Abstract
Inflammasome complexes are pivotal in the innate immune response. The NLR family pyrin domain containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is activated in response to a broad variety of cellular stressors. However, a primary and converging sensing mechanism by the NLRP3 receptor initiating inflammasome assembly remains ill defined. Here, we demonstrate that NLRP3 inflammasome activators primarily converge on disruption of endoplasmic reticulum–endosome membrane contact sites (EECS). This defect causes endosomal accumulation of phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate (PI4P) and a consequent impairment of endosome-to-trans-Golgi network trafficking (ETT), necessary steps for endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 and subsequent inflammasome activation. Lowering endosomal PI4P levels prevents endosomal association of NLRP3 and inhibits inflammasome activation. Disruption of EECS or ETT is sufficient to enhance endosomal PI4P levels, to recruit NLRP3 to endosomes and to potentiate NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Mice with defects in ETT in the myeloid compartment are more susceptible to lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis. Our study thus identifies a distinct cellular mechanism leading to endosomal NLRP3 recruitment and inflammasome activation.
Subject terms: NOD-like receptors, Endosomes
A dogma in the inflammasome field is that NLRP3 activation occurs at dispersed vesicles of the trans-Golgi network. Here, Ricci and colleagues find that these vesicles are of endosomal origin and that endosomes comprise the compartment where NLRP3 is activated.
Main
Inflammasomes are cytosolic multimeric protein complexes that play critical roles in innate immune responses to pathogens and damage-associated signals. The NLRP3 inflammasome is unique, as it is capable of detecting a remarkable variety of danger signals and it is therefore broadly implicated in different inflammatory diseases1–4. NLRP3 inflammasome activation requires two principal steps, priming through Toll-like or cytokine receptor signaling resulting in robust expression of the inflammasome components and their assembly upon exposure to NLRP3 inflammasome activating factors. Upon activation, NLRP3 oligomerizes and recruits the apoptosis-associated speck-like (ASC) adapter and pro-caspase-1, leading to self-activation of caspase-1. Active caspase-1 cleaves pro-interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and pro-IL-18 into their mature forms and also cleaves gasdermin D, triggering a form of pro-inflammatory cell death called pyroptosis.
Depending on the nature of the activating stimuli, several mechanisms can lead to assembly of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Most of these mechanisms trigger potassium efflux to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome5,6. Yet, a primary sensing mechanism of the NLRP3 inflammasome receptor remains largely elusive. A recent study showed that NLRP3 recruitment to vesicles containing PI4P was important for its activation7.
In this work, we find that the vesicles to which NLRP3 is recruited are of endosomal origin. We further demonstrate that endosomes accumulate PI4P, a required step for NLRP3 recruitment to endosomes and activation of the inflammasome at the endosomal membranes. PI4P accumulation in endosomes results from disruption of EECS and a subsequent defect in ETT that occurs in response to different NLRP3 inflammasome activators. Genetic disruption of EECS and ETT potentiates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. We propose that NLRP3 primarily senses distinct changes in the endosomal composition, including PI4P accumulation, in response to different NLRP3 activators.
Results
NLRP3 activators induce PI4P accumulation on endosomes
First, we assessed whether NLRP3 activators cause any change in intracellular PI4P levels or distribution using the PI4P probe GFP-P4CSidC and an antibody against PI4P in HeLa cells. We found that potassium efflux-dependent nigericin as well as the potassium efflux-independent imiquimod-derived compound CL097 induced a fast and marked overall increase in PI4P levels in HeLa cells. Nigericin increased the levels of PI4P not only at the Golgi complex, the site where PI4P is particularly concentrated in non-treated cells, but also in sparse vesicles throughout the cytoplasm (Extended Data Fig. 1a,b). PI4P-positive cytoplasmic vesicles are early endosomes (EEs) as judged by transferrin loading and labeling with the EE marker SNX2 and EEA1 (Extended Data Fig. 1c–h). ASC-deficient THP-1 cells, a human acute leukemia monocytic cell line, and immortalized mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (iBMDMs) lacking ASC also showed PI4P distribution to EEA1-positive vesicles upon nigericin or CL097 treatment (Extended Data Fig. 2a–d). The PI4P-positive vesicular compartment also contained PI3P (as judged by the PI3P probe, the FYVE domain of SARA), confirming its endosomal origin (Extended Data Fig. 1i,j). Thus, inflammasome activators generate an endosomal compartment with mixed phosphatidylionositol identity.
Accumulation of PI4P on endosomes is required for recruitment and activation of NLRP3 in the endosomal compartment
Next, we asked whether NLRP3 is recruited to this compartment. Indeed, ectopically expressed enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged NLRP3 (NLRP3-eGFP) acquired a punctate distribution co-localizing with PI4P-positive EEs upon nigericin or CL907 treatment, whereas it exhibited a diffuse distribution in non-treated cells (Fig. 1a,b). Furthermore, NLRP3-eGFP co-localized with EEA1-positive and PI4P-enriched vesicles in ASC-deficient THP-1 cells (Fig. 1c–f). Using the pyrin domain of ASC (ASCPYD) tagged with eGFP in HeLa cells as previously described7, we confirmed that the tips of oligomerized ASCPYD filaments co-localized with the endosomal marker EEA1 (Fig. 1g,h), indicating that inflammasome assembly predominantly originates at endosomes.
Next, we addressed the source of increased endosomal PI4P in response to NLRP3 activators. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases, consisting of PI4KIIα, PI4KIIβ, PI4KIIIα and PI4KIIIβ, are important for the production of PI4P. First, we deleted PI4KIIIβ, which is the main source of PI4P at the Golgi, and assessed PI4P levels and endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 in HeLa cells in response to NLRP3 activators. Deletion of PI4KIIIβ depleted PI4P in the Golgi without altering endosomal PI4P levels and endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 in response to nigericin or CL097 (Extended Data Fig. 3a,b), excluding the possibility that increased endosomal PI4P is derived from the Golgi pool. Three kinases, PI4KIIα, PI4KIIβ and PI4KIIIβ, have been shown to locate to endosomes8,9. We therefore suspected functional redundancy of these kinases and combined depletion of PI4KIIα and PI4KIIβ with existing specific inhibitors. We found that the endosomal PI4P increase and the endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 induced by nigericin were dampened by the depletion of PI4KIIα and PI4KIIβ combined with the PI4KIIIβ inhibitor IN-9 in HeLa cells (Extended Data Fig. 3c,d). We then generated THP-1 cells lacking both PI4KIIα and PI4KIIβ using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in combination with the PI4KIIIβ inhibitors IN-9 and IN-10 or the PI4KIIIα inhibitor GSK-A1. Deletion of PI4KIIα and PI4KIIβ in combination with IN-9 and IN-10 substantially reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in THP-1 cells. Western blotting revealed reduced release of mature IL-1β and cleaved caspase-1 to supernatants. Measurements of the cellular uptake of the live cell-impermeant nucleic acid dye Sytox Green revealed reduced pyroptosis. Finally, reduced IL-1β secretion was confirmed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). However, deletion in combination with GSK-A1 had no such effect (Extended Data Fig. 3e,f). These data corroborated the importance of PI4P for the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and identified kinases responsible for PI4P accumulation in endosomes.
NLRP3 activators lead to PI4P accumulation on endosomes via disruption of EECS
As previously reported, an increase of PI4P in endosomes can be caused by disruption of the EECS due to the inability of endosomal PI4P to be transferred by lipid transfer proteins such as oxysterol binding protein (OSBP) to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it is degraded by PI4P phosphatase SAC110. Depletion of VAP proteins (VAPA and VAPB), key components of ER–Golgi and EECS, as well as OSBP induces increased endosomal PI4P10. We therefore wondered whether NLRP3 activators affect contact sites. To this end, we developed a Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based assay with a donor fluorophore molecule (GFP) conjugated to the endosomal protein RAB5 that, when excited, transfer energy to an acceptor fluorophore molecule (mCherry) conjugated to the ER membrane protein Cb5 in a situation in which EECS are maintained (Fig. 2a). A significant decrease of the RAB5-GFP mean lifetime value (τ) was observed in cells expressing RAB5-GFP and mCherry-Cb5 (donor and acceptor) compared with cells expressing RAB5-GFP alone (donor). This decrease was abolished by nigericin treatment, suggesting that EECS were disrupted (Fig. 2b,c). To corroborate this phenomenon, we then used a system allowing for chemically induced dimerization of the RAB5 and Cb5 reporter proteins fused with FRB and FKBP domains by short treatment with a low concentration of rapamycin11,12, which stabilizes pre-existing physiological EECS without inducing artificial tethering between endosomes and ER (Fig. 2d). Rapamycin induced co-localization of RAB5-FRB-iRFP and mCherry-FKBP-Cb5 in control cells. In contrast, co-localization was significantly decreased in nigericin-treated cells (Fig. 2e,f). Similar results were obtained upon CL097 stimulation (Fig. 2f). Thus, NLRP3 inflammasome activators converge on disruption of EECS.
Disruption of EECS is accompanied by an increase in actin polymerization on endosomal membranes manifested by actin comets that propel EEs. Strikingly, nigericin, as well as CL097, indeed induced the formation of actin comets on EEs in HeLa cells (Extended Data Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Videos 1 and 2). Importantly, some of these EEs propelled by actin comets also contained NLRP3-eGFP, thus indicating that this altered EE compartment represents the site where NLRP3 is recruited (Extended Data Fig. 4c and Supplementary Video 3). Formation of actin comets was confirmed in nigericin-stimulated and CL097-stimulated primary BMDMs (Extended Data Fig. 4d).
In line with impaired delivery of the endosomal PI4P to the ER-located SAC1 as a consequence of EECS disruption, nigericin-induced increase of PI4P on endosomes and endosomal recruitment of NRLP3 were largely insensitive to ectopic expression of SAC1. However, these parameters were dramatically reduced upon ectopic expression of the cytosolic (and endosome-associated) SAC2 phosphatase (Extended Data Fig. 5a,b). Consistent with this observation, SAC2 was also much more efficient than SAC1 in decreasing NLRP3 inflammasome activity in wild-type (WT) THP-1 cells stimulated with nigericin, CL097 or imiquimod R837 (Extended Data Fig. 5c,d). These findings suggest that PI4P accumulation in endosomes as a consequence of EECS disruption is important for NLRP3 inflammasome activation.
Disruption of EECS and impaired transfer of endosomal PI4P to ER potentiates NLRP3 inflammasome activation
Next, we asked whether disrupting the EECS or interfering with PI4P exchange at the level of EECS was per se sufficient to trigger NLRP3 activation. To this end, we assessed NLRP3 localization in VAPA/B double knockout (dKO)10 and OSBP-depleted HeLa cells. We found that NLRP3-eGFP is constitutively localized to PI4P-enriched endosomes in both VAPA/B dKO and OSBP-depleted cells in the absence of inflammasome activators (Fig. 3a,b). Next, we generated VAPA/B dKO and OSBP KO THP-1 cells to assess NLRP3 inflammasome activity compared with WT cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. VAPA/B dKO and OSBP KO THP-1 cells showed prominent pyroptotic cell death, secretion and cleavage of IL-1β and caspase-1 upon priming by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (a TLR4 ligand) or Pam3CSK4 (a TLR1/TLR2 ligand), whereas priming alone had no such effect in corresponding WT control cells (Fig. 3c–e,g–i). These effects were independent of potassium efflux, as increase of extracellular potassium levels did not show any differences, indicating that disruption of EECS in response to nigericin occurs downstream of potassium efflux (Fig. 3c,d,g,h). However, they were dependent on NLRP3, as inhibition or deletion of NLRP3 abolished these effects (Fig. 3c–e,g–i). Interestingly, tumor-necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) release was dampened from VAPA/B dKO and OSBP null THP-1 cells compared with levels from control cells (Fig. 3g–i). Re-expression of VAPA in VAPA/B dKO THP-1 cells abolished enhanced susceptibility to LPS priming (Fig. 3f,j). In contrast, the VAPA K94D/M96D mutant devoid of FFAT motif binding that is required for the formation of contact sites did not abolish increased susceptibility to LPS priming (Fig. 3f,j).
Interestingly, using a rapamycin-induced reporter dimerization assay12, nigericin and CL097 also disrupted ER–trans-Golgi network (TGN) contact sites (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). ER–TGN contact sites have also been shown to be VAPA/B-dependent12. However, depletion of ORP10, which is specific for the maintenance of ER–TGN contact sites12, did not show the same effect as depletion of VAPA/B or OSBP in response to LPS priming (Extended Data Fig. 6c,d), excluding a major role of disruption of ER–TGN contact sites. Overall, these data suggest that disruption of EECS is sufficient to potentiate NLRP3 inflammasome activation.
NLRP3 activators impair ETT, resulting in endosomal retention of TGN-destined cargos
The consequences of the endosomal PI4P increase and of increased actin polymerization include ineffective endosome fission and impairment of ETT with endosomal retention of TGN-destined cargos10 such as TGN46, which cycles between plasma membrane, endosomes and TGN13–15. Indeed, nigericin impaired the trafficking of TGN46 from the EEs to the TGN, thus causing re-localization of TGN46 from the Golgi area to scattered RAB5-positive EEs, and at the same time induced the association of NLRP3-eGFP to these vesicles in HeLa cells (Fig. 4a,b). The re-localization of TGN38 (mouse orthologue of human TGN46) into scattered endosomes was confirmed in primary BMDMs in response to nigericin or CL097 (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b).
Next, we dissected the temporal sequence of events induced by nigericin, that is, peripheral PI4P increase, endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 and peripheral redistribution of TGN46. We found that endosomal PI4P accumulation and NLRP3 recruitment preceded peripheral redistribution of TGN46, indicating that the latter is a consequence of increased endosomal PI4P that hampers its ETT (Fig. 4c–e). In line with this conclusion, the distribution of GRIP domain-containing TGN proteins, which do not undergo ETT16, such as the golgins GCC1/GCC88, GCC2/GCC185, Golgin97 and Golgin245/p230, was not affected by treatment with nigericin or CL097, excluding defects in overall TGN integrity (Extended Data Figs. 7c–f and 8a–f).
To further address the extent to which NLRP3 inflammasome activators affect ETT, we examined their effect on the retrograde trafficking of Cy3-conjugated Shiga toxin subunit B (StxB)17,18. We observed that in control cells, the majority of StxB localized to a GCC1-positive TGN compartment after 40 min of endocytosis, in line with efficient endosomal retrograde transport to the TGN (Fig. 5a,c and Extended Data Fig. 9a,b). In contrast, in nigericin-treated (Fig. 5a,c) or CL097-treated cells (Extended Data Fig. 9a,b), StxB was mainly found in enlarged EEA1-positive EEs. As expected, StxB-enriched EEA1-positive vesicles were not positive for GCC1, GCC2 or p230, confirming their endosomal origin (Fig. 5a,c and Extended Data Fig. 9a–d). Importantly, StxB co-localized with TGN46 upon nigericin treatment, in line with the fact that TGN46 also transits along the ETT pathway (Extended Data Fig. 9e,f). These results indicated that treatment with nigericin or CL097 blocked ETT, leading to retention of StxB and TGN46 on endosomes. To corroborate this observation, we assessed the retrograde transport of another cargo: the cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate receptor (CI-MPR) as previously described19,20. We examined the internalization of an antibody recognizing the extracellular domain of CI-MPR10 in control versus nigericin-treated or CL097-treated HeLa cells. In control cells, the CI-MPR antibody mainly localized to the TGN with only small amounts still at endosomes (Fig. 5b,d and Extended Data Fig. 9g,h). In contrast, most of the CI-MPR antibody was detected in endosomes but not at the TGN in nigericin-treated or CL097-treated cells (Fig. 5b,d and Extended Data Fig. 9g,h). These observations indicate that NLRP3 inflammasome activators impair ETT, resulting in endosomal retention of TGN cargos such as TGN46 and CI-MPR. These results align with a previous report that NLRP3-positive vesicles are positive for EEA1 and TGN467. In that report, however, the authors concluded that EEA1 was missorted to Golgi-derived TGN46-positive vesicles. In contrast, our data support a model in which NLRP3-positive vesicles are of endosomal origin and that TGN46 is enriched on endosomes because of a defect in ETT.
Disruption of ETT potentiates NLRP3 inflammasome activation
Next, we wondered whether defective ETT is a driving event in NLRP3 inflammasome activation. We targeted ETT through genetic means and assessed the effects of this manipulation on NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Both ADP ribosylation factor related protein 1 (ARFRP1) and SYS1 are critical regulators of TGN tethering factors, including long coiled-coil tethers of the golgin family and the heterotetrameric complex GARP, which mediates tethering and fusion of endosome-derived transport carriers with the TGN membranes21. In line with a previous study21, deletion of ARFRP1 or SYS1 disrupted retrograde ETT of StxB toxin and TGN46 (Fig. 6a–d). In these cells, we found that NLRP3-eGFP was constitutively localized to endosomes in the absence of inflammasome activators, similar to those observed in VAPA/B dKO and OSBP-depleted cells shown above (Fig. 6e,f). Similarly, enhanced endosomal PI4P levels were observed in these cells (Fig. 6e,f). We further deleted ARFRP1 and SYS1 in THP-1 cells using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing. Gene disruption was validated by immunoblotting or Sanger sequencing (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c). In line with a previous report21, deletion of SYS1 reduced protein levels of ARFRP1 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Deletion of ARFRP1 or SYS1 did not affect expression of the inflammasome components, NLRP3, ASC, caspase-1 and NEK7 (Supplementary Fig. 1c). However, priming through stimulation with LPS or Pam3CSK4 was sufficient to induce lytic cell death of ARFRP1 KO and SYS1 KO THP-1 cells (Fig. 7a), accompanied by the cleavage and secretion of caspase-1 and IL-1β (Fig. 7b,c). In contrast, LPS or Pam3CSK4 alone did not evoke such a response in parental WT cells (Fig. 7a–c). LPS-induced lytic cell death, cleavage and secretion of caspase-1 and IL-1β in KO cells were dependent on NLRP3, as these effects were abolished in the presence of the NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 (Fig. 7b,c) or by deletion of NLRP3 (Fig. 7d). Interestingly, analogous to findings in VAPA/B dKO and OSBP KO cells, secretion of TNF-α was lower from ARFRP1 KO and SYS1 KO cells than its release from control cells in response to LPS priming (Fig. 7c). LPS treatment induced the assembly of mature inflammasome in these KO cells as evidenced by the formation of ASC specks (Fig. 7e,f). LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in KO cells was independent of potassium efflux, as high extracellular potassium levels did not affect pyroptotic cell death, cleavage and secretion of caspase-1 and IL-1β induced by LPS (Fig. 7b,c). Furthermore, re-expression of WT ARFRP1 or constitutively active ARFRP1 Q79L, but not inactive ARFRP1 T31N or Flag-tagged SYS1 abrogated LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in ARFRP1 KO THP-1 cells (Fig. 7g,h), whereas only re-expression of Flag-tagged SYS1, but not ARFRP1 WT, Q79L or T31N, prevented LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in SYS1 KO THP-1 cells (Fig. 7g,h). These results are in line with previous studies showing that SYS1 and ARFRP1 are both critical components of TGN tethering21,22. Activation of other inflammasomes, including the NLRC4 or AIM2 inflammasome, was not affected in ARFRP1 KO and SYS1 KO cells (Fig. 7i). Of note, cells depleted of RAB7 (RAB7A and RAB7B), which is critical for late endosome maturation and lysosome biogenesis, did not show the same effect as observed in ARFRP1 or SYS1 KO cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b), excluding the major contribution of the endosome–lysosome transport pathway to NLRP3 inflammasome activation. From these experiments, we concluded that perturbation of the TGN tethering machinery was sufficient to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in response to priming in THP-1 cells in a potassium efflux-independent manner.
To further test whether this mechanism is conserved among species, we generated iBMDMs lacking Arfrp1 or Sys1 and tested NLRP3 inflammasome activation (Fig. 7j). As observed in THP-1 KO cells, both Arfrp1 and Sys1 KO iBMDMs showed IL-1β release in response to LPS priming in the absence of NLRP3 activators, whereas WT cells did not (Fig. 7k). However, KO iBMDMs did not undergo lytic cell death in response to LPS priming as observed in THP-1 cells. Yet, KO iBMDMs revealed dramatically enhanced NLRP3 inflammasome activation when treated with nigericin or CL097 compared with WT cells (Fig. 7k).
To assess the in vivo relevance of our findings, we generated mice lacking Arfrp1 in the myeloid lineage by crossing Arfrp1-floxed mice to LysM-cre mice. Efficient deletion of Arfrp1 in BMDMs was confirmed by immunoblotting (Fig. 8a). Arfrp1 KO BMDMs displayed significantly enhanced caspase-1 activation, IL-1β cleavage, and IL-1β secretion in response to ATP, nigericin, CL097 or R837 treatment compared with control cells (Fig. 8a,b). NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β release is crucial in low-dose LPS-induced endotoxemia23. Thus, we next performed intraperitoneal injections of LPS using a sublethal dose. Strikingly, myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice were more susceptible to an LPS challenge compared with control mice, as most of the myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice died, whereas most of the control mice survived at such a dose of LPS (Fig. 8c). Serum IL-1β levels were substantially enhanced in myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice compared with levels in control mice (Fig. 8d). TNF-α levels were also slightly increased in myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice (Fig. 8d). Increased serum IL-1β and susceptibility to LPS were dependent on NLRP3, as MCC950 reversed these effects in myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice (Fig. 8c,d). Enhanced levels of TNF-α were also dependent on NLRP3 (Fig. 8d), indicating that increased TNF-α release was most likely a consequence of pro-inflammatory activity of enhanced NLRP3 inflammasome activation. These results suggest that defective ETT drives NLRP3 inflammasome activation in vivo in mice.
Discussion
The NLRP3 inflammasome receptor is rather exceptional, as it is capable of sensing a broad range of cellular stressors. We demonstrate here that NLRP3 inflammasome activators converge into disruption of EECS, endosomal PI4P accumulation and recruitment of NLRP3 to endosomes. We were able to dissect the temporal sequence of events in response to NLRP3 activators: the destabilization of membrane contact sites, the increase of endosomal PI4P and the endosomal recruitment of NLRP3 precedes impairment of ETT that eventually results in retention of TGN cargo on endosomes (Fig. 8e). It will be of great interest in the future to understand how NLRP3 inflammasome activators disrupt EECS. We have also demonstrated that accumulation of PI4P on endosomes is critical for NLRP3 activation. However, whether full-length NLRP3 directly binds PI4P on endosomes is still to be determined, as forced binding of NLRP3 with PI4P was not sufficient to induce inflammasome assembly7. Of note, a very recent study demonstrated that the inactive NLRP3 dodecamer was capable of binding negatively charged lipids including PI4P in vitro24. Given the importance of defective ETT in inflammasome activation, cargo retention in endosomes might be another important step. How ETT contributes to endosomal PI4P accumulation is to be further investigated. NLRP3 might thus detect other molecules (lipids or proteins) that accumulate on endosomes in response to TGN cargo retention.
Although disruption of EECS or ETT is sufficient to activate NLRP3 on endosomes in HeLa cells, priming through LPS is needed in EECS- or ETT-deficient THP-1 cells to trigger inflammasome activation. One possible explanation of this apparent discrepancy is that overexpression of NLRP3 in HeLa cells overrides the requirement for LPS-induced priming. This hypothesis is in line with the observations that nigericin alone without LPS priming is sufficient to trigger the formation of ASCPYD filaments in HeLa cells, whereas priming is needed for endogenous NLRP3 activation in THP-1 cells. As NLRP3 is constitutively expressed in THP-1 cells, we assume that LPS-induced specific post-transcriptional modifications in NLRP3 are needed to allow NLRP3 translocation to endosomes. It is tempting to speculate that one of these modifications might favor conformational changes in NLRP3 necessary for PI4P binding. As for BMDMs, priming is needed to express NLRP3 in the first place.
Endosomes have emerged as signaling hubs involved in many cellular processes, including innate immune responses25. For instance, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) such as TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and TLR13 are located on endosomal membranes25. Endosomal location of TLR4 is critical for TRIF-mediated signaling26. The endosomal location of other TLRs is critical for their functions in detecting cognate microbial ligands27–31. In this study, we discovered that distinct changes in the composition of endosomes is a mark for activation of innate immunity mediated by NLRP3. Our findings thus define an unrecognized role of the endosomal compartment in pattern recognition receptor-induced innate immune responses.
In conclusion, our study provides evidence for NLRP3 to primarily sense endosomal stress occurring through defective EECS and ETT.
Methods
Mice
Mice with targeted alleles for Arfrp1 (Arfrp1fl/fl) were described previously32 and were provided by Annette Schürmann (German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke). Arfrp1fl/fl mice on C57BL/6J background were crossed with LysM-Cre mice to obtain myeloid-specific Arfrp1 KO mice. Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions with controlled temperature (19–23 °C) and humidity (40–60%) on a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle with unrestricted access to water and standard laboratory chow. Maintenance and animal experimentation were in accordance with the local ethical committee (Com’Eth) in compliance with the European legislation on care and use of laboratory animals (La cellule AFiS (Animaux utilisés à des Fins Scientifiques): APAFIS#30865-2021040115389039 v3). No exclusion of animals used for experiments was performed. Healthy mouse littermates were chosen randomly according to their genotypes.
Chemicals
Nigericin sodium salt (N7143), adenosine 5′-triphosphate disodium salt (ATP; A2383), StxB (SML0562), GSK-A1 (SML2453), rapamycin, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; P8139), anthrax protective antigen (176905) and LPS from Escherichia coli 055:B5 (L2880) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Pam3CSK4 (tlrl-pms), imiquimod (tlrl-imq), CL097 (tlrl-c97), FLn-Needle (tlrl-ndl) and poly(dA:dT) (tlrl-patn) were obtained from InvivoGen. MCC950 (HY-12815), PI4KIIIβ-IN-9 (HY-19798) and PI4KIIIβ-IN-10 (HY-100198) were purchased from MedChemExpress. Sytox Green nucleic acid stain (S7020), Alexa-488-conjugated transferrin (T13342), Alexa-633-conjugated transferrin (T23362) and Alexa-568-conjugated phalloidin (A12380) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Cy3-StxB was generated by conjugating Cy3 dye onto StxB according to the manufacturer’s manual of Cy3 Ab Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, PA330000).
DNA plasmids
pX330-U6-Chimeric_BB-CBh-hSpCas9 (42230), lentiCRISPR v2 (52961) and iRFP-FKB-Rab5 (51612) were purchased from Addgene. eGFP-tagged mouse NLRP3 and eGFP-tagged human SNX2 were cloned into pBOB empty vector using ligation-independent cloning (LIC) as described previously33. The pEGFP-C1-HA-FKB-RAB5a was generated using LIC/PIPE cloning, in which the fragment HA-FKB-RAB5 was amplified from iRFP-FKP-RAB5 using the following three primers to insert the HA tag by PCR:
HA x GFP fw1, AGATCTCGAGCTCAAGCTTCGAATTCAACCACCATGGTTTATCCATACGACGTTCCAGACTATGC;
HA_FRAP_fw2, CACCACCATGGTTTATCCATACGACGTTCCAGACTATGCCGGAGGAGGTATGTGGCATGAAGGCCTGG;
RAB5 x GFP-rev, TGATCAGTTATCTAGATCCGGTGGATCCTTACTAGTTACTACAACACTGACTCCTGGTTGGC.
The pEGFP-C1 plasmid was amplified with the following primers:
GFP-C (+), TAAGGATCCACCGGATCTAGATAACTGATCA;
GFP-C (−), GAATTCGAAGCTTGAGCTCGAGATC.
The ER–TGN contact sites reporter construct TGN46-FRB-HA-GFP-T2A-mCherry-FKBP-Cb5-pIRES-neo2 was generated as described in ref. 12. The EECS reporter Cb5 (17 residues of the transmembrane domain of rat cytochrome b5)34 was cloned in frame downstream of the mCherry-FKBP construct as described in ref. 12. The PI4P probe GFP-SidC was a kind gift from Y. Mao (Cornell University). The PI3P probe GFP-FYVE-SARA was a kind gift from S. Corvera (University of Massachusetts Medical School). LifeAct-RFP was derived a construct from ref. 35. pEGFP-C1 hVAPA was from Fabien Alpy (Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire, IGBMC). pEGFP-N1 hSYS1 and pEGFP-N1 hARFRP1 (WT, Q79L, T31N) were described previously21. Flag-tagged hSYS1, eGFP-tagged hARFRP1 (WT, Q79L, T31N), hVAPA (WT, K94D/M96D mutant), ASCPYD fused with carboxy-terminal eGFP, and hSAC1 and hSAC2 fused with amino-terminal mCherry were amplified by PCR and were cloned into pBOB empty vector at the BamHI site. The pX330-P2A-eGFP/RFP plasmids were generated by inserting the P2A-eGFP/RFP sequence into EcoRI-digested pX330-U6-Chimeric_BB-CBh-hSpCas9 before the stop codon using LIC. Small guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences targeting human ARFRP1 (hARFRP1), hSYS1, hVAPA, hVAPB, hORP10, hRAB7A and hRAB7B gene were inserted into Bbs-I-digested pX330-P2A-eGFP/RFP plasmids through ligation by T4 DNA ligase. sgRNA sequences targeting mouse Arfrp1 (mArfrp1), mSys1, hOSBP, hPI4KIIIβ, hPI4KIIα and hPI4KIIβ were inserted into Bbs-I-digested lentiCRISPR v2 through ligation by T4 DNA ligase.
The sequences of sgRNAs used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Cell culture
All mammalian cells were cultured at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cell lines used in this study are not listed in the databases of commonly misidentified cell lines maintained by the International Cell Line Authentication Committee (ICLAC). THP-1 cells (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC) were grown in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM HEPES, 2.5 g l−1 glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and gentamycin. HeLa cells were grown in DMEM (4.5 g l−1 glucose) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin. HEK293T cells (ATCC, CRL-3216) obtained from the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ Heidelberg) were grown in DMEM containing 1 g ml−1 glucose, 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin. NLRP3 KO and ASC KO THP-1 cells were generated as previously described33. The RAB5-mApple stably expressing HeLa cell line was provided by Anne Spang (Biozentrum, University of Basel). The HeLa WT and HeLa VAP dKO cell lines10 were a generous gift from Pietro De Camilli (Yale University School of Medicine). The iBMDM cell line was obtained from Eicke Latz (University of Bonn) and was grown in DMEM (4.5 g l−1 glucose) containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin. Primary BMDMs were obtained by differentiating bone marrow progenitors from the tibia and femur in RPMI 1640 containing 50 ng ml−1 recombinant hM-CSF (ImmunoTools, 11343113), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin for 7 days. BMDMs and peritoneal macrophages were seeded 1 day before experiments using RPMI 1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, penicillin and streptomycin. Cell cultures were negative for mycoplasma contamination. THP-1 cells and HEK293T cells have been authenticated using short randem repeat (STR) performed by LGC Standards.
HeLa cells were transfected with plasmids using TransIT-LT1 (Mirus Bio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Expression was maintained for 16–24 h before processing unless otherwise stated. For RNA interference, HeLa cells were treated with control short interfering RNA (siRNA) or OSBP, PI4KIIα and PI4KIIβ siRNA (50 nM) for 72 h using Oligofectamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by direct transfection. siRNA sequences used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
For treatment, BMDMs were primed with 1 µg ml−1 LPS for 4 h, followed by the treatment of ATP, nigericin, imiquimod and CL097; THP-1 cells were differentiated by PMA (100 nM) treatment for 3 h followed by overnight incubation with fresh medium before experiments. To activate the NLRC4- and AIM2 inflammasome in ARFRP1 KO and SYS1 KO THP-1 cells, PMA-differentiated WT, ARFRP1 KO and SYS1 KO THP-1 cells were pre-treated with 10 µM MCC950 (to avoid spontaneous NLRP3 inflammasome activation in these cells) for 30 min, followed by treatment with LFn-Needle plus anthrax protective antigen (100 ng ml−1 each) or transfected with poly(dA:dT) (double-stranded DNA, dsDNA) (1 µg ml−1) for 4 h in the presence of 10 µM MCC950.
For the packaging of lentivirus, 12 µg of Lenti-mix (3 µg pVSVG, 3 µg pMDL and 3 µg pREV) plus 12 µg of the gene of interest expressing plasmid were transfected into HEK293T cells (10 cm plate) using Lipofectamine 2000. After 48 h, the supernatants were collected and filtered using 0.45 µm Millex-HV Syringe Filters and kept at −80 °C. BMDMs and THP-1 cells were infected in fresh medium containing 1 µg ml−1 polybrene (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-134220) and 25% lentivirus-contained supernatant.
Gene disruption using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system
To generate the ARFRP1 KO, SYS1 KO, VAPA/B dKO (VAP dKO), ORP10 KO and RAB7A/B dKO (RAB7 KO) THP-1 cell lines, two sgRNA sequences for each gene were designed using the website https://www.benchling.com. A total of 1.0 × 106 THP-1 cells were transfected with sgRNA-expressing plasmids (0.5 µg each) using X-tremeGENE 9 DNA Transfection Reagent (Roche, 6365779001) according to the manufacturer’s manual. Twenty-four hours after transfection, GFP-positive and/or RFP-positive cells were enriched by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (BD FACSAria II, BD Biosciences). Single cell colonies were obtained by seeding them into 96-well plates by series of dilution. Obtained single-cell KO clones were validated by immunoblotting or Sanger sequencing of the PCR-amplified targeted fragment after cloning into the pUC57 vector. The following primers were used for PCR amplification of the SYS1 targeted fragment: 5′-CGAATGCATCTAGATATCGGATCCACTCTGAGAATGGGTCTGTCTGCCC-3′ and 5′-GCCTCTGCAGTCGACGGGCCCGGGTTCCCAGGGCTACAAAGAAAGAAGG-3′.
To generate Arfrp1 KO and Sys1 KO iBMDM cell lines, we designed two sgRNAs for each gene and cloned them into lentiCRISPR v2. Lentiviruses were produced as described above. Twenty-four hours after lentiviral infection, sgRNA-expressing iBMDMs were selected by treatment with 2 µg ml−1 puromycin for 24 h. Single cell colonies were obtained by seeding them into 96-well plates by series of dilution. Obtained Arfrp1 KO and Sys1 KO single-cell clones were validated by immunoblotting or Sanger sequencing.
To generate the OSBP, PI4KIIα or PI4KIIβ KO THP-1 cell pool, we designed two sets of sgRNAs (two sgRNAs for each gene in each set) and cloned them into lentiCRISPR v2 puro or bsd. Lentiviruses were produced as described above. THP-1 cells were infected with sgRNA-expressing lentivirus as indicated. Forty-eight hours after lentiviral infection, sgRNA-expressing cells were selected by treatment with 2 µg ml−1 puromycin or 30 µg ml−1 blasticidin S for 24 h. After two splitting, cells were used for further experiments.
Immunoblotting
After treatments, cell culture supernatants and cell lysates were collected for immunoblotting analysis. Cell lysates were collected in 1× SDS sample buffer or in 1× RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM NaVO4 and 1 mM NaF) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail. The immunoblots were prepared using Tris-glycine SDS–PAGE. For the supernatants, the proteins were extracted using methanol–chloroform precipitation, separated by tricine SDS–PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting. The immunoblots were probed overnight at 4 °C or 1 h at room temperature 22–23 °C with primary antibody. After three washes with TBST, membranes were incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were again washed with TBST three times and were incubated with Immobilon Forte Western HRP substrate (EMD Millipore, WBLUF0500). Images were captured using an AI600 imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The primary and secondary antibodies used for immunoblotting in this study are listed in in Supplementary Table 2.
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Immunofluorescence analyses in Figs. 1a, 1b, 3a, 3b, 4c–e, 6e and 6f; Extended Data Figs. 1a–j, 3c, 3d, 4a–c, 5a, 5b, 6a and 6b; and Supplementary Fig. 3 were performed as previously described12. Cells were imaged using a Plan-Apochromat 63× or 100×/1.4 oil objective on a Zeiss LSM800 or LSM880 confocal system equipped with an Airyscan module and controlled by the Zen blue software. For the rest, cells plated on coverslips (9–15 mm) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature after the indicated treatments. Cells were permeabilized in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% saponin for 10 min. After blocking with 10% normal goat serum in PBS for 1 h, cells were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, cells were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific, P36934). Intracellular PI4P staining was performed as previously described in ref. 36. Images were acquired below pixel saturation using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal laser scanning microscope (Leica Microsystems). Fluorescence micrographs are representative of images collected from at least three independent experiments. The images used for phenotype quantification were acquired with the same parameters (that is, digital gain, laser power and magnification) and processed with Fiji software (ImageJ; National Institutes of Health, NIH). Brightness and contrast were adjusted with Adobe Photoshop, and figure panels were assembled with Adobe Illustrator.
Antibodies used for immunofluorescence analysis in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 2.
All of the antibodies used in this study have been experimentally validated. The fluorescence-minus-one (FMO) controls for all fluorescently labeled antibodies are provided in Supplementary Fig. 4.
Live-video imaging
For the live-video imaging of actin comets, HeLa cells were plated in glass-bottomed dishes (MatTek) and co-transfected with SNX2-eGFP or NLRP3-eGFP and LifeAct-RFP. Cells were treated with vehicle or 15 µM nigericin for 60 min in the presence of 5 µg ml−1 Alexa-633-conjugated transferrin and imaged with the Zeiss LSM800 microscope equipped with 488 nm, 561 nm and 647 nm argon lasers using the Plan-Apochromat NA 63×/1.4 DIC oil immersion objective. During imaging, cells were maintained in complete culture medium in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C. Fluorescence images presented are representative of cells imaged in at least three independent experiments and were processed with Fiji software. One hundred frames were taken with 6 s intervals for each condition.
Uptake and trafficking of CI-MPR antibody and Cy3-labeled StxB
CI-MPR antibody uptake was performed as previously described37. Cells were treated with 10 μM nigericin or 45 μg ml−1 CL097 in serum-free medium. At 5 min after nigericin addition or 20 min after CL097 addition, an anti-CI-MPR antibody (10 μg ml−1; Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA1-066) was added into culture medium. Cells were fixed at 40 min after the incubation of CI-MPR antibody and co-stained with antibodies against GCC1 or EEA1. For StxB uptake, Cy3-conjugated StxB was added into culture medium at 5 min after nigericin (10 μM) addition or 20 min after CL097 (45 μg ml−1) addition. Cells were fixed at 40 min after the incubation of Cy3-conjugated StxB and stained with cognate antibodies. Images were acquired using the Leica TCS SP8.
Detection and quantification of intracellular PI4P levels
Intracellular PI4P levels were assessed using two independent approaches: indirect immunofluorescence using an antibody against PI4P (Echelon Biosciences, Z-P004), and fluorescence of a GFP-tagged genetically encoded PI4P probe, SidC38. Both of these approaches provided highly matched intracellular PI4P distribution patterns shown in Supplementary Data 1. For the indirect immunofluorescence, cells were stained with the antibody against PI4P following the protocol described in ref. 36. Images from 10–15 fields (each containing 5–10 cells) were randomly taken below pixel saturation with the same microscope settings (that is, laser power and detector amplification). The mean intensity per cell was determined using Fiji software. For the assessment of PI4P levels, a mask using EEA1 or golgin-97 was generated for each cell. The mean intensities of both PI4P and EEA1 or Golgin97 were measured in these regions. After background subtraction, the PI4P values were normalized singularly by the intensity of EEA1 or Golgin97. The relative values are expressed by further normalization against the control condition. To analyze the peripheral number of PI4P-positive spots, we used the ‘Analyze Particles’ tool in Fiji after subtraction of the PI4P signal in the Golgi area. For the fluorescence of GFP-SidC, HeLa cells expressing SidC-GFP were fixed after treatment as indicated. Cells were stained with EEA1, Golgin97 or TGN46. Golgin97 signal was used to generate a mask for the Golgi region. The mean intensity of GFP-SidC was measured in the Golgi region and normalized for the mean intensity of an equivalent area outside the Golgi region. Golgi PI4P was expressed as the ratio between the intensity of GFP-SidC in the Golgi region and in the equivalent extra-Golgi area.
Quantitative measurement of membrane contact sites
FRET/FLIM-based reporter system
FRET/FLIM analysis of RAB5-GFP alone and in combination with mCherry-Cb5 was performed as previously described12. Fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) data analysis was performed using SymPhoTime 64 (PicoQuant). In brief, for RAB5-GFP detection, after fixation, samples were excited using a pulsed laser (femtosecond Ti:Sa laser, Chameleon Vision 2, Coherent; set at 900 nm) at a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The fluorescence signal was spectrally filtered using a narrowband emission filter (BP filter 482/35; Chroma). Photons were temporally collected using a single-photon sensitive detector (PMA Hybrid 40, PicoQuant) combined with a single photon counting module (TimeHarp 260, PicoQuant). FLIM data were background-subtracted and processed using the pixel-based fitting software SymPhoTime 64 to calculate the lifetime maps. Lifetime was measured for each single thresholded pixel. Amplitude-weighted average lifetime was calculated as τ = Σ(αiτi)/Σαi, where αi is the amplitude of each lifetime τi. FRET/FLIM efficiency was calculated by applying the following equation: FRET efficiency = 1 − (τDA/τD), where τDA is the lifetime of the donor in the presence of the acceptor and τD is the lifetime of the donor without the acceptor39.
Rapamycin-induced reporter system
In cells expressing FRB and FKBP domain-fused membrane-localized reporters, short treatment with low concentrations of rapamycin stabilizes pre-existing physiological membrane contact sites without inducing artificial tethering12. To measure EECS, iRFP-FKB-Rab5 and mCherry-FKBP-Cb5 were expressed in HeLa cells; to measure ER–TGN contact sites, TGN46-FRB-HA-GFP-T2A-mCherry-FKBP-Cb5 was expressed in HeLa cells. Cells were further treated with vehicle, nigericin or CL097 for the indicated time points followed by incubation with or without 200 nM rapamycin for 4 min before paraformaldehyde fixation. Images from 15–20 individual fields were captured (for a total of 100–120 cells for each group) to assess the localization of mCherry-Cb5. P values were calculated on the basis of mean values from four independent experiments.
Analysis of Sytox Green uptake using flow cytometry
After treatment, cells were detached with 5 mM EDTA and incubated with Sytox Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific, S7020) at 1/8,000 dilution. Cells were then analyzed using a BD FACSCelesta cell analyzer (BD Biosciences). The percentage of Sytox Green-positive cells was analyzed using FlowJo v10.8.1 software. The gating strategy is shown in Supplementary Fig. 5.
LPS-induced endotoxemia in mice
Arfrp1fl/fl and Arfrp1fl/fl;LysM-Cre mice at 6–8 weeks of age were used. Mice were peritoneally injected with 15 mg kg−1 LPS. Vehicle or 50 mg kg−1 MCC950 was peritoneally injected at 1 h before LPS injection. For the analysis of serum cytokines, blood was collected at 3 h after LPS injection. For survival curves, 2.5 mg kg−1 buprenorphine was peritoneally administrated every 6 h, and the survival of mice was monitored every 6 h.
Measurement of cytokines using ELISA
Human IL-1β, human TNF-α, mouse IL-1β and mouse TNF-α in cell culture supernatants or serum were measured using Human IL-1β/IL-1F2 DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY201), Human TNF-α DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY210), Mouse IL-1β/IL-1F2 DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY401) and Mouse TNF-α DuoSet ELISA (R&D Systems, DY410), separately, according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Image quantification
Image processing and quantification were performed using Fiji software. For the quantification of StxB and CI-MPR on endosomes and Golgi, to define regions of interest (ROIs), we thresholded the EEA1 (for endosomes) and GCC1 (for Golgi) channels. Defined ROIs was superimposed onto the channel of interest (StxB and CI-MPR). Fluorescence in the defined ROIs were measured by recording ‘RawIntDen’ (the sum of the values of the pixels in the selection). The percentages of StxB and CI-MPR in defined ROIs were calculated by dividing RawIntDen in the defined ROIs by RawIntDen of the whole cell. A single mid-Z-stack image was analyzed per cell. Co-localization analysis was carried out by subtracting background and measuring the Pearson’s correlation coefficient using the Fiji co-localization plug-in ‘Coloc2’. The percentages of cells with NLRP3 puncta, peripheral PI4P spots and TGN46 dispersal were analyzed using the ‘Analyze Particles’ tool in Fiji to determine their number in each cell. For each experiment, images were acquired below pixel saturation, and the same threshold was chosen and applied.
Statistical analyses
Preliminary experiments were performed and sample size was determined based on generally accepted rules to test preliminary conclusions reaching statistical significance, where applicable. Unless specified, statistical analyses were performed with the unpaired two-sided t-test using GraphPad Prism. For serum cytokine levels, statistical analyses were performed with the Mann–Whitney U-test. For survival curves, statistical analysis was performed with the log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41590-022-01355-3.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Anne Spang at the Biozentrum, University of Basel, for providing HeLa cells stably expressing mApple-tagged RAB5. We thank Fabien Alpy and Izabela Sumara for helpful suggestions and discussions. We also thank the scientific platforms at the IGBMC, including the cell cytometry facility, the cell culture facility, the imaging facility and the animal facility, for their help during the entire project. Work in the laboratory of R.R. was supported by Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR) (AAPG 2017 LYSODIABETES), the USIAS fellowship grant 2017 of the University of Strasbourg, the Fondation pour la recherche médicale (FRM) – Program: Equipe FRM (EQU201903007859, Prix Roger PROPICE pour la recherche sur le cancer du pancréas), grants from French State funds managed by the ANR under the frame program Investissements d’Avenir (ANR-10-LABX-0030-INRT and ANR-11-INBS-0009-INGESTEM). L.R. acknowledges the support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC). M.A.D.M. acknowledges the support from the European Research Council Advanced Investigator grant 670881 (SYSMET), the Italian Association for Cancer Research (grant IG 2017_20815), and the Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN, 2020PKLEPN). R.V. acknowledges the support from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (grant MFAG 2020_25174). A.S. acknowledges the support from the ‘German Research Foundation [DFG, SFB 958]’. J.S.B. acknowledges the support from the Intramural Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the NIH (project ZIA HD001607 to J.S.B.).
Extended data
Source data
Author contributions
Conceptualization, Z.Z., R.R., M.A.D.M. and J.S.B.; methodology, Z.Z., R.V., L.R. and Z.L.; investigation, Z.Z., R.V., L.R., K.V. and Z.L.; writing (original draft), Z.Z.; writing (review and editing), R.R., Z.Z., J.S.B., A.S. and M.A.D.M.; funding acquisition, R.R. and M.A.D.M.; resources, Z.Z., R.V., J.S.B. and A.S.; supervision, R.R., Z.Z. and M.A.D.M.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Immunology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Primary Handling Editor: S. Houston, in collaboration with the Nature Immunology team.
Data availability
All data are available in the main text, extended data figures or supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Zhirong Zhang, Rossella Venditti.
Contributor Information
Zhirong Zhang, Email: zhirong.zhang@igbmc.fr.
Maria Antonietta De Matteis, Email: dematteis@tigem.it.
Romeo Ricci, Email: romeo.ricci@igbmc.fr.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41590-022-01355-3.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41590-022-01355-3.
References
- 1.Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013;13:397–411. doi: 10.1038/nri3452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rathinam VAK, Fitzgerald KA. Inflammasome complexes: emerging mechanisms and effector functions. Cell. 2016;165:792–800. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Christgen S, Kanneganti T-D. Inflammasomes and the fine line between defense and disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020;62:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2019.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:407–420. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pétrilli V, et al. Activation of the NALP3 inflammasome is triggered by low intracellular potassium concentration. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1583–1589. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muñoz-Planillo R, et al. K+ efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38:1142–1153. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.05.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen J, Chen ZJ. PtdIns4P on dispersed trans-Golgi network mediates NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Nature. 2018;564:71–76. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0761-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balla A, Balla T. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases: old enzymes with emerging functions. Trends Cell Biol. 2006;16:351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Graaf P, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinaseβ is critical for functional association of rab11 with the Golgi complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:2038–2047. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e03-12-0862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dong R, et al. Endosome–ER contacts control actin nucleation and retromer function through VAP-dependent regulation of PI4P. Cell. 2016;166:408–423. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choi J, Chen J, Schreiber SL, Clardy J. Structure of the FKBP12-rapamycin complex interacting with the binding domain of human FRAP. Science. 1996;273:239–242. doi: 10.1126/science.273.5272.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Venditti R, et al. Molecular determinants of ER–Golgi contacts identified through a new FRET–FLIM system. J. Cell Biol. 2019;218:1055–1065. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201812020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ladinsky MS, Howell KE. The trans-Golgi network can be dissected structurally and functionally from the cisternae of the Golgi complex by brefeldin A. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 1992;59:92–105. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Reaves B, Horn M, Banting G. TGN38/41 recycles between the cell surface and the TGN: brefeldin A affects its rate of return to the TGN. Mol. Biol. Cell. 1993;4:93–105. doi: 10.1091/mbc.4.1.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chapman RE, Munro S. Retrieval of TGN proteins from the cell surface requires endosomal acidification. EMBO J. 1994;13:2305–2312. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06514.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Muschalik N, Munro S. Golgins. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:R374–R376. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sandvig K, van Deurs B. Delivery into cells: lessons learned from plant and bacterial toxins. Gene Ther. 2005;12:865–872. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Johannes L, Römer W. Shiga toxins—from cell biology to biomedical applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:105–116. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bonifacino JS, Rojas R. Retrograde transport from endosomes to the trans-Golgi network. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;7:568–579. doi: 10.1038/nrm1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Burd C, Cullen PJ. Retromer: a master conductor of endosome sorting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a016774. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a016774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ishida M, Bonifacino JS. ARFRP1 functions upstream of ARL1 and ARL5 to coordinate recruitment of distinct tethering factors to the trans-Golgi network. J. Cell Biol. 2019;218:3681–3696. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201905097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Behnia R, Panic B, Whyte JRC, Munro S. Targeting of the Arf-like GTPase Arl3p to the Golgi requires N-terminal acetylation and the membrane protein Sys1p. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004;6:405–413. doi: 10.1038/ncb1120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sutterwala FS, et al. Critical role for NALP3/CIAS1/Cryopyrin in innate and adaptive immunity through its regulation of caspase-1. Immunity. 2006;24:317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ohto U, et al. Structural basis for the oligomerization-mediated regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2121353119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2121353119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kagan JC. Signaling organelles of the innate immune system. Cell. 2012;151:1168–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kagan JC, et al. TRAM couples endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4 to the induction of interferon-β. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9:361–368. doi: 10.1038/ni1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature. 2001;413:732–738. doi: 10.1038/35099560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Diebold SS, Kaisho T, Hemmi H, Akira S, Reis e Sousa C. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science. 2004;303:1529–1531. doi: 10.1126/science.1093616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hemmi H, et al. A Toll-like receptor recognizes bacterial DNA. Nature. 2000;408:740–745. doi: 10.1038/35047123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hidmark, A., von Saint Paul, A. & Dalpke, A. H. Cutting edge: TLR13 is a receptor for bacterial RNA. J. Immunol. 189, 2717–2721 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Oldenburg M, et al. TLR13 recognizes bacterial 23S rRNA devoid of erythromycin resistance-forming modification. Science. 2012;337:1111–1115. doi: 10.1126/science.1220363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zahn C, et al. ADP-ribosylation factor-like GTPase ARFRP1 is required for trans-Golgi to plasma membrane trafficking of E-cadherin. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:27179–27188. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802108200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang Z, et al. Protein kinase D at the Golgi controls NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Exp. Med. 2017;214:2671–2693. doi: 10.1084/jem.20162040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bulbarelli A, Sprocati T, Barberi M, Pedrazzini E, Borgese N. Trafficking of tail-anchored proteins: transport from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and sorting between surface domains in polarised epithelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:1689–1702. doi: 10.1242/jcs.115.8.1689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Riedl J, et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Methods. 2008;5:605–607. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hammond GRV, Schiavo G, Irvine RF. Immunocytochemical techniques reveal multiple, distinct cellular pools of PtdIns4P and PtdIns(4,5)P2. Biochem. J. 2009;422:23–35. doi: 10.1042/BJ20090428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hoyer MJ, et al. A novel class of ER membrane proteins regulates ER-associated endosome fission. Cell. 2018;175:254–265.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Luo X, et al. Structure of the Legionella virulence factor, SidC reveals a unique PI(4)P-specific binding domain essential for its targeting to the bacterial phagosome. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004965. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Llères D, et al. Quantitative FLIM-FRET microscopy to monitor nanoscale chromatin compaction in vivo reveals structural roles of condensin complexes. Cell Rep. 2017;18:1791–1803. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in the main text, extended data figures or supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper.