Skip to main content
Frontiers in Genetics logoLink to Frontiers in Genetics
. 2022 Nov 29;13:982008. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.982008

miR-17-92 cluster in osteoarthritis: Regulatory roles and clinical utility

Xuefeng Pan 1,2, Xiao Cen 1,3, Xiner Xiong 4, Zhihe Zhao 1,2,*, Xinqi Huang 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9745093  PMID: 36523768

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent articular disease, especially in aged population. Caused by multi-factors (e.g., trauma, inflammation, and overloading), OA leads to pain and disability in affected joints, which decreases patients’ quality of life and increases social burden. In pathophysiology, OA is mainly characterized by cartilage hypertrophy or defect, subchondral bone sclerosis, and synovitis. The homeostasis of cell–cell communication is disturbed as well in such pro-inflammatory microenvironment, which provides clues for the diagnosis and treatment of OA. MicoRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous non-coding RNAs that regulate various processes via post-transcriptional mechanisms. The miR-17-92 cluster is an miRNA polycistron encoded by the host gene called MIR17HG. Mature miRNAs generated from MIR17HG participate in biological activities such as oncogenesis, neurogenesis, and modulation of the immune system. Accumulating evidence also indicates that the expression level of miRNAs in the miR-17-92 cluster is tightly related to the pathological processes of OA, such as chondrocyte apoptosis, extracellular matrix degradation, bone remodeling, and synovitis. In this review, we aim to summarize the roles of the miR-17-92 cluster in the underlying molecular mechanism during the development and progression of OA and shed light on the new avenue of the diagnosis and treatment of OA.

Keywords: osteoarthritis, miRNA, chondrocyte apoptosis, extracellular matrix degradation, bone remodeling, synovitis

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent joint disease, which is becoming an increasing social-economic problem worldwide (Bortoluzzi et al., 2018; Peat and Thomas, 2021). It has been estimated that over 3% people are troubled with symptomatic OA in the world (Katz et al., 2021). Clinically, to relieve pain and joint disability, two leading symptoms caused by inflammatory microenvironment and articular tissue destruction, a comprehensive plan for OA management is required (Jang et al., 2021; Sharma, 2021). Patient education and lifestyle change should be applied first if necessary (Hunter and Bierma-Zeinstra, 2019). Pharmaceutical therapy (e.g., nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), hyaluronic acid, protease inhibitors, and bisphosphonates), via oral medication or intra-articular injection, could alleviate the pain and promote tissue repair to some extent (Conaghan et al., 2019; Jones et al., 2019; Latourte et al., 2020). If the lesions advance progressively and the aforementioned conservative methods do not work, total joint replacement might be the only choice currently (Ferguson et al., 2018; Price et al., 2018).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous non-coding RNAs with about 22 nucleotides in length, which regulate the expression of genes via the post-transcriptional mechanism (Bartel, 2004). Numerous functions have been ascribed to miRNAs in various physiological and pathological activities during these decades (Liu et al., 2014; Galagali and Kim, 2020). For example, miR-125, mammalian ortholog of the first reported animal miRNA lin-4, was found to regulate cancers and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases (Peng et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). The well-known let-7 was originally found in Caenorhabditis elegans by Reinhart et al. (2000), following which researchers identified that this miRNA is highly evolutionarily conserved across species and functions in tumor suppressing, organism development, and stem cell differentiation (Thornton and Gregory, 2012; Ventayol et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2016). The biogenesis of miRNA is a complicated and precisely regulated process (Lin and Gregory, 2015; Lee et al., 2016; Ali Syeda et al., 2020). In brief, primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) is first synthesized in the nucleus with a hairpin stem–loop structure. The Drosha/DGCR8 complex cleaves the pri-miRNA into a 60–70-nucleotide pre-miRNA, and exportin 5 subsequently translocates the pre-miRNA into cytoplasm. In cytoplasm, pre-miRNA is processed into a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) with ∼22 base pairs in length by Dicer. One strand of the dsRNA is loaded on the Argonaute (AGO) to form an RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), which has the potential to regulate various biological processes by binding to the 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of target genes. miRNAs regulate gene expression via two mechanisms: suppressing protein translation by inhibiting its initiation or elongation and promoting the cleavage or degradation of mRNAs (Saliminejad et al., 2019).

miR-17-92 is a classical polycistronic cluster, and its roles in tumor and normal development were extensively studied (Chen et al., 2013; Mogilyansky and Rigoutsos, 2013; Murphy et al., 2013). A recent study also reported the relationship between miR-17-92 and OA. For example, Kong et al. (2017) collected the plasma samples of OA patients and health control for miRNA detection and analysis. miR-19b-3p and miR-92a-3p, constituents of the miR-17-92 cluster, were among the eight top differentially expressed miRNAs. In the present review, we aim to summarize the current knowledge about the underlying molecular mechanism of the miR-17–92 cluster during the development and progression of OA and shed light on the new avenue of the diagnosis and treatment of OA.

The pathology of OA

Normally, articular cartilage coordinates with subchondral bone and synovial membrane to keep the joint in homeostasis (Zhen and Cao, 2014). The cartilage buffers external stress, while the subchondral bone transmits and absorbs the mechanical loading, and synovial fluid lubricates the joint and provides the avascular cartilage with nutrition and biological cues (Madry, 2010; Lories and Luyten, 2011). Considering their interplay under the physiological condition, it is natural to hold the belief that the progression of OA is not just questions about the cartilage. During the onset and progression of OA, loss of cartilage causes excessive loading on subchondral bone, which subsequently leads to bone lesions such as microfracture, necrosis, and fibrosis (Zhen and Cao, 2014). With the constant production and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, nearby synovium, ligament, and even periarticular muscles will be affected (Katz et al., 2021).

Mechanistically, the apoptosis and hypertrophy of chondrocyte occur during OA progression, and the normal structure of the matrix is destructed by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS); blood vessels from bone marrow invade through the osteochondral junction into the calcified cartilage zone, leading to endochondral osteogenesis (Karsdal et al., 2014; Goldring and Goldring, 2016). In subchondral bone, bone turnover is enhanced during the early OA stage, which causes the subchondral bone becoming thinner (Hu et al., 2021). During the late stage, growth factors like transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which promote matrix production and protect joints from damage under physiological conditions, would stimulate osteophyte production and subchondral bone sclerosis under such abnormal environment (Hu et al., 2021). In synovium, chemokines are secreted to promote monocyte/macrophage infiltration, which stimulates excessive proliferation of synovial fibroblasts and production of inflammatory cytokines (Kapoor et al., 2011; Sanchez-Lopez et al., 2022). The aforementioned pathological processes of OA have been sketched in Figure 1.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Physiological and pathological structure of the joint. In a healthy joint, the cartilage coordinates with subchondral bone, synovial membrane, and other peri-articular tissues to keep the joint in homeostasis. In an OA joint, chondrocyte hypertrophy and apoptosis occur with cartilage matrix degradation; subchondral bone changes including sclerosis, osteophyte formation, and blood vessel infiltration can also be observed; synoviocytes are over-proliferative, and plenty of macrophages infiltrate into the synovial membrane to secret pro-inflammatory cytokines, which deteriorate the microenvironment.

The miR-17-92 cluster and its biogenesis

The miR-17-92 cluster (also known as oncomir-1) is an important miRNA polycistron located in the non-protein-coding region of chromosome 13 open reading frame 25 (C13orf25), which is also referred to as the miR-17-92 host gene (MIR17HG) (Mogilyansky and Rigoutsos, 2013). There are six mature miRNAs generated from the miR-17-92 cluster transcript: miR-17, miR-18a, miR-19a, miR-20a, miR-19b-1, and miR-92a-1. These miRNAs were reported to regulate biological processes including oncogenesis, neurogenesis, and immune system modulation (Mendell, 2008; Osada and Takahashi, 2011; Baumjohann, 2018). The miR-106a-363 cluster (located on chromosome X) and miR-106b-25 cluster (located on chromosome 7) are two paralogs of the miR-17-92 cluster in the human genome (Petrocca et al., 2008; Gruszka and Zakrzewska, 2018). The former cluster contains six miRNAs: miR-106a, miR-18b, miR-20b, miR-19b-2, miR-92a-2, and miR-363. The latter one contains three miRNAs: miR-106b, miR-93, and miR-25. According to their seed sequence, miRNAs in these three clusters are categorized into four groups: the miR-17 family, the miR-18, the miR-19, and the miR-92 family (see Figures 2A,B).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

miR-17-92 cluster and their paralogs. (A) miR-17-92 cluster, miR-106a-363 cluster, and miR-106b-25 cluster are three paralogs in the human genome; (B) they can be classified into four subfamilies based on their seed sequence; (C) Biogenesis of the miR-17-92 cluster. RISC, RNA-induced silencing complex.

The biogenesis of the miR-17-92 cluster is the same as processes of other miRNAs, except there contains multiple stem–loop structures to form six miRNAs in a single transcript (Olive et al., 2010) (see Figure 2C). The production of these miRNAs could be regulated by a class of transcriptional factors. Members of the miR-17-92 and miR-106a-363 cluster were consistently observed to be upregulated when the transcription factor c-Myc was elevated in multiple cell types, and subsequent experiments validated that c-Myc could directly bind to miR-17-92 genomic locus-MIR17HG (O’Donnell et al., 2005). The amplification of another oncogenic gene n-Myc was discovered to upregulate miR-17-92 via transcription regulation (Schulte et al., 2008). Other transcription factors from the E2F transcription factor family (e.g., E2F1, 2, and 3) and ETS transcription factor family (e.g., Spi-1 and Fli-1) were reported to participate in the regulation of miR-17-92 biogenesis as well (Woods et al., 2007; Kayali et al., 2012). In addition, post-transcriptional factor like the tertiary structure of transcripts could also influence the biogenesis of miRNAs (Chaulk et al., 2011; Chakraborty et al., 2012). However, mechanisms of how transcription factor network and post-transcriptional factors control the biogenesis of the miR-17-92 cluster remains elucidated even with the knowledge mentioned previously.

miR-17-92 in cartilage degradation

Articular cartilage is composed of chondrocytes along with their surrounding matrix, which features the joints with the load-bearing characteristic (Guilak et al., 2018). However, the cartilage has weak ability to self-repair in response to chronic or acute pathological stimuli due to its shortage of blood supply (Makris et al., 2015; Robinson et al., 2016). Hence, proper interventions are necessary for cartilage regeneration when it is destructed. Exploring mechanisms of cartilage repair is a vital path for OA treatment (Goldring and Marcu, 2012). Interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are the two most common factors used for in vitro OA phenotype induction (Wang et al., 2019; Zhang H et al., 2021), and members of the miR-17-92 cluster were found to attenuate or promote OA progression in such an in vitro OA model. For example, miR-17a-5p, miR-19b-3p, and miR-92a-3p were reported to prevent OA progression in IL-1β-induced chondrocyte apoptosis and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation (Mao et al., 2017a; Duan et al., 2019; Li Y et al., 2020). Under LPS induction, miR-20a inhibitor attenuated pro-inflammatory response of chondrocytes (Zhao and Gong, 2019). Based on current research, multiple signaling pathways (e.g., mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, TGF-β pathway, Wnt/β-catenin, and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB)) have been found to participate in the chondrocyte and ECM metabolism (van der Kraan, 2017; Choi et al., 2019; Shang et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022) (Table 1) (See Figure 3).

TABLE 1.

Expression level of the miR-17-92 cluster and its function during OA progression.

miRNA Expression level Target gene Expression level of the target gene Function of miRNA Upstream lncRNA Reference
miR-18a Downregulated in hypoxia-exosomes of BMSCs - - Its knockdown relieves OA - Zhang Y et al. (2022)
miR-17-3p Downregulated in LPS-induced chondrocytes ETV1 Up Its knockdown promotes LPS-induced C28/I2 cell injury lnc HOTAIR Chen et al. (2017)
miR-18a Upregulated in the rat knee OA model TGFβ1, SMAD2, and SMAD3 Down Its overexpression accelerates OA progression by promoting chondrocyte hypertrophy - Lian et al. (2020)
miR-17-5p Downregulated in OA cartilage FUT2 Up Its overexpression alleviates knee OA progression in vivo and suppresses IL-1β-induced ECM degradation and chondrocyte apoptosis in vitro lnc HOTAIR Hu et al. (2018)
miR-20a Upregulated in plasma of OA patients IκBβ Down Its knockdown alleviates LPS-induced chondrocyte apoptosis in vitro - Zhao and Gong (2019)
miR-17-5p Downregulated in the mouse knee OA model p62 Up Its overexpression promotes autophagy in SW1353 cells - Li et al. (2018)
miR-20a Downregulated during chondrogenic differentiation Atg7 Up Its overexpression suppresses chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells via inhibiting autophagy - Xu et al. (2019)
miR-92a-3p Upregulated during hMSC chondrogenic differentiation and downregulated in OA cartilage HDAC2 Down Its overexpression increased histone acetylation of cartilage-specific genes including Col2A1 and ACAN - Mao et al. (2017a)
miR-17-5p Downregulated in OA cartilage EZH2 Up Its overexpression inhibits IL-1β-induced ECM degradation and chondrocyte apoptosis in vitro - Li Y et al. (2020)
miR-17-5p Downregulated in OA cartilage FUT1 Up Its overexpression attenuates IL-1β-induced ECM degradation and chondrocyte apoptosis in vitro lnc TUG1 Li Z et al. (2020)
miR-19a-3p Downregulated in OA cartilage - - Its knockdown promotes LPS-induced chondrocyte inflammatory injury lnc DANCR Li et al. (2021)
miR-17-3p Downregulated during osteogenesis SOX6 Up Its overexpression inhibits osteoblast differentiation - Chen et al. (2020)
miR-92a Downregulated in TGF-β1-treated OA synovial fibroblasts FOXO3 Up Its overexpression promotes inflammatory mediator expression in OA fibroblasts - Kuo et al. (2019)
miR-92a-3p Downregulated in TNF-α-treated synoviocytes KLHL29 Up Its knockdown promotes chemokine and inflammatory factors in synoviocytes co-cultured with micro-fragmented adipose tissue - Shi et al. (2022)
miR-18a-3p - - - Its overexpression inhibits synovial membrane cell proliferation and reduces inflammatory cells - Feng et al. (2022)
miR-18a Downregulated in OA knee anterior cruciate ligaments - - - - Li et al. (2017)

BMSCs, bone marrow stem cells; OA, osteoarthritis; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ECM, extracellular matrix.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Roles of the miR-17-92 cluster in the articular cartilage metabolism.

MAPK pathway

MAPK is a class of serine/threonine-protein kinases, including three main types of subfamily members: the extracellular-signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), the c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNKs), and the p38 kinases (Lee et al., 2020; Sinkala et al., 2021). They can transfer the extracellular signals into the nucleus via the MAP3K–MAP2K–MAPK cascade to participate in cellular activities like proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Chen et al., 2018; Ostojic et al., 2021). It was reported that bone marrow stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (BMSC-EVs) could alleviate the IL-1β-induced chondrocyte inflammatory phenotype (Zhang B et al., 2022), and such effect was further improved with the treatment of BMSC-EV generated in a hypoxic environment. RNA sequencing showed that 12 miRNAs were aberrantly expressed in hypoxia BMSC-EV, in which miR-18a was downregulated, indicating its involvement in exosome-treated OA progress, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed that such progress may be mediated by the MAPK pathway (Zhang Y et al., 2022). Chen et al. (2017) found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) promoted cellular injury and cytokine secretion of human articular chondrocytes, which was influenced by the lncHOTAIR-miR-17-3p-ETV1 network. Knockdown of HOTAIR and ETV1 or overexpression of miR-17-3p could reverse LPS-mediated apoptosis, and subsequent results verified that the ceRNA regulatory triad regulated such process through activating MAPK signaling (Chen et al., 2017).

TGF-β pathway

The TGF-β superfamily consists of factors including TGF-β, BMPs, and growth and differentiation factors (GDFs), which regulate gene expression in an SAMD-dependent or SMAD-independent way (Thielen et al., 2019; Cherifi et al., 2021). Accumulating evidence has shown that the TGF-β pathway is tightly related to the osteoarthritis progression and cartilage regeneration (MacFarlane et al., 2017; Wang C et al., 2020; Wang G et al., 2020). Lian et al. (2020) reported that miR-18a was significantly upregulated in IL-β-induced rat knee OA models; in in vitro experiments, hypertrophic genes like COL10A1 and MMP13 increased in the miR-18a overexpression group after 14 days of chondrogenic differentiation and 14 days of hypertrophic induction. As cartilage hypertrophy is a crucial step during OA progression, miR-18a has the potential to regulate OA progress negatively. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis indicated the underlying relationship between miR-18a and TGF-β; bioinformatics found that there existed binding sites of miR-18a in the 3′UTR of TGF-β1, SMAD2, and SMAD3, which was validated by RIP assay and luciferase reporter assay (Lian et al., 2020).

Wnt/β-catenin pathway

The nomination of Wnt comes from the integrase-1 gene in mice and the wingless gene in Drosophila. Wnt gene regulates biological activities via two distinctive ways (namely, canonical pathway and noncanonical pathway). The noncanonical pathway includes the Wnt-Ca2+ pathway and Wnt-atypical protein kinase C pathway. The canonical pathway is dependent on β-catenin, so it is also called as the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. With regard to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, in the absence of the extracellular Wnt signal, a compound that is comprised of axis inhibition protein (AXIN), adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), and casein kinase 1 (CK1) constantly degraded cytoplasmic β-catenin via the ubiquitination mechanism; when the ligand Wnt binds to the transmembrane receptor, cytoplasmic β-catenin will be released from the destruction complex and regulates target genes via translocating into the nucleus (Zhou et al., 2017; Shang et al., 2021). Except for its roles in embryonic development and cancers, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is also tightly related to bone remodeling and cartilage homeostasis (Lietman et al., 2018; Sun J et al., 2020). Hu et al. (2018) discovered the HOTAIR–miR-17-5p–FUT2 cascade in regulating matrix degradation and cell apoptosis in IL-1β-induced experimental OA models. Due to the correlation between FUT family and Wnt/β-catenin signaling, they made the hypothesis that FUT2 participated in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Results showed that FUT2 upregulation significantly increased phosphorylated GSK-3β (member of the β-catenin destruction complex) expression and nuclear β-catenin accumulation, which are the signs of Wnt/β-catenin activation.

NF-κB pathway

RelA/p65, RelB, c-Rel, NF-κB1/p105, and NF-κB2/p100 are the five constituents of the NF-κB transcription factor family (Lepetsos et al., 2019). In the resting state, NF-κB dimers are inhibited via binding with NF-κB inhibitors (IκBs). When the NF-κB pathway is activated, IκBs are phosphorylated and degraded by IκB kinases (IKKs) to relieve NF-κB (Taniguchi and Karin, 2018). Finally, NF-κB is translocated into the nucleus to regulate downstream gene expression. The activation of NF-κB signaling provokes cartilage matrix degradation and chondrocyte hypertrophy via producing catabolic mediator (e.g., MMPs and aggrecanases) and inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)) (Olivotto et al., 2015). Chen et al. (2017) reported that miR-17-3p mediated OA phenotype regulation via NF-κB signaling. From another research by Zhao and Gong (2019), it was found that IκBβ, a constituent of the IκB family, could be directly targeted by miR-20a and the inhibition of miR-20a could upregulate IκBβ, thus protecting chondrocytes via NF-κB signaling suppression.

Autophagy

Autophagy is a bio-protective mechanism in response to endogenous or exogenous stress (Xia et al., 2021). Intracellular components (e.g., pathogens, damaged organelles, and misfolded proteins) engulfed by autophagosomes are delivered to the lysosomal compartment for degradation and recycling (Dikic and Elazar, 2018). Three kinds of autophagy have been described currently (Mizushima and Levine, 2020; Kitada and Koya, 2021). Macroautophagy is the best understood type, where intracellular contents are first engulfed to form autophagosomes, which are fused with enzyme-enriched lysosomes to degrade contents in a selective or nonselective manner; microautophagy refers to the process in which cytoplasmic components are directly sequestered into lysosomes and chaperone-mediated autophagy selectively degrades proteins with the assistance of chaperone complexes (Mizushima and Levine, 2020; Kitada and Koya, 2021). The majority of human diseases like cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolism diseases are influenced by autophagy according to the research studies till date (Levy et al., 2017; Scrivo et al., 2018; Klionsky et al., 2021). Meanwhile, it was observed that autophagy was constantly activated under physiological articular cartilage while disturbed in aged and OA joints (Duarte, 2015; Li et al., 2016), hinting that they are tightly correlated.

Selective autophagy receptors mediate the selective degradation of aggregated proteins, dysfunctional mitochondria, and pathogens during macroautophagy. The deficiency of p62 (also referred to as sequestosome-1), a prototype autophagy receptor, leads to ubiquitinated protein accumulation and mitochondrial defects via impairing the selectivity of autophagy (Aparicio et al., 2020). Decreased miR-17-5p expression and suppressed autophagy were concurrently detected in the experimental mouse OA model (Li et al., 2018). The 3′-UTR of p62 was found to contain a conserved binding site with miR-17-5p, which was validated by luciferase reporter assay. However, deeper investigations on the underlying mechanisms of the miR-17-92/p62 axis and its effect on OA relief remain to be elucidated.

It was found that the miR-17-92 cluster was all decreased during ATDC5 cell chondrogenic differentiation (Xu et al., 2019). Among the six members, miR-20a showed the most significant inhibition trend on chondrogenesis. The mRFP-GFP-LC3 adenoviral vector was transfected into ATDC5 cells to trace the dynamic autophagic activities. At different induction time points (i.e., 24, 36, 48, and 72 h), increased red and yellow puncta in the chondrogenic group indicated the active state of autophagy, which can be blocked by miR-20a (Xu et al., 2019). Dozens of autophagy-related proteins were discovered in controlling the dynamics of membranes during autophagy (Xie et al., 2015). For instance, Atg5 along with Atg12/Atg16 is essential in autophagosome formation (Romanov et al., 2012; Sheng et al., 2018); Atg7 dysregulation significantly influenced the COL Ⅱ synthesis and secretion (Cinque et al., 2015). Xu et al. (2019) reported that disruption of Atg7 could reverse the promotion effect of miR-20a inhibitor on ATDC5 chondrogenic differentiation and autophagic vacuole production.

Histone modification

Histones are alkaline proteins that envelope DNA. Histone modification (e.g., acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation) alters the conformation of chromatin and influences transcription of genes (Stoll et al., 2018; Zhang Y et al., 2021). Histone deacetylases (HDACs) were reported to regulate chondrogenesis and cartilage degradation via deacetylating nucleosomal histone (Carpio and Westendorf, 2016; Meng et al., 2018). miR-92a-3p and HDAC2 were aberrantly expressed during MSC chondrogenesis and OA progression, and the luciferase reporter assay confirmed their interaction (Mao et al., 2017b). Moreover, the acetylation of histone H3 on Col Ⅱ and aggrecan promoter was enhanced by miR-92a-5p, contributing to the process of cartilage protection. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a histone methyltransferase, was upregulated in OA cartilage (Li Z et al., 2020), hinting its vital roles in OA pathogenesis. However, such effect can be attenuated by upstream miR-17-5p.

Others

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-coding endogenous RNAs with over 200 nucleotides in length (Herman et al., 2022). Cytoplastic lncRNAs usually function as a miRNA sponge to regulate downstream target genes via classical ceRNA mechanisms (Thomson and Dinger, 2016). The roles of lncRNAs during OA-related ECM degradation and chondrocyte apoptosis were identified as well (Ghafouri-Fard et al., 2021). Hu et al. (2018) transfected chondrocytes with the HOTAIR pcDNA3.1 vector and showed that the overexpression of HOTAIR significantly promoted chondrocyte apoptosis and synthesis of cartilage-degrading enzymes (i.e., MMP13 and ADAMTS-5), while ECM-formation genes like COLⅡ and aggrecan were inhibited in the IL-1β-induced inflammatory environment. The addition of its target miR-17-5p could reverse such a pro-osteoarthritis trend via the FUT2-Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Another research discovered that the HOTAIR-miR-17-3p axis had the potential to influence LPS-induced OA (Chen et al., 2017). TUG1, an lncRNA related to cell apoptosis, was reported to target miR-17-5p (Li2 et al., 2020). Differentiation antagonizing non-protein coding RNA (DANCR) is an oncogenic lncRNA. Except for its vital roles in cancer progression, DANCR was reported to participate in stem cell differentiation. Li et al. (2021) found that si-DANCR could protect human chondrocytes from LPS-induced apoptosis, and miR-19a-3p was a vital mediator.

miR-17-92 in subchondral bone remodeling

Subchondral bone refers to the cortical plate and subchondral cancellous bone beneath the calcified cartilage (Burr and Gallant, 2012). Under physiological conditions, the viscoelastic characteristic of articular cartilage allows the maximum contact area to avoid stress concentration when mechanical stress is loaded, and the subchondral plate and cancellous bone play a role in stress transmission (Burr and Gallant, 2012). In the early stage of OA, the thickness of the subchondral plate is reduced as bone remodeling is accelerated. In the late stage, subchondral bone sclerosis (hallmark of OA progression) occurs, and the increase of stiffness and density will lead to stress concentration and exacerbate overlying cartilage deterioration in return (Hu et al., 2021).

Sun X et al. (2020) discovered that miR-29b was downregulated in BMSCs extracted from condylar subchondral bone of the OA mouse model, and knockdown of this miRNA significantly rescued the subchondral bone loss and cartilage degradation, which means miR-29b functions as a vital mediator during articular cartilage and subchondral bone physiopathological change. As for members of the miR-17-92 cluster, it was reported that the expression level of miR-17-3p was low during BMP2-induced osteogenesis. SRY-box transcription factor 6 (SOX6), a transcription factor related to alteration of bone mineral density, was discovered to contain binding sites of miR-17-3p (Chen et al., 2020). The promotion effect of miR-17-3p inhibitor on osteoblast differentiation could be partially reversed by si-SOX6, which shows that miR-17-3p–SOX6 might be the candidate molecular mechanism for OA subchondral bone treatment. However, mechanisms that show how the miR-17-92 cluster is involved in the changes of OA subchondral bone turnover and its communication with overlying cartilage are still obscure.

miR-17-92 in periarticular tissue destruction

Synovitis

Synovitis predominant with T cells characterizes the autoimmune disease—rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Giannini et al., 2020). As for OA, synovitis featured by macrophage infiltration emerges with disease progression and subsequently deteriorates the articular microenvironment to aggravate cartilage and subchondral bone lesions (Sellam and Berenbaum, 2010; Mathiessen and Conaghan, 2017).

Kuo et al. (2019) reported that treating OA synovial fibroblasts (OASFs) with TGF-β1 diminished the synthesis of TNF-α, IL-1β, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and C–C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and stimulated forkhead box O3 (FOXO3) expression, which means FOXO3 mediates the TGF-β1-stimulated anti-inflammation effect. Bioinformatics prediction and functional experiments convinced that miR-92a was a molecule upstream of FOXO3, indicating that the inhibition of miR-92a was essential for FOXO3 release and thus alleviated OASF inflammation. It was reported that the secretion of chemokines (e.g., CCL2/MCP-1 and CCL3/MIP-1α) decreased when synoviocytes were co-cultured with micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MF) (Shi et al., 2022). Given that chemokines are crucial factors mediating monocytes/macrophage infiltration and subsequent inflammatory cytokine production in synovial tissues and fluids (Raghu et al., 2017), the aforementioned results indicate the potential treatment effects of MF on OA synovitis. Mechanistically, miR-92a-3p was detected to be downregulated in TNF-α-treated synoviocytes, and knockdown of miR-92a-3p overturned the protective effect of co-cultured MF upon synovitis (Shi et al., 2022), which contradicts the results from Kuo et al. (2019). Hence, more high-quality evidence is required to illustrate the roles of miR-92a in synovitis. In the rat OA model from another researcher (Feng et al., 2022), upon injecting adeno-associated virus (AAV)–miR-18a-3p, the proliferation of synovial membrane cells was inhibited, accompanied by the reduction of inflammatory cells.

With the OA progression, pro-inflammatory cytokines could affect periarticular ligaments, which contributes to symptoms like pain and articular immobility (Katz et al., 2021). Li et al. (2017) reported the miRNA microarray results of knee anterior cruciate ligaments (ACLs) with or without OA, showing that OA progression significantly downregulated the expression of miR-18a in ACL.

miR-17-92 in OA treatment

Stem cell therapy

Tissue engineering is a novel technology aimed at different kinds of tissue repair and regeneration with the compound of seed cells, biocompatible materials, and bioactive molecules (Yang et al., 2017; Armiento et al., 2018). During the development of these years, its great success and huge potential attract more and more researchers.

The global change of miRNA expression during chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) was detected by microarray chips (Zhang et al., 2012). Hundreds of differentially expressed miRNAs were found after chondrogenic differentiation, among which miR-92a was upregulated. However, the results of aforementioned research studies were not extended to in vivo validation, which obscures the roles of miR-92a in stem cell therapy for the treatment of OA.

Exogenous and endogenous miRNA promotion

Agomir/antagomir is usually used for promoting exogenous gene expression in experimental animal models. Agomir-17 injection reversed the high expression level of OA markers (i.e., MMP13, ADAMTS5, and nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2)) in mouse destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model (Zhang B et al., 2022). Moreover, Lian et al. (2020) reported that in the combination of antagomir-18a and IL-1β inhibitor, better effects were observed on the suppression of chondrocyte hypertrophy and cartilage degradation than single anti-cytokine therapy, which means the injection of antagomir-18a sensitizes OA chondrocytes to anti-inflammatory cytokine and significantly promotes OA treatment.

From another research, AAV–miR-18a-3p was injected to promote exogenous miR-18a-3p expression in the rat knee OA model (Feng et al., 2022). Upon localized miR-18a-3p overexpression, the over-proliferation of synovial cells and the infiltration of inflammatory cells were significantly alleviated, and cytokines like IL-6 and PGE2, which are responsible for cartilage degradation and bone turnover deterioration, were in the low serum level in the miR-18a-3p group. To promote endogenous miR-17 expression, the intra-articular injection of GDF-5 was administered into the animal OA models (Zhang Y et al., 2022), which showed the significant effect of attenuating the knee OA phenotype.

Extracellular vesicle

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoparticles carrying bioactive molecules (e.g., proteins, mRNA, and miRNA) with a lipid bilayer structure, and EVs can be categorized into three subtypes based on their biogenesis processes and surface markers (namely, microvesicles, exosome, and apoptotic bodies) (van Niel et al., 2018; Mathieu et al., 2019). Their release and transfer play a role in intercellular communication, extensively participating in pathophysiological situations, such as cancer, metabolic diseases, and inflammatory responses (Akbar et al., 2019; Harrell et al., 2019; Walker et al., 2019). Meanwhile, EV-based therapy is an ideal substitute for MSC-based tissue regeneration due to its advantage of avoiding tumorigenesis and immunological rejection (Nagelkerke et al., 2021). For instance, exosomal miR-320c from human bone marrow MSCs (hBMSCs) reversed SOX9 downregulation and MMP13 upregulation in OA chondrocytes, and such effects were enhanced by exosomes from miR-320c-overexpressed hBMSCs (Sun et al., 2019).

MSC exosomes (MSC-Exos) with or without chondrogenic differentiation were collected for miRNA microarray (Mao et al., 2018). It was detected that 141 miRNAs were differentially expressed, among which miR-92a-3p was nearly eight-fold higher in the chondrogenic group. miR-92a-3p-overexpressed MSC-Exos (MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exos) were found to promote chondrocyte proliferation and MSC chondrogenesis. With MSC-miR-92a-3p-Exo injection on 7, 14, and 21 days, OA-related cartilage matrix degradation was significantly alleviated, while MMP13 expression was reduced compared to the OA mouse model without treatment.

Zhang B et al. (2022) isolated EVs secreted by bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs); subsequent validation confirmed that they were approximately 150-nm oval particles with positive EV surface marker expression. After uptake of BMSC-EVs, the OA phenotype of chondrocytes was surprisingly relieved, and EVs collected from BMSCs incubated in a hypoxic environment showed even better therapeutic efficacy on inflammatory chondrocytes. In the rat OA model, injection of BMSC-EVs protected joint from cartilage degradation, and OARSI scores in the hypoxia-EV group was significantly lower than those in OA and OA + normal EV groups, which indicates the excellent OA-treating function of hypoxia-preconditioned EVs (Zhang Y et al., 2022). To clarify the bioactive contents in these nanoparticles, miRNA profiling was implemented and miR-18a-3p was found as one of the downregulated miRNAs in hypoxia-EVs (Zhang B et al., 2022) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Treatment effect of the miR-17-92 cluster upon OA.

miRNA Expression level Function Reference
miR-92a Upregulated during hADSC chondrogenesis - Zhang et al. (2012)
miR-17 Downregulated in the mouse OA model Its overexpression suppresses cartilage destruction in vitro, and local injection of agomir-17 inhibits OA progression in vivo Zhang B et al. (2022)
miR-18a Upregulated in the rat OA model Antagomir-18a injection sensitizes chondrocytes to anti-inflammatory cytokine therapy Lian et al. (2020)
miR-18a-3p Downregulated in the IL-1β-induced OA model in vitro AAV–miR-18a-3p injection inhibits synovial cell over-proliferation and inflammatory cell infiltration Feng et al. (2022)
miR-92a-3p Upregulated during MSC chondrogenic differentiation miR-92a-3p-overexpressed MSC-exosomes promote chondrocyte proliferation in vitro and alleviate cartilage degradation in vivo Mao et al. (2018)
miR-18a-3p Downregulated in extracellular vesicles secreted by BMSCs BMSC-exosome featured with low level miR-18a-3p alleviates OA inflammation in vitro and in vivo Zhang Y et al. (2022)

hADSCs, human adipose-derived stem cells; OA, osteoarthritis; BMSCs, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Conclusion

The onset and progression of OA are complex processes related to multiple tissues—cartilage, subchondral bone, synovium, and periarticular ligament. The pathological transformation of such tissues will affect each other, thus deteriorating the microenvironment in a vicious circle. miRNAs are one of the best understood mediators that epigenetically regulate physiological and pathological activities across species. As one miRNA could target a great number of downstream genes and a single mRNA could be complementarily blocked by various miRNAs, the multifaceted function and regulatory network would be complex even if functional redundancy exists. Although the participation of the miR-17-92 cluster in OA was extensively explored, the regulatory network construction of the six constituents remains a lot of work to perform.

As for the whole picture of the miR-17-92 cluster, several problems are still required for clarification. First, researchers up to date mostly focus on the roles of miR-17-92 in a single tissue of OA joint, and little is known about communication between different articular tissues (e.g., overlying cartilage and subchondral bone; synovium and cartilage), which is vital for joint homeostasis and equally important in joint diseases. Thus, more investigations are required to explore the function of the miR-17-92 cluster during such cross-talk in the future. Then, a well-designed in vivo experiment and a medication delivery system are still rare in miR-17-92-mediated treatment. In current in vivo research, the miR-17-92 cluster is usually delivered through viral vectors like AAVs; viral vectors have the advantage of excellent delivery efficiency, but they might cause tumorigenesis and immune rejection. To make it safe enough to deliver miR-17-92 into OA joint in human, developing ideal non-viral delivery systems could be a good choice. Moreover, there still exists contradiction concerning the roles of miR-17-92 in OA. One single miRNA could show reverse effect on the OA progression in different literature. For example, Kuo et al. (2019) reported that the inhibition of miR-92a could alleviate the inflammation of OA synovial fibroblasts, but another research discovered that miR-92a was downregulated in TNF-α-treated synoviocytes (Shi et al., 2022). The reason of such phenomena might be the differences in cell lineage and experimental conditions. To better illustrate the underlying mechanisms and current contradictions, more high-quality research studies about this topic are required in the future.

Author contributions

XH, XC, and ZZ: conception and literature search. XP, XH, and XX: manuscript writing and final approval. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81900981), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M663530), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2021YJ0149), Research and Development Foundation of West China Hospital of Stomatology (RD-02-202106), and Research Funding from West China School/Hospital of Stomatology Sichuan University (RCDWJS 2020-18).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Akbar N., Azzimato V., Choudhury R. P., Aouadi M. (2019). Extracellular vesicles in metabolic disease. Diabetologia 62 (12), 2179–2187. 10.1007/s00125-019-05014-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ali Syeda Z., Langden S. S. S., Munkhzul C., Lee M., Song S. J. (2020). Regulatory mechanism of MicroRNA expression in cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (5), E1723. 10.3390/ijms21051723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aparicio R., Hansen M., Walker D. W., Kumsta C. (2020). The selective autophagy receptor SQSTM1/p62 improves lifespan and proteostasis in an evolutionarily conserved manner. Autophagy 16 (4), 772–774. 10.1080/15548627.2020.1725404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Armiento A. R., Stoddart M. J., Alini M., Eglin D. (2018). Biomaterials for articular cartilage tissue engineering: Learning from biology. Acta Biomater. 65, 1–20. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bartel D. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116 (2), 281–297. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00045-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baumjohann D. (2018). Diverse functions of miR-17-92 cluster microRNAs in T helper cells. Cancer Lett. 423, 147–152. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bortoluzzi A., Furini F., Scire C. A. (2018). Osteoarthritis and its management - epidemiology, nutritional aspects and environmental factors. Autoimmun. Rev. 17 (11), 1097–1104. 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burr D. B., Gallant M. A. (2012). Bone remodelling in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 8 (11), 665–673. 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Carpio L. R., Westendorf J. J. (2016). Histone deacetylases in cartilage homeostasis and osteoarthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 18 (8), 52. 10.1007/s11926-016-0602-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chakraborty S., Mehtab S., Patwardhan A., Krishnan Y. (2012). Pri-miR-17-92a transcript folds into a tertiary structure and autoregulates its processing. RNA 18 (5), 1014–1028. 10.1261/rna.031039.111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chaulk S. G., Thede G. L., Kent O. A., Xu Z., Gesner E. M., Veldhoen R. A., et al. (2011). Role of pri-miRNA tertiary structure in miR-17∼92 miRNA biogenesis. RNA Biol. 8 (6), 1105–1114. 10.4161/rna.8.6.17410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen H., Qi J., Bi Q., Zhang S. (2017). Expression profile of long noncoding RNA (HOTAIR) and its predicted target miR-17-3p in LPS-induced inflammatory injury in human articular chondrocyte C28/I2 cells. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 10 (9), 9146–9157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen J., Huang Z. P., Seok H. Y., Ding J., Kataoka M., Zhang Z., et al. (2013). mir-17-92 cluster is required for and sufficient to induce cardiomyocyte proliferation in postnatal and adult hearts. Circ. Res. 112 (12), 1557–1566. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300658 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen N., Wu D., Li H., Liu Y., Yang H. (2020). MiR-17-3p inhibits osteoblast differentiation by downregulating Sox6 expression. FEBS open bio 10 (11), 2499–2506. 10.1002/2211-5463.12979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen X., Lv Q., Ma J., Liu Y. (2018). PLCγ2 promotes apoptosis while inhibits proliferation in rat hepatocytes through PKCD/JNK MAPK and PKCD/p38 MAPK signalling. Cell Prolif. 51 (3), e12437. 10.1111/cpr.12437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cherifi C., Monteagudo S., Lories R. J. (2021). Promising targets for therapy of osteoarthritis: A review on the wnt and TGF-beta signalling pathways. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 13, 1759720X211006959. 10.1177/1759720X211006959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Choi M. C., Jo J., Park J., Kang H. K., Park Y. (2019). NF-κB signaling pathways in osteoarthritic cartilage destruction. Cells 8 (7), E734. 10.3390/cells8070734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cinque L., Forrester A., Bartolomeo R., Svelto M., Venditti R., Montefusco S., et al. (2015). FGF signalling regulates bone growth through autophagy. Nature 528 (7581), 272–275. 10.1038/nature16063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Conaghan P. G., Cook A. D., Hamilton J. A., Tak P. P. (2019). Therapeutic options for targeting inflammatory osteoarthritis pain. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 15 (6), 355–363. 10.1038/s41584-019-0221-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dikic I., Elazar Z. (2018). Mechanism and medical implications of mammalian autophagy. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 (6), 349–364. 10.1038/s41580-018-0003-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Duan L., Duan D., Wei W., Sun Z., Xu H., Guo L., et al. (2019). MiR-19b-3p attenuates IL-1β induced extracellular matrix degradation and inflammatory injury in chondrocytes by targeting GRK6. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 459 (1-2), 205–214. 10.1007/s11010-019-03563-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Duarte J. H. (2015). Osteoarthritis: Autophagy prevents age-related OA. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11 (12), 683. 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Feng X., Lu J., Wu Y., Xu H. (2022). MiR-18a-3p improves cartilage matrix remodeling and inhibits inflammation in osteoarthritis by suppressing PDP1. J. Physiol. Sci. 72 (1), 3. 10.1186/s12576-022-00827-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ferguson R. J., Palmer A. J., Taylor A., Porter M. L., Malchau H., Glyn-Jones S. (2018). Hip replacement. Lancet 392 (10158), 1662–1671. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Galagali H., Kim J. K. (2020). The multifaceted roles of microRNAs in differentiation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 67, 118–140. 10.1016/j.ceb.2020.08.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ghafouri-Fard S., Poulet C., Malaise M., Abak A., Mahmud Hussen B., Taheriazam A., et al. (2021). The emerging role of non-coding RNAs in osteoarthritis. Front. Immunol. 12, 773171. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.773171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Giannini D., Antonucci M., Petrelli F., Bilia S., Alunno A., Puxeddu I. (2020). One year in review 2020: Pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 38 (3), 387–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Goldring M. B., Marcu K. B. (2012). Epigenomic and microRNA-mediated regulation in cartilage development, homeostasis, and osteoarthritis. Trends Mol. Med. 18 (2), 109–118. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.11.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldring S. R., Goldring M. B. (2016). Changes in the osteochondral unit during osteoarthritis: Structure, function and cartilage-bone crosstalk. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12 (11), 632–644. 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gruszka R., Zakrzewska M. (2018). The oncogenic relevance of miR-17-92 cluster and its paralogous miR-106b-25 and miR-106a-363 clusters in brain tumors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (3), E879. 10.3390/ijms19030879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guilak F., Nims R. J., Dicks A., Wu C. L., Meulenbelt I. (2018). Osteoarthritis as a disease of the cartilage pericellular matrix. Matrix Biol. 71-72, 40–50. 10.1016/j.matbio.2018.05.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Harrell C. R., Jovicic N., Djonov V., Arsenijevic N., Volarevic V. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes and other extracellular vesicles as new remedies in the therapy of inflammatory diseases. Cells 8 (12), E1605. 10.3390/cells8121605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Herman A. B., Tsitsipatis D., Gorospe M. (2022). Integrated lncRNA function upon genomic and epigenomic regulation. Mol. Cell 82 (12), 2252–2266. 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.05.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu J., Wang Z., Shan Y., Pan Y., Ma J., Jia L. (2018). Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR promotes osteoarthritis progression via miR-17-5p/FUT2/β-catenin axis. Cell Death Dis. 9 (7), 711. 10.1038/s41419-018-0746-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu W., Chen Y., Dou C., Dong S. (2021). Microenvironment in subchondral bone: Predominant regulator for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 80 (4), 413–422. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hunter D. J., Bierma-Zeinstra S. (2019). Lancet 393 (10182), 1745–1759. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30417-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jang S., Lee K., Ju J. H. (2021). Recent updates of diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment on osteoarthritis of the knee. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (5), 2619. 10.3390/ijms22052619 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Jones I. A., Togashi R., Wilson M. L., Heckmann N., Vangsness C. T., Jr (2019). Intra-articular treatment options for knee osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 15 (2), 77–90. 10.1038/s41584-018-0123-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kapoor M., Martel-Pelletier J., Lajeunesse D., Pelletier J. P., Fahmi H. (2011). Role of proinflammatory cytokines in the pathophysiology of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 7 (1), 33–42. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Karsdal M. A., Bay-Jensen A. C., Lories R. J., Abramson S., Spector T., Pastoureau P., et al. (2014). The coupling of bone and cartilage turnover in osteoarthritis: Opportunities for bone antiresorptives and anabolics as potential treatments? Ann. Rheum. Dis. 73 (2), 336–348. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Katz J. N., Arant K. R., Loeser R. F. (2021). Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A review. JAMA 325 (6), 568–578. 10.1001/jama.2020.22171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kayali S., Giraud G., Morle F., Guyot B. (2012). Spi-1, Fli-1 and Fli-3 (miR-17-92) oncogenes contribute to a single oncogenic network controlling cell proliferation in friend erythroleukemia. PloS one 7 (10), e46799. 10.1371/journal.pone.0046799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kitada M., Koya D. (2021). Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 17 (11), 647–661. 10.1038/s41574-021-00551-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Klionsky D. J., Petroni G., Amaravadi R. K., Baehrecke E. H., Ballabio A., Boya P., et al. (2021). Autophagy in major human diseases. EMBO J. 40 (19), e108863. 10.15252/embj.2021108863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kong R., Gao J., Si Y., Zhao D. (2017). Combination of circulating miR-19b-3p, miR-122-5p and miR-486-5p expressions correlates with risk and disease severity of knee osteoarthritis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 9 (6), 2852–2864. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Kuo S. J., Liu S. C., Huang Y. L., Tsai C. H., Fong Y. C., Hsu H. C., et al. (2019). TGF-β1 enhances FOXO3 expression in human synovial fibroblasts by inhibiting miR-92a through AMPK and p38 pathways. Aging 11 (12), 4075–4089. 10.18632/aging.102038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Latourte A., Kloppenburg M., Richette P. (2020). Emerging pharmaceutical therapies for osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 16 (12), 673–688. 10.1038/s41584-020-00518-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee H., Han S., Kwon C. S., Lee D. (2016). Biogenesis and regulation of the let-7 miRNAs and their functional implications. Protein Cell 7 (2), 100–113. 10.1007/s13238-015-0212-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee S., Rauch J., Kolch W. (2020). Targeting MAPK signaling in cancer: Mechanisms of drug resistance and sensitivity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (3), E1102. 10.3390/ijms21031102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lepetsos P., Papavassiliou K. A., Papavassiliou A. G. (2019). Redox and NF-κB signaling in osteoarthritis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 132, 90–100. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.09.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy J. M. M., Towers C. G., Thorburn A. (2017). Targeting autophagy in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 17 (9), 528–542. 10.1038/nrc.2017.53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li B., Bai L., Shen P., Sun Y., Chen Z., Wen Y. (2017). Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs in knee anterior cruciate ligament tissues surgically removed from patients with osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Med. 40 (4), 1105–1113. 10.3892/ijmm.2017.3086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Li H., Miao D., Zhu Q., Huang J., Lu G., Xu W. (2018). MicroRNA-17-5p contributes to osteoarthritis progression by binding p62/SQSTM1. Exp. Ther. Med. 15 (2), 1789–1794. 10.3892/etm.2017.5622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  54. Li X. P., Wei X., Wang S. Q., Sun G., Zhao Y. C., Yin H., et al. (2021). Differentiation antagonizing non-protein coding RNA knockdown alleviates lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury and apoptosis in human chondrocyte primary chondrocyte cells through upregulating miRNA-19a-3p. Orthop. Surg. 13 (1), 276–284. 10.1111/os.12845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li Y Y., Yuan F., Song Y., Guan X. (2020). miR-17-5p and miR-19b-3p prevent osteoarthritis progression by targeting EZH2. Exp. Ther. Med. 20 (2), 1653–1663. 10.3892/etm.2020.8887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li Y. S., Zhang F. J., Zeng C., Luo W., Xiao W. F., Gao S. G., et al. (2016). Autophagy in osteoarthritis. Jt. bone spine 83 (2), 143–148. 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Li Z., Dai A., Yang M., Chen S., Deng Z., Li L. (2022). p38MAPK signaling pathway in osteoarthritis: Pathological and therapeutic aspects. J. Inflamm. Res. 15, 723–734. 10.2147/JIR.S348491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Li Z Z., Wang J., Yang J. (2020). TUG1 knockdown promoted viability and inhibited apoptosis and cartilage ECM degradation in chondrocytes via the miR-17-5p/FUT1 pathway in osteoarthritis. Exp. Ther. Med. 20 (6), 154. 10.3892/etm.2020.9283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Lian C., Tao T., Su P., Liao Z., Wang X., Lei Y., et al. (2020). Targeting miR-18a sensitizes chondrocytes to anticytokine therapy to prevent osteoarthritis progression. Cell Death Dis. 11 (11), 947. 10.1038/s41419-020-03155-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lietman C., Wu B., Lechner S., Shinar A., Sehgal M., Rossomacha E., et al. (2018). Inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling ameliorates osteoarthritis in a murine model of experimental osteoarthritis. JCI Insight 3 (3), 96308. 10.1172/jci.insight.96308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lin S., Gregory R. I. (2015). MicroRNA biogenesis pathways in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15 (6), 321–333. 10.1038/nrc3932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu B., Li J., Cairns M. J. (2014). Identifying miRNAs, targets and functions. Brief. Bioinform. 15 (1), 1–19. 10.1093/bib/bbs075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Lories R. J., Luyten F. P. (2011). The bone-cartilage unit in osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 7 (1), 43–49. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. MacFarlane E. G., Haupt J., Dietz H. C., Shore E. M. (2017). TGF-Beta family signaling in connective tissue and skeletal diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 9 (11), a022269. 10.1101/cshperspect.a022269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Madry H. (2010). The subchondral bone: A new frontier in articular cartilage repair. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 18 (4), 417–418. 10.1007/s00167-010-1071-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Makris E. A., Gomoll A. H., Malizos K. N., Hu J. C., Athanasiou K. A. (2015). Repair and tissue engineering techniques for articular cartilage. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 11 (1), 21–34. 10.1038/nrrheum.2014.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mao G., Wu P., Zhang Z., Zhang Z., Liao W., Li Y., et al. (2017a). MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates aggrecanase-1 and aggrecanase-2 expression in chondrogenesis and IL-1β-induced catabolism in human articular chondrocytes. Cell. Physiol. biochem. 44 (1), 38–52. 10.1159/000484579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mao G., Zhang Z., Hu S., Zhang Z., Chang Z., Huang Z., et al. (2018). Exosomes derived from miR-92a-3p-overexpressing human mesenchymal stem cells enhance chondrogenesis and suppress cartilage degradation via targeting WNT5A. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9 (1), 247. 10.1186/s13287-018-1004-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Mao G., Zhang Z., Huang Z., Chen W., Huang G., Meng F., et al. (2017b). MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates the expression of cartilage-specific genes by directly targeting histone deacetylase 2 in chondrogenesis and degradation. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 25 (4), 521–532. 10.1016/j.joca.2016.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Mathiessen A., Conaghan P. G. (2017). Synovitis in osteoarthritis: Current understanding with therapeutic implications. Arthritis Res. Ther. 19 (1), 18. 10.1186/s13075-017-1229-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Mathieu M., Martin-Jaular L., Lavieu G., Thery C. (2019). Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat. Cell Biol. 21 (1), 9–17. 10.1038/s41556-018-0250-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Mendell J. T. (2008). miRiad roles for the miR-17-92 cluster in development and disease. Cell 133 (2), 217–222. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Meng F., Li Z., Zhang Z., Yang Z., Kang Y., Zhao X., et al. (2018). MicroRNA-193b-3p regulates chondrogenesis and chondrocyte metabolism by targeting HDAC3. Theranostics 8 (10), 2862–2883. 10.7150/thno.23547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Mizushima N., Levine B. (2020). Autophagy in human diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 383 (16), 1564–1576. 10.1056/NEJMra2022774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Mogilyansky E., Rigoutsos I. (2013). The miR-17/92 cluster: A comprehensive update on its genomics, genetics, functions and increasingly important and numerous roles in health and disease. Cell Death Differ. 20 (12), 1603–1614. 10.1038/cdd.2013.125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Murphy B. L., Obad S., Bihannic L., Ayrault O., Zindy F., Kauppinen S., et al. (2013). Silencing of the miR-17∼92 cluster family inhibits medulloblastoma progression. Cancer Res. 73 (23), 7068–7078. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Nagelkerke A., Ojansivu M., van der Koog L., Whittaker T. E., Cunnane E. M., Silva A. M., et al. (2021). Extracellular vesicles for tissue repair and regeneration: Evidence, challenges and opportunities. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 175, 113775. 10.1016/j.addr.2021.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. O'Donnell K. A., Wentzel E. A., Zeller K. I., Dang C. V., Mendell J. T. (2005). c-Myc-regulated microRNAs modulate E2F1 expression. Nature 435 (7043), 839–843. 10.1038/nature03677 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Olive V., Jiang I., He L. (2010). mir-17-92, a cluster of miRNAs in the midst of the cancer network. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42 (8), 1348–1354. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.03.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Olivotto E., Otero M., Marcu K. B., Goldring M. B. (2015). Pathophysiology of osteoarthritis: Canonical NF-κB/IKKβ-dependent and kinase-independent effects of IKKα in cartilage degradation and chondrocyte differentiation. RMD Open 1 (1), e000061. 10.1136/rmdopen-2015-000061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Osada H., Takahashi T. (2011). let-7 and miR-17-92: small-sized major players in lung cancer development. Cancer Sci. 102 (1), 9–17. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01707.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Ostojic J., Yoon Y. S., Sonntag T., Nguyen B., Vaughan J. M., Shokhirev M., et al. (2021). Transcriptional co-activator regulates melanocyte differentiation and oncogenesis by integrating cAMP and MAPK/ERK pathways. Cell Rep. 35 (7), 109136. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Peat G., Thomas M. J. (2021). Osteoarthritis year in review 2020: Epidemiology & therapy. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 29 (2), 180–189. 10.1016/j.joca.2020.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Peng B., Theng P. Y., Le M. T. N. (2021). Essential functions of miR-125b in cancer. Cell Prolif. 54 (2), e12913. 10.1111/cpr.12913 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Petrocca F., Vecchione A., Croce C. M. (2008). Emerging role of miR-106b-25/miR-17-92 clusters in the control of transforming growth factor beta signaling. Cancer Res. 68 (20), 8191–8194. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Price A. J., Alvand A., Troelsen A., Katz J. N., Hooper G., Gray A., et al. (2018). Knee replacement. Lancet 392 (10158), 1672–1682. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Raghu H., Lepus C. M., Wang Q., Wong H. H., Lingampalli N., Oliviero F., et al. (2017). CCL2/CCR2, but not CCL5/CCR5, mediates monocyte recruitment, inflammation and cartilage destruction in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 76 (5), 914–922. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Reinhart B. J., Slack F. J., Basson M., Pasquinelli A. E., Bettinger J. C., Rougvie A. E., et al. (2000). The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature 403 (6772), 901–906. 10.1038/35002607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Robinson W. H., Lepus C. M., Wang Q., Raghu H., Mao R., Lindstrom T. M., et al. (2016). Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 12 (10), 580–592. 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Romanov J., Walczak M., Ibiricu I., Schuchner S., Ogris E., Kraft C., et al. (2012). Mechanism and functions of membrane binding by the Atg5-Atg12/Atg16 complex during autophagosome formation. EMBO J. 31 (22), 4304–4317. 10.1038/emboj.2012.278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Saliminejad K., Khorram Khorshid H. R., Soleymani Fard S., Ghaffari S. H. (2019). An overview of microRNAs: Biology, functions, therapeutics, and analysis methods. J. Cell. Physiol. 234 (5), 5451–5465. 10.1002/jcp.27486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Sanchez-Lopez E., Coras R., Torres A., Lane N. E., Guma M. (2022). Synovial inflammation in osteoarthritis progression. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 18 (5), 258–275. 10.1038/s41584-022-00749-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Schulte J. H., Horn S., Otto T., Samans B., Heukamp L. C., Eilers U. C., et al. (2008). MYCN regulates oncogenic MicroRNAs in neuroblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 122 (3), 699–704. 10.1002/ijc.23153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Scrivo A., Bourdenx M., Pampliega O., Cuervo A. M. (2018). Selective autophagy as a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative disorders. Lancet. Neurol. 17 (9), 802–815. 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30238-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sellam J., Berenbaum F. (2010). The role of synovitis in pathophysiology and clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 6 (11), 625–635. 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Shang X., Boker K. O., Taheri S., Hawellek T., Lehmann W., Schilling A. F. (2021). The interaction between microRNAs and the wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (18), 9887. 10.3390/ijms22189887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Sharma L. (2021). Osteoarthritis of the knee. N. Engl. J. Med. 384 (1), 51–59. 10.1056/NEJMcp1903768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Sheng Y., Song Y., Li Z., Wang Y., Lin H., Cheng H., et al. (2018). RAB37 interacts directly with ATG5 and promotes autophagosome formation via regulating ATG5-12-16 complex assembly. Cell Death Differ. 25 (5), 918–934. 10.1038/s41418-017-0023-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Shi Z., He J., He J., Xu Y. (2022). Micro-fragmented adipose tissue regulated the biological functions of osteoarthritis synoviocytes by upregulating MiR-92a-3p expression. Tissue Cell 74, 101716. 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Sinkala M., Nkhoma P., Mulder N., Martin D. P. (2021). Integrated molecular characterisation of the MAPK pathways in human cancers reveals pharmacologically vulnerable mutations and gene dependencies. Commun. Biol. 4 (1), 9. 10.1038/s42003-020-01552-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Stoll S., Wang C., Qiu H. (2018). DNA methylation and histone modification in hypertension. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (4), E1174. 10.3390/ijms19041174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Sun H., Hu S., Zhang Z., Lun J., Liao W., Zhang Z. (2019). Expression of exosomal microRNAs during chondrogenic differentiation of human bone mesenchymal stem cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 120 (1), 171–181. 10.1002/jcb.27289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Sun J J. L., Yan J. F., Yu S. B., Zhao J., Lin Q. Q., Jiao K. (2020). MicroRNA-29b promotes subchondral bone loss in TMJ osteoarthritis. J. Dent. Res. 99 (13), 1469–1477. 10.1177/0022034520937617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Sun X X., Zhang R., Chen H., Du X., Chen S., Huang J., et al. (2020). Fgfr3 mutation disrupts chondrogenesis and bone ossification in zebrafish model mimicking CATSHL syndrome partially via enhanced Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Theranostics 10 (16), 7111–7130. 10.7150/thno.45286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Taniguchi K., Karin M. (2018). NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: Coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18 (5), 309–324. 10.1038/nri.2017.142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Thielen N. G. M., van der Kraan P. M., van Caam A. P. M. (2019). TGFβ/BMP signaling pathway in cartilage homeostasis. Cells 8 (9), E969. 10.3390/cells8090969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Thomson D. W., Dinger M. E. (2016). Endogenous microRNA sponges: Evidence and controversy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17 (5), 272–283. 10.1038/nrg.2016.20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Thornton J. E., Gregory R. I. (2012). How does Lin28 let-7 control development and disease? Trends Cell Biol. 22 (9), 474–482. 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. van der Kraan P. M. (2017). The changing role of TGFβ in healthy, ageing and osteoarthritic joints. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13 (3), 155–163. 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. van Niel G., D'Angelo G., Raposo G. (2018). Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19 (4), 213–228. 10.1038/nrm.2017.125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Ventayol M., Vinas J. L., Sola A., Jung M., Brune B., Pi F., et al. (2014). miRNA let-7e targeting MMP9 is involved in adipose-derived stem cell differentiation toward epithelia. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1048. 10.1038/cddis.2014.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Walker S., Busatto S., Pham A., Tian M., Suh A., Carson K., et al. (2019). Extracellular vesicle-based drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. Theranostics 9 (26), 8001–8017. 10.7150/thno.37097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Wang B. W., Jiang Y., Yao Z. L., Chen P. S., Yu B., Wang S. N. (2019). Aucubin protects chondrocytes against IL-1β-induced apoptosis in vitro and inhibits osteoarthritis in mice model. Drug Des. devel. Ther. 13, 3529–3538. 10.2147/DDDT.S210220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wang C C., Yue H., Huang W., Lin X., Xie X., He Z., et al. (2020). Cryogenic 3D printing of heterogeneous scaffolds with gradient mechanical strengths and spatial delivery of osteogenic peptide/TGF-β1 for osteochondral tissue regeneration. Biofabrication 12 (2), 025030. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab7ab5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wang G G., Chen S., Xie Z., Shen S., Xu W., Chen W., et al. (2020). TGFβ attenuates cartilage extracellular matrix degradation via enhancing FBXO6-mediated MMP14 ubiquitination. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 79 (8), 1111–1120. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang Y., Tan J., Wang L., Pei G., Cheng H., Zhang Q., et al. (2021). MiR-125 family in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 799049. 10.3389/fcell.2021.799049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Woods K., Thomson J. M., Hammond S. M. (2007). Direct regulation of an oncogenic micro-RNA cluster by E2F transcription factors. J. Biol. Chem. 282 (4), 2130–2134. 10.1074/jbc.C600252200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Xia H., Green D. R., Zou W. (2021). Autophagy in tumour immunity and therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21 (5), 281–297. 10.1038/s41568-021-00344-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Xie Y., Kang R., Sun X., Zhong M., Huang J., Klionsky D. J., et al. (2015). Posttranslational modification of autophagy-related proteins in macroautophagy. Autophagy 11 (1), 28–45. 10.4161/15548627.2014.984267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Xu R., Wei Y., Yin X., Shi B., Li J. (2019). miR-20a suppresses chondrogenic differentiation of ATDC5 cells by regulating Atg7. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 9243. 10.1038/s41598-019-45502-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang J., Zhang Y. S., Yue K., Khademhosseini A. (2017). Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 57, 1–25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhang B B., Tian X., Qu Z., Hao J., Zhang W. (2022). Hypoxia-preconditioned extracellular vesicles from mesenchymal stem cells improve cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. Membr. (Basel) 12 (2), 225. 10.3390/membranes12020225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhang H H., Ge J., Lu X. (2021). CircFADS2 is downregulated in osteoarthritis and suppresses LPS-induced apoptosis of chondrocytes by regulating miR-195-5p methylation. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 96, 104477. 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang Y Y., Li S., Jin P., Shang T., Sun R., Lu L., et al. (2022). Dual functions of microRNA-17 in maintaining cartilage homeostasis and protection against osteoarthritis. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 2447. 10.1038/s41467-022-30119-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhang Y Y., Sun Z., Jia J., Du T., Zhang N., Tang Y., et al. (2021). Overview of histone modification. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1283, 1–16. 10.1007/978-981-15-8104-5_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Zhang Z., Kang Y., Zhang Z., Zhang H., Duan X., Liu J., et al. (2012). Expression of microRNAs during chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 20 (12), 1638–1646. 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhao H., Gong N. (2019). miR-20a regulates inflammatory in osteoarthritis by targeting the IκBβ and regulates NK-κB signaling pathway activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 518 (4), 632–637. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.08.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Zhen G., Cao X. (2014). Targeting TGFβ signaling in subchondral bone and articular cartilage homeostasis. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 35 (5), 227–236. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.03.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Zhou Y., Wang T., Hamilton J. L., Chen D. (2017). Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteoarthritis and in other forms of arthritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 19 (9), 53. 10.1007/s11926-017-0679-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Genetics are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES