Abstract
The Pacific oyster (PO), Crassostrea gigas, is an important commercial marine species but periodically experiences large stock losses due to disease events known as summer mortality. Summer mortality has been linked to environmental perturbations and numerous viral and bacterial agents, indicating this disease is multifactorial in nature. In 2013 and 2014, several summer mortality events occurred within the Port Stephens estuary (NSW, Australia). Extensive culture and molecular-based investigations were undertaken and several potentially pathogenic Vibrio species were identified. To improve species identification and genomically characterise isolates obtained from this outbreak, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and subsequent genomic analyses were performed on 48 bacterial isolates, as well as a further nine isolates from other summer mortality studies using the same batch of juveniles. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) identified most isolates to the species level and included members of the Photobacterium , Pseudoalteromonas , Shewanella and Vibrio genera, with Vibrio species making up more than two-thirds of all species identified. Construction of a phylogenomic tree, ANI analysis, and pan-genome analysis of the 57 isolates represents the most comprehensive culture-based phylogenomic survey of Vibrios during a PO summer mortality event in Australian waters and revealed large genomic diversity in many of the identified species. Our analysis revealed limited and inconsistent associations between isolate species and their geographical origins, or host health status. Together with ANI and pan-genome results, these inconsistencies suggest that to determine the role that microbes may have in Pacific oyster summer mortality events, isolate identification must be at the taxonomic level of strain. Our WGS data (specifically, the accessory genomes) differentiated bacterial strains, and coupled with associated metadata, highlight the possibility of predicting a strain’s environmental niche and level of pathogenicity.
Keywords: accessory genome, average nucleotide identity, core genome, Crassostrea gigas, microbial pathogens, microbiota, Pacific oyster, pan genome, phylogenetic tree, phylogenetics, summer mortality, whole genome sequencing, Vibrio
Data Summary
All genome assemblies mentioned here have been submitted to NCBI under BioProject accession number PRJNA795272. The authors confirm that all supporting data, code, and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.
Impact Statement.
Summer mortality in Pacific oysters can have a devastating effect on this industry, and although no definitive cause has been discovered, there is increasing evidence that summer mortality is a multifactorial disease which somehow includes elements of the oyster microbiome. This study compares the relatedness of isolate genomes taken from Pacific oysters suffering summer mortality (and some controls) and dates and locations around Port Stephens. We identified not only a diverse set of species belonging to the Gammaproteobacteria class (including many Vibrios), but for species with three or more isolates a high genetic diversity was also seemingly apparent.
Introduction
Of all the oysters commercially grown worldwide, the Pacific oyster (PO), Crassostrea gigas, is the most geographically distributed and economically important oyster. It is the only oyster farmed on all inhabited continents, with a total harvest weight in 2017 of 637 742 metric tons, valued at just over $US1.24 billion [1]. Due to a combination of accidental and deliberate dispersal of POs, cultivation of this species has increased markedly since the end of World War II in terms of both tonnage and locations farmed [2, 3]. However, expanding production has been accompanied by a simultaneous worldwide increase in disease events in C. gigas, including periodic disease outbreaks occurring during warmer months, known as summer mortality (SM). Despite decades of research, no definitive cause of SM in POs has been determined [4, 5]. Biotic stresses such as viral and bacterial pathogens [6], as well as genetic [7] and reproductive factors [8, 9] have all been implicated, as have many abiotic stresses, especially heat stress, low salinity (high rainfall), ocean acidification (pH change), low dissolved oxygen, and pollution [10–13]. On balance, although a definitive cause remains elusive, the sum of evidence suggests that SM is caused by a multifactorial combination of biotic and abiotic stresses [4, 14–17].
Pacific oyster mortality syndrome (POMS) is another important disease of C. gigas that is often confused with or mislabelled as SM, both for historical reasons and because it also occurs during warmer weather. In general SM tends to affect older POs experiencing their second summer, while POMS usually affects spat and juveniles. Moreover, POMS is caused by a virus - an ostreid herpesvirus (OsHV-1 and its variants). Herpes-like viruses have been observed during PO SM events since 1991 [18, 19], and after the characterisation of an ostreid herpesvirus (OsHV-1) in 1999 [20, 21], OsHV-1 and its variants were observed in a number of Pacific oyster SM events worldwide, including Australia [22–26]. Moreover, during many of these events, high bacterial loads of one or two Vibrio species (including V. splendidus , V. aesturianus, V. tubiashii , V. harveyi ), were detected alongside infection with OsHV-1 [6, 25, 27]. It has also been observed that the presence of certain pathogenic vibrios is required for full pathogenicity of OsHV-1 [28]. While de Lorgeril et al. [29] observed that PO immune suppression by the OsHV-1 virus leads to the PO being overwhelmed by opportunistic bacteria, in another study the pathogenicity of virulent Vibrio strains at low doses was enhanced by the presence of avirulent Vibrios [30].
Worldwide, there have also been many SM events where putative bacterial pathogens were observed to be the only etiological cause of disease. During the 1950s and 60s, nocardiosis - a disease caused by the bacteria Nocardia crassostreae, was observed during summer mortalities of POs in Japan, Canada, and the USA [31–34]. Ricksettsia-like bacteria have also been implicated in PO SM [35]. Yet, species within the Vibrio genus have most often been associated with reports of SM and POMS [27, 29]. Larval vibriosis (or bacillary necrosis) has been observed in hatcheries, often resulting in more than 90 % mortality [36]. PO mortality from vibriosis has also been observed in oyster spat [37, 38] and adults [39]. Indeed, for all C. gigas life stages several putative Vibrio pathogens have been identified, including V. alginolyticus , V. tubiashii , V. anguillarum , V. parahaemolyticus and V. harveyi [4, 30, 40, 41]. Investigations of bacterial community composition during SM disease events have also identified significant increases in Vibrio relative abundance [42–44].
Several SM events, where high temperatures appeared to play a role, occurred between January 2013 and January 2014 within the Port Stephens (PS) estuary in NSW [4]. These events were investigated in three stages (see Methods) which are, briefly: 1) diagnostic submissions of diseased POs, 2) a structured survey of selected SM-affected leases and control sites, and 3) a challenge trial. In total this 2013–2014 study was significant because no OsHV-1 or variants were detected in association with mortalities, and the bacterial isolates obtained represented a wide range of species, many of which were identified as Vibrios by characterization of the 16S rRNA taxonomic maker gene. A 16S-based microbiome study of the surveyed POs also revealed changes in relative abundance of certain bacterial groups including rare OTUs belonging to V. harveyi and another unknown Vibrio species [45]. To further investigate which species and strains may have been involved in this outbreak we used whole-genome sequencing to characterise 48 isolates from affected and unaffected POs and as a comparison, a further nine isolates originating from the same stock of juvenile POs.
Methods
Definition of SM-affected and SM-unaffected
Multiple SM events in POs occurred in Port Stephens between January 2013 and January 2014 that were investigated in three stages. Isolates obtained from SM-affected POs were acquired from the first two stages: 1) diagnostic testing of oysters from nine leases suffering mortalities, 2) a structured survey of ten affected sites and four unaffected sites around Port Stephens. Isolates from SM-unaffected hosts were obtained only from the second stage. Isolates from the third stage challenge trials as described in Go et al. [4] were not used in this work. All SM-affected sites suffered mortalities above the background rate, and the SM-affected POs from which isolates were derived also displayed signs of disease (gaping, high bacterial load). SM-unaffected POs from which isolates were derived were from control sites with no mortalities above the background rate and appeared healthy.
Bacterial isolates used in this study
The 48 isolates obtained during the structured survey in 2013–2014 were derived from PO hosts grown at six locations within the PS estuary, including several locations with multiple sites (Fig. 1). At Tilligerry creek, nine sites (including two control sites) were sampled yielding 21 isolates, while at Cromartys Bay, four locations (two controls) were sampled resulting in 13 isolates. Tilligerry Creek and Cromartys Bay are close to more urbanised parts of the PS estuary, with the Tilligerry Creek catchment also containing abandoned mines. Although the greatest number of isolates originated from Tilligerry Creek, the proportion of isolates per affected site was greatest for Cromartys Bay with a significantly higher bacterial abundance in affected oysters relative to unaffected POs [4]. A further nine isolates were also obtained from the same stock of juvenile POs. Six of the nine originated from other diagnostic cases occurring during the 2013–2014 SM event, following translocation from Port Stephens [4]. Another isolate was from a previous Port Stephens mortality event (2008), and two (V. harveyi, PS05 and PS09) were derived from a study in Oyster Cove, Port Stephens, investigating heat stress in POs [42].
Fig. 1.
Locations of the host PO sample sites from which the bacterial isolates were derived, with POs sampled during the SM outbreak of January 2013 to January 2014. Red circles represent the sites of diagnostic submissions, while orange and blue circles represent sites of the structured survey that included both affected and unaffected POs, respectively.
Nucleic acid extraction and whole-genome sequencing
DNA was extracted from isolates using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen) according to instructions from the manufacturer. The Nextera system (Illumina) involving Tagmentation of genomic DNA and PCR amplification was performed on each sample. The sequencing libraries were pooled and normalized using bead size selection (SPRI beads from Beckman Coulter). The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, with the High Sensitivity DNA kit was used to quantitate the pooled library before loading. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq instruments. Paired-end 250 nt reads were generated using MiSeq V2 chemistry while paired-end 150 nt reads were generated using the HiSeq2500 system.
Genome assembly and annotation
Genome assembly was achieved by running the Illumina raw reads through the A5-miseq pipeline (version 20160825) as described in Coil et al. [46]. The ‘RAST’ (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) and Prokka v1.12 pipelines were used to perform genome annotation [47, 48]. Quality of the isolate genome assemblies was examined using Quast (https://github.com/ablab/quast).
Detection of potential plasmids in V. harveyi isolates
Alignments of the V. harveyi isolate genomes (M14-00197 and M14-00480) were performed by the progressive Mauve [49] plugin for the Geneious software v. 5.3.6 [50], using default values. An approximately 86 Kbp DNA fragment was found to be missing from M14-00480, with the corresponding additional DNA sequence in M14-00197 checked for plasmid homology using BLASTn-Megablast searches [51] with default parameters. The 86 Kbp fragment was found to be homologous to several plasmids, and later confirmed to be circular by PCR using custom primers amplifying outwards from each end of the fragment (Table S1). Another 86 Kbp plasmid was detected in PS05, using a custom blast database of the 86 Kbp putative plasmid found in V. harveyi M14-00197 that was constructed from the NCBI command-line application makeblastdb.
Isolate species identification by WGS and ANI
Isolate genomes and a subset of reference and representative refseq genomes within the Gammaproteobacteria were compared against each other, using an ANI cut off level of 95 % or greater to identify which bacterial species each isolate belonged to [52, 53]. All genomes were downloaded from NCBI, and their average nucleotide identity (ANI) compared against those of the unknown isolates using the bioinformatic packages FastANI and Pyani. FastANI is a whole-genome similarity estimation utility used for high throughput parsing of ANI comparisons [54], whereas Pyani [55] is a python three module (version 0.2.10, available at https://github.com/widdowquinn/pyani) that is slower but incorporates a more comprehensive algorithm. For pyani the ANIm method of calculating percent identity was used in which input sequences were aligned with MUMmer [56]. Isolates were identified by species if they were found to have an ANI identity of 95 % or greater to previously identified species of published bacterial genomes downloaded from NCBI. Additional ANI visualisations were performed using a custom R-script based on the ‘pheatmap’ R-package (https://github.com/raivokolde/pheatmap).
16S identification of isolate species unidentified by WGS and ANI
Isolate species that could not be identified by ANI comparisons against reference genomes from NCBI (ANI ≤95 %), were instead similarly compared according to their 16S rRNA gene sequences. The 16S rRNA gene was identified within WGS isolate genomes using the ContEst16S web service (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/contest16s), described in [45]. Then BLASTn, using the megablast search with default settings, was performed on the extracted 16S gene from each sample and the species identification accepted if the percent identity was greater or equal to 98.65 %. All 16S reference strains were type strains for each species. The 98.65 % (percent identity) species cut-off was chosen based on Kim et al. [57], who added to prior work, especially Stackebrandt and Ebers [58] and Meier-Kolthoff et al. [59].
Construction of a phylogenomic tree
After the identification of isolates by genus or species, a phylogenomic tree was constructed by genomic alignments of core genes from each isolate using the phylosift suite (version 20141126; available at https://phylosift.wordpress.com/ [60). After phylogenomic alignments of core bacterial genes by phylosift [60] a newick formatted file was produced using FastTree-20.1.10 [61]. Final visualisation and annotation using the newick file was then implemented by the web based bioinformatic tool: Interactive tree of life (iTOL) (https://itol.embl.de/). NCBI bacterial genomes were also downloaded and used in combination with isolate genomes to generate many phylogenomic trees and confirm species identities determined by ANI. Initial confirmatory phylogenomic trees consisted of all reference and representative bacterial genomes along with the isolate genomes. These initial phylogenomic trees were then iterated on with genus and then species-specific reference genomes.
Pan-genome examination
The pan-genome of all sequenced isolates was examined using Roary v3.13.0 [62]. Roary was executed with default options. Gene presence/absence plots were generated using roary_plots.py (https://github.com/sanger-pathogens/Roary/tree/master/contrib/roary_plots). Other pan-genome plots not presented here were generated using the web-based tool ‘Phandango’ (http://jameshadfield.github.io/phandango/#/), as described in Hadfield et al. [63]. Custom R-scripts were used with Roary output to examine gene differences between isolates obtained from SM affected POs versus SM unaffected POs.
Gene ontology
The functional profile of selected accessory genomes was also examined. Namely the accessory genomes of V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi and V. mediterranei that represented a mix of potential pathogens and commensal isolates, as well as V. parahaemolyticus and V. mediterranei whose isolates were all from either affected or unaffected oysters respectively. Initially, gene ontology from all five pan-genomes were examined using shinyGO (http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/), or manually using gene ontology data from the Uniprot knowledge base (https://www.uniprot.org/), the GO consortium (http://geneontology.org/), and quickGO (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/annotations). For gene ontology analysis the R-package seqinr was used to construct a fasta file consisting of a gene subset representing the accessory genomes of V. parahaemolyticus, V. chagasii, V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi , and V. mediterranei from the initial fasta output of Roary. The fasta file of the accessory genome for each of the five species listed were then subjected to Diamond-Blastx [64] database searches using the Uniprot protein database and a list of gene identifiers obtained. Strict subsets of accessory genes were also concatenated into fasta files, with each file representing genes that were present in one isolate set of a species while completely absent in the other isolate set. For each species the two sets differed by locations of origin ( V. chagasii ), or potential pathogenicity ( V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi , and V. mediterranei ). Excluding V. brasiliensis, the strict gene subset for V. chagasii, V. harveyi, and V. mediterranei ) resolved down to a comparison between one variable: location ( V. chagasii ) or suspected pathogenicity ( V. harveyi and V. mediterranei ). The two V. harveyi isolate sets were based on presence or absence of an 86 Kbp plasmid The gene ontology terms were obtained by gene identifiers from the blastx search being input into the Uniprot website (https://www.uniprot.org/uploadlists/). For all gene ontologies examined, generic summaries (GO-SLIMS) of gene ontology terms were obtained from quickGO or the GO-SLIMS tool at AgBase (https://agbase.arizona.edu/index.html), described in McCarthy et al. [65]. Gene Ontology summary of terms was performed by Revigo (http://revigo.irb.hr/), described by Supek et al. [66], using default settings – with the exception of the list size being set to small. CirGO (https://github.com/IrinaVKuznetsova/CirGO) was used for additional summation and visualisation of the enriched gene ontology data [67].
Mobile genetic elements (MGEs)
Vibrio harveyi isolate pairs M14-00197 and M14-00480, as well as V. harveyi PS05 and PS09 were manually analysed and mapped for mobile genetic elements (MGEs) via several bioinformatic programmes and web services. The genomes were investigated for insertion sequence elements (ISEs) via ISEScan [68]. Prophage sequences were searched for using PhiSpy [69] as well as PHASTER [70]. Genomic islands were searched for using IslandViewer4 [71]. CRISPR sequences were detected using Geneious [50]. All MGEs mentioned above were mapped to the four V. harveyi genomes also through Geneious (https://www.geneious.com/). In contrast, all isolates were bioinformatically scanned for antibiotic resistance using Abricate [72] [https://github.com/tseemann/abricate] and the virulence factor database [73] using the full dataset of verified and potential virulence factors.
Results
For the 57 isolates sequenced the median total length of genome assemblies was 5220 Kbp, ranging from a maximum of 6570 Kbp to a minimum of 3700 Kbp. The number of contigs per assembly ranged from 2742 (single extreme outlier) down to 16, with a median of 70, while the median N50 was around 196 Kbp within a range of 4640 Kbp to 2190 Kbp. The percent GC of all isolates ranged between 40–53 with a median of 45. See Table S2 of the supplementary material for the quality measures of the isolate as determined by Quast.
The WGS results were used to identify species, and to study gross genomic and functional differences between isolates of the same species in terms of their geographic origin, or their potential involvement in pathogenicity (i.e., possibly pathogenic isolates if obtained from SM-affected POs). Species identification of isolates was achieved by comparing the ANI of each isolate with reference bacterial genomes downloaded from NCBI, especially type strains if they were present. ANI results from all 57 isolates are summarised in Fig. 2, and identifications to type strains in Table 1. Out of a total of 15 species identified from WGS, the majority of species (11) were identified as belonging to the Vibrio genus, as expected from the results reported in Go et al. [4]. The remainder were identified as belonging to the genera Shewanella , Photobacterium , and Pseudoalteromonas . Isolates categorised as Vibrio chagasii , V. kanaloae , V. mediterranei , V. brasiliensis , V. tubiashii , V. vulnificus , V. harveyi , V. parahaemolyticus , V. natriegens , and V. alginolyticus all had ANI matches to their respective type strains whose genomes had been fully sequenced (see Table 1). Similarly, Shewanella insulae , Pseudoalteromonas piscicida and P. shioyasakiensis isolates were identified with matches to their WGS type strains. The V. diabolicus isolates were identified with matches to 19 reference genomes (non-type strains), as the type strain had no fully sequenced genomes. Thus, of the 57 isolates, 42 were identified to the species level with the remaining 15 only identified to the taxonomic level of genus. In total ANI comparisons of isolate genomes to those from the following taxonomic orders were made: Oceanospirillales , Alteromonadales (containing Pseudoalteromonas and Shewanella genera), Vibrionales (containing Vibrio and Photobacterium genera), and Aeromonadales .
Fig. 2.
Clustering of isolates by comparing average nucleotide identity (ANI) between genomes using the MUMmer ultra-rapid aligning tool. The shades of red on the heatmap denote an ANI≥95 % (same species). The isolate names marked in red text were not part of the 2013–2014 study, while the isolates in blue text originate from SM-unaffected POs within Port Stephens with black text representing SM-affected POs.The single asterisk denotes two sets of two V. harveyi isolates, each set being essentially two clones differentiated almost entirely by the presence or absence of an 86 Kbp DNA fragment (suspected plasmid). Isolates PS05 and M14-00197 containing the 86 Kbp plasmid are in bold text. The numbers preceding the species or genus name represent the submission number of the oyster batch received. It should be noted that occasionally multiple isolates originated from a single oyster.
Table 1.
Identified species of isolates and their type-strain/s
|
Species |
Type strain/s |
ANI≥95 % Identity to fully sequenced type strain/s |
|---|---|---|
|
ATCC 15057, JCM 20779 |
Yes |
|
|
JCM 18891 |
Yes |
|
|
JBTF-M18 |
Yes |
|
|
CIP 102761, NCTC11647, ATCC 33539 |
Yes |
|
|
LMG 21353, CCUG 48643 |
Yes |
|
|
CCUG 56968 |
Yes |
|
|
UVEG, NBRC15635 |
Yes |
|
|
LMG 20546 |
Yes |
|
|
ATCC 19109(2014) |
Yes |
|
|
ATCC 27562(2017), NCTC13647, NBRC 15645(2017) |
Yes |
|
|
FDAARGOS_109, NCTC12970, NBRC 15634, ATCC 14126 |
Yes |
|
|
FDAARGOS_115, NCTC10903, NBRC 12711, ATCC 17802(2017), CAIM 320 |
Yes |
|
|
ATCC 14048(2016), CCUG 16371, NBRC 15636, DSM 759 |
Yes |
|
|
FDAARGOS_97, ATCC 17749, NCTC12160, NBRC 15630 |
Yes |
|
|
HE800, 16S sequence only |
No WGS Data* |
*No WGS assembly currently exists in the NCBI database for the type-strain.
For the 15 isolates unidentified to species level, 16S rRNA gene comparisons were also employed as an identification tool, using 98.65 % sequence identity to the 16S rRNA gene of the type-strain as a species cut off [57, 58, 74]. Not only were all 16S rRNA-based identifications invalidated by WGS-ANI results, but these differences were at times quite substantial. The most extreme cases being comparisons of isolates to the type strains of Shewanella fidelis (ATCC BAA-318), S. loihica (PV-4), Vibrio profundi (TP187) and V. atlantis (CECT 7223), which had respective WGS-ANIs of 85, 90, 86, and 89 %, despite the isolates having been confidently assigned to these species by 16S rRNA analysis. Poor 16S rRNA taxonomic identification has also been observed in other studies involving Vibrio species [75–77]. While results are noted here for reference, the 16S rRNA identifications of the 15 unidentified isolates were subsequently disregarded.
For the WGS based ANI identifications, there were a diverse number of species observed (Fig. 3). Aside from the 15 identified species, there was a total of nine unidentified and potentially new species (represented in Fig. 3 only by genera), that were only able to be identified to the genus level using ANI comparisons. These unnamed species were from the genera Pseudoalteromonas (one), Shewanella (three), and Vibrio (five). Just under half of the unidentified species were represented by only one isolate, while one unidentified Shewanella and two unidentified Vibrio species each had two isolates. Only one unidentified Vibrio species had three representative isolates (Fig. 2 and Fig. 4). In total, there were potentially 24 species (15 identified and nine unidentified), of which even the 15 identified species alone represented a diverse number of species (Fig. 3) in comparison to most other reported SM events [37, 38, 78, 79]. Of the 57 isolates from this study, all were members of the class Gammaproteobacteria , with the majority from the Vibrio genus (Fig. 3). However, this is largely due to the culture-based approach used in Go et al. [4] that likely favoured Vibrio growth (culture on marine salt blood agar). The number of species identified from the Vibrio genus using WGS, was at least four times greater than the next most numerous genus ( Shewanella ). However, it should also be noted that no species identified was numerically dominant. Both Vibrio harveyi and V. diabolicus had the highest number of isolates, but only with five isolates each, out of a total of 57.
Fig. 3.
Number of isolates per bacterial species, obtained from POs grown at various locations around Port Stephens, or within the Hawkesbury River or Shoalhaven (the latter two marked with blue text and line). The isolates bordered in light green were not obtained from the 2013–2014 PS study but from PO leases within the Hawkesbury River, Shoalhaven, or Oyster Cove (PS). For each genus, the isolates belonging to unidentified species have been summed into one column.
Fig. 4.
Phylogenetic tree constructed from selected core genes of the whole genome sequenced bacterial isolates used in this study. The genome alignment and tree construction were performed by the phylosift and FastTree programmes respectively, with an E. coli Genbank reference as the outgroup. The different genera are represented by different coloured branches and bootstrap values are proportional to the radius of each pink circle (largest=1). The isolate names marked in red text were not part of the 2013–2014 study, while the isolates in blue text originate from SM-unaffected POs within PS with black text representing SM-affected POs. The V. harveyi isolates marked with a single black asterisk are two sets of isolates, with each set of two isolates being virtually clonal except for the presence or absence of an 86 Kbp DNA fragment (suspected plasmid). From these two sets the two isolates containing a 86 Kbp fragment are in bold and marked with a carat (^). Numbers preceding the species or genus name represent the submission number of the batch of diseased oysters received. Occasionally multiple isolates originated from a single oyster.
To examine the genomic relationships between all 57 isolates and the species to which they belonged, a phylogenomic tree was constructed using the Phylosift and FastTree programmes (Fig. 4). As expected, the results showed two major branches split into the orders Alteromonadales and Vibrionales . The Alteromonadales branch split further into the Pseudoalteromonas and Shewanella genera, while the Vibrionales branch split into the genera Photobacterium (one species only) and Vibrio species. The taxonomic order of isolate species followed recent publications [80] and online taxonomic databases and visualisers (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/taxonomy or http://lifemap-ncbi.univ-lyon1.fr/). Small differences in isolate clustering were observed between Figs 2 and 4, reflecting the different clustering algorithms used and the more information-rich data from which Fig. 5) Fig. 4 (multiple gene alignments) was derived.
Fig. 5.
Summary of the pan-genome results for isolate species described in this study, in terms of both the core and accessory genomes that make up the pan-genome for each species.
The phylogenomic tree of Fig. 4 (and Figs 2 and 3), also provides insight into the diverse number of species, as well as the apparently large isolate diversity within each species, at least in terms of the geographical origin or the health-state (SM-affected or SM-unaffected) of the host POs. Of the ten identified species with multiple isolates, seven were obtained from POs grown at multiple locations, while only two species contained isolates originating from only one location ( V. mediterranei and V. parahaemolyticus ), although three of four V . chagasii also originated from one location. In contrast, there was a much greater association between species identification and the health state of the host. For the 17 isolates derived from unaffected POs, 11 belonged to species sets of two or more isolates while all four V . chagasii isolates originated from POs unaffected by SM, as did three of four isolates identified as V. mediterranei . Conversely, all the isolates of V. diabolicus , V. alginolyticus , S. insulae , and Photobacterium damselae were obtained from POs that had been affected by SM. To also investigate any gross functional diversity within isolates of the same species, a pan-genome analysis was performed on each identified species with three or more isolates. In particular, the accessory genome as a percentage of the pan-genome was examined (Fig. 5), as this is where adaptations to new environments or challenges are most likely to be found, and a likely indicator of functional diversity. Contrary to expectations, we observed that the accessory genome size for each species appeared not to be associated with that species’ geographic spread, nor whether they were obtained from affected vs unaffected oysters. For example, S. insulae had a small accessory genome (27 %), but its three corresponding isolates were each found at a different location, while V. diabolicus - with a relatively large (45 %) accessory genome – also had isolates from multiple locations, spaced many kilometres apart. Similarly, V. parahaemolyticus with the smallest accessory genome and V. tubiashii with one of the larger accessory genomes, were both represented by isolates that were all obtained from POs affected by SM. Of course, the small number of isolate genomes per species and thus the potential for random bias should also be considered.
The above-mentioned correlations between species identifications and geographic location or health state of the host POs, the pan-genome of each species and the associated ANI of the isolates for each species were investigated (summarised in Fig. 6). Looking at the ANI results alone, only S. insulae (Fig. 6, section a) had differing ANI values corresponding to differing geographic origins, while V. parahaemolyticus (Fig. 6, section d) was the sole species with isolates of highly homologous sequences (ANI≥98.5 %), all originating from the same location. In juxtaposition, three of five V . diabolicus (Fig. 6, section b) and three of four V . tubiashii (Fig. 6, section c) isolates were extremely homologous in terms of ANI but had geographically dissimilar origins. It should be noted here that while two of the V. diabolicus (M14-00267 and M14-00267b) and two V . tubiashii (M14-02590 and M14-02590b) isolates had almost identical ANI results that correlated with the same geographical origin, both isolate pairs came from a single submission and were likely grown in proximity. In contrast to the limited and inconsistent associations to geographic origins, there were clearer associations between isolate ANI scores within each species and their relation to whether the isolates originated from SM-unaffected or SM-affected POs. All V. chagasii and three out of four V . mediterranei isolates were all highly homologous and from unaffected POs, with the remaining and most genetically distant V. mediterranei isolate having the lowest ANI score. Similarly, for V. brasiliensis , if both the ANI and pan-genome analyses were combined, the most genetically distant isolate was the only one (out of four) that originated from a PO unaffected by SM (see also Fig. 4). Moreover, when the pan-genome of each species was examined, there was clear evidence of diversity between the isolates of each species. In particular, the accessory genomes of isolates identified as V. diabolicus , V. tubiashii , V. brasiliensis , and V. harveyi displayed substantial variation in contrast to the extreme homology evident in the high ANI scores within each species. High diversity was observed in the accessory genomes of three of four V . diabolicus (Fig. 6, section b), three of four V . tubiashii (Fig. 6, section c), and four of five V. harveyi (Fig. 6, section g) isolates despite the virtually identical ANI scores (ANI≥99.9 %). Indeed, two sets of V. harveyi isolates (M14-00197, M14-00480 and PS05, PS09) were virtually identical (by ANI) but nonetheless displayed differences in their accessory genomes that were associated with whether the isolate was obtained from SM-affected or SM-unaffected POs (Fig. 6, section h).
Fig. 6.
Side by side comparisons of ANIm percent identity with pan-genomes of selected isolates grouped into their species. Red text denotes isolates obtained from POs not part of the PS 2013–2014 SM study. Blue text denotes isolates taken from healthy POs unaffected by summer mortality during 2013–2014. The phylogenomic trees are only general representations of taxonomic distance between the isolate pan-genomes within a species. The two V. harveyi isolates marked with an asterisk, are both from a PO affected by summer mortality and contain an 86 Kbp DNA plasmid.
Initial whole genome alignments of the WGS results via the progressive mauve package within the Geneious programme, led to the discovery of two virtually identical V. harveyi isolates: one originating from SM affected POs (M14-00197) and the other from SM unaffected POs (M14-00480). These isolates were almost entirely differentiated by the presence of an ~86 Kbp DNA fragment only present in the isolate (M14-00197) obtained from a SM affected PO. BLASTn-megablast searches confirmed the 86 Kbp DNA fragment to be homologous to several Vibrio plasmids that were themselves suspected of conferring pathogenicity, including plasmids from pathogenic strains of V. campbellii and V. parahaemolyticus . Indeed, annotation of this fragment by RAST and Prokka led to the identification of several potential virulence genes, such as: Type IV secretory pathway, VirB4 components CDS; Type IV secretory pathway, VirD4 components CDS and Recombinase. The 86 Kbp fragment was later confirmed to be circular via a PCR that spanned the fragment gap (OVP2b: Supplementary material, Table S1). The plasmid-containing and plasmid-less isolate were obtained from a single lease at Cromartys Bay, Port Stephens. Similarly, during this analysis two V. harveyi isolates with highly similar characteristics came to light from a separate study of POs from Oyster Cove, Port Stephens, which were subjected to a simulated marine heatwave [42]. We found that the putative pathogenic isolate ( V. harveyi PS05) and the commensal isolate ( V. harveyi PS09) from this study were also virtually clonal and again differentiated almost entirely by an ~86 Kbp plasmid found only in the isolate (PS05). Both V. harveyi PS05 and PS09 had been obtained from PO hosts that had been part of a study where POs were subjected to a simulated summer marine heatwave. The ~86 Kbp plasmid from M14-00197 and the ~86 Kbp plasmid from PS05 ware highly homologous with a 99.2 % pairwise identity. The distance between Cromartys Bay entrance (M14-00197) and Oyster Cove (PS05) is approximately 11 km by sea.
To further investigate whether other MGEs may be harbouring virulence-associated genes, a survey of MGEs was performed on the genomes of the V. harveyi isolates M14-00197, M14-00480, PS05 and PS09. In almost all cases many MGEs or their remnants were discovered in relatively equal numbers in all four genomes (supplementary material, Fig. S1). The exception being PS09 which had roughly half the number of repeat regions detected and three-fifths the number of insertion sequences. The numbers of MGEs detected are summarised in the supplementary material, Fig. S1 and Table S3. Additionally, as described above, the 86 Kbp plasmid was only found in the two V. harveyi isolates (M14-00197 and PS05) obtained from affected oysters and not the related strains M14-00480 and PS09 obtained from unaffected POs.
Selective gene ontology investigations were also performed, to examine whether any phenotypic differences between the isolates of a particular species might be related to apparent differences (or similarities) in the health state or geographic location of the host POs from which the isolates were obtained. We found that the accessory genome of V. parahaemolyticus (all potential pathogens obtained from the same site) included several gene ontology identifiers that are believed to be associated with MGEs, including functions such as plasmid maintenance and resistance to antibiotics and heavy metals,or MGE movement within and between genomes, including transposition; establishment of integrated proviral latency, and DNA-mediated transformation. However, a similar picture was seen for V. chagasii , V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi , and V. mediterranei , with each per species group of isolates differing in either location of origin ( V. chagasii ) or by potential pathogen versus commensality ( V. mediterranei and V. harveyi ). For completeness V. brasiliensis and V. harveyi were also included (differing by both origin of location and potential pathogen/commensal). Subsequently, a more focussed approach was used, where for each species, a subset of genes was obtained that were all present in one or more isolates representing a certain condition, but all absent in the comparative set. For example, genes present in all three V . chagasii isolates from Cromarty’s Bay but absent in the isolate from Karuah River. This also included V. brasiliensis and V. mediterranei , as well as four of five V . harveyi isolates where two isolates from Cromartys Bay were compared to one another (potential pathogen versus commensal), as were two from Oyster Cove. While gene ontology terms were again observed (including xenobiotic transmembrane transporter activity, bacterial-type flagellum, protein secretion systems, motility, pilus assembly, and oxidative stress response) the general result was just a reduced set of the same or similar terms. V. mediterranei was an exception amongst this group, possibly due to its larger accessory genome (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6) resulting in many terms being retained in the subset. To examine whether pan-genome components may be associated with phenotype, V. chagasii (location of origin), and V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi , and V. mediterranei (potential pathogenicity) data were input into Scoary, but no association was found.
Discussion
POs (C. gigas) regularly experience large stock losses from a condition known as SM, with increasing evidence that implicates the involvement of opportunistic or pathogenic marine bacteria after one or more stress events [81–84]. The work described here targets SM events in POs that took place at the Port Stephens estuary in NSW, Australia, between January 2013 to January 2014 as outlined in Go et al. [4]. We sought to accurately identify the species and strains of the isolates that may have a role in SM by genomically characterising isolates obtained from the PS outbreak and subjecting their genomes to WGS, and subsequent genomic, phylogenomic, and pan-genomic analysis. As expected from the initial 16S rRNA gene-based species identifications from Go et al. [4], WGS of isolates and their ANI comparisons to reference genomes identified most isolates as belonging to the Vibrio genus. A total of 15 species of bacteria within the class Gammaproteobacteria were identified, including 11 Vibrio species. In addition to these 15, there were potentially an additional nine new species, which included five within the Vibrio genus. To our knowledge, this study represents the largest and most diverse genome survey of Vibrio species obtained from SM events in POs within the southern hemisphere, with the genomic data also serving as a comparative reference against future SM outbreaks in Australia. In total the results suggested that most species identified in this study were highly diverse, which was particularly evident in each species’ pan-genome. Indeed, there appeared to be a difference in the banding patterns between (isolate) accessory genomes of the same species when comparing the health state of the host POs (SM-affected or SM-unaffected).
A diverse group of species were identified from the 57 isolates examined in this study and included representatives from the Photobacterium (one), Pseudoalteromonas (two), Shewanella (one), and Vibrio (11) genera. Vibrio species were by far observed to be the most numerically dominant (Figs 2–4), and diverse genus. These results also mirror others that found large increases in Vibrio numbers within host POs during SM outbreaks. However, our results contrast with many studies of SM in POs that report only one or two dominant Vibrio species in affected oysters [6, 27, 78, 85, 86], although some European studies have also observed the possible involvement of multiple Vibrio species in SM [28–30]. Similarly, while a proportional increase in Vibrio species is often reported within POs infected by OsHV-1 (and its variants), these are often represented by only one or two dominant species [6, 25, 27, 28].
As also observed in other studies involving Vibrio (and Shewanella ) species, 16S rRNA sequence analysis was found to be a poor tool for species identification [75, 76, 87–89]. This is unsurprising given the greater volume of information delivered by WGS, but it may also suggest that despite extensive characterisation of Vibrio genomic diversity there remains more to be discovered. Certainly, the V. splendidus clade is known to form a diverse phylogenetic cluster probably due to extensive lateral gene transfer [89], and Vibrio and Shewanella 16S rRNA gene sequences have been shown as inadequate at resolving individual Vibrio and Shewanella species [75, 76, 87, 88]. Indeed, WGS and other molecular techniques including the examination of housekeeping gene sequences [77] and other (non-WGS) genome-wide approaches [90–94] have demonstrated that the Vibrio genus is not only highly genetically diverse but has populated a plethora of different niche environments.
While the depth of Vibrio diversity remains to be fully understood, it is well known that many marine pathogens come from the Vibrio genus and of all the species vibrios are the most numerous in this study. Mortalities in clams have been reportedly caused by V. alginolyticus [95], while V. parahaemolyticus has been observed as a fish pathogen [96] as well as a pathogen in humans [97]. Similarly, V. vulnificus has also been observed as a human pathogen [98]. Transmission experiments have also shown that V. brasiliensis , V. kanaloae and V. tubiashii all cause disease in rainbow trout and brine shrimp [99]. In field observations, Vibrio tubiashii and Vibrio coralliilyticus have been observed to be highly infectious to eastern oysters [100], and V. mediterranei has been reported as a pathogen in pen shells [101] as well as coral [102]. In POs, V. kanaloae in association with V. pomeroyi , has been observed as a pathogen [79]. In scallops (Patinopecten yessoensis), mortality has been associated with V. chagasii [103], while V. harveyi has been associated with disease in many marine invertebrates [104]. V. chagasii (under the umbrella of V. splendidus ), has been associated with mortalities of larval flat-fish (Scophthalmus maximus) [94], blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) [105], oysters (C. gigas) [28, 106] and carpet shell clam (Ruditapes decussatus) [95]. In contrast, V. diabolicus has not been observed as a pathogen in any marine animals. In short, many Vibrio species are known or potential pathogens, with some of these species, such as V. harveyi and those of the V. splendidus clade (that includes V. chagasii ), also recognised as having a high genetic diversity [89, 107]. Other species or genera detected in this study are also suspected or known marine pathogens. Photobacterium damselae , is a potential fish, crustacean, and (for those exposed to it) human pathogen [108]. Pseudoalteromonas shioyasakiensis has been reported as an opportunistic pathogen in juvenile Pacific abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) [109]. In contrast, while P. piscicida has no known pathogenicity, it is known to form biofilms with antimicrobial capacity and produce several toxin genes [110]. Similarly, S. insulae [111] has no known pathogenicity, although other Shewanella , namely S. putrefaciens and S. algae are human pathogens [112]. Thus, it is conceivable that some of the species described by this study have a highly diverse pan-genome, capable of acting as a genomic scaffold upon which new strains can evolve via horizontal gene transfer and gene capture [89, 113, 114]. In this scenario, genes or whole sections of genomes could potentially be shuffled around (for example, via mobile genetic elements) until a new combination evolves that results in niche success (including pathogenesis).
Our results also suggest (some) Vibrio species are highly diverse and that identification of Vibrio pathogens should probably be at the taxonomic level of strain. For almost all the Vibrio species within the phylogenomic tree of Fig. 4, their isolates were obtained from host POs that were many kilometres apart and/or had differing states of health (SM-affected or SM-unaffected). Species diversity was even more apparent from the ANI results, which for most Vibrio species identified, juxtaposed the high sequence similarity within isolates of the same species to the differences in geographical origin and/or health state (SM-affected or SM-unaffected) of the PO host from which the isolate was obtained. Certainly, from Fig. 6, only V. mediterranei isolates displayed any association between ANI scores and the health of their host POs. In comparison subgroups of isolates from V. diabolicus , V. tubiashii , and V. harveyi had extremely high ANI scores (minimum ANI of 99.9 %.) despite their differing host origins and health states. Species identification for Vibrios as a limited pathogenicity indicator has been suggested in several studies [85, 113, 115].
In contrast to the sequence comparison by ANI, a function-based analysis was effective at revealing the genomic diversity within isolates of the same species. For the virtually identical isolates (ANI >99.9 %) within the V. diabolicus , V. tubiashii , and V. harveyi species (Fig. 6, parts b, c, and g), pan-genome analysis was able to detect differential banding patterns in the accessory genome that not only reflected individual isolates but also the similarities corresponding to the same geographic origin of the host PO or the health state of the PO (SM-affected versus SM-unaffected). This was also seen in all other species with multiple isolates for comparison, including the two pairs of V. harveyi isolates (M14-00197 and M14-00480; PS05 and PS09) that each contained two isolates of extreme homology (ANI ≥99.99 %). Indeed, the differences in the accessory genes within the two sets of virtually sequence identical V. harveyi isolates correspond with the presence of an 86 Kbp plasmid in one isolate of each set (M14-00197 and PS05), and its absence in the corresponding (commensal) isolate of each set (M14-00480 and PS09). Moreover, both V. harveyi isolates with an 86 Kbp plasmid (M14-00197 and PS05) were obtained from their respective host POs that were each 11 km apart, yet in terms of length, sequence, and annotated genes the two plasmids were almost identical. This included several virulence factors that mapped to both plasmids, such as: Type IV secretory pathway, VirB4 components; Type IV secretory pathway, VirD4 components; and recombinase. In addition, for all these four V. harveyi isolates there was evidence of many MGEs scattered throughout the genomes at roughly similar numbers (supplementary material, Fig. S1). MGEs such as insertion sequences, prophage sequences, and inverted repeats at similar levels suggested that these four isolates once had, or still retained, the capability of shuffling genetic material within their own genomes, or between genomes of other strains or species. Moreover, we also found from the accessory genomes of V. parahaemolyticus , V. chagasii , V. brasiliensis , V. harveyi, and V. mediterranei , numerous gene ontology terms that are suspected of being involved with MGEs (supplementary material, Table S4 and Figs S2–S4).
Conclusion
Here we have genomically characterised a group of bacterial isolates obtained from POs affected by SM events occurring between January 2013 and January 2014 at Port Stephens, New South Wales. Not only were many marine bacterial species observed, including many from the Vibrio genus, but phylogenomic, sequence and pan-genome analysis in combination with metadata also suggested that most of the identified species have highly diverse genomes. While we were not able to definitively link a single species with SM, associations between isolate accessory genomes and the health state of their hosts were evident. We found two instances, in V. harveyi strains, where these differences were attributable to the presence of plasmids. In summary, the large number of species detected during the SM outbreak, the within-species diversity and the presence of virulence-associated genes in a couple of strains, suggest that many different Vibrio species could have the capacity to acquire pathogenicity under adverse conditions.
Supplementary Data
Funding information
Supported by the Australian centre for genomic epidemiological microbiology (AusGEM), a collaboration between the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) and the NSW Department of Primary Industries.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Abbreviations: ANI, average nucleotide identity; CDS, coding sequence; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; iTOL, interactive tree of life; MGE, mobile genetic element; NCBI, National Centre for Biotechnology Information; NSW, New South Wales; OsHV, ostreid herpesvirus; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PO, pacific oyster; POMS, pacific oyster mortality syndrome; PS, Port Stephens; rRNA, ribosomal ribonucleic acid; SM, summer mortality; SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; WGS, whole genome sequencing.
Four supplementary tables and four supplementary figures are available in the online version of this article.
References
- 1.FAOSTAT Global Aquaculture Production 1950-2017 [Online] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2012) 2017. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-aquaculture-production/query/en
- 2.FAOSTAT Global Aquaculture Production 1950-2017 [Online] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2012) 1950-2017. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-aquaculture-production/query/en
- 3.Ruesink JL, Byers JE, Lenihan HS, Kay MC, Trimble AC, et al. Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 2005;36:643–689. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152638. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Go J, Deutscher AT, Spiers ZB, Dahle K, Kirkland PD, et al. Mass mortalities of unknown aetiology in Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas in Port Stephens, New South Wales, Australia. Diseases of aquatic organisms. 2017;125:227. doi: 10.3354/dao03146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Panel EA. Scientific opinion on the increased mortality events in Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas . EFSA Journal. 2010;8:1–60. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Barbosa Solomieu V, Renault T, Travers M-A. Mass mortality in bivalves and the intricate case of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas . J Invertebr Pathol. 2015;131:2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Samain J-F. Review and perspectives of physiological mechanisms underlying genetically-based resistance of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas to summer mortality. Aquatic Living Resources. 2011;24:227–236. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gagnaire B, Soletchnik P, Madec P, Geairon P, Le Moine O, et al. Diploid and triploid Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), reared at two heights above sediment in Marennes-Oleron Basin, France: Difference in mortality, sexual maturation and hemocyte parameters. Aquaculture. 2006;254:606–616. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guévélou E, Huvet A, Galindo-Sánchez CE, Milan M, Quillien V, et al. Sex-specific regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas . Biol Reprod. 2013;89:100. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.113.109728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bodoy A, Garnier J, Razet D, Geairon P. CIEM Conseil International Pour l’Exploration de La Mer. 1990. Mass mortalities of oysters (Crassostrea gigas) during spring 1988 in the Bay of Marennes-Oleron, related to environmental conditions. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bustamante P, Luna-Acosta A, Clemens S, Cassi R, Thomas-Guyon H, et al. Bioaccumulation and metabolisation of.sup.14C-pyrene by the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas exposed via seawater.(report) Chemosphere. 2012;87:938. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lee S, Jo Q, Han J, Park Y, Park T. Pelagic oxycline and damage potential of hypoxia to the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas suspended in longline aquaculture systems. Aquacult Environ Interact. 2017b;9:461–468. doi: 10.3354/aei00245. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sabine CL, Feely RA, Gruber N, Key RM, Lee K, et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science. 2004::305–367. doi: 10.1126/science.1097403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.King WL, Jenkins C, Seymour JR, Labbate M. Oyster disease in a changing environment: decrypting the link between pathogen, microbiome and environment. Mar Environ Res. 2019b;143:124–140. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu Z, Wang L, Zhou Z, Liu Y, Dong M, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of oyster Crassostrea gigas larvae illustrates the response patterns regulated by catecholaminergic system upon acute heat and bacterial stress. Dev Comp Immunol. 2017;73:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2017.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Soletchnik P, Ropert M, Mazurié J, Gildas Fleury P, Le Coz F. Relationships between oyster mortality patterns and environmental data from monitoring databases along the coasts of France. Aquaculture. 2007;271:384–400. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.02.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang H, Wang H, Chen H, Wang M, Zhou Z, et al. The transcriptional response of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas under simultaneous bacterial and heat stresses. Developmental & Comparative Immunology. 2019;94:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hine PM, Wesney B, Hay BE. Herpesviruses associated with mortalities among hatchery-reared larval Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas diseases of aquatic organisms. 1992;12:135–142. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nicolas JL, Comps M, Cochennec N. Herpes-like virus infecting Pacific-oyster larvae, Crassostrea gigas . Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists (United Kingdom) 1992;12:11–12. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davison AJ, Trus BL, Cheng N, Steven AC, Watson MS, et al. A novel class of herpesvirus with bivalve hosts. J Gen Virol. 2005;86:41–53. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80382-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Le Deuff RM, Renault T. Purification and partial genome characterization of a herpes-like virus infecting the Japanese oyster, Crassostrea gigas . J Gen Virol. 1999;80 (Pt 5):1317–1322. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-5-1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Arzul I, Renault T, Lipart C, Davison AJ. Evidence for interspecies transmission of oyster herpesvirus in marine bivalves. J Gen Virol. 2001;82:865–870. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-82-4-865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Burge CA, Griffin FJ, Friedman CS. Mortality and herpesvirus infections of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in Tomales Bay, California, USA. Dis Aquat Organ. 2006;72:31–43. doi: 10.3354/dao072031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jenkins C, Hick P, Gabor M, Spiers Z, Fell SA, et al. Identification and characterisation of an ostreid herpesvirus-1 microvariant (oshv-1 µ-var) in Crassostrea gigas (Pacific oysters) in Australia. Diseases of aquatic organisms. 2013;105:109. doi: 10.3354/dao02623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Keeling SE, Brosnahan CL, Williams R, Gias E, Hannah M, et al. New Zealand juvenile oyster mortality associated with ostreid herpesvirus 1-an opportunistic longitudinal study. Dis Aquat Organ. 2014;109:231–239. doi: 10.3354/dao02735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Segarra A, Pépin JF, Arzul I, Morga B, Faury N, et al. Detection and description of a particular Ostreid herpesvirus 1 genotype associated with massive mortality outbreaks of Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas, in France in 2008. Virus Res. 2010;153:92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.EFSA-AHAW-PANEL Scientific Opinion on the increased mortality events in Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel on Animal Health and welfare (AHAW); 2010. pp. 1–60. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Petton B, Bruto M, James A, Labreuche Y, Alunno-Bruscia M, et al. Crassostrea gigas mortality in France: the usual suspect, a herpes virus, may not be the killer in this polymicrobial opportunistic disease. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:686. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.De Lorgeril J, Lucasson A, Petton B, Toulza E, Montagnani C, et al. Immune-suppression by OsHV-1 viral infection causes fatal bacteraemia in Pacific oysters. Nature Communications. 2018;9 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06659-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lemire A, Goudenege D, Versigny T, Petton B, Calteau A, et al. Populations, not clones, are the unit of vibrio pathogenesis in naturally infected oysters. The ISME Journal. 2014;9 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Friedman CS, Beaman BL, Chun J, Goodfellow M, Gee A, et al. Nocardia crassostreae sp. nov., the causal agent of nocardiosis in Pacific oysters. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 1998;48:237–246. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-1-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Friedman CS, Beattie JH, Elston RA, Hedrick RP. Investigation of the relationship between the presence of a Gram-positive bacterial infection and summer mortality of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas Thunberg. Aquaculture. 1991;94:1–15. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(91)90124-P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Takeuchi T, Matsubara T, Hirokawa H, Tsukiyama A. Bacteriological Studies on the Unusually High Mortality of Ostrea gigas in Hiroshima Bay-I. NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI. 1955;20:1066–1070. doi: 10.2331/suisan.20.1066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Takeuchi T, Takemoto Y, Matsubara T. Haematological study of bacteria affected oysters.: Hiroshima-ken Suisan Shikenjo Hokoku. Report of Hiroshima Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station; 1960. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carvalho-Saucedo L, Dimitrov ISR, Jaramillo CR, Garcia-Gasca A, Gutiérrez-Rivera JN. First report of an Eosinophilic Rickettsia-like organism in diseased oysters Crassostrea gigas . Journal of Shellfish Research. 2018;37:507–513. doi: 10.2983/035.037.0306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Elston RA, Hasegawa H, Humphrey KL, Polyak IK, Häse CC. Re-emergence of Vibrio tubiashii in bivalve shellfish aquaculture: severity, environmental drivers, geographic extent and management. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008;82:119–134. doi: 10.3354/dao01982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lacoste A, Jalabert F, Malham S, Cueff A, Gélébart F, et al. A Vibrio splendidus strain is associated with summer mortality of juvenile oysters Crassostrea gigas in the Bay of Morlaix (North Brittany, France) Dis Aquat Org. 2001;46:139–145. doi: 10.3354/dao046139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Waechter M, Le Roux F, Nicolas J-L, Marissal É, Berthe F. Caractérisation de bactéries pathogènes de naissain d’huître creuse Crassostrea gigas . Comptes Rendus Biologies. 2002;325:231–238. doi: 10.1016/S1631-0691(02)01428-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.De Decker S, Saulnier D. Vibriosis induced by experimental cohabitation in Crassostrea gigas: evidence of early infection and down-expression of immune-related genes. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011;30:691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kirs M, Depaola A, Fyfe R, Jones JL, Krantz J, et al. A survey of oysters (Crassostrea gigas) in New Zealand for Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus . Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;147:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tubiash HS, Colwell RR, Sakazaki R. Marine vibrios associated with bacillary necrosis, a disease of larval and juvenile bivalve mollusks. J Bacteriol. 1970;103:271–272. doi: 10.1128/jb.103.1.271-272.1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Green TJ, Siboni N, King WL, Labbate M, Seymour JR, et al. Simulated marine heat wave alters abundance and structure of Vibrio populations associated with the Pacific Oyster resulting in a mass mortality event. Microb Ecol. 2019;77:736–747. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1242-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.King WL, Jenkins C, Go J, Siboni N, Seymour JR, et al. Characterisation of the Pacific Oyster Microbiome during a Summer Mortality event. Microb Ecol. 2019a;77:502–512. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1226-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.King WL, Siboni N, Kahlke T, Green TJ, Labbate M, et al. A new high throughput sequencing assay for characterizing the diversity of natural Vibrio communities and its application to a Pacific Oyster mortality event. Front Microbiol. 2019c;10:2907. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H, et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017a;67:2053–2057. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:587–589. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, Dejongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Morgulis A, Coulouris G, Raytselis Y, Madden TL, Agarwala R, et al. Database indexing for production MegaBLAST searches. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1757–1764. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106:19126. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nature Communications. 2018;9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Pritchard L, Glover RH, Humphris S, Elphinstone JG, Toth IK. Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Analytical Methods. 2015;8:12–24. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, et al. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64:1825. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.064931-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today. 2006;8:6–9. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen FA, 4th, Bik HM, et al. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e243. doi: 10.7717/peerj.243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree: computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:1641–1650. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Hadfield J, Croucher NJ, Goater RJ, Abudahab K, Aanensen DM, et al. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics. 2017;34:292–293. doi: 10.1101/119545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Buchfink B, Reuter K, Drost H-G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18:366–368. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01101-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.McCarthy FM, Wang N, Magee GB, Nanduri B, Lawrence ML, et al. AgBase: a functional genomics resource for agriculture. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Supek F, Bošnjak M, Škunca N, Šmuc T, Gibas C. REVIGO Summarizes and Visualizes Long Lists of Gene Ontology Terms. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e21800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kuznetsova I, Lugmayr A, Siira SJ, Rackham O, Filipovska A. CirGO: an alternative circular way of visualising gene ontology terms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;20:84. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-2671-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Xie Z, Tang H. ISEScan: automated identification of insertion sequence elements in prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:3340–3347. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Akhter S, Aziz RK, Edwards RA. PhiSpy: a novel algorithm for finding prophages in bacterial genomes that combines similarity- and composition-based strategies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e126. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W16–21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group. Lau BY, et al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:W30–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Seeman T. GitHub - tseemann/abricate: Mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes. [Online] GitHub: GitHub; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu B, Zheng D, Zhou S, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D912–D917. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic Note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1994;44:846–849. doi: 10.1099/00207713-44-4-846. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Dikow RB. Genome-level homology and phylogeny of Shewanella (Gammaproteobacteria: lteromonadales: Shewanellaceae) BMC Genomics. 2011;12:237. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Fox GE, Wisotzkey JD, Jurtshuk P., Jr How close is close: 16S rRNA sequence identity may not be sufficient to guarantee species identity. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:166–170. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Le Roux F, Gay M, Lambert C, Nicolas JL, Gouy M, et al. Phylogenetic study and identification of Vibrio splendidus-related strains based on gyrB gene sequences. Dis Aquat Organ. 2004;58:143–150. doi: 10.3354/dao058143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Garnier M, Labreuche Y, Garcia C, Robert M, Nicolas JL. Evidence for the involvement of pathogenic bacteria in summer mortalities of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas . Microb Ecol. 2007;53:187–196. doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gay M, Renault T, Pons A-M, Le Roux F. Two vibrio splendidus related strains collaborate to kill Crassostrea gigas: taxonomy and host alterations. Dis Aquat Organ. 2004b;62:65–74. doi: 10.3354/dao062065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sawabe T, Ogura Y, Matsumura Y, Feng G, Amin AR, et al. Updating the Vibrio clades defined by multilocus sequence phylogeny: proposal of eight new clades, and the description of Vibrio tritonius sp. nov. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:4. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ana L, Karl Mathias W. Hemolymph microbiome of pacific oysters in response to temperature, temperature stress and infection. The ISME Journal. 2014;9 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cheney DP, MacDonald BF, Elston RA. Summer mortality of Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas (thunberg): initial findings on multiple environmental stressors in Puget sound, Washington, 1998. J Shellfish Res. 2000;18:456–473. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Li Y, Qin J, Abbott C, Li X, Benkendorff K. Synergistic impacts of heat shock and spawning on the physiology and immune health of Crassostrea gigas: an explanation for summer mortality in Pacific oysters. American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2007;293:R2353–R2362. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00463.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Wendling CC, Wegner KM. Relative contribution of reproductive investment, thermal stress and Vibrio infection to summer mortality phenomena in Pacific oysters. Aquaculture. 2013;412–413:88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Le Roux F, Gay M, Lamber C, Waechter M, Poubalanne S, et al. Comparative analysis of Vibrio splendidus-related strains isolated during Crassostrea gigas mortality events. Aquatic Living Resources. 2002;15:251–258. doi: 10.1016/S0990-7440(02)01176-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Saulnier D, De Decker S, Haffner P, Cobret L, Robert M, et al. A large-scale epidemiological study to identify bacteria pathogenic to Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas and correlation between virulence and metalloprotease-like activity. Microb Ecol. 2010;59:787–798. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9620-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Dorsch M, Lane D, Stackebrandt E. Towards a phylogeny of the genus Vibrio based on 16S rRNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1992;42:58–63. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Fang Y, Wang Y, Liu Z, Dai H, Cai H, et al. Multilocus sequence analysis, a rapid and accurate tool for taxonomic classification, evolutionary relationship determination, and population biology studies of the genus Shewanella . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2019;85:e03126-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03126-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nasfi H, Travers MA, de Lorgeril J, Habib C, Sannie T, et al. A European epidemiological survey of Vibrio splendidus clade shows unexplored diversity and massive exchange of virulence factors. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31:461–475. doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1800-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Gabriel MW, Matsui GY, Friedman R, Lovell CR. Optimization of multilocus sequence analysis for identification of species in the genus Vibrio. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:5359–5365. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01206-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Gomez-Gil B, Soto-Rodríguez S, García-Gasca A, Roque A, Vazquez-Juarez R, et al. Molecular identification of Vibrio harveyi-related isolates associated with diseased aquatic organisms. Microbiology (Reading) 2004;150:1769–1777. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26797-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kai Man KAM, Luey CKY, Parsons MB, Cooper KLF, Nair GB, et al. Evaluation and validation of a PulseNet standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocol for subtyping Vibrio parahaemolyticus: an international multicenter collaborative study. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:2766–2773. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00424-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Thompson FL, Hoste B, Vandemeulebroecke K, Swings J. Genomic diversity amongst Vibrio isolates from different sources determined by fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2001;24:520–538. doi: 10.1078/0723-2020-00067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Thomson R, Macpherson HL, Riaza A, Birkbeck TH. Vibrio splendidus biotype 1 as a cause of mortalities in hatchery-reared larval turbot, Scophthalmus maximus (L.) J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99:243–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gómez-León J, Villamil L, Lemos ML, Novoa B, Figueras A. Isolation of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio splendidus from Aquacultured Carpet Shell Clam (Ruditapes decussatus) larvae associated with mass mortalities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:98. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.98-104.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Marudhupandi T, Kumar TTA, Prakash S, Balamurugan J, Dhayanithi NB. Vibrio parahaemolyticus a causative bacterium for tail rot disease in ornamental fish, Amphiprion sebae . Aquaculture Reports. 2017;8:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Letchumanan V, Chan K-G, Lee L-H. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:705. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Daniels NA. Vibrio vulnificus oysters: pearls and perils. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:788–792. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Austin B, Austin D, Sutherland R, Thompson F, Swings J. Pathogenicity of vibrios to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum) and Artemia nauplii . Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1488–1495. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Richards GP, Watson MA, Needleman DS, Church KM, Häse CC. Mortalities of Eastern and Pacific oyster Larvae caused by the pathogens Vibrio coralliilyticus and Vibrio tubiashii . Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:292–297. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02930-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Andree KB, Carrasco N, Carella F, Furones D, Prado P. Vibrio mediterranei, a potential emerging pathogen of marine fauna: investigation of pathogenicity using a bacterial challenge in Pinna nobilis and development of a species-specific PCR. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130:617–631. doi: 10.1111/jam.14756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Rubio-Portillo E, Yarza P, Peñalver CA, Ramos-esplá A, Antón J. New insights into Oculina patagonica coral diseases and their associated Vibrio spp. communities. The ISME Journal. 2014;8 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Teng W, Li W, Zhang M, Yu Z, Li S, et al. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Vibrio chagasii from Patinopecten yessoensis . Journal of Fisheries of China. 2012;36:937. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1231.2012.27674. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Austin B, Zhang X-H. Vibrio harveyi: a significant pathogen of marine vertebrates and invertebrates. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43:119–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01989.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ben Cheikh Y, Travers M-A, Le Foll F. Infection dynamics of a V. splendidus strain pathogenic to Mytilus edulis: In vivo and in vitro interactions with hemocytes. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;70:515–523. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2017.09.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Gay M, Berthe FCJ, Le Roux F. Screening of Vibrio isolates to develop an experimental infection model in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas . Dis Aquat Organ. 2004a;59:49–56. doi: 10.3354/dao059049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Klein SL, Gutierrez West CK, Mejia DM, Lovell CR. Genes similar to the Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence-related genes tdh, tlh, and vscc2 occur in other vibrionaceae species isolated from a pristine estuary. Applied and environmental microbiology. 2014;80:595. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02895-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Osorio CR, Vences A, Matanza XM, Terceti MS. Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae, a generalist pathogen with unique virulence factors and high genetic diversity. J Bacteriol. 2018;200:e00002–18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00002-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Li M, Wu W, You W, Huang S, Huang M, et al. A novel screening method for the detection of Pseudoalteromonas shioyasakiensis, an emerging opportunistic pathogen that caused the mass mortality of juvenile Pacific abalone (Haliotis discus hannai) during A record-breaking heat wave. Preprints. 2020 doi: 10.22541/au.159863400.08792481. [DOI]
- 110.Richards GP, Watson MA, Needleman DS, Uknalis J, Boyd EF, et al. Mechanisms for Pseudoalteromonas piscicida-induced killing of Vibrios and other bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e00175-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00175-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Park S, Kim IK, Kim W, Yoon J-H, Microbiology E. Shewanella Insulae Sp. Nov., Isolated from a Tidal Flat. 2020. pp. 3872–3877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Vignier N, Barreau M, Olive C, Baubion E, Théodose R, et al. Human infection with Shewanella putrefaciens and S. algae: report of 16 cases in Martinique and review of the literature. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;89:151–156. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bruto M, Labreuche Y, James A, Piel D, Chenivesse S, et al. Ancestral gene acquisition as the key to virulence potential in environmental Vibrio populations. ISME J. 2018;12:2954–2966. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0245-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Chibani CM, Roth O, Liesegang H, Wendling CC. Genomic variation among closely related Vibrio alginolyticus strains is located on mobile genetic elements. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-6735-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Bruto M, James A, Petton B, Labreuche Y, Chenivesse S, et al. Vibrio crassostreae, a benign oyster colonizer turned into a pathogen after plasmid acquisition. ISME J. 2017;11:1043–1052. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






