Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276809

Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: A community-based study

Azmeraw Ambachew Kebede 1, Dereje Nibret Gessesse 1, Mastewal Belayneh Aklil 1, Wubedle Zelalem Temesgan 1, Marta Yimam Abegaz 1, Tazeb Alemu Anteneh 1, Nebiyu Solomon Tibebu 1, Haymanot Nigatu Alemu 1, Tsion Tadesse Haile 1, Asmra Tesfahun Seyoum 1, Agumas Eskezia Tiguh 1, Ayenew Engida Yismaw 1, Muhabaw Shumye Mihret 1, Goshu Nenko 2, Kindu Yinges Wondie 1, Birhan Tsegaw Taye 3, Nuhamin Tesfa Tsega 4,*
Editor: Ammal Mokhtar Metwally5
PMCID: PMC9604988  PMID: 36288375

Abstract

Background

Depression is the most common mental health problem that affects women during pregnancy and after child-birth. Postpartum depression, in particular, has both short and long-term effects on the lives of mothers and children. Women’s health is a current global concern, but postpartum depression is a neglected issue in the maternal continuum of care and is rarely addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to assess postpartum depression and associated factors in Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from August 1st to 30th, 2021 in Gondar city. A cluster sampling technique was employed to select 794 postpartum women. Data were entered by EPI DATA version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 for further analysis. The multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to identify factors associated with postpartum depression. The adjusted odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval at a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to declare the level of significance.

Results

A total of 794 women were included in the analysis, giving a response rate of 98.5%. The prevalence of postpartum depression was 17.25% (95% CI: 14.5, 20.2). Younger maternal age (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.23, 5.85), low average monthly income (AOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.24, 5.91), low decision-making power (AOR = 2.04, 95%CI: 1.31, 3.18), low husband/partner involvement in MNCH care service (AOR = 2.34, 95%CI: 1.44, 3.81), unplanned pregnancy (AOR = 3.16 95% CI: 1.77, 5.62), and experience of intimate partner violence (AOR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.96, 4.99) were significantly associated with increased odds of postpartum depression.

Conclusion

In this study, nearly 1/5th of the study participants had postpartum depression. Thus, it is important to integrate maternal mental health services with the existing maternal health care services. It is also crucial to advocate the need for husband’s involvement in MNCH care services and ensure women’s decision-making power in the household. Moreover, community-based sexual and reproductive health education would be better to reduce risk factors of postpartum depression.

Introduction

Depression is the most common psychiatric condition that occurs during pregnancy and the postpartum period [1]. Postpartum Depression (PPD) is defined as depressive symptoms such as reduced mood, loss of enjoyment, diminished energy and activity, functional impairment, low self-esteem, and suicidal thoughts or acts that occur within the first year after childbirth [24]. The transition to motherhood is considered to be a difficult and emotional transition with significant changes in psychological, social and physiological aspects, and increased susceptibility to mental illnesses including PPD [5]. It is a major public health concern because it affects mothers and newborns, as well as family members and the society at large [6]. In the same way, intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health problem within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological, or sexual harm [7]. It can cause extensive mental health consequences including depression among victims [8,9]. In Ethiopia, the prevalence of IPV among pregnant women was 28.74 [10] and in central Ethiopia, it was 31.4% postpartum IPV [11].

Around 10%-20% of mothers suffer from depressive symptoms after childbirth worldwide [12]. In sub-Saharan Africa the magnitude of postpartum depression is 18.6% [13]. A meta-analysis study conducted in Ethiopia also showed that 21.5% of women develop postpartum depression [14].

Empirical evidence has found that postpartum depression is linked to impaired mother-infant bonding, child abuse, child neglect, maternal substance abuse, and self-harm [15,16]. In addition, maternal depression has also been linked to poor weight gain, impaired cognitive and motor development in infants, and early discontinuation of breastfeeding because of reduced breast milk production [15,17]. Moreover, maternal depression affects the nutrition of the women that could lead to some morbid conditions like anemia, malnutrition, and hypertension [1,12]. The family can be affected through neglect of family duties and financial strain due to the treatment costs for PPD and low productivity at work [12]. This maternal depression can also lead to suicide, which is a leading cause of death in the first postnatal year, accounting for around 22% of maternal deaths. About 10% of maternal suicide, in particular, is resulted from postpartum mental health problems [18].

Endless crying of babies, painful and cracked nipples, painful delivery wounds, inadequate breast milk, family demands, sleepless nights, and constant fatigue have been associated with postpartum depression [19]. Even though PPD has no single cause, some of the factors are being a first-time mother, history of previous depression [20], domestic violence [21,22], history of substance use, poor social support [22,23], and unplanned pregnancy [20,21].

The 2015 World Health Organization recommendation on measures to promote maternal and child health outcomes during pregnancy, childbirth and the postpartum period include effective implementation of male involvement in the maternal continuum of care [24]. This is because low husband/partner involvement in Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health (MNCH) care services during pregnancy and the postpartum period is a leading cause of poor maternal health, including PPD [25].

However, the PPD screening tool (i.e. Patient health questionnaire-9) is not incorporated into modern postnatal care guidelines in Ethiopia. This study can help reduce maternal PPD and influencing factors and provide information on strategies targeting on maternal and child health. Therefore, this community based cross-sectional study assessed postnatal depression and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last one year in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia.

Method and materials

Study design and period

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Gondar city from August 1st to August 30th, 2021.

Study area

Gondar city is found in Amhara national regional state, Central Gondar Zone. It is located 166 km from Bahir Dar (the capital city of Amhara regional state) and 750 km Northwest of Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia). According to the population projection of Ethiopia, the estimated total population of the city was 432,191, of whom, 224,508 are females. From this, about 133, 477 (30.88%) of females are in the reproductive age (women aged from 15–49 years old) (unpublished data by Amhara regional state, 2021). There are 1 governmental comprehensive specialized referral hospital, 8 governmental health centers, 22 health posts, 1 private primary hospital, and 1 general hospital serving the town.

Study population and eligibility criteria

The study population included all women who gave birth in the last year (from August 2020 to August 2021) and who resided in the city for at least 6 months in the selected kebeles during the data collection period.

Sample size determination and sampling procedure

The sample size was determined by using the single population proportion formula by considering the following assumptions: the proportion of postpartum depression 33.82%, which was done in southwest Ethiopia [26], level of confidence 95%, and margin of error 5%. Therefore, the sample size (n)=(Zα/2)2p(1p)d2 =(1.96)2*0.3382(10.3382)(0.05)2=344. After considering a design effect of 2 and a non-response rate of 10%, the total sample size was 757. Gondar city has 22 kebeles (the smallest administrative unit) and six kebeles (25% of the total kebeles) were randomly selected by a lottery method. All eligible women in the selected clusters were interviewed. Finally, due to the nature of cluster sampling, 806 women were included in our study.

Variables of the study

Postpartum depression was the outcome variable whereas maternal age, religion, marital status, mother’s educational status, women’s occupation, average monthly income, mother’s educational status, husband educational status, husband occupation, parity, having ANC visit, place of delivery, mode of delivery, PNC visit, planned pregnancy, intimate partner violence (IPV), decision-making power, social support, and husband/partner involvement in MNCH, family history of mental health problem, known psychiatric illness, having information about mental health during pregnancy, having medical illness and experienced a death of family or friends were independent variable of the study.

Operational definitions and measurements

Postpartum depression: Women who were interviewed and scored ten and above by using patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) were considered as depressed [27].

Social support: The Oslo Social Support Scale (OSS-3) scores ranged from 3–14 with a score of 3–8, poor support; 9–11, moderate support; and 12–14, strong support [28].

Household decision-making power: A total of eight questions were prepared to assess the household decision-making power of the women. A score of 2 were given for women who decided independently, 1 for women who decided with their husband, and 0 for decisions made by the husband alone or other person. The minimum and the maximum scores were 0 and 16, respectively. Thus, based on the summative score of variables designed to assess household decision-making power women, who answered above the mean value (8.98) were considered to have higher decision-making power [29].

Husband/partner involved in MNCH services: It was composed of nine questions for this study. For each question, the response was given a score of 0 and 1. The total score was 9, with a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 9. Hence, husband involvement with a score above the mean (6.08) was considered as involved [25].

Intimate partner violence: Intimate partner is considered as a current spouse, co-habited, current boyfriends, former partner, or spouse. Women were considered to have experienced intimate partner violence, if they said “Yes” to any one of the ranges of sexual, psychological, and physical or any combination of the three coercive acts regardless of the legal status of the relationship with current/former intimate partner, it was considered as IPV [30].

Having medical illness: It was defined as a women who presented with at least one of the following medically diagnosed illness: hypertension, diabetes, asthma, cardiac and renal disease [31].

Data collection tool and quality assurance

The data collection tool was developed by reviewing the literature [8,2123,26,3236] and was collected using a structured questionnaire through face-to-face interviews. The questionnaire was prepared in the English version and translated to the local language (Amharic) and back to English to keep uniformity. The questionnaire contains socio-demographic characteristics, obstetric, medical, and maternal health services-related characteristics, social support, husband/partner involvement in MNCH, decision-making power, and intimate partner violence-related questions, and questions assessing PPD. Six BSc and two MSc midwives were recruited for data collection and supervision, respectively. To assure the quality of the data, one day training was given for data collectors and supervisors about the interview technique and supervising the data process. Moreover, pretest was done on 5% of the determined sample size in the Maksegnit district to look for the understandability and appropriateness of the study tool. The completeness of the questionnaire was checked by the supervisors daily.

Data management and analysis

Data were checked, coded, and entered into EPI Data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 25 for further analysis. Descriptive statistics like frequency, mean, and proportion were used to present participants’ characteristics. Binary logistic regression was fitted to identify eligible factors and variables having a p-value of ≤ 0.2 were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a p-value of ≤ 0.05 with a 95% CI for the adjusted odds ratio was used to claim the level of significance.

Ethical considerations

BKEthical clearance was obtained from the University of Gondar Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Reference number: V/P/RCS/05/2710/2021). A formal letter of administrative approval was obtained from the selected clusters (kebeles) of Gondar city. Written informed consent was taken from each study participants after a clear explanation of the aim of the study.

Result

Socio demographic characteristics of respondents

A total of 806 women were included in the study making a response rate of 98.5%. Among the total study participants, the mean age of the respondents was 29.7 years old (±SD 4.83) and 550 (69.3%) of the respondents were in the age group of 25–34 years. Most (81.6%) of the study participants were Orthodox Christian. Regarding marital status, 718 (90.4%) of study participants were married. More than one quarter, 229 (28.8%) of study participants had completed secondary education. Regarding occupation, 357 (45%) women were housewives, and 457(66.15%) of their husbands were government employees (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of women who gave birth in the last one year in Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 794).

Variables Frequency Percentage (%)
Age
≤24 98 12.3
25–34 550 69.3
≥35 146 18.4
Religion
Orthodox Christian 648 81.6
Muslim
Protestant
105
32
13.2
4.0
Othersa 9 1.1
Current marital status
Married 718 90.4
Unmarried 76 9.6
Women’s education status
No formal education 96 12.1
Primary education 128 16.1
Secondary education 229 28.8
Diploma and above 341 42.9
Women’s occupation
Housewives 357 45
Daily laborer 14 1.8
Self-employee 97 12.2
Merchant 97 12.2
Government employee 215 27.1
Husband educational status (n = 718)
No formal education 40 5.57
Primary education 54 7.52
Secondary education 149 20.75
Diploma and above 457 66.15
Husband occupation (n = 718)
Daily labor

45

6.27
Self-employee 161 22.42
Government employee 333 46.37
Merchant 151 21.03
Othersb 28 3.89
Average family monthly income
≤1000 ETB 49 6.2
1001–2000 ETB 53 6.7
≥2001 ETB 692 87.2

ETB: Ethiopian Birr, a: Jewish and Adventist, b: Student and Farmer.

Obstetrics, medical related, and maternal health service characteristics

Among the total respondents, more than half (56.2%) of women had a parity of two to four. The majority, 773 (97.4%) of study participants had at least one ANC visit whereas 418 (52.6%) of the participants had at least one PNC visit. Six hundred seventy eight (85.4%) and seven hundred thirty seven (92.8%) of the pregnancies were planned and supported by husband/family, respectively. Regarding social support, 228 (28.7%) of the respondents had poor social support. More than half, 416 (52.4%) of women’s got their husband/partner’s support during maternal, neonatal, and child health care services, and nearly two-thirds, 494 (62.2%) of women had a higher decision making power (Table 2).

Table 2. Obstetrics, medical related and maternal health service characteristics of women who gave birth in the last one year in Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 794).

Variables Frequency Percentage (%)
Parity
1 318 40.1
2–4 446 56.2
≥5 30 3.8
ANC visit
Yes 773 97.4
No 21 2.6
Number of ANC visit (n = 773)
<4
4 and above

274
499

35.4
64.6
Place of delivery
Home 24 3
Health facility 770 97
Mode of delivery
SVD 471 59.3
Cesarean section 297 37.4
Instrumental delivery 26 3.3
PNC visit
Yes 418 52.6
No 376 47.4
Type of pregnancy
Planned 678 85.4
Unplanned 116 14.6
Was the pregnancy supported
Yes 737 92.8
No 57 7.2
Women’s decision making power
Higher 494 62.2
Lower 300 37.8
Husband/partner involvement in MNCH
Involved 416 52.4
Not involved 378 47.6
Social support
Poor 228 28.7
Moderate 351 44.2
Strong 215 27.1
Intimate partner violence
Yes 388 48.9
No 406 51.1
Family history of mental health problem
Yes 83 10.5
No 711 89.5
Known psychiatric illness
Yes 19 2.4
No 775 97.6
Having information about mental health during pregnancy
Yes 365 46
No 429 54
Having medical illness
Yes 86 10.8
No 708 89.2
Experienced death of husband/friend/relatives
Yes 202 25.4
No 592 74.6

ANC: Antenatal Care, SVD: Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery, PNC: Postnatal Care, MNCH: Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health.

Prevalence of postpartum depression and associated factors

The prevalence of postpartum depression among women who gave birth in the last one year was 17.25% (95% CI: 14.5, 20.2). In the binary logistic regression analysis: maternal age, women’s educational status, family monthly income, intimate partner violence, women’s decision-making power, type of pregnancy, husband/partner involvement in MNCH service, social support, place of delivery, and pregnancy supported by family/partner were found to be a p-value of <0.2 and entered into multivariable analysis. However, maternal age, family monthly income, women’s decision-making power, husband/partner involvement in MNCH care service, type of pregnancy, and IPV were significantly associated with postpartum depression in the multivariable analysis.

Women whose age was ≤ 24 years were 2.72 times more likely to develop postpartum depression compared with women whose age was ≥ 35 years (AOR = 2.72, 95% CI: 1.23, 5.85). Women whose average monthly income ≤ 1000 Ethiopian Birr (ETB) were 2.71 times more likely to experience postpartum depression than those women who earned > 2000 ETB (AOR = 2.71, 95% CI: 1.24, 5.91). This study revealed that women who had lower decision-making power were 2.04 times more likely to have had depression during the postpartum period compared with those women who had higher decision-making power (AOR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.31, 3.18).

Women whose husband/partner were not actively involved in MNCH service were 2.34 times more likely to experience postpartum depression compared with those women whose husbands/partners were actively involved in MNCH care services (AOR = 2.34, 95%CI: 1.44, 3.81). The current study revealed that type of pregnancy has been strongly associated with postpartum depression. The odds of experiencing postpartum depression among respondents who had unplanned pregnancies were 3 times higher as compared to those women who had planned pregnancies (AOR = 3.16 95% CI: 1.77, 5.62). The study also found that there was a significant association between IPV and postpartum depression. Thus, the odds of having PPD among women who experienced IPV were about 3 times higher compared with their counterparts (AOR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.96, 4.99) (Table 3).

Table 3. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of associated factors of postpartum depression among women who gave birth in the last 1 year in Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia, 2021 (n = 794).

Variables
Postpartum depression COR (95%CI)
AOR (95% CI)
Yes No
Material age
≤ 24 31 67 3.09 (1.63, 5.88) 2.72 (1.23, 5.85)*
25–34 87 463 1.26 (0.74, 2.14) 1.35 (0.73, 2.51)
≥ 35 19 127 1 1
Women’s education status
No formal education 30 66 3.97 (2.28, 6.93) 1.16 (0.57, 2.39)
Primary education 18 110 1.43 (0.78, 2.63) 0.49 (0.24, 1.02)
Secondary education 54 175 2.69 (1.69, 4.29) 1.21 (0.71, 2.08)
Diploma and above 35 306 1 1
Family monthly income
≤ 1000 ETB 21 28 4.24 (2.32, 7.75) 2.71 (1.24, 5.91)*
1001–2000 ETB 12 41 1.66 (0.84, 3.25) 0.92 (0.42, 2.02)
≥ 2001 ETB 104 588 1 1
Place of delivery
Home 9 15 3.01 (1.29, 7.03) 2.36 (0.89, 6,29)
Health facility 128 642 1 1
Social support
Poor 64 164 2.97 (1.79, 4.93) 1.53 (0.84, 2.77)
Moderate 48 303 1.20 (0.72, 2.02) 1.11 (0.62, 1.98)
Strong 25 190 1 1
Women’s decision-making power
Higher 61 433 1 1
Lower 76 224 2.41 (1.66, 3.49) 2.04 (1.31, 3.18)*
Husband/partner involvement in MNCH care services



Involved 43 373 1 1
Not involved 94 284 2.87 (1.94, 4.25) 2.34 (1.44, 3.81)**
Type pregnancy
Planned 86 592 1 1
Unplanned 51 65 5.40 (3.51, 8.31) 3.16 (1.77, 5.62)**
Was the recent pregnancy supported
Yes 118 619 1 1
No 19 38 2.62 (1.46, 2.71) 0.53 (0.23, 1.19)
Intimate partner violence
Yes 104 284 4.41 (2.71, 6.31) 3.13 (1.96, 4.99)**
No 33 373 1 1

NB

* Significant (P-value ≤ 0.05)

** P-value <0.001.

MNCH: Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health, AOR: Adjusted Odd Ratio, COR: Crude Odd Ratio, CI: Confidence Interval.

Discussion

This community-based cross-sectional study assessed postpartum depression and associated factors among women who gave birth in the last one year (from August 2020 to August 2021) in Gondar city, northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Thus, it was found that the prevalence of postpartum depression was 17.25% (95% CI: 14.5, 20.2), which is comparable with studies conducted in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia-15.6% [37] and Eastern Ethiopia-16.3% [38].

However, the finding of this study was higher than studies conducted in Hiwot Fana Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia-13.11% [39], Eritrea-7.4% [40], Kenya-13.0% [34], and South Africa-8.8% [41]. The possible reason for this discrepancy could be due to study setting and socio-cultural differences. All the above-mentioned studies were institution-based cross-sectional studies where women who came for MNCH care services will get health education about the physiologic and psychologic changes during the postpartum period. In addition, IPV has been linked with mental health problems, particularly postpartum depression [42]. For instance, nearly half (48.9%) of the study participants in the current study have experienced IPV, while only 3.7% of women in South Africa experienced IPV. Moreover, the possible discrepancy might be the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and the internal conflict in the country, which may increase the prevalence of PPD in this study [43].

On the other hand, the result of this study was lower compared with other studies conducted somewhere else in Ethiopia including Gondar town-25% [44], Awi Zone-23.7% [45], Bench Maji Zone-22.4% [23], and Southwest Ethiopia-33.8% [26]. The result of this study is also lower as compared to a study conducted in Cameron-23.4% [35]. This variation might be due to the differences in the tool we used to measure the outcome variable, time of data collection, and characteristics of the study participants. The study conducted in Awi Zone, Ethiopia used Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) with a cutoff point of 8 to declare postpartum depression. In this study, however, the PHQ-9 depression scale with a cutoff point of 10 was used. Moreover, the study participants in Gondar town and Cameron were women who gave birth in the last 6 weeks and women whose children aged 4 to 6 weeks, respectively. As a result, the prevalence of PPD might be increased because postpartum depression is most common in the first 6 weeks after child birth [23]. On the other hand, the study in Bench Maji Zone, Ethiopia showed that 42.1% of the study participants were under the age of 23 years. However, only 11.2% of the participants were under the age of 24 in this study. It has been evidenced that being younger age is highly correlated with postpartum depression [32,46]. The lower prevalence of PPD in the current study might also be related to the low incidence of unplanned pregnancy. Unplanned and unsupported pregnancies have been associated with PPD as evidenced by scholars [22,23,47,48]. Hence, 30% of the pregnancy in the Southwest Ethiopia study was unplanned whereas only 14.6% of the pregnancies were unplanned in our study.

It has been found that being younger age increases the odds of developing PPD. Accordingly, the odds of having postpartum depression was 2.72 times higher among women aged ≤ 24 years compared with those women aged ≥ 35 years old. This finding was supported by the study conducted in Southwest Ethiopia [23], Sudan [33], Kenya [49], and Armenia [32]. The possible explanation might be due to the fact that younger women are expected to be exposed to emotional distress as they experience childbirth for the first time. Besides, the additional burden of caring for infants and preparation to be a mother will be often challenging and will lead to unpleasant health outcomes [50]. In this regard, the need to screen younger women for mental health problems and endorsing screening tools starting from the prenatal period will be crucial.

The study also affirmed that the family monthly income of the respondents was one of the variables positively associated with PPD. Respondents who had an average monthly income ≤ 1000 ETB were 2.7 times more likely to report PPD than participants who had an average monthly income of >2000 ETB. This finding was supported by studies conducted in Kenya [34] and Cameron [35]. This might be due to women with low socioeconomic status may face difficulties to fulfill their needs and newborns during the postpartum period. Low socioeconomic status has been connected with a high rate of different mental health problems [51,52].

This study also revealed that women who had lower decision-making power were 2.04 times more likely to have had depression during the postpartum period compared with those women who had higher decision-making power. This result is consistent with studies done in Bahir Dar, Ethiopia [21], and China [36]. The possible reason for this could be those women who didn’t have power and control over resources, restriction to access maternal and reproductive health services, and unable to decide independently for their health could negatively affect their overall wellbeing. This could also be justifies as about 45% of the participants in this study were housewives, in which being unemployed has been associated with mental health problems so far [53]. This is because employed women are expected to have higher levels of household decision-making power as compared with their counterparts. Unemployed women are usually economically dependent on their husband/partner, particularly in developing countries and exclude women from different opportunities [54].

In this study, husband/partner involvement in MNCH service was significantly associated with PPD. Accordingly, women whose husbands/partners were not actively involved in MNCH care service were 2.34 times more likely to experience postpartum depression compared with those women whose husbands/partners were involved in MNCH care service. This could be explained by having husband/partner involvement in MNCH care services may build a higher sense of support for the women. The other possible justification could be that men are influential in health care decision-making, which leads to a woman’s experiencing mental health problems. Evidence support that husband/partner involvement in MNCH services is found to be crucial for the reduction of adverse health outcomes [55]. However, only 52.4% of husbands/partners have been involved in MNCH care service in the current study.

The current study revealed that the type of pregnancy has been strongly associated with PPD. Thus, the odds of experiencing PPD among respondents who had unplanned pregnancy was 3 times more compared with those women who had planned pregnancy. This result is supported by studies conducted in Ethiopia such as Bahir Dar [21], Nekemte town [22], Bench Maji zone, [23], and southwest Ethiopia [26], in Kenya [49], in Nepal [56], and in Pennsylvania [57]. This could be due to the fact that pregnancy itself needs physiological, psychological, and financial preparation. Empirical evidence showed that unplanned pregnancy is associated with PPD [47,48].

This study also declared that there was a significant association between IPV and PPD. Hence, the odds of having PPD among women who experienced IPV were 3 times higher compared with their counterparts. Similar findings were reported from previous studies done in Ethiopia [14,21,22], Nigeria [58], Bangladesh [8], and Canada [59]. The explanation for this might be IPV has a major effect on women’s physical and psychological health and this may lead to postpartum depression [9]. This indicates that screening for IPV in antenatal and postnatal care could help to identify and treat women at risk of depression.

We authors strongly believe that the present study is very important in providing evidences about the prevalence and its associated factors of PPD. Based on this evidence, policymakers should think about the burden of PPD, which is left undiagnosed and untreated due to the lack of an integrated depression screening tool with prenatal and postnatal care and low PNC service utilization. Lastly, the authors would like to acknowledge the limitation of this study. Due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, it couldn’t be possible to infer cause-effect between the outcome and explanatory variables. Our study did not assess the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and internal conflict-related issue. The use of interviewer-administer questions can lead to social desirability bias. This might cause to underestimate of the prevalence of PPD. Moreover, since we include women who gave birth in the last year recall bias might be expected.

Conclusion

In this study, PPD was comparable with previous studies. However, given the community health context, it is an important public health issue. Being younger, lack of husband involvement in MNCH care services, lack of decision-making power in the household, experiencing IPV, unplanned pregnancy, and lower household monthly income were increase the odds of experiencing PPD. It is important to integrate routine screening and management tools for PPD with prenatal and PNC service guidelines for screening, timely transfer, and early treatment of those women who are at risk of postpartum depression, so as to improve maternal and child wellbeing in general. Therefore, the government and non-governmental organizations should focus on this public health problem because PPD has a potential adverse effect on parenting practices and children’s physical and emotional development [34,60]. It is also crucial to advocate the need for the husband’s/partner involvement in MNCH services and ensure women’s decision-making power in the household. Moreover, community-based sexual and reproductive health education would be better to reduce risk factors for postpartum depression.

Healthcare providers who work directly with pregnant and postpartum women have a better opportunity to identify the risks, signs, and symptoms of PPD and refer patients for treatment. They also focus on preconception care for the prevention of unplanned pregnancy and provide psychotherapy for IPV victims for the prevention of PPD. The healthcare provider prefers to give counseling about the impact of husband’s/partner involvement in maternal and child health.

For future researchers, we recommend an advanced study design that would strongly infer the casual link between exposure to varying forms of independent factors and the development of PPD. In addition, we recommend a qualitative research to explore PPD in depth.

Supporting information

S1 File. English version of the questionnaire.

(DOCX)

S2 File. SPSS dataset.

(SAV)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Gondar for providing study ethical clearance to conduct this study. Our gratitude also goes to all data collectors and study participants. We are glad to Gondar city kebeles for writing permission letter.

Abbreviations

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

ANC

Antenatal Care

CI

Confidence Interval

COR

Crude Odds Ratio

IPV

Intimate Partner Violence

MNCH

Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Health

PNC

Postnatal Care

PPD

Postpartum Depression

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Science

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Parsons CE, Young KS, Rochat TJ, Kringelbach ML, Stein A. Postnatal depression and its effects on child development: a review of evidence from low-and middle-income countries. British medical bulletin. 2012;101(1):57–79. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Turkcapar AF, Kadıoğlu N, Aslan E, Tunc S, Zayıfoğlu M, Mollamahmutoğlu L. Sociodemographic and clinical features of postpartum depression among Turkish women: a prospective study. BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0532-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lund C, Town C. Maternal depression. Health And Education Advice & Resource Team. 2016:1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Guo N, Bindt C, Te Bonle M, Appiah-Poku J, Hinz R, Barthel D, et al. Association of antepartum and postpartum depression in Ghanaian and Ivorian women with febrile illness in their offspring: a prospective birth cohort study. American journal of epidemiology. 2013;178(9):1394–402. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowdhary N, Sikander S, Atif N, Singh N, Ahmad I, Fuhr DC, et al. The content and delivery of psychological interventions for perinatal depression by non-specialist health workers in low and middle income countries: a systematic review. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2014;28(1):113–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Connelly CD, Hazen AL, Baker-Ericzén MJ, Landsverk J, Horwitz SM. Is screening for depression in the perinatal period enough? The co-occurrence of depression, substance abuse, and intimate partner violence in culturally diverse pregnant women. Journal of Women’s Health. 2013;22(10):844–52. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.WHO. Understanding and addressing violence against women: 2012. [Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/77432/WHO_RHR_12.36_eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Azad R, Fahmi R, Shrestha S, Joshi H, Hasan M, Khan ANS, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum depression within one year after birth in urban slums of Dhaka, Bangladesh. PloS one. 2019;14(5):e0215735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ziaei S, Frith AL, Ekström E-C, Naved RT. Experiencing lifetime domestic violence: associations with mental health and stress among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh: the MINIMat Randomized Trial. PLoS one. 2016;11(12):e0168103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liyew AM, Alem AZ, Ayalew HG. Magnitude and factors associated with intimate partner violence against pregnant women in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. BMC public health. 2022;22(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dirirsa DE, Desta AA, Geleta TA, Gemmechu MM, Melese GT, Abebe ST. Intimate partner violence in the postpartum period and its associated factors among women attending a postnatal clinic in Central Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine. 2022;10:20503121221100136. doi: 10.1177/20503121221100136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Azale T, Fekadu A, Hanlon C. Treatment gap and help-seeking for postpartum depression in a rural African setting. BMC psychiatry. 2016;16(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Woldeyohannes D, Tekalegn Y, Sahiledengle B, Ermias D, Ejajo T, Mwanri L. Effect of postpartum depression on exclusive breast-feeding practices in sub-Saharan Africa countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Desta M, Memiah P, Kassie B, Ketema DB, Amha H, Getaneh T, et al. Postpartum depression and its association with intimate partner violence and inadequate social support in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of affective disorders. 2021;279:737–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Eastwood J, Ogbo FA, Hendry A, Noble J, Page A, Group EYR. The impact of antenatal depression on perinatal outcomes in Australian women. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169907 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Desmarais SL, Pritchard A, Lowder EM, Janssen PA. Intimate partner abuse before and during pregnancy as risk factors for postpartum mental health problems. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2014;14(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Perfetti J, Clark R, Fillmore C-M. Postpartum depression: identification, screening, and treatment. WMJ-MADISON-. 2004;103:56–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Knight M, Kenyon S, Brocklehurst P, Neilson J, Shakespeare J, Kurinczuk JJ. Saving lives, improving mothers’ care-lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into maternal deaths and morbidity 2009–2012: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Warren CE, Abuya T, Kanya L, Obare F, Njuki R, Temmerman M, et al. A cross sectional comparison of postnatal care quality in facilities participating in a maternal health voucher program versus non-voucher facilities in Kenya. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2015;15(1):1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Biratu A, Haile D. Prevalence of antenatal depression and associated factors among pregnant women in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Reproductive health. 2015;12(1):1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Abebe A, Tesfaw G, Mulat H, Hibdye G. Postpartum depression and associated factors among mothers in Bahir Dar Town, Northwest Ethiopia. Annals of general psychiatry. 2019;18(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12991-019-0244-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Abadiga M Magnitude and associated factors of postpartum depression among women in Nekemte town, East Wollega zone, west Ethiopia, 2019: A community-based study. PloS one. 2019;14(11):e0224792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Toru T, Chemir F, Anand S. Magnitude of postpartum depression and associated factors among women in Mizan Aman town, Bench Maji zone, Southwest Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Davis J, Luchters S, Holmes W. Men and maternal and newborn health: benefits, harms, challenges and potential strategies for engaging men. Melbourne, Australia: Compass: Women’s and Children’s Health Knowledge Hub. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yargawa J, Leonardi-Bee J. Male involvement and maternal health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(6):604–12. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kerie S, Menberu M, Niguse W. Prevalence and associated factors of postpartum depression in Southwest, Ethiopia, 2017: a cross-sectional study. BMC research notes. 2018;11(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gelaye B, Williams MA, Lemma S, Deyessa N, Bahretibeb Y, Shibre T, et al. Validity of the patient health questionnaire-9 for depression screening and diagnosis in East Africa. Psychiatry research. 2013;210(2):653–61. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.07.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abiola T, Udofia O, Zakari M. Psychometric properties of the 3-item oslo social support scale among clinical students of Bayero University Kano, Nigeria. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013;22(2):32–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kebede AA, Cherkos EA, Taye EB, Eriku GA, Taye BT, Chanie WF. Married women’s decision-making autonomy in the household and maternal and neonatal healthcare utilization and associated factors in Debretabor, northwest Ethiopia. PloS one. 2021;16(9):e0255021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Stöckl H, March L, Pallitto C, Garcia-Moreno C. Intimate partner violence among adolescents and young women: prevalence and associated factors in nine countries: a cross-sectional study. BMC public health. 2014;14(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bante A, Mersha A, Zerdo Z, Wassihun B, Yeheyis T. Comorbid anxiety and depression: Prevalence and associated factors among pregnant women in Arba Minch zuria district, Gamo zone, southern Ethiopia. PloS one. 2021;16(3):e0248331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248331 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petrosyan D, Armenian HK, Arzoumanian K. Interaction of maternal age and mode of delivery in the development of postpartum depression in Yerevan, Armenia. Journal of affective disorders. 2011;135(1–3):77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Khalifa DS, Glavin K, Bjertness E, Lien L. Determinants of postnatal depression in Sudanese women at 3 months postpartum: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2016;6(3):e009443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009443 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Madeghe BA, Kimani VN, Vander Stoep A, Nicodimos S, Kumar M. Postpartum depression and infant feeding practices in a low income urban settlement in Nairobi-Kenya. BMC research notes. 2016;9(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Adama ND, Foumane P, Olen JPK, Dohbit JS, Meka ENU, Mboudou E. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum depression in Yaounde, Cameroon. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2015;5(11):608. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chien L-Y, Tai C-J, Yeh M-C. Domestic decision-making power, social support, and postpartum depression symptoms among immigrant and native women in Taiwan. Nursing research. 2012;61(2):103–10. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31824482b6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wubetu AD, Engidaw NA, Gizachew KD. Prevalence of postpartum depression and associated factors among postnatal care attendees in Debre Berhan, Ethiopia, 2018. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02873-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ashenafi W, Mengistie B, Egata G, Berhane Y. The role of intimate partner violence victimization during pregnancy on maternal postpartum depression in Eastern Ethiopia. SAGE open medicine. 2021;9:2050312121989493. doi: 10.1177/2050312121989493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shewangzawa A, Tadesse B, Ashani T, Misgana T, Shewasinad S. Prevalence of postpartum depression and associated factors among postnatal women attending at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital. Harar, East Ethiopia. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gebregziabher NK, Netsereab TB, Fessaha YG, Alaza FA, Ghebrehiwet NK, Sium AH. Prevalence and associated factors of postpartum depression among postpartum mothers in central region, Eritrea: a health facility based survey. BMC public health. 2020;20(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Govender D, Naidoo S, Taylor M. Antenatal and postpartum depression: prevalence and associated risk factors among adolescents’ in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Depression research and treatment. 2020;2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/5364521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nur N. The effect of intimate partner violence on mental health status among women of reproductive ages: A population-based study in a middle Anatolian city. Journal of interpersonal violence. 2012;27(16):3236–51. doi: 10.1177/0886260512441255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bo H-X, Yang Y, Chen J, Zhang M, Li Y, Zhang D-Y, et al. Prevalence of depressive symptoms among pregnant and postpartum women in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2021;83(4):345–50. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000904 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Asaye MM, Muche HA, Zelalem ED. Prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression: Northwest Ethiopia. Psychiatry Journal. 2020;2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Shitu S, Geda B, Dheresa M. Postpartum depression and associated factors among mothers who gave birth in the last twelve months in Ankesha district, Awi zone, North West Ethiopia. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu S, Yan Y, Gao X, Xiang S, Sha T, Zeng G, et al. Risk factors for postpartum depression among Chinese women: path model analysis. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Salsabilla DA, Prasetya H, Murti B. The Effect of Unplanned Pregnancy on Postpartum Depression: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Maternal and Child Health. 2020;5(5):500–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Barton K, Redshaw M, Quigley MA, Carson C. Unplanned pregnancy and subsequent psychological distress in partnered women: a cross-sectional study of the role of relationship quality and wider social support. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2017;17(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kariuki EW, Kuria MW, Were FN, Ndetei DM. Predictors of postnatal depression in the slums Nairobi, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2022;22(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Prevalence of self-reported postpartum depressive symptoms—17 states, 2004–2005. MMWR Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2008;57(14):361–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mahfouz E, Mohammed E, Alkilany S, Rahman TA. Impact of household food insecurity on maternal mental health in Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2021;27(4). doi: 10.26719/2021.27.4.344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Abimana MC, Karangwa E, Hakizimana I, Kirk CM, Beck K, Miller AC, et al. Assessing factors associated with poor maternal mental health among mothers of children born small and sick at 24–47 months in rural Rwanda. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03301-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Osamor PE, Grady C. Women’s autonomy in health care decision-making in developing countries: a synthesis of the literature. International journal of women’s health. 2016;8:191. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S105483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Balabanova ES. Women’s economic dependency: Nature, causes, and consequences. Sociological research. 2007;46(2):5–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ampim GA. Men’s Involvement in Maternal Healthcare in Accra, Ghana. From Household to Delivery Room: The University of Bergen; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Chalise A, Bhandari TR. Postpartum depression and its associated factors: a community-based study in Nepal. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council. 2019;17(2):200–5. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v0i0.1635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abbasi S, Chuang CH, Dagher R, Zhu J, Kjerulff K. Unintended pregnancy and postpartum depression among first-time mothers. Journal of women’s health. 2013;22(5):412–6. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Adeyemo EO, Oluwole EO, Kanma-Okafor OJ, Izuka OM, Odeyemi KA. Prevalence and predictors of postpartum depression among postnatal women in Lagos, Nigeria. African health sciences. 2020;20(4):1943–54. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i4.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Beydoun HA, Al-Sahab B, Beydoun MA, Tamim H. Intimate partner violence as a risk factor for postpartum depression among Canadian women in the Maternity Experience Survey. Annals of epidemiology. 2010;20(8):575–83. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Grace SL, Evindar A, Stewart DE. The effect of postpartum depression on child cognitive development and behavior: a review and critical analysis of the literature. Archives of women’s mental health. 2003;6(4):263–74. doi: 10.1007/s00737-003-0024-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally

21 Apr 2022

PONE-D-21-35177

Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: a community-based study

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tsega,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD)

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please note that your manuscript was reviewed by 2 experts in the field. There is consensus agreement that the idea of the article is interesting. Meanwhile, some of the reviewers identified important problems in your submission and provided copious comments. Please consider responding to the reviewers’ remarks. The manuscript could be greatly strengthened by considering editing according to the specific mentioned comments.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: There are a number of terms that need additional explanation or definitions throughout the text. There are statements that require more clarity. The discussion section doesn't really tell us anything. Such a huge part of it is spent discussing the differences in PPD prevalence between your study and other studies, which isn't really telling the reader anything helpful. Very little time is spent talking about what you learned from the study that is new information. There is no discussion of future research that is needed. There are no specific recommendations about what to do to address the issues addressed in your paper. I am left think so what when I read the paper. Yes we now know this about PPD in Gondor, but what should be done to address that issue? What else should be considered when looking more into this topic in that setting or in other parts of Ethiopia? The discussion and conclusion sections need to be reworked so they are actually telling us something useful.

Reviewer #2: Overall, the manuscript is good and has been organized well. I have a few comments to improve the manuscript as follows:

1. Abstract: the abstract is good and concise. However, I noticed you didn’t write anything about the discussion that you mentioned in the manuscript.

-in the result of the abstract section, you mentioned MNCH and in the conclusion, you have written, ‘maternal and child health’. Two are the same things. please keep consistency.

2. Introduction: You could add some references on IPV in the national and local context that could strengthen your argument in the paper.

- you mentioned you did not compare the PPD screening tool with the national guideline? Why? What was the gap in the national guideline? Did you explore or analyze it?

3. Method: In the method section, you said that you choose samples from mothers who were first- time mothers and who had experienced multiple pregnancies. Can you mention how many Primi mothers you have interviewed who were suffering from depression?

-can you explain clearly the lottery method or any reference?

-Two data collectors completed 757 interviews while nonresponse rate was 10%. They collected data within a single month. How many interviews did they conduct per day? How the data quality was checked? Can you explain it a bit more?

4. Result:

You have mentioned women’s socio-cultural aspects were linked to postpartum depression. How is religious background linked to depression? Would you please explain?

- 92.8% of pregnancy was planned and had family support during pregnancy that you mentioned. If so how this variable was selected as the cause of postpartum depression?

- Family income is another factor you mentioned. I am saying, poverty is a common reason for mental stress in any situation. Why did you particularly mention it as a cause of postpartum depression? Please explain.

- You have focused on IPV more than any other variables you mentioned in the manuscript. But IPV itself is a big area that leads to worse mental health situations. I think you did not mention all the component of IPV that leads to postpartum depression. I encourage you to recheck your data and dig down the path.

5. Discussion: you have written well, but it would be stronger if you could add more references on these issues you have explored in your research.

-What about the national data about postpartum depression. Does it support your data? Did you check other studies in Ethiopia’s other regions that support your data?

-What about the policy implication? How did your data recommend to improve the mental health situation of the women in the country? Please explain

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-35177_Reviewed.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-35177.docx

Decision Letter 1

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally

19 Jul 2022

PONE-D-21-35177R1Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: a community-based studyPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tsega,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 02 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD)

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Great effort was made by the authors to utilize the feedback that was provided for them to correct their manuscript. I find it interesting and improved with respect to the original submission. Please consider responding to the reviewers’ remarks. The manuscript could be greatly strengthened by considering editing according to the specific mentioned comments.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Because of the timing of this study, it is important to acknowledge the potential impacts of the COVID 19 pandemic and the conflict in Tigray, as it isn’t too far from Gondor City, on the mental health of the women included in the study.

Evidence collected around the world has shown an increase in IPV during the pandemic, and this would likely have an impact on PPD. Also the pandemic itself has had a massive effect on mental health directly. There is also evidence that living in or near a conflict zone has dramatic impacts on mental health, further exacerbating the chances of PPD. Your study didn’t collect data related to this, but at least acknowledging the potential impacts and that you are comparing your findings to studies pre-COVID could skew the data.

You don’t really “have” IPV, it isn’t a disease, it is something that you experience or is done to you. The language around this topic should be adjusted.

There still needs to be more information in the conclusion/discussion about what the outcomes from this study should be. You talk about policymakers and researchers a little but, but what about practitioners who will be working directly with these patients? What do you recommend as to screening? I'm still not clear on what your recommendations are regarding regular screening for PPD.

Reviewer #2: Review report of D-21-35177:

I would like to thank to the authors who addressed majority of the comments on the issues I raised during my first review. This is an important manuscript having data with mental health issues.

However, still I didn’t understand the lottery method theoretically. If possible, explain it or provide a reference which will help readers to understand.

Wish you good luck!

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Review report_D-21-35177_R1.docx

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0276809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276809.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


1 Sep 2022

Date: August 31/ 2022

Point by point response to reviewers comment

Manuscript title: Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: a community-based study.

Manuscript Ref: Submission ID PONE-D-21-35177R1

We are very grateful to both the editor and reviewers for your comments and concerns for the betterment of our manuscript. Appreciating your effort and valuable comments, we have provided possible reflections on the raised concerns and questions. Kindly find our responses here. In addition, we incorporated your comments and suggestions in the revised manuscript.

Response to reviewer’s comments

Reviewer Comments:

#Reviewer 1

1. Because of the timing of this study, it is important to acknowledge the potential impacts of the COVID 19 pandemic and the conflict in Tigray, as it isn’t too far from Gondar City, on the mental health of the women included in the study. Evidence collected around the world has shown an increase in IPV during the pandemic, and this would likely have an impact on PPD. Also the pandemic itself has had a massive effect on mental health directly. There is also evidence that living in or near a conflict zone has dramatic impacts on mental health, further exacerbating the chances of PPD. Your study didn’t collect data related to this, but at least acknowledging the potential impacts and that you are comparing your findings to studies pre-COVID could skew the data.

Author’s response: Thank you dear reviewer for your insightful comment. It has been considered in the revised manuscript.

2. You don’t really “have” IPV, it isn’t a disease, and it is something that you experience or is done to you. The language around this topic should be adjusted.

Author’s response: Dear reviewer, thank you for your important comment. It has been corrected in the revised manuscript. Please look at the revised manuscript.

3. There still needs to be more information in the conclusion/discussion about what the outcomes from this study should be. You talk about policymakers and researchers a little, but what about practitioners who will be working directly with these patients? What do you recommend as to screening? I'm still not clear on what your recommendations are regarding regular screening for PPD.

Author’s response: Thank you dear reviewer for your important comment. We have tried to add further recommendations. Please look at the revised manuscript.

#Reviewer 2

1. I would like to thank to the authors who addressed majority of the comments on the issues I raised during my first review. This is an important manuscript having data with mental health issues. However, still I didn’t understand the lottery method theoretically. If possible, explain it or provide a reference which will help readers to understand.

Author’s response: Dear reviewer, thank you for your invaluable contribution to the improvement of our manuscript. We simply meant that simple random sampling method. The lottery method is one type of simple random sampling technique, and we used it by assigning a number to each kebele (the smallest administrative unit), after which numbers are selected at random.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Authors response.docx

Decision Letter 2

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally

14 Oct 2022

Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: a community-based study

PONE-D-21-35177R2

Dear Dr. Tsega,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally, Ph.D (MD)

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: I Don't Know

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: This manuscript have met its full criteria. I think this will contribute a lot to public health researcher for future research.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Attachment

Submitted filename: Reviewer comments_PONE-D-21-35177_R2.docx

Acceptance letter

Ammal Mokhtar Metwally

17 Oct 2022

PONE-D-21-35177R2

Low husband involvement in maternal and child health services and intimate partner violence increases the odds of postpartum depression in northwest Ethiopia: a community-based study

Dear Dr. Tsega:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Ammal Mokhtar Metwally

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. English version of the questionnaire.

    (DOCX)

    S2 File. SPSS dataset.

    (SAV)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-35177_Reviewed.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-35177.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Authors response to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Review report_D-21-35177_R1.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Authors response.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Reviewer comments_PONE-D-21-35177_R2.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES