Dear Editors:
Little is known about the risks of drug-induced liver injury potentially associated with the use of molnupiravir or ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in a real-world setting until the recently reported work by Wong et al.1 In their study, they analyzed retrospectively the data from 13,041 molnupiravir users and 4408 ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir users vs 165,592 molnupiravir and nirmatrelvir nonusers in Hong Kong, China between January 1, 2022 and March 31, 2022 and concluded subsequently that both molnupiravir and ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir were not associated with a significantly higher risk of drug-induced liver injury as compared with nonusers. Of note, only data from the first quarter of 2022 were collected, and the sample size of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir users was much smaller than that of molnupiravir users in their study. Moreover, as acknowledged,1 their study shared limitations similar to other retrospective studies. Further studies using real-world data are warranted, particularly for ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir.
We therefore explored whether there is a safety signal of drug-induced liver injury associated with ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir using data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) products.2 This reporting system updates weekly adverse event reports submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for medications used under the EUA for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. A total of 25,551 adverse event reports of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir was submitted to the COVID-19 EUA Adverse Event Reporting System between January 1, 2022 and January 13, 2023. Among these adverse event reports, only 0.023% (6/25,551) of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir users were documented to have drug-induced liver injury, which is much lower than that reported by Wong et al.1 The median age of the 6 patients identified was 66.0 years (interquartile range, 46.5–68.8), and 4 cases involved female patients. All 6 cases with drug-induced liver injury relating to ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir were recorded to have serious outcomes, but none was documented to have died, which is in agreement with the observations of Wong et al.1
To assess quantitatively putative associations of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir with drug-induced liver injury using these pharmacovigilance data, a case–noncase (disproportionality) analysis were performed through the Bayesian neural network method,3 which was considered to be a significant pharmacovigilance signal if the lower limit of the 95% credible interval of the information component (IC025), the most robust risk measure in disproportionality analyses,4 was greater than 0. Based on the disproportionality analysis, no significant pharmacovigilance signal of drug-induced liver injury was observed for ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir (IC025 = –0.80) (Supplementary Figure 1) as compared with other drugs used under the EUA for COVID-19, suggesting a lack of any association of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir with drug-induced liver injury. Sensitivity analyses by restricting the data to those reported by healthcare professionals only showed very similar results with an IC025 of –0.88 (Supplementary Figure 1), ensuring no potential associations between ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir and drug-induced liver injury existed.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first disproportionality analysis of drug-induced liver injury with ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir using large-scale and timely pharmacovigilance data, showing consistent observations with those by Wong et al.1 Together with a previous randomized control trial5 and the retrospective cohort study by Wong et al,1 our disproportionality analysis using real-world pharmacovigilance data strongly support the lack of a meaningful safety signal of drug-induced liver injury with ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, recommending the use of ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir in clinical practice without fear of adverse events in terms of drug-induced liver injury.
Acknowledgments
Shu-Xin Jiao and Yan Liu are appreciated for their assistance in preliminary data cleaning.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest This author discloses the following: Guo Yu reports receiving grants from Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (BK20200005). The remaining author discloses no conflicts.
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at www.gastrojournal.org and at https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.008.
Supplementary Material
References
- 1.Wong G.L.-H., et al. Gastroenterology. 2023;164:151–153. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.U.S. FDA https://www.fda.gov/drugs/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
- 3.Bate A., et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;54:315–321. doi: 10.1007/s002280050466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Almenoff J.S., et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82:157–166. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hammond J., et al. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1397–1408. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.