Abstract
Chlamydiae is a bacterial phylum composed of obligate animal and protist endosymbionts. However, other members of the Planctomycetes–Verrucomicrobia–Chlamydiae superphylum are primarily free living. How Chlamydiae transitioned to an endosymbiotic lifestyle is still largely unresolved. Here we reconstructed Planctomycetes–Verrucomicrobia–Chlamydiae species relationships and modelled superphylum genome evolution. Gene content reconstruction from 11,996 gene families suggests a motile and facultatively anaerobic last common Chlamydiae ancestor that had already gained characteristic endosymbiont genes. Counter to expectations for genome streamlining in strict endosymbionts, we detected substantial gene gain within Chlamydiae. We found that divergence in energy metabolism and aerobiosis observed in extant lineages emerged later during chlamydial evolution. In particular, metabolic and aerobic genes characteristic of the more metabolically versatile protist-infecting chlamydiae were gained, such as respiratory chain complexes. Our results show that metabolic complexity can increase during endosymbiont evolution, adding an additional perspective for understanding symbiont evolutionary trajectories across the tree of life.
Subject terms: Bacterial evolution, Symbiosis
Extensive gene gain via horizontal gene transfer facilitated the evolution of obligate intracellular Chlamydiae.
Main
Symbioses are sustained interactions between different organisms that span the mutualism–parasitism spectrum1,2. Symbiotic associations between bacterial symbionts and both microbial (that is, protists) and multicellular eukaryotic hosts are ubiquitous3,4 and play essential roles, from ecosystem functioning to the evolution of biological complexity5–8. Driven by small population sizes, lack of recombination and host dependence, obligate intracellular symbionts—that is, endosymbionts—tend to undergo genome reduction and metabolic streamlining9–13. Studying the origins of ancient endosymbiotic groups is necessary to unravel symbiont evolutionary trajectories and underlying evolutionary processes. Host association has evolved multiple times in the Planctomycetes–Verrucomicrobia–Chlamydiae (PVC) superphylum, a group of bacteria consisting of the aforementioned phyla alongside Lentisphaerae, Kirimatiellaeota and other potential members14,15. PVC bacteria represent an ideal case for investigation of symbiont evolution because they are ubiquitous, have large variations in lifestyle and metabolism and include members of ecological, medical and industrial importance14,16,17. While most PVC bacteria are free living, all described Chlamydiae are obligate endosymbionts of eukaryotes16.
Chlamydiae are well known for the medically important human pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis and other Chlamydiaceae family members, which are animal pathogens with a high health burden and zoonotic potential18–20. Chlamydiae are also ubiquitous in environmental samples21,22 as endosymbionts of a wide range of both protist and animal hosts15,23,24. Nevertheless, apart from roles as pathogens (for example, Chlamydiaceae), chlamydial host effects are understudied despite host interactions spanning the mutualism–parasitism spectrum. Protist-infecting chlamydiae (for example, Parachlamydiaceae) can act as mutualists that protect against host co-infection with Legionella and giant viruses25,26. Parachlamydiaceae have larger genomes and greater metabolic capacity than the animal-pathogenic Chlamydiaceae27,28. Despite contrasting genomic features, all described chlamydiae share a biphasic lifestyle with an intracellular replicative phase as reticulate bodies (RBs) and a nondividing extracellular phase as elementary bodies (EBs)19. Chlamydiae diverged from other PVC bacteria 1–2 billion years ago (Ga)29,30, and their endosymbiotic lifestyle is proposed to have evolved early29,31–33. It was also thought that the chlamydial ancestor resembled extant protist-infecting lineages and had greater coding potential and metabolic versatility while other chlamydial groups underwent genome reduction. However, because initial studies included only the minimal chlamydial genomic diversity available from cultured representatives, little is known about the evolution of endosymbiosis in Chlamydiae. Through culture-independent genomics, numerous chlamydial lineages with unknown hosts have now been retrieved from various environments34–39. These groups fundamentally changed our understanding of chlamydial physiology by revealing genetic potential for motility37,38 and anaerobic metabolism39,40. However, all isolated chlamydiae are still obligate endosymbionts.
We leveraged the culture-independent expansion in PVC bacteria genomic diversity to investigate endosymbiont evolution exemplified by Chlamydiae. We performed in-depth phylogenomic analyses to reconstruct PVC bacteria evolutionary relationships and gene-tree-aware ancestral state reconstruction. We reconstructed key endosymbiont genomic features in the Chlamydiae ancestor, suggesting an ancient capability to infect eukaryotic hosts. The Chlamydiae ancestor was inferred to have been a motile facultative anaerobe, indicating a lifestyle involving transitions between oxic and anoxic environments. Major shifts in chlamydial energy metabolism and oxygen tolerance were later mainly driven by gene gain. Counter to our expectations for genome streamlining during endosymbiont evolution, gene gain led to expanded metabolic potential in protist-infecting chlamydial groups.
Results
Establishment of a resolved Chlamydiae species phylogeny
To accurately resolve PVC bacteria species relationships we selected high-quality genomes of species (Chlamydiae) and genus (other PVC bacteria) representatives (Extended Data Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 1 and 2). Maximum-likelihood (ML) and Bayesian species trees were inferred using 74 concatenated single-copy marker genes, using methods to account for compositional bias and long branch attraction (Fig. 1, Supplementary Figs. 2–5, Supplementary Data 3–5 and Supplementary Discussion 1). Chlamydiae monophyly was fully supported, and chlamydial families were consistently resolved and compatible with a 16S ribosomal RNA gene phylogeny (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. 3–6). Two long-branching lineages consisting of four chlamydial genomes were removed due to unstable positions (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 and Supplementary Discussion 1). In the final dataset, deep evolutionary relationships were consistently resolved in both Bayesian and ML analyses when compositional bias was taken into account (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 5). These final 180 PVC representatives included 91 chlamydial species sequenced from nine environments with genome size and GC content ranging from 1.05 to 3.42 Mbp and 26.2 to 49.1%, respectively. With a robust species tree and comprehensive sampling, we here propose revision of chlamydial taxonomy (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Discussion 2). Consistent with recent work37,39–41, an early divergence of Chlamydiae into two major groups, Group 1 (G1) and Group 2 (G2), is well supported. We can further subdivide G1 into two putative orders: Simkaniales (families Simkaniaceae and Rhabdochlamydiaceae) and Anoxychlamydiales (Anoxychlamydiaceae, formerly Anoxychlamydiales37, and Chlamydiae Clade III). G1 members are primarily represented by metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) sequenced from diverse environments and with unknown hosts, although several distinct groups were obtained from invertebrate animal metagenomes. The G2 subdivision includes the classical chlamydial animal pathogens, Chlamydiaceae and Clavichlamydia, alongside Sororchlamydiaceae42 in the previously established Chlamydiales order43. Other G2 families (Parachlamydiaceae, Criblamydiaceae, Waddliaceae and orphan lineages) comprise the here-defined order Amoebachlamydiales, which primarily infect protists.
The chlamydial endosymbiotic lifestyle is ancestral
To reconstruct PVC genome evolution we used the gene-tree-aware amalgamated likelihood estimation (ALE) approach44 (Supplementary Figs. 7–10 and Supplementary Data 7–9). Protein-coding genes from PVC genomes were clustered into homologous gene families and phylogenies inferred for the 11,996 clusters with more than three sequences. Gene tree samples were then reconciled with the species tree to infer evolutionary events (speciations, originations, duplications, transfers and losses) and proteome size (that is, the sum of inferred gene copies corrected by gene extinction probability) across ancestral nodes (Extended Data Fig. 1). Genes inferred as present with high confidence were used to reconstruct ancestral gene content, and event frequencies to assess overall patterns in gene content evolution. Of note, we can reconstruct only those genes present in extant genomes and in the dataset. Thus, ancestral reconstructions are incomplete because we miss gene families that have gone extinct or were not sampled. ALE compensates for this by taking into account estimated gene extinction rates and genome completeness for inferring gene copy numbers. Originations can derive from either de novo gene birth or horizontal gene transfer (HGT) from outside the PVC genome dataset. For Chlamydiae originations, to differentiate between these we searched for homologues in protein databases. Where identified, phylogenetic trees were inferred to discern with which taxonomic groups chlamydial genes affiliated, indicating putative donor lineages of the horizontally transferred gene families.
The last common Chlamydiae ancestor (LCCA) was reconstructed with ~1,118 protein-coding genes (Figs. 2 and 3, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 9). Of these, 401 were inferred as gene gains, many associated with metabolism (n = 99) and obtained through HGT (Extended Data Figs. 3 and 4). Hallmark endosymbiont genomic features for host interaction, energy parasitism and the chlamydial biphasic lifecycle were gained before LCCA. These genes included a type III secretion system (T3SS) (for example, genes sctJ, sctT, sctS, sctV and sctW), the adhesin Ctad1 and major outer membrane protein (MOMP), two nucleotide transporters (NTTs), DsbB, glycogen biosynthesis and degradation (for example, glgC, glgP, malQ) and the transcriptional regulator early upstream ORF (EUO) (Fig. 2, Extended Data Figs. 2 and 5 and Supplementary Data 9 and 10). The T3SS facilitates host cell entry through effector secretion45, and Ctad1 and MOMP are pathogenicity factors in Chlamydiaceae involved in host invasion19. In the RB stage, NTTs facilitate energy parasitism and metabolite scavenging by importing ATP, nucleotides and NAD+ from the host cytosol28. In the EB stage, DNA is condensed by histone-like proteins (for example, HctA), and the cell envelope rigidified to protect against osmotic and physical stress through disulfide crosslinking of outer membrane proteins by DsbB46. HctA was not reconstructed in LCCA, but in all early chlamydial ancestors (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 10). Glycogen is used as a carbon source by EBs and enhances extracellular survival47. EUO is a master regulator that represses T3SS, DNA condensation and cell surface modification genes before RB-to-EB conversion48,49, and is a putative chlamydial gene invention.
Many gene losses (31%, n = 362) were inferred between LCCA and the last common ancestor of Chlamydiae, Verrucomicrobia, Lentisphaerae and Kiritimatiellaeota (LVCCA) (Fig. 3), and were predominantly associated with metabolism (49%, Extended Data Fig. 3). Relative to LVCCA, de novo amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis capabilities were strongly reduced in LCCA through loss of genes for histidine, arginine, tryptophan, methionine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, threonine and purine (for example, purC, purD and purH) biosynthesis (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 9). However, a suite of amino acid and oligopeptide transporters was already inferred as being present in LVCCA and maintained in LCCA, with both able to acquire amino acids from external sources. NAD and NADP biosynthesis genes were inferred in LCCA. Pathways for biosynthesis of other cofactors, such as ferredoxin and cobalamin, were inferred as lost and LCCA probably depended on their uptake. Several Chlamydiaceae virulence factors associated with host metabolite degradation (for example, proteases and lipases) were inferred as present already in LVCCA and retained throughout chlamydial evolution (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 10). LVCCA also already had the potential to import glucose-6-phosphate with the transporter UhpC, which is used to scavenge host glucose by chlamydiae and other endosymbionts50 (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 9). While peptidoglycan biosynthesis genes are absent in some Planctomycetes51, we reconstructed most key genes (for example, murACDEFGJ, mreB and mraY) in both LVCCA and LCCA (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 9 and 10).
Earlier hypotheses for Chlamydiae genome evolution were based only on gene presence patterns or included limited genomic diversity32,33. Our results provide the previously missing support that LCCA already had the genetic toolkit for an endosymbiotic and biphasic lifestyle. Furthermore, we have shown that key genes were gained before LVCCA, and that LCCA also evolved through a reduction in pathways involved in de novo biosynthesis and hence a dependence on uptake of essential metabolites. Chlamydiae diverged from other PVC bacteria between 1 and 2 Ga, coinciding with estimates for the evolution of eukaryotes (1.2–2.1 Ga)29,30,32,33. Our reconstruction demonstrates that LCCA was already an obligate endosymbiont, indicating a billion-year-old history of chlamydiae infecting eukaryotic hosts as they evolved.
A facultative anaerobic origin of Chlamydiae
Although most Chlamydiae are aerobes, groups with anaerobic metabolism (for example, Anoxychlamydiaceae) were recently identified39,40. To unravel the evolutionary history of aerobiosis in Chlamydiae, we investigated metabolic genes reconstructed in LCCA and LVCCA. Core metabolic genes conserved in most extant chlamydiae28 were inferred alongside genes indicating a facultatively anaerobic lifestyle (Figs. 2 and 4, Extended Data Figs. 5 and 6 and Supplementary Data 9 and 10). LCCA had the potential to use glycolysis to generate ATP with both glucose (glucokinase) and glucose-6-phosphate (UhpC). The resulting pyruvate could be converted to acetyl-CoA using pyruvate dehydrogenase or the oxygen-sensitive pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase (PFO) under oxic and anoxic conditions, respectively. Acetyl-CoA could then be directed into the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle or fermented. The TCA cycle was reconstructed as missing citrate synthase and malate dehydrogenase in LCCA, but as complete in many early chlamydial ancestors (Extended Data Fig. 6 and Supplementary Data 10). LCCA could probably perform oxidative phosphorylation, because we inferred a complete respiratory electron transport chain (ETC) including sodium-transporting NADH dehydrogenase (Nqr; Complex I, CI), succinate dehydrogenase (Sdh; CII), terminal oxidases (CIV) cytochrome bd ubiquinol oxidase (CydA-B) and cytochrome c oxidase cbb3-type (CcoO/N), and sodium-driven ATP synthase (Ntp; CV) (Fig. 4a,b and Suplementary Data 9 and 10). These terminal oxidases have high oxygen affinity and could have been used to respire oxygen under micro-aerophilic conditions, or to provide oxidative stress protection for oxygen-sensitive enzymes like PFO52,53. The LCCA ETC was probably used to generate a sodium motive force (SMF), as demonstrated in C. trachomatis54. The same central metabolism was reconstructed in LVCCA, except for succinate dehydrogenase (Extended Data Fig. 6). LVCCA could also oxidize pyruvate using the oxygen-sensitive pyruvate formate lyase (PFL), and couple pyruvate oxidation to H2 production with the oxygen-sensitive [FeFe]-hydrogenase (HydA) (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 9). More extensive fermentative capabilities were also reconstructed in LVCCA, which could ferment pyruvate to acetate, acetoin and, potentially, ethanol. An Rnf complex (sodium ion-translocating ferredoxin:NAD+ oxidoreductase), which is strictly linked to sodium energetics and strongly associated with anaerobes55, was also reconstructed as part of the LVCCA ETC. PFL, HydA, the Rnf complex and some fermentative capabilities were lost between LVCCA and LCCA.
Additional genes encoding proteins with central functions and varying oxygen tolerances were reconstructed in LCCA and LVCCA, and differentially retained across early chlamydial ancestors (Fig. 2, Extended Data Figs. 2 and 5 and Supplementary Data 9 and 10). Complementary copies of ribonucleotide reductase (RNR), the key enzyme for ribonucleotide-to-deoxyribonucleotide interconversion, were reconstructed in LCCA. Under anoxic conditions LCCA and LVCCA could use a class III RNR, which is highly oxygen sensitive56, and under oxic conditions LCCA could use a class Ic RNR, which is oxygen dependent57. Similarily, haem biosynthesis can occur through both anaerobic and aerobic routes. The anaerobic-route, oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase was reconstructed in LCCA and LVCCA and retained in all chlamydial family ancestors. The aerobic-route, oxygen-dependent protoporphyrinogen III oxidase was reconstructed in most early chlamydial ancestors, but not in LCCA and LVCCA. The oxygen-dependent superoxide dismutase and nitronate monooxygenase, which detoxify oxygen radicals and oxidize alkyl nitronates, were also reconstructed in LCCA and LVCCA. Transport systems for both primary iron species under anoxic (Fe2+) and oxic (Fe3+) conditions58,59 were reconstructed in LVCCA but not in LCCA. LVCCA and LCCA were both probably motile, based on an inferred flagellar apparatus and an additional type IV pilus in LVCCA. Contrary to our expectations and previous hypotheses32,33, in LCCA we did not reconstruct the extensive aerobic and energy metabolism found in modern Amoebachlamydiales.
LCCA and LVCCA were reconstructed as facultative anaerobes that encoded oxygen-sensitive and -dependent metabolic genes and pathways associated with both anaerobic and aerobic lifestyles. LVCCA would have lived 2 Ga, soon after the great oxidation event (2.1–2.4 Ga)30, when environments with transient oxygen and oxic microclines would have been common. Extant facultative anaerobes in analogous environments (for example, tidal zones, sediments and animal tissues) regulate aerobic and anaerobic gene expression with oxygen exposure60. LVCCA may have used motility to transit oxic microclines and adjusted metabolism accordingly, and potentially had a biphasic lifestyle based on oxic–anoxic transitions rather than host invasion as in extant chlamydiae. The eukaryotic intracellular environment can provide a refuge from oxygen, and strict anaerobes can survive and divide within amoeba vacuoles when exposed to high oxygen61. A possible scenario that drove the evolution of chlamydial endosymbiosis was a coinciding increase in oxygen and the emergence of a niche suited to a facultative anaerobe within early eukaryotic hosts. Thus, Chlamydiae evolution may have been facilitated by both endosymbiosis-related gene gains and a facultatively anaerobic ancestor.
Gene gain facilitated oxygen tolerance and respiratory chain expansion in Chlamydiae
Chlamydiae later diversified into two major groups, G1 and G2, divergent in oxygen tolerance. Genes reconstructed in the last common ancestors of G1 (LG1CA) and G2 (LG2CA) and their descendents are indicative of lifestages in anoxic and oxic environments, respectively. The arginine deiminase pathway, known as anaerobic substrate-level phosphorylation, was reconstructed in LG1CA (Extended Data Fig. 6 and Supplementary Data 9 and 10). Similarly, the iron transporter FeoAB for the primary species under anoxic conditions (Fe2+) and the hydrogen-producing and oxygen-sensitive HydA were reconstructed in Anoxychlamydiales and Anoxychlamydiaceae ancestors, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 5). Oxygen-utilizing enzymes, such as cytochrome bd ubiquinol oxidase, were also lost before the Anoxychlamydiaceae ancestor (Fig. 4a,b and Supplementary Data 9 and 10). In contrast, the oxygen-sensitive PFO was lost before LG2CA (Extended Data Fig. 6). Unexpected in G2 was the gain of an extensive suite of aerobiosis-associated pathways and oxygen-dependent enzymes between the last common ancestors of Amoebachlamydiales (LAMCA) and Criblamydiaceae, Waddliaceae and Parachlamydiaceae (LCWPCA), which indicates adaptation to higher-oxygen environments during early Amoebachlamydiales evolution (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 10). These included genes encoding coproporphyrinogen III oxidase for aerobic-route haem biosynthesis, iron complex transporters (for example, siderophores) for the primary species under oxic conditions (Fe3+), catalase and superoxide dismutases for oxidative stress response, a bacterial globin for nitric oxide detoxification, and the glyoxylate shunt, a TCA cycle bypass almost exclusive to aerobes62. Overall, early Amoebachlamydiales ancestors were probably better adapted to oxic environments, suggesting oxygen tolerance as a driving force in chlamydial evolution.
Amoebachlamydiales also expanded energy metabolism by gaining complexes for generation of a proton motive force (PMF) alongside the ancestral SMF. PMF has a larger redox gap than SMF and can result in greater ATP generation63. We reconstructed several PMF-associated complexes in LCWPCA, including a proton-transporting NADH dehydrogenase (NuoA-N; CI), cytochrome bc complex (PetBD; CIII), cytochrome o ubiquinol oxidase (CyoA-D) and proton-driven F-type ATP synthase (AtpA-H; CV) (Fig. 4a,b). In phylogenetic trees of NuoA-H subunits, chlamydial sequences consistently branch with members of the Terrabacteria superphylum (NuoG; Fig. 4c and Supplementary Data 6), supporting gain before LCWPCA. Such physiologically coupled proteins from multisubunit complexes are often gained as a functional unit64. PetBD was reconstructed in LG2CA and retained in most descendants, but lost in Chlamydiaceae (Fig. 4a,b). The evolutionary history of CyoA-D in Chlamydiae is unclear. It was reconstructed in Simkaniales (LSICA) and LAMCA order ancestors, but also in Chlamydiae Clade III and Sororchlamydiaceae family ancestors (Fig. 4a,b). CyoA-D gene trees show an affiliation with Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR) bacteria members and suggest at least one HGT event (CyoA; Fig. 4d and Supplementary Data 6). CyoA-D has lower oxygen affinity and is associated with higher oxygen levels than other terminal oxidases in Chlamydiae65. Haem O synthase (CyoE), which generates the CyoA-D haem O cluster, was also reconstructed in LCWPCA and the Chlamydiae Clade III ancestor but not in other early ancestors (Extended Data Fig. 5). In phylogenetic trees of AtpA-H subunits, chlamydial sequences affiliate with Candidatus Zixibacteria and the complex was probably gained before LCWPCA in a single HGT event (AtpD; Fig. 4e and Supplementary Data 6). Thus, an extended ETC with mosaic origins was gained before LCWPCA through additive HGT of several complexes from different bacterial groups (Fig. 4). The more extensive metabolic capabilities in protist-infecting Amoebachlamydiales compared with animal pathogen Chlamydiaceae had previously been noted27,28,66. However, it had been presumed that differences were a result of gene loss in Chlamydiaceae and other lineages, with LCCA having had the more flexible and branched ETC33,36. Our analyses instead indicate that the extended Amoebachlamydiales ETC was gained after divergence from LCCA.
Gene content expansion as a mode of evolution in endosymbionts
Amoebachlamydiales aerobiosis-associated gene expansion was accompanied by additional metabolic gene gains (Extended Data Fig. 3), in line with the extended metabolic capabilities and larger gene repertoires of extant members relative to other chlamydiae27,28,66. Our results provide evidence that these key genes were not present in LCCA as expected, but were instead gained later through HGT leading to the characteristic Amoebachlamydiales metabolic complexity. Although we cannot accurately reconstruct the evolution of all genes, such as those gone extinct or rapidly evolving, it is possible to investigate general patterns in relative reconstructed proteome sizes. Our results indicate a shift towards larger proteome sizes between LAMCA and LCWPCA relative to other early chlamydial ancestors (Fig. 5a). The upward trend in reconstructed Amoebachlamydiales proteome sizes was corroborated using a gene presence/absence method (Supplementary Fig. 12). However, proteome sizes of extant taxa and in-family ancestors were consistent only when using the gene-tree-aware method (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 12b). Proteome size was reconstructed as having expanded from 1,691 in LAMCA to 2,560 in LCWPCA, nearly double that inferred for LG2CA (n = 1,408) and indicating genome expansion in Amoebachlamydiales. In contrast, the reconstructed proteome size of the Chlamydiaceae ancestor (n = 1,092) suggests genome reduction. In other early chlamydial ancestors, reconstructed proteome sizes are consistent with genome maintenance (Fig. 5).
Despite a conserved endosymbiotic lifestyle, divergent patterns in genome evolution were found across Chlamydiae. Genome reduction in obligate endosymbionts is associated with vertical transmission and a strict host range. The resulting small intracellular population sizes and genetic isolation lead to gene loss through genetic drift, the accumulation of slightly deleterious mutations and a lack of recombination9–12. We observed genome reduction leading to the pathogenic Chlamydiaceae, which are typically horizontally transmitted but have strict animal hosts. Genome maintenance in obligate endosymbionts is associated with horizontal transmission and a wider host range. For example, marine bivalve endosymbionts maintain intermediate genome sizes due to horizontal transmission and recombination67. Protists have been referred to as ‘melting pots’ of evolution, because their endosymbionts tend to undergo less genome reduction due to HGT with host prey and co-infecting endosymbionts68–70. In most chlamydial lineages we observe patterns consistent with genome maintenance, although we lack information about host ranges and transmission. Genome reduction and maintenance are in line with previous work on the effects of transmission mode and host variability on endosymbiont genome evolution71,72. While genome expansion has been shown in facultative symbionts with free-living lifestages73, it has not previously been shown in obligate endosymbionts. We observed extensive gene gain as having led to the larger proteome sizes and increased metabolic complexity characteristic of extant protist-infecting Amoebachlamydiales. Our findings challenge existing paradigms by providing evidence that obligate endosymbionts can counter genome reduction processes and undergo genome expansion. Given that Chlamydiae is an ancient endosymbiotic phylum, we suggest that endosymbiont genomic and metabolic complexity can increase over long evolutionary time scales.
Gene exchange is common among chlamydiae
In our analysis, 70% of PVC gene families were found to have evolved vertically, closely mirroring previous reconstructions of bacterial evolution74. The remaining 30% represent horizontal gene transmission from within (that is, transfers) or outside the PVC dataset (that is, HGT-derived originations). HGT is known to occur in both horizontally and vertically transmitted endosymbionts (for example, Wolbachia), although it is more prevalent in the former67,71,75–79. Nevertheless, obligate endosymbionts are expected to be limited in HGT relative to free-living bacteria9. A large number of gene originations were reconstructed in Chlamydiae (n = 1,458), many of which were probably HGTs from diverse bacterial groups (Extended Data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Data 11). For example, chlamydial sequences affiliate with bacterial groups for 94% of LCCA HGT-derived originations. For many gene originations, chlamydial sequences affiliate with taxonomic groups known for host association, such as Proteobacteria, Bacteroides and CPR bacteria80. This pattern is suggestive of HGT facilitated by co-occurring symbionts or phagocytosed prey bacteria, which is common in protists68–70,81. We further examined putative HGTs within the PVC dataset (that is, transfer events) and approximated gene transfer rates between ancestors. In Chlamydiae we found lower, but not statistically significant (P = 0.068), transfer rates than in other PVC bacteria (Extended Data Fig. 7). Between chlamydial families, Parachlamydiaceae and Rhabdochlamydiaceae had significantly higher transfer rates than Chlamydiaceae (P = 4.8 × 10−3 and 8.5 × 10−3) and Anoxychlamydiaceae (P = 7.1 × 10−3 and 1.1 × 10−3). Overall, gene exchange rates in some chlamydial groups do not differ from free-living PVC bacteria.
Interchlamydial HGT was visualized by testing for statistically over-represented gene transfers between chlamydial nodes where donor and acceptor lineages could be assigned (n = 5,937, P ≤0.05). The resulting network reveals gene transfer highways indicating probable shared environmental niches, such as shared hosts (Extended Data Fig. 7). Genome sequence divergence is a major barrier to HGT82. Despite this, 59% (n = 3,493, P ≤0.05) of significant transfers occured between members of different chlamydial families. Elevated HGT frequency between more distantly related chlamydiae could be explained by ecological overlap in host or environment82,83. Chlamydiaceae, Anoxychlamydiaceae and Neochlamydia were under-represented in the network and have isolated transfer highways. These groups have convergently lost central metabolic pathways, including TCA cycle and ETC components (Fig. 4, Extended Data Figs. 5 and 6 and Supplementary Data 10), suggesting adaptation to specialized environments. Extensive gene transfer highways between Amoebachlamydiales members also support divergent genome evolution in this group (Extended Data Fig. 7). Chlamydial gene exchange could be facilitated by the presence of ancestral plasmids, which encode conjugative elements in some lineages including several Parachlamydiaceae41. While HGT is well recognized in endosymbiotic bacteria67,71,75–79, our study provides a systematic view on the pervasiveness of HGT and the role of intersymbiont transfers in endosymbiont genome evolution.
Conclusions
In our study we present a comprehensive view of evolution in the Chlamydiae phylum. We found that the Chlamydiae ancestor was already adapted to an endosymbiotic lifestyle and probably infected eukaryotic hosts. We also found that Chlamydiae did not evolve from a metabolically versatile aerobe as expected but rather from a facultative anaerobe. Energy metabolism and oxygen tolerance gene gain later shaped diversification within the phylum. Counter to expectations for obligate endosymbionts, our results show that the protist-infecting Amoebachlamydiales underwent genome expansion and only later gained their characteristic aerobic and metabolic versatility. Together, our results lay a foundation for further investigation of the complex, and perhaps varied, evolutionary trajectories of bacterial endosymbionts.
Methods
See Extended Data Fig. 1 for an overview of key steps for the reconstruction of gene content evolution in PVC bacteria.
Selection of representative genomes
A representative dataset of PVC bacteria genomes was selected using genome quality to obtain species-level Chlamydiae representatives and genus-level representatives of other PVC bacteria from the genome taxonomy database (GTDB) and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). GTDB is continually updated as genomes are released on NCBI and thus naming structures are nonstationary84. Here Chlamydiae were initially classified as a phylum, but in the version used were classified as a class of Verrucomicrobiota (that is, Chlamydiia). All genomes from GTDB v.86 (2018 database) classified as Planctomycetota and Verrucomicrobiota were selected (n = 1,183). Non-chlamydial PVC genomes (n = 773; Supplementary Data 1) with completeness ≥90% and contamination ≤2%, based on GTDB metadata, were downloaded from NCBI (n = 182; 3 April 2019). For Chlamydiae, genomes from GTDB class ‘c__Chlamydiia’ were downloaded from NCBI (n = 410; 3 April 2019) and supplemented with recently acquired MAGs and isolate genomes (n = 216) for a total of 626 chlamydial genomes. We used miComplete85 v.1.1.1 to estimate the quality of chlamydiae genomes using a specific marker gene set37 and selected those with completeness ≥0.9 and redundancy ≤1.02 for downstream analysis (n = 460; Supplementary Data 1).
To reduce dataset redundancy, all genomes were dereplicated with dRep86 v.1.4.3 using previously proposed cutoffs for strain-level delineation87—that is, an average nucleotide identity of 96.5% and genome alignment fraction of at least 60%, resulting in 224 genomes (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 1). Non-chlamydial PVC genomes were further dereplicated by comparing genome quality scores (GQS) per GTDB genus level (Supplementary Data 1). GQS was calculated as described in ref. 88—that is, GQS = completeness (%) – 5 × contamination (%). The highest GQS-scoring genome per genus was selected as a representative and, when two genomes had an equal score one was manually selected (Supplementary Fig. 1). The final dataset included 184 PVC genomes with 95 species-level Chlamydiae representatives and 89 genus-level non-Chlamydiae PVC representatives (47 Planctomycetes, 34 Verrucomicrobia, 5 Lentisphaerae and 3 Kiritimatiellaeota) (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 2). Genome characteristics were calculated using miComplete85 v.1.1.1 (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Data 2). Putative uncharacterized PVC phyla were not included, such as Candidatus Omnitrophica16 due to its conflicting position in some large-scale species trees of Bacteria15,88.
Phylogenomic analyses
PVC species relationships were inferred using phylogenomic datasets of concatenated single-copy marker genes (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Data 3) for the initial 184 selected taxa (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Data 2). Additional species phylogenies were inferred after removal of genomes with unresolved phylogenetic positions, resulting in datasets with 183 taxa (removal of Chlamydiae bacterium 1070360-7; Supplementary Fig. 4) and 180 taxa (further removal of the 3 Parilichlamydiaceae genomes; Supplementary Fig. 5). ML and Bayesian phylogenies were inferred with and without the removal of compositionally heterogeneous sites for all three datasets (184, 183 and 180 taxa) as outlined below (Supplementary Data 4–6). Species phylogenies were rooted with Planctomycetes based on its phylogenetic position in recent large-scale phylogenomic analyses of bacterial species relationships88–90. The 180-taxa dataset was selected for further analyses and the converged Bayesian species phylogeny (consensus of chains 1 and 3), with compositionally heterogeneous sites removed, was used for ancestral state reconstruction (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Discussion 1).
Identification of single-copy marker genes
Candidate single-copy marker genes were identified using nonsupervised orthologous groups (NOGs) from eggNOG91 v.4.5.1. Protein-coding gene sequences from all PVC bacteria genomes were mapped to NOGs at the last universal common ancestor level (that is, root-level ‘-d NOG’) using emapper92 v.1.0.1. Resulting NOGs where 95% of taxa were found in a single copy were identified as candidate markers for further investigation (n = 116; Supplementary Data 3).
Sequences from each gene family NOG were aligned using MAFFT L-INS-i93 v.7.427 and manually inspected, with poorly aligned and short sequences removed. Alignments were trimmed using BMGE94 v.1.12 (entropy score cutoff or ‘-h’ of 0.6). IQ-TREE95 v.1.6.11 was used to infer phylogenetic trees, with model selection by ModelFinder96 from empirical profile mixture models97 combined with the LG exchangeability matrix98 (that is, LG + C10 to LG + C60), and with 1,000 ultrafast bootstraps (ufBP)99. Resulting trees (available in repository) were manually examined for patterns indicative of vertical inheritance and sufficient phylogenetic signal, and markers were removed that did not generally resolve PVC phyla (Supplementary Data 3). Sequences were removed that could represent HGT events, distant paralogues or contamination (Supplementary Data 3). Where multiple sequences per taxon were present, if they overlapped both were removed (duplicates) and, if they were partial and nonoverlapping, the longer sequence was retained (Supplementary Data 3). A second round of sequence alignment and tree inference was performed as above, with further markers removed resulting in 79 marker genes (Supplementary Data 3).
Discordance filtering100 was then performed to remove markers with the most anomalous phylogenetic signal relative to the majority (that is, the most discordant trees). NOGs (all of which were clusters of orthologous groups, that is, COGs) were ranked by discordance score and the top-scoring fraction was removed, leaving 74 single-copy marker genes for phylogenomic analyses (Supplementary Fig. 2). Amino acid sequences for each selected marker gene were realigned and trimmed, as above, after removal of taxa with unresolved phylogenetic positions (that is, datasets with 183 and 180 taxa). Trimmed amino acid alignments were concatenated into a supermatrix for each of the three datasets.
Phylogenomic inferences
Heterogenous site removal was performed using χ2-trimming101, with the most compositionally heterogeneous sites removed from each concatenated alignment in incremental steps of 1% of alignment sites. Site removal continued until no taxa significantly heterogeneous in their amino acid composition remained (based on the χ2 test score statistic; significance P ≤0.05; Supplementary Figs. 3–5 and Supplementary Data 4).
Using IQ-TREE95 v.1.6.10 with model selection96, ML phylogenies were inferred for the initial unrefined alignment, for alignments in 10% increments of total sites removed based on χ2-trimming (up to 50%; Supplementary Data 4), and for the alignment with no significantly heterogeneous taxa (fully refined alignment). ML trees were then reconstructed using the posterior mean site frequency (PMSF) approximation of the LG + C60 + F + Γ4 model (selected in all initial trees) with 100 nonparametric bootstraps. Transfer bootstrap expectation102 bipartition support was also inferred for the initial unrefined alignment and for the fully refined alignment using IQ-TREE103 v.2.0.
Bayesian phylogenies were reconstructed for these two alignments for all three taxa datasets. In each case, four independent Markov chain Monte Carlo chains were run using PhyloBayes-MPI v.1.7b104 with the CAT + GTR + Γ4 model97,105, for at least 10,000 iterations. CAT, a site-heterogeneous model, performs more robustly against long-branch attraction artefacts106. If at least 10,000 iterations had been run but no chains had begun to converge (maximum difference <1), all chains were stopped. The number of generations, burn-in and any chain convergence (maximum difference <0.3) can be found in Supplementary Figs. 3–5 alongside a consensus tree of all four chains with posterior probability (P) indicating branch support. Posterior predictive checks were also performed with PhyloBayes-MPI v.1.7b104, with configurations sampled every ten generations after burn-in. The resulting range of z-scores for maximum heterogeneity and diversity across chains can be found in Supplementary Figs. 3–5. See Supplementary Data 6 for all uncollapsed species phylogenies and Supplementary Data 5 for a summary of the number of taxa, alignment lengths, inference methods, bootstrap supports and model of evolution for each phylogeny.
16S rRNA gene species phylogeny
Near-full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences from chlamydiae (n = 233) and other PVC members (n = 205) were downloaded from SILVA107 v.138 SSU Ref NR 99, 79 near-full-length chlamydial 16S rRNA gene sequences (97% identity operational taxonomic unit representatives) retrieved from Schulz et al.22 and 142 sequences from our reference genome dataset. Sequences (n = 659) were clustered at 90% sequence identity to reduce redundancy using USEARCH108 v.11.0.667 with ‘-cluster_smallmem’. The resulting family-level sequence representatives (n = 177) were aligned with SINA109 and the alignment trimmed with trimAl110 v.1.4.1 ‘-gappyout’ (1,533 aligned positions). Bayesian tree samples with four Markov chain Monte Carlo chains in parallel (n = 100,000 each) were inferred under the CAT + GTR + Γ4 model97,105 in PhyloBayes v.4.1c111 (Supplementary Fig. 6). Convergence was assumed once maximum difference dropped below 0.3 and effective sample sizes for continuous parameters were >100 (according to the commands 'bpcomp' and 'tracecomp' in PhyloBayes, respectively) after burn-in (n = 25,000).
Generation of gene families and trees
NOG clustering
PVC gene sequences from the 180-taxa dataset (n = 445,591) were mapped against eggNOG91 v.4.5.1 using emapper92 v.1.0.1 at root-level ‘-d NOG’. Of these, 326,083 (73%) gene sequences were assigned to 17,935 NOGs (Supplementary Fig. 7).
De novo clustering
For the remaining 119,508 gene sequences in the 180-taxa dataset with no homologue in eggNOG v.4.5.1, we performed pairwise sequence alignment in an all-against-all fashion with DIAMOND112 v.0.9.21 using the parameter ‘–more-sensitive’. Subsequently, de novo clustering with SiLiX113 v.1.2.9 was performed with default overlap of 80% and identity thresholds ranging from 5 to 40% in 5% increments (Supplementary Fig. 7). To select an appropriate identity threshold we (1) inspected the number of singleton clusters per threshold and (2) assigned TIGRFAM114 v.15.0 domains with InterProScan115 v.5.36-75.0 to gene sequences. Using the assigned TIGRFAMs, true positive rate (sensitivity) and true negative rate (specificity) were calculated for clusters, with different clusterings evaluated using the balanced accuracy measure ((specificity + sensitivity)/2) as suggested113. A 25% identity cutoff performed best, yielding 10,548 de novo gene families with at least two members (75,218 singletons).
Gene family phylogenetic trees
We performed phylogenetic analysis on all gene families (both NOG and de novo clusters) with at least four members (n = 11,996). Sequences were aligned with MAFFT116 v.7.427 using the strategy ‘–localpair’. Alignments were then trimmed using BMGE94 v.1.12 with default parameters and an entropy cutoff of 0.6. The permitted gap rate for alignment positions was increased to 0.5 for 94 gene families with <50 informative aligned positions using the initial parameters. Gene trees were then inferred with IQ-TREE95 v.1.6.11 using the best-fit model identified by ModelFinder96, with ‘-m TESTNEW’, ‘-madd LG + C10, LG + C20, LG + C30, LG + C40, LG + C50, LG + C60’ and 1,000 improved ufBPs99 ‘-bnni’. Two specific gene families were later excluded (COG3119 and COG0457) due to poor alignment (probably caused by repeat regions) and subsequent difficulties inferring a ML tree, bootstraps from which are required for ALE. These gene families primarily occur in non-Chlamydiae PVC members and thus should not impact chlamydial ancestor proteome sizes (Supplementary Data 7). The remaining 91,705 gene families had three or fewer sequences. Thus, phylogenetic trees could not be inferred. However, because ALE requires gene families in a tree format we thus provided mock trees for those with two or three sequences.
Annotation of gene families
We assigned protein domain annotations to gene families using InterProScan115 v.5.36-75.0 to identify the domains of Protein Families (Pfam)117, TIGRFAM114 and InterPro (IPR)118. We assigned Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes orthology and enzyme commision numbers using GhostKOALA119 and inferred eggNOG91 functional annotation as described above, and also at the bacterial level (‘-d BACT’).
Ancestral state reconstruction
To gain a more complete perspective on PVC genome evolution we used the complete genome dataset outlined above, which includes MAGs from uncultured lineages that would otherwise be missed. However, this was restricted to high-quality MAGs as outlined above (completeness ≥90% and contamination ≤2%).
Gene-tree-unaware method, Count
For gene-tree-unaware ancestral gene content reconstruction, we ran Count120 v.10.04 with the gain–loss–duplication model of evolution with Poisson distribution to model gene family size at the root. We used the same gain–loss and duplication–loss ratios for all lineages and inferred ancestral gene content using the Wagner maximum parsimony framework with default costs.
Gene-tree-aware method, ALE
ML tree bootstrap samples of gene families identified in the PVC dataset were reconciled with the species tree to reconstruct their gene family histories. We computed conditional clade probabilities from bootstrap samples (ALEobserve) and sampled 100 reconciliations with the species tree (ALEml_undated) using ALE121 v.0.449, implemented as a computational pipeline (https://github.com/maxemil/ALE-pipeline). We added singleton gene families as originations at the corresponding species node to the reconstructions. Furthermore, the estimated fraction of missing gene content per genome was provided to ALE because it uses this to correct for potentially missing data—that is, in the MAGs included. In addition, the specific implementation of ALE corrects ancestor gene copy number estimates using modelled gene extinction probability rates44, which has previously been employed to estimate ancestral proteome sizes122.
Comparison of ancestral state reconstruction methods and selection of ALE cutoff
ALE improves on earlier methods by direct estimation of rates of gene duplication, transfer and loss from data, as well as incorporating the uncertainty in gene trees while exploring a larger gene tree space121. The accuracy of reconstructions can be negatively influenced by an inaccurate species tree and imbalanced taxon sampling44,121. Here, these risks are minimized due to our extensive taxon sampling and species tree reconstruction efforts (Supplementary Figs. 1–6 and Supplementary Data 1–6).
ALE reports relative frequencies for ancestral events and gene family copy frequencies that express their statistical support. This support accumulates the uncertainty introduced by alignment, tree reconstruction and reconciliation and should therefore not be set at a standard-level cutoff. We therefore aimed to identify a suitable threshold by investigating density distribution per inferred event type and transfer ratio per gene family (Supplementary Fig. 8), which indicated a cutoff of 0.3 for a candidate with high signal-to-noise ratio. The identified cutoff is in accordance with recent similar analyses that selected 0.3 as a frequency cutoff123,124. The transfer ratio represents the proportion of horizontal events over all events per gene tree. We further compared the tree-aware reconstructions generated by ALEml with the thresholds 0.3 (sensitive), 0.5 (specific) and 0.7 (very specific) using gene-content-only-aware Count reconstructions (Supplementary Fig. 9). The highest number of consensus gene families obtained with gene-tree-aware and -unaware methods was reached with a threshold of 0.3 (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Based on this analysis and event density distributions, we selected a frequency cutoff of 0.3 for inferring evolutionary events in our ancestral state reconstruction analysis (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). Gene families were thus inferred as present when reconstructing ancestor gene content if they had a copy frequency of at least 0.3. In addition, we used this cutoff to calculate confident-event frequencies. This meant that an event frequency ≥0.3 and <1.3 was counted as 1, a frequency ≥1.3 and <2.3 was counted as 2 and so on. These confident-event frequencies correspond to the gene content and events used in our ancestral reconstructions (Figs. 2 and 4, Supplementary Figs. 10–12 and Extended Data Figs. 2–6). However, for estimation of genome content evolution dynamics and ancestral proteome size, raw reconciliation frequencies were used to avoid potential underestimation of transfers and losses (Figs. 3 and 5 and Extended Data Fig. 7).
Inference of transfer rates and gene transfer highways
We approximated the rate of intra-PVC HGT (that is, transfer rate) for nodes in the species tree by calculating the inferred gene transfers in our reconstructions divided by the number of substitutions in the species tree along the given branch. Based on shared gene families between two extant or ancestral genomes, we tested whether more HGT events occured between genomes than the median of transferred gene families within chlamydiae members. We used a one-sided binomial test (‘binom.test’) with ‘alternative = greater’ in the R base package125, and false discovery rate corrected P values for multiple testing with ‘p.adjust’ to identify enriched transfer routes (‘gene transfer highways’) with P ≤0.05. Significant gene transfer highways were visualized with Cytoscape126 v.3.7.0.
Identification of non-PVC gene transfer donors
For genes inferred as originations within Chlamydiae, to distinguish bona fide HGTs from outside the PVC dataset and candidate de novo gene families, we performed a homology search against the NCBI nonredundant database. If no homologous protein sequences could be identified, gene families were referred to as de novo candidates, otherwise we inferred gene trees to identify affiliated taxonomic groups and thus potential donor lineages of the horizontally transferred gene (workflow: https://github.com/jennahd/HGT_trees). For each gene family a DIAMOND v.0.9.36.137 blastp112 search (with ‘max-target-seqs 2000’ and ‘more-sensitive’) was performed using all sequences against NCBI’s nonredundant database127 (v.5, accessed 8 October 2020). Unique hits per gene family were compiled and clustered using CD-HIT128 v.4.8.1 at 80% sequence identity. NCBI’s taxonomy database129 was used for taxonomic classification. Protein sequences from each gene family and any database hits were aligned with MAFFT93 v.7.471 (‘–auto’) and trimmed with trimAl110 v.1.4.rev15 (‘gappyout’). Sequences that covered <40% of the trimmed alignment were removed, followed by inference of an initial phylogenetic tree using FastTree130 2 v.2.1.11. Long-branching taxa were identified as having outlier terminal branch lengths (third quartile + 1.5× interquartile range) relative to others in each tree, and were removed before reinferring trees as above.
These initial trees were prohibitively large for performing ML analyses and smaller subtrees were therefore selected using the above workflow. Here, clades comprising ≥25% chlamydiae with at least two chlamydial sequences were identified. To account for multiple HGT events, per gene family up to three clades with the largest number of chlamydial sequences were identified although, in the majority of cases, only one was found. Subtrees including these clades were selected by finding nodes at least three further up the tree hierarchy and that included at least 150 additional taxa and up to 400 additional taxa with bipartition support ≥0.7. Where a subtree fulfilling these conditions was identified, but with a larger number of taxa, the number of taxa was reduced to ≤400 by removal of more distant sequences (support ≥0.7, at least five sequences and at least six steps until a common ancestor with the chlamydial clade). Between 20 and 50 outgroup sequences were randomly selected from the clade with a position sister to the selected subtree (moving to the next subtending clade when there were <20 initial outgroup sequences). Selected subtrees were subsequently aligned and trimmed and an initial phylogenetic tree was inferred as above. ML trees were then inferred for each subtree using the trimmed alignment with IQ-TREE95 v.1.6.12 under the LG model of evolution98, with 1,000 ufBP. The clade sister to chlamydial sequences, and that subtending this clade (‘nested’) with ufBP ≥80, were identified. Taxonomic labels of sister and nested taxa were each compared at domain, superphylum and phylum levels. The lowest-level shared taxonomy at cutoffs of 75% (Extended Data Fig. 7), 90% and 100% of taxa was selected as the affiliated taxonomic group and hence putative gene donor (Supplementary Data 11). Originations were identified as de novo in the case where no non-chlamydial hits were found or when no sister group to chlamydial sequences was inferred.
Reconstruction of metabolic pathways
The evolutionary history of ETC components was investigated using the workflow described above. We reconstructed ancestral gene family repertoires from ALE by selecting all families predicted to be present at a given node with a relative frequency ≥0.3. We assessed the metabolic capabilities of ancestral genomes using either the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Module tool131 or MetaCyc pathways132.
Statistics and data visualization
Phylogenetic trees and protein domains were visualized using Figtree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree), iTOL132 and the ETE3 Toolkit133 v.3.1.2. Relative evolutionary divergence of chlamydiae ancestors in the species tree was calculated using PhyloRank84 v.0.1.10 (https://github.com/dparks1134/PhyloRank). Plots were generated using Cytoscape126 v.3.7.0 and the R v.3.6.2 base package125 alongside the packages ggplot2 (ref. 134) v.3.3.3, ggtree135 v.2.5.0.991 and treeio136 v.1.10.0.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the IMG/M Data Consortium for contributing metagenomic data, and L. Alteo and J. Blanchard for early access to Harvard forest soil MAGs. We thank D. Tamarit and C. Stairs for advice and discussions. T.J.G.E. received funding from the European Research Council (grant nos. 310039 and 817834), the Dutch Research Council (grant no. VI.C.192.016), the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 2015-04959), Volkswagen Foundation (grant no. 96725) and the European Union (grant no. H2020-MSCA-ITN-2015-675752). M.H. and A.C. received funding from the European Research Council ERC (grant no. 281633) and the Austrian Science Fund FWF (FunChlam, grant no. P32112 and doc.funds MAINTAIN, grant no. DOC 69-B). S.K. received a KWA (Kurzfristige Wissenschaftliche Auslandsstipendien) travel grant from the University of Vienna. Computational resources were provided by the Life Science Compute Cluster (https://lisc.univie.ac.at) at the University of Vienna and the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX (project no. SNIC 2020/15-158), and at PDC (project nos. SNIC 2019/3-474 and SNIC 2020/5-473).
Extended data
Author contributions
T.J.G.E., M.H., J.E.D. and S.K. conceptualized the project. S.K. and J.E.D. were responsible for data curation. J.E.D., S.K., A.C. and M.E.S. conducted formal analysis. S.K. and J.E.D. carried out the investigation. All authors were responsible for validation. T.J.G.E. and M.H. supervised the project. J.E.D. and S.K. were responsible for visulization. S.K. and J.E.D. wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed and edited the article. These authors contributed equally: J.E.D. and S.K., T.J.G.E. and M.H.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Microbiology thanks Christian Jogler, Peter Timms and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Uppsala University.
Data availability
Genome data was obtained either from NCBI Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide), the JGI portal (https://portal.nersc.gov/GEM) or a zenodo repository (10.5281/zenodo.4318714). 16S rRNA gene data used in this study are available via the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de). Genbank accessions and database links for genomes used in the ancestral state reconstruction are provided in Supplementary Data 2. Additional raw data files are hosted on the online repository figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.17033417). These include sequences, alignments, trimmed alignments and trees for single-copy marker genes used for species phylogenies (both those selected and not selected), the 16S rRNA gene alignment and tree, as well as concatenated alignments and trees for all three species datasets (of 184, 183 and 180 taxa). Both NOG and de novo gene families used for the ancestral state reconstruction are also provided along with alignments, trimmed alignments, trees and bootstrap trees (ufboot) provided to ALE. The raw ALE results with all events are also included, along with gene annotations and events, and events for each gene family mapped to the species tree. Protein sequence datasets, alignments and trees inferred as part of the analysis to determine HGT donors for chlamydiae gene originations are provided. In addition, PDFs of metabolic reconstructions of LVCCA, LG1CA and LG2CA can be found in the repository files.
Code availability
The Nextflow pipeline for running the ALE ancestral state reconstruction (https://github.com/maxemil/ALE-pipeline) and the Snakemake pipeline for identification of putative HGT donor groups (https://github.com/jennahd/HGT_trees) are available on GitHub.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Jennah E. Dharamshi, Stephan Köstlbacher.
Contributor Information
Thijs J. G. Ettema, Email: thijs.ettema@wur.nl
Matthias Horn, Email: matthias.horn@univie.ac.at.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41564-022-01284-9.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41564-022-01284-9.
References
- 1.De Bary, A. Die Erscheinung der Symbiose (De Gruyter, 1879).
- 2.Drew GC, Stevens EJ, King KC. Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:623–638. doi: 10.1038/s41579-021-00550-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McFall-Ngai M, et al. Animals in a bacterial world, a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3229–3236. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218525110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Husnik F, et al. Bacterial and archaeal symbioses with protists. Curr. Biol. 2021;31:R862–R877. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sogin EM, Maggie Sogin E, Leisch N, Dubilier N. Chemosynthetic symbioses. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:R1137–R1142. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.López-García P, Eme L, Moreira D. Symbiosis in eukaryotic evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 2017;434:20–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wilkins LGE, et al. Host-associated microbiomes drive structure and function of marine ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 2019;17:e3000533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McLean, A. H. C., Parker, B. J., Hrček, J., Henry, L. M. & Godfray, H. C. J. Insect symbionts in food webs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B371, 20150325 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Moran NA. Microbial minimalism: genome reduction in bacterial pathogens. Cell. 2002;108:583–586. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00665-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wernegreen JJ. For better or worse: genomic consequences of intracellular mutualism and parasitism. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2005;15:572–583. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2005.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Toft C, Andersson SGE. Evolutionary microbial genomics: insights into bacterial host adaptation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:465–475. doi: 10.1038/nrg2798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Moran NA. Accelerated evolution and Muller’s rachet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1996;93:2873–2878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McCutcheon JP, Boyd BM, Dale C. The life of an insect endosymbiont from the cradle to the grave. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:R485–R495. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rivas-Marín E, Devos DP. The paradigms they are a-changin’: past, present and future of PVC bacteria research. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018;111:785–799. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0962-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Collingro A, Köstlbacher S, Horn M. Chlamydiae in the environment. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:877–888. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.05.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wagner M, Horn M. The Planctomycetes, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae and sister phyla comprise a superphylum with biotechnological and medical relevance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006;17:241–249. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Niftrik L, Devos DP. Editorial: Planctomycetes-Verrucomicrobia-Chlamydiae bacterial superphylum: new model organisms for evolutionary cell biology. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1458. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bachmann, N. L., Polkinghorne, A. & Timms, P. Chlamydia genomics: providing novel insights into chlamydial biology. Trends Microbiol.22, 464–472 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Elwell, C., Mirrashidi, K. & Engel, J. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14, 385–400 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Borel N, Polkinghorne A, Pospischil A. A review on chlamydial diseases in animals: still a challenge for pathologists? Vet. Pathol. 2018;55:374–390. doi: 10.1177/0300985817751218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lagkouvardos I, et al. Integrating metagenomic and amplicon databases to resolve the phylogenetic and ecological diversity of the Chlamydiae. ISME J. 2014;8:115–125. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schulz F, et al. Towards a balanced view of the bacterial tree of life. Microbiome. 2017;5:140. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0360-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Horn M. Chlamydiae as symbionts in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;62:113–131. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Taylor-Brown, A., Vaughan, L., Greub, G., Timms, P. & Polkinghorne, A. Twenty years of research into Chlamydia-like organisms: a revolution in our understanding of the biology and pathogenicity of members of the phylum Chlamydiae. Pathog. Dis.73, 1–15 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Ishida, K. et al. Amoebal endosymbiont Neochlamydia genome sequence illuminates the bacterial role in the defense of the host amoebae against Legionellapneumophila. PLoS ONE9, e95166 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 26.Arthofer P, Delafont V, Willemsen A, Panhölzl F, Horn M. Defensive symbiosis against giant viruses in amoebae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2205856119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205856119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Collingro A, et al. Unity in variety—the pan-genome of the Chlamydiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2011;28:3253–3270. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Omsland A, Sixt BS, Horn M, Hackstadt T. Chlamydial metabolism revisited: interspecies metabolic variability and developmental stage-specific physiologic activities. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014;38:779–801. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kamneva OK, Knight SJ, Liberles DA, Ward NL. Analysis of genome content evolution in PVC bacterial super-phylum: assessment of candidate genes associated with cellular organization and lifestyle. Genome Biol. Evol. 2012;4:1375–1390. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evs113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Betts HC, et al. Integrated genomic and fossil evidence illuminates life’s early evolution and eukaryote origin. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2018;2:1556–1562. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0644-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Greub G, Raoult D. History of the ADP/ATP-translocase-encoding gene, a parasitism gene transferred from a Chlamydiales ancestor to plants 1 billion years ago. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003;69:5530–5535. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5530-5535.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Horn M, et al. Illuminating the evolutionary history of chlamydiae. Science. 2004;304:728–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1096330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Subtil A, Collingro A, Horn M. Tracing the primordial Chlamydiae: extinct parasites of plants? Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Taylor-Brown A, Spang L, Borel N, Polkinghorne A. Culture-independent metagenomics supports discovery of uncultivable bacteria within the genus Chlamydia. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10661. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10757-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Taylor-Brown A, Madden D, Polkinghorne A. Culture-independent approaches to chlamydial genomics. Micro. Genom. 2018;4:e000145. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pillonel T, Bertelli C, Greub G. Environmental metagenomic assemblies reveal seven new highly divergent chlamydial lineages and hallmarks of a conserved intracellular lifestyle. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:79. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dharamshi JE, et al. Marine sediments illuminate Chlamydiae diversity and evolution. Curr. Biol. 2020;30:1032–1048.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Collingro A, et al. Unexpected genomic features in widespread intracellular bacteria: evidence for motility of marine chlamydiae. ISME J. 2017;11:2334–2344. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Köstlbacher S, et al. Pangenomics reveals alternative environmental lifestyles among chlamydiae. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4021. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24294-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stairs CW, et al. Chlamydial contribution to anaerobic metabolism during eukaryotic evolution. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabb7258. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb7258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Köstlbacher S, Collingro A, Halter T, Domman D, Horn M. Coevolving plasmids drive gene flow and genome plasticity in host-associated intracellular bacteria. Curr. Biol. 2021;31:346–357. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dharamshi, J. E. et al. Genomic diversity and biosynthetic capabilities of sponge-associated chlamydiae. ISME J. 10.1038/s41396-022-01305-9 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Gupta RS, Naushad S, Chokshi C, Griffiths E, Adeolu M. A phylogenomic and molecular markers based analysis of the phylum Chlamydiae: proposal to divide the class Chlamydiia into two orders, Chlamydiales and Parachlamydiales ord. nov., and amended description of the class Chlamydiia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108:765–781. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0532-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Szöllősi GJ, Rosikiewicz W, Boussau B, Tannier E, Daubin V. Efficient exploration of the space of reconciled gene trees. Syst. Biol. 2013;62:901–912. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Peters, J., Wilson, D. P., Myers, G., Timms, P. & Bavoil, P. M. Type III secretion à la Chlamydia. Trends Microbiol.15, 241–251 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 46.Aistleitner K, et al. Conserved features and major differences in the outer membrane protein composition of chlamydiae. Environ. Microbiol. 2015;17:1397–1413. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gehre L, et al. Sequestration of host metabolism by an intracellular pathogen. eLife. 2016;5:e12552. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rosario CJ, Hanson BR, Tan M. The transcriptional repressor EUO regulates both subsets of Chlamydia late genes. Mol. Microbiol. 2014;94:888–897. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rosario CJ, Tan M. The early gene product EUO is a transcriptional repressor that selectively regulates promoters of Chlamydia late genes. Mol. Microbiol. 2012;84:1097–1107. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08077.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Passalacqua, K. D., Charbonneau, M.-E. & O’Riordan, M. X. D. Bacterial metabolism shapes the host-pathogen interface. Microbiol. Spectr.4, 10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0027-2015 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Wiegand S, et al. Cultivation and functional characterization of 79 planctomycetes uncovers their unique biology. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:126–140. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0588-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Giuffrè A, Borisov VB, Arese M, Sarti P, Forte E. Cytochrome bd oxidase and bacterial tolerance to oxidative and nitrosative stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1837:1178–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2014.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Buschmann S, et al. The structure of cbb3 cytochrome oxidase provides insights into proton pumping. Science. 2010;329:327–330. doi: 10.1126/science.1187303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liang P, et al. Dynamic energy dependency of Chlamydia trachomatis on host cell metabolism during intracellular growth: role of sodium-based energetics in chlamydial ATP generation. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:510–522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.797209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kuhns M, Trifunović D, Huber H, Müller V. The Rnf complex is a Na+ coupled respiratory enzyme in a fermenting bacterium, Thermotoga maritima. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:431. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01158-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Torrents E. Ribonucleotide reductases: essential enzymes for bacterial life. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2014;4:52. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Jiang W, et al. A manganese(IV)/iron(III) cofactor in Chlamydia trachomatis ribonucleotide reductase. Science. 2007;316:1188–1191. doi: 10.1126/science.1141179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lau CKY, Krewulak KD, Vogel HJ. Bacterial ferrous iron transport: the Feo system. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016;40:273–298. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Miethke M. Molecular strategies of microbial iron assimilation: from high-affinity complexes to cofactor assembly systems. Metallomics. 2013;5:15–28. doi: 10.1039/C2MT20193C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sawers G, Böck A. Anaerobic regulation of pyruvate formate-lyase from Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 1988;170:5330–5336. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.11.5330-5336.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tomov AT, Tsvetkova ED, Tomova IA, Michailova LI, Kassovski VK. Persistence and multiplication of obligate anaerobe bacteria in amebae under aerobic conditions. Anaerobe. 1999;5:19–23. doi: 10.1006/anae.1999.0182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ahn S, Jung J, Jang I-A, Madsen EL, Park W. Role of glyoxylate shunt in oxidative stress response. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:11928–11938. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.708149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mulkidjanian AY, Dibrov P, Galperin MY. The past and present of sodium energetics: may the sodium-motive force be with you. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1777:985–992. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. Adaptive evolution of bacterial metabolic networks by horizontal gene transfer. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:1372–1375. doi: 10.1038/ng1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Degli Esposti M, Mentel M, Martin W, Sousa FL. Oxygen reductases in alphaproteobacterial genomes: physiological evolution from low to high oxygen environments. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bertelli, C. et al. The Waddlia genome: a window into chlamydial biology. PLoS ONE5, e10890 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 67.Russell SL, et al. Horizontal transmission and recombination maintain forever young bacterial symbiont genomes. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1008935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Moliner C, Fournier P-E, Raoult D. Genome analysis of microorganisms living in amoebae reveals a melting pot of evolution. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2010;34:281–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Wang, Z. & Wu, M. Comparative genomic analysis of Acanthamoeba endosymbionts highlights the role of amoebae as a ‘Melting Pot’ shaping the Rickettsiales evolution. Genome Biol. Evol.9, 3214–3224 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 70.Bertelli C, Greub G. Lateral gene exchanges shape the genomes of amoeba-resisting microorganisms. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012;2:110. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Perreau J, Moran NA. Genetic innovations in animal–microbe symbioses. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022;23:23–39. doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00395-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Husnik F, Keeling PJ. The fate of obligate endosymbionts: reduction, integration, or extinction. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2019;58–59:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2019.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Medina M, Sachs JL. Symbiont genomics, our new tangled bank. Genomics. 2010;95:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Coleman GA, et al. A rooted phylogeny resolves early bacterial evolution. Science. 2021;372:eabe0511. doi: 10.1126/science.abe0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Nakabachi, A. et al. Horizontal gene acquisition of Liberibacter plant pathogens from a bacteriome-confined endosymbiont of their psyllid vector. PLoS ONE8, e82612 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Bordenstein, S. R. & Wernegreen, J. J. Bacteriophage flux in endosymbionts (Wolbachia): infection frequency, lateral transfer, and recombination rates. Mol. Biol. Evol.21, 1981–1991 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 77.Pinto-Carbó M, et al. Evidence of horizontal gene transfer between obligate leaf nodule symbionts. ISME J. 2016;10:2092–2105. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Scholz, M. et al. Large scale genome reconstructions illuminate Wolbachia evolution. Nat. Commun.11, 5235 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 79.Tsai Y-M, Chang A, Kuo C-H. Horizontal gene acquisitions contributed to genome expansion in insect-symbiotic Spiroplasma clarkii. Genome Biol. Evol. 2018;10:1526–1532. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jaffe, A. L. et al. Patterns of gene content and co-occurrence constrain the evolutionary path toward animal association in candidate phyla radiation bacteria. mBio12, e0052121 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 81.Lagkouvardos I, Shen J, Horn M. Improved axenization method reveals complexity of symbiotic associations between Bacteria and Acanthamoebae. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2014;6:383–388. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Popa O, Hazkani-Covo E, Landan G, Martin W, Dagan T. Directed networks reveal genomic barriers and DNA repair bypasses to lateral gene transfer among prokaryotes. Genome Res. 2011;21:599–609. doi: 10.1101/gr.115592.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Smillie CS, et al. Ecology drives a global network of gene exchange connecting the human microbiome. Nature. 2011;480:241–244. doi: 10.1038/nature10571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Parks DH, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Hugoson E, Lam WT, Guy L. miComplete: weighted quality evaluation of assembled microbial genomes. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:936–937. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Varghese NJ, et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:6761–6771. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Parks DH, et al. Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2017;2:1533–1542. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0012-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hug LA, et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2016;1:16048. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Zhu Q, et al. Phylogenomics of 10,575 genomes reveals evolutionary proximity between domains Bacteria and Archaea. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:5477. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13443-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Huerta-Cepas J, et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Huerta-Cepas J, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017;34:2115–2122. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 2010;10:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2015;32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 2017;14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Quang LS, Gascuel O, Lartillot N. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:2317–2323. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2008;25:1307–1320. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018;35:518–522. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Williams KP, et al. Phylogeny of Gammaproteobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 2010;192:2305–2314. doi: 10.1128/JB.01480-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Viklund J, Ettema TJG, Andersson SGE. Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:599–615. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Lemoine F, et al. Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature. 2018;556:452–456. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0043-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Minh BQ, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Lartillot N, Rodrigue N, Stubbs D, Richer J. PhyloBayes MPI: phylogenetic reconstruction with infinite mixtures of profiles in a parallel environment. Syst. Biol. 2013;62:611–615. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syt022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Lartillot N, Philippe H. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004;21:1095–1109. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msh112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Lartillot, N., Brinkmann, H. & Philippe, H. Suppression of long-branch attraction artefacts in the animal phylogeny using a site-heterogeneous model. BMC Evol. Biol.7 (Suppl 1), S4 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 107.Quast C, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1823–1829. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2286–2288. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Miele V, Penel S, Duret L. Ultra-fast sequence clustering from similarity networks with SiLiX. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:371–373. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Jones P, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Nakamura T, Yamada KD, Tomii K, Katoh K. Parallelization of MAFFT for large-scale multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2490–2492. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.El-Gebali S, et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D427–D432. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Blum M, et al. The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D344–D354. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Csurös M. Count: evolutionary analysis of phylogenetic profiles with parsimony and likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1910–1912. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Szöllősi, G. J., Davín, A. A., Tannier, E., Daubin, V. & Boussau, B. Genome-scale phylogenetic analysis finds extensive gene transfer among fungi. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B370, 20140335 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 122.Williams TA, et al. Integrative modeling of gene and genome evolution roots the archaeal tree of life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:E4602–E4611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618463114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Martijn J, et al. Hikarchaeia demonstrate an intermediate stage in the methanogen-to-halophile transition. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5490. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19200-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Huang W-C, et al. Comparative genomic analysis reveals metabolic flexibility of Woesearchaeota. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5281. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25565-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
- 126.Shannon P, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D7–D19. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3150–3152. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Schoch CL, et al. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools. Database. 2020;2020:baaa062. doi: 10.1093/database/baaa062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Kawashima M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D457–D462. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Caspi R, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes – a 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D445–D453. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Huerta-Cepas J, Serra F, Bork P. ETE 3: reconstruction, analysis, and visualization of phylogenomic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1635–1638. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2009).
- 135.Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT-Y. ggtree: An R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2017;8:28–36. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Wang L-G, et al. Treeio: an R package for phylogenetic tree input and output with richly annotated and associated data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2020;37:599–603. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Genome data was obtained either from NCBI Genbank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide), the JGI portal (https://portal.nersc.gov/GEM) or a zenodo repository (10.5281/zenodo.4318714). 16S rRNA gene data used in this study are available via the SILVA database (https://www.arb-silva.de). Genbank accessions and database links for genomes used in the ancestral state reconstruction are provided in Supplementary Data 2. Additional raw data files are hosted on the online repository figshare (10.6084/m9.figshare.17033417). These include sequences, alignments, trimmed alignments and trees for single-copy marker genes used for species phylogenies (both those selected and not selected), the 16S rRNA gene alignment and tree, as well as concatenated alignments and trees for all three species datasets (of 184, 183 and 180 taxa). Both NOG and de novo gene families used for the ancestral state reconstruction are also provided along with alignments, trimmed alignments, trees and bootstrap trees (ufboot) provided to ALE. The raw ALE results with all events are also included, along with gene annotations and events, and events for each gene family mapped to the species tree. Protein sequence datasets, alignments and trees inferred as part of the analysis to determine HGT donors for chlamydiae gene originations are provided. In addition, PDFs of metabolic reconstructions of LVCCA, LG1CA and LG2CA can be found in the repository files.
The Nextflow pipeline for running the ALE ancestral state reconstruction (https://github.com/maxemil/ALE-pipeline) and the Snakemake pipeline for identification of putative HGT donor groups (https://github.com/jennahd/HGT_trees) are available on GitHub.