Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2022 Nov 23;13(23):3342–3351. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00364

Radiochemical Synthesis and Evaluation of 3-[11C]Methyl-4-aminopyridine in Rodents and Nonhuman Primates for Imaging Potassium Channels in the CNS

Yang Sun 1, Nicolas J Guehl 1, Yu-Peng Zhou 1, Kazue Takahashi 1, Vasily Belov 1, Maeva Dhaynaut 1, Sung-Hyun Moon 1, Georges El Fakhri 1, Marc D Normandin 1, Pedro Brugarolas 1,*
PMCID: PMC9732819  PMID: 36417797

Abstract

graphic file with name cn2c00364_0007.jpg

Demyelination, the loss of the insulating sheath of neurons, causes failed or slowed neuronal conduction and contributes to the neurological symptoms in multiple sclerosis, traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, stroke, and dementia. In demyelinated neurons, the axonal potassium channels Kv1.1 and Kv1.2, generally under the myelin sheath, become exposed and upregulated. Therefore, imaging these channels using positron emission tomography can provide valuable information for disease diagnosis and monitoring. Here, we describe a novel tracer for Kv1 channels, [11C]3-methyl-4-aminopyridine ([11C]3Me4AP). [11C]3Me4AP was efficiently synthesized via Pd(0)–Cu(I) comediated Stille cross-coupling of a stannyl precursor containing a free amino group. Evaluation of its imaging properties in rats and nonhuman primates showed that [11C]3Me4AP has a moderate brain permeability and slow kinetics. Additional evaluation in monkeys showed that the tracer is metabolically stable and that a one-tissue compartment model can accurately model the regional brain time–activity curves. Compared to the related tracers [18F]3-fluoro-4-aminopyridine ([18F]3F4AP) and [11C]3-methoxy-4-aminopyridine ([11C]3MeO4AP), [11C]3Me4AP shows lower initial brain uptake, which indicates reduced permeability to the blood–brain barrier and slower kinetics, suggesting higher binding affinity consistent with in vitro studies. While the slow kinetics and strong binding affinity resulted in a tracer with less favorable properties for imaging the brain than its predecessors, these properties may make 3Me4AP useful as a therapeutic.

Keywords: demyelination, K+ channels, PET, carbon-11, Stille reaction, pharmacokinetics

Introduction

Myelin is the protective sheath that surrounds most axons in the brain and spinal cord and speeds up impulse propagation along the axons of neurons. Demyelination occurs when the myelin is damaged from various diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS),1 brain and spinal cord injury,2,3 stroke,4 and Alzheimer’s disease.5 However, the time course of demyelination and its contribution to disease symptoms and progression remain unclear. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has the potential to detect and quantify biochemical processes underlying demyelination and thus serves for monitoring the progress of remyelinating therapies.6,7 Following demyelination, the axonal voltage-gated potassium channels Kv1.1 and Kv1.2, normally buried beneath the myelin sheath, become exposed and increase in expression.812 4-Aminopyridine (4AP) is a nonselective inhibitor of several Kv channels including Kv1.1 and Kv1.2.13 4AP has been used clinically for the treatment of MS, whose proposed mechanism of action involves binding intracellularly to the open state of Kv channels in demyelinated axons, thereby reducing leakage of K+ ions and partially restoring conduction.1418 Based on 4AP, our group previously proposed a radiofluorinated analogue of 4AP (3-[18F]fluoro-4-aminopyridine, [18F]3F4AP) that could be used to image demyelination. This hypothesis was confirmed experimentally in rodent models of MS.19 Further evaluation of [18F]3F4AP in nonhuman primates (NHPs) showed that [18F]3F4AP has excellent properties for primate brain imaging, such as high brain penetration, fast kinetics, and high metabolic stability. Furthermore, [18F]3F4AP was very sensitive to a focal brain injury in a monkey.20 More recently, due to the advantages of having short-lived radiotracers, such as allowing multiple scans on the same subject on the same day, we explored 3-[11C]trifluoromethyl-4-aminopyridine ([11C]3CF34AP)21 and 3-[11C]methoxy-4-aminopyridine ([11C]3MeO4AP)22 as viable 11C-labeled alternatives. Compared to [18F]3F4AP, [11C]3CF34AP showed higher brain penetration and faster washout with lower heterogeneity across brain regions, which is consistent with its higher lipophilicity and lower binding affinity as was measured in vitro.(23) Comparatively, [11C]3MeO4AP showed lower initial brain penetration and slower brain kinetics than [18F]3F4AP, indicative of its lower lipophilicity and higher binding affinity. A quantitative comparison of [11C]MeO4AP and [18F]3F4AP showed a high correlation in volumes of distribution (VT) across brain regions, suggesting that these compounds bind to the same target. A recent detailed study of four novel 4-aminopyridine potassium channel blockers by electrophysiology showed that 3-methyl-4-aminopyridine (3Me4AP) has a lower in vitro IC50 value (i.e., more potent) than 4AP, 3F4AP, 3CF34AP, and 3MeO4AP.23 Although the in vitro IC50 appears insufficient for a PET imaging agent (40 μM), the in vivo binding affinity, where a depolarizing voltage keeping the channels open is not continuously applied, is likely much lower (nanomolar range). Furthermore, previous reports have provided evidence that [18F]3F4AP shows specific binding in the brain,20 supporting that these compounds have sufficient binding affinity for in vivo PET imaging. Moreover, measurement of the basicity (pKa) and lipophilicity (log D) of these K+ channel blockers showed that 3Me4AP is more basic (higher pKa) than 4AP, 3MeO4AP, 3CF34AP, and 3F4AP and more polar (lower log D) than all of these compounds except 4AP. These counterbalanced properties (high binding affinity and high polarity) make 3Me4AP an attractive candidate tracer for imaging potassium channels. In the present work, we describe the radiochemical synthesis of [11C]3Me4AP and the evaluation of its imaging properties in rodents and nonhuman primates. We also perform a detailed comparison between [18F]3F4AP, [11C]MeO4AP, and [11C]Me4AP.

Results and Discussion

Radiochemical Synthesis of 3-[11C]Methyl-4-aminopyridine ([11C]3Me4AP) by Pd(0)–Cu(I) Comediated 11C-Methylation

The most common 11C-labeling strategy for the synthesis of 11C-labeled PET tracers is 11C-methylation via a nucleophilic substitution with [11C]methyl iodide (MeI) or triflate (MeOTf).2426 However, this method is only suitable for methylating heteroatom nucleophiles to form O–[11C]CH3, N–[11C]CH3, and S–[11C]CH3.17,18 Several palladium-mediated Suzuki and Stille cross-coupling reactions of [11C]MeI with the corresponding organoboron and organostannyl precursors have been reported in the last decade, allowing a direct C–[11C] bond formation.27 In addition, copper(I) salt has been used in combination with organostannyl precursors to enhance the cross-coupling by generating in situ an organocuprate reagent.28 Such an intermediate reduces the energy barrier of the transmetalation, which is the rate-determining step in the catalytic cycle of the Stille reaction. Despite these advances, multiple-step synthesis29 or harsh conditions,18 such as high temperature and microwave, are required to achieve satisfactory efficiency. Based on these previous reports, we hypothesized that 3-(tributylstannyl)pyridin-4-amine 2 would be a good precursor for our desired target compound [11C]3Me4AP 3, considering the stability and functional group tolerance of tributylstannyl precursors in cross-coupling reactions.30 Consequently, 2 was prepared from 3-iodopyridin-4-amine 1 without preprotection in one pot via sequential deprotonation, lithium–halogen exchange, and stannylation in a 49% isolated yield (Figure 1A, equation 1). Next, single-step labeling of 2 with [11C]MeI via the Pd(0)–Cu(I) comediated reaction gave the desired [11C]3Me4AP in an overall 89 ± 5% (n = 5) decay-corrected radiochemical yield by analytical HPLC with the only byproduct being unreacted [11C]MeI (Figure 1B). The product was purified using normal-phase semipreparative HPLC. On semiprep HPLC, the product peak was broad, and we typically only collected the tip of the peak, resulting in an average of 51 ± 4% (n = 4) decay-corrected isolated yield (prep-HPLC, Figure 1C). The molar activity was excellent (up to 129.5 GBq/μmol) and so was the radiochemical purity (>99%) (Figure 1A, equation 2). The identity of [11C]3Me4AP was confirmed by analytical HPLC (Figure 1D,E). Avoiding the typical protection and deprotection steps of the amino group reduced the synthesis time, which is critical when working with the relatively fast decaying radionuclide carbon-11 (t1/2 = 20.3 min). From the end of the bombardment to reformulation, it took about 50 min.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Radiochemical synthesis of [11C]3Me4AP. (A) Chemical reaction scheme of precursor preparation and radiosynthesis of [11C]3Me4AP, (B) analytical HPLC (radio and 254 nm UV chromatograms) of the crude reaction, (C) semipreparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification (radio and 220 nm UV chromatograms), (D) analytical HPLC (radio and 254 nm UV chromatograms) of tracer only, and (E) analytical HPLC (radio and 254 nm UV chromatograms) of tracer plus reference standard.

[11C]3Me4AP in Healthy Rats: PET Imaging, Time–Activity Curves, and Biodistribution

To evaluate the potential use of [11C]3Me4AP as a PET tracer for brain imaging, PET imaging in healthy female and male rats was conducted following intravenous tail injection of [11C]3Me4AP (55.5–99.9 kBq/g) alone or [11C]3Me4AP (same) plus 5 mg/kg of non-radiolabeled 3Me4AP (coinjection). The summed PET images from 10 to 60 min showed high uptake in the thyroid and salivary glands (Figure 2A), similar to what has been observed with [18F]3F4AP. Radioactivity in the brain peaked early (within the first 3 min) and was followed by a short phase where the activity increased (3–10 min) and a very slow washout (Figure 2B). The brain time–activity curves (TACs) after coinjection of the tracer with 5 mg/kg of 3Me4AP showed a similar initial brain uptake and a higher signal after 10 min. To confirm the higher brain uptake, additional animals were injected with [11C]3Me4AP with or without the cold compound, and the radioactivity in the brain and blood was measured ex vivo using a γ counter. At 60 min, the whole brain to blood standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was 43% higher in the coinjection group than in the baseline group (2.65 ± 0.67, n = 8, vs 1.85 ± 0.23, n = 7, p = 0.017) (Figure 2C). This increase in brain uptake upon coinjection of cold tracer is consistent with previous reports describing that high doses of 4AP analogues cause more channels to transition to the open (bindable) conformation and thus result in higher receptor binding.20,31

Figure 2.

Figure 2

[11C]3Me4AP in rats. (A) Representative CT and PET images of two rats: one injected with [11C]3Me4AP only (baseline) and the other injected with [11C]3Me4AP plus 5 mg/kg of cold 3Me4AP. (B) Brain time–activity curves (TACs) of the animals shown in panel (A). (C) Ex vivo SUV of rat blood and brain 60 min after injection of [11C]3Me4AP and [11C]3Me4AP plus 5–10 mg/kg of cold 3Me4AP. Each dot represents a different animal.

[11C]3Me4AP in Nonhuman Primates: Brain Uptake and Pharmacokinetic Modeling

Given the promising results obtained in rodents, dynamic PET imaging with arterial blood sampling was performed in two nonhuman primates after injection of [11C]3Me4AP. Each animal was scanned twice under baseline conditions.

Analysis of [11C]3Me4AP in Blood

Radioactivity time courses in whole blood (WB) and plasma (PL) were consistent between the two scans from M2 and the first scan in M1 (Figure 3A,B). The second scan in M1, however, showed slightly faster blood clearance (Figure S1). Plasma-free fraction measurements performed in triplicate for each scan indicated that [11C]3Me4AP is mostly free in plasma (0.94 ± 0.03, n = 4) with no differences between animals. The WB to PL radioactivity concentration ratio reached a plateau within 1 min (WB/PL ratio at 1 min postinjection across all studies = 1.28 ± 0.01, Figure 3C). RadioHPLC measurements demonstrated high in vivo stability with ∼90% of activity attributable to [11C]3Me4AP even after 90 min (Figure 3D,E). Due to the moderately low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) observed in the metabolite measurements of plasma samples drawn toward the end of the scan, metabolite measurements were averaged across the two baseline scans within each animal to derive the metabolite-corrected input function used in the subsequent pharmacokinetic modeling analysis.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

[11C]3Me4AP in arterial blood. (A) Time course in whole blood (WB), (B) time course in plasma (PL), (C) time course of WB to PL radioactivity concentration ratio, and (D) [11C]3Me4AP percent parent fraction in plasma (%PPF) in blood samples drawn up to 120 min post tracer administration. (E) Representative radiochromatograms of arterial plasma samples drawn up to 60 min post tracer administration. In the legends, M1 and M2 refer to monkey 1 and monkey 2, respectively.

Analysis of [11C]3Me4AP in Brain

In the monkey brain, [11C]3Me4AP showed moderate initial brain penetration (whole brain SUV at 3 min = 0.7), followed by a slow increase in brain uptake. Brain time–activity curves (TACs) were largely consistent in three of the four scans (Figure S2). The second scan in M1, however, showed more reversible [11C]3Me4AP brain kinetics, which was consistent with faster blood clearance observed in this particular study. Summed images from 60 to 120 min (Figure 4A) and brain TACs (Figure 4B) showed moderate heterogeneity across brain regions, with the highest uptake in the cortex and lowest in the white matter, which is consistent with the distribution of bindable K+ channels and previous [14C]4AP and [125I]kaliotoxin autoradiography findings.19,32 Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the full scan duration (150 min) as well as after truncating the data to 120, 90, and 60 min. Visual inspection of the model fits demonstrated good fits in all brain regions and for all scans using a one-tissue (1T) compartment model with the vascular contribution to the PET signal included as a model parameter (1T2k1v). The Akaike information criterion (AIC)33 used to assess the goodness of fits across alternative models confirmed that the 1T2k1v was the preferred model. Overall, VT estimates obtained while truncating the scan duration were in good agreement with those obtained while using the full 150 min of data demonstrating good stability of VT measurements (Table 1). Most of the variability in the VT estimates can be attributed to variation in VT measurements in small brain regions like the amygdala and hippocampus, which presented a higher noise level, especially toward the end of the scan (Figure 4C). Using 120 min of data provided the best reproducibility (Table 1) between baseline scans compared to using other scan durations. However, due to the slow kinetics of this tracer, 150 min of data was selected as the reference duration for the remaining analyses performed in this work.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

[11C]3Me4AP in the monkey brain. (A) Representative MRI MEMPRAGE (top) and representative PET SUV images calculated from 60 to 120 min postinjection (bottom) of M2. Images are presented in the MRI NIMH macaque template (NMT) space. (B) Time–activity curves of selected brain regions in the same animal. (C) Regional 1T2k1v VT estimates (mL/cc) for each baseline scan and animal.

Table 1. Time Stability (Relative to Full Scan Duration) and Reproducibility of VT Estimates between Baseline Scans Using Different PET Data Truncationsa.
data duration (min) time stability (%) test–retest M1 (%) test–retest M2 (%)
0–150 NA 17.4 ± 16.9 11.0 ± 6.7
0–120 –0.6 ± 7.5 12.7 ± 9.8 7.3 ± 6.0
0–90 1.2 ± 12.2 20.6 ± 20.6 10.6 ± 7.3
0–60 0.5 ± 20.0 25.4 ± 31.0 17.0 ± 8.9
a

Data are presented for each animal as average ± standard deviation across all brain regions.

K1 estimates—representing the rate constant for transfer of a tracer from plasma to the brain tissue—quantitatively confirmed moderate brain penetration (K1 in whole brain ∼0.035 mL/min/cc). The total volume of distribution (VT) values ranged from 3.61 and 3.78 mL/cc in the white matter to 4.67 and 4.68 mL/cc in the striatum of monkeys 1 and 2, respectively (Figure 4C).

In addition to compartmental modeling, the Logan and MA1 graphical methods were tested for the estimation of VT. The VT estimates obtained with the Logan graphical method underestimated compartmental VT values (mean difference = −11.8 ± 13.1% across brain regions using a t* of 20 min), and this underestimation was exacerbated in the small brain regions surveyed in this work such as in amygdala (−45.0 ± 10.9%) and hippocampus (−19.7 ± 13.6%). This underestimation was likely due to the increased noise level in those small regions combined with the slow kinetics of [11C]3Me4AP in the monkey brain, as previously reported for the Logan graphical method with other tracers.34 On the other hand, VT estimates obtained with MA1 and using a t* of 20 min demonstrated a good agreement with VTestimates obtained from the 1T model (VT,MA1 = 0.92 VT,1T2k1v + 0.18; r = 0.99, p < 0.0001; mean difference = −3.2 ± 2.3% across brain regions and studies).

Quantitative Comparison of [11C]3Me4AP with [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP

Prior comparison between the previously developed tracers [11C]3MeO4AP and [18F]3F4AP using the Guo method35 had shown a very good correlation between the two tracers (r = 0.93), suggesting a common target.22 This comparison also indicated that [11C]3MeO4AP has a higher binding affinity and specific binding than [18F]3F4AP. In the present work, a comparison between the VT estimates from [11C]3Me4AP and [18F]3F4AP showed a weaker linear correlation (Figure 5A, r = 0.75) which, although it still suggests a common target, may be indicative of higher variability in the VT estimates. The correlation plot showed a slope greater than 1 (1.93, p = 0.0001 for both monkeys combined), which suggests that [11C]3Me4AP has a higher in vivo binding affinity than [18F]3F4AP which is consistent with the dissociation constants measured using electrophysiology.23 When comparing [11C]3Me4AP with [11C]3MeO4AP, the linear correlation in VT values was also moderate (Figure 5B, r = 0.79). In this comparison, the slope of the linear regression was smaller than 1 (0.73, p < 0.0001 for both monkeys combined), suggesting that [11C]3Me4AP has a slightly lower in vivo affinity than [11C]3MeO4AP. The Guo plot can also provide information about the relative specific binding of the two compounds being compared by looking at the sign of the intercept. When [11C]Me4AP was compared with [18F]3F4AP, the intercept value was close to 0 (y = 0.10, p = 0.91) and when compared with [11C]3MeO4AP the intercept value was greater than 0 (y = 0.67, p = 0.31). However, given the high p-values, it is not possible to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the relative specific binding.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of [11C]3Me4AP with [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP. (A) [11C]3Me4AP vs [18F]3F4AP. (B) [11C]3Me4AP vs [11C]3MeO4AP.

One more aspect worth noting is that one of the monkeys used in these studies (M2) had a minor focal lesion in the brain. This lesion could be easily visualized and quantified with [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP and displayed a higher VT value and lower K1 value than the contralateral control region.20,22 With [11C]3Me4AP, this lesion was not visible on the PET images. The small size of this structure combined with the short half-life of carbon-11, as well as the moderate brain penetration and slow kinetics of [11C]3Me4AP resulted in a noisy TAC, preventing us from being able to conclude that tracer uptake was enhanced in the craniotomy site (Figure S3). While this finding does not completely exclude the possibility that [11C]3Me4AP may be able to detect large demyelinating lesions in the brain, it shows that the sensitivity of this tracer to this particular lesion was poor compared to [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP.

Conclusions

In this study, we have developed a rapid and efficient radiochemical synthesis method of [11C]3Me4AP, a novel radiotracer for voltage-gated K+ channels based on the drug 4-aminopyridine. The synthesis proceeds via one-pot Pd(0)–Cu(I)-mediated [11C]methylation of a stannyl precursor containing a free amino group. The labeling occurs under mild conditions and produces [11C]3Me4AP in good radiochemical yield, high molar activity, and excellent radiochemical purity (Figure 1). The evaluation of [11C]3Me4AP in rodents showed moderate brain penetration, slow kinetics, and an increase in brain signal upon coinjection of 3Me4AP, which is consistent with the mechanism that pharmacological doses of K+ channel blockers cause more channels to transition to the open/bindable state (Figure 2). Further studies performed in NHPs confirmed the moderate brain penetration and slow kinetics (Figure 4A,B). Additionally, analyses of arterial blood collected in NHPs showed that [11C]3Me4AP is metabolically stable and mostly free in plasma (Figure 3). The kinetics of [11C]3Me4AP in the different brain regions could be accurately described by a one-tissue compartment model, which was used to calculate regional VT estimates (Figure 4C). Regional VT estimates could also be accurately estimated using the MA1 graphical analysis method. Comparison of the regional VT estimates with the VT estimates of its predecessors [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP suggested a binding affinity similar to [11C]3MeO4AP and higher than [18F]3F4AP (Figure 5). Despite the good model fits, good overall test–retest reproducibility (<10% in average for both monkeys), high binding affinity, and other favorable properties, the limited brain penetration and slower kinetics of [11C]3Me4AP resulted in a tracer with inferior performance than [11C]3MeO4AP and [18F]3F4AP. While this compound does not appear as promising as [11C]3MeO4AP and [18F]3F4AP for brain PET imaging, it may be useful as a therapeutic. Finally, given the high similarity in physicochemical properties (log P and pKa) and pharmacological properties (metabolic stability and binding affinity) of the therapeutic drug 4AP and 3Me4AP, the pharmacokinetic properties described here for 3Me4AP may provide a good approximation of the brain penetration and clearance of 4AP.

Experimental Section

Compliance

All rodent procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Massachusetts General Hospital. All experiments involving nonhuman primates were performed in accordance with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal Welfare Act and Animal Welfare Regulations (Animal Care Blue Book), Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 9, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, Part 2, Subpart C, §2.31. 2017. All animal studies were conducted in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) for reporting animal experiments.

Chemistry

General

Unless otherwise stated, all chemical reactions were carried out under an inert nitrogen atmosphere with dry solvents under anhydrous conditions. All chemicals were ordered from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. Reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) carried out on 0.25 mm silica gel plates (60F-254, Merck) using UV light as the visualizing agent. Flash column chromatography employed SiliaFlash P60 (40–60 μm, 230–400 mesh) silica gel (SiliCycle, Inc.). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were collected on a 300 MHz Bruker spectrometer at 300 and 75 MHz, respectively. Copies of the spectra can be found in the Supporting Information. All 1H NMR data are reported in δ units, parts per million (ppm), and were calibrated relative to the signals for residual chloroform (7.26 ppm) in deuterochloroform (CDCl3). All 13C NMR data are reported in ppm relative to CDCl3 (77.16 ppm) and were obtained with 1H decoupling unless otherwise stated. The following abbreviations or combinations thereof were used to explain the multiplicities: s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, q = quartet, br = broad, and m = multiplet. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded on a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC coupled to a Thermo Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer system using ESI as the ionization approach.

[11C]MeI was produced in the GE TRACERlab FX MeI synthesizer for the reported radiochemistry. Semipreparative HPLC separations were performed on a Sykam S1122 Solvent Delivery System HPLC pump with the UV detector at 220 nm (for purification of [11C]3Me4AP). The purity of final compounds was verified by HPLC on a Thermo Scientific Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC equipped with a waters XBridge BEH HILIC column (5 μm, 4.6 mm × 150 mm) and a diode array detector set at 254 nm.

Synthesis of Precursor 3-(Tributylstannyl)pyridin-4-amine (2)

To a solution of 3-iodo-4-aminopyridine (220 mg, 1.0 equiv, 1.0 mmol) in anhydrous THF (1.0 mL) at −40 °C, t-butylmagnesium chloride solution (1.0 M in THF, 2.4 mL, 2.4 equiv, 2.4 mmol) was added dropwise while vigorously stirring. The white precipitate was formed immediately. After stirring the suspension at −40 °C for 30 min, the reaction was moved to a −78 °C cold bath. t-Butyllithium solution (1.7 M in pentane, 1.4 mL, 2.4 equiv, 2.4 mmol) was added dropwise, and the reaction mixture was allowed to warm up to room temperature by removing from the cold bath and stirring for 30 min. Then, a solution of tributyltin chloride (0.4 mL, 1.5 equiv, 1.5 mmol) in THF (0.6 mL) was added to the reaction mixture at −78 °C, and the reaction mixture was warmed up slowly and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched by sat. NH4Cl aqueous solution (6 mL) and extracted with AcOEt (10 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, and the solvent was removed via rotary evaporation. The residue was purified by flash chromatography with hexanes/AcOEt (2:1) as an eluent giving the desired 2 in 49% yield as a light yellowish oil. The product was aliquoted for each vial containing 4 mg for further radiochemistry. Rf = 0.29 (hexanes/AcOEt = 2:1). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.21–8.14 (m, 2H), 6.50–6.43 (m, 1H), 4.07 (br, 2H), 1.67–1.44 (m, 6H), 1.39–1.25 (m, 6H), 1.23–1.00 (m, 6H), 0.88 (t, 9H); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4 (JC–Sn = 5.9 Hz), 156.8 (JC–Sn = 15.5 Hz), 150.3, 119.1, 109.4, 29.2 (JC–Sn = 29.5 Hz), 27.4 (JC–Sn = 10.2 Hz), 13.7, 9.8 (JC–Sn = 168.2 Hz); ESI-HRMS (m/z): [M + H]+ calc’d for C17H33N2Sn+: 385.1660; found: 385.1659.

Radiosynthesis of [11C]3Me4AP (3)

In an oven-dried Thermo 3–5 mL V-vial, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, was weighed tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0) (3.5 mg, 0.4 equiv, 3.8 μmol), tri(o-tolyl)phosphine (3.5 mg, 1.1 equiv, 11.5 μmol), cesium fluoride (2.2 mg), and copper(II) bromide (2.8 mg). The aliquoted precursor 2 (4 mg, 1.0 equiv, 10.4 μmol) was dissolved with anhydrous N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, 0.2 mL) and transferred to the V-vial reactor. The complete transfer of the precursor is by rinsing with an additional 0.15 mL of NMP. The reaction vial was sealed with the cap under the inert atmosphere and prestirred for 5 min. Then [11C]MeI was bubbled into the reaction solution and allowed to react at room temperature for 15 min. The reaction mixture was diluted with 3.5 mL of mobile phase (described below) and purified using HPLC (SiliChrom HILIC column, 5 μm, 10 mm × 150 mm; 25% acetone in 75% ammonium bicarbonate aqueous (10 mM, pH = 8); flow 5 mL/min; tR ∼10.5 min, collecting from ∼9.7 to ∼11.4 min). The non-decay-corrected RCC was determined to be 89 ± 5% from the reaction crude by HPLC (70% 10 mM NH4HCO3 aqueous and 30% acetonitrile). Compound identity was confirmed by coinjection with a nonradioactive reference standard on HPLC (30% 10 mM NH4HCO3 aqueous and 70% acetonitrile, tR ∼7.2 min on radioactive spectra). See the molar activity calculation curve and NMP amount determination in the Supporting Information. The collected solution was diluted with saline to achieve a solution containing no more than 10% acetone by volume for the animal studies.

Rats Imaging Studies and Measurement of Brain SUV Ex Vivo

Animals

Six–eight-week-old male and female Sprague Dawley rats were used.

Imaging Studies and Measurement of Brain SUV Ex Vivo

Both naive female and male rats were imaged on a Sedecal SuperArgus PET/CT scanner. Rats were injected via the tail vein with the radioligand only (∼14.8 MBq in 1 mL solution) or radioligand (same) plus 5 mg/kg of cold 3Me4AP and scanned for 60 min under anesthesia (2% isoflurane with an oxygen flow of 2.0 L/min). After completing the scan, the animals were euthanized, their blood was collected by cardiac puncture, and their brains were harvested. Blood and brain samples were weighed, and the radioactive concentrations were measured using a single-well γ counter. Four rats (2 male, 2 female) were used in imaging experiments. Fifteen rats (11 male, 4 female) were used in γ-counter experiments.

NHP PET Imaging Studies

Animals

Two male adult rhesus macaques (monkey 1 and monkey 2) were used in the study (ages 10- and 14-year-old, respectively). Their body weights on the day of imaging were 14.2 kg for monkey 1 and 17.5 kg for monkey 2. As previously reported, one of the animals (monkey 2) had sustained an accidental injury during a craniotomy procedure 4 years before imaging.20,22

Animal Preparation

Before each imaging session, animals were sedated with ketamine/xylazine (10/0.5 mg/kg IM) and were intubated for maintenance anesthesia with isoflurane (1–2% in 100% O2). A venous catheter was placed in the saphenous vein for radiotracer injection, and an arterial catheter was placed in the posterior tibial artery for blood sampling. The animal was positioned on a heating pad on the bed of the scanner for the duration of the study.

Imaging Procedure

A three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MEMPRAGE) was acquired in each animal to provide an anatomical reference with acquisition parameters as described previously.20,22

The two rhesus macaques each underwent two baseline dynamic PET scans on a Discovery MI (GE Healthcare) PET/CT scanner. The two scans were acquired on the same day for monkey 1 and were separated by 1 month for monkey 2. A CT scan was performed before each PET acquisition for the purpose of correcting the PET images for photon attenuation. Emission PET data were acquired for 180 min in 3D list mode, and data collection was started right before [11C]3Me4AP injection. [11C]3Me4AP was administered as a 3 min infusion and was followed by a 3 min infusion of a saline flush. Radiotracer and saline flush were injected using two Medfusion 3500 syringe pumps. At the time of injection, [11C]3Me4AP doses were 304.6 and 314.2 MBq for monkey 1 and 330.1 and 291.5 MBq for monkey 2. Corresponding molar activities (Am) of [11C]3Me4AP were 90.3 and 247.5 GBq/μmol for monkey 1 and 162.8 and 176.1 GBq/μmol for monkey 2 at the time of injection. PET images were reconstructed with a 3D time-of-flight iterative reconstruction algorithm using 3 iterations and 34 subsets with corrections for scatter, attenuation, deadtime, random coincident events, and scanner normalization. Dynamic images were reconstructed with the following time frames: 6 × 10, 8 × 15, 6 × 30, 8 × 60, and 8 × 120 s and remaining were 300 s frames. Final PET images had voxel dimensions of 256 × 256 × 89 with voxel sizes of 1.17 × 1.17 × 2.8 mm3.

Arterial Blood and Radiometabolite Analysis

Blood samples were manually collected throughout the PET acquisition to measure the radioactivity time courses in whole blood (WB) and plasma (PL) and to characterize [11C]3Me4AP in vivo stability by radioHPLC. The procedures adopted to measure WB and PL curves in kBq/mL and for subsequent transformation into SUV units were similar to those previously described in Guehl et al.22 [11C]3Me4AP radiochromatograms and corresponding parent fractions were measured for plasma samples drawn at 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after radiotracer injection. The plasma samples were further filtrated with 10 K filter (Amicon Ultracel-10 regenerated cellulose membrane, 0.5 mL sample volume, Centrifugal Filter Unit) by centrifugation at 21 000 rcf (8 °C) for 15 min. The filtrates were injected into HPLC (Agilent 1260 Infinity II, along with Eckert and Ziegler FlowCount radioisotope detector) through a C18 column (XBridge, BEH, 130 Å, 3.5 μm, 4.6 mm × 100 mm) with a VanGuard cartridge (XBridge, BEH, 130 Å, 3.5 μm, 3.9 mm × 5 mm) using 12 mM Na2HPO4/8 mM NaOH aqueous solution (pH = 12): MeCN = 96:4 as the mobile phase. For each study, the plasma-free fraction (fp) was measured in triplicate as previously described.20

PET Data Processing and Image Quantification

Dynamic PET images were registered to the corresponding MEMPRAGE images via a rigid body transformation and the structural MEMPRAGE images were aligned to the National Institute of Mental Health macaque template (NMT)36 via affine, followed by nonlinear transformations. The inverse transformation matrices were calculated and applied to the NMT atlases for extraction of brain time–activity curves (TACs) in the native PET space. Registration procedures were performed using FLIRT and FNIRT from the FMRIB Software Library.37 TACs were extracted for 10 brain regions (occipital cortex, parietal cortex, temporal cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, striatum, thalamus, white matter, and whole cerebellum) in Bq/cc and were subsequently transformed into SUV units.

TACs were analyzed by compartmental modeling using one-tissue (1T) and two-tissue (2T) models and the metabolite-corrected input function. The total volume of distribution (VT) was the primary outcome measure used in this work to quantify [11C]3Me4AP uptake and was calculated from the model microparameters. In addition, the Logan graphical method38 and the multilinear analysis 1 (MA1) method39 were tested as simplified methods for the direct estimation of VT. The consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands described in Innis et al.40 was followed in this work.

Quantitative Comparison of In Vivo Binding Properties between [11C]3Me4AP, [18F]3F4AP, and [11C]3MeO4AP

In each animal, we performed a direct comparison of the in vivo affinity and specific binding ratios of [11C]3Me4AP vs [18F]3F4AP and [11C]3Me4AP vs [11C]3MeO4AP using regional VT values via linear regression following the method reported by Guo et al.22,35 that we previously used when we reported the comparison between [11C]3MeO4AP and [18F]3F4AP.22 Briefly, in this graphical method, VT of [11C]3Me4AP and VT of [18F]3F4AP are directly related to the in vivo affinity and specific binding ratios as shown in eq 1 below

graphic file with name cn2c00364_m001.jpg 1

where fp[11C]3Me4AP and fp are the plasma-free fractions, KD[11C]3Me4AP and KD are the equilibrium dissociation constants, BPND[11C]3Me4AP and BPND are the binding potentials (the ratio at the equilibrium of a specifically bound radioligand to that of a nondisplaceable radioligand in tissue) for [11C]3Me4AP and [18F]3F4AP, respectively, and VND[11C]3Me4AP is the nondisplaceable volumes of distribution of [11C]3Me4AP assumed to be homogeneous across brain regions. By plotting of VT of one tracer against VT of the other tracer across several brain regions with different levels of binding, this graphical method allows to (1) determine whether the two tracers bind to the same target (assessed by the linearity or lack of linearity of the regression) and (2) identify which compound presents the higher signal-to-noise ratio (assessed from the sign of the y intercept). In addition, since measurements of fp and fp[18F]3F4AP are available and both [11C]3Me4AP and [18F]3F4AP enter the brain by passive diffusion, the slope of the linear regression provides information on the in vivo affinity ratio.35 In each animal, the comparison was performed on the average VT values of the radiotracers calculated from the two baseline scans. Regional [18F]3F4AP VT data were obtained from Guehl et al.20 (where monkeys 3 and 4 correspond, respectively, to monkeys 1 and 2 in the present work). Paired comparisons were plotted for the regional VT estimates in the occipital cortex, parietal cortex, temporal cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, striatum, thalamus, white matter, and whole cerebellum. A similar comparison between [11C]3Me4AP and [11C]3MeO4AP was performed.

Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as the mean value ± 1 standard deviation (SD). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to assess the relative goodness of fit between compartment models.33 The most statistically appropriate model is the one producing the smallest AIC values. The linear correlation between VT of [11C]3Me4AP and VT of [18F]3F4AP (eq 1) was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient r, and the t distribution of the Fisher transformation was used to generate p-values for linear regressions and intercept. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Test–retest variability (TRT in %) of VT estimates was calculated from the two baseline scans acquired on 2 days 1 month apart in between in monkey 2 as TRT (%) = 100 × 2 × abs(VT,baseline 1VT,baseline 2)/(VT,baseline 1 + VT,baseline 2). The same equation was also used to calculate the reproducibility of VT measurements in monkey 1 from the baseline scans that were acquired 1 month apart on the same day.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank David F. Lee, Jr., Dr. John A. Correia, and Dr. Hamid Sabet for providing the carbon-11 for the radiotracer synthesis. The authors thank Jennifer X. Wang for the high-resolution mass spectra measurement and data analysis.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschemneuro.2c00364.

  • NMR spectra of 3-(tributylstannyl)pyridin-4-amine (2), the molar activity calibration curve, NMP residue determination in [11C]3Me4AP dose solution, and figures showing [11C]3Me4AP concentration in plasma and selective brain regions of each monkey and each scan (time–activity curves) (PDF)

Author Contributions

Y.S. and N.J.G. contributed equally. Y.S. developed the radiosynthesis method, produced the tracer, and performed quality control. Y.S., Y.-P.Z., V.B., and K.T. performed PET imaging in rats, rat tissue dissections, γ counting, and data analysis of the rodent data. N.J.G., G.E.F., and M.D.N. performed PET imaging in NHPs and analyzed the data. Y.S., M.D., and S.-H.M. processed and analyzed the NHP blood samples. Y.S., N.J.G., and P.B. wrote the manuscript, which was reviewed and approved by all the authors.

This study was supported by NIH R01NS114066 (P.B.), P41EB022544 (G.E.F.), and S10OD026987 (M.D.N. and G.E.F.).

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): PB has a financial interest in Fuzionaire Diagnostics and the University of Chicago. PB is the inventor of a PET imaging agent owned by the University of Chicago and licensed to Fuzionaire Diagnostics. Dr. Brugarolass interests were reviewed and are managed by MGH and Mass General Brigham in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies. The other authors declare no conflict of interests.

Notes

P.B. has a financial interest in Fuzionaire Diagnostics and the University of Chicago. P.B. is the inventor of a PET imaging agent owned by the University of Chicago and licensed to Fuzionaire Diagnostics. P.B.’s interests were reviewed and are managed by MGH and Mass General Brigham in accordance with their conflict-of-interest policies.

Supplementary Material

cn2c00364_si_001.pdf (843.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Reich D. S.; Lucchinetti C. F.; Calabresi P. A. Multiple Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 169–180. 10.1056/NEJMra1401483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bramlett H. M.; Dietrich W. D. Progressive damage after brain and spinal cord injury: pathomechanisms and treatment strategies. Prog. Brain Res. 2007, 161, 125–141. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61009-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Armstrong R. C.; Mierzwa A. J.; Marion C. M.; Sullivan G. M. White matter involvement after TBI: Clues to axon and myelin repair capacity. Exp. Neurol. 2016, 275, 328–333. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bronge L.; Bogdanovic N.; Wahlund L. O. Postmortem MRI and histopathology of white matter changes in Alzheimer brains. A quantitative, comparative study. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2002, 13, 205–212. 10.1159/000057698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aboul-Enein F.; Rauschka H.; Kornek B.; Stadelmann C.; Stefferl A.; Bruck W.; Lucchinetti C.; Schmidbauer M.; Jellinger K.; Lassmann H. Preferential loss of myelin-associated glycoprotein reflects hypoxia-like white matter damage in stroke and inflammatory brain diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2003, 62, 25–33. 10.1093/jnen/62.1.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauckneht M.; Capitanio S.; Raffa S.; Roccatagliata L.; Pardini M.; Lapucci C.; Marini C.; Sambuceti G.; Inglese M.; Gallo P.; Cecchin D.; Nobili F.; Morbelli S. Molecular imaging of multiple sclerosis: from the clinical demand to novel radiotracers. EJNMMI Radiopharm. Chem. 2019, 4, 6. 10.1186/s41181-019-0058-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brugarolas P.; Reich D. S.; Popko B. Detecting Demyelination by PET: The Lesion as Imaging Target. Mol. Imaging 2018, 17, 1536012118785471 10.1177/1536012118785471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rasband M. N.; Trimmer J. S.; Schwarz T. L.; Levinson S. R.; Ellisman M. H.; Schachner M.; Shrager P. Potassium channel distribution, clustering, and function in remyelinating rat axons. J. Neurosci. 1998, 18, 36–47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00036.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagchi B.; Al-Sabi A.; Kaza S.; Scholz D.; O’Leary V. B.; Dolly J. O.; Ovsepian S. V. Disruption of myelin leads to ectopic expression of KV1.1 channels with abnormal conductivity of optic nerve axons in a cuprizone-induced model of demyelination. PLoS One 2014, 9, e87736 10.1371/journal.pone.0087736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sinha K.; Karimi-Abdolrezaee S.; Velumian A. A.; Fehlings M. G. Functional changes in genetically dysmyelinated spinal cord axons of shiverer mice: role of juxtaparanodal Kv1 family K+ channels. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95, 1683–1695. 10.1152/jn.00899.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Arroyo E. J.; Sirkowski E. E.; Chitale R.; Scherer S. S. Acute demyelination disrupts the molecular organization of peripheral nervous system nodes. J. Comp. Neurol. 2004, 479, 424–434. 10.1002/cne.20321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Karimi-Abdolrezaee S.; Eftekharpour E.; Fehlings M. G. Temporal and spatial patterns of Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 protein and gene expression in spinal cord white matter after acute and chronic spinal cord injury in rats: implications for axonal pathophysiology after neurotrauma. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19, 577–589. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2004.03164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gutman G. A.; Chandy K. G.; Grissmer S.; Lazdunski M.; McKinnon D.; Pardo L. A.; Robertson G. A.; Rudy B.; Sanguinetti M. C.; Stühmer W.; Wang X. International Union of Pharmacology. LIII. Nomenclature and Molecular Relationships of Voltage-Gated Potassium Channels. Pharmacol. Rev. 2005, 57, 473–508. 10.1124/pr.57.4.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kostadinova I.; Danchev N. 4-aminopyridine – the new old drug for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacia 2019, 66, 67–74. 10.3897/pharmacia.66.e35976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirsch G. E.; Shieh C. C.; Drewe J. A.; Vener D. F.; Brownt A. M. Segmental exchanges define 4-aminopyridine binding and the inner mouth of K+ pores. Neuron 1993, 11, 503–512. 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90154-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bostock H.; Sears T. A.; Sherratt R. M. The effects of 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium ions on normal and demyelinated mammalian nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 1981, 313, 301–315. 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stefoski D.; Davis F. A.; Faut M.; Schauf C. L. 4-Aminopyridine improves clinical signs in multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1987, 21, 71–77. 10.1002/ana.410210113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Waxman S. G.; Ritchie J. M. Molecular dissection of the myelinated axon. Ann. Neurol. 1993, 33, 121–136. 10.1002/ana.410330202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Brugarolas P.; Sanchez-Rodriguez J. E.; Tsai H. M.; Basuli F.; Cheng S. H.; Zhang X.; Caprariello A. V.; Lacroix J. J.; Freifelder R.; Murali D.; DeJesus O.; Miller R. H.; Swenson R. E.; Chen C. T.; Herscovitch P.; Reich D. S.; Bezanilla F.; Popko B. Development of a PET radioligand for potassium channels to image CNS demyelination. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 607 10.1038/s41598-017-18747-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Guehl N. J.; Ramos-Torres K. M.; Linnman C.; Moon S. H.; Dhaynaut M.; Wilks M. Q.; Han P. K.; Ma C.; Neelamegam R.; Zhou Y. P.; Popko B.; Correia J. A.; Reich D. S.; Fakhri G. E.; Herscovitch P.; Normandin M. D.; Brugarolas P. Evaluation of the potassium channel tracer [18F]3F4AP in rhesus macaques. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2021, 41, 1721–1733. 10.1177/0271678X20963404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ramos-Torres K. M.; Zhou Y. P.; Yang B. Y.; Guehl N. J.; Sung-Hyun M.; Telu S.; Normandin M. D.; Pike V. W.; Brugarolas P. Syntheses of [11C]2- and [11C]3-trifluoromethyl-4-aminopyridine: potential PET radioligands for demyelinating diseases. RSC Med. Chem. 2020, 11, 1161–1167. 10.1039/D0MD00190B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Guehl N. J.; Neelamegam R.; Zhou Y. P.; Moon S. H.; Dhaynaut M.; El Fakhri G.; Normandin M. D.; Brugarolas P. Radiochemical Synthesis and Evaluation in Non-Human Primates of 3-[11C]methoxy-4-aminopyridine: A Novel PET Tracer for Imaging Potassium Channels in the CNS. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2021, 12, 756–765. 10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodríguez-Rangel S.; Bravin A. D.; Ramos-Torres K. M.; Brugarolas P.; Sanchez-Rodriguez J. E. Structure-activity relationship studies of four novel 4-aminopyridine K+ channel blockers. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 52 10.1038/s41598-019-56245-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wuest F.; Berndt M.; Kniess T.In Carbon-11 Labeling Chemistry Based Upon [11C]methyl Iodide, Ernst Schering Foundation Symposium Proceedings, 2007; pp 183–213. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Dahl K.; Halldin C.; Schou M. New methodologies for the preparation of carbon-11 labeled radiopharmaceuticals. Clin. Transl. Imaging 2017, 5, 275–289. 10.1007/s40336-017-0223-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Qu W.; Hu B.; Babich J. W.; Waterhouse N.; Dooley M.; Ponnala S.; Urgiles J. A general 11C-labeling approach enabled by fluoride-mediated desilylation of organosilanes. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1736 10.1038/s41467-020-15556-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Doi H. Pd-mediated rapid cross-couplings using [11C]methyl iodide: groundbreaking labeling methods in 11C radiochemistry. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 2015, 58, 73–85. 10.1002/jlcr.3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Farina V.; Kapadia S.; Krishnan B.; Wang C. J.; Liebeskind L. S. On the Nature of the Copper Effect in the Stille Cross-Coupling. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5905–5911. 10.1021/jo00099a018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Suzuki M.; Doi H.; Hosoya T.; Langstrom B.; Watanabe Y. Rapid methylation on carbon frameworks leading to the synthesis of a PET tracer capable of imaging a novel CNS-type prostacyclin receptor in living human brain. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2004, 23, 595–607. 10.1016/j.trac.2004.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maes B. U. W.; Lemière G. L. F.. Pyridazines and their Benzo Derivatives. In Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry III; Elsevier, 2008; pp 1–116. [Google Scholar]
  31. Armstrong C. M.; Loboda A. A model for 4-aminopyridine action on K channels: similarities to tetraethylammonium ion action. Biophys. J. 2001, 81, 895–904. 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)75749-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mourre C.; Chernova M. N.; Martin-Eauclaire M.-F.; Bessone R.; Jacquet G.; Gola M.; Alper S. L.; Crest M. Distribution in Rat Brain of Binding Sites of Kaliotoxin, a Blocker of Kv1.1 and Kv1.3 α-Subunits. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1999, 291, 943–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1974, 19, 716–723. 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Slifstein M.; Laruelle M. Effects of statistical noise on graphic analysis of PET neuroreceptor studies. J. Nucl. Med. 2000, 41, 2083–2088. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Guo Q.; Owen D. R.; Rabiner E. A.; Turkheimer F. E.; Gunn R. N. A Graphical Method to Compare the in vivo Binding Potential of PET Radioligands in the Absence of a Reference Region: Application to [11C]PBR28 and [18F]PBR111 for TSPO Imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2014, 34, 1162–1168. 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Seidlitz J.; Sponheim C.; Glen D.; Ye F. Q.; Saleem K. S.; Leopold D. A.; Ungerleider L.; Messinger A. A population MRI brain template and analysis tools for the macaque. NeuroImage 2018, 170, 121–131. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jenkinson M.; Beckmann C. F.; Behrens T. E.; Woolrich M. W.; Smith S. M. Fsl. NeuroImage 2012, 62, 782–790. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Logan J.; Fowler J. S.; Volkow N. D.; Wolf A. P.; Dewey S. L.; Schlyer D. J.; Macgregor R. R.; Hitzemann R.; Bendriem B.; Gatley S. J.; Christman D. R. Graphical Analysis of Reversible Radioligand Binding from Time-Activity Measurements Applied to [N-11C-Methyl]-(−)-Cocaine PET Studies in Human Subjects. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1990, 10, 740–747. 10.1038/jcbfm.1990.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ichise M.; Toyama H.; Innis R. B.; Carson R. E. Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002, 22, 1271–1281. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000038000.34930.4E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Innis R. B.; Cunningham V. J.; Delforge J.; Fujita M.; Gjedde A.; Gunn R. N.; Holden J.; Houle S.; Huang S. C.; Ichise M.; Iida H.; Ito H.; Kimura Y.; Koeppe R. A.; Knudsen G. M.; Knuuti J.; Lammertsma A. A.; Laruelle M.; Logan J.; Maguire R. P.; Mintun M. A.; Morris E. D.; Parsey R.; Price J. C.; Slifstein M.; Sossi V.; Suhara T.; Votaw J. R.; Wong D. F.; Carson R. E. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2007, 27, 1533–1539. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cn2c00364_si_001.pdf (843.5KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Chemical Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES