Skip to main content
BMC Plant Biology logoLink to BMC Plant Biology
. 2023 Jan 24;23:52. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04073-6

Transcriptome analysis of sugarcane reveals rapid defense response of SES208 to Xanthomonas albilineans in early infection

Yaying Ma 1,2,#, Hongying Yu 3,#, Yijing Lu 1,2, Sanji Gao 4, Mahpara Fatima 2, Ray Ming 2,, Jingjing Yue 2,
PMCID: PMC9872421  PMID: 36694139

Abstract

Background

Diseases are the major factor affecting the quality and yield of sugarcane during its growth and development. However, our knowledge about the factors regulating disease responses remain limited. The present study focuses on identifying genes regulating transcriptional mechanisms responsible for resistance to leaf scald caused by Xanthomonas albilineans in S. spontaneum and S. officinarum.

Results

After inoculation of the two sugarcane varieties SES208 (S. spontaneum) and LA Purple (S. officinarum) with Xanthomonas albilineans, SES208 exhibited significantly greater resistance to leaf scald caused by X. albilineans than did LA Purple. Using transcriptome analysis, we identified a total of 4323 and 1755 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in inoculated samples of SES208 and LA Purple, respectively. Significantly, 262 DEGs were specifically identified in SES208 that were enriched for KEGG pathway terms such as plant-pathogen interaction, MAPK signaling pathway, and plant hormone signal transduction. Furthermore, we built a transcriptional regulatory co-expression network that specifically identified 16 and 25 hub genes in SES208 that were enriched for putative functions in plant-pathogen interactions, MAPK signaling, and plant hormone signal transduction. All of these essential genes might be significantly involved in resistance-regulating responses in SES208 after X. albilineans inoculation. In addition, we found allele-specific expression in SES208 that was associated with the resistance phenotype of SES208 when infected by X. albilineans. After infection with X. albilineans, a great number of DEGs associated with the KEGG pathways ‘phenylpropanoid biosynthesis’ and ‘flavonoid biosynthesis’ exhibited significant expression changes in SES208 compared to LA Purple that might contribute to superior leaf scald resistance in SES208.

Conclusions

We provided the first systematical transcriptome map that the higher resistance of SES208 is associated with and elicited by the rapid activation of multiple clusters of defense response genes after infection by X. albilineans and not merely due to changes in the expression of genes generically associated with stress resistance. These results will serve as the foundation for further understanding of the molecular mechanisms of resistance against X. albilineans in S. spontaneum.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-023-04073-6.

Keywords: Saccharum spp., Xanthomonas albilineans, Leaf scald, RNA-Seq, Disease resistance


Very high yields of sucrose make Saccharum officinarum and other sugarcane species among the most important crops as the largest sources of sugar and biofuel feedstocks from warm climates around the world [1, 2]. In the past few decades, sugarcane has been used not only to generate sugars for food but also to develop potentially sustainable processes to shift the global energy mix toward cleaner and renewable resources [3]. Current cultivated sugarcane hybrids were derived from interspecific crosses between several parental species including S. barberi, S. sinense, S. officinarum, and wild accessions of S. spontaneum and S. robustum that resulted in complex autopolyploids with 2n = 100–130 chromosomes [4, 5]. The growth and productivity of sugarcane can be very adversely impacted by biotic stress caused by microorganisms and also by abiotic stresses [6]. Researchers have taken several decades to breed cultivated varieties for high sucrose yield and disease resistance. In particular, the high sucrose content of modern sugarcane cultivars was derived from S. officinarum, which exhibits poor disease resistance, while their disease resistance was derived from its relative S. spontaneum, which exhibits low sugar content. S. spontaneum is a key contributor of outstanding traits such as tolerance to environmental stress and ratoon capacity and was therefore used during a program of backcrossing to S. officinarum, referred to as nobilization [7]. Thus, considering the genetic background of sugarcane, analysis of the mechanisms of its parental responses to pathogenic bacteria has become necessary. We therefore consider the S. officinarum cultivar LA Purple and the S. spontaneum cultivar SES208 ideal materials for genetic research into high sugar content and disease resistance traits.

As one of the main diseases of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids), leaf scald can cause the death of the entire sugarcane plant. Due to the potential for leaf scald to cause severe economic losses, this disease has severely restricted the cultivation of susceptible sugarcane varieties [8]. Leaf scald was first recognized as a disease caused by an organism in the Proteobacteria, Xanthomonas albilineans. Symptoms of infection with this pathogen in sugarcane have allowed the progression of this disease to be classified into three different stages including incubation period, chronic period, and acute period [9]. X. albilineans colonizes the plant vascular system and parenchyma cells [10] and leads to the inhibition of chloroplast development and disruption of photosynthesis [11], followed by “scalding” of stalks and stalk death. A hypersensitive response (HR) is induced early during infection with X. albilineans. This pathogen-induced HR is thought to reduce infiltration and spread of the pathogen through local cell death at the site of infection [12, 13].

During their evolution, plants have established an immune system against pathogen infection [14]. Plants live in environments that also host some microorganisms that, as pathogens, can adversely affect their growth and development. To avoid infection by pathogens in their environments, plants respond via an innate immune system [15]. Plants first recognize molecules originating from both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes and then respond to virulence factors from pathogens. The primary immune response in plants, known as PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI), involves the recognition of conserved microbial features. PTI is initiated by the perception of pathogens at the cell surface and pathogens that cross the host plasma membrane, which are recognized according to their pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) [16]. The hypersensitive response (HR) is the hallmark response of effector-triggered immunity, or ETI, which is initiated directly or indirectly when effectors from pathogens are recognized by NLRs, which are receptors containing nucleotide-binding domains and leucine-rich repeats [15]. Crosstalk between PTI and ETI involves mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling [17] and results in massive accumulation of active oxygen within a short time [18]. A substantial influx of Ca2+ [19] and the biosynthesis of plant hormones, including salicylic acid (SA), abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ET), and jasmonic acid (JA) also occurs [20]. The beta-hydroxy phenolic compound SA is known as a defense-related hormone that mediates systemic acquired resistance (SAR) [13]. In 1979, aspirin (acetyl-SA) was first reported to increase the resistance of a susceptible tobacco line to infection with TMV (tobacco mosaic virus) [21]. Further, JA- and SA-induced systemic resistance (ISR) can reprogram plant induction mechanisms to alleviate stresses [22]. Plant secondary metabolites, which can be expressed constitutively or in response to pathogens, mediate interactions between plants and microbes in particular [23]. Studies conducted on the activities of these metabolites during disease resistance in plants have shown that many metabolites including phenylpropanoids, terpenoid quinones, and flavonoids can potentially combat plant pathogens [23, 24].

Several studies of plants infected with X.albilineans have been carried out in species such as rice [25, 26], elephant grass [27], and wheat [28], and shown that the expression of some genes involved in pathways controlling the biosynthesis and activity of ethylene, jasmonic acid, or secondary metabolites respond to inoculation with this pathogen. Although transcripts of more than 5000 genes with altered expression were previously revealed in an analysis comparing the transcriptomes of sugarcane cultivars that are resistant or susceptible to leaf scald after infection with X. albilineans [29], the cellular mechanisms of resistance to this pathogen in sugarcane are still unknown. The first global sugarcane proteome dataset revealed that seven candidate genes associated with “photosynthesis”, “glycolytic process”, “glycosylation process”, “plant innate immune system”, “plant cytochrome P450”, and “non-specific lipid transfer proteins” are expressed in response to X. albilineans inoculation in SES208 [30]. However, although some infected plants do not display external symptoms, especially under conditions unsuitable for the pathogen, the reasons for such latent progression through infection phases are not known [9]. Therefore, a qualitative PCR assay was established to detect X. albilineans infection, exclude the presence of other pathogens, and monitor epidemics and evaluate resistance in the field [31]. Despite such progress, the mechanisms of the molecular responses of modern sugarcane cultivars to infection with X.albilineans are still unclear.

To analyze the origins of X. albilineans resistance in modern sugarcane varieties from a cross between S. spontaneum exhibiting disease resistance and S. officinarum exhibiting high sugar and biomass yields, the leaf scald resistance of these two parental species was compared. In the present study, we used RNA-Seq and weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to compare the transcriptomes of the representative sugarcane cultivars SES208 (Saccharum spontaneum, 2n = 64) and LA Purple (Saccharum officinarum, 2n = 80) during their genetic responses to infection with X. albilineans. Our analysis identified transcripts of DEGs associated with X. albilineans resistance that will be of great significance for improving our understanding of X. albilineans resistance in sugarcane.

Results

Differences in responses of sugarcane cultivars LA purple and SES208 to inoculation with X. albilineans

To investigate the differences in resistance to leaf scald caused by X. albilineans between the sugarcane cultivars SES208 (S. spontaneum), a disease-resistant variety, and LA Purple (S. officinarum), a disease-susceptible variety, we experimentally inoculated plants with X. albilineans. We observed the phenotypic differences between inoculated and uninoculated plants of these two species and collected leaf tissue samples at 24 hpi (hpi: hours post inoculation), 48 hpi, and 72 hpi for subsequent RNA extraction. Plants of SES208 and LA Purple exhibited different responses to inoculation with X. albilineans. Although there were no leaf scald symptoms on SES208 plants after infection, there were thin streaks on the leaves. LA Purple plants exhibited symptoms of leaf scald at 72 hpi infection (Fig. 1a), thus confirming the differences between LA Purple and SES208 in resistance to leaf scald caused by X. albilineans.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

a Leaf scald symptoms observed in sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. Pencil line streak (red arrow). b Box diagram of gene expression (log10(FPKM+ 1)). c The numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with increased or decreased transcript abundance in SES208 and LA Purple (|FDR| > 2,p-value< 0.005). d Venn diagrams of DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple, respectively. SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

Identification of DEGs and core conserved DEGs in resistant and susceptible sugarcane cultivars in response to inoculation with X. albilineans

Global gene expression profiles in leaves of SES208 (S. spontaneum) and LA Purple (S. officinarum) inoculated with X. albilineans and uninoculated control plants were analyzed at 24 hpi, 48 hpi, and 72 hpi. In general, global gene expression in SES208 was higher than that in LA Purple (Fig. 1b). Transcriptome comparisons at each time point were made within each of the cultivars. Compared to time point 0, at 24 hpi, transcripts of 1480 DEGs were more abundant and 939 DEGs were less abundant in leaves of SES208 while transcripts of 104 DEGs were more abundant and 182 DEGs were less abundant in leaves of LA-Purple (Fig. 1c). Trends in the number of genes with increased transcript abundance and those with decreased transcript abundance were similar between 0 and 72 hpi in LA Purple but differed during this time period in SES208 (Fig. 1c). Between 0 and 48 hpi, SES208 showed 735 genes with increased transcript abundance and 1538 genes with decreased transcript abundance (Fig. 1c). The number of genes with increased transcript abundance in SES208 was significantly greater than that in LA Purple (Fig. 1c). The highest number of genes with increased transcript abundance in SES208 occurred at 24 hpi, but in LA Purple occurred at 72 hpi (Fig. 1c). The highest number of DEGs with decreased transcript abundance occurred at 48 hpi in leaves of SES208 and at 72 hpi in leaves of LA Purple (Fig. 1c). A total of 4323 DEGs were expressed in leaves of SES208 in response to X. albilineans, nearly twice the number of DEGs in LA Purple in response to this pathogen (Fig. 1d). The expression of 975, 646, and 714 DEGs specifically changed at 24, 48, and 72 hpi, respectively, in SES208, while the expression of 70, 158, and 1053 DEGs specifically changed in LA Purple at 24, 48, and 72 hpi, respectively (Fig. 1d). These results indicate that the transcript expression of more genes in SES208 than in LA Purple changed rapidly during infection with X. albilineans.

Further, we annotated the genes encoding TFs among the DEGs responding to inoculation with X. albilineans in LA Purple and SES208. We identified genes representing a total of 23 TF families in both cultivars, and found that more TF families exhibited changed transcript expression in SES208 than in LA Purple (Fig. 2a). It is worth noting that gene families encoding WRKY, NAC, MYB, ERF, and bHLH were significantly overrepresented among DEGs in SES208 inoculated with X. albilineans. All DEGs encoding TFs showed higher expression in SES208 than in LA Purple except for three genes encoding ERF, MYB, and WRKY, respectively (Fig. 2b). The transcript abundances of 15 genes encoding MYBs, 17 encoding NACs, 8 encoding ERFs, and 8 encoding WRKYs significantly increased, while the transcript abundances of 12 genes encoding bHLHs and 12 encoding ERFs significantly decreased in SES208 compared to LA Purple after inoculation with X. albilineans (Fig. 2b), suggesting that members of these TF families might be involved in the regulation of responses to this pathogen in sugarcane.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Transcription factors (TFs) encoded by DEGs in sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. a The number of TFs encoded by DEGs. b Heat map of TF expression after inoculation with X. albilineans. Expression values were calculated as the relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

GO term and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of DEGs responding to inoculation with X. albilineans in SES208 and LA purple

To further analyze the possible functions of DEGs during X. albilineans infection in LA Purple and SES208 sugarcane, KEGG and GO analyses were performed. A total of 6098 DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple were significantly enriched in 119 KEGG pathways (Fig. 3a). By cross-comparison of all DEGs between SES208 and LA Purple, we found that these two cultivars shared 715 DEGs across the comparison, while 3804 showed specifically changed expression in SES208 and 1579 DEGs showed specifically changed expression in LA Purple (Fig. 3a). We also found that the overall expression of DEGs responding to X. albilineans was higher in SES208 than in LA Purple (Fig. 3b). KEGG analysis was performed on the core DEGs and cultivar-specific DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple. In SES208, we found that 3804 cultivar-specific DEGs were enriched in 110 pathways, particularly in plant-pathogen interaction (Fig. 3c). Notably, 58, 124, 80, and 28 genes were significantly enriched for pathways including MAPK signaling, plant-pathogen interactions, plant hormone-mediated signal transduction, and the biosynthesis of ubiquinone and other terpenoid quinones, respectively. Another 95, 71, 39, and 37 DEGs were mainly concentrated in functions such as the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids, metabolism of starch and sucrose, metabolism of phenylalanine, and the biosynthesis of flavonoids, respectively (Fig. 3c). In LA Purple, 1579 cultivar-specific DEGs were also significantly enriched for terms in metabolic pathways and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Fig. 3d). A total of 715 DEGs in common between SES208 and LA Purple were enriched in 76 pathways and 298 DEGs were enriched for terms related to metabolic pathways and secondary metabolite biosynthesis (Fig. 3e). Our GO term enrichment analysis showed that, compared to LA Purple, DEGs in SES208 were significantly enriched for terms in the biological processes domain including those related to responses to stresses or plant hormones (Additional file 1).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Analysis of differential gene expression in sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. a Venn diagrams of DEGs between SES208 with LA Purple. b Heat map of conserved core DEGs expressed in common between SES208 with LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. c-e Numbers of DEGs in major KEGG pathways after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. c Specific DEGs in SES208. The red font represents the pathway specifically enriched in SES208; The blue font indicates that the number of DEGs in the enriched pathway in SES208 is greater than that in LA Purple. d Specific DEGs in LA Purple. e DEGs expressed in common between SES208 and LA Purple. Expression values were calculated as relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

WGCNA analysis of coexpressed gene modules responding to inoculation with X. albilineans in SES208 and LA purple

To identify the key regulatory genes related to X. albilineans resistance in SES208 and LA Purple, a WGCNA was performed. A total of 6098 DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple were chosen for constructing the network, and of the 18 modules with correlated expression detected by WGCNA, seven had correlation coefficients higher than 0.7 (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4a). DEGs in SES208 enriched in the MEblack module (r = 0.83) and the MEdarkolivegreen module (r = 0.87) were involved in plant hormone signaling, MAPK signaling, plant-pathogen interactions, biosynthesis of terpenoid quinones, metabolism of starch and sucrose, and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis (Additional file 2). These genes were then chosen to construct coexpression networks to identify candidate regulatory genes that respond to X. albilineans in SES208. Our co-expression network indicated 16 and 25 hub genes in the MEblack module and the MEdarkolivegreen module, respectively (Fig. 4b, c). These hub genes are enriched for putative functions in plant-pathogen interactions, MAPK signaling, and plant hormone signal transduction, all of which might be involved in regulating the responses of sugarcane to infection with X. albilineans (Fig. 4b, c).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) of sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. a Heat map of the correlation between WGCNA modules in SES208 and LA Purple. SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. The left lane indicates 18 modules. The right lane indicates the module-trait correlation from − 1 to 1. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively. b The co-expression networks in SES208 in MEblack module. c The co-expression networks in SES208 in MEdarkolivegreen module. Light blue: plant pathogen interaction; Purple: MAPK signaling pathway; Red: plant hormone signal transduction; Orange: terpenoid quinone biosynthesis; Green: phenylpropanoid biosynthesis; Pink:starch and sucrose metabolism. The blue font indicates hub genes

Allelic analysis of DEGs that respond to inoculation with X. albilineans in SES208 and LA purple

Allelic diversity including ASE (allele-specific expression) may be assessed in diploid or polyploid plants. ASE can lead to dramatic changes in gene expression profiles [32]. To identify ASE of defense response genes in sugarcane, we analyzed 345 DEGs from SES208 and LA Purple sugarcane that were identified in response to X. albilineans by KEGG pathway enrichment analysis (Fig. 5). According to the allele table https://www.life.illinois.edu/ming/downloads/Spontaneum_genome/Saccharum%20spont%20alleleTable-Jan%202019.csv [4], all of these 345 DEGs have one to four alleles and include dispersed duplicated genes and tandem duplicated genes. These 345 DEGs include a total of 281 differentially expressed alleles, 57 dispersed duplicated genes, and 7 tandem duplicated genes (Fig. 5). Many of the DEGs that might be involved in plant-pathogen interactions, MAPK signaling, and plant hormone signal transduction exhibited decreased transcript abundance after X. albilineans infection, indicating that the expression of these DEGs was likely negatively regulated in response to pathogen invasion (Fig. 5a). However, the transcript abundances of most DEGs in metabolic pathways increased, indicating that the expression of these DEGs was likely positively regulated in response to pathogen invasion (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Alleles analysis of DEGs involved in major pathways with function annotation information and expression pattern between sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. a Alleles analysis of DEGs involved in MAPK signaling pathway, plant-pathogen interaction and plant hormone signal transduction. b Alleles analysis of DEGs in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and terpenoid quinone biosynthesis. The blue font indicates hub genes in Fig. 4. Genes shown in red font exhibited expression of one specific allele. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

Of these 345 DEGs, 21 exhibited expression of one specific allele (Fig. 5). We also examined the expression of differentially expressed alleles of DEGs with two, three, or four alleles in response to X. albilineans, and found that 64.86, 49.02, and 30.61% of the haplotypes were differentially expressed among these multi-allelic DEGs, respectively, indicating an allelic dominance effect in these two cultivars responding to X. albilineans treatment (Fig. 5; Additional file 3). After analyzing their transcript expression in SES208, we found that 85 out of 281 DEGs exhibited ASE, 42 out of these 85 DEGs expressed alleles with increased transcript abundance, and 43 out of these 85 DEGs exhibited decreased transcript abundance for one differentially expressed allele at 24 hpi (Additional file 4). It is noteworthy that we identified 62 genes with two differentially expressed alleles, 93 genes with three differentially expressed alleles, and 44 genes with four differentially expressed alleles (Addition file 3). The transcript abundances of alleles of about 37.2% of the genes with two to four alleles were strictly up-regulated at 24 hpi in response to X.albilineans in SES208 (Additional file 4). Thus, our results indicate that ASE is associated with resistance to infection by X. albilineans in SES208. Further, we discovered that the genes exhibiting ASE showed similar expression patterns in response to X. albilineans in SES208 (Additional file 4). Further, 19 DEGs showed increased transcript abundances and 38 DEGs showed decreased transcript abundances at 24 hpi in dispersed duplicated DEGs (Additional file 5). The transcript abundances of five tandem duplicated DEGs showed decreased transcript abundances at 24 hpi and two tandem duplicated DEG showed increased transcript abundances at 48 hpi in SES208 during X. albilineans infection (Additional file 5). These results indicated the expression of these alleles, dispersed duplicated genes, and tandem duplicated genes showed significant and consistent responses to infection with X. albilineans.

Potential functions of major metabolic pathways to X. albilineans infection in sugarcane

Our KEGG analysis of DEGs responding to inoculation with X. albilineans infection identified a total of 165 DEGs between SES208 and LA Purple that might participate in the biosynthesis of terpenoid quinones, phenylpropanoids, and flavonoids, or the metabolism of starch and sucrose or phenylalanine, among which 122 of 165 DEGs exhibited high transcript abundances and 43 out of 165 DEGs exhibited low transcript abundances in SES208 compared to LA Purple at 24 hpi in response to X. albilineans infection (Fig. 5b).

The transcript abundances of DEGs encoding the key enzymes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, and terpenoid quinone biosynthesis were mainly increased in SES208 compared to LA Purple in response to X. albilineans infection and the alleles of these DEGs showed the same expression patterns (Fig. 5b). Of the DEGs putatively involved in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway, the transcript abundances of 81% were increased at 24 hpi or 48 hpi in SES208 but were less highly expressed in LA Purple (Fig. 5b). The transcripts of all alleles of the beta-glucosidase(BglX) and Bright Trichomes 1 (BRT1) genes, which are both essential in phenylpropanoid synthesis, increased significantly after infection with X. albilineans in SES208 but not in LA Purple (Fig. 5B; Additional file 6). The CYP450 family is involved in the synthesis and metabolism of phenylpropanoids [33] and one of its members, CYP73, also showed increased transcript expression after 24 hpi in SES208 (Fig. 5B; Additional file 7). The CYP75 gene family plays an important role in flavonoid biosynthesis in plants [34]. Members of the CYP 98 family catalyze the 3-hydroxylation step in the phenylpropanoid pathway (add reference). Interestingly, all alleles of these two genes showed increased transcript abundance after 24 hpi in SES208 (Fig. 5B), indicating that their expression responds positively to infection with X. albilineans in SES208. However, the expression of these two genes showed little change in LA Purple (Fig. 5B), which could be consistent with the stronger resistance of SES208 than LA Purple to infection with X.albilineans.

DEGs associated with starch and sucrose metabolism pathways showed differential expression trends in SES208 and LA Purple after X. albilineans infection. For example, glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase 4 (GN4) and glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase (glgC) exhibited increased transcript expression in SES208 at 24 hpi (Additional file 7). However, glycogenin (GYG1) exhibited decreased transcript expression at 24 hpi (Additional file 6). The transcript abundances of otsB, which encodes trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase, sharply decreased for five of eight alleles at 24 hpi in response to X. albilineans infection. The dynamic changes in the expression of the above DEGs in the starch and sucrose metabolism pathway might provide evidence of a direct relationship between higher X. albilineans resistance and lower biomass in SES208.

Potential functions of the MAPK signaling pathway and plant-pathogen interaction pathway during X. albilineans infection

Based on the above results, we identified candidate genes from the plant-pathogen interaction and MAPK signaling pathways whose expression responds to X. albilineans infection. In PTI, respiratory burst oxidase homologues (RBOHs) are a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during plant-microbe interactions [35, 36]. We found that the Rboh gene exhibited significantly increased expression in response to inoculation with X. albilineans in SES208 (Fig. 6a). Further, transcript expression of the catalase1/ascorbate peroxidase1 (CAT1/APX1) genes related to cell death and H2O2 production increased, which might induce MAPK signaling to protect plant cells from oxidative stress and death. In the early stages of X. albilineans infection of sugarcane, the transcript expression of SsMEKK, SsMKK, and SsMPK decreased (Fig. 6b). The transcript expression of SsWRKY22 and SsWRKY33, TF-encoding core genes with two and three alleles, respectively, decreased sharply in response to infection with X. albilineans, suggesting that the decreased expression of these genes could be an important aspect of the sugarcane response to X. albilineans (Fig. 5a; Fig. 6b). The expression of genes encoding cyclic nucleotide gated channels (CNGCs) that are normally involved in the regulation of Ca2+ channels and stomata increased in SES208, while the expression of CNGCs showed no response in LA Purple (Fig. 6a). The expression of the majority of genes encoding CDPK and CML, except for Sspon.03G0026290-3P in SES208, dramatically decreased at 24 hpi (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Models for regulation of gene expression in plant-pathogen interaction, MAPK signaling pathway, and plant hormone signal transduction in sugarcane varieties SES208 and LA Purple after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans. a Plant-pathogen interaction. b MAPK signaling pathway. c Plant hormone signal transduction. Expression values were calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

The transcript abundance of the ethylene receptor ripening inhibitor (RIN) gene decreased in SES208 but not in LA Purple (Fig. 6a). The disease resistance genes RPM1 (RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA 1) and RPS2 (RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S2), which exhibit ASE, decrease in transcript expression after X. albilineans infection in SES208. In contrast, downstream resistance genes involved in R gene-mediated plant disease resistance responses showed significantly decreased expression (Fig. 6a). Further, the 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase (KCS) genes involved in the synthesis of ultra-long-chain fatty acids increased sharply at 24 hpi (Fig. 6a). These results indicate that differential expression of genes involved in the PTI and ETI signaling pathways is likely essential for X. albilineans response in SES208.

Potential functions of plant hormone signal transduction in resistance to X. albilineans infection

The plant hormones SA, JA, ET, and ABA act in pathways that protect plants against infection with pathogens [37]. NPR1-LIKE PROTEIN 3 (NPR3) is an important regulator of plant SAR signaling, and we found that the transcript expression of the NPR3 genes decreased sharply in SES208 and LA Purple at 24 hpi (Fig. 6c; Additional file 7). In SES208, the transglutaminase (TGA) gene downstream of the SA pathway exhibited significantly increased transcript expression that peaked at 48 hpi in SES208, but showed a slight decrease at 24 hpi in LA Purple (Fig. 6c; Additional file 7). The transcript abundance of the downstream gene PR1 (pathogenesis-related protein 1), a core R gene with ASE, increased in both SES208 and LA Purple in response to X. albilineans infection (Fig. 6c). The JAZ (jasmonate ZIM domain) gene functions during the regulation of responses involving the plant hormone JA [38]. At 48 hpi and 72 hpi, the transcript abundances of JAZ genes were significantly increased in SES208 (Fig. 6c). All four alleles of MYC2 showed decreased expression at 24 hpi in SES208 (Fig. 5a; Fig. 6c; Additional file 7).

In the ethylene signal transduction pathway, response to antagonist 1 (RAN1) helps ethylene receptor (ETR) to interact with ethylene [39]. After X. albilineans infection, the expression of ETR decreased in LA Purple, but increased in SES208 (Fig. 6c). Transcript expression of the EBF1 (EIN3-BINDING F BOX PROTEIN 1) gene decreased significantly in SES208, but there was no obvious change in the transcript abundance of this gene in LA Purple (Fig. 6c; Fig.8). The expression of ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 (EIN3) was likely inhibited by EBF1 in SES208 while the expression of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (ERF) genes increased in both SES208 and LA Purple (Fig. 6c). Transcripts encoding PYL (pyr1-like), an ABA receptor that is involved in the sensing and transduction of ABA signals [40] were expressed at lower levels after infection in SES208. However, genes encoding type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2C) were all expressed at higher levels at 24 hpi, and the downstream genes encoding SnRK2 (class III SNF-1-related protein kinase 2) exhibited increased expression of two genes and decreased expression of two other genes after inoculation of SES208 with X. albilineans (Additional file 7). Further, the expression of genes encoding abscisic acid-responsive TFs (ABF) increased and their transcripts exhibited increased abundance at 24 hpi in SES208 (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Verification by qRT-PCR of the expression patterns of four DEGs involved in different pathways during infection of sugarcane with Xanthomonas albilineans. The right y-axis indicates FPKM value; the left y-axis indicates relative expression; the x-axis indicates different time periods after infection. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h represent 24, 48, and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively

Discussion

Analysis of sugarcane cultivars transcriptomes during X. albilineans infection

We constructed 24 cDNA libraries to elucidate genetic responses that are triggered by X. albilineans infection in the sugarcane species S. spontaneum and S. officinarum. Comparative transcriptome and functional enrichment analyses of SES208 and LA Purple revealed sharp X. albilineans infection-induced gene expression changes in SES208 compared to LA Purple. These changes involved genes in key plant defense pathways such as plant-pathogen interaction, MAPK signaling, and plant hormone function pathways in addition to metabolic pathways for flavonoid, phenylpropanoid, and terpenoid quinone biosynthesis as well as for phenylalanine, starch, and sucrose metabolism.

Polyploidy results in changes in cellular structure, function [41, 42], and allelic diversity [43] that result in dramatic changes in gene expression profiles [44, 45], such as ASE [32]. Here, we identified a total of 345 DEGs involved in X. albilineans resistance in SES208 (Fig. 5). The hub DEGs identified were candidates that might be crucial for responses to X. albilineans infection in sugarcane. Among these 345 DEGs, 85 exhibited ASE while 196 showed balanced allelic expression (Additional file 4). We suggest that ASE in SES208 is largely a genotype-specific phenomenon and might be common in some individual wild species. Notably, the expression patterns of genes with multiple alleles were similar, which indicates that these alleles might act synergistically in resistance to X. albilineans. We predict that the genes showing ASE in SES208 reflect the breeding history of sugarcane, and might have undergone greater selection pressure. Furthermore, the occurrence of ASE among these defense genes might be associated with traits inherited from wild genotypes as discussed previously [46]. The higher frequency of ASE in defense-responsive genes is consistent with observations in wheat, in which many such genes exhibit homologous gene expression bias in plants attacked by pathogenic fungi [47]. Sugarcane hybridization and breeding have long focused mainly on selection for disease resistance and cultivars thus vary widely in their response to pathogen infection.

Transcriptional regulation is an important aspect of gene expression regulation in plants that controls many crucial biological processes via gene regulatory networks [48, 49]. Transcripts encoding five types of TFs including WRKY, NAC, MYB, ERF, and bHLH were enriched in SES208 in response to X. albilineans infection, which suggests that these TFs could be directly or indirectly involved in resistance to X. albilineans. Previous studies have indicated that WRKY TFs can interact with receptors for PTI and become involved in MAPK signaling to activate or regulate gene expression [50]. The decreased transcript expression of SsWRKYs in SES208 indicates that these genes might be involved in some regulatory responses during defense to X. albilineans (Fig. 2; Fig.8). NAC TFs ANAC019 and ANAC055 might be involved in plant defense responses mediated by JA and in regulation of the expression of the JA-induced defense genes VSP1 and LOX2 [51]. R2R3-MYB TFs such as AtMYB96 [50] and OsMYB4 [52] could increase P. syringae resistance and increase the expression of PR protein-encoding genes in Arabidopsis and rice, respectively. The transcript expression of about 90% of the SsNACs and all of the SsMYBs in SES208 increased, suggesting that these TFs might activate gene expression during resistance to X. albilineans (Fig. 2). ERF19 plays a role with NINJA in ERF19-mediated regulation of Arabidopsis innate immunity [53]. SsERF genes show ASE and all increase in transcript abundance in SES208, suggesting that they might activate gene expression to enhance resistance to X. albilineans (Fig. 2). The bHLH transcription factor GmPIB1 increases soybean resistance to P. sojae infection by inhibiting the expression of GmSPOD1 [54]. Further, the bHLH TF HBI1 negatively regulates some aspects of disease defense responses in Arabidopsis [55]. However, the transcript abundances of about 85% of SsbHLHs actually decreased in SES208, suggesting that the expression of the bHLH TFs themselves might be regulated negatively during responses to X. albilineans in sugarcane. This might also indicate that increased or decreased transcript expression of genes encoding different classes of TFs affect various resistance responses to X. albilineans in SES208 (Fig. 2).

Plant-pathogen interaction pathway responsive X. albilineans infection in sugarcane

Plant immunity requires the action of multiple receptors and ligands to provide adequate protection against pathogen attack. In the early stage of oxidative burst when plants are infected by pathogenic microorganisms, they sense PAMPs, abiotic stress, and extracellular signals through surface-localized PRRs [56]. Flagellin receptor FLS2 can recognize bacterial proteins [57] and elevate ROS production [58]. APX1 is a key factor in removing ROS produced in response to stresses and disease progression in plants [59]. In addition, CAT can also decompose H2O2 to generate O2, and trigger benzoic acid synthesis for generation of SA, leading to the elaboration of a systemic defense response (Fig. 7). CAT activity in transgenic tobacco can result in serious HR and effectively control bacterial infection [60, 61]. The expression of the SsCAT1 gene decreased continuously at 24 hpi upon X. albilineans infection (Fig. 8), and the transcript abundance of two SsAPX1 genes increased at 24 hpi in SES208 (Fig. 6a). These results demonstrate that SsWRKY genes might negatively regulate the expression of SsPR1 and plants might mainly rely on SsAPX1 to generate H2O2 in early stages of infection and then rely on SsCAT1 activated by the MAPK signaling pathway during later stages. CEBiP and CERK act as LysM-RP and LysM-RK proteins, respectively, and are also regarded as PRRs [62]. Interestingly, the response of CEBiP to the pathogen in SES208 and LA Purple was similar to that of OsLYP4 and OsLYP6 in response to X. oryzae pv. oryzae (PGNXoo), X. oryzae pv. oryzaecola (PGNXoc), and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) DC3000 (PGNPto) in rice. OsLYP4 and OsLYP6 are normally complexed but can dissociate and when complexed with OsCERK can sense bacterial peptidoglycan (PGN). The susceptibility of transgenic plants was positively correlated with the transcript abundances of OsLYP4 and OsLYP6 genes [63]. At 24 hpi, the transcript abundance of CEBiP is lower in SES208 and higher in LA Purple (Additional file 7).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Hypothetical model of the molecular mechanism of the response to X. albilineans in sugarcane

As a cation channel protein, CNGC can participate in the regulation of Ca2+ influx to prevent pathogen invasion [64]. In SES208, the expression of CNGS transcripts showed an increasing trend. If CNGS participates in X. albilineans resistance in SES208, it might act to open calcium channels, promote Ca2+ influx, and activate intracellular disease resistance genes (Fig. 6a; Additional file 7). Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) can be activated by Ca2+ [65] and overexpression of the CPK4 gene in tobacco could enhance the transcription of SAR-related genes, lead to HR, and improve the broad-spectrum disease resistance of plants [66]. In addition, the increase in calcium can directly or through CaM/CML, result in the phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of TFs [67]. In the early stages of infection in sugarcane, metabolites from pathogenic bacteria might inhibit the binding of SsCML and SsCDPK to calcium ions, resulting in decreased expression of SsCML and SsCDPK transcripts (Additional file 7). Expression of SsRboh transcripts increases, which might enhance production of reactive oxygen species (H2O2) (Fig. 6a). The processes above constitute our proposed model for a pathogen-associated molecular PTI response that might occur during the response of SES208 against pathogens.

When a pathogen suppresses or acts on PTI by secreting effector proteins into the host, R proteins can sense or recognize the effector protein, thereby triggering ETI [15]. During the ETI response, effectors (Avirulence, Avr) activate the expression of numerous genes encoding disease-resistance proteins that specifically recognize the effector and allow a resistance response [15]. The RPM1 protein can recognize the RIN4 protein that becomes phosphorylated due to the presence of the effectors AvrRPM1 and AvrB, which in turn results in the HR [68]. The RPS2 gene that functions in disease resistance in Arabidopsis was used to identify a virulence gene avrRpt2 and to select the mutants with altered resistance to Pseudomonas syringae, a bacterial plant pathogen [69]. In SES208, the transcript abundances of SsRIN4, SsRPM1, SsRPS2, and genes encoding R proteins significantly decreased within 0-24 hpi (Fig. 6a). It is possible that when plants are strongly attacked by pathogenic organisms, these genes cannot be expressed quickly enough to resist invasion by pathogens. The expression of these genes responds relatively weakly to pathogen invasion and a slight HR occurs. The protein encoded by XopD from X. campestris pv. campestris strain B100 targets the MYB30 TF in Arabidopsis that activates plant defense and cell death induced by bacteria [70]. In our analysis of TFs, we observed increased transcript expression for 15 genes encoding MYB TFs (Fig. 2; Fig. 6a). Transcript abundances of MYB genes and KSC both increased in SES208 (Fig. 6a), which suggest that MYBs might act as positive regulators of KCS to activate SES208 defenses against X. albilineans infection.

Possible roles of plant hormone-mediated signal transduction genes responsive to X. albilineans infection in sugarcane

Both PTI and ETI can cause increased biosynthesis of SA and defense phytohormones that mediate SAR (Fig. 7) [71]. The SA receptor NPR3 is known to promote the degradation of the transcriptional repressor JAZ, thereby activating JA synthesis and inducing JA-responsive gene expression to allow plants to resist pathogens [72]. In SES208, the expression of Sspon.01G0024890-2C (SsNPR3) decreased, which suggests that defense responses in SES208 might not depend on this signaling pathway (Fig. 6c; Additional file 7). MYC2 is a positive regulator in the JA signal pathway [73]. At 0 hpi, the abundances of MYC2 and JAZ transcripts were significantly higher in SES208 than in LA Purple (Fig. 8), but the expression of both these genes decreased in response to X. albilineans in SES208 (Fig. 6c; Additional file 7), suggesting that JAZ might interact with MYC to inhibit the transcription of JA-responsive genes. During infection of plants with viruses or other pathogens, HR responses are triggered by Avr/R protein interactions that can result in changes in the levels of disease defense-related hormones including ET, JA, NO, SA, and in the accumulation of ROS via MAPK signaling (Fig. 7) [74].

Some studies have shown that ABA can also have positive or negative regulatory effects during plant immunity [75, 76]. In our study, we regarded the SsPYL and SsPP2C genes as putative negative and positive regulators of responses to X. albilineans infection (Fig. 6c; Additional file 7). Therefore, we hypothesize that several members of the MAPK family might be activated directly or indirectly by the ABA core signaling pathway during response to X. albilineans infection (Fig. 7) [77]. The above results suggest that ETI and ABA might play necessary roles in response to X. albilineans infection in SES208.

Major metabolic pathways responsive to X. albilineans infection in sugarcane

Studies of different plant metabolites have shown the potential defensive activity of these compounds against plant pathogens [24]. The phenylpropanoid pathway is involved in the production of flavonoids, lignans, phytoalexins, phenolic acids, coumarins, and stilbene, which are directly and indirectly involved in plant development and disease responses [78]. Thus, altered levels of JA, SA, and secondary metabolites might influence HR and other disease resistance-related processes (Fig. 7) [79]. We found that the transcript expression of essential genes BglX and BRT1 encoding important enzymes in the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway increased in SES208 during X. albilineans infection, which might have contributed to the defense of plants against this pathogen (Additional file 7). As important phenylpropanoid compounds, flavonoids and their derivatives have been shown to act as antimicrobial and signaling molecules during plant defense responses [80]. Enhanced levels of flavonoids in cotton suppress plant invasion by the fungal pathogen Verticillium dahliae [81]. The expression of flavonoid biosynthesis-related enzymes such as chalcone synthase (CHS), 5-O-(4-coumaroyl)-D-quinate 3′-monooxygenase (CYP98A/C3’H), flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase (CYP75B1) encoded by SsCHS, SsCYP98A, and SsCYP75B1, respectively, increased in SES208 after X. albilineans infection (Fig. 5b; Additional file 7), suggesting that increased flavonoid synthesis might be part of the defense response against X. albilineans infection in this sugarcane cultivar.

In maize, terpenoids represent another class of metabolites with disease defense functions in plants. Therefore, the higher expression of important genes in the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway and the increased accumulation of terpenoids have both been correlated with disease resistance [82, 83]. The transcript expression of four genes encoding 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPD) increased in SES208 after X. albilineans infection (Fig. 5b; Additional file 7), suggesting that the synthesis of terpenoids might aid defense against X. albilineans infection in SES208. Interestingly, many plant hormones, including cytokinins, ABA, and gibberellins are derived from terpenoids (Fig. 7) [84, 85].

During various metabolic processes, TFs can regulate the transcript abundances of genes that encode the regulatory proteins and structural enzymes that participate in the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Six major TF families including AP2/ERF, bHLH, MYB, NAC, WRKY, and bZIP are involved in the metabolism of terpenoids in plants [86], and the MYB-bHLH-WD40 complex regulates flavonoids bio-synthesis in plants [87, 88](Fig.7). Overall, the expression of DEGs encoding TFs and enzymes involved in primary and secondary metabolism and hormone signaling was more rapidly and strongly induced in SES208 than in LA Purple after inoculation with X. albilineans. Increased expression of transcripts related to the accumulation of metabolites also significantly increased in SES208, which is consistent with some previous findings that altered metabolite abundances can be associated with greater disease resistance in plants [89, 90]. These results suggest avenues for future research related to the effects of metabolic changes on the resistance of sugarcane to X. albilineans.

Conclusions

Infection with Xanthomonas albilineans can have destructive consequences for the vascular system of sugarcane plants. So far, the mechanisms by which sugarcane plants defend themselves against pathogens post inoculation have been unclear. Therefore, research into and cloning of resistance genes and breeding resistant varieties should provide effective methods for preventing infection with X. albilineans. The present study compared transcriptome profiles in the sugarcane cultivars SES208 and LA Purple before and after X. albilineans infection, revealing the apparent activation of an immune response to X. albilineans infection in SES208 but not in LA Purple. Genes showing changes in expression during X. albilineans infection were annotated with functions including plant-pathogen interactions, MAPK signaling, plant hormone signal transduction, and flavonoid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. The expression of many genes often associated with activated disease resistance decreased sharply after infection with X. albilineans in SES208, suggesting that its defense mechanisms are worthy of further study. Further, the involvement of putative core resistance genes that exhibit ASE was observed less frequently than that of multi-allelic genes with balanced allele expression, suggesting that the expression of genes with balanced allelic expression might allow synergistic maintenance of this resistance phenotype, especially as the existence of genes exhibiting ASE in S. saccharum appears to be a largely genotype-specific phenomenon.

In conclusion, the results of the present study provide useful knowledge for the improvement of resistance to X. albilineans in sugarcane and provide new insights into sugarcane responses against X. albilineans infection.

Methods

Sample collection and X. albilineans inoculation

For the present study, seedings of the sugarcane cultivars SES208 and LA Purple were grown in a standard greenhouse at the Center for Genomics and Biotechnology in Fujian Province with a 16-h light (28 °C) and 8-h dark (28 °C) cycle. A single colony of X. albilineans strain Xa-FJ1 was suspended in 1 mL of XAS liquid medium [91] and cultured at 28 °C with constant shaking at 200 rpm for 48 h. Then we added 1 μL of the latter culture to 40 mL of fresh XAS liquid medium and incubated at 28 °C for approximately 10 h. The bacterial suspension was diluted to 108 CFU/mL for plant inoculation. The leaves of twenty-day-old seedlings of SES208 and LA Purple with 3–5 leaves were inoculated with X. albilineans by cutting the leaf blades at mid-length with sterile scissors dipped in the bacterial suspension. Five control plants were treated in a similar way, but the bacterial suspension was replaced by sterile liquid medium XAS [29]. Leaf samples were collected from the two cultivars at 0 h post inoculation (hpi) hpi (named AP0 hpi and LA0 hpi), 24 hpi (named AP24 hpi and LA24 hpi), 48 hpi (named AP48 hpi and LA48 hpi) and 72 hpi (named AP72 hpi and LA72 hpi). Three biological and three technical replicates were collected for all treatments, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at − 80 °C prior to RNA extraction.

RNA extraction and library construction

Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol® kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The integrity and quality of RNA were assessed using 1.0% agar gel electrophoresis and the NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). An NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® was used to construct the RNA-Seq libraries. The sample library concentrations were evaluated using the Qubit® 2.0 fluorimeter with the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit before sending to Novogene (City, Country) for sequencing on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 System.

Differential gene expression analysis, weighted correlation network analysis (WGCNA), and function enrichment analysis

The assembly and annotation of the sugarcane AP85-441 genome was downloaded from Ray Ming’s laboratory at (http://www.life.illinois.edu/ming/downloads/Spontaneum_genome/) [92]. We conducted quantitative analysis of RNA-Seq data using Trinity Transcript Quantification. For detailed methods, please refer to the website: https://github.com/trinityrnaseq/trinityranseq/wiki/Trinity-Transcript-Quantification. The default comparison software Bowtie2 [93] and then RSEM [94] were used to calculate TPM (Transcripts Per Kilobase Million) values, and genes with an adjusted p-value < 0.001 (|log2(fold change)| ≥ 2) found using edgeR [95] were considered as DEGs.

Differentially expressed TFs were predicted using the PlantTFDB website (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn/prediction.php). Then WGCNA analysis was performed using the WGCNA (v1.70-3, https://horvath.genetics.ucla.edu/html/CoexpressionNetwork/Rpackages/WGCNA/) package to find clusters (modules) of genes with highly correlated expression [96].

GO (Gene ontology) enrichment analysis [97] and KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathway enrichment analysis [98] of the DEGs was performed using the EggNOG (v5.0) Database (http://eggnog5.embl.de/#/app/home) and OmicShare online tools (https://www.omicshare.com/).

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis

Each cDNA sample was synthesized using a Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa) and diluted with nuclease-free water to a concentration of 200 ng/μl. Primers to amplify genes chosen for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) were designed by IDT (https://sg.idtdna.com/pages) (Additional file 8). Each qRT-PCR was conducted in a 12.5 μl reaction system with the following components: 6.25 μL SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (2 ×), 0.5 μL 0.4 μM forward primer, 0.5 μL 0.4 μM reverse primer, 0.5 μL diluted cDNA, and 4.75 μL ddH2O. Each qRT-PCR amplification was conducted on a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA) with the following thermal cycling procedure: 95 °C for 3 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 30 s. The temperature was increased by 0.5 °C every 5 s and the melting curve was generated from 65 °C to 95 °C. The transcript expression of each gene we analyzed was detected in three biological and three technical replications. The eukaryotic elongation factor 1a (eEF-1a) gene was used as an internal control for normalizing the expression data [99]. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method [100].

Supplementary Information

12870_2023_4073_MOESM1_ESM.docx (942.5KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple infected by X. albilineans.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (10.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2. Number of DEGs in major KEGG pathways in MEblack and MEdarkolivegreen module after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM3_ESM.docx (595.6KB, docx)

Additional file 3. Proportion of alleles in differential genes.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM4_ESM.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Additional file 4. Heatmaps of differentially expressed alleles involved in MAPK signaling pathway, plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM5_ESM.docx (1.8MB, docx)

Additional file 5. Heatmaps of dispersely and tandem duplicated DEGs involved in MAPK signaling pathway, plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM6_ESM.docx (2.3MB, docx)

Additional file 6. Heatmaps of DEGs involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and starch and sucrose metabolism. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)

Additional file 7. Significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) information involved in sugarcane response to X. albilineans infection.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM8_ESM.docx (15.3KB, docx)

Additional file 8. Primes sequences used in qRT-PCR.

Acknowledgments

Xanthomonas albilineans was provided by Professor Gao Sanji of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University.

Abbreviations

DEGs

differentially expressed genes

TF

transcription factor

ASE

Allele-specific expression

LA

Louisiana

HR

hypersensitive response

PTI

PAMP-triggered immunity

PAMPs

pathogen-associated molecular patterns

ETI

effector-triggered immunity

MAPK

mitogen-activated protein kinase

SA

salicylic acid

ABA

abscisic acid

JA

jasmonic acid

ET

ethylene

SAR

systemic acquired resistance

TMV

tobacco mosaic virus

ISR

induced systemic resistance

WGCNA

weighted gene correlation network analysis

hpi

hours post inoculation

PAL

phenylalanine ammonia lyase

4CL

4-coumarate:CoA ligase

F5H

ferulate-5-hydroxylase

GN4

glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidase 4

AMY

alpha-amylase

INV

beta-fructofuranosidase

ISA

isoamylase

glgA

starch synthase

glgC

glucose-1-phosphate adenylyltransferase

GYG1

glycogenin

E2.4.1.34

1,3-beta-glucan synthase

PYG

glycogen phosphorylase

HK

hexokinase

PRRs

pattern recognition receptors

FLS2

FLAGELLIN SENSING2

RBOHs

respiratory burst oxidase homologues

CAT1/APX1

catalase1/ascorbate peroxidase1

CNGCs

cyclic nucleotide gated channels

RIN

ethylene receptor ripening inhibitor

RPM1

RESISTANCE TO P. SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA 1

RPS2

RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN S2

KCS

3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase

NPR1

NONEXPRESSER OF PR GENES 1

NPR3

NPR1-LIKE PROTEIN 3

TGA

transglutaminase

PR1

pathogenesis-related protein 1

JAZ

jasmonate ZIM domain

RAN1

response to antagonist 1

ETR

ethylene receptor

CTR1

CONSTITUTIVE TRIPLE RESPONSE 1

EBF1

EIN3-BINDING F BOX PROTEIN 1

EIN3

ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3

ERF

ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR

PP2C

type 2C protein phosphatases

SnRK2

class III SNF-1-related protein kinase 2

ABF

abscisic acid-responsive transcription factor

CDPKs

Calcium-dependent protein kinases

LRR

leucine-rich repeat

CHS

chalcone synthase

ANR

anthocyanidin reductase

CYP98A/C3’H

5-O-(4-coumaroyl)-D-quinate 3′-monooxygenase

CYP75B1

flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase

HPD

4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase

HPT

homogentisate phytyltransferase

TAT

tyrosine aminotransferase

TPS6

TERPENE SYNTHASE 6

TPM

Transcripts Per Kilobase Million

GO

Gene Ontology.

Authors’ contributions

YYM, HYY, RM, and JJY designed the experiments and performed the analyses. YYM, HYY, and YJL performed the experiments. YYM designed the figures and tables. YYM, HYY, and JJY wrote the manuscript. SJG provided the X. albilineans strain. JJY and RM supervised the experiments and revised the manuscript. MF revised the manuscript. All authors have approved the final article.

Funding

This project was supported by a startup fund from Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University to R.M.

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequencing reads of transcriptome data have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) as Bioproject PRJNA893415 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA893415).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project uses plant materials and complies with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Yaying Ma and Hongying Yu contributed equally to this work.

Contributor Information

Ray Ming, Email: rayming@illinois.edu.

Jingjing Yue, Email: jingjingyue11@126.com.

References

  • 1.Botha FC, Moore PH. In: Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Functional Biology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2013. biomass and bioenergy; pp. 521–540. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chandra A. Physio-biochemical and molecular approaches to enhance sucrose content in sugarcane: Indian initiatives. Sugar Tech. 2011;13(4):315–321. doi: 10.1007/s12355-011-0100-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aguiar A, Milessi TS, Mulinari DR, Lopes MS, da Costa SM, Candido RG. Sugarcane straw as a potential second generation feedstock for biorefinery and white biotechnology applications. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;144:105896. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105896. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhang J, Zhang X, Tang H, Zhang Q, Hua X, Ma X, Zhu F, Jones T, Zhu X, Bowers J, et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat Genet. 2018;50(11):1565–1573. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.D'Hont A, Grivet L, Feldmann P, Rao S, Berding N, Glaszmann JC. Characterisation of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;250(4):405–413. doi: 10.1007/BF02174028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O'Hara I, Mundree S. Sugarcane-based biofuels and bioproducts. John Wiley & Sons; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dillon SL, Shapter FM, Henry RJ, Cordeiro G, Izquierdo L, Lee LS. Domestication to crop improvement: genetic resources for Sorghum and saccharum (Andropogoneae) Ann Bot-London. 2007;100(5):975–989. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brandes EW, B. Sartoris G: sugarcane: its origin and improvement. Yearb US Dep Agric. 1936:561–624.
  • 9.Rott P, Bailey RA, Comstock JC, Croft BJ, Girard J. Saumtally AS: a guide to sugarcane diseases. D-CAS 1.2: a guide to sugarcane diseases. D-CAS. 2000;1:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mensi I, Vernerey MS, Gargani D, Nicole M, Rott P. Breaking dogmas: the plant vascular pathogen Xanthomonas albilineans is able to invade non-vascular tissues despite its reduced genome. Open Biol. 2014;4(2):130116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Hashimi SM, Wall MK, Smith AB, Maxwell A, Birch RG. The phytotoxin albicidin is a novel inhibitor of DNA gyrase. Antimicrob Agents Ch. 2007;51(1):181–187. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00918-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Johansson ON, Nilsson AK, Gustavsson MB, Backhaus T, Andersson MX, Ellerstrom M. A quick and robust method for quantification of the hypersensitive response in plants. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1469. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ding P, Ding Y. Stories of salicylic acid: a plant defense hormone. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25(6):549–565. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Han GZ. Origin and evolution of the plant immune system. New Phytol. 2019;222(1):70–83. doi: 10.1111/nph.15596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jones JD, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature. 2006;444(7117):323–329. doi: 10.1038/nature05286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chisholm ST, Coaker G, Day B, Staskawicz BJ. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 2006;124(4):803–814. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL, Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J. MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature. 2002;415(6875):977–983. doi: 10.1038/415977a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Torres MA, Dangl JL, Jones JD. Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(1):517–522. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012452499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yu X, Feng BM, He P, Shan LB. From Chaos to harmony: responses and signaling upon microbial pattern recognition. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2017;55:109–137. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yuan M, Ngou BPM, Ding P, Xin XF. PTI-ETI crosstalk: an integrative view of plant immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2021;62:102030. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.White RF. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) induces resistance to tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco. Virology. 1979;99(2):410–412. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90019-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Choudhary DK, Prakash A, Johri BN. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action. Indian J Microbiol. 2007;47(4):289–297. doi: 10.1007/s12088-007-0054-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Piasecka A, Jedrzejczak-Rey N, Bednarek P. Secondary metabolites in plant innate immunity: conserved function of divergent chemicals. New Phytol. 2015;206(3):948–964. doi: 10.1111/nph.13325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zaynab M, Fatima M, Abbas S, Sharif Y, Umair M, Zafar MH, Bahadar K. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2018;124:198–202. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhang F, Huang LY, Zhang F, Ali J, Cruz CV, Zhuo DL, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling of a rice line carrying Xa39 and its parents triggered by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae provides novel insights into the broad-spectrum hypersensitive response. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26.Tariq R, Wang C, Qin T, Xu F, Tang Y, Gao Y, et al. Comparative transcriptome profiling of Rice near-isogenic line carrying Xa23 under infection of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(3):717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Meng JY, Ntambo MS, Luo LM, Huang MT, Fu HY, Gao SJ. Molecular identification of Xanthomonas albilineans infecting elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in China. Crop Prot. 2019;124:353.
  • 28.Garcia-Seco D, Chiapello M, Bracale M, Pesce C, Bagnaresi P, Dubois E, et al. Transcriptome and proteome analysis reveal new insight into proximal and distal responses of wheat to foliar infection by Xanthomonas translucens. Sci Rep-Uk. 2017;7(1):10157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Ntambo MS, Meng JY, Rott PC, Henry RJ, Zhang HL, Gao SJ. Comparative transcriptome profiling of resistant and susceptible sugarcane cultivars in response to infection by Xanthomonas albilineans. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6138. doi: 10.3390/ijms20246138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meng JY, Ntambo MS, Rott PC, Fu HY, Huang MT, Zhang HL, Gao SJ. Identification of differentially expressed proteins in sugarcane in response to infection by Xanthomonas albilineans using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. Microorganisms. 2020;8(1):76. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8010076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wang HB, Xiao NY, Wang YJ, Guo JL, Zhang JS. Establishment of a qualitative PCR assay for the detection of Xanthomonas albilineans (Ashby) Dowson in sugarcane. Crop Prot. 2020;130:105053. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.105053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gaur U, Li K, Mei S, Liu G. Research progress in allele-specific expression and its regulatory mechanisms. J Appl Genet. 2013;54(3):271–283. doi: 10.1007/s13353-013-0148-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Werck-Reichhart D. Cytochromes P450 in phenylpropanoid metabolism. Drug Metabol Drug Interact. 1995;12(3-4):221–243. doi: 10.1515/DMDI.1995.12.3-4.221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nelson D, Werck-Reichhart D. A P450-centric view of plant evolution. Plant J. 2011;66(1):194–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04529.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Torres MA, Onouchi H, Hamada S, Machida C, Hammond-Kosack KE, Jones JD. Six Arabidopsis thaliana homologues of the human respiratory burst oxidase (gp91phox) Plant J. 1998;14(3):365–370. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Noirot E, Der C, Lherminier J, Robert F, Moricova P, Kieu K, Leborgne-Castel N, Simon-Plas F, Bouhidel K. Dynamic changes in the subcellular distribution of the tobacco ROS-producing enzyme RBOHD in response to the oomycete elicitor cryptogein. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(17):5011–5022. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Alazem M, Lin NS. Roles of plant hormones in the regulation of host-virus interactions. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16(5):529–540. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pauwels L, Goossens A. The JAZ proteins: a crucial interface in the jasmonate signaling cascade. Plant Cell. 2011;23(9):3089–3100. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Binder BM. Ethylene signaling in plants. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(22):7710–7725. doi: 10.1074/jbc.REV120.010854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dittrich M, Mueller HM, Bauer H, Peirats-Llobet M, Rodriguez PL, Geilfus CM, Carpentier SC, Al Rasheid KAS, Kollist H, Merilo E, et al. The role of Arabidopsis ABA receptors from the PYR/PYL/RCAR family in stomatal acclimation and closure signal integration. Nat Plants. 2019;5(9):1002–1011. doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0490-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Comai L. Genetic and epigenetic interactions in allopolyploid plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;43(2-3):387–399. doi: 10.1023/A:1006480722854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Renny-Byfield S, Wendel JF. Doubling down on genomes: polyploidy and crop plants. Am J Bot. 2014;101(10):1711–1725. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yant L, Bomblies K. Genome management and mismanagement--cell-level opportunities and challenges of whole-genome duplication. Genes Dev. 2015;29(23):2405–2419. doi: 10.1101/gad.271072.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Feldman M, Levy AA. Genome evolution in allopolyploid wheat--a revolutionary reprogramming followed by gradual changes. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(9):511–518. doi: 10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chen ZJ, Ni Z. Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids. Bioessays. 2006;28(3):240–252. doi: 10.1002/bies.20374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Correr FH, Furtado A, Garcia AAF, Henry RJ, Margarido GRA. Allele expression biases in mixed-ploid sugarcane accessions. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8778. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12725-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Powell JJ, Fitzgerald TL, Stiller J, Berkman PJ, Gardiner DM, Manners JM, Henry RJ, Kazan K. The defence-associated transcriptome of hexaploid wheat displays homoeolog expression and induction bias. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(4):533–543. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Valliyodan B, Nguyen HT. Understanding regulatory networks and engineering for enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(2):189–195. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hobert O. Gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Science. 2008;319(5871):1785–1786. doi: 10.1126/science.1151651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu YL, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Involvement of MEK1 MAPKK, NTF6 MAPK, WRKY/MYB transcription factors, COI1 and CTR1 in N-mediated resistance to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant J. 2004;38(5):800–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bu Q, Jiang H, Li CB, Zhai Q, Zhang J, Wu X, Sun J, Xie Q, Li C. Role of the Arabidopsis thaliana NAC transcription factors ANAC019 and ANAC055 in regulating jasmonic acid-signaled defense responses. Cell Res. 2008;18(7):756–767. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Vannini C, Iriti M, Bracale M, Locatelli F, Faoro F, Croce P, Pirona R, Di Maro A, Coraggio I, Genga A. The ectopic expression of the rice Osmyb4 gene in Arabidopsis increases tolerance to abiotic, environmental and biotic stresses. Physiol Mol Plant P. 2006;69(1-3):26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Huang PY, Zhang JS, Jiang BE, Chan C, Yu JH, Lu YP, Chung KM, Zimmerli L. NINJA-associated ERF19 negatively regulates Arabidopsis pattern-triggered immunity. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(3):1033–1047. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cheng Q, Dong LD, Gao TJ, Liu TF, Li NH, Wang L, Chang X, Wu JJ, Xu PF, Zhang SZ. The bHLH transcription factor GmPIB1 facilitates resistance to Phytophthora sojae in Glycine max. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(10):2527–2541. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Fan M, Bai MY, Kim JG, Wang TN, Oh E, Chen L, Park CH, Son SH, Kim SK, Mudgett MB, et al. The bHLH transcription factor HBI1 mediates the trade-off between growth and pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(2):828–841. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.121111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nejat N, Mantri N. Plant immune system: crosstalk between responses to biotic and abiotic stresses the missing link in understanding plant Defence. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2017;23:1–15. doi: 10.21775/cimb.023.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang D, Liang X, Bao Y, Yang S, Zhang X, Yu H, Zhang Q, Xu G, Feng X, Dou D. A malectin-like receptor kinase regulates cell death and pattern-triggered immunity in soybean. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(11):e50442. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zou Y, Wang S, Zhou Y, Bai J, Huang G, Liu X, Zhang Y, Tang D, Lu D. Transcriptional regulation of the immune receptor FLS2 controls the ontogeny of plant innate immunity. Plant Cell. 2018;30(11):2779–2794. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Davletova S, Rizhsky L, Liang HJ, Zhong SQ, Oliver DJ, Coutu J, Shulaev V, Schlauch K, Mittler R. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17(1):268–281. doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gaffney T, Friedrich L, Vernooij B, Negrotto D, Nye G, Uknes S, Ward E, Kessmann H, Ryals J. Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science. 1993;261(5122):754–756. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5122.754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chen Z, Silva H, Klessig DF. Active oxygen species in the induction of plant systemic acquired resistance by salicylic acid. Science. 1993;262(5141):1883–1886. doi: 10.1126/science.8266079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Tang DZ, Wang GX, Zhou JM. Receptor kinases in plant-pathogen interactions: more than pattern recognition. Plant Cell. 2017;29(4):618–637. doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Liu B, Li JF, Ao Y, Qu J, Li Z, Su J, Zhang Y, Liu J, Feng D, Qi K, et al. Lysin motif-containing proteins LYP4 and LYP6 play dual roles in peptidoglycan and chitin perception in rice innate immunity. Plant Cell. 2012;24(8):3406–3419. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.102475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hetherington AM, Brownlee C. The generation of Ca2+ signals in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55:401–427. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xu W, Huang W. Calcium-dependent protein kinases in Phytohormone signaling pathways. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(11):2436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 66.Heo WD, Lee SH, Kim MC, Kim JC, Chung WS, Chun HJ, Lee KJ, Park CY, Park HC, Choi JY, et al. Involvement of specific calmodulin isoforms in salicylic acid-independent activation of plant disease resistance responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(2):766–771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Reddy ASN, Ali GS, Celesnik H, Day IS. Coping with stresses: roles of calcium- and calcium/calmodulin-regulated gene expression. Plant Cell. 2011;23(6):2010–2032. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.084988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mackey D, Holt BF, 3rd, Wiig A, Dangl JL. RIN4 interacts with pseudomonas syringae type III effector molecules and is required for RPM1-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2002;108(6):743–754. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00661-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kunkel BN, Bent AF, Dahlbeck D, Innes RW, Staskawicz BJ. RPS2, an Arabidopsis disease resistance locus specifying recognition of pseudomonas syringae strains expressing the avirulence gene avrRpt2. Plant Cell. 1993;5(8):865–875. doi: 10.1105/tpc.5.8.865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Canonne J, Marino D, Jauneau A, Pouzet C, Briere C, Roby D, Rivas S. The Xanthomonas type III effector XopD targets the Arabidopsis transcription factor MYB30 to suppress plant defense. Plant Cell. 2011;23(9):3498–3511. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.088815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 71.Johnson C, Boden E, Arias J. Salicylic acid and NPR1 induce the recruitment of trans-activating TGA factors to a defense gene promoter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2003;15(8):1846–1858. doi: 10.1105/tpc.012211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Liu LJ, Sonbol FM, Huot B, Gu YN, Withers J, Mwimba M, et al. Salicylic acid receptors activate jasmonic acid signalling through a non-canonical pathway to promote effector-triggered immunity. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 73.Dombrecht B, Xue GP, Sprague SJ, Kirkegaard JA, Ross JJ, Reid JB, Fitt GP, Sewelam N, Schenk PM, Manners JM, et al. MYC2 differentially modulates diverse jasmonate-dependent functions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19(7):2225–2245. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mandadi KK, Scholthof KB. Plant immune responses against viruses: how does a virus cause disease? Plant Cell. 2013;25(5):1489–1505. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.111658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Adie BAT, Perez-Perez J, Perez-Perez MM, Godoy M, Sanchez-Serrano JJ, Schmelz EA, Solano R. ABA is an essential signal for plant resistance to pathogens affecting JA biosynthesis and the activation of defenses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19(5):1665–1681. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Song W, Ma X, Tan H, Zhou J. Abscisic acid enhances resistance to Alternaria solani in tomato seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49(7):693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.de Zelicourt A, Colcombet J, Hirt H. The role of MAPK modules and ABA during abiotic stress signaling. Trends Plant Sci. 2016;21(8):677–685. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bellincampi D, Cervone F, Lionetti V. Plant cell wall dynamics and wall-related susceptibility in plant-pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:228. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Li J, Chen M, Fan T, Mu X, Gao J, Wang Y, Jing T, Shi C, Niu H, Zhen S, et al. Underlying mechanism of accelerated cell death and multiple disease resistance in a maize lethal leaf spot 1 allele. J Exp Bot. 2022;73(12):3991–4007. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ververidis F, Trantas E, Douglas C, Vollmer G, Kretzschmar G, Panopoulos N. Biotechnology of flavonoids and other phenylpropanoid-derived natural products. Part I: chemical diversity, impacts on plant biology and human health. Biotechnol J. 2007;2(10):1214–1234. doi: 10.1002/biot.200700084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Long L, Liu J, Gao Y, Xu FC, Zhao JR, Li B, Gao W. Flavonoid accumulation in spontaneous cotton mutant results in red coloration and enhanced disease resistance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;143:40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Christensen SA, Huffaker A, Sims J, Hunter CT, Block A, Vaughan MM, Willett D, Romero M, Mylroie JE, Williams WP, et al. Fungal and herbivore elicitation of the novel maize sesquiterpenoid, zealexin A4, is attenuated by elevated CO2. Planta. 2018;247(4):863–873. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2830-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Huffaker A, Kaplan F, Vaughan MM, Dafoe NJ, Ni X, Rocca JR, Alborn HT, Teal PE, Schmelz EA. Novel acidic sesquiterpenoids constitute a dominant class of pathogen-induced phytoalexins in maize. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(4):2082–2097. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen F, Ludwiczuk A, Wei G, Chen XL, Crandall-Stotler B, Bowman JL. Terpenoid secondary metabolites in bryophytes: chemical diversity, biosynthesis and biological functions. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2018;37(2-3):210–231. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2018.1482397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Amini H, Naghavi MR, Shen T, Wang Y, Nasiri J, Khan IA, Fiehn O, Zerbe P, Maloof JN. Tissue-Specific Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Candidate Genes for Terpenoid and Phenylpropanoid Metabolism in the Medicinal Plant Ferula assafoetida. G3 (Bethesda) 2019;9(3):807–816. doi: 10.1534/g3.118.200852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Xu Y, Zhu C, Xu C, Sun J, Grierson D, Zhang B, et al. Integration of metabolite profiling and transcriptome analysis reveals genes related to volatile Terpenoid metabolism in finger citron (C. medica var. sarcodactylis). Molecules. 2019;24(14):2564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 87.Zhao J. Flavonoid transport mechanisms: how to go, and with whom. Trends Plant Sci. 2015;20(9):576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Xie Y, Tan H, Ma Z, Huang J. DELLA proteins promote anthocyanin biosynthesis via sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 complex in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant. 2016;9(5):711–721. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Mu X, Li J, Dai Z, Xu L, Fan T, Jing T, Chen M, Gou M. Commonly and specifically activated defense responses in maize disease lesion mimic mutants revealed by integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:638792. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.638792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Konig S, Feussner K, Kaever A, Landesfeind M, Thurow C, Karlovsky P, Gatz C, Polle A, Feussner I. Soluble phenylpropanoids are involved in the defense response of Arabidopsis against Verticillium longisporum. New Phytol. 2014;202(3):823–837. doi: 10.1111/nph.12709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lin LH, Ntambo MS, Rott PC, Wang QN, Lin YH, Fu HY, Gao SJ. Molecular detection and prevalence of Xanthomonas albilineans, the causal agent of sugarcane leaf scald, in China. Crop Prot. 2018;109:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2018.02.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhang JS, Zhang XT, Tang HB, Zhang Q, Hua XT, Ma XK, Zhu F, Jones T, Zhu XG, Bowers J, et al. Allele-defined genome of the autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. Nat Genet. 2018;50(12):1565–1573. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0237-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC bioinformatics. 2011;12(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Chen Y, Lun AT, Smyth GK. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res. 2016;5:1438. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8987.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11(2):R14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kanehisa M. KEGG bioinformatics resource for plant genomics and metabolomics. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374:55–70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ling H, Wu Q, Guo J, Xu L, Que Y. Comprehensive selection of reference genes for gene expression normalization in sugarcane by real time quantitative rt-PCR. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

12870_2023_4073_MOESM1_ESM.docx (942.5KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs in SES208 and LA Purple infected by X. albilineans.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (10.7KB, xlsx)

Additional file 2. Number of DEGs in major KEGG pathways in MEblack and MEdarkolivegreen module after inoculation with Xanthomonas albilineans.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM3_ESM.docx (595.6KB, docx)

Additional file 3. Proportion of alleles in differential genes.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM4_ESM.docx (1.7MB, docx)

Additional file 4. Heatmaps of differentially expressed alleles involved in MAPK signaling pathway, plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, starch and sucrose metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM5_ESM.docx (1.8MB, docx)

Additional file 5. Heatmaps of dispersely and tandem duplicated DEGs involved in MAPK signaling pathway, plant-pathogen interaction, plant hormone signal transduction, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism, flavonoid biosynthesis and terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM6_ESM.docx (2.3MB, docx)

Additional file 6. Heatmaps of DEGs involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and starch and sucrose metabolism. The expression value was calculated by relative expression of genes (log2 Fold Change from − 2 to + 2). SES: SES208; LA: LA Purple. 0 h: uninfected plants; 24 h, 48 h,and 72 h represent 24, 48 and 72 hours post inoculation of sugarcane with X. albilineans, respectively.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (19KB, xlsx)

Additional file 7. Significant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) information involved in sugarcane response to X. albilineans infection.

12870_2023_4073_MOESM8_ESM.docx (15.3KB, docx)

Additional file 8. Primes sequences used in qRT-PCR.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequencing reads of transcriptome data have been deposited to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) as Bioproject PRJNA893415 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA893415).


Articles from BMC Plant Biology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES