Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2022 Dec 1;16(12):e0010965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010965

Clock genes regulate mating activity rhythms in the vector mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus

Shuang Liu 1,#, Jiayong Zhou 1,#, Ling Kong 1,#, Yiquan Cai 1, Hongkai Liu 1, Zhensheng Xie 1, Xiaolin Xiao 1, Anthony A James 2,3, Xiao-Guang Chen 1,*
Editor: Joshua B Benoit4
PMCID: PMC9746994  PMID: 36455055

Abstract

Background

Endogenous circadian rhythms result from genetically-encoded molecular clocks, whose components and downstream output factors cooperate to generate cyclic changes in activity. Mating is an important activity of mosquitoes, however, the key aspects of mating rhythm patterns and their regulatory mechanisms in two vector mosquito species, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus, remain unclear.

Methodology/Principal findings

We determined and compared the diel mating activity rhythms of these two mosquito species and discovered that Ae. albopictus had mating peaks in the light/dark transition periods (ZT0-3 and ZT9-12), while Cx. quinquefasciatus only had a mating peak at ZT12-15. Knockouts of the clock (clk) orthologous genes (Aalclk and Cxqclk) resulted in phase delay or phase reversal of the mating peaks in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively. In addition, the temporal expression pattern of the desaturase orthologous genes, desat1, in both mosquito species was also different in respective wild-type strains and showed phase changes similar to the mating rhythms in clk mutant strains. Inhibition of desat1 expression resulted in decreased mating activity in male mosquitoes of both species but not females. In addition, desat1 regulated cuticular hydrocarbons’ synthesis in both species. Silencing desat1 in male Ae. albopictus resulted in decreases of nonadecane and tricosane, which promoted mating, with concomitant increases of heptacosane, which inhibited mating. Silencing desat1 in male Cx. quinquefasciatus also resulted in decreases of tricosane, which promoted mating.

Conclusions/Significance

These results suggest that Aalclk and Cxqclk have significant roles in the mating activity rhythms in both Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus by regulating the temporal expression of the desat1 gene under LD cycles, which affects sex pheromone synthesis and mating. This work provides insights into the molecular regulatory mechanism of distinct mating rhythm of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus and may provide a basis for the control of these two important vector mosquitoes.

Author summary

Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus are globally-distributed and important vector mosquito species that transmit a variety of pathogens. The two mosquito species have different circadian patterns, with Ae. albopictus being diurnal and Cx. quinquefasciatus being nocturnal. Mating is an important activity of mosquitoes, however, the mating rhythms and their regulatory mechanisms in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus have yet to be described. Here, we compared the diel mating activities of these two mosquito species and discovered that Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus have distinct mating rhythms, which can be entrained by daily LD cycles. CRISPR/Cas9 technologies were used to knock out the core clock gene clock (clk) in the two mosquito species and found that Aalclk and Cxqclk have significant roles in the mating activity rhythms in both Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus by regulating the temporal expression of the desaturase desat1 gene, which can affect sex pheromone synthesis and mating. These findings establish the basis for an in-depth understanding of the mating rhythms for mosquito vectors, which may provide insights in the development of novel and precise mosquito control.

Introduction

Daily changes in light and temperature exert strong selective pressures on organisms and entrain them to distinct physiological and behavioral activity cycles with an ~24 hour rhythm [14]. It has been confirmed in Drosophila melanogaster and mammals that these rhythms are regulated and maintained by molecular circadian clocks [5]. In D. melanogaster, the expression products of core clock genes clock (clk) and cycle (cyc) act as transcriptional factors that heterodimerize and bind to E-boxes of other core clock genes period (per) and timeless (tim) to activate their transcription [6,7]. per and tim mRNAs are translated and their products then repress clk-mediated transcription [8]. Such transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL) comprised of these core clock genes is the key molecular basis of the circadian clock. Although some components differ in function, the TTFL is conserved from insects to mammals. These genetically-encoded circadian clocks can respond to environmental cues (termed zeitgeber) such as light and control the expression of downstream output genes throughout the body, thereby temporally controlling the behavior and physiology to accommodate and exploit daily recurring environmental changes [5,9].

Mating behavior in animals is important and fundamental for species reproduction. It can be a complex process that depends on the accuracy of temporal and spatial coordination of the behaviors of both males and females. This coordination is critical, and short- (choosing the correct mate) and long-term (evolutionary) processes may be regulated by molecular circadian clocks [10]. Insects in particular show rhythmicity in mating behavior. For example, the mating activity of D. mercatorum, has diel rhythms under 12h light:12h dark (LD) cycles [11]. In LD cycles, the mating activity during the day is high in both D. melanogaster and D. simulans [12]. Moths (lepidoptera) mate mainly at night in order to elude predators [13,14]. The African malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae, mates at dusk during the first hour of the dark phase [15]. However, the genetic and molecular bases for this behavior rhythm have yet to be described in many insect species.

Aedes albopictus is a diurnal mosquito that prefers to feed on humans and livestock in the early morning and evening. It is an important vector of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya viruses [16,17]. Culex quinquefasciatus is a nocturnal, anthropophilic mosquito that can transmit filariasis and Japanese encephalitis [18,19]. These mosquitoes are distributed globally and the pathogens they transmit represent major threats to human health [19,20]. A recent study showed that knockdown of both per and tim in An. gambiae and An. stephensi caused a decrease in swarming and mating rate [21]. In Ae. aegypti, knockout of cyc was found to reduced mating success [22]. However, it remains unclear how the molecular clocks regulate the mating behavior rhythm in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, two mosquito species with different activity patterns. Mosquito-control strategies, such as sterile insect technique (SIT) [23], that rely on manipulating or exploiting mating behaviors are rapidly becoming important tools in the management of mosquito populations. An in-depth understanding of the temporal characteristics of mating behavior and their mechanisms in these two species may provide new insights into mosquito control strategies.

Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) are widely used as contact pheromones by insect during sexual communication [24,25]. CHCs are waxy molecules derived from fatty acids through a biosynthetic process involving desaturases, elongases, fatty acid synthases, and cytochrome P450 enzymes [2628]. Studies in Drosophila and Anopheles show that the desaturase gene desat1 is rhythmically expressed and regulates the production of cuticular hydrocarbons [21,29]. Little is known of the functions of CHCs and desat1 genes in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

We compare here the daily mating activity of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus at discrete intervals under different light / dark conditions. Knockout strains of the core clock gene clock (clk) orthologs were established in both Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus using CRISPR/Cas9 to examine the relationship between the molecular clock and mating behavior rhythm of the two mosquito species. The daily mating activity between the mutant and wild-type (WT) strains were compared. Furthermore, the expression of the gene desat1 orthologs was inhibited in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus and their effects on CHCs synthesis and mating activity were analyzed.

Materials and methods

Mosquitoes strains

The Ae. albopictus (Foshan strain) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Guangzhou strain) WT strains were obtained from the Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), Guangdong Province, China. The clk mutants (AalclkΔ293 and CxqclkΔ98) were established and maintained by our laboratory. All mosquitoes were maintained under standard insectary conditions of 27±1°C, 70±10% relative humidity, and a light/dark (LD) cycle of 12h/12h (250 lux light). To obtain experimental mosquitoes, the larvae (200 larvae/L water) were reared in stainless steel trays containing dechlorinated water and were provided daily with yeast and turtle food. Pupae of both species were collected individually and secured in 2mL Eppendorf tubes with 1 mL water. When adults emerged, virgin males and females were placed separately in paper bowls (9.5 × 6.7 × 6.2 cm3) with a mesh cover and offered a 10% sucrose solution on a cotton wick.

Mating activity analysis

Adult mosquitoes aged 2 days post emergence were placed in chambers with different light and dark conditions for four-days entrainment period. The 12:12 light/dark (LD) cycle refers to lights on at zeitgeber time (ZT) 0 (8:00 am) and lights off at ZT12 (20:00 pm). The 12:12 dark/light (DL) cycle has lights on at ZT12 (20:00 pm) and lights off at ZT0 (8:00 am). The daily mating activity of mosquitoes was assessed on day 4 of LD and DL. In order to measure the mating activity during the free running period, the mosquitoes were measured on day 2 of constant darkness (DD) [12] after 4 days entrainment in LD (LDDD) and DL (DLDD). Mosquitoes were handled under dim red illumination during the nighttime conditions. At the beginning of each experiment, 10 virgin male and 10 virgin female mosquitoes were placed in a 250ml paper cup within an environment chamber and maintained at conditions of 27±1°C, 70±10% relative humidity. Mosquitoes were allowed to mate for 3 hours under different light and dark conditions prior to dissecting spermathecae of females. The mating rate was calculated as the percentage of the number of inseminated females divided by the number of dissected females. A new group of 10 virgin males were transferred into another 250ml paper cup containing 10 virgin females to mate for 3h at the next zeitgeber time. Similar experiments were performed at different zeitgeber times of a day. Both Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus were performed mating experiments on the same procedure and the mating activity experiments were repeated three times. Under LD or LDDD condition, the total mating rate during daytime or subjective daytime (ZT0-12) was calculated as the number of inseminated females divided by the number of dissected females at zeitgeber times including ZT0-3, ZT3-6, ZT6-9 and ZT9-12. The total mating rate during nighttime (ZT12-24) was calculated as the number of inseminated females divided by the number of dissected females at zeitgeber times including ZT12-15, ZT15-18, ZT18-21 and ZT21-24. Under DL or DLDD conditions, the calculation of total mating rates for daytime and nighttime was the opposite of that for LD or LDDD.

Clock-knockout generated using CRISPR/Cas9

Injections into phenotypically wild-type embryos were performed using the Ae. albopictus Foshan strain and Cx. quinquefasciatus Guangzhou strain. In order to produce a large deletion in the genome, a dual sgRNA knockout strategy was used. CRISPOR (http://crispor.tefor.net), an online tool, was uesd to identify appropriate guide RNAs (sgRNAs) target sequence containing the T7 polymerase-binding site and specifically targeting 20 bp of the site. The exon 2 of Ae. albopictus and exon 3 of Cx. quinquefasciatus were used to design and determine optimum candidate sgRNAs, respectively. According to the off-target analyses, top two, sgRNA1 and sgRNA2, were selected and these target Aalclk at positions 37 / 248 for Ae. albopictus and target Cxqclk at positions 170 / 323 for Cx. quinquefasciatus. The injection mixes contained 300 ng/μL TrueCut Cas9 Protein v2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 100 ng/μL purified sgRNA1 and 100 ng/μL purified sgRNA2 added to PBS (PH = 7.2). Embryo microinjections of the two mosquito species were used procedures described for mosquitoes [30].

DNA extraction, clock mutation detection and screening

The larvae hatched from all G0 generation embryos after microinjection were reared to adult mosquitoes. Male and female had been separated from each other in the pupal stage to avoid mating. We designed oligonucleotide primers complementary to genomic DNA sequences at the 5’-end (upstream) and 3’-end (downstream) of the sgRNA target sites for screening mutations. Genomic DNA was extracted from legs of individual G0 adults using the Extract-N-Amp Tissue PCR Kit (Sigma-Aldrich) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Mosaic G0 mosquitoes were screened by gene amplification (polymerase chain reaction, PCR) by using Maxima Hot Start Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Scientific). Subsequently, each mosaic G0 virgin male was mated with three wild-type virgin females. Meanwhile, each mosaic G0 virgin female was mated with three wild-type virgin males. Female mosquitoes were fed blood to lay eggs and G1 generation was obtained (S1 Table). The genomic DNA was extracted from legs of individual G1 adult mosquitoes and the heterozygous G1 adults were detected by PCR. The PCR products were purified with a MiniBEST DNA Fragment Purification Kit (Takara) and subcloned in the PMD-18 T Vector (Takara). Sequences of individual clones were detected by Sanger sequencing and sequence analysis were performed with MEGA7 (version 7.1.0, http://www.megasoftware.net/). Through sequence analysis, the G1 adults heterozygous male and female mosquitoes with the same mutation type were screened and crossed with each other to produce G2 generation. The homozygous clk mutants were selected from G2 generation by the same detection and sequence analysis. These homozygous clk mutants were mass-crossed to establish the clk mutant strain (AalclkΔ293 and CxqclkΔ98). Before testing, genomic DNA was extracted from AalclkΔ293 and CxqclkΔ98 samples using a MiniBEST Universal Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Takara). Mutant strains were confirmed to be homozygous with PCR (S1 Fig). All of the designed sgRNAs were checked using Cas-OFFinder online software (http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder/) to predict potential off-target sites (S2 Table). Off-target effects were tested in genomic DNA extracted from clk mutant strains. No off-target effect was confirmed by PCR and sequence analysis (S2 Fig). All primers are listed in S5 Table.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Total RNA from 10 adult mosquitoes heads or bodies at different zeitgeber times on day 4 under 12:12 LD cycles was isolated using the TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each treatment was replicated three times. The RNA quantity and quality were determined using a NanaDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). A total of 5 μg RNA was digested using TURBO DNA-free Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad CA, USA) to remove genomic DNA following the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized with GoScript Reverse Transcription System (Promega Corporation, Madison WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene expression was assessed by quantitative real-time PCR analysis with the SYBR selected master mix (Life Technologies). PCR involved an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95°C, 15 sec at 55°C, and a final extension at 72°C for 1min. All primers are listed in S5 Table.

dsRNA-mediated gene silencing and mating assessment in adult mosquitoes

Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was synthesized using T7 RiboMAX Express RNAi System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), as described elsewhere for mosquitoes [31]. The coding region fragments of desat1 (LOC109412434, LOC6047469) were amplified from Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus cDNA with forward and reverse primers containing the T7 promoter sequence at their 5’ ends (GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGG) (S5 Table). The PCR products was purified with the GeneJET PCR Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad CA, USA) and the purified PCR products were used as templates to synthesize dsRNA. The dsRNA for green fluorescent protein GFP was synthesized and used as negative control for the non-specific dsRNA effects. Two-day-old virgin Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus adults were anesthetized on a cold tray, and ~ 500nL of dsRNA solution (3000ng/μL) was injected laterally into the thorax under a microscope. Each treatment was replicated three times with 30 male or 30 female mosquitoes per replicate. The RNAi silencing efficiency was assessed over five consecutive days post injection (dpi). At dpi 4, which was the most efficient, 30 injected males or females were exposed to 30 virgin females or males in paper bowls (9.5 × 6.7 × 6.2 cm3). Mating assays were started at ZT9 and allowed to continue for 24 hours. Mating activity analysis was also assessed at each zeitgeber time using the same method as above. The ribosomal protein S7 genes of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus were used as an endogenous control. The primers used for dsRNA synthesis and gene detection are shown in S5 Table.

Extraction of cuticular hydrocarbons

Cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) were extracted from 80 virgin male mosquitoes injected with GFP and desat1 dsRNA at dpi 4, respectively. Male mosquitoes were soaked in 800 μL hexane for 5 min in 10 mL conical glass centrifuge tubes with centrifugation at 2,500×g. Each groups were treated at the same time point ZT12 under 12:12 LD cycles. The extract was pipetted to a new 2mL conical glass tubes and concentrated under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas. The concentrated extracts were immediately dissolved in 200 μL hexane before their injection into the Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometer (GC/MS). Alkanes standards (from C7-C40) O2si was purchased from Anpel company. Six different concentrations including 0.1ppm, 0.5ppm, 1 ppm, 5ppm, 10ppm and 50ppm of n-alkane standards (C7-C40) were injected with every set of samples. Samples were analyzed within 24 h of preparation.

GC/MS analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons

Identification and quantifications of CHCs were performed by using a GC/MS instrument (7890B-7000D, Agilent, USA), equipped with a HP-5MS column (Agilent, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25μm film thickness, 5% phenyl methyl siloxane stationary phase). The GC/MS conditions were as follows: the GC injection port temperature was maintained at 300°C and the samples were injected in the split-less mode. The oven temperature was programmed from an initial temperature of 80°C held for 2min, followed by a ramp at 20°C/min to 200°C, and a second ramp at 5°C/min to 290°C and held in that temperature for 19 min. The transfer line between GC and MS was set at 290°C, and the temperatures of the MS source were 230°C and operated under electron ionization mode. The scan mode was used for monitoring the targeted compounds. The carrier gas was helium (purity > 99.999%) at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Data acquisition and evaluation were carried out using Agilent MassHunter Data Acquisition, Quantitative Analysis and Qualitative Analysis programs (version B07.00, Agilent Technologies, CA), respectively. The peaks were identified based upon comparison with standards and the National Institute of Standards and Technology library (NIST, version 17). The peak area of each CHC component was calculated as a proportion of the total area of all detected peaks for each samples.

Effect of cuticular hydrocarbons on mating activity

Hydrocarbons were dissolved in n-hexane at a concentration of 75 μg/mL [21] and paintbrushes were used to apply 1μL on the abdomen of two-day-old virgin male Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Mosquitoes which received no solvent (blank group) and those that only applied the n-hexane (control group) were included for comparisons. Hydrocarbons were applied to Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus males at ZT6. Three hours after perfuming, 20 treated male and 20 virgin female Ae. albopictus adults were transferred into paper bowls and allowed to mate for 2 hours. The mating time was from ZT9 to ZT11, which was the peak of mating activity. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, 20 treated male and 20 virgin female adults were transferred into paper bowls at ZT9 and left overnight. Spermathecae were then dissected from females and examined for insemination status. The different mating durations for Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus were used to try to achieve the mating rate at an intermediate level to help determine if CHCs promote or inhibit mosquito mating. The mating assays were repeated three times. Treated mosquitoes were maintained on 10% sucrose at 27±1°C and 70±10% relative humidity, with a 12:12 LD cycle.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics). All data were first tested to determine they followed a normal distribution by using a Shapiro-Wilk normality test (α = 0.05). To compare the mating rates at different zeitgeber times, the generalized linear model (GLM) of binomial distribution with logic link and Sidak’s test for pairwise comparisons were used. To compare the differences in mating rates between the two groups, GLM of binomial distribution with logic link was also used. The relative mRNA levels between the two groups at a certain time were compared using the Student t-test. The differences in the relative mRNA levels of desat1 gene at different zeitgeber times were compared using a one-way ANOVA. The Student t-test was also used to compare differences in the relative percentages of each CHC components between treatments and controls. A value of P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Aedes albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus display distinct mating activity rhythms

The diel mating activities of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus were measured during 12:12 LD cycles with lights on at ZT0, lights off at ZT12 (Fig 1A). Ae. albopictus mating occurs throughout the LD cycles, however, the mating activities were significantly influenced by the time of a day (GLM, χ2 = 143.00, d.f. = 7, P < 0.0001). Mating activities peaked at ZT0-3 and ZT9-12 in Ae. albopictus (Fig 1B). To determine whether this diel mating rhythms of Ae. albopictus were controlled by an endogenous clock, the mating activities were measured on day 2 of constant dark (DD) after 4 days of entrainment in LD cycles (LDDD). Mating activity rhythm was still observed under LDDD (GLM, χ2 = 35.15, d.f. = 7, P < 0.0001) and was similar to the LD cycles with mating activity peaking at CT0-3 and CT9-12 (Fig 1B). In addition, we reversed the onset of light and dark (lights on at ZT12 and lights off at ZT0, DL) and found that the mating activity rhythm appeared entrained by the DL cycles (Fig 1C). The mating rate of Ae. albopictus was high during the daytime and low at night, which was similar to LD cycles. The mating peaks occurred at ZT12-15 and ZT21-24 in DL. In order to demonstrate circadian entrainment of mating rhythm rather than acute stress response to light, the mating activities of mosquitoes on day 2 of DD after 4 days of entrainment in DL cycles (DLDD) were measured. The mating rhythm of mosquitoes under DLDD was similar to those of mosquitoes under DL cycles (Fig 1C). These results support the conclusion that the mating activity rhythm of Ae. albopictus is controlled by an endogenous clock and can be entrained to daily LD cycles.

Fig 1. Mating activities of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus at different times of the day under different light conditions.

Fig 1

(A) Experimental flow chart of mating rate of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus at different zeitgeber times in a day. Blue represents male mosquitoes and red represents female mosquitoes. (B) Daily changes in mating activities of Ae. albopictus on day 4 under 12:12 light/dark (LD) cycles (lights on at ZT0) and mating activities on day 2 under constant dark (DD) after 4 days of entrainment in LD cycles. (C) Daily changes in mating activities of Ae. albopictus on day 4 under 12:12 dark/light (DL) cycles (lights on at ZT12) and mating activities on day 2 under DD after 4 days of entrainment in DL cycles. (D) Daily changes in mating activities of Cx. quinquefasciatus on day 4 under 12:12 LD cycles and mating activities on day 2 under DD after 4 days of entrainment in LD cycles. (E) Daily changes in mating activities of Cx. quinquefasciatus on day 4 under 12:12 DL cycles and mating activities on day 2 under DD after 4 days of entrainment in DL cycles. (F) Total mating rates of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus during daytime and nighttime under different light conditions. The white portion of the bar below the graph indicates lights-on, the black portion indicates lights-off, and the gray portion indicates “subjective day” under DD condition. The black and orange lines represent Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively. Statistics were performed using generalized linear models (GLM) with binomial distribution and Sidak’s test for pairwise comparisons. Values with different letters were significantly different between zeitgeber times. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each mosquito was measured only once. n = 28–30 for each zeitgeber time. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Using the same procedures, the diel mating activities of Cx. quinquefasciatus were also significantly influenced by the time of a day (GLM, χ2 = 21.86, d.f. = 7, P = 0.0027) under LD cycles. However, Cx. quinquefasciatus rarely mated during the daytime and there was a single mating peak at ZT12-15 at night (Fig 1D). The mating activity rhythm remained consistent under LDDD as well as in LD with a mating peak at CT12-15 (Fig 1D). The mating rhythm of Cx. quinquefasciatus under DL cycles showed that most mosquitoes mated at night and there was only a mating peak at ZT0-3 (Fig 1E). The mating activity rhythm also remained consistent under DLDD as well as in DL (Fig 1E). The mating rhythm of Cx. quinquefasciatus is also controlled by an endogenous clock and can be entrained to daily LD cycles. These results suggest that there is different mating activity rhythm of Cx. quinquefasciatus compared with Ae. albopictus. The two mosquito species have distinct and different peaks of mating activity.

The total mating rates during daytime or subjective daytime (ZT0-12) and nighttime (ZT12-24) were calculated to evaluate the difference in mating activity between day and night under LD or LDDD condition. For DL or DLDD, the calculation of total mating rates during daytime and nighttime was the opposite of that for LD or LDDD. These combined results showed that the total mating rates of Ae. albopictus were significantly higher in the daytime or subjective daytime than that at night under different conditions (GLM, all P < 0.01; Fig 1F). In Cx. quinquefasciatus, the total mating rates were significantly higher at night than that in the daytime or subjective daytime under different conditions (GLM, all P < 0.01; Fig 1F).

Cas9/guide RNA-mediated clock (clk) gene knockouts affect mating activity rhythms of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus

Dual small guide RNAs (sgRNA) (sgRNA37/sgRNA248 for Ae. albopictus; sgRNA170/sgRNA323 for Cx. quinquefasciatus) and Cas9 endonuclease were used to generate clk ortholog knockout mutations in the respective species following microinjection into embryos. The sgRNA target sites are in exon 2 in Ae. albopictus (Fig 2A) and exon 3 in Cx. quinquefasciatus (Fig 2F). The Ae. albopictus homozygous strains, AalclkΔ293, has a deletion 293 base-pairs (bp) in length and a 76bp insertion and the Cx. quinquefasciatus CxqclkΔ98 strain has a 98bp deletion and 8bp insertion, both resulting in frameshift mutations of the respective target genes (Figs 2A and 2F and S1). clk gene transcription products were measured under LD cycles in AalclkΔ293, CxqclkΔ98 and wild-type (WT; Aalclk+ and Cxqclk+) using qRT-PCR. The results showed strong fluctuations in mRNA abundance levels in the both WT controls, while clk knockout strains exhibited significantly reduced mRNA levels throughout the day (Fig 2B, 2C, 2G and 2H). These results support the conclusion that clk gene knockouts suppress the expression levels of the respective transcripts.

Fig 2. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated clk mutagenesis and mating activities at different times of day in clk mutants.

Fig 2

(A) Schematic diagram of sgRNA-targeting sites to induce clk mutations in Ae. albopictus using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The scissors represent the corresponding position of sgRNA in the genome. The red sequence is sgRNA and the gray sequence is intron sequence. The dotted line indicates base deletion and the green sequence indicates base insertion. The number in brackets indicates the number of omitted bases on the genome. The red box highlights the stop codon. The number at the end of the sequence indicates the number of inserted or missing bases on the genome. Green arrows indicate mutation identification primer positions, yellow arrows indicate the positions of qPCR detection primers. (B-C) Temporal expression patterns of clk mRNA between WT (Aalclk+) and AalclkΔ293 under LD cycles. The abundance of clk mRNA was measured by qRT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from 10 males or 10 females heads at 3h intervals. White and black bars indicate light phase and dark phase, respectively. (B) Ae. albopictus males, (C) Ae. albopictus females. (D) Daily changes in mating activities between WT (Aalclk+) and AalclkΔ293 under LD cycles. (E) Total mating rates between WT (Aalclk+) and AalclkΔ293 during daytime and nighttime. (F) Schematic diagram of sgRNA-targeting sites to induce clk mutations in Cx. quinquefasciatus using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. (G-H) Temporal expression patterns of clk mRNA between WT (Cxqclk+) and CxqclkΔ98 under LD cycles. (G) Cx. quinquefasciatus males, (H) Cx. quinquefasciatus females. (I) Daily changes in mating activities between WT (Cxqclk+) and CxqclkΔ98 under LD cycles. (J) Total mating rates between WT (Cxqclk+) and CxqclkΔ98 during daytime and nighttime. For the relative mRNA level, statistics were performed using Student t-test and error bars represent the standard error of mean (SEM). Each treatment was replicated three times. For mating rate between two groups at a certain time, statistics were performed using GLM with binomial distribution and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each mosquito was measured only once. n = 28–30 for each point. * P< 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

AalclkΔ293 and CxqclkΔ98 mating activity rhythms after 4 days of entrainment in LD cycles was observed to determine if it is impacted by disruptions of the respective clk genes. The mating rate of AalclkΔ293 males was > 70% at each zeitgeber time during the day. However, there was a mating peak at ZT12-15 in dark phase, showing a delayed mating peak phase that did not occur in the WT group (Fig 2D). The total mating rate of AalclkΔ293 at night (45.8%) was significantly higher than that of WT group (30.8%; GLM, χ2 = 5.65, d.f. = 1, P = 0.017), but there was no significant difference between AalclkΔ293 and WT group in daytime mating rates (GLM, χ2 = 1.61, d.f. = 1, P = 0.205) (Fig 2E).

CxqclkΔ98 mating activities were observed at each zeitgeber time during the daytime but not at night and the nighttime mating peak at ZT12-15 disappeared (Fig 2I). This was in contrast to the WT group, indicating that the mutation caused a significant phase change in the mating behavior in CxqclkΔ98. Comparisons of the total mating rate during LD conditions revealed that the total mating rate of CxqclkΔ98 at night (0.0%) was significantly lower than that of WT group (13.3%; GLM, χ2 = 18.46, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001). The total mating rate of CxqclkΔ98 during daytime (9.2%) was significantly higher than that of WT group (1.7%; χ2 = 5.23, d.f. = 1, P = 0.022) (Fig 2J).

clk mutation led to a phase disruption in the diel mating rhythm under LD cycle, resulting in Ae. albopictus showing a nighttime mating peak, and Cx. quinquefasciatus showing mating during the daytime but not at night. These results indicate that the core clock gene clock (clk) in the two mosquito species have significant roles in maintaining the diel mating activity rhythms.

The temporal expression of desat1 gene is different and regulated by clk in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus

A recent study showed that the desat1 gene was involved in the synthesis of pheromone and affected mating behavior in An. gambiae and An. stephensi [21]. As discussed previously, Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus had different mating activity rhythm. qRT-PCR analyses were used to characterize desat1 transcript abundance oscillations after 4 days of entrainment in LD cycles. The results showed that desat1 transcript levels in the heads and bodies of Ae. albopictus exhibited oscillations with expression peaks in both day and night (S3 Fig). The Cx. quinquefasciatus desat1 transcripts had a different oscillation trend with peak abundance at the moment of the light/dark transition (S3 Fig). These results indicated that the relative abundance of desat1 in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus had contrasting and opposite trends of daily oscillation.

Mutations of clk gene orthologs had effects on the temporal abundance profiles of the respective desat1 transcripts in two mosquito species. The abundance of desat1 transcripts in AalclkΔ293 males was high during light/dark transition at ZT12. The peak and trough values were out of phase compared to WT controls (Fig 3A). The desat1 transcripts profile in CxqclkΔ98 males was also out of phase and had lowest abundance during light/dark transition which was opposite to that of WT controls (Fig 3C). In contrast, the desat1 transcript abundance profile of AalclkΔ293 females (Fig 3B) and CxqclkΔ98 females (Fig 3D) only changed in amplitude and there was no distinct phase change in temporal expression trend compared to WT controls. These results support the conclusion that the clk gene orthologs are involved in regulating the oscillatory expression of their respective desat1 genes.

Fig 3. Changes in temporal expression of desat1 in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus after clk-knockout and effects of desat1 on mosquito mating activity.

Fig 3

(A-D) The expression pattern of desat1 at different times of a day in WT and clk mutant mosquitoes heads under LD cycles. The housekeeping gene RpS7 was used as the internal control for qRT-PCR. Data were normalized to median fold change. (A) WT (Aalclk+) and AalclkΔ293 males, (B) WT (Aalclk+) and AalclkΔ293 females, (C) WT (Cxqclk+) and CxqclkΔ98 males, (D) WT (Cxqclk+) and CxqclkΔ98 females. (E-F) Silencing efficiency of desat1 of male Ae. albopictus (E) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (F) injected with GFP and desat1 dsRNA. The X-axis represents days post thoracic injection (dpi) and Y-axis represents genes relative transcript accumulation. Statistics were performed using Student t-test and error bars represent the standard error of mean (SEM). Each treatment was replicated three times. (G) Experimental flow chart of the effect of desat1 gene on mating behavior of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, and ‘Δ’ represents male mosquitoes injected with dsRNA. (H-I) Effects of silencing desat1 expression on mating activity in male Ae. albopictus (H) and male Cx. quinquefasciatus (I). A total of 30 injected males on 4 dpi were exposed to 30 virgin females in paper bowls. Mating assay was started at ZT9 and they were exposed for 24h. Gray, black and red columns represent WT group, the injection group of GFP dsRNA and the injection group of desat1 dsRNA, respectively. n = 88–90 for each treatment. (J-K) Effects of silencing desat1 on mating rhythm of Ae. albopictus (J) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (K) under LD cycles. The black lines represent the injection of GFP dsRNA and the red lines represent the injection of desat1 dsRNA. For mating rate, statistics were performed using GLM with binomial distribution and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). n = 29–30 for each point. Each mosquito was measured only once. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001, ns = not significant.

desat1 gene orthologs affect mating behavior and regulate cuticular hydrocarbons(CHCs) biosynthesis in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus

Double-strand RNA (ds RNA) injections were used to modulate desat1 transcript levels in virgin Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus males and qRT-PCR was used to determine the gene silencing efficiency over five consecutive days post injection (dpi). The lowest transcript abundance was detected at 4 dpi in both species (Fig 3E and 3F). The effects of desat1 on mosquito mating activity and mating rhythm were then measured. Male mosquitoes on 4 dpi were mated with virgin females for 24 hours and mating rhythms of one day under 12:12 LD cycles were conducted using the previously described spermathecae dissection assay (Fig 3G). For the mating assay, 30 injected males on 4 dpi were exposed to 30 virgin females at ZT9 and they were exposed for 24h. The average mating rates of the desat1 dsRNA injected males of both species (65.6%, Ae. albopictus; 62.2%, Cx. quinquefasciatus) were significantly reduced compared with GFP dsRNA controls (96.7%, GLM, χ2 = 18.83, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001, Ae. albopictus; 90.9%, GLM, χ2 = 17.61, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001, Cx. quinquefasciatus; Fig 3H and 3I). Virgin female mosquitoes also were injected with desat1 dsRNA and it did not result in any differences in mating rates in either species when compared with GFP dsRNA-injected controls (GLM, all P > 0.05; S4 Fig). For the mating rhythms assay, the daily mating activity of desat1 dsRNA-injected Ae. albopictus males showed that the overall mating rhythm did not change with mating peaks at ZT0-3 and ZT9-12. However, the mating rate decreased, especially for ZT0-3, ZT6-9 and ZT9-12 (GLM, all P < 0.05; Fig 3J). In Cx. quinquefasciatus, the daily mating activity of desat1 dsRNA-injected males was significantly reduced at ZT12-15 and ZT15-18 (GLM, all P < 0.01; Fig 3K), but the overall mating rhythm did not change. These results support the conclusion that desat1 knockdown has no effect on the overall mating rhythm of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, but significantly reduces mating rate under LD cycles.

GC/MS was used to examine the role of desat1 in regulating the biosynthesis of cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs). Analyses of cuticular extracts of Ae. albopictus males on 4 dpi identified 25 major CHCs in both GFP dsRNA-injected controls and desat1 dsRNA-injected treatments, respectively (Figs 4A and S5 and S3 Table). Analyses of cuticular extracts of Cx. quinquefasciatus males on 4 dpi identified 17 major CHCs in both controls and treatments, respectively (Figs 4B and S5 and S4 Table). DsRNA-mediated silencing of desat1 resulted in significant reduction of nonadecane (C19), tricosane (C23), nonacosane (C29) and hentriacontane (C31) (Student t-test, all P < 0.05), while heptacosane (C27) significantly increased in Ae. albopictus (Student t-test, t = 4.30, d.f. = 4, P = 0.0126) (Fig 4C). Silencing desat1 resulted in significant reduction of heneicosane (C21) and C23 in Cx. quinquefasciatus (Student t-test, all P < 0.05), while C27 and C29 were significantly increased (Student t-test, all P < 0.05) (Fig 4D). These results support the conclusion that desat1 is involved in the production of CHCs in these two mosquito species.

Fig 4. Silencing of desat1 changed the CHC profiles of male Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus and altered mating activity.

Fig 4

(A-B) Representative CHC profiles of male Ae. albopictus (A) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (B) on day 4 after GFP ds RNA injection. Numbers above the peaks correspond to peak numbers given in S3 and S4 tables. Comparison of CHCs between mosquitoes injected with ds GFP and ds desat1 in Ae. albopictus (C) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (D). The gray bars represent the groups injected with GFP dsRNA, and the pink bars represent the groups injected with desat1 dsRNA. Statistics were performed using Student t-test and error bars represent the standard error of mean (SEM). Each treatment was replicated three times. (E) Flow chart of mating experiment after hydrocarbons application. Blue represents male mosquitoes and red represents female mosquitoes. Hydrocarbons were applied to Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus males at ZT6. Three hours after perfuming, 20 treated male mosquitoes and 20 virgin female mosquitoes were allowed to mate for 2 hours in Ae. albopictus or allowed to mate overnight in Cx. quinquefasciatus. (F-G) Effect of the CHCs on mosquito mating activity of Ae. albopictus (F) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (G). For mating rate, statistics were performed using GLM with binomial distribution and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each mosquito was measured only once. n = 59–60 for each group, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, ns = not significant.

Two day-old virgin male Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus were treated with hydrocarbons and applied to their abdomens at ZT6. Three hours after perfuming, 20 treated male and 20 virgin female Ae. albopictus mosquitoes were allowed to mate for 2 hours. For Cx. quinquefasciatus, 20 treated male mosquitoes and 20 virgin female mosquitoes were exposed overnight (Fig 4E). Applications of C19 and C23 to Ae. albopictus males resulted in a significant increase in the mating rate (GLM, all P < 0.05), while C27 lead to a significant decrease in average mating rate (28.3%) compared with control group (47.5%; GLM, χ2 = 4.55, d.f. = 1, P = 0.033). C29 and C31 did not alter mating activity of Ae. albopictus (GLM, all P > 0.05; Fig 4F). In Cx. quinquefasciatus males, only C23 significantly increased the average mating rate (79.7%) compared with control group (61.0%; GLM, χ2 = 4.78, d.f. = 1, P = 0.029), while the other altered pheromones did not affect mating activity of Cx. quinquefasciatus (GLM, all P > 0.05; Fig 4G).

Discussions

An in-depth understanding of mosquito mating biology is essential for mosquito control strategies that rely on interfering with vector reproduction [23]. The results of these experiments described here demonstrate that Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus have distinct and different mating rhythms. Their diel mating rhythms are regulated by their respective orthologs of the core clock gene clk and the pheromone synthesis-related desat1 gene under LD cycles. The differences in the temporal expression of desat1 gene between the two mosquitoes may be one of the mechanisms leading to the different mating rhythms. These findings, which are consistent with studies in An. stephensi [21], support the conclusion that the core clock genes regulate diel mating rhythm by controlling the temporal expression of pheromone-related genes. This mechanism may be conserved throughout mosquito species.

Circadian patterns, swarm sizes and mating activities vary widely among different mosquito species [3234]. For example, Ae. aegypti mate in single pairs or in small swarms around the human host during the day [35,36], whereas An. freeborni swarm by the thousands and mates at dusk [34]. In this study, we found the mating behaviors of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus showed distinct diel rhythm patterns under different light/dark cycle conditions. In LD cycles, Ae. albopictus displayed mating activity throughout the day but mating peaks were observed at ZT0-3 and ZT9-12, while Cx. quinquefasciatus rarely mated during the day and had a mating peak at ZT12-15. Experiments in constant dark and reversed light/dark cycles showed that endogenous mating rhythms existed in both species of mosquitoes and the mating rhythms could be reset by external light conditions. Notably, the mating rhythm may be different from the general motor activity rhythm. It has been reported that in cockroach Leucophaea maderae [37], the optic lobe receiving light signals contains oscillating factors that drive circadian motor activity, and ablation of part of optic lobe can lead to loss of detectable motor rhythm. However, cutting off the optic lobe partially in female cockroaches had no effect on mating rhythm, while similar ablations in males resulted in significant differences in mating time, but significant rhythm still existed. Although both motor activity and mating behavior are regulated by light synchronization and circadian clock, their output mechanisms may be different.

The circadian clock is controlled genetically, and mutation in‘clock genes’can change rhythmic behaviour in animals, including insects, humans and other species. The molecular clock is thought to control the expression of output genes throughout the body, thereby temporally controlling the behavior [5]. In this study, knocking out the clock (clk) gene orthologs was found to have different effects on the mating behavior of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus. Aalclk mutation affected the mating rhythm of diural Ae. albopictus under LD conditons. The mating peak delayed and appeared in the dark phase. However, there was still a mating activity rhythm in general. Whether the mating rhythm is directly affected by light exposure, or whether other core clock genes have compensatory effects needs to be further explored. In contrast, Cxqclk mutation significantly disrupted the mating rhythm of nocturnal Cx. quinquefasciatus under the same LD condition, suggesting that clk gene played an important role in the maintenance of the mating rhythm in this mosquito. Further research is needed to determine the effects of clk gene on other behavioral rhythms in both mosquito species. For mosquito disease vectors, clock genes expression and locomotor activity rhythms are well-documented [3840]. Furthermore, some clock genes, such as per, tim and cyc have been found to be involved in locomotor activity, mating or blood feeding behaviors [21,22,41,42]. However, the complete molecular clock mechanisms of mosquitoes and how they regulate various behaviors requires further study. This will provide a significant scientific basis for vector biology and mosquito control.

The molecular pathways of mating rhythms may be more complex than those of motor rhythms [43], as the former involve temporal coordination of both males and females [14]. Sex pheromones related to mating behavior are proposed to be involved in the regulation of mating rhythms in cockroach [10]. In this study, we found significant differences in the temporal expression pattern of the pheromone synthesis-related desat1 gene between Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus, and knockout of clk gene orthologs resulted in altered temporal expression of the desat1 gene. The peak expression of desat1 in AalclkΔ293 showed a phase delay while the expression of desat1 in CxqclkΔ98 showed a phase inversion. These results support the conclusion that clk can regulate the mating rhythm of both species by controlling the temporal expression of desat1 gene orthologs. The phase difference of the temporal expression of desat1 may be one of the mechanisms for the distinct and different mating rhythms between Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

Knockdown of male desat1 expression in both species significantly reduced mating rates, while knockdown of female desat1 expression had no effect on mating. In mosquito mating system, mating is initiated by the male mosquitoes, and this is followed by mate recognition by the female mosquitoes during contact [44]. Recent study has shown that the desaturase gene desat1 is up-regulated of swarming males and regulates the production of cuticular hydrocarbons [21]. Based on the role of male in mosquito mating system and the results in our study, we propose that desat1 plays an important role in the CHCs synthesis in male mosquitoes and mating activity. However, whether there are other pheromone synthesis-related genes or receptors in female mosquitoes needs further research. Knockdown of desat1 affected the mating rate of each zeitgeber time under the LD cycle, but the phase of the mating rhythm was not changed at all. It indicates that desat1 gene does not affect the rhythm, but could act as a downstream gene to affect the mating behavior. The further mechanism of the interaction between desat1, clock genes and zeitgebers remains to be explored. In addition, we found that desat1 expression peak and mating peak did not coincide. The former occurred earlier than the latter. This process may involve pheromone synthesis, mating activity initiation, mate recognition and other events.

Many insects use CHCs as species and sex recognition signals for mating [28,29,45]. In Drosophila, knockdown of desat1 was sufficient or largely inhibited pheromone biosynthesis, and this effect was particularly pronounced in males [29,46,47]. In recent study of Anopheles, the desat1 ortholog regulates the production of CHCs [21]. In this study, desat1 knockdown in male Ae. albopictus resulted in decreases of nonadecane and tricosane which were found to promote mating, while resulted in an increase of heptacosane which was found to inhibit mating. In Cx. quinquefasciatus, desat1 knockdown resulted in a significant decrease of tricosane, which was found to promote mating. Tricosane has been reported to be associated with mate recognition in D. suzukii [48] and promote mating in the male white-marked tussock moth, Orgyia leucostigma [49], as well as attracting ovipositing female houseflies, Musca domestica [50]. Nonadecane has an important role as the sex pheromone and allomone on several lepidopteran species [5154]. Heptacosane is thought to facilitate the mating activity in An. stephensi [21] and the tea weevil, Myllocerinus aurolineatus [55], however, it also has been reported to have an inhibitory effect on reproduction in the wasp, Vespula vulgaris [56]. Previous studies showed that CHC abundance in male D. melanogaster varied with light and time [57,58], supporting the conclusion that male CHCs are a dynamic feature. These results support the conclusion that desat1 gene orthologs play an important role in the biosynthesis of sex pheromones such as cuticular hydrocarbons in both Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus. Knockdown of desat1 reduced or increased levels of certain cuticular hydrocarbons, which could promote or inhibit mating. The temporal expression of the desat1 gene is regulated by the clock gene and this may be one of the mechanisms of mating rhythm formation.

Conclusions

We can conclude from these findings that Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus have significantly different diel mating rhythms that involve the regulation of clock-desat1-CHCs pathway under LD cycles (S6 Fig). The desat1 gene plays a role in the biosynthesis of cuticular hydrocarbons in both species, thus affecting mating. The temporal expression of desat1 is regulated by clk gene orthologs. Clock genes make up the circadian clocks that entrain to external light signals to give temporal characteristics to mating behavior. The observed distinct and different mating activity rhythms of two mosquito species and their molecular mechanisms regulated by clock genes and sex pheromones, may provide the basis for developing precise mosquito control strategies.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Identification of mutation in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus clk mutant strains.

Genomic DNA extracted from Ae. albopictus clkΔ293 and Cx. quinquefasciatus clkΔ98 and mutations were confirmed with PCR.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Sequence analysis of the off-target site in Ae. albopictus and Cx.quinquefasciatus clk mutant strains.

Potential off-target mutations were screened in genomic DNA extracted from Ae. albopictus clkΔ293 and Cx. quinquefasciatus clkΔ98 mutants. Blue arrows indicate the off-target test primers. No off-target mutations were confirmed.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Temporal expression patterns of desat1 gene in the heads and bodies of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

(A) Ae. albopictus male heads, (B) Ae. albopictus male bodies, (C) Ae. albopictus female heads, (D) Ae. albopictus female bodies, (E) Cx. quinquefasciatus male heads, (F) Cx. quinquefasciatus male bodies, (G) Cx. quinquefasciatus female heads, (H) Cx. quinquefasciatus female bodies. Tissues were collected from 3 replicate groups with 10 individuals at each zeitgeber time with 3h intervals for 24 h under LD condition. RNA levels were quantified by qPCR. Each value was the mean±SEM. White and black shades represent the photophase and scotophase, respectively. P-value determined by one-way ANOVA.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Silencing desat1 expression in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus female mosquitoes does not affect mating acitivity.

(A) Silencing efficiency of desat1 of female Ae. albopictus on 4dpi. (B) Mating rate of Ae. albopictus. (C) Silencing efficiency of desat1 of female Cx. quinquefasciatus on 4dpi. (D) Mating rate of Cx. quinquefasciatus. A total of 30 injected females on 4 dpi were exposed to 30 virgin males at ZT9 and they were exposed for 24h. Statistics were performed using GLM with binomial distribution and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each mosquito was measured only once. n = 88–90 for each group, ** P < 0.01, ns = not significant.

(TIF)

S5 Fig

(A-B) Representative CHC profiles of male Ae. albopictus (A) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (B) on day 4 after desat1 ds RNA injection. Numbers above the peaks correspond to peak numbers given in S3 Table and S4 Table.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. A schematic model of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus mating rhythms and their regulation by clock-desat1-CHCs pathway.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Statistics of mutation rates of G0 adults and G1 mutant pools in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. clk gRNA off-target sites in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus genome.

Mismatches bases are highlighted in lowercase and red.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Identity of cuticular hydrocarbon peaks of male adult Ae. albopictus.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Identity of cuticular hydrocarbon peaks of male adult Cx. quinquefasciatus.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Primers used in this study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention for providing the Ae. albopictus Foshan strain and the Cx. quinquefasciatus Guangzhou strain for this study, Dr. Tong Liu for his technical support and guidance in CRISPR/Cas9, and other colleagues from Southern Medical University for their advice and assistance in this study.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFC1200100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81829004, 31830087), and the National Institutes of Health, USA (AI136850) to X-G.C. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Ouyang Y, Andersson CR, Kondo T, Golden SS, Johnson CH. Resonating circadian clocks enhance fitness in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(15):8660–4. Epub 1998/07/22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8660 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC21132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pittendrigh CS, Minis DH. Circadian systems: longevity as a function of circadian resonance in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972;69(6):1537–9. Epub 1972/06/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.6.1537 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC426743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sehgal A. Physiology Flies with Time. Cell. 2017;171(6):1232–5. Epub 2017/12/02. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woelfle MA, Ouyang Y, Phanvijhitsiri K, Johnson CH. The adaptive value of circadian clocks: an experimental assessment in cyanobacteria. Current biology: CB. 2004;14(16):1481–6. Epub 2004/08/25. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.023 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Patke A, Young MW, Axelrod S. Molecular mechanisms and physiological importance of circadian rhythms. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2020;21(2):67–84. Epub 2019/11/27. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0179-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yu W, Zheng H, Houl JH, Dauwalder B, Hardin PE. PER-dependent rhythms in CLK phosphorylation and E-box binding regulate circadian transcription. Genes & development. 2006;20(6):723–33. Epub 2006/03/18. doi: 10.1101/gad.1404406 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1434787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Taylor P, Hardin PE. Rhythmic E-box binding by CLK-CYC controls daily cycles in per and tim transcription and chromatin modifications. Molecular and cellular biology. 2008;28(14):4642–52. Epub 2008/05/14. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01612-07 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2447118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Darlington TK, Wager-Smith K, Ceriani MF, Staknis D, Gekakis N, Steeves TD, et al. Closing the circadian loop: CLOCK-induced transcription of its own inhibitors per and tim. Science. 1998;280(5369):1599–603. Epub 1998/06/11. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5369.1599 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(45):16219–24. Epub 2014/10/29. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1408886111 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4234565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rymer J, Bauernfeind AL, Brown S, Page TL. Circadian rhythms in the mating behavior of the cockroach, Leucophaea maderae. J Biol Rhythms. 2007;22(1):43–57. Epub 2007/01/19. doi: 10.1177/0748730406295462 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ikeda H. Effects of light conditions on mating speed in Drosophila mercatorum. Behav Genet. 1976;6(3):305–13. Epub 1976/07/01. doi: 10.1007/BF01065726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sakai T, Ishida N. Circadian rhythms of female mating activity governed by clock genes in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(16):9221–5. Epub 2001/07/27. doi: 10.1073/pnas.151443298 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC55401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sadek MM, von Wowern G, Löfstedt C, Rosén WQ, Anderson P. Modulation of the temporal pattern of calling behavior of female Spodoptera littoralis by exposure to sex pheromone. J Insect Physiol. 2012;58(1):61–6. Epub 2011/10/18. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.09.016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Silvegren G, Löfstedt C, Qi Rosén W. Circadian mating activity and effect of pheromone pre-exposure on pheromone response rhythms in the moth Spodoptera littoralis. J Insect Physiol. 2005;51(3):277–86. Epub 2005/03/08. doi: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2004.11.013 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Charlwood J, Jones M. Mating behaviour in the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s. 1. save: I. Close range and contact behaviour. Physiological Entomology. 1979;4(2):111–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kauffman EB, Kramer LD. Zika Virus Mosquito Vectors: Competence, Biology, and Vector Control. J Infect Dis. 2017;216(suppl_10):S976–s90. Epub 2017/12/22. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix405 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5853459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Z, Zhang Z, Lai Z, Zhou T, Jia Z, Gu J, et al. Temperature Increase Enhances Aedes albopictus Competence to Transmit Dengue Virus. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2337. Epub 2017/12/19. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02337 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5717519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu QM, Li CX, Wu Q, Shi QM, Sun AJ, Zhang HD, et al. Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes In Deltamethrin-Resistant Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017;33(4):324–30. Epub 2018/01/26. doi: 10.2987/17-6658.1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tolle MA. Mosquito-borne diseases. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2009;39(4):97–140. Epub 2009/03/31. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2009.01.001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Weetman D, Kamgang B. Aedes Mosquitoes and Aedes-Borne Arboviruses in Africa: Current and Future Threats. 2018;15(2). doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020220 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang G, Vega-Rodríguez J. Clock genes and environmental cues coordinate Anopheles pheromone synthesis, swarming, and mating. 2021;371(6527):411–5. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4359 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shetty V, Meyers JI, Zhang Y, Merlin C, Slotman MA. Impact of disabled circadian clock on yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti fitness and behaviors. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):6899. Epub 2022/04/29. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10825-5 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9046260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cator LJ, Wyer CAS, Harrington LC. Mosquito Sexual Selection and Reproductive Control Programs. Trends Parasitol. 2021;37(4):330–9. Epub 2021/01/11. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2020.11.009 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8454880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Blomquist GJ, Bagnères A-G. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology: Cambridge University Press; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Singer TL. Roles of hydrocarbons in the recognition systems of insects. American Zoologist. 1998;38(2):394–405. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chung H, Loehlin DW, Dufour HD, Vaccarro K, Millar JG, Carroll SB. A single gene affects both ecological divergence and mate choice in Drosophila. Science. 2014;343(6175):1148–51. Epub 2014/02/15. doi: 10.1126/science.1249998 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grigoraki L, Grau-Bové X. Isolation and transcriptomic analysis of Anopheles gambiae oenocytes enables the delineation of hydrocarbon biosynthesis. 2020;9. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58019 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Holze H, Schrader L, Buellesbach J. Advances in deciphering the genetic basis of insect cuticular hydrocarbon biosynthesis and variation. 2021;126(2):219–34. doi: 10.1038/s41437-020-00380-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wicker-Thomas C, Guenachi I, Keita YF. Contribution of oenocytes and pheromones to courtship behaviour in Drosophila. BMC Biochem. 2009;10:21. Epub 2009/08/13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2091-10-21 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2734525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu T, Yang WQ, Xie YG, Liu PW, Xie LH, Lin F, et al. Construction of an efficient genomic editing system with CRISPR/Cas9 in the vector mosquito Aedes albopictus. Insect Sci. 2019;26(6):1045–54. Epub 2018/10/13. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12645 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou TF, Lai ZT, Liu S, Zhou JY, Liu Y, Wu Y, et al. Susceptibility and interactions between Aedes mosquitoes and Zika viruses. 2021;28(5):1439–51. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12858 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hartberg WK. Observations on the mating behaviour of Aedes aegypti in nature. Bull World Health Organ. 1971;45(6):847–50. Epub 1971/01/01. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2428001. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Reisen WK, Knop NF, Peloquin JJ. Swarming and mating behavior of laboratory and field strains of Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 1985;78(5):667–73. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yuval B, Bouskila A. Temporal dynamics of mating and predation in mosquito swarms. Oecologia. 1993;95(1):65–9. Epub 1993/03/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00649508 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.League GP, Degner EC. The impact of mating and sugar feeding on blood-feeding physiology and behavior in the arbovirus vector mosquito Aedes aegypti. 2021;15(9):e0009815. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009815 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Oliva CF, Damiens D, Benedict MQ. Male reproductive biology of Aedes mosquitoes. Acta Trop. 2014;132 Suppl:S12–9. Epub 2013/12/07. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.11.021 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Homberg U, Reischig T, Stengl M. Neural organization of the circadian system of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae. Chronobiol Int. 2003;20(4):577–91. Epub 2003/08/15. doi: 10.1081/cbi-120022412 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gentile C, Rivas GB, Meireles-Filho AC, Lima JB, Peixoto AA. Circadian expression of clock genes in two mosquito disease vectors: cry2 is different. J Biol Rhythms. 2009;24(6):444–51. Epub 2009/11/21. doi: 10.1177/0748730409349169 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rivas GBS, Teles-de-Freitas R, Pavan MG, Lima JBP, Peixoto AA, Bruno RV. Effects of Light and Temperature on Daily Activity and Clock Gene Expression in Two Mosquito Disease Vectors. 2018;33(3):272–88. doi: 10.1177/0748730418772175 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rund SS, Hou TY, Ward SM, Collins FH, Duffield GE. Genome-wide profiling of diel and circadian gene expression in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(32):E421–30. Epub 2011/07/01. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100584108 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3156198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Das S, Dimopoulos G. Molecular analysis of photic inhibition of blood-feeding in Anopheles gambiae. BMC physiology. 2008;8:23. Epub 2008/12/18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6793-8-23 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2646746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gentile C, Rivas GB, Lima JB, Bruno RV, Peixoto AA. Circadian clock of Aedes aegypti: effects of blood-feeding, insemination and RNA interference. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):80–7. Epub 2014/01/30. doi: 10.1590/0074-0276130471 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4109183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tauber E, Roe H, Costa R, Hennessy JM, Kyriacou CP. Temporal mating isolation driven by a behavioral gene in Drosophila. Current biology: CB. 2003;13(2):140–5. Epub 2003/01/28. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00004-6 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Aldersley A, Cator LJ. Female resistance and harmonic convergence influence male mating success in Aedes aegypti. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2145. Epub 2019/02/16. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38599-3 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6375921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Blomquist GJ, Tittiger C, Jurenka R. Cuticular hydrocarbons and pheromones of arthropods. Hydrocarbons, oils and lipids: diversity, origin, chemistry and fate. 2020:213–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bousquet F, Nojima T, Houot B, Chauvel I, Chaudy S, Dupas S, et al. Expression of a desaturase gene, desat1, in neural and nonneural tissues separately affects perception and emission of sex pheromones in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(1):249–54. Epub 2011/11/25. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109166108 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3252891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dallerac R, Labeur C, Jallon JM, Knipple DC, Roelofs WL, Wicker-Thomas C. A delta 9 desaturase gene with a different substrate specificity is responsible for the cuticular diene hydrocarbon polymorphism in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(17):9449–54. Epub 2000/08/02. doi: 10.1073/pnas.150243997 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC16884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Snellings Y, Herrera B, Wildemann B, Beelen M, Zwarts L, Wenseleers T. The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in mate recognition in Drosophila suzukii. 2018;8(1):4996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23189-6 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grant GG, Frech D, Macdonald L, Slessor KN, King GG. Copulation releaser pheromone in body scales of female whitemarked tussock moth,Orgyia leucostigma (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae): Identification and behavioral role. J Chem Ecol. 1987;13(2):345–56. Epub 1987/02/01. doi: 10.1007/BF01025894 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiang Y, Lei C, Niu C, Fang Y, Xiao C, Zhang Z. Semiochemicals from ovaries of gravid females attract ovipositing female houseflies, Musca domestica. J Insect Physiol. 2002;48(10):945–50. Epub 2003/05/29. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(02)00162-2 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Schneider D, Schulz S, Kittmann R, Kanagaratnam P. Pheromones and glandular structures of both sexes of the weed-defoliator moth Pareuchaetes pseudoinsulata Rego Barros (Lep., Arctiidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 1992;113(1–5):280–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Schulz S, Boppré M, Vane-Wright R. Specific mixtures of secretions from male scent organs of African milkweed butterflies (Danainae). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 1993;342(1300):161–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wong JW, Palaniswamy P, Underbill EW, Steck WF, Chisholm MD. Novel sex pheromone components from the fall cankerworm moth,Alsophila pometaria. J Chem Ecol. 1984;10(3):463–73. Epub 1984/03/01. doi: 10.1007/BF00988092 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mujiono K, Witjaksono W, Putra NS. The sex pheromone content of the Spodoptera exigua (Hubner) under artificial and natural diets. International Journal of Science and Engineering. 2015;8(2):146–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun X, Zhang X, Wu G, Li X, Liu F, Xin Z, et al. n-Pentacosane Acts as both Contact and Volatile Pheromone in the tea Weevil, Myllocerinus aurolineatus. J Chem Ecol. 2017;43(6):557–62. Epub 2017/06/12. doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0857-5 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Oi CA. Honeybee queen mandibular pheromone fails to regulate ovary activation in the common wasp. Journal of comparative physiology A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology. 2022;208(2):297–302. Epub 2022/01/15. doi: 10.1007/s00359-021-01531-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Krupp JJ, Kent C, Billeter JC, Azanchi R, So AK, Schonfeld JA, et al. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster. Current biology: CB. 2008;18(18):1373–83. Epub 2008/09/16. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.089 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kent C, Azanchi R, Smith B, Chu A, Levine J. A model-based analysis of chemical and temporal patterns of cuticular hydrocarbons in male Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2007;2(9):e962. Epub 2007/09/27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000962 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1978534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010965.r001

Decision Letter 0

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano, Joshua B Benoit

26 Aug 2022

Dear Professor Chen,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Clock genes regulate circadian mating activity in the vector mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

The reviewers have completed their assessment of the paper and find that it is sufficient quality following revision for PLoS NTD. Please address the comments provided by the reviewers individually.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Joshua B. Benoit

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

The reviewers have completed their assessment of the paper and find that it is sufficient quality following revision for PLoS NTD. Please address the comments provided by the reviewers individually.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: I have concerns regarding the use of statistical tests that are not optimized for handling frequencies and percentages. Please find suggestions for alternative tests in my comments to the authors.

Reviewer #2: Methods needs more details. Were the nighttime condition mosquitoes handled? Under dim red light? n # for experiments should be provided throughout.

For mating assays, how many groups were tested per experimental rep? Was power analysis performed?

How were the Clock mutants screened and confirmed? How were the target sites selected and were the mutant lines tested for off-target effects? Please provide details on how mutagenesis was determined and if the mosquitoes outcrossed before being tested.

Figure 3H&I and S2 B&D: More details of experimental conditions should be provided, including time (ZT) and duration of these experiments. How many females were examined?

What time of day was the CHC-applied mating assay performed for Ae. albopictus?

The authors nicely demonstrate here that there is a mating rhythm for both species tested. Authors should provide time of experiment for any mating assays performed.

Variance in data is not very clear throughout this manuscript.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Yes.

Reviewer #2: Lines 93: Please elaborate on what the authors mean by ‘evolutionary mechanisms’ here.

When referring to time, Zeitgeber Time (ZT), rather than real time, should be provided.

Line 239: 3 hours before darkness is ZT9, not ZT12. In Figure 1B, mating seems to peak at light:dark transition at ZT12. Either way, this sentence needs clarification.

Line 240: “~3h after lights off”. Is there reason for “~” here? This should be referred to as ZT15.

Line 243: Needs clarification. While the Ae. albopictus evening mating peak looks delayed by 3 hrs, the morning mating peak appears have advanced by 3 hrs and is less pronounced under DD condition compared to LD. Similarly, Culex seems to have a small morning mating peak at ZT0/24 under LD that is not observed under DD.

Lines 247-250: Is 4 days considered enough for re-entrainment to a complete anti-phasic condition (reversed schedule) before measuring mating frequency? The shift in timing of mating peak suggests that the animals may still be re-entraining.

Line 248: Needs clarification. What do the authors mean by at each time period?

Line 250-252: Lack of mating after lights on in Culex maybe due to acute suppression rather than re-entrainment.

In order to demonstrate circadian re-entrainment of mating rhythm, the assay must be followed by sufficient re-entrainment period and then performed under free running condition (DD).

Line 265: While I agree with this conclusion, the way that DD data in Fig. 1E is presented does not seem to support this idea. How was day vs night total mating frequency calculated? Is ZT12 or ZT0 considered day or night?

What are the authors’ interpretation on clock mRNA cycling in WT Culex? Here clock mRNA expression display 2-3 peaks, which is inconsistent with prior literature (Rivas 2018), and male versus female expression patterns look different from each other.

Figure 2E & J: One reason for this could be because the animals are under LD condition, which can mask some of the effects circadian gene mutants can have. To measure circadian regulation, both mRNA abundance and mating frequency assays must be done under free running condition.

How was the timepoint of 20:00 chosen for extraction of CHC? For figure 4C&D, how many days post dsRNA injection was the CHC collected? It’d be helpful to provide representative CHC profiles for dsRNA injected groups.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Yes.

Reviewer #2: Discussion section summarizes main findings but lacks in scope. Authors should utilize this section to provide more insight.

Line 443-444: Needs clarification. Onset of daylight is ZT0/24. ZT3 is considered 3 hrs after daylight onset. Mating peak seems to be at ZT12, which at the transition of light/dark, not 3 hrs before.

Line 456-458: Needs clarification.

Do the authors have any thoughts on the sex differences of desat knockdown effects on mating? Are the affected CHC more specific to males? Or could desat affect biosynthesis of CHC differently in each sex?

Could the authors comment on what the implications of their findings may be in terms of vector control?

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: NA

Reviewer #2: Use of red and green in the same graph is not recommended in order to keep graphs accessible to colorblind readers.

Incorrect figure and table references are found throughout. For example, reference to Figure S2 should be S1 in line 347 & 349; Figure S3 should be S2 in line 392; Table S3 should be Table S4 in line 176.

Line 147: “bodys” should be “bodies”

Line 213: I think the authors mean “3 hrs after perfuming”, rather than 3 hrs duration of perfuming.

Formatting errors throughout: missing space after comma, between sentences, or before parenthesis.

Line 529: Perhaps the authors mean “that entrains to external light”?

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: In the present manuscript, the authors analyzed the circadian nature of mating rhythms in two mosquito species of epidemiological importance: Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus. Overall, the manuscript is well written and the logic flow between experiments is well articulated.

I have only 2 main concerns and a series of minor points and questions.

Main concerns:

Statistics: Instead of a chi-square (or Fisher) test, it would be more appropriate to use a test based on a binomial distribution. Ideally, a GLM with a binomial distribution of residuals or even better, a GLMM using the replicate number as a random effect.

Similarly, instead of t-tests to compare mating rates, a similar strategy based on a GLM or GLMM, with a binomial distribution, would be better.

Finally, an ANOVA also assumes a normal distribution of the data and, by definition, frequencies and percentages are not normally distributed. I strongly recommend that authors use a GLM with binomial distribution of residuals and a posthoc Tukey test for pairwise comparisons between treatments.

The conclusions drawn from the reversed light cycle experiment are not clear. The authors state that these experiments demonstrate that the mating rhythm is entrainable, but since they were conducted under LD conditions, it could also simply be that a certain component of the rhythm is driven by external light conditions. An experiment where the light cycle is reversed for 3 days before testing mosquitoes under constant darkness conditions would be necessary to demonstrate that they have entrained to the reversed light cycle. Please clarify the interpretation of these results.

Minor points:

Abstract

L25: should “period” be plural? (since authors talk about the two transitions).

L80: there is a missing “s” at D. simulans

L89: in “Culex quinquefasciatus is a nocturnal, harassing mosquito”, what do you mean by harassing? Males are harassing females? Or that it is an aggressively anthropophilic mosquito?

L89: replace “coordinately-guided” with “coordinated”

L102: consider replacing “constructed” with “established”

L104: “ablation” should not be used here as this refers to RNAi. Instead, “the expression of the gene desat1 was inhibited” would be better.

L181: CHCs are extracted at 20:00pm. To what ZT time does this correspond?

L196: replace “sec” with “a second”

L213: “After perfuming 3 hours,” did you mean “Three hours after perfuming,”?

L239: shouldn’t ZT12 be ZT9? (i.e., 3 hours before lights off?)

L251: “These results suggest that the circadian rhythms of mating activity can be precisely entrained by light signals.” Don’t you need to expose mosquitoes to this reversed light cycle and then transition to DD to show that they are entrained? Maybe what we are seeing is simply driven by external cues (light).

L263: “ There were no significant difference in the total mating rates of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus between day and night under DD conditions (Fig 1E). These results indicate that the mating rhythms of the two species are completely opposite with Ae. albopictus mating during the day and Cx. quinquefasciatus mating at night.”

This paragraph is a bit unclear and needs to be reworded. What specific comparisons were made?

L310: “but there was no significant difference in daytime mating rates (P >0.05).” please add the values here for clarity.

L444: again, in “onset of day-light (ZT3) and 3 hours before darkness (ZT12)” Shouldn’t it be ZT9?

L467: “tus” is missing from “quinquefascia”

L526: delete “in” from “that involve in the regulation”

Figure 1

Panels B-D: an ANOVA is used to compare frequencies while an ANOVA assume normal distribution. Using GLM with a binomial distribution and posthoc Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons would be better.

Panel D: So, with the reversed LD: what are we seeing? That rhythms are driven by light? Entrainment would require 3 days in reversed LD and then DD to see that they have entrained. The interpretation of these results needs to be clarified in the MS.

E: Binomial tests would be more appropriate.

Figure 2:

Panels D-E: So, although the difference between the scotophase of WT and clock knockouts seems to be different (but see my previous comment about statistics), the overall profile is similar between WT and mutants. Showing that mating rhythms are driven, to a large extent by light conditions. An interesting experiment would have been to test the knockout line under DD. Can authors comment on that in the manuscript? This would help readers identify the outstanding knowledge gaps.

Panels I-J: Here the phase inversion is interesting, but again, running the experiment under DD would have allowed the authors to detangle the effect of the circadian clock from the external light input. In any case, there seems to be an interaction between these two factors in Culex mosquitoes, which would be good to discuss in the manuscript.

Figure 3

Same comment here: additional DD experiments would have allowed the distinction between light and clock effects. Could authors add a comment in the discussion?

It is interesting that in males, the inversion of the curves in A and C leads to an increase in the mating rates but with a peak at the same times of day. Shouldn’t we expect to see a shift in the time of peak mating frequency? And a reduction of the mating rate during peak hours (since desat1 is less expressed)?

Figure 4

One could argue that showing the unmated bars is redundant in panels F and G since the insemination rates already include that information. Please consider removing the grey bars.

Reviewer #2: Liu et al. investigate an interesting topic of circadian regulation of mating activity in Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. This reviewer agrees with the general conclusion and find the study interesting. There are parts that require clarification and discussion section lacks insight in its current state. Few of the conclusions are not supported by their data and need to be clarified.

Reviewer #3: The authors have done a great job of presenting the regulation of circadian mating activity in Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus by clock genes. This study is quite important as it adds to the current body of knowledge of mating behavior and circadian rhythm of mosquitoes, and also provide insights for the development of mosquito control programs. The paper was clearly written, and the methods were well described. I have no big concerns with this manuscript; however, I would like to provide some few suggestions that will strengthen the manuscript.

1. This current study is similar to a previous investigation by Wang et al., 2021 (Clock genes and environmental cues coordinate Anopheles pheromone synthesis, swarming, and mating). In the 2021 study, the role of the clock genes (period and timeless) and desat1 was evaluated in three Anopheles species. While a different clock gene was investigated in two different mosquito species in this study, the authors need to state clearly a significant research gap this study is trying to address in mosquito mating behavior. I do not think the justification provided in the introduction was strong enough.

2. Line 90-91, "...the mating activity of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus has yet to be determined molecularly" - is the use of "has" correct in this context?

3. There are some formatting issues in Lines 110, 114, 128 etc. The authors might want to do a thorough check through the whole manuscript.

4. Line 147 - "bodys" should be "bodies".

5. Lines 179 and 184 - The unit of measurement should be confirmed and corrected accordingly.

6. Line 210-211, "Every mosquito was applied ~1μL." - This is not clear.

7. Line 215-217 - Is there a reason for the difference in the mating duration for the two mosquito species? If yes, sufficient justification should be provided.

8. Line 275-276 (Figure 1 legend): No description of the gray portion of the bar.

9. Line 303 - "Circadian" should be starting with a lowercase "c".

10. Line 391 - compared should replace "comparted".

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010965.r003

Decision Letter 1

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano, Joshua B Benoit

16 Nov 2022

Dear Professor Chen,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Clock genes regulate circadian mating activity in the vector mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus" for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

The reviewer have indicated that the paper is improved, but there are still minor issues that need to be addressed.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript.

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Joshua B. Benoit

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

The reviewer have indicated that the paper is improved, but there are still minor issues that need to be addressed.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: See below

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The methods used in this study are adequate for the hypothesis being tested and suitable for the study system.

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: See below

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Results were properly presented and described.

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: See below

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Important conclusions and inferences made in this study are consistent with the data presented. Public health importance of this study was properly addressed.

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: none

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: The authors might need to modify the sentence on lines 262-263 to read as follows: "Mosquitoes which received no solvent (blank group) and those that only got the n-hexane application (positive control) were included for comparisons".

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Overall, the authors have addressed the comments of the reviewers and added experimental details to the manuscript. Concerns about the statistical approach employed in the study have been addressed by using GLMs based on binomial distributions.

However, in the first part of the results section, the authors use wording suggesting that the GLM proves “distinct rhythmicity“. Rhythmicity needs to be tested by other statistical means. That being said, the authors could change the wording to “....activities were significantly influenced by the time of day”. Or something to this effect.

L291: if measured under LD conditions, these are not “circadian” mating activities, but diel rhythms since they result from a combination of endogenous control and exogenous drive.

Reviewer #2: I thank the reviewers for their effort in addressing questions and concerns in the initial review. Two major concerns remain: (1) Results presented in Figures 2 and 3 still cannot conclude circadian effects as they were performed under LD. This is consistent with Reviewer #1’s initial concern. (2) Clk mutant mosquitoes were not properly outcrossed. Doing so is standard and necessary to rule out any genetic background effects, especially for behavioral tests. Both of these points should be clearly and properly addressed in the final version of this manuscript.

Overall, this manuscript has been largely improved with interesting and important findings. With the two major points listed above addressed properly, I would recommend this manuscript for publication.

Reviewer #3: I appreciate the authors for the clarifications provided to the concerns raised and the clear responses to the reviewers' comments. The study is important as it provides evidence to the role of the circadian clock in the mating behavior of Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus. Conclusions derived from this study are relevant for devising novel mosquito control strategies. This study will consequently expand knowledge in the field of circadian biology and integrated pest management which is important not only to scientists in these fields, but also the general public. Therefore, I recommend it for publication.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes: Oluwaseun M. Ajayi

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

References

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article's retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010965.r005

Decision Letter 2

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano, Joshua B Benoit

20 Nov 2022

Dear Professor Chen,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Clock genes regulate mating activity rhythms in the vector mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Joshua B. Benoit

Academic Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano

Section Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010965.r006

Acceptance letter

Alvaro Acosta-Serrano, Joshua B Benoit

28 Nov 2022

Dear Professor Chen,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Clock genes regulate mating activity rhythms in the vector mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Identification of mutation in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus clk mutant strains.

    Genomic DNA extracted from Ae. albopictus clkΔ293 and Cx. quinquefasciatus clkΔ98 and mutations were confirmed with PCR.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Sequence analysis of the off-target site in Ae. albopictus and Cx.quinquefasciatus clk mutant strains.

    Potential off-target mutations were screened in genomic DNA extracted from Ae. albopictus clkΔ293 and Cx. quinquefasciatus clkΔ98 mutants. Blue arrows indicate the off-target test primers. No off-target mutations were confirmed.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Temporal expression patterns of desat1 gene in the heads and bodies of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

    (A) Ae. albopictus male heads, (B) Ae. albopictus male bodies, (C) Ae. albopictus female heads, (D) Ae. albopictus female bodies, (E) Cx. quinquefasciatus male heads, (F) Cx. quinquefasciatus male bodies, (G) Cx. quinquefasciatus female heads, (H) Cx. quinquefasciatus female bodies. Tissues were collected from 3 replicate groups with 10 individuals at each zeitgeber time with 3h intervals for 24 h under LD condition. RNA levels were quantified by qPCR. Each value was the mean±SEM. White and black shades represent the photophase and scotophase, respectively. P-value determined by one-way ANOVA.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Silencing desat1 expression in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus female mosquitoes does not affect mating acitivity.

    (A) Silencing efficiency of desat1 of female Ae. albopictus on 4dpi. (B) Mating rate of Ae. albopictus. (C) Silencing efficiency of desat1 of female Cx. quinquefasciatus on 4dpi. (D) Mating rate of Cx. quinquefasciatus. A total of 30 injected females on 4 dpi were exposed to 30 virgin males at ZT9 and they were exposed for 24h. Statistics were performed using GLM with binomial distribution and error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Each mosquito was measured only once. n = 88–90 for each group, ** P < 0.01, ns = not significant.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig

    (A-B) Representative CHC profiles of male Ae. albopictus (A) and Cx. quinquefasciatus (B) on day 4 after desat1 ds RNA injection. Numbers above the peaks correspond to peak numbers given in S3 Table and S4 Table.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. A schematic model of Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus mating rhythms and their regulation by clock-desat1-CHCs pathway.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Statistics of mutation rates of G0 adults and G1 mutant pools in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. clk gRNA off-target sites in Ae. albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus genome.

    Mismatches bases are highlighted in lowercase and red.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Identity of cuticular hydrocarbon peaks of male adult Ae. albopictus.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Identity of cuticular hydrocarbon peaks of male adult Cx. quinquefasciatus.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Primers used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 20221011 Response to the reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 20221117 Response to the reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES