Abstract
The complexity of affected brain regions and cell types is a challenge for Huntington’s disease (HD) treatment. Here we use single nucleus RNA sequencing to investigate molecular pathology in the cortex and striatum from R6/2 mice and human HD post-mortem tissue. We identify cell type-specific and -agnostic signatures suggesting oligodendrocytes (OLs) and oligodendrocyte precursors (OPCs) are arrested in intermediate maturation states. OL-lineage regulators OLIG1 and OLIG2 are negatively correlated with CAG length in human OPCs, and ATACseq analysis of HD mouse NeuN-negative cells shows decreased accessibility regulated by OL maturation genes. The data implicates glucose and lipid metabolism in abnormal cell maturation and identify PRKCE and Thiamine Pyrophosphokinase 1 (TPK1) as central genes. Thiamine/biotin treatment of R6/1 HD mice to compensate for TPK1 dysregulation restores OL maturation and rescues neuronal pathology. Our insights into HD OL pathology spans multiple brain regions and link OL maturation deficits to abnormal thiamine metabolism.
Subject terms: Huntington's disease, Huntington's disease, Mechanisms of disease
Here the authors evaluate single cell gene expression from mouse and human Huntington’s disease brains, finding incomplete oligodendrocyte maturation and pathways involved. Treating mice with thiamine/biotin ameliorates molecular pathology.
Introduction
Huntington disease (HD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by prominent loss of medium spiny neurons (MSN) in the striatum and cortical atrophy1. The disease, which manifests with cognitive, psychiatric and movement impairments, is caused by an autosomal dominant CAG repeat expansion in the first coding exon of the Huntingtin gene and a corresponding expanded polyglutamine repeat in the Huntingtin (HTT) protein2. Genome-wide approaches, including bulk RNA- and ChIP-sequencing, have facilitated understanding the molecular impact of mutant HTT (mHTT) expression in a variety of model systems3–6 and have suggested deficits in neurodevelopmental programs in HD3,7–9. However, bulk tissue analysis limits the understanding of cell type-specific changes. The ability to distinguish common signatures of HD across multiple cell types from those that are unique to specific cell types can facilitate our mechanistic understanding of the disease. Past studies uncover these differences by expressing mHTT using cell type-specific drivers in animal models of HD10 or using human HD induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) differentiated to specific cell types; these studies support the idea that cell type-specific effects of HD synergistically lead to pathogenesis11,12. Recent studies using single cell transcriptomics approaches also show cell type-specific neurodevelopmental impairments in HD13,14.
One such cell type are oligodendrocytes (OL) for which there has been a growing awareness that these and other OL-lineage cells, including oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs), are abnormal in HD. Prior studies focusing on HD models have shown early myelination deficits based on structural and transcriptomic data in mouse models of HD15,16, and that OL targeted mHTT expression causes HD symptoms as well as myelination deficits and altered OL maturation in mice via a mechanism involving myelin regulatory factor (Myrf)17. Myelination deficits were also evident in BACHD and R6/2 mice18,19 and OL maturation impairments, glial dysfunction20,21 and impaired OPC differentiation have been described in HD. For example, HD embryonic stem cell-derived glial progenitors transplanted into shiverer mice exhibit decreased differentiation and hypomyelination22, while another study showed that remyelination was impaired in cuprizone-treated mice, implicating abnormal OPC function in HD23, and inactivation of mHTT in OPCs prevented myelin abnormalities in HD mice11. Corroborating these findings in HD models, several studies have shown myelination and OL impairment in HD patient tissue. Bulk transcriptional studies of HD postmortem tissues revealed that MYT1L, a myelin transcription factor, and MBP were decreased in the caudate and prefrontal cortex, respectively24,25, and radiographic and neuropathological studies also reveal that OLs and myelination are abnormal (summarized in ref. 26). Neuropathologic examination of postmortem HD brains revealed a higher density than normal of OLs in the caudate nucleus27,28, including in pre-symptomatic HD patients. Stereological examinations of white matter revealed a decrease of 20–30% of the cross-sectional area of white matter in coronal levels from frontal to occipital regions29, as well as in the fornix30, in both lower and higher HD grades, suggesting that white matter loss represents an early change.
To further support these prior findings of OL maturation deficits, provide additional insight into cell type-specific versus agnostic signatures, and fill in the gaps in knowledge of key drivers that regulate OL impairments, we used single nucleus-RNAseq (snRNAseq) to obtain cell type-specific gene expression data across multiple brain regions from both the rapidly progressing R6/2 mouse model31 and human post-mortem brain samples of increasing grades of disease severity—including both adult- and juvenile-onset HD—and used these data for correlative and causal network modeling. We detail the differences in cell type-specific and agnostic gene expression changes, as well as putative causal drivers of cell type-specific transcriptomic changes. Consistent with previous literature, we find that OL-lineage cells show significant transcriptional dysregulation. We expand on these observations, finding that HD OPCs and OLs have altered the expression of development and maturation genes in both mice and human, with many HD OL-lineage cells showing intermediate states of development. Causal network modeling identified putative key drivers whose expression and extent of dysregulation was shown to correlate with the CAG repeat length in human tissue. We found that a gene central to the OPC/OL causal network, Protein kinase C epsilon (PRKCE), was downregulated in human and mouse, and we provide functional studies to clarify its role in promoting OL maturation. These findings are further supported by evidence from ATACseq and subsequent validation studies. We also identified impairments in glucose and lipid metabolism, identified as cell type-agnostic signatures, as potential drivers of this pathology. This connection to metabolism led us to find potentially unique roles for diacylglycerol (DAG), which regulates PRKCE, and for thiamine and biotin (T&B) metabolic processes in HD OL maturation impairments. Thiamine Pyrophosphokinase 1 (Tpk1), which converts thiamine into thiamine pyrophosphate, was differentially expressed in the most cell types in the 12w R6/2 mice, and both TPK1 and SLC19A2, a thiamine transporter, were downregulated in human HD. Interestingly, mutations in TPK1 or the thiamine-transporter SLC19A3 lead to thiamine pyrophosphate deficiencies and early-onset neurodegeneration with brain atrophy, basal ganglia impairment, and motor dysfunction which can be effectively treated with high dose T&B32,33. In addition, mutations in SLC19A2 lead to Roger’s syndrome, with megaloblastic anemia, thrombocytopenia, diabetes mellites, and sensorineural deafness34 and general dietary thiamine deficiencies are known to contribute to a number of neurological and psychiatric symptoms35. To further examine potential connections between early metabolic changes in HD and OL maturation, we treated R6/1 mice, which has a longer therapeutic window than R6/2 mice and also show dys-maturation signatures in a number of cell types14, with T&B and conducted snRNAseq on the striata of T&B treated and vehicle-treated mice. T&B treatment resulted in significant rescue of dys-maturation signatures in OL and neurons, and an overall decrease in the number of significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Our data provide evidence that dysregulated metabolism and metabolic genes can directly contribute to the cell maturation deficits observed in OLs and other cell types, and that diet supplementation may be a therapeutic modality for HD.
Results
Single nuclei RNAseq of R6/2 mouse model of HD
R6/2 mice are a rapidly progressing transgenic model that express mHTT exon 1 and have features in common with human symptomatic HD, including transcriptional changes31. To uncover progressive, cell type-specific, and region-specific transcriptional changes, snRNAseq was conducted on three striatal and cortical samples each from R6/2 and non-transgenic (NT) mice at 8w and 12w of age (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a see “Methods”). snRNAseq data were also generated and analyzed from human HD and control brains (Fig. 1a, e and Supplementary Fig. 1b, c described below). Unsupervised clustering identified 13 clusters in the 8w and 12w striatal samples, and 18 and 16 clusters in the 8w and 12w cortical samples, respectively (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1a), which we annotated using known cell type gene markers (Supplementary Fig. 1d). R6/2 and NT cells clearly separate in some of the clusters, such as the 12w D1 + MSNs, which corresponded to a large number of DEGs between the two conditions (Fig. 1b–d and Supplementary Data 1). We also identified DEGs in the excitatory (Ex) and inhibitory (Inhib) neurons, astrocyte (Astro), OLs, and OPC clusters (Fig. 1c). Minimal to no changes were seen in the microglia (MG), vascular cells, and cholinergic neurons (Fig. 1c). These clusters had the smallest number of cells and therefore could lack the power required to identify statistical differences. Regional differences are reflected in the number of cell type-specific DEGs across both regions (Fig. 1c). When we combined all data from both ages and regions, we found no clustering differences for each cell type between age and region, except for cell types that were specific to either the striatum or cortex, e.g., MSNs in the striatum (Supplementary Fig. 1e). The only differences between the age groups were seen as a slight shift within cluster between the 8w and 12w OLs.
Gene ontology (GO36) enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses were used to investigate the biological implications of the cell type-specific DEGs. The top 10 significant terms revealed that the majority of DEGs, regardless of cell type, are involved in neuronal related functions, including neurogenesis, synaptic function, and glutamate-related signaling (Supplementary Fig. 2a), but certain cell types were enriched for unique terms such as RNA processing in inhibitory neurons. We also identified common terms related to “developmental process” in the cell types with the most DEGs, such as in OLs and OPCs. Similar to the GO analysis data there were recurring KEGG pathways across regions, ages, and cell types as well as sets of unique pathways that group together (Supplementary Fig. 2b). We also identified cell type-agnostic DEGs that were common to both glia and neurons. Figure 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3a show the top multi-cluster DEGs identified in at least 50% of the cell types/clusters per tissue region and age. Many DEGs across both glia and neurons are involved in RNA processing and splicing, and metabolism. KEGG pathway analysis also highlighted glucose metabolic pathways, many of which appeared in the earlier 8w samples (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The dysregulated metabolic genes were found to be in or downstream of the glucose super metabolism pathway that includes glycolysis, the hexosamine biosynthetic, polyol, and diacylglycerol pathways, including Tpk1 that happened to be dysregulated across the most cell types in the 12w striatum (Fig. 2a). Moreover, Tpk1 was also among the top dysregulated genes in the 12w cortex, and another glycolytic gene, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 1 (Gpi1), was one of the top multi-cluster DEGs in both 8w striatum and cortex (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 3a). Both metabolic genes are upregulated in R6/2. We investigated whether there was an enrichment for KEGG metabolic genes in the DEGs and which metabolic pathways were most impacted Fig. 2b, 12w striatum and Supplementary Fig. 3b. Tpk1, Ogt, Dgkx genes, and Galnt13, found in sub-pathways related to glucose and lipid metabolism, are among the most commonly dysregulated genes in all cell types.
Taken together, these data indicate that developmental genes, RNA processing, and glucose and lipid metabolism may be core, cell type-agnostic signatures, while cell type-specific changes are more related to cell functions and identity. Further, OPCs and OLs show massive transcriptional dysregulation that includes both developmental genes and functional genes such as MBP.
R6/2 OPCs are committed to maturation while OLs appear transcriptionally less mature than NT OLs
Given the changes in developmental genes in OPC and OLs, and the unique embedding of R6/2 cells right between the OPC and OL clusters (Fig. 1), we investigated whether these cells might represent intermediate maturation cell states between OPCs and OLs. The OL-OPC data were subclustered, revealing six clusters in the 12w striatum and five clusters in the 8w striatum, 8w cortex, and 12w cortex. Each cluster represented distinct populations of OPCs or OLs comprised of R6/2 and/or NT (Fig. 2c (12wk striatum), and Supplementary Fig. 3c–e, integrated data cross regions, and ages are described in supplementary results and Supplementary Data 2). These subclustered data were then further annotated based on the gene expression markers and annotations defined by Marques and Zeisel et al.37 as OPCs, committed oligodendrocyte precursors (COP), newly formed oligodendrocytes (NFOL), myelin-forming oligodendrocytes (MFOL), or mature oligodendrocytes (MOL) (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3c). The relative proportions of R6/2 and NT cells in each cell stage and DEG analyses revealed that R6/2 OPCs (OPC & COP) and OLs (NFOL, MFOL, and MOL), at both ages and in both anatomic regions have changes in expression that suggest developmental/maturation impairments. DEGs included: Mog, Mag, Mbp, Opalin, microtubule genes, and genes involved in OL maturation, function, and myelination (Supplementary Data 1 and Supplementary Fig. 3e). DEGs involved in glucose and lipid metabolism were also found in OPCs and OLs, including upregulation of Tpk1. Pseudotime analysis38 further suggested that most R6/2 cells were in transitional cell states between OPCs (pseudotime 0) and MOLs (pseudotime 30+), with many HD cells found in the COP cluster and a cluster of NFOL, while NT cells were mostly either OPCs, MFOL, or MOLs (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Fig. 3c–f, these results are further described in the Supplementary Results).
The downregulation of mature OL genes in the R6/2 cells and the distribution of R6/2 cells in intermediate stages of OL differentiation suggests states of abnormal maturation (Fig. 2d) and implies that OPC maturation and subsequent OL differentiation is impaired in R6/2 mice.
Causal network modeling (CNM) identifies disrupted gene expression networks in R6/2 mice and reveals potential cell type-specific mechanisms of transcriptional change
To investigate disruptions in cell type-specific gene networks in HD, and identify potential key driver genes, we utilized weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA39) and Bayesian causal network modeling (Fig. 1a) to identify causal relationships between genes identified as cell type-specific DEGs and genes correlated within WGCNA network modules40–42. After feature selection (“Methods”), we used WGCNA and ran a signed network analysis using cells from all NT samples; 6 gene co-expression modules were detected across cortical and striatal tissues at both ages (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Data 3, and Supplementary Fig. 4). Trait-module correlation analyses showed that our modules were correlated to specific cell types (Fig. 3a). The yellow module positively correlated with neuronal cell types and negatively correlated with glia, and the red, turquoise, green, brown, and blue modules positively correlated with Ex, MSNs, MG, Astros, and OLs, respectively. GO enrichment analysis of gene module members showed enrichment for terms related to each cell type (Fig. 3b). For example, the OL-correlated blue module was enriched for myelination-related terms. Except for the green module, each module was significantly enriched for DEGs determined using the hypergeometric test (Supplementary Fig. 5a and Supplementary Data 3), suggesting that these gene networks are relevant to the disease state and become impacted as the disease progresses. The connectivity of the top module members rank-ordered by eigengene-based connectivity (kME) revealed significant alterations (Fig. 3c).
To understand the potential cell type-specific causal connections between these genes we applied a Bayesian causal network modeling approach (see “Methods”), using the cell x gene data matrix which was filtered and run for each individual cell type and used for network structure learning. Gene features were selected as input by using only that cell type’s DEGs and gene members from the correlated WGCNA module (Fig. 4a, b, Supplementary Fig. 5b–d, and Supplementary Data 4). We explored the MSN and OPC/OL bayes nets (bnets) in detail for two reasons: (1) since MSN are the most studied cell type in HD the bnet should recapitulate previous findings and also reveal both known and undefined interactions between known dysregulated genes, providing validation for our approach, and (2) both cell types were the most impacted in our mouse model (total number of DEG) with the OPCs and OLs showing the largest number of DEGs that suggested developmental deficits. The merged NT and R6/2 bnets per each cell type are shown in Fig. 4a, b. We enlarged genes that represent key drivers (hub genes with high outward centrality, or genes connecting 2 hubs) which are potentially causal regulators of downstream nodes.
The MSN bnet includes genes involved in MSN development/identity, function, and genes implicated in HD, including Ebf1, a key driver identified in the R6/2 bnet (yellow edges) and involved in striato-nigral MSN development43,44. Genes of the indirect pathway in D2 + MSNs, including Adora2a, Drd2, and Penk, were all downregulated and only show NT causal interactions (purple edges), indicating a loss of function of these genes45. Furthermore, Drd2 is a parent node of Penk, which is not only a downstream target of Drd2 signaling and dysregulated in HD14, but is transcriptionally regulated by Drd2 expression through dopamine-induced activation46, thus validating the approach.
We next explored the OPC/OL bnet (Fig. 4b) and found Prkce, Sgk1, Zbtb16 and Tnr as key drivers. Prkce is functionally regulated by DAG and transcriptionally by Zbtb1647, a zinc finger binding protein that is involved on OL maturation and myelination, is found downstream of Adipor2, an adiponectin receptor that regulates glucose and lipid metabolism. Downstream of Zbtb16 is serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase 1 (Sgk1), which is normally upregulated in OLs during cellular stress and regulates many ion channels and solute carrier proteins involved in metabolic pathways and glucose uptake (e.g., ref. 48), such as GLUT1, GLUT4, and glutamate transporters. Sgk1 is downregulated in R6/2 mice indicating a potential loss of function in HD—see supplementary results for additional validation studies. Exploration of downstream nodes reveals a connection between Smarca2, which is a protein in the SWI/SNF family involved in gene expression and chromatin remodeling in OLs, and Prkce. Smarca2 (BRM) and Smarca4 (BRG1) play roles in OPC and OL development, including promoting OPC differentiation49,50. The majority of the outward edges from key drivers are NT specific, indicating a loss of causal connection to downstream nodes in the R6/2 mice. Transcription regulator analysis of the network gene members using LISA51 revealed the network is enriched for targets of Smarca4, and Olig2, as well as other regulators previously highlighted for HD, including Suz12, Fos, and Mefc2 (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Data 4).
Finally, to complement these findings using a completely different knowledge-driven approach, and provide additional interpretability, we also included cell type-specific gene regulon network analysis using IRIS352. This analysis identifies predicted transcriptional regulators from prior knowledge which we then used to overlay onto our data driven causal network (Supplementary Fig. 5e, Supplementary Data 4). We found a significant enrichment of genes and regulons already within our causal network (p < 2.373e−201, exact hypergeometric probability), and many connections between several of these regulons, including OLIG2, and our key drivers. ELF5 and E2F3, which were two regulons predicted from the IRIS3 analysis, both regulate Prkce and have previously been implicated in OPC maturation and HD transcriptional dysregulation5,53. These findings further validate the causal networks and together these data suggest an interconnected process between OPC/OL development and lipid and glucose metabolism and known HD-related genes.
MG, Astro, and Ex neuron bnets are described in the supplementary results.
ATACseq of glial-enriched nuclei identifies regulators underlying transcriptional pathology in HD glia
To understand the drivers of gene expression changes in non-neuronal cells (e.g., glia) versus neurons, and validate the transcriptional regulator analyses (LISA & IRIS3), we performed ATACseq on NeuN+ and NeuN- sorted nuclei from both the striatum and cortex of the same R6/2 mouse cohort (Supplementary Fig. 6a and Supplementary Data 5). The neuronal protein NeuN is localized in the nuclei and perinuclear cytoplasm of most neurons. We performed footprinting analysis using the ATACseq data and TOBIAS54 which revealed developmental changes in the glia-enriched NeuN- data (Fig. 4d (12w striatum) and Supplementary Fig. 6b, and Supplementary Data 5), and enrichment for immediate early genes in the neuron-enriched NeuN+ data. Among the top 20 TFs in the NeuN- data that showed differential binding between R6/2 and NT, we found Sox9 and 10 were significantly decreased in the 8wk striatal data, and Olig1 and Olig2 decreased in the 12wk striatal data. Interestingly, when all the samples were grouped and we compared the top 20 up and down TFs per an age and region, there were some overlapping TFs between the 12w cortical and both striatal samples, but these were in opposite directions (e.g., Hes1 and Zbtb14, Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). The 8w cortical samples had the least similarities compared to all other regions and ages (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c) and showed a number of HOX genes within the top 20 TFs with reduced binding. The cortical data showed differential binding of other known HD genes such as Egr1 and Sp1.
Since we did not have ATACseq data from our human samples we next conducted global chromatin accessibility prediction using our human snRNAseq data and the BIRD tool55. BIRD analysis revealed differential peaks at genes important for OPC/OL maturation, such as SMARCA4, which were dysregulated in the snRNAseq data in both mouse and human samples (Supplementary Fig. 6a).
Independently, both analyses of ATACseq data suggest maturation impairments in HD OPC/OLs. Together with the snRNAseq data, a coordinated network of regulators and downstream effectors that implicate known OL developmental genes (e.g., SMARCA4 and Olig2), and other potential regulators (e.g., PRKCE) is observed.
Single nucleus RNAseq from HD and control cingulate, caudate, and nucleus accumbens identifies several heterogeneous OL lineage cells and altered maturation states
Given the altered gene expression in OL lineage cells in R6/2 mice, we investigated whether mHTT expression also impacted gene expression in OPCs and OLs in human HD post-mortem tissue. snRNAseq was carried out on 66 samples from 29 donors (3 grade I, 4 grade II, 4 grade III, 3 grade IV, 5 juvenile-onset HD, and 10 matched controls—the demographics of whom are outlined in Supplementary Data 6). To define the pathology in different brain regions, we microdissected the cingulate cortex, the caudate, and the nucleus accumbens from frozen brain tissue as outlined in Fig. 1a. All major lineages were identified in the 290525 nuclei analyzed (Supplementary Fig. 1e). Projection of nuclei in UMAP space shows that nuclei of the same lineages largely occupy neighboring space (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e (tSNE)), without distinct donor or batch related colocalization after correcting for batch effects (Supplementary Fig. 7a, b). We detected changes in gene expression in all cell types; for this study, we focused on cells of the OL lineage.
We focused on OLs and OPCs (Fig. 5a, b) and analyzed 80199 OL and 13844 OPC nuclei in isolation from other lineages. Projecting OL and OPC in their own reduced dimension space (PHATE reduction—see “Methods”) shows a continuous trajectory from OPCs to OLs, and separation between HD and control nuclei (Fig. 5a, b). To examine the differentiation states of these cells, using well-established methods56, we calculated the relative ordering of cells along a pseudotime dimension (Fig. 5c). Similar to our mouse data, examination of pseudotime values per anatomic region in control, grades I–III HD, and Juvenile onset HD nuclei show altered maturation states across brain regions and grade in HD. That is, across all brain regions examined, HD nuclei showed a relatively larger proportion of cells with intermediate pseudotime values compared with controls, which is more pronounced with increasing HD grade, particularly in HD grade 3. Conversely, in juvenile onset HD (HDJ), the effect was less appreciable in the cingulate cortex, and more pronounced in the striatum, with the majority of caudate and accumbens OPCs showing intermediate pseudotime values (Fig. 5d). The results suggest that HD maturation pathology is at least partially progressive with HD grade, and that HDJ maturation pathology affects mainly OPCs.
We next performed unbiased sub-clustering of OL and OPC nuclei and identified 7 sub-clusters (Fig. 5e). Most subclusters contained a mix of cells from all three regions (Fig. 5f) and HD grades (Fig. 5g, h), although in clusters 4 and 6 most nuclei were derived from the cingulate, and in clusters 1, 3, and 7 caudate nuclei represented the largest proportion (Fig. 5g). Most clusters contained mixtures of nuclei from both HD and controls, but a number showed a preponderance of one or the other (Fig. 5h) with the caveat that our dataset harbored relatively larger numbers of HD nuclei versus control (Con 17955, HD 76088). With that caveat, Cluster 2 was mostly composed of HDJ nuclei, while cluster 6 was composed of a preponderance of HD3 nuclei (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Examination of select gene markers shows that clusters 4 and 5 represent OPCs with relatively high expression of OPC markers TNR and DSCAM (Fig. 5i and Supplementary Fig. 7d) and low expression of gene markers for mature OLs. Compared to cluster 5, cluster 4 shows lower expression of OPC genes BCAN, VCAN, PDGFRA, and CSPG4, but a higher proportion of cells with TCF7L2 expression, suggesting this cluster represents differentiation committed OPCs57 (Supplementary Fig 7d). Conversely, clusters 1, 2, 3, and 7 show relatively high expression of OL genes CNP, PLP1, and MBP (Fig. 5i). Among the former, cluster 2 shows the highest expression levels of OPALIN and MOG, suggesting it is most mature (myelinating). Cluster 7 showed expression of both OL genes (although at comparatively lower levels) and the OPC gene DSCAM and is interpreted as an intermediate state between OL and OPC lineages. Likewise, cluster 6 showed expression of the immature OL gene CA2 as well as other OL genes including APOD, PTGDS, and CRYAB, but not myelin genes. It is thus also interpreted as immature OL. Interestingly, the HD-enriched clusters 1, 2, and 7 showed higher expression levels of KIRREL3 compared with the control-enriched cluster 3. KIRREL3 is a gene shown to be highly expressed in OL residing in chronic inactive lesions of multiple sclerosis57, and was identified as a key driver in our causal network model. The cluster markers are provided in Supplementary Data 7.
These data show a progressive loss of OL maturation in HD that spans different brain regions. but appears more pronounced in the striatum. The data also suggests similar mechanisms between the mouse and human HD samples, showing differential expression of previously described key drivers, but also unique features of human HD OLs with immune-related genes changes.
Differential gene expression analysis reveals further differences between HD and control OLs
We next identified significant DEGs between HD and control OL and OPC nuclei in different regions; the number of significant DEGs unique to and shared by respective anatomic regions is shown in Venn diagrams for OLs (Fig. 6a and Supplementary Data 8) and OPCs (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Data 8). Given that the neurodegeneration is detected in the caudate nucleus at the earliest stages of HD and that pathology in the nucleus accumbens and cortex is typically seen in more advanced disease, we reasoned that comparing DEGs in these regions is informative in the following ways: (1) DEGs that are shared among the caudate, accumbens, and cingulate likely represent pervasive or core transcriptional pathology in different anatomic regions regardless of disease severity. (2) DEGs shared between the relatively preserved nucleus accumbens and less severely affected cingulate cortex likely represent early pathologic alterations that may be compensatory in early stages of the disease and are lost in more advanced stages. This does not preclude the possibility that any number of these DEGs may represent cell-autonomous changes due to mHTT in OL and OPCs.
With this insight, examination of significant DEGs in these regions highlights a number of themes; first, myelin related and OL identity genes (e.g.,MAG, MBP, MOBP, MOG, OPALIN, PLP1, CNP, and OLIG1 and OLIG2) were downregulated in OLs of all areas in HD, (Supplementary Data 8). This was reflected in a negative enrichment of the GO myelination in HD OL’s across all three brain regions (Fig. 6c). Second, multiple heat shock encoding and heat shock response genes were increased across all anatomic regions, suggesting widespread, pervasive pathology in HD OLs (Supplementary Data 8). Multiple metallothionein genes (e.g., MT2A, MT3, MT1X, MT1M, and MT1E) were also increased in all brain regions in HD (Supplementary Data 8). SPP1, which encodes a secreted protein that is increased in demyelination and remyelination58, was also increased in all these regions. CA2, a gene encoding a carbonic anhydrase enzyme expressed in immature OL and mature OLs but not OPCs59, was increased in cingulate OLs (validated in Supplementary Fig. 8b–e).
To determine whether similar metabolic genes were dysregulated in our human OPC and OLs that were found in our mouse data, we overlapped human OPC and OL DEGs with the dysregulated metabolic genes in the 12w striatum data and found a large overlap with these DEGs (Supplementary Fig. 8a) including DGKx, GALNTx genes, PTGDS, and TPK1. Furthermore, several DEGs shared between the accumbens and cingulate OLs were related to metabolism, including adipogenesis (ARL4A, COQ3, CHUK, ABCA1, GBE1, and ME1—increased in HD OLs), fatty acid metabolism (EVOVL2 and PLA2G6—decreased in HD OLs), and pyruvate metabolism (pyruvate kinase M1/M2 PKM - decreased in HD OLs). These results implicate metabolic pathways, including lipid and glucose metabolism in HD pathology (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Data 8). The involvement of immune genes we observed in HD-enriched clusters is also reflected in the enrichment of immune-related ontologies in the HD OLs DEGs, including NFKB activation and inflammasome (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Data 8). Similar to the mouse data, we also see terms related to nervous system development, ion channels, and cell adhesion (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Data 8).
These results confirmed the pseudotime analysis showing a decrease in OL maturation in HD. Downregulation of OL-specific functional genes and a significant enrichment of metabolic genes, similarly identified in our mouse data, suggest a common theme and possible connection between metabolic processes and OL development in HD.
Dysregulated gene expression is related to numbers of CAG repeats
The length of CAG repeats varied among our donors, and even between regions in the same donor (Supplementary Data 6). To determine if any of the OL or OPC genes varied as a function of the numbers of CAG repeats, we conducted a regression analysis with gene expression as response variable and CAG repeats as explanatory variable. We collapsed cells from each sample and used the pseudobulk samples as input for the regression analysis, corrected for batch and brain region, and only extracted the significant CAG coefficients (Supplementary Data 7). A number of genes showed significant correlations between expression and CAG repeat lengths, some in OPCs or OLs or both (Fig. 6d). Among genes with negative correlations in OPCs are transcription factors OLIG1 and OLIG2, ASCL1, SOX2, and SOX4, which play roles in OL-lineage development, along with IGF2R, suggesting that progression through the OL lineage is further inhibited with longer repeat length. Indeed, OPC lineage genes including OPCML and CSPG4 were negatively correlated with CAG repeat length (Fig. 6d). Moreover, PTGDS, a cluster 6 marker, had the most negative coefficients in both OPCs and OLs as a function of CAG repeat length, implicating prostaglandin synthesis in the severity of HD pathology. Some of these genes also were identified in our OL bnet as key drivers, including: SGK1, TNR, and NAV3 (Fig. 4b). We also investigated KEGG and REAC pathways that were enriched in genes correlated with CAG repeat lengths (Fig. 6e and Supplementary Data 7). Among the pathways that are enriched in OLs with increasing repeat lengths are those of inflammation, which is more pronounced in human brain than in the mice, sphingolipid signaling, and ERK2 activation, known to control myelination60. Both OLs and OPCs show enrichment in genes related to glutamatergic synapses and ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. When we examined the OL genes with negative coefficients, we found that a number of them are involved in cholesterol metabolism including (DHCR7, DHCR24, ABCA2, and ACAT2 – Supplementary Data 7), which further implicates lipid metabolism as central to OL pathology in HD.
Validation of OL pathology in human HD and mouse data
Many genes that regulate OL maturation or were identified as key regulators were similarly dysregulated in HD patient and mouse data including: MOBP, MAL, CLDN11, MBP, OLIG1, OPALIN, PRKCE, and SMARCA2 (Fig. 7a). We performed WB analysis to confirm dysregulation of key genes PRKCE and TPK1. Additional investigation and validation of OL genes and other metabolic genes was also conducted (Supplementary results and Fig. 8). Protein levels of PRKCE, and phospho-PRKCE were significantly decreased in the cingulate and caudate of HD brains and the cortex and striatum in the 12w R6/2 mice (Fig. 7b–e). Both species showed an increase in PRKCE RNA levels, opposite of the protein data. The ratio of p-PRKCE to PRKCE was not altered though, suggesting that reduction in active PRKCE is related to reduced protein levels (Fig. 7b–e).
Since TPK1 was found to be dysregulated in both mouse (up) and human (down) data at the RNA level in OLs and OPCs, we assessed the protein levels of the monomer and active dimer form of TPK1. Figure 7f, g shows a decrease of TPK1 (monomer and dimer) in HD patient tissue with HD grades 3 & 4 (At adjusted p-value <0.1 for 3, and <0.05 for 4), and in juvenile HD (adjusted p < 0.05), consistent with RNA expression data, whereas TPK1 dimer is increased in the R6/2 striatum (Fig. 7d, e). The mouse and human data are discordant from each other which may indicate a loss of function of expression in humans and compensatory increase in the mice or other unknown mechanism. Nonetheless, the data confirms that TPK1 is dysregulated in both human HD and murine model of HD.
Given the potential contribution of DAG to OL development and as a substrate of PRKCE—a central hub of the OL causal network, we evaluated DAG levels using lipidomic profiling of control brain versus HD in the cingulate. A significant decrease in DAG levels was observed in juvenile HD brain as well as grade 2 HD brains relative to controls (Fig. 7h). These data support the hypothesis that glucose and lipid metabolism, and specifically DAG signaling, potentially through PRKCE, could be playing an important role in the OPC/OL maturation changes we see between HD and control patients. This is further supported by the reduction in TPK1 in HD brains due to the involvement of thiamine in the production of acetyl-CoA, which is then used during DAG formation. Given this finding along with the results demonstrating the reduction of PRKCE in human tissue, together with the causal network analysis placing PRKCE at the top of the OL/OPC network upstream to several maturation genes, we hypothesized that it played an important role in promoting OL differentiation. To test this hypothesis, we knocked down Prkce in primary murine OPC cultures, and differentiated these cells into OLs. The cultures expressed OLIG2, and OLs expressed CNPase. Compared with scrambled siRNA, siRNA specific to Prkce effectively knocked down the protein (Fig. 7i). The levels of MOG were significantly increased by Prkce knockdown, supporting that the downregulation of Prkce leads to increased OL differentiation. Thus, the loss of PRKCE—as seen in our western blot data—in both human and mouse HD OPCs/OLs—would lead to increased OPC commitment to differentiation and an increase in COP cells, seen in our snRNAseq data.
These results provide validation of our causal network approach to identify key regulatory genes, and suggests important roles for glucose, thiamine, and lipid metabolism, through DAG and PRKCE, in regulating OL maturation in HD.
High Dose thiamine and biotin rescues transcriptional dysregulation in neurons and altered OL and OPC developmental genes in a mouse model of HD
Given that both mouse and human data showed alterations in TPK1 and SLC19A2, and these may regulate PRKCE thorough DAG, we hypothesized that altered signaling due to TPP deficiencies may be contributing to gene expression and cell maturation differences. We, therefore, tested whether high doses of thiamine and biotin (T&B) treatment, similar to that used to treat HD-like phenocopy diseases such as biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease33, would rescue gene expression changes including OL maturation genes. Furthermore, due to the discordant RNA expression changes in our mouse and human data we speculate that the increase in TPK1 was compensatory in the HD mouse model. Considering TPK1 was only increased at 12w and not 8w, we suspect that these compensatory changes are responding to earlier metabolic changes and tested whether targeting thiamine metabolism at a relatively early timepoint prior to any documented changes in TPK1 expression61, would rescue the dys-maturation. For this study, R6/1 mice were used given symptoms are delayed by several weeks relative to R6/2 mice31, thus allowing a greater window to observe effects of a given treatment. R6/1 and NT mice (8w-old) were treated with vehicle or T&B for 7wks to a time point at which transcriptional changes are observed, before striatal tissue was collected and analyzed using snRNAseq (Fig. 8a). MSNs, inhibitory neurons, OPCs, OL, and Astros showed the most DEGs between R6/1 and NT vehicle-treated mice (Supplementary Data 10). Comparing R6/2 and R6/1 DEGs for each cell type, we found high correlation between HD models and a significant overlap in DEGs, including between OPC and OL maturation genes (Fig. 8b) supporting the use of R6/1 mice for the supplementation study. When we evaluated DEGs between R6/1T&B treated and vehicle-treated mice (treatment effect), for each cell type, there was a significant overlap of genes impacted by T&B treatment and genotype DEGs (Fig. 8b). Figure 8c shows a scatterplot of the overlapping DEGs between the T&B treatment effect (R6/1 + T&B vs R6/1 + vehicle) and the genotype DEGs (R6/1 vs NT) for each cell type, which shows significant discordance between the genotype DEGs and the treatment DEGs, indicating rescue of these transcriptional alterations. This translated into a decrease in the number of significant DEGs detected for each cell type ((R6/1 + T&B vs NT) compared to (R6/1 + Vehicle vs NT)), except for the Ex neurons which actually had an increase in DEGs (Fig. 8d). Interestingly, the cell types with the most genes rescued by T&B treatment (discordant values) were OL-lineage cells and Adarb2+ interneurons that represent inhibitory neuron subcluster 1 (Inhib1 (Fig. 8a)). Based on the reduction of DEGs detected, OL, MSNs, Interneurons, Astros, and OPC all had a large decrease in the number of DEGs detected (115, 176, 378, 129, and 82 DEGs, respectively). Within the OPCs and OLs there was significant rescue of maturation-related DEGs Clnd11 and Mal, and a further increase of Neat1, which was increased in caudate-parenchymal human HD OLs, and is upregulated during OL maturation. Several genes that correlated with CAG repeat length, e.g., Ptgds, Phgdh, and Tmtc2, were rescued by T&B treatment. GO enrichment analysis also revealed the molecular functions of the genotype DEGs that were rescued from T&B treatment (Fig. 8e). In Astrocytes there was a significant rescue of iron metabolism-related genes, Ex neurons showed rescue of neuroligin binding and calcium signaling, and the MSNs showed rescue of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity, GABA receptor activity, calcium transport, creatine kinase activity, and electron transport chain genes. Similar to MSNs, the inhibitory neurons showed rescue of calcium-related genes, cyclic phosphodiesterase activity, and creatine kinase activity, but also showed unique terms such as glutamate receptor activity, LDL binding, neurotrophic TRK receptor, and fructose binding. Lastly, the OPCs and OLs showed rescue of glutamate receptor activity, RNA binding, creatine kinase activity, calcium-related genes, and GTP binding.
These results (a) support the hypothesis that common metabolic changes across cell types in HD contribute to driving cell type-specific transcriptional changes and that (b) specifically thiamine metabolism deficits may be contributing to OL maturation deficits.
Discussion
The studies above describe a systematic and in-depth analysis of single cell transcriptomics of HD mouse models and human patient brains leveraging CNM to implicate key drivers of gene expression pathology. Using snRNAseq, we identified dysregulated genes across multiple cell types and cell type-specific changes that may drive the functional changes seen in each cell type. In addition to specific changes in neurons, such as D1 and D2 MSNs, a large number of changes were seen in the OL lineage that related to development and maturation processes. We defined a progressive dys-maturation phenotype that spans multiple brain regions in both human and mouse HD. CNM identified potential key genes and molecules with putative causal roles in cell type-specific alterations, several of which were connected to metabolic functions, cell maturation, and OL/OPC-identity genes. This includes PRKCE, a signaling protein regulated by DAG, which causally interacts with SMARCA2 and OLIG2, both important in OL maturation. Functional studies validated PRKCE’s role in promoting OL maturation. ATACseq data provided further validation demonstrating decreased accessibility for genes regulated by known OL developmental TFs (SOX9 and 10, OLIG1 and 2, and ASCL1)62, further implicating abnormalities in OL differentiation in HD. These data provided a framework to build targeted therapeutics, as illustrated by treatment with T&B that restored many of the maturation and transcriptional deficits and provides further validation of our approach.
Recent single nuclei studies identified common and cell type-specific transcriptional alterations in R6/2 and Q175 HD mouse models that were recapitulated in postmortem HD human caudate and putamen14,63, showing cell-type specific alterations in HD. In MSNs, mitochondrial dysfunction underlay a detrimental innate immune response14. Striatal OLs showed decreased expression of several markers, however, the correlation between mouse and human OL signatures was low in this case. Here, we show that OLs are increased in the human cingulate and caudate, and mouse and human OL show similar transcriptional dysregulation and reduced maturation. HD OLs are transcriptionally immature across multiple human and mouse brain regions. The fact that this phenotype spans the severely affected caudate, moderately involved cingulate, and the relatively preserved nucleus accumbens suggests that the deficits are independent of disease severity or anatomic region. Nonetheless, our data shows that impaired OL maturation is progressive with HD grade, and that in juvenile-onset HD, the maturation deficits largely involve OPCs. This was supported by ATACseq results demonstrating reduced binding of OL developmental TFs.
A caveat of our ATACseq analysis is that we FACS-sorted nuclei using NeuN. While this enriches for neurons in the sorted fraction, and glia in the flowthrough fraction, the analysis is limited by the sensitivity and specificity of the antibody we used. It is also known that not all neurons express NeuN64. Thus, our NeuN- fraction may still contain NeuN negative neurons. Furthermore, the NeuN- fraction may contain other non-glial cells such as endothelial cells. These caveats would be circumvented by the use of single cell ATACseq, a future direction for this study. That being said, our NeuN- fraction showed high read densities over the Olig2 gene, which indicates that we indeed represented OL-lineage cells in the dataset.
The OL lineage pathology may reflect both a maturational deficiency and an inability to turn over myelin components. We suggest that OL defects start during the development of OLs from OPCs, which is consistent with previous studies22. In our human data, this finding was most pronounced in juvenile-onset HD, where maturational deficits appear to almost entirely involve OPCs, based on the pseudotime analysis. We speculate this may arise from the longer CAG repeat lengths in juvenile-onset HD, and the fact that HTT is expressed more highly in OPCs compared to OLs65. Other studies suggest that MYRF plays a role in OL maturational defects, Huang et al. showed that mHTT binds to MYRF and downregulates myelin genes17. MYRF is positively regulated by CHD7, which is regulated by OLIG249—a master regulator of OL identity and a gene our results implicate in HD pathology. Finally, if the accumulation of mHTT downregulates the transcription of myelin genes, it may inhibit the ability of already myelinating OLs to produce myelin components during their normal turnover, thus leading to a progressive loss of myelin.
Metabolic disturbances in HD are hypothesized to lead directly to cellular distress, but less is known about their contributions towards epigenetic regulation, transcriptional deficits, and impact on cell maturation and identity. Both mouse and human snRNAseq data show dysregulation of key genes related to glucose and lipid metabolism that include genes that are within or downstream of several key metabolic pathways, including glycolysis, DAG, and hexosamine and protein glycosylation. Additionally, we show that DAG lipids, which activate PRKCE, were decreased in HD brains. Interestingly, protein kinase C signaling has been shown to be important to OPC differentiation, and myelination66–69. We found PRKCE levels to be decreased in HD, and that downregulating PRKCE in OPCs in vitro leads to increased differentiation of OLs. Further determination of the mechanism underlying these findings is the subject of future studies. Moreover, appropriate glucose metabolism is critical for the proper development and function of OLs, as OPCs transition to myelinating OLs70–73. Finally, thiamine metabolism is linked to OL differentiation based on evidence from deficient pyruvate dehydrogenase function in humans, which is known to cause structural white matter abnormalities74, and experimental evidence from pyruvate-dehydrogenase deficient mice, which show a reduction of O4-positive OL/OPCs75.
TPK1 is a highly dysregulated gene and the most common DEG across cell types in the R6/2 12w striatal data. TPK1 regulates the conversion of thiamine to thiamine-pyrophosphate (TPP), a cofactor required for the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA, by alpha-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase in the TCA cycle and by ketolase in the pentose phosphate pathway, the latter being active in OL cultures and important for myelinating OLs76. Acetyl-CoA links metabolic processes to many epigenetic regulators of transcriptional control as it is used for histone acetylation, is required for the TCA cycle and for feeding metabolites into DNA and histone methylation, for generating both DAG and UDP-GlcNAc, and for PRKCE signaling and protein glycosylation by OGT (Fig. 8f). Interestingly, mutations in TPK1 are linked to Thiamine Metabolism Dysfunction Syndrome 5, which pheno-copies HD, and mutations in thiamine transporters such as SLC19A3 lead to biotin responsive basal ganglia disease77 which is treated with high T&B supplementation. Driven by our findings and similarities to other human disorders, we evaluated T&B treatment as a therapeutic strategy to reverse HD pathology in R6/1 mice. We hypothesized that TPK1 shows a compensatory increase in HD mice at later ages, responding to earlier metabolic changes, and tested this hypothesis by treating relatively pre-symptomatic R6/1 HD mice. Several transcriptional pathologies in HD were rescued by high dose T&B, suggesting promise as a potential treatment strategy. Excitingly, during the course of our study, a separate study was published showing a decrease in SLC19A3 and TPP in HD patients and in both R6/1 and zQ175 mice78. High dose T&B treatment produced both increased thiamine levels in the brain and CSF and behavioral rescue in R6/1 mice as early as 13 weeks. Our snRNAseq data revealed that R6/1 mice show maturation deficits and loss of cell identity genes similar to the R6/2 model and that treatment with T&B in the R6/1 mice, prior to TPK1 or SLC19A3 RNA changes, not only rescued a significant portion of dysregulated genes, including neuronal, but also specifically rescued expression of a specific subtype of inhibitory neurons and OPC and OL maturation genes. Furthermore, there was a reduction in the total number of significant DEGs in all cell types, except for in Ex neurons which may reflect compensatory changes due to the discordant levels in the genotype and treatment effects, but this requires further study outside the scope of this work. These data provide validation of the two studies and additional mechanistic insight that rescue by T&B likely acts in part through rescue of transcriptional deficits in many cell types and not just MSNs, whose survival was rescued in the other study, including a specific subpopulation of inhibitory neurons expressing Adarb2, and of OPC/OLs. Our data suggests that OL maturation impairments may be driven, in part, by thiamine metabolism and changes in the binding of TFs that regulate OL maturation, including SOX9 and 10 and OLIG1 and OLIG2. Furthermore, HD OPCs seem to have increased commitment into COP and immature OL which could be driven by decreased DAG and PRKCE, which is rescued by T&B treatment (Fig. 8g).
Lastly, these data further supports T&B as a viable potential treatment for HD, now undergoing a clinical trial in Spain (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04478734), and supports the utility of using single cell approaches and CNM to guide therapeutic target identification and evaluation.
Methods
All research conducted for this study complies with all relevant ethical regulations including IACUC approval protocol #s AUP-18-155 and, ASRC-2022-1 and the Columbia University IRB protocol # AAAT2895. Human brain tissues from HD and non-HD patient autopsies, which were diagnosed based on accepted neuropathological criteria, were obtained from the New York Brain Bank. All brains were donated after consent from the next of kin or an individual with legal authority to grant such permission. The use of postmortem brain tissues for research was approved by the Columbia University Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol # AAAT2895) with informed consent from patients or their families. The Institutional Review Board has determined that clinicopathologic studies on de-identified postmortem tissue samples are exempt from Human Subject Research according to Exemption 45 CFR 46.104(d)(2).
Mice: All experimental procedures were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the NIH and animal protocols were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of California Irvine (UCI), an AAALAC accredited institution - PROTOCOL # AUP-18-155. Animal work for OPC cultures was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the Advanced Science Research Center at the City University of New York, an AAALAC accredited institution - PROTOCOL # ASRC-2022-1. R6/1 (Jax strain 006471 B6.Cg-Tg(HDexon1)61Gpb/J carrying CAG 115-150) and R6/2 (Jax strain 006494 B6CBA-Tg(Hdexon1)62Gpb/3J carrying CAG 120 +/− 5) mice have been described elsewhere in detail31. For the study using R6/2 mice, 10 five-week-old R6/2 and non-transgenic (NT) male mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories and aged to 8 or 12 weeks. For the thiamine/biotin study using R6/1 mice, 10 five-week-old R6/1 and NT male and female mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. R6/1 mice (5/grp) were given a daily dose of combined 50 mg/kg thiamine and 20 mg/kg biotin (Caymen, Ann Arbor, MI) or vehicle (PBS) I.P. beginning at age 8 weeks, treated for 7 weeks, then euthanized at age 15 weeks. All mice were housed in groups of up to five animals/cage under a 12 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to chow and water at ambient temperature: 70F and 50% humidity. Mice were euthanized by pentobarbital overdose and perfused with 0.01 M PBS. Striatum and cerebral cortex were dissected out of each hemisphere and flash-frozen for snRNAseq or biochemical analysis.
Single nuclei RNAseq
Mouse
Single nuclei were isolated from ½ hemisphere full striatal or full cortex in Nuclei EZ Lysis buffer (Cat#NUC101-1KT, Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 5 min. Samples were passed through a 70 μm filter and incubated in additional lysis buffer for 5 min and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C before two washes in Nuclei Wash and Resuspension buffer (1×PBS, 1% BSA, 0.2 U/μl RNase inhibitor). Nuclei were FACS sorted using DAPI to further isolate single nuclei and remove additional cellular debris. These nuclei were run on the 10× Chromium Single cell 3’ gene expression v3 platform. Libraries were QCed and sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 using 30 bases for read 1 and 98 bases for read2, ß to obtain >=50 K reads per a cell. A total of 109,053 cells with 6.1 billion reads were sequenced for the 24 samples with on average 4544 cells per sample with ~55.6 K reads each. Alignment was done using the CellRanger pipeline v3.1.0 (10× Genomics https://github.com/10XGenomics/cellranger) to a custom pre-mRNA transcriptome built from refdata-cellranger-mm10-1.2.0 transcriptome using cellRanger mkref. UMI Count matrices were generated from BAM files using default parameters of cellRanger count command. The gene barcode matrices for each sample were imported into R using the Read10X function in the Seurat R package79 (v3.1.5). Replicates were combined using cellRanger aggr.
Human
Dissection of the cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, and nucleus accumbens from frozen postmortem specimens was performed on material procured and preserved from autopsies on control as well as grade II and grade III HD. These samples were obtained from the New York Brain Bank. All cases had RNA integrity numbers of >7. Brain tissue measuring ~ 5 × 4 × 3 mm were dissected on a dry ice cooled stage and processed immediately as described below. A Table of the cases and controls used is provided in Supplementary Data 4. Nuclei were isolated as described in (ref. 88). Briefly, brain tissue was homogenized in a Dounce homogenizer with 12–15 strokes of the loose pestle and 12–15 strokes of the tight pestle on ice in a Triton X-100 based, sucrose-containing buffer. The suspension from each sample was filtered through a BD Falcon tube with a cell strainer cap (Becton Dickinson, cat. no. 352235), washed, re-filtered, washed, followed by a cleanup step using iodixanol gradient centrifugation as described in ref. 75. The nuclear pellet was then re-suspended in 1% BSA in nuclease-free PBS (containing RNAse inhibitors) and titrated to 600–1200 nuclei/μl. The nuclear suspensions were processed by the Chromium Controller (10× Genomics) using single Cell 3′ Reagent Kit v2 or v3 (Chromium Single Cell 3′ Library & Gel Bead Kit v2/v3, catalog number PN-1000075; Chromium Single Cell A Chip Kit, 48 runs, catalog number: 120236; 10× Genomics). Sequencing and alignment: Sequencing of the snRNAseq libraries was done on Illumina NOVAseq 6000 platformV4 150 bp paired end reads. Alignment was done using the CellRanger pipeline (10× Genomics) to GRCh38.p12 (refdata-cellrangerGRCh38–1.2.0 file provided by 10× genomics). Count matrices were generated from BAM files using default parameters of the DropEst pipeline80.
QC and filtering
Mouse
Based on the distribution of number of genes detected in each cell and the distribution of number of UMIs, nuclei with less than 200 genes or more than 6000 genes were excluded from the downstream analyses. Nuclei with percent mitochondrial reads aligning to mitochondria genes of more than 2% were excluded. UMI counts were then normalized in Seurat 3.0 and top 2000 highly variable genes were identified using FindVariableFeatures function with variance stabilization transformation (VST).
Human
To remove low quality cells, we first used the combined quality calls from the CellRanger algorithm as well as the DropEst algorithm. This allowed us to retain more high-quality nuclei than either algorithm alone. Data QC was done using the scater package81. Nuclei with percent exonic reads from all reads in the range of less 75% were included. Nuclei with percent mitochondrial reads aligning to mitochondria genes of more than 14% were excluded. Genes were filtered by keeping features with >10 counts per row in at least in 31 cells. A temporary count slot was created by decontaminating the counts from ambient RNA by calling decontX() function with default parameters in R82. These counts were used for downstream clustering, but not differential gene expression analysis.
Combining multiple datasets from different sequencing batches and count normalization: Using the R package Seurat (version 4.06)83, the datasets were merged after controlling for sequencing batches (four batches). We integrated the lognormalized and scaled datasets in Harmony version 0.1. The Harmony reductions were then added to the merged Seurat object containing all datasets. The merged object was normalized using SCTransform function in Seurat accounting for batch and percentage mitochondrial reads84.
Dimension reduction and clustering
Mouse
Based on the elbow plot, top 20 PCs were retained for seurat objects with all cell types and 15 for the OPC and OL analysis. These PCs were used in the downstream unsupervised clustering using a shared nearest neighbor Louvain modularity optimization to identify clusters of cells of the same type. Some of the identified clusters were comprised of multiple cell types, therefore we subclustered these cells for further downstream DEG generation and analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1a).
Human
Pre-clustering of nuclei was done in Seurat using the shared nearest neighbor smart local moving algorithm85 after using the iNMF or UMAP reducions, and calling FindClusters(…, algorithm=3,method = “igraph”, n.iter = 100, …). Several resolution and k options were trialed to select the option with the largest number of pre-clusters with the high lineage purity. Lineage identity was determined for each cluster using geneset enrichment analysis of lineage markers86 and by inspecting cluster markers generated by scran::findmarkers(direction = ”up”) function87. We also depended on the cell_classifier tool we previously used88. Pre-clusters with mixed identities based on enrichment of multiple lineage genes were sub-clustered iteratively until all pre-clusters showed pure identities which we combined into lineages (Astrocytes, neurons, oligodendrocytes, myeloid, endothelial, OPCs, and ependymal cells). Sub-clustering of select pre-clusters was done as needed to get the lineage-pure small clusters. We next combined the clusters of the same lineage to call the lineages presented in Fig. 1e.
After getting pure OL and OPCs, a new object from these cells only was created in monocle3. Corpus callosum cells were removed, because no HD corpus callosum samples were included in the dataset. Filtering lowly expressed genes yielded 16955 genes. The SCT normalized counts were used to reduce the dimensions using the PHATE function89 in R correcting for batch (using the mutual nearest neighbor option), and using the following parameters: KNN = 5, Dim=3, Decay=50, T = 10. Clustering was done in monocle3 utilizing the three PHATE reductions as input using the Levine algorithm.
Cluster annotation and differential gene expression
Mouse
Unsupervised clustering was done using shared nearest neighbor Louvain modularity optimization. For each cluster, we used multiple cell type-specific marker genes that have been previously described in the literature to determine cell type/state identity. Exemplary genes used as markers for major cell types are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Differentially expressed genes between different clusters, ages or disease groups were identified using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test on genes that are expressed in at least 25% of the group. Further sub-clustering was conducted on some of the main clusters due to mixed cell types represented in that cluster, e.g., OPCs and premyelinating oligodendrocytes and astrocytes with vascular cells. Specifically, for subclustered OPCs and OL, OL-lineage, annotations were used from Marques et al.37 by looking at gene expression for marker genes identified in that study. These annotations were then collapsed into OPC and OL groups for ease of reference and consistency with human OPC and OL cells. Cluster and DEG analyses were conducted on each region and age for HD versus NT independently and combined where noted that the cells were integrated together across region and age.
Human
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between HD and control per anatomic region in OL and OPC separately were identified using EdgeR glmQLFTest adjusting for sequencing batch and using an FDR cutoff of 25% (9). The raw counts were used here, not the decontaminated counts. Retrieving the top 3000 differentially expressed genes resulted in adjusted p values less than 0.05, which were considered significant and were used for downstream analysis.
The CAG gene correlation analysis was conducted through the R package limma (version 3.14). Samples for the analysis were prepared using a pseudo-bulk approach. Gene expression data for each donor at a specific region were summed up together respectively to create pseudo-samples for the correlation analysis. Each pseudo donor-region sample were then log normalized and scaled using Seurat’s NormalizeData function (version 4.06) for optimal performance in limma. The covariates accounted for in the design matrix between samples included age and gender. Lastly, a row in the design matrix included the CAG repeats for each donor-region sample. The weights of the model were determined using limma’s lmFit with the arguments of the function including the pseudo-bulk donor region expression data and the design matrix as described above.
Pseudotime trajectory analysis using Monocle3
Mouse
For oligodendrocyte developmental trajectory assessment, cells that were identified as OPC and OL lineage were used to create a separate Seurat object using SubsetData function on raw counts. Pseudotime analysis was conducted on the integrated data across all regions and ages.
Human
Pseudotime analysis was done using monocle3 employing the three PHATE dimensions to learn the principal graph using the following parameters: use_partition = F, learn_graph_control = list(euclidean_distance_ratio=0.5, geodesic_distance_ratio=0.7, minimal_branch_len=100, orthogonal_proj_tip=TRUE, rann.k = 100), close_loop = F). The root nodes were set as OPC cells. Grade 4 cases were excluded because after filtering low quality cells, two samples had very few OPCs after removing low quality cells and doublets.
ATACseq
Isolation of NeuN+ and NeuN- nuclei: The pulverized tissue was resuspended in 2 ml NEB buffer (320 mM sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 5 mM CaCl2, 3 mM MgAc2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche, 11836170001) and transferred through 40 μm tissue strainer, followed by 5 min centrifugation at 600 × g at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended in 1 ml HS buffer (1.8 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 1 mM MgCl2 and Proteinase inhibitors) and centrifuged for 20 min at 16,000 × g at 4 °C. The nuclei containing pellet was resuspended in blocking buffer (PBS with 0.5% BSA, 5% Normal Goat Serum and Proteinase Inhibitors) and labeled with anti NeuN-PE antibody (1:100 dilution, Millipore, FCMAB317PE) and with Hoechst (1:2000 dilution, Invitrogen, H3570) for 30 min. The nuclei were filtered through 40 μm mesh and sorted using BD FACSAria™ with gates set to separate NeuN+ and NeuN- single nuclei populations. The nuclei were collected in tubes pre-coated with 1%BSA and sucrose was added to the sorted nuclei to a final concentration of 0.32 M followed by 15 min incubation on ice to stabilize the nuclei after sorting. The ATAC-seq was performed as described in Corces et al.90. Briefly, 50,000 sorted nuclei were transferred to tubes and pelleted by centrifugation at 2000 × g for 15 min. The pellet was resuspended in transposition reaction mix (25 μl 2× TD buffer, 2 μl transposase, 17 μl PBS, 0.5 μl 1% digitonin, 0.5 μl 10% Tween-20, 5 μl water) and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min following by clean up with Zymo DNA Clean and Concentrator kit (Zymo D4004). Illumina adapters were added by PCR to generate sequencing libraries as previously described. The ATAC-seq libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 for single-end 50 bp reads. Fastq files were aligned to the mm10 genome using Bowtie2 and paramaters previously described in Smith-Gearter et al. 202091.
Footprinting analysis
We used TOBIAS software54 for footprinting analysis of ATAC-seq data. Briefly, aligned BAM files were used to call accessible regions (peaks) using MACS2 using the following parameters:–nomodel–shift −100–extsize 200–broad. Peaks from all the samples across all conditions were merged to a set of union peaks using bedtools merge. TF motifs were downloaded from JASPAR CORE 2022 database (https://jaspar.genereg.net/). TOBIAS software robustly performs all steps of footprinting analysis including Tn5 bias correction, footprinting, and comparison between conditions and has been shown to outperform other common methods of footprinting. TOBIAS also calculates TF binding on a global level across all sites as well as the locus-specific level using JASPAR motif data. Scatterplots generated using ggplot2 (3.3.5).
IRIS3
We used IRIS352 to infer cell type specific regulons for single nucleus RNA-seq data from 12 week mouse striatal and cortical tissue. Specifically, gene count matrices from the full datasets were subset so that only OPC and OL cells are retained for striatal and cortical samples (4689, 3871 cells, respectively). These matrices together with sub cluster IDs were imported to the IRIS3 web portal (https://bmbl.bmi.osumc.edu/iris3/) and data were QC filtered, normalized and log transformed. DrImpute was used to impute the missing values. Gene modules were detected using QUBIC 2.0 and motif analysis was performed using MEME suite. CTSR(cell type specific regulons) were reported for each of the identified clusters within the OPC and OL population.
BIRD
We predicted cell type specific chromatin accessibility from snRNA data using the BIRD algorithm (https://github.com/WeiqiangZhou/BIRD)55. Specifically, the human postmortem snRNA data (OPC and OL cells in caudate only) was first used for imputation of miss values in the 10× data with ALRA algorithm (https://github.com/KlugerLab/ALRA). To make predictions for each cell type (OPC and OL), we pooled cells within each cell type as input for BIRD. Predictions of chromatin accessibility were made using models for the human reference genome trained using 167 ENCODE RNA-seq samples. Prediction chromatin accessibility signals across both cell types in HD and CTR samples were converted to WIG format for visualization in genome viewers.
Gene ontology, KEGG pathway, and TF enrichment analyses
Mouse
DEGs, gene modules members, and bnet gene members were used for further analyses using GOrilla for gene ontology enrichment analyses, KEGG pathway analysis, and LISA for TF enrichment analysis.
Human
Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis was done in gProfiler2 package in R86. The results of edgeR DEG was used as input and the following options: (ordered_query = T, significant = T, exclude_iea = T, underrep = F, evcodes = F, region_query = F, max_p_value = 1, min_set_size = 0, max_set_size = 100, min_isect_size = 5, correction_method = “gSCS”). Statistical significance was determined using the more conservative gSCS method 38 yielding adjusted p values. Terms with adjusted p values <0.05 were considered significant. The terms shown in the Figs. are selected based on ordering the results based on negative_log10_of_adjusted_p_value followed by the ratio of the shared of number of genes enriched in a term to that of the total number of genes in the GO term (desc(intersection_size/term_size)). Dotplots were generated using ggplot2 (3.3.5).
Network modeling
Mouse
Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)39)was used to identify gene network modules from the mouse snRNAseq data. Normalized count data from Seurat 3.0 were first used for feature selection, filtering all genes without at least 1 count in 25% of all cells. Co-expression networks were then generated for NT data using WGCNA. Correlative module-trait relationships were used to identify gene network modules that were positively correlated with specific cell types used as input, and module preservation statistics were used to assess recapitulation of gene networks in R6/2 data. Bayesian network modeling: To identify causal relationships between cell type-specific gene subnetwork we used a bayesian network modeling approach using the R package BNLearn92. Probabilistic graphical modeling has been previously used to assess causal relationships between genes/proteins with great success in recapitulating known biological pathway interactions from single cell data93. Our approach took advantage of the co-expressed gene networks we previously identified to try and find causal relationships amongst these genes. To better interpret our data we chose to use input data from individual cell types, which were identified to be most correlated with each individual gene network module. The resulting causal network would be cell type-specific and easier to biological interpret. Features were chosen based on their inclusion within these gene modules and additionally genes were added based on differential expression between R6/2 and NT mice for each cell type-gene network module pair. For instance, we identified that the turquoise gene network module most highly correlated with our MSNs, these genes and DEGs found in both D1 and D2 MSNs were used as input from both 8 and 12w striatal and cortical data. HD and NT networks were separately generated to identify changes in network structure between disease and control. No priors were used as input for the structure learning. Using this input we constructed our Bayesian networks with a bootstrap approach using 50% of samples and 200 rounds. Due to the spasticity of single nuclei data, even after gene filtering, we chose to use an interval method for discretization, factoring input data into 3 breaks. For structure learning we utilized Bayesian Dirichlet likelihood-equivalence scoring and a hill-climbing algorithm for searching for network structures. An average network was generated from each output where the strength and direction (empirical frequency computed from the probability of each edges’ existence and direction) of each causal edge were greater than or equal to 0.85 and 0.5, respectively. HD and control networks were then merged to identify changes in network structure, of both nodes and edges.
Primary oligodendrocyte culture
Mouse primary OPCs were isolated with immunopanning as described previously94. Briefly, cerebral cortices from C57BL/6 pups at P7 were digested in papain solution for 20 min at 37 °C, followed by titration and filtration. Cells were then sequentially incubated in three immunopanning dishes (2 negative selections with BSL1, followed by 1 positive selection with anti-mouse CD140a antibody (BD Bioscience, 558774). After positive selection, OPCs were trypsinized, plated onto PDL-coated culture dishes with SATO medium supplemented with growth factors (10 ng/mL PDGF-AA and 10 ng/mL bFGF), and maintained in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator for further expansion.
siRNA Transfection
Mouse primacy OPCs were seeded onto PDL-coated 6-well plate at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well a day before transfection. Cells were transiently transfected with either siRNA targeting Prkce or non-targeting control (Origene, SR427452) at a final concentration of 30 nM using X-tremeGENE 360 Transfection Reagent (Roche, 8724105001). After 24 h of knockdown, cells were cultivated with either proliferating (supplemented with growth factors) or differentiation (supplemented T3, 60 ng/mL) media. After 3 days of proliferation and 5 days of differentiation, cells were harvested, and proteins were extracted and processed for western blot analysis.
Qualitative lipidomic analysis of samples by electrospray triple Quadrupole mass spectrometry coupled with high performance liquid chromatography
Total lipids were extracted from frozen 40–70 mg human brain dissected as described above. Lipidomics profiling in mouse plasma and tissue samples was performed using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (UPLC-MSMS). Lipid extracts were prepared from homogenized tissue samples using modified Bligh and Dyer method95, spiked with appropriate internal standards, and analyzed on a platform comprising Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC integrated to Agilent 6490A QQQ mass spectrometer controlled by Masshunter v 7.0 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Glycerophospholipids and sphingolipids were separated with normal-phase HPLC as described before96, with a few modifications. An Agilent Zorbax Rx-Sil column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm) maintained at 25 °C was used under the following conditions: mobile phase A (chloroform: methanol: ammonium hydroxide, 89.9:10:0.1, v/v) and mobile phase B (chloroform: methanol: water: ammonium hydroxide, 55:39:5.9:0.1, v/v); 95% A for 2 min, decreased linearly to 30% A over 18 min and further decreased to 25% A over 3 min, before returning to 95% over 2 min and held for 6 min. Separation of sterols and glycerolipids was carried out on a reverse phase Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 × 100 mm, 3.5 μm) using an isocratic mobile phase, chloroform, methanol, 0.1 M ammonium acetate (25:25:1) at a flow rate of 300 μl/min. Quantification of lipid species was accomplished using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions96,97 under both positive and negative ionization modes in conjunction with referencing of appropriate internal standards: PA 14:0/14:0, PC 14:0/14:0, PE 14:0/14:0, PG 15:0/15:0, PI 17:0/20:4, PS 14:0/14:0, BMP 14:0/14:0, APG 14:0/14:0, LPC 17:0, LPE 14:0, LPI 13:0, Cer d18:1/17:0, SM d18:1/12:0, dhSM d18:0/12:0, GalCer d18:1/12:0, GluCer d18:1/12:0, LacCer d18:1/12:0, D7-cholesterol, CE 17:0, MG 17:0, 4ME 16:0 diether DG, D5-TG 16:0/18:0/16:0 (Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL). Lipid levels for each sample were calculated by summing up the total number of moles of all lipid species measured by all three LC-MS methodologies, and then normalizing that total to mol%. The final data are presented as mean mol% with error bars showing mean ± S.E. Statistical comparisons were done using a one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for post hoc analysis. Only results on DAG are provided. Boxplots were generated using ggplot2 (3.3.5).
Western blots
Mouse
Brain tissue was prepared for western blot analysis as follows: Soluble/Insoluble Fractionation: Striatal tissue was processed as described previously98. Total Fractionation: Isolated striatum or cortex was homogenized with 20 strokes of a potter-Elvenhjem glass tissue homogenizer in 1 mL modified RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Na-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA) supplemented with one Pierce protease inhibitor mini tablet (Fisher Scientific A32953), 1 mM PMSF, phosphatase inhibitors 2 (Millipore Sigma, P5726) (1:1000) and 3 (Millipore Sigma P0044) (1:1000), 10 μg/mL aprotinin, and 10 μg/mL leupeptin. Lysates were sonicated then centrifuged at 16,000 rcf for 15 min, and 5–10 μg analyzed by western blot. Combined linear range was quantified on Empiria by analyzing a concentration gradient of protein (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 μg per lane) with Revert for each antibody (Licor) to determine loading concentration. Protein was then subjected to SDS/PAGE on a NuPage Novex 4–12% Bis-Tris precast gel (Thermo Fisher NW04125) with MOPS running buffer (Invitrogen NP0001) and transferred onto a Immobilon-FL PVDF (Millipore Sigma IPFL00010) membrane. 5 µg of reduced, insoluble protein from Insoluble Fractions were resolved on 3–8% Tris-Acetate Poly-Acrylamide gels. Whole protein was quantified using the revert assay (LI-COR Biosciences 926-11016), and the membrane was blocked with Intercept (TBS) Blocking Buffer (LI-COR biosciences 927-60010) for 1 h. The membrane was then incubated in primary antibodies overnight, washed three times with TBS-0.1% Tween-20, and incubated for 1 h in Intercept block supplemented with 0.1% Tween-20 and near-infrared conjugated secondary antibodies. Membranes were imaged on a LI-COR scanner and quantified using Empiria Software. Experiments were performed at least twice with multiple biological replicates. Antibodies for the following antigens were used: DGKB (Thermofisher cat# PA5-15416 1:1000), PRKCE (Invitrogen PA5-83725 – 1:1000), p-PKCε (ser729) (Millipore 06-821-1; 1:1000), SGK1 (abcam - ab59337 1:1000), TPK1 (Fisherscientific cat# 50-172-6732 1:500), GPI1 (Thermofisher cat# PA5-26787 1:1000), Anti-Huntingtin Antibody (a.a. 1-82|MAB5492 - EMD Millipore 1:1000). The mice used for westerns were from two separate cohorts and did not include the mice used for snRNAseq and snATACseq. 6 males animals per group were used for each western except for the solb/insolb fractionated western which were mice were from a third cohort that included 4 male mice per group. All Western statistical analysis was performed using Students T-Test with two-tailed distribution and two-sample equal variance (homoscedastic). Exact p-values for significant differences are provided in the figure.
Human
Protein was extracted from dissected frozen tissue using RIPA buffer on ice. Protein concentration was estimated using a modified Bradford assay. Western blotting was performed using sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) as described previously99. Briefly, protein lysates were separated by precast 4–20% Bis-Tris gradient gels (GenScript), followed by transferring onto PVDF membrane (Millipore). After 1 h blocking in blocking buffer (5% milk, 0.1% TBS-Tween) at room temperature, membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Antibodies for the following antigens were used: MAG (Proteintech cat#14386-1-AP - 1:1000-3000), MOG (Proteintech #12690-1-AP - 1:500-1000), PRKCE (Invitrogen PA5-83725 – 1:1000), p-PKCε (ser729) (Millipore 06-821-1; 1:1000), MBP (Cell signal #78896S, 1:1000), SGK1 (abcam - ab59337 1:1000), TPK1 (Fisherscientific cat# 50-172-6732 1:500), GAPDH (Proteintech 60004-1-Ig 1:1000), Actin (Proteintech 66009-1-Ig; 1:5000), Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit Peroxidase-AffiniPure Donkey IgG (H + L) (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 715-035-151 and 711-035-152). Detection was using enhanced chemiluminescence (cat# 1705061 or 1705062) on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc™ Touch Imaging System. Band areas were normalized to Actin and/or GAPDH. Statistical comparisons were conducted using unpaired two-tailed t-test or Mann–Whitney test as appropriate. TPK1 was analyzed separately using similar methods as described in the mouse section and using only striatal tissue lysates. Boxplots were generated using ggplot2 (3.3.5).
Western blot analysis of OPC cultures was performed as outlined above with the following modifications. The following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-PRC-epsilon (Invitrogen PA5-83725, 1:1000), mouse anti-OLIG2 (Millipore, MABN50, 1:1000), mouse anti-CNPase (Biolegend, SMI-91, 1:5000), rabbit anti-MOG (Thermo, PA5-19602, 1:1000) and mouse anti-αTUBULIN (Calbiochem, CP06, 1:2500). Detection of target proteins was done by measuring chemiluminescence signal using ECL™ Prime Western Blotting Detection Reagent (Sigma, GERPN2232) on a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad). Image J was used to quantify the protein bands and αTUBULIN was used as loading control.
Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization
Standard chromogenic and fluorescent immunohistochemistry as well as in situ hybridization were done as described previously88. Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissue sections were used for IHC and ISH. The following antibodies were used CA2 (Abcam ab124687- 1:100), MBP (Invitrogen PA1-10008 – 1:5000). RNAscope™ was done per the manufacturer instructions using an RNAscope ™ multiplex Fluorescent v2 kit (ACDbio 323100) with the following probes for SPP1 (cat# 889751-C2), NEAT1 (cat# 411531-C3), and MBP (cat# 573051-C4).
Imaging and quantification
Whole slides were scanned and the images on an Aperio™ Leica slide scanner at 40×. Fluorescent stained slides were scanned on Leica Aperio™ Versa scanner at 40×. additional images were taken on a Zeiss™ 810 LSM 800 confocal microscope at using a 40×/1.3 NA oil-immersion objective. For quantification of IHC, we employed an automated method using Qupath v0.2 positive cell detection algorithm100. Identification of pencil fibers and blood vessels was done using a pixel classifier trained on regions not quantified but in the same slide. Quantification of ISH slides uses positive cell detection method followed by subcellular detection. Only cells with nuclear signal were considered positive. Staining artifact and blood vessels were excluded. One or more images from each patient were used. The results were loaded in R v4.0. and cells with a minimum of 3 or more MBP dots or clusters were considered positive. NEAT1 and SPP1 were quantified in MBP positive cells. Nuclei with 2 or more dots or clusters were considered positive for SPP1 and with 2 or more dots/clusters for NEAT1. Statistical comparisons were done using one-tailed t-test or Wilcox rank test as appropriate. For calculating MBP:CA2 ratios, immunofluorescence for MBP and CA2 was performed on three or more images per case from 3 HD and 4 control caudate stained sections. The MBP signal was binarized using the threshold function in ImageJ (threshold detected automatically) and was divided by the number of CA2 positive cells counted in each image.
Statistics and reproducibility
All features highlighted in the paper and reported as statistically significant have p-values <0.05 or adjusted p-values <0.1, unless otherwise stated. For single nucleus sequencing, we use negative binomial distribution to estimate power and sample size (https://satijalab.org/howmanycells). Assuming there are ≤18 cell types within the tissue, in order to detect rare cell types present at 1% with at least 20 nuclei per each type, we need at least 3775 nuclei to achieve power of 0.99. In our 10× experiment, we detected 4k–5k single nuclei per subject, to achieve power >0.99. No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes for the number of subjects needed but our sample sizes were similar to those reported in previous publications. No data were excluded from the analyses. The experiments were not randomized. For all human data collection and analysis, the investigators were blinded to conditions, data was unblinded after the completion of data collection. Mouse treatment groups were randomized but no other blinding was done.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Iliana Herrera and Marie Heath for their technical assistance, and Karen Sachs for guidance with causal network modeling. This work was supported by the following NIH grants: R35 NS116872 and P01 NS092525 (L.M.T.), R01 NS089076 (E.F. and L.M.T.). OAD was supported through funding from the Huntington Disease Society of America and the Hereditary Disease Foundation and RGL by the Hereditary Disease Foundation. This work was possible, in part, through access to the UCI Genomic High Throughput Facility Shared Resource of the Cancer Center Support Grant (CA-62203) and the Flow Cytometry Core in the Sue and Bill Gross Stem Cell Center. This research was supported by the Digital Computational Pathology Laboratory in the Department of Pathology and Cell Biology at Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and by the Biomarkers Core Laboratory at the Irving Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, home to Columbia University’s Clinical and Translational Science Award.
Source data
Author contributions
O.A.D., R.G.L., J.W., J.C.R., L.M.T., and J.E.G. designed and oversaw the study. Data analyses for the snRNAseq data from the mouse model and also human OPC and OLs were performed by R.G.L., J.W., R.M., A.M.R., V.M., F.P., and O.A.D. R.M. and R.G.L. performed the WGCNA on the mouse snRNAseq data. R.G.L. performed the causal network modeling. E.M., N. Michael and V.S. performed the nuclei isolation and 10× prep for the mouse snRNAseq. O.A.D. and F.K. performed nuclei isolation on human samples. M.A. performed the ATACseq and M.P.G. and V.S. performed the ATACseq data analyses. KO performed DNA extractions and assisted in data analysis. O.A.D., A.T., and F.K. performed the immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, imaging, and image analysis on the human data. D.D., H.J.P., and P.C. performed the in vitro studies and analysis. J.P.V. diagnosed and assessed the human postmortem HD tissue. X.F. assisted with human tissue collection and clinical metadata. G.T. performed all human proteomic analyses. S.D. analyzed the lipidomic data. J.C.R., A.L., and N. McClure handled the mice, did brain isolations, and performed Licor western and data analyses for the mouse data. A.L. carried out isolation of single nuclei. R.G.L., O.A.D., J.W., J.E.G., and L.M.T. wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited, and approved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The human snRNAseq, mouse snRNAseq, and mouse ATACseq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE180928, GSE180294, and GSE180236, respectively. The aggregate imaging, western blot and DAG lipidomic data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data files. The JASPAR CORE 2022 data can be found at https://jaspar.genereg.net/. In addition to being found in the above locations, all raw data, materials, code, and associated protocols can also be requested from the corresponding authors and will be made available immediately to the requester. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The code used in this study are deposited in the GitHub repository at https://github.com/jwuuci/snRNAseqHD.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Ryan G. Lim, Osama Al-Dalahmah, Jie Wu.
These authors jointly supervised this work: James E. Goldman, Leslie M. Thompson.
Contributor Information
James E. Goldman, Email: jeg5@cumc.columbia.edu
Leslie M. Thompson, Email: lmthomps@hs.uci.edu
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-35388-x.
References
- 1.Vonsattel JP, Keller C, Del Pilar Amaya M. Neuropathology of Huntington’s disease. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2008;89:599–618. doi: 10.1016/S0072-9752(07)01256-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.The Huntington’s Disease Collaborative Research Group. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell72, 971–983 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 3.The Huntington’s Disease iPSC Consortium Developmental alterations in Huntington’s disease neural cells and pharmacological rescue in cells and mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2017;20:648–660. doi: 10.1038/nn.4532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hyeon, J. W., Kim, A. H. & Yano, H. Epigenetic regulation in Huntington’s disease. Neurochem. Int.148, 105074 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 5.Malla B, Guo X, Senger G, Chasapopoulou Z, Yildirim F. A systematic review of transcriptional dysregulation in Huntington’s disease studied by RNA sequencing. Front. Genet. 2021;12:751033. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.751033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vashishtha M, et al. Targeting H3K4 trimethylation in Huntington disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:E3027–3036. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311323110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barnat M, et al. Huntington’s disease alters human neurodevelopment. Science. 2020;369:787–793. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hickman RA, et al. Developmental malformations in Huntington disease: neuropathologic evidence of focal neuronal migration defects in a subset of adult brains. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;141:399–413. doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02269-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Conforti P, et al. Faulty neuronal determination and cell polarization are reverted by modulating HD early phenotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E762–E771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715865115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee CY, Cantle JP, Yang XW. Genetic manipulations of mutant huntingtin in mice: new insights into Huntington’s disease pathogenesis. FEBS J. 2013;280:4382–4394. doi: 10.1111/febs.12418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ferrari Bardile C, et al. Intrinsic mutant HTT-mediated defects in oligodendroglia cause myelination deficits and behavioral abnormalities in Huntington disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:9622–9627. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818042116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lim RG, et al. Huntington’s disease iPSC-derived brain microvascular endothelial cells reveal WNT-mediated angiogenic and blood-brain barrier deficits. Cell Rep. 2017;19:1365–1377. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Haremaki T, et al. Self-organizing neuruloids model developmental aspects of Huntington’s disease in the ectodermal compartment. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:1198–1208. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0237-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee H, et al. Cell type-specific transcriptomics reveals that mutant Huntingtin leads to mitochondrial RNA release and neuronal innate immune activation. Neuron. 2020;107:891–908.e898. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Teo RT, et al. Structural and molecular myelination deficits occur prior to neuronal loss in the YAC128 and BACHD models of Huntington disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016;25:2621–2632. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jin J, et al. Early white matter abnormalities, progressive brain pathology and motor deficits in a novel knock-in mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:2508–2527. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang B, et al. Mutant huntingtin downregulates myelin regulatory factor-mediated myelin gene expression and affects mature oligodendrocytes. Neuron. 2015;85:1212–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ferrari Bardile C, et al. Abnormal spinal cord myelination due to oligodendrocyte dysfunction in a model of Huntington’s disease. J. Huntington’s Dis. 2021;10:377–384. doi: 10.3233/JHD-210495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Benraiss A, et al. A TCF7L2-responsive suppression of both homeostatic and compensatory remyelination in Huntington disease mice. Cell Rep. 2022;40:111291. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Benraiss A, et al. Cell-intrinsic glial pathology is conserved across human and murine models of Huntington’s disease. Cell Rep. 2021;36:109308. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meunier C, Merienne N, Jolle C, Deglon N, Pellerin L. Astrocytes are key but indirect contributors to the development of the symptomatology and pathophysiology of Huntington’s disease. Glia. 2016;64:1841–1856. doi: 10.1002/glia.23022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Osipovitch M, et al. Human ESC-derived chimeric mouse models of Huntington’s disease reveal cell-intrinsic defects in glial progenitor cell differentiation. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24:107–122.e107. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2018.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Teo RTY, et al. Impaired remyelination in a mouse model of Huntington disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019;56:6873–6882. doi: 10.1007/s12035-019-1579-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hodges A, et al. Regional and cellular gene expression changes in human Huntington’s disease brain. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2006;15:965–977. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Labadorf A, et al. RNA sequence analysis of human Huntington disease brain reveals an extensive increase in inflammatory and developmental gene expression. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wilson H, Dervenoulas G, Politis M. Structural magnetic resonance imaging in Huntington’s disease. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2018;142:335–380. doi: 10.1016/bs.irn.2018.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Myers RH, et al. Decreased neuronal and increased oligodendroglial densities in Huntington’s disease caudate nucleus. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1991;50:729–742. doi: 10.1097/00005072-199111000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gomez-Tortosa E, et al. Quantitative neuropathological changes in presymptomatic Huntington’s disease. Ann. Neurol. 2001;49:29–34. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200101)49:1<29::AID-ANA7>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.de la Monte SM, Vonsattel JP, Richardson EP., Jr. Morphometric demonstration of atrophic changes in the cerebral cortex, white matter, and neostriatum in Huntington’s disease. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1988;47:516–525. doi: 10.1097/00005072-198809000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gabery S, et al. Early white matter pathology in the fornix of the limbic system in Huntington disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;142:791–806. doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02362-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mangiarini L, et al. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell. 1996;87:493–506. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81369-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mayr JA, et al. Thiamine pyrophosphokinase deficiency in encephalopathic children with defects in the pyruvate oxidation pathway. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;89:806–812. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zeng WQ, et al. Biotin-responsive basal ganglia disease maps to 2q36.3 and is due to mutations in SLC19A3. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2005;77:16–26. doi: 10.1086/431216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Labay V, et al. Mutations in SLC19A2 cause thiamine-responsive megaloblastic anaemia associated with diabetes mellitus and deafness. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:300–304. doi: 10.1038/10372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dhir S, Tarasenko M, Napoli E, Giulivi C. Neurological, psychiatric, and biochemical aspects of thiamine deficiency in children and adults. Front. Psychiatry. 2019;10:207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinform. 2009;10:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Marques S, et al. Oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in the mouse juvenile and adult central nervous system. Science. 2016;352:1326–1329. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trapnell C, et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:381–386. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Beckmann ND, et al. Multiscale causal networks identify VGF as a key regulator of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3942. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17405-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Bendall SC, et al. Single-cell mass cytometry of differential immune and drug responses across a human hematopoietic continuum. Science. 2011;332:687–696. doi: 10.1126/science.1198704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carcamo-Orive I, et al. Analysis of transcriptional variability in a large human iPSC library reveals genetic and non-genetic determinants of heterogeneity. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20:518–532.e519. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Langfelder P, et al. Integrated genomics and proteomics define huntingtin CAG length-dependent networks in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2016;19:623–633. doi: 10.1038/nn.4256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lobo MK, Yeh C, Yang XW. Pivotal role of early B-cell factor 1 in development of striatonigral medium spiny neurons in the matrix compartment. J. Neurosci. Res. 2008;86:2134–2146. doi: 10.1002/jnr.21666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kusko R, et al. Large-scale transcriptomic analysis reveals that pridopidine reverses aberrant gene expression and activates neuroprotective pathways in the YAC128 HD mouse. Mol. Neurodegener. 2018;13:25. doi: 10.1186/s13024-018-0259-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Savell KE, et al. A dopamine-induced gene expression signature regulates neuronal function and cocaine response. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaba4221. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba4221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Usui N, et al. Zbtb16 regulates social cognitive behaviors and neocortical development. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021;11:242. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01358-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hinds LR, et al. Dynamic glucocorticoid-dependent regulation of Sgk1 expression in oligodendrocytes of adult male rat brain by acute stress and time of day. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0175075. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gregath A, Lu QR. Epigenetic modifications-insight into oligodendrocyte lineage progression, regeneration, and disease. FEBS Lett. 2018;592:1063–1078. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.12999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yu Y, et al. Olig2 targets chromatin remodelers to enhancers to initiate oligodendrocyte differentiation. Cell. 2013;152:248–261. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Qin Q, et al. Lisa: inferring transcriptional regulators through integrative modeling of public chromatin accessibility and ChIP-seq data. Genome Biol. 2020;21:32. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-1934-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ma A, et al. IRIS3: integrated cell-type-specific regulon inference server from single-cell RNA-Seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:W275–W286. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chamling X, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic reveals molecular diversity and developmental heterogeneity of human stem cell-derived oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:652. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20892-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bentsen M, et al. ATAC-seq footprinting unravels kinetics of transcription factor binding during zygotic genome activation. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:4267. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18035-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou W, Ji Z, Fang W, Ji H. Global prediction of chromatin accessibility using small-cell-number and single-cell RNA-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:e121. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cao J, et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature. 2019;566:496–502. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jakel S, et al. Altered human oligodendrocyte heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2019;566:543–547. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0903-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Selvaraju R, et al. Osteopontin is upregulated during in vivo demyelination and remyelination and enhances myelin formation in vitro. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2004;25:707–721. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2003.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cammer W, Zhang H. Carbonic anhydrase in distinct precursors of astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in the forebrains of neonatal and young rats. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 1992;67:257–263. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(92)90226-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ishii A, Fyffe-Maricich SL, Furusho M, Miller RH, Bansal R. ERK1/ERK2 MAPK signaling is required to increase myelin thickness independent of oligodendrocyte differentiation and initiation of myelination. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:8855. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0137-12.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yildirim F, et al. Early epigenomic and transcriptional changes reveal Elk-1 transcription factor as a therapeutic target in Huntington’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:24840–24851. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908113116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Szu J, Wojcinski A, Jiang P, Kesari S. Impact of the Olig family on neurodevelopmental disorders. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:659601–659601. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.659601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Garcia FJ, et al. Single-cell dissection of the human brain vasculature. Nature. 2022;603:893–899. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04521-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kumar SS, Buckmaster PS. Neuron-specific nuclear antigen NeuN is not detectable in gerbil subtantia nigra pars reticulata. Brain Res. 2007;1142:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Zhang Y, et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:11929. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Asotra K, Macklin WB. Protein kinase C activity modulates myelin gene expression in enriched oligodendrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 1993;34:571–588. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490340509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Baer AS, et al. Myelin-mediated inhibition of oligodendrocyte precursor differentiation can be overcome by pharmacological modulation of Fyn-RhoA and protein kinase C signalling. Brain. 2009;132:465–481. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Baron W, de Jonge JC, de Vries H, Hoekstra D. Regulation of oligodendrocyte differentiation: protein kinase C activation prevents differentiation of O2A progenitor cells toward oligodendrocytes. Glia. 1998;22:121–129. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199802)22:2<121::AID-GLIA3>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Damato, M. et al. Protein kinase C activation drives a differentiation program in an oligodendroglial precursor model through the modulation of specific biological networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci.10.3390/ijms22105245 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Amaral AI, Tavares JM, Sonnewald U, Kotter MR. Oligodendrocytes: development, physiology, and glucose. Metab. Adv. Neurobiol. 2016;13:275–294. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-45096-4_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.da Rosa PM, et al. High-glucose medium induces cellular differentiation and changes in metabolic functionality of oligodendroglia. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019;46:4817–4826. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04930-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Rinholm JE, et al. Regulation of oligodendrocyte development and myelination by glucose and lactate. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:538–548. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3516-10.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yan H, Rivkees SA. Hypoglycemia influences oligodendrocyte development and myelin formation. Neuroreport. 2006;17:55–59. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000192733.00535.b6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.DeBrosse SD, et al. Spectrum of neurological and survival outcomes in pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) deficiency: lack of correlation with genotype. Mol. Genet Metab. 2012;107:394–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Freedman D, et al. Loss of oligodendrocytes in mouse model of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex deficiency and partial reversal by phenylbutyrate treatment. Transl. Neurosci. 2020;3:53–61. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang S, Lachance BB, Mattson MP, Jia X. Glucose metabolic crosstalk and regulation in brain function and diseases. Prog. Neurobiol. 2021;204:102089. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2021.102089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Marce-Grau A, Marti-Sanchez L, Baide-Mairena H, Ortigoza-Escobar JD, Perez-Duenas B. Genetic defects of thiamine transport and metabolism: a review of clinical phenotypes, genetics, and functional studies. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2019;42:581–597. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Pico S, et al. CPEB alteration and aberrant transcriptome-polyadenylation lead to a treatable SLC19A3 deficiency in Huntington’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 2021;13:eabe7104. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abe7104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Stuart T, et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell. 2019;177:1888–1902 e1821. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Petukhov V, et al. dropEst: pipeline for accurate estimation of molecular counts in droplet-based single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Genome Biol. 2018;19:78. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1449-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.McCarthy DJ, Campbell KR, Lun AT, Wills QF. Scater: pre-processing, quality control, normalization, and visualization of single-cell RNA-seq data in R. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1179–1186. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Yang S, et al. Decontamination of ambient RNA in single-cell RNA-seq with DecontX. Genome Biol. 2020;21:57. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-1950-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Hao Y, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184:3573–3587 e3529. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hafemeister C, Satija R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biol. 2019;20:296. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1874-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Welch JD, et al. Single-cell multi-omic integration compares and contrasts features of brain cell identity. Cell. 2019;177:1873–1887 e1817. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Raudvere U, et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update) Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W191–W198. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Lun AT, McCarthy DJ, Marioni JC. A step-by-step workflow for low-level analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data with Bioconductor. F1000Res. 2016;5:2122. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9501.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Al-Dalahmah O, et al. Single-nucleus RNA-seq identifies Huntington disease astrocyte states. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 2020;8:19. doi: 10.1186/s40478-020-0880-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Moon KR, et al. Visualizing structure and transitions in high-dimensional biological data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:1482–1492. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0336-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Corces MR, et al. An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:959–962. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Smith-Geater C, et al. Aberrant development corrected in adult-onset Huntington’s disease iPSC-derived neuronal cultures via WNT signaling modulation. Stem Cell Rep. 2020;14:406–419. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Scutari M. Learning Bayesian Networks with the bnlearn R Package. J. Stat. Softw. 2010;35:1–22. doi: 10.18637/jss.v035.i03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Sachs K, Perez O, Pe’er D, Lauffenburger DA, Nolan GP. Causal protein-signaling networks derived from multiparameter single-cell data. Science. 2005;308:523–529. doi: 10.1126/science.1105809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Emery B, Dugas JC. Purification of oligodendrocyte lineage cells from mouse cortices by immunopanning. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2013;2013:854–868. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot073973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959;37:911–917. doi: 10.1139/y59-099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Chan RB, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer disease. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:2678–2688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.274142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Hsu FF, Turk J, Shi Y, Groisman EA. Characterization of acylphosphatidylglycerols from Salmonella typhimurium by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004;15:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Ochaba J, et al. PIAS1 regulates mutant Huntingtin accumulation and Huntington’s disease-associated phenotypes in vivo. Neuron. 2016;90:507–520. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Dansu DK, et al. PRMT5 interacting partners and substrates in oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2022;16:820226. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2022.820226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bankhead P, et al. QuPath: open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:16878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The human snRNAseq, mouse snRNAseq, and mouse ATACseq data generated in this study have been deposited in the GEO database under accession code GSE180928, GSE180294, and GSE180236, respectively. The aggregate imaging, western blot and DAG lipidomic data generated in this study are provided in the Source Data files. The JASPAR CORE 2022 data can be found at https://jaspar.genereg.net/. In addition to being found in the above locations, all raw data, materials, code, and associated protocols can also be requested from the corresponding authors and will be made available immediately to the requester. Source data are provided with this paper.
The code used in this study are deposited in the GitHub repository at https://github.com/jwuuci/snRNAseqHD.