Abstract
Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are increasing in frequency and intensity due to climate change. Several well-documented effects of heatwaves on community structure exist, but examples of their effect on functioning of species, communities or ecosystems remain scarce. We tested the effects of short-term, moderate and strong MHWs on macrofauna bioturbation and associated solute fluxes as examples of ecosystem functioning. We also measured macrofaunal excretion rates to assess effects of temperature on macrofauna metabolism. For this experiment, we used unmanipulated sediment cores with natural animal communities collected from a muddy location at 32 m depth in the northern Baltic Sea. Despite the mechanistic effect of bioturbation remaining unchanged between the treatments, there were significant differences in oxygen consumption, solute fluxes and excretion. Biogeochemical and biological processes were boosted by the moderate heatwave, whereas biogeochemical cycling seemed to decrease under a strong heatwave. A prolonged, moderate heatwave could possibly lead to resource depletion if primary production cannot meet the demands of benthic consumption. By contrast, decreased degradation activities under strong heatwaves could lead to a build-up of organic material and potentially hypoxia. The strong variability and the complexity of the response highlight the context dependency of these processes complicating future predictions.
Keywords: global warming, biodiversity-ecosystem functioning, benthic communities, sediment biogeochemical cycling, coastal ecosystems
1. Introduction
Estuarine habitats are among the most productive environments in the world. They are also among the most impacted ecosystems where multiple stressors coincide [1]. On top of local or regional stressors, such as eutrophication, changes in coastal land use and fishing pressure, ongoing anthropogenic climate change has affected ecosystems and their functioning worldwide with consequences for their provision of goods and services [2,3]. Mean temperature on land as well as in the oceans has been rising globally, and the increase has been most notable at high latitudes [4]. In addition to an increase in long-term average temperatures, the severity, intensity and frequency of marine heatwaves (MHWs) are increasing [5–9] with severe effects on biota and ecosystem functioning [3,6,10]. A MHW can be described as an anomalously warm-water event that lasts at least 5 days [5,9,11], but can vary in duration, magnitude, onset and spatial extent [11].
Temperature fundamentally affects all life on Earth and organisms have long been known to have certain temperature optima where they perform best. An increase in temperature also increases the metabolic activity and energy demand of organisms [12,13], which needs to be met with available resources [14,15]. This can lead to changes in activity and feeding choice (e.g. [16,17]). For example, Lohrer et al. [18] showed that warming in McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, during 2010–2017 resulted in higher sediment primary production, which increased sediment metabolism and shifted benthic community composition. In addition to direct effects on organism physiology and biology, temperature may also affect animal behaviour and performance. Several consequences of both terrestrial and MHWs have been reported during the past decade including for example, geographical range shifts, shifts in species composition, harmful algal blooms and increased mortality of species [7]. For example, the Western Australian MHW in 2011 led to a tropicalization of the temperate reef ecosystem and replacement of the dominant kelp forest with persistent seaweed turfs and a shift into temperate water by tropical species [10,19]. Following this regime shift, the kelp forests have been unable to recover [19]. The 2013–2015 ‘Blob’ in the northeast Pacific caused increased mortality of marine mammals and seabirds, very low ocean primary productivity, and an increase in warm-water copepod species in the northern Californian region creating novel species compositions [20]. The Mediterranean heatwave in 2003 led to mass mortalities of rocky benthic communities, specifically gorgonian corals [21]. Although the vulnerability of the recipient ecosystem depends on its sensitivity and capacity to adapt to changes [22], the consequences of severe or extreme heatwave events are usually more dramatic than those of moderate and strong events [5].
Ecosystem functioning encompasses all the activities of organisms in the ecosystem and entails their interaction with the environment [23], often resulting in changes in, for example, biogeochemical processes. One example of this is the remineralization of organic matter in sediments, where organic matter is broken down to its inorganic nutrient constituents to be re-used by primary producers. Another example is bioturbation, that is sediment reworking and bioirrigation activities of fauna [24], which can also be seen as an indicator of species functional type and behaviour. Species functional traits (e.g. size, mobility and feeding mode) determine their effect on the sediment matrix [25]. Bioturbation enhances diffusion of solutes and microbial remineralization processes, for example, by increasing the area of oxygenized sediment for aerobic degradation processes and by enhancing porewater exchange [26]. Microbial communities are responsible for the remineralization processes and carbon loss through sediment respiration processes [27]. Climate warming may lead to changes in macrofaunal and microbial community composition and biomass, which in turn can lead to changes in their functioning and in carbon cycling [28]. Although severe changes in the structure of biological communities have been observed in heatwave-impacted ecosystems globally, and both chemical and physiological processes are temperature dependent [2,13], there are only few studies exploring impacts of MHWs on functioning at the ecosystem level. For example, Dolbeth et al. [29] found a slight increase in bioturbation and release of nutrients from the sediment under an experimentally induced heatwave.
Understanding the changes taking place during heatwaves in benthic communities and their functioning is essential for predicting their contribution to carbon and nutrient turnover under future climates, where extreme events become more and more common. In order to disentangle the potential effects of MHWs on ecosystem functioning, we conducted an experiment using intact sediment cores collected from aphotic (32 m), muddy sediments in the Northern Baltic Sea. We experimentally studied macrofauna bioturbation and associated solute fluxes, and community excretion rates at in situ temperature (corresponding to ambient temperature conditions at the time of core retrieval) and under experimentally simulated moderate and strong heatwaves. We hypothesized that the activity of the macrofaunal and microbial community, demonstrated by oxygen consumption and bioturbation rates, would increase with increasing temperature. We also expected that the macrofauna would show increasing metabolism and signs of stress with increasing temperature (expressed, for example, as increasing oxygen consumption and excretion rates).
2. Material and methods
(a) . Temperature conditions in the study area
The annual mean seawater temperature at a long-term monitoring site at 32 m depth in southwestern Finland, northern Baltic Sea (59° 51 318 N 23° 15 796 E) has increased by ca 2°C since the beginning of 1990s [30]. At the same site the frequency of MHWs has also increased [31]. In 2018, the highest temperature ever recorded at this coastal monitoring site (Tvärminne Storfjärden) reached 20.5°C in the bottom water at the end of July [30]. To identify a MHW, we followed the categorization by Hobday et al. [5], and based it on the mean climatology during a 30-year baseline period (1960–1990) from the Tvärminne Storfjärden monitoring site, which is located close to our sampling site (59° 51 283 N 23° 16 883 E). Generally, sea surface temperatures are used to define heatwaves, but as this study focuses on the effects of heatwaves on seafloor processes, we used available temperature data from bottom water (1 m above the sediment surface) during our study period, August–October, to calculate our baseline. Data were obtained from pelagic monitoring programmes maintained by the Finnish Meteorological Institute and Tvärminne Zoological Station, sampled every 10 days with either a CTD cast or using a Limnos water sampler.
The limit for a moderate heatwave (12.5°C) was defined as the 90th percentile of the 30-year period, while the temperature identifying a strong heatwave (17.1°C) was calculated as the local climatological mean plus twice the difference between the 90th percentile and the climatological mean ([5], figure 1a). The heatwave of 2018 was captured by an automated logger (figure 1b, MONICOAST network of loggers, logger at Storfjärden (32 m; www.helsinki.fi/monicoast)). The highly dynamic nature of this coastal area encompasses upwelling events [32] that can rapidly change bottom water temperatures, as was observed in 2018 (figure 1b). The temperatures in our experimental treatments corresponded to a moderate and a strong heatwave, while in situ temperature represents the actual bottom water temperature at the time of sampling (hereafter in situ, moderate and strong, figure 1c).
Figure 1.
(a) Measured bottom water temperatures at Storfjärden during August–October 1960–1990 (30 m) (years on the x-axis). The 90th percentile marks the temperature defining a moderate heatwave (12.5°C), while 2 x the difference between the climatological mean and the 90th percentile defines the threshold for a strong heatwave (17.1°C; [5]). Measurements were conducted every 10 days. (b) Data from Storfjärden show the rapidly increasing bottom water temperature in September 2018 (days on the x-axis). (c) Observed temperature in the experimental units during the experiment. Heating started 12.9 (days on the x-axis). Data from the Finnish Meteorological Institute and Tvärminne Zoological Station (unpublished). (Online version in colour.)
(b) . Experiment set-up
(i) . Core retrieval and experimental design
The experiment was conducted in September 2019 at Tvärminne Zoological Station, University of Helsinki. Five intact sediment cores (inner diameter 9.0 cm) per treatment were used as experimental units and retrieved 9 September 2019, with a GEMAX twin corer (site Storfjärden). Thereafter, the experimental cores were carefully transferred to three temperature-controlled rooms, and left to settle at in situ temperature with continuous aeration for 3 days prior to the start of the experiment. We thereafter tested the effect of temperature increase on sediment mixing, oxygen and solute fluxes (, , and Si4+), bioirrigation, sediment characteristics and porewater concentrations and community excretion rates (NH4-N, PO4-P) (N = 5 per treatment) at in situ conditions and under short-term moderate and strong heatwaves (5–9 days; minimum duration of the event to be considered a heatwave is 5 days; [5]). Temperature and salinity in the experimental cores were followed daily throughout the experiment (YSI ProODO and VWR CO310 Conductivity Meter), and the water in the cores was exchanged every second day and prior to the flux measurements, using in situ seawater collected at the time of core sampling and stored in the treatment temperature. Water was exchanged to avoid solutes to accumulate during the experiment due to the lack of flow-through in the cores. On day 1 of the 9-day experiment, the room temperature was increased to the target temperatures (12.5–17.1°C in moderate and greater than 17.1 in strong), which allowed a gradual temperature increase in the cores mimicking a natural heatwave in this system (Figure 1b,c). Due to technical problems, the start temperature differed ca 2°C between the treatments (figure 1c).
(ii) . Luminophore incubations to study sediment mixing
Concurrently with the temperature increase, luminophores were added as sediment particle tracers to study sediment particle mixing [33]. Aeration was stopped and 2.5 g DW (dry weight) of luminophores (eco-trace®, Environmental Tracing Systems Ltd, density = 2.5 g cm−3) were spread evenly across the sediment surface. A size fraction of luminophores corresponding to ‘mud’ with particle diameter between 10 and 70 µm was used mimicking the grain size at the sediment collection site. Luminophores were allowed to settle for 1 h before aeration was restarted. The incubation lasted 9 days. At the end of the experiment, the cores were sliced at 0.5 cm intervals down to 2 cm, at 1.0 cm intervals down to 5 cm and at 2.0 cm intervals down to 13 cm depth, and the slices were subsampled for luminophores. Luminophores were subsampled by carefully homogenizing the sediment slice on a Petri dish and thereafter transferring a small amount of sediment with a metal spoon or spatula into a zip lock bag. During the subsampling, any animals visible to the bare eye were removed and transferred to the excretion incubation (see below). The rest of the slice was then sieved through a 0.5 mm sieve to retain any additional animals left in the sediment. Due to resource constraints in handling the luminophore samples, the heated treatments were sliced first, while the in situ cores were sliced the following day. Sediment samples were stored in the freezer until analysis.
Sediment subsamples were freeze-dried and 0.5 g of dry sediment photographed under UV light. Luminophore pixels were counted after a binarization step (based on the RGB level) for each image corresponding to a single slice. The relative concentrations of luminophores in each slice were then used to compute the corresponding vertical depth profiles. From these, the maximum penetration depth (MPD; cm) of the tracers, and a single normal biodiffusion coefficient ( in cm2 yr−1) reflecting particle mixing intensity were derived by fitting of a continuous time random walk model [34].
(iii) . Dark incubations of solute fluxes
In the middle of the heatwaves (Day 6), dark incubations for oxygen and solute fluxes were conducted. The average incubation time for in situ was 3.84 ± 0.05 h, for moderate 3.03 ± 0.07 h and for the strong treatment 2.97 ± 0.06 h. We decreased the time for the heated treatments to avoid oxygen levels dropping below 80%, which would have affected the biogeochemical processes (e.g. [35,36]). Start samples were taken from the overlying water in each core and the cores were sealed with a lid with an inbuilt magnetic stirrer. At the end of the incubation, end samples were taken from the overlying water for flux calculations. Nutrient samples were filtered through a GF/F filter and frozen for later analysis, while oxygen samples were analysed by Winkler titration. Fluxes were calculated as the difference between end and start concentration of oxygen and/or solutes, and corrected for incubation time, water volume and surface area of the experimental core to represent a flux per square metre per day (24 h).
(c) . Bromide incubations to study bioirrigation
After the flux incubations, an inert bromide tracer was added to the water column of the cores to study bioirrigation. Bromide concentration in the overlying water was thereafter sampled at 0, 6, 12, 24 and 36 h. Bioirrigation was quantified in each core through the measurement of the decrease of an inert bromide (Br–) solute tracer spread in the overlying water. A known volume of stock NaBr solution (1 M) was introduced after the incubation to an initial Br– concentration of ca 10 mM in the overlying water. Incubation then lasted 36 h during which overlying water was stirred using gentle aeration. Samples were kept at 4°C until analysis. The concentration of Br– ions in the water samples was analysed spectrophotometrically [37] and the relation between bromide concentration in the overlying water and incubation time was assessed using simple linear regression [38,39]. Bioirrigation rates were then given as a porewater exchange rate Q (in ml d−1) calculated after [38].
(d) . Sediment characteristics and porewater concentrations
To characterize sediment properties, one additional core per treatment was kept under the same conditions and sliced together with the others at 0.5 cm intervals down to 2 cm, at 1.0 cm intervals down to 5 cm and at 2.0 cm intervals down to 21 cm depth for sediment organic matter (measured as loss on ignition), particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic nitrogen (PON), chl a and phaeophytin, as well as porewater solute concentrations. These measurements were used as supporting information for interpretation of the results, and not analysed statistically. The sediment slices were transferred into zip lock bags and sealed underwater to remove all air. Thereafter, the sediment was transferred to 50 ml Falcon tubes and centrifuged for 20 min at 4500 rpm. The supernatant was carefully pipetted to sample tubes through GF/F filters, and a subsample of the sediment was frozen for later analysis of C and N and pigments. Sediment chl a content was extracted with acetone (90%) for 24 h and measured spectrophotometrically. Acidification was included to identify degradation products (phaeopigments) from chl a [40].
(e) . Community composition and excretion rates
After luminopore subsampling, the slices were sieved through 0.5 mm sieve, and all animals visible to the bare eye (the clam Macoma balthica, the amphipod Monoporeia affinis, the polychaetes Marenzelleria spp., and Bylgides sarsi and the isopod Saduria entomon) were transferred to beakers containing filtered seawater to study excretion (for detailed methodology see [41]). Benthic excretion rates of ammonium (NH4-N) and phosphate (PO4-P) were measured as a community rate, that is by incubating all animals per replicate core in 105 ml of filtered (combusted Whatman GF/F) seawater over 1 h. Water temperatures corresponded to each respective treatment, and the animals were kept in darkness. Predators (Saduria entomon and Halicryptus spinulosus) were incubated separately. At the end of incubation, water samples were withdrawn with a syringe (60 ml) and filtered (GF/F) to remove faeces and pseudoefaeces. The excretion rates were corrected for nutrient concentrations of control water samples without animals for each treatment, which were incubated and treated as described above. Thereafter, the water samples were frozen (−20°C) and the animals were freeze-dried to obtain their dry weights. Any macrofauna that were not included in excretion measurements were stored in 70% ethanol for later identification under microscope to determine taxa abundance and biomass. Macrofauna taxa were divided into three functional types, surface modifiers (S), biodiffusors (B) and upward–downward conveyors (UC/DC) according to Quieros et al. [25] for further analysis purposes.
(f) . Statistical analyses
To check for possible differences in functional group composition of macrofauna (surface modifiers S, biodiffusors B and upward–downward conveyors UC/DC; [25]) in the experimental cores, we used non-metric multi-dimensional scaling in PRIMER 7 [42]. Different functional types affect the sediment matrix differently, thus any significant differences in the functional group composition between treatments could overrun the treatment effect. Densities and biomasses were square-root transformed before analysis.
We use a permutational ANOVA (PERMANOVA) to explore differences in the single response variables between treatments. PERMANOVA is based on a distance-matrix, using Euclidean distances. The p-values are obtained by a permutation procedure, testing the null hypothesis by randomly shuffling the measured values between treatments [43]. A separate PERMANOVA was run for differences in each measured parameter of excretion rates (NH4-N and PO4-P), bioturbation (MPD, and Q) and solute fluxes (O2, NOx-N, NH4-N, PO4-P and Si) between the treatments with treatment as a fixed factor (factor levels in situ, moderate and strong), using PRIMER 7 PERMANOVA add-on [43]. When examining differences in excretion between treatments, community biomass was used as a covariate in the PERMANOVA analysis, as it is known to significantly affect the excretion rate [44]. Correspondingly, when testing for the differences in bioturbation metrics between treatments, the biomass of B, UC/DC and S, and the density of S were used as covariates. Densities of B and UC/DC were discarded due to high correlation with their biomass. When exploring differences in oxygen and nutrient fluxes between treatments, bioturbation parameters (, MPD and bioirrigation) were added as covariates. For the NOx flux, we additionally included the O2 and fluxes as covariates, as these are known to affect nitrification–denitrification processes. Similarly, when analysing differences in the flux between treatments, we used NOX as covariate since the magnitude of is affected by NOx reduction. The PERMDISP procedure was used for each response variable to test for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions in the data. When needed, response variables were log10(x + 1) transformed to equalize the variance.
Finally, we performed a principal component analysis (PCA) to illustrate the treatment effect on the overall fluxes of oxygen and nutrients across the sediment–water interface. This analysis was thus performed on multiple variables (O2, , , , and Si4+) to illustrate the multivariate response. The analysis was based on Euclidean distances, calculated on untransformed but normalized data and performed in PRIMER 7 [42].
3. Results
(a) . Environmental conditions
Temperature in the in situ treatment varied between 7.5 and 9.4°C. This is comparable to the climatological mean at the site (August–October 1960–1990; 7.8°C). After the initiation of the heatwave, the temperature in moderate varied between 9.7 and 13.7°C, and in strong between 12.7 and 18.2°C (figure 1c). Salinity varied between 6.2 and 6.5 and the oxygen saturation (%) between 85.3 and 98.5 in in situ, 83.5 and 100.3 in moderate, and between 84.9 and 99.6 in strong.
Sediment organic matter availability (averaged over the sediment layers 0–5 cm) was lowest in moderate (8.0%) compared to in situ (17.0%) and strong (15.2%). Sediment phaeophytin content averaged over the sediment layers was lower in strong (122.9 µg g−1) than in in situ (127.4 µg g−1) and moderate (129.6 µg g−1). Chl a content, on the other hand, was lowest in the in situ (26.2 µg g−1) treatment compared to moderate (27.2 µg g−1) and strong (27.0 µg g−1). The chl a : phaeophytin ratio, used to assess the freshness of organic matter (ratio greater than 0.5 indicates fresh organic matter; [45]) was 0.21 in in situ and moderate and 0.22 in strong. Averaged over the oxygenized layer of the sediment (4 cm by visual inspection of the cores), the C/N ratio indicating the freshness of the material, was 6.9 in in situ, 7.3 in moderate and 7.1 in strong. At the sediment surface (top 0.5 cm) where animals feed, the C/N ratio was 7.3 in in situ, 7.4 in moderate and 6.6 in strong.
(b) . Macrofauna
In total, seven taxa were observed in the cores (the bivalve Macoma balthica, the spionid polychaete Marenzelleria arctia, the amphipod Monoporeia affinis, the priapulid Halicryptus spinulosus, the polychaete Bylgides sarsi, the crustacean Saduria entomon and Ostracoda). These species are adapted to a wide range of temperatures, as they occur in both shallow and deeper waters. No significant, either density- or biomass-based, differences in the functional composition between the treatments were detected (electronic supplementary material, figure S1).
(c) . Sediment mixing and bioirrigation
The MPD (figure 2a) was highest in in situ (7.1 ± 0.9 cm, mean ± s.d. throughout) and lowest in moderate (5.2 ± 2.8 cm). The sediment mixing rate (; figure 2b) was highest in strong (3.4 ± 2.1 cm−2 yr−1) and lowest in moderate (2.6 ± 2.2 cm−2 yr−1), whereas bioirrigation (figure 2c) was highest in in situ (63.8 ± 17.8 mL d−1) and lowest in moderate (39.7 ± 17.2 mL d−1). There were no statistically significant differences in bioturbation between the treatments (figure 2, PERMANOVA test p > 0.05; electronic supplementary material, table S1). The main dispersion effect (PERMDISP test) was also non-significant for all measured parameters (p > 0.05). The surface was completely reworked in all the cores. There was a quasi-significant treatment effect for MPD (PERMANOVA d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 3.38, p = 0.09) as shown in electronic supplementary material, table S2. The biomass of biodiffusors covaried significantly with MPD (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 13.53, p < 0.01).
Figure 2.
Boxplots presenting the (a) MPD (cm), (b) sediment mixing measured as the biodiffusion coefficient and (c) the porewater exchange rate or bioirrigation (Q) between the different treatments. On the x-axis, the in situ treatment represents a bottom water temperature of 7.5–9.4°C, the moderate varied between 9.7 and 13.7°C and strong 12.7–18.2°C. The boxplots mark the minimum, maximum, median and the first and third quartiles. (Online version in colour.)
(d) . Excretion rates
Benthic community excretion rates of NH4-N and PO4-P increased with increasing temperature (figure 3f) and were significantly higher in strong compared to in situ (PERMANOVA for NH4-N: d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 7.00, p < 0.01 and PO4-P: d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 6.84, p < 0.05; electronic supplementary material, table S2; figure 3f). The excretion rate of ammonium was also significantly higher in strong compared to moderate (figure 3f). Community biomass was a significant co-variable for NH4-N excretion (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 7.24, p < 0.05), which increased with increasing biomass, but this relationship was not significant for PO4-P (PERMANOVA p > 0.05, electronic supplementary material, table S2). Notably, the community excretion rates were of the same magnitude as measured effluxes of and , if re-calculating values to per square metre.
Figure 3.
Solute (a–d) and oxygen (e) fluxes and excretion rates (f) in the different treatments (in situ, moderate and strong). The whiskers mark minimum, maximum, median, and the first and third quartiles. Different letters mark significant differences between treatments (PERMANOVA post hoc, p < 0.05). Note that excretion rates are represented per core (i.e. 0.006 m2). (Online version in colour.)
(e) . Porewater and bottom water concentrations
The average porewater concentration in the first 4 cm of the sediment was higher for all solutes in moderate and strong, and for , and SiO4 at in situ conditions compared to the average concentration in the overlying water from the five flux cores per treatment. NOX concentration, however, was higher in the bottom water at in situ conditions than in the porewater (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). , and Si4+ concentrations increased from top down to the deeper layers of the sediment whereas NOx concentrations were highest in the first two layers of the sediment (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Concentrations of porewater solutes were in general higher in strong compared to the other two treatments.
(f) . Solute fluxes
All measured solute fluxes (NOx, , , Si and O2; all results in mmol m−2 d−1) showed tendencies to differ in magnitude and direction between treatments (figure 3). Mean oxygen consumption, indicative of respiration processes, was similar in in situ (−54.6 ± 16.2), moderate (−61.2 ± 23.6) and lowest in strong (−31.2 ± 15.7). Similarly, the mean and fluxes, indicative of remineralisation processes, were highest in moderate (0.7 ± 0.4 and 0.2 ± 0.2, for and , respectively) and lowest in the strong treatment (0.02 ± 0.9 and −0.1 ± 0.3 and , respectively; figure 4). Mean silicate flux varied from an efflux in the in situ treatment (2.3 ± 2.3) to a slight influx in moderate (−1.4 ± 13.1) and an higher influx in strong (−34.7 ± 10.8). The mean in situ NOX flux was slightly positive (0.3 ± 0.2), and decreased and became an influx towards moderate (−3.0 ± 1.2) and strong (−2.7 ± 1.9; figure 3).
Figure 4.
PCA of the overall fluxes of oxygen and nutrients across the sediment–water interface in each of the treatments. Oxygen consumption decreases while nutrient fluxes increase in direction of the lines. The analysis is based on Euclidean distances calculated on untransformed, normalized data.
PERMANOVA test revealed a statistically significant treatment effect for NOx (d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 10.62, p < 0.01), Si4+ (d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 16.48, p < 0.01) and O2 (d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 11.28, p < 0.01; figure 3; electronic supplementary material, table S2). Pairwise comparisons showed that strong differed significantly from in situ and moderate (p < 0.05) but no significant difference was found between in situ and moderate (p > 0.05). Also flux showed a similar response and the main treatment effect was close to significant (PERMANOVA d.f. = 2, pseudo-F = 4.16, p = 0.06). The flux significantly covaried with the NOX flux (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 13.47, p < 0.01) but did not have any significant treatment effect (p > 0.05). Similarly, (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 10.98, p = 0.01) and bioirrigation (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 6.26, p < 0.05) significantly covaried with NOX. Bioirrigation was also a significant covariate for O2 consumption (PERMANOVA d.f. = 1, pseudo-F = 29.12, p < 0.001). Overall, if considering the fluxes together, PCA clearly summarizes that oxygen consumption increases together with the nutrient fluxes towards the in situ and moderate treatments compared to the strong treatment (figure 4).
4. Discussion
As coastal ecosystems around the world are already under multiple pressures [1], including eutrophication, hypoxia and acidification, disentangling the effects of MHWs is necessary for forecasting possible future changes in marine ecosystems [22]. Here, we explored the effects of short-term moderate and strong MHWs on sediment ecosystem functioning. The remineralization of organic matter in the sediment recycles nutrients back to the primary producers, which are the basis of the food web. Proper functioning of the seafloor is therefore essential for sustaining marine ecosystems. Our results suggest significant changes in the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients within the seafloor under strong heatwaves, while moderate heatwaves seem to boost remineralisation processes. Strong heatwaves also lead to increased metabolism and stress of benthic animals, although they are able to maintain their mechanistic processes.
(a) . Heating did not decrease macrofauna bioturbation
Bioturbation performed by benthic macrofauna is an essential ecosystem process, which alters the redox conditions of the sediment matrix thereby affecting the rate of chemical processes [26]. The mechanism by which different species affect these rates depends on their functional traits. We found no effect of temperature on sediment mixing rate, MPD of luminophores (fauna) in the sediment or bioirrigation rates. The lack of significant differences in bioturbation between the treatments is not surprising given that there were no significant differences in macrofauna community (functional) structure between the experimental units. However, the general mechanistic effect of bioturbation was sustained even under strong heatwave conditions, indicating that, on a community level, the macrofauna was still able to perform its functional task. There can be inter- or even intraspecific variation on the responses of individuals to heatwaves [17,46–48], which could cause the increasing variation seen in the bioturbation parameters from in situ towards strong heatwave conditions, thus hampering the detection of statistically significant differences. However, the increasing variation per se already indicates an effect of heatwaves on bioturbation processes (figure 2). Depending on the temperature optima of different taxa, some species might be expected to decrease their movement and feeding activities towards higher temperature. Thus, the decrease in oxygen consumption seen in the strong treatment could be an indication of macrofauna decreasing their activity due to heat shock. This is, however, unlikely since the sediment mixing and bioirrigation remained at the same level throughout the different treatments.
(b) . Macrofauna metabolism increases with temperature
Our results showed that community excretion rates increased with temperature and biomass, although the effects of temperature were only significant under the strong heatwave treatment. Indeed, the metabolic process of excretion is predicted to increase with increasing temperatures [13,44]. The higher excretion rate indicates a higher metabolic rate of benthic species, but could also partly be interpreted as a stress response of the animals in response to the warming temperatures [41]. Handling of the animals before incubation is also likely to induce stress in the animals [41]; however, animals from all treatments were handled in a similar manner.
(c) . Heating affects sediment biogeochemical processes
Interestingly, we found differences in both magnitude and direction of sediment biogeochemical fluxes between treatments (figure 5) despite the lack of statistically significant differences in benthic bioturbation or functional composition of the macrofauna. Similarly to our results, Sanz-Lázaro et al. [49] found no significant effect of temperature on bioirrigation by Nereis diversicolor, although they found a significant effect of temperature on sediment metabolism mediated by Nereis bioirrigation. In this experiment, bioirrigation rates are at the same level in strong and in the in situ treatment. However, in the (normal) in situ conditions, we observed a slight efflux of solutes while in the strong heatwave conditions an influx of oxygen-associated solutes, such as nitrate-nitrite and phosphate was observed. The influx in the strong treatment could partly be due to mechanistic effects of the fauna on sediment oxygenation. Hence, the solutes associated with oxygen, such as phosphate and silicate, are trapped in the sediment. This also explains the importance of sediment mixing and bioirrigation as covariables for these fluxes. It should be noted that the fluxes in the in situ treatment can be somewhat overestimated compared to the heated treatments due to a slightly longer incubation time (maximum 53 min difference). However, because the fluxes are given as millimoles per square metre per day, this difference in incubation time should not affect the results. The low temperature in the in situ treatment did not allow a shorter incubation time based on previous studies [35,36], to get measurable results. A shorter incubation time was, however, necessary for the heated treatments to keep oxygen level saturated (greater than 80%).
Figure 5.
A conceptual figure summarizing and combining the results of the measured parameters. Macrofaunal communities and ecosystem functions respond differently depending on the intensity of the heatwave. Even though the mechanistic activities of macrofauna remain unchanged, metabolism (as estimated by excretion (E); yellow arrow) increased with temperature. A moderate heatwave was observed to boost oxygen consumption (O2, light blue arrow) and nutrient recycling processes (symbolized by the size of the circular, green arrows) in the sediment, which then decreased under a strong heatwave. Magnitude in fluxes is illustrated with their position at the sediment–water interface, whereas the length of the dashed line indicates the amount of variation in each flux. The dominant benthic species (the bivalve Macoma balthica, the amphipod Monoporeia affinis and the polychaete Marenzelleria spp.) and their position in the sediment is illustrated. (Online version in colour.)
Overall, the negligible solute effluxes and the oxygen consumption in in situ conditions are comparable to previous studies conducted in organic-rich, muddy sediments in the area (e.g. [36,50]). The increase in especially ammonium, phosphate and silicate fluxes in the moderate treatment is indicative of both a purely chemical increase in diffusion rates, increased metabolic activity of organisms in higher temperature as well as higher activity of degradation processes. Oxygen consumption of the sediment can be used as a proxy for the activity of both macrofauna and microbial processes in the sediment [51]. Hence the increase in oxygen consumption simultaneously with the aforementioned solutes in moderate indicates a boost in nutrient cycling. In the strong treatment, however, the oxygen consumption decreases almost to half of that in the two other treatments, indicating a lower activity of sediment processes. Similarly, the silicate flux, which is sensitive to movements of particles and water, while also being a degradation product of diatoms, has a large influx in the strong treatment. However, ammonium and phosphate fluxes remain rather high in the strong treatment, possibly due to the increase in metabolic activity of macrofauna (figure 5).
(d) . Indications of changes in organic matter cycling in response to heatwaves of different intensity
Even though we did not measure microbial activity in this experiment, temperature likely has a direct effect on the microbial community and thus organic matter degradation processes [52–54]. For example, soil warming by 5°C could result in a decline in microbial and degradative enzyme biomass and thereby a decrease in the carbon flow from soil to atmosphere [28]. On the other hand, thermal adaptation or change in the community structure in response to warming towards species more efficient in degradation could counteract the loss of biomass [54]. Microbial activities break down organic matter to its molecular constituents. In addition to temperature, the breakdown of organic matter into its molecular constituents by microbial activities is also much more effective under aerobic than anaerobic conditions. Sediment reworking and burrow ventilation activities by benthic macrofauna increase oxygenized surfaces where microbial remineralization of organic matter can occur. Our results show that sediment mixing and burrow ventilation rates in in situ and strong are similar to each other, despite the high variability in strong, and along with visual evidence, indicate that oxygen was available in the sediment for aerobic processes. However, the low oxygen consumption and the low correlation between ammonium and phosphate fluxes, as well as the lower sediment C/N ratio in strong (6.6) compared to the in situ (7.3) and moderate (7.4), indicate decreased microbial processes in strong heatwave conditions resulting in the freshest organic material in these treatments.
On the other hand, the highest oxygen consumption and correlation between ammonium and phosphate, the lowest organic matter and chl a concentration, highest phaeophytin, as well as highest C/N ratio, were observed in moderate. This is indicative of a functioning microbial community and implies the highest efficiency of organic matter degradation during a short-term, moderate heatwave. This is in line with the results of Redfern et al. [17] who observed the highest activity and probability of feeding at intermediate temperature, and of Baker et al. [55] who similarly observed high nutrient uptake rates in intermediate temperatures. By contrast, Walker et al. [52] found, by combining field observations and experimental work, that microbial activity is temperature-dependent and does not acclimate to a warming of 6°C over the course of weeks or even decades. Based on our bioturbation and excretion measurements as well as the evidence from solute fluxes above, macrofauna were still active in strong heatwave conditions, and thus a decrease in microbial activity most likely explains the decrease in remineralisation processes under a short-term, strong heatwave. Since we did not offer any fresh food for the macrofauna, it is also possible that the response seen in the strong treatment is due to the macrofauna shutting down their activities in response to the decreased food supply. However, results from organic matter, POC, PON and pigment analyses suggest that fresh material was available and our results from the bioturbation measurements show no changes in the activity of macrofauna.
(e) . The need to encompass complexity and variability of natural systems
This experiment was designed to explore the effects of short-term heatwaves of differing intensities on benthic ecosystem functioning. The different response variables measured the effects of heatwaves on different timescales. As we used intact sediment cores, they contained the legacy effect of the community contained in the core. The measured bioturbation rates are therefore an integration over several days and not only measured the immediate effects of heatwaves across the short term. Therefore, significant treatment effects could be difficult to detect even if there were some. Solute fluxes, excretion rates and sediment oxygen consumption represent a snapshot of the immediate effects of a heatwave and give information regarding the short-term response. Our design did not allow the study of individual species, but this could be an important aspect in future experiments. Given that different species have different thermal tolerance limits, knowing the effects of single species might help us predict the consequences for ecosystem functioning where we are facing a loss of some species while gaining others.
Due to the design of the experiment, we were not able to follow up on the possible recovery phase after the heatwave. For future predictions, it would be crucial to know if and when the ecosystem functions recover and whether or not the consequences are dependent on the intensity, length or frequencies of heatwaves. In the experiment by Amorim et al. [56], for example, survival and condition of the bivalve Scrobicularia plana were not affected by the exposure to extreme heatwaves. However, longer heatwaves with shorter recovery periods induced a physiological defense mechanism, which was normalized during recovery. Our results indicated a decrease in organic matter degradation under a strong heatwave. If this function does not recover in a reasonable time, organic matter would start to deposit on the seafloor in excess, potentially leading to hypoxia. The risk of hypoxia during heatwaves is further increased by the capacity of warmer water to retain less oxygen than colder water. Although our treatments mimicked natural conditions observed at the sampling site during the heatwave of 2018, no hypoxia was observed in the bottom water during this time. However, hypoxia and/or other stressors do co-occur with heatwaves [22,57–59] and experiments on multiple stressors are needed to reveal possible synergistic and/or antagonistic effects. There is also indication from the study site that hypoxia following a long-term heatwave leads to a degradation of the benthic community, indicating a legacy effect of the abnormally high temperature (L.K. & A.V. 2021, pers. obs.). In the study area, changes in salinity have also been expected as a result of climate change [60]. A decrease in salinity would cause further stress on the marine biota, many of which are already living at the edge of their distribution range in the brackish Baltic Sea. Coupled with heatwaves, the low salinity might push many of the marine taxa over the edge.
5. Conclusion
Climate change and the consequent increase in intensity and frequency of MHWs are threatening the biodiversity as well as the functioning of coastal seas. Our results suggest that macrofaunal communities and ecosystem functions respond differently depending on the intensity of the heatwave. Even though the mechanistic activities of macrofauna (sediment mixing and burrow ventilation activities) did not significantly change, a moderate heatwave seemed to boost nutrient recycling, which then decreased under a strong heatwave. Should a moderate heatwave last for a longer time, the boost in degradation processes could result in substrate depletion [52] with consequences for several aspects of the macrobenthic community [15,61]. On the other hand, the decrease in degradation processes under a strong heatwave could over time lead to a build-up of organic matter on the seafloor, which would cause oxygen depletion. For the great majority of our measured parameters, variation increased from in situ towards strong heatwave conditions, suggesting that the predictability of the consequences of a heatwave decreases in response to its strength, at least up to the point where the limit of thermal tolerance is reached and the system collapses. Considering the vast area of marine sedimentary ecosystems and their importance for regulating cycles of carbon and nutrients, studies in aquatic systems are sorely needed.
Acknowledgements
We are deeply grateful for field and laboratory assistance by Zuzanna Borawska, Iván F. Rodil and Rebecca Gladstone-Gallagher. Our warmest thanks go to the technical and laboratory staff at Tvärminne Zoological Station. We also thank our reviewers for their constructive and thorough comments that helped to improve this paper.
Data accessibility
The dataset underlying this study is available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2v6wwpzrx [62].
The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material [63].
Authors' contributions
L.K.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, writing—original draft and writing—review and editing; A.V.: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology and writing—review and editing.
All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.
Conflict of interest declaration
The authors declare no competing interests.
Funding
The study was financed by Walter and Andrée de Nottbeck Foundation, the Academy of Finland (project 1323212), Helsinki 3-year research grant (A.V.) and the Sophie von Julin foundation.
References
- 1.Cloern JE, et al. 2016. Human activities and climate variability drive fast-paced change across the world's estuarine–coastal ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 513-529. ( 10.1111/gcb.13059) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hughes L. 2000. Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already. TREE 15, 57-61. ( 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Smale DA, et al. 2019. Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 306-312. ( 10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.IPCC. 2021. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (eds Masson-Delmotte V, et al.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hobday AJ, et al. 2018. Categorizing and naming marine heatwaves. Oceanography 31, 162-173. ( 10.5670/oceanog.2018.205) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Frölicher TL, Fischer EM, Gruber N. 2018. Marine heatwaves under global warming. Nature 560, 360-364. ( 10.1038/s41586-018-0383-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stillman JH. 2019. Heat waves, the new normal: summertime temperature extremes will impact animals, ecosystems, and human communities. Physiology 34, 86-100. ( 10.1152/physiol.00040.2018) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Laufkötter C, Zscheischler J, Frölicher TL. 2020. High-impact marine heatwaves attributable to human-induced global warming. Science 369, 1621-1625. ( 10.1126/science.aba0690) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oliver ECJ, Benthuysen JA, Darmaraki S, Donat MG, Hobday AJ, Holbrook NJ, Schlegel RW, Gupta AS. 2021. Marine heatwaves. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 13, 313-342. ( 10.1146/annurev-marine-032720-095144) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wernberg T, Smale DA, Tuya F, Thomsen MS, Langlois TJ, de Bettignies T, Bennett S, Rousseaux CS. 2013. An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 78-82. ( 10.1038/nclimate1627) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hobday AJ, et al. 2016. A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves. Prog. Oceanogr. 141, 227-238. ( 10.1016/j.pocean.2015.12.014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gillooly JF, Brown JH, West GB, Savage VM, Charnov EL. 2001. Effects of size and temperature on metabolic rate. Science 293, 2248-2251. ( 10.1126/science.1061967) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brown JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85, 1771-1789. ( 10.1890/03-9000) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hillebrand H, et al. 2009. Herbivore metabolism and stoichiometry each constrain herbivory at different organizational scales across ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 12, 516-527. ( 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01304.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mäkelin S, Villnäs A. 2022. Food sources drive temporal variation in elemental stoichiometry of benthic consumers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9999, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Horwitz R, et al. 2020. Near-future ocean warming and acidification alter foraging behaviour, locomotion, and metabolic rate in a keystone marine mollusc. Sci. Rep. 10, 5461. ( 10.1038/s41598-020-62304-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Redfern JC, Foggo A, Mieszkowska N. 2021. Handling the heat: responses of two congeneric limpet species to environmental temperature differences. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 536, 151500. ( 10.1016/j.jembe.2020.151500) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lohrer AM, Norkko AM, Thrush SF, Cummings VJ. 2021. Climate cascades affect coastal Antarctic seafloor ecosystem functioning. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 6181-6191. ( 10.1111/gcb.15907) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wernberg, et al. 2016. Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem. Science 353, 169–172. ( 10.1126/science.aad8745) [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Cavole, et al. 2016. . Biological impacts of the 2013–2015 warm-water anomaly in the Northeast Pacific: winners, losers, and the future. Oceanography 29, 273–285.
- 21.Garrabou J, et al. 2009. Mass mortality in northwestern Mediterranean rocky benthic communities: effects of the 2003 heat wave. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 1090-1103. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01823.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frölicher TL, Laufkötter C. 2018. Emerging risks from marine heat waves. Nat. Commun. 9, 650. ( 10.1038/s41467-018-03163-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Harvey BP, Marshall KE, Harley CDG, Russell BD. 2021. Predicting responses to marine heatwaves using functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 20-29. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kristensen E, Penha-Lopes G, Delefosse M, Valdemarsen T, Quintana CO, Banta GT. 2012. What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 446, 285-302. ( 10.3354/meps09506) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Queiros AM, et al. 2013. A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates. Ecol. Evol. 3, 3958-3985. ( 10.1002/ece3.769) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kristensen E. 2000. Organic matter diagenesis at the oxic/anoxic interface in coastal marine sediments, with emphasis on the role of burrowing animals. Hydrobiologia 426, 1-24. ( 10.1023/A:1003980226194) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Middelburg JJ. 2018. Reviews and syntheses: to the bottom of carbon processing at the seafloor. Biogeosciences 5, 413-427. ( 10.5194/bg-15-413-2018) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA. 2010. Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat. Geosci. 3, 336-340. ( 10.1038/ngeo846) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dolbeth M, Babe O, Costa DA, Mucha AP, Cardoso PG, Arenas F. 2021. Benthic estuarine communities' contribution to bioturbation under the experimental effect of marine heatwaves. Sci. Rep. 11, 1-11. ( 10.1038/s41598-021-90720-7) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Humborg C, et al. 2019. High emissions of carbon dioxide and methane from the coastal Baltic Sea at the end of a summer heat wave. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 493. ( 10.3389/fmars.2019.00493) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goebeler N, Norkko A, Norkko J. 2022. Ninety years of coastal monitoring reveals baseline and extreme ocean temperatures are increasing off the Finnish coast. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 1-11. ( 10.1038/s43247-022-00545-z) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Myrberg K, Andrejev O. 2003. Main upwelling regions in the Baltic Sea—a statistical analysis based on three-dimensional modelling. Boreal Environ. Res. 8, 97–112.
- 33.Mahaut M, Graf G. 1987. A luminophore tracer technique for bioturbation studies. Oceanolog. Acta 10, 323-328. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Meysman FJR, Malyuga VS, Boudreau BP, Middelburg JJ. 2008. A generalized stochastic approach to particle dispersal in soils and sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 72, 3460-3478. ( 10.1016/j.gca.2008.04.023) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Villnäs A, Norkko J, Lukkari K, Hewitt J, Norkko A. 2012. Consequences of increasing hypoxic disturbance on benthic communities and ecosystem functioning. PLoS ONE 7, e44920. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0044920) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kauppi L, Norkko J, Ikonen J, Norkko A. 2017. Seasonal variability in ecosystem functions: quantifying the contribution of invasive species to nutrient cycling in coastal ecosystems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 572, 193-207. ( 10.3354/meps12171) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Presley BJ. 1971. Techniques for analyzing interstitial water samples. Part I. Determination of selected minor and major inorganic constituents. Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drilling Project 7, 1749-1755. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rao AM, Malkin SY, Montserrat F, Meysman FJ. 2014. Alkalinity production in intertidal sands intensified by lugworm bioirrigation. Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci. 148, 36-47. ( 10.1016/j.ecss.2014.06.006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.De Smet B, Braeckman U, Soetaert K, Vincx M, Vanaverbeke J. 2016. Predator effects on the feeding and bioirrigation activity of ecosystem-engineered Lanice conchilega reefs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 475, 31-37. ( 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.11.005) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lorenzen CJ. 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology 12, 343-346. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Villnäs A, Mäkelin S, Vanni MJ. 2022. Allometric and stoichiometric traits predict nutrient excretion rates by benthic consumers. Front. Mar. Sci. 9, 870308. ( 10.3389/fmars.2022.870308) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2015. PRIMER v7: user manual/tutorial. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E. See http://updates.primer-e.com/primer7/manuals/User_manual_v7a.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. 2008. Permanova+ for primer: guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth, UK: PERIMER-e. See http://updates.primer-e.com/primer7/manuals/PERMANOVA+_manual.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Vanni MJ, McIntyre PB. 2016. Predicting nutrient excretion of aquatic animals with metabolic ecology and ecological stoichiometry: a global synthesis. Ecology 97, 3460-3471. ( 10.1002/ecy.1582) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Rodil IF, Lucena-Moya P, Tamelander T, Norkko J, Norkko A. 2020. Seasonal variability in benthic–pelagic coupling: quantifying organic matter inputs to the seafloor and benthic macrofauna using a multi-marker approach. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 404. ( 10.3389/fmars.2020.00404) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Semsar-Kazerouni M, Verberk WCEP. 2018. It's about time: linkages between heat tolerance, thermal acclimation and metabolic rate at different temporal scales in the freshwater amphipod Gammarus fossarum Koch, 1836. J. Therm. Biol 75, 31-37. ( 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.04.016) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sorte CJB, Fuller A, Bracken MES. 2010. Impacts of a simulated heat wave on composition of a marine community. Oikos 119, 1909-1918. ( 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18663.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pansch C, et al. 2018. Heat waves and their significance for a temperate benthic community: a near-natural experimental approach. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4357-4367. ( 10.1111/gcb.14282) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sanz-Lázaro C, Valdemarsen T, Marín A, Holmer M. 2011. Effect of temperature on biogeochemistry of marine organic-enriched systems: implications in a global warming scenario. Ecol. Appl. 21, 2664-2677. ( 10.1890/10-2219.1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gammal J, Järnström M, Bernard G, Norkko J, Norkko A. 2019. Environmental context mediates biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in coastal softsediment habitats. Ecosystems 22, 137-151. ( 10.1007/s10021-018-0258-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Glud RN. 2008. Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments. Mar. Biol. Res. 4, 243-289. ( 10.1080/17451000801888726) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Walker TWN, Kaiser C, Strasser F, Herbold CW, Leblans NIW, Woebken D, Janssens IA, Sigurdsson BD, Richter A. 2018. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 885-889. ( 10.1038/s41558-018-0259-x) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hopkins FM, Filley TR, Gleixner G, Lange M, Top SM, Trumbore SE. 2014. Increased belowground carbon inputs and warming promote loss of soil organic carbon through complementary microbial responses. Soil Biol. Biochem. 76, 69. ( 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.028) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bradford MA. 2013. Thermal adaptation of decomposer communities in warming soils. Front. Microbiol. 4, 1-16. ( 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00333) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Baker KG, Robinson CM, Radford DT, McInnes AS, Evenhuis C, Doblin MA. 2016. Thermal performance curves of functional traits aid understanding of thermally induced changes in diatom-mediated biogeochemical fluxes. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 44. ( 10.3389/fmars.2016.00044) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Amorim VE, Gonçalves O, Capela R, Fernández-Boo S, Oliveira M, Dolbeth M, Arenas F, Cardoso PG. 2020. Immunological and oxidative stress responses of the bivalve Scrobicularia plana to distinct patterns of heatwaves. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 106, 1067-1077. ( 10.1016/j.fsi.2020.09.024) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vaquer-Sunyer R, Duarte CM. 2011. Temperature effects on oxygen thresholds for hypoxia in marine benthic organisms. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 1788-1797. ( 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02343.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Araújo JE, Madeira D, Vitorino R, Repolho T, Rosa R, Diniz M. 2018. Negative synergistic impacts of ocean warming and acidification on the survival and proteome of the commercial sea bream, Sparus aurata. J. Sea Res. 139, 50-61. ( 10.1016/j.seares.2018.06.011) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Horwitz R, Jackson MD, Mills SC. 2017. The embryonic life history of the tropical sea hare Stylocheilus striatus (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) under ambient and elevated ocean temperatures. PeerJ 5, e2956. ( 10.7717/peerj.2956) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Meier HE, et al. 2021. Climate change in the Baltic Sea region: a summary. Earth Syst. Dyn. 13, 457-593. ( 10.5194/esd-2021-67) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ehrnsten E, Norkko A, Müller-Karulis B, Gustafsson E, Gustafsson BG. 2020. The meagre future of benthic fauna in a coastal sea—Benthic responses to recovery from eutrophication in a changing climate. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2235-2250. ( 10.1111/gcb.15014) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kauppi L, Villnäs A. 2022. Data from: Marine heatwaves of differing intensities lead to distinct patterns in seafloor functioning. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.2v6wwpzrx) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Kauppi L, Villnäs A. 2022. Data from: Marine heatwaves of differing intensities lead to distinct patterns in seafloor functioning. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6268396) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Kauppi L, Villnäs A. 2022. Data from: Marine heatwaves of differing intensities lead to distinct patterns in seafloor functioning. Dryad Digital Repository. ( 10.5061/dryad.2v6wwpzrx) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Kauppi L, Villnäs A. 2022. Data from: Marine heatwaves of differing intensities lead to distinct patterns in seafloor functioning. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6268396) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Data Availability Statement
The dataset underlying this study is available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2v6wwpzrx [62].
The data are provided in the electronic supplementary material [63].





