Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2022 Nov 14;13:1034943. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1034943

The discovery of a key prenyltransferase gene assisted by a chromosome-level Epimedium pubescens genome

Guoan Shen 1,†, Yanjiao Luo 1,2,†, Yu Yao 1, Guoqing Meng 3,4, Yixin Zhang 1, Yuanyue Wang 1, Chaoqun Xu 1, Xiang Liu 1,5, Cheng Zhang 1,6, Gang Ding 1, Yongzhen Pang 2,*, Hui Zhang 3,*, Baolin Guo 1,*
PMCID: PMC9702526  PMID: 36452098

Abstract

Epimedium pubescens is a species of the family Berberidaceae in the basal eudicot lineage, and a main plant source for the traditional Chinese medicine “Herba Epimedii”. The current study achieved a chromosome-level genome assembly of E. pubescens with the genome size of 3.34 Gb, and the genome guided discovery of a key prenyltransferase (PT) in E. pubescens. Our comparative genomic analyses confirmed the absence of Whole Genome Triplication (WGT-γ) event shared in core eudicots and further revealed the occurrence of an ancient Whole Genome Duplication (WGD) event approximately between 66 and 81 Million Years Ago (MYA). In addition, whole genome search approach was successfully applied to identify 19 potential flavonoid PT genes and an important flavonoid PT (EpPT8) was proven to be an enzyme for the biosynthesis of medicinal compounds, icaritin and its derivatives in E. pubescens. Therefore, our results not only provide a good reference genome to conduct further molecular biological studies in Epimedium genus, but also give important clues for synthetic biology and industrial production of related prenylated flavonoids in future.

Keywords: Epimedium pubescens, genome assembly, prenyltransferase, prenylated flavonoids, whole genome duplication

Introduction

Epimedium L., the largest herbaceous genus within the family Berberidaceae, order Ranunculales according to the updated Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV) system ( Figure 1A ) (Byng et al., 2016), contains more than 60 species occurring unevenly from North Africa (Algeria) to East Asia (Stearn et al., 2002). With more than 50 species identified, China is believed to be the recent diversity center of Epimedium genus (De Smet et al., 2012). Herba Epimedii is totally made of leaves from Epimedium plants and well-known as “Yinyanghuo” in the traditional Chinese medicine for more than 2000 years (Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2020). Besides the extraordinary pharmaceutical activities for treating sexual dysfunction, Epimedium plants could confer other benefits to human health, including anti-tumor, anti-antiosteoporosis, cardiovascular protective, and neuroprotective effects (Zheng et al., 2014; Rouger et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2019). It has been verified by modern pharmacological studies that 8-prenylated flavonol and its glycosides are the bioactive components in Epimedium plants (Ma et al., 2011; Ming et al., 2013; Mbachu et al., 2020).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The phyologentic position of E. pubescens from Timetree website and the geographical distributions of Epimedium and E. pubescens in China. (A) Timetree of selected taxonomic groups in angiosperm. Whole Genome Duplication (WGD) events (red oval) and Whole Genome Triplication (WGT-γ) events (yellow oval) were shown on the Timetree; the divergence times among different taxonomic groups on the phylogenetic tree were predicted by Timetree online services (http://www.timetree.org/); hierarchy classifications of taxonomic groups was highlighted with different colors on the right of Timetree, based on Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV (APG IV). (B) Geographical distributions of Epimedium and E. pubescens in China. The purple line delimited the border of China, the light blue line delimited the border of Chinese coast. The geographical distributed area of Epimeidum was highlighted in cyan color on the map of China; the distribution areas of E. pubescens were indicated with purple triangles and split into two groups circled with red and green dash lines respectively (the geographical locations were provided in Table S2 and sampling details were described in Supplemental Information ). Two E. pubescens groups possessed different morphological features, including flowers, young leaves, and whole plants.

Epimedium belongs to basal eudicots and is a key sister group to core eudicots (Byng et al., 2016). There exists an ancestral Whole Genome Triplication gamma (WGT-γ) event (Soltis and Soltis, 2016; Clark and Donoghue, 2018) before the divergence of core eudicots 128 Million Years Ago (MYA) ( Figure 1A ) from basal eudicots. Moreover, a lack of such an ancestral WGT-γ event has been revealed in multiple species from Ranunculales of basal eudicots (Jaillon et al., 2007; Filiault et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021c). In addition, Whole Genome Duplication (WGD) events are believed to widely appear in eudicot species during their genome evolution (Sankoff and Zheng, 2018) ( Figure 1A ). Such events are critical in shaping the genome structure among different plants (Wu et al., 2020). However, it is so far less known about the whole genome replication events in Epimedium genome evolutionary history.

In China, Epimedium species are unevenly distributed across temperate mountain regions ( Figure 1B ). Among which, wild populations of E. pubescens with a broad morphological diversity are widely distributed at altitudes from 300 to 2000 meters in Southwest of China ( Figure 1B ) (Gao et al., 2011; He, 2014; Liu et al., 2017a). E. pubescens is an important species of Epimedium with high and stable level of 8-prenylated flavonoids as a major commercial source for Herba Epimedii (Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission, 2020). In addition, E. pubescens as a diploid species (2n=2x=12), possesses the chromosomal structure of karyotype symmetry type of 2A, which is previously reported to be similar to most Epimedium species ( Table S1 ) (Zhang et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2020). Therefore, E. pubescens is a suitable representative species for constructing the reference genome of Epimedium for answering evolutionary questions and the exploring biosynthetic mechanisms of medicinal compounds in Herba Epimedii.

In this study, a chromosome-level genome assembly was achieved for E. pubescens and the further analyses confirmed that E. pubescens genome did not experience the WGT-γ event shared by core eudicots, but possessed an ancient WGD event during its evolutionary process. A genome guided PT gene search revealed 19 potential prenyltransferases (PTs) in E. pubescens, and especially E. pubescens PT8 (EpPT8) were further confirmed as an enzyme for the production of 8-prenylated flavonols. The reference genome of E. pubescens provided new insights into the early evolution events of this species, and could potentially facilitate the design of breeding strategy in improving the germplasm resources of Herba Epimedii.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

E. pubescens plants were grown in the germplasm nursery at the Shawan District (29°N, 103°E), Leshan city, Sichuan province of China. In the germplasm nurseries, Epimedium plants were grown and covered with a black shade net to avoid direct sun exposure. Wild populations of E. pubescens were thoroughly investigated during field trips from 2018 to 2019 by Dr. Chaoqun Xu ( Table S2 ) and totally 39 samples of E. pubescens were identified by Professor Baolin Guo. Voucher specimens from these wild populations were deposited at the herbarium of the Institute of Medicinal Plant Development (IMPLAD), Beijing, China, under the voucher numbers from B. L. Guo00841 to B. L. Guo00879. Fully developed leaves were detached in the spring of 2018 and washed with double-distilled sterile water, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until DNA extraction and sequencing. Fresh roots, shoots, leaves, flowers, and fruits from the same individual plant were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for RNA extraction and RNA sequencing.

Genomic DNA sequencing and chromosome-level genome assembly

Genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves using the CTAB DNA extraction protocol (Varma et al., 2007). DNA concentration and purity were examined using NanoDrop and Qubit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA), and DNA integrity was assessed using the pulsed-field electrophoresis. The genomic DNA was then used to construct libraries with an average insert size of 300 bp, and sequenced on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with average sequencing depth at about 230.94 × (771 Gb). For ONT sequencing, the high-quality genomic DNA was separated using the BluePippin™ System (Sage Science, USA), and purified to construct a library with size ranging from 15 to 50  kb using ONT template prep kit (SQK-LSK109, Oxford headquarters, USA) and NEB Next FFPE DNA Repair Mix kit (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). The high-quality library was sequenced on the ONT PromethION platform with MinION flow cell (R9.4.1) and ONT sequencing kit (Oxford headquarters, USA. Finally, a total of 906 Gb raw data (271.32 ×) was generated with an average ONT length of 19.79 kb and an N50 of 31.17 kb ( Table S3 , S4 ). Raw data was processed for base calling by Oxford Nanopore base caller using default parameters (Wick et al., 2019), and ONT reads were trimmed with Porechop (https://github.com/xxz19900/Porechop). Finally, these reads were assembled into contigs using SMARTdenovo (Liu et al., 2021a). The assembled contigs were then polished with Illumina short reads three times by Racon (Vaser et al., 2017) and Pilon v1.20 (Walker et al., 2014). Finally, BWA-MEM2 (https://github.com/bwa-mem2/bwa-mem2) for alignment of short reads and BUSCO 4.0.6 with viridiplantae_odb10 (Simao et al., 2015) were used to assess the quality and completeness of the assembly.

Genome annotation and transcriptomic analysis

For the prediction of gene models, ab initio prediction program Augustus v2.4 and evidence/homology-based strategies were applied to annotate genomic contigs and transcriptomic data and the results were integrated into final gene models using EVM v1.1.1 (Haas et al., 2008). For repeat annotation, the sequences of genome assembly were subjected to structural and ab initio prediction of repeats using LTR_FINDER v4.0.6, RepeatScout v1.0.5 and RepeatMasker v4.0.6. For non-coding RNA annotation, microRNA, rRNA, tRNA, and other functional RNA were predicted by combining several strategies. For functional annotation, the predicted gene models were subjected to homology searches against the following databases: NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (NR), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (KOG/COG/eggNOG), Gene Ontology (GO), Pfam and Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL ( Table S5 ). In the RNA-seq analysis, raw data was cleaned by Trimmomatic software v0.39 and the gene expression levels were determined with Hisat2 and Stringtie. The differentially expressed genes were detected by R package DESeq v1.10.1. Co-expressed gene network was inferred from the FPKM values in different tissues (FPKM > 10) using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) (Langfelder and Horvath, 2008).

Comparative genomic analyses

Protein sequences from E. pubescens and other 11 angiosperms ( Table S6 ) were clustered into orthologous groups using Orthofinder software v2.3.3 and aligned by MUSCLE v3.8.155147. The phylogenetic tree was built using the maximum-likelihood method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates in RAxML v8.2.1248. Synonymous substitution rate per synonymous site (Ks) was calculated by MCScanX software. Ks peaks were determined by using the Genome_tools (Ks_Density_plot.r, https://github.com/ZhangXu-CAS/Genome_tools/), and the Ks distribution plots were made using R package ggplot2. The times of Ks peaks were calculated by the formula, Ks/13×1000 (MYA) (Gaut et al., 1996). The divergence times among different taxonomic groups were estimated by the TimeTree online service (Kumar et al., 2017).

Phylogenetic analysis of candidate prenyltransferases

To identify the candidate prenyltransferase genes, protein sequences from the known plant flavonoid prenyltransferases were used to search the E. pubescens genome using BLASTP with E-value of 10−5. The candidate sequences were further submitted to NCBI CDD database to confirm the presence of conservative domains. The protein properties of putative EpPTs, including physical and chemical properties, subcellular localization, transmembrane (TM) α-helices and the presence of chloroplast transit peptides (cTP) were predicted using the online ExPASY ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/), TargetP online server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/), TMHMM 2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/), ChloroP 1.1 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/) and PSORT (http://psort1.hgc.jp/form.html), respectively. The sequence alignments were generated using ClustalW (Li, 2003), and the gene tree was constructed using RAxML package v 8.13 with 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Stamatakis, 2014). The best substitution model was determined using BestModel.

Cloning and in vitro functional characterization of prenyltransferase genes

Total RNA from fresh leaves of E. pubescens was extracted using an Eastep® Super total RNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Shanghai, China). First-strand cDNAs were synthesized using FastKing One-Step RT-PCR Kit (TIANGEN Biotech, Beijing, China) for amplification of putative flavonoid E. pubescens prenyltransferase genes (EpPTs). Specific primers ( Table S7 ) were designed according to the candidate gene sequences and nested PCR amplification was performed using Q5® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerases (New England BioLabs, MA, USA). The PCR program was set up as follows: denaturation at 98°C for 30 s; 35 cycles of 98°C for 10 s, 53-56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 1 min and 20 s; and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. After the first-round PCR amplification, PCR products were used as the template for second-round PCR amplification under the same PCR conditions. PCR products were purified using AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Corning, NY, USA) and further cloned into pTOPO-Blunt simple vectors (LANY, Beijing, China), which were transformed into Escherichia coli competent cell Trans1-T1 (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Candidate EpPT genes and two truncated EpPTΔTP constructs were cloned into the entry vector pENTR/D-TOPO (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and then they were inserted into yeast expression vectors (pDR196GW) using LR Clonase™ II Enzyme (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The resulting vectors, pDR196GW-EpPT and pDR196GW-EpPTΔTP were separately transformed into yeast strain DD104 using the modified LiAc method (Pompon et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2003). The transformants were screened on SD/-Ura plates and confirmed by PCR. Yeast expression vector pDR196GW and strain DD104 were kindly provided by Professor Guodong Wang (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China). Yeast-Extract Peptone Adenine Dextrose Medium (YEPAD) and Ura Minus Medium were purchased from FunGenome (Beijing FunGenome Co. Ltd, Beijing, China).

Monoclonal yeast clones, which contained empty pDR196GW vector (blank control) or pDR196GW-EpPTs/EpPTΔTPs vector, were cultured in 5 mL of SD (-Ura) overnight at 28°C, separately. Cultured yeast of 200 μL was inoculated into 780 μL of SD (-Ura) broth supplemented with 17 flavonoid substrates ( Figure S3 ) with a final concentration of 200 μM and grown at 28°C for 72 h. These flavonoid substrates were purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China). After the incubation period, the enzymatic reaction mix was ultrasonically extracted three times with an equal volume of ethyl acetate for 20 min. The ethyl acetate solvent in samples was evaporated and the dried powder was then dissolved in 200 μL absolute methanol for HPLC and UHPLC-PDA-Q-TOF/MS analyses.

HPLC purification, LC-MS/MS and 1H NMR methods for reaction products

The yeast cultures fed with kaempferol were scaled up to 1.5 L, and extracted with ethyl acetate. For the isolation of enzymatic products, semipreparative RP-HPLC was conducted on a Lumtech K-501 equipped with a YMCPack ODS-A column (250 mm × 10 mm i.d., 5 mm, YMC Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) at a flow rate of 3 mL·min-1. The solvent system consisted of a linear gradient (70%–100%, v/v) of methanol in water over 0-20 min. UV detection was set at 254 nm and 280 nm.

LC-MS/MS analysis was performed on Waters Xevo G2-XS Tof (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The separation was carried out with a Waters ACQUITYTM HSS T3 C18 column (2.1 mm×100 mm, 1.8 μm) at 40°C. The gradient is consisted of 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) as the mobile phase, 0-1.5 min (21%-24% B), 1.5-3 min (24%-25% B), 3-4 min (25%-29% B); 4-5 min (29% B); 5-6.5 min (29%-32% B); 6.5-7 min (32%-44% B); 7-8 min (44%-45% B); 8-9 min (45%-46% B); 9-11min (46%-95% B). The operating conditions were as follows: flow rate of 0.6 mL·min-1 with positive ion ESI mode, a capillary voltage at 3 kV, a cone voltage at 50 V, desolvation gas with a flow rate of 850 L·h-1. The mass-to-charge ratio was scanned from 100 to 1,600 m/z.

Approximately 10 mg of each compound was evaporated to dryness under N2 gas, resuspended in dimethyl sulfoxide-d 6 (DMSO-d 6), and analyzed through 1H NMR spectra acquired on a Bruker 600 spectrometer (Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany).

1H NMR data of substrate and prepared isoprene products were shown as follows:

  • Kaempferol (1). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6, 600 MHz): δ H 6.19 (1H, d, J=2.6 Hz, H-6), 6.44 (1H, d, J=2.4 Hz, H-8), 6.93 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 8.05 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 9.44 (1H, s, 3-OH), 10.10 (1H, s, 4′-OH), 10.80 (1H, s, 7-OH), 12.50 (1H, s, 5-OH).

  • 8-prenylkaempferol (1a). 1H NMR (DMSO-d 6, 600 MHz): δ H 1.63 (3H, s, H-5′′), 1.75 (3H, s, H-4′′), 3.43 (2H, d, J=7.0 Hz, H-1′′), 5.17 (1H, t, J=6.9 Hz, H-2′′), 6.29 (1H, s, H-6), 6.93 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 8.04 (2H, d, J=9.0 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 12.42 (1H, s, 5-OH).

Results

Chromosome-level genome assembly of E. pubescens

Both previous studies and our survey showed that the genome size of Epimedium species varied from 3.14 Gb/1C to 4.49 Gb/1C, and the size of E. pubescens genome was estimated to be 3.23 Gb based on k-mer (k=23) distribution analysis and flow cytometry analysis (Chen et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2018) ( Table S1 ). In addition, the k-mer analysis of E. pubescens further revealed a relatively low hybridization rate at 1.2% and an estimated percentage of repetitive elements at 61.57%, suggesting that E. pubescens possessed a relatively noncomplicated genome (the E. pubescens genome is complicated compared to model diploid plants such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, but uncomplicated compared to allopolyploid plants Triticum aestivum and Medicago sativa) (Michael, 2014). Therefore, E. pubescens was eventually selected as a representative species for the construction of reference genome for Epimedium genus.

Approximately 48.01 million Oxford Nanopore Technology (ONT) long reads were acquired and accounted for 906 Gb (271.32×) with an average read size of 20,267 bp ( Table S3 , S4 ). The preliminary genome assembly of E. pubescens was created with 39,251,621 ONT reads of >2 kb in length, yielding 6,229 contigs with a total size of 3.34 Gb ( Table S8 ). Illumina reads of 771 Gb (230.94×) was used for further polishing the initial genome assembly to achieve contig N50 of 871.79 kb ( Table 1 and Table S8 ). Subsequently, 1,965,567,758 paired-end reads from the Hi-C (High-throughput chromosome conformation capture) sequencing were used to successfully anchor 6,176 contigs (99.15%) onto six chromosome-level pseudo-molecules, with an average size of 538.98 Mb ( Figure 2A and Table S9 ). The resultant chromosome-level genome assembly had a size of 3.34 Gb with evenly distributed genes, slightly unevenly distributed Transposable Elements (TEs) and 37.48% of average GC content ( Table 1 and Figure 2B ). Eventually, 5,162 contigs of 3.16 Gb were fully anchored and oriented on six complete chromosome-level pseudo-molecules ( Table 1 and Figure 2B ).

Table 1.

Assembly and annotation statistics of E. pubescens genome.

Genome assembly feature Number Size/Percentage
Estimated genome size 3.23 Gb
Assembled sequences 3.34 Gb
Total contigs 6229 3.34 Gb
N50 contigs 871.79 kb
Anchored and oriented contigs 5162 3.16 Gb
Average pseudo-chromosome size 538.98 Mb
Gaps 5156 0.49 Mb
GC content 37.48%
Repeat percentage 66.93%
Protein-coding genes 44,722 487.81 Mb
Average length of protein-coding genes 4.53 kb
Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

E. pubescens genome assembly. (A) Dotplot of E. pubescens syntenic blocks from Hi-C (High-throughput chromosome conformation capture) genome assembly. Each red segment was marked by different pseudo-chromosome label on the X and Y axis. (B) Circos graph of E. pubescens genome assembly. From outer to inner circles, the outer circle of (a) illustrated 6 chromosomes of E. pubescens; the inner circles of (b–d) showed TE density, gene density and GC content. The solid color lines inside all the circles represented segmental duplication relationships between syntenic blocks of different chromosomes, Chr01-Chr06 and Chr01-Chr03 with orange lines, Chr02-Chr06 and Chr02-Chr03 with light blue lines, Chr03-Chr05 and Chr04-Chr05 with green lines and others with grey lines.

Homology and ab initio based gene prediction strategies were combined to predict 44,722 protein-coding gene models from E. pubescens genome assembly ( Table 1 ). Among these gene models, protein coding genes accounted for 487.81 Mb (14.61%) with an average gene length of 13.36 kb ( Table 1 ), and have 33,355 with 1~5 exons (74.58%) and 11,367 with more than 5 exons (25.40%) ( Table S10 ). A total of 94.5% gene models were successfully annotated by eight protein databases ( Table S5 ), and a total of 8,415 noncoding RNA genes were identified, including 1,713 rRNA (ribosomal RNA), 172 miRNA (microRNAs), 5,794 tRNA (transfer RNA), 278 snoRNA (small nucleolar RNA), and 458 snRNA (small nuclear RNA) ( Table S11 ). In addition, large amounts of repetitive elements were identified in the E. pubescens genome (66.93%), which was relatively high in comparison with other species of Ranunculales ( Table S12 ). Among these repetitive elements, there were 62.61% Class I retrotransposons, which were predominantly the long terminal repeats (LTRs) with mainly Gypsy and Copia at 26.62% and 5.03% respectively, and 7.92% of DNA transposons (Class II) ( Table S12 , S13 ). Notably, 1,236 out of 1,375 (89.9%) BUSCO (Benchmarking universal single-copy orthologues) core genes were confirmed in the final chromosome-level E. pubescens genome ( Table S14 ). These above evidences indicated that the current chromosome-level genome assembly of E. pubescens was relatively complete and accurate.

Comparative genomic analyses revealed the lacking of WGT-γ

The genomic syntenic blocks and orthologous gene ratio between V. vinifera and E. pubescens was analyzed, demonstrating that there was a significant percentage of genes with 3:1 ratio of V. vinifera to E. pubescens, but not be observed between P. somniferum/C. chinensis and E. pubescens ( Figures 3B, C and Figure S1A–C ). It was known that only one Whole Genome Triplication (WGT-γ) event occurred in Vitis vinifera (Jaillon et al., 2007), and moreover, P. somniferum and C. chinensis were also proven to have not experience WGT-γ event (Guo et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021c). The combination of previous research results with current evidences suggested that E. pubescens had escaped the ancient WGT-γ event. To further dissect genome evolutionary history, the analysis of synonymous substitution rate per synonymous site (Ks) was performed among the orthologous genes of E. pubescens, P. somniferum, Coptis chinensis and Aquilegia coerulea from Ranunculales, revealing an significant peak (around Ks=0.997) in E. pubescens compared to C. chinensis (around Ks=0.85) ( Figure 3A ), indicating that only one Whole Genome Duplication (WGD) event occurred during E. pubescens genome evolution, which was consistent with the widespread occurrence of WGD events in flowering plants (Jaillon et al., 2007).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Comparative genomic analysis of E. pubescens and other species. (A) Ks plots of orthologous genes in the genome of C. chinensis, A. coerulea, E. pubescens, and P. somniferum. Blue, red, light purple and yellow curves represent C. chinensis, A. coerulea, E. pubescens and P. somniferum respectively. (B) Comparison of orthologous gene ratio of E. pubescens to Vitis vinifera, P. somniferum, Amborella trichopoda, and C. chinensis, reciprocally. Blue, red, green and purple bars represent one, two, three and four orthologous genes. Short names were assigned as EP (E. pubescens), VV (V. vinifera), ATR (A. trichopoda), PP (P. somniferum) and CC (C. chinensis). Top left is the comparison of orthologous gene ratio of EP to VV; top right, the comparison of orthologous gene ratio of EP to ATR; bottom left, the comparison of orthologous gene ratio of EP to PP; bottom right, the comparison of orthologous gene ratio of EP to CC. (C) Dotplot of syntenic blocks between E. pubescens and V. vinifera. Chromosomes of V. vinifera and E. pubescens were labeled on the Y-axis and X-axis respectively; the number of syntenic blocks from V. vinifera and E. pubescens was labeled on the right and top respectively; syntenic blocks with 3:1 ratio of V. vinifera to E. pubescens were green-colored on the dotplot. (D) Phylogenetic tree of 12 plant species. In phylogenetic tree, red and yellow ovals represent the reported WGD events and WGT-γ event, respectively; the green star highlighted the independent WGD event in E. pubescens; ML (Maximum Likelihood Method) bootstrap values were labeled on the left of key phylogenetic tree nodes in black and the divergence times were labeled on the right of key phylogenetic tree nodes in blue, based on Timetree online services. Based on APG IV system, the phylogenetic classification of 12 plant species was labeled on the right of phylogenetic tree with different background color.

To investigate the evolving history of E. pubescens, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using shared single-copy orthologues identified by Orthofinder from E. pubescens and 11 key angiosperm species, including A. trichopoda, P. somniferum, C. chinensis and V. vinifera, etc. ( Figure 3D and Table S6 ). In the resultant phylogenetic tree, E. pubescens and other species from Ranunculales formed an early diverging taxonomic clade of basal eudicots, and these species were further divided into 3 distinct taxonomic groups, including Ranunculaceae (A. coerulea and C. chinensis), Papaveraceae (P. somniferum and Macleaya cordata) and Berberidaceae (E. pubescens). Using Treetime online services, the divergence time between Ranunculaceae and Berberidaceae was determined at ~81 MYA (million years ago) and the formation of Ranunculaceae was also estimated at ~66 MYA. In addition, there exhibited some strong patterns of inter-chromosomal synteny between chromosomes of E. pubescens, as shown in Figure S1C , inferring that multiple ancient chromosomal breaks and fusion events could occur after the only WGD event in E. pubescens genome.

Chromosome-level genome guided the identification of a prenyltransferase gene

It has been known that, for Epimedium flavonoids, after the formation of basic flavonoid skeleton, several enzymatic steps still are needed for further modification, including prenylation, methylation and glycosylation (Pandey et al., 2016; Nabavi et al., 2020). The addition of prenyl group to flavonoids is one of the most important enzymatic steps, which is catalyzed by prenyltransferases (PTs) ( Figure 4A ), and provides the medicinal efficacy for Epimedium flavonoids (Ming et al., 2013; Mbachu et al., 2020). Genome-wide homology-based search discovered 19 potential PTs from UbiA (ubiquinone biosynthesis gene A) superfamily in E. pubescens ( Figure 4B and Table 2 ). Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was constructed with these 19 EpPTs and additional 108 UbiA PTs from other plant species ( Table 2 and Table S15 ), revealing that all PTs of UbiA superfamily could be clustered into distinctive groups based on the preference of their substrates, such as flavonoids, polyphenol, chlorophyllide a/b and homogentisate acid etc. ( Figure 4B ). It was found that, 11 EpPTs formed a distinctive cluster that was nested in the clade of PTs using polyphenols or flavonoids as preferred substrates, and six out of these 11 EpPTs (EpPT3, EpPT4, EpPT5, EpPT6, EpPT7, EpPT8 and EpPT9) were found to form a cluster at the end of Chr02 (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Analysis of specific prenyltransferase genes for biosynthesis of prenylated flavonoids. (A) Biosynthetic pathways of prenylated flavonoids in E. pubescens. (B) Phylogenetic tree of prenyltransferase genes (PTs). Clades of PTs were classified by their respective substrates, including two categories, flavonoid/polyphenol and others labeled with coral color and light blue color respectively; 11 candidate flavonoid PTs from E pubescens were marked with blue star and EpPT8 was highlighted with red color. (C) Expression profiles of 19 putative E. pubescens prenyltransferase genes (EpPTs) in different tissues. Expression levels in the heatmap were scaled from blue to red (low to high); protein IDs were labeled on the right of heatmap; different tissue samples were labeled at the bottom. (D) Verification of the products from the reaction catalyzed by recombinant EpPT8 protein using kaempferol as substrate. The reaction catalyzed by EpPT8 was illustrated on the top part of the panel; at the bottom part of the panel, HPLC chromatographs at 254 nm from the examined standards and different reaction mixes were colored with gold, green, blue and red color, representing Kaempferol standard, 8-prenylkaempferol standard, the reaction mix of Kaempferol+vector and the reaction mix of Kaempferol+EpPT8 respectively; the peaks of Kaempferol and 8-prenylkaempferol were pointed out on the first chromatograph with black arrows separately and the corresponding peaks of other three chromatographs were indicated through black dotted line.

Table 2.

Characteristics of 19 EpPTs.

Gene name Substrates Chromosome Predicted protein size
EpPT1 Flavonoid Chr01 392
EpPT3 Flavonoid Chr02 265
EpPT4 Flavonoid Chr02 394
EpPT5 Flavonoid Chr02 155
EpPT6 Flavonoid Chr02 229
EpPT7 Flavonoid Chr02 261
EpPT8 Flavonoid Chr02 391
EpPT9 Flavonoid Chr02 379
EpPT14 Flavonoid Chr03 266
EpPT15 Flavonoid Chr03 397
EpPT18 Flavonoid Chr06 398
EpPT2 Chlorophyllide a/b Chr01 374
EpPT13 Chlorophyllide a/b Chr03 424
EpPT10 Homogentisate acid Chr02 229
EpPT11 Homogentisate acid Chr02 415
EpPT17 Homogentisate acid Chr05 407
EpPT19 Homogentisate acid Chr06 399
EpPT12 Haem B Chr03 222
EpPT16 Haem B Chr04 447
Open in a new tab

EpPTs, E. pubescens prenyltransferases.

To further explore these 11 E. pubescens PTs, their tissue expression profiles were analyzed, showing that EpPT8 was most highly expressed in leaves, where the bioactive compounds accumulated ( Figure 4C ) (Guo and Xiao, 1996; Zhou et al., 2012). Further analysis revealed that EpPT8 shared relatively high sequence similarity with known plant flavonoid PT genes ( Figure S2 ), suggesting that EpPT8 was a promising candidate gene for the addition of prenyl group on flavonoids in E. pubescens. In EpPT8, the transit peptides were predicted to be 32 or 82 amino acids in length at the N terminus which were subsequently removed to generate the truncated EpPT8 constructs. Yeast strain DD104 cells were transformed with EpPT8 and two truncated EpPT8 constructs, and subsequently co-cultured with 17 representative flavonoid substrates listed in Figure S3 . After purification, the reaction mixtures were subjected to the examination of PT enzymatic activities. Notably, the recombinant EpPT8 proteins only showed enzymatic activity towards kaempferol (highest enzymatic activity), apigenin and quercetin out of 17 substrates ( Figure S3 ). Meanwhile, the other two truncated EpPT8 proteins have similar levels of prenylation activities ( Table 3 ), suggesting that putative transit peptides in EpPT8 did not affect the enzymatic activity of EpPT8 proteins.

Table 3.

Results of enzymatic reactions.

Substrate category Substrate names EpPT8 EpPT8△TP32 EpPT8△TP82
Flavonol Kaempferol + + +
Quercetin + + +
Kaempferide ND ND ND
Tamarixetin ND ND ND
Myricetin ND ND ND
Mearnsetin ND ND ND
Flavone Apigenin + + +
Luteolin ND ND ND
Tricin ND ND ND
Tricetin ND ND ND
Dihydroflavonol Dihydrokaempferol ND ND ND
Dihydroquercetin ND ND ND
Hydromyricetin ND ND ND
Dihydroflavone Liquiritigenin ND ND ND
Naringenin ND ND ND
Eriodictyol ND ND ND
Chalcone Naringenin chalcone ND ND ND
Open in a new tab

ND means "Not detectable".

To examine the products in the EpPT8 catalyzed reaction using kaempferol as substrate, their HPLC chromatographs, MS spectra and MS/MS spectra were acquired for the confirmation of chemical property. The above reaction products were shown at about 55% conversion ratio of substrate to product and possessed the same HPLC retention time and reference data as 8-prenylkaempferol standard ( Figure 4D , Figure S3 , S4 ) (Liu et al., 2021b), indicating that EpPT8 was able to prenylate kaempferol at C-8 position. To confirm the chemical structure, the EpPT8 catalyzed reaction products were further separated with preparative liquid chromatograph and determined by NMR experiments. In 1H NMR spectrum ( Figure S5 ), the characteristic signals (Hillerns and Wink, 2005; Kim et al., 2018) were identified as follows: δ H=1.63 ppm (3H, s, H-5′′) and δ H=1.75 ppm (3H, s, H-4′′) for two methyl groups, δ H=3.43 ppm (2H, d, J=7.0 Hz, H-1′′) for one methylene and δ H=5.18 (1H, t, J=6.9 Hz, H-2′′) for one methine, suggesting the addition of a dimethylallyl moiety onto kaempferol (De Souza et al., 2017). By comparing the 1H NMR spectrum of kaempferol (De Souza et al., 2017) with that of 8-prenylkaempferol in the literature (Hillerns and Wink, 2005), the addition of dimethylallyl unit was determined to occur at the C-8 position ( Figure S5 ). Taken together, EpPT8 could catalyze the prenylation of kaempferol, leading to the principal enzymatic product, 8-prenylkaempferol ( Figure 4D ). Moreover, the enzymatic products of EpPT8 with quercetin and apigenin as substrates were also predicted to be prenylated products with expected MS and MS/MS spectrum ( Figures 5A, B ), but the prenylation position could not be resolved by NMR due to an extremely low amount of available enzymatic products. In addition, among 11 PTs, EpPT1, EpPT4 and EpPT9 were close to full length with minor change (similarity 88.52%-95.4%) compared to EpPT8, but they are either failed to be cloned or proved no PT activity. The rest of the PTs are with low similarity to EpPT8 and either N-terminal or C-terminal truncated.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Determination of the enzymatic products of the recombinant EpPT8 protein with quercetin and apigenin as substrates. (A) The reaction with quercetin catalyzed by the recombinant EpPT8 protein. The HPLC chromatograph of reaction mix was shown in the upper panel; in the lower panel, MS (upper) and MS/MS (lower) chromatograms at 270 nm of quercetin and prenylated quercetin was on the left and right, respectively. (B) The reaction with apigenin catalyzed by the recombinant EpPT8 protein. The HPLC chromatograph of reaction mix was shown in the upper panel; in the lower panel, MS (upper) and MS/MS (lower) chromatograms of apigenin and prenylated apigenin were on the left and right, respectively.

Discussion

Consistent with the previous reports, the current genome assembly of E. pubescens possessed a large genome size of 3.34 Gb (the most frequently observed published genome size is around 500 Mb) (Michael, 2014). Our chromosome-level genome assembly of E. pubescens with contig N50 of 871.79 kb was substantially better than those of other Ranunculales plant genomes (Rounsaville and Ranney, 2010; Liu et al., 2017b; Guo et al., 2018). Moreover, the quality of current genome assembly was further manifested by the relatively high ratio of mapped BUSCO core genes and successfully applied to whole genome search for prenyltransferase (PT) genes. Based on the comparative analyses of E. pubescens genome, as other species of Ranunculales already exhibited (Liu et al., 2017b; Filiault et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021c), E. pubescens escaped the early WGT-γ event, which is the key to the expansion of core eudicots. Specially, the genome evolution of E. pubescens was also involved in an early WGD event between 66 and 81 MYA.

Notably, there is a large discrepancy between the limited number of chromosomes and the large genome size of Epimedium species (Chen et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2020). The E. pubescens genome is consisted of 66.94% of repetitive elements, which is much higher than other species from Ranunculales. Among these repetitive elements, a large portion of LTR (60.08%) was identified and may be considered as one of the major reasons for a large discrepancy between few of chromosomes and such large genome size in E. pubescens (Chen et al., 2012; Novikov et al., 2012) For example, maize B73 genome with a size of 2.1 Gb contains a total of 64% repetitive elements with 59.98% of LTR, which is proven to largely contribute to its large genome size (Jiao et al., 2017). Based on the Large Genome Constraint Hypothesis (LGCH), the species with large genomes have some constraints on plant performance such as reducing maximum photosynthetic rates (Meyerson et al., 2020). In general, it is imperative for E. pubescens to rapidly adapt to a variety of natural environmental changes by maintaining enormous molecular and phenotypic diversification from a great amount of LTR and the large size of gene introns (Chen et al., 2012; Novikov et al., 2012). The above genomic characteristics might partly explain why Epimedium plants are not resistant to sunlight and high temperature, and have to grow in the shade area (Ma et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2017a).

In recent studies, there are more and more evidences confirming the 8-prenylated flavonoids as the key medicinal components of Herba Epimedii (Wang et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2020). PTs are a class of enzymes responsible for prenyl moiety transferring, which is the key biosynthetic step of prenylated flavonoids, such as 8-prenylkaempferol in E. pubescens (Yang et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2021). In E. pubescens genome, we were able to identify 19 putative E. pubescens PT genes (EpPTs) on six chromosomes and two contigs ( Table 2 ). The phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that 11 flavonoid EpPTs formed a special cluster, which appeared to be unique to E. pubescens. Based on the patterns of tissue specific expression, EpPT8 was identified as the possible PT to be further explored. LC-MS/MS and NMR experiments convincingly showed that EpPT8 possessed the activity for prenylation at C-8 position of kaempferol ( Figure 4D ). The successful cloning and characterization of EpPT8 proved that the gene discovery strategy with the combination of genome, transcriptome and biochemistry approaches is feasible for the novel gene cloning and its functional characterization in E. pubescens.

Many Leguminosae PTs use isoflavonoids as the preferred substrates (Sukumaran et al., 2018), but EpPT8 from E. pubescens prefers kaempferol (flavonol) as the major substrate, which is consistent with the predominant accumulation of 8-prenylkaempferol derivatives in E. pubescens plants (Chen et al., 2015). The truncated EpPT8ΔTP32/82 proteins were found to possess similar levels of PT enzymatic activity ( Table 3 , Figure S3 ), suggesting that EpPT8ΔTP32/82 might be a more suitable choice for synthetic biology application than full length EpPT8. In addition, EpPT8 was highly expressed in leaf tissue ( Figure 4C ), in which large amounts of 8-prenylkaempferol derivatives accumulates (Guo and Xiao, 1996; Zhou et al., 2012), implying a critical role of EpPT8 for prenylated flavonols accumulation in E. pubescens.

Recent study showed that the recombinant LaPT2 protein from Lupinus albus (Leguminosae) could also use kaempferol as substrate to produce 8-prenylkaempferol, and possessed activity towards a wide range of flavonoid substrates, including flavonols, flavones, and naringenin, but L. albus plants only accumulate a trace amount of 8-prenylkaempferol in roots (Liu et al., 2021b). In a more recent study, the recombinant EsPT2 protein from E. sagittatum was found to be able to prenylate both kaempferol and methylated kaempferol (Wang et al., 2021). By contrast, our EpPT8 appeared to prefer kaempferol as the principal substrate ( Figure 4D , Figures 5A, B ), but only displaying negligible difference of enzymatic activity toward different flavonoid substrates comparing to EsPT2 ( Table S16 ). The open reading frame of EpPT8 (1176 bp), EsPT2 (1176 bp), and LaPT2 (1209 bp) were predicted to encode 391, 391, and 402 amino acids, respectively. The EpPT8 shared 28% of amino acid sequence with LaPT2, and exhibited only 9 different amino acid residues from EsPT2. In summary, the prenylation specificity of homologues of EpPT8 might be differently evolved in diverse plant taxonomic groups.

In conclusion, a high-quality reference genome (3.34 Gb) of E. pubescens with a reliable annotation was constructed. Comparative genomic analysis revealed the absence of WGT-γ event shared in core eudicots, and further demonstrated the occurrence of one ancient WGD event between 66 and 81 MYA during the evolutionary history of E. pubescens genome. The cloning and characterization of EpPT8 open a new door for improving the biosynthetic technique in the production of prenylated flavonoids, such as the precursors of icaritin and its derivatives.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material . All raw data were available at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under project PRJNA747870; the genome assembly and annotation files are available at the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwh/Assembly/21845/show) under BioProject PRJCA006303.

Author contributions

BG, GS, HZ, and YP contributed to conception and design of the study. CZ, GS, GM, XL, and YL organized the database. CX, GS, GD, GM, HZ, YL, and YW performed the statistical analysis. GS, HZ, YP, YL, YY, and YZ wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) under Grant 2021-I2M-1-031 and 2017-I2M-3-013; the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570306, U20A2004, 81473302); the Chongqing Science and Technology Commission under Grants cstc2018jcyjAX0316, cc-cstc-CA-19-2, cstc2019jcyj-msxmx0464, cstc2019jxjl-jbky10007, and cstc2020jxjl10004.

Acknowledgments

We thank Professor Guodong Wang at Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Senior Engineer, Zhen Xue and Assistant Engineer Wangyin Yu at Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences for the great help in the cloning of potential Epimedium PTs, the interpretation of LC-MS/MS and NMR data and data graphical presentation respectively in this project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1034943/full#supplementary-material

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, pdf)
Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, jpeg)

References

  1. Byng J. W., Chase M. W., Christenhusz M. J. M., Fay M. F., Judd W. S., Mabberley D. J., et al. (2016). An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc 181, 1–20. doi:  10.1111/boj.12385 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen J., Li L., Wang Y. (2012). Diversity of genome size and Ty1-copia in Epimedium species used for traditional Chinese medicines. HortScience 47, 979–984. doi:  10.21273/hortsci.47.8.979 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen X. J., Tang Z. H., Li X. W., Xie C. X., Lu J. J., Wang Y. T. (2015). Chemical constituents, quality control, and bioactivity of epimedii folium (Yinyanghuo). Am. J. Chin. Med. 43, 783–834. doi:  10.1142/S0192415x15500494 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission (2020). Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2020. Part I (Beijing, China: China Medical Science Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark J. W., Donoghue P. C. J. (2018). Whole-genome duplication and plant macroevolution. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 933–945. doi:  10.1016/j.tplants.2018.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Smet Y., Goetghebeur P., Wanke S., Asselman P., Samain M. S. (2012). Additional evidence for recent divergence of Chinese Epimedium (Berberidaceae) derived from AFLP, chloroplast and nuclear data supplemented with characterisation of leaflet pubescence. Plant Ecol. Evol. 145, 73–87. doi:  10.5091/plecevo.2012.646 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Souza L. A., Tavares W. M. G., Lopes A. P. M., Soeiro M. M., De Almeida W. B. (2017). Structural analysis of flavonoids in solution through DFT h-1 NMR chemical shift calculations: Epigallocatechin, kaempferol and quercetin. Chem. Phys. Lett. 676, 46–52. doi:  10.1016/j.cplett.2017.03.038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Filiault D. L., Ballerini E. S., Mandakova T., Akoz G., Derieg N. J., Schmutz J., et al. (2018). The Aquilegia genome provides insight into adaptive radiation and reveals an extraordinarily polymorphic chromosome with a unique history. Elife 7, e36426. doi:  10.7554/eLife.36426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao M., Fu C., Liu J., Guo B., Yang X., Chen D., et al. (2011). Distribution and influencing factors of magnoflorine in Epimedium . China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 36, 2475–2478. doi: 10.4268/cjcmm20111805 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaut B. S., Morton B. R., McCaig B. C., Clegg M. T. (1996). Substitution rate comparisons between grasses and palms: synonymous rate differences at the nuclear gene adh parallel rate differences at the plastid gene rbcL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 10274–10279. doi:  10.1073/pnas.93.19.10274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guo L., Winzer T., Yang X., Li Y., Ning Z., He Z., et al. (2018). The opium poppy genome and morphinan production. Science 362, 343–347. doi:  10.1126/science.aat4096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo B., Xiao P. (1996). Determination of flavonoids in different parts of five Epimedium plants. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 21, 523–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Y., Zhu H., Weng M., Chen B., Wang C., Sun L. (2020). Baohuoside-1 targeting mTOR inducing apoptsis to inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma proliferation, invasion and migration. Biomed. Pharmacother. 128, 110366. doi:  10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Haas B. J., Salzberg S. L., Zhu W., Pertea M., Allen J. E., Orvis J., et al. (2008). Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the program to assemble spliced alignments. Genome Biol. 9, 1–22. doi:  10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. He S. (2014). The genus epimedium of China in color (Guizhou, China: Guizhou science and technology press; ). [Google Scholar]
  16. Hillerns P. I., Wink M. (2005). Binding of flavonoids from Sophora flavescens to the rat uterine estrogen receptor. Planta Med. 71, 1065–1068. doi:  10.1055/s-2005-871302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jaillon O., Aury J. M., Noel B., Policriti A., Clepet C., Casagrande A., et al. (2007). The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 449, 463–467. doi:  10.1038/nature06148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiao Y. P., Peluso P., Shi J. H., Liang T., Stitzer M. C., Wang B., et al. (2017). Improved maize reference genome with single-molecule technologies. Nature 546, 524–527. doi:  10.1038/nature22971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim J. H., Cho I. S., So Y. K., Kim H. H., Kim Y. H. (2018). Kushenol a and 8-prenylkaempferol, tyrosinase inhibitors, derived from Sophora flavescens . J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Ch. 33, 1048–1054. doi:  10.1080/14756366.2018.1477776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kumar S., Stecher G., Suleski M., Hedges S. B. (2017). TimeTree: A resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1812–1819. doi:  10.1093/molbev/msx116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Langfelder P., Horvath S. (2008). WGCNA: An r package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinf. 9, 1–13. doi:  10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li K. B. (2003). ClustalW-MPI: ClustalW analysis using distributed and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 19, 1585–1586. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btg192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu C. J., Huhman D., Sumner L. W., Dixon R. A. (2003). Regiospecific hydroxylation of isoflavones by cytochrome p450 81E enzymes from Medicago truncatula. Plant J: For Cell Mol. Biol. 36, 471–484. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01893.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Liu X., FU C., Gao M., Zhi H., Yang X., Guo B. (2017. a). Genetic relationship and population genetic diversity of Epimedium pubescens and its related species based on ISSR and non-glandular hair characteristic. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 42, 3090–3097. doi:  10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20170714.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu X., Liu Y., Huang P., Ma Y., Qing Z., Tang Q., et al. (2017. b). The genome of medicinal plant Macleaya cordata provides new insights into benzylisoquinoline alkaloids metabolism. Mol. Plant 10, 975–989. doi:  10.1016/j.molp.2017.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu Y., Wang B., Shu S., Li Z., Song C., Liu D., et al. (2021. c). Analysis of the Coptis chinensis genome reveals the diversification of protoberberine-type alkaloids. Nat. Commun. 12, 3276. doi:  10.1038/s41467-021-23611-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Liu H., Wu S., Li A., Ruan J. (2021. a). SMARTdenovo: A de novo assembler using long noisy reads. Gigabyte 2021, 1–9. doi:  10.46471/gigabyte.15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liu J. Y., Xia Y. Y., Jiang W. B., Shen G. A., Pang Y. Z. (2021. b). LaPT2 gene encodes a flavonoid prenyltransferase in White lupin . Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi:  10.3389/fpls.2021.673337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu D., Zeng S. H., Chen J. J., Zhang Y. J., Xiao G., Zhu L. Y., et al. (2013). First insights into the large genome of Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. et zucc) maxim, a Chinese ttaditional medicinal plant. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 13559–13576. doi:  10.3390/ijms140713559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ma H., He X., Yang Y., Li M., Hao D., Jia Z. (2011). The genus Epimedium: An ethnopharmacological and phytochemical review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 134, 519–541. doi:  10.1016/j.jep.2011.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mbachu O. C., Howell C., Simmler C., Garcia G. R. M., Skowron K. J., Dong H., et al. (2020). SAR study on estrogen receptor alpha/beta activity of (Iso)flavonoids: Importance of prenylation, c-ring (Un)Saturation, and hydroxyl substituents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 68, 10651–10663. doi:  10.1021/acs.jafc.0c03526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Meyerson L. A., Pysek P., Lucanova M., Wigginton S., Tran C. T., Cronin J. T. (2020). Plant genome size influences stress tolerance of invasive and native plants via plasticity. Ecosphere 11, 1–20. doi:  10.1002/ecs2.3145 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Michael T. P. (2014). Plant genome size variation: bloating and purging DNA. brief. Funct. Genomics 13, 308–317. doi:  10.1093/bfgp/elu005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ming L. G., Lv X., Ma X. N., Ge B. F., Zhen P., Song P., et al. (2013). The prenyl group contributes to activities of phytoestrogen 8-prenynaringenin in enhancing bone formation and inhibiting bone resorption in vitro (vol 154, pg 1202, 2013). Endocrinology 154, 3487–3487. doi:  10.1210/en.2013-1715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Nabavi S. M., Samec D., Tomczyk M., Milella L., Russo D., Habtemariam S., et al. (2020). Flavonoid biosynthetic pathways in plants: Versatile targets for metabolic engineering. Biotechnol. Adv. 38, 107316. doi:  10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Novikov A., Smyshlyaev G., Novikova O. (2012). Evolutionary history of LTR retrotransposon chromodomains in plants. Int. J. Plant Genomics 2012, 874743. doi:  10.1155/2012/874743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pandey R. P., Parajuli P., Koffas M. A. G., Sohng J. K. (2016). Microbial production of natural and non-natural flavonoids: Pathway engineering, directed evolution and systems/synthetic biology. Biotechnol. Adv. 34, 634–662. doi:  10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.02.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Pompon D., Louerat B., Bronine A., Urban P. (1996). Yeast expression of animal and plant P450s in optimized redox environments. Methods Enzymol. 272, 51–64. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)72008-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rouger C., Pagie S., Derbre S., Le Ray A. M., Richomme P., Charreau B. (2016). Prenylated polyphenols from clusiaceae and calophyllaceae with immunomodulatory activity on endothelial cells. PloS One 11, e0167361. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0167361 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Rounsaville T. J., Ranney T. G. (2010). Ploidy levels and genome sizes of Berberis l. and Mahonia nutt. species, hybrids, and cultivars. Hortscience 45, 1029–1033. doi:  10.21273/Hortsci.45.7.1029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sankoff D., Zheng C. (2018). Whole genome duplication in plants: implications for evolutionary analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1704, 291–315. doi:  10.1007/978-1-4939-7463-4_10 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Simao F. A., Waterhouse R. M., Ioannidis P., Kriventseva E. V., Zdobnov E. M. (2015). BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31, 3210–3212. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Soltis P. S., Soltis D. E. (2016). Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 30, 159–165. doi:  10.1016/j.pbi.2016.03.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Stamatakis A. (2014). RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313. doi:  10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Stearn W. T., Shaw J. M. H., Green P. S., Mathew B. (2002). The genus epimedium and other herbaceous berberidaceae (Portland, Or: Timber Press; ). [Google Scholar]
  46. Sukumaran A., McDowell T., Chen L., Renaud J., Dhaubhadel S. (2018). Isoflavonoid-specific prenyltransferase gene family in soybean: GmPT01, a pterocarpan 2-dimethylallyltransferase involved in glyceollin biosynthesis. Plant J. 96, 966–981. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Varma A., Padh H., Shrivastava N. (2007). Plant genomic DNA isolation: an art or a science. Biotechnol. J. 2, 386–392. doi:  10.1002/biot.200600195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vaser R., Sovic I., Nagarajan N., Sikic M. (2017). Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res. 27, 737–746. doi:  10.1101/gr.214270.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Walker B. J., Abeel T., Shea T., Priest M., Abouelliel A., Sakthikumar S., et al. (2014). Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS One 9, e112963. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wang L. J., Gao M. D., Sheng M. Y., Yin J. (2020). Cluster analysis of karyotype similarity coefficients in Epimedium (Berberidaceae): insights in the systematics and evolution. PhytoKeys 161, 11–26. doi:  10.3897/phytokeys.161.51046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang P., Li C., Li X., Huang W., Wang Y., Wang J., et al. (2021). Complete biosynthesis of the potential medicine icaritin by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli . Sci. Bull. 66 (18), 1906–1916. doi:  10.1016/j.scib.2021.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wang S., Wang Q., Wang H., Qin C., Cui X., Li L., et al. (2019). Induction of ROS and DNA damage-dependent senescence by icaritin contributes to its antitumor activity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Pharm. Biol. 57, 424–431. doi:  10.1080/13880209.2019.1628073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wick R. R., Judd L. M., Holt K. E. (2019). Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol. 20, 1–10. doi:  10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wu S., Han B., Jiao Y. (2020). Genetic contribution of paleopolyploidy to adaptive evolution in angiosperms. Mol. Plant 13, 59–71. doi:  10.1016/j.molp.2019.10.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yang X. M., Jiang Y. M., Yang J. L., He J. R., Sun J., Chen F., et al. (2015). Prenylated flavonoids, promising nutraceuticals with impressive biological activities. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 44, 93–104. doi:  10.1016/j.tifs.2015.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang C., Peng Z.-B., Nie Z.-L., Zhang D.-G., Li K.-G., Meng Y. (2018). Chromosome numbers and karyotypes of 18 species of Epimedium sect. Diphyllon (Berberidaceae) from central China. Caryologia 71, 428–437. doi:  10.1080/00087114.2018.1499482 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zheng Q., Liu W. W., Li B., Chen H. J., Zhu W. S., Yang G. X., et al. (2014). Anticancer effect of icaritin on human lung cancer cells through inducing s phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. J. Huazhong U. Sci-Med. 34, 497–503. doi:  10.1007/s11596-014-1305-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhou T., Zhang X., Guo L., Lin G., Jiang W., Qiang A. I., et al. (2012). Variation of icariin and total flavonoid of Epimedium acuminatum in different parts and habitats. China J. Chin. Mater. Med. 37, 1917–1921. doi:  10.4268/cjcmm20121312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, pdf)
Click here for additional data file. (1.3MB, jpeg)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/ Supplementary Material . All raw data were available at National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under project PRJNA747870; the genome assembly and annotation files are available at the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC, https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gwh/Assembly/21845/show) under BioProject PRJCA006303.

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES