ABSTRACT
Free-living bacteria have evolved multiple times to become host-restricted endosymbionts. The transition from a free-living to a host-restricted lifestyle comes with a number of different genomic changes, including a massive loss of genes. In host-restricted endosymbionts, gene inactivation and genome reduction are facilitated by mobile genetic elements, mainly insertion sequences (ISs). ISs are small autonomous mobile elements, and one of, if not the most, abundant transposable elements in bacteria. Proliferation of ISs is common in some facultative endosymbionts, and is likely driven by the transmission bottlenecks, which increase the level of genetic drift. In this study, we present a manually curated genome annotation for a Cardinium endosymbiont of the dwarf spider Oedothorax gibbosus. Cardinium species are host-restricted endosymbionts that, similarly to ColbachiaWolbachia spp., include strains capable of manipulating host reproduction. Through the focus on mobile elements, the annotation revealed a rampant spread of ISs, extending earlier observations in other Cardinium genomes. We found that a large proportion of IS elements are pseudogenized, with many displaying evidence of recent inactivation. Most notably, we describe the lineage-specific emergence and spread of a novel IS-derived Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Element (MITE), likely being actively maintained by intact copies of its parental IS982-family element. This study highlights the relevance of manual curation of these repeat-rich endosymbiont genomes for the discovery of novel MITEs, as well as the possible role these understudied elements might play in genome streamlining.
IMPORTANCE Cardinium bacteria, a widespread symbiont lineage found across insects and nematodes, have been linked to reproductive manipulation of their hosts. However, the study of Cardinium has been hampered by the lack of comprehensive genomic resources. The high content of mobile genetic elements, namely, insertion sequences (ISs), has long complicated the analyses and proper annotations of these genomes. In this study, we present a manually curated annotation of the Cardinium symbiont of the spider Oedothorax gibbosus. Most notably, we describe a novel IS-like element found exclusively in this strain. We show that this mobile element likely evolved from a defective copy of its parental IS and then spread throughout the genome, contributing to the pseudogenization of several other mobile elements. We propose this element is likely being maintained by the intact copies of its parental IS element and that other similar elements in the genome could potentially follow this route.
KEYWORDS: Cardinium, mobile element, insertion sequence, endosymbiont, Amoebophilaceae
OBSERVATION
Microbial symbionts are widespread across the animal kingdom, shaping their hosts’ evolution and serving them as a source for novel metabolic capabilities (1, 2). Of particular interest are those relations that evolve between microbes and their hosts where the microbe cannot thrive outside of its host’s cells or tissues. Within these endosymbionts, we find the widely studied obligate nutritional symbioses observed in phloem- or blood-feeders as well as those involving facultative endosymbiotic lineages (3). A widespread feature of the genomes of facultative endosymbionts is the presence of large numbers of mobile elements; including prophages, group II introns, and mainly insertion sequences (ISs) (4–8). In their simplest form, ISs are small, autonomous, transposable elements encoding for a transposase gene flanked by terminal inverted repeats. ISs are arguably the most numerous mobile elements in bacteria (9), and have been implicated in promoting widespread genome rearrangement and differential pseudogenization between closely related strains of facultative endosymbionts (10–14).
Facultative endosymbionts include both conditional beneficial symbionts as well as reproductive manipulators. Reproductive manipulation entails, most famously, male killing, feminization, and cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) (15), which can facilitate the spread of the endosymbiont in a host population (16). While Wolbachia strains are the most notorious male killing and CI-inducing endosymbionts, specific strains of the endosymbiotic genus Cardinium have also been shown to be involved in inducing CI (17), parthenogenesis (18), and feminization (19). Analysis of the genome of a CI-inducing Cardinium strain from the parasitoid wasp Encarsia pergandiella suggests an independent evolution of the CI phenotype in Wolbachia and Cardinium lineages (20). Based on available genome sequences, Cardinium strains have been organized into 3 groups, with group A containing exclusively endosymbionts from arthropods (namely, insects and mites), group B from nematodes, and group C from Culicoides punctatus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) (21). Similarly to Wolbachia, phylogenetic analyses suggest that occasional switching between distant host phyla may be a feature of the genus Cardinium (21). To date, 8 genomes of different finishing status are available in the databases. All strains hold genomes of around 1 Mega base-pair (Mbp) and are highly enriched in mobile elements, namely, ISs. Despite the important role IS elements play in both genome inactivation and genome rearrangement, only the cBtQ1 strain isolated from the whitefly Bemisia tabaci biotype MEDQ1 has undergone rigorous annotation of these elements (22). In this study, we present the manually curated annotation of the Cardinium endosymbiont of the spider Oedothorax gibbosus. This revealed an abundant small non-autonomous IS-derived Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Element (or MITE), which to our knowledge, is previously unreported for endosymbionts and is unique to this Cardinium strain.
The genome of Cardinium strain cOegibbosus-W744x776 (hereafter cOegib) was assembled previously from long- and short-read data generated for the genome sequencing of its spider host, O. gibbosus (23, 24). To produce a high-quality annotation of the mobile elements of cOegib, an initial draft annotation was done using Prokka v1.14.6 (25). This draft annotation was followed by careful manual curation using a combination of DELTA-BLASTP (versus NCBI’s nr and Swiss-Prot) (26), InterProScan v5.45-80.0 (27), Infernal v1.1.3 (–cut_tc –mid; versus Rfam v14.2) (28, 29), tRNAscan-SE v2.0.9 (-B –isospecific) (30), and ARAGORN v1.2.38 (31). Finally, careful manual searches against the ISfinder database (32) were performed in order to identify complete, partial, and fragmented elements across the genome, with special care to correctly identify the terminal inverted repeats of IS elements.
As previously reported in Halter et al. (24), the general features of the genome of cOegib are comparable to other members of the Cardinium genus (Table S1). Similarly to other Cardinium strains (20, 22), a large fraction of cOegib’s genome (29.60%) is made up of mobile elements, which is the highest reported for the genus. Manual curation revealed that group II introns and ISs made up the majority of these elements (87.97%), with the latter being by far the most abundant. From the repertoire of in total 300 ISs, we were able to identify ISCca2 to ISCca6 elements, previously reported for other Cardinium strains (20, 22). Nonetheless, their copy numbers are dissimilar to those of strain cBtQ1, revealing lineage-specific expansions/contractions (Table 1). In addition to these Cardinium-specific ISs, we were able to detect an additional 8 mobile elements (named ISCca9 to ISCca16) belonging to 7 different IS families. Despite being highly abundant, only 23.33% of these IS elements, belonging to 6 different types, encode for an intact transposase gene, and 8.00% are only partial IS elements with no transposase gene/pseudogene. This suggests that only the subset of IS elements that have at least one intact copy in the genome still preserve the ability to mobilize, while those that do not are likely to be eventually purged, unless new intact copies are acquired through horizontal gene transfer. This hypothesis is supported by the 5 most abundant IS elements matching all but one of the intact ones.
TABLE 1.
Distribution of intact and partial IS elements in selected Cardinium
| cOegib |
cBtQ1 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is type | Family, group | Total | Intact | Total | Intact |
| ISCca1a | IS982 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 8 |
| ISCca2 | IS6 | 109 | 43 | 18 | 4 |
| ISCca3 | IS5, IS5 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2 |
| ISCca4 | IS982 | 68 | 7 | 41 | 10 |
| ISCca5 | IS5, IS5 | 3 | 0 | 38 | 2 |
| ISCca6 | IS1634 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
| ISCca7+ | IS5, IS5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
| ISCca8− | IS6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| ISCca9 | IS256 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca10 | IS256 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca11 | IS3, IS150 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca12 | IS110 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca13 | IS4, IS4 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca14 | IS481 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca15 | Tn3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ISCca16 | IS66 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
aISCca1 is highly similar to ISCca4. +, ISCca7 is highly similar to ISCca3. −, ISCca8 is highly similar to ISCca2. These two Cardinium strains were selected given that they are the only two to undergo thorough manual curation for IS elements.
Most notably, manual curation of the IS elements revealed a large number of a shorter sequence of circa 240 bp flanked by an inverted repeat very similar to those of ISCca4 (IS982 family) (Fig. 1A), the second most abundant IS element in the cOegib genome. However, these shorter repeats completely lack a transposase gene. Upon closer inspection, we found good evidence to suggest that these shorter repeats are likely derived from a parental ISCca4 element: downstream of the left inverted repeat, there is a short 5 bp-long conserved sequence when compared to ISCca4. In addition, despite MITECca01 possessing identical but shorter inverted repeats, it preserves the 5′-AGMTTGTW-3′ downstream sequence from its likely parental ISCca4. This novel Cardinium IS-like element, designated MITECca01, has all the features of Miniature Inverted repeat Transposable Elements (or MITEs), which are short (typically shorter than 300 bp), non-autonomous transposable elements that depend on a functional transposase gene of their parental IS to mobilize (9). Hitherto, MITEs have been reported in animals, protists, fungi, and a few plants, bacteria, and archaea (9, 33), with no reports, to our knowledge, in maternally-inherited intracellular endosymbionts. This under-reporting might be due to their small nature, a lack of thorough annotation of mobile genetic elements in genomes, and the lack of available full-length annotations (i.e., including terminal inverted repeats) of their parental IS elements.
FIG 1.
Diagram depicting ISCca4, MITE-like, and MITE elements detected in cOegib. In red boxes, inverted repeats of each element are displayed in both subpanels. (A) Comparison of ISCca4 and MITECca01 and their inverted repeats. Sequence of the palindromic inverted repeats are shown underlined in black. Red square brackets highlight the conserved sequence downstream of the left inverted repeats of both mobile elements. (B) Diagram depicting, form top to bottom, the ISCca4 and related MITEs in order of likely stages of MITE formation and copy number increase across the genome. At the bottom-right of each panel, the number of copies is expressed as “n” under the diagram of each element. Gray parallelograms connecting the linear depiction of the mobile elements indicate conserved regions.
The newly identified MITE has successfully spread throughout the genome of cOegib, effectively becoming the most abundant mobile element in the genome, with 169 copies and making up 3.5% of the total chromosomal sequence. This large number of copies contrasts even the 5 most abundant IS elements, which are present in 109 (ISCca2), 68 (ISCca4), 35 (ISCca9), 26 (ISCca10), and 20 (ISCca3) copies, respectively. Similar to other ISs in the genome of cOegib and other endosymbionts (11, 13, 14), MITECca01 was found mostly in intergenic regions as well as disrupting other mobile elements, and much less commonly inactivating protein-coding genes. Its genomic distribution points toward a role for MITECca01 in IS element inactivation in the genome of cOegib. Contrary to IS elements, very few MITECca01 elements are found disrupted by other mobile elements, which could likely be due to their small size compared to ISs (240 versus ca. 1000 bp). Further, we were able to identify a second MITE element very similar to MITECca01, termed MITECca02 (Fig. 1B), which likely represents yet another MITE element with potential to spread throughout this Cardinium lineage. This second MITE element might be evolutionarily younger, given its copy number and the fact it keeps a much longer conserved sequenced with ISCca4 following the left inverted repeat (Fig. S1). On top of these 2 MITE elements, we also identified an uninterrupted highly eroded ISCca4 element of 250 bp in length that retains a small part of the 3′-end of its transposase gene (Fig. S1). This IS remnant potentially represents a very early stage of the birth of a MITE element. Finally, blastn searches of these novel Cardinium MITE elements did not reveal the presence of these in any of the other sequenced Cardinium strains, suggesting that it originated in the lineage leading to cOegib.
In conclusion, through the thorough annotation of the Cardinium strain cOegib, we were able to shed light on the dynamics that likely resulted in the current distribution and abundance of mobile elements in this genome. In addition, the MITECca01 element present in the cOegib genome represents, to our knowledge, a novel kind of IS-like element in a maternally-inherited endosymbiont lineage. This novel MITE has been very successful in multiplying across the genome, and its mobility and persistence is likely linked to the survival of intact copies of the “parental” ISCca4 element. Finally, the genome of cOegib along with its careful and detailed annotation represents a valuable resource with relevance to the continued study of this endosymbiont taxon and transposable elements, as well as the larger field of reductive genome evolution.
Data availability.
The genome annotation of the Cardinium endosymbiont of Oedothorax gibbosus strain cOegibbosus-W744x776 has been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number OW441264.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project has received funding from the University of Vienna (uni:docs to T.H.) and the Austrian Science Fund FWF (DOC 69-B). A.M.-M. was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (LEECHSYMBIO, grant agreement no. 840270). F.H. was supported by an Individual Research Grant (Fund for Scientific Research – 152761N).
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Alejandro Manzano-Marín, Email: alejandro.manzano.marin@univie.ac.at.
Swaine L. Chen, The National University of Singapore and the Genome Institute of Singapore
REFERENCES
- 1.McFall-Ngai M, Hadfield MG, Bosch TCG, Carey HV, Domazet-Lošo T, Douglas AE, Dubilier N, Eberl G, Fukami T, Gilbert SF, Hentschel U, King N, Kjelleberg S, Knoll AH, Kremer N, Mazmanian SK, Metcalf JL, Nealson K, Pierce NE, Rawls JF, Reid A, Ruby EG, Rumpho M, Sanders JG, Tautz D, Wernegreen JJ. 2013. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:3229–3236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218525110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Douglas AE. 2014. Symbiosis as a general principle in eukaryotic evolution. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6:a016113. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moran NA, McCutcheon JP, Nakabachi A. 2008. Genomics and evolution of heritable bacterial symbionts. Annu Rev Genet 42:165–190. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.110306.130119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.McCutcheon JP, Moran NA. 2011. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:13–26. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Latorre A, Manzano-Marín A. 2017. Dissecting genome reduction and trait loss in insect endosymbionts. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1389:52–75. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Degnan PH, Yu Y, Sisneros N, Wing RA, Moran NA. 2009. Hamiltonella defensa, genome evolution of protective bacterial endosymbiont from pathogenic ancestors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9063–9068. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900194106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Patel V, Chevignon G, Manzano-Marín A, Brandt JW, Strand MR, Russell JA, Oliver KM. 2019. Cultivation-assisted genome of Candidatus Fukatsuia symbiotica; the enigmatic ‘X-type’ symbiont of aphids. Genome Biol Evol 11:3510–3522. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Degnan PH, Leonardo TE, Cass BN, Hurwitz B, Stern D, Gibbs RA, Richards S, Moran NA. 2010. Dynamics of genome evolution in facultative symbionts of aphids. Environ Microbiol 12:2060–2069. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02085.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Chandler M. 2014. Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev 38:865–891. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gillespie JJ, Joardar V, Williams KP, Driscoll T, Hostetler JB, Nordberg E, Shukla M, Walenz B, Hill CA, Nene VM, Azad AF, Sobral BW, Caler E. 2012. A Rickettsia genome overrun by mobile genetic elements provides insight into the acquisition of genes characteristic of an obligate intracellular lifestyle. J Bacteriol 194:376–394. doi: 10.1128/JB.06244-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Manzano-Marín A, Latorre A. 2014. Settling down: the genome of Serratia symbiotica from the aphid Cinara tujafilina zooms in on the process of accommodation to a cooperative intracellular life. Genome Biol Evol 6:1683–1698. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Halter T, Köstlbacher S, Collingro A, Sixt BS, Tönshoff ER, Hendrickx F, Kostanjšek R, Horn M. 2022. Ecology and evolution of chlamydial symbionts of arthropods. ISME Commun 2:45. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00124-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clayton AL, Oakeson KF, Gutin M, Pontes A, Dunn DM, von Niederhausern AC, Weiss RB, Fisher M, Dale C. 2012. A novel human-infection-derived bacterium provides insights into the evolutionary origins of mutualistic insect-bacterial symbioses. PLoS Genet 8:e1002990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Belda E, Moya A, Bentley S, Silva FJ. 2010. Mobile genetic element proliferation and gene inactivation impact over the genome structure and metabolic capabilities of Sodalis glossinidius, the secondary endosymbiont of tsetse flies. BMC Genomics 11:449. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hurst GDD, Frost CL. 2015. Reproductive parasitism: maternally inherited symbionts in a biparental world. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7:a017699. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a017699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tram U, Ferree PM, Sullivan W. 2003. Identification of Wolbachia-host interacting factors through cytological analysis. Microbes Infect 5:999–1011. doi: 10.1016/s1286-4579(03)00192-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hunter MS, Perlman SJ, Kelly SE. 2003. A bacterial symbiont in the Bacteroidetes induces cytoplasmic incompatibility in the parasitoid wasp Encarsia pergandiella. Proc Biol Sci 270:2185–2190. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zchori-Fein E, Gottlieb Y, Kelly SE, Brown JK, Wilson JM, Karr TL, Hunter MS. 2001. A newly discovered bacterium associated with parthenogenesis and a change in host selection behavior in parasitoid wasps. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12555–12560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.221467498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Weeks AR, Breeeuwer JAJ. 2003. A new bacterium from the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides phylum that causes sex-ratio distortion, p 165–176. In Bourtzis K, Miller TA (ed), Insect Symbiosis, 1st ed Boca Raton, Florida. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Penz T, Schmitz-Esser S, Kelly SE, Cass BN, Müller A, Woyke T, Malfatti SA, Hunter MS, Horn M. 2012. Comparative genomics suggests an independent origin of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Cardinium hertigii. PLoS Genet 8:e1003012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Siozios S, Pilgrim J, Darby AC, Baylis M, Hurst GDD. 2019. The draft genome of strain cCpun from biting midges confirms insect Cardinium are not a monophyletic group and reveals a novel gene family expansion in a symbiont. PeerJ 7:e6448. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Santos-Garcia D, Rollat-Farnier PA, Beitia F, Zchori-Fein E, Vavre F, Mouton L, Moya A, Latorre A, Silva FJ. 2014. The genome of Cardinium cBtQ1 provides insights into genome reduction, symbiont motility, and its settlement in Bemisia tabaci. Genome Biol Evol 6:1013–1030. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendrickx F, De Corte Z, Sonet G, Van Belleghem SM, Köstlbacher S, Vangestel C. 2022. A masculinizing supergene underlies an exaggerated male reproductive morph in a spider. Nat Ecol Evol 6:195–206. doi: 10.1038/s41559-021-01626-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Halter T, Köstlbacher S, Rattei T, Hendrickx F, Manzano-Marín A, Horn M. 2022. One to host them all: genomics of the diverse bacterial endosymbionts of the spider Oedothorax gibbosus. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2022.05.31.494226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boratyn GM, Schäffer AA, Agarwala R, Altschul SF, Lipman DJ, Madden TL. 2012. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol Direct 7:12. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong SY, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nawrocki EP, Eddy SR. 2013. Infernal 1.1: 100-fold faster RNA homology searches. Bioinformatics 29:2933–2935. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kalvari I, Nawrocki EP, Ontiveros-Palacios N, Argasinska J, Lamkiewicz K, Marz M, Griffiths-Jones S, Toffano-Nioche C, Gautheret D, Weinberg Z, Rivas E, Eddy SR, Finn RD, Bateman A, Petrov AI. 2021. Rfam 14: expanded coverage of metagenomic, viral and microRNA families. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D192–D200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chan PP, Lin BY, Mak AJ, Lowe TM. 2021. tRNAscan-SE 2.0: improved detection and functional classification of transfer RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res 49:9077–9096. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. 2006. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fattash I, Rooke R, Wong A, Hui C, Luu T, Bhardwaj P, Yang G. 2013. Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements: discovery, distribution, and activity. Genome 56:475–486. doi: 10.1139/gen-2012-0174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Download spectrum.02627-22-s0001.xls, XLS file, 0.01 MB (10KB, xls)
Fig. S1. Download spectrum.02627-22-s0002.pdf, PDF file, 0.2 MB (157KB, pdf)
Data Availability Statement
The genome annotation of the Cardinium endosymbiont of Oedothorax gibbosus strain cOegibbosus-W744x776 has been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number OW441264.

