Abstract
Coenzyme Q (CoQ, aka ubiquinone) is a key component of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) and membrane-incorporated antioxidant. CoQ10 deficiencies encompass a heterogeneous spectrum of clinical phenotypes and can be caused by hereditary mutations in the biosynthesis pathway or result from pharmacological interventions such as HMG-CoA Reductase inhibitors, and statins, which are widely used to treat hypercholesterolemia and prevent cardiovascular disease. How CoQ deficiency affects individual tissues and cell types, particularly mitochondrial-rich ones such as brown adipose tissue (BAT), has remained poorly understood. Here we show that pharmacological and genetic models of BAT CoQ deficiency show altered respiration that can only in part be explained by classical roles of CoQ in the respiration chain. Instead, we found that CoQ strongly impacts brown and beige adipocyte respiration via the regulation of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) expression. CoQ deficiency in BAT robustly decreases UCP1 protein levels and uncoupled respiration unexpectedly, resulting in increased inner mitochondrial membrane potential and decreased ADP/ATP ratios. Suppressed UCP1 expression was also observed in a BAT-specific in vivo model of CoQ deficiency and resulted in enhanced cold sensitivity. These findings demonstrate an as yet unappreciated role of CoQ in the transcriptional regulation of key thermogenic genes and functions.
Keywords: Coenzyme Q, brown adipose tissue, mitochondrial function, thermogenesis
1. Introduction
Coenzyme Q (CoQ) is widely known as one of the components of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) chain in the mitochondria, responsible for carrying electrons from multiple entry points to Complex III. While the functions of CoQ in the mitochondrial electron transport chain are well explored, basic questions about CoQ physiology, such as its transport [1], participation in redox reactions outside of mitochondria [2], and roles in mitochondrial to nuclear communications are still under investigation.
Human CoQ deficiencies, caused by either genetic or pharmacological inhibition of CoQ synthesis, have a plethora of phenotypes, and clinical consequences are highly variable. Different impacts on multiple organs, and the underlying molecular mechanisms, still represent a challenging question to be answered. Primary CoQ deficiency is usually associated with multisystem involvement, and the major phenotypes are predominantly encephalomyopathy, severe infantile multisystemic disease, nephropathy, cerebellar ataxia, and isolated myopathy [3,4]. Secondary CoQ deficiency, occurring in conditions not directly linked to mutations in the COQ or PDSS genes, also comprises a broader spectrum of disorders frequently associated with drug treatments, such as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, ‘statins’ and Amitriptyline therapy. Further, serum and tissue CoQ10 concentrations in individuals with metabolic disorders, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, or hypercholesterolemia, are also decreased due to incompletely understood reasons resulting in altered lipid and redox homeostasis [5,6]. While the clinical benefits of CoQ supplementation remain controversial [7], it is clear that statins have the ability to lower serum levels of CoQ [8] and are associated with mitochondrial dysfunction in muscle [9]. CoQ deficiency commonly affects organs rich in mitochondria and with high energy demand, such as the heart, brain, and kidney [10].
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) facilitates nonshivering thermogenesis through the actions of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1), which allows for the dissipation of metabolic energy in the form of heat. It features highly active and densely packed mitochondria [11,12]. In the last two decades, BAT has received considerable interest for its multifaceted roles in adult human metabolism [13], and it has also been described as a potential target for the treatment of a broad range of metabolic disorders, such as obesity. How CoQ deficiency affects BAT has not been well studied. Thus far, muscle biopsies are the most common clinical method to detect primary CoQ deficiency [14], and CoQ levels in adipose tissues of primary CoQ deficiency patients have not been reported to our knowledge. Despite this, Raman et al. reported a clinical case of a neonate with ubiquinone deficiency presenting hypothermia at 6 h of age [15].
Previously, we showed that BAT is a major sink for circulating CoQ and that its uptake is dependent on the scavenger receptor CD36 [1]. In this paper, we created pharmacological and genetic BAT CoQ deficiency models by inhibiting endogenous synthesis. This approach uncovered a novel role of CoQ in the transcriptional regulation of UCP1 and, thus, respiratory and thermogenic function.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mouse Model
All animal experiments were approved and performed under the guidelines and ethical regulations established by the UC Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee. Brown fat-specific PDSS2 knockout PDSS2BKO were generated by crossing PDSS2-LoxP mice (gift from Dr. Gasser) [16] with UCP1-cre mice (mouse model developed by the Rosen lab deposited in JAX, stock #024670) on a C57BL/6J background. The animals were fed a regular diet (LabDiet 5053) under the ambient temperature of 23 °C. Male animals aged between 6-8-week-old were fed a defined low CoQ diet (Research diet D12450J) for two to three weeks before experiments unless described otherwise. The defined low CoQ diet contains only 32% of CoQ content compared to normal chow and thus is suitable in our experiments for limiting CoQ intake. PDSS2 flox allele control animals (PDSS2FL) were used as control relative to PDSS2BKO. All animal studies were performed using age-matched male mice (6–12 weeks) and repeated at least twice.
2.2. Lentiviruses
Doxycycline inducible lentiviral Cre recombinase expression plasmid pLenti-Cre was constructed by replacing the complete attR1-CmR-ccdB-attR2 of the destination vector pInducer20, a gift from Stephen Elledge [17] (Addgene plasmid # 44012; RRID:Addgene_44012), with the Cre recombinase gene of the entry vector pENTR1a-cre (a gift from Xin Chen at UCSF) using Gateway cloning technique (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Lentiviruses were produced using Lipofectamine3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 293T cells were transfected with pLenti-cre, with psPAX2 (a gift from Didier Trono, Addgene plasmid # 12260; RRID: Addgene_12260), pMD2.G (gift from Didier Trono, Addgene plasmid # 12259; RRID: Addgene_12259) in Lipofectamine3000. Supernatants were harvested at 24 h and 48 h later, clarified, filtered through a 0.45-μm filter, and stored at −80 °C.
2.3. Cell Cultures
Murine brown/beige cells: Immortalized murine brown preadipocyte line is a generous gift from Kajimura Lab [18]. The SVFs were isolated from BAT fat depots of either C57/B6 or PDSS2FL male mice aged 8-12 weeks. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 5% penicillin, and streptomycin (P/S). Murine brown adipocytes were prepared from adipogenic differentiation of the confluent preadipocytes/SVFs with DMEM containing 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, and differentiation cocktails (850 nM insulin, 2 nM T3, 125 nM indomethacin, 0.5 mM 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), 1µM dexamethasone, and 1 µM rosiglitazone) for two days. Two days after induction, cells were switched to a maintenance medium containing 10%FBS, P/S, insulin, T3, and rosiglitazone. Experiments assessing CoQ deficiency on thermogenic function were performed on day 4–6 of differentiation (48 h) or day 5–6 (24 h) in the presence of 4-chlorobenzoic acid (4CBA, 4 mM) or vehicle (0.1% DMSO and 1% ethanol in culture medium) for murine adipocytes. Primary beige adipocytes were treated at days six to eight, based on when the expression of adipocyte markers fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) and UCP1 reached a plateau (indicators of adipocyte maturation), n = 3 independent biological replicates per condition. Antioxidants were added with 4CBA (4 mM) in the maintenance medium at day five of differentiated adipocytes for 24 h for assessment of UCP1 rescue effects. N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC) (250 μM), mitoquinone (mitoQ) (2 μM), MitoTEMPOL (2 μM), vitamin E antioxidants alpha-tocopherol phosphate disodium salt (vitE(TP)) (10 μM), alpha-tocopheryl quinone (VitE(TQ)) (10 μM).
Human beige cells: Human mesenchymal stem cells isolated from subcutaneous fats were purchased from ZenBio and cultured in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 ng/mL bFGF, and FGF, 10 mM N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES), penicillin, and streptomycin. Beige adipogenesis was induced two days post-confluent with DMEM/F12 (10%FBS, 10 mM HEPES, P/S) in the presence of the aforementioned differentiation cocktail for three days (Days 0–3). Cells were then switched to DMEM/F12 (10%FBS, 10 mM HEPES, Pen/Strep) containing insulin and T3 for five days. 4CBA or vehicle was added from day eight to day ten of differentiation.
Murine white cells: 3T3L1 preadipocytes were kept in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.25 U/mL amphotericin B, an antibiotic mixture (100 U/mL penicillin + 100 μg/mL streptomycin) until confluence. To initiate differentiation, cells were treated with DMEM containing 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, and differentiation cocktails (0.5 mM IBMX, 1 μM dexamethasone, 10 μg/mL insulin) for three days. After three days cells were replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS, penicillin/streptomycin, and 10 μg/mL insulin. After three more days, cells were returned to media containing just DMEM containing 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were treated with 4CBA (4 mM) for 24 h on days 6–7 of differentiation.
Lentivirus infection: Isolated SVFs from BAT of PDSS2FL male mice were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin, and streptomycin. Cells were then incubated with a medium containing lentivirus (pLenti-cre construct) for 16–18 h. Adipogenic differentiation was initiated once cells reached full confluency, as previously described. After five days of adipogenic differentiation, the adipocytes derived from SVFs of PDSS2FL male mice were switched to a DMEM medium supplemented with doxycycline (0.5 ug/mL) and 10% lipoprotein free serum for 48 h.
2.4. CoQ10 Supplementation
MicelleQ10: CoQ10-loaded micelles were prepared as previously published [19]. Briefly, polyethylene glycol (15)-hydroxystearate (Kolliphor HS15) (30 mg) and CoQ10 (5 mg) were dissolved at 50 °C with constant stirring, and 3 mL of glucose solution (0.2% w/v) containing sodium chloride (0.1538 M) was added drop by drop while stirring. CoQ10 concentration in the micelle solution was determined by the High-Performance Liquid chromatography HPLC method. A final concentration of 2 µM of the micelle formulation CoQ10 was used in the described experiments.
Intralipid CoQ10: Intralipid CoQ10 was prepared as previously described [1]. Briefly, CoQ10 was dissolved in 100% ethanol to a concentration of 1mM and heated at 65 °C for 5 min. 10 uL of 1 mM CoQ10 was mixed with 90 uL of Intralipid and heated at 65 °C for 5 min. This solution was then mixed with 1 mL of prewarmed media, yielding a 10 µM final concentration of CoQ10, and added directly to cells.
2.5. Coenzyme Q Extraction and Measurement
CoQ levels from tissue cells or isolated mitochondria were extracted using hexane as previously described [1]. The extraction of CoQ from cultured cells or tissue was performed with minor modifications as described by Podda et al. [20]. Tissue or cells were homogenized in 1XPBS with 0.5 mg/mL of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). 0.1 mM SDS was added, and samples were vortexed and sonicated. 50 µL of the sample was removed for BCA assay protein quantification and 50 µL of 50 µM CoQ4 was spiked in as an internal standard to calculate extraction and recovery efficiency. 100% EtOH was added, and samples were vortexed and sonicated. Hexane was added, and samples were vortexed and centrifuged. The upper hexane layer was dried under gentle nitrogen steam in a 37 °C water bath. The dried remnants were dissolved in 100 µL 100% EtOH. Quantification of CoQ9 and CoQ10 was determined using Agilent 1100 (HPLC) system equipped with a photodiode array detector on a C18-ODS Hypersil reverse phase column (Thermo Scientific #30105-254630). The CoQ analysis was performed with a flow rate of 1 mL/min with a mobile phase consisting of solution A (80% methanol/20% water) and solution B (100% ethanol) for 40 min. CoQ4, CoQ9, and CoQ10 peaks, identified at λ = 275 nm, appear around 8 min, 23.8 min, and 24.6 min, respectively. Absolute CoQ amounts were determined using a standard curve generated from commercial CoQ9 and CoQ10 (Sigma), and these amounts were normalized to protein amount.
2.6. Mitochondria Isolation
Mitochondria were isolated as previously described [1]. Briefly, murine brown adipocytes were trypsinized, washed in PBS, and resuspended in STE buffer (250 mM sucrose, 5 mM Tris, and 2 mM EGTA, pH 7.4) with 1% BSA. Cells were homogenized using 10 strokes with a tight fit dounce homogenizer. Cells were then centrifuged at 8500× g for 10 min at 4 °C and the pellet was resuspended in STE with 1% BSA. Centrifugation at 700× g for 10 min at 4 °C was conducted to get rid of nuclei. The nuclei pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and centrifuged at 8500× g for 15 min at 4 °C to pellet the crude mitochondrial fraction.
2.7. Mitochondrial ROS and Mitochondrial Mass Detection
Cells were treated as described and were loaded with MitoSOX (5 μM, Molecular Probe M36008) or Nonyl Acridine Orange (NAO, 250 nM, Invitrogen A1372, Waltham, MA, USA) in culture media for 30 min at 37 °C. Single-cell suspensions were prepared using TrpLE (Invitrogen) and an LSRII (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) flow cytometer was used for fluorescence detection. Data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
2.8. ADP/ATP and NAD/NADH Measurements
Cells grew and differentiated on a 96-well plate and were treated with 4CBA (4 mM) for 48 h from day four to day six. Cells were then washed with PBS, lysed in Nucleotide Releasing Buffer, and immediately used for measuring ADP/ATP ratio with an ADP/ATP ratio assay kit (ab65313, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For NAD/NADH ratio, cells were homogenized in NADH/NAD Extraction Buffer and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were subjected to NAD and NADH measurements using NAD/NADH Quantification Kit (MAK037, Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, NJ, USA).
2.9. RNA Preparation and Quantitative RT-PCR
mRNA was extracted from tissues or in vitro cultures with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and purified using Direct-zol RNA miniprep (R2055, Zymo, Irvine, CA, USA) following manufacture instructions with DNase treatment. cDNA was synthesized using a Maxima First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (K1672, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 10–20 ng cDNA was used for qPCR on a QuantStudio 5 real-time PCR system with TaqMan Universal Master Mix II and validated PrimeTime primer-probe sets (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA, USA). The ΔΔCt method was used to comparatively assess gene expression. Primer sequences are listed in Table A1.
2.10. In Vivo Respirometry
Between six to eight week old male animals were fed a defined low CoQ diet (D12450J Research Diets, New Brunswick, USA) under ambient temperature (23 °C) for two weeks. Food intake and body weight were monitored three times a week. Whole-body energy expenditure (VO2, VCO2, and real-time) was recorded at indicated environmental temperatures using a Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS, Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA). Data were imported and analyzed using the web-based analysis tool for indirect calorimetry experiments (CalR) [21].
2.11. H&E Staining and Imaging
Tissue samples were harvested from male C57/BL mice fed with a defined low CoQ diet for 21 days and were fixed in 10% formalin, embedded in parafilm, and sectioned. BAT, iWAT, eWAT, and liver were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and were imaged using the EVOS M5000 imaging system. Images are representative of three mice per group, with three images taken per mouse.
2.12. In Vitro Respirometry
Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured in differentiated white and brown adipocytes using the Seahorse XFe24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Cells were treated with 4CBA (4 mM) for 24 h and preincubated in the XF assay medium supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM GlutaMAX at CO2 free incubator for an hour. Cells were subjected to the mitochondrial stress test by sequentially adding oligomycin (1 µM), FCCP (1 µM), and antimycin/rotenone mix (1 µM/1 µM). For OCR measured in UCP1 activating conditions cells were pretreated with 2% BSA and 2 µM of isoproterenol for 1 h before analysis using the mitochondrial stress test.
2.13. Immunoblot
BAT mitochondria were isolated as previously described [1], and protein lysates were extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1% Triton-X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, 0.2% SDS). Samples were mixed with SDS Protein Loading Buffer (Laemmli buffer) and boiled for 5 min at 95 °C. 15 ug of mitochondrial proteins or 25 ug of total cellular proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis on either a 4–20% gradient TGX gels and transferred onto PVDF or nitrocellulose membranes using Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer system (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). After transfer, membranes were blocked using 5% milk in TBST buffer and incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C in blocking buffer. Mitochondrial electron transport chain proteins were detected using Total OXPHOS Rodent WB Antibody Cocktail (ab110413). Membranes were washed three times with TBST buffer before incubation in IRDye 680LT Goat anti-Mouse IgG antibody or IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG antibody (LI-COR Biosciences) for 1 h at room temperature in blocking buffer. The membranes were washed three times with TBST, and proteins were detected using Odyssey Imaging System. Image Studio Lite was used for protein quantification. If more than one protein was probed on a membrane, the primary and secondary antibody incubation steps were repeated individually for each protein prior to imaging. Primary and secondary antibodies are listed in Table A2.
2.14. Lipid Peroxidation
Lipid peroxidation products malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured using TBARS assay (KGE013, R&D). BAT tissues (20–25 mg) were homogenized in RIPA buffer containing Halt protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, USA) and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. The tissue homogenates were subjected to TBARS assay following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.15. UCP1 Current Measurement
Mitoplast isolation and UCP1 current measurement were carried out as previously described [22]. Briefly, mitoplasts were isolated from BAT of C57/BL mice fed with a defined low CoQ diet for 10–15 days. Patch pipettes were filled with 130 mM tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMA), 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM magnesium chloride, 150 mM HEPES, (pH adjusted to 7.0 with D-gluconic acid, tonicity adjusted to ∼360 mmol/kg with sucrose). Whole-mitoplast UCP1 current was recorded in the bath solution containing 150 mM HEPES and 1 mM EGTA (pH adjusted to 7 with Trizma base, tonicity adjusted to ∼300 mmol/kg with sucrose). All experiments were performed under continuous perfusion of the bath solution. Data acquisition and analysis were performed using PClamp 10 (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) and Origin 7.5 (OriginLab, Northampton, PA, USA). All electrophysiological data presented were acquired at 10 kHz and filtered at 1 kHz. Amplitudes of H+ currents were measured 25 ms after the application of the −160 mV voltage step.
2.16. Statistical Analysis
All measurements were taken from distinct samples. Data were analyzed using Prism and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by unpaired two-tailed student t-test or one-way ANOVA for the comparison of two conditions. Significance presented at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 compared to controls or otherwise indicated.
3. Results
3.1. CoQ Regulates UCP1 Expression in BAT
To investigate the impact of CoQ deficiency on respiration and thermogenic function in brown adipocytes, we treated mature murine brown adipocytes (sBAT) [18] with the CoQ biosynthesis inhibitor 4-Carboxybenzaldehyde (4CBA) [23]. Total CoQ levels, dominated by CoQ9, were reduced by ~60% with 4 mM µM 4CBA treatment for 48 h (Figure 1a). The impact of CoQ deficiency on cellular respiration in sBAT was examined using a standard mitochondrial stress test (Figure 1b). Surprisingly, while basal, maximal, and uncoupled respiration were affected by 4CBA treatment, the most significant decrease, 50% suppression, was observed with uncoupled respiration, while ATP production was unchanged (Figure 1c). These results were reproduced under UCP1-activating conditions in the presence of 2% BSA and 2 µM isoproterenol (Figure A1a,b). Expression of major electron transport chain complexes was unaffected by CoQ deficiency based on Western blots (Figure 1d). As CoQ had been suggested to act as an obligatory cofactor for UCP1 [24], we next performed mitochondrial patch clamp experiments with and without CoQ supplementation as previously described [25]. Supplementation with CoQ10 did not affect the inner mitochondrial membrane proton leak suggesting that the defects in respiration we observe are not due to CoQ’s effect on UCP1 activity (Figure 1e). However, CoQ deficiency triggered a robust suppression of the UCP1 gene and protein expression and downregulated several key brown/beige transcriptional regulators, including PGC1α, EBF2, and PPARγ, but not PRDM16 (Figure 1f,g). This suggests that decreased UCP1 expression, rather than defective electron transfer or decreased UCP1 activity, dominates the observed decrease in basal and uncoupled respiration. To confirm that the downregulation of UCP1 was due to CoQ deficiency, we employed a genetic loss of function system. To this end, stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells from BAT of decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 2 (PDSS2), an obligatory coenzyme Q biosynthetic enzyme, floxed mice [16] were infected with a lentivirus containing Cre recombinase resulting in decreased PDSS2 expression. As with pharmacological CoQ deficiency, genetic suppression of CoQ synthesis in BAT cells resulted in greatly decreased UCP1 gene expression (Figure 1h).
3.2. CoQ Deficiency Driven UCP1 Suppression Is Specific to Brown and Beige Fat
To determine the generality of the observed CoQ deficiency effects on adipocytes, we analyzed the effect of CoQ synthesis suppression on white adipocytes. Fully differentiated 3T3L1 adipocytes were treated with 4CBA as above and analyzed via a mitochondrial stress test. Interestingly, we did not observe any significant changes in oxygen consumption rates, nor the very low-level expression of UCP1 (Figure 2a–c). Conversely, in other UCP1-expressing cell types, particularly human beige adipocytes, reduction of total CoQ levels, dominated in this case by CoQ10, also resulted in a robust suppression of UCP1 (Figure 2d,e) indicating that this novel effect of CoQ holds true across UCP1 positive cell types and across species. Next, we determined if superphysiological levels of CoQ can further enhance UCP1 expression in brown and beige adipocytes. Due to its low solubility in water and its limited bioavailability when supplemented in its naked form, CoQ10 was supplemented in either a micelle or intralipid form, allowing increased absorbance efficiency into cells. Indeed, supplementation of murine brown adipocytes and human beige adipocytes with 2 µM and 10 µM exogenous CoQ10, respectively resulted in increased UCP1 expression (Figure 2f,g). This shows a direct relationship between CoQ levels in brown and beige adipocytes and UCP1 expression.
3.3. BAT CoQ Deficiency Alters Cellular Bioenergetics and Redox Functions
To further characterize changes in BAT mitochondrial function, we stained sBAT cells with 10-N-nonyl-acridine orange chloride (NAO) [26] with and without 4CBA treatment and found, despite the decreased cellular respiration rates, an increase of mitochondrial mass (Figure 3a) was observed. This could be in part due to defective autophagy under oxidative stress and thus the accumulation of dysfunctional mitochondria [27]. Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ), measured using JC-9 [28], was increased (Figure 3b) as expected from the decreased uncoupled respiration and UCP1 expression. In line with the decreased uncoupled respiration and higher membrane potential, NAD+/NADH and ADP/ATP ratios were decreased (Figure 3c,d). High ΔΨ has been associated with increased reactive oxidative species (ROS) production [29]. Since CoQ is a known cellular antioxidant, we measured mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in response to CoQ deficiency. Indeed, we found increased mitochondrial superoxide production in 4CBA-treated cells measured using MitoSOX, a fluorogenic dye targeted to mitochondria for superoxide detection (Figure 3e). We then incubated cells with either the ROS inhibitors N-acetyl cysteine (NAC, at 250 µM), the mitochondrially targeted CoQ analog mitoquinone (mitoQ) [30,31] (2 µM), the mitochondria-targeted superoxide dismutase mimetic MitoTEMPOL [32] (2 µM), the vitamin E antioxidants alpha-tocopherol phosphate disodium salt (TP, 10 µM) alpha-tocopheryl quinone (TQ, 10 µM), and a micelle formulation of CoQ10 (2 µM). Surprisingly, most of the well-known antioxidants had only modest effects on the recovery of UCP1 expression (Figure 3f). In contrast CoQ10 supplementation was able to rescue over 40% of the UCP1 expression, suggesting both an involvement of ROS as well as a unique role for CoQ in suppression of UCP1 expression.
3.4. CoQ Deficiency Leads to BAT Dysfunction In Vivo
To examine BAT CoQ deficiency in vivo, we generated a brown/beige fat-specific knockout strain for the CoQ synthesis enzyme PDSS2. To this end, a UCP1-cre line was crossed with a PDSS2 Flox strain [16], both in the C57 background, thus generating the PDSS2BKO line. PDSS2BKO animals display abrogation of PDSS2 expression (Figure 4b) in BAT. When mice are fed a normal chow diet, BAT CoQ levels in PDSS2BKO animals are reduced to 50% compared to PDSS2FL (Figure A2b). However, we noticed that standard rodent chow contains high levels of CoQ9 and −10 (60 pmol/mg). To better define our model and to exclude that CoQ levels in regular chow could mask PDSS2BKO phenotype, we switched animals to a defined chow containing 32% of the CoQ content present in normal chow (Figure A2a), for two to three weeks prior to experiments. This further reduced CoQ levels in PDSS2BKO BAT to 25% compared to PDSS2FL. CoQ levels in other tissues were unaffected while plasma CoQ levels were increased (Figure 4a and Figure A2c,d). Importantly, a pronounced suppression of the UCP1 gene and protein expression was detected in BAT tissues of the PDSS2BKO animals (Figure 4b,c). Further, when wild-type C57BL6/j mice were fed a defined, low CoQ diet supplemented with exogenous CoQ10 for seven weeks, UCP1 gene expression in brown adipose tissue was increased (Figure 4d) similar to our in vitro findings with exogenous CoQ10 supplementation to cells. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of BAT revealed that some brown adipocytes in PDSS2BKO animals have a unilocular lipid droplet morphology, suggesting a more white adipose tissue (WAT)-like phenotype (Figure 4e), in line with the observed decrease in expression of UCP1. This is not observed in BAT of PDSS2FL controls and further supports the notion that CoQ deficiency causes BAT dysfunction. Unlike BAT, epidydimal WAT (eWAT) and liver did not display apparent changes to morphology (Figure A2e,f). We then studied how these alterations in BAT morphology and UCP1 expression affect the cold tolerance of PDSS2BKO animals. Mice were fed a defined low CoQ diet for two to three weeks, then mice were placed into a Comprehensive Lab Animal Monitoring System (CLAMS) metabolic chamber in order to measure their oxygen consumption rate at 4 °C. When PDSS2BKO animals were exposed to a 4 °C cold challenge, an immediate and dramatic respiration defect became apparent with significantly lower VO2 rates. Mice became hypothermic after 5–6 h at 4 °C and had to be removed from the metabolic chamber due to animal welfare concerns (Figure 4f). Lastly, because of CoQ’s ability to act as an antioxidant, lipid peroxidation was measured in the BAT of our mouse model. We found that levels of malondialdehyde were significantly upregulated in BAT from our PDSS2BKO animals suggesting more oxidative damage in CoQ-deficient BAT (Figure 4g). Overall, we show that our CoQ deficiency phenotype can be replicated in vivo and that suppression of UCP1 expression in BAT leads to changes in BAT morphology and impaired cold tolerance in CoQ-deficient animals.
4. Discussion
In this study, we established that CoQ deficiency in brown adipose tissue (BAT) results in impaired oxygen consumption, notably a 50% reduction in uncoupled respiration and a 40% reduction in basal respiration (Figure 1b), resulting from uncoupling protein 1 (UCP) expression suppression (Figure 1f). UCP1 expression suppression could be replicated in human beige adipocytes (Figure 2e) but not in murine white adipocytes (Figure 2c) suggesting that major effects on cellular respiration of CoQ deficiency are driven by UCP1 suppression and are thus specific to brown and beige fat. BAT CoQ deficiency also resulted in changes to cellular bioenergetics, including increased membrane potential (Figure 3b), decreased ADP/ATP ratios (Figure 3d), and increased mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (Figure 3e) alongside increased mitochondrial mass (Figure 3a), reflecting a possible impairment in the complex mitochondrial quality control machinery leading to an alteration of mitophagy events [27]. By creating a UCP1-cre driven decaprenyl diphosphate synthase subunit 2 (PDSS2) conditional knockout strain, we were able to produce a BAT-specific CoQ deficiency in vivo model (75% reduction in total BAT CoQ) (Figure 4b). As with the in vitro systems, UCP1 expression was decreased in BAT subsequent to CoQ deficiency (Figure 4a), resulting in impaired cold tolerance and morphological alterations to BAT in PDSS2BKO animals (Figure 4e–g). Exogenous CoQ supplementation, both in vitro (Figure 2f,g) and in vivo (Figure 4d) resulted in increased UCP1 expression providing a positive correlation between CoQ levels and UCP1 expression in BAT.
The PDSS2BKO line provides a first insight into the brown adipose tissue-specific effects of CoQ deficiency. Although primary CoQ deficiencies (MIM 607426) are rare and manifest from mutations in CoQ biosynthesis genes, secondary CoQ deficiency encompasses a broader spectrum of disease and is also associated with drug treatments such as the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (frequently referred to as statins), which is widely used for lowering cholesterol. The effects of CoQ deficiency on specific tissues are still poorly understood but are thought to disproportionately affect cells with high energy demands, such as BAT. BAT and, to a lesser extent, beige adipose tissue, are present in all mammals, including humans [33], and exclusively express UCP1. BAT activation and prevalence are associated with improved metabolic health, such as a lower incidence of type two diabetes mellitus [34], suggesting that CoQ deficiency-induced BAT dysfunction could result in adverse effects on patients. Indeed, studies have revealed that statin treatment is associated with decreased BAT activity [35], increased body weight, and increased risk for the development of type two diabetes [36]. Although it remains unclear if the mechanism resulting in these adverse effects of statin treatment involves CoQ deficiency, it has been reported that statin treatment in patients results in lower levels of serum CoQ levels [37], providing a potential link between statins’ adverse metabolic effects and CoQ deficiency. Even though it is difficult to make a direct comparison between our model, which focuses on BAT-specific CoQ deficiency in cells and mice, and the heterogenous clinical phenotypes of CoQ deficient patients, some commonalities were noted. Similar to our findings, decreased oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) respiration and ROS production are also common aspects of several diseases linked to CoQ deficiency [38], showing the relevance of our study to patient phenotypes. Further in our in-vivo model, we found that CoQ deficiency shows a higher cold sensitivity (Figure 4f). Interestingly, in line with our finding, Rahman et al. [15] described a neonatal case of systemic CoQ10 deficiency presenting hypothermia at 6 h of age, which could be attributed to decreased UCP1 affected by CoQ lower levels. Despite this, we cannot exclude that in a systemic CoQ deficient case such as the one described by Rahman et al., other failures of cellular energy metabolism occurred.
CoQ functions extended substantially beyond the classical role as electron carriers in the respiratory chains. Among the functions described so far, the relation between CoQ and UCP is still poorly understood. In 2000 Echtay et al. reported that CoQ was an obligatory cofactor for proton transport by UCP1 [24]. Conversely, a report in 2004 [39] suggested that CoQ was not required for UCP1 proton conductance in a yeast system. This conclusion is supported by our patch-clamp analysis showing that the uncoupling function of UCP1 was independent of CoQ. Instead, CoQ deficiency causes changes in UCP1 abundance via the regulation of mRNA and protein levels. However, it remains to be elucidated how CoQ regulates the expression of UCP1 and if this occurs through direct or indirect mechanisms. Interestingly, Tiefenbach et al. showed that CoQ10, and its more soluble analogue, idebenone, acts as partial agonists for both peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors α (PPARα) and γ (PPARγ) in a Zebra Fish model [40]. Since UCP1 gene expression is controlled by PPARs [41], this could provide one plausible mechanistic connection.
Another interesting finding in our model is CoQ’s ability to stimulate UCP1 expression when it is exogenously supplemented both in vitro and in vivo. While enhanced UCP1 expression could result in metabolic benefits in patients, the efficacy and the benefits of CoQ supplementation remain controversial. While some studies reported improved glycemic control in diabetic patients [42,43] following CoQ supplementation, others failed to find such effects on plasma glucose or Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) levels [44,45]. These discrepancies could be potentially due to the low number of clinical trials and a limited number of patients [46] as well as the high variability of various CoQ formulations, treatment length, dosage, and intra-individual variations such as concomitant medications, diet, onset, and severity of the diseases. CoQ absorption and transport throughout are also poorly understood [47]. Here, we used intralipid loaded CoQ10 or micellar CoQ10 to improve absorption into cells as well as a relatively long 7-week CoQ supplementation period to study in vivo effects of CoQ on UCP1 expression. These approaches may not directly be translated to the treatment of patients, but several efforts have been carried out to find new CoQ formulations, in order to enhance its absorption through incorporation in different carriers such as liposomes, micelles, oleogels, β-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes or nanoparticles [48]. For instance, in a recent study, Hekimi et al. reported promising data regarding the effects of caspofungin analogues on CoQ10 solubilization and uptake [49].
Overall, the new insights into the relationship between CoQ and BAT function reported here should have significant implications for our understanding of how ubiquinone levels affect metabolic health and may provide new venues for the treatment of diseases such as type two diabetes.
Acknowledgments
We thank Greg A. Timblin for the materials and technical support for mitochondrial mass measurements. We thank David L. Gasser for providing PDSS2-LoxP mice.
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Table A1.
Gene | Exons | Forward | Reverse |
---|---|---|---|
UCP1 | 2-3 | CACACCTCCAGTCATTAAGCC | CAAATCAGCTTTGCCTCACTC |
PGC1a | 2-3 | CTCCATCTGTCAGTGCATCA | CCAACCAGTACAACAATGAGC |
PRDM16 | 12-13 | CACTTGAACGGCTTCTCTTTG | CACAAGACATCTGAGGACACA |
EBF2 | 14-15 | GGAGGTGCTGTAATTAGATTGCT | GTCAGCATTTCAGAGTCCACA |
PPARG | 4-5 | TGCAGGTTCTACTTTGATCGC | CTGCTCCACACTATGAAGACAT |
PPIA | 4-5 | TTCACCTTCCCAAAGACCAC | CAAACACAAACGGTTCCCAG |
PDSS2 | 6-8 | CACCTTTGCCAGCTTTGATTG | GTCTTACATCAGGAGTTTCTTGGA |
Cre | N/A | CATCGCTCGACCAGTTTAGTT | CTGACGGTGGGAGAATGTTAAT |
Appendix D
Table A2.
Antibody | Source | Identifier |
---|---|---|
beta Tubulin | Abcam | Cat# ab131205, RRID:AB_11156121 |
beta Actin | Sigma-Aldrich | Cat# A1978, RRID:AB_476692 |
UCP1a | Abcam | Cat# ab209483 RRID:AB_2722676 |
UCP1 (E9Z2V) XP Rabbit mAb | Cell Signaling Technology | Cat# 72298 |
Total OXPHOS Rodent WB Antibody Cocktail | Abcam | Cat# ab110413 |
IRDye 680LT Goat anti-Mouse IgG antibody | LI-COR Biosciences | Cat# 925-68020, RRID:AB_2687826 |
IRDye 800CW Goat anti-Rabbit IgG antibody | LI-COR Biosciences | Cat# 925-32211, RRID:AB_2651127 |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.S. and C.-F.C.; Methodology, C.-F.C., P.-J.H.Z. and A.L.G.; Supervision, A.S. and Y.K.; Investigation and data analysis, C.-F.C., A.L.G., I.L. and A.M.B.; Writing, A.S., C.-F.C., A.L.G. and I.L.; Funding Acquisition: A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
All animal experiments were approved and performed under the guidelines and ethical regulations established by the UC Berkeley Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol code: AUP-2019-05-12180-1; approval date: 12 June 2019).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this manuscript can be found in the submission or obtained from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by NIH grants R01DK089202, R01DK118727, and R01DK126830 to A.S. A.L.G. was supported by the American Heart Association predoctoral fellowship 23PRE1018992.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Anderson C.M., Kazantzis M., Wang J., Venkatraman S., Goncalves R.L., Quinlan C.L., Ng R., Jastroch M., Benjamin D.I., Nie B., et al. Dependence of brown adipose tissue function on CD36-mediated coenzyme Q uptake. Cell Rep. 2015;10:505–515. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bersuker K., Hendricks J.M., Li Z., Magtanong L., Ford B., Tang P.H., Roberts M.A., Tong B., Maimone T.J., Zoncu R., et al. The CoQ oxidoreductase FSP1 acts parallel to GPX4 to inhibit ferroptosis. Nature. 2019;575:688–692. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1705-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Emmanuele V., López L.C., Berardo A., Naini A., Tadesse S., Wen B., D’Agostino E., Solomon M., DiMauro S., Quinzii C., et al. Heterogeneity of coenzyme Q10 deficiency: Patient study and literature review. Arch. Neurol. 2012;69:978–983. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Quinzii C.M., Emmanuele V., Hirano M. Clinical presentations of coenzyme q10 deficiency syndrome. Mol. Syndromol. 2014;5:141–146. doi: 10.1159/000360490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ates O., Bilen H., Keles S., Alp H.H., Keleş M.S., Yıldırım K., Ondaş O., Pınar L.C., Civelekler M., Baykal O. Plasma coenzyme Q10 levels in type 2 diabetic patients with retinopathy. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2013;6:675–679. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.05.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hasegawa G., Yamamoto Y., Zhi J.G., Tanino Y., Yamasaki M., Yano M., Nakajima T., Fukui M., Yoshikawa T., Nakamura N. Daily profile of plasma %CoQ10 level, a biomarker of oxidative stress, in patients with diabetes manifesting postprandial hyperglycaemia. Acta Diabetol. 2005;42:179–181. doi: 10.1007/s00592-005-0199-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garrido-Maraver J., Cordero M.D., Oropesa-Avila M., Vega A.F., de la Mata M., Pavon A.D., Alcocer-Gomez E., Calero C.P., Paz M.V., Alanis M., et al. Clinical applications of coenzyme Q10. Front. Biosci. 2014;19:619–633. doi: 10.2741/4231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Littarru G.P., Tiano L. Clinical aspects of coenzyme Q10: An update. Nutrition. 2010;26:250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2009.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Golomb B.A., Evans M.A. Statin adverse effects: A review of the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism. Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs. 2008;8:373–418. doi: 10.2165/0129784-200808060-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stefely J.A., Pagliarini D.J. Biochemistry of Mitochondrial Coenzyme Q Biosynthesis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017;42:824–843. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rosen E.D., Spiegelman B.M. What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell. 2014;156:20–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Enerback S. Human brown adipose tissue. Cell Metab. 2010;11:248–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cypess A.M., Kahn C.R. Brown fat as a therapy for obesity and diabetes. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2010;17:143–149. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e328337a81f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yubero D., Montero R., Artuch R., Land J.M., Heales S.J., Hargreaves I.P. Biochemical diagnosis of coenzyme q10 deficiency. Mol. Syndromol. 2014;5:147–155. doi: 10.1159/000362390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rahman S., Hargreaves I., Clayton P., Heales S. Neonatal presentation of coenzyme Q10 deficiency. J. Pediatr. 2001;139:456–458. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.117575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Peng M., Falk M.J., Haase V.H., King R., Polyak E., Selak M., Yudkoff M., Hancock W.W., Meade R., Saiki R., et al. Primary coenzyme Q deficiency in Pdss2 mutant mice causes isolated renal disease. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Meerbrey K.L., Hu G., Kessler J.D., Roarty K., Li M.Z., Fang J.E., Herschkowitz J.I., Burrows A.E., Ciccia A., Sun T., et al. The pINDUCER lentiviral toolkit for inducible RNA interference in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:3665–3670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019736108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Galmozzi A., Sonne S.B., Altshuler-Keylin S., Hasegawa Y., Shinoda K., Luijten I.H.N., Chang J.W., Sharp L.Z., Cravatt B.F., Saez E., et al. ThermoMouse: An in vivo model to identify modulators of UCP1 expression in brown adipose tissue. Cell Rep. 2014;9:1584–1593. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu L., Mao K., Wang W., Pan H., Wang F., Yang M., Liu H. Kolliphor(R) HS 15 Micelles for the Delivery of Coenzyme Q10: Preparation, Characterization, and Stability. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016;17:757–766. doi: 10.1208/s12249-015-0399-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Podda M., Weber C., Traber M.G., Milbradt R., Packer L. Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography techniques for simultaneous determination of tocopherols, tocotrienols, ubiquinols, and ubiquinones in biological samples. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:330–341. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)99033-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mina A.I., LeClair R.A., LeClair K.B., Cohen D.E., Lantier L., Banks A.S. CalR: A Web-Based Analysis Tool for Indirect Calorimetry Experiments. Cell Metab. 2018;28:656–666.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bertholet A.M., Kirichok Y. Patch-Clamp Analysis of the Mitochondrial H(+) Leak in Brown and Beige Fat. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:326. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bour S., Carmona M.C., Galinier A., Caspar-Bauguil S., Van Gaal L., Staels B., Penicaud L., Casteilla L. Coenzyme Q as an antiadipogenic factor. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011;14:403–413. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Echtay K.S., Winkler E., Klingenberg M. Coenzyme Q is an obligatory cofactor for uncoupling protein function. Nature. 2000;408:609–613. doi: 10.1038/35046114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bertholet A.M., Kazak L., Chouchani E.T., Bogaczyńska M.G., Paranjpe I., Wainwright G.L., Bétourné A., Kajimura S., Spiegelman B.M., Kirichok Y. Mitochondrial Patch Clamp of Beige Adipocytes Reveals UCP1-Positive and UCP1-Negative Cells Both Exhibiting Futile Creatine Cycling. Cell Metab. 2017;25:811–822.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Petit J.M., Maftah A., Ratinaud M.H., Julien R. 10N-nonyl acridine orange interacts with cardiolipin and allows the quantification of this phospholipid in isolated mitochondria. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992;209:267–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17285.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Luo C., Li Y., Wang H., Feng Z., Long J., Liu J. Mitochondrial accumulation under oxidative stress is due to defects in autophagy. J. Cell. Biochem. 2013;114:212–219. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smiley S.T., Reers M., Mottola-Hartshorn C., Lin M., Chen A., Smith T.W., Steele G.D., Jr., Chen L.B. Intracellular heterogeneity in mitochondrial membrane potentials revealed by a J-aggregate-forming lipophilic cation JC-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88:3671–3675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.9.3671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Korshunov S.S., Skulachev V.P., Starkov A.A. High protonic potential actuates a mechanism of production of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria. FEBS Lett. 1997;416:15–18. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01159-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Feillet-Coudray C., Fouret G., Ebabe Elle R., Rieusset J., Bonafos B., Chabi B., Crouzier D., Zarkovic K., Zarkovic N., Ramos J., et al. The mitochondrial-targeted antioxidant MitoQ ameliorates metabolic syndrome features in obesogenic diet-fed rats better than Apocynin or Allopurinol. Free Radic. Res. 2014;48:1232–1246. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2014.945079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.James A.M., Sharpley M.S., Manas A.R., Frerman F.E., Hirst J., Smith R.A., Murphy M.P. Interaction of the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ with phospholipid bilayers and ubiquinone oxidoreductases. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:14708–14718. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611463200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dikalova A.E., Bikineyeva A.T., Budzyn K., Nazarewicz R.R., McCann L., Lewis W., Harrison D.G., Dikalov S.I. Therapeutic targeting of mitochondrial superoxide in hypertension. Circ. Res. 2010;107:106–116. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.109.214601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cypess A.M., Lehman S., Williams G., Tal I., Rodman D., Goldfine A.B., Kuo F.C., Palmer E.L., Tseng Y.-H., Doria A., et al. Identification and Importance of Brown Adipose Tissue in Adult Humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:1509–1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Becher T., Palanisamy S., Kramer D.J., Eljalby M., Marx S.J., Wibmer A.G., Butler S.D., Jiang C.S., Vaughan R., Schöder H., et al. Brown adipose tissue is associated with cardiometabolic health. Nat. Med. 2021;27:58–65. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1126-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Balaz M., Becker A.S., Balazova L., Straub L., Müller J., Gashi G., Maushart C.I., Sun W., Dong H., Moser C., et al. Inhibition of Mevalonate Pathway Prevents Adipocyte Browning in Mice and Men by Affecting Protein Prenylation. Cell Metab. 2019;29:901–916.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Swerdlow D.I., Preiss D., Kuchenbaecker K.B., Holmes M.V., Engmann J.E., Shah T., Sofat R., Stender S., Johnson P.C., Scott R.A., et al. HMG-coenzyme A reductase inhibition, type 2 diabetes, and bodyweight: Evidence from genetic analysis and randomised trials. Lancet. 2015;385:351–361. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61183-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qu H., Meng Y.Y., Chai H., Liang F., Zhang J.Y., Gao Z.Y., Shi D.Z. The effect of statin treatment on circulating coenzyme Q10 concentrations: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2018;23:57. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0353-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Quinzii C.M., Hirano M. Coenzyme Q and mitochondrial disease. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev. 2010;16:183–188. doi: 10.1002/ddrr.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Esteves T.C., Echtay K.S., Jonassen T., Clarke C.F., Brand M.D. Ubiquinone is not required for proton conductance by uncoupling protein 1 in yeast mitochondria. Biochem. J. 2004;379:309–315. doi: 10.1042/bj20031682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tiefenbach J., Magomedova L., Liu J., Reunov A.A., Tsai R., Eappen N.S., Jockusch R.A., Nislow C., Cummins C.L., Krause H.M. Idebenone and coenzyme Q10 are novel PPARα/γ ligands, with potential for treatment of fatty liver diseases. Dis. Models Mech. 2018;11:dmm034801. doi: 10.1242/dmm.034801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Villarroya F., Iglesias R., Giralt M. PPARs in the Control of Uncoupling Proteins Gene Expression. PPAR Res. 2007;2007:074364. doi: 10.1155/2007/74364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hodgson J.M., Watts G.F., Playford D.A., Burke V., Croft K.D. Coenzyme Q10 improves blood pressure and glycaemic control: A controlled trial in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002;56:1137–1142. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zahedi H., Eghtesadi S., Seifirad S., Rezaee N., Shidfar F., Heydari I., Golestan B., Jazayeri S. Effects of CoQ10 Supplementation on Lipid Profiles and Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2014;13:81. doi: 10.1186/s40200-014-0081-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Eriksson J.G., Forsén T.J., Mortensen S.A., Rohde M. The effect of coenzyme Q10 administration on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biofactors. 1999;9:315–318. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520090229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Akbari Fakhrabadi M., Zeinali Ghotrom A., Mozaffari-Khosravi H., Hadi Nodoushan H., Nadjarzadeh A. Effect of Coenzyme Q10 on Oxidative Stress, Glycemic Control and Inflammation in Diabetic Neuropathy: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2014;84:252–260. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hernández-Camacho J.D., Bernier M., López-Lluch G., Navas P. Coenzyme Q(10) Supplementation in Aging and Disease. Front. Physiol. 2018;9:44. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mantle D., Dybring A. Bioavailability of Coenzyme Q10: An Overview of the Absorption Process and Subsequent Metabolism. Antioxidants. 2020;9:386. doi: 10.3390/antiox9050386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pastor-Maldonado C.J., Suárez-Rivero J.M., Povea-Cabello S., Álvarez-Córdoba M., Villalón-García I., Munuera-Cabeza M., Suárez-Carrillo A., Talaverón-Rey M., Sánchez-Alcázar J.A. Coenzyme Q10: Novel Formulations and Medical Trends. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:8432. doi: 10.3390/ijms21228432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang Y., Hekimi S. Micellization of coenzyme Q by the fungicide caspofungin allows for safe intravenous administration to reach extreme supraphysiological concentrations. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101680. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that supports the findings of this manuscript can be found in the submission or obtained from the corresponding author upon request.