Skip to main content
BMC Surgery logoLink to BMC Surgery
. 2022 Nov 2;22:373. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01806-6

Obesity paradox among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study

Lulu Ma 1, Xuerong Yu 1,✉, Xisheng Weng 2, Jin Lin 2, Wenwei Qian 2, Yuguang Huang 1
PMCID: PMC9632147  PMID: 36324099

Abstract

Background

Obesity has been recognized as the risk factor for postoperative complication for surgical patients. However, recent studies have showed protective effect of obesity in surgical and non-surgical patients. Our study is to examine the association of body mass index(BMI) with early postoperative complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Materials and methods

All patients who had primary total knee arthroplasty between January 2014 and December 2019 were included. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed and BMI was categorized as underweight(BMI < 18.5), normal weight(18.5 < BMI < 24.9), overweight I(25 < BMI < 27.4), overweight II(27.5 < BMI < 29.9), obese I(30 < BMI < 34.9) and obese II(BMI ≥ 35). The association between BMI and occurrence of early postoperative complications was examined and logistic regression was used to calculate relationship between BMI and early postoperative complications.

Results

A total of 2969 patients were included in our analysis. The overall complication rate in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty was 14.8%, with the highest complication being 22.2% in the underweight group, the second highest in the normal weight group(17.5%), the lowest in the overweight I(13.8%) and obese I(12.0%) group and then higher again in obese II group(16.7%). In multivariable analyses, overweight I (OR 0.737, 95% CI 0.559–0.972, P = 0.031) and obese I (OR 0.631, 95% CI 0.449–0.885, P = 0.008) were associated with lower risk of early postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty.

Conclusion

In this retrospective study, overweight and obese patients had a lower risk of early postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty. Further studies are necessary to confirm and investigate the mechanism of obesity paradox in this surgical population.

Trial registration

This study had been registrated in www.chictr.org.cn on 25/10/2021 and the registration ID was ChiCTR2100052408.

Keywords: Obesity paradox, Total knee arthroplasty, Postoperative complications

Introduction

Obesity has been considered as a public health problem both in developed [1, 2] and developing countries [3, 4]. It has been proven that obesity is associated with comorbidities [5], which include hypertension, diabetes and coronary artery disease, and postoperative complications [6]. However, recent research had demonstrated the protective effect of obesity in both surgical [1, 7, 8] and non-surgical patients [9–12]. This phenomenon has been called “obesity paradox”, which means better outcome in patients with higher BMI.

Since obesity increases the risk of osteoarthritis, the prevalence of obesity is related to the growing demands of joint arthroplasty [13]. The role of obesity in outcome of joint arthroplasty was still controversary. Although the negative effects of obesity on the outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and/or hip arthroplasty(THA) [14, 15] had been reported, some studies demonstrated the obesity paradox applied to early postoperative complications after hip or knee surgeries [16, 17].

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the incidence of early postoperative complications stratified by body mass index.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective review of the electronic medical records of patients who underwent primary TKA (unilateral TKA or simultaneous bilateral TKA) at our institution from January 2014 to December 2019. This study had been registrated in www.chictr.org.cn on 25/10/ 2021 and the registration ID was ChiCTR2100052408. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) review of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and the need for informed consent was waived by institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital due to the retrospective nature of our study.

The exclusion criteria included: patients who had TKA and THA simultaneously, patients who had unicompartmental knee arthroplasty or revision surgery and patients who had incomplete data of weight and/or height. BMI was calculated by using the standard formula of weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. BMI was categorized into 6 groups [8]: underweight(< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2), overweight I (25-27.4 kg/m2), overweight II(27.5–29.9 kg/m2) and obese I (30-34.9 kg/m2) and obese II (≥ 35 kg/m2).

Electronic medical records were reviewed and demographic data were collected, which included age, sex, BMI, American society of Anesthesiologists physical status(ASA class), New York Heart Association(NYHA) classification, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) and cerebrovascular disease or accident(CVD). Intraoperative and postoperative data were also collected, which included the duration of anesthesia, tourniquet and operation, type of anesthesia, type of surgery, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), the length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. Laboratory results, including baseline hemoglobin were also collected for analysis.

Anemia was defined according to WHO scientific Group report, with a cutoff value of hemoglobin < 130 g/L for adult men and < 120 g/L for adult nonpregnant women. Early postoperative complications were defined as complications occurred during hospital stay. The severity of postoperative complications were defined according to Clavien-Dindo classification system [18]. For patients who had more than 1 complication, the grade of the most severe complication was recognized as the severity of complications. Complications of grade ≥ 3 were defined as severe complications [19].

Categorical variables were described as number (percentage) and chi-square test was used to compare difference across BMI categories. Continuous data were presented as means ± standardized deviation (SD) or median [25th percentile, 75th percentile interquartile range(IQR)], analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare across BMI classes. Logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the adjusted odds ratios for the occurrence of complications in the BMI categories with the normal weight group (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2) as reference. All reported P value were 2 sided, and a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Standardized statistical software (SPSS 23, CHICAGO, IL) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 2969 patients were included in our analysis. 27 patients (0.9%) were underweight, 905 (30.5%) were normal weight,1478 (49.8%) were overweight and 559 patients (18.8%) were obese. Demographic characteristics were presented in Table 1. Overweight and obese patients were more likely to be female and had higher ASA class. Patients with higher BMI were more prone to have hypertension(P < 0.001), CAD(P = 0.046) and DM(P = 0.008). There was no significant difference in CVD(P = 0.671) and COPD(P = 0.259) among different BMI groups. Patients with lower BMI were associated with lower preoperative hemoglobin level(P = 0.042) and higher proportion of preoperative anemia(P < 0.001).

Table 1.

Comparison of patient characteristics in different BMI groups

Underweight Normal weight    Overweight    Obese P
(n = 27) (n = 905) I(n = 863) II(n = 615) I(n = 500) II(n = 59)
Age, year old 51.5 ± 19.7 66.8 ± 10.6 66.6 ± 7.8 66.8 ± 7.6 66.0 ± 7.9 65.4 ± 7.0 < 0.001
Old than 65 years old 8(29.6%) 544(60.1%) 500(57.9%) 343(55.8%) 259(51.8%) 28(47.5%) 0.003
Female 16(59.3%) 686(75.8%) 710(82.3%) 497(80.8%) 436(87.2%) 54(91.5%) < 0.001
ASA ≥ 3 0 55(6.1%) 81(9.4%) 39(6.3%) 45(9.0%) 5(8.5%) 0.035
Diagnosis < 0.001
OA 9(33.3%) 801(88.5) 816(94.6%) 593(96.4%) 480(96.0%) 58(98.3%)
Diagnosis other than OA 18(66.7%) 104(11.5%) 47(5.4%) 22(3.6%) 20(4.0%) 1(1.7%)
Comorbidity
Hypertension 0 411(45.4%) 486(56.3%) 392(63.7%) 350(70.0%) 42(71.2%) < 0.001
CAD 2(7.4%) 87(9.6%) 102(11.8%) 77(12.5%) 77(15.4%) 8(13.6%) 0.046
CVD 2(7.4%) 47(5.2%) 52(6.0%) 38(6.2%) 25(5.0%) 1(1.7%) 0.671
COPD 1(3.7%) 17(1.9%) 11(1.3%) 10(1.6%) 15(3.0%) 2(3.4%) 0.259
Diabetes mellitus 0 149(16.5%) 176(20.4%) 123(20%) 91(18.2%) 17(28.8%) 0.008
Hemoglobin(g/l) 122 ± 14 131 ± 14 134 ± 41 133 ± 13 132 ± 12 132 + 10 0.042
Preoperative anemia 13(48.1%) 191(21.1%) 113(13.1%) 75(12.2%) 77(15.4%) 5(8.5%) < 0.001

Patients in overweight and obese groups had longer length of operation (P = 0.001)and tourniquet(P < 0.001). And patients with higher BMI were more likely to had simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty(P = 0.010)(See Table 2). The overall rate of all complications and severe complications in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty was 14.8% and 2.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of all complications(P = 0.056) and severe complications(P = 0.425) among different BMI groups(See Table 3). The distribution of all complications demonstrated a J-shaped distribution, with lowest incidence of in the obese I group(See Fig. 1).Although there was no statistical significance in length of stay in hospital among different BMI groups, patients in underweight group had the longest LOS (P = 0.163) and highest rate of admission to ICU(P = 0.510).

Table 2.

Comparisons of intraoperative parameters among different BMI groups

Underweight Normal weight    Overweight    Obese P
(n = 27) (n = 905) I(n = 863) II(n = 615) I(n = 500) II(n = 59)
Duration of surgery(minutes) 130 ± 55 119 ± 54 124 ± 54 125 ± 55 130 ± 57 142 ± 65 0.001
Duration of tourniquet(minutes) 94 ± 46 98 ± 48 106 ± 49 106 ± 49 111 ± 51 109 ± 52 < 0.001
Anesthesia method 0.120
General anesthesia 24(88.9%) 843(93.1%) 818(94.8%) 584(95.0%) 482(96.4%) 56(94.9%)
Intrathecal anesthesia 3(11.1%) 62(6.9%) 45(5.2%) 31(5.0%) 18(3.6%) 3(5.1%)
The type of surgery 0.010
Unilateral TKA 19(70.4%) 644(71.2%) 555(64.3%) 402(65.4%) 314(62.8%) 36(61%)
Bilateral TKA 8(29.6%) 261(28.8%) 308(35.7%) 213(34.6%) 186(37.2%) 23(39.0%)

Table 3.

Comparisons of outcomes of patients in different BMI groups

Underweight Normal weight    Overweight    Obese p
(n = 27) (n = 905) I(n = 863) II(n = 615) I (n = 500) II (n = 59)
All-type complications

6

(22.2%)

158

(17.5%)

118(13.7%) 86(14.0%) 60(12.0%) 10(16.9%) 0.056
Severe complications 0 27(3.0%) 16(1.9%) 15(2.4%) 11(2.2%) 3(5.1%) 0.425
Subtype complications
Venous thromboembolism 1(3.7%) 26(2.9%) 23(2.7%) 17(2.8%) 11(2.2%) 0 0.801
Transfusion 4(14.8%) 112(12.4%) 77(8.9%) 62(10.1%) 44(8.8%) 9(15.3%) 0.097
Wound complication 1(3.7%) 19(2.1%) 9(1.0%) 14(2.3%) 6(1.3%) 0 0.155
Pulmonary complication 0 1(0.1%) 6(0.7%) 2(0.3%) 3(0.6%) 2(3.4%) 0.012
Cardiac complication 0 9(1.0%) 10(1.2%) 5(0.8%) 3(0.6%) 1(1.7%) 0.778
Urinary tract infection 0 8(0.9%) 3(0.3%) 2(0.3%) 1(0.2%) 1(1.7%) 0.238
Neurologic complication 0 4(0.4%) 0 4(0.7%) 1(0.2%) 2(3.4%) 0.001
Length of hospital stay(day) 8[6, 9] 7[4, 9] 7[4, 9] 6[4, 9] 6[4, 8] 6[5, 11] 0.163
Admission to ICU 1(2.7%) 12(1.3%) 7(0.8%) 4(0.7%) 6(1.2%) 1(1.7%) 0.510

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The incidence of postoperative complication rate in different BMI groups

Age, sex, ASA class, diagnosis, hypertension, CAD, DM, preoperative anemia,the type of operation, the duration of the operation and tourniquet, and the 6 BMI classes were entered into the logistic regression model.Of these variables, age(OR 1.023, 95%CI 1.010–1.036, P = 0.001), ASA class(OR 1.315, 95%CI 1.034–1.672, P = 0.026), diagnosis(OR 1.069, 95%CI 1.019–1.121, P = 0.006), preoperative anemia(OR 2.316, 95%CI 1.792–2.994, P < 0.001), the type of operation (OR 1.938, 95%CI 1.358–2.769, P < 0.001)and the duration of the operation(OR 1.009, 95%CI 1.006–1.012, P < 0.001) were risk factors of postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty( See Table 4). Overweight I (OR 0.737, 95%CI 0.559–0.972, P = 0.031) and obese I(OR 0.631, 95%CI 0.449–0.885, P = 0.008) were the risk factors associated with less early postoperative complications after total knee arthroplasty( See Table 4).

Table 4.

Logistic regression of analysis for the incidence of early postoperative complications

Variables OR   95% CI P
lower upper
Age 1.023 1.010 1.036 0.001
Sex 0.851 0.643 1.127 0.260

ASA class

Diagnosis

1.315

1.069

1.034

1.019

1.672

1.121

0.026

0.006

Hypertension 0.872 0.691 1.100 0.149
CAD 1.296 0.940 1.787 0.113
DM 1.215 0.924 1.596 0.163
Preoperative anemia 2.316 1.792 2.994 < 0.001
The type of operation 1.938 1.358 2.769 < 0.001
The duration of the operation 1.009 1.006 1.012 < 0.001
The duration of the tourniquet 0.998 0.996 1.001 0.129
Undereweight 1.079 0.401 2.901 0.880
Overweight I 0.737 0.559 0.972 0.031
Overweight II 0.990 0.738 1.328 0.947
Obese I 0.631 0.449 0.885 0.008
Obese II 0.747 0.342 1.632 0.464

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we demonstrated a J-shaped pattern between BMI and early postoperative complications. Although not statistically significant, risk of early postoperative complications tended to be higher in underweight group when compared to normal weight group. Overweight I and obese I were the predictive risk factors of less early postoperative complications. Our results did support obesity paradox in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

Previous studies had demonstrated the non-linear relationship between BMI and outcome in patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty[16, 20, 21]. However there results were not consistent and few studies focused on obesity paradox in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. George had demonstrated the U-shaped relationship between BMI and readmission & reoperation after total knee arthroplasty [21],however this study did not include underweight patients. Other studies showed the strong relationship between BMI and postoperative complications[22, 23] after total knee arthroplasty. Patients in the underweight, normal and morbidly obese groups had the highest incidence of early postoperative complications after total hip arthroplasty [16], but Zhang demonstrated that selection bias may contribute obesity paradox since patients who were morbidly obese did not have a reduced risk of death in 30 days after urgent hip surgery [24]. In our study, we did find the highest complication rate in the group of underweight (22.2%), while patients in the group of obese I had the lowest complication rate. However, patients in underweight or obese II group only represented 0.9% and 2.0% of the whole study population, and the result should be interpreted with caution.

The protective effect of obesity in certain chronic disease and postoperative period for surgical patients had been reported previously. The exact underlying mechanisms were not clear, and several possible mechanisms had been suggested. First, lipoproteins may have protective effects against inflammatory mediators and endotoxins [25], which protect patients from the inflammatory reaction associated with surgery. Second, patients with low BMI are at a high risk of malnutrition and the nutrition status is associated with poor postoperative outcome [26–29]. Third, obesity paradox also reflects that BMI may not be the best indicator of obesity and the best cutoff point of BMI has not been determined [21, 30]. Besides these, patients in overweight or obese groups usually get more attention in the perioperative period. Preoperative comprehensive screening and optimization of cardiopulmonary function may lead to decreased complications after operation.

Our study had several limitations. First, this is a retrospective study in a single center and selection bias could not be avoided. Second, we only selected BMI as the category of obesity, and the waist-to-hip ratio or cholesterol level were not considered as the markers of obesity. Third, we only explore the association between BMI and in-hospital complications. The relationship between BMI and the long-term complications was not determined in our study.

In conclusion, our study suggested that overweight and obese patients are at lower risk of postoperative complications. Further research is necessary to determine the mechanism of the protective effect of weight and whether obesity paradox is a result of weight itself or due to other related effects.

Author contribution

LM made contribution to statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. XY performed statistical analysis and made contribution to the interpretation of results. XW, WQ, JL and JJ performed the operations and provided data for this manuscript. YH contributed to the study design and made revision of this manuscript.

All authors have viewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all the aspects of the work.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Availability

The datasets used during the current study are not publicly available due to local regulations, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval and conset to participate

This study was approved by Institutional Review Board (IRB) review of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and the need for informed consent was waived by institutional review board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital due to the retrospective nature of our study. Our study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

All authors declared no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

None.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Tjeertes EEKM, Hoeks SSE, Beks SSBJC, Valentijn TTM, Hoofwijk AAGM, Stolker RJRJ. Obesity - a risk factor for postoperative complications in general surgery? BMC Anesthesiol. 2015;15(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12871-015-0096-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berghöfer A, Pischon T, Reinhold T, Apovian CM, Sharma AM, Willich SN. Obesity prevalence from a European perspective: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang Y, Wang L, Qu W. New national data show alarming increase in obesity and noncommunicable chronic diseases in China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017;71(1):149–50. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Poobalan A, Aucott L. Obesity Among Young Adults in Developing Countries: A Systematic Overview. Curr Obes Rep. 2016;5(1):2–13. doi: 10.1007/s13679-016-0187-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Calle EE, Thun MJ, Petrelli JM, Rodriguez C, Heath CW., Jr Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of U.S. adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(15):1097–105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199910073411501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bazurro S, Ball L, Pelosi P. Perioperative management of obese patient. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018;24(6):560–7. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.El Moheb M, Jia Z, Qin H, El Hechi MW, Nordestgaard AT, Lee JM, et al. The Obesity Paradox in Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency Surgery: A Nationwide Analysis. J Surg Res. 2021;265:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Che L, Xu L, Wang MY, Huang YG. Obesity paradox among elderly patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018;15(9):598–604. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2018.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lavie CJ, Pandey A, Lau DH, Alpert MA, Sanders P. Obesity and Atrial Fibrillation Prevalence, Pathogenesis, and Prognosis: Effects of Weight Loss and Exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(16):2022–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lavie CJ, De Schutter A, Parto P, Jahangir E, Kokkinos P, Ortega FB, et al. Obesity and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Diseases and Prognosis-The Obesity Paradox Updated. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(5):537–47. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Persaud SR, Lieber AC, Donath E, Stingone JA, Dangayach NS, Zhang X, et al. Obesity Paradox in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: National Inpatient Sample Analysis. Stroke. 2019;50(4):999–1002. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sandhu RK, Ezekowitz J, Andersson U, Alexander JH, Granger CB, Halvorsen S, et al. The “obesity paradox” in atrial fibrillation: Observations from the ARISTOTLE (Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation) trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2869–78. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.George J, Klika AK, Navale SM, Newman JM, Barsoum WK, Higuera CA. Obesity Epidemic: Is Its Impact on Total Joint Arthroplasty Underestimated? An Analysis of National Trends. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(7):1798–806. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5222-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kerkhoffs GM, Servien E, Dunn W, Dahm D, Bramer JA, Haverkamp D. The influence of obesity on the complication rate and outcome of total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(20):1839–44. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ward DT, Metz LN, Horst PK, Kim HT, Kuo AC. Complications of Morbid Obesity in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Risk Stratification Based on BMI. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(9):42–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shaparin N, Widyn J, Nair S, Kho I, Geller D, Delphin E. Does the obesity paradox apply to early postoperative complications after hip surgery? A retrospective chart review. J Clin Anesth. 2016;32:84–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cao G, Chen G, Yang X, Huang Q, Huang Z, Xu H, et al. Obesity does not increase blood loss or incidence of immediate postoperative complications during simultaneous total knee arthroplasty: A multicenter study. Knee. 2020;27(3):963–9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Okabe H, Ohsaki T, Ogawa K, Ozaki N, Hayashi H, Akahoshi S, et al. Frailty predicts severe postoperative complications after elective colorectal surgery. Am J Surg. 2018;217(4):677–81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Smith EL, Shahien AA, Chung M, Stoker G, Niu R, Schwarzkopf R. The Obesity Paradox: Body Mass Index Complication Rates Vary by Gender and Age Among Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(9):2658–65. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.George J, Piuzzi NS, Ng M, Sodhi N, Khlopas AA, Mont MA. Association Between Body Mass Index and Thirty-Day Complications After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):865–71. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wagner ER, Kamath AF, Fruth K, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ. Effect of body mass index on reoperation and complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2016;98(24):2052–60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Christensen TC, Wagner ER, Harmsen WS, Schleck CD, Berry DJ. Effect of physical parameters on outcomes of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2018;100(21):1829–37. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang JC, Matelski J, Gandhi R, Jackson T, Urbach D, Cram P. Can patient selection explain the obesity paradox in orthopaedic hip surgery? an analysis of the acs-nsqip registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(5):964–73. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rauchhaus M, Coats AJS, Anker SD. The endotoxin-lipoprotein hypothesis. Lancet. 2000;356(9233):930–3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02690-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Park A, Lans J, Raskin K, Hornicek F, Schwab J, Lozano Calderon S. Is malnutrition associated with postoperative complications in patients with primary bone sarcomas? J Surg Oncol. 2019;119(3):324–8. doi: 10.1002/jso.25332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Banning LBD, ter Beek L, El Moumni M, Visser L, Zeebregts CJ, Jager-Wittenaar H, et al. Vascular Surgery Patients at Risk for Malnutrition Are at an Increased Risk of Developing Postoperative Complications. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;64:213–20. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Gu A, Malahias MA, Strigelli V, Nocon AA, Sculco TP, Sculco PK. Preoperative Malnutrition Negatively Correlates With Postoperative Wound Complications and Infection After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(5):1013–24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Eminovic S, Vincze G, Eglseer D, Riedl R, Sadoghi P, Leithner A, et al. Malnutrition as predictor of poor outcome after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2021;45(1):51–6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04892-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kartheuser AH, Leonard DF, Penninckx F, Paterson HM, Brandt D, Remue C, et al. Waist circumference and waist/hip ratio are better predictive risk factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery than body mass index and body surface area. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):722–30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6605a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used during the current study are not publicly available due to local regulations, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from BMC Surgery are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES