Skip to main content
Journal of Education and Health Promotion logoLink to Journal of Education and Health Promotion
. 2022 Nov 26;11:356. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_920_21

Estimating the prevalence of high-risk behaviors using network scale-up method in medical university students

Fatemeh Moghaddam Tabrizi 1, Rahim Sharafkhani 2,, Zeynab Heydari 3, Abdolah Khorami Markani 4, Najaf Ahmadi Aghziyarat 5, Hamid Reza Khalkhali 6
PMCID: PMC9818702  PMID: 36618457

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There is not much information about high-risk behaviors in young groups, especially students. This study was conducted to estimate the prevalence of high-risk behaviors in students of universities of medical sciences in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran, by network scale-up (NSU) method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This cross-sectional study was performed on 450 students from the universities of medical sciences. A researcher-developed checklist was used to collect the data. We considered number 16 for the social network size of students according to a previous study. Based on the response of individuals to each of the high-risk behaviors (including cigarette smoking, hookah use, opium consumption, alcohol drinking, tramadol/ecstasy taking, and extramarital sex) in their social network, the prevalence of these behaviors was estimated. The required calculations were performed using the NSU method. Furthermore, 95% uncertainty interval (UI) was calculated using the bootstrap method.

RESULTS:

Totally, 196 (44%) participants were male. The mean age (standard deviation) of the participants was 22 ± 2 years. Results showed that hookah use (20% 95% UI [18.9–21.1]) and opium consumption (0.4% 95% UI [0.24–0.6]) had the highest and lowest frequencies, respectively. Cigarette smoking (17% 95% UI [15.8–18]), alcohol use (8.3% 95% UI [7.5–9.1]), extramarital sex (8.2% 95% UI [7.4–9]), and tramadol/ecstasy taking (4% 95% UI [6.4–4.6]) were the next most common high-risk behaviors, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Given that hookah use and cigarette smoking are the most common high-risk behaviors in students, especially males, appropriate cultural activities and educational programs should be employed by relevant authorities to reduce these behaviors.

Keywords: Dangerous behavior, health occupation students, prevalence

Introduction

Any typical behavior, regardless of moral, social, or customary rules, that leads to dangerous consequences for the health of individuals or society is called a risky behavior.[1] Despite the ongoing activities in the last three decades, high-risk behaviors have been growing exponentially worldwide.[2] There is an increasing trend in some high-risk behaviors that threaten the health of communities at the national and international levels.[2] High-risk behaviors such as smoking, drug or alcohol abuse, and unhealthy sexual intercourses are important health and social problems.[3] In recent years, alcohol, methamphetamine, and various illegal drug abuses have become significant concerns in Iran[2,4,5] that have increased medical care costs.[6] Adolescents and young people are the main groups that are most prone to high-risk behaviors. These behaviors increase the risk of premature death, disability, and increased incidence of chronic diseases.[7] Iran has a young population, 25% of which is within the age range of 15–29 years, according to the latest population census in 2016.[8] Living away from the family imposes stresses such as leading independent personal life, providing the expenditures, employment while studying, academic pressures, and examinations. Besides the deprivation of supervision and emotional support of family, these conditions predispose to high-risk behaviors.[9,10,11]

In Iran, despite the precautions taken in this regard, the increasing drug abuse among young people, especially students, has become a significant concern for policymakers and planners.[12] Moreover, lack of awareness of the side effects of drug abuse among young people has made this age group more prone to infectious diseases such as hepatitis B and C and HIV. In a study conducted among the youth and students in Tehran, the young people's awareness of the consequences of high-risk behaviors was low.[13] In most studies, the data collection tool is a self-administered, direct, or interview questionnaire. When questions about sensitive behaviors are asked directly in a questionnaire, it generally leads to intense biases such as nonresponse and low reporting errors by the study participants. This issue reduces the number of correct answers and accuracy of data collection. Therefore, the estimates will suffer from a low accuracy.[14,15,16]

Despite the sensitivity of high-risk behaviors and the religious, cultural, legal, and social stigma associated with them, there is not much information about risky or hidden behaviors in young groups, especially students.[17] Therefore, there are few internal and valid studies in this field to be regarded as literature. The limitations of direct methods in estimating high-risk behaviors necessitate faster studies such as indirect methods for estimating such sensitive behaviors.[2] The network scale-up (NSU) method is a relatively new approach that facilitates the estimation of high-risk behaviors in hidden groups of society. In this method, instead of asking about the individual's behaviors, the behaviors of people in their social network are questioned, and it is assumed that the prevalence of the behavior of interest in the sample network is more or less representative of its prevalence in the whole society.[18,19]

Due to the need for being aware of the prevalence of high-risk behaviors in groups at risk, we decided to conduct a study using this new approach among the students of universities of medical sciences in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran.

Materials and Methods

Study design and setting

A cross-sectional study was performed on students from the universities of medical sciences in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran.

Study participants and sampling

There is no specific formula for estimating sample size in NSU studies. According to the total number of students, which was close to 5000, and according to the size of the student's social network, which was estimated at 16 in a previous study,[11]450 people enrolled in the study. The sample size of each school was determined by proportional method (according to the number and sex of students in each school) [Table 1].

Table 1.

Subjects enrolled in the study by location

Urmia University of Medical Sciences Number of male students Number of female students
School located in Urmia city
 Nursing-Midwifery 30 33
 School of Medicine 74 80
 International Branch 0 29
 School of Applied Medical Sciences 23 36
 School of Pharmacy 7 9
 School of Health 11 25
 School of Dentistry 10 9
School located other cities
 School of Nursing – Naqadeh city 8 7
 School of Nursing – Bukan city 9 0
 School of Nursing – Salmas city 6 5
 Khoy School of Medical Sciences – Khoy city 18 21
Total 196 254

Data collection tool and technique

A researcher-developed checklist was used to collect the data. Interviews with students were conducted in the faculty on different days of the week. The study sample was the students studying at Urmia/Khoy universities of medical sciences in 2019 that at least 1 year had passed since their enrollment. In case of one's refusal to participate in the study, another person replaced him/her. The researchers explained to the individuals that participating in the survey was voluntary and subject to their informed consent before the interview. Individuals were also assured that their personal information was safe and confidential.

Network scale-up method

The first step in this method is to determine the size of the social network of individuals. Since the social network size of Iranian students was 16 in a previous study,[11] this number was used in this study. Using trained interviewers, the participants were asked about high-risk behaviors in their social network (people who knew each other by name and face, met several times a week, and spent at least 2 h a week outside their classes) to assess the prevalence of high-risk behaviors among students. Based on the response of individuals to each of the high-risk behaviors (including cigarette smoking, hookah use, opium consumption, alcohol drinking, tramadol/ecstasy taking, and extramarital sex) in their social network, the prevalence of these behaviors was estimated. The required calculations were performed using the following formula.

graphic file with name JEHP-11-356-g001.jpg

m: The mean number of students with high-risk behavior in the social network of students (for example, hookah use)

c: The size of the students' social network

e: Estimated total number of students with high-risk behavior

t: Total number of students

Data were analyzed using SPSS software (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). The 95% uncertainty interval (UI) was calculated using the bootstrap method. Percentiles of 2.5 and 97.5% were considered as lower and upper limits. We compared whether the estimated prevalence of high-risk behaviors was significantly different between males and females.[20]

Ethical consideration

This study acquired an ethical code from Khoy University of Medical Sciences (IR.KHOY.REC.1397.001).

Results

According to the latest available statistics, 4667 people were studying, while 2149 (46%) of them were male, and the rest (54%) were female. This study interviewed 196 men and 254 women from the student population of universities of medical sciences. The mean age (standard deviation) of the participants was 22 ± 2 years. Some other demographic variables, including marital status and education, were examined; most of them were single and undergraduate students [Table 2].

Table 2.

Some characteristics of the participants

Variable Frequency (%)
Sex
 Male 197 (43.7)
 Female 254 (56.3)
Education
 Undergraduate 233 (51.6)
 General medicine 217 (48.1)
 Upper graduate 1 (0.2)
Marital status
 Single 435 (96.2)
 Married 16 (3.5)
 Divorced 1 (0.2)

The results of population size estimation based on the maximum likelihood function of the network generalization estimator showed that hookah use (20% 95% UI [18.9–21.1]) and opium consumption (0.4% 95% UI [0.24–0.6]) had the highest and lowest frequencies, respectively, among the groups with high-risk behaviors. Cigarette smoking (17% 95% UI [15.8–18]), alcohol drinking (8.3% 95% UI [7.5–9.1]), extramarital sex (8.2% 95% UI [7.4–9]), and tramadol/ecstasy taking (4% 95% UI [6.4–4.6]) were the next most common high-risk behaviors, respectively. The results also showed that the prevalence of high-risk behaviors is significantly higher in males than in females [Table 3]. The biggest difference was related to hookah use, while the least difference was related to extramarital sex and tramadol/ecstasy use (P = 0.001).

Table 3.

Prevalence of high-risk behaviors in all students and stratified by gender

High-risk behavior Total Male Female
Hookah use 20* (18.9–21.1)# 32.6 (29.5–33.6) 9 (7.9–10.2)
Cigarette smoking 17 (15.8–18) 29.2 (27.3–31.2) 6.8 (5.8–7.8)
Alcohol use 8.3 (7.5–9.1) 13.8 (12.4–15.4) 3.6 (2.9–4.3)
Extramarital sex 8.2 (7.4–9.0) 12.0 (10.7–13.4) 5.0 (4.2–5.9)
Tramadol and ecstasy 4.0 (3.4–4.6) 8.0 (7.0–9.2) 1.0 (0.64–1.4)
Opium 0.4 (0.24–0.6) 0.9 (0.5–1.3) No data

*Percent, #95% UI. UI=Uncertainty interval

Discussion

This study applied an indirect method to estimate the prevalence of high-risk behaviors because the results of other research have shown that indirect methods provide better estimations than direct methods.[21,22] The results of this study and other studies conducted in Iran[11,21,23,24] indicated a lower prevalence of high-risk behaviors in Iran compared to other countries.[25,26,27] The reason may be the prevailing cultural and religious beliefs in Iran. In addition, the results of this study showed that high-risk behaviors such as hookah use, cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and sexual intercourse are more common among students. Moreover, all the high-risk behaviors were more prevalent in males, which was consistent with the results of other studies.[11,21] In general, these high-risk behaviors have adverse consequences on the health of individuals and society. For example, cigarette smoking and hookah use are two of the most important risk factors for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer.[28] Numerous documents have also reported that opium consumption and taking drugs such as ecstasy and tramadol cause students to drop out of school due to mental disorders.[3,29] Alcohol drinking leads to liver disorders and accidents, especially at young ages,[30] and extramarital sex increases the risk of sexually transmitted diseases.[31] Kazemzadeh et al., who conducted a study by the NSU method, examined 563 students from Kerman University of Medical Sciences and concluded that the most common high-risk behaviors in males are: friendship with the opposite sex (40%), alcohol drinking (14.6%), and extramarital sex (10.5%). Moreover, consumption of any narcotics (such as opium and heroin) was reported at 4.2%.[24] In the present study, alcohol use, extramarital sex, and opium consumption in males were 13.8, 12, and 0.9%, respectively. These prevalences were estimated as 3.6, 5, and 0% in the female population, respectively. These percentages were 1.5, 4, and 0.3% in Kazemzadeh's study. Perhaps, one of the reasons for the difference in the results of the two studies is the spatial and temporal variation.

In the present study, hookah use was 31.6% and 9% in male and female students, respectively. These estimates were 51% and 13% in Zahedi's study, respectively.[21] One of the reasons for the low estimate of this high-risk behavior may be the lack of visibility factor in the present study. In the present study, the prevalence of cigarette smoking was 29.2% and 6.8% in men and women, respectively, which were 25% and 3.4% in Zahedi's study. The shared point of both studies is the high level of hookah use compared to cigarette smoking, which can be seen in Maghsoudi's study as well.[11] Over the last decade, studies[32] have reported an increasing trend in hookah use than cigarette smoking. The most important reasons are the lower perception of risk and lower social stigma of hookah use in society.[33] Alcohol drinking was reported as 26% and 5.5% in men and women, respectively, in Zahedi's study,[21] while they were 13.8% and 3.6% in the present study. Zahedi's analysis was performed on 2157 students from three universities of Bahonar, Chamran, and Medical Sciences. The comparison between the present study and studies conducted in Kerman indicates high use of narcotics in Kerman and a slightly higher prevalence of alcohol drinking in West Azerbaijan Province. In this regard, the prevalence of alcohol drinking was 33% among all students in Sajjadi's study, which was conducted on 801 medical students from three universities in Tehran and Karaj.[34] Likewise, 25% of male and 12% of female students in Lar city, Fars Province, Iran, drink alcohol.[11] It seems that based on the environmental and behavioral conditions of each region, there are differences in the prevalence of high-risk behaviors.[35]

A web-based survey conducted in Tabriz city (Northwest of Iran) indicated that the prevalence of health risk behaviors was higher in male students. The prevalence of cigarette smoking, hookah use, alcohol drinking, and extramarital sex was 36%, 32.6%, 13.8%, and 20% in male students, respectively.[23] The results of the two studies were almost identical, especially in alcohol drinking and extramarital sex. Perhaps, the most important reason was the similarity of dominant cultural and social values in the two regions.

Tramadol/ecstasy taking was estimated as 8% and 1% in male and female students, respectively, in the studied province, which is consistent with the results of a case study by Maghsoudi among students in Lar, Fars Province (Tramadol taking was 11% and 1% in males and females, respectively).[11] In Sajjadi and the present study, tramadol taking was 6.2% and 4% among the students.[34] Opium consumption was 0.33% in Sajjadi's study which was consistent with the present study results.[34] However, this rate was 2.2% in Kazemzadeh et al. study, which was higher than the value obtained in this study.[24] Studies have shown that narcotics consumption and drug addiction are highly affected by gender,[36] ethnicity, religion, and cultural and social differences.[37,38] It seems that hookah use and consumption of narcotics such as opium are more common in students in the south of the country.

Limitation and recommendation

Lack of calculation of transparency coefficients was the most important limitation of the present study. Studies have shown that the visibility factor in female students is lower than in male students.[21,34] Perhaps, the most important reason is that women do not share their sensitive behaviors even with close friends. According to the results of similar studies,[21,34] it seems that the lack of visibility factor has led to underestimation in the present study, especially in male students. The present study was conducted with an indirect method to estimate the prevalence of high-risk behaviors in medical students in the province. We recommend that a study be conducted, at least every 5 years, to find out the latest status of high-risk behaviors in students of each university.

Conclusion

Adolescence is one of the riskiest periods of the tendency to high-risk behaviors due to its special physical and mental characteristics. Therefore, addressing this issue among students is one of the basic topics of youth health and one of the most important challenges in the public health-care system. In general, the results showed that high-risk behaviors such as hookah use, cigarette smoking, drinking alcohol, and extramarital sex are more prevalent, especially in male students. Therefore, to reduce these behaviors, appropriate cultural activities and educational programs should be presented to health and medicine-related students when entering the university and during the study period by the relevant authorities.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by Khoy University of Medical Sciences. (Grant number: 97-911836).

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgement

We thank the Khoy University of Medical Sciences for sponsoring this study, also we thank all the participating students.

References

  • 1.Ziaii S. Assessment Risky Behaviors among Students in Islamic Azad University. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hamdye M, Matlabi N, Hasheri H, Berojerdi A. Prevalence of stimulant drugs, alcohol and psychoactive drugs Youth and adolescents 15-35 years in Tehran. Med J. 2008;32:315–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jalilian F, Ataee M, Matin BK, Ahmadpanah M, Jouybari TA, Eslami AA, et al. Cognitive factors related to drug abuse among a sample of Iranian male medical college students. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;7:143. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n5p143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jackson CA, Henderson M, Frank JW, Haw SJ. An overview of prevention of multiple risk behaviour in adolescence and young adulthood. J Public Health (Bangkok) 2012;34(Suppl 1):i31–40. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Visser RO, Rissel CE, Smith AMA, Richters J. Sociodemographic correlates of selected health risk behaviors in a representative sample of Australian young people. Int J Behav Med. 2006;13:153–62. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1302_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daina L, Chereji A, Cioara F. Role of health education in prevention of dental disorders in school age. Heal Tolooh. 2010;8:20–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Paper O. Frequency of risky behaviours among students in Babol Universities (2009) J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2011;13:53–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Changing the Population Structure of Iran from Youth to Old Age. ISNA; 2020. [Last updated on 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.isna.ir/news/99023021943/ Last cited on 2020 May 20.
  • 9.Abbasi Ghahramanloo A, Fotouhi A, Zeraati H, Rahimi Movaghar A. Prescription drugs, alcohol, and illicit substance use and their correlations among medical sciences students in Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4:e21945. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.21945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Heydari ST, Izedi S, Sarikhani Y, Kalani N, Akbary A, Miri A, et al. The prevalence of substance abuse and associated risk factors among university students in the city of Jahrom, Southern Iran. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015;4:e22381. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.4(2)2015.22381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Maghsoudi A, Jalali M, Neydavoodi M, Rastad H, Hatami I, Dehghan A. Estimating the prevalence of high-risk behaviors using network scale-up method in university students of Larestan in 2014. J Subst Use. 2017;22:145–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ahmadi J, Benrazavi L, Ghanizadeh A. Substance abuse among contemporary Iranian medical students and medical patients. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2001;189:860–1. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200112000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.ShojaKazemi M. Elation between of Aknowledge to stimulent substance and consumption in students. Psychol Stud. 2011;7:33–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Najafi K, Zarrabi H, Shirazi M, Fekri F, Mohseni R. Prevalence of substance use among Iranian high school students in 2005-2006. Kuwait Med J. 2009;41:20–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Center RB. Institute of HIV/AIDS Disease Prevention and Control, Annual Report on HIV Care and Treatment. Unpubl Rep. 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zamanian M, Zolala F, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR. Estimating the annual abortion rate in Kerman, Iran: Comparison of direct, network scale-up, and single sample count methods. Int J Fertil Steril. 2019;13:209–14. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2019.5721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Heydari Z, Baneshi MR, Sharifi H, Zamanian M, Haji-Maghsoudi S, Zolala F. Evaluation of the treatment failure ratio in individuals receiving methadone maintenance therapy via the network scale up method. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;73:36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zamanian M, Zolala F, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR. Effect of estimation method, definition of ratio, and the plausible range in estimating social network size. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2018;8:35. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zamanian M, Zolala F, Haghdoost AA, Haji-Maghsoudi S, Heydari Z, Baneshi MR. Methodological considerations in using the Network Scale Up (NSU) for the estimation of risky behaviors of particular age-gender groups: An example in the case of intentional abortion. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0217481. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Phosri A, Sihabut T, Jaikanlaya C. Short-term effects of diurnal temperature range on hospital admission in Bangkok, Thailand. Sci Total Environ. 2020;717:137202. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zahedi R, Noroozi A, Hajebi A, Haghdoost AA, Baneshi MR, Sharifi H, et al. Self-reported and network scale-up estimates of substance use prevalence among university students in Kerman, Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2018;18:e00413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sheikhzadeh K, Baneshi MR, Afshari M, Haghdoost AA. Comparing direct, network scale-up, and proxy respondent methods in estimating risky behaviors among collegians. J Subst Use. 2016;21:9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shekari F, Habibi P, Nadrian H, Mohammadpoorasl A. Health-risk behaviors among Iranian university students, 2019: A web-based survey. Arch Public Heal. 2020;78:131. doi: 10.1186/s13690-020-00514-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kazemzadeh Y, Shokoohi M, Baneshi MR, Haghdoost AA. The frequency of high-risk behaviors among Iranian college students using indirect methods: Network scale-up and crosswise model. Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2016;5:e25130. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.25130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amare T, Yeneabat T, Amare Y. Systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiology of risky sexual behaviors in college and university students in Ethiopia, 2018. Environ Public Health. 2019;2019:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2019/4852130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Evans-Polce R, Lanza S, Maggs J. Heterogeneity of alcohol, tobacco, and other substance use behaviors in US college students: A latent class analysis. Addict Behav. 2016;53:80–5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kwan MY, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Duku E, Faulkner G. Patterns of multiple health risk-behaviours in university students and their association with mental health: Application of latent class analysis. Heal Promot Chronic Dis Prev Canada Res Policy Pract. 2016;36:163–70. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.8.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thomas D. Smoking and cardiovascular diseases. Rev Prat. 2012;62:339–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Deressa W, Azazh A. Substance use and its predictors among undergraduate medical students of Addis Ababa University in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:660. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Velazquez EA. Generational status, sexual behavior, and alcohol use among college students. McNair Sch Res J. 2012;8:13. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hedayati-Moghaddam MR, Eftekharzadeh-Mashhadi I, Fathimoghadam F, Pourafzali SJ. Sexual and reproductive behaviors among undergraduate university students in Mashhad, a city in northeast of Iran. Reprod Infertil. 2015;16:43–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Primack BA, Sidani J, Agarwal AA, Shadel WG, Donny EC, Eissenberg TE. Prevalence of and associations with waterpipe tobacco smoking among US university students. Ann Behav Med. 2008;36:81–6. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9047-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Primack BA, Land SR, Fan J, Kim KH, Rosen D. Associations of mental health problems with waterpipe tobacco and cigarette smoking among college students. Subst Use Misuse. 2013;48:211–9. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2012.750363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sajjadi H, Jorjoran Shushtari Z, Shati M, Salimi Y, Dejman M, Vameghi M, et al. An indirect estimation of the population size of students with high-risk behaviors in select universities of medical sciences: A network scale-up study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ji Y, Xu H, Zhang Y, Liu Q. Heterogeneity of adolescent health risk behaviors in rural western China: A latent class analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Etten ML, Anthony JC. Male-female differences in transitions from first drug opportunity to first use: Searching for subgroup variation by age, race, region, and Urban status. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2001;10:797–804. doi: 10.1089/15246090152636550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Roncero C, Egido A, Rodríguez-Cintas L, Pérez-Pazos J, Collazos F, Casas M. Substance use among medical students: A literature review 1988- 2013. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2015;43:109–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Webb E, Ashton C, Kelly P, Kamali F. Alcohol and drug use in UK university students. Lancet. 1996;348:922–5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)03410-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Education and Health Promotion are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES