Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Jan 20;12:e81604. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81604

Community composition shapes microbial-specific phenotypes in a cystic fibrosis polymicrobial model system

Fabrice Jean-Pierre 1,, Thomas H Hampton 1, Daniel Schultz 1, Deborah A Hogan 1, Marie-Christine Groleau 2, Eric Déziel 2, George A O'Toole 1,
Editors: Vaughn S Cooper3, Arturo Casadevall4
PMCID: PMC9897730  PMID: 36661299

Abstract

Interspecies interactions can drive the emergence of unexpected microbial phenotypes that are not observed when studying monocultures. The cystic fibrosis (CF) lung consists of a complex environment where microbes, living as polymicrobial biofilm-like communities, are associated with negative clinical outcomes for persons with CF (pwCF). However, the current lack of in vitro models integrating the microbial diversity observed in the CF airway hampers our understanding of why polymicrobial communities are recalcitrant to therapy in this disease. Here, integrating computational approaches informed by clinical data, we built a mixed community of clinical relevance to the CF lung composed of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Prevotella melaninogenica. We developed and validated this model biofilm community with multiple isolates of these four genera. When challenged with tobramycin, a front-line antimicrobial used to treat pwCF, the microorganisms in the polymicrobial community show altered sensitivity to this antibiotic compared to monospecies biofilms. We observed that wild-type P. aeruginosa is sensitized to tobramycin in a mixed community versus monoculture, and this observation holds across a range of community relative abundances. We also report that LasR loss-of-function, a variant frequently detected in the CF airway, drives tolerance of P. aeruginosa to tobramycin specifically in the mixed community. Our data suggest that the molecular basis of this community-specific recalcitrance to tobramycin for the P. aeruginosa lasR mutant is increased production of phenazines. Our work supports the importance of studying a clinically relevant model of polymicrobial biofilms to understand community-specific traits relevant to infections.

Research organism: Other

Introduction

The disconnect between in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and clinical response poses a significant threat to the eradication of mixed microbial communities observed in human infections (Lebeaux et al., 2014). That is, while minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays are widely used to guide clinical intervention by determining the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of pathogenic species, such approaches often fail to resolve chronic, polymicrobial infections (Orazi and O’Toole, 2019; Waters et al., 2019). Studies published several decades ago documented that microbe-microbe interactions can drive shifts in antimicrobial susceptibility profiles (Linn and Szabo, 1975; Shahidi and Ellner, 1969). Thus, antibiotics effective at killing a single microorganism in vitro may be ineffective against the same microbe when grown in the context of a polymicrobial infection. More recent studies provide some insight as to the mechanisms driving resistance and tolerance (also referred to as recalcitrance or resilience) toward antimicrobials in the context of mixed-species infections (Beaudoin et al., 2017; Bottery et al., 2022; O’Brien et al., 2022; Orazi et al., 2020; Orazi and O’Toole, 2017; Orazi et al., 2019). These mechanisms include (but are not limited to) the production of metabolites altering microbial physiology, horizontal gene transfer of genetic material, and passive protection by the production of shared ‘public goods’, such as β-lactamases (reviewed in Orazi and O’Toole, 2019; Vandeplassche et al., 2019).

Over the last decade, both culture-based and culture-independent studies have indicated that chronic cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infections are characterized by the presence of numerous microbial taxa (O’Sullivan and Freedman, 2009; O’Toole, 2018; Rogers et al., 2003; Surette, 2014). The clinical relevance of such mixed communities is highlighted by the observations that co-occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus alters the antimicrobial susceptibility of the latter organism and worsens CF lung disease (Orazi et al., 2020; Orazi and O’Toole, 2017; Orazi et al., 2019; Limoli et al., 2016). Furthermore, antibiotics effective against pathogens such as P. aeruginosa in classic in vitro MIC assays show limited clinical efficacy, as indicated by the inability of tobramycin to clear this microorganism from the CF airway (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020; Ramsey et al., 1999). Indeed, a recent report recommends abandoning MIC testing for microorganisms isolated from CF airway infections as their predictive value for a positive treatment outcome is not supported (Waters et al., 2019).

The pathogenesis of mixed-species infections in the CF airway is still poorly understood, but it is now appreciated that distinct community types can impact clinical outcomes (Hampton et al., 2021; Widder et al., 2022). However, one of the current missing links allowing for the translation of microbiome-informed studies back to the clinic is the establishment of in vitro mixed-community models that can be used to understand community function(s) of CF pathogens (Jean-Pierre et al., 2021). That is, although some CF-relevant model communities have been proposed (Orazi et al., 2020; Orazi and O’Toole, 2017; Orazi et al., 2019; Flynn et al., 2020; Flynn et al., 2016; Vandeplassche et al., 2020), they (i) do not entirely reflect the polymicrobial nature of the CF airway and/or (ii) do not utilize in vitro conditions recapitulating the nutritional milieu and/or biofilm-like growth observed in the CF lung. Thus, there is a pressing need for the development of clinically informed, in vitro polymicrobial communities to probe the molecular mechanism(s) governing microbial interactions, particularly in regard to the responsiveness to antimicrobial agents.

The aims of this study were fourfold: (i) to leverage large, existing microbiome data sets and their associated clinical metadata to inform and develop a clinically relevant and tractable in vitro model of the polymicrobial communities found in the CF airway, (ii) to identify community-specific phenotypes, (iii) to test this in vitro model system against the most common front-line CF antimicrobial, tobramycin (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, 2021), and (iv) to provide a mechanistic understanding whereby community composition can impact tobramycin responsiveness.

Results

Using computational approaches to identify community types found in the CF airway

We sought to exploit available 16S rRNA gene amplicon library sequencing data and associated clinical metadata to identify a representative set of microbial communities found in persons with CF (pwCF) that we could model in vitro. A recent study from our team using k-means to cluster 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing relative abundance values and another machine learning approach (e.g. the gap statistic) identified five microbial community clusters as the most parsimonious number (Hampton et al., 2021). This same study revealed, following the analysis of a large cross-sectional 16S rRNA gene sequence data set and associated metadata, that the five community types explained 24% of variability in lung function, twice as high as any other factor or group of factors previously identified (Hampton et al., 2021). Thus, two different approaches, using clinical data, identified five similar community types.

Of these five communities, two were dominated by a single microbial taxa: P. aeruginosa (designated the ‘Pa.D’ community) and Streptococcus (Strep.D); these communities included 73/167 (~43%) of the analyzed samples (Hampton et al., 2021). Several P. aeruginosa-focused CF studies make it clear that specifically targeting this pathogen does not translate to positive clinical outcomes in pwCF (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020; Acosta et al., 2021; Heirali et al., 2017), and there has already been a substantial focus on the study of P. aeruginosa in monoculture in the context of CF (Malhotra et al., 2019; Rossi et al., 2021). Thus, we deemed that in vitro modeling of a P. aeruginosa-dominated community would not allow us to probe unknown/novel factors driving chronic CF lung disease. Furthermore, while the presence of Streptococcus spp. may influence CF airway health, the clinical relevance of this microbe in CF is still a matter of active research, and this genus is associated with both worsened and improved clinical outcomes (Scott and O’Toole, 2019). We identified a third cluster designated Oth.D, for ‘other’; this cluster was composed of samples from pwCF whose lung microbiota were dominated by less-common, individual genera including Stenotrophomonas, Burkholderia, and Achromobacter. Based on these factors, we decided to focus on two community types identified in the study cited above (Hampton et al., 2021), which are composed of various microbial taxa (Pa.M1/Pa.M2; which we refer to as ‘mixed’). The Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 mixed communities represented ~34% of the analyzed samples in this study (Hampton et al., 2021).

As previously reported (Henson et al., 2019), we performed metabolic flux analyses of the various community types to identify the top predicted exchanged metabolites driving the abundances of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Prevotella melaninogenica by using their known relative 16S rRNA gene abundance detected in the Pa.M1/Pa.M2, Pa.D, and Strep.D communities (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Using this approach, we noted multiple similarities between the predicted metabolic fluxes of Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 that distinguished these communities from the Pseudomonas- and Streptococcus-dominated communities, for example, the fluxes of ethanol, lactate, and acetate (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Furthermore, as the predicted metabolic fluxes between Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 were similar, we considered these two mixed communities as functionally similar and decided to focus on the development of a single ‘mixed’ community model.

Next, we sought to identify a limited number of community members to model as a tractable in vitro mixed community. We noted that 10 microbial taxa achieved relatively high abundance and prevalence across the five identified community types (Hampton et al., 2021; Figure 1A). From among these taxa, we decided to focus on P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. as members of our model mixed community for the following reasons: (i) P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. are important in shaping health outcomes in pwCF based on studies using culture-dependent and -independent approaches (Malhotra et al., 2019; Filkins et al., 2012; Lamoureux et al., 2021; Sibley et al., 2008; Thornton et al., 2022; Ulrich et al., 2010; Waters and LiPuma, 2020; Zemanick et al., 2013). (ii) Additional studies provide evidence of the potential for two or more of these microorganisms found together in the CF airway to lead to worsened clinical outcomes (Limoli et al., 2016; Limoli and Hoffman, 2019; Sherrard et al., 2016). (iii) Imaging studies of sputum have shown evidence for a subset of these microbes being in close physical proximity (DePas et al., 2016; Jennings et al., 2021). (iv) Assessing the fraction of 16S rRNA reads across the data sets analyzed by Hampton, O’Toole, and colleagues (Hampton et al., 2021), Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella were among the top 10 microbial taxa detected in the CF airway with relative abundances of 35, 3, 20, and 13% and prevalence rates of 70, 50, 90, and 80%, respectively (Hampton et al., 2021; Figure 1A, red box). (v) In 103 of the 167 (~62%) patient samples analyzed by Hampton, O’Toole, and colleagues, >70% of 16S rRNA gene reads were assigned to Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella (Figure 1B); another 30 samples contained at least 50% of the reads assigned to these four genera. Including the next most abundant and prevalent genera such as Burkholderia or Achromobacter as a fifth member of the mixed community would only marginally increase (by ~6%) the number of patient samples covered (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and C). Furthermore, the average abundance of Burkholderia was skewed by a relatively small number of pwCF in our cohort that were dominated by this pathogen (Hampton et al., 2021). (vi) Finally, work published by our group using metabolic modeling indicates that P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica are top contributors of cross-fed metabolites in communities detected in the CF lung (Henson et al., 2019). That is, the abundance of these four genera in the CF airway could be explained by predicted metabolic cross-feeding among these four microorganisms. Thus, we settled on a mixed community composed of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp., which represents a common ‘pulmotype’ detected in ~34% of airway infections for pwCF, as the basis for the development of an in vitro model system.

Figure 1. Leveraging clinical microbiome data sets with computational analyses to identify communities and community members to model in vitro.

(A) Relative 16S rRNA gene abundance and prevalence of the top 10 cystic fibrosis (CF) lung pathogens in the 167 persons with CF (pwCF) data set used as the basis for developing the in vitro mixed community, as reported by Hampton et al., 2021. (B) Number of unique samples for which >70% of 16S rRNA reads are associated with the combined presence of Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella. #Indicates the number of samples (103) that meet this criterion from the total sample size of 167 pwCF. (C) Colony forming units (CFUs) counts of each microbial member grown as a monoculture and in a mixed community (Mix) for biofilm (B) and planktonic (P) fractions. CFUs were performed by plating on medium selective for the growth of each microorganism. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=6). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05; ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant. Error bars represent SD. Pa = Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Sa = Staphylococcus aureus, Strep = Streptococcus sanguinis, Prev = Prevotella melaninogenica, and bd = below detection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Leveraging clinical microbiome data sets with computational analyses to identify communities and community members to model in vitro.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) In silico prediction of metabolic flux between P. aeruginosa-dominated (Pa.D), Streptococcus-dominated (Strep.D) and the “mixed” Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 communities based on the abundance of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica analyzed by Hampton, O’Toole, and colleagues (Hampton et al., 2021). (B and C) Number of unique samples for which >70% of 16S rRNA reads are associated with the combined presence of Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Prevotella with either Burkholderia (B), or Achromobacter (C). #Indicates the number of samples that meet these criteria from the total sample size is 167 persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Compare the values in panels B,C with the 103 samples with >70% Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella shown in Figure 1B.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Prevotella melaninogenica does not grow as monoculture biofilms in artificial sputum medium (ASM) in anoxic conditions.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of P. melaninogenica grown in ASM or Prevotella growth medium (PGM) as planktonic or biofilm monospecies communities using an anoxic environmental chamber. Each data point presented in a column represents the average of three biological replicates each with three technical replicates (n=3). Prev = P. melaninogenica. Error bars represent SD. Statistical analyses were done using t-test.with **, p<0.01. ns = non-significant, bd = below detection.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Productivity of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown as monospecies or mixed planktonic/biofilm communities.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) Measures of productivity (or yield) represented as colony forming unit (CFU)/mL counts of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in planktonic or biofilm and as pure or mixed communities. For theoretical productivity of planktonic and biofilm mixed communities, we assumed additivity of the four community members (denoted as ‘Mix (P/B) – Theoretical’). Observed yield of the mixed communities is based on actual CFU/mL yield counts of each of the four species shown as ‘Mix (P/B) – Observed’. (B) Productivity comparisons of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, P. melaninogenica, and S. sanguinis grown as monospecies biofilms to their counterparts grown in a mixed biofilm community. Data points presented in (A) and (B) are tabulated from data shown in Figure 1C, each with three technical replicates performed on six different days (n=6). Raw data for the figure is presented in Source code 1. Pa = P. aeruginosa, Sa = S. aureus, Strep = S. sanguinis, and Prev = P. melaninogenica. Mix = mixed biofilm community. Y=yes, N=no. ns = non-significant. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001. Error bars represent SD. Statistical analyses were done using t-tests.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw data for productivity calculation of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in various conditions.
Data presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 3 represents the average of six biological replicates, each with three technical replicates performed at least on three different days. For each microorganism grown in the mixed communities, the log10 geometric mean value of the three biological replicates was transformed to colony forming unit (CFU)/mL counts and divided by the total CFU/mL of the community (total community). Data visualization was done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).
Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Microbial composition range of in vivo CF mixed communities compared with the in vitro model.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

(A) Relative abundance ranges of 16S rRNA reads assigned to Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella detected in the M1/M2 community types identified previously (Hampton et al., 2021). These data were plotted against the relative abundance of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in the in vitro mixed community shown in Figure 1C. (B) In vitro relative abundance of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica in mixed communities where P. aeruginosa was maintained at the same starting inoculum and other microbes grown 10× in excess or diluted from 1:10 to 1:1000 relative to P. aeruginosa. Data points presented in (B) represents the average from three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates performed on three different days (n=3). Raw data for (B) is presented in Source code 2. Pa = P. aeruginosa, others = S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Raw data for in vitro relative abundance of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in various ratios in mixed communities.
Data presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 4 represents the average of three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates performed on three different days. For each microorganism grown in the mixed communities, the log10 geometric mean value of the three biological replicates was transformed to colony forming unit (CFU)/mL counts and divided by the total CFU/mL of the community (total community). Data visualization was done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).
Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Testing additional laboratory and clinical strains in the in vitro polymicrobial community model.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of communities including different (A) S. aureus strains, (B) P. melaninogenica (P. mel), Prevotella intermedia (P. int), (C) Streptococcus spp., and (D) P. aeruginosa strains. Various clinical isolates/strains pairs shown in panels A–D were tested in the in vitro polymicrobial system to determine if the observations reported in Figure 1C were also applicable to these strains. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, and ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant. Error bars represent SD. Pa = P. aeruginosa PA14, Sa = S. aureus Newman, Strep = S. sanguinis, Prev = P. melaninogenica, and bd = below detection.
Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Fourteen days co-culture experiment of community members grown in a planktonic and biofilm mixed communities.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of (A) P. aeruginosa, (B) S. aureus, (C) S. sanguinis, and (D) P. melaninogenica. Red lines represent biofilm cells and black lines the planktonic cells. Each data point presented in the curves represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Every 24 hr the medium was removed, and then fresh medium added. Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons posttest with the 24 hr timepoint as control. *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001. Error bars represent SD.

Implementing a mixed in vitro model system to probe community function

Based on the data outlined in the previous section, we focused on four bacteria: P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica. We cultivated laboratory strains of P. aeruginosa PA14, S. aureus Newman, S. sanguinis SK36, and P. melaninogenica ATCC25845 as monocultures and mixed communities in anoxic conditions, which reflects the CF airway environment (Worlitzsch et al., 2002), and using artificial sputum medium (ASM), which mimics the nutritional conditions of the CF lung (Palmer et al., 2005; Turner et al., 2015). We could quantify the respective viable counts from both biofilm and planktonic populations for each of these four microorganisms by plating on selective media, as shown in Figure 1C and described below.

The P. aeruginosa biofilm population did not show statistically significant differences in endpoint colony forming unit (CFU) counts at 24 hr when cultivated as either a monoculture or in a mixed community (Figure 1C, gray bars). However, a modest (~0.5 log) but statistically significant decrease was detected for P. aeruginosa grown planktonically in the mixed community (Figure 1C, gray bars). While not negatively impacted in a mixed community versus monoculture in a biofilm, S. aureus viable counts were reduced in a planktonic community versus when cultivated as monoculture (Figure 1C, blue bars). A statistically significant increase in biofilm CFU counts was observed for S. sanguinis in the mixed community (Figure 1C, red bars). However, no differences were detected for planktonic cells of this microorganism in the presence of microbial partners (Figure 1C, red bars). Interestingly, we could not detect P. melaninogenica in monoculture, a finding predicted in our previous metabolic modeling study (Henson et al., 2019), but ~6 log10 CFU/mL of this microorganism could be detected when cultivated in the presence of other microbial partners in both biofilm and planktonic fractions (Figure 1C, green bars).

The impact of residual oxygen negatively influencing the growth of P. melaninogenica in monoculture was ruled out by performing these experiments using an anoxic environmental chamber (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). That is, we did not detect CFU counts for either planktonic or biofilm populations of P. melaninogenica when grown in ASM in the anoxic environmental chamber, but as a positive control, significant growth was detected when using a medium shown previously to support growth of this microbe (Jang et al., 2016; Prevotella growth medium, or PGM; Figure 1—figure supplement 2).

Calculating the theoretical productivity (or yield) of each microorganism grown as planktonic or biofilm monospecies or as mixed communities, as defined using a reported method (Poltak and Cooper, 2011), and comparing these values to the experimentally determined populations revealed several interesting findings (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). First, the yield of monospecies biofilm populations of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus was higher than planktonically grown cells, while the opposite was observed for S. sanguinis (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). Furthermore, the observed productivity in the mixed planktonic community (denoted as ‘Mix (P) – Observed’) was lower than the theoretical productivity (i.e. assuming additivity of the CFU/mL yield counts of each species in the community, denoted as ‘Mix (P) – Theoretical’), suggesting antagonism among the different species grown in these conditions (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). Interestingly, examining the yield of the observed mixed biofilm and planktonic populations (both denoted as ‘Mix (P/B) – Observed’) revealed that the productivity of the mixed biofilm is higher than that of the planktonic community (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). There was no statistically significant difference in the yield of observed and theoretical mixed biofilm communities (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A). However, taking a closer look at the productivity of each species in the observed mixed community revealed that there is a trend wherein P. aeruginosa and S. aureus have lower productivity in the mixed biofilm versus monoculture (p=0.67; Figure 1—figure supplement 3B). On the other hand, S. sanguinis showed a statistically significant increase in productivity in a mixed biofilm community compared to the monospecies biofilm (p=0.03; Figure 1—figure supplement 3B). Overall, these data indicate a complex relationship among the microbes in the community, which varies depending on whether they are growing planktonically or in a biofilm.

The in vitro mixed biofilm community under the model growth conditions resulted in a composition within the range observed for the in vivo M1/M2 mixed communities previously reported (Hampton et al., 2021; Figure 1—figure supplement 4A). Moreover, by maintaining P. aeruginosa at the same starting concentration and shifting the inoculum of S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica, varying mixed community compositions reflecting the microbial populations in the CF lung were observed (Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1).

While the data shown in Figure 1C pertains to commonly used laboratory strains, similar observations were made for multiple other strains and/or CF clinical isolates of these four microbial genera (Figure 1—figure supplement 5). Finally, we assessed whether this model system could maintain these microbial populations over time by replacing the medium every 24 hr. We stably detected each member of the mixed community for up to 2 weeks (Figure 1—figure supplement 6). Taken together, our data shows that we can model an in vitro mixed community reflective of the polymicrobial infection in the CF airway found in the airway of ~34% of pwCF and that the microorganisms in this model display community-specific growth phenotypes.

Polymicrobial context shifts tobramycin sensitivity of CF pathogens

Using the newly developed model described above, we sought to test the hypothesis that the susceptibility of CF pathogens to tobramycin would shift when treated in the context of a mixed community. Tobramycin was selected as it is one of the most heavily prescribed antimicrobials in the CF clinic Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, 2021; we used clinically relevant concentrations in all studies (Ruddy et al., 2013).

Initially focusing on biofilm communities, which are more recalcitrant to antimicrobial therapy (Mah and O’Toole, 2001), we observed that tobramycin treatment of wild-type (WT) P. aeruginosa PA14 grown in the mixed community resulted in an unexpected reduction in the number of viable cells compared to monoculture (Figure 2A). Furthermore, no detectable counts of P. aeruginosa in the planktonic phase of the mixed community were observed (Figure 2A). Notably, inoculating the community with a 1000× fold less CFU of S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica than P. aeruginosa rescued the tolerance phenotype of this microbe to tobramycin (Figure 2—figure supplement 1 labeled in red). These data demonstrate increased killing of P. aeruginosa by tobramycin in a polymicrobial environment can occur over a range of abundances of other microbial partners, but there may be an eventual lower limit to the presence of other partners to observe community-specific phenotypes.

Figure 2. Polymicrobial context shifts tobramycin sensitivity of CF pathogens.

Colony forming units of planktonic (P) and biofilm (B) populations of (A) P. aeruginosa (Pa), (B) S. aureus (Sa), (C) S. sanguinis (Strep), and (D) P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monocultures or mixed communities (Mix) and challenged or not with 100 µg/mL of tobramycin (+Tb). Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, and bd = below detection. Error bars represent SD.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Microbial partners increase the killing of P. aeruginosa exposed to tobramycin in a mixed community over a wide range of population sizes.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa grown in the presence of varying concentrations of S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica ranging from 10× the initial abundance of P. aeruginosa to 1000× less (0.001) for all three of the other organisms, and then treated with tobramycin. P. aeruginosa was inoculated at the same starting OD600 in all conditions. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=4). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with **, p<0.01. Error bars represent SD. ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, un = untreated. Pa = P. aeruginosa, Sa = S. aureus, Strep = S. sanguinis, and Prev = P. melaninogenica. Monoculture biofilm = light gray and mixed biofilm = dark gray.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Drug sensitivity of P. aeruginosa clinical strains grown in a mixed community challenged with tobramycin.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of various P. aeruginosa strains grown as monocultures (light gray) or mixed biofilm communities (dark gray) treated with tobramycin. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001, and ****, p<0.0001; ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, and un = untreated. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Shifted sensitivity of P. aeruginosa PA14 grown in a mixed community using various laboratory strains and clinical isolates treated with tobramycin.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

Colony forming units (CFUs) of P. aeruginosa PA14 biofilms grown as monocultures (light gray) or mixed communities (dark gray) in the presence of (A) S. sanguinis, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus constellatus, (B) P. melaninogenica and Prevotella intermedia, or (C) S. aureus strains treated with tobramycin. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with **, p<0.01 and ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant. bd = below detection, Pa = P. aeruginosa, P. mel = P. melaninogenica, P. int = Prevotella intermedia, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, and un = untreated. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4. Recalcitrance of S. aureus biofilms grown in a mixed community composed of various strains and treated with tobramycin.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4.

S. aureus colony forming units (CFUs) when grown as monocultures (light blue) or mixed communities (dark blue) treated with tobramycin for (A) S. aureus strains spp., (B) Prevotella spp., and (C) Streptococcus spp. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05; ***, p<0.001, and ****, p<0.0001; ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, un = untreated, Sa = S. aureus Newman, P. inter = P. intermedia, and P. mel = P. melaninogenica. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 2—figure supplement 5. Recalcitrance of Streptococcus spp. biofilms grown in a mixed community composed of various strains and treated with tobramycin.

Figure 2—figure supplement 5.

Streptococcus spp. colony forming units (CFUs) when grown as monocultures (light red) or mixed communities (dark red) treated with tobramycin for (A) Streptococcus spp., (B) S. aureus strains, or (C) Prevotella spp. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with ***, p<0.001 and ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, un = untreated, Strep = S. sanguinis, P. inter = P. intermedia, and P. mel = P. melaninogenica. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 2—figure supplement 6. Recalcitrance of Prevotella spp. biofilms grown in a mixed community composed of various strains and treated with tobramycin.

Figure 2—figure supplement 6.

Prevotella spp. colony forming units (CFUs) when grown as monocultures (light green) or mixed communities (dark green) treated with tobramycin for (A) Prevotella spp., (B) S. aureus strains, or (C) Streptococcus spp. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin, un = untreated. For Panel (A), Prev = P. intermedia, or P. melaninogenica. For Panels (B) and (C), Prev = P. melaninogenica. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 2—figure supplement 7. Polymicrobial context shifts tobramycin sensitivity of CF pathogens in fully anoxic conditions.

Figure 2—figure supplement 7.

Colony forming units of biofilm (B) populations of (A) P. aeruginosa (Pa), (B) S. aureus (Sa), (C) S. sanguinis (Strep), and (D) P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monocultures or mixed communities (Mix) and challenged or not with 100 µg/mL of tobramycin (+Tb) grown in an anoxic environmental chamber. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from three biological replicates each with three technical replicates (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05, ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, and bd = below detection. Error bars represent SD.

We expanded our analysis beyond the PA14 laboratory strain of P. aeruginosa. Of the six P. aeruginosa CF clinical isolates tested (including mucoid and non-mucoid strains), two strains displayed a similar phenotype to strain PA14 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2: strains SMC1596, AMT0101-1-2, labeled in red), one strain showed equal sensitivity in monoculture and the polymicrobial community (Figure 2—figure supplement 2: strain SMC1587), while one clinical isolate displayed increased tolerance in a polymicrobial environment (Figure 2—figure supplement 2: strain SMC1595, labeled in blue). A similar enhancement of tobramycin-mediated killing was observed when P. aeruginosa PA14 was co-cultivated with multiple Streptococcus and Prevotella species (Figure 2—figure supplement 3). Interestingly, co-cultivating P. aeruginosa PA14 with S. aureus strain USA300 did not impact tobramycin sensitivity of P. aeruginosa in the mixed community while strains Newman and JE2 did alter sensitivity (Figure 2—figure supplement 3C), indicating that only a subset of strains of S. aureus might contribute to the community-specific shift in P. aeruginosa sensitivity to tobramycin.

We noted several other changes in tobramycin sensitivity in the context of the mixed community compared to monoculture. Most S. aureus strains and Streptococcus spp. showed decreased tobramycin susceptibility when cultivated in the mixed community in both planktonic and biofilm populations (Figure 2B, Figure 2C, Figure 2—figure supplement 4, Figure 2—figure supplement 5). S. aureus strain USA300 showed high level tolerance to tobramycin in monoculture but was not further protected from tobramycin in the mixed community (Figure 2—figure supplement 4A). We could not determine shifts in Prevotella spp. sensitivity to tobramycin in monoculture as this microorganism cannot be cultivated under these conditions in the absence of the other community members (Figure 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 6). Growing and replenishing the pre-formed biofilm communities with fresh ASM supplemented or not with tobramycin using an anoxic environmental chamber resulted in similar phenotypes for all tested microorganisms (Figure 2—figure supplement 7), indicating that the use of the GasPak system provides a robust anoxic environment.

Community-specific protection of bacterial members was unlikely driven by microbial-based inactivation of the drug as the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) value remained similar to ASM control when P. aeruginosa was treated with tobramycin that was pre-incubated with microbial supernatants for 24 hr (Supplementary file 1). This conclusion was supported by the observation that tobramycin treatment still effectively killed some of the microbes in the community. Taken together, we demonstrated that growth in the mixed community shifts the antimicrobial sensitivity of multiple bacteria compared to growth in monoculture in anoxic conditions.

LasR loss of function increases tobramycin tolerance of P. aeruginosa in the mixed community

The unexpected increase in sensitivity of P. aeruginosa when challenged with tobramycin in the mixed community (Figure 2A) prompted us to reconcile our in vitro observations with what is observed in the clinic. That is, culture-independent microbiome studies do not indicate any appreciable changes in the abundance of P. aeruginosa in the airways of pwCF post-treatment with tobramycin (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020; Ramsey et al., 1999).

P. aeruginosa undergoes genetic adaptation in the airway of pwCF (Smith et al., 2006), and loss-of-function mutations in the gene coding for the key intercellular communication regulator, LasR (Lee and Zhang, 2015), are frequently observed in the airway of pwCF and other environments (Feltner et al., 2016; Groleau et al., 2022; Hoffman et al., 2009; Mould et al., 2022; Robitaille et al., 2020). Strains lacking LasR function have also been associated with worsened lung function (Hoffman et al., 2009), in vitro growth advantage in low oxygen conditions (Clay et al., 2020), increased production of virulence factors through intraspecies interactions (Mould et al., 2020), and greater tolerance to front-line CF drugs (Hoffman et al., 2010). We thus hypothesized that loss of LasR function might result in a different response toward tobramycin treatment in the community.

To test this hypothesis, we replaced WT P. aeruginosa PA14 in the mixed population with an isogenic ΔlasR mutant. The absence of LasR function resulted in increased tolerance of this P. aeruginosa mutant to tobramycin in the mixed community (Figure 3A). This phenotype was complemented by restoring a WT lasR allele at the native locus (Figure 3A). Importantly, the ΔlasR mutant showed a similar degree of sensitivity to tobramycin as the WT when these strains were grown in monoculture (Figure 3A). The recalcitrance of the ΔlasR mutant was observed to be biofilm-specific as planktonic cells grown in a mixed community displayed equal sensitivity to the drug when compared to monoculture (Figure 3B). Endpoint CFU counts of other microbial members in the mixed community were not impacted by the inactivation of the lasR gene with or without tobramycin treatment (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Inactivation of tobramycin by the ΔlasR mutant was unlikely as the P. aeruginosa MBC remained similar to ASM control when WT P. aeruginosa was treated with tobramycin pre-incubated in the supernatant of the ΔlasR mutant (Supplementary file 1).

Figure 3. LasR loss-of-function drives biofilm-specific tobramycin tolerance in a mixed community.

Colony forming units of (A) P. aeruginosa strain PA14 (wild-type [WT]), isogenic ΔlasR mutant, and the complemented strain (ΔlasR::lasR), (B) planktonic and biofilm ΔlasR mutant cells, (C) LasR-defective (NC-AMT0101-1-1; LasR−) and LasR+ (NC-AMT0101-1-2) clinical isolates (CIs) and (D) P. aeruginosa quorum sensing regulator mutants grown as monocultures and mixed communities (Mix) and challenged or not with 100 µg/mL of tobramycin (+Tb). Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was done using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001; ****, p<0.0001. Error bars represent SD. bd = below detection and un = untreated.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Loss of P. aeruginosa LasR function does not alter the viability of the other microbes in the mixed community compared to growth with wild-type (WT) P. aeruginosa.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

Colony forming units (CFUs) counts of S. aureus (Sa), S. sanguinis (Strep), and P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monoculture (light color) or mixed biofilm communities (dark color) with WT P. aeruginosa (WT) and associated mutants treated with tobramycin. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, un = untreated, and +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 3—figure supplement 2. LasR-specific phenotypic tests of P. aeruginosa CF clinical isolate SMC1595.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2.

(A) Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) quantification of the 3-oxo-C12-HSL signaling molecule. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with ***, p<0.001, ns = non-significant, and bd = below detection. (B) 3-oxo-C12-HSL-specific lacZ bioreporter assay. (C) Protease activity on milk plates. For the bioreporter assays, four SMC1595 clones were tested at least on four different days (n=4). For protease assays, six clones of SMC1595 were tested at least on three different days (n=3). Wild-type (WT) = P. aeruginosa PA14, ns = non-significant, and bd = below detection. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 3—figure supplement 3. Tolerance of ΔlasR mutant in a mixed community: a role for the MvfR/PQS regulatory system.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3.

Colony forming unit (CFU) counts of S. aureus (Sa), S. sanguinis (Strep), and P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monoculture (light color) or mixed biofilm communities (dark color) with wild-type (WT) P. aeruginosa (WT) or the indicated mutants treated with tobramycin. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with **, p<0.001 and ****, p<0.0001; ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, un = untreated, and +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin. Error bars represent SD.

To determine whether the altered tolerance of LasR loss-of-function is not specific to the P. aeruginosa PA14 strain, we tested a chronic CF clinical isolate, NC-AMT0101-1-1, defective for LasR activity (LasR; Smith et al., 2006). The strain displayed higher tolerance to tobramycin in the mixed community than its parent isolate (NC-AMT0101-1-2; LasR+; Figure 3C). Both NC-AMT0101-1-1 and NC-AMT0101-1-2 isolates were equally sensitive to tobramycin in monoculture, suggesting a community-specific phenotype for LasR loss-of-function in the model (Figure 3C). These results further prompted us to test the hypothesis that the clinical isolate SMC1595 lacked LasR function as this strain is more tolerant to tobramycin treatment in a mixed community (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Indeed, both low protease activity and reduced 3-oxo-C12 homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C12-HSL) production, features associated with LasR loss-of-function variants (Feltner et al., 2016; Groleau et al., 2022; Mould et al., 2022), were observed in this strain when compared to controls (Figure 3—figure supplement 2).

The LasR quorum sensing (QS) regulator influences the function of many target systems in P. aeruginosa including the QS regulators RhlR and MvfR (also known as PqsR; Lee and Zhang, 2015). We tested the impact of the inactivation of RhlR or MvfR in a ΔlasR mutant background to understand how LasR influences community tolerance. We observed that recalcitrance of the ΔlasR mutant in the mixed community is dependent on the MvfR-PQS pathway, as the absence of a functional MvfR regulator resensitized the ΔlasR mutant to tobramycin (Figure 3D). On the other hand, the inactivation of RhlR QS regulator did not impact the sensitivity of the ΔlasR mutant (Figure 3D). None of the tested mutants, including ΔlasR, ΔrhlR, ΔmvfR, ΔmvfRΔlasR, and ΔrhlRΔlasR, resulted in a change in the endpoint CFUs of the other members in the mixed community in the presence or absence of tobramycin (Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Our data indicate that the tolerance of the ΔlasR mutant is biofilm-specific and implicates the MvfR-PQS QS system in this increased tolerance observed for this mutant in the mixed community.

Phenazines induce P. aeruginosa tolerance in the mixed community

Studies examining the impact of interspecies interactions on LasR mutant variants have shown that phenazine production is stimulated in the presence of other microbial partners (Hoffman et al., 2010; Cugini et al., 2010). Furthermore, as the inactivation of the mvfR gene in a ΔlasR background rescued tobramycin sensitivity of P. aeruginosa in a polymicrobial environment (Figure 3D), and the MvfR-PQS system is crucial for phenazines production (Déziel et al., 2005; Recinos et al., 2012), we hypothesized that these molecules might be overproduced in the mixed community, thereby conferring tolerance to the ΔlasR mutant. That is, phenazines have previously been shown to drive tolerance of P. aeruginosa to various drug classes, including aminoglycosides (Meirelles et al., 2021; Schiessl et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019). For example, Schiessl and colleagues observed that inactivating phenazine production results in increased sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to tobramycin (Schiessl et al., 2019). Moreover, it has been reported that inactivation of the lasR gene drives overproduction of phenazines in P. aeruginosa (Cabeen, 2014), thus further suggesting a pivotal role of these redox-active molecules in P. aeruginosa tobramycin tolerance in our experimental conditions. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying the precursor molecule phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) produced by WT and associated mutants of P. aeruginosa grown as monospecies and mixed biofilm communities. Confirming our hypothesis, we measured significantly higher PCA levels in the mixed community containing the ΔlasR mutant when compared to WT P. aeruginosa (Figure 4A).

Figure 4. Phenazines drive tolerance of P. aeruginosa in mixed communities.

(A) High performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) quantification of phenazines in monoculture and mixed communities (Mix) containing the indicated P. aeruginosa wild-type (WT) and mutant strains (n=3). (B) Colony forming units (CFUs) counts of P. aeruginosa (WT) and indicated mutants grown as monoculture or mixed communities (Mix; n=5). (C) Exogenous addition of phenazine to monoculture and mixed communities with WT P. aeruginosa treated with 100 µg/mL tobramycin (+Tb). Two physiologically relevant phenazine concentrations were tested; 50 µM (+PYO50) and 300 µM (+PYO300). Data for S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica counts are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *=p<0.05; ***=p<0.001; ****=p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, and bd = below detection. Error bars represent SD.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Phenazine drive tolerance of P. aeruginosa in mixed communities: lack of impact on other community members.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

Colony forming units (CFUs) counts of (A) S. aureus (Sa), S. sanguinis (Strep), and P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monoculture (light color) or mixed biofilm communities (dark color) with wild-type (WT) P. aeruginosa (WT) and associated mutants treated with tobramycin. (B) CFU counts of monoculture (light gray), or mixed (dark gray) P. aeruginosa (WT) and associated mutants biofilm communities treated or not with 50 µM (+PYO50) and 300 µM (+PYO300) of phenazine. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, and ****, p<0.0001, ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, un = untreated, and +Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin. Error bars represent SD.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Impact of phenazine on community members treated with tobramycin: added phenazines and P. aeruginosa mutants do not impact other community members.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

Colony forming units (CFUs) counts of S. aureus (Sa), S. sanguinis (Strep), and P. melaninogenica (Prev) grown as monoculture (light color) or mixed biofilm communities (dark color) co-cultivated with P. aeruginosa (wild-type [WT]) and associated mutants treated with tobramycin and (A, C, and E) 50 µM (+PYO50) or (B, D, and F) 300 µM (+PYO300) of phenazine. Each data point presented in a column represents the average from at least three technical replicates performed at least on three different days (n=3). Statistical analysis was performed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons posttest with *, p<0.05, **, p<0.01, ***, p<0.001, and ****, p<0.0001; ns = non-significant, bd = below detection, un = untreated, and + Tb = +100 µg/mL tobramycin. Error bars represent SD.

Also consistent with our hypothesis, blocking the production of phenazines in the ΔlasR background (ΔΔphzΔlasR, which lacks both phz operons) resensitized the ΔlasR mutant strain to tobramycin in the mixed community (Figure 4B). None of the tested mutants impacted the abundance of other members in the mixed community in the presence or absence of tobramycin (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). We next sought to test the hypothesis that exogenous addition of phenazine induces tolerance of P. aeruginosa in the mixed community. Treatment of pre-formed biofilms with the phenazine pyocyanin triggered tolerance of WT P. aeruginosa in the mixed community in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4C). The tested phenazine concentration did not impact endpoint CFUs of P. aeruginosa in all conditions tested (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B).

Discussion

By leveraging culture-independent studies in combination with clinical metadata, we built a stable CF-relevant polymicrobial model system composed of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica (Figure 1). We used experimental conditions reflecting the nutritional (e.g. ASM) and environmental (e.g. anoxia) of the CF airway (DePas et al., 2016; Worlitzsch et al., 2002; Palmer et al., 2005). The community fell within the range of clinically observed communities in terms of species relative abundance (Figure 1—figure supplement 4), and furthermore, we observed several community-specific phenotypes (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 5). In agreement with previous reports (Filkins et al., 2015; Li et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2019; Stoner et al., 2022), S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. showed decreased and increased growth, respectively, in the mixed community versus monoculture. While other studies have demonstrated that P. aeruginosa-secreted exoproducts can eradicate S. aureus in co-culture (Filkins et al., 2015; Limoli et al., 2017), we could maintain S. aureus viability in the mixed community for up to 14 days under the CF-like conditions used here (Figure 1—figure supplement 6B). Thus, the observations in our polymicrobial community mirror the capacity of these two pathogens to co-exist in the CF airway (Camus et al., 2021). Also, we ruled out the possibility of remaining oxygen in ASM negatively impacting the viability of P. melaninogenica by reproducing our results using an anoxic chamber (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). That is, we observed that P. melaninogenica can robustly grow as a planktonic or biofilm monospecies community in a medium capable of sustaining its growth (PGM), while this microbe fails to grow in ASM in monoculture (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Thus, we argue that the mixed-community-specific growth of Prevotella spp. we observed across several conditions (Figure 1C, Figure 1—figure supplement 5, Figure 2—figure supplement 6) is not due to depletion of residual oxygen.

A major hurdle in the eradication of microbial communities detected in the CF airway is their resilience to front-line CF antimicrobials (Orazi and O’Toole, 2019; Vandeplassche et al., 2019). That is, while pathogens tested in monoculture demonstrate sensitivity to several antimicrobial classes (Orazi and O’Toole, 2019; Vandeplassche et al., 2019), these findings do not translate to improved outcomes in the clinic (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020; Heirali et al., 2017). For example, a recent report shows that current testing methods fail to predict outcomes in pwCF (Waters et al., 2019). By modeling a polymicrobial community of six frequently encountered pathogens in the CF lung, Vandeplassche and colleagues compared the impact of several CF drugs on microbes grown as monocultures versus in a mixed community (Vandeplassche et al., 2020). Surprisingly, no shifts in sensitivities of any of the microorganisms were observed. These results could perhaps be explained by the differences in experimental conditions as Vandeplassche and colleagues used a rich medium, and incubations were performed under normoxic conditions (Vandeplassche et al., 2020). However, we acknowledge that the work of Vandeplassche and colleagues represents an important first step in tackling the impact of microbial interactions on antimicrobial susceptibility of CF pathogens.

Using more ‘CF-like’ experimental conditions informed by existing clinical data sets, we sought to test the hypothesis that growth in a mixed community would shift the sensitivity of CF microorganisms versus growth as monocultures. We focused on the front-line CF antimicrobial tobramycin as (i) this drug is the most heavily prescribed therapeutic to treat chronic CF lung infections (Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, 2021) but (ii) often does not eradicate pathogens (especially P. aeruginosa) from the airways of pwCF (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020). Using our system, we made several observations. First, almost all tested S. aureus and Streptococcus spp. strains were protected from tobramycin-mediated killing in the mixed community versus monoculture (Figure 2B, Figure 2C, Figure 2—figure supplement 4, Figure 2—figure supplement 5). In a recently published study, Murray and colleagues observed that S. aureus can be protected from tobramycin eradication in the presence of P. aeruginosa (Murray et al., 2022), but this protection was abolished in the presence of a PQS operon inhibitor (Murray et al., 2022). Inactivation of the MvfR regulator, which controls the expression of the PQS operon (Déziel et al., 2005), did not sensitize S. aureus to tobramycin under our experimental conditions (Figure 3—figure supplement 3), indicating that other mechanisms might be driving this phenotype in our system. Furthermore, the observed increased tobramycin resilience of Streptococcus spp. in a polymicrobial environment (Figure 2C, Figure 2—figure supplement 5) is in agreement with a previous report (Price et al., 2016). Future studies will be necessary to identify the community-specific recalcitrance mechanisms employed by S. aureus and Streptococcus spp.

The decrease in the viability of P. aeruginosa in a tobramycin-treated community (Figure 2A, Figure 2—figure supplement 1, Figure 2—figure supplement 2, Figure 2—figure supplement 3, Figure 2—figure supplement 7) was unexpected. Recent culture-independent studies investigating the impact of tobramycin in pwCF do not show any appreciable decrease in P. aeruginosa after extended exposure to this antibiotic (Heirali et al., 2020; Nelson et al., 2020). These results prompted us to interrogate the molecular mechanisms driving this increased sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to tobramycin in the community. We observed biofilm-specific tolerance of a ΔlasR mutant grown in the mixed community (Figure 3A), a result repeated with two phenotypically LasR-defective CF clinical isolate variants (AMT0101-1-1 in Figure 3C and SMC1595 in Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Given that not all P. aeruginosa strains exhibited increased sensitivity in the mixed community, some strains may carry mutations in other pathways conferring tolerance to tobramycin in the mixed community. Indeed, clinical P. aeruginosa isolates can accumulate mutations including in the negative regulator MexZ, driving multidrug resilience (Smith et al., 2006).

We observed that phenazines mediate the community tolerance of the ΔlasR mutant and can induce tolerance of WT P. aeruginosa (Figure 4B, Figure 4C). Our rationale for testing the impact of these redox-active compounds in our system is supported by reports highlighting the capacity of these molecules to drive P. aeruginosa drug tolerance (Meirelles et al., 2021; Schiessl et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019). Also, strains lacking LasR function are known to overproduce phenazines (Groleau et al., 2022; Mould et al., 2020; Cugini et al., 2010; Cabeen, 2014; Dekimpe and Déziel, 2009). Interestingly, the highest levels of phenazine production by the ΔlasR mutant were observed in the mixed community (Figure 4A). PCA production of WT P. aeruginosa grown in the mixed community was not statistically significantly different from the concentration detected in monospecies biofilm, while the ΔlasR mutant did show a significant, twofold increase in PCA production in the community compared to the monoculture (Figure 4A). The mechanistic basis for the difference between the WT and ΔlasR mutant production of PCA in the mixed community is the subject of ongoing work. Finally, while we do see a role of phenazines in conferring tolerance, we acknowledge that other LasR-regulated factors may also contribute to this phenotype.

While the approaches used here have allowed us to explore community function, we acknowledge certain limitations to this study. First, while we provide a rationale for the selection of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica for use in our mixed community system, it is fair to ask, ‘is four enough?’ While the four microorganisms we have selected are a reasonable start, the model could be further improved by including additional CF-relevant species. However, adding pathogens such as Burkholderia or Achromobacter does not markedly increase the number of pwCF captured by our model (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B and C). Furthermore, while the in vitro polymicrobial model does not perfectly match the Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 mixed community compositions detected in the CF airway (Hampton et al., 2021), the abundances of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica all fall within the clinical range detected in these communities (Figure 1—figure supplement 4). More importantly, the increased sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to tobramycin treatment in the mixed community could be observed for P. aeruginosa co-cultivated over a 1000-fold range of the other microbial partners (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). These in vitro observations confirm the importance of studying microbes in the context of mixed-species communities but also suggest that the ratio of microbial partners relative to the P. aeruginosa population can vary with similar observed phenotypes.

Finally, we argue that this novel in vitro polymicrobial system will serve as a resource for the research community to probe novel community functions ranging from persistence to virulence and also for understanding the impact of host factors such as immune cells and host-derived metabolites. As such, all strains and protocols will be made freely available upon request, and we are happy to assist other groups in the implementation of this system.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

All the P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary file 2. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus cultures were grown in Tryptic soy broth (TSB) with shaking at 37°C. Prevotella spp. cultures were grown in TSB supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract (YE), 5 µg/mL hemin, 2.85 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride, and 1 µg/mL menadione (PGM). Streptococcus spp. cultures were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with 0.5% YE (THY) at 37°C with 5% CO2. Single colonies of each microbial species cultivated on either TSB solidified with 1.5% agar (TSA) for both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus species or TSA supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood (blood agar) for Streptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. were utilized to start overnight cultures in the abovementioned liquid media. ASM with 5 mg/mL of mucin (ASM) was prepared as previously described (Turner et al., 2015; Palmer et al., 2007) and supplemented with 100 mM 3-morpholinopropane-1-sulfonic acid (MOPS) to maintain a pH of 6.80 over the course of our studies.

Microbial assays

Cultures experiments were performed using polystyrene flat-bottom 96-well plates. Cells from overnight liquid cultures of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. were individually collected and washed twice (for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus) or once (for Streptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp.) in sterile PBS by centrifuging at 10,000 × g for 2 min. After the final wash, cells were resuspended in ASM with no mucin. The optical density (OD600) was then measured for each bacterial suspension and diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 in ASM. Monocultures and co-culture conditions were prepared from the OD600=0.2 suspension and diluted to a final OD600 of 0.01 for each microbial species in ASM corresponding to final bacterial concentrations of 1 × 107 CFU/mL, 3.5 × 106 CFU/mL, 1.2 × 106 CFU/mL, and 4.6 × 106 CFU/mL of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. respectively. A volume of 100 µL of bacterial suspension all at a final OD600 of 0.01 each in the mix was added to three wells. Plates were incubated using an AnaeroPak-Anaerobic container with a GasPak sachet (ThermoFisher) at 37°C for 24 hr. Then, unattached cells were aspirated with a multichannel pipette, and the pre-formed biofilms were replenished with 100 µL of fresh ASM on the bench and incubated for an additional 24 hr at 37°C using an AnaeroPak-Anaerobic container with a GasPak sachet (ThermoFisher). Similar experiments were performed using an anoxic environmental chamber (Whitley A55 - Don Whitley Scientific, Victoria Works, UK) with 10% CO2, 10% H2, and 80% N2 mixed gas at 37°C, yielding results identical to those observed for the GasPak system. After a total of 48 hr of incubation, the planktonic fraction was collected, 10-fold serially diluted and plated on Pseudomonas isolation agar (PIA) for P. aeruginosa detection, Mannitol salt agar (MSA) for S. aureus quantification, TSB + 0.5% YE+1.5% agar supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood, 10 µg/mL oxolinic acid, 10 µg/mL polymixin B for Streptococcus spp. (Streptococcus selective agar – SSA), TSB + 0.5% YE + 1.5% agar supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood, 5 µg/mL hemin, 2.85 mM L-cysteine hydrochloride, 1 µg/mL menadione, 5 µg/mL vancomycin, and 100 µg/mL kanamycin for Prevotella spp. (Prevotella selective agar – PSA). For surface-attached communities, biofilms were washed twice with sterile PBS and resuspended in 50 µL sterile PBS. Bacteria in the biofilms were disrupted using a 96-pin metal replicator, and the resulting resuspended biofilm cells were 10-fold serially diluted in sterile PBS. Dilutions were plated on PIA, MSA, SSA, and PSA selective plates. P. aeruginosa and S. aureus selective plates were incubated for 16–20 hr at 37°C. Streptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. selective plates were incubated in anoxic conditions for 24–48 hr at 37°C. After incubation, colonies were counted, and CFU/mL were determined for each microbial species. For the time course assays, CFU counts were performed for planktonic and biofilm fractions at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, and 336 hr of monoculture and mixed communities grown in anoxic conditions. Pre-formed biofilms were replenished with fresh ASM every 24 hr for the duration of the experiment. For experiments with varying concentrations of S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica in monocultures and co-cultures, the organisms were grown from bacterial suspensions adjusted to an OD600=0.8 in ASM. Suspensions were further diluted in ASM to an OD600 of either 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001, or 0.00001 while maintaining P. aeruginosa at OD600=0.01 (approximating 1 × 107 CFU/mL) in all conditions. The OD600=0.1 dilution factor resulted in CFU/mL count average of 3.8 × 108 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.6 × 108 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis, and 1.0 × 108 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600=0.001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 6.7 × 105 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.1 × 105 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis, and 1.4 × 105 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600=0.0001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 4.2 × 104 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 3.3 × 104 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis, and 4.6 × 104 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600=0.00001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 5.6 × 103 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 4.4 × 103 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis, and 6.2 × 103 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. Data visualization and statistical analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

Tobramycin susceptibility assay

Fresh stocks of tobramycin sulfate (Alfa Aesar) were prepared in sterile milli-Q water to a concentration of 50 mg/mL and subsequently diluted to a working stock of 5 mg/mL in ASM for each experiment. Triplicate wells containing pre-formed live cell biofilms of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Prevotella spp. grown as monoculture and mixed communities were initially grown for 24 hr as described in the ‘Microbial assays’ section. After incubation, the non-attached cells were collected, and pre-formed biofilms were exposed to 100 µg/mL tobramycin (100 µL/well) and further incubated for an additional 24 hr under anoxic conditions at 37°C. After a total of 48 hr of incubation, planktonic and biofilm cell fractions were sampled, 10-fold serially diluted, and plated as described previously. Data visualization and statistical analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

MBC assay

Communities were grown in ASM for a total of 48 hr as described in the ‘Microbial assays’ section. The supernatants were collected then centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 × g and filtered-sterilized by using at 0.22 µM filter. To assess sterility of the supernatants, a volume of 5 µL for each condition was spotted on PIA, MSA, SSA, PSA, and blood agar plates. The supernatant spots were incubated at 37°C for PIA, MSA, and blood agar plates (aerobically) as well as SSA, PSA, and blood agar plates (anaerobically) for 24 hr. Serial twofold dilutions of tobramycin ranging from 500 µg/mL to 0.49 µg/mL were performed in either ASM or with the supernatants from P. aeruginosa monocultures and mixed communities. Duplicate wells of a sterile 96-well plate were used to inoculate 50 µL of various tobramycin concentration ranges in combination with either (i) 50 µL of sterile ASM (negative control) or (ii) 50 µL of the monoculture or mixed community supernatants. The plate was incubated at room temperature for a total of 24 hr. To compare the MBC concentrations of tobramycin after incubation in ASM or in supernatants, overnight cultures of P. aeruginosa PA14 were washed twice with sterile 1× PBS and resuspended in ASM to a final OD600 of 0.1. 50 µL of the P. aeruginosa bacterial suspension were then transferred to two wells of the 96-well plate containing the various twofold dilutions of tobramycin made in either ASM or the culture supernatants. The plate was then incubated in aerobic conditions for 24 hr at 37°C. After the incubation, a 96-pin metal replicator was used to disrupt the cells formed at the bottom of the wells and then 3 µL of the resuspended cells were spotted on TSA plates and incubated at 37°C for 24 hr. Then, the MBC was determined by looking for absence of growth on the agar plate.

Quantification of phenazines produced by P. aeruginosa by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

For phenazines quantification, communities of P. aeruginosa grown as monocultures and in mixed communities were prepared as described in the ‘Microbial assays’ section and inoculated in 12 wells (full row) of a 96-well plate. After incubation under anoxic conditions at 37°C, biofilms were disrupted into the planktonic fraction using at 96-well metal pin replicator, and cell suspension of 10 wells were transferred to a sterile 2.0 mL microtube. A volume of 1 mL of 100% dichloromethane (DCM - Thermo Scientific Chemicals) containing 0.02 ppm of 5,6,7,8-tetradeutero-4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline (HHQ-d4) as the internal standard (IS) was then added to the cells. The samples were then vortexed for 20 s and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The organic (bottom) phase of each sample was then transferred to a new 2.0 mL microtube. A second extraction of the remaining aqueous (top) phase was performed and added to the first organic extraction. The samples were evaporated at room temperature to a volume of 500 µL and then transferred to a conical high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) glass vial before being completely evaporated. Samples were stored at –20°C until resuspended in 100 µL HPLC-grade acetonitrile and analyzed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) as previously described with minor modifications (Lépine et al., 2018). A 15 µL volume of sample was injected and analyzed by HPLC (Waters 2795; Waters, Mississauga, ON, Canada) using a Kinetex (100- by 3.0 mm) 5 μm EVO C18 reverse-phase LC column (Phenomenex). The detector was a tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer (Quattro premier XE; Waters) equipped with a Z-spray interface using electrospray ionization in positive mode (ESI+). Nitrogen was used as a nebulizing and drying gas at flow rates of 15 and 100  mL/min, respectively. HPLC flow rate was 400 µL/min split to 40 µL/min by a Valco tee splitter. An acetonitrile-water gradient containing 1% acetic acid was used. In multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, the following transition was monitored: 225 → 207 for PCA and 248→163 for the IS. The collision energies were set at 15 and 30 V, respectively, and the collision gas flow (argon) was set at 0.35 mL/min. Pure PCA (Sigma) was used as a standard for the method. Data visualization and statistical analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

Quantification of 3-oxo-C12-HSL produced by P. aeruginosa

Extraction of the LasR regulated signaling molecule 3-oxo-C12-HSL from pure culture bacterial suspensions was performed as described in the ‘Quantification of phenazines produced by P. aeruginosa by LC-MS/MS’ section. Quantification of 3-oxo-C12-HSL was done as previously reported by Lépine et al., 2018. Data visualization and statistical analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

Tobramycin susceptibility assay in the presence of phenazines

Fresh stocks of tobramycin sulfate (Alfa Aesar) were prepared in sterile milli-Q water to a concentration of 50 mg/mL and subsequently diluted to a working stock of 5 mg/mL in ASM for each experiment. A 20 mM pyocyanin (Sigma) stock was prepared in 100% DMSO. Preparations containing either (i) ASM with or without vehicle controls, (ii) ASM supplemented with 100 µg/mL of tobramycin, (iii) ASM supplemented with 50 µM or 300 µM pyocyanin, and (iv) ASM supplemented with 100 µg/mL tobramycin and 50 µM or 300 µM pyocyanin were added to triplicate wells containing pre-formed biofilms of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown as monoculture and mixed community biofilms grown for 24 hr as described in the ‘Microbial assays’ section. Communities were incubated for 24 hr in anoxic conditions at 37°C. After a total of 48 hr of incubation, biofilm cell fractions were taken, 10-fold serially diluted, and plated as described previously. Data visualization and statistical analysis were done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

Molecular techniques

In frame deletion of the lasR gene in a ΔΔphz mutant was done using Escherichia coli SM10 λpir carrying the pEX18Gm-ΔlasR plasmid as previously reported (Hogan et al., 2004). Complementation of the lasR gene in a ΔlasR mutant background was done using E. coli S17 λpir carrying the knock-in pMQ30-lasR construct as previously described (Clay et al., 2020). Strains were confirmed by sequencing.

16S rRNA gene data analyses

The compendium of CF sputum microbiome data sets used here was developed from publicly available 16S rRNA reads as previously published (Hampton et al., 2021). Briefly, reads from sputum samples from 167 clinically stable subjects aged 8–69 from 14 CF centers in the United States and Europe were assigned to bacterial taxa at the genus level. Applying a gap statistic to unsupervised k-means clustering of Bray-Curtis distance of these 167 subject samples suggested that five community types best represented differences between the 167 subjects as previously described (Hampton et al., 2021). Here, we have used this compendium of taxonomically assigned reads from 167 pwCF to assess how many distinct genera, which ones, are required to capture 70% or more of taxonomically assigned 16S rRNA reads in each subject. See Source code 1 for the script used to generate the data presented in Figure 1A, Figure 1B, Figure 1—figure supplement 1, and Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

In silico community modeling

We used the SteadyCom method (Chan et al., 2017) to simulate the steady-state metabolism of a P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica mixed community. SteadyCom performs community flux balance analysis by computing the maximal community growth while ensuring that all metabolites are properly balanced within each species and across the community. SteadyCom provides the capability to constrain the relative abundance of each species in the community to determine the main interspecies metabolic interactions. This simulation method is based on several simplifying assumptions, including spatial homogeneity and that all propagating species have the same growth rate at steady state. Outputs of each SteadyCom simulation included the community growth rate and species-dependent uptake and secretion rates of each extracellular metabolite. Model parameters, such as constraints in metabolite uptake rates, were taken from previous work modeling CF airway communities (Henson et al., 2019). Four independent simulations, corresponding to the species abundances in the community types found to explain the variability in lung function, were performed. We calculated the relative abundance between P. aeruginosa, S. sanguinis, P. melaninogenica, and S. aureus within each community type, while ignoring remaining species. The simulations were then used to determine the main metabolites exchanged between the four species. See Source code 2 for the SteadyCom script used to generate the modeling data presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 1A. Species abundance used for in silico modeling are presented in Supplementary file 3.

Protease assays

Protease activity was assessed through casein degradation of tested P. aeruginosa strains grown on 1.5% TSA plates containing 1.5% sterile skim milk. Briefly, six colonies and appropriate controls grown on TSA plates were inoculated on milk plates and incubated overnight at 30°C for 24 and 48 hr. Casein degradation activity was observed by the presence or not of a zone of clearance around the inoculation site.

3-oxo-C12-HSL autoinducer assays

The production 3-oxo-C12-HSL of tested strain and associated controls was measured as described previously through the utilization of a 3-oxo-C12-HSL-specific lacZ reporter (Mould et al., 2022). Briefly, the 3-oxo-C12-HSL-specific lacZ reporter strain (DH161) was diluted to an OD600=0.01 in lysis broth (LB) from an overnight culture. A volume of 100 µL was spread on LB agar plates supplemented with 150 µg/mL of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) dissolved in 100% DMSO. Then, the plates were allowed to dry for 15 min in a biological safety cabinet. Once dry, a volume of 5 µL of OD600 adjusted to 1.0 tested strains and controls (PA14 WT, ΔlasR, and ΔlasIΔrhlI) was spotted on the pre-inoculated reporter strain. The plates were allowed to dry for an additional 15 min and then incubated at 37°C for 16–18 hr. Development of a blue halo around tested colonies was interpreted as a positive 3-oxo-C12-HSL activity.

Materials/data availability statement

All the necessary data needed for rigorous evaluation of the manuscript conclusions are accessible within the main text and/or associated supplementary files/figures/source data. Requests for reagents and other resources presented in the paper should be addressed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant R01 AI155424 to GAO, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) operating grant MOP-142466 to ED, NIH/NIGMS 5 P20 GM130454 project support to DS, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) grant HOGAN19G0 to DAH and CFF Postdoctoral Fellowship JEAN21F0 to FJP. Additional support is provided by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Research Development Program (STANTO19R0) and NIH P30-DK117469 (Dartmouth Cystic Fibrosis Research Center). We thank Dallas L Mould for technical help and helpful discussions. We also thank Dr. Benjamin D Ross for access to his anoxic environmental chamber and Dr. Sophie Robitaille, Dr. Courtney E Price, and Alexis R Ramsey for helpful discussions.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Fabrice Jean-Pierre, Email: jeanpierre.fabrice@gmail.com.

George A O'Toole, Email: georgeo@dartmouth.edu.

Vaughn S Cooper, University of Pittsburgh, United States.

Arturo Casadevall, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation JEAN21F0 to Fabrice Jean-Pierre.

  • National Institutes of Health R01 AI155424 to George A O'Toole.

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-142466 to Eric Déziel.

  • National Institutes of Health 5 P20 GM130454 to Daniel Schultz.

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation HOGAN19G0 to Deborah A Hogan.

  • NIH P30-DK117469 to Deborah A Hogan.

  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Research Development Program STANTO19R0 to Deborah A Hogan.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Validation, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Resources, Validation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Additional files

Supplementary file 1. Minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of P. aeruginosa PA14 planktonic and biofilm cells treated with tobramycin exposed to the following conditions for 24 hr.
elife-81604-supp1.docx (29KB, docx)
Supplementary file 2. Strains and plasmids used in the study.
elife-81604-supp2.docx (53.4KB, docx)
Supplementary file 3. Species abundances in community types used for in silico modeling of metabolic flux.
elife-81604-supp3.docx (32.5KB, docx)
MDAR checklist
Source code 1. ‘R’ script code used (i) to determine the abundance and prevalence data presented in Figure 1A, (ii) to determine the number of persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) for which >70% of 16S rRNA gene reads were assigned to Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella (Figure 1B) and Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella with Burkholderia or Achromobacter (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B, C), and (iii) to determine the microbial composition range of in vivo cystic fibrosis (CF) mixed communities compared with the in vitro model (Figure 1—figure supplement 4A).

The 16S rRNA raw data published in Hampton et al., 2021 was used with Source Code 1.

elife-81604-code1.zip (3.8KB, zip)
Source code 2. SteadyCom (Chan et al., 2017) script used to determine predicted metabolic fluxes between P. aeruginosa, S. sanguinis, S. aureus, and P. melaninogenica for the P. aeruginosa-dominated (Pa.D), Streptococcus-dominated (Strep.D), and the Pa.M1/M2 mixed communities using the 16S rRNA relative abundances available in Hampton et al., 2021. Code used to generate Figure 1—figure supplement 1A.
elife-81604-code2.zip (653.8KB, zip)

Data availability

Figure 1 - figure supplement 3 & Source Data 1 contains the numerical data used to generate the figure. Figure 1 - figure supplement 4 & Source Data 2 contains numerical data used to generate the figure. Source Code 1 contains the script used to generate Figure 1, Figure 1 - figure supplement 1 and Figure 1 - figure supplement 4. Source Code 2 contains the script used to generate the modeling data presented Figure 1 - figure supplement 1.

The following previously published dataset was used:

Hampton TH, Thomas D, van der Gast C, O'Toole GA, Stanton BA. 2021. Mild Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease Is Associated with Bacterial Community Stability. NCBI BioProject. PRJEB30646

References

  1. Acosta N, Thornton CS, Surette MG, Somayaji R, Rossi L, Rabin HR, Parkins MD. Azithromycin and the microbiota of cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Microbiology. 2021;21:96. doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02159-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beaudoin T, Yau YCW, Stapleton PJ, Gong Y, Wang PW, Guttman DS, Waters V. Staphylococcus aureus interaction with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm enhances tobramycin resistance. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes. 2017;3:25. doi: 10.1038/s41522-017-0035-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bottery MJ, Matthews JL, Wood AJ, Johansen HK, Pitchford JW, Friman VP. Inter-species interactions alter antibiotic efficacy in bacterial communities. The ISME Journal. 2022;16:812–821. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01130-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabeen MT. Stationary phase-specific virulence factor overproduction by a lasR mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLOS ONE. 2014;9:e88743. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camus L, Briaud P, Vandenesch F, Moreau K. How bacterial adaptation to cystic fibrosis environment shapes interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:617784. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.617784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chan SHJ, Simons MN, Maranas CD. SteadyCom: predicting microbial abundances while ensuring community stability. PLOS Computational Biology. 2017;13:e1005539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clay ME, Hammond JH, Zhong F, Chen X, Kowalski CH, Lee AJ, Porter MS, Hampton TH, Greene CS, Pletneva EV, Hogan DA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasr mutant fitness in microoxia is supported by an anr-regulated oxygen-binding hemerythrin. PNAS. 2020;117:3167–3173. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917576117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cugini C, Morales DK, Hogan DA. Candida albicans-produced farnesol stimulates Pseudomonas quinolone signal production in LasR-defective Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microbiology. 2010;156:3096–3107. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.037911-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry . 2020 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, Maryland: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dekimpe V, Déziel E. Revisiting the quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the transcriptional regulator RhlR regulates LasR-specific factors. Microbiology. 2009;155:712–723. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.022764-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DePas WH, Starwalt-Lee R, Van Sambeek L, Ravindra Kumar S, Gradinaru V, Newman DK. Exposing the three-dimensional biogeography and metabolic states of pathogens in cystic fibrosis sputum via hydrogel embedding, clearing, and rRNA labeling. MBio. 2016;7:e00796-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00796-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Déziel E, Gopalan S, Tampakaki AP, Lépine F, Padfield KE, Saucier M, Xiao G, Rahme LG. The contribution of MvfR to Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis and quorum sensing circuitry regulation: multiple quorum sensing-regulated genes are modulated without affecting lasRI, rhlRI or the production of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones. Molecular Microbiology. 2005;55:998–1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04448.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feltner JB, Wolter DJ, Pope CE, Groleau MC, Smalley NE, Greenberg EP, Mayer-Hamblett N, Burns J, Déziel E, Hoffman LR, Dandekar AA, Winans SC, Diggle S, Goldberg J. LasR variant cystic fibrosis isolates reveal an adaptable quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio. 2016;7:e01513-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01513-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Filkins LM, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Gross MJ, Hogan DA, Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Paster BJ, O’Toole GA. Prevalence of streptococci and increased polymicrobial diversity associated with cystic fibrosis patient stability. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194:4709–4717. doi: 10.1128/JB.00566-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, O’Toole GA. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa drives S. aureus towards fermentative metabolism and reduced viability in a cystic fibrosis model. Journal of Bacteriology. 2015;197:2252–2264. doi: 10.1128/JB.00059-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Flynn JM, Niccum D, Dunitz JM, Hunter RC. Evidence and role for bacterial mucin degradation in cystic fibrosis airway disease. PLOS Pathogens. 2016;12:e1005846. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Flynn JM, Cameron LC, Wiggen TD, Dunitz JM, Harcombe WR, Hunter RC. Disruption of cross-feeding inhibits pathogen growth in the sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis. MSphere. 2020;5:e00343-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00343-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Groleau MC, Taillefer H, Vincent AT, Constant P, Déziel E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates defective in function of the lasR quorum sensing regulator are frequent in diverse environmental niches. Environmental Microbiology. 2022;24:1062–1075. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hampton TH, Thomas D, van der Gast C, O’Toole GA, Stanton BA. Mild cystic fibrosis lung disease is associated with bacterial community stability. Microbiology Spectrum. 2021;9:e0002921. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00029-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Heirali AA, Workentine ML, Acosta N, Poonja A, Storey DG, Somayaji R, Rabin HR, Whelan FJ, Surette MG, Parkins MD. The effects of inhaled aztreonam on the cystic fibrosis lung microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5:51. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0265-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Heirali A, Thornton C, Acosta N, Somayaji R, Laforest Lapointe I, Storey D, Rabin H, Waddell B, Rossi L, Arrieta MC, Surette M, Parkins MD. Sputum microbiota in adults with CF associates with response to inhaled tobramycin. Thorax. 2020;75:1058–1064. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Henson MA, Orazi G, Phalak P, O’Toole GA. Metabolic modeling of cystic fibrosis airway communities predicts mechanisms of pathogen dominance. MSystems. 2019;4:e00026-19. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00026-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoffman LR, Kulasekara HD, Emerson J, Houston LS, Burns JL, Ramsey BW, Miller SI. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants are associated with cystic fibrosis lung disease progression. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. 2009;8:66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoffman LR, Richardson AR, Houston LS, Kulasekara HD, Martens-Habbena W, Klausen M, Burns JL, Stahl DA, Hassett DJ, Fang FC, Miller SI. Nutrient availability as a mechanism for selection of antibiotic tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa within the CF airway. PLOS Pathogens. 2010;6:e1000712. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hogan DA, Vik A, Kolter R. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecule influences Candida albicans morphology. Molecular Microbiology. 2004;54:1212–1223. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jang EY, Kim M, Noh MH, Moon JH, Lee JY. In vitro effects of polyphosphate against Prevotella intermedia in planktonic phase and biofilm. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2016;60:818–826. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01861-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jean-Pierre F, Vyas A, Hampton TH, Henson MA, O’Toole GA. One versus many: polymicrobial communities and the cystic fibrosis airway. MBio. 2021;12:e00006-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00006-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jennings LK, Dreifus JE, Reichhardt C, Storek KM, Secor PR, Wozniak DJ, Hisert KB, Parsek MR. Pseudomonas aeruginosa aggregates in cystic fibrosis sputum produce exopolysaccharides that likely impede current therapies. Cell Reports. 2021;34:108782. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lamoureux C, Guilloux CA, Courteboeuf E, Gouriou S, Beauruelle C, Héry-Arnaud G. Prevotella melaninogenica, a sentinel species of antibiotic resistance in cystic fibrosis respiratory niche? Microorganisms. 2021;9:1275. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lebeaux D, Ghigo JM, Beloin C. Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2014;78:510–543. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00013-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee J, Zhang L. The hierarchy quorum sensing network in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Protein & Cell. 2015;6:26–41. doi: 10.1007/s13238-014-0100-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lépine F, Milot S, Groleau MC, Déziel E. Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) for the detection and quantification of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones (AHLs) and 4-hydroxy-2-alkylquinolines (HAQs) Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018;1673:49–59. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7309-5_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Li K, Gifford AH, Hampton TH, O’Toole GA. Availability of zinc impacts interactions between Streptococcus sanguinis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in coculture. Journal of Bacteriology. 2020;202:e00618-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00618-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Limoli DH, Yang J, Khansaheb MK, Helfman B, Peng L, Stecenko AA, Goldberg JB. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa co-infection is associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and poor clinical outcomes. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 2016;35:947–953. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2621-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Limoli DH, Whitfield GB, Kitao T, Ivey ML, Davis MR, Grahl N, Hogan DA, Rahme LG, Howell PL, O’Toole GA, Goldberg JB. Pseudomonas aeruginosa alginate overproduction promotes coexistence with Staphylococcus aureus in a model of cystic fibrosis respiratory infection. MBio. 2017;8:e00186-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00186-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Limoli DH, Hoffman LR. Help, hinder, hide and harm: what can we learn from the interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus during respiratory infections? Thorax. 2019;74:684–692. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Linn BS, Szabo S. The varying sensitivity to antibacterial agents of micro-organisms in pure vs. mixed cultures. Surgery. 1975;77:780–785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mah T-FC, O’Toole GA. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends in Microbiology. 2001;9:34–39. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Malhotra S, Hayes D, Wozniak DJ. Cystic fibrosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: the host-microbe interface. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2019;32:e00138-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00138-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Meirelles LA, Perry EK, Bergkessel M, Newman DK. Bacterial defenses against a natural antibiotic promote collateral resilience to clinical antibiotics. PLOS Biology. 2021;19:e3001093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mould DL, Botelho NJ, Hogan DA. Intraspecies signaling between common variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases production of quorum-sensing-controlled virulence factors. MBio. 2020;11:e01865-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01865-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mould DL, Stevanovic M, Ashare A, Schultz D, Hogan DA. Metabolic basis for the evolution of a common pathogenic Pseudomonas aeruginosa variant. eLife. 2022;11:e76555. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Murray EJ, Dubern J-F, Chan WC, Chhabra SR, Williams P. A Pseudomonas aeruginosa PQS quorum-sensing system inhibitor with anti-staphylococcal activity sensitizes polymicrobial biofilms to tobramycin. Cell Chemical Biology. 2022;29:1187–1199. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2022.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nelson MT, Wolter DJ, Eng A, Weiss EJ, Vo AT, Brittnacher MJ, Hayden HS, Ravishankar S, Bautista G, Ratjen A, Blackledge M, McNamara S, Nay L, Majors C, Miller SI, Borenstein E, Simon RH, LiPuma JJ, Hoffman LR. Maintenance tobramycin primarily affects untargeted bacteria in the CF sputum microbiome. Thorax. 2020;75:780–790. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. O’Brien TJ, Figueroa W, Welch M. Decreased efficacy of antimicrobial agents in a polymicrobial environment. The ISME Journal. 2022;16:1694–1704. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01218-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Orazi G, O’Toole GA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters Staphylococcus aureus sensitivity to vancomycin in a biofilm model of cystic fibrosis infection. MBio. 2017;8:e00873-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00873-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Orazi G, O’Toole GA. “It takes a village”: Mechanisms underlying antimicrobial recalcitrance of polymicrobial biofilms. Journal of Bacteriology. 2019;202:e00530-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00530-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Orazi G, Ruoff KL, O’Toole GA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa increases the sensitivity of biofilm-grown Staphylococcus aureus to membrane-targeting antiseptics and antibiotics. MBio. 2019;10:e01501-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01501-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Orazi G, Jean-Pierre F, O’Toole GA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 enhances the efficacy of norfloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus Newman biofilms. Journal of Bacteriology. 2020;202:e00159-20. doi: 10.1128/JB.00159-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. O’Sullivan BP, Freedman SD. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2009;373:1891–1904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60327-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. O’Toole GA. Cystic fibrosis airway microbiome: overturning the old, opening the way for the new. Journal of Bacteriology. 2018;200:e00561-17. doi: 10.1128/JB.00561-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Palmer KL, Mashburn LM, Singh PK, Whiteley M. Cystic fibrosis sputum supports growth and cues key aspects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa physiology. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187:5267–5277. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.15.5267-5277.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Palmer KL, Aye LM, Whiteley M. Nutritional cues control Pseudomonas aeruginosa multicellular behavior in cystic fibrosis sputum. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007;189:8079–8087. doi: 10.1128/JB.01138-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Poltak SR, Cooper VS. Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities. The ISME Journal. 2011;5:369–378. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Price KE, Naimie AA, Griffin EF, Bay C, O’Toole GA. Tobramycin-treated Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 enhances Streptococcus constellatus 7155 biofilm formation in a cystic fibrosis model system. Journal of Bacteriology. 2016;198:237–247. doi: 10.1128/JB.00705-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ramsey BW, Pepe MS, Quan JM, Otto KL, Montgomery AB, Williams-Warren J, Vasiljev-K M, Borowitz D, Bowman CM, Marshall BC, Marshall S, Smith AL. Intermittent administration of inhaled tobramycin in patients with cystic fibrosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:23–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Recinos DA, Sekedat MD, Hernandez A, Cohen TS, Sakhtah H, Prince AS, Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LEP. Redundant phenazine operons in Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibit environment-dependent expression and differential roles in pathogenicity. PNAS. 2012;109:19420–19425. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213901109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Robitaille S, Groleau MC, Déziel E. Swarming motility growth favours the emergence of a subpopulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing mutants. Environmental Microbiology. 2020;22:2892–2906. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rogers GB, Hart CA, Mason JR, Hughes M, Walshaw MJ, Bruce KD. Bacterial diversity in cases of lung infection in cystic fibrosis patients: 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) length heterogeneity PCR and 16S rDNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism profiling. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41:3548–3558. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.8.3548-3558.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rossi E, La Rosa R, Bartell JA, Marvig RL, Haagensen JAJ, Sommer LM, Molin S, Johansen HK. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adaptation and evolution in patients with cystic fibrosis. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2021;19:331–342. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00477-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruddy J, Emerson J, Moss R, Genatossio A, McNamara S, Burns JL, Anderson G, Rosenfeld M. Sputum tobramycin concentrations in cystic fibrosis patients with repeated administration of inhaled tobramycin. Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery. 2013;26:69–75. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Schiessl KT, Hu F, Jo J, Nazia SZ, Wang B, Price-Whelan A, Min W, Dietrich LEP. Phenazine production promotes antibiotic tolerance and metabolic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature Communications. 2019;10:762. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08733-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Scott JE, Li K, Filkins LM, Zhu B, Kuchma SL, Schwartzman JD, O’Toole GA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa can inhibit growth of streptococcal species via siderophore production. Journal of Bacteriology. 2019;201:e00014-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00014-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Scott JE, O’Toole GA. The yin and yang of streptococcus lung infections in cystic fibrosis: a model for studying polymicrobial interactions. Journal of Bacteriology. 2019;201:e00115-19. doi: 10.1128/JB.00115-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shahidi A, Ellner PD. Effect of mixed cultures on antibiotic susceptibility testing. Applied Microbiology. 1969;18:766–770. doi: 10.1128/am.18.5.766-770.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sherrard LJ, McGrath SJ, McIlreavey L, Hatch J, Wolfgang MC, Muhlebach MS, Gilpin DF, Elborn JS, Tunney MM. Production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and the potential indirect pathogenic role of Prevotella isolates from the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiota. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2016;47:140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Rabin HR, Duan K, Norgaard JC, Surette MG. A polymicrobial perspective of pulmonary infections exposes an enigmatic pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients. PNAS. 2008;105:15070–15075. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804326105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith EE, Buckley DG, Wu Z, Saenphimmachak C, Hoffman LR, D’Argenio DA, Miller SI, Ramsey BW, Speert DP, Moskowitz SM, Burns JL, Kaul R, Olson MV. Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. PNAS. 2006;103:8487–8492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602138103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Stoner SN, Baty JJ, Scoffield JA. Pseudomonas aeruginosa polysaccharide Psl supports airway microbial community development. The ISME Journal. 2022;16:1730–1739. doi: 10.1038/s41396-022-01221-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Surette MG. The cystic fibrosis lung microbiome. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2014;11 Suppl 1:S61–S65. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201306-159MG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Thornton CS, Caverly LJ, LiPuma JJ. Coming up for air: the role of anaerobes in cystic fibrosis. Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 2022;19:713–716. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1142PS. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Turner KH, Wessel AK, Palmer GC, Murray JL, Whiteley M. Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. PNAS. 2015;112:4110–4115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419677112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Ulrich M, Beer I, Braitmaier P, Dierkes M, Kummer F, Krismer B, Schumacher U, Gräpler-Mainka U, Riethmüller J, Jensen PØ, Bjarnsholt T, Høiby N, Bellon G, Döring G. Relative contribution of Prevotella intermedia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa to lung pathology in airways of patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 2010;65:978–984. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.137745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Vandeplassche E, Tavernier S, Coenye T, Crabbé A. Influence of the lung microbiome on antibiotic susceptibility of cystic fibrosis pathogens. European Respiratory Review. 2019;28:190041. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0041-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Vandeplassche E, Sass A, Ostyn L, Burmølle M, Kragh KN, Bjarnsholt T, Coenye T, Crabbé A. Antibiotic susceptibility of cystic fibrosis lung microbiome members in a multispecies biofilm. Biofilm. 2020;2:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2020.100031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Waters VJ, Kidd TJ, Canton R, Ekkelenkamp MB, Johansen HK, LiPuma JJ, Bell SC, Elborn JS, Flume PA, VanDevanter DR, Gilligan P, Antimicrobial Resistance International Working Group in Cystic Fibrosis Reconciling antimicrobial susceptibility testing and clinical response in antimicrobial treatment of chronic cystic fibrosis lung infections. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69:1812–1816. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Waters VJ, LiPuma JJ. In: Cystic Fibrosis: A Multi-Organ System Approach. Davis SD, Rosenfeld M, Chmiel J, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. Bacterial infections and the respiratory microbiome; pp. 73–92. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Widder S, Zhao J, Carmody LA, Zhang Q, Kalikin LM, Schloss PD, LiPuma JJ. Association of bacterial community types, functional microbial processes and lung disease in cystic fibrosis airways. The ISME Journal. 2022;16:905–914. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01129-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Worlitzsch D, Tarran R, Ulrich M, Schwab U, Cekici A, Meyer KC, Birrer P, Bellon G, Berger J, Weiss T, Botzenhart K, Yankaskas JR, Randell S, Boucher RC, Döring G. Effects of reduced mucus oxygen concentration in airway Pseudomonas infections of cystic fibrosis patients. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2002;109:317–325. doi: 10.1172/JCI13870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zemanick ET, Harris JK, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Sagel SD, Stevens MJ, Accurso FJ, Laguna TA. Inflammation and airway microbiota during cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e62917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhu K, Chen S, Sysoeva TA, You L. Universal antibiotic tolerance arising from antibiotic-triggered accumulation of pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLOS Biology. 2019;17:e3000573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Vaughn S Cooper 1

This article establishes a new model of the multispecies microbiome of infections of the cystic fibrosis airway and demonstrates its utility and reproducibility for testing the effectiveness of antibiotics and understanding how different bacteria interact. It shows that antibiotic susceptibility of the dominant pathogen P. aeruginosa changes in this mixed community relative to when grown alone, and indicates that a commonly-arising mutant of P. aeruginosa alters this sensitivity. This report is significant as a community resource and for its discovery of one reason why antimicrobial treatments can fail in polymicrobial infections.

Decision letter

Editor: Vaughn S Cooper1
Reviewed by: William DePas2, Robert Quinn3

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Community composition shapes microbial-specific phenotypes in a cystic fibrosis polymicrobial model system" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, one of whom is a member of our Board of Reviewing Editors, and the evaluation has been overseen by Arturo Casadevall as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in the review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: William DePas (Reviewer #2); Robert Quinn (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) Further justification is required for why the authors jump to phenazine production as the singular lasR-associated phenotype they pursue. Details of phenazine experiments should be expanded.

2) There is a missed opportunity to analyze how interactions between species influence the productivity of each species and the greater community, with methods provided by one reviewer.

3) The methods for oxygen exposure during experiments and their effects require more clarity, particularly focusing on how it affects antibiotic tolerance and Prevotella growth in monoculture

4) The diluted mixed community experiment should be repeated to ensure reproducibility

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

L174-187 The difference in yield between biofilm and planktonic cultures is interesting. More interesting, and not explored, is how cultivation methods change the interactions between these species. With measures of growth yield from each of the species in monoculture at a given time point, and estimates of the numbers of each species in the inoculum, you can calculate how interactions between species influence the productivity of each species and the community as a whole. These calculations are important for a broader understanding of the community ecology of the model system and provide a baseline for further manipulations in the paper, eg following TOB treatment. This approach is detailed in Poltak and Cooper ISMEJ 2011 and is based on Loreau and Hector Nature 2002. I encourage the authors to analyze data using these equations to report realized productivity in mixture – who are the winners and losers of mixture, and how do these changes depend on cultural context? The way the data are currently presented in the figures makes these inferences nearly impossible.

TOB sensitivity in monoculture vs mixed culture: the reported changes are interesting and the results that lasR mutants influence susceptibility reasonable. However, the methods don't provide sufficient context for the reported findings and leave me wondering about intermediate ratios of strains, whether these changes require cells or merely supernatant, etc. This is fundamentally a methods development paper and these specific methods deserve further attention.

Re: lasR, please describe some other plausible reasons why lasR could have influenced TOB sensitivity other than phenazines. This section immediately jumps to these compounds as the cause of altered sensitivity and considers no other possible causes, which is problematic for such a pleiotropic regulator.

Reproducibility and sharing: cultivation and testing of this CF-relevant microbial community are presumably designed to be a resource for the community. Thus, a short statement in the main text describing the potential and limitations for sharing these resources would be a strength, beyond the standard availability statements in the supplementary material.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The paper is extremely interesting and, in my opinion, very valuable for infectious disease microbiologists and likely the broader microbiology field. My major concerns are related to the weaknesses identified in the public review.

1) How do your findings that phenazines can be protective against tobramycin tie in to your original observation that WT P. aeruginosa becomes susceptible to tobramycin in mixed communities? Figure 4 seems to indicate that WT P. aeruginosa makes more PCA in the mixed community than in a monospecies biofilm. Shouldn't that increase confer increased protection against tobramycin? Is that difference not significant? Is increased susceptibility possibly due to a decrease in a different type of phenazine? Even if phenazine production is not decreased in WT in the mixed biofilm community compared to monospecies biofilms, that result should be explicitly discussed.

2) Are you exposing cells to oxygen when changing the medium and when exposing cells to tobramycin? If so, how would you expect that to impact tolerance?

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

– Figure 1 c really adds nothing to the study. It needs to be more detailed to be useful.

– The metabolic flux analysis is poorly explained. Why would one expect the abundance of the organism to affect the metabolic flux? Is this not more of a binary analysis? It is unclear why this was done. For example, the wording 'multiple similarities' and 'distinguish' is very confusing. Can this be quantified?

– The decision to use a single 'mixed community model' is not well supported. This modeling aspect of the manuscript suffers from clarity and reasoning behind the approach.

– In fact lines 132-148 set a much better rationale for choosing these organisms, they are abundant and prevalent seems to make enough sense to me.

– Figure 1 supplement 3 is confusing. There are many bar graphs shown for the clinical strains, but the figure legend doesn't explain well what is being shown. Can this be better explained? This is an important experiment because the use of laboratory strains was peculiar after all the rationale for choosing the bacteria from people with CF.

– Figure 1 supplement 2B. It would be useful to show the variation in the experiment instead of a single point. Looking at the source data, the replicates are quite reproducible. This is important information for the reader and those trying to work on similar experiments to know that it is quite reproducible.

– The use of anaerobic culture conditions is of interest, especially with all of the pre-preparation of the cultures described in the methods. Were the washing and resuspending of cells done in anaerobic conditions? Might this explain the lack of growth of Prevotella spp. It is not clear if these preparations were done anaerobically. If Prevotella cultures are prepared and cultured in ASM anaerobically does the microbe grow? Or is it missing nutrients in ASM?

– Why was treating Pseudomonas alone with tobramycin and finding a reduction in planktonic growth surprising? It is an antibiotic after all.

– A recent experiment with sputum cultures in ASM as model communities shows that outcomes of competition in CF microbiome were driven by pH (Ghuneim et al. ISMEJ. 2022). The authors mention that they added MOPS to their cultures, can they comment on how this might affect competition and antibiotic outcomes in light of this similar manuscript?

– Figure 2 supplement 1, the 1000x diluted cultures of other bacteria with P. aeruginosa exposed to tobramycin has a very large error bar. I believe three technical replicates were performed, but only two points can be seen. Can this be explained? Repeated?

– Line 247 again brings up the question of whether the inability to culture Prevotella is due to not preparing in robust anaerobic conditions. This should be tested and shown.

– The pre-incubation with microbial supernatants does not preclude microbial inactivation as responsible for the increased killing. What if an intracellular toby deactivating enzyme is responsible? One could use mass spec to measure the amount of Toby that remains after the experiment.

eLife. 2023 Jan 20;12:e81604. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81604.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) Further justification is required for why the authors jump to phenazine production as the singular lasR-associated phenotype they pursue. Details of phenazine experiments should be expanded.

We appreciate the reviewers’ comments and have expanded our justifications as to why we tested phenazines as a LasR-regulated target to explain the P. aeruginosa tolerance phenotype.

We have modified the text at lines 362–379 to the following:

“Studies examining the impact of interspecies interactions on LasR mutant variants have shown that phenazine production is stimulated in the presence of other microbial partners (1, 2). Furthermore, as the inactivation of the mvfR gene in a ΔlasR background rescued tobramycin sensitivity of P. aeruginosa in a polymicrobial environment (Figure 3D), and the MvfR-PQS system is crucial for phenazines production (3, 4), we hypothesized that these molecules might be overproduced in the mixed community, thereby conferring tolerance to the ΔlasR mutant. That is, phenazines have previously been shown to drive tolerance of P. aeruginosa to various drug classes, including aminoglycosides (5-7). For example, Schiessl and colleagues observed that inactivating phenazine production results in increased sensitivity of P. aeruginosa to tobramycin (6). Moreover, it has been reported that inactivation of the lasR gene drives overproduction of phenazines in P. aeruginosa (8), thus further suggesting a pivotal role of these redox-active molecules in P. aeruginosa tobramycin tolerance in our experimental conditions. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying the precursor molecule phenazine-1-carboxylic acid (PCA) produced by wild-type and associated mutants of P. aeruginosa grown as monospecies and mixed biofilm communities. Confirming our hypothesis, we measured significantly higher PCA levels in the mixed community containing the ΔlasR mutant when compared to WT P. aeruginosa (Figure 4A).”

2) There is a missed opportunity to analyze how interactions between species influence the productivity of each species and the greater community, with methods provided by one reviewer.

We agree with the reviewer’s comment that this type of analysis would be a good addition to the manuscript. We have added the productivity analyses to the paper (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3) and added the following paragraph at lines 206–228:

“Calculating the theoretical productivity (or yield) of each microorganism grown as planktonic or biofilm monospecies or as mixed communities, as defined using a reported method (9), and comparing these values to the experimentally determined populations revealed several interesting findings (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3). First, the yield of monospecies biofilm populations of P. aeruginosa and S. aureus was higher than planktonically-grown cells, while the opposite was observed for S. sanguinis (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3A). Furthermore, the observed productivity in the mixed planktonic community (denoted as “Mix (P) – Observed”) was lower than the theoretical productivity (i.e. assuming additivity of the CFU/mL yield counts of each species in the community, denoted as “Mix (P) – Theoretical”), suggesting antagonism among the different species grown in these conditions (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3A). Interestingly, examining the yield of the observed mixed biofilm and planktonic populations (both denoted as “Mix (P/B) – Observed”) revealed that the productivity of the mixed biofilm is higher than that of the planktonic community (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3A). There was no statistically significant difference in the yield of observed and theoretical mixed biofilm communities (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3A). However, taking a closer look at the productivity of each species in the observed mixed community revealed that there is a trend wherein P. aeruginosa and S. aureus have lower productivity in the mixed biofilm versus monoculture (P = 0.67) (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3B). On the other hand, S. sanguinis showed a statistically significant increase in productivity in a mixed biofilm community compared to the monospecies biofilm (P = 0.03) (Figure 1 —figure supplement 3B). Overall, these data indicate a complex relationship among the microbes in the community, which varies depending on whether they are growing planktonically or in a biofilm.”

3) The methods for oxygen exposure during experiments and their effects require more clarity, particularly focusing on how it affects antibiotic tolerance and Prevotella growth in monoculture

We agree with the reviewers and have integrated additional figures and associated text in the manuscript confirming that anoxic conditions were used. That is, we used an anoxic environmental chamber (10% CO2, 10% H2, 80% N2) for all steps in the experiment (thus the cultures were never exposed to oxygen), confirming that: (i) P. melaninogenica does not grow in ASM in monoculture, while as a positive control, we show it does grow when using a rich medium that has been reported previously to support its growth (10) (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2) and (ii) our observed changes in tobramycin susceptibility can be reproduced using the anoxic environmental chamber (Figure 2 —figure supplement 7). Taken together, these data indicate that our methods presented in the original manuscript (GasPak + anaerobic jar system) can rigorously and reproducibly recapitulate findings obtained in a controlled anoxic environment. The modifications to the revised manuscript are as follows:

Lines 198–204: “The impact of residual oxygen negatively influencing the growth of P. melaninogenica in monoculture was ruled out by performing these experiments using an anoxic environmental chamber (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2). That is, we did not detect CFU counts for either planktonic or biofilm populations of P. melaninogenica when grown in ASM in the anaerobic chamber, but as a positive control, significant growth was detected when using a medium shown previously to support growth of this microbe (10) (Prevotella Growth Medium, or PGM) (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2).”

Lines 406–414: “Also, we ruled out the possibility of remaining oxygen in ASM negatively impacting the viability of P. melaninogenica by reproducing our results using an anoxic chamber (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2). That is, we observed that P. melaninogenica can robustly grow as a planktonic or biofilm monospecies community in a medium capable of sustaining its growth (PGM) while this microbe fails to grow in ASM (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2). Thus, we argue that the mixed-community-specific growth of Prevotella spp. we observed across several conditions (Figure 1C, Figure 1 —figure supplement 5, Figure 2 —figure supplement 6) is not due to residual oxygen.”

Lines 290–293: “Growing and replenishing the preformed biofilm communities with fresh ASM supplemented or not with tobramycin using an anoxic environmental chamber resulted in similar phenotypes for all tested microorganisms (Figure 2 —figure supplement 7), indicating that the use of the GasPak system provides a robust anoxic environment.”

4) The diluted mixed community experiment should be repeated to ensure reproducibility

The diluted mixed community experiment was repeated a fourth time, yielding the same statistical conclusions. An updated “Figure 2 —figure supplement 1” was added to the paper. The highest (1:1000 – labeled in red in Figure 2 —figure supplement 1) dilution still yielded high variation, which could perhaps be explained by low (i.e., ~103 CFU/mL) inoculum for S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica used in these experiments—see updated (“Microbial assays” paragraph of the “Materials and methods” section). Thus, the variation at low inoculum is robust and reproducible. The Materials and methods section was also updated to clarify the CFU counts used for those experiments. We have added modifications to the text as follows to address this critique:

Lines 526–532: “The optical density (OD600) was then measured for each bacterial suspension and diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 in ASM. Monocultures and co-culture conditions were prepared from the OD600 = 0.2 suspension and diluted to a final OD600 of 0.01 for each microbial species in ASM corresponding to final bacterial concentrations of 1x107 CFU/mL, 3.5x106 CFU/mL, 1.2x106 CFU/mL and 4.6x106 CFU/mL of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. respectively. A volume of 100 µl of bacterial suspension all at a final OD600 of 0.01 each in the mix was added to three wells.”

Lines 558–570: “For experiments with varying concentrations of S. aureus, S. sanguinis and P. melaninogenica in monocultures and co-cultures, the organisms were grown from bacterial suspensions adjusted to an OD600 = 0.8 in ASM. Suspensions were further diluted in ASM to an OD600 of either 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001 or 0.00001 while maintaining P. aeruginosa at OD600 = 0.01 (approximating 1x107 CFU/mL) in all conditions. The OD600 = 0.1 dilution factor resulted in CFU/mL count average of 3.8x108 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.6x108 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 1.0x108 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 6.7x105 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.1x105 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 1.4x105 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.0001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 4.2x104 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 3.3x104 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 4.6x104 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.00001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 5.6x103 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 4.4x103 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 6.2x103 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica.”

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations for the authors):

L174-187 The difference in yield between biofilm and planktonic cultures is interesting. More interesting, and not explored, is how cultivation methods change the interactions between these species. With measures of growth yield from each of the species in monoculture at a given time point, and estimates of the numbers of each species in the inoculum, you can calculate how interactions between species influence the productivity of each species and the community as a whole. These calculations are important for a broader understanding of the community ecology of the model system and provide a baseline for further manipulations in the paper, eg following TOB treatment. This approach is detailed in Poltak and Cooper ISMEJ 2011 and is based on Loreau and Hector Nature 2002. I encourage the authors to analyze data using these equations to report realized productivity in mixture – who are the winners and losers of mixture, and how do these changes depend on cultural context? The way the data are currently presented in the figures makes these inferences nearly impossible.

We thank the reviewer for this great suggestion. We have revised our manuscript and added new analyses including measures of productivity of each microbe grown as planktonic or biofilm monoculture or in a mixed community (see “Essential Revisions” section, Comment #2).

TOB sensitivity in monoculture vs mixed culture: the reported changes are interesting and the results that lasR mutants influence susceptibility reasonable. However, the methods don't provide sufficient context for the reported findings and leave me wondering about intermediate ratios of strains, whether these changes require cells or merely supernatant, etc. This is fundamentally a methods development paper and these specific methods deserve further attention.

We agree with the reviewer and have made modifications in the Materials and methods section accordingly. More specifically, we have added a more detailed explanation for the target CFU/mL counts associated with the OD600 measurements for co-culture experiments as follows in the revised manuscript:

Lines 526–532: “The optical density (OD600) was then measured for each bacterial suspension and diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 in ASM. Monocultures and co-culture conditions were prepared from the OD600 = 0.2 suspension and diluted to a final OD600 of 0.01 for each microbial species in ASM corresponding to final bacterial concentrations of 1x107 CFU/mL, 3.5x106 CFU/mL, 1.2x106 CFU/mL and 4.6x106 CFU/mL of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. respectively. A volume of 100 µl of bacterial suspension all at a final OD600 of 0.01 each in the mix was added to three wells.”

Lines 558–570: “For experiments with varying concentrations of S. aureus, S. sanguinis and P. melaninogenica in monocultures and co-cultures, the organisms were grown from bacterial suspensions adjusted to an OD600 = 0.8 in ASM. Suspensions were further diluted in ASM to an OD600 of either 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001 or 0.00001 while maintaining P. aeruginosa at OD600 = 0.01 (approximating 1x107 CFU/mL) in all conditions. The OD600 = 0.1 dilution factor resulted in CFU/mL count average of 3.8x108 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.6x108 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 1.0x108 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 6.7x105 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 1.1x105 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 1.4x105 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.0001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 4.2x104 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 3.3x104 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 4.6x104 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica. The OD600 = 0.00001 dilution factor resulted in a CFU/mL count average of 5.6x103 CFU/mL for S. aureus, 4.4x103 CFU/mL for S. sanguinis and 6.2x103 CFU/mL for P. melaninogenica.”

Re: lasR, please describe some other plausible reasons why lasR could have influenced TOB sensitivity other than phenazines. This section immediately jumps to these compounds as the cause of altered sensitivity and considers no other possible causes, which is problematic for such a pleiotropic regulator.

We thank the reviewer for this comment. To probe mechanisms associated with the community tolerance phenotype of the lasR mutant, we tested ~20 mutants coding for global regulators, including mutants in metabolism regulation genes (relAspoT, crc) and/or mutants in genes coding for factors that are known targets implicated in P. aeruginosa tolerance to antimicrobials (pel, rhamnolipids, efflux pumps, siderophores). None of the tested mutants except for the lasR mutant resulted in increased tolerance to tobramycin. The observation that the double lasRmvfR mutant resulted in loss of the increased tolerance in the lasR mutant, in addition to our review of the recent literature, prompted us to focus on phenazines, as explained on Lines 362–379 of the updated manuscript (see “Essential Revisions” section Comment #1). We do note in the Discussion (Lines 476–478) that other LasR-regulated factors could also contribute to this phenotype, but that is the subject of future studies.

Reproducibility and sharing: cultivation and testing of this CF-relevant microbial community are presumably designed to be a resource for the community. Thus, a short statement in the main text describing the potential and limitations for sharing these resources would be a strength, beyond the standard availability statements in the supplementary material.

We agree with the reviewer’s comment. As such, the final part of the discussion has been modified to include the following text at Lines 498–502:

“Finally, we argue that this novel in vitro polymicrobial system will serve as a resource for the research community to probe novel community functions ranging from persistence to virulence and also for understanding the impact of host factors such as immune cells and host-derived metabolites. As such, all strains and protocols will be made freely available upon request, and we are happy to assist other groups in the implementation of this method.”

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations for the authors):

The paper is extremely interesting and, in my opinion, very valuable for infectious disease microbiologists and likely the broader microbiology field. My major concerns are related to the weaknesses identified in the public review.

1) How do your findings that phenazines can be protective against tobramycin tie in to your original observation that WT P. aeruginosa becomes susceptible to tobramycin in mixed communities? Figure 4 seems to indicate that WT P. aeruginosa makes more PCA in the mixed community than in a monospecies biofilm. Shouldn't that increase confer increased protection against tobramycin? Is that difference not significant? Is increased susceptibility possibly due to a decrease in a different type of phenazine? Even if phenazine production is not decreased in WT in the mixed biofilm community compared to monospecies biofilms, that result should be explicitly discussed.

We thank the reviewer for this comment. While we cannot completely rule out that other factors might shift tobramycin susceptibility of P. aeruginosa in a mixed community, our genetic, quantification, and biochemical data strongly suggest that phenazines play a major role in this phenotype. That is, adding phenazine to the mixed community treated with tobramycin restores tolerance of WT P. aeruginosa. We have updated Figure 4A, which now shows the statistical analysis comparing PCA production in WT P. aeruginosa grown as a monospecies vs mixed community. No statistically significant differences were observed. However, as specified by the reviewer, we have not measured all the possible phenazines produced by P. aeruginosa, and so cannot rule out contributions of other phenazines; but PCA and other phenazines such as pyocyanin can induce similar tolerance phenotypes in P. aeruginosa, as reported (6), suggesting a similar role for these molecules, at least for antibiotic tolerance. We argue that future work, outside the scope of this publication, will be necessary to completely understand how phenazines impact community tolerance of P. aeruginosa.

To address this critique, the following text was added at Lines 471–476:

“PCA production of WT P. aeruginosa grown in the mixed community was not statistically significantly different from the concentration detected in monospecies biofilm, while the lasR mutant did show a significant, 2-fold increase in PCA production in the community compared to the monoculture (Figure 4A). The mechanistic basis for the difference between the WT and lasR mutant production of PCA in the mixed community is the subject of ongoing work.”

2) Are you exposing cells to oxygen when changing the medium and when exposing cells to tobramycin? If so, how would you expect that to impact tolerance?

When the communities are replenished with fresh medium or treated with tobramycin, they are briefly exposed to oxygen. However, as shown in Figure 2 —figure supplement 7, when we repeated the key assays using an anoxic environmental chamber, we observed that the phenotypes are robust and reproducible as when using GasPaks and anaerobic jars.

Clarifications in the “Materials and methods” section have also been made at Lines 533–540:

“Plates were incubated using an AnaeroPak-Anaerobic container with a GasPak sachet (ThermoFisher) at 37 °C for 24 hours. Then, unattached cells were aspirated with a multichannel pipette and the pre-formed biofilms replenished with 100 µl of fresh ASM on the bench and incubated for an additional 24 hours at 37 °C using an AnaeroPak-Anaerobic container with a GasPak sachet (ThermoFisher). Similar experiments were performed using an anoxic environmental chamber (Whitley A55 – Don Whitley Scientific, Victoria Works, UK) with 10% CO2, 10% H2, 80% N2 mixed gas at 37 °C, yielding results identical to those observed for the GasPak system.”

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations for the authors):

– Figure 1 c really adds nothing to the study. It needs to be more detailed to be useful.

We agree with the reviewer. We have decided to remove Figure 1C from the manuscript.

– The metabolic flux analysis is poorly explained. Why would one expect the abundance of the organism to affect the metabolic flux? Is this not more of a binary analysis? It is unclear why this was done. For example, the wording 'multiple similarities' and 'distinguish' is very confusing. Can this be quantified?

Varying abundances of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica (for all of which genome-scale metabolic models are available) result in shifts in the predicted metabolites produced by the various community types presented in “Figure 1 —figure supplement 1A”; the metabolite flux is indeed weighted to reflect community composition. As we have also previously published (13), these changes in metabolic flux can be used to predict the abundance of microbes that can be detected in the CF lung. We had hypothesized that the Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 community types, while identified as different by 16S rRNA gene amplicon clustering approaches, could be “collapsed” into a single community type that is distinct from a P. aeruginosa dominated community or a Streptococcus-dominated one. We do agree with the reviewer that future work using metabolomics approaches would be of interest to validate the modeling predictions between the different community types that we identified.

– The decision to use a single 'mixed community model' is not well supported. This modeling aspect of the manuscript suffers from clarity and reasoning behind the approach.

We have revised our manuscript and have updated our rationale for why a single “mixed community model” was selected. At Lines 130–140 it now reads:

“As previously reported (13), we performed metabolic flux analyses of the various community types to identify the top predicted exchanged metabolites driving the abundances of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, Streptococcus sanguinis and Prevotella melaninogenica by using their known relative 16S rRNA gene abundance detected in the Pa.M1/Pa.M2, Pa.D, and Strep.D communities (Figure 1 —figure supplement 1A). Using this approach, we noted multiple similarities between the predicted metabolic fluxes of Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 that distinguished these communities from the Pseudomonas- and Streptococcus-dominated communities, for example, the fluxes of ethanol, lactate and acetate (Figure 1 —figure supplement 1A). Furthermore, as the predicted metabolic fluxes between Pa.M1 and Pa.M2 were similar, we considered these two mixed communities as functionally similar and decided to focus on the development of a single “mixed” community model.”

– In fact lines 132-148 set a much better rationale for choosing these organisms, they are abundant and prevalent seems to make enough sense to me.

We sought to use multiple approaches, including clinical observations, 16S rRNA gene amplicon clustering, and metabolic modeling approaches, to strengthen the reasons why we developed this in vitro polymicrobial community. We hope that this updated manuscript will clarify our rationale.

– Figure 1 supplement 3 is confusing. There are many bar graphs shown for the clinical strains, but the figure legend doesn't explain well what is being shown. Can this be better explained? This is an important experiment because the use of laboratory strains was peculiar after all the rationale for choosing the bacteria from people with CF.

We sought to use multiple approaches, including clinical observations, 16S rRNA gene amplicon clustering, and metabolic modeling approaches, to strengthen the reasons why we developed this in vitro polymicrobial community. We hope that this updated manuscript will clarify our rationale.

– Figure 1 supplement 2B. It would be useful to show the variation in the experiment instead of a single point. Looking at the source data, the replicates are quite reproducible. This is important information for the reader and those trying to work on similar experiments to know that it is quite reproducible.

We agree with the reviewer and have made the appropriate modifications to the figure so that experimental variation is also represented. Please see new “Figure 1 – —figure supplement 4B” as well as the associated “Source Data File 2”.

– The use of anaerobic culture conditions is of interest, especially with all of the pre-preparation of the cultures described in the methods. Were the washing and resuspending of cells done in anaerobic conditions? Might this explain the lack of growth of Prevotella spp. It is not clear if these preparations were done anaerobically. If Prevotella cultures are prepared and cultured in ASM anaerobically does the microbe grow? Or is it missing nutrients in ASM?

As mentioned in the “Essential Revisions” section, Comment #3, new experiments were performed using completely anoxic conditions (anoxic environmental chamber) that yielded similar observations, ruling out residual oxygen as the basis for the lack of growth of Prevotella.

– Why was treating Pseudomonas alone with tobramycin and finding a reduction in planktonic growth surprising? It is an antibiotic after all.

We agree with the reviewer that reduction in CFU counts of P. aeruginosa planktonic communities was not surprising. However, the interesting phenotype was the increased sensitivity of P. aeruginosa biofilms cells in a mixed community versus monoculture.

– A recent experiment with sputum cultures in ASM as model communities shows that outcomes of competition in CF microbiome were driven by pH (Ghuneim et al. ISMEJ. 2022). The authors mention that they added MOPS to their cultures, can they comment on how this might affect competition and antibiotic outcomes in light of this similar manuscript?

While not shown in this manuscript, we decided to add MOPS to ASM because our initial experiments indicated that endpoint growth of P. aeruginosa and P. melaninogenica was negatively impacted by low pH of ASM. These observations were likely driven by S. sanguinis, as the pH measurements for monocultures of this species were similar to the one observed in the mixed community (pH = ~4-5). Therefore, the mixed community was dominated by S. sanguinis, which was not reflective of the mixed communities in vivo. Furthermore, our in vitro observations seem to be in line with the data reported by Ghuneim and colleagues, where they report increased total bacterial load (driven by Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus) as a function of increase in pH through antibiotic-mediated inhibition of fermenting anaerobes. We do believe that in future work it would be interesting to look at the impact of pH on antibiotic susceptibility of microbes in various community types.

– Figure 2 supplement 1, the 1000x diluted cultures of other bacteria with P. aeruginosa exposed to tobramycin has a very large error bar. I believe three technical replicates were performed, but only two points can be seen. Can this be explained? Repeated?

As mentioned above in the “Essential Revisions” section, Comment #4, we repeated this experiment a fourth time, with similar observations. The highest (1:1000 – labeled in red in Figure 2 —figure supplement 1) dilution still yielded high variation, which could perhaps be explained by the very sparse (i.e. ~103 CFU/mL) cells for S. aureus, S. sanguinis and P. melaninogenica; see updated “Microbial assays” paragraph of the “Materials and methods section” leading to stochastic effects at those concentrations.

– Line 247 again brings up the question of whether the inability to culture Prevotella is due to not preparing in robust anaerobic conditions. This should be tested and shown.

As presented in the “Essential Revisions” section, Comment #3, we have performed new experiments in strict anoxic conditions (Figure 1 —figure supplement 2) and have observed similar results.

– The pre-incubation with microbial supernatants does not preclude microbial inactivation as responsible for the increased killing. What if an intracellular toby deactivating enzyme is responsible? One could use mass spec to measure the amount of Toby that remains after the experiment.

We thank the reviewer for this comment. While we did not measure the remaining tobramycin concentration at the end of the experiment, we argue here that since we are still seeing killing of microbes such as the Streptococcus milleri group (Figure 2 —figure supplement 5A) in the mixed community, this suggests that the antimicrobial is still present at high enough concentrations to mediate its bactericidal activity. Furthermore, other studies such as in (14) have also reported a minimal bactericidal activity of tobramycin against P. aeruginosa situated at approximately the same concentration as the one reported in our study (i.e. 64 ug/mL).

References

1. Cugini C, Morales DK, Hogan DA. 2010. Candida albicans-produced farnesol stimulates Pseudomonas quinolone signal production in LasR-defective Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microbiology 156:3096-3107.

2. Hoffman LR, Richardson AR, Houston LS, Kulasekara HD, Martens-Habbena W, Klausen M, Burns JL, Stahl DA, Hassett DJ, Fang FC, Miller SI. 2010. Nutrient availability as a mechanism for selection of antibiotic tolerant Pseudomonas aeruginosa within the CF airway. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000712.

3. Déziel E, Gopalan S, Tampakaki AP, Lepine F, Padfield KE, Saucier M, Xiao G, Rahme LG. 2005. The contribution of MvfR to Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogenesis and quorum sensing circuitry regulation: multiple quorum sensing-regulated genes are modulated without affecting lasRI, rhlRI or the production of N-acyl-L-homoserine lactones. Mol Microbiol 55:998-1014.

4. Recinos DA, Sekedat MD, Hernandez A, Cohen TS, Sakhtah H, Prince AS, Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LE. 2012. Redundant phenazine operons in Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibit environment-dependent expression and differential roles in pathogenicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:19420-5.

5. Meirelles LA, Perry EK, Bergkessel M, Newman DK. 2021. Bacterial defenses against a natural antibiotic promote collateral resilience to clinical antibiotics. PLoS Biol 19:e3001093.

6. Schiessl KT, Hu F, Jo J, Nazia SZ, Wang B, Price-Whelan A, Min W, Dietrich LEP. 2019. Phenazine production promotes antibiotic tolerance and metabolic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nat Commun 10:762.

7. Zhu K, Chen S, Sysoeva TA, You L. 2019. Universal antibiotic tolerance arising from antibiotic-triggered accumulation of pyocyanin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Biol 17:e3000573.

8. Cabeen MT. 2014. Stationary phase-specific virulence factor overproduction by a lasR mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One 9:e88743.

9. Poltak SR, Cooper VS. 2011. Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities. ISME J 5:369-78.

10. Jang EY, Kim M, Noh MH, Moon JH, Lee JY. 2016. in vitro effects of polyphosphate against Prevotella intermedia in planktonic phase and biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:818-26.

11. Heirali A, Thornton C, Acosta N, Somayaji R, Laforest Lapointe I, Storey D, Rabin H, Waddell B, Rossi L, Arrieta MC, Surette M, Parkins MD. 2020. Sputum microbiota in adults with CF associates with response to inhaled tobramycin. Thorax 75:1058-1064.

12. Nelson MT, Wolter DJ, Eng A, Weiss EJ, Vo AT, Brittnacher MJ, Hayden HS, Ravishankar S, Bautista G, Ratjen A, Blackledge M, McNamara S, Nay L, Majors C, Miller SI, Borenstein E, Simon RH, LiPuma JJ, Hoffman LR. 2020. Maintenance tobramycin primarily affects untargeted bacteria in the CF sputum microbiome. Thorax 75:780-790.

13. Henson MA, Orazi G, Phalak P, O'Toole GA. 2019. Metabolic modeling of cystic fibrosis airway communities predicts mechanisms of pathogen dominance. mSystems 4:e00026-19.

14. Taylor PK, Zhang L, Mah TF. 2019. Loss of the two-component system TctD-TctE in Pseudomonas aeruginosa affects biofilm formation and aminoglycoside susceptibility in response to citric acid. mSphere 4:e00102-19.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Hampton TH, Thomas D, van der Gast C, O'Toole GA, Stanton BA. 2021. Mild Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease Is Associated with Bacterial Community Stability. NCBI BioProject. PRJEB30646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. Raw data for productivity calculation of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in various conditions.

    Data presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 3 represents the average of six biological replicates, each with three technical replicates performed at least on three different days. For each microorganism grown in the mixed communities, the log10 geometric mean value of the three biological replicates was transformed to colony forming unit (CFU)/mL counts and divided by the total CFU/mL of the community (total community). Data visualization was done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

    Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Raw data for in vitro relative abundance of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. sanguinis, and P. melaninogenica grown in various ratios in mixed communities.

    Data presented in Figure 1—figure supplement 4 represents the average of three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates performed on three different days. For each microorganism grown in the mixed communities, the log10 geometric mean value of the three biological replicates was transformed to colony forming unit (CFU)/mL counts and divided by the total CFU/mL of the community (total community). Data visualization was done using GraphPad Prism 9 (version 9.2.0).

    Supplementary file 1. Minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of P. aeruginosa PA14 planktonic and biofilm cells treated with tobramycin exposed to the following conditions for 24 hr.
    elife-81604-supp1.docx (29KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 2. Strains and plasmids used in the study.
    elife-81604-supp2.docx (53.4KB, docx)
    Supplementary file 3. Species abundances in community types used for in silico modeling of metabolic flux.
    elife-81604-supp3.docx (32.5KB, docx)
    MDAR checklist
    Source code 1. ‘R’ script code used (i) to determine the abundance and prevalence data presented in Figure 1A, (ii) to determine the number of persons with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) for which >70% of 16S rRNA gene reads were assigned to Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella (Figure 1B) and Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Prevotella with Burkholderia or Achromobacter (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B, C), and (iii) to determine the microbial composition range of in vivo cystic fibrosis (CF) mixed communities compared with the in vitro model (Figure 1—figure supplement 4A).

    The 16S rRNA raw data published in Hampton et al., 2021 was used with Source Code 1.

    elife-81604-code1.zip (3.8KB, zip)
    Source code 2. SteadyCom (Chan et al., 2017) script used to determine predicted metabolic fluxes between P. aeruginosa, S. sanguinis, S. aureus, and P. melaninogenica for the P. aeruginosa-dominated (Pa.D), Streptococcus-dominated (Strep.D), and the Pa.M1/M2 mixed communities using the 16S rRNA relative abundances available in Hampton et al., 2021. Code used to generate Figure 1—figure supplement 1A.
    elife-81604-code2.zip (653.8KB, zip)

    Data Availability Statement

    Figure 1 - figure supplement 3 & Source Data 1 contains the numerical data used to generate the figure. Figure 1 - figure supplement 4 & Source Data 2 contains numerical data used to generate the figure. Source Code 1 contains the script used to generate Figure 1, Figure 1 - figure supplement 1 and Figure 1 - figure supplement 4. Source Code 2 contains the script used to generate the modeling data presented Figure 1 - figure supplement 1.

    The following previously published dataset was used:

    Hampton TH, Thomas D, van der Gast C, O'Toole GA, Stanton BA. 2021. Mild Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease Is Associated with Bacterial Community Stability. NCBI BioProject. PRJEB30646


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES