Skip to main content
Frontiers in Dentistry logoLink to Frontiers in Dentistry
. 2022 Aug 10;19:26. doi: 10.18502/fid.v19i26.10597

Pre-Heating of Low-Shrinkage Composite Resins: Effects on Color Stability and Surface Roughness

Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee 1, Siavash Savadi Oskoee 2, Fatemeh Pournaghi-Azar 2, Sana Dibazar 2,*, Mehdi Esmaeili 3
PMCID: PMC9675621  PMID: 36458276

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the effect of preheating on the color stability and surface roughness of a silorane-based composite resin.

Materials and Methods: A total of 44 Filtek P90 composite resin disks, (10mm×1mm), were fabricated using plastic molds and were divided into two groups. In group 2, the composite resin syringes were placed in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 55‒60°C before preparing the disks. After polishing the samples with silicon carbide papers, they were stored in distilled water for 48 hours. Roughness and color parameters were then measured in two stages: immediately after retrieval from distilled water and after 40 days of storage in tea solution. Finally, the differences in roughness and color parameters were recorded. Independent sample t-test and regression analysis were used at a significance level of P<0.05.

Results: Based on the findings of the present study, there was no significant difference among the mean ∆E values (P=0.4); however, a significant difference in mean surface roughness (P=0.01) was found between the two groups. Regression analysis showed a significant relationship between the study groups in terms of surface roughness and ΔE values​ (preheated: r2 = 0.73; non-preheated: r2= 0.76).

Conclusion: Filtek P90 silorane-base composite showed ΔE>3.3 and surface roughness above 0.2µ under preheated and non-preheated conditions and discoloration increased following preheating.

Key Words: Heating, Filtek LS Low Shrink Resin, Composite Resins, Color

Introduction

Despite ever-increasing advances in dental materials, the problems such as polymerize-tion shrinkage and the subsequent stress have limited using the methacrylate-based composites (MBCs) [1,2]. One of the results of efforts to improve the clinical performance and minimize the polymerization shrinkage of MBCs is introducing new monomers, including ring-opening siloranes [2,3]. Siloranes are a group of composites introduced to dentistry by Weinmann in 2005. The word silorane is derived from the combination of siloxane and oxirane. These two compounds form silorane which is biocompatible and hydrophobic.

The polymerization mechanism of silorane-based composites (SBCs) is the cationic ring-opening which modulates the polymerization shrinkage in the composite by expanding the polymer chain [4].

Color stability as a multifactorial phenomenon is an effective factor in the successful clinical performance of direct tooth-colored restora-tions in dentistry [5,6], which can be affected by debonding of fillers or changes in the resin matrix [7]. The resin matrix discoloration is ​​related to the degree of conversion (DC), physicochemical properties, and hydrophilic nature of the matrix [8,9].

Various studies were conducted on the effects of preheating on improving the composite resin properties since its application in dental restorative materials [10-15]. During preheating, the composite syringe is heated in the range of 39-60°C before use [16]. It was stated that chair-side preheating increases the DC and crosslinking in the polymer network by increasing the flow and reactivity of the active groups in the polymerization process and ultimately improves the mechanical properties [13,17]. Considering the importance of the color stability of composites in maintaining the aesthetic properties, the role of preheating to ensure the chemical stability of resin matrix [18], and the effect of chemical differences among composite resins on the color stability of composite restorations was the focus of researches [19,20].

This study aimed to investigate the effect of preheating on the color stability and surface roughness (Ra) of a silorane-based composite resin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present experimental study, Filtek P90-silorane-based composite (3M-ESPE, Dental product, St.Paul, MN, USA) was used to prepare the study samples. Table 1 demonstrates the characteristics of the studied material. Fourty-four composite samples were fabricated in two groups (n=22 per group) as follows:

Table 1.

Characteristics of the composite

Material/Type Description and composition Lot No. Manufacturer
Filtek LS P90
Silorane-based
microhybrid
composite
Silorane resin (siloxane + oxirane) 23%wt; monomer:
Bis-3,4-epoxycyclohexylethylphenyl-methylsilane, 3,4-
epoxycyclohexylethylcyclopolymethylsiloxane,di-and
epoxy functional oligosiloxane, and trifluoride ITRE;
N468933 3M, ESPE, St.
Paul, MN, USA
Filler (76%wt): silanized quartz yttrium fluoride;
Initiating system (camphorquinone, iodonium
salt and electron donors) 0.9% and stabilizer 0.13%,
and pigments, 0.005%. 0.4-1.7µm

Group 1: a total of 22 composite samples were prepared in the form of discs using plastic molds with a diameter of 10mm and a thickness of 1.5mm. In order to prevent the formation of an air-inhibition layer on the sample surface, the molds containing the composite were placed between two glass slabs and then light-cured using an Astralis 7 light-curing unit (Ivoclar, Vivadent, FL-9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein) for 40 seconds with a light intensity of 700mw/cm2. During irradiation, the light-guiding probe's tip made a right angle contact with the glass slab's surface. The output light intensity was measured periodically by a radiometer (Demetron/Kerr Corp, Orange, CA, USA). The surface of composite resin disk on which color was to be determined using a spectrophotometer was distinguished by placing a mark on its opposite side with a bur. The samples were then polished using silicon carbide paper disks (Soflex, UltraThin, 3M ESPE, USA) up to 1000-grit paper.

In group 2, all composite sample preparation steps were similar to group 1, except that in this group, the syringe containing the resin composite was immersed in a hot water bath for 15 minutes before use. The temperature of the water bath was set at 55-60°C [18].

All samples were kept in distilled water for 48 hours at 37°C [21]. After removing the excess water using an absorbent paper, 20 samples were selected for color analysis and Ra, and two samples were discarded to evaluate the DC. A reflective spectrophotometer (Sheen Micromatch plus, Sheen Instruments Ltd., England) and CIE L*a*b* system were used to analyze the color parameters. In the CIE L*a*b* system, a* and b*, as two axes perpendicular to each other, indicate color, and the third axis, L*, which is perpendicular to a* and b* axes, indicates lightness. The samples were placed on a standard white background, and three parameters, L* (lightness), a* (red-green) and b* (blue-yellow) were recorded as initial readout. A profilometer (PFM-3320 contact profilometer, Sharif Solar, Tehran, Iran) assessed the initial Ra of the samples. The accuracy range of the z determination was 50nm (with a maximum range of 200 µm) and steps for scanning the surface were <2.5µm [22].

The measurements were made three times for each sample; finally, the mean values were calculated. Composite samples from both groups were put in a container containing tea solution after recording numerical values of color characteristics and Ra as a baseline. To prepare the tea solution, a Lipton teabag was placed in 150mL of boiling water [18], and the composite samples were placed on the bottom of the container one hour later. The samples were kept in tea solution for 3 hours daily for 40 consecutive days. Then, the samples were transferred to a distilled water container for the rest of the day. The tea solution was refreshed daily [21]. Then, the samples were subjected to spectrophotometry again to investigate possible color changes. Color change values were calculated using the formula:

∆E=[∆L*2+∆a*2+∆b*2]½

for both groups, where ΔL, Δa, and Δb indicate the differences between pre-and post-aging coordination [23].

Similarly, the post-immersion roughness values were calculated to assess the Ra difference in both preheated and non- preheated groups.

FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy) test (TENSOR 27, Bruker, Germany) assessed the DC for two samples of both groups. Measurements were performed in absorbance mode under following conditions: wave range of 400-4000cm-1, resolution of 1cm-1, and 14 scans per sample.

SBC (Filtek P90) monomer does not have C=C aliphatic (1610cm-1) groups and remains constant during the polymerization process.

The DC of SBRC samples was calculated by FTIR spectrum at 883 cm-1, which is related to oxirane ring-opening regions (C-O-C), according to the following formula [24]:

%COC=polymeroxiraneCOCaromaticC=CmonomeroxiraneCOCaromaticC=C

Independent samples t-test was used to compare ΔE and Ra values, and regression

Results

The mean and standard deviation of ΔE and Ra values are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Means and standard deviations of ΔE and roughness values

Variable Mean SD SE 95% CI for Mean Min Max
Lower Upper
ΔE Preheated 11.85 0.95 0.21 11.4 12.29 10.69 13.01
Non-preheated 11.63 0.81 0.18 11.24 12.01 10.52 12.74
Roughness Preheated 0.71 0.45 0.1 0.5 0.92 0.1 1.89
Non-preheated 0.41 0.24 0.05 0.29 0.52 0.1 1.01

SD: standard deviation; SE: standard error; CI: confidence interval; Min: minimum; Max: maximum

Results of the Independent samples t-test showed no significant difference among the mean ∆E values in non-preheated and preheated groups (P = 0.4).

On the other hand, the results of the Independent samples t-test showed a significant difference between the two study groups in terms of the mean Ra (P = 0.01).

Regression analysis showed a significant relationship among the study groups in terms of the Ra and ΔE values​ (preheated: r2 = 0.73; non-preheated: r2= 0.76). Figure 1 shows the results of DC in the study groups. The DC of the samples in the preheated and non-preheated groups was 64% and 53%, respectively.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

FTIR spectra- Degree of monomer conversion

Discussion

The positive effect of preheating on mechanical properties of composite resins such as viscosity, DC, hardness, etc., were investigated in previous studies [11-13,17]. Considering the surface characteristics are one of the most important factors that directly affect the longevity of composite restorations [25], in the present study the effect of preheating on color stability and Ra of Filtek P90 SBC- as a composite with low polymerization shrinkage rate- was evaluated. The results showed that ΔE values ​​in both study groups were higher than 3.3 (as clinically acceptable levels). Although ΔE values in the preheated group were higher, there was no statistically significant difference between two groups.

Extrinsic discoloration, which is mostly produced by the adsorption and absorption of exogenous pigments, is a key and effective component in the color instability of restorations [6]. The quality of the matrix polymer and filler-resin interface affects intrinsic discoloration [18]. Both types of discolorations are related to Ra directly or indirectly. In other words, the Ra of composite restorations is affected by the interaction of factors such as type, shape, size and, distribution of filler particles, resin matrix type, final DC, the bond quality between filler and matrix on the one hand, and the polishing system, its application and other environmental factors, on the other hand [26,27].

Silorane-based monomer resin has one siloxane core and 4 oxirane functional groups which are connected to the core as side chains [28]. Oxirane is responsible for biocompatibility and low polymerization shrinkage, and siloxane backbone gives the material a hydrophobic nature. This characteristic is important since SBC restorations have a lower proclivity to absorb colored elements in the daily diet and are less sensitive to external discoloration [3].

Fine particular filler (dimensions<0.5μm) was added to the SBC to ensure mechanical stability [3]. In silorane technology, silane is modified with an epoxy functionality to establish the filler-resin interface and prevent acid attack by quartz Si-OH groups [3]. The important point is the low filler content (55% by volume) of SBC [29]. It seems that the changes in the matrix composition, filler content, and poor performance of the matrix-filler interface [27] lead to an increase in the Ra of the SBCs following artificial aging. Although some studies have yielded different results [27,30], various studies showed that the Ra of SBCs was higher than the other groups [31-34]. Lins et al [26] showed that the Ra of SBCs when in contact with a polyester band is close to critical values (0.2µm) for microbial plaque accumulation, and following the use of polishing systems, the values ​​increase by even more than twice the critical values. Although the Ra was high in both study groups, its mean in the preheated group was significantly higher than in the non-preheated group. Heating-induced attenuated covalent bonds between quartz particles and resin matrix [18] can justify further detachment of filler particles and Ra. High Ra values in both study groups could justify ΔE> 3.3. The discoloration propensity of the resin matrix is affected by DC and physicochemical properties of the matrix, including water absorption [8,9]. Not only does composite preheating under isothermal circumstances enhance the DC, resulting in a high-crosslinking polymer chain with desired mechanical characteristics [11], but it also speeds up the polymerization process by enhancing monomer mobility [35,36]. This is indicative of the effect of preheating on DC enhancement of SBC with the delayed polymerization reaction [37]. The DC is a clinical parameter to describe the conversion rate of monomers and is measured by FTIR [38]. The results of the DC evaluation indicated a positive effect of preheating on increasing the polymerization rate of SBC (64% for preheated and 54% for non-preheated groups). Considering the increase in DC, following preheating and the hydrophobic properties of Filtek P90 composite, an improvement in optical properties of the studied samples in the preheated group was expected, but as in the study conducted by Kahnamouei et al [18], color change increased in SBC in preheated samples, although there was no significant difference between the study groups. It seems that Ra following the separation of quartz particles in terms of poor performance of the modified silane layer under non-preheated conditions; on the one hand, and delayed polymerization, on the other hand, causes high color changes in study samples of the tea solution. A similar result was obtained in a study by Pires-de-Souza et al [39]. Although it has been shown that preheating as a cycle does not have a detrimental effect on the mechanical properties of composites [36,40], it seems that the Achilles heel of SBCs, even after preheating and increasing the DC, is the resin matrix - filler interface that is affected by the thermal cycle, and leads to a significant increase in Ra and color changes even more than non-preheated and low DC conditions. Finally, it must be mentioned that it was not possible to simulate conditions of the oral cavity with various chemical and mechanical factors. In future studies, the simultaneous effect of these factors on the Ra and color stability of composite restorations is proposed.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the present study, it can be concluded that Filtek P90 silorane-base Composite showed ΔE>3.3 and surface roughness above 0.2µ under preheated and non-preheated conditions. Although preheating improved D.C, due to the significant increase in surface roughness, it does not positively affect the color stability of the Filtek P90 silorane-base composite.

Notes:

Cite this article as: Alizadeh Oskoee P, Savadi Oskoee S, Pournaghi-Azar F, Dibazar S, Esmaeili M. Pre-Heating of Low-Shrinkage Composite Resins: Effects on Color Stability and Surface Roughness. Front Dent. 2022:19:26.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

None declared.

References

  • 1.Ferracane JL. Placing dental composites—a stressful experience. Oper dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):247–57. doi: 10.2341/07-BL2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Progress in polymer science. 2001;26(4):535–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005 Jan;21(1):68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mitthra S, Hema R, Anuradha B, Reddy TVK. Role of Silorane composites in Dentistry-an Overview of the Composition and Properties. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2020;14(4):1179. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alkhadim YK, Hulbah MJ, Nassar HM. Color shift, color stability, and post-polishing surface roughness of esthetic resin composites. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:4895846. doi: 10.3390/ma13061376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu H, Cheng S-l, Jiang N-w, Cheng H. Effects of cyclic staining on the color, translucency, surface roughness, and substance loss of contemporary adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):462–9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, Garcıa-Godoy F. Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. J Dent. 2003 Jan;31(1):43–50. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00083-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Gee AJ, ten Harkel-Hagenaar E, Davidson CL. Color dye for identification of incompletely cured composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 Nov;52(5):626–31. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(84)90129-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Um CM, Ruyter I. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int. 1991 May;22(5):377–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ayub KV, Santos Jr GC, Rizkalla AS, Bohay R, Pegoraro LF, Rubo JH, et al. Effect of preheating on microhardness and viscosity of 4 resin composites. J Can Dent Assoc. 2014;80(12):e12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Daronch M, Rueggeberg F, De Goes M. Monomer conversion of pre-heated composite. Journal of dental research. 2005;84(7):663–7. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Daronch M, Rueggeberg F, De Goes M, Giudici R. Polymerization kinetics of pre-heated composite. J Dent Res. 2006 Jan;85(1):38–43. doi: 10.1177/154405910608500106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wagner WC, Aksu MN, Neme A, Linger J, Pink FE, Walker S. Effect of pre-heating resin composite on restoration microleakage. Oper Dent. 2008 Jan-Feb;33(1):72–8. doi: 10.2341/07-41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mangani F, Marini S, Barabanti N, Preti A, Cerutti A. The success of indirect restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Stomatol. 2015;64(5):231–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butz F, Heydecke G, Okutan M, Strub J. Survival rate, fracture strength and failure mode of ceramic implant abutments after chewing simulation. J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Nov;32(11):838–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.D'amario M, Pacioni S, Capogreco M, Gatto R, Baldi M. Effect of repeated preheating cycles on flexural strength of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2013 Jan-Feb;38(1):33–8. doi: 10.2341/11-476-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Munoz CA, Bond PR, Sy-Munoz J, Tan D, Peterson J. Effect of pre-heating on depth of cure and surface hardness of light-polymerized resin composites. Am J Dent. 2008;21(4):215–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kahnamouei MA, Gholizadeh S, Rikhtegaran S, Daneshpooy M, Kimyai S, Oskoee PA, et al. Effect of preheat repetition on color stability of methacrylate-and silorane-based composite resins. Journal of dental research, J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2017 Fall;11(4):222–8. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2017.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Asmussen E. Factors affecting the color stability of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand. 1983;41(1):11–8. doi: 10.3109/00016358309162298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schneider LFJ, Pfeifer CS, Consani S, Prahl SA, Ferracane JL. Influence of photoinitiator type on the rate of polymerization, degree of conversion, hardness and yellowing of dental resin composites. Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1169–77. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pruthi G, Jain V, Kandpal H, Mathur VP, Shah N. Effect of bleaching on color change and surface topography of composite restorations. Int J Dent. 2010;2010:695748. doi: 10.1155/2010/695748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hosseini MG, Ahmadiyeh S, Rasooli A, Khameneh-Asl S. Pulse plating of Ni-WB coating and study of its corrosion and wear resistance. Metall Mater Trans A. 2019;50(11):5510–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pires-de-Souza FdCP, Garcia LdFR, Hamida HM, Casemiro LA. Color stability of composites subjected to accelerated aging after curing using either a halogen or a light emitting diode source. Braz Dent J. 2007;18(2):119–23. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000200006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silva VA, de Lacerda Gontijo SM, Gatti A, de Abreu Poletto LT, Alvim HH. Cytotoxicity and degree of conversion of methacrylate and silorane. Braz J. Oral Sci. 2020 Nov. 419:e200656. [cited 2022 Jul. 16] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Erdemir U, Tiryaki M, Saygi G, Yücel T, Yildiz SO, Yıldız E. Effects of different kinds of beers on the surface roughness of glazed and polished methacrylate and Silorane-based composites: a 1-month study. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):23–28. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lins FCR, Ferreira RC, Silveira RR, Pereira CNB, Moreira AN, Magalhães CS. Surface roughness, microhardness, and microleakage of a silorane-based composite resin after immediate or delayed finishing/polishing. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:8346782. doi: 10.1155/2016/8346782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marghalani HY. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Apr;22(2):127–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00324.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mary NSGP, Subbiya A, Vivekanandan P, Prakash V, Malarvizhi D, Mitthra S. Effect of Composite Preheating on the Degree of Monomer Conversion, Polymerization Shrinkage and Micro Hardness of A Silorane based Composite-An In Vitro Study. Indian Journal of Public Health. 2019;10(8):1549. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul-Sep;13(3):152–155. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.71649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tuncer S, Demirci M, Tiryaki M, Ünlü N, Uysal Ö. The effect of a modeling resin and thermocycling on the surface hardness, roughness, and color of different resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013 Dec;25(6):404–19. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bansal K, Acharya SR, Saraswathi V. Effect of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages on color stability and surface roughness of resin composites: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2012 Jul;15(3):283–8. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.97961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Benetti AR, de Jesus VCBR, Martinelli NL, Pascotto RC, Poli-Frederico RC. Colour stability, staining and roughness of silorane after prolonged chemical challenges. J Dent. 2013 Dec;41(12):1229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pettini F, Corsalini M, Savino MG, Stefanachi G, Di Venere D, Pappalettere C, et al. Roughness analysis on composite materials (microfilled, nanofilled and silorane) after different finishing and polishing procedures. Open Dent J. 2015;9:357–367. doi: 10.2174/1874210601509010357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Karaman E, Tuncer D, Firat E, Ozdemir OS, Karahan S. Influence of different staining beverages on color stability, surface roughness and microhardness of silorane and methacrylate-based composite resins. J Contemp Dent Pract . 2014 May 1;15(3):319–25. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fróes-Salgado NR, Silva LM, Kawano Y, Francci C, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Composite pre-heating: effects on marginal adaptation, degree of conversion and mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2010 Sep;26(9):908–14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Deb S, Di Silvio L, Mackler HE, Millar BJ. Pre-warming of dental composites. Dent mater. 2011;27(4):e51–e9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tabatabaei MH, Arami S, Farahat F. Effect of mechanical loads and surface roughness on wear of silorane and methacrylate-based posterior composites. J Dent (Tehran) 2016 Nov;13(6):407–414. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Al-Ahdal K, Ilie N, Silikas N, Watts DC. Polymerization kinetics and impact of post polymerization on the Degree of Conversion of bulk-fill resin-composite at clinically relevant depth. Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1207–13. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pires-de-Souza Fde C, Garcia Lda F, Roselino Lde M, Naves LZ. Color stability of silorane-based composites submitted to accelerated artificial ageing--an in situ study. J Dent. 2011 Jul;39(Suppl 1):e18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uctasli MB, Arisu HD, Lasilla LV, Valittu PK. Effect of preheating on the mechanical properties of resin composites. Eur J Dent. 2008 Oct;2:263–268. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES