Skip to main content
PMC home page
Vaccines logoLink to Vaccines
. 2023 Jan 5;11(1):131. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010131

Identification of NS2B-NS3 Protease Inhibitors for Therapeutic Application in ZIKV Infection: A Pharmacophore-Based High-Throughput Virtual Screening and MD Simulations Approaches

Hafiz Muzzammel Rehman 1,2, Muhammad Sajjad 3, Muhammad Akhtar Ali 3, Roquyya Gul 4, Muhammad Irfan 5, Muhammad Naveed 6, Munir Ahmad Bhinder 2, Muhammad Usman Ghani 7, Nadia Hussain 8,9, Amira S A Said 9,10,11, Amal H I Al Haddad 12, Mahjabeen Saleem 1,13,*
Editors: Bapi Pahar, Juan C De la Torre
PMCID: PMC9862652  PMID: 36679976

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) pandemic and its implication in congenital malformations and severe neurological disorders had created serious threats to global health. ZIKV is a mosquito-borne flavivirus which spread rapidly and infect a large number of people in a shorter time-span. Due to the lack of effective therapeutics, this had become paramount urgency to discover effective drug molecules to encounter the viral infection. Various anti-ZIKV drug discovery efforts during the past several years had been unsuccessful to develop an effective cure. The NS2B-NS3 protein was reported as an attractive therapeutic target for inhibiting viral proliferation, due to its central role in viral replication and maturation of non-structural viral proteins. Therefore, the current in silico drug exploration aimed to identify the novel inhibitors of Zika NS2B-NS3 protease by implementing an e-pharmacophore-based high-throughput virtual screening. A 3D e-pharmacophore model was generated based on the five-featured (ADPRR) pharmacophore hypothesis. Subsequently, the predicted model is further subjected to the high-throughput virtual screening to reveal top hit molecules from the various small molecule databases. Initial hits were examined in terms of binding free energies and ADME properties to identify the candidate hit exhibiting a favourable pharmacokinetic profile. Eventually, molecular dynamic (MD) simulations studies were conducted to evaluate the binding stability of the hit molecule inside the receptor cavity. The findings of the in silico analysis manifested affirmative evidence for three hit molecules with −64.28, −55.15 and −50.16 kcal/mol binding free energies, as potent inhibitors of Zika NS2B-NS3 protease. Hence, these molecules holds the promising potential to serve as a prospective candidates to design effective drugs against ZIKV and related viral infections.

Keywords: Zika virus, e-pharmacophore approach, high-throughput virtual screening, ASINEX database, prime MM-GBSA, molecular dynamics simulation

1. Introduction

A mosquito-borne pathogen, Zika virus (ZIKV) is an RNA virus from the Flaviviridae family and exhibits significant association with congenital malformations as well as severe neurological disorders [1]. The ZIKV is mainly transmitted by Aedes (subgenus Stegomyia) mosquito [2]. It emerged in 2007 in Yap Island in the western Pacific [3] and re-emergened in 2013–2014 in French Polynesia and the South Pacific [4]. For the first time, serious consequences and non-vector-borne transmission of ZIKV were documented in this pandemic. A national public health emergency was declared in 2015 after the Zika virus outbreak in Brazil, and a worldwide public health emergency in was declared in 2016 after reports of rising microcephaly cases. Later on, the Zika virus spread out to the continental USA, Africa, and Southeast Asia in 2016–2017. It was confirmed that ZIKV also follows non-vector-borne transmission and was also implicated in severe neurological problems in adults, neonates and in fetuses [5].

ZIKV is a spherical and single stranded virus containing 11 kilobases RNA genome [6]. The open reading frame (ORF) encodes a polypeptide having 3423 amino acids. This polypeptide is cleaved by the host, as well as viral proteases, into a total of 10 individual proteins, of which 3 are structural and are 7 non-structural proteins. The structural proteins are capsid (C), premembrane (prM), and envelope (E) proteins, whereas non-structural (NS) includes NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, and NS5 [7]. Among all the non-structural proteins, the NS2B-NS3 protein plays an imperative role in viral replication and maturation of non-structural viral proteins. Hence, potent inhibitors of NS2B-NS3 protease could translate into a promising treatment for ZIKV infections [8]. It exhibits similarities with other flaviviruses such as tick-borne encephalitis virus, Japanese encephalitis virus, yellow fever virus, and West Nile virus, but possesses close similarities mainly with the dengue virus (DENV), exhibiting immunological cross-reactivity [9]. The NS2B-NS3 protein also plays a pivotal role in the downregulation of the DENV-triggered antiviral responses, known to be executed by immune evasion of the NS2B-NS3 protein [10]. Hence, it primarily serves as a dual function target, and its inhibition can hinder viral replication with the subsequent protection of innate immunity.

Notwithstanding the severity of the epidemic and several drug discovery efforts during the past years, no treatment had been developed. Efficacious drug discoveries necessitate intricated, expensive, and time-intensive processes. The e-pharmacophore-based high-throughput virtual screening holds the promising potential to identify clinically effective drugs at the cost of minimum time and expense [11,12,13]. The afore mentioned approach has precedence over other drug repurposing strategies as reported for several discoveries of specific inhibitors for the potential control of viral infections [14,15]. For this purpose, the present study was designed to generate energy-optimised pharmacophore by employing the Pharmacophore Alignment and Scoring Engine (PHASE) module of Schrödinger Suite to achieve the successful screening of the molecules having the potential to inhibit NS2B-NS3 protein of Zika virus.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Molecular Databases Used

The co-crystallised structure of the NS2B-NS3 and boronate (PDB ID: 5LC0) was retrieved from the Protein Data Bank (PDB), having a resolution of 2.7 Å [16]. The PubChem database was explored to retrieve the 2D structure of the boronate inhibitor (PubChem ID: 16740933). It has inhibitory activity for ZIKV NS2B-NS3, with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) = 0.25 ± 0.02 μM and inhibition constant (Ki) = 0.040 ± 0.006 μM [17]. The ASINEX database, which contains a regularly updated collection of compounds with several libraries covering distinct chemical characteristics, was used for the virtual screening of the compounds to reveal novel hits [18].

2.2. Ligand Preparation

The LigPrep module of the Schrödinger package was employed to prepare the ligand [19] by the modification of the ligand’s torsions, followed by the assigning of protonation states [20]. Subsequent conversion of the 2D ligand structure into 3D, hydrogen attachment, generation of stereoisomers, and ionization state identification lead to ligand refining [21,22]. Furthermore, the OPLS4 force field incorporated in PHASE was used for energy minimization and to optimize the low-energy 3D structure of the ligand.

2.3. Protein Preparation

The retrieved crystal structure of the NS2B-NS3 protein (PDB ID: 5LC0) was refined using Schrödinger’s protein preparation wizard [23]. This ensured high-confidence structural correctness by transforming the protein structure from the raw state to the refined state and to be prepared adequately for molecular docking and molecular dynamic studies. The protein preparation process involved assigning the corrected bond orders, omitting water molecules and other non-specific chemical components from the crystal structure, and the addition of hydrogen atoms to the protein structure for remodelling the tautomeric and ionization states of amino acid residues [24]. Subsequent addition of missing hydrogen and loops in the structure was followed by restrained energy minimization by employing the OPLS4 force field to achieve high accuracy [25].

2.4. Molecular Docking

Schrödinger’s GLIDE module was employed to perform docking of the NS2B-NS3 protein together with the prepared ligand. This facilitated the enhancement of the binding affinity by contributing to the identification of specific structural motifs [26]. XP descriptors were used to analyze the docking results, which provided significant details of various intermolecular interactions [27]. The energy for each pose was identified by Glide XP descriptor information, to optimise the ligand conformation of the ligand–receptor complex. Prior to performing the docking protocol, Schrödinger’s Glide Grid Generation was utilised to generate a Glide Grid around the co-crystallised boronate ligand [28]. Grid generation was followed by the docking process using the prepared ligand and protein structures. Subsequently, the resultant protein–ligand complex of NS2B-NS3 and boronate was used to generate e-pharmacophore model.

2.5. Energy-Optimised Pharmacophore

The intrinsic flexibility of a target active site was incorporated into energy-optimised pharmacophore (e-pharmacophore) model generation. According to reports, energetically efficient pharmacophores can screen millions of molecules in a short amount of time. The e-pharmacophore methods combine the features of ligands with structure-based approaches to study the intrinsic flexibility of active sites and ligand binding [29]. An e-pharmacophore model was developed by using the protein–ligand complex of NS2B-NS3 and boronate in the phase module of Schrödinger [30]. The default six pharmacophore features include the aromatic ring (R), the negatively ionizable region (N), the hydrogen bond acceptor (A), the hydrogen bond donor (D), the hydrophobic group (H) and the positively ionizable region (P) were employed in the Phase module [31]. The particular amount of energy comparable to the summation of Glide XP contributions was assigned to each pharmacophore feature. This aided in quantifying and ranking the sites concerning the energy values. The e-pharmacophore hypotheses were generated based on molecular patterns known as SMARTS patterns (Smiles ARbitrary Target Specification patterns) [32].

2.6. ADME/T Analysis and High-Throughput Virtual Screening

A set of molecules was generated by virtual screening on the basis of the properties of the e-pharmacophore. These compounds were subjected to molecular docking with NS2B-NS3 as selected molecules possessing common descriptors of e-pharmacophore [28]. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis was conducted to determine numerous properties of these docked molecules, which are required to evaluate their potential as prospective inhibitors of NS2B-NS3. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) are important factors in the development of new drugs. A high-quality drug candidate should exhibit the right ADMET characteristics at a therapeutic dose in addition to having enough activity against the therapeutic target. The two main factors that contribute to medication failure are ineffectiveness and safety; therefore, chemical properties, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET), are crucial at every stage of drug discovery and development. Finding effective compounds with improved ADMET characteristics is thus important. Hence, Lipinski rules for the top hits were also assessed, and the properties assessed included molecular weight, brain/blood partition coefficient, lipophilicity (log Po/w), hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity (QPlogPo/w, QPlogS, QPPCaco, QPlogBB, and QPPMDCK), and human oral absorption (HOA%) [33]. Molecular docking was employed to filter out the binding compounds in order to obtain the finest corresponding binding pose of ligands to the protein. It aimed to generate several poses (possible conformations) of the inhibitor within the binding site of the protein. Hence, protein–ligand complexes were generated and filtered based on scoring, representing their binding affinity [34,35]. Moreover, virtual screening was performed by using e-pharmacophore model coupled with high-throughput virtual screening (HTVS), standard precision (SP), and extra precision (XP) docking to achieve a set of molecules with promising binding energies [36].

2.7. Binding Free Energy Calculation Using MM-GBSA

To quantify the binding affinity between the protein and small molecules, the molecular mechanics-generalized born surface area (MM-GBSA) approach was adopted. The prime module of Schrödinger was used to estimate the theoretical binding free energies of the promising NS2B-NS3 binding small molecules. The hits obtained after the XP docking, based on the Glide scores, were subjected to MM-GBSA analysis [37]. The energetics of free ligand, free protein, and protein–ligand complex were used to estimate the binding free energies [38].

ΔGbind calculations were executed using the following equations:

ΔGbind = Gcom − (Grec + Glig) (1)

Using Equation (1), ΔGbind is obtained by the difference between total of the free energies of the ligand (Glig) and the receptors (Grec) and the free energy of protein–ligand complex (Gcom).

ΔGbind is supposed to comprise enthalpy (H) [38] (Onufriev et al., 2004) and entropy (TΔS) as presented in Equation (2).

ΔGbind = ΔH − TΔS (2)

2.8. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

The Desmond module of Schrodinger was exploited to conduct MD simulation studies. The dynamic behavior and stability of the protein–ligand complexes were investigated using their docked poses and the co-crystalized structure of NS2B-NS3, and boronate was used as a control [39]. The protein–ligand complexes were preprocessed using Protein Preparation Wizard of Maestro, which included complex optimization and minimization. All the systems were prepared using the System Builder tool. Solvation of the complexes was performed with the simple point-charge (SPC) water model with orthorhombic box, along with a 10-Å distance from the edge of the box, and the system was neutralized with Na+/Cl− ions. To mimic physiological conditions, 0.15 M sodium chloride (NaCl) was added. The potential energy of the protein–ligand complexes was minimized by employing the NPT ensemble. The molecular simulations were performed at 300 K temperature and 1 atm pressure for 100 ns and NPT production ran under the OPLS4 force field. The models were relaxed before the simulation. The trajectories were saved for examination after every 100 ps, and the simulation’s stability was verified by comparing the protein and ligand’s Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) over time. The projected changes in their conformation from the initial structure over the entire simulation period were expressed as Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) and Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) for MD simulations.

3. Results

3.1. E-Pharmacophore Model

As a qualitative process, energetically optimized pharmacophore modelling, already assist to determine novel moieties with several biological activities [40]. The present study aimed to predict the e-pharmacophore model to screen NS2B-NS3 inhibitors, using Schrödinger’s PHASE module. To serve the purpose, the structure and energy-based e-pharmacophore generation approaches were employed using the obtained values in the scoring function of GLIDE [41]. The pharmacophore hypothesis was generated using the PHASE module’s six intrinsic pharmacophore features. The pharmacophore hypothesis exhibited five pharmacophoric features (ADPRR) including one hydrogen bond acceptor (A), one hydrogen bond donor (D), one positively ionic (P) and two aromatic rings structures (R) (Figure 1). The higher correlation indicates greater efficiency of the predicted model to assess the activities of potential inhibitor molecules [42].

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The e-pharmacophore model of NS2B-NS3 protein of ZIKV with boronate inhibitor showing one hydrogen bond acceptor (A), one hydrogen bond donor (D), one positively ionic (P) and two aromatic rings structures (R).

3.2. E-Pharmacophore-Based High Throughput Virtual Screening

The potential NS2B-NS3 protein inhibitors were retrieved from the ASINEX database that contains screening libraries of lead-like molecules. The generated pharmacophore model (ADPRR) was used to screen the database, and the molecules were retrieved from the database by using formulated features of the pharmacophore hypothesis. To find out the potential inhibitor of the NS2B-NS3 protein, these molecules were subjected to docking-based virtual screening consisting of HTVS, SP, and XP docking steps, followed by the validation of hits through MM-GBSA calculations. For molecular docking, the GLIDE module of Schrödinger was employed [43,44]. Initially, the binding efficiency of molecules was estimated by performing HTVS of 25% hit molecules against the binding site of the NS2B-NS3 protein. The, docking accuracy was increased by conducting 25% SP docking, using top compounds, which eliminated false positives to enhance the accuracy. The 25% filtered molecules were then used for XP docking, which resulted in 285 hits. The hits were found to possess scores ranging from −8.838 to −5.676 kcal/mol. The glide scores and MMGBSA values of the top three hits are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Top 3 hits with their Glide score and MMGBSA values.

Compound XP GScore MMGBSA Mol MW Docking Score Rule of Five Violation Prime vdw
Comp 1 −7.399 −64.58 317.387 −7.228 0 −833.91
Comp 2 −8.040 −55.15 337.424 −8.040 0 −828.84
Comp 3 −5.792 −50.16 303.323 −5.792 0 −829.43
Open in a new tab

3.3. Description of the ADME Properties of the Hit Molecules

Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties in acceptable ranges are the prime requisites for drug designing. Therefore, the pharmacokinetic profile of the hits is mandatory to prevent any failure during the drug development process [45]. Pharmacokinetic profiles of hits and the findings of the ADME investigations are shown in Table 2. The most significant descriptors taken into consideration include QPlogPo/w, QPlogS, QPlogBB, and QPPMDCK (determining hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity), #star (showing number of properties that fall beyond the recommended range), and Rule of Five (indicating number of violations of Lipinski’s rule of five). The findings showed all top three hit molecules possess acceptable ADME properties, with the potential hits containing promising pharmacokinetic properties.

Table 2.

ADME/T properties of all three compounds select after HTVS.

Ranges
Sr. No.		 QPlogPo/w
(−2.0–6.5)		 QPlogBB
(−3.0–1.2)		 Mol MW
(130.0–725)		 Percent Human-Oral Absorption
(>80% Is High <25% Is Poor)		 FISA
(7.0–330)		 PISA
(0.0–450)		 QPlogHERG
(Concern below −5)		 QPlogS
(−6.5–0.5)
Comp 1 2.307 0.158 342.827 90.439 115.470 242.988 −3.454 −2.855
Comp 2 0.681 −2.206 343.359 58.803 257.159 304.534 −5.85 −3.726
Comp 3 0.288 −1.553 303.323 69.379 181.286 166.144 −4.592 −2.086
Open in a new tab

3.4. Intermolecular Interactions of Hit Molecules with NS2B-NS3 Protein

Intermolecular interaction patterns of the NS2B-NS3 protein structure were determined using Schrödinger’s ligand interaction diagram that displays hydrogen bonds and salt bridges as intermolecular interactions [46]. The hydrogen bonds play a pivotal role in stabilizing the protein–ligand complex [47]. For NS2B-NS3 protein, the amino acid residues that exhibited hydrogen bonding with compound 1 include Ser 1135, Gly 1151, Gly 1153, and Tyr 1161. Compound 1 also made a salt bridge with Ser 1135, as indicated in Figure 2. Compound 2 made four hydrogen bonds with Tyr 1130, Gly 1151, Asp 1075, and Asn 1152, and pi–pi stacking with Tyr 1161 (Figure 3). Compound 3 formed two pi–pi stackings with His 1051 and Tyr 1150, and six hydrogen bonds with Asp 83, Phe 84, Asn 1152, Ser 1135, Tyr 1161, and Tyr 1130 (Figure 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Interactions analysis of comp 1 with NS2B-NS3 protein of Zika virus.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Interactions analysis of comp 2 with NS2B-NS3 protein of Zika virus.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Interactions analysis of comp 3 with NS2B-NS3 protein of Zika virus.

3.5. Binding Free Energy Calculation Using MM-GBSA

The MM-GBSA approach was adopted to calculate the binding free energies of Comp1, Comp2, and Comp3 to assess their binding affinity with the NS2B-NS3 protein. The calculated ΔGbind for these compounds is given in Table 1. As high negative ΔGbind represents great affinity for the receptor, Comp1, Comp2, and Comp3 with binding free energies −64.28, −58.22 and −75.241 kcal/mol, respectively, were found to possess a strong affinity for NS2B-NS3, suggesting its high potential to be an efficient inhibitor of the ZIKV NS2B-NS3 protein.

3.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation

The stability and dynamic behaviour of protein–ligand complexes, was determined by Molecular Dynamics Simulation (MD) studies. High binding free energies-exhibiting top hits, selected based on MM-GBSA analysis, were subjected to MD simulations. These top hits included Comp1, Comp2, and Comp3 with binding free energies of −64.28 kcal/mol, −55.15 kcal/mol and −50.16 kcal/mol, respectively. NS2B-NS3 in complex with each hit was employed, and the projected changes in their conformation from the initial structure over the simulation period were expressed as Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). Moreover, Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) values were also calculated to analyse the structural stability, atomic mobility, and flexibility of residues during protein–hit interaction.

MD simulation studies indicated the protein backbone was found to be consistent during the simulation, and no abnormal deviation was found in comparison to the native structure, which confirmed the binding stability of Comp1 with NS2B-NS3. More precisely, initially the backbone RMSD was consistent until 83 ns; after that, there was a small flip, and then consistency was achieved until the end of simulation (Figure 5). For Comp2-NS2B-NS3 complex, the system was equilibrated, and the backbone was stable until the end of simulation (Figure 6). For Comp3-protein complex, the backbone was also consistent and stable throughout the simulation (Figure 7a). In the case of the ligand (Comp1), there was not much deviation observed, except during about 80 to 85 ns. Higher deviation during the above duration might be due to high level of conformational changes, and after about 85 ns, again, the ligand RMSD was equilibrated (Figure 5). For Comp2 and Comp3, there was not much deviation (Figure 6 and Figure 7a). Hence, the above observation explained the protein–ligand complex stability in the dynamic states, as a positive control co-crystal structure of NS2B-NS3 with boronate (PDB ID:5LC0) was also analysed. The RMSD showed the stability of the complex, as there was a small deviation in the start and then the simulation was equilibrated (Figure 7b).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Root Mean Square Deviation plot of Comp1 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Representation of Root Mean Square Deviation plot of Comp2 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

(a) Representation of Root Mean Square Deviation plot of Comp3 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV. (b) Root Mean Square Deviation plot of NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV PDB ID: 5LC0.

Moreover, to examine individual amino acid residue fluctuation, the RMSF values for all the complexes were estimated. The RMSF values for the catalytic region of the NS2B-NS3 of all the complexes exhibited stability. There were no considerable fluctuations observed where the ligand binds with the protein. As compared to all residues, the residues Lys 1015, Gly 1016, and Glu 1017 expressed higher fluctuations. The calculated RMSF values are represented in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11. The green vertical lines in the plots represent the interacting residues of NS2B-NS3 of Zika virus with their respective compounds. The residues where most of the compounds make interactions are SER 81- PHE 84, GLN 135-GLY 139, TRP 150-LYS 154, VAL 172-ASP 175, LEU 1128-THR 1134, and TYR 1150-TYR 1161.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Root Mean Square Fluctuation plot of Comp1 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Root Mean Square Fluctuation plot of Comp2 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Root Mean Square Fluctuation plot of Comp3 and NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Open in a new tab

Root Mean Square Fluctuation plot NS2B-NS3 complex of ZIKV PDB ID: 5LC0.

4. Discussion

The ZIKV, mosquito-borne flavivirus, belongs to the Flaviviridae family, exhibiting significant similarities to West Nile virus and DENV, as well as the yellow fever virus. Effective and reliable medication or treatment against ZIKV still needs to be discovered. NS2B-NS3 protease is a potential candidate to target the infection caused by the ZIKV because it holds a promising contribution to the viral life cycle. A few studies have reported small molecules, such as flavonoids, bromocriptine, and other small molecules, as inhibitors to target NS2B-NS3 protease, using different virtual drug discovery approaches [17,48,49,50]. There still is a need to discover novel inhibitors for the NS2B-NS3 protein to achieve efficacious treatment for ZIKV infection. The present in silico study aimed at employing e-pharmacophore-based high-throughput virtual screening to discover potent inhibitors targeting ZIKV’s NS2B-NS3 protein. To serve this purpose, the ASINEX database containing screening libraries of lead-like molecules was exploited to retrieve the potential NS2B-NS3 protein inhibitors. The five-featured hypothesis (ADPRR) was generated to screen the database. Furthermore, HTVS, SP, and XP docking were carried out to screen the obtained hit molecules, resulting in six hits with higher Glide scores than boronate inhibitors. Subsequently, the pharmacokinetic parameters were also assessed, including QPlogPo/w, QPlogS, QPPCaco, QPlogBB, QPPMDCK, HOA%, and Lipinski’s rule of five. The findings revealed three hits, i.e., Comp1, Comp2 and Comp3, exhibiting favourable ADME properties. The findings were in accordance with the previous explorations in the search for potential NS2B-NS3 targeting inhibitors [17,37]. Additionally, to validate the docking results, molecular dynamics simulation studies were performed. The findings of the MD results evinced the stability of the NS2B-NS3-hit molecule complexes. The structural analysis detected the presence of an imidazole ring in the screened hits. An imidazole ring and its derivatives have been reported to exhibit effective antiviral activities against several viral diseases, such as dengue virus (DENV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), West Nile virus (WNV), and many others [51,52]. The findings of the present study, in accordance with the previous research, deduced that these hits hold the promising prospect to be candidate lead compounds against the NS2B-NS3 protease of ZIKV.

5. Conclusions

The Zika virus outbreak created a global health concern, resulting in the declaration of a pandemic by the World Health Organization in 2016 [53]. The drug discovery studies concerning ZIKV have focused on the identification of certain inhibitors to target the Zika virus to treat its infection. Great emphasis has been imposed to target and inhibit proteases, more typically, the non-structural NS2B-NS3 protein, owing to its significant role in the viral life cycle. Undoubtedly, immense consideration is needed to discover potent and reliable drugs by exploring potential inhibitors of ZIKV NS2B-NS3 protein. The present study has identified the potential NS2B-NS3 protein inhibitors by coupling high throughput screening with MM-GBSA and molecular dynamics simulation. The docking studies showed the docking scores of compound 1, compound 2 and compound 3 are −7.399, −8.040 and −5.792, respectively. The binding energies validated the strong binding as compound 1, compound 2, and compound 3 showed binding free energies of −64.28 kcal/mol, −55.15 kcal/mol and −50.16 kcal/mol, respectively. Furthermore, the RMSD graph also indicated that the protein–ligand complexes were stable during 100 ns of MD simulation. The pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that top-scored inhibitors have no violation of Lipinski’s rule of five, confirming drug-likeness ability. Hence, both docking and molecular dynamics simulation investigations revealed that the top-scored inhibitors have a strong binding affinity towards the NS2B-NS3 protein of ZIKV. The e-pharmacophore-based virtual screening approach resulted in the identification of novel inhibitor candidates of the NS2B-NS3 Zika protein that can be further explored to achieve the effective treatment of ZIKV infection and to combat the rapid spread of Zika virus. Consequently, this study can provide a way for researchers to test these inhibitors against Zika virus in in vitro and in vivo analysis.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the School of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, at the University of the Punjab, for providing us with resources to carry out this study.

Author Contributions

H.M.R., conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, software, writing—original draft; M.S. (Muhammad Sajjad), formal analysis, methodology, writing—original draft; M.A.A., data curation, formal analysis, writing—review and editing; R.G., conceptualization, investigation M.I., data curation, methodology; M.N., formal analysis, writing; M.A.B., formal analysis; M.U.G., formal analysis, review; N.H., formal analysis, methodology, writing; A.S.A.S., data curation, methodology; A.H.I.A.H., formal analysis, methodology; M.S. (Mahjabeen Saleem), conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

More data related to this study can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Shi Y., Li S., Wu Q., Sun L., Zhang J., Pan N., Wang Q., Bi Y., An J., Lu X., et al. Vertical transmission of the Zika virus causes neurological disorders in mouse offspring. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:3541. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21894-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Musso D., Gubler D.J. Zika virus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2016;29:487–524. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00072-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duffy M.R., Chen T.H., Hancock W.T., Powers A.M., Kool J.L., Lanciotti R.S., Pretrick M., Marfel M., Holzbauer S., Dubray C., et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, federated states of Micronesia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2536–2543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cao-Lormeau V.M., Roche C., Teissier A., Robin E., Berry A.L., Mallet H.P., Sall A.A., Musso D. Zika virus, French polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014;20:1085. doi: 10.3201/eid2006.140138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baud D., Gubler D.J., Schaub B., Lanteri M.C., Musso D. An update on Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2017;390:2099–2109. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31450-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bollati M., Alvarez K., Assenberg R., Baronti C., Canard B., Cook S., Coutard B., Decroly E., de Lamballerie X., Gould E.A., et al. Structure and functionality in flavivirus NS-proteins: Perspectives for drug design. Antivir. Res. 2010;87:125–148. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuno G., Chang G.J. Full-length sequencing and genomic characterization of Bagaza, Kedougou, and Zika viruses. Arch. Virol. 2007;152:687–696. doi: 10.1007/s00705-006-0903-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Faye O., Freire C.C., Iamarino A., Faye O., de Oliveira J.V.C., Diallo M., Zanotto P.M. Molecular evolution of Zika virus during its emergence in the 20th century. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014;8:e2636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Paixão E.S., Barreto F., da Glória Teixeira M., da Conceição N., Costa M., Rodrigues L.C. History, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of Zika: A systematic review. Am. J. Public Health. 2016;106:606–612. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Aguirre S., Maestre A.M., Pagni S., Patel J.R., Savage T., Gutman D., Maringer K., Bernal-Rubio D., Shabman R.S., Simon V., et al. DENV inhibits type I IFN production in infected cells by cleaving human STING. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002934. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Preethi B., Shanthi V., Ramanathan K. Investigation of nalidixic acid resistance mechanism in Salmonella enterica using molecular simulation techniques. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015;177:528–540. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1760-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rohini K., Shanthi V. Discovery of potent neuraminidase inhibitors using a combination of pharmacophore-based virtual screening and molecular simulation approach. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018;184:1421–1440. doi: 10.1007/s12010-017-2625-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.James N., Shanthi V., Ramanathan K. Drug design for ALK-positive NSCLC: An integrated pharmacophore-based 3D QSAR and virtual screening strategy. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018;185:289–315. doi: 10.1007/s12010-017-2650-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mirza S.B., Lee R.C.H., Chu J.J.H., Salmas R.E., Mavromoustakos T., Durdagi S. Discovery of selective dengue virus inhibitors using combination of molecular fingerprint-based virtual screening protocols, structure-based pharmacophore model development, molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro studies. J. Mol. Graphics. Model. 2018;79:88–102. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wei Y., Li J., Qing J., Huang M., Wu M., Gao F., Li D., Hong Z., Kong L., Huang W., et al. Discovery of novel hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase inhibitors by combining random forest, multiple e-pharmacophore modeling and docking. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148181. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mirza M.U., Alanko I., Vanmeert M., Muzzarelli K.M., Salo-Ahen O.M., Abdullah I., Froeyen M. The discovery of Zika virus NS2B-NS3 inhibitors with antiviral activity via an integrated virtual screening approach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022;175:106220. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lei J., Hansen G., Nitsche C., Klein C.D., Zhang L., Hilgenfeld R. Crystal structure of Zika virus NS2B-NS3 protease in complex with a boronate inhibitor. Science. 2016;353:503–505. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pérez-Regidor L., Zarioh M., Ortega L., Martín-Santamaría S. Virtual screening approaches towards the discovery of toll-like receptor modulators. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016;17:1508. doi: 10.3390/ijms17091508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Den Driessche G., Fourches D. Adverse drug reactions triggered by the common HLA-B* 57: 01 variant: A molecular docking study. J. Cheminf. 2017;9:1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13321-017-0202-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Banerjee K., Gupta U., Gupta S., Wadhwa G., Gabrani R., Sharma S.K., Jain C.K. Molecular docking of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase in Rhizopus oryzae. Bioinformation. 2011;7:285. doi: 10.6026/007/97320630007285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramatenki V., Dumpati R., Vadija R., Vellanki S., Potlapally S.R., Rondla R., Vuruputuri U. Identification of new lead molecules against UBE2NL enzyme for cancer therapy. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2017;182:1497–1517. doi: 10.1007/s12010-017-2414-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jorgensen W.L., Tirado-Rives J. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988;110:1657–1666. doi: 10.1021/ja00214a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.De Falco F., Di Giovanni C., Cerchia C., De Stefano D., Capuozzo A., Irace C., Iuvone T., Santamaria R., Carnuccio R., Lavecchia A. Novel non-peptide small molecules preventing IKKβ/NEMO association inhibit NF-κB activation in LPS-stimulated J774 macrophages. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016;104:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kalliokoski T., Salo H.S., Lahtela-Kakkonen M., Poso A. The effect of ligand-based tautomer and protomer prediction on structure-based virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009;49:2742–2748. doi: 10.1021/ci900364w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lanciotti R.S., Kosoy O.L., Laven J.J., Velez J.O., Lambert A.J., Johnson A.J., Stanfield S.M., Duffy M.R. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerging Infect. Dis. 2008;14:1232. doi: 10.3201/eid1408.080287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Friesner R.A., Murphy R.B., Repasky M.P., Frye L.L., Greenwood J.R., Halgren T.A., Sanschagrin P.C., Mainz D.T. Extra precision glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J. Med. Chem. 2006;49:6177–6196. doi: 10.1021/jm051256o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoo J., Medina-Franco J.L. Homology modeling, docking and structure-based pharmacophore of inhibitors of DNA methyltransferase. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2011;25:555–567. doi: 10.1007/s10822-011-9441-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Friesner R.A., Banks J.L., Murphy R.B., Halgren T.A., Klicic J.J., Mainz D.T., Repasky M.P., Knoll E.H., Shelley M., Perry J.K., et al. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004;47:1739–1749. doi: 10.1021/jm0306430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Salam N.K., Nuti R., Sherman W. Novel method for generating structure-based pharmacophores using energetic analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009;49:2356–2368. doi: 10.1021/ci900212v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Muthusamy K., Singh K.D., Chinnasamy S., Nagamani S., Krishnasamy G., Thiyagarajan C., Premkumar P., Anusuyadevi M. High throughput virtual screening and E-pharmacophore filtering in the discovery of new BACE-1 inhibitors. Interdiscip. Sci. Comput. Life Sci. 2013;5:119–126. doi: 10.1007/s12539-013-0157-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rathee D., Lather V., Dureja H. Pharmacophore modeling and 3D QSAR studies for prediction of matrix metalloproteinases inhibitory activity of hydroxamate derivatives. Biotechnol. Res. Innov. 2017;1:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.biori.2017.10.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.James N., Ramanathan K. Discovery of potent ALK inhibitors using pharmacophore-informatics strategy. Cell Biochem. Biophy. 2018;76:111–124. doi: 10.1007/s12013-017-0800-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Baell J., Congreve M., Leeson P., Abad-Zapatero C. Ask the experts: Past, present and future of the rule of five. Future Med. Chem. 2013;5:745–752. doi: 10.4155/fmc.13.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Pinheiro A.S., Duarte J.B.C., Alves C.N., de Molfetta F.A. Virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations from a bank of molecules of the amazon region against functional NS3-4A protease-helicase enzyme of hepatitis C virus. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015;176:1709–1721. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1672-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gupta K.K., Sethi G., Jayaraman M. Molecular docking and simulation studies of gustatory receptor of Aedes aegypti: A potent drug target to distract host-seeking behaviour in mosquitoes. J. Vector Borne Dis. 2016;53:179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rohini K., Agarwal P., Preethi B., Shanthi V., Ramanathan K. Exploring the lead compounds for Zika Virus NS2B-NS3 protein: An e-pharmacophore-based approach. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019;187:194–210. doi: 10.1007/s12010-018-2814-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cappel D., Hall M.L., Lenselink E.B., Beuming T., Qi J., Bradner J., Sherman W. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016;56:2388–2400. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Onufriev A., Bashford D., Case D.A. Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2004;55:383–394. doi: 10.1002/prot.20033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ash J., Fourches D. Characterizing the chemical space of ERK2 kinase inhibitors using descriptors computed from molecular dynamics trajectories. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2017;57:1286–1299. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Meng F., Cheng S., Ding H., Liu S., Liu Y., Zhu K., Chen S., Lu J., Xie Y., Li L., et al. Discovery and optimization of novel, selective histone methyltransferase SET7 inhibitors by pharmacophore-and docking-based virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2015;58:8166–8181. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kumari M., Chandra S., Tiwari N., Subbarao N. 3D QSAR, pharmacophore and molecular docking studies of known inhibitors and designing of novel inhibitors for M18 aspartyl aminopeptidase of Plasmodium falciparum. BMC Struct. Biol. 2016;16:1–11. doi: 10.1186/s12900-016-0063-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kandakatla N.A., Ramakrishnan G., Karthikeyan J., Chekkara R. Pharmacophore modeling, atom based 3D-QSAR and docking studies of chalcone derivatives as tubulin inhibitors. Orient. J. Chem. 2014;30:1083–1098. doi: 10.13005/ojc/300320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pradeep N., Munikumar M., Swargam S., Hema K., Sudheer Kumar K., Umamaheswari A. 197 Combination of e-pharmacophore modeling, multiple docking strategies and molecular dynamic simulations to discover of novel antagonists of BACE1. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2015;33((Suppl. S1)):129–130. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2015.1032834. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pradhan D., Priyadarshini V., Munikumar M., Swargam S., Umamaheswari A., Bitla A. Para-(benzoyl)-phenylalanine as a potential inhibitor against LpxC of Leptospira spp.: Homology modeling, docking, and molecular dynamics study. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2014;32:171–185. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2012.758056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chikan N.A., Bhavaniprasad V., Anbarasu K., Shabir N., Patel T.N. From natural products to drugs for epimutation computer-aided drug design. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013;170:164–175. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Laskowski R.A., Swindells M.B. LigPlot+: Multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011;51:2778–2786. doi: 10.1021/ci200227u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Patil R., Das S., Stanley A., Yadav L., Sudhakar A., Varma A.K. Optimized hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding at the target-ligand interface leads the pathways of drug-designing. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Chan J.F., Chik K.K., Yuan S., Yip C.C., Zhu Z., Tee K.M., Tsang J.O., Chan C.C., Poon V.K., Lu G., et al. Novel antiviral activity and mechanism of bromocriptine as a Zika virus NS2B-NS3 protease inhibitor. Antivir. Res. 2017;141:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Voss S., Nitsche C. Inhibitors of the Zika virus protease NS2B-NS3. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020;30:126965. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2020.126965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yadav R., Selvaraj C., Aarthy M., Kumar P., Kumar A., Singh S.K., Giri R. Investigating into the molecular interactions of flavonoids targeting NS2B-NS3 protease from ZIKA virus through in-silico approaches. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021;39:272–284. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1709546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Saudi M., Zmurko J., Kaptein S., Rozenski J., Neyts J., Van Aerschot A. Synthesis and evaluation of imidazole-4, 5-and pyrazine-2, 3-dicarboxamides targeting dengue and yellow fever virus. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014;87:529–539. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.09.062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang N., Chen H.M., Koch V., Schmitz H., Liao C.L., Bretner M., Bhadti V.S., Fattom A.I., Naso R.B., Hosmane R.S., et al. Ring-expanded (“fat”) nucleoside and nucleotide analogues exhibit potent in vitro activity against flaviviridae NTPases/helicases, including those of the West Nile virus, hepatitis C virus, and Japanese encephalitis virus. J. Med. Chem. 2003;46:4149–4164. doi: 10.1021/jm030842j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.World Health Organization . Situation Report: Zika Virus Microcephaly Guillain-Barré Syndrome. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

More data related to this study can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.

Articles from Vaccines are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES