Abstract
Knowledge about the diversity microglia (MG) type and function in the rodent and human brain has advanced significantly in the last few years. Nevertheless, we have known for 40 years that MG, monocytes, and macrophages in the brain play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of the HIV‐1 in all tissues. HIV enters and spreads in the brain early, long before the initiation of antiviral therapy. As a result, many people with HIV continue to experience neurologic and neuropsychiatric comorbid conditions collectively known as HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). HIV pathogenic sequelae in the CNS pose a challenge for cure strategies. Detailed understanding at a mechanistic level of how low‐level and latent HIV‐1 infection in MG negatively impacts neuroglial function has remained somewhat elusive. Direct rigorous in vivo experimental validation that the virus can integrate into MG and assume a latent but reactivatable state has remained constrained. However, there is much excitement that human in vitro models for MG can now help close the gap. This review will provide a brief background to place the role of MG in the ongoing neurologic complications of HIV infection of the CNS, then focus on the use and refinement of human postmitotic monocyte‐derived MG‐like cells and how they are being applied to advance research on HIV persistence and proinflammatory signaling in the CNS. Critically, an understanding of myeloid plasticity and heterogeneity and rigorous attention to all aspects of cell handling is essential for reproducibility.
Summary Sentence: This review focuses on human postmitotic monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells as tools to advance research on HIV persistence and neuroinflammatory signaling.
Keywords: monocytes, innate immunity, inflammation, central nervous system, bone marrow progenitors, myeloid, phagocytosis
Graphical Abstract
Review focuses on human post‐mitotic monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells as tools to advance research on HIV persistence and neuroinflammatory signaling.

KEY CONCEPTS
Myeloid plasticity: The phenotype and function of myeloid cells (monocytes, macrophages, and microglia) are shaped and regulated by intercellular signals. These include cytokines, chemokines, and other cues from neighboring cells in the tissue microenvironment. In addition, paracrine and autocrine signals under the homeostatic state are altered with injury, stress, infection, or chronic disease conditions. In responding to these cues, myeloid cells undergo some or all of the following: morphologic changes, altered metabolism, variation of components released into the extracellular matrix, increased migration, cytokine/chemokine production, and phagocytosis.
Human monocyte‐derived microglia (hMMGS): Purified subpopulations of bone marrow‐derived monocytes incubated in highly defined in vitro culture conditions that support the development of microglia‐like cells. Their phenotype closely resembles primary cells (e.g., TMEM119, CXC3R1, P2YR12, PU.1, IRF8), and functionally, hMMGs are phagocytic and possess synaptic pruning and calcium signaling activity.
Abbreviations
- BBBblood–brain barrier
blood–brain barrier
- CSF
cerebrospinal fluid
- hMMGs
human monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells
- HSC
hematopoietic stem cell
- iPSCs
induced pluripotent stem cells
- MG
microglia
- NOG
NOD.Cg‐Prkdcscidil2gtmlSug/Jic mouse strain
- TIC
TGF‐beta, IL‐34, cholesterol in DMEM/F12 base tissue culture media
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Human microglia as reservoirs for HIV in the CNS
Forty years ago, an aggressive dementia‐like syndrome accompanied by movement disorders and a general failure to thrive or wasting was the first defining differential diagnosis for AIDS. 1 These clinical findings pointed to the brain, spinal cord, and immune system as targets for the retrovirus that would become known as the HIV‐1. Examination of human postmortem brain tissue showed a regional congregation of microglia (MG) forming walled‐off barriers around a central core (named microglial nodules), the massive proliferation of astrocytes (called astrocytosis), and multinucleated giant cells, the products of macrophage‐to‐macrophage cell fusion. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 These neuropathologic hallmarks provided the most substantial evidence at the time that HIV‐1 enters and replicates in brain macrophages and MG. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 With techniques like laser capture microdissection, HIV‐1 proviral DNA was detected in human brain astrocytes. 6 HIV‐1 infects astrocytes via CD4‐independent alternative entry pathways resulting in limited viral replication. 7 , 8 , 9 However, under conditions of inflammation or drugs of abuse that are known to potentiate HIV replication, infected astrocytes could be a significant source of early gene viral proteins. 10 , 11 Using sensitive sandwich ELISA detection methods, the HIV transcriptional activator protein Tat can be readily found in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). 12 A recent study found a positive correlation between levels of Tat and soluble insulin receptor in the CSF of cognitively impaired persons with HIV infection. 13 HIV Tat alters cellular pathways controlling calcium regulation that causes neurons to die by apoptosis. 14 , 15 , 16
Binding of the HIV envelope (env) protein with chemokine receptors such as CCR5 and CXCR4 on cultured neurons induces death signals. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 Indeed, the first rodent models for HAND were generated by constitutive or regulated expression of HIV env driven by the astrocyte‐specific promoter for glial acidic fibrillary protein. 22 In the absence of anti‐HIV therapy, the action of cytokines, chemokines, and metabolic pathways, which under normal conditions serve to protect and maintain neural function, instead become chronically active and pathologic. The clinical syndrome described earlier, known as HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND), though significantly decreased in severity with current antiretroviral therapy, remains a debilitating comorbidity for many people with HIV. 23 , 24
Today, HIV replication and person‐to‐person transmission are effectively controlled by strict adherence to an antiretroviral drug regimen that targets 2‐to‐3 different phases of the viral life cycle. Unfortunately, by ultrasensitive assays, we know that long‐term treatment does not effectively increase the clearance of infected T‐cells, macrophages, and MG in tissues nor completely block early viral gene transcription. 25 Another early gene, the harmful effector protein, Nef, interferes with immune recognition mechanisms that help target infected cells for elimination. 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 Additionally, these viral proteins, perhaps carried in extracellular vesicles 13 , 30 , 31 , 32 and low‐level virus replication in tissues, stimulate immune activation and inflammatory signaling in a chronic fashion. The comorbid conditions, including cardiovascular disease, metabolic disorders, and neurologic and neuropsychiatric complications that affect many aging with HIV, are exacerbated in a proinflammatory milieu. 33 , 34 , 35 In the brain, while MG are the primary resident immune cells, they also collaborate with astrocytes and neurons in regulating homeostasis in the CNS.
To fully realize a cure for HIV, we need to understand whether the molecular mechanisms of the viral life cycle and potential for latent infection in macrophages and MG are similar or not to those in T‐cells. Given their central roles in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, researchers working in these fields, and more broadly in neurovirology, have renewed interest in reproducible, physiologically relevant, in vitro postmitotic human MGl culture systems for mechanistic studies. Several recent excellent reviews on induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived (iPSC) MG have been published. 36 , 37 , 38 A comprehensive comparison between in vitro models to study HIV‐microglial biology using cultured primary human MG, microglial cell lines, human postmitotic monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells (hMMGs), iPSC‐MG, and 3D organoids was published most recently. 39 Each model has advantages and limitations in that they recapitulate aspects of primary brain MG morphology, gene expression, function, and capacity to support HIV replication. 39 Importantly, all agree that these model systems provide a starting point from which continuous cycles of assessment and refinement are expected. This review will focus on hMMG models, recent experimental findings using this technology, and how these cells will be employed in humanized mouse models for HIV neuropathogenesis to gain translational insights.
1.2. Early postmitotic microglial culture models and microglial cell lines
The precursor to modern‐day human brain organoids was dissociated fetal or adult brain cell cultures plated on plastic surfaces in which MG were established as the targets of infection by HIV. 3 , 40 These cultures had a mixture of astrocytes (70–90%), neurons (10–30%), and MG (1–5%) in similar proportions to the 3D brain. 40 Long‐term productive infection of brain human fetal MG cultured with GM‐CSF alone or with LPS was used to bring more reproducibility to these model systems. 41 Out of these landmark studies, CD4 and the chemokine receptors CXCR4, CCR3, and CCR5 were confirmed as the molecules allowing HIV entry and replication in human MG. 40 Electron microscopy visualized the accumulation of immature viral particles in fetal MG. 42 Analyses of HIV replication kinetics in MG showed that the virus grew at lower titers than monocyte‐derived macrophages but could form syncytia formation. 42 Cultures maintained for 3–4 weeks showed low‐level viral gene expression in long‐term surviving MG 70 days after infection. 3 , 41
The availability of cell lines that faithfully recapitulate aspects of biology/physiology remains a vital research tool with an understanding of the need to validate research results in primary cells and in vivo. As highlighted in a recent review by Timmerman et al., 43 2 cell lines derived from the adult human brain telencephalon or cortex were immortalized with SV40 T antigen and the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (Huμglia) or with the v‐myc oncogene (HMO6). 44 , 45 Clonal Huμglia lines containing integrated single‐round‐fluorescently tagged reporters were developed to study the mechanism of latency. 46 Prototypical proinflammatory molecules reactivated HIV gene expression of Huμglia clone HC69.5 to different extents, with TNF‐a being the most effective at stimulating 94% of cells, IL‐1b, 78%, and LPS, 67%. 44 The Huμglia displayed a wide range of cytokine/chemokine secretion activity upon stimulation, had a gene expression profile similar to primary human MG, could clear dead neurons in culture through phagocytosis, and also exhibited a gene expression profile migratory ability demonstrating these expected MG functions are intact. 44 While there is some variability in the expression of CD4 and HIV coreceptors CCR5 and CXCR4 with time in culture, infection with replication‐competent HIV is possible. DNA mimics activating TLR 3 signaling released the MG clones from a latent state via a mechanism dependent on IRF3. 46 For TLRs 1, 2, 4, and 6, reactivation from latency was driven via NFκ‐b activation. 46 The HC69 Huμglia clone demonstrated its utility for identifying the possible role (s) of cortical and dopaminergic neurons in mechanisms of HIV entry and exit from latency, 46 testing the ability of novel eradication strategies to cross in vitro blood–brain barriers (BBBs) to disrupt the formation and maintenance of latent HIV infection in MG 47 , 48 and repopulation of the brain in humanized mice. 49
1.3. Postmitotic monocyte‐derived microglial culture models
The myeloid field is currently in the midst of an exciting inflection phase. The fuller realization of myeloid tissue cells' functional and phenotypic heterogeneity and their critical roles in health and disease is rapidly emerging. We thought that all tissue myeloid cells originated from progenitor cells residing in the bone marrow until 11 years ago. With a better understanding of the critical transcription factors and promoters that drive lineage‐specific differentiation, landmark studies using genetically tagged mice convincingly demonstrated that during development, MG arise in the mesodermal layer from erythro‐myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac. Under homeostatic conditions, bone marrow‐derived stem cells do not contribute significantly to this pool. 50 , 51 , 52 Single‐cell RNA (sc‐RNA) sequencing studies of mouse brain MG isolated across several time points in embryogenesis to the postnatal stage demonstrate the vast heterogeneity of MG phenotypes in health and neurodegenerative disease. 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 In the mouse brain, canonical MG subpopulations segregate with Tmem119, Fcrls, P2yr12, Cx3cr1, Trem2, and Clqa. 53 , 58 , 59 , 60 In mouse models of multiple sclerosis, 4 significant MG subpopulations were found. All expressed low levels of Tmem119, P2yr12, and either Apoe, Cxcl10, and Tnfa, or Ccl5 as unique genes in their respective signatures. 60 Four MG populations were found in the adult human brain without disease Like mice, the human canonical MG MG1, MG2, and MG3 expressed TMEM119, P2YR12, and CX3CR1, while the. 61 Instead, the human MG4 population was defined by the expression of CCL2, CCL4, EGR2, and EGR3. 61 Like in the diseased mouse brain, the canonical markers TMEM119, P2YR12, and CX3CR1 decrease in multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease. 59 There is an understanding that these new insights are viewed in the context of the current knowledge that the phenotypic and functional plasticity of myeloid cells is profoundly shaped and influenced by cytokine/chemokine signals from neighboring support cells and between other myeloid‐to‐cell specific interactions particular to each tissue microenvironment. 62 , 63 , 64 Regarding the brain, these cells include astrocytes, neuronal subtypes, endothelial/epithelial cells of the BBB and blood–CSF barrier, the lymphatics, meninges, blood vessels, and other discrete anatomical structures that interface with immune cells in the peripheral circulation. Knowledge of myeloid plasticity and their tissue heterogeneity can be harnessed to fill the gaps in understanding MG–pathogen molecular mechanisms.
For example, inhibition of M‐CSF receptor signaling with pharmacologic agents induces the rapid death and depletion of brain MG 65 demonstrating the critical role that the ligands M‐CSF and IL‐34 plays in the trophic support for these cells. 66 , 67 These studies revealed that newly divided MG arise in 2 weeks from a brain progenitor population. Under conditions of stress or injury to the brain, local proliferation and HSC progenitors infiltrating the brain from the periphery contribute to repopulation. 65 , 68 , 69 , 70 Although the bone marrow‐derived MG were less dense processes than their yolk‐sac counterparts, 71 these studies demonstrate decisively the potential for blood myeloid postmitotic progenitors to cross blood–brain barriers, enter the brain parenchyma and differentiate into MG. Many researchers have investigated the possibility of human postmitotic monocytes developing into MG. One of the first was Leone et al., who used elutriated monocytes incubated on plastic flasks in DMEM with 10% heat‐inactivated fetal calf serum, M‐CSF, and GM‐CSF (see Table 1). However, there have been significant recent advances in culturing physiologic human MG. A recent study by Rai et al., comparing MG cell lines (C20, HMC3), iPSC‐derived MG, and hMMG found ∼78% conservation among 780 MG‐enriched genes. 72 After 14 days of HIVBal infection, the iPSC‐MG, in contrast to hMMG, showed significantly increased apoptotic death. 72 Overall, they found that the hMMGs and iPSC‐derived MG were more similar to human primary MG than the C20 and HMC3 cell lines examined. 72 We have been able to successfully adapt a protocol by Bohlen et al., 73 to reproducibly, and efficiently induce human postmitotic monocytes into MG‐like cells that express TMEM119, 71 , 74 P2YR12, and CX3CR1, markers of resting MG 75 (Figure 1). A cautionary tale and comprehensive investigation of the historic development and subsequent usage of the HMC3 microglial cell line (known by different names) in laboratories worldwide that the ATCC recently validated were recently published. 76 We direct interested readers to another recent review of culture methods for human embryonic or PSCs‐derived MG, which require 30–180 days to develop. 43 , 77 , 78 Several groups are beginning to successfully apply these culture systems to ask key mechanistic questions about microglial function. 79 , 80 Their findings show that hMMGs provide a pathway to gaining molecular insights into HIV‐MG pathogenesis. A key advantage of hMMGs is that they can be readily derived from adult human donor blood monocytes providing an opportunity to understand the contribution of biologic sex and somatic gene expression on phenotype and function.
TABLE 1.
Comparison of culture methods for postmitotic monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells
| Reference (differentiation time) | Isolation method | Base medium | Serum | M‐CSF (ng/ml) | GM‐CSF (ng/ml) | Human embryonic astrocyte conditioned medium | IL‐34 (ng/ml) | CCL2 (ng/ml) | NGF (ng/ml) | TGF‐β (ng/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leone et al., 2006 (10 days) | Elutriation | DMEM, Pen (100 U/ml)/Strep (100 μg/ml) | 10% FCS | 10 | 1 | 25% (with the indicated cytokines for 8 days) | None | None | None | None |
| Bertin et al., 2012 (14 days) | Period of adherence | RPMI‐1640 | 10% FCS | 10 | 1 | 25–35% | None | None | None | None |
| Ohgidani et al., 2014 (14 days) | Overnight adherence | RPMI1640 GlutaMAX™ | 10% FCS | 10 | 10 | None | 100 | None | None | None |
| Ohgidani et al., 2014 (14 days) | Overnight adherence | RPMI1640 GlutaMAX™ | 10% FCS | None | 10 | None | None | None | None | None |
| Lannes et al., 2017 (7–10 days) | PBMC, 2 h adherence | RPMI1640 GlutaMAX™ | None | 10 ng/ml | 10 ng/ml | None | None | 50 | 10 | None |
| Bohlen et al., 2018 | Immunopanning (rodent microglia) |
DMEM/F12 1 μg/ml oleic acid, 0.001 μg/ml gondoic acid, 5 μg/ml N‐acetyl cysteine, 5 μg/ml insulin, 100 μg/ml Apo‐transferrin, 0.1 μg/ml sodium selenite, 2 ng/ml hTGF‐ß2,100 ng/ml hIL‐34, and 1.5 μg/ml cholesterol |
None | None | None | None | 100 | None | None | 2 |
All humidified atmosphere, 5% CO2, 37°C; Pen, penicillin; Strep, streptomycin.
FIGURE 1.

Human monocyte‐derived microglia‐like cells 28 days after differentiation. Negatively selected pan‐monocyte bead‐purified human monocytes incubated in serum‐free DMEM/F12 base medium with 2 ng/ml TGF‐β and 100 ng/ml IL‐34 (method of Bohlen et al. 73 ) at 28 days after plating. Cells assume different intricate morphologies with extensive processes (green arrowheads), spine‐like structures (burgundy arrows), and intracellular vesicles (yellow arrows)
1.4. Future translational potential
Novel approaches using humanized mice have allowed researchers to take more rigorous experimental methods to demonstrate that myeloid cells can serve as sources of HIV replication under antiviral therapy. 81 , 82 , 83 Most recently, Mathews et al. 84 showed that NOG‐mice brains expressing human IL‐34 could be engrafted with fetal cord blood stem cells that mature into hMG. The hMG showed dense complex processes, expressed microglial signature genes, and was susceptible to HIV infection. 84 In ongoing studies, we plan to use NOG‐IL‐34 mice to determine whether hMMGs delivered to the neonatal brain differentiate into mature MG‐like cells and support HIV replication. If successful, this approach could help ease the challenges and expense of procuring cord blood needed to generate humanized mice. iPSCs often retain a gene expression pattern that is embryonic.
In contrast, with hMMGs originating from postmitotic cells, the gene expression signatures are expected to represent more differentiated adult cells. Furthermore, while a blood draw is required, this is a safe, relatively quick procedure conducted by an expert in an outpatient setting. Therefore, the hMMG approach could expand experimental findings’ translational potential and relevance. The feasibility of this approach is also encouraged based on recent successful studies using human iPSC‐derived MG implanted in mouse brains. 85 , 86 , 87
2. CONCLUDING REMARKS
As artfully illustrated by Ohgidani et al. and others, with continued refinement and attention to the rigor of the postmitotic hMMG approach combined with advances in the range of technologies, 3D in vitro brain models and humanized mice to safely translate the findings to better the lives of those suffering from HAND and other neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders will be possible in the long term (Figure 2). 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 Moreover, these investigations will continue to advance our understanding of novel regulatory mechanisms at the juxtaposition of the brain and peripheral immune systems.
FIGURE 2.

Use of postmitotic adult human monocytes to generate microglia‐like cells (hMMGs) and future basic and clinical translational potential. Monocytes purified from leukopaks obtained from healthy blood donors were, after gradient centrifugation, negatively selected with magnetic beads and plated in a serum‐free medium containing cholesterol, IL‐34 and TGF‐β2 (TIC media) described by Bohlen et al. 73 for primary mouse microglia. Within 4−7 days, the differentiated cells assumed a microglia‐like phenotype with numerous branched projections. Immunochemistry and flow cytometric analyses are used to confirm the expression of microglia defining surface proteins, TMEM119, P2YR12, CX3CR1, CD11b, CD45 as well as CD4 and the coreceptors, CCR5 and CXCR4 used by HIV‐1. The functional competence of hMMGs is demonstrated by productive infection with HIV and phagocytosis of toxic amyloid beta1–42 peptide. With the ability to rapidly produce functional human microglia‐like cells having an adult phenotype in vitro, such cells are now in use in 2D‐, 3D‐, and in vivo rodent models of increasing complexity. The end goals are to develop more relevant screening assays that better reflect the genetic architecture and physiology of adult microglia. Illustration created by Lydia Gregg and Jeff Day © 2020 Johns Hopkins University
AUTHORSHIP
T. B. and A. M. B. developed and refined methods for hMMG culturing; S. L. conducted studies with hMMGs; A. M. B. wrote and edited the manuscript; T. B. and S. L. reviewed the manuscript.
DISCLOSURE
The authors declare that they have no financial relationship with the funding agency that sponsored the research or any other conflict of interest to declare.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Mental Health, R21MH128152, and Neurological Disorders and Stroke, R01NS102006 to AMB.
Boucher T, Liang S, Brown AM. Advancing basic and translational research to deepen understanding of the molecular immune‐mediated mechanisms regulating long‐term persistence of HIV‐1 in microglia in the adult human brain. J Leukoc Biol. 2022;112:1223–1231. 10.1002/JLB.1MR0422-620R
REFERENCES
- 1. Navia BA, Jordan BD, Price RW. The AIDS dementia complex: I. Clinical features. Ann Neurol. 1986;19:517‐524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wekerle H, Linnington G, Lassmann H, Meyermann R. Cellular immune reactivity within the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1986;9:271‐277. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Watkins BA, Dorn HH, Kelly WB, et al. Specific tropism of HIV‐1 for microglial cells in primary human brain cultures. Science. 1990;249:549‐553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Hickey WF, Hsu BL, Kimura H. T‐lymphocyte entry into the central nervous system. J Neurosci Res. 1991;28:254‐260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Davis L, Hjelle B, Miller V, et al. Early viral brain invasion in iatrogenic human immunodeficiency virus infection. Neurology. 1992;42:1736‐1739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Churchill MJ, Wesselingh SL, Cowley D, et al. Extensive astrocyte infection is prominent in human immunodeficiency virus‐associated dementia. Ann Neurol. 2009;66:253–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Li GH, Henderson L, Nath A. Astrocytes as an HIV reservoir: mechanism of HIV infection. Curr HIV Res. 2016;14:373‐381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Li GH, Anderson C, Jaeger L, Do T, Major EO, Nath A. Cell‐to‐cell contact facilitates HIV transmission from lymphocytes to astrocytes via CXCR4. AIDS (London, England). 2015;29:755‐766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Do T, Murphy G, Earl LA, et al. Three‐dimensional imaging of HIV‐1 virological synapses reveals membrane architectures involved in virus transmission. J Virol. 2014;88:10327‐10339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Gonzalez H, Podany A, Al‐Harthi L, Wallace J. The far‐reaching HAND of cART: cART effects on astrocytes. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Jones MV, Bell JE, Nath A. Immunolocalization of HIV envelope gp120 in HIV encephalitis with dementia. AIDS. 2000;14:2709‐2713. AIDS 14, 2709–2713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Johnson TP, Nath A. Protocol for detection of HIV‐Tat protein in cerebrospinal fluid by a sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1354:343‐352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gerena Y, Menendez‐Delmestre R, Delgado‐Nieves A, et al. Release of soluble insulin receptor from neurons by cerebrospinal fluid from patients with neurocognitive dysfunction and HIV infection. Front Neurol. 2019;10:285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bagashev A, Sawaya BE. Roles and functions of HIV‐1 Tat protein in the CNS: an overview. Virol J. 2013;10:358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mattson MP, Haughey NJ, Nath A. Cell death in HIV dementia. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:893‐904. Suppl 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Santerre M, Bagashev A, Gorecki L, et al. HIV‐1 Tat protein promotes neuronal dysregulation by inhibiting E2F transcription factor 3 (E2F3). J Biol Chem. 2019;294:3618‐3633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hesselgesser J, Taub D, Baskar P, et al. Neuronal apoptosisinduced by HIV‐1 gp120 and the chemokine SDF‐1 alphais mediated by the chemokine receptor CXCR4. Curr Biol. 1998;8:595‐598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Letendre SL, Lanier ER, McCutchan JA. Cerebrospinal fluid beta chemokine concentrations in neurocognitively impaired individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Infec Dis. 1999;180:310‐319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lipton SA. Requirement for macrophages in neuronal injury induced by HIV envelope protein gp120. Neuroreport. 1992;3:913‐915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Masliah E, Ge N, Mucke L. Pathogenesis of HIV‐1 associated neurodegeneration. Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1996;10:57‐67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Schmidtmayerova H, Nottet HSLM, Nuovo G, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection alters chemokine beta peptide expression in human monocytes: implications for recruitment of leukocytes into brain and lymph nodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:700‐704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Langford D, Oh Kim B, Zou W, et al. Doxycycline‐inducible and astrocyte‐specific HIV‐1 Tat transgenic mice (iTat) as an HIV/neuroAIDS model. J Neurovirol. 2018;24:168‐179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69:1789‐1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Saylor D, Dickens AM, Sacktor N, et al. HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorder ‐ pathogenesis and prospects for treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:234‐248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jiang C, Lian X, Gao C, et al. Distinct viral reservoirs in individuals with spontaneous control of HIV‐1. Nature. 2020;585:261‐267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hirao K, Andrews S, Kuroki K, et al. Structure of HIV‐2 Nef reveals features distinct from HIV‐1 involved in immune regulation. iScience. 2020;23:100758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Omondi FH, Chandrarathna S, Mujib S, et al. HIV subtype and Nef‐mediated immune evasion function correlate with viral reservoir size in early‐treated individuals. J Virol. 2019:93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pawlak EN, Dikeakos JD. HIV‐1 Nef: a master manipulator of the membrane trafficking machinery mediating immune evasion. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1850:733‐741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wonderlich ER, Leonard JA, Collins KL. HIV immune evasion disruption of antigen presentation by the HIV Nef protein. Adv Virus Res. 2011;80:103‐127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Campbell LA, Mocchetti I. Extracellular vesicles and HIV‐associated neurocognitive disorders: implications in neuropathogenesis and disease diagnosis. Neurotox Res. 2021;39:2098‐2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Ramirez SH, Buzhdygan TP, Hale JF, et al. Extracellular microvesicles released from brain endothelial cells are detected in animal models of HIV‐1 signifying unresolved inflammation. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2021;16:785‐795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Sil S, Singh S, Chemparathy DT, Chivero ET, Gordon L, Buch S. Astrocytes & astrocyte derived extracellular vesicles in morphine induced amyloidopathy: implications for cognitive deficits in opiate abusers. Aging Dis. 2021;12:1389‐1408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Armah KA, McGinnis K, Baker J, et al. HIV status, burden of comorbid disease, and biomarkers of inflammation, altered coagulation, and monocyte activation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55:126‐136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Pahwa S, Deeks S, Zou S, et al. NIH workshop on HIV‐associated comorbidities, coinfections, and complications: summary and recommendation for future research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;86:11‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gabuzda D, Jamieson BD, Collman RG, et al. Pathogenesis of aging and age‐related comorbidities in people with HIV: highlights from the HIV ACTION workshop. Pathogens & Immunity. 2020;5:143‐174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Franklin H, Clarke BE, Patani R. Astrocytes and microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: lessons from human in vitro models. Progress Neurobiol. 2021;200:101973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Premeaux TA, Mediouni S, Leda A, et al. Next‐generation human cerebral organoids as powerful tools to advance NeuroHIV research. mBio. 2021;12:e0068021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yoo HJ, Kwon MS. Aged microglia in neurodegenerative diseases: microglia lifespan and culture methods. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:766267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Gumbs SBH, Kubler R, Gharu L, et al. Human microglial models to study HIV infection and neuropathogenesis: a literature overview and comparative analyses. J Neurovirol. 2022;28(1):64‐91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. He JL, Chen YZ, Farzan M, et al. CCR3 and CCR5 are corecptors for HIV‐1 infection of microglia. Nature 1997;385:645‐649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ioannidis JP, Reichlin S, Skolnik PR. Long‐term productive human immunodeficiency virus‐1 infection in human infant microglia. Am J Pathol. 1995;147:1200‐1206. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lee SC, Hatch WC, Liu W, Brosnan CF, Dickson DW. Productive infection of human fetal microglia in vitro by HIV‐1. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1993;693:314‐316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Timmerman R, Burm SM, Bajramovic JJ. An overview of in vitro methods to study microglia. Front Cell Neurosci. 2018;12:242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Garcia‐Mesa Y, Jay TR, Checkley MA, et al. Immortalization of primary microglia: a new platform to study HIV regulation in the central nervous system. J Neurovirol. 2017;23:47‐66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Nagai A, Nakagawa E, Choi HB, Hatori K, Kobayashi S, Kim SU. Erythropoietin and erythropoietin receptors in human CNS neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes grown in culture. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001;60:386‐392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Alvarez‐Carbonell D, Garcia‐Mesa Y, Milne S, et al. Toll‐like receptor 3 activation selectively reverses HIV latency in microglial cells. Retrovirology. 2017;14:9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Alamer E, Zhong C, Liu Z, et al. Epigenetic suppression of HIV in myeloid cells by the BRD4‐selective small molecule modulator ZL0580. J Virol. 2020;94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kaushik A, Yndart A, Atluri V, et al. Magnetically guided non‐invasive CRISPR‐Cas9/gRNA delivery across blood‐brain barrier to eradicate latent HIV‐1 infection. Sci Rep. 2019;9:3928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Llewellyn GN, Alvarez‐Carbonell D, Chateau M, Karn J, Cannon PM. HIV‐1 infection of microglial cells in a reconstituted humanized mouse model and identification of compounds that selectively reverse HIV latency. J Neurovirol. 2018;24:192‐203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ginhoux F, Greter M, Leboeuf M, et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science (New York, NY). 2010;330:841‐845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Gomez Perdiguero E, Klapproth K, Schulz C, et al. Tissue‐resident macrophages originate from yolk‐sac‐derived erythro‐myeloid progenitors. Nature. 2015;518:547‐551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Amici SA, Dong J, Guerau‐de‐Arellano M. Molecular mechanisms modulating the phenotype of macrophages and microglia. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Li Q, Cheng Z, Zhou L, et al. Developmental heterogeneity of microglia and brain myeloid cells revealed by deep single‐cell RNA sequencing. Neuron. 2019;101:207‐223.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Keren‐Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer's disease. Cell. 2017;169:1276‐1290.e17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kierdorf K, Masuda T, Jordao MJC, Prinz M. Macrophages at CNS interfaces: ontogeny and function in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019;20:547‐562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kierdorf K, Prinz M, Geissmann F, Gomez Perdiguero E. Development and function of tissue resident macrophages in mice. Semin Immunol. 2015;27:369‐378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Krasemann S, Madore C, Cialic R, et al. The TREM2‐APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases. Immunity. 2017;47:566‐581.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Hammond TR, Dufort C, Dissing‐Olesen L, et al. Single‐Cell RNA sequencing of microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain reveals complex cell‐state changes. Immunity. 2019;50:253‐271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Masuda T, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single‐cell resolution. Nature. 2019;566:388‐392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Joost E, Jordao MJC, Mages B, Prinz M, Bechmann I, Krueger M. Microglia contribute to the glia limitans around arteries, capillaries and veins under physiological conditions, in a model of neuroinflammation and in human brain tissue. Brain Struct Funct. 2019;224:1301‐1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bottcher C, Schlickeiser S, Sneeboer MAM, et al. Human microglia regional heterogeneity and phenotypes determined by multiplexed single‐cell mass cytometry. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:78‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Gordon S, Taylor PR. Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:953‐964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ziegler‐Heitbrock L, Hofer TP. Toward a refined definition of monocyte subsets. Front Immunol. 2013;4:23. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sevenich L. Brain‐resident microglia and blood‐borne macrophages orchestrate central nervous system inflammation in neurodegenerative disorders and brain cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Bruttger J, Karram K, Wörtge S, et al. Genetic cell ablation reveals clusters of local self‐renewing microglia in the mammalian central nervous system. Immunity. 2015;43:92‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Elmore MR, Lee RJ, West BL, Green KN. Characterizing newly repopulated microglia in the adult mouse: impacts on animal behavior, cell morphology, and neuroinflammation. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Elmore MR, Najafi AR, Koike MA, et al. Colony‐stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron. 2014;82:380‐397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Mildner A, Schmidt H, Nitsche M, et al. Microglia in the adult brain arise from Ly‐6ChiCCR2+ monocytes only under defined host conditions. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1544‐1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Priller J, Flugel A, Wehner T, et al. Targeting gene‐modified hematopoietic cells to the central nervous system: use of green fluorescent protein uncovers microglial engraftment. Nat Med. 2001;7:1356‐1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Varvel N, Grathwohl S, Baumann F, et al. Microglial repopulation model reveals a robust homeostatic process for replacing CNS myeloid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:18150‐18155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Bennett ML, Bennett FC, Liddelow SA, et al. New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E1738‐46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Rai MA, Hammonds J, Pujato M, Mayhew C, Roskin K, Spearman P. Comparative analysis of human microglial models for studies of HIV replication and pathogenesis. Retrovirology. 2020;17:35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bohlen CJ, Bennett FC, Tucker AF, Collins HY, Mulinyawe SB, Barres BA. Diverse requirements for microglial survival, specification, and function revealed by defined‐medium cultures. Neuron. 2017;94:759‐773.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Satoh J, Kino Y, Asahina N, et al. TMEM119 marks a subset of microglia in the human brain. Neuropathology. 2016;36:39‐49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Biber K, Neumann H, Inoue K, Boddeke HW. Neuronal ‘On’ and ‘Off’ signals control microglia. Trends Neurosci. 2007;30:596‐602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Dello Russo C, Cappoli N, Coletta I, et al. The human microglial HMC3 cell line: where do we stand? A systematic literature review. J Neuroinflamm. 2018;15:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Abud EM, Ramirez RN, Martinez ES, et al. iPSC‐derived human microglia‐like cells to study neurological diseases. Neuron. 2017;94:278‐293 e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Muffat J, Li Y, Yuan B, et al. Efficient derivation of microglia‐like cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. 2016;22:1358‐1367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Claes C, Van Den Daele J, Boon R, et al. Human stem cell‐derived monocytes and microglia‐like cells reveal impaired amyloid plaque clearance upon heterozygous or homozygous loss of TREM2. Alzheimer's Dement. 2019;15:453‐464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Yanagimachi MD, Niwa A, Tanaka T, et al. Robust and highly‐efficient differentiation of functional monocytic cells from human pluripotent stem cells under serum‐ and feeder cell‐free conditions. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Akiyama H, Gummuluru S. HIV‐1 persistence and chronic induction of innate immune responses in macrophages. Viruses. 2020;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Honeycutt JB, Garcia JV. Humanized mice: models for evaluating NeuroHIV and cure strategies. J Neurovirol. 2018;24:185‐191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Honeycutt JB, Wahl A, Archin N, Choudhary S, Margolis D, Garcia JV. HIV‐1 infection, response to treatment and establishment of viral latency in a novel humanized T cell‐only mouse (TOM) model. Retrovirology. 2013;10:121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Mathews S, Branch Woods A, Katano I, et al. Human Interleukin‐34 facilitates microglia‐like cell differentiation and persistent HIV‐1 infection in humanized mice. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14:12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hasselmann J, Coburn MA, England W, et al. Development of a chimeric model to study and manipulate human microglia in vivo. Neuron. 2019;103(6):1016‐103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Svoboda DS, Barrasa MI, Shu J, et al. Human iPSC‐derived microglia assume a primary microglia‐like state after transplantation into the neonatal mouse brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:25293‐25303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Zhou LJ, Peng J, Xu YN, et al. Microglia are indispensable for synaptic plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn and chronic pain. Cell Rep. 2019;27:3844‐3859.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Bennett ML, Bennett FC. The influence of environment and origin on brain resident macrophages and implications for therapy. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:157‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Bullen CK, Hogberg HT, Bahadirli‐Talbott A, et al. Infectability of human BrainSphere neurons suggests neurotropism of SARS‐CoV‐2. ALTEX. 2020;37:665‐671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Ohgidani M, Kato TA, Kanba S. Introducing directly induced microglia‐like (iMG) cells from fresh human monocytes: a novel translational research tool for psychiatric disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ransohoff RM, El Khoury J. Microglia in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;8:a020560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
