Abstract
Calorie restriction (CR) increases healthy life span and is accompanied by slowing or reversal of aging-associated DNA methylation (DNAm) changes in animal models. In the Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIETM) human trial, we evaluated associations of CR and changes in whole-blood DNAm. CALERIETM randomized 220 healthy, nonobese adults in a 2:1 allocation to 2 years of CR or ad libitum (AL) diet. The average CR in the treatment group through 24 months of follow-up was 12%. Whole blood (baseline, 12, and 24 months) DNAm profiles were measured. Epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) analysis tested CR-induced changes from baseline to 12 and 24 months in the n = 197 participants with available DNAm data. CR treatment was not associated with epigenome-wide significant (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05) DNAm changes at the individual-CpG-site level. Secondary analysis of sets of CpG sites identified in published EWAS revealed that CR induced DNAm changes opposite to those associated with higher body mass index and cigarette smoking (p < .003 at 12- and 24-month follow-ups). In contrast, CR altered DNAm at chronological-age-associated CpG sites in the direction of older age (p < .003 at 12- and 24-month follow-ups). Although individual CpG site DNAm changes in response to CR were not identified, analyses of sets CpGs identified in prior EWAS revealed CR-induced changes to blood DNAm. Altered CpG sets were enriched for insulin production, glucose tolerance, inflammation, and DNA-binding and DNA-regulation pathways, several of which are known to be modified by CR. DNAm changes may contribute to CR effects on aging.
Keywords: Caloric restriction, Epigenome, Human aging
The geroscience hypothesis proposes that interventions that slow or reverse biological processes of aging can simultaneously prevent multiple chronic diseases and extend healthy life span (1). Proof of concept for geroscience is emerging from studies with animals, in which interventions that slow or reverse the accumulation of molecular “hallmarks” of aging delay the onset of disease and functional impairment and extend healthy aging (2–4). One of the best-evidenced geroscience intervention in animals is calorie restriction (CR) (5). CR is defined as a reduction in caloric intake from a normal intake (“ad libitum” [AL]) diet while maintaining adequate nutrient intake (6). From worms to mice to monkeys, CR is associated with delayed onset of age-associated diseases, including diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular disease, osteoarthritis, and increased healthy life span (7–9).
The mechanisms by which CR slows aging and extends healthspan in animal models are several and include alterations at physiological, metabolic, and genomic levels (6,10). Studies in animals have identified slowing or reversal of epigenetic changes associated with aging in response to CR, including alterations of whole blood DNA methylation (DNAm) (11,12). However, the effects of CR on whole blood DNAm in nonobese humans are unknown.
The Comprehensive Assessment of Long-term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIETM) study is the first long-term, randomized clinical trial of CR in healthy, nonobese humans (13). The goal of CALERIETM was to identify the effects of 2 years of CR on predictors of longevity, disease risk factors, and quality of life. The intervention yielded substantial and sustained weight loss and signs of improved cardiometabolic health, reduced inflammation, and slowed biological aging, as measured by physiology-based algorithms (14,15). In ancillary studies in subsets of CALERIETM participants, CR induced signs of metabolic slowing and reversal of markers of immune-system aging (16,17).
We conducted a genome-wide analysis of whole-blood DNAm changes over 12 and 24 months in CALERIETM. The primary analysis tested changes in methylation levels at each of 828,613 C-G dinucleotides (CpGs). Secondary analyses tested changes at sets of CpGs identified in published epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of the body mass index (BMI), cigarette smoking, and chronological age (18–21). BMI EWAS analysis was of interest because the CALERIETM intervention induced substantial weight loss. Smoking- and chronological-age EWAS analyses were of interest in CALERIETM because these are established risk factors for shortening healthy life span and have associations with DNAm differences at large numbers of CpG sites, which are not currently known to be directly affected by CR. We hypothesized that CR would offer a geroprotective effect which could be measured molecularly via DNAm, especially at regions associated with risk factors for a shorter life span.
Method
The CALERIETM trial randomized 220 healthy, nonobese (BMI 22.0 ≤ BMI < 28.0 kg/m2), adults aged 21–50 years to either a 25% CR intervention condition or AL control at a 2:1 (CR:AL) ratio across 3 sites (Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Washington University, and Tufts University; Figure 1A, Table 1) (13,22). Participants were excluded from the study if they had significant medical conditions, abnormal laboratory markers, present or potential psychiatric or behavioral problems, regular use of medications (except oral contraceptives), currently smoked, were highly physically active, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Randomization was stratified by study site, sex, and BMI. The trial duration was 24 months. As measured using doubly labeled water, the CR intervention group achieved an average of 11.7 ± 0.7% CR (19.5 ± 0.08% in the first 6 months, 9.1 ± 0.7% during the subsequent 18 months) (23).
Figure 1.
Study design. (A) CALERIETM trial design. Two hundred and twenty participants were randomly assigned to either 25% calorie restriction (CR) or ad libitum (AL) at a 2:1 ratio. Of the 220 participants assigned, 218 started and 188 completed the intervention. (B) Blood samples were collected from participants at baseline and 12- and 24-month follow-ups. DNA was isolated and stored. DNA methylation was assayed with Illumina methyl EPIC bead chip arrays. After quality control and normalization, epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) analysis tested CALERIETM intervention effects at 12- and 24-month follow-ups at each of 828,613 CpG sites. Finally, we conducted secondary analysis comparing results from CALERIETM EWAS with results from published EWAS of BMI, cigarette smoking, and chronological age.
Table 1.
Study Participant Characteristics at Pre-treatment Baseline
| Intervention | CR (n = 142) | AL (n = 72) |
|---|---|---|
| Females | 97 | 50 |
| Males | 45 | 22 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Asian | 12 | 3 |
| African American | 15 | 10 |
| White | 110 | 55 |
| Other | 3 | 0 |
| BMI (mean ± SD) | 25.17 (1.8) | 25.14 (1.7) |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 38.19 (7.3) | 38.16 (7.1) |
Note: AL = ad libitum; BMI = body mass index; CR = calorie restriction.
DNA Methylation
DNAm profiling was conducted in the Kobor Lab from whole-blood DNA stored at −80°C. After quality controls and normalization, DNAm data sets were generated for n = 595 samples from 214 individuals (142 CR, 72 AL; Figure 1B, Table 1). Briefly, 750 ng of DNA was extracted from whole blood and bisulfite was converted using the EZ DNA Methylation kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). Methylation was measured from 160 ng of bisulfite-converted DNA using the Illumina EPIC Beadchip (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Quality control (QC) and normalization were performed using methylumi (v. 2.32.0) (24) and the Bioconductor (v 2.46.0) (25) packages from the R statistical programming environment (v 3.6.3). Probes with detection p-values > .05 were coded as missing; probes missing in > 5% of samples were removed from the dataset (final probe n = 828,613 CpGs). Normalization to eliminate systematic dye bias in the 2-channel probes was carried out using the methylumi default method. We conducted a principal component analysis of EPIC-array control-probe beta values to compute controls for technical variability across the samples (26).
Statistical Analysis
The primary analysis was an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) of CALERIETM treatment effects in which the treatment group was the exposure and changes in probe beta value from baseline to 12 months and baseline to 24 months were the outcome variables. Secondary analyses examined sets of CpG sites identified in published EWAS of obesity, cigarette smoking, and chronological age to test if CALERIETM treatment specifically affected DNAm at CpG sites known to be altered by these exposures.
Epigenome-wide association study of CALERIETM treatment effects
We tested associations of CALERIETM intervention with changes in DNAm at each QC’ed CpG site using a mixed model. The model took the form of:
where “β” is the level of methylation for CpG site “i” at time “t”; “a” is the model intercept, including sample-wide and person-specific components, “Follow-up Time” is a pair of indicator variables encoding the 12- and 24-month follow-ups; “CR” is an indicator of treatment group; “Follow-up Time × CR” is a series of interaction terms between follow-up time and treatment group; “X” is a matrix of covariates; and “e” is the error term comprising both sample-wide and person-specific components. The effect of the intervention is tested by the coefficients for the interaction terms, which evaluate the treatment effect at 12 and 24 months as the difference in change from baseline between the treatment (CR) and control AL groups.
Time-invariant covariates were pre-intervention-baseline chronological age, sex, BMI stratum (22–24.9, 25–27.9), study site, and the first 3 principal components estimated from genome-wide SNP data in order to correct for population stratification. Time-varying covariates were proportions of monocytes, neutrophils, and CD4T, CD8T, Natural Killer, and B-cell lymphocytes estimated from the DNAm data using the Houseman Equation via the Minfi and FlowSorted.Blood.EPIC R packages and the first 7 principal components were estimated from EPIC-array control probes (26–28). Benjamini–Hochberg correction was applied to account for nonindependence of tests. Statistical significance was established at a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05. EWAS analysis was conducted using the lmerTest R package (29).
Secondary analyses of EWAS summary statistics
We evaluated whether DNAm changes associated with CALERIETM intervention reflected changes expected based on published EWAS. We conducted analyses of EWAS results from studies of BMI, cigarette smoking, and chronological age (18–21). Hypothesis testing was performed using a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test to compare distributions of CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for phenotype-associated CpGs to the distribution of CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for all other CpGs. Independent tests were performed for CpG sites identified as hypermethylated and hypomethylated in association with the target phenotype. Because all target-phenotype EWAS used an earlier generation of Illumina array technology, we restricted these analyses to the 431,205 EPIC-array CpGs measured in CALERIETM that were also included on the Illumina 450k array.
Secondary analysis of BMI-associated CpGs
The CALERIETM intervention was associated with an average weight loss of 8 kg by 12 months of follow-up (23). We therefore evaluated whether DNAm changes associated with the CALERIETM intervention overlapped with DNAm associations with BMI. We examined 129 CpGs identified in a prior EWAS of BMI (18). Specifically, we tested if CpGs hypomethylated in individuals with higher BMI showed signs of increased DNAm in response to the CALERIETM intervention, and if CpGs hypermethylated in individuals with higher BMI showed signs of decreased DNAm in response to CALERIETM intervention, that is, we tested the hypothesis that DNAm changed induced by CALERIETM intervention would be opposite to the pattern of association with higher BMI.
Secondary analysis of smoking-associated CpGs
We tested if DNAm changes associated with the CALERIETM intervention overlapped with DNAm associations with cigarette smoking, a potent risk factor for aging-related disease and mortality known to have pervasive effects on blood DNAm. We examined 2 622 CpGs identified in a prior EWAS of smoking (21). We tested if CpGs hypomethylated in smokers showed signs of increased DNAm in response to the CALERIETM intervention and if CpGs hypermethylated in smokers showed signs of decreased DNAm in response to the CALERIETM intervention, that is, we tested the hypothesis that DNAm changes induced by CALERIETM intervention would be opposite to the pattern of association with smoking.
Secondary analysis of chronological-age-associated CpGs
We tested if DNAm changes associated with the CALERIETM intervention overlapped with DNAm associations with chronological age. We examined 1 000 CpGs identified in a prior EWAS of chronological age (19). We tested if CpGs hypomethylated in chronologically older individuals showed signs of increased DNAm in response to the CALERIETM intervention and if CpGs hypermethylated in chronologically older individuals showed signs of decreased DNAm in response to CALERIETM intervention, that is, we tested the hypothesis that DNAm changes induced by CALERIETM intervention would be opposite to the pattern of association with older chronological age. We repeated the analysis using 875 CpGs identified in a prior EWAS of chronological age (20).
For all secondary analyses, we applied a Bonferoni-corrected threshold of p < .003 to establish statistical significance (16 tests; 0.05/16 = 0.003).
Enrichment analyses
To inform the interpretation of secondary analyses, we performed an enrichment analysis of sets of CpGs identified in published EWAS (18–20). We annotated each CpG to the nearest transcription start site to conduct gene enrichment analysis. We used the Reactome Database to identify enriched biological processes, pathways, and functional relationships (30). We used the GM12878 chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) data from the ENCODE data portal (31) to identify whether certain transcription factor binding sites were enriched amongst phenotype-associated CpGs. Briefly, BEDtools were used to identify the intersection between the Methyl 450 annotation file and the ChIP-seq bed file (32). Enrichment of transcription factors bound within 500 bp of the phenotype-associated CpGs compared to non-phenotype-associated CpGs was tested with permutation analysis. We additionally tested ontological enrichment using the gene ontology enrichment analysis and visualization tool (Gorilla) (33).
Results
EWAS of CALERIETM Treatment Effects
We conducted an intent-to-treat analysis of CALERIETM treatment effects at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Genome-wide comparison of DNAm between CR and AL at 12 and 24 months did not identify any CpG-site-specific changes that were statistically different from zero at FDR < 0.05 (Figure 2; Supplementary Table 1). The top-ranked CpG site at 12 months was within the first exon of T-Cell Receptor T3 Delta Chain (CD3D) (cg07728874, p-value = 4.05 × 10−6). At 24 months, the top-ranking CR-associated site was located on chromosome 1 within Long intergenic Non-Protein Coding RNA 1344 (LNC01334) (cg12040931, p-value = 2.5 × 10−6).
Figure 2.
Quantile-quantile (QQ) plots of p-value distributions from epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) analysis of CALERIETM treatment effects at 12- and 24-month follow-ups. The figure shows QQ plots for EWAS of blood DNA methylation changes in response to CR at 12 months (Genomic Inflation—0.97; Panel A) and 24 months (Genomic Inflation—0.99; Panel B).
Secondary Analyses of CpG Sites Identified in Published EWAS of BMI, Cigarette Smoking, and Chronological Age
We conducted secondary analyses of summary statistics from the CALERIETM EWAS using published results from EWAS of BMI, cigarette smoking, and chronological age.
Because CR induced substantial weight loss (23), we first compared CALERIETM EWAS results for DNAm at n = 129 CpG sites identified in a published EWAS of BMI (18) with results for all other CpG sites. For CpG sites identified as hypermethylated in individuals with higher BMI (n = 50), CR tended to reduce DNAm (12 months, p = 2.06E−07; 24 months, p = 3.96E−11). For CpG sites identified as hypomethylated in individuals with higher BMI (n = 79), CR tended to increase DNAm (12 months, p = 1.04E−06; 24 months, p = 7.04E−04). Thus, for both sets of CpGs, CR reversed BMI-associated DNAm.
We next compared CALERIETM EWAS results for DNAm at n = 2 622 CpG sites identified in EWAS of cigarette smoking (34) with results for all other CpG sites. For CpG sites identified as hypermethylated in smokers (n = 1 555), compared with AL, CR tended to reduce DNAm (12 months, p = 1.03E−05; 24 months, p = 2.63E−30). For CpG sites identified as hypomethylated in smokers (n = 1 067), compared with AL, CR tended to increase DNAm, although this finding was statistically different from the null only at 24 months of follow-up (12 months, p = .08; 24 months, p = 4.3E−04). Overall, CR showed signs of reversing smoking-associated DNAm.
Finally, we compared CALERIETM EWAS results for DNAm at 1 000 CpG sites previously associated with chronological age (19) to results for all other CpG sites. For CpG sites identified as hypermethylated in older adults (n = 980), compared with AL, CR tended to increase DNAm (12 months, p = 3.79E−41; 24 months, p = 5.73E−06). For CpG sites identified as hypomethylated in older adults (n = 20), compared with AL, CR was not associated with changes in DNAm (12 months, p = .12; 24 months, p = .29). Results were similar in repeated analyses using results from a second EWAS of chronological age (20). Thus, for sites hypermethylated in older adults, CR induced DNAm changes consistent with older age. In contrast, CR had no detectable effect on sites hypomethylated in older as compared to younger adults.
Results for analyses of BMI-, cigarette smoking-, and chronological-age-associated CpG sites are reported in Table 2. Distributions of CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for BMI-, cigarettesmoking-, and chronological-age-associated CpGs are shown in Figure 3. Enrichment results and gene ontological process analyses are reported in Supplementary Table 2. External EWAS CpGs and test statistics are included in Supplementary Table 3.
Table 2.
Analysis of CpG Sites Identified in Published Epigenome-wide Association Studies of BMI, Smoking, and Chronological Age
| Phenotype | Publication | EWAS Sample Size | Hypomethylated with Phenotype | Hypermethylated with Phenotype | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of CpGs | 12 mo CALERIETM EWAS Median T-statistic | 12 Months Wilcox p-value | 24 mo CALERIETM EWAS Median T-statistic | 24 mo Wilcoxon p-value | Number of CpGs | 12 mo CALERIETM EWAS Median T-statistic | 12 Months Wilcoxon p-value | 24 mo CALERIETM EWAS Median T-statistic | 24 mo Wilcoxon p-value | |||
| BMI | Wahl et al. (18) | 10,261 | 79 | 0.61 | 1.04E−06 | 0.32 | 7.04E−04 | 50 | −0.93 | 2.06E−07 | −1.08 | 3.96E−11 |
| Smoking | Joehanes et al. 21) | 15,907 | 1 067 | −0.12 | .08 | −0.17 | 4.3E−04 | 1 555 | −0.14 | 1.03E−05 | −0.32 | 2.63E−30 |
| Age | McCartney et al. (19) | 7 036 | 20 | 0.67 | .12 | 0.27 | .29 | 980 | 0.39 | 3.79E−41 | 0.16 | 5.73E−06 |
| Age | Rönn et al. (20) | 294 | 15 | −0.08 | .90 | −0.47 | .06 | 860 | 0.19 | 1.08E−09 | 0.05 | 9.04E−04 |
Notes: The table summarizes results for anlaysis of CpG sites identified in published epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of body-mass index (BMI), smoking, and chronological age. We included CpGs identified in the published EWAS with p-value < 1E−7, with the exception of the chronological-age EWAS by McCartney et al., which reported only the top 1 000 sites (all p-values < 1E−7). We used a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test to compare CALERIETM-EWAS T-statistic distributions between phenotype-associated CpGs and all other CpGs. Tests were conducted separately for CpGs hypermethylated with the phenotype (ie, for which the association between the phenotype and DNA methylation was positive) and CpGs hypomethylated with the phenotype (ie, for which the association between the phenotype and DNA methylation was negative). The table reports the number of CpGs included in each test and the resulting z-statistic and p-value. Positive median CALERIETM EWAS t-statistics indicate that DNAm change in response to CALERIETM intervention was in the same direction as the DNAm association with the target phenotype. A negative median t-statistic indicates that the DNAm change in response to CALERIETM intervention was in the opposite direction of DNAm association with the target phenotype.
Figure 3.
Distributions of test statistics from epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) analysis of CALERIETM treatment effects for CpG sites identified in published EWAS of body mass index, cigarette smoking, and chronological age. The figure shows box plots of CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for 3 groups of CpGs sites for each target phenotype. The blue-shaded box plot shows CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for CpG sites that exhibit lower levels of DNA methylation in association with the target phenotype in published EWAS of independent samples. The red-shaded box plot shows CALERIETM EWAS test statistics for CpG sites that exhibit higher levels of DNA methylation in association with the target phenotype in published EWAS. The gray-shaded box plot shows test statistics for CpG sites not associated with the target phenotype in published EWAS. Box plots are drawn for CALERIETM EWAS results from 12- and 24-month follow-ups. Stars indicate p-value threshold for comparisons based on a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. (* < .05, ** < .005, *** < .0005). Panel A graphs data grouped according to EWAS of body mass index (BMI) by Wahl et al. (18). The figure illustrates reversal of BMI-associated DNAm changes in response to CALERIETM intervention. Panel B graphs data grouped according to EWAS of cigarette smoking by Joehanes et al. (21). The figure illustrates reversal of smoking-associated DNAm changes in response to CALERIETM intervention. Panel C graphs data grouped according to EWAS of chronological age by McCartney et al. (19). The figure illustrates induction of older-chronological-age-associated DNAm changes in response to CALERIETM intervention, although only for sites exhibiting increased DNAm in older as compared to younger people.
Discussion
The goal of the CALERIETM Trial was to identify the effects of CR on predictors of longevity, disease risk factors and quality of life. Published analyses of CALERIETM data establish that the intervention improved cardiometabolic health and suggest it may have slowed or reversed aging-related biological changes (14–17,23,35). In this study, we tested whether the intervention altered whole-blood DNAm. After accounting for multiple testing, EWAS analysis revealed no sites of altered CpG methylation by CR. However, secondary analyses of sets of CpG sites, identified in published EWAS of BMI, cigarette smoking, and chronological age, indicated that the CALERIETM intervention changed blood DNAm in a manner consistent with a reversal of DNAm patterns linked with obesity and cigarette smoking, but in the direction of older chronological age. Further interrogation across BMI-, cigarette smoking-, and chronological aging-associated sites revealed enrichment of genes associated with insulin production, glucose tolerance, inflammation, and DNA binding and regulation (Supplementary Table 2).
CALERIETM-induced DNAm changes at BMI-associated CpG sites were enriched for genes involved in insulin production, glucose tolerance, and inflammatory processes, consistent with CR-induced epigenetic changes in animal models (7–9,31,36–40). The 26 genes enriched in CpG sites hypermethylated with higher BMI include P4HB, critical for lipoprotein metabolism, insulin production, and glucose intolerance (37–39). CR-induced hypomethylation at P4HB may mediate previously reported CR-derived metabolic improvements in lipoproteins and insulin sensitivity (15). Another potential epigenetic benefit of CR on glucose tolerance may derive from hypermethylation at cg16246545 (Supplementary Table 4), located near PHGDH. Deletion of PHGDH in adipocytes of mice with diet-induced obesity improves glucose tolerance. CR-induced methylation changes at both P4HB and PHGDH likely enhance glucose tolerance. Additional CR-induced epigenetic changes at BMI-associated sites included hypomethylation at cg19750657 (Supplementary Table 4), located near UFM1, which has been identified as a mediator of the inflammatory response in diabetic mice. Taken together, these results imply that CR, especially when maintained for 24 months, may produce anti-inflammatory benefits (31,40).
CALERIETM-induced DNAm changes at smoking-associated CpG sites were enriched for genes involved in the tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 (TNF2) noncanonical NF-kB signaling pathway (Supplementary Table 2), a key driver of systemic inflammation (41). In addition, changes at sites with less methylation in smokers versus nonsmokers included sites identified in published EWAS of C-reactive protein (CRP) (42), a well-studied biomarker of inflammation, which is elevated in smokers and was reduced with CR in CALERIETM (43–46). Taken together, CR appears to reverse smoking-associated DNAm patterns in inflammatory pathways.
The overwhelming majority of CpG sites identified in EWAS of chronological age exhibited greater DNAm in older as compared to younger individuals. These sites, at which we observed increased DNAm in response to CR, are enriched for multiple transcription factors and DNA binding proteins, including T-Box Transcription Factor 15 (TBX15), SRY-Box Transcription Factor 1 (SOX1), Zic Family Member 4 (ZIC4), SIM BHLH Transcription Factor 1 (SIM1), and SRY-Box Transcription Factor 17 (SOX17). Therefore, CR may induce gain of methylation parallel to aging at genomic sites serving regulatory functions. An important next step is to better understand if such gain of methylation reflects processes of aging-related decline in system integrity or, instead, genomic changes that preserve health in aging. For example, the association of CpG methylation at these sites with chronological age could reflect survivor bias, in which relatively fewer individuals with lower levels of DNAm at these sites survive to advanced ages. CR slows the accumulation of aging-related DNAm changes in mice and monkeys (11,47). Further investigation of the significance of chronological-age-associated CpG sites for phenotypes of aging is needed to clarify the interpretation of our findings. Specifically, studies are needed that establish if DNAm correlates of older chronological age are predictive of morbidity and mortality and if changes in DNAm at these loci correspond to worsening health trajectories.
We acknowledge limitations. Foremeost, response to the CR intervention was heterogeneous, as is typical in lifestyle interventions (48). Over the 2-year intervention, the treatment group achieved on average 12% CR (23). The trial sample was relatively small for genome-wide analysis; EWAS analyses were powered to detect only medium-to-large effect-size changes in DNAm at individual CpG sites. Identification of such changes is hampered by imperfect measurement precision for individual CpG-site DNAm (48), which will bias estimates of change toward the null. Nevertheless, aggregate analyses of sets of CpGs identified in prior EWAS suggest that the CALERIETM intervention altered the blood methylome. As EWAS consortia uncover new CpG sites associated with a broader array of aging-related diseases, this analysis can be expanded. As new methods are developed to improve the precision of DNAm measurement from Illumina array data, it may be possible to revisit analyses to identify specific regions in which DNAm may be altered by the intervention (49). Future studies testing stronger doses of CR or including larger samples may also improve the detection of DNAm changes. In that light, sex-dependent effects of weight loss interventions, particularly in CR, have been identified in rodents (50). Although this study was underpowered to identify sex-dependent methylation changes in response to CR, future studies should incorporate a study population and size better suited to address these phenomena. Additionally, the majority of participants enrolled in CALERIETM were White. A priority for future trials of lifestyle interventions, including CR, is increased representation of non-White race/ethnic groups. Last, because follow-up extended only to the end of the intervention period, we cannot know if DNAm changes associated with CR persisted after the intervention concluded.
In conclusion, while CR did not result in individual CpG-site DNAm changes that reached epigenome-wide significance, analyses of sets of CpGs identified in prior EWAS of BMI, cigarette smoking, and chronological age identified clear evidence of DNAm changes in response to CR. As expected, the BMI-associated changes were consistent with CR-induced reversal of BMI-associated patterns of DNAm. Likewise, CR reversed DNAm patterns associated with cigarette smoking, a known correlate of premature aging. Last, and to our surprise, CR appeared to increase methylation at sites where hypermethylation is associated with older as compared to a younger age. That these sites were enriched for regulatory mechanisms suggests a complex interplay of CR with genomic changes characteristic of older age. Whether they imply pro-aging effects of CR or reflect signatures of healthy aging remains to be determined.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We thank the CALERIETM Biorepository (R33AG070455) for its support of this work.
Contributor Information
Megan E Ramaker, Duke University Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David L Corcoran, Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Abner T Apsley, Behavioral Health Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Biobehavioral Health, Molecular, Cellular, and Integrative Biosciences Program, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Michael S Kobor, BC Children’s Hopsital Research Institute (BCCHR), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Program in Child and Brain Development, CIFA, MaRS Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; The Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Virginia B Kraus, Duke University Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
William E Kraus, Duke University Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David T S Lin, BC Children’s Hopsital Research Institute (BCCHR), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Melissa C Orenduff, Duke University Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Carl F Pieper, Center for Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Reem Waziry, Butler Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Kim M Huffman, Duke University Molecular Physiology Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Daniel W Belsky, Butler Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Funding
This work was supported by National Institute on Aging Grant R01AG061378. W.E.K. and K.M.H. are also supported by the National Institute of Aging Grant R33AG070455. V.B.K. is supported by National Institute of Health Grants R01AG054840 and P30-AG028716. R.W. is the recipient of a McKnight Scholar Award from the McKnight Brain Research Foundation through the American Brain Foundation in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology.
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
References
- 1. Sierra F. Geroscience and the challenges of aging societies. Aging Med. 2019;2(3):132–134. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kennedy BK, Berger SL, Brunet A, et al. Geroscience: linking aging to chronic disease. Cell. 2014;159(4):709–713. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Campisi J, Kapahi P, Lithgow GJ, Melov S, Newman JC, Verdin E. From discoveries in ageing research to therapeutics for healthy ageing. Nature. 2019;571(7764):183–192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1365-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Liang Y, Liu C, Lu M, et al. Calorie restriction is the most reasonable anti-ageing intervention: a meta-analysis of survival curves. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24146-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Speakman JR, Mitchell SE. Caloric restriction. Mol Aspects Med. 2011;32(3):159–221. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2011.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Colman RJ, Beasley TM, Kemnitz JW, Johnson SC, Weindruch R, Anderson RM. Caloric restriction reduces age-related and all-cause mortality in rhesus monkeys. Nat Commun. 2014;5:1–5. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lawler DF, Larson BT, Ballam JM, et al. Diet restriction and ageing in the dog: major observations over two decades. Br J Nutr. 2008:793–805. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507871686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Min K, Flatt T, Kulaots I, Tatar M. Counting calories in Drosophila diet restriction. Exp Geront. 2007;42:247–251. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.10.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sinclair DA. Toward a unified theory of caloric restriction and longevity regulation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005;126(9 SPEC. ISS):987–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Maegawa S, Lu Y, Tahara T, et al. Caloric restriction delays age-related methylation drift. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00607-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Green CL, Lamming DW, Fontana L. Molecular mechanisms of dietary restriction promoting health and longevity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(1):56–73. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00411-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rickman AD, Williamson DA, Martin CK, et al. The CALERIE Study: Design and methods of an innovative 25% caloric restriction intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32(6):874–881. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Belsky DW, Huffman KM, Pieper CF, Shalev I, Kraus WE. Change in the rate of biological aging in response to caloric restriction: CALERIE biobank analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(1):4–10. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kraus WE, Bhapkar M, Huffman KM, et al. 2 years of calorie restriction and cardiometabolic risk (CALERIE): exploratory outcomes of a multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(9):673–683. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30151-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Redman LM, Smith SR, Burton JH, Martin CK, Il’yasova D, Ravussin E. Metabolic slowing and reduced oxidative damage with sustained caloric restriction support the rate of living and oxidative damage theories of aging. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):805–815.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.02.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Spadaro O, Youm Y, Shchukina I, et al. Caloric restriction in humans reveals immunometabolic regulators of health span. Science. 2022;375(6581):671–677. doi: 10.1126/science.abg7292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wahl S, Drong A, Lehne B, et al. Epigenome-wide association study of body mass index, and the adverse outcomes of adiposity. Nature. 2017;541(7635):81–86. doi: 10.1038/nature20784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. McCartney DL, Zhang F, Hillary RF, et al. An epigenome-wide association study of sex-specific chronological ageing. Genome Med. 2020;12(1): 1–11. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0693-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Rönn T, Volkov P, Gillberg L, et al. Impact of age, BMI and HbA1c levels on the genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA expression patterns in human adipose tissue and identification of epigenetic biomarkers in blood. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(13):3792–3813. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Joehanes R, Just AC, Marioni RE, et al. Epigenetic signatures of cigarette smoking. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2016;9(5):436–447. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rochon J, Bales CW, Ravussin E, et al. Design and conduct of the CALERIE study: comprehensive assessment of the long-term effects of reducing intake of energy. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011;66 A(1):97–108. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ravussin E, Redman LM, Rochon J, et al. A 2-year randomized controlled trial of human caloric restriction: Feasibility and effects on predictors of health span and longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(9):1097–1104. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Davis S, Du P, Bilke S, TricheT, Jr, and Bootwalla M.. Methylumi: Handle Illumina Methylation Data. 2014. R package version 2.12.0. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;12(2):115–121. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lehne B, Drong AW, Loh M, et al. A coherent approach for analysis of the Illumina HumanMethylation450 BeadChip improves data quality and performance in epigenome-wide association studies. Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0600-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, et al. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(10):1363–1369. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Salas LA, Koestler DC, Butler RA, et al. An optimized library for reference-based deconvolution of whole-blood biospecimens assayed using the Illumina HumanMethylationEPIC BeadArray. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1448-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82(13): 1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Jassal B, Matthews L, Viteri G, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D498–D503. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Davis CA, Hitz BC, Sloan CA, et al. The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D794–D801. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(6):841–842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Eden E, Navon R, Steinfeld I, Lipson D, Yakhini Z. GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists. BMC Bioinf. 2009;10:1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Office of the Surgeon General (US); Office on Smoking and Health (US). The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2004.. PMID: 20669512. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kwon D, Belsky DW. A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: BioAge. GeroScience. 2021;43(6):2795–2808. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00480-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. McCay C, Crowell MF, Maynard L. The effect of retarded growth upon the length of life span and upon the ultimate body size. J Nutr. 1935;10(1):63–79. doi: 10.1093/jn/10.1.63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Beilstein F, Bouchoux J, Rousset M, Demignot S. Proteomic analysis of lipid droplets from Caco-2/TC7 enterocytes identifies novel modulators of lipid secretion. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e530171–e530117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Beilstein F, Carrière V, Leturque A, Demignot S. Characteristics and functions of lipid droplets and associated proteins in enterocytes. Exp Cell Res. 2016;340(2):172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jang I, Pottekat A, Poothong J, et al. PDIA1/P4HB is required for efficient proinsulin maturation and ß cell health in response to diet induced obesity. Elife. 2019;8:1–22. doi: 10.7554/eLife.44528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Hu X, Zhang H, Song Y, et al. Ubiquitin fold modifier 1 activates NF-κB pathway by down-regulating LZAP expression in the macrophage of diabetic mouse model. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(1):1–11. doi: 10.1042/BSR20191672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun SC. NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2(March). doi: 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ligthart S, Marzi C, Aslibekyan S, et al. DNA methylation signatures of chronic low-grade inflammation are associated with complex diseases. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1119-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Ohsawa M, Okayama A, Nakamura M, et al. CRP levels are elevated in smokers but unrelated to the number of cigarettes and are decreased by long-term smoking cessation in male smokers. Prev Med. 2005;41(2):651–656. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Dietrich T, Garcia RI, de Pablo P, Schulze PC, Hoffmann K. The effects of cigarette smoking on C-reactive protein concentrations in men and women and its modification by exogenous oral hormones in women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2007;14(5):694–700. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328270b913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tang Y, Fung E, Xu A, Lan HY. C-reactive protein and ageing. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2017;44(March):9–14. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12758 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Meydani SN, Das SK, Pieper CF, et al. Long-term moderate calorie restriction inhibits inflammation without impairing cell-mediated immunity: a randomized controlled trial in non-obese humans. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8(7):1416–1431. doi: 10.18632/aging.100994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Anderson OS, Sant KE, Dolinoy DC. Nutrition and epigenetics: An interplay of dietary methyl donors, one-carbon metabolism and DNA methylation. J Nutr Biochem. 2012;23(8):853–859. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2012.03.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Sugden K, Hannon EJ, Arseneault L, et al. Patterns of reliability: assessing the reproducibility and integrity of DNA methylation measurement. Patterns. 2020;1(2):100014. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Higgins-Chen AT, Thrush KL, Wang Y, et al. A computational solution for bolstering reliability of epigenetic clocks: Implications for clinical trials and longitudinal tracking. bioRxiv. 2021:2021.04.16.440205. doi: 10.1101/2021.04.16.440205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Kane AE, Sinclair DA, Mitchell JR, Mitchell SJ. Sex differences in the response to dietary restriction in rodents. Curr Opin Physiol. 2018;6:28–34. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2018.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



