ≤ 0.0001). (B) Quantification of the cell wall thickness in S. aureus SG511 (WT), CmR-02, and 02REV reveals a significant cell wall thickening in CmR-02 (***, P value < 0.0001). (C) Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) of exponentially growing S. aureus strains: top left S. aureus SG511, top right 02REV, bottom CmR-02. (D) Zymogram of LiCl extracts from S. aureus strains SG511 (1), CmR-02 (2), 02REV (3), CmR-04 (4), 04REV (5), CmR-09 (6), and 09REV (7). Numbers to the left of the gel indicate the molecular weights of size standard (PageRuler Plus prestained protein ladder). Dark bands indicate regions of hydrolase activity of the major S. aureus hydrolase AtlA, which appears in different subunits (PP, propeptide; AM, amidase; GL, glucosaminidase). (E) Percentage reduction of the OD600 after 60 min of exponential S. aureus cells in PBS with 0.1% Triton X-100. The OD600 was normalized to the starting value (* P ≤ 0.0272; ** P ≤ 0.0063; *** P ≤ 0.0001).

We next determined the autophosphorylation activity of the WalK variants as the proportion of autophosphorylated WalK kinase after 30 min under activating conditions. WalK variants from the CmR strains displayed a significantly decreased WalK activity, with WalKY549D being completely inactive in the in vitro test system (Fig. 4A). Surprisingly, the additional walK mutations from the revertant strains had no extra effect on WalK autophosphorylation in vitro, and resembled the activity of the respective WalK variants from the cervimycin-resistant mutants (Fig. 4A). Unfortunately, we were not able to obtain reproducible results of the influence of cervimycin on the phosphorylation activity of WalK, neither with the Phos-tag activity assay, nor with a 32P liposome system. The naphthoquinoid system of cervimycin formed phenolate salts under the assay conditions (pH 8, 5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]), indicated by a color change from yellow to violet, and in MIC assays the violet form of cervimycin showed poor activity. However, in an agar diffusion assay, induced downregulation of walK or walR acted synergistically with CmC (Table 6). SsaA and LytM expression were shown to restore cell viability in the absence of WalRK (21). However, overexpression of SsaA or LytM from the xylose-inducible vector pEPSA5 did not promote cervimycin resistance, but acted synergistically with CmC, as well as the overexpression of a constitutively active WalR variant WalRD55E (Table 6). Hence, a lower and a higher WalRK activity increased the susceptibility of S. aureus toward cervimycin.

TABLE 6.

Downregulation of the histidine kinase gene walK or the response regulator gene walR increases the susceptibility of S. aureus RN4220 to cervimycin Ca

Altered gene expression Function Fold increase diam inhibition zone
Decreased gene expression
 Heat shock response
  dnaK Heat shock protein 70 1.10
 Cell wall metabolism
  pbp3 Penicillin-binding protein 3 1.00
  smc Chromosome segregation protein 1.00
  ftsZ Cell division protein 1.08
  walK Cell wall metabolism sensor histidine kinase 1.24
  walR DNA-binding response regulator 1.30
  Δatl Bifunctional autolysin 1.00
Increased gene expression
ssaA Secretory antigen precursor 1.10
lytM Glycyl-glycine endopeptidase 1.65
walR DNA-binding response regulator 1.10
walRC DNA-binding response regulator, constitutively active (D55E amino acid exchange) 1.24
a

Expression levels of indicated genes were increased/decreased with the pEPSA5-system (95). CmC susceptibility was tested in agar diffusion assays in comparison to an empty vector control.

The dnaK mutation has no effect on cervimycin susceptibility.

One CmR strain (CmR-02) carried a nucleotide polymorphism in dnaK. The nucleotide exchange C358G in dnaK of S. aureus CmR-02 led to an amino acid exchange from alanine to proline at position 112 in the N-terminal nucleotide-binding domain of the protein. However, the reconstitution of the A112P amino acid exchange into the parent strain and the downregulation of dnaK using the pEPSA5 system showed no effect on CmC susceptibility (Table 5 and 6).

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses reveal major alterations in the cervimycin-resistant mutant CmR-02.

Mutations found in the CmR strains raised both the cervimycin and the vancomycin MICs. Because the regulatory aspect of these mutations is of interest, and also to obtain a more global view on the effect of the mutations found in the cervimycin-resistant mutants, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of one CmR strain, its susceptible revertant, and the wild-type S. aureus SG511 were performed.

While only minor alterations occurred in the transcriptome of the revertant 02REV in comparison to the S. aureus SG511 wild type, a large number of genes was differentially expressed in the resistant strain CmR-02 (Table 7, Fig. 5A, Fig. S5). This was also confirmed by the proteomic analysis and revealed the broad impact of the mutations in clpP and walK in CmR-02 (and possibly dnaK), which was substantially alleviated by the additional mutations in the revertant 02REV.

TABLE 7.

Differential expression/translation of genes/proteins in S. aureus CmR-02 and its revertant 02REV in comparison to S. aureus SG511 Berlina

CmR-02
02REV
Sample Transcriptome Proteome Transcriptome Proteome
Total 1993 565 1315 439
Up 370 (18.57%) 78 (13.81%) 56 (4.26%) 38 (8.66%)
Down 442 (22.18%) 73 (12.92%) 100 (7.61%) 21 (4.78%)
Sum 812 (40.74%) 151 (26.73%) 156 (11.86%) 59 (13.44%)
a

Shown are the total numbers of genes/proteins with a significant detection level (total, P value ≤ 0.05), as well as the numbers of significantly upregulated (up, log2 fold change ≥ 1) and downregulated (down, log2 fold change ≤ −1) genes/proteins.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

RNA-Seq transcriptomics of S. aureus CmR-02. (A) The expression profile is shown as ratio/intensity scatterplot (M/A-plot: M value, log2 fold change; A value, log2 base mean), which is based on the differential gene expression analysis. Colored symbols indicate significantly induced or repressed transcripts (M value ≥ 1 or ≤ −1; P value ≤ 0.05). Colors refer to the annotated regulator (based on the AureoWiki Database [118]). Regulons with at least seven differentially expressed genes and the phage ΦSA3 encoding genes are shown. Light gray symbols denote transcripts with similar expression levels in comparison to the wild-type S. aureus SG511 Berlin (P value ≤ 0.05, log2 FC ≤ 1 or ≥ −1). Genes of interest with at least 1.5-fold differential expression are also color-coded (e.g., atl). The RNA-seq data of differential transcription of all genes and regulons of CmR-02 are listed in Table S5. Expression profiles of the CtsR/HrcA heat shock operon (B) and the WalR regulon (C) together with the walRK genes of S. aureus CmR-02 (orange) and its revertant 02REV (green) reveal major alterations. Up-regulation (log2 FC ≥ 1, P value ≤ 0.05; red color) and downregulation (log2 FC ≤ −1; blue color) on the transcriptomic (light-blue) and proteomic level (light-pink) are compared.

In CmR-02 the expression of several ABC transporters was repressed, as well as the expression of purine biosynthesis genes, of several regulons of the amino acid biosynthesis (ArgR regulon, S-box), of major parts of the carbohydrate metabolism (MalR, GapR, CcpA-regulon), and of the CodY-regulon (Fig. S6). On a transcriptomic level, also the lac operon was repressed. On the other hand, several metabolic pathways were upregulated, like the riboflavin-biosynthesis pathway (FMN-box regulon) and the last four genes of the staphyloxanthin (STX) biosynthesis cluster (KQU62_11530 to KQU62_11545), which might contribute to the intense coloring of CmR-02 on blood agar (Fig. S2).

As expected, major alterations were also detected in the expression of the CtsR/HrcA operon (including clpP and dnaK) and the WalR regulon (regulated by WalRK). In vitro and in vivo experiments indicated that the I29F amino acid exchange led to a loss of ClpP function in CmR-02. Expression of the CtsR/HrcA operon, which encodes ClpP and DnaK, was completely derepressed in CmR-02, and the Clp machinery and the chaperones were also more abundant on the protein level (Fig. 5B and Fig. S6), which is in accordance with the observations in the clpP mutant of Michel et al. (17). Transcription of clpX and trfA (sometimes also called mecA), which are not encoded in the CtsR/HrcA operon, was also increased (Table S5).

The WalRK TCS positively controls global autolytic activity, particularly via AtlA and the LytM endopeptidase (22). The walK mutation of CmR-02 is located in the HAMP-domain coding region, which is a signal transduction domain (23). The reduced autolytic activity in the zymography of CmR cell extracts, together with the reduced cell lysis and the thickened cell walls observed via electron microscopy, suggest a hampered WalK function due to the detected mutation. However, the expression profile of the WalR regulon in CmR-02 was not as explicit as for the CtsR/HrcA operon (Fig. 5C and Fig. S6). Six genes of the WalR regulon were significantly upregulated, the expression of sle1 was repressed, and the reduced abundance of the major autolysin Atl and the Sle1 amidase was confirmed on the protein level. Interestingly, WalJ (YycJ), which is encoded downstream of the walRKHI operon but functionally unrelated and transcribed from a separate promoter (24), was more abundant in CmR-02. However, the consequences of the increased abundance of WalJ remain to be elucidated. Although functions in mismatch repair and chromosome segregation have been described for the genus Bacillus (25, 26), a walJ knockout mutant did not show any growth related phenotype in S. aureus (24).

In the suppressor mutant, the expression of three hydrolases was increased, and sceD expression was decreased. The altered expression of autolysins in 02REV in comparison to CmR-02 indicates an effect of the additional walK mutation in the revertant strain, which was not detectable in the in vitro activity assay. An upregulation of the VraS regulon, indicating increased cell wall biosynthesis (27) in the resistant mutant, was not observed.

DISCUSSION

Streptomyces tendae HKI 0179 produces the antibiotic complex of cervimycin, which possesses promising activity against Gram-positive organisms, especially against MRSA and VRE (8). Earlier incorporation studies indicated disturbance of the DNA metabolism, due to cervimycin treatment, although at high concentrations and time-delayed (6). The anthracycline antibiotics dutomycin (28) and polyketomycin (29) are structural homologs of cervimycin, and it has been assumed that these substances might intercalate into DNA, as described for other anthracyclines (30), an activity which was not seen for the cervimycins (6).

We selected cervimycin-resistant strains from S. aureus SG511 Berlin. Cross-resistances to other antibiotics were observed for vancomycin, daptomycin, and teicoplanin for all strains and for acyldepsipeptides (ADEPs) for some strains. Genome sequencing revealed SNPs in the caseinolytic protease gene clpP or its cognate ATPase gene clpC, the HSP70 gene dnaK, and the essential histidine kinase gene walK.

ClpP is the proteolytic core of the caseinolytic protease and possesses a key function in protein homeostasis, generally maintaining protein quality, and tightly controlling key regulatory proteins (31), affecting a large number of processes. ClpP forms two-component proteases together with ATPases like ClpX and ClpC (32). This proteolytic machinery degrades various substrates in an ATP-dependent manner (32), allowing adaptation to multiple stresses by degrading accumulated and misfolded proteins (17). The ClpC ATPase forms a complex with the ClpP protease for protein degradation under thermal stress conditions (20). In addition, ClpC is thought to act as a chaperone for the CtsR repressor, which blocks transcription of the CtsR/HrcA operon, encoding clpCP, dnaK, groESL, and more (20). DnaK is a HSP70 chaperone, which catalyzes the folding of newly synthesized polypeptides and the refolding of stress-denatured and aggregated proteins in an ATP-dependent manner (3335). Although ClpP is not essential, proteolysis of “unemployed,” disintegrated and inactive proteins is a fundamental process of cellular regulation in all organisms (36). Substrates larger than small peptides are degraded by a complex of ClpP and a Clp ATPase, i.e., ClpX or ClpC in S. aureus (37), which also determines the substrate specificity for protein degradation (38, 39).

The ClpPI29F amino acid exchange is located in the N-terminal hydrophobic pocket, which is a major regulatory site of the protease (15, 16). The expression of the Clp machinery is autoregulated, since the CtsR repressor is a substrate of ClpXP (40). However, the CtsR repressor seems to accumulate in an inactive form in CmR-02, an effect which was also seen in a clpP deletion mutant (17) and a daptomycin-resistant mutant with a SNP in clpP (41), leading to a derepressed transcription of the CtsR/HrcA operon. Several additional characteristics of a clpP deletion mutant (17) were also detected in the transcriptome of CmR-02: (i) the derepression of the Fur regulon and the down-regulation of the MntR regulon, which are both involved in metal ion homeostasis; (ii) increased expression of the urease operon; and (iii) reduced expression of the ArcR, NreC, and Rex regulons, which are important in anaerobic growth. In addition, the enhanced expression of the sirABC and the clpC operons was shared with the previously described clpP mutant (42). The loss of ClpP function was also reflected on the proteomic level, because proteins of the CtsR/HrcA operon accumulated in CmR-02, and proteins of the purine/pyrimidine metabolism were depleted, which was also described for clpP mutants of different genetic backgrounds (43, 44). The transcriptome and the proteome of the revertant 02REV showed only little similarity to the clpP mutant and resembled the wild type.

ClpP activity is an important mechanism to regulate gene expression in S. aureus, which might be the reason for the occurrence of clpP mutations in VISA strains (42, 45). Inactivation of either ClpX (4648) or ClpP (4850) were found in either vancomycin or daptomycin, and cefotaxime-resistant Gram-positives. In addition to that, a multitude of SNPs was found in ClpP, conferring mostly glycopeptide, β-lactam, or ADEP resistance (41, 42, 5052). Bæk et al. (48) revealed that S. aureus may under some circumstances benefit from shutting down the Clp proteolytic activity during treatment with antibiotics that target the cell wall, due to the accumulation of ClpP target substrates participating in cell wall metabolism. However, on MIC level, the clpP mutation had a lower impact than the walK mutation (42), which was also seen for CmR-02 (Table 4). Still, the combination of the clpP and the walK mutation had a synergistic effect on glycopeptide/daptomycin resistance, with CmR-02 being more resistant than S. aureus WalKA243V (Table 4). Such a strong synergy was not observed for the combination of the same walK mutation with the loss-of-function clpC mutation in CmR-05 (Table 4).

Three different mutations were identified in the ClpC ATPase gene of different CmR strains, all leading to a complete deletion or an inactivation of the ClpC ATPase (Table 3, Table S4, Fig. 3E). ClpC is important under thermal stress conditions (20) and affects the expression of genes and/or proteins of gluconeogenesis, the pentose-phosphate pathway, pyruvate metabolism, the electron transport chain, nucleotide metabolism, oxidative stress, metal ion homeostasis, stringent response, and programmed cell death (5356). In addition, ClpCP is responsible for degradation of SsrA-tagged proteins in S. aureus, proteins that arise from stalled ribosomes and may contain translation errors (57); however, ClpXP is also capable to degrade SsrA-tagged substrates in vitro (15, 52, 58). In B. subtilis, ClpXP degrades SsrA-tagged proteins (59). Hitherto, the precise role of ClpC in response to drug exposure and antibiotic resistance is not well defined (60). Although clpC mutants were generated and extensively studied (20, 53, 54, 6164), antibiotic resistant mutants with clpC mutations have not yet been described for S. aureus. However, in mycobacteria, ClpC1 is the molecular target for the lassopeptide lassomycin and the cyclic peptide cyclomarin A, which activate the ATPase activity, or the proteolysis mediated by the ClpP protease, respectively (6567). However, these compounds act specifically on the N-terminal domain of mycobacterial ClpC1, while other Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria are resistant (65, 66), possibly because of the protective role of ClpC adapter proteins (67). Here, Mycobacterium smegmatis showed poor susceptibility toward cervimycin. So far, a direct interaction between cervimycin and ClpC or ClpP similar to the ADEP antibiotics seems unlikely. Although a clpP deletion in S. aureus conferred low-level CmC resistance, a clpP mutant in B. subtilis was still susceptible to cervimycin, and cervimycin did not interfere with the degradation of the model substrate eGFP-SsrA in in vitro assays using S. aureus ClpXP.

Clinically relevant resistance is often built up through multiple steps, each of which contributes to an increase in resistance (68). The loss-of-function mutation in clpP or clpC conferred only a two- to 4-fold decrease in cervimycin susceptibility (Table 5). Possible additional contributors were the HSP70 DnaK and the histidine kinase WalK. However, the introduction of the dnaK mutation in an antibiotic-susceptible background did not alter the cervimycin susceptibility on the MIC level, and dnaK was only mutated in one CmR strain.

Depletion of functional ClpP alters cell wall composition, thickness, and cross-linking (48), which are also extensively influenced by the WalK histidine kinase (22). The WalRK two-component system, which comprises WalK and its cognate response regulator WalR, functions in the regulation of peptidoglycan maturation, cell wall turnover, cell separation and protein secretion, as well as biofilm formation, and positively controls global autolytic activity, particularly via AtlA and the LytM endopeptidase (22). Combinations of mutations in clpP and walK have been described before and were identified after selection for vancomycin- (42) or daptomycin-resistant mutants (41). Shoji et al. (42) described a laboratory-derived VISA (LR5P1-V3) strain with an N-terminal truncation of ClpP and an amino acid deletion in WalK. Interestingly, the very same amino acid deletion was also detected in a cervimycin-resistant mutant (CmR-04: WalKΔQ371). The nucleotide exchanges found in the walK gene of the CmR strains affected the HAMP-domain (A243V), the region between the intracellular PAS-domain and the HisKA-domain (ΔQ371), or the HATPase_c-domain (Y549D) of the essential kinase. The in vitro activity of these variants was significantly decreased, although the inactivity of WalKY549D is doubtful, due to the essentiality of the WalK kinase in S. aureus (69) and the fact that the activating signal for WalK is still unknown and, therefore, could not be incorporated into the in vitro assays. There is a high diversity of SNPs in the walRK locus, which were mainly identified in VISA strains or daptomycin-resistant mutants (27, 41, 42, 51, 7072), but were also induced by the lassopeptides siamycin-I and streptomonomicin (73, 74), the membrane active compound chlorhexidine (75), or the redox-active antibiotic actinorhodin (76). No clear clustering of mutations in specific functional regions of these genes has been apparent (77). Numerous mutations were already detected in the HAMP-domain of WalK (27, 78, 79), including amino acid exchanges on position 243 (42, 77, 80). In these clinical VISA, the walK mutation was frequently accompanied by mutations in other two-component systems, like VraSR or GraSR, that influence biosynthesis and composition of the cell envelope (42, 77, 80). Mutations in the HATPase_c domain of WalK are more likely to occur in laboratory-derived antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains (72, 80, 81), but are also seen in clinical isolates (27).

The multitude of SNPs observed across all functional WalRK domains leads to the assumption that WalRK activity is reduced in VISA strains (27, 78, 82, 83). This was supported by the in vitro activity tests with the WalK variants from the CmR strains, the increased lysis resistance and increased cell wall thickness. WalK depletion also caused this phenotype (22, 82). However, intermediate vancomycin resistance was also seen with a hybrid promoter that increased walRK transcription (84), but a constant WalR activation failed to produce a VISA phenotype (82).

In walHI deletion mutants, which exhibit reduced WalRK activity, the expression of atlA and sle1 was decreased (83), which is consistent with the gene expression in CmR-02. Also, the upregulation of isaA was seen in another S. aureus strain with a mutation in the HAMP-domain of WalK (27). However, most autolysins under the control of WalRK were overexpressed in CmR-02. This contradicts the theory of a decreased WalK activity in CmR-02, but actually an elevated expression of the minor autolysins was also seen for other VISA/glycopeptide-intermediately resistant Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) strains (81, 8587), and these proteins are most probably not involved in cell lysis but in growth and confer plasticity to the cell envelope (21).

Taken together, the activity measurements and phenotype of the CmR strains indicate a reduced WalK activity. However, the identified mutations do not cluster around a possible interaction site between WalK and cervimycin, and tests of WalK activity did not yield consistent results in the presence of cervimycin in vitro. The uncoupling of autolysin expression from WalRK through homologous expression of LytM or SsaA was shown to restore cell viability in S. aureus (21). However, neither overexpression of these autolysins nor downregulation of WalK did abrogate the bactericidal effect of CmC in S. aureus RN4220 (Table 6). Therefore, a direct interaction between cervimycin and the kinase seems unlikely as antibiotic mode of action, in contrast, a carefully regulated activity of WalK seems to support survival in the presence of CmC.

In conclusion, we studied the mode of action of the naphthoquinone antibiotic cervimycin, which is bactericidal and exclusively active against Gram-positive bacteria. A selection for cervimycin-resistant S. aureus mutants revealed loss-of-function mutations in the caseinolytic protease gene clpP or its cognate Clp ATPase gene clpC, and mutations in the essential histidine kinase gene walK, eventually leading to a VISA phenotype. However, a direct interaction with cervimycin was neither seen for ClpP nor for WalK, leaving the definitive target of cervimycin to be determined. Omics data of cervimycin treated S. aureus might give further insight into what happens inside the cell in response to cervimycin, and whether there are analogies to antibiotics with known mode of action. Nevertheless, the combination of clp and walK mutations in the cervimycin-resistant mutants might suggest either a target structure associated with growth and cell wall biosynthesis, like lipid II, which is the target of vancomycin, or protection of the target site from cervimycin by a thickened cell envelope. The VISA phenotype, based on the mutations in walK, might also have a compensatory effect toward cervimycin activity, either by slowing down growth, or by modulation of the cell wall and central metabolism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Construction of cervimycin-resistant mutants.

S. aureus SG511 Berlin was serially passaged by subculturing the strain in 1/100 dilutions each day in medium supplemented with cervimycin C or D (for 15–28 days). Cervimycin was added at 0.5× MIC (1 μg/mL) and increased 1.5- to 2-fold each day up to 64× MIC. This culture was plated on TSA with 120 μg/mL cervimycin and incubated overnight at 37°C. Ten sibling clones of three different passaging experiments were isolated and three clones (CmR strains, CmR-01 to CmR-09) of each lineage were analyzed thoroughly. Revertants (01REV–09REV) were generated by passaging the CmR strains in the absence of cervimycin for several times.

Genomic DNA was isolated from nine CmR mutants and their respective revertants using the Master Pure Gram-positive DNA purification kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies) with one modification: lysostaphin solution (30 ng/mL) was added during the lysis step. Whole-genome sequencing of the wild-type strain S. aureus SG511 (PacBio) was previously described (88). Illumina technology was used for resequencing of the mutant strains, according to Kehl et al. (89). Genomes of all sequenced mutants were assembled de novo and were aligned to the parent strain S. aureus SG511 Berlin (NZ_CP076660) using the Geneious mapping and assembly tool. SNPs were called on the mapped reads by comparing the mutant genomes with the parent strain using Geneious SNP caller (Geneious R10.2.6; https://www.geneious.com [90]). Mutations were verified via PCR and Sanger sequencing. Bacterial strains and primers used in this study are listed in Tables S2 and S3.

Allelic exchange using the pMAD-system.

The pMAD-vector is a temperature-sensitive shuttle vector for markerless allelic replacement in Gram-positive bacteria (91). The pMAD-system was used to introduce SNPs identified in cervimycin-resistant mutants into the genome of S. aureus SG511. Fragments of the respective genes (500 bp) were amplified via PCR (primers are listed in Table S3), cloned into the pMAD-vector, transformed into E. coli DC10B, and verified via sequencing. The constructs were then transformed into S. aureus RN4220, and afterwards transduced into S. aureus SG511 or CmR-01 using phage 85. For the allelic exchange, a blue colony of S. aureus, containing the respective pMAD-vector, was inoculated into 5 mL brain heart infusion (BHI) broth with 10 μg/mL erythromycin and grown at 30°C. Subsequently, the temperature was shifted to the nonpermissive temperature (42 or 44°C) or a 1:10 dilution was directly plated on BHI agar containing erythromycin and X-gal (300 mg/L) and incubated at the nonpermissive temperature. Then, a blue colony was inoculated into 5 mL BHI without antibiotic and the procedure was repeated. This time the culture was diluted 1:10,000-fold and plated on BHI agar containing only X-gal. The presence of specific mutations in white colonies was verified via PCR and sequencing. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for S. aureus WalKA243V and S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F using Illumina technology as described above.

Phenotyping of CmR strains and revertants.

The colony morphology of the different S. aureus isolates was analyzed after plating of serially diluted stationary cells on Columbia blood agar and overnight incubation at 37°C. The colony size was quantified using the ImageJ Software (92). Growth of S. aureus at different temperatures was carried out as described earlier (93). Briefly, TSB was inoculated with 1% of a S. aureus overnight preculture and incubated at 37°C until reaching an optical density at 600 nm wavelength (OD600) of 0.5. Serial dilutions (0.9% NaCl, 10-fold dilutions, 10 μL each) of the culture were spotted on TSA plates. The agar plates were incubated at different temperatures until visible growth occurred, usually overnight. Anaerobic growth conditions were generated using the GasPak system (Becton, Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany).

Electron microscopy.

For scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) sample preparation, BHI was inoculated with 1% of a S. aureus SG511, CmR-02, or 02REV preculture and incubated with aeration at 37°C until reaching an OD600 of 1.0. Cells were harvested (8,000 × g, 5 min, room temperature (RT)), washed with 1 mL ultrapure water, resuspended in fixation buffer (4% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) and incubated at 4°C overnight. After fixation, bacteria were washed with cacodylate buffer before treatment with osmium (1% osmium tetroxide, 0.8% ferricyanate in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer) for 2 h at room temperature. Bacteria were pelleted and dehydrated in ethanol. During dehydration, at 70% ethanol, 0.5% uranyl acetate was added for 1 h. After dehydration in ethanol, samples were incubated in propylene oxide before embedding in EPON. Ultrathin sections were collected onto Formvar/Carbon coated copper slot grids, and counter stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Imaging was done using a Zeiss Crossbeam 550 at 30 kV with STEM detector.

Firefly luciferase assay.

Construction and validation of whole-cell antibiotic biosensors was reported earlier (12). The assay allows a high-throughput diagnosis of antibiotic interference in the major metabolic pathways of bacteria and was performed as described previously (94). Briefly, the promoter and upstream regions of certain genes induced selectively by reference antibiotics were fused to the firefly luciferase reporter gene in B. subtilis 1S34. Specifically, the promoter regions of ypuA, liaI, bmrC (yheI), helD, and yorB signaled cell membrane stress, interference with the undecaprenyl-phosphate cycle, translation stalling, inhibition of RNA synthesis, and interference with DNA synthesis or structure, respectively. Overnight cultures grown in LB medium with 5 μg/mL erythromycin at 37°C with shaking were diluted to an OD600 of 0.05 in LB or BMM (bmrC) with 5 μg/mL erythromycin and were grown as before to an OD600 of approximately 0.8 or 0.4 (bmrC), respectively. Serial 2-fold dilutions of cervimycin C (0.002–4 μg/mL) were inoculated with suspensions of the reporter strains in white 96-well flat-bottom polystyrene microtiter plates and incubated at 37°C for different periods of time depending on the induction kinetics of the respective strain (12). Subsequently, flash luminescence was measured in a Tecan M200 microtiter plate reader after injecting 60 μL of a 2 mM luciferin solution.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Determination of MICs was performed in polystyrene round-bottom microtiter plates (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany) using cation-adjusted Müller Hinton (MH) broth or BHI broth. An inoculum of 5 × 105 CFU/mL was employed in the arithmetic broth microdilution method. Due to the high mutation rate, only 1 × 105 CFU/mL were used for ADEP MICs. For dilution of Mycobacterium smegmatis, 0.05% Tween 80 was added to the MH broth. For MIC testing of vancomycin and daptomycin (Vancomycin CP LILLY, Lilly GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany; Cubicin, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany), CaCl2 was added to all cultures to a final concentration of 1.25 mM (51). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of the antibiotic that inhibited visible growth after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Susceptibility testing of S. aureus strains against vancomycin was performed on BHI gradient agar supplemented with 1.25 mM CaCl2. Material of several colonies was resuspended to an optical density at 600 nm wavelength of 0.1 in 0.9% NaCl and the gradient agar plates were inoculated using a cotton swab.

Antisense-based susceptibility profiling.

The vector-based antisense clones were created in S. aureus RN4220 by Forsyth et al. (95) and provided by Merck (USA). The pEPSA5 vector is xylose-inducible and selected by 34 μg/mL chloramphenicol. Antisense strains were inoculated into LB broth and grown at 37°C without shaking. Next, 20 μL of the cell suspension were diluted in 4 mL 0.9% potassium chloride, poured on LB agar with chloramphenicol and xylose, allowed to settle for 2 min, and surplus suspension was removed. The inocula of antisense strains and the empty vector control were adjusted to yield similar inhibition zones with the control antibiotics. Antibiotic discs with 5 μg CIP, 30 μg VA, and 25 μg cervimycin were added. Inhibition zones were measured after overnight incubation at 37°C. The same procedure was used to measure the effect of protein-overexpression on antibiotic susceptibility. The primers used to construct the lytM- and ssaA-overexpression strains are listed in Table S3. The pEPSA5-ssaA vector was cloned using S. aureus VC40 as the template (96), and the SNP present in this strain was repaired using the QuikChange lightning kit (Agilent) and the primers listed in Table S3.

Zymographic analysis of autolysin extracts and Triton X-100-induced autolysis.

Zymographic analyses of autolysin extracts were performed according to Gajdiss et al. (97). For Triton X-100-induced lysis experiments, S. aureus strains were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with aeration at 37°C. At an OD600 of 0.6, the cells were cooled on ice and harvested by centrifugation. The cell pellets were washed once with ultrapure water, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7), and autolysis was induced by the addition of 0.1% Triton X-100. The cells were incubated at 37°C and lysis was observed photometrically at 600 nm every 30 min.

Transcriptomics.

For RNA extraction, cultures of S. aureus SG511, CmR-02, and 02REV were grown in TSB at 37°C with shaking until an OD600 of 1.0 was reached. Next, 20 mL cultures were harvested (5 min, 8,000 × g, RT), the cells were resuspended in 1 mL RNA protect buffer (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and incubated for 5 min at RT. The cells were resuspended in 200 μL Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer with 25 μg lysostaphin and cell lysis was achieved by incubation at 37°C for 30 min. RNA was extracted using the Monarch total RNA miniprep kit (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s instructions and stored at −80°C. Quality and quantity of total RNA were determined by agarose gel electrophoresis. Per replicate, a total amount of 400 ng RNA was subjected to rRNA depletion. For rRNA depletion and cDNA library construction, the Illumina Stranded Total RNA Prep Kit and the Ribo-Zero Plus Kit were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were sequenced as single-read (101 bp read length) on a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina) at a depth of 10.1 to 24.9 million reads each. Library preparation and sequencing procedures were performed by the same individual and a design aimed to minimize technical batch effects was chosen. RNA sequencing was performed by the Institute for Medical Microbiology (part of the NGS Competence Center NCCT (Tübingen, Germany)) while data management, including data storage of raw data for this project were done by the Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC, Tübingen, Germany).

Sequencing statistics, including the quality per base and adapter content assessment of resulting transcriptome sequencing data were conducted with FastQC v0.11.5 (98). All reads mappings were performed against the reference strain of S. aureus SG511 Berlin (RefSeq ID NZ_CP076660.1). The mappings of all samples were conducted with HISAT2 v2.1.0 (99). Spliced alignment of reads was disabled and library type was set to reverse (HISAT2 parameter --no-spliced-alignment and --rna-strandness R). The resulting mapping files in SAM format were converted to BAM format using SAMtools v1.9 (100). Mapping statistics, including percentage of mapped reads and fraction exonic region coverage, were conducted with the RNA-Seq module of QualiMap2 v2.2.2-dev (101). Gene counts for all samples were computed with featureCounts v1.6.4 (102) based on the annotation of the respective reference genome, where the selected feature type was set to transcript records (featureCounts parameter -t transcript). To assess variability of the replicates of each condition, a principal-component analysis (PCA) was conducted with the DESeq2 package v1.20.0 (103).

For the computation of genes differentially expressed between the wild-type strain and the strains S. aureus SG511, CmR-02, and 02REV, respectively, DESeq2 v1.20.0 (103) was applied to the absolute gene counts as computed with featureCounts. Genes with low counts (less than 10 reads) over all replicates in both media were filtered prior to differential expression analysis. For differences between each strain, genes with an adjusted P-value (false discovery rate [FDR]) < 0.05 and absolute log2 fold change (FC) ≥ 1 were reported as differentially expressed.

Proteomics.

Total protein extraction was performed from S. aureus cultures in TSB using the same cultivation conditions as for total RNA extraction. Cells were harvested (6,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and washed with 1 mL ice-cold ultrapure water. The cells were resuspended in 1 mL SDS buffer (4% wt/vol SDS, in 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0), incubated at 95°C for 10 min, chilled on ice for 5 min, transferred into bead beating tubes with 0.1 mm glass beads (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), and disrupted via bead beating (3 × 30 s, 5,000 rpm with pauses of 90 s). Cell debris was removed via centrifugation (11,000 × g, 5 min, 4°C) and the supernatant was treated with 10 mM DTT (45 min, 650 rpm, RT) and 5.5 mM iodoacetamide (45 min, 650 rpm, RT). Debris was removed (12,000 × g, 15 min, RT) and proteins were precipitated with eight volumes of ice-cold acetone/methanol (8:1 vol/vol mixture) at −20°C overnight. Precipitated proteins were harvested by centrifugation (13,000 × g, 10 min, RT) and washed 3 times with 1 mL 80% aqueous acetone. Residual acetone was evaporated, protein pellets were resuspended in denaturation buffer (6 M urea, 2 M thiourea in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5), and protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method. Ten micrograms of proteins per sample were purified on a NuPAGE 12% gel (Invitrogen) and Coomassie-stained gel pieces were digested in gel with trypsin (104). Desalted peptide mixtures (105) were separated on an Easy-nLC 1200 system coupled to a quadrupole Orbitrap Exploris 480 mass spectrometer (all Thermo Fisher Scientific) as described previously (106) with slight modifications: peptides were separated using a 57-min segmented gradient from 10% to 33, 50, and 90% of HPLC solvent B (80% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid) in HPLC solvent A (0.1% formic acid) at a flow rate of 200 nl/min. The mass spectrometer was operated in data-dependent mode, collecting MS spectra in the Orbitrap mass analyzer (60,000 resolution, 300–1,750 m/z range) with an automatic gain control (AGC) set to standard and a maximum ion injection time set to automatic. The 20 most intense precursor ions were sequentially fragmented with a normalized collision energy of 28 in each scan cycle using higher energy collisional dissociation (HCD) fragmentation. In all measurements, sequenced precursor masses were excluded from further selection for 30 s. MS/MS spectra were recorded with a resolution of 15,000, whereby fill time was set to automatic.

Acquired MS spectra were processed with MaxQuant software package v1.6.14.0 (107) with integrated Andromeda search engine (108). Database search was performed against a Staphylococcus aureus database obtained from Uniprot (https://www.uniprot.org/; 2.889 protein entries), and 286 commonly observed contaminants. Endoprotease trypsin was defined as protease with a maximum of two missed cleavages. Oxidation of methionine, and protein N-terminal acetylation were specified as variable modifications. Carbamidomethylation on cysteine was set as fixed modification. Initial maximum allowed mass tolerance was set to 4.5 ppm for precursor ions and 20 ppm for fragment ions. Peptide, protein and modification site identifications were reported at a FDR of 0.01, estimated by the target-decoy approach (109). The Intensity Based Absolute Quantification (iBAQ) and Label-Free Quantification (LFQ) algorithms were enabled, as was the “match between runs” option (110, 111). The generated data were analyzed using the LFQ-Analyst (https://bioinformatics.erc.monash.edu/apps/LFQ-Analyst/).

Cloning, overexpression, and purification of S. aureus WalK and ClpXP.

Cloning and purification of the full-length WalK histidine kinase (112, 113) and the ClpX ATPase (114) was described before. WalK- and ClpP variants (listed in Table 3) were created using the same protocol and the primers listed in Table S3. Shortly, the genes of interest were cloned into pET22bΔpelB, transformed into E. coli C43(DE3) pREP4groESL(MT) for expression of membrane proteins, or E. coli BL21 LOBSTR (115) for expression of cytoplasmic proteins, and overexpressed overnight at 30°C. Cells were harvested, lysed by ultrasonication, and membrane proteins were removed from the membrane using n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (DDM). Proteins were purified via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The WalK proteins were dialyzed (50 mM HEPES [N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid], 200 mM KCl, 50% [vol/vol] glycerol, pH 8) using Slide-A-Lyzer dialysis cassettes (Thermo Fisher Scientific), supplemented with glycerol to a final concentration of 50% and stored at −20°C. ClpX and ClpP were dialyzed in sodium phosphate buffer (25 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 5% glycerol [vol/vol]).

ClpP activity assays.

The ClpP peptidase activity, ClpP FITC-casein, and SaClpXP assays were performed in triplicates as previously described (52). For the ClpP peptidase activity assay, ClpP (final concentration 2 μM) was preincubated in assay buffer (100 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 100 mM NaCl) at 32°C. Then, 50 μL Suc-Leu-Tyr-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (Suc-LY-AMC) was added to a final concentration of 200 μM and a total volume of 100 μL. The reaction was measured every minute using an Infinite M200Pro plate reader (Tecan), following the increase of fluorescence (excitation, 380 nm; emission, 440 nm). Fluorescence was plotted over time and slopes of the initial segment of the fluorescence-time plot were calculated via linear regression.

The ClpP FITC-casein assay was performed in black flat-bottomed 96-well plates (Sarstedt). Next, 1 μL ADEP 2 (final concentration 0 to 10 μM) was incubated with 49 μL ClpP (final concentration 1 μM) in assay buffer at 37°C. FITC-casein was added to a final concentration of 30 μM and a total volume of 100 μL. The reaction was measured using an infinite M200Pro plate reader (Tecan), following the increase of fluorescence (excitation, 494 nm; emission, 521 nm). The initial 300 s were used for data analysis. A casein solution without ClpP served as reference.

The SaClpXP assay was performed in PZ buffer (PZ: 25 mM HEPES, 200 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, pH 7.6) in a white flat-bottom well plate (Greiner, Frickenhausen, Germany) with a 100 μL reaction volume at 30°C. The reaction contained 2.8 μM ClpP, 2.4 μM ClpX, 0.36 μM eGFP-SsrA, and an ATP regeneration system (4 mM ATP, 16 mM creatine phosphate, 20 U/mL creatine phosphokinase). eGFP-SsrA degradation was measured in an Infinite M200 Pro plate reader (Tecan) with an exciting wavelength of 465 nm and a measured emission of 535 nm. eGFP-SsrA unfolding activity was derived as initial slopes in fluorescence time courses.

Detection of WalK phosphorylation by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE or radioactively labeled ATP.

Auto-phosphorylation and phosphorylation detection of WalK was performed in Triton X-100 micelles and via Phos-tag PAGE or in phospholipid liposomes with radioactively labeled ATP as described in Gajdiss et al. (113).

Data availability.

The whole-genome sequencing data of the CmR strains, the revertants, and the allelic exchange mutants S. aureus WalKA243V and S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F were deposited in NCBI under the BioProject number PRJNA852436. All high-throughput RNA-sequencing data in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (116) and are accessible under accession number GSE206309. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (117) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD034970.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by a grant from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research-funded project DrugBioTune in the frame of Infectcontrol2020 to G.B. and H.-G.S. (project number 03ZZ0808D) and the Jürgen Manchot Stiftung to A.D. and G.B. We thank the Microscopy Core Facility of the Medical Faculty at the University of Bonn for providing support and instrumentation funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation [project number 388171357]). We also gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, TRR261 (project number 398967434) to P.S., B.M., K.N., and H.B.-O. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

The project and data management work for this project was supported by the Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC) of the University of Tübingen. We thank Dorte Frees from the University of Copenhagen for providing the S. aureus clpP deletion strains. A special thank goes to Anne Berscheid from the University of Tübingen for providing the pEPSA5-ssaA(VC40) and pET22b-clpX plasmids.

Conceptualization, A.D., P.S., H.B.-O., H.-G.S., and G.B.; Data curation, A.D., M.F.-W., and T.A.H.; Funding acquisition, A.D., B.M., K.N., H.B.-O., H.-G.S., and G.B.; Investigation, A.D., U.S., M.G., A.-L.B., J.K.D., C.S., I.T.M., J.B., L.R., M.F.-W., and T.A.H.; Methodology, A.D., M.G., I.T.M., J.B., L.R., B.M., M.F.-W., K.N., and T.A.H.; Project administration, A.D. and G.B.; Resources, K.S. and C.H.; Software, B.M., M.F.-W., K.N., and T.A.H.; Supervision, H.B.-O., H.-G.S., and G.B.; Validation, A.D. and U.S.; Visualization, A.D.; Writing – Original Draft, A.D.; Writing – Review & Editing, A.D., M.G., P.S., M.F.-W., K.N., K.S., C.H., H.B.-O., H.-G.S., and G.B.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Fig. S1 to S6 and Tables S1 to S5. Download spectrum.02567-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Gabriele Bierbaum, Email: g.bierbaum@uni-bonn.de.

M.-N. Frances Yap, Northwestern University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rice LB. 2006. Antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive bacteria. Am J Infect Control 34:S11–S19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddy PN, Srirama K, Dirisala VR. 2017. An update on clinical burden, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic options of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Dis (Auckl) 10:1179916117703999. doi: 10.1177/1179916117703999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hassoun A, Linden PK, Friedman B. 2017. Incidence, prevalence, and management of MRSA bacteremia across patient populations- a review of recent developments in MRSA management and treatment. Crit Care 21:211. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1801-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kemung HM, Tan LT-H, Khan TM, Chan K-G, Pusparajah P, Goh B-H, Lee L-H. 2018. Streptomyces as a prominent resource of future anti-MRSA drugs. Front Microbiol 9:2221. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Herold K, Xu Z, Gollmick FA, Gräfe U, Hertweck C. 2004. Biosynthesis of cervimycin C, an aromatic polyketide antibiotic bearing an unusual dimethylmalonyl moiety. Org Biomol Chem 2:2411–2414. doi: 10.1039/B409221J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herold K. 2005. Untersuchungen zur Struktur, Wirkungsweise und Biosynthese der Cervimycine als Verbindungen einer besonderen Klasse aromatischer Polyketide aus Streptomyceten. Dissertation. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bretschneider T, Zocher G, Unger M, Scherlach K, Stehle T, Hertweck C. 2011. A ketosynthase homolog uses malonyl units to form esters in cervimycin biosynthesis. Nat Chem Biol 8:154–161. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Herold K, Gollmick FA, Groth I, Roth M, Menzel K-D, Möllmann U, Gräfe U, Hertweck C. 2005. Cervimycin A-D: a polyketide glycoside complex from a cave bacterium can defeat vancomycin resistance. Chemistry 11:5523–5530. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chopra I, Roberts M. 2001. Tetracycline antibiotics: mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 65:232–260. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.2.232-260.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Krügel H, Licht A, Biedermann G, Petzold A, Lassak J, Hupfer Y, Schlott B, Hertweck C, Platzer M, Brantl S, Saluz H-P. 2010. Cervimycin C resistance in Bacillus subtilis is due to a promoter up-mutation and increased mRNA stability of the constitutive ABC-transporter gene bmrA. FEMS Microbiol Lett 313:155–163. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02143.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vaara M, Vaara T. 1983. Sensitization of Gram-negative bacteria to antibiotics and complement by a nontoxic oligopeptide. Nature 303:526–528. doi: 10.1038/303526a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Urban A, Eckermann S, Fast B, Metzger S, Gehling M, Ziegelbauer K, Rübsamen-Waigmann H, Freiberg C. 2007. Novel whole-cell antibiotic biosensors for compound discovery. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6436–6443. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00586-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Beyer D, Kroll H-P, Endermann R, Ladel C, Schroeder W, Hinzen B, Raddatz S, Paulsen H, Henninger K, Bandow JE, Sahl H-G, Labischinski H. 2005. Dysregulation of bacterial proteolytic machinery by a new class of antibiotics. Nat Med 11:1082–1087. doi: 10.1038/nm1306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sass P, Josten M, Famulla K, Schiffer G, Sahl H-G, Hamoen L, Brötz-Oesterhelt H. 2011. Antibiotic acyldepsipeptides activate ClpP peptidase to degrade the cell division protein FtsZ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:17474–17479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110385108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gersch M, Famulla K, Dahmen M, Göbl C, Malik I, Richter K, Korotkov VS, Sass P, Rübsamen-Schaeff H, Madl T, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Sieber SA. 2015. AAA+ chaperones and acyldepsipeptides activate the ClpP protease via conformational control. Nat Commun 6:6320. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Malik IT, Brötz-Oesterhelt H. 2017. Conformational control of the bacterial Clp protease by natural product antibiotics. Nat Prod Rep 34:815–831. doi: 10.1039/c6np00125d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Michel A, Agerer F, Hauck CR, Herrmann M, Ullrich J, Hacker J, Ohlsen K. 2006. Global regulatory impact of ClpP protease of Staphylococcus aureus on regulons involved in virulence, oxidative stress response, autolysis, and DNA repair. J Bacteriol 188:5783–5796. doi: 10.1128/JB.00074-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thompson MW, Singh SK, Maurizi MR. 1994. Processive degradation of proteins by the ATP-dependent Clp protease from Escherichia coli. Requirement for the multiple array of active sites in ClpP but not ATP hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 269:18209–18215. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32436-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schäfer H, Turgay K. 2019. Spx, a versatile regulator of the Bacillus subtilis stress response. Curr Genet 65:871–876. doi: 10.1007/s00294-019-00950-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Frees D, Chastanet A, Qazi S, Sørensen K, Hill P, Msadek T, Ingmer H. 2004. Clp ATPases are required for stress tolerance, intracellular replication and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 54:1445–1462. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Delaune A, Poupel O, Mallet A, Coic Y-M, Msadek T, Dubrac S. 2011. Peptidoglycan crosslinking relaxation plays an important role in Staphylococcus aureus WalKR-dependent cell viability. PLoS One 6:e17054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dubrac S, Boneca IG, Poupel O, Msadek T. 2007. New insights into the WalK/WalR (YycG/YycF) essential signal transduction pathway reveal a major role in controlling cell wall metabolism and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 189:8257–8269. doi: 10.1128/JB.00645-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hulko M, Berndt F, Gruber M, Linder JU, Truffault V, Schultz A, Martin J, Schultz JE, Lupas AN, Coles M. 2006. The HAMP domain structure implies helix rotation in transmembrane signaling. Cell 126:929–940. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Poupel O, Moyat M, Groizeleau J, Antunes LCS, Gribaldo S, Msadek T, Dubrac S. 2016. Transcriptional analysis and subcellular protein localization reveal specific features of the essential WalKR system in Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 11:e0151449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Biller SJ, Wayne KJ, Winkler ME, Burkholder WF. 2011. The putative hydrolase YycJ (WalJ) affects the coordination of cell division with DNA replication in Bacillus subtilis and may play a conserved role in cell wall metabolism. J Bacteriol 193:896–908. doi: 10.1128/JB.00594-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang H, Yung M, Li L, Hoch JA, Ryan CM, Kar UK, Souda P, Whitelegge JP, Miller JH. 2013. Evidence that YycJ is a novel 5’-3’ double-stranded DNA exonuclease acting in Bacillus anthracis mismatch repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 12:334–346. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Howden BP, McEvoy CRE, Allen DL, Chua K, Gao W, Harrison PF, Bell J, Coombs G, Bennett-Wood V, Porter JL, Robins-Browne R, Davies JK, Seemann T, Stinear TP. 2011. Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002359. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Xuan LJ, Xu SH, Zhang HL, Xu YM, Chen MQ. 1992. Dutomycin, a new anthracycline antibiotic from Streptomyces. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 45:1974–1976. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.45.1974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Momose I, Chen W, Nakamura H, Naganawa H, Iinuma H, Takeuchi T. 1998. Polyketomycin, a new antibiotic from Streptomyces sp. MK277-AF1. II. Structure determination. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 51:26–32. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.51.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Otoguro K, Ui H, Ishiyama A, Arai N, Kobayashi M, Takahashi Y, Masuma R, Shiomi K, Yamada H, Omura S. 2003. In vitro antimalarial activities of the microbial metabolites. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 56:322–324. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Sass P. 2014. Bacterial caseinolytic proteases as novel targets for antibacterial treatment. Int J Med Microbiol 304:23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Frees D, Savijoki K, Varmanen P, Ingmer H. 2007. Clp ATPases and ClpP proteolytic complexes regulate vital biological processes in low GC, Gram-positive bacteria. Mol Microbiol 63:1285–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Agashe VR, Hartl FU. 2000. Roles of molecular chaperones in cytoplasmic protein folding. Semin Cell Dev Biol 11:15–25. doi: 10.1006/scdb.1999.0347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bukau B, Horwich AL. 1998. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 Chaperone Machines. Cell 92:351–366. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80928-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Young JC, Agashe VR, Siegers K, Hartl FU. 2004. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:781–791. doi: 10.1038/nrm1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Michalik S, Bernhardt J, Otto A, Moche M, Becher D, Meyer H, Lalk M, Schurmann C, Schlüter R, Kock H, Gerth U, Hecker M. 2012. Life and death of proteins: a case study of glucose-starved Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:558–570. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.017004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Olivares AO, Baker TA, Sauer RT. 2016. Mechanistic insights into bacterial AAA+ proteases and protein-remodelling machines. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:33–44. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2015.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hoskins JR, Pak M, Maurizi MR, Wickner S. 1998. The role of the ClpA chaperone in proteolysis by ClpAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:12135–12140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.21.12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hoskins JR, Singh SK, Maurizi MR, Wickner S. 2000. Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:8892–8897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Illigmann A, Thoma Y, Pan S, Reinhardt L, Brötz-Oesterhelt H. 2021. Contribution of the Clp protease to bacterial survival and mitochondrial homoeostasis. Microb Physiol 31:260–279. doi: 10.1159/000517718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Song Y, Rubio A, Jayaswal RK, Silverman JA, Wilkinson BJ. 2013. Additional routes to Staphylococcus aureus daptomycin resistance as revealed by comparative genome sequencing, transcriptional profiling, and phenotypic studies. PLoS One 8:e58469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shoji M, Cui L, Iizuka R, Komoto A, Neoh H-m, Watanabe Y, Hishinuma T, Hiramatsu K. 2011. walK and clpP mutations confer reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3870–3881. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01563-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Frees D, Andersen JH, Hemmingsen L, Koskenniemi K, Bæk KT, Muhammed MK, Gudeta DD, Nyman TA, Sukura A, Varmanen P, Savijoki K. 2012. New insights into Staphylococcus aureus stress tolerance and virulence regulation from an analysis of the role of the ClpP protease in the strains Newman, COL, and SA564. J Proteome Res 11:95–108. doi: 10.1021/pr200956s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kirsch VC, Fetzer C, Sieber SA. 2021. Global inventory of ClpP- and ClpX-regulated proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. J Proteome Res 20:867–879. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hu Q, Peng H, Rao X. 2016. Molecular events for promotion of vancomycin resistance in vancomycin intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 7:1601. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Stahlhut SG, Alqarzaee AA, Jensen C, Fisker NS, Pereira AR, Pinho MG, Thomas VC, Frees D. 2017. The ClpXP protease is dispensable for degradation of unfolded proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 7:11739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12122-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bæk KT, Thøgersen L, Mogenssen RG, Mellergaard M, Thomsen LE, Petersen A, Skov S, Cameron DR, Peleg AY, Frees D. 2015. Stepwise decrease in daptomycin susceptibility in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with an initial mutation in rpoB and a compensatory inactivation of the clpX gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6983–6991. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01303-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bæk KT, Gründling A, Mogensen RG, Thøgersen L, Petersen A, Paulander W, Frees D. 2014. β-Lactam resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 is increased by inactivation of the ClpXP protease. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:4593–4603. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02802-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Boyle-Vavra S, Jones M, Gourley BL, Holmes M, Ruf R, Balsam AR, Boulware DR, Kline S, Jawahir S, Devries A, Peterson SN, Daum RS. 2011. Comparative genome sequencing of an isogenic pair of USA800 clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained before and after daptomycin treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:2018–2025. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01593-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Luo Y, Helmann JD. 2012. Analysis of the role of Bacillus subtilis σ(M) in β-lactam resistance reveals an essential role for c-di-AMP in peptidoglycan homeostasis. Mol Microbiol 83:623–639. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07953.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Müller A, Grein F, Otto A, Gries K, Orlov D, Zarubaev V, Girard M, Sher X, Shamova O, Roemer T, François P, Becher D, Schneider T, Sahl H-G. 2018. Differential daptomycin resistance development in Staphylococcus aureus strains with active and mutated gra regulatory systems. Int J Med Microbiol 308:335–348. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Malik IT, Pereira R, Vielberg M-T, Mayer C, Straetener J, Thomy D, Famulla K, Castro H, Sass P, Groll M, Brötz-Oesterhelt H. 2020. Functional characterisation of ClpP mutations conferring resistance to acyldepsipeptide antibiotics in Firmicutes. Chembiochem 21:1997–2012. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chatterjee I, Becker P, Grundmeier M, Bischoff M, Somerville GA, Peters G, Sinha B, Harraghy N, Proctor RA, Herrmann M. 2005. Staphylococcus aureus ClpC is required for stress resistance, aconitase activity, growth recovery, and death. J Bacteriol 187:4488–4496. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.13.4488-4496.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chatterjee I, Schmitt S, Batzilla CF, Engelmann S, Keller A, Ring MW, Kautenburger R, Ziebuhr W, Hecker M, Preissner KT, Bischoff M, Proctor RA, Beck HP, Lenhof H-P, Somerville GA, Herrmann M. 2009. Staphylococcus aureus ClpC ATPase is a late growth phase effector of metabolism and persistence. Proteomics 9:1152–1176. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Graham JW, Lei MG, Lee CY. 2013. Trapping and identification of cellular substrates of the Staphylococcus aureus ClpC chaperone. J Bacteriol 195:4506–4516. doi: 10.1128/JB.00758-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Mashruwala AA, Eilers BJ, Fuchs AL, Norambuena J, Earle CA, van de Guchte A, Tripet BP, Copié V, Boyd JM. 2019. The ClpCP complex modulates respiratory metabolism in Staphylococcus aureus and is regulated in a SrrAB-dependent manner. J Bacteriol 201:e00188-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00188-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Donegan NP, Marvin JS, Cheung AL. 2014. Role of adaptor TrfA and ClpPC in controlling levels of SsrA-tagged proteins and antitoxins in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 196:4140–4151. doi: 10.1128/JB.02222-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Schwarz M, Hübner I, Sieber SA. 2022. Tailored phenyl esters inhibit ClpXP and attenuate Staphylococcus aureus α-hemolysin secretion. Chembiochem 23:e202200253. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202200253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wiegert T, Schumann W. 2001. SsrA-mediated tagging in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 183:3885–3889. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.13.3885-3889.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Renzoni A, Kelley WL, Barras C, Monod A, Huggler E, François P, Schrenzel J, Studer R, Vaudaux P, Lew DP. 2009. Identification by genomic and genetic analysis of two new genes playing a key role in intermediate glycopeptide resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:903–911. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01287-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chatterjee I, Maisonneuve E, Ezraty B, Herrmann M, Dukan S. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus ClpC is involved in protection of carbon-metabolizing enzymes from carbonylation during stationary growth phase. Int J Med Microbiol 301:341–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Donegan NP, Thompson ET, Fu Z, Cheung AL. 2010. Proteolytic regulation of toxin-antitoxin systems by ClpPC in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 192:1416–1422. doi: 10.1128/JB.00233-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Luong TT, Sau K, Roux C, Sau S, Dunman PM, Lee CY. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus ClpC divergently regulates capsule via sae and codY in strain newman but activates capsule via codY in strain UAMS-1 and in strain Newman with repaired saeS. J Bacteriol 193:686–694. doi: 10.1128/JB.00987-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Springer MT, Singh VK, Cheung AL, Donegan NP, Chamberlain NR. 2016. Effect of clpP and clpC deletion on persister cell number in Staphylococcus aureus. J Med Microbiol 65:848–857. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gavrish E, Sit CS, Cao S, Kandror O, Spoering A, Peoples A, Ling L, Fetterman A, Hughes D, Bissell A, Torrey H, Akopian T, Mueller A, Epstein S, Goldberg A, Clardy J, Lewis K. 2014. Lassomycin, a ribosomally synthesized cyclic peptide, kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the ATP-dependent protease ClpC1P1P2. Chem Biol 21:509–518. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schmitt EK, Riwanto M, Sambandamurthy V, Roggo S, Miault C, Zwingelstein C, Krastel P, Noble C, Beer D, Rao SPS, Au M, Niyomrattanakit P, Lim V, Zheng J, Jeffery D, Pethe K, Camacho LR. 2011. The natural product cyclomarin kills Mycobacterium tuberculosis by targeting the ClpC1 subunit of the caseinolytic protease. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:5889–5891. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vasudevan D, Rao SPS, Noble CG. 2013. Structural basis of mycobacterial inhibition by cyclomarin A. J Biol Chem 288:30883–30891. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.493767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.McCallum N, Berger-Bächi B, Senn MM. 2010. Regulation of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 300:118–129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2009.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Dubrac S, Bisicchia P, Devine KM, Msadek T. 2008. A matter of life and death: cell wall homeostasis and the WalKR (YycGF) essential signal transduction pathway. Mol Microbiol 70:1307–1322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06483.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Peleg AY, Miyakis S, Ward DV, Earl AM, Rubio A, Cameron DR, Pillai S, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM. 2012. Whole genome characterization of the mechanisms of daptomycin resistance in clinical and laboratory derived isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 7:e28316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cameron DR, Mortin LI, Rubio A, Mylonakis E, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM, Peleg AY. 2015. Impact of daptomycin resistance on Staphylococcus aureus virulence. Virulence 6:127–131. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1011532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kim JW, Lee KJ. 2020. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain based on whole-genome sequencing. Arch Microbiol 202:2255–2261. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-01906-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tan S, Ludwig KC, Müller A, Schneider T, Nodwell JR. 2019. The lasso peptide siamycin-I targets lipid II at the Gram-positive cell surface. ACS Chem Biol 14:966–974. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Metelev M, Tietz JI, Melby JO, Blair PM, Zhu L, Livnat I, Severinov K, Mitchell DA. 2015. Structure, bioactivity, and resistance mechanism of streptomonomicin, an unusual lasso peptide from an understudied halophilic actinomycete. Chem Biol 22:241–250. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Baseri N, Najar-Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B. 2021. The effect of subinhibitory concentration of chlorhexidine on the evolution of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus and the induction of mutations in walKR and vraTSR systems. Infect Genet Evol 87:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Mak S, Nodwell JR. 2017. Actinorhodin is a redox-active antibiotic with a complex mode of action against Gram-positive cells. Mol Microbiol 106:597–613. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hafer C, Lin Y, Kornblum J, Lowy FD, Uhlemann A-C. 2012. Contribution of selected gene mutations to resistance in clinical isolates of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:5845–5851. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01139-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Peng H, Hu Q, Shang W, Yuan J, Zhang X, Liu H, Zheng Y, Hu Z, Yang Y, Tan L, Li S, Hu X, Li M, Rao X. 2017. WalK(S221P), a naturally occurring mutation, confers vancomycin resistance in VISA strain XN108. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1006–1013. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Zhu J, Liu B, Shu X, Sun B. 2021. A novel mutation of walK confers vancomycin-intermediate resistance in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 311:151473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wang Y, Li X, Jiang L, Han W, Xie X, Jin Y, He X, Wu R. 2016. Novel mutation sites in the development of vancomycin-intermediate resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol 7:2163. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Berscheid A, François P, Strittmatter A, Gottschalk G, Schrenzel J, Sass P, Bierbaum G. 2014. Generation of a vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) strain by two amino acid exchanges in VraS. J Antimicrob Chemother 69:3190–3198. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Delauné A, Dubrac S, Blanchet C, Poupel O, Mäder U, Hiron A, Leduc A, Fitting C, Nicolas P, Cavaillon J-M, Adib-Conquy M, Msadek T. 2012. The WalKR system controls major staphylococcal virulence genes and is involved in triggering the host inflammatory response. Infect Immun 80:3438–3453. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00195-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Cameron DR, Jiang J-H, Kostoulias X, Foxwell DJ, Peleg AY. 2016. Vancomycin susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by YycHI activation of the WalRK essential two-component regulatory system. Sci Rep 6:30823. doi: 10.1038/srep30823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Jansen A, Türck M, Szekat C, Nagel M, Clever I, Bierbaum G. 2007. Role of insertion elements and yycFG in the development of decreased susceptibility to vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol 297:205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Hort M, Bertsche U, Nozinovic S, Dietrich A, Schrötter AS, Mildenberger L, Axtmann K, Berscheid A, Bierbaum G. 2021. The role of β-glycosylated wall teichoic acids in the reduction of vancomycin susceptibility in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0052821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00528-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Mongodin E, Finan J, Climo MW, Rosato A, Gill S, Archer GL. 2003. Microarray transcription analysis of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates resistant to vancomycin. J Bacteriol 185:4638–4643. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.15.4638-4643.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wootton M, Bennett PM, MacGowan AP, Walsh TR. 2005. Reduced expression of the atl autolysin gene and susceptibility to autolysis in clinical heterogeneous glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hGISA) and GISA strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:944–947. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Dietrich A, Steffens U, Sass P, Bierbaum G. 2021. The hypersusceptible antibiotic screening strain Staphylococcus aureus SG511-Berlin harbors multiple mutations in regulatory genes. Int J Med Microbiol 311:151545. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2021.151545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kehl K, Schallenberg A, Szekat C, Albert C, Sib E, Exner M, Zacharias N, Schreiber C, Parčina M, Bierbaum G. 2022. Dissemination of carbapenem resistant bacteria from hospital wastewater into the environment. Sci Total Environ 806:151339. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Arnaud M, Chastanet A, Débarbouillé M. 2004. New vector for efficient allelic replacement in naturally nontransformable, low-GC-content, Gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6887–6891. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6887-6891.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Frees D, Qazi SNA, Hill PJ, Ingmer H. 2003. Alternative roles of ClpX and ClpP in Staphylococcus aureus stress tolerance and virulence. Mol Microbiol 48:1565–1578. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03524.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wenzel M, Chiriac AI, Otto A, Zweytick D, May C, Schumacher C, Gust R, Albada HB, Penkova M, Krämer U, Erdmann R, Metzler-Nolte N, Straus SK, Bremer E, Becher D, Brötz-Oesterhelt H, Sahl H-G, Bandow JE. 2014. Small cationic antimicrobial peptides delocalize peripheral membrane proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:E1409-18. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319900111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Forsyth RA, Haselbeck RJ, Ohlsen KL, Yamamoto RT, Xu H, Trawick JD, Wall D, Wang L, Brown-Driver V, Froelich JM, C KG, King P, McCarthy M, Malone C, Misiner B, Robbins D, Tan Z, Zhu Zy Z-y, Carr G, Mosca DA, Zamudio C, Foulkes JG, Zyskind JW. 2002. A genome-wide strategy for the identification of essential genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 43:1387–1400. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sass P, Berscheid A, Jansen A, Oedenkoven M, Szekat C, Strittmatter A, Gottschalk G, Bierbaum G. 2012. Genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus VC40, a vancomycin- and daptomycin-resistant strain, to study the genetics of development of resistance to currently applied last-resort antibiotics. J Bacteriol 194:2107–2108. doi: 10.1128/JB.06631-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Gajdiss M, Monk IR, Bertsche U, Kienemund J, Funk T, Dietrich A, Hort M, Sib E, Stinear TP, Bierbaum G. 2020. YycH and YycI regulate expression of Staphylococcus aureus autolysins by activation of WalRK phosphorylation. Microorganisms 8:870. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8060870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 99.Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2015. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357–360. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup . 2009. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, García-Alcalde F. 2016. Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 32:292–294. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. 2014. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Borchert N, Dieterich C, Krug K, Schütz W, Jung S, Nordheim A, Sommer RJ, Macek B. 2010. Proteogenomics of Pristionchus pacificus reveals distinct proteome structure of nematode models. Genome Res 20:837–846. doi: 10.1101/gr.103119.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rappsilber J, Mann M, Ishihama Y. 2007. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat Protoc 2:1896–1906. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Bekker-Jensen DB, Martínez-Val A, Steigerwald S, Rüther P, Fort KL, Arrey TN, Harder A, Makarov A, Olsen JV. 2020. A compact quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer with FAIMS interface improves proteome coverage in short LC gradients. Mol Cell Proteomics 19:716–729. doi: 10.1074/mcp.TIR119.001906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Cox J, Mann M. 2008. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol 26:1367–1372. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Cox J, Neuhauser N, Michalski A, Scheltema RA, Olsen JV, Mann M. 2011. Andromeda: a peptide search engine integrated into the MaxQuant environment. J Proteome Res 10:1794–1805. doi: 10.1021/pr101065j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Elias JE, Gygi SP. 2007. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4:207–214. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M. 2011. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Luber CA, Cox J, Lauterbach H, Fancke B, Selbach M, Tschopp J, Akira S, Wiegand M, Hochrein H, O'Keeffe M, Mann M. 2010. Quantitative proteomics reveals subset-specific viral recognition in dendritic cells. Immunity 32:279–289. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Türck M, Bierbaum G. 2012. Purification and activity testing of the full-length YycFGHI proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One 7:e30403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Gajdiss M, Türck M, Bierbaum G. 2017. Bacterial histidine kinases. Methods Mol Biol 1520:247–259. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6634-9_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Berscheid A. 2014. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus VC40 reveals a major role of the VraS and WalK histidine kinases in the development of vancomycin and daptomycin resistance. Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, Bonn. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Andersen KR, Leksa NC, Schwartz TU. 2013. Optimized E. coli expression strain LOBSTR eliminates common contaminants from His-tag purification. Proteins 81:1857–1861. doi: 10.1002/prot.24364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. 2002. Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res 30:207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Perez-Riverol Y, Bai J, Bandla C, García-Seisdedos D, Hewapathirana S, Kamatchinathan S, Kundu DJ, Prakash A, Frericks-Zipper A, Eisenacher M, Walzer M, Wang S, Brazma A, Vizcaíno JA. 2022. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Fuchs S, Mehlan H, Bernhardt J, Hennig A, Michalik S, Surmann K, Pané-Farré J, Giese A, Weiss S, Backert L, Herbig A, Nieselt K, Hecker M, Völker U, Mäder U. 2018. AureoWiki - The repository of the Staphylococcus aureus research and annotation community. Int J Med Microbiol 308:558–568. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental file 1

Fig. S1 to S6 and Tables S1 to S5. Download spectrum.02567-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 2.5 MB (2.6MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The whole-genome sequencing data of the CmR strains, the revertants, and the allelic exchange mutants S. aureus WalKA243V and S. aureus SG511 ClpPI29F were deposited in NCBI under the BioProject number PRJNA852436. All high-throughput RNA-sequencing data in this publication have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (116) and are accessible under accession number GSE206309. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE (117) partner repository with the data set identifier PXD034970.


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES