Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most common malignancies of the hematopoietic progenitor cell in adults. Quercetin has gained recognition over the years because of its anti-cancer effect with minimal toxicity. Herein, we aim to investigate the anti-leukemia mechanism of quercetin and to decipher the signaling pathway of quercetin in HL-60 leukemic cells. We observed that quercetin induces apoptosis and autophagic cell death, in which both pathways play an important role in suppressing the viability of leukemia cells. Phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK) protein expressions are lower in primary AML cells, HL-60 cells, KG-1 and THP-1 cells than in peripheral blood monocular cells. After quercetin treatment, the expression of p-AMPK is increased while the expression of p-mTOR is decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Mechanistically, compound C, an AMPK phosphorylation inhibitor, upregulates the phosphorylation of mTOR and inhibits autophagy and apoptosis in quercetin-induced HL-60 cells, while silencing of CaMKKβ inhibits the quercetin-induced phosphorylation of AMPK, resulting in increased mTOR phosphorylation. Furthermore, silencing of CaMKKβ inhibits the autophagy in HL-60 cells. Taken together, our data delineate that quercetin plays its anti-leukemia role by inhibiting cell viability and inducing apoptosis and autophagy in leukemia cells. Quercetin inhibits the phosphorylation of mTOR by regulating the activity of AMPK, thus playing a role in the regulation of autophagy and apoptosis. CaMKKβ is a potential upstream molecule for AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway, through which quercetin induces autophagy in HL-60 cells.
Keywords: acute myeloid leukemia, quercetin, autophagy, AMP-activated protein kinase, mammalian rapamycin target protein
Introduction
Quercetin belongs to flavonoid family and is almost non-toxic. As a type of OTC, quercetin is used for the treatment of prostate cancer [1]. The structure of quercetin is stable and quercetin is easy to be separated and purified. Due to its antioxidant and anti-cancer effect, quercetin has gained recognition over the past years [ 2, 3] . It is a type of “molecular targeted drug” that can interfere with the signal transduction pathway of tumor cells [ 4, 5] . It was found that flavonoids, including quercetin, can inhibit the proliferation of many hematologic malignant tumor cells, including leukemia cells [ 6, 7] . Our previous study also revealed that quercetin can inhibit the proliferation of HL-60 cells and induce apoptosis [8]. The in-depth mechanism, however, remains ambiguous.
Autophagy is a kind of programmed cell death, an emerging form of cell death found in cancer [9]. Induction of autophagy may be a new method for acute leukemia therapy [ 10, 11] . However, some studies suggest that autophagy plays a protective role in the development of leukemia [7]. Whether quercetin can exert its antitumor activity through inducing autophagy-associated death of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells has not been reported. Autophagy is closely related to cell energy metabolism [12]. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a central molecule that regulates cell energy metabolism, and it is also a regulatory molecule in the signal pathway of autophagy [ 13, 14] . Tumor is often accompanied by energy metabolism disorder and AMPK activation inhibition. AMPK signaling pathway is closely related to the occurrence of autophagy [ 15, 16] . Mammalian rapamycin target protein (mTOR) is an important downstream signal molecule of AMPK and participates in the progress of tumors. Over-activation of mTOR can accelerate the cell cycle of tumor cells and promote cell migration and apoptosis-resistance [ 17, 18] . As an allosteric molecule, the complete activation of AMPK also requires the phosphorylation of the threonine (threonine 172) in its catalytic center by the upstream kinases. The upstream kinases of AMPK include LKB1, CaMKKβ, and TAK1 [ 19– 21] . In our previous study, we observed that quercetin could activate AMPK and inhibit the proliferation of HL-60 cells [8]. Further study is needed to elucidate the mechanism of quercetin’s anti-leukemic function.
In this present study, we attempted to seek novel drug targets in the treatment of AML and provide the theoretical foundation for the development of anti-cancer drugs with low toxicity. We found that quercetin could induce apoptosis and autophagy in acute leukemia cells. Inducing the phosphorylation of AMPK or inhibiting the mTOR activity in leukemia cells may be a potential method for acute leukemia treatment. Quercetin may activate AMPK and inhibit the phosphorylation of mTOR, thus inducing apoptosis and autophagy in HL-60 cells. CaMKKβ siRNA could effectively inhibit the protein expression of CaMKKβ. When CaMKKβ gene was silenced in HL-60 cells, the quercetin-activated AMPK phosphorylation was decreased, and its ability to inactivate mTOR function was reduced. CaMKKβ siRNA had a negative effect on the ratio of LC3 II/I which was upregulated by quercetin. We propose that quercetin induces autophagy-associated death in HL-60 Cells through CaMKKβ/AMPK/mTOR signal pathway.
Materials and Methods
Cells and cell culture
Human AML cell lines HL-60, THP-1, and KG-1 were purchased form Tianjin Institute of Hematology of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Tianjin, China). Cells were seeded in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 3% glutamine, cultured in an incubator at 37°C with 5% CO 2, and passaged with medium changed every 2 or 3 days. The cells in the logarithmic growth phase were used for the subsequent experiments.
Normal human PBMCs were collected from twelve healthy subjects who underwent routine physical examinations in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. AML primary cells were obtained from thirty-eight AML patients in our hospital without M3 French-American-British (FAB) Classification . The research methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and an informed consent statement was signed by each participant. Blood or bone marrow was treated with ethylenediamine tetracetic acid for anti-coagulation, diluted with 2-fold volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), and mixed well. The cell suspension was added with caution to the lymphocyte separation liquid equal in volume to the blood, and centrifuged horizontally at 500 g at room temperature for 20 min. The PBMCs at the junction of the plasma layer and the lymphocyte separation liquid were collected, followed by addition of equal amount of PBS, mixed well, and centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min. After the supernatant was discarded, the cells were washed twice to remove the residual lymphocyte separation liquid.
Materials
Autophagy detection kit, rabbit anti-human LC3B IgG polyclonal antibody, mouse anti-human GAPDH IgG monoclonal antibody, rabbit polyclonal to LC3B, mouse monoclonal anti-AMPK alpha 1+AMPK alpha 2 antibody, rabbit monoclonal anti-AMPK alpha 1 (phospho T183)+AMPK alpha 2 (phospho T172) antibody, rabbit monoclonal anti-CaMKK antibody, rabbit polyclonal anti-LKB1 antibody, rabbit polyclonal to anti-LKB1 (phospho S428) antibody, rabbit monoclonal anti-mTOR antibody, rabbit monoclonal anti-mTOR (phospho S2448), rabbit monoclonal anti-TAK1 antibody, and mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Quercetin was from Sigma (St Louis, USA) and compound C was from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).
Cell proliferation and cell apoptosis analysis
The cells were incubated with different concentrations of quercetin (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 μM) for 24, 48 and 72 h. Cell viability was detected by CCK-8 assay as described previously [8]. Colony formation assay which is used to evaluate the proliferative potential of cells was performed as described previously [22].
For apoptosis detection, the cells were washed twice with PBS and diluted to a final concentration of 1×10 6 cells/mL, and then incubated with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI) for 30 min in the dark. The cell apoptosis was determined by Flow Cytometry on a BD flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson, Temse, Belgium). Early stage of cell apoptosis was defined as Annexin V-FITC +PI – and late stage as Annexin V-FITC +PI +.
Electron microscopy
The cells were harvested and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) at 4°C. The specimens were then fixed in 0.5% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) for 30 min at 4°C, dehydrated using an ethanol gradient (50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, and 100% for 20 min each), and transferred to EM812 medium (EMS). After impregnation with pure resin, the specimens were embedded in the same resin mixture. The samples were sectioned (60 nm) with an ultramicrotome (UC7; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany), collected on nickel grids, and then stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate in a Leica EM Stainer (Leica Microsystems). The products were examined by electron microscopy at the Faculty of Medical Sciences of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) and the autophagosomes were imaged and analyzed.
Immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy
Cellular autophagy was detected using an Autophagy Detection Kit (ab139484; Abcam). After treatment, the cells were washed twice with 1×assay buffer. The supernatant was carefully removed and 100 μL of microscopy dual detection reagent solution was dispensed to cover the cell pellet. The samples were protected from light and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. The cells were washed with 1×assay buffer and then resuspended in 100 μL 1×assay buffer. A drop of the cell suspension was applied onto a glass microscope slide and overlaid with a cover slip. The stained cells were analyzed under a wide-field fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). A standard FITC filter set was used to image the autophagic signal, and a DAPI filter set was used to image the nucleus.
Flow cytometry
Cell autophagy was also detected by Flow Cytometry. After being washed with 1×assay buffer, the cells were resuspended in 250 μL of indicator free cell culture medium containing 5% FBS and 250 μL of the diluted Green stain solution, and then incubated for 30 min at room temperature or 37°C in the dark. After collection and fixation, the cells were incubated for 20 min with 10% formalin and washed 3 times with 1×assay buffer. Flow Cytometry (Becton Deckinson, Franklin Lakes, USA) was used to quantify cell autophagy with FL1 channel.
siRNAs and cell transfection
The design and synthesis of LKB-1, CaMKKβ, and TAK1 siRNA were completed by GenePharma Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). The nucleotide sequences of sense and antisense LKB-1, CaMKKβ, and TAK1 siRNA were listed in Table 1. FAM-labeled negative control siRNA was provided by Lonza Co. (Catalog No. VCA-1003; Basel, Switzerland), which did not match any gene of known function in GenBank.
Name |
Sense (5′→ 3′) |
Antisense (5′→ 3′) |
LKB-1 siRNA |
CCUGCUGAAAGGGAUGCUUTT |
AAGCAUCCCUUUCAGCAGGTT |
CaMKK-β siRNA |
GCAUCGAGUACUUACACUATT |
UAGUGUAAGUACUCGAUGCTT |
TAK-1 siRNA |
GUCCCAGUGUCAGAAUGAUTT |
AUCAUUCUGACACUGGGACTT |
One nucleofection sample contained 2×10 6 cells, 10 mL of 20 mM siRNA and 100 mL Amaxa Cell Line Nucleofector Solution V (Catalog No. VCA-1003; Lonza Co). The supplemented Nucleofector Solution V was pre-warmed to room temperature. The 6-well plates filled with culture medium containing supplements and serum were pre-incubated in a humidified 5% CO 2 incubator at 37°C. The cells were resuspended in Cell Line Nucleofector Solution V to a final concentration of 2×10 6 cells/ 100 mL nucleofection. The transfection program was started by mixing the nucleofection sample with 10 ml siRNA and then transferred to an Amaxa certified cuvette. After the program was completed, the sample was transferred to the prepared 6-well plates. Cells were incubated in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% CO 2.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated from the cells in each group using Trizol regent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total cellular RNA was used for reverse transcription (RT) of cDNA by a standardized technique (Takara, Japan). Obtained cDNA was amplified using specific primers listed in Table 2. After pre-denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out for 30 cycles: 10 s denaturation at 95°C, followed by annealing for 20 s at 60°C and finally extended for 30 s at 72°C. Realtime PCR was performed on the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real Time PCR Instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA).
Gene |
Primer sequence (5′→ 3′) |
|
β-Actin |
Forward Reverse |
TGGCACCCAGCACAATGAA CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA |
LKB-1 |
Forward Reverse |
AGGGCCGTCAAGATCCTCAA CACACGCAGTACTCCATCACCA |
CaMKK beta |
Forward Reverse |
GAAGACCTGGCCCGTTTCTACT TGCCCTTGAATTCATTGCTCAC |
TAK-1 |
Forward Reverse |
GCCTGATGACTCGTTGTTGGTCTA ATGGCTCATCTGCTCCTGGAA |
Western blot analysis
Total protein was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (CWbiotech, Beijing, China) containing 1 mM phenyl methyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Beyotime, Shanghai, China). The protein concentration was measured using BCA Protein Assay kit (Beyotime). For western blot analysis, equal amounts of soluble protein (50 μg per well) were subjected to 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk at 37°C for 1 h and then incubated with the primary anti-LC3, TAK1, LKB1, CaMKK β, AMPK, p-AMPK, mTOR, and p-mTOR antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) on the rocking bed overnight at 4°C. After three times washe with TBST, the PVDF membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG monoclonal antibody or goat anti-rabbit IgG monoclonal antibody in the blocking solution (1:10,000) at room temperature for 1 h. After being washed with TBST, membranes were detected using a DBA kit (Pulilai, Beijing, China). The images were analyzed using the gel analysis software (Quantity one; Bio-Rad, USA). All experiments were repeated three times.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD). Comparison of the mean values of two independent specimens was conducted using Student’s t-test. Comparison of the mean values between the multiple groups was conducted using one-way analysis of variance or two-way analysis of variance. All data were treated using SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, USA). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Quercetin inhibits cell viability and induces cell apoptosis in AML cells
HL-60, THP-1 and KG-1 cells were incubated with different concentrations of quercetin (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 μM) for 24, 48 and 72 h. CCK-8 assay was used to detect the cell viability. The results showed that quercetin could effectively inhibit the viability of AML cells in a concentration-dependent manner ( Figure 1A). In addition, quercetin markedly suppressed colony formation of HL-60, THP-1 and KG-1 cells. Colony formation was decreased by the increase of quercetin concentration ( Figure 1B). The cell apoptosis was determined by flow cytometry. Quercetin induced apoptosis in HL-60, THP-1 and KG-1 cells. The apoptosis rate was increased with the increase in quercetin concentration ( Figure 2). These results showed that quercetin could inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in AML cells.
Quercetin induces autophagy in AML cells
HL-60, THP-1 and KG-1 cells were incubated with different concentrations of quercetin (25 and 50 μM) for 48 h. The cells were harvested and fixed with glutaraldehyde and examined by electron microscopy. The EM results showed that autophagosomes appeared in the cells after quercetin treatmnent ( Figure 3A).
Cell autophagy was also detected using Autophagy Detection Kit. Immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were applied to observe the autophagosomes and profile the autophagy in HL-60 cells. The results showed that cells in negative control group did not have green staining, while rapamycin (Rapa)-treated cells had intense punctuate structures. Flow Cytometry results showed that the average fluorescence intensity of the Rapa group was significantly higher than those of the control group and the Rapa+3-Methyladenine (3-MA) group. Quercetin could also induce auto- phagy in HL-60 cells. With the increase of quercetin concentration, the green fluorescence signal intensity was enhanced. The fluorescence microscopy results also showed that the staining became faint in the cells incubated with 3-MA+quercetin ( Figure 3B), indicating that 3-MA inhibited autophagy which was induced by quercetin or Rapa.
Western blot analysis results showed that the ratio of LC3 II/I in quercetin groups were higher than that in negative control group. Quercetin-induced cell autophagy could be inhibited by 3-MA ( Figure 3C). Spautin -1 (5 μM), another autophagy inhibitor, consistently reversed the ratio of LC3 II/I which was promoted by quercetin ( Figure 3D).
Quercetin induces autophagic cell death in HL-60 cells
The viability and apoptosis rates of HL-60 cells were detected after autophagy was inhibited. The results of CCK-8 assay showed that the cell viability in the quercetin+3-MA or quercetin+spautin-1 group was higher than that in quercetin alone group at both 24 h and 48 h ( Figure 4A), implying that quercetin could induce autophagic cell death in HL-60 cells. After the autophagy was inhibited with 3-MA, flow cytometry was used to analyze cell apoptosis rate. The cell apoptosis in the quercetin+3-MA group was slightly increased at 24 h. However, the difference of cell apoptosis between quercetin+3-MA group and quercetin alone group was not significant at 48 h ( Figure 4B).
We propose that quercetin may play an anti-leukemia role through inducing cell apoptosis and autophagy simultaneously. When the autophagy pathway is blocked, the apoptotic pathway is slightly enhanced. However, this compensatory mechanism will fade as the incubation time is prolonged.
TAK-1, AMPK and mTOR are potential therapeutic targets for AML
The protein expressions of LKB-1, CaMKKβ, TAK-1, AMPK and mTOR in PBMCs, AML primary cells, HL-60 cells, THP-1cells and KG-1 cells were detected by western blot anlysis. The results of variance analysis showed that the expressions of p-AMPK in AML primary cells and AML cell lines were lower than that in normal human PBMCs, and the expressions of p-mTOR in the primary AML cells and AML cell lines were higher than that in normal human PBMCs. These results indicated that inducing the phosphorylation of AMPK or inhibiting the mTOR activity in leukemia cells might be a potential method for acute leukemia treatment. It was also found that LKB-1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 were all expressed in HL-60 cells, primary AML cells and normal human PBMCs. The differences of LKB-1 and CaMKKβ protein expressions among PBMCs, primary AML cells and AML cell lines were not significant. The TAK1 expressions in primary AML cells and AML cell lines were higher than that in PBMCs ( Figure 5). These data showed that regulating the expression of TAK-1 and the phosphorylation of AMPK or/and mTOR might be potential approaches for the treatment of AML.
Quercetin induces autophagy and apoptosis in anAMPK/mTOR-dependent manner
We have proven that when the concentration of compound C (an AMPK specific small molecule inhibitor) was less than 50 μM, it would not affect the viability of HL-60 cells. Compound C could specifically inhibit the activity of AMPK at a concentration of over 10 μM [8]. Compound C (25 μM) together with quercetin (25, 50 μM) were chosen to treat HL-60 cells in this study. The expressions of AMPK, p-AMPK, mTOR andp-mTOR were detected by western blot analysis. It was found that quercetin could activate AMPK activity in a concentration-dependent manner. Quercetin increased the phosphorylation level of AMPK in HL-60 cells and decreased the phosphorylation of mTOR. However, while the quercetin-induced phosphorylation of AMPK was inhibited by compound C, the p-mTOR expression was elevated ( Figure 6A). The ratio of LC3 II/I was increased in quercetin-treated cells, suggesting that the level of autophagy was increased, with an obvious increasing trend as the concentration of quercetin was increased. When compound C was used to inhibit quercetin–induced phosphorylation of AMPK, the ratio of LC3 II/I was decreased consequently ( Figure 6A).
The expressions of caspase-3 and Bax were increased in HL-60 cells after treatment with quercetin. In contrast, Bcl-2 expression was decreased. These results suggested that quercetin could induce apoptosis of HL-60 cells. However, when the phosphorylation of AMPK was inhibited by compound C, the effect of quercetin on inducing apoptosis was eliminated ( Figure 6B).
These results suggested that quercetin could inhibit the p-mTOR expression through activating AMPK. When the AMPK’s phosphorylation was inhibited by compound C, the effect of quercetin on mTOR was weakened. Meanwhile, the autophagy and apoptosis levels induced by quercetin were decreased. We propose that quercetin may induce autophagy and apoptosis through activating the phosphorylation AMPK and reducing the consequent phosphorylation of mTOR protein.
CaMKKβ manipulates the quercetin-induced AMPK phosphorylation and autophagy in HL-60 cells
The upstream kinases of AMPK include LKB1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 [ 19– 21] . In this study, we found that that LKB-1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 were all expressed in HL-60 cells. Therefore, LKB-1 siRNA, CaMKKβ siRNA and TAK1 siRNA were transfected into HL-60 cells respectively. IF staining observed by microscopy visualized that HL-60 cells were effectively transfected with FAM-labeled siRNAs 24 h after Nucleofection ( Figure 7A). Realtime PCR and western blot analysis were used to detect their mRNA and protein expressions. After the cells were transfected for 48 h, the relative protein expressions of LKB-1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 were decreased by 73.54%±3.27%, 64.62%±10.86%, and 65.16%±13.99%, compared to the negative control; and their mRNA levels were decreased by 97.73%±0.25%, 86.04%±1.99% and 79.29%±2.93%, compared to the negative control ( Figure 7B).
HL-60 cells were transfected with CaMKKβ siRNA for 24 h, and then incubated with quercetin for another 48 h. After that, proteins were isolated and subjected to western blot analysis using indicated antibodies. The results showed that 50 μM of quercetin did not affect the CaMKKβ protein expression. CaMKKβ siRNA could inhibit the protein expression of CaMKKβ effectively. There was an interactive effect of quercetin and CaMKKβ siRNA on the protein expressions of p-AMPK and p-mTOR in HL-60 cells. When the CaMKKβ gene was silenced in HL-60 cells, the quercetin-activated AMPK phosphorylation was eliminated, and its ability to inactivate mTOR was reduced. Quercetin could induce the increase of LC3 II/I ratio in HL-60 cells. Meanwhile, it could elevate the expression of beclin-1 and reduce the expression of p62 ( Figure 7C,D).
These data supported the idea that quercetin could induce autophagy in HL-60 cells. However, CaMKKβ siRNA eliminated the effect of quercetin on LC3 II/I ratio, beclin-1 protein expression, and p62 protein expression. However, neither LKB-1 nor TAK1 siRNA affected the quercetin-elevated ratio of LC3 II/I ( Figure 7E). We speculate that quercetin may activate autophagy in HL-60 cells through the CaMKKβ/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway. CaMKKβ might be an upstream signal molecule of quercetin-activated AMPK/mTOR.
Discussion
In this study, we investigated the anti-leukemic mechanism of quercetin. We found that quercetin could induce cell apoptosis and autophagic cell death, and finally suppress the viability of leukemia cells. Mechanistically, AMPK/mTOR is a vital intracellular signal pathway for quercetin-induced apoptosis and autophagy in leukemic HL-60 cells, while CaMKKβ is an important upstream signaling molecule for AMPK/mTOR pathway.
AML is one of the most common malignancies of the hematopoietic progenitor cell in adults. The cure and survival rate of AML are still not satisfactory [ 23, 24] . To improve the cure rate of AML and prolong the survival of patients, scientists have been searching for new treatments [25]. Quercetin, belonging to flavonoids, is an almost non-toxic medicine. The structure of quercetin is stable and quercetin is easy to be separated and purified. It has gained recognition over the years due to its antioxidant and anti-cancer effects [ 26, 27] .
Tumorigenesis is closely regulated by apoptosis and autophagy [ 28, 29] . The function of autophagy in cell survival is still ambiguous. Some studies found that autophagy played a protective role in the cell survival [ 23– 25] , while others concluded that autophagy was another type of programmed cell death (PCD) [ 26– 28] . Our preliminary study proved that quercetin had anti-leukemia effect by inducing AML cells apoptosis [8]. However, could quercetin affect autophagy in leukemia cells? And if yes, what kind of role would autophagy play in the procedure of leukemia cell death? These questions are unclear so far. Using electron microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry assays, we demonstrated that autophagy could be induced by quercetin in the leukemia cells. We also found that the quercetin-induced apoptosis was increased slightly when autophagy was blocked. Combined with our previous research [8], we concluded that quercetin might play the anti-leukemia role through inducing apoptosis and autophagy simultaneously; as quercetin-induced autophagy and apoptosis acted complementarily on the death of HL-60 cells. When the autophagy pathway was blocked by 3-MA, the quercetin-induced apoptosis showed a compensatory increase in the early stage. However, this compensatory mechanism was incomplete and subject to time constraint.
The intracellular signaling pathway by which quercetin induces apoptosis and autophagy in leukemia cells is still unclear. Both apoptosis and autophagy are regulated by intracellular energy metabolism, and some studies have shown that there may be a common signaling pathway for apoptosis and autophagy [ 29, 30] . AMPK is the cellular energy receptor that regulates cell energy metabolism [31]. Tumor is often accompanied by energy metabolism disorder and AMPK activation inhibition [32]. Therefore, AMPK is considered as a potential target for the treatment of tumors [33]. mTOR is a kind of silk/threonine protein kinase. It is an important downstream signal molecule of AMPK and participates in the progress of tumors [34]. Over-activation of mTOR can accelerate the cell cycle of tumor cells and promote cell migration and apoptosis-resistance [ 35– 37] . Green et al. [38] found that a specific inhibitor of mTOR induces a multisite dephosphorylation of 4E-BP1, which markedly inhibits the initiation step of mRNA translation, resulting in a strong anti-leukemic activity against primary AML cells while sparing normal hematopoiesis ex vivo and significantly reducing the growth of AML cells in nude mice. Studies showed that the regulation of apoptosis and autophagy is intimately connected, and the same regulators can sometimes control both of these two processes [ 39, 40] . mTOR may have multi-effect on the regulation of cell death, including apoptosis and autophagy [41]. The mechanisms linking autophagy and apoptosis are not fully interpreted [42]. Recent studies have revealed that some apoptotic proteins ( e.g., Bax and Bim) modulate autophagy [ 43, 44] . Moreover, autophagic proteins regulate intrinsic apoptosis through calpain- and caspase-mediated cleavage of autophagy-related proteins, which switches the cellular program from autophagy to apoptosis [ 45, 46] . On one hand, autophagy degrades damaged mitochondria and caspases [ 47, 48] , on the other hand, it provides a membrane-based intracellular platform for caspase processing in the regulation of apoptosis [49]. Here, we found that the expressions of phosphorylated AMPK in AML primary cells and HL-60 cells were lower than those in normal human PBMCs, and the expressions of p-mTOR in the primary AML cells and HL-60 cells were higher than those in PBMCs. These results indicated that inducing the phosphorylation of AMPK or inhibiting the mTOR activity in leukemia cells might be a potential method for acute leukemia treatment. Moreover, we observed that p-AMPK was activated and p-mTOR expression was decreased in HL-60 cells under the impact of quercetin. However, AMPK inhibitor compound C could antagonize the above effects of quercetin. Quercetin-induced autophagy and apoptosis levels were decreased when the phosphorylation of AMPK was blocked by compound C. Since the mechanism of quercetin′s anti-leukemia effect is related to AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway, we speculate that quercetin may activate AMPK and inhibit the phosphorylation of mTOR, thus inducing autophagy and apoptosis in the HL-60 cells. In our study, when autophagy was inhibited by 3-MA or spautin-1, cell apoptosis rate was increased. Indeed, our results indicated that quercetin decreased the expression of p62, an autophagy related protein which binds with and activates caspase 8 to induce cell apoptosis [50]. However, further study is needed to clarify the crosslink between quercetin-induced autophagy and apoptosis and the role of AMPK/mTOR in these programmed cell death processes.
As a type of allosteric molecule, the complete activation of AMPK also requires the phosphorylation of the threonine (threonine 172) in its catalytic center by the upstream kinases [51]. The upstream kinases of AMPK include LKB1, CaMKKβ and TAK-1 [ 19– 21] . When cellular energy crisis occurs, LKB1 phosphorylates AMPK, and then inhibits mTOR activity by binding directly to mTOR′s key subunit receptor or through phosphorylating TSC2 [ 52, 53] . In addition to LKB-1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 are also important upstream signal molecules for AMPK. When the concentration of Ca 2+ in the cell increases, AMPK can be activated by CaMKKβ [54]. Recent studies have shown that it plays an important role in many kinds of malignant tumors, such as breast cancer, neck tumor and prostate cancer [ 55– 57] . TAK1 could induce autophagic death and be activated by factors such as TLRs, IL-1, TNF and TGF-β [ 58– 60] . How TAK1 causes autophagy is not completely clear, and studies show that it may be realized through the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway [61]. In this study, we found that LKB-1, CaMKKβ and TAK1 were all expressed in HL-60 cells, primary AML cells and PBMCs. The expression levels of LKB-1 and CaMKKβ protein among PBMCs, primary AML cells and HL-60 cells were not significantly different. The TAK1 expressions in primary AML cells and HL-60 cells were higher than those in PBMCs. When CaMKKβ gene was silenced by siRNA, the function of quercetin on regulating AMPK and mTOR phosphorylation was weakened, and the quercetin-induced autophagy was decreased. This phenomenon was not observed when LKB-1 or TAK1 was silenced. We suspected that CaMKKβ might be the upstream molecular of AMPK/mTOR in response to quercetin in HL-60 cells. However, quercetin did not affect the protein expression of CaMKKβ. It has been proven that the protein structure of CaMKKβ could change to an active conformation to bind and form a complex with AMPK under external stimuli. Subsequently, the intracellular concentration of Ca 2+ is elevated and finally AMPK is activated [ 62– 64] . We speculate that quercetin may activate AMPK through CaMKKβ without affecting the protein expression of CaMKKβ. Further studies are needed to clarify how quercetin affects the function of CaMKKβ.
Based on our experimental results, we conclude that quercetin has anti-leukemia function, and may induce apoptosis and autophagy of HL-60 cells through modulating the CaMKKβ/AMPK/ mTOR signaling pathway. Our data shed light on the development of potential new strategies for leukemia treatment.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81803783) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Nos. 2016A030313270 and 2017A030310017).
References
- 1.Yang F, Song L, Wang H, Wang J, Xu Z, Xing N. Quercetin in prostate cancer: chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive effects, mechanisms and clinical application potential (Review) Oncol Rep. . 2015;33:2659–2668. doi: 10.3892/or.2015.3886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang Z, Ma J, Li X, Wu Y, Shi H, Chen Y, Lu G, et al. Quercetin induces p53‐independent cancer cell death through lysosome activation by the transcription factor EB and reactive oxygen species‐dependent ferroptosis. Br J Pharmacol. . 2021;178:1133–1148. doi: 10.1111/bph.15350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yin M, Liu Y, Chen Y. Iron metabolism: an emerging therapeutic target underlying the anti-cancer effect of quercetin. Free Radical Res. . 2021;55:296–303. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2021.1898604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reyes-Farias M, Carrasco-Pozo C. The anti-cancer effect of quercetin: molecular implications in cancer metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. . 2019;20:3177. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dhanaraj T, Mohan M, Arunakaran J. Quercetin attenuates metastatic ability of human metastatic ovarian cancer cells via modulating multiple signaling molecules involved in cell survival, proliferation, migration and adhesion. Arch Biochem Biophys. . 2021;701:108795. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang H, Yu D, Zhang H, Ma R, Wu H, Zhai H, Wang H, et al. Quercetin inhibits the proliferation of multiple myeloma cells by upregulating PTPRR expression. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. . 2021;53:1505–1515. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmab128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ma R, Yu D, Peng Y, Yi H, Wang Y, Cheng T, Shi B, et al. Resveratrol induces AMPK and mTOR signaling inhibition-mediated autophagy and apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. . 2021;53:775–783. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmab042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xiao J, Niu G, Yin S, Xie S, Li Y, Nie D, Ma L, et al. The role of AMP-activated protein kinase in quercetin-induced apoptosis of HL-60 cells. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. . 2014;46:394–400. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmu014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Noguchi M, Hirata N, Tanaka T, Suizu F, Nakajima H, Chiorini JA. Autophagy as a modulator of cell death machinery. Cell Death Dis. . 2020;11:517. doi: 10.1038/s41419-020-2724-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Du W, Xu A, Huang Y, Cao J, Zhu H, Yang B, Shao X, et al. The role of autophagy in targeted therapy for acute myeloid leukemia. Autophagy. . 2021;17:2665–2679. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1822628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Liu J, Liu P, Xu T, Chen Z, Kong H, Chu W, Wang Y, et al. Berberine induces autophagic cell death in acute lymphoblastic leukemia by inactivating AKT/mTORC1 signaling. Drug Des Dev Ther. . 2020;Volume 14:1813–1823. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S239247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang J, Zhou R, Ma Z. Autophagy and Energy Metabolism. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019, 1206: 329-357 . [DOI] [PubMed]
- 13.Jia J, Bissa B, Brecht L, Allers L, Choi SW, Gu Y, Zbinden M, et al. AMPK, a regulator of metabolism and autophagy, is activated by lysosomal damage via a novel galectin-directed ubiquitin signal transduction system. Mol Cell. . 2020;77:951–969.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lin SC, Hardie DG. AMPK: sensing glucose as well as cellular energy status. Cell Metab. . 2018;27:299–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dohmen M, Krieg S, Agalaridis G, Zhu X, Shehata SN, Pfeiffenberger E, Amelang J, et al. AMPK-dependent activation of the Cyclin Y/CDK16 complex controls autophagy. Nat Commun. . 2020;11:1032. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14812-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jia J, Abudu YP, Claude-Taupin A, Gu Y, Kumar S, Choi SW, Peters R, et al. Galectins control MTOR and AMPK in response to lysosomal damage to induce autophagy. Autophagy. . 2019;15:169–171. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1505155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim J, Kundu M, Viollet B, Guan KL. AMPK and mTOR regulate autophagy through direct phosphorylation of Ulk1. Nat Cell Biol. . 2011;13:132–141. doi: 10.1038/ncb2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Law BYK, Michelangeli F, Qu YQ, Xu SW, Han Y, Mok SWF, Dias IRSR, et al. Neferine induces autophagy-dependent cell death in apoptosis-resistant cancers via ryanodine receptor and Ca2+-dependent mechanism. Sci Rep. . 2019;9:20034. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56675-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1–AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. . 2009;9:563–575. doi: 10.1038/nrc2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liu W, Zhuang J, Jiang Y, Sun J, Prinz RA, Sun J, Jiao X, et al. Toll‐like receptor signalling cross‐activates the autophagic pathway to restrict Salmonella Typhimurium growth in macrophages . Cell Microbiol. . 2019;21:e13095. doi: 10.1111/cmi.13095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang P, Liu X, Li H, Chen Z, Yao X, Jin J, Ma X. TRPC5-induced autophagy promotes drug resistance in breast carcinoma via CaMKKβ/AMPKα/mTOR pathway. Sci Rep. . 2017;7:3158. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03230-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xiao Y, Ming X, Xu J. Inhibition of human leukemia cells growth by juglone is mediated via autophagy induction, endogenous ROS production, and inhibition of cell migration and invasion. J BUON. 2020, 25: 1600-1606 . [PubMed]
- 23.Shallis RM, Wang R, Davidoff A, Ma X, Zeidan AM. Epidemiology of acute myeloid leukemia: Recent progress and enduring challenges. Blood Rev. . 2019;36:70–87. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2019.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Estey E, Karp JE, Emadi A, Othus M, Gale RP. Recent drug approvals for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: gifts or a Trojan horse? Leukemia. . 2020;34:671–681. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0704-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nair R, Salinas-Illarena A, Baldauf HM. New strategies to treat AML: novel insights into AML survival pathways and combination therapies. Leukemia. . 2021;35:299–311. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01069-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Almatroodi SA, Alsahli MA, Almatroudi A, Verma AK, Aloliqi A, Allemailem KS, Khan AA, et al. Potential therapeutic targets of quercetin, a plant flavonol, and its role in the therapy of various types of cancer through the modulation of various cell signaling pathways. Molecules. . 2021;26:1315. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang SM, Deng XT, Zhou J, Li QP, Ge XX, Miao L. Pharmacological basis and new insights of quercetin action in respect to its anti-cancer effects. Biomed Pharmacother. . 2020;121:109604. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang RC, Wei Y, An Z, Zou Z, Xiao G, Bhagat G, White M, et al. Akt-mediated regulation of autophagy and tumorigenesis through Beclin 1 phosphorylation. Science. . 2012;338:956–959. doi: 10.1126/science.1225967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Garland JM, Halestrap A. Energy metabolism during apoptosis. J Biol Chem. . 1997;272:4680–4688. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.8.4680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rabinowitz JD, White E. Autophagy and metabolism. Science. . 2010;330:1344–1348. doi: 10.1126/science.1193497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Garcia D, Shaw RJ. AMPK: mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol Cell. . 2017;66:789–800. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Faubert B, Boily G, Izreig S, Griss T, Samborska B, Dong Z, Dupuy F, et al. AMPK is a negative regulator of the warburg effect and suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Cell Metab. . 2013;17:113–124. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liang J, Mills GB. AMPK: a contextual oncogene or tumor suppressor? Cancer Res. . 2013;73:2929–2935. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Visnjic D, Dembitz V, Lalic H. The role of AMPK/mTOR modulators in the therapy of acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Med Chem. . 2019;26:2208–2229. doi: 10.2174/0929867325666180117105522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ekim B, Magnuson B, Acosta-Jaquez HA, Keller JA, Feener EP, Fingar DC. mTOR kinase domain phosphorylation promotes mTORC1 signaling, cell growth, and cell cycle progression. Mol Cell Biol. . 2011;31:2787–2801. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05437-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Harvey RF, Pöyry TAA, Stoneley M, Willis AE. Signaling from mTOR to eIF2α mediates cell migration in response to the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin. Sci Signal. . 2019;12:eaaw6763. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aaw6763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zeng Z, Wang RY, Qiu YH, Mak DH, Coombes K, Yoo SY, Zhang Q, et al. MLN0128, a novel mTOR kinase inhibitor, disrupts survival signaling and triggers apoptosis in AML and AML stem/ progenitor cells. Oncotarget. . 2016;7:55083–55097. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Green AS, Chapuis N, Trovati Maciel T, Willems L, Lambert M, Arnoult C, Boyer O, et al. The LKB1/AMPK signaling pathway has tumor suppressor activity in acute myeloid leukemia through the repression of mTOR-dependent oncogenic mRNA translation. Blood. . 2010;116:4262–4273. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-269837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Thorburn A. Apoptosis and autophagy: regulatory connections between two supposedly different processes. Apoptosis. . 2008;13:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10495-007-0154-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saleem S. Apoptosis, autophagy, necrosis and their multi galore crosstalk in neurodegeneration. Neuroscience. . 2021;469:162–174. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lu Q, Zhou Y, Hao M, Li C, Wang J, Shu F, Du L, et al. The mTOR promotes oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of mesangial cells in diabetic nephropathy. Mol Cell Endocrinol. . 2018;473:31–43. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mukhopadhyay S, Panda PK, Sinha N, Das DN, Bhutia SK. Autophagy and apoptosis: where do they meet? Apoptosis. . 2014;19:555–566. doi: 10.1007/s10495-014-0967-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen F, Amgalan D, Kitsis RN, Pessin JE, Feng D. ATG16L1 autophagy pathway regulates BAX protein levels and programmed cell death. J Biol Chem. . 2020;295:15045–15053. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Luo S, Garcia-Arencibia M, Zhao R, Puri C, Toh PPC, Sadiq O, Rubinsztein DC. Bim inhibits autophagy by recruiting Beclin 1 to microtubules. Mol Cell. . 2012;47:359–370. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bhutia SK, Dash R, Das SK, Azab B, Su ZZ, Lee SG, Grant S, et al. Mechanism of autophagy to apoptosis switch triggered in prostate cancer cells by antitumor cytokine melanoma differentiation-associated gene 7/interleukin-24. Cancer Res. . 2010;70:3667–3676. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.An HK, Chung KM, Park H, Hong J, Gim JE, Choi H, Lee YW, et al. CASP9 (caspase 9) is essential for autophagosome maturation through regulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. Autophagy. . 2020;16:1598–1617. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1695398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vera-Ramirez L, Vodnala SK, Nini R, Hunter KW, Green JE. Autophagy promotes the survival of dormant breast cancer cells and metastatic tumour recurrence. Nat Commun. . 2018;9:1944. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04070-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lindqvist LM, Frank D, McArthur K, Dite TA, Lazarou M, Oakhill JS, Kile BT, et al. Autophagy induced during apoptosis degrades mitochondria and inhibits type I interferon secretion. Cell Death Differ. . 2018;25:784–796. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0017-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mahapatra KK, Mishra SR, Behera BP, Patil S, Gewirtz DA, Bhutia SK. The lysosome as an imperative regulator of autophagy and cell death. Cell Mol Life Sci. . 2021;78:7435–7449. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03988-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yan XY, Zhong XR, Yu SH, Zhang LC, Liu YN, Zhang Y, Sun LK, et al. p62 aggregates mediated Caspase 8 activation is responsible for progression of ovarian cancer. J Cell Mol Med. . 2019;23:4030–4042. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Carling D, Sanders MJ, Woods A. The regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by upstream kinases. Int J Obes. . 2008;32:S55–S59. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tan FH, Bai Y, Saintigny P, Darido C. mTOR signalling in head and neck cancer: heads up. Cells. . 2019;8:333. doi: 10.3390/cells8040333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Adjei AA, Hidalgo M. Intracellular signal transduction pathway proteins as targets for cancer therapy. J Clin Oncol. . 2005;23:5386–5403. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.23.648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Fujiwara Y, Kawaguchi Y, Fujimoto T, Kanayama N, Magari M, Tokumitsu H. Differential AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) recognition mechanism of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase isoforms. J Biol Chem. . 2016;291:13802–13808. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.727867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Racioppi L, Nelson ER, Huang W, Mukherjee D, Lawrence SA, Lento W, Masci AM, et al. CaMKK2 in myeloid cells is a key regulator of the immune-suppressive microenvironment in breast cancer. Nat Commun. . 2019;10:2450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10424-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Subbannayya Y, Syed N, Barbhuiya MA, Raja R, Marimuthu A, Sahasrabuddhe N, Pinto SM, et al. Calcium calmodulin dependent kinase kinase 2 - a novel therapeutic target for gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. . 2015;16:336–345. doi: 10.4161/15384047.2014.972264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Huang Q, Cao H, Zhan L, Sun X, Wang G, Li J, Guo X, et al. Mitochondrial fission forms a positive feedback loop with cytosolic calcium signaling pathway to promote autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. . 2017;403:108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shin JH, Min SH, Kim SJ, Kim YI, Park J, Lee HK, Yoo OJ. TAK1 regulates autophagic cell death by suppressing the phosphorylation of p70 S6 kinase 1. Sci Rep. . 2013;3:1561. doi: 10.1038/srep01561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ouyang C, Nie L, Gu M, Wu A, Han X, Wang X, Shao J, et al. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) activation requires phosphorylation of serine 412 by protein kinase A catalytic subunit α (PKACα) and x-linked protein kinase (PRKX) J Biol Chem. . 2014;289:24226–24237. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.559963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Song IJ, Yang YM, Inokuchi-Shimizu S, Roh YS, Yang L, Seki E. The contribution of toll-like receptor signaling to the development of liver fibrosis and cancer in hepatocyte-specific TAK1-deleted mice. Int J Cancer. . 2018;142:81–91. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Liu W, Jiang Y, Sun J, Geng S, Pan Z, Prinz RA, Wang C, et al. Activation of TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) restricts Salmonella Typhimurium growth by inducing AMPK activation and autophagy. Cell Death Dis. . 2018;9:570. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0612-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ma Y, Yang F, Wang Y, Du Z, Liu D, Guo H, Shen J, et al. CaMKKβ is involved in AMP-activated protein kinase activation by baicalin in LKB1 deficient cell lines. PLoS ONE. . 2012;7:e47900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Green MF, Anderson KA, Means AR. Characterization of the CaMKKβ–AMPK signaling complex. Cell Signalling. . 2011;23:2005–2012. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Iseli TJ, Turner N, Zeng XY, Cooney GJ, Kraegen EW, Yao S, Ye Y, et al. Activation of AMPK by bitter melon triterpenoids involves CaMKKβ. PLoS ONE. . 2013;8:e62309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]