Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Jan 26;12:e77701. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77701

Novel analytical tools reveal that local synchronization of cilia coincides with tissue-scale metachronal waves in zebrafish multiciliated epithelia

Christa Ringers 1,2,3, Stephan Bialonski 4,5, Mert Ege 1, Anton Solovev 5,6, Jan Niklas Hansen 2, Inyoung Jeong 1, Benjamin M Friedrich 5,6,, Nathalie Jurisch-Yaksi 1,2,
Editors: Raymond E Goldstein7, Aleksandra M Walczak8
PMCID: PMC9940908  PMID: 36700548

Abstract

Motile cilia are hair-like cell extensions that beat periodically to generate fluid flow along various epithelial tissues within the body. In dense multiciliated carpets, cilia were shown to exhibit a remarkable coordination of their beat in the form of traveling metachronal waves, a phenomenon which supposedly enhances fluid transport. Yet, how cilia coordinate their regular beat in multiciliated epithelia to move fluids remains insufficiently understood, particularly due to lack of rigorous quantification. We combine experiments, novel analysis tools, and theory to address this knowledge gap. To investigate collective dynamics of cilia, we studied zebrafish multiciliated epithelia in the nose and the brain. We focused mainly on the zebrafish nose, due to its conserved properties with other ciliated tissues and its superior accessibility for non-invasive imaging. We revealed that cilia are synchronized only locally and that the size of local synchronization domains increases with the viscosity of the surrounding medium. Even though synchronization is local only, we observed global patterns of traveling metachronal waves across the zebrafish multiciliated epithelium. Intriguingly, these global wave direction patterns are conserved across individual fish, but different for left and right noses, unveiling a chiral asymmetry of metachronal coordination. To understand the implications of synchronization for fluid pumping, we used a computational model of a regular array of cilia. We found that local metachronal synchronization prevents steric collisions, i.e., cilia colliding with each other, and improves fluid pumping in dense cilia carpets, but hardly affects the direction of fluid flow. In conclusion, we show that local synchronization together with tissue-scale cilia alignment coincide and generate metachronal wave patterns in multiciliated epithelia, which enhance their physiological function of fluid pumping.

Research organism: Zebrafish

Introduction

Motile cilia are highly conserved, hair-like cell appendages that beat periodically to move fluid in a wide range of species. In vertebrates, motile cilia are present in the brain, the respiratory system, reproductive tracts, and the left-right organizer, where they serve numerous functions related to fluid transport. Cilia move cerebrospinal fluid along the ventricles of the vertebrate brain (Olstad et al., 2019; Sawamoto et al., 2006; Ringers et al., 2020; Faubel et al., 2016; Worthington and Cathcart, 1966, Date et al., 2019; D’Gama et al., 2021) and spinal cord (Sternberg et al., 2018; Thouvenin et al., 2020), contribute to mucociliary clearance, which protect our lungs and nose from pathogens (Bustamante-Marin and Ostrowski, 2017; Ramirez-San Juan et al., 2020, Wallmeier et al., 2019), or establish the left-right body axis during embryonic development (Ferreira et al., 2018; Nonaka et al., 1998). Cilia often coordinate their movements within and across cell boundaries (Sanderson and Sleigh, 1981; Brumley et al., 2012; Machemer, 1972; Knight-Jones, 1954), which may improve cilia-mediated fluid transport as suggested by modeling studies (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013). Yet, how cilia coordination emerges in multiciliated tissues remains an active topic of research.

In the absence of a tissue-scale ciliary pacemaker, cilia require a physical coupling to coordinate their beat. Coupling between cilia can occur through the surrounding fluid, which is referred to as hydrodynamic coupling, as originally proposed by Taylor, 1952 and first demonstrated experimentally for pairs of cilia (Brumley et al., 2014). In short, the movement of one cilium sets the surrounding fluid in motion, which impacts hydrodynamic friction forces on other cilia in its vicinity. A change in hydrodynamic friction forces causes cilia to beat slightly faster or slower (Klindt et al., 2016). Theoretical studies showed that hydrodynamic interactions could, at least in principle, orchestrate self-organized synchronization of cilia in metachronal waves, which refer to a sequential rather than synchronous or random movement of neighboring cilia (Gueron and Levit-Gurevich, 1999; Guirao and Joanny, 2007; Osterman and Vilfan, 2011; Wollin and Stark, 2011; Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Meng et al., 2021; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Chakrabarti et al., 2022; Kanale et al., 2022). Additionally, basal coupling of cilia through their anchoring in the cell cortex may contribute to cilia synchronization (Quaranta et al., 2015; Wan and Goldstein, 2016; Klindt et al., 2017; Soh et al., 2020). Putative synchronization mechanisms must be sufficiently strong to overcome the deleterious effects of slightly distinct beat frequencies, active cilia noise (Polin et al., 2009; Ma et al., 2014; Goldstein et al., 2009; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a), and disorder in cilia alignment (Guirao et al., 2010). Hence, global synchronization across an entire tissue is rather unlikely.

The localization of cilia carpets deep inside the vertebrate body has motivated previous studies of cilia carpet dynamics to resort to more accessible and simpler, non-animal model systems on the surface of protists such as Paramecium (Machemer, 1972) or the green alga Volvox (Machemer, 1972; Brumley et al., 2012), or cell culture systems (Pellicciotta et al., 2020; Oltean et al., 2018; Gsell et al., 2020; Khelloufi et al., 2018). Intriguingly, cilia coordination in the form of metachronal waves is observed in some systems, but not in others, prompting the question on the determinants of cilia synchronization. Previous work showed that cilia density and spatial distribution (Pellicciotta et al., 2020; Khelloufi et al., 2018), the viscosity of the surrounding fluid (e.g. mucus versus water) (Machemer, 1972; Gheber et al., 1998), as well as the tissue-scale alignment of cilia polarity (Mitchell et al., 2009) appear to be key parameters for synchronization in cilia carpets. Intriguingly, the wave direction of these metachronal waves can be rotated relative to the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia beat (Knight-Jones, 1954). This broken chiral symmetry of metachronal waves is likely a consequence of chiral cilia beat patterns (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Meng et al., 2021), but the details are not understood. Finally, it is not even clear to what extent metachronal coordination is rather a local or a tissue-scale phenomenon, and how this in turn affects the pumping rate of cilia carpets. Answering these open questions requires accessible model systems.

In this study, we combined experimental and theoretical work to study the coordination of motile cilia and its impact on fluid pumping. We chose as main experimental model the larval zebrafish nose, a cup-like structure of approximately 50 µm diameter containing many multiciliated cells (Reiten et al., 2017), which allows for non-invasive biophysical measurements of cilia beating due to its superficial location. Using this in vivo model, we observed that the cilia beat frequency is heterogeneous across the epithelium, limiting synchronization to local domains. Notwithstanding, we identified robust metachronal coordination, with waves that propagated along stable directions across the multiciliated epithelium. The direction of metachronal waves is consistently different in the right nose as compared to the left nose. This difference between left and right noses marks an instance of broken chiral symmetry, which is not explained by cilia (Gheber et al., 1998) orientation. To understand the implications for fluid pumping of local synchronization as observed in the zebrafish nose, we used a computational model of a regular array of cilia (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a). We detail how local synchronization is necessary to avoid steric collisions between cilia at higher cilia densities, which helps efficient cilia beating. At the same time, the rate of fluid pumping is robust against weak levels of noise. Finally, we showed that the direction and wavelength of metachronal traveling waves influence the mean pumping rate, but hardly affects the direction of fluid flow.

Altogether, we propose that local synchronization, tissue-scale cilia alignment, and the emergence of global metachronal waves coincide in a cilia carpet. Collectively, they support its physiological function of fluid pumping.

Results

The dense packing of multiciliated cells in the zebrafish nose provides a powerful model to study cilia coordination

To study how cilia beating coordinates throughout an entire ciliated organ in its native state, we turned to the larval zebrafish nose, as its localization on the snout allows for non-invasive live imaging of an entire tissue (Figure 1A & Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). At 4-day post fertilization, the zebrafish nose is a cup-like structure containing multiciliated cells at its rim and olfactory sensory neurons and support cells in its center (Kermen et al., 2013; Reiten et al., 2017; Hansen and Zeiske, 1993). To characterize the three-dimensional organization of motile cilia in this organ, we quantified the number, distribution, and properties of multiciliated cells. We imaged 4-day-old larvae that expressed a GFP-based indicator within multiciliated cells (Tg(Foxj1a:GCaMP6s)), and that were stained for the ciliary markers, acetylated tubulin (Reiten et al., 2017) and glutamylated tubulin (Olstad et al., 2019; Pathak et al., 2014, Figure 1B and Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Our results revealed that the distribution of multiciliated cells across the 3D geometry of the nose is stereotypical: most cells populate the lateral rim, forming two to three rows of multiciliated cells, while fewer cells occupy the medial rim, and are even absent in the anteromedial center regions (Figure 1B&C). This pattern is highly consistent across fish and mirrored for left and right noses (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). We identified that on average each nose contains 50.8 multiciliated cells (±6.2; Figure 1—figure supplement 1B–B’). We also measured that 47.7 cilia (±9.9; Figure 1—figure supplement 1C–C’) emanate from an apical cell surface of 17.4 µm2 (±6.3; Figure 1—figure supplement 1D–D’), with a length of 8.8 µm (±0.9; Figure 1—figure supplement 1E–E’). From the abovementioned values (Figure 1D), we calculated the distance between cilia to be 0.68 µm, and an area density of 2.7 cilia/µm2. Altogether, our results revealed that multiciliated cells in the four-day old zebrafish nose contain fewer cilia than multiciliated cells of the lung epithelium (>100 cilia per cell) (Nanjundappa et al., 2019) or Xenopus laevis embryonic skin (~150 cilia per cell) (Klos Dehring et al., 2013; Kulkarni et al., 2021), but retain a similar cilia density due to their reduced apical surface (Figure 1E). Because of this, we argue that the larval zebrafish nose is a powerful model to study cilia coordination within and across neighboring cells in a three-dimensional multiciliated carpet.

Figure 1. The zebrafish nose as model system for a ciliated epithelium with small and densely packed multiciliated cells.

(A) Surface rendering of a 4-day-old zebrafish larva (top) and a zoom-in of the nasal cavity (bottom). (B) A representative example of a left nose marked by a red box in (A). In the maximum projection, motile cilia are labeled in magenta (glutamylated tubulin), nuclei in blue (DAPI), and multiciliated cells in green (foxj1a:GCaMP6s). Note the lack of multiciliated cells in the center of the nose. DAPI signals highlight the presence of other cell types. (C) A contour plot showing the average multiciliated cell density (maximum projection) with a total number of 50.8 multiciliated cells per fish (±6.2 SD; n=15). (D) A representative example (left) and schematic (right) of a multiciliated cell labelled in the transgenic line hspGGFF19B:UAS:GFP. On average, each cell has 47.7 cilia (±9.9 SD; n=4), the apical surface spans 17.4 µm2 (±6.3 SD; n=11), and cilia are 8.83 µm long (±0.86 SD; n=38; Figure 1—figure supplement 1B-E'). (E) A graph depicting ciliary density per cell across animals and organs. Shown are the zebrafish nose, clawed frog skin (Klos Dehring et al., 2013; Kulkarni et al., 2021), mouse brain ventricles (Redmond et al., 2019), lungs (Nanjundappa et al., 2019), and oviduct (Shi et al., 2014). All n refer to the number of fish. SD = standard deviation, A: anterior, P: posterior.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Quantification of multiciliated cell features in the zebrafish nose.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Top, front and side view of the surface rendering of a zebrafish head at 4dpf (using a transgenic lines expressing Cherry in all cells, ubi:zebrabow). The approximate location of multiciliated cells and overall fluid flow direction is overlaid on the surface rendering. Scale bar is 100 µm. Ciliated cells in the right nose are indicated in green.(B) A representative example of a left and right 4 dpf zebrafish nose. Motile cilia are in magenta (glutamylated tubulin), nuclei in blue (DAPI), and multiciliated cells in green (foxj1a:GCaMP6s). Scale bar is 10 µm. (B’) There is a total number of 50.8 cells per fish (±6.24 SD; n=15). (C) To quantify the number of cilia per cell, basal feet were immunostained with gamma-tubulin (red). Insets display for one representative cell the raw fluorescence (top), the signal after applying a bandpass filter (middle), and the detected peaks corresponding to each individual basal body (bottom) (C’) a cell bears 47.7 cilia (±9.94 SD; n=4). (D) To quantify the apical surface of a multiciliated cells, (foxj1a:GCaMP6s) larvae expressing GFP in multiciliated cells were immunostained for cilia (glutamylated tubulin, magenta), nuclei (DAPI, blue), and cell borders (beta-catenin, red). Right: example of a manual tracing of apical surfaces (D’) the apical surface spans 17.4 µm2 (±6.31 SD; n=11). (E) To quantify ciliary length, motile cilia expressing GFP (hspGGFF19B:UAS:GFP) were manually traced from light-sheet microscopy still images. Scale bars are 5 µm. (E’) cilia are 8.83 µm long (±0.862 SD; n=38). All n refer to the number of fish. In the scatterplots, the individual data points are light-gray, an average number per fish is in black, and a total average is in red.

Frequency heterogeneity restricts the synchronization of cilia to a local scale

To understand the dynamic properties of cilia beating in our system and their impact on ciliary coordination, we recorded cilia beating with light transmission microscopy and measured the ciliary beat frequency (CBF) using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)-based method (Figure 2A–C and Materials and methods) adapted from Reiten et al., 2017. Using this technique, we observed that CBF is heterogeneous in the nose but organized in frequency patches (Figure 2C and Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). This CBF map remained stable over time (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B) and across different depths of the recording (Figure 2—figure supplement 1C). To investigate the origin of frequency patches, we tested whether individual patches correspond to the beating of individual cells. Specifically, we examined cilia beating in transgenic animals expressing GFP sparsely in multiciliated cells of the nose (Et(hspGGFF19B:Gal4)Tg(UAS:gfp) Reiten et al., 2017). We then recorded cilia beating sequentially with light-sheet microscopy, where we can identify individual cells, and light-transmission microscopy, where we can record the entire cilia carpet, and compared their CBF maps. We observed that the CBF of an individual cell corresponds better to that of the frequency patch than to the rest of the cilia carpet (Figure 2—figure supplement 2), suggesting that cilia on the same cell beat at a similar frequency. Taken together, the presence of local frequency patches rules out global synchronization in our system but still complies with local synchronization across neighboring cells.

Figure 2. Spectral analysis of cilia beating reveals local coherence but global heterogeneity.

(A) Schematic spectral analysis of a reference pixel. As cilia move through a pixel (black rectangle), the pixel intensity fluctuates. The Fourier transform of pixel intensity time series (top), with peak frequency indicated (bottom). (B) Raw image frame of a representative light transmission recording in the left nose of a 4-day-old zebrafish larva overlaid with region representing cilia beating (white line). Example pixels used for panel D are shown with crosses. (C) Frequency map of nose pit depicting peak frequency for each pixel. Reference pixel used for panel D is shown with a black cross (D) Schematic depicting how the peak coherence measures ciliary synchronization. Note that unsynchronized pixels (blue) have low coherence throughout the frequency spectrum (left), while synchronized pixels (red) have a high coherence at the ciliary beating frequency (right). The location of the color-coded example pixels is shown on panel B (black: reference, blue: not synchronized, red: synchronized). (E) Peak coherence for three reference pixels (indicated with black crosses) with all other pixels in a recording. (F) Spectral power evaluated at the frequency of the reference pixels (f=25.9 Hz; 24.5 Hz; 25.2 Hz) (G) Relationship between coherence and spectral power for a representative example (using Pixel 1 from panel E as reference pixel). Three regions of interest are identified: synchronized pixels with high coherence and high spectral power at the frequency of Pixel 1 (red, coherence ≥0.5 and spectral power ≥10%), non-synchronized pixels with high spectral power at the frequency of Pixel 1 but low coherence (blue, coherence ≤0.3and spectral power ≥25%), and non-synchronized pixels with low spectral power at the frequency of Pixel 1 and low coherence (green, coherence ≤0.5 and spectral power ≤25%). Note that very few pixels show low spectral power but high coherence. (G’) Spatial position of the pixels classified in (G): Note that synchronized (red) and non-synchronized (blue) pixels do not spatially overlap. Same color scheme in G and G’. (H) Analogous to (G), but now as average across 6 fish represented as a probability density (using 6 reference pixels per fish). (I) The relationship between coherence and pixel distance plotted as probability density for an average of 6 fish. Note that pixels located within 20 µm tend to be more coherent.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Distribution of ciliary beat frequencies.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Ciliary beat frequency of six different fish, for left (top) and right (bottom) noses show high levels of heterogeneity. (B) Ciliary beating remains relatively constant over time. Ciliary beat frequency for a representative example over the course of 10 min. Six instances are shown for frequency (top) and ΔCBF/CBF (B’). Values of four fish are depicted for both frequency and ΔCBF/CBF (B’’). (C) A 3D CBF map across seven 10 µm depth planes shows that frequency patches are consistent across Z planes. (C’-C’’’) Median and standard deviations for all 3D recordings. All scale bars are 10 µm.
Figure 2—figure supplement 2. Cilia from individual cells beat at similar frequencies.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2.

(A–B) Cilia from individual cells beat at a similar frequency. Representative examples of the beating of one cell versus the entire multiciliated epithelium. A hspGGFF19B:UAS:GFP animal, expressing GFP in a sparse population of multiciliated cells, was recorded with light sheet microscopy (A), CBF in the light sheet (B, top), and CBF in light transmission (B, bottom). (C) Corresponding CBF histograms show the entire frequency map (orange), together with the light sheet CBF (green), and light transmission CBF (blue) of individual cells. (D) Quantification of the standard deviation of all histograms show that standard deviation is smaller for individual cells than for the entire epithelium.
Figure 2—figure supplement 3. Systematic analysis of relationships between coherence and spectral power.

Figure 2—figure supplement 3.

A grid of 16 reference pixels with equal spacing across the nose were chosen for systematic analysis. The relationship between coherence and spectral power at the frequency of the reference pixel is plotted (left). For each reference pixel, the same three regions of interest are identified: synchronized pixels with high coherence and high spectral power (red), non-synchronized pixels with high spectral power but low coherence (blue), and non-synchronized pixels with low spectral power and low coherence (green). Their spatial distributions are plotted back into the nose (right). Open circles instead of crosses represent example pixels that were identified in the noise region. Note that none of these non-signal sample pixels display synchronization with other pixels.
Figure 2—figure supplement 4. Cilia beating displays local coherence in the zebrafish brain.

Figure 2—figure supplement 4.

(A) Schematic representation of the adult brain explant and location of multiciliated cells on the tela choroida. (B) (Top) Peak coherence for three reference pixels (indicated with black crosses) with all other pixels in a recording. (Middle) Spectral power evaluated at the frequency of the reference pixels (f=14.7 Hz; 13.3 Hz; 13.4 Hz). (Bottom) Relationship between coherence and spectral power is plotted for the representative examples. (C) The relationship between coherence and pixel distance is plotted for an average of 4 brains as a probability density. Pixels located within 30 µm display more coherence than pixels at a distance beyond 30 µm.

We asked next if cilia indeed synchronize, that is, display not only the same CBF, but keep a fixed phase relation. To analyze cilia synchronization in the zebrafish nose, we adopted a measure inspired from neuroscience, the magnitude-squared coherence (Engel et al., 2001; Carter et al., 1973; Diaz Verdugo et al., 2019). This measure, which has also been referred to as cross-correlation in Fourier space, reports the correlation of two signals across frequencies, independent of a phase lag between them. In theory, we should observe high coherence at the CBF only for synchronized cilia with fixed phase relationship, and not for unsynchronized cilia beating at the same frequency accidentally without fixed phase relation (Figure 2D).

To measure the degree of coherence between pixels and hence cilia, we calculated the coherence score for one reference pixel with all other pixels in the recording, revealing so-called coherence domains surrounding the reference pixel (Figure 2E). To relate coherence to CBF, we recovered the spectral power for the peak frequency of the reference pixel across the entire map (Figure 2F) and compared the coherence score to the spectral power for all pixels of the recording (Figure 2G, H). We observed that the peak frequency of the reference pixel is dominant in the entire coherence domain (note the similarity in coherence and frequency domains in Figure 2E–F also shown in the red area in Figure 2G–G’ & Figure 2—figure supplement 3), confirming that cilia beat at (approximately) the same frequency when synchronized. Occasionally, the frequency domain extended to a region not in the coherence domain (blue highlight in Figure 2G–G’ & Figure 2—figure supplement 3), suggesting that cilia can beat at the same frequency by coincidence. As expected, if two pixels or cilia are not oscillating at the same frequency, they are not synchronized (green highlight, Figure 2G & Figure 2—figure supplement 3).

Since the coherence appeared to be organized in domains (Figure 2E–G’), we next calculated the coherence for all signal pixels in the recording and related it to the Euclidian distance separating the two pixels. We saw that, similarly to the reference pixel analysis (Figure 2E), the coherence score quickly drops at approximately 20 µm (Figure 2I). In comparison, the diameter of a cell is 4.1–4.7 µm.

We next performed similar analyses in another multiciliated tissue located in the zebrafish adult brain, the tela choroidea (D’Gama et al., 2021, Jeong et al., 2022). Similarly to the nose pit, we observed high heterogeneity of CBF restricting synchronization locally (Figure 2—figure supplement 4). Notably, we identified that the coherence score quickly drops at approximately 30 µm (Figure 2—figure supplement 4).

Altogether, we propose the coherence score and the coherence versus distance as methods to quantify synchronization within a cilia carpet. Application of these methods to the multiciliated epithelia of the zebrafish nose pit and adult brain indicates that cilia synchronize locally rather than globally.

Increasing viscosity reduces ciliary beating frequency and extends ciliary coherence

Since cilia synchronization appears to be local in nature, we asked whether changes in cilia beat dynamics can influence the spatial extent of their synchronization. To test this, we exposed the zebrafish nose to surrounding mediums of increasing viscosity (1,875 cP; 3.75 cP; 7.5 cP; 15 cP). We chose to apply methylcellulose based on its reversible and non-invasive properties, and prior work suggesting that viscosity change can affect synchronization between cilia (Gheber et al., 1998; Machemer, 1972). By increasing methylcellulose concentration in a stepwise manner, we found that the CBF decreases upon increases in viscosity of the surrounding medium (Figure 3A–B & Figure 3—figure supplement 1B), similarly to previous reports (Brokaw, 1966; Katoh et al., 2018; Machemer, 1972).

Figure 3. An increase in fluid viscosity decreases ciliary beat frequency and extends the spatial range of cilia coherence.

(A–B) Ciliary beating frequency decreases under increasing viscosity conditions (0–2% methylcellulose) and partially recovers upon re-exposure to 0% methylcellulose (0%*). (A) Representative example of ciliary beat frequency (CBF) maps of a 4-day-old zebrafish nose. (B) CBF for n=9 (gray) and average in black. A repeated measures ANOVA (*) indicates a significant effect of viscosity conditions on CBF (p = 0.003; n = 9). (C–D) Ciliary coherence extends with increased fluid viscosity. (C) A representative example of pairwise coherence versus distance for different viscosity conditions (Coherence bin width = 0.04/bin; distance bin width = 0.5 µm/bin). (D) Mean coherence across distance bins (width = 0.5 µm) for different viscosity conditions shows that coherence domains expand for conditions of increased viscosity. Mean curves and standard error of the mean are plotted (n=9). ANOVA-N indicates a significant effect of viscosity conditions on mean coherence across distances (p=3∙10-5). CBF = Ciliary Beat Frequency.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Ciliary beating in different viscosity conditions.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Difference probability histograms between the various viscosity conditions for the example shown in Figure 3C. (B) The fraction of synchronized pixels (coherence>0.25) increases with viscosity. Mean and standard deviation are shown. p = 3∙ 10-5 with ANOVA-N. (C) Significance tables depicting Tukey-Kramer post hoc multiple comparisons procedures for CBF in light transmission, CBF in the light sheet, and mean coherence versus distance measurements shown in Figure 3F. (D) Ciliary beat frequency of single cells decreases upon increasing viscosities as imaged by light-sheet microscopy. A repeated measures ANOVA (#) indicates a significant effect of viscosity conditions on CBF (p = 0.0011; n = 11). (E) Representative light sheet recording of a hspGGFF19B:UAS:GFP zebrafish nose exposed to increasing concentration of methylcellulose shows changes in ciliary beating dynamics. (E’) Kymographs (red) on transverse ciliary beating in recordings upon increasing viscosities. (F) Manually traced ciliary waveforms upon increasing viscosities (n = 11).

Next, to probe the impact of viscosity on synchronization, we calculated the coherence versus distance for all pixels in the recordings (Figure 3C). To visualize changes in the distribution, we plotted the difference from the baseline for the different conditions (Figure 3—figure supplement 1A) and observed that the number of coherent pixel pairs increased in the 5–20 µm distance range when viscosity increased. To quantify this effect, we compared the mean coherence (Figure 3D) and the fraction of coherent pixels using a threshold of coherence >0.25 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1B) across distance bins (width = 0.5 µm). We observed a significant effect of high viscosity conditions for both measures, suggesting that increasing viscosity enhances synchronization between pixels with distance in the 5–20 µm range.

Increasing the viscosity of the surrounding medium and thus the hydrodynamic load acting on beating cilia was previously shown to change the waveform of cilia beating (Brokaw, 1966; Katoh et al., 2018; Klindt et al., 2016), a phenomenon termed waveform compliance (Goldstein et al., 2016). While this could in principle explain the improved synchronization observed in the zebrafish nose (Figure 3D, Figure 3—figure supplement 1B), changes in cilia waveform, if present, were too small to detect. Specifically, we performed light-sheet microscopy on multiciliated cells sparsely expressing GFP in their cilia upon increasing viscosity conditions. The cells were imaged from a transverse angle to allow manual reconstruction of the cilia beating waveform. By applying our FFT-based analysis on the light-sheet recordings, we observed a decrease in CBF, matching the light transmission experiment (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C, D). Similarly, kymographs revealed changes in the frequency and kinetics of ciliary beating (Figure 3—figure supplement 1E–E'). Manual tracking of cilia waveforms did not reveal obvious alterations in the ciliary beat amplitude, although our approach may not be sensitive enough to observe slight variations in waveform (Figure 3—figure supplement 1F). We argue that the combined use of coherence and frequency analyses is better suited for investigating changes in the collective cilia dynamics than the use of kymographs and manual tracing. Using this combined approach, our results indicate that an increase in viscosity both changes cilia beating properties and improves short-range synchronization.

Persistent tissue-scale patterns of metachronal coordination differ for left and right noses

Motile cilia can coordinate their beat into so-called metachronal waves, which refer to the sequential beating of neighboring cilia (Gray, 1922; Brumley et al., 2015; Wan et al., 2020; Ovadyahu and Priel, 1989; Nawroth et al., 2017). Given the heterogeneous beating frequency and lack of global synchronization that we observed, we asked whether metachronal waves emerge in our system.

Metachronal waves have been commonly detected using kymographs (Brumley et al., 2015; Wan et al., 2020). Using such an approach on our light transmission recordings (Figure 4A–A’), we observed that metachronal-like activity is present in the zebrafish nose, but is not stable over time, as shown by analyzing the same recording during two different time windows (Figure 4A’). This suggests that these waves are highly dynamic in space and time and studying them by means of kymographs is time-intensive and prone to subjective interpretations. In agreement with our findings, simulated metachronal waves may display defects (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013), but maintain a stable direction over time (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b). Hence, we developed an automated detection method to quantify and visualize the properties of metachronal waves, including direction and wavelength, based on the phase angle of our FFT-based CBF detection method (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Wave directions and wavelengths of local metachronal coordination.

(A-A’) Metachronal coordination observed using a conventional kymograph-based analysis. (A) A kymograph was drawn (red line in inset, representing transverse cilia beating) on a light transmission recording of a zebrafish nose at 4dpf. (A’) Kymographs of cilia beating in the same location at different time points. Note the orderly pattern in the left panel (#) versus the disorderly pattern in the right panel (*). (B–D) Pipeline to measure metachronal coordination based on a phase angle method. (B) Neighboring pixels with similar frequency (beat frequency map, left) are segmented into patches (center). Phase angles are determined from Fourier transforms evaluated at the prominent frequency of each segmented frequency patch (right). (C) Analysis proceeds for each patch by extracting an image gradient, as shown by the arrows. (D–E) The mean direction of the gradient vector characterizes wave direction – with transparency representing the inverse circular standard deviation (D, right) while its length determines the wavelength (E, left). Scale bars, 10 µm. See also Videos 13.

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Metachronal wave directions and lengths.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Wave parameters, wave direction (top), and wavelength (bottom), for a representative fish over the course of 10 min. (B) Wave direction (top), and wavelength (bottom), for a representative fish across seven 10-µm-depth planes. (C) A representative example of wave directions (top) and wavelengths (bottom) upon increasing viscosities. Note that the transparency in wave direction reflects the inverse standard deviation.
Figure 4—figure supplement 2. Cilia beating displays local metachronal coordination in the ependymal layer of the zebrafish brain.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2.

(A–B) Neighboring pixels with similar frequency (beat frequency map, A) are segmented into frequency patches (B). (C) Phase angles are determined from Fourier transforms evaluated at the prominent frequency of each segmented patch, as shown in B. (D) The mean direction of the gradient vector field of the phase map characterizes wave direction – with transparency representing the inverse circular standard deviation. Scale bars, 10 µm.

To obtain robust phase angles across the ciliated epithelium, we first segmented the frequency map into distinct patches, so that neighboring pixels with similar frequency (CBF bin = 0.54 Hz) were assigned to the same patch. We then extracted the phase angle from the Fourier spectrum for the dominant frequency of that given patch. We decided to extract phases from segmented patches because (i) phases extracted for different frequencies are not comparable and lead to noisy signals precluding further analysis, and (ii) for time series of finite length, phases of Fourier modes at nearby frequencies are correlated. This analysis provides a unique phase angle for each pixel of the recording (Figure 4B right and Videos 1 and 2). Next, to translate phase information to wave direction and wavelength quantifications, we extracted image gradient vectors from each patch separately (Figure 4C). This allowed us to quantify and plot both wave direction and wavelength, by calculating the mean gradient vector direction and the mean gradient vector length, respectively (Figure 4D and E). Using this approach, we found that the wave directions form regular patterns (Figure 4D), which are relatively stable over time (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A and Video 3), across depth (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B), and not particularly affected by increasing viscosity (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). In contrast, we observed a large variability of wavelength in space and time (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–C). Similar results were obtained for the tela choroidae in the brain (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). The patterns were, however, more diverse, probably due to a lower density of cilia and motile ciliated cells (D’Gama et al., 2021). In summary, our results indicate that metachronal waves are present in the zebrafish nose and adult brain and that their wave direction remains stable.

Video 1. Measurement of metachronal wave properties in segmented frequency patch.

Download video file (891.2KB, mp4)

Video 2. Measurement of metachronal wave in a 30 s long recording.

Download video file (8.4MB, mp4)

Each frame of the movie represents the analysis of 20s-long sliding windows. The timer indicates the center of the sliding window.

Video 3. Metachronal wave direction is stable over time (total of 10 min) as shown for four examples.

Download video file (1.1MB, mp4)

Every frame of the video corresponds to the output of a Fourier Transform calculated over a 30 s timebin.

We next asked whether the observed pattern of metachronal wave direction is a consistent feature across different individuals. To compare multiple noses, we first aligned multiple recordings of left noses and found that the pattern of wave directions is highly comparable across noses, while wavelengths vary (Figure 5A & Figure 5—figure supplement 1A-B). Next, to compare left noses with right noses, we mirrored and aligned right noses so that they had the same anterior-posterior and mediolateral orientation as the left noses. Surprisingly, we observed that the wave directions between left and right are consistently different for the lateral side of the noses (Figure 5B & Figure 5—figure supplement 1A-B). To relate the direction of the metachronal waves to cilia beating, we measured the cilia beat direction. The cilia beat direction is set developmentally (Guirao et al., 2010; Gsell et al., 2020; Vladar et al., 2012; Wallingford and Mitchell, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2009) and can be inferred from the location of the cilia basal foot, which points toward the cilia beat direction (Clare et al., 2014; Ramirez-San Juan et al., 2020). To discern the cilia beat direction for each cell, we stained the 4dpf zebrafish nose for basal feet (gamma-tubulin) as well as the cilium (glutamylated tubulin) (Figure 5C and Figure 5—figure supplement 2). We found that the ciliary beat direction is consistent across fish (Figure 5D) and is mirrored for the left and right noses (Figure 5D& E). In contrast, we observed a stark difference in the angle of the metachronal wave, with an angle of 163.2° relative to the anterior-posterior axis for left noses (Figure 5F) and 100.2° for the mirrored right noses (Figure 5G). We did not observe any significant difference in any other measures between the left and the right noses, including fields of fluid flow (Figure 5—figure supplement 3, Figure 5—figure supplement 4). Ciliary beating of multiciliated cells have been shown to have a certain rotational component, which introduces a defined chirality of the cilia beat (Machemer, 1972). Moreover, in modeling studies, this chirality was shown to set a direction of emergent metachronal waves different from the cilia beat direction (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b). The chiral cilia beat patterns explains why the direction of metachronal waves can be rotated relative to the main cilia beat direction. However, it cannot explain why we observe different angles for the left and right noses.

Figure 5. Metachronal waves are chiral.

(A–B) Wave direction (top) and wavelength (bottom) for three left (A, red) and three mirrored right (B, green) noses show asymmetry in the wave direction between the left and right noses. Transparency reflects the inverse circular standard deviation. (C) Immunohistochemistry on a left nose stained for gamma-tubulin (basal body marker, red) and glutamylated tubulin (cilia marker, white). Zoom-in obtained at higher magnification displays how gamma-tubulin and glutamylated-tubulin stains are offset, allowing to determine cilia foot orientation and thus ciliary beat direction. (D–E) Overlay of all ciliary beat directions in the left (D; n=10) and mirrored right (E; n=3) noses. Individual arrows refer to the polarity of individual cells across fish. Direction is color-coded. Note a clear distinction in polarity between the latero-posterior and medial part of the nose indicated by a dashed line. (F–G) Quantification of ciliary beat directions, metachronal wave (left, n=16; right, n=18) and overall fluid flow directions for left (F; n=14) and mirrored right (G; n=14) noses. Plotted are the mean directions per fish for the latero-posterior part of the noses (above dashed line in D and E). Note that a direct comparison of ciliary beating direction and wave direction in the same experiments was not possible due to different positioning of the zebrafish for both experiments. (H) Schematic of the ciliary beating, metachronal wave and fluid flow directions in the left versus the right noses. Note the offset between the fluid flow (blue) and metachronal waves directions (green) for the left and right noses. Scale bars 10 µm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Difference in wave direction between left and right noses.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Wave parameters, including phase angles, wave direction, and wavelength, for all aligned left (A1–A2) and mirrored right (B1–B2) noses. Note that the transparency in wave direction reflects the inverse standard deviation. A1,B1 and A2,B2 were acquired with different cameras and microscopes. Scale bars 10µm.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Cilia orientation is mirrored in the left and right noses.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

Immunohistochemistry on a left nose stained for gamma-tubulin (basal body marker, red) and glutamylated tubulin (cilia marker, white) for left (n=3) and right (n=2) noses. Ciliary direction measured with a 40 x objective is similar to the results obtained with a 20 x objective, as shown in Figure 5C.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3. No anatomical differences between left and right noses.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

A systematic comparison of left (red) and right (green) noses (A) revealed no significant differences in the median CBF (B; left n=20; right n=24), nose (C; left n=13; right n=12) and cavity size (D; left n=13; right n=13), and number of MCC (E; left n=9; right n=9). Each dot represents one fish.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4. Sequential measurement of ciliary beating and fluid flow direction.

Figure 5—figure supplement 4.

(A,D) Light transmission images of 4-day-old zebrafish larva left (A; n=14) or mirrored right (D; n=14) nose at ×63 magnification. Note that the images are rotated to align with the reference left nose. (B,D) Phase angle map showing the prominent wave direction per cilia patch – with transparency representing the inverse circular standard deviation. (C,F) The zebrafish nose flow field was generated as the maximum projection of a time-series (60 s) of fluorescent particles at ×63 magnification of the same nose, rotated to align with the reference left nose. The outline of the nose is shown in red. The angle of fluid flow at the lateral end of the nose is indicated with the arrow. The fluid flow direction of all examples is plotted in Figure 5F–H. Color bar indicates fluorescence intensity. Scale bars, 10 µm.

In conclusion, by designing novel ways to quantify cilia synchronization and the spatial organization of cilia within a tissue in dense carpets, we revealed the presence of metachronal waves with stable wave directions that are different for the left and right noses.

Metachronal coordination enhances fluid pumping and reduces steric hindrance but does not affect direction of fluid flow

To investigate the role of metachronal coordination in cilia carpets on their physiological function of fluid pumping, we resorted to a computational model. Specifically, we used a recently established multi-scale model of a regular array of cilia (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a), which uses detailed hydrodynamic computations and an experimentally measured three-dimensional beat pattern from Paramecium (Machemer, 1972). This model can probe the effect of any wave direction and wavelength of metachronal coordination on fluid pumping and steric interactions, i.e., cilia colliding with each other. Thereby it allows us to disentangle the roles of hydrodynamic interactions and the importance of avoiding steric collision between neighboring cilia in a systematic way. The computational model enables us to investigate metachronal waves with different directions and wavelengths in a cilia carpet as shown in Figure 6A, where each dot in the hexagonal plot represents a different wave solution with different wave length λ and direction angle θ represented by a wave vector (kx,ky) = 2π/λ ( - sin θ, cos θ ). Using this model, we first investigated how different traveling waves affect the pumping rate per cilium and the mean direction of fluid flow. We observed that the pumping rate is close to its minimum when all cilia beat with the same phase, that is, for in-phase cilia beating with (kx,ky) = (0,0) (Figure 6B). In contrast, if cilia beat in the form of a metachronal traveling wave with finite wavelength λ, the pumping rate increases significantly. We observed a stronger increase in pumping rate for symplectic or antiplectic metachronal coordination (for which the wave vector is parallel to the direction of the cilia effective stroke, θ = 0⁰ or 180⁰), as compared to dexioplectic or laeoplectic metachronism (for which the wave vector is perpendicular to the direction of the effective stroke, θ = ±90⁰). The observed change in pumping rate is a result of hydrodynamic interactions between cilia: if cilia move in opposite directions for an antiplectic wave, destructive interference of flow fields implies that the hydrodynamic load increases for each cilium. Thus, the beating cilia perform more work on the fluid per beat cycle and consequently pump the fluid faster. Hydrodynamic interactions also explain why the pumping rate is higher for symplectic and antiplectic waves as compared to laeoplectic and dexioplectic waves because hydrodynamic interactions are stronger in the direction of an applied force as compared to the direction perpendicular to the force. As a subtle point, an increase in hydrodynamic load also slows down the collective frequency of cilia beating (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b), but this secondary effect is not strong enough to revert the increase of pumping rate due to enhanced hydrodynamic load. For numerical reasons, our computational model allows only a dilute cilia density of 0.0036 μm–2 for which cilia do not collide. For higher cilia densities, we expect an even more pronounced change in pumping rate (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Osterman and Vilfan, 2011).

Figure 6. Metachronal coordination enhances fluid pumping and reduces steric interactions, but does not affect fluid flow direction.

(A) Possible traveling wave solutions in a computational model of a cilia carpet. Left: Cilia are arranged on a triangular lattice (gray dots), with three-dimensional cilia beat pattern from Paramecium (not to scale, cilia length 10 μm). Three example wave solutions are highlighted: in-phase beating, symplectic wave, dexioplectic wave. Wave fronts are indicated by black lines and the wave direction by an arrow, while the color code of cilia base points represents cilia phase. Right: Visualization of the set of all possible wave solutions as function of wave vector k=(kx,ky), where the distance from the origin encodes the wavelength of the wave as λ = 2π / |k| and the directional angle θ encodes the direction of the wave relative to the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia beat. Example waves from left panel are highlighted as colored dots. (B) Pumping rate Q per cilium computed for different wave solutions, with each wave represented by a color-coded dot as in hexagon plot of panel A (normalized by pumping rate Qrand ≈ 7.87 μm3/ms for cilia beating with random phase relationship). (C) Direction of cilia-generated flow (averaged over one beat cycle) for different wave solutions relative to the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia beat; note that the range of the color bar spans only 10⁰. Mean ± standard deviation is shown in the upper right corner. (D) Pumping rate per cilium for four selected wave solutions as indicated in hexagon plot of panel (A) as function of a noise strength σ (see text for details). Dashed line indicates mean pumping rate for cilia beating with random phase relationship (Qrand). (E) Critical density ρ of a cilia carpet below which steric interactions between cilia arise for different wave solutions; density ρ is normalized relative to a critical density for cilia beating with random phase relationship, ρrand = 0.015 μm–2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. Visualization of increasing noise strength on synthetic metachronal waves.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A) Synthetic phase map of a metachronal wave with wave direction of 190º and wavelength 4 µm, represented with pixel resolution of 0.15 µm. Noise was modeled as superposition of independent Fourier modes with normally distributed complex amplitudes that scale with the inverse squared modulus of the corresponding wavevector, such that the standard deviation of two pixels separated by 18 µm along the x-axis equals a prescribed value of the noise strength σ (ranging from 0.2-1.5). Scalebar is 10 µm. (B) Histogram of estimated gradient vectors for the synthetic noisy metachronal waves from panel (A) above. Note that the circular variance increases with noise strength σ.

Next, we investigated the impact of different metachronal wave solutions on the direction of cilia-generated fluid flow. As shown in Figure 6C, we observed that the flow direction is virtually independent of the direction and wavelength of metachronal waves with a variability of less than ±5⁰ for the chosen cilia density. This theory prediction matches our experimental observation. Indeed, we did not find any difference in the overall fluid flow direction in left and right noses with their different metachronal directions (Figure 5F&G and Figure 5—figure supplement 4). In conclusion, our results show that metachronal coordination is beneficial for fluid pumping, but does not affect the direction of fluid flow.

We then probed how deviating from global synchronization impacts fluid pumping. We previously demonstrated theoretically that above a characteristic level of cilia phase noise, global synchronization is lost but local synchronized domains persist (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a). For efficient numerical computations, it is sufficient to consider a smaller carpet that exhibits a single coordinated metachronal wave perturbed by cilia phase noise, instead of several domains with local synchronization each. This is valid because long-range hydrodynamic interactions near a boundary wall such as an epithelial layer decay as inverse cubed distance (~d–3). Therefore, hydrodynamic interactions between distant cilia should have little impact on the rate of fluid pumping, and in fact were previously shown to be dispensable for our computational model (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b). Hence, we expect that in a cilia carpet with noise-perturbed global synchronization, the main determinant affecting fluid pumping is phase noise between nearby cilia. Correspondingly, we investigated how adding increasing phase noise to a prescribed metachronal wave affects fluid pumping for four possible scenarios: (i) the dexioplectic wave with wave vector kI that emerges spontaneously in the computational model (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b), (ii) a perfect dexioplectic wave with θ = 90o, (iii) the antiplectic wave that maximizes fluid pumping, and (iv) in-phase cilia beating.

We observed that, for the dexioplectic wave kI, the rate of fluid pumping approximately equals that for cilia beating with a random phase relationship, while the pumping rate is substantially higher for the most efficient antiplectic wave and a dexioplectic wave with θ = 90o (Figure 6D). Generally, if random perturbations of cilia phase remain small (standard deviation σ<0.2, Figure 6—figure supplement 1), the pumping rate is only moderately changed. For stronger phase noise (σ>1, Figure 6—figure supplement 1), the pumping rate attains a constant value, irrespective of the underlying wave solution, as cilia essentially beat with random phase relationship. Taken together, our results show that cilia carpets exhibiting metachronal coordination can tolerate some level of noise of cilia beating for their physiological function of fluid pumping.

Besides improving fluid flow, metachronal waves may also prevent steric collisions between neighboring cilia, which could slow down their dynamics. To probe the relevance of steric interactions, we computed for each wave solution a critical density ρ(k) at which cilia do not collide (Figure 6E). We observed that this critical density is substantially higher than a corresponding density ρrand defined for cilia beating with random phase relationship. In fact, this critical density is minimal for in-phase cilia beating. However, for in-phase beating, the predicted pumping rate is also minimal. In contrast, symplectic and dexioplectic metachronal coordination allow for both an elevated pumping rate and denser cilia packing without steric collisions. The product of the pumping rate per cilium and cilia density yield the total pumping rate of a cilia carpet. We speculate that metachronal coordination may represent an evolutionary solution to the trade-off choice of both realizing a high pumping rate per cilium (which favors metachronal coordination with short wavelength, see Figure 6B) and a high cilia density (which favors in-phase synchronization, see Figure 6E). Our argument refines a previous hypothesis by Machemer, who proposed that dexioplectic waves reduce steric interactions as compared to symplectic or antiplectic waves Machemer, 1972.

Our computational model shows that local synchronization is a prerequisite for efficient cilia beating in dense cilia carpets by avoiding steric collisions between cilia. We propose that local synchronization allows to already realize almost the maximal possible rate of fluid pumping, while reducing steric interactions effectively.

Discussion

By using novel tools to quantify ciliary synchronization in vivo and a computational model, we put forward the notion of local but not global synchronization as the expected form of cilia coordination in the presence of noise and perturbations. Even with only local synchronization of cilia, tissue-scale metachronal coordination with distinct pattern of wave directions is possible in cilia carpets. Indeed, we observed in a zebrafish model system tissue-scale patterns of metachronal waves, which were consistent across individual animals, but different for left and right noses. This difference in wave directions is not a mere consequence of different patterns of cilia alignment, but instead points at an important role of the chirality of the cilia beat and 3D architecture of the underlying tissue. On the basis of computational results, we propose that local synchronization is sufficient to pump fluids at an almost maximal rate.

In this study, we chose to study multiciliated cells in the developing zebrafish nose. We identified that although these cells bear a reduced number of cilia as compared to mammalian tissues or Xenopus embryonic skin, they retain a ciliary density similar to these other multiciliated epithelia due to their smaller apical area (Goldstein et al., 2016). In principle, the apical size of cells should not matter for the physics of cilia synchronization. As a small caveat, it is possible that a ciliated epithelium made of smaller cells may be more heterogeneous due to higher divergence in cilia properties across cells. Yet, since the density of cilia is a key property for synchronization of motile cilia (Brumley et al., 2014; Pellicciotta et al., 2020), we argue that the zebrafish nose is an appropriate model for studying coupling mechanisms within and across cell boundaries in a naturally dense cilia carpet, which is highly accessible for imaging experiments. We have also performed experiments in another ciliated tissue, the tela choroidea of the adult zebrafish brain (D’Gama et al., 2021, Jeong et al., 2022), to further strengthen the applicability of our analysis tools.

Using Fourier-based analyses, we observed that motile cilia in the zebrafish nose and brain beat at slightly different frequencies, both within the organ and across fish. The beating frequency may depend on the number of cilia on the cell (Pellicciotta et al., 2020), the age of the cell or animal (Olstad et al., 2019), but likely not the length of the cilium (Bottier et al., 2019; Pintado et al., 2017). Beat frequency may also relate to the level of synchronization across cilia. In fact, it was shown that upon synchronization, the emergent frequencies of two oscillators converge to the same value as long as the intrinsic frequencies are similar enough (Brumley et al., 2014; Pellicciotta et al., 2020; Quaranta et al., 2015; Pikovsky et al., 2003). Moreover, cilia should beat faster (or slower) when they are synchronized in-phase (or in anti-phase) because the hydrodynamic friction acting on an individual cilium decreases (or increases) (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013; Pellicciotta et al., 2020; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Meng et al., 2021). Of note, the cilia beat frequencies reported here do not represent the intrinsic beat frequencies of individual cilia, but instead the emergent frequency when a cilium is interacting with its neighbors. Nevertheless, in our system, we observed that beat frequencies are widely distributed, suggesting that there is no synchronization on a global, tissue scale. This also agrees with experimental data in airway human cells (Feriani et al., 2017) and modeling work showing that frequency dispersity and active noise in cilia beating limit synchronization to the local scale (Guirao and Joanny, 2007; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a). To probe how global versus local synchronization affects the transport of fluid, we turned to a computational approach. We highlight how local synchronization is a prerequisite to reduce steric hindrance in dense cilia carpets. Moreover, the pumping rate of a cilia carpet is robust against moderate levels of phase noise between neighboring cilia, while it should be independent of hydrodynamic interactions with distant cilia, suggesting that locally synchronized cilia can achieve fluid pumping at an almost maximal possible rate. Our results thus complement a previous study suggesting a favorable effect of slight disorder in the cilia polarity for effective fluid transport in the lung (Ramirez-San Juan et al., 2020), by highlighting benefits of local order.

Previous methods to investigate coordinated ciliary movement include spatial correlation approaches (Gheber and Priel, 1989; Wan et al., 2020), measures of phase similarity (Oltean et al., 2018), or spatial correlation functions (Feriani et al., 2017; Brumley et al., 2015). However, these approaches are either not automated, or complicated to interpret. In this study, we applied another measure for synchronization commonly used in neuroscience, the magnitude-squared coherence (Engel et al., 2001; Carter et al., 1973). This measure proved to be very robust to detect synchronization across pixels. Synchronized oscillators should beat at the same frequency. Indeed, we observed that our coherence score only reported pixel pairs oscillating at the same frequency. Yet, having the same frequency is only a necessary but not a sufficient condition. Indeed, we noticed that not all pixel pairs oscillating at the same frequency were coherent, in particularly when pixels were far apart and only ‘accidentally’ shared the same frequency. Using this measure, we observe that coherence rapidly decays at a pixel distance of approximately 20 µm, which is larger than the diameter of a cell (4.1–4.7 µm), and longer than the length of a single cilium of approximately 9 µm in the nose. We thus have an indirect, but not yet direct proof that coherence domains cross cell boundaries. It remains to be understood what sets the size of the observed coherence domains. Generally, a stronger coupling between cilia promotes larger domains, while active noise of the cilia beat, dispersity of intrinsic cilia beat frequency, and imperfect cilia alignment should cause smaller domains (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a; Guirao and Joanny, 2007).

Our results revealed that coherence domains slightly increase in size when the viscosity of the surrounding medium is increased. This complements previous findings by Machemer that changing viscosity can change the direction of metachronal waves in cilia carpets in unicellular Paramecium (Machemer, 1972). We suppose that changing the viscosity of the surrounding medium slightly changes the cilia beat pattern and therefore the synchronization coupling between nearby cilia. Indeed, previous literature showed that shape and speed of the cilia beat changes upon increased viscosities or hydrodynamic load (Brokaw, 1966; Klindt et al., 2016).

Traveling waves of ciliary phase, in the form of so-called metachronal waves, have been previously observed in ciliated system, particularly in ciliates (Wan et al., 2020; Brumley et al., 2015). They are often highlighted as a feature of synchronized cilia (Bustamante-Marin and Ostrowski, 2017; Ovadyahu and Priel, 1989), which promote efficient fluid transport (Elgeti and Gompper, 2013). Using a novel analysis method based on the phase of the Fourier transform of time-lapse recordings, we revealed coherent patterns of metachronal wave directions in nose pits, which were consistent across individual fish. Intriguingly, wave patterns were different for the left and right noses with an offset of approximately 65° in relation to the anterior-posterior axis of the animal. Of note, due to a slighty different mounting angle of the samples for measuring ciliary beating and cilia polarity, we are not able to directly measure the offset between ciliary beating and metachronal wave direction and hence normalized these values to the anterior-posterior axis of the larvae.

As we did not observe any other differences between the left and right noses, we speculate that chiral cilia beat patterns may be slightly different for the left and right noses, respectively, since different cilia beat patterns will give rise to different dominant metachronal waves (Meng et al., 2021), as observed for different metazoan species (Knight-Jones, 1954). Usually, only one type of metachronism is observed in a single species, and even in a single systematic group. The zebrafish model system established here thus opens the unique opportunity to study two different fundamental types of metachronal coordination in a single species.

Using hydrodynamic computations, we showed that metachronal coordination hardly changes the direction of cilia-generated fluid flow. Hence, it is unlikely that the different metachronal wave patterns observed between the left and right zebrafish noses and in different species in general affect the direction of fluid flow and thus their physiological function. In line with this, we have not observed differences in the direction of the overall flow generated by the left or right pit. However, metachronal coordination enhances the rate of fluid pumping and at the same time reduces steric interactions at higher cilia density. We speculate that the observed metachronal waves may provide an optimal trade-off between a high pumping rate per cilium and a high cilia density within a cilia carpet.

In conclusion, we describe here an accessible in vivo model system and novel analytical methods to quantify the properties of the cilia beat as well as emergent synchronization in ciliated epithelium in an unbiased manner. Using these tools, we show that local synchronization is sufficient for coherent patterns of metachronal coordination, which expectedly allows to realize almost the maximal rate of fluid pumping.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Genetic reagent (zebrafish) Et(hspGGFF19B:Gal4)Tg(UAS:gfp) Reiten et al., 2017; Asakawa et al., 2008 ZDB-ALT-080523–22
Genetic reagent (zebrafish) Tg(foxj1a:gCaMP6s)nw9 This study N/A Trangenic zebrafish line expressing the calcium indicator GCamp6s in multiciliated cells of the nose, Jurisch-Yaksi lab, NTNU
Genetic reagent (zebrafish) Tg(Ubi:zebrabow) Pan et al., 2013 ZDB-ALT-130816–1
Genetic reagent (zebrafish) mitfab692 Lister et al., 1999 ZDB-ALT-010919–2
Antibody Mouse monoclonal glutamylated tubulin (GT335) Adipogen Cat#AG-20B-0020-C100; RRID: AB_2490210 Dilution 1:400
Antibody Rabbit polyclonal Gamma-tubulin Thermo Fisher Cat# PA5-34815;
RRID: AB_2552167
Dilution 1:400
Antibody Rabbit Polyclonal anti beta-catenin Cell Signalling Technologies Cat#9562;
RRID:AB_331149
Dilution 1:200
Antibody Chicken Polyclonal Anti-GFP Abcam Cat#ab13970; RRID:AB_300798 Dilution 1:1,000
Antibody Goat Polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-adsorbed Alexa Fluor 555 Thermo Fisher Cat# A32732; RRID:AB_2633281 Dilution 1:1,000
Antibody Goat Polyclonal anti-mouse IgG (H+L) Highly Cross-adsorbed Alexa Fluor 647 Thermo Fisher Cat#A32728;
RRID:AB_2633277
Dilution 1:1,000
Chemical compound, drug Alpha-bungarotoxin Invitrogen Cat#BI601
Chemical compound, drug Ultrapure LMP agarose Fisher Scientific Cat#16520100
Chemical compound, drug DAPI Invitrogen Cat# D1306 Dilution 1:1,000
Software, algorithm ImageJ/Fiji Schindelin et al., 2012
Software, algorithm Cell counter plugin for Fiji/ImageJ Kurt De Vos, University of Sheffield https://imagej.net/Cell_Counter
Software, algorithm BigWarp Saalfeld lab, Janelia https://imagej.net/BigWarp;
Bogovic et al., 2016
Software, algorithm Zebrascope software in Labview Ahrens lab, Janelia Farm; Vladimirov et al., 2014
Software, algorithm Manta Controller Yaksi lab, NTNU; Reiten et al., 2017
Software, algorithm Fast Fourier Analysis MATLAB, this paper; Jurisch-Yaksi, 2023 https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination
Software, algorithm Coherence analysis MATLAB, this paper; Jurisch-Yaksi, 2023 https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination
Software, algorithm Wave analysis MATLAB, this paper; Jurisch-Yaksi, 2023 https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination
Software, algorithm Computation model of cilia carpet Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b; Solovev and Friedrich, 2021a; Solovev and Friedrich, 2021b; Solovev and Friedrich, 2021c https://github.com/icemtel/reconstruct3d_opt, https://github.com/icemtel/stokes, and https://github.com/icemtel/carpet
Software, algorithm ColorBrewer: Attractive and Distinctive Colormaps Brewer, 2022; Cynthia Brewer https://github.com/DrosteEffect/BrewerMap/releases/tag/3.2.3, GitHub. Retrieved December 4, 2022
Software, algorithm Beeswarm Stevenson, 2019; Ian Stevenson https://github.com/ihstevenson/beeswarm GitHub. Retrieved December 4, 2022.
Other Sutter laser puller Sutter Model P-200 pulling needles for injection
Other Pressure injector Eppendorf Femtojet 4i injection of bungartoxin for paralysis
Other Confocal microscope Zeiss Examiner Z1 confocal imaging
Other 20 x water immersion Plan-Apochromat NA 1 Zeiss 421452-9880-000 confocal imaging
Other Light-sheet objective Nikon 20 x Plan-Apochromat, NA 0.8 light-sheet imaging
Other Transmission microscope Bresser, Olympus transmission imaging
Other Transmission microscope objective Zeiss 63 X, NA 0.9 transmission imaging

Experimental model and subject details

The animal facilities and maintenance of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, were approved by the NFSA (Norwegian Food Safety Authority). Fish were kept in 3.5 L tanks in a Techniplast Zebtech Multilinking system at constant conditions: 28 °C, pH7 and 600µSiemens, at a 14:10 hr light/dark cycle to simulate optimal natural breeding conditions. Fish were fed twice a day with dry food (ZEBRAFEED; SPAROS I&D Nutrition in Aquaculture), and once with Artemia nauplii (Grade0, platinum Label, Argent Laboratories, Redmond, USA). Larvae were maintained in egg water (1.2 g marine salt and 0.1% methylene blue in 20 L RO water) from fertilization to 3 dpf and subsequently in AFW (1.2 g marine salt in 20 L RO water). For experiments, the following fish lines were used: Et(hspGGFF19B:Gal4)Tg(UAS:gfp) (Reiten et al., 2017), Tg(ubi:zebrabow)(Pan et al., 2013) . Tg(foxj1a:GCaMP6s)nw9 transgenic animals were generated in our laboratory upon co-injection of tol2 transposase mRNA and pCS2-Foxj1a:GCaMP6s plasmid containing the 0.6 kb Foxj1a promoter described in upstream of GCamp6s open reading frame (Caron et al., 2012). Experiments were performed on embryos of AB Background. All procedures were performed on zebrafish larvae at 4 dpf in accordance with the directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and the Norwegian Food Safety Authorities.

Immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy

Euthanized larvae were fixed in a solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde solution (PFA), 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS (0.3% PBSTx) for at least 3 hr at room temperature. Larvae were washed with 0.3% PBSTx (3x5 min) and permeabilized with acetone (100% acetone, 10 min incubation at −20 °C). Subsequently, samples were washed with 0.3% PBSTx (3x10 min) and blocked in 0.1% BSA/0.3% PBSTx for 2 hr. Larvae were incubated with glutamylated tubulin (GT335, 1:400, Adipogen), and beta-catenin (#9562, 1:200, Cell Signalling Technologies) or gamma-tubulin (1:400, Thermo Scientific) overnight at 4 °C. On the second day samples were washed (0.3% PBSTx, 3x1 hr) and subsequently incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa-labelled GAM555 plus, Thermo Scientific, 1:1,000) overnight at 4 °C. The third day, samples were incubated with 0.1% DAPI in 0.3% PBSTx, Life Technology, 2 hr, washed (0.3% PBSTx, 3x1 hr), and transferred to a series of increasing glycerol concentrations (25%, 50%, and 75%). Stained larvae were stored in 75% glycerol at 4 °C and imaged using a Zeiss Examiner Z1 confocal microscope with a 20 x plan NA 0.8 objective. An antibody against GFP (Millipore, ab16901, and Alexa488-anti-chicken, Thermo Scientific) was used to enhance the GFP signal if needed. Acquired images were processed with Fiji/ImageJ (Schindelin et al., 2012). Numbers of cells were counted using the “Cell Counter” plugin for Fiji/ImageJ (Kurt De Vos, Univ Sheffield, Academic Neurology, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/cell-counter.html). The apical surfaces were collected from the beta-catenin staining using Fiji. The ciliary length was measured from cilia in their extended shape in the hspGGFF19B;UAS:GFP line using Fiji. The number of cilia was acquired from the gamma-tubulin staining, at 40 X. Using Fiji, first an ROI was drawn around the apical surface of a cell. The crop was then rescaled and applied with an FFT bandpass filter (up to 50 px; down to 6 px; Suppress stripes: None; Tolerance of direction: 50%), and finally used the detect peaks function in Fiji (prominence = 50). Ciliary direction was identified per cell by comparing the relative position of gamma tubulin compared to glutamylated tubulin, imaged at both 20 X and 40 X. All measurements were further processed in Matlab.

Tg(ubi:zebrabow)(Pan et al., 2013) larvae were imaged at 20 X. The image was binarized in Fiji, and the surface of the zebrafish was rendered in Matlab.

Light transmission recordings in the larval nose

High-speed microscopy recordings of motile cilia were conducted with 4-day-old larvae paralyzed with an intramuscular injection of α-bungarotoxin Invitrogen BI601, 1 mg/mL and then embedded in 0.75% low melting point agarose prepared in AFW in a FluoroDish (World Precision Instruments). Specifically, animals were mounted carefully at a 15 degree angle and titled to one side, fully exposing the lateral region of the nose. Agarose covering the nostrils was removed to allow free ciliary beating. The mounted fish was left to rest for 5 min to properly set the agarose and avoid drift. Olfactory pits of zebrafish larvae were visualized by a Bresser transmitted light microscope using a 63 x water immersion objective lens (Zeiss, NA 0.9, plan). The microscope was stabilized using Sorbothane feet blocks (Thorlabs; AV4 - Ø27.0 mm). High-speed digital recordings were captured with an Allied Vision Manta camera (G-031B) at 99–110 frames per second (Fs) at a resolution of 0.15 µm/pixel. Frames were acquired and stored by custom made software written in C++, and further analysis was conducted in MATLAB (Mathworks).

Motile cilia-mediated fluid flow recordings with fluorescent particles

First a CBF analysis was performed with an Olympus transmitted light microscope, a 63 x water immersion objective lens (Zeiss, NA 0.9, plan) and an Allied Vision Prosilica (GT2000) at a frame rate of 99–110 Hz with a resolution of 0.09375 µm/pixel. Then cilia-mediated flow fields around zebrafish noses were recorded for the same animals, keeping the positioning unchanged. 2 ml of 1.5% fluorescent particle solution in AFW (1.33 µm, Spherotech) was carefully pipetted into the recording chamber. The fish was left to rest for five minutes, letting the particles settle to avoid any drift in the flow. After a 60 s recording, flow fields were generated on MATLAB and the flow direction was determined manually using Fiji.

Light transmission recordings in the adult brain explant

To measure ciliary beating in the adult zebrafish brain, we used an optimized protocol described earlier (D’Gama et al., 2021, Jeong et al., 2022). We dissected the brain of nacre (mitfab692) adult zebrafish (male and female, less than 1 year-old) in cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF). Then we placed the brain explant on a FluoroDish and perfused the brain explants with oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) at room temperature. Ciliary beating of the tela choroidae in the brain explant was recorded using an Olympus transmitted light microscope, a 40 x water immersion objective (Olympus, NA 0.8) and a manta camera (Prosilica GT1930, Allied Vision) at circa 100 Hz with a resolution of 0.314 µm/pixel. Further analyses were performed in MATLAB (Mathworks).

Light sheet recordings

hspGGFF19B;UAS:GFP larvae were imaged using a custom-build light-sheet microscope (based on the design described by Vladimirov et al., 2014) with a 20 x water immersion objective (Olympus, NA 1.00, plan), a 4 X illumination objective (Olympus, NA 0.28, XLFLUOR-340), a Hamamatsu CMOS camera (C11440-42U30), PXI system for instrument control (NI PXI 1042Q), and a laser of 488 nm wavelength (Cobolt). Multiciliated cells in the zebrafish nose were recorded for 1–2 s at 300–500 Hz. Paralyzed larvae were mounted in 1.5% Low melting point agarose, agarose was removed in front of their nose, and larvae were positioned in a custom-build chamber so that the multiciliated cells directly faced the light sheet. Images were acquired by the Zebrascope software in LabView (Vladimirov et al., 2014) and analysed in ImageJ/Fiji and MATLAB. The light-sheet was adapted to allow for sequential light transmission image acquisition using the same Zebrascope software. Sequential imaging in light-sheet and light transmission mode of hspGGFF19B;UAS:GFP animals (4dpf), sparsely labeling multiciliated cells in the nose, to compare the contribution of ciliary beating of one cell to the entire ciliated epithelium. In addition, the light transmission mode was used to acquire sequential ciliary beat recordings with 10 µm spacing (100 Hz), effectively creating a 3D ciliary beating map of the zebrafish nose.

Viscosity experiments

Methylcellulose 15 cP (M7140-100G; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved at 2% (w/v) in Artificial Fish Water (AFW) overnight (500 rpm). Serial dilutions were performed to achieve lower concentrations of methylcellulose in AFW (0.25%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2%), corresponding to (1,875 cP; 3.75 cP; 7.5 cP; 15 cP). Using light transmission microscopy as described above, a 60 s baseline was first recorded at 100 Hz in AFW, after which AFW was exchanged for a viscous solution. After settling for five minutes, the nose is recorded again for 60 s. This was repeated until the fish were recorded with all increasing concentrations and a return to baseline AFW. In another set of experiments, light-sheet experiments were performed as described above. A 4 s baseline was first recorded at 500 Hz in AFW, after which AFW was exchanged for increasingly more viscous solutions. After settling for five minutes, the nose is recorded again for 4 s. Data were further analyzed for CBF, using the framework described above, and ciliary waveforms in Fiji.

Analysis pipeline for wave direction and wavelength

Beating cilia interfere with the transmission of light and result in an oscillatory change of light intensity over time (Sanderson and Sleigh, 1981). We established an analysis pipeline based on the analysis in Reiten et al., 2017.

We used the university’s servers to run computationally heavier segments of the code – especially Coherence and coherence-versus-distance calculations. Since the hardware is shared between users of those servers, available resources are at most 384 GB memory, 2.60 GHz CPU, and Nvidia Tesla K80 GPU.

Frequency

We analyzed the frequency of oscillations for every pixel of the recording by computing the Fourier transform of the corresponding intensity time series of that pixel using the Matlab fast Fourier transform (fft()). To increase computational speed, we spatially down-sampled each frame by a factor 5. For each pixel, cilia beat frequency (CBF) was calculated as the frequency (between 15 Hz and half the frequency of acquisition) where the absolute value of the Fourier transform was maximal. This resulted in a spatial CBF map. As beating cilia do not cover the entire recording area, we automatically segmented this area into signal and noise pixels, using a threshold for the local standard deviation (SD). In brief, we moved a 3x3 kernel across the entire frequency map and any pixel belonging to a 3x3 kernel whose SD was below 3 Hz was considered as signal, whereas pixels belonging only to kernels with an SD above 3 Hz were considered as noise. To remove small signal regions, we listed all connected pixels in the frequency map using the bwconncomp() Matlab function, and removed regions with fewer than 500 pixels. Altogether, with SD-thresholding and by removing small signal regions, we robustly identified those regions of the imaging area with beating cilia.

Coherence and coherence-versus-distance calculations

The coherence score constitutes a normalized cross-power spectral density: for a pair of time series x(t) and y(t), it is defined as

,Cxy(f)=|Pxy(f)|2Pxx(f)Pyy(f) (1)
  • where

  • Cxy (f) is the magnitude-squared coherence score of the two time series x(t) and y(t) as function of frequency f

  • Pxy (f) is the cross-power spectral density of x(t) and y(t)

  • Pxx (f) and Pyy (f) are the power spectral densities of x(t) and y(t), respectively.

One may think of Pxx (f) and Pyy (f) as the squared magnitude of the Fourier transforms of x(t) and y(t), whereas Pxy (f)~x*(f) y(f) is related to the product of the Fourier transforms of x(t) and y(t).

We apply the coherence score to the intensity time series x(t) and y(t) corresponding to a pair of signal pixels. Figure 2D shows an example of input time series and resulting coherence score, see top and bottom panels.

Specifically, coherence scores were calculated for 30 s long raw recordings (approx. 99–110 frames per second; parameter: Fs) using an adapted version of the Matlab mscohere() built-in function. In short, mscohere() takes two signals and returns the coherence as a function of frequency with values between 0 and 1 (Cxy(f)). In detail, we first calculated the power spectra for the two time series x(t) and y(t) (Pxx(f)) and (Pyy(f)) using Welch’s method with parameters pwelch(Pxx, window, noverlap, nfft, Fs, ‘psd’). Second, we calculated the cross spectrum for the x(t) and y(t), (Pxy(f)) using the Matlab function cpsd(Pxx, Pyy, window, noverlap, nfft, Fs) with parameters window = hamming(100); noverlap = 80; nfft = 100. Finally, we estimated a dimensionless coherence score from the power spectra and cross spectrum according to Equation 1.

To evaluate coherence in space, we either calculated the coherence for one reference pixel with all other pixels, or for all pixel-pairs in the recording. We use the latter pixel-pairs to plot coherence-versus- distance, a measure similar to the correlation-versus-distance analysis employed by previous authors (Bartoszek et al., 2021; Jetti et al., 2014). Since mscohere() recalculates the power spectra for a given pixel each time coherence is estimated, we reduced the computing costs by retaining the power spectra. In addition, when calculating the coherence for all pixel-pairs, we spatially down-sampled each frame by a factor 5 and discarded all pixels outside the signal region.

In the end, to visualize the coherence-versus-power, and coherence-versus-distance measured, we plotted the density using hexscatter()(Bean, 2021), using distance bins of width 0.5 µm and bins of width 0.04 for the coherence.

Segmentation

To segment the frequency map into distinct frequency patches, we first bin the power spectra into 100 bins (~0.5 Hz). We then divide the map into frequency patches by grouping same frequency pixels using bwconncomp() with two-dimensional eight-connected neighborhood as the desired connectivity, and finally set a minimum size for a patch to 200 pixels. These frequency patches underlie the further analysis.

Phase

Phase, or phase angle, was extracted from the complex Fourier output by taking the angle(). But instead of taking a pixel-based approach, we took a patch-based approach: for all pixels of a given patch, we extracted the phase angle at the main frequency of that patch.

Gradients

From the segmented phase angle maps, we generated gradient maps by computing the image gradient imgradientxy(phase, ‘prewitt’) over both x and y direction, as well as over phase and phase+ π to adjust for the circular nature of the phase. From these gradient maps, wave directions are extracted by taking the mean angle per patch, while wavelengths are extracted by taking the mode magnitude per patch.

Detection of ciliary direction and rotating using BigWarp

To compare the noses of different fish, we aligned raw recording frames using BigWarp (Bogovic et al., 2016). We choose to perform the rotation morphometric transformation. The raw recordings were preselected based on their anatomy: we found that fish exposing much of the lateral region of the nose, tend to have a stronger and larger signal. All animals were aligned to a reference fish left nose (Figure 4). Upon aligning the recordings based on spatial features such as, pit edges, centre, and skin regions, we extracted the landmarks before and after the transformation. In addition, all right noses were flipped vertically preceding the transformation. Finally, we applied the transformations, associated with the imported landmarks, to the outputs of the analysis pipeline: frequency, phase, wave direction and wavelength maps.

Computational model

We consider a computational model of a cilia carpet, where cilia are regularly spaced on a triangular lattice (lattice spacing 18 μm) with aligned cilia polarity, see Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b for details. Specifically, we employed a unit cell of 16x16 cilia, for which periodic boundary conditions are imposed. This defines a finite set of possible perfect traveling waves of cilia phase compatible with the boundary conditions, each characterized by different wave direction angle θ and wavelength λ, see Figure 6A. Insets visualize example waves, where the color of dots at respective cilia positions encodes cilia phase. Python packages are available on github to (i) reconstruct 3D curves from orthogonal 2D projections: https://github.com/icemtel/reconstruct3d_opt, (ii) create triangulated surface meshes and solve the Stokes equation of low-Reynolds number hydrodynamics: https://github.com/icemtel/stokes, and (iii) study systems of coupled oscillators with couplings obtained from hydrodynamic computations https://github.com/icemtel/carpet.

Cilia pumping rate

We computed the mean pumping rate per cilium for different wave solutions as follows: Detailed hydrodynamic computations based on a triangulated surface mesh for a set of neighboring cilia and the boundary surface were conducted using the Stokes equation valid at low Reynolds numbers as detailed in Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b. The three-dimensional cilia beat pattern used had been previously tracked from Paramecium using stereographic recordings (Machemer, 1972). Due to the linearity of the Stokes equation, the individual contributions of all cilia add up and it is sufficient to consider a scenario, where only a single cilium, say at position xj and phase ϕj, moves with phase speed dϕj/dt, while all other cilia at positions xi remain immotile with fixed phase ϕi. Detailed hydrodynamic computations then yielded a surface distribution f(x) of hydrodynamic friction forces, which depends on the vector of cilia phases and is linear in the phase speed dϕj/dt. Exploiting once more the linearity of the Stokes equation, the instantaneous pumping rate Qj of the central cilium can be computed as a surface integral of all local contributions to fluid pumping arising from this force density over the surface S of all cilia. The pumping due to a point-force of magnitude F coplanar with a planar no-slip boundary at height z above the surface is given by F z / (π η), where η is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid (Osterman and Vilfan, 2011). This result was found by integrating Blake’s fundamental solution for the flow field induced by a point force near a no-slip boundary; up to prefactor, this result follows also from symmetry considerations and dimensional analysis. We thus find for the instantaneous pumping rate vector (with units of volume pumped per unit time)

Qj(ϕ1,,ϕN)=(πη)1Sd2xf(x)z.

To economize simulations, this surface integral can be split into contributions from integrating over the surface of different cilia as Qj = ΣI Qij. Importantly, here the contribution Qij stemming from integrating over the surface Si of cilium i depends on the phase ϕj of the central cilium that is moving and the phase ϕi of non-moving cilium i, but is virtually independent of the phases of the other cilia, i.e., QijQiji,ϕj). Due to the linearity of the Stokes equation, each of these contributions is linear in the phase speed of the central cilium, Qiji,ϕj)=qiji,ϕj) dϕj/dt with pumping coefficient qiji,ϕj). This allows efficient tabulation of computation results for combinations of neighbors and pairs of cilia phases. Moreover, we confirmed that hydrodynamic interactions between distant cilia are weak and therefore only included the contributions from nearest and certain next-to-nearest neighbors (along the direction of the cilia effective stroke), for which hydrodynamic are strongest (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b). Generally, the contribution from the other cilia, Qij for i ≠ j, points in the direction opposite of Qjj (but is weaker in magnitude), because the other cilia act as obstacles for the fluid flow generated by the central cilium j. Finally, the instantaneous pumping rate vector Qj1,…,ϕN) was averaged over a full beat cycle and all cilia indices j, to yield a mean pumping rate vector Q per cilium.

Of note, in an infinite cilia carpet of density ρ, the mean pumping rate per cilium sets a slip velocity of approximately steady fluid flow vslip at a suitable height above the cilia carpet as (Osterman and Vilfan, 2011)

vslip=πρQ=Fh/η.

We computed the pumping rate vector Q for different traveling waves, where the wave vector k of the waves determines the phase difference of neighboring cilia. The scalar magnitude Q=|Q| is reported for all possible k in Figure 6B. There, the scalar pumping rates Q(k) were normalized by the pumping rate Qrand = |Qrand| for cilia beating with random phase relationship. For the cilia density and beat pattern used, Qrand / (μm3/ms) ≈ 1.452 ex+7.739 ey, with unit vector ey pointing in the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia beat. This pumping rate Qrand used for normalization was determined by initializing cilia phases with random values (uniformly distributed in the interval [0,2π]), and integrating the dynamics of the cilia carpet over one full beat cycle (corresponding to the increase of the global phase by 2π); results were averaged over n=100 stochastic realizations.

The mean pumping rate vector Q is parallel to the boundary surface. We can thus report its direction angle relative to the direction of the effective stroke of the cilia beat, see Figure 6C.

Impact of noise

To investigate the effect of imperfect synchronization, we performed dynamic simulations of the cilia carpet model from Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b with perturbed initial conditions and computed the mean pumping rate averaged over one beat cycle. Specifically, initial conditions were chosen as a perfect traveling wave as indicated, with independent normal distributed random numbers with variance σ2 added to the initial phase of each cilium (as well as a global random phase offset uniformly distributed in the interval [0,2π]). The dynamics was then integrated for a full beat cycle, see Figure 6D. For large values of σ, the pumping rates converged to the rate Qrand corresponding to cilia beating with random phase relationship. All results represent averages of n=100 independent realizations.

Critical density

The dilute spacing of cilia in the computational model prevents steric interactions between cilia. We determined for each possible wave solution with wave vector k the highest density ρk at which still no steric interactions occur at any point of the beat cycle (determined by a minimal distance of the respective centerlines of neighboring cilia of more than 0.5 μm) by down-scaling the lattice spacing of the triangular arrangement of cilia, see Figure 6E. Analogously, we determined a similar critical density ρrand for cilia beating with random phase relationship, by testing all possible phase relationships of neighboring cilia.

We confirmed that results are robust: if for a pair of neighboring cilia instead of the exact value of the phase difference Δϕ between their respective phases as determined by the wave solutions under consideration, a phase difference from the interval [Δϕ-σ,Δϕ+σ] is chosen, we obtain very similar results even for phase fluctuations with σ=0.4.

Acknowledgements

We thank V Nguyen, A Nygaard and the Trondheim fish facility team for their technical support, E Yaksi and F Palumbo for the helpful discussions. This work was supported by a Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds fellowship and the Research Council of Norway (RCN) grant 326003 (CR), RCN FRIPRO grants 314189 (NJY). BMF is supported by a DFG-Heisenberg grant (FR3429/4-1), as well as ‘Physics of Life’ (Cluster of Excellence EXC-2068) and cfaed. AS is supported by the DFG priority program SPP1726 ‘Microswimmers’ (FR3429/1-1 and FR3429/1-2 to BMF).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Benjamin M Friedrich, Email: benjamin.m.friedrich@tu-dresden.de.

Nathalie Jurisch-Yaksi, Email: nathalie.jurisch-yaksi@ntnu.no.

Raymond E Goldstein, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Aleksandra M Walczak, CNRS, France.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds to Christa Ringers.

  • Research Council of Norway 314189 to Nathalie Jurisch-Yaksi.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FR3429/1-1 to Benjamin M Friedrich.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FR3429/1-2 to Benjamin M Friedrich.

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FR3429/4-1 to Benjamin M Friedrich.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Software, Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Validation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Software, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Software, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

The animal facilities and maintenance of the zebrafish, Danio rerio, were approved by the NFSA (Norwegian Food Safety Authority). All procedures were performed on zebrafish larvae at 4 dpf in accordance with the directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and the Norwegian Food Safety Authorities.

Additional files

Transparent reporting form

Data availability

All codes and a large set of experimental data is published at the following URL https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006. Matlab codes for analysis is available on github https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination (and archived at https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006) Python packages are available on github to (i) reconstruct 3D curves from orthogonal 2D projections: https://github.com/icemtel/reconstruct3d_opt, (ii) create triangulated surface meshes and solve hydrodynamic Stokes equation: https://github.com/icemtel/stokes, and (iii) study systems of coupled oscillators https://github.com/icemtel/carpet.

The following dataset was generated:

Jurisch-Yaksi N. 2023. Analytical tools to measure cilia synchronization by Ringers et al. NIRD Research Data Archive.

References

  1. Asakawa K, Suster ML, Mizusawa K, Nagayoshi S, Kotani T, Urasaki A, Kishimoto Y, Hibi M, Kawakami K. Genetic dissection of neural circuits by tol2 transposon-mediated GAL4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. PNAS. 2008;105:1255–1260. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704963105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bartoszek EM, Jetti SK, Chau KTP, Yaksi E. Ongoing Habenular Activity Is Driven by Forebrain Networks and Modulated by Olfactory Stimuli. bioRxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1101/2021.02.14.431141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bean G. Hexscatter.m. MATLAB Central File Exchange. 2021 https://uk.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/45639-hexscatter-m
  4. Bogovic JA, Hanslovsky P, Wong A, Saalfeld S. Robust registration of calcium images by learned contrast synthesis. 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; 2016. pp. 1123–1126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bottier M, Thomas KA, Dutcher SK, Bayly PV. How does cilium length affect beating? Biophysical Journal. 2019;116:1292–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.02.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brewer CA. ColorBrewer. 3.2.3Github. 2022 https://github.com/DrosteEffect/BrewerMap
  7. Brokaw CJ. Effects of increased viscosity on the movements of some invertebrate spermatozoa. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1966;45:113–139. doi: 10.1242/jeb.45.1.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brumley DR, Polin M, Pedley TJ, Goldstein RE. Hydrodynamic synchronization and metachronal waves on the surface of the colonial alga volvox carteri. Physical Review Letters. 2012;109:268102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.268102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brumley DR, Wan KY, Polin M, Goldstein RE. Flagellar synchronization through direct hydrodynamic interactions. eLife. 2014;3:e02750. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brumley DR, Polin M, Pedley TJ, Goldstein RE. Metachronal waves in the flagellar beating of volvox and their hydrodynamic origin. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface. 2015;12:20141358. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bustamante-Marin XM, Ostrowski LE. Cilia and mucociliary clearance. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2017;9:a028241. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a028241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caron A, Xu X, Lin X. Wnt/β-catenin signaling directly regulates foxj1 expression and ciliogenesis in zebrafish kupffer’s vesicle. Development. 2012;139:514–524. doi: 10.1242/dev.071746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Carter G, Knapp C, Nuttall A. Estimation of the magnitude-squared coherence function via overlapped fast Fourier transform processing. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 1973;21:337–344. doi: 10.1109/TAU.1973.1162496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chakrabarti B, Fürthauer S, Shelley MJ. A multiscale biophysical model gives quantized metachronal waves in A lattice of beating cilia. PNAS. 2022;119:e2113539119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113539119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clare DK, Magescas J, Piolot T, Dumoux M, Vesque C, Pichard E, Dang T, Duvauchelle B, Poirier F, Delacour D. Basal foot MTOC organizes Pillar mts required for coordination of beating cilia. Nature Communications. 2014;5:4888. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Date P, Ackermann P, Furey C, Fink IB, Jonas S, Khokha MK, Kahle KT, Deniz E. Visualizing flow in an intact CSF network using optical coherence tomography: implications for human congenital hydrocephalus. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:6196. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42549-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. D’Gama PP, Qiu T, Cosacak MI, Rayamajhi D, Konac A, Hansen JN, Ringers C, Acuña-Hinrichsen F, Hui SP, Olstad EW, Chong YL, Lim CKA, Gupta A, Ng CP, Nilges BS, Kashikar ND, Wachten D, Liebl D, Kikuchi K, Kizil C, Yaksi E, Roy S, Jurisch-Yaksi N. Diversity and function of motile ciliated cell types within ependymal lineages of the zebrafish brain. Cell Reports. 2021;37:109775. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Diaz Verdugo C, Myren-Svelstad S, Aydin E, Van Hoeymissen E, Deneubourg C, Vanderhaeghe S, Vancraeynest J, Pelgrims R, Cosacak MI, Muto A, Kizil C, Kawakami K, Jurisch-Yaksi N, Yaksi E. Glia-neuron interactions underlie state transitions to generalized seizures. Nature Communications. 2019;10:3830. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11739-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Elgeti J, Gompper G. Emergence of metachronal waves in cilia arrays. PNAS. 2013;110:4470–4475. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218869110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Engel AK, Fries P, Singer W. Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 2001;2:704–716. doi: 10.1038/35094565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Faubel R, Westendorf C, Bodenschatz E, Eichele G. Cilia-based flow network in the brain ventricles. Science. 2016;353:176–178. doi: 10.1126/science.aae0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Feriani L, Juenet M, Fowler CJ, Bruot N, Chioccioli M, Holland SM, Bryant CE, Cicuta P. Assessing the collective dynamics of motile cilia in cultures of human airway cells by multiscale DDM. Biophysical Journal. 2017;113:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ferreira RR, Pakula G, Klaeyle L, Fukui H, Vilfan A, Supatto W, Vermot J. Chiral cilia orientation in the left-right organizer. Cell Reports. 2018;25:2008–2016. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gheber L, Priel Z. Synchronization between beating cilia. Biophysical Journal. 1989;55:183–191. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82790-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gheber L, Korngreen A, Priel Z. Effect of viscosity on metachrony in mucus propelling cilia. Cell Motility and the Cytoskeleton. 1998;39:9–20. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0169(1998)39:1&#x0003c;9::AID-CM2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Goldstein RE, Polin M, Tuval I. Noise and synchronization in pairs of beating eukaryotic flagella. Physical Review Letters. 2009;103:168103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.168103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Goldstein RE, Lauga E, Pesci AI, Proctor MRE. Elastohydrodynamic synchronization of adjacent beating flagella. Physical Review Fluids. 2016;1:073201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.073201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gray J. The mechanism of ciliary movement. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character. 1922;93:104–121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1922.0007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gsell S, Loiseau E, D’Ortona U, Viallat A, Favier J. Hydrodynamic model of directional ciliary-beat organization in human airways. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:8405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64695-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gueron S, Levit-Gurevich K. Energetic considerations of ciliary beating and the advantage of metachronal coordination. PNAS. 1999;96:12240–12245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Guirao B, Joanny J-F. Spontaneous creation of macroscopic flow and metachronal waves in an array of cilia. Biophysical Journal. 2007;92:1900–1917. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.084897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guirao B, Meunier A, Mortaud S, Aguilar A, Corsi J-M, Strehl L, Hirota Y, Desoeuvre A, Boutin C, Han Y-G, Mirzadeh Z, Cremer H, Montcouquiol M, Sawamoto K, Spassky N. Coupling between hydrodynamic forces and planar cell polarity orients mammalian motile cilia. Nature Cell Biology. 2010;12:341–350. doi: 10.1038/ncb2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hansen A, Zeiske E. Development of the olfactory organ in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 1993;333:289–300. doi: 10.1002/cne.903330213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jeong I, Hansen JN, Wachten D, Jurisch-Yaksi N. Measurement of ciliary beating and fluid flow in the zebrafish adult telencephalon. STAR Protocols. 2022;3:101542. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jetti SK, Vendrell-Llopis N, Yaksi E. Spontaneous activity governs olfactory representations in spatially organized habenular microcircuits. Current Biology. 2014;24:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jurisch-Yaksi N. 2023. Analytical tools to measure cilia synchronization by Ringers et al. NIRD Research Data Archive. [DOI]
  37. Kanale AV, Ling F, Guo H, Fürthauer S, Kanso E. Spontaneous phase coordination and fluid pumping in model ciliary carpets. PNAS. 2022;119:e2214413119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214413119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Katoh TA, Ikegami K, Uchida N, Iwase T, Nakane D, Masaike T, Setou M, Nishizaka T. Three-dimensional tracking of microbeads attached to the tip of single isolated tracheal cilia beating under external load. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:15562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33846-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kermen F, Franco LM, Wyatt C, Yaksi E. Neural circuits mediating olfactory-driven behavior in fish. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 2013;7:62. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Khelloufi M-K, Loiseau E, Jaeger M, Molinari N, Chanez P, Gras D, Viallat A. Spatiotemporal organization of cilia drives multiscale mucus swirls in model human bronchial epithelium. Scientific Reports. 2018;8:2447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20882-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Klindt GS, Ruloff C, Wagner C, Friedrich BM. Load response of the flagellar beat. Physical Review Letters. 2016;117:258101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.258101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Klindt GS, Ruloff C, Wagner C, Friedrich BM. In-phase and anti-phase flagellar synchronization by waveform compliance and basal coupling. New Journal of Physics. 2017;19:113052. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa9031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Klos Dehring DA, Vladar EK, Werner ME, Mitchell JW, Hwang P, Mitchell BJ. Deuterosome-mediated centriole biogenesis. Developmental Cell. 2013;27:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2013.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Knight-Jones EW. Relations between metachronism and the direction of ciliary beat in metazoa. Journal of Cell Science. 1954;s3-95:503–521. doi: 10.1242/jcs.s3-95.32.503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Kulkarni S, Marquez J, Date P, Ventrella R, Mitchell BJ, Khokha MK. Mechanical stretch scales centriole number to apical area via Piezo1 in multiciliated cells. eLife. 2021;10:e66076. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lister JA, Robertson CP, Lepage T, Johnson SL, Raible DW. Nacre encodes a zebrafish microphthalmia-related protein that regulates neural-crest-derived pigment cell fate. Development. 1999;126:3757–3767. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.17.3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ma R, Klindt GS, Riedel-Kruse IH, Jülicher F, Friedrich BM. Active phase and amplitude fluctuations of flagellar beating. Physical Review Letters. 2014;113:048101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.048101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Machemer H. Ciliary activity and the origin of metachrony in Paramecium: effects of increased viscosity. The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1972;57:239–259. doi: 10.1242/jeb.57.1.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Meng F, Bennett RR, Uchida N, Golestanian R. Conditions for metachronal coordination in arrays of model cilia. PNAS. 2021;118:e2102828118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102828118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mitchell B, Stubbs JL, Huisman F, Taborek P, Yu C, Kintner C. The PCP pathway instructs the planar orientation of ciliated cells in the Xenopus larval skin. Current Biology. 2009;19:924–929. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.04.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nanjundappa R, Kong D, Shim K, Stearns T, Brody SL, Loncarek J, Mahjoub MR. Regulation of cilia abundance in multiciliated cells. eLife. 2019;8:e44039. doi: 10.7554/eLife.44039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nawroth JC, Guo H, Koch E, Heath-Heckman EAC, Hermanson JC, Ruby EG, Dabiri JO, Kanso E, McFall-Ngai M. Motile cilia create fluid-mechanical microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host microbiome. PNAS. 2017;114:9510–9516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706926114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nonaka S, Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Takeda S, Harada A, Kanai Y, Kido M, Hirokawa N. Randomization of left-right asymmetry due to loss of nodal cilia generating leftward flow of extraembryonic fluid in mice lacking KIF3B motor protein. Cell. 1998;95:829–837. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81705-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Olstad EW, Ringers C, Hansen JN, Wens A, Brandt C, Wachten D, Yaksi E, Jurisch-Yaksi N. Ciliary beating compartmentalizes cerebrospinal fluid flow in the brain and regulates ventricular development. Current Biology. 2019;29:229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Oltean A, Schaffer AJ, Bayly PV, Brody SL. Quantifying ciliary dynamics during assembly reveals stepwise waveform maturation in airway cells. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 2018;59:511–522. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2017-0436OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Osterman N, Vilfan A. Finding the ciliary beating pattern with optimal efficiency. PNAS. 2011;108:15727–15732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107889108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ovadyahu D, Priel Z. Characterization of metachronal wave in beating cilia: distribution of phases in space. Biorheology. 1989;26:677–685. doi: 10.3233/bir-1989-26401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pan YA, Freundlich T, Weissman TA, Schoppik D, Wang XC, Zimmerman S, Ciruna B, Sanes JR, Lichtman JW, Schier AF. Zebrabow: multispectral cell labeling for cell tracing and lineage analysis in zebrafish. Development. 2013;140:2835–2846. doi: 10.1242/dev.094631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pathak N, Austin-Tse CA, Liu Y, Vasilyev A, Drummond IA. Cytoplasmic carboxypeptidase 5 regulates tubulin glutamylation and zebrafish cilia formation and function. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2014;25:1836–1844. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pellicciotta N, Hamilton E, Kotar J, Faucourt M, Delgehyr N, Spassky N, Cicuta P. Entrainment of mammalian motile cilia in the brain with hydrodynamic forces. PNAS. 2020;117:8315–8325. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1910065117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pikovsky A, Kurths J, Rosenblum M, Kurths J. Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pintado P, Sampaio P, Tavares B, Montenegro-Johnson TD, Smith DJ, Lopes SS. Dynamics of cilia length in left-right development. Royal Society Open Science. 2017;4:161102. doi: 10.1098/rsos.161102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Polin M, Tuval I, Drescher K, Gollub JP, Goldstein RE. Chlamydomonas swims with two “ gears ” in a eukaryotic version of run-and-tumble locomotion. Science. 2009;325:487–490. doi: 10.1126/science.1172667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Quaranta G, Aubin-Tam M-E, Tam D. Hydrodynamics versus intracellular coupling in the synchronization of eukaryotic flagella. Physical Review Letters. 2015;115:238101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.238101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ramirez-San Juan GR, Mathijssen A, He M, Jan L, Marshall W, Prakash M. Multi-scale spatial heterogeneity enhances particle clearance in airway ciliary arrays. Nature Physics. 2020;16:958–964. doi: 10.1038/s41567-020-0923-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Redmond SA, Figueres-Oñate M, Obernier K, Nascimento MA, Parraguez JI, López-Mascaraque L, Fuentealba LC, Alvarez-Buylla A. Development of ependymal and postnatal neural stem cells and their origin from a common embryonic progenitor. Cell Reports. 2019;27:429–441. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Reiten I, Uslu FE, Fore S, Pelgrims R, Ringers C, Diaz Verdugo C, Hoffman M, Lal P, Kawakami K, Pekkan K, Yaksi E, Jurisch-Yaksi N. Motile-cilia-mediated flow improves sensitivity and temporal resolution of olfactory computations. Current Biology. 2017;27:166–174. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ringers C, Olstad EW, Jurisch-Yaksi N. The role of motile cilia in the development and physiology of the nervous system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2020;375:20190156. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sanderson MJ, Sleigh MA. Ciliary activity of cultured rabbit tracheal epithelium: beat pattern and metachrony. Journal of Cell Science. 1981;47:331–347. doi: 10.1242/jcs.47.1.331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sawamoto K, Wichterle H, Gonzalez-Perez O, Cholfin JA, Yamada M, Spassky N, Murcia NS, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Marin O, Rubenstein JLR, Tessier-Lavigne M, Okano H, Alvarez-Buylla A. New neurons follow the flow of cerebrospinal fluid in the adult brain. Science. 2006;311:629–632. doi: 10.1126/science.1119133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez J-Y, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Shi D, Komatsu K, Hirao M, Toyooka Y, Koyama H, Tissir F, Goffinet AM, Uemura T, Fujimori T. Celsr1 is required for the generation of polarity at multiple levels of the mouse oviduct. Development. 2014;141:4558–4568. doi: 10.1242/dev.115659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Soh AWJ, van Dam TJP, Stemm-Wolf AJ, Pham AT, Morgan GP, O’Toole ET, Pearson CG. Ciliary force-responsive striated fibers promote basal body connections and cortical interactions. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2020;219:e201904091. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201904091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Solovev A, Friedrich BM. Reconstruct3d_opt. Icemtel. 2021a https://github.com/icemtel/reconstruct3d_opt
  75. Solovev A, Friedrich BM. Stokes. Icemtel. 2021b https://github.com/icemtel/stokes
  76. Solovev A, Friedrich BM. Carpet. Icemtel. 2021c https://github.com/icemtel/carpet
  77. Solovev A, Friedrich BM. Synchronization in cilia carpets and the kuramoto model with local coupling: breakup of global synchronization in the presence of noise. Chaos. 2022a;32:013124. doi: 10.1063/5.0075095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Solovev A, Friedrich BM. Synchronization in cilia carpets: multiple metachronal waves are stable, but one wave dominates. New Journal of Physics. 2022b;24:013015. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac2ae4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sternberg JR, Prendergast AE, Brosse L, Cantaut-Belarif Y, Thouvenin O, Orts-Del’Immagine A, Castillo L, Djenoune L, Kurisu S, McDearmid JR, Bardet P-L, Boccara C, Okamoto H, Delmas P, Wyart C. Pkd2l1 is required for mechanoception in cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons and maintenance of spine curvature. Nature Communications. 2018;9:3804. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06225-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Stevenson I. Beeswarm. Github. 2019 https://github.com/ihstevenson/beeswarm
  81. Taylor GI. Analysis of the swimming of long and narrow animals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 1952;214:158–183. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1952.0159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Thouvenin O, Keiser L, Cantaut-Belarif Y, Carbo-Tano M, Verweij F, Jurisch-Yaksi N, Bardet P-L, van Niel G, Gallaire F, Wyart C. Origin and role of the cerebrospinal fluid bidirectional flow in the central canal. eLife. 2020;9:e47699. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Vladar EK, Bayly RD, Sangoram AM, Scott MP, Axelrod JD. Microtubules enable the planar cell polarity of airway cilia. Current Biology. 2012;22:2203–2212. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Vladimirov N, Mu Y, Kawashima T, Bennett DV, Yang C-T, Looger LL, Keller PJ, Freeman J, Ahrens MB. Light-sheet functional imaging in fictively behaving zebrafish. Nature Methods. 2014;11:883–884. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wallingford JB, Mitchell B. Strange as it may seem: the many links between Wnt signaling, planar cell polarity, and cilia: Figure 1. Genes & Development. 2011;25:201–213. doi: 10.1101/gad.2008011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Wallmeier J, Frank D, Shoemark A, Nöthe-Menchen T, Cindric S, Olbrich H, Loges NT, Aprea I, Dougherty GW, Pennekamp P, Kaiser T, Mitchison HM, Hogg C, Carr SB, Zariwala MA, Ferkol T, Leigh MW, Davis SD, Atkinson J, Dutcher SK, Knowles MR, Thiele H, Altmüller J, Krenz H, Wöste M, Brentrup A, Ahrens F, Vogelberg C, Morris-Rosendahl DJ, Omran H. De novo mutations in FOXJ1 result in a motile ciliopathy with hydrocephalus and randomization of left/right body asymmetry. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2019;105:1030–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.09.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wan KY, Goldstein RE. Coordinated beating of algal flagella is mediated by basal coupling. PNAS. 2016;113:E2784–E2793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518527113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wan KY, Hürlimann SK, Fenix AM, McGillivary RM, Makushok T, Burns E, Sheung JY, Marshall WF. Reorganization of complex ciliary flows around regenerating stentor coeruleus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 2020;375:20190167. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Wollin C, Stark H. Metachronal waves in a chain of rowers with hydrodynamic interactions. The European Physical Journal E. 2011;34:1–10. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2011-11042-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Worthington WC, Cathcart RS. Ciliary currents on ependymal surfaces. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1966;130:944–950. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb12638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Editor's evaluation

Raymond E Goldstein 1

This fundamental study reports new observations on the coordination of cilia in zebrafish multiciliated epithelia. The work combines novel experimental methods and computation to provide convincing evidence for a conjectured relationship between local and global synchronization in the form of metachronal waves. The work will be of broad interest to researchers in the areas of cell biology, development, and physiology.

Decision letter

Editor: Raymond E Goldstein1

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Local synchronization of cilia and tissue-scale cilia alignment are sufficient for global metachronal waves" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 2 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Aleksandra Walczak as the Senior Editor. The reviewers have opted to remain anonymous.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

1) We take issue with the strong message conveyed by the title – If anything, the study showed that local synchronization of cilia etc is necessary for global metachronal waves – the manuscript does not answer the question of how the waves emerge – there may well be additional mechanisms at play that are not accounted for (indeed the difference between left/right noses strongly hints at some additional mechanisms), so this study merely shows necessity rather than sufficiency. We suggest focusing the title on the system. Whilst the statement in the title ("sufficient") is true, the fact that biological systems might in general behave like this is unknown… conclusions could depend quite strongly on the liquid medium (e.g. mucus or watery), on the 3d geometry which could lead to different sorts of flow recirculation, on the details of cilia arrangements which might be species dependent, etc.

2) The title and the abstract heavily assume that readers know what a metachronal wave is… we doubt that all readers will understand the somewhat subtle difference between the direction and coherence in the wave of coordination and the direction of fluid transport. Maybe the abstract should try to be more introductory in this sense.

3) Page 3, "results". how big is the nose "cup"? We found ourselves worrying about patterns of fluid recirculation. The scales in the maps are not immediately obvious to a reader who is not an expert on this organism. Could a diagram, illustrating this "cup" together with cells and flows be made early in the manuscript? Are there any possible consequences of the tissue not being flat, and perhaps specifically cup shaped?

4) Page 3, "results": numbers are provided with too many significant figures. There's no point giving an error with 3 s.f.

5) Data analysis: In looking at Figure 2G we wonder is this special of pixel 1? How does it look like from other reference points? Can authors make perhaps 16 of these, with equally spaced 4 by 4 reference points?

6) Data analysis: Figure 2I: does panel I change at all if authors consider CBF regions with the highest (and lowest) frequencies, i.e. only work with subregions from C?

7) Caption Figure 2 when discussing sync or no sync in D, say gray-red and gray-blue (you need 2 to sync). How far are these pairs of pixels? illustrate on panel B or C all three positions. In the caption of G', clarify that these are the 3 colors from G.

8) Page 6 line 23, give range of viscosities achieved, even if rough values. (We see them in SM but should be here).

9) Page 9. The differences in the left and right nose are really curious. How symmetric are the left and right nose in terms of the various maps (CBF, coherence, etc)? I don't get a clear sense of this from Figure 5… can something more be presented?

10) Our biggest wish would be to see flow data, on the same experiments… could this be done? Flow visualization is quite easy, especially if tracers can be added e.g. by particle tracking or PIV? As it is, the connection to flow is made, but only by mapping to the simulation model, which has various differences (β, density, fixed waveform, etc). What exactly is the function of motile cilia in the nose? Is flow rate the critical factor, or flow directionality? More discussion would help.

11) The model shows there is some tolerance to phase noise – how does this noise compare with data? Can the model help explain why wave direction seems to be more stable than wavelength?

12) The theory predicts that the flow direction is essentially independent of the direction and wavelength of the waves… so why the distinction between the left/right nose? What is the physiological purpose of the two different wave directions?

Can the authors provide more (i) biological explanations for why this might happen (is there directional transport of some chemical morphogen?), (ii) physical explanations for how an array with identical ciliary orientation can exhibit different wave directions?

13) Have the authors checked carefully if there are any other differences between left and right noses, e.g. in terms of beat frequency, distribution/density of cilia, 3D beat pattern, cilia length etc? Is manual tracking of cilia shape possible say from light-sheet recordings (figure S3 showed this was at least possible in some cases)?

14) The viscosity experiments – when viscosity is increased, the improvement in local coherence is not surprising. The increase is coherence was only slight and restricted mainly to ~20um. The results also didn't pick up any changes in the direction or wavelength of the metachronal waves – so what should be the main take-home message from these experiments?

15) There is some subtlety in the spatial phase mapping technique, e.g. in the segmentation of space into equal-frequency patches, in the treatment of time signals etc – if this technique can be applied successfully to a different system, a more careful discussion of these details and the level of systematic vs real biological noise in the system would be helpful. E.g. What's the optimal choice of patch size? What are the criteria for extracting phases – what is the tolerance in frequency variation across regions? Are 30s recordings ideal for this method?

eLife. 2023 Jan 26;12:e77701. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77701.sa2

Author response


Essential revisions:

1) We take issue with the strong message conveyed by the title – If anything, the study showed that local synchronization of cilia etc is necessary for global metachronal waves – the manuscript does not answer the question of how the waves emerge – there may well be additional mechanisms at play that are not accounted for (indeed the difference between left/right noses strongly hints at some additional mechanisms), so this study merely shows necessity rather than sufficiency. We suggest focusing the title on the system. Whilst the statement in the title ("sufficient") is true, the fact that biological systems might in general behave like this is unknown… conclusions could depend quite strongly on the liquid medium (e.g. mucus or watery), on the 3d geometry which could lead to different sorts of flow recirculation, on the details of cilia arrangements which might be species dependent, etc.

We agree that we do not answer the question of how the metachronal waves emerge, a question, which in fact is open for several decades now and which is rather difficult to address experimentally. Nevertheless, we hope that our experiments could spur new hypotheses on the emergence of metachronal waves. To facilitate further discovery, we have made some of the experimental data and our codes available on Mendeley and Github.

We also agree that additional mechanisms and/or the 3D geometry of the epithelia tissue may affect metachronal coordination.

Following the suggestions of the reviewers, we have changed to title to (i) reflect that is merely a necessity for metachronal waves (while sufficiency is somewhat open), and (ii) state our model system; the new title reads:

“Novel analytical tools reveal that local synchronization of cilia coincides with tissue-scale metachronal waves in zebrafish multiciliated epithelia”

2) The title and the abstract heavily assume that readers know what a metachronal wave is… we doubt that all readers will understand the somewhat subtle difference between the direction and coherence in the wave of coordination and the direction of fluid transport. Maybe the abstract should try to be more introductory in this sense.

We thank the reviewers for raising this important point. We revised the abstract to make it more accessible to the broad readership of eLife. We also have rephrased the introduction of metachronal waves in the introduction and results part, using a simpler language. Below is the newly edited abstract.

“Motile cilia are hair-like cell extensions that beat periodically to generate fluid flow along various epithelial tissues within the body. In dense multiciliated carpets, cilia were shown to exhibit a remarkable coordination of their beat in the form of traveling metachronal waves, a phenomenon which supposedly enhances fluid transport. Yet, how cilia coordinate their regular beat in multiciliated epithelia to move fluids remains insufficiently understood, particularly due to lack of rigorous quantification. We combine experiments, novel analysis tools, and theory to address this knowledge gap. To investigate collective dynamics of cilia, we studied zebrafish multiciliated epithelia in the nose and the brain. We focused mainly on the zebrafish nose, due to its conserved properties with other ciliated tissues and its superior accessibility for non-invasive imaging. We revealed that cilia are synchronized only locally and that the size of local synchronization domains increases with the viscosity of the surrounding medium. Even though synchronization is local only, we observed global patterns of traveling metachronal waves across the zebrafish multiciliated epithelium. Intriguingly, these global wave direction patterns are conserved across individual fish, but different for left and right nose, unveiling a chiral asymmetry of metachronal coordination. To understand the implications of synchronization for fluid pumping, we used a computational model of a regular array of cilia. We found that local metachronal synchronization prevents steric collisions, cilia colliding with each other, and improves fluid pumping in dense cilia carpets, but hardly affects the direction of fluid flow. In conclusion, we show that local synchronization together with tissue- scale cilia alignment coincide and generate metachronal wave patterns in multiciliated epithelia, which enhance their physiological function of fluid pumping.”

3) Page 3, "results". how big is the nose "cup"? We found ourselves worrying about patterns of fluid recirculation. The scales in the maps are not immediately obvious to a reader who is not an expert on this organism. Could a diagram, illustrating this "cup" together with cells and flows be made early in the manuscript? Are there any possible consequences of the tissue not being flat, and perhaps specifically cup shaped?

Again, we thank the reviewers for raising our awareness for this point. We have now addressed the comments by revising the figures as described below.

In Figure 1, we now include a 3D rendering of the zebrafish snout (former Figure S1A) and a zoom-in of the nasal cavity together with scale-bars. These data were obtained from a live animal expressing a fluorescent indicator in all cells; hence the structure is not altered by fixation.

We have also included a scheme where we drew the location of motile ciliated cells and the fluid flow direction on the 3D rendering of the zebrafish head in Figure 1-supplemental 1 panel A.

As shown in Figure 1A (and mentioned by the reviewers), the nasal cavity is cup-shaped and not flat. Based on the prior literature, such as (Bouderlique et al., 2022; Ferreira et al., 2018; Nawroth et al., 2017), we expect that the 3D geometry has only a small impact on short-range hydrodynamic interactions and local synchronization but can impact the direction of cilia-generated flows. Besides, we focused most of our analysis on the dorsolateral part of the pit because cells are more homogeneously polarized in the dorsolateral part of the pit as compared to the ventromedial part (Figure 5) and the tissue is flatter in the dorsolateral part. Nevertheless, we added the following sentence to the Discussion section to discuss possible impacts of a non-flat geometry: “This difference in wave directions is not a mere consequence of different patterns of cilia alignment, but instead points at an important role of the chirality of the cilia beat and 3D architecture of the underlying tissue”

4) Page 3, "results": numbers are provided with too many significant figures. There's no point giving an error with 3 s.f.

We have now edited the numbers as suggested by the reviewers.

5) Data analysis: In looking at Figure 2G we wonder is this special of pixel 1? How does it look like from other reference points? Can authors make perhaps 16 of these, with equally spaced 4 by 4 reference points?

We thank the reviewer for bringing this point up. We have now included a Supplementary Figure (Figure2- Supplement 3), where we systematically look at 16 reference pixels. The 16 pixels were identified from a 4x4 grid without manual selection and represent well the diversity in coherence score that we observed. Also, as expected, pixels in the non-signal region (no beating cilia present), do not synchronize with other pixels in the nose (these reference pixels are represented by circles instead of crosses).

6) Data analysis: Figure 2I: does panel I change at all if authors consider CBF regions with the highest (and lowest) frequencies, i.e. only work with subregions from C?

Following the suggestion by the reviewer, we tested how the coherence-versus-distance distribution (Figure 2I) changes when selecting CBF regions according to their frequency (analogous to the example shown in Figure 2BC). Specifically, we selected either

– The bottom 33.3% of pixels (red) – low frequencies

– The top 33.3% of pixels (green) – high frequencies

(Note that selecting CBF regions with either the highest or lowest CBF results in only a small number of data points.)

We have not seen any obvious difference for this example case (see Author response image 1). This observation is consistent with our finding that frequency is largely variable across individuals, but the mean coherence and fraction of synchronized pixel remain similar across individuals. Hence, we conclude that frequencies do not directly correlate with synchronization strength.

Author response image 1. Coherence-versus-distance distributions for high and low frequencies.

Author response image 1.

(A) Histogram representing the CBF for all pixels and their segmentation into high and low CBF. In red are indicated the bottom 33% CBF values and in green the top 33% CBF values. (B) Map showing the location of the high and low CBF. (C) The coherence versus distance measure is not majorly affected when analyzing only the top 33% or bottom 33% CBF values.

7) Caption Figure 2 when discussing sync or no sync in D, say gray-red and gray-blue (you need 2 to sync). How far are these pairs of pixels? illustrate on panel B or C all three positions. In the caption of G', clarify that these are the 3 colors from G.

We have now included the location of the pixels of panel D on the map of the ciliated epithelium in panel 2B. The reference pixel is indicated in black, the synchronized example is indicated in red and the non-synchronized example is indicated in blue.

We have also clarified in the figure caption that the colors used in panel G’ correspond to those used in panel G.

8) Page 6 line 23, give range of viscosities achieved, even if rough values. (We see them in SM but should be here).

We have now included this information also in the main text as suggested by the reviewers.

9) Page 9. The differences in the left and right nose are really curious. How symmetric are the left and right nose in terms of the various maps (CBF, coherence, etc)? I don't get a clear sense of this from Figure 5… can something more be presented?

We agree with the reviewers that the differences between the left and right nose are really curious. We have now performed extensive comparison between left and right noses on all quantifiable measures from our experiments. We have not observed any significant differences for median CBF, nose size, nasal cavity size, number of multiciliated cells (MCC) and the directionality of the flow. These data are now included in Figure5 – supplement 3.

We would like to also highlight that there is a large diversity across individual animals (see figure 2 supplement 1 panel A) and our biggest challenge is that we cannot image from both noses of the same fish due to the positioning of the animal. So all data are obtained from a left or a right nose of a different animal, and hence also include the inter-individual differences, which may mask subtle differences between left and right nose.

10) Our biggest wish would be to see flow data, on the same experiments… could this be done? Flow visualization is quite easy, especially if tracers can be added e.g. by particle tracking or PIV? As it is, the connection to flow is made, but only by mapping to the simulation model, which has various differences (β, density, fixed waveform, etc). What exactly is the function of motile cilia in the nose? Is flow rate the critical factor, or flow directionality? More discussion would help.

As prompted by the reviewers, we have now performed CBF and flow measurement sequentially on the same animals. These new data are included in Figure 5F-H and Figure 5 – supplement 4. This new data confirmed the difference in wave direction between the left and the right noses, while net flow directions are approximately mirror symmetric. We observed a consistent wave direction for left noses and a larger variance for the right noses while performing these additional experiments (n=9 right and 10 left). We have now added this new set of data in Figure 5 F-H (green colors for wave directions), updated the quantifications and provided all examples in Figure 5 – supplement 1.

For flow measurement following the CBF measurements, we applied fluorescent beads and measured their movements over a period of 1 minute. We recovered the flow field upon projection of the time series and quantified the direction of the fluid flow at the exit of the nasal cavity, as shown in Figure 5 – supplement 4.

We would like to emphasize that the flow pattern is rather complex due to the 3D geometry of the nose pit and the complex cilia polarity. Hence, we are not able to measure the fluid flow generated solely by the region showing different wave direction, but only the entire output of the ciliated epithelium.

We did not observe any significant difference in the fluid flow direction between the left and right nose as indicated in Figure 5F-G. This provides evidence that the net flow generated by the ciliated epithelium remains identical irrespective of the different wave directions in the left and right nose, which is consistent with the predictions of our computational model.

We had previously published an article on the biological function of cilia-generated fluid flow for olfaction in the zebrafish larvae (Reiten et al., 2017). In this previous work, we showed that flow patterns are important to draw fluid containing odor molecules to the nasal cavity and to expel it afterwards, which improves the temporal resolution of odor detection. So far, we only analyzed the impact of a complete loss of cilia motility, and thus flow, on olfaction, but not yet of only a gradual reduction of flow speed. Notwithstanding, based on our prior work and the literature, we expect that both flow speed and flow direction are important for drawing and expelling odors to the epithelium in an efficient manner.

11) The model shows there is some tolerance to phase noise – how does this noise compare with data?

A direct comparison of phase noise of cilia dynamics in the zebrafish noise and in the computational model is difficult for three reasons, indicated below:

1. Our phase reconstruction algorithm estimates a phase for each pixel, but not for individual cilia (each motile cilium will contribute to several pixels, likewise the intensity of a pixel may comprise contributions from several pixels).

2. Apparent fluctuations in reconstructed phase maps comprise both genuine biological noise of cilia dynamics and measurement noise, which are difficult to separate.

3. The cilia spacing in the zebrafish noise and the computational model are different.

Nonetheless, we can resort to a visual comparison to convery the biological importance of the noise strengths used in the computational model.

For this, we ploted synthetic phase maps perturbed by noise of various strength. Specifically, we assume a phase map of the form

ϕ(x) = k·x + ξ(x),

where k = 2π e / λ is a wavevector pointing along the direction of the unit vector e (enclosing an angle of 10⁰ with the ex-axis), λ = 4µm is a typical wavelength, and ξ (x) is a phase noise term.

Based on previous theoretical work on a model cilia carpet of hydrodynamically coupled cilia exhibiting active phase noise, we chose the phase noise term such that its Fourier transform modes are stochastically independent and normally distributed with variance that scales inversely with the squared norm of the Fourier mode vector

m~|m~=2D δm,m 1|m|2

We refer the interested reader to the Supplemental Material of Solovev et al. for additional information and a derivation (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a). We can choose the noise parameter Dϕ such that two phase values at a distance d=18µm have a prescribed standard deviation σ.

We have now included visualizations of various noise strength σ of metachronal waves in Figure 6- supplement 1. These data show wave patterns as phase maps perturbed by noise as well as histograms of wave direction computed by using the same image gradient analysis as used for the analysis of experimental data. Even though a direct comparison of phase noise of cilia dynamics in the zebrafish noise and in the computational model is difficult, these results indicate that phase noise does not perturb our analysis of wave direction.

Can the model help explain why wave direction seems to be more stable than wavelength?

Our computational model focuses on fluid pumping. Hence, we would have to resort to more detailed computational models that address synchronization by hydrodynamic interactions to address this question. The video still in Author response image 2 is taken from the Supplemental Material of (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b) and shows a snapshot of metachronal coordination in a model cilia carpet with active noise, where each colored dot represents cilia phase of a model cilium at the respective position. Wave fronts of metachronal waves are clearly visible, corresponding to a well-defined direction of metachronal waves, whereas relative phase differences between neighboring cilia vary more. We assume that fluctuations in metachronal wave direction would result in hydrodynamic interactions favoring incompatible phase differences between neighboring cilia (and possibly steric collisions in dense carpets). This will in turn attenuate as compared to variations in wavelength, which will arise already from small variations in the relative phase difference between neighboring cilia.

Author response image 2.

Author response image 2.

This qualitative argument thus suggests that wave direction should be more stable than wavelength. Future theoretical work should investigate this interesting point more thoroughly.

12) The theory predicts that the flow direction is essentially independent of the direction and wavelength of the waves… so why the distinction between the left/right nose? What is the physiological purpose of the two different wave directions?

Can the authors provide more (i) biological explanations for why this might happen (is there directional transport of some chemical morphogen?), (ii) physical explanations for how an array with identical ciliary orientation can exhibit different wave directions?

Computational studies suggest that the direction of metachronal waves direction depends crucially on the shape of the cilia beat pattern (Kanale, Ling, Guo, Fürthauer, and Kanso, 2022; Meng, Bennett, Uchida, and Golestanian, 2021). In fact, our own work and that of others showed that three-dimensional, chiral beat patterns of cilia give rise to anisotropic hydrodynamic interactions between neighboring cilia, which select the direction of emergent metachronal waves (Solovev and Friedrich, 2022a). We speculate that subtle differences in the cilia beat pattern between left and right nose could be the cause for the observed differences in metachronal wave direction. We assume that changes in wave direction would result in frustrated hydrodynamic interactions between neighboring cilia (and possibly steric collisions in dense cilia carpets) and are thus less pronounced that variations of wavelength, which result already from small changes in the relative phase difference between neighboring cilia.

Based on the literature, including our own work, we showed that metachronal wave direction depends on the shape of the beat pattern (Meng et al., 2021; Solovev and Friedrich, 2022b).

Given that we have not observed any differences between the left and the right nose for the anatomy, CBF and overall flow direction, but only for the metachronal wave direction, it is possible that this difference may reflect an epiphenomenon with no direct biological function.

13) Have the authors checked carefully if there are any other differences between left and right noses, e.g. in terms of beat frequency, distribution/density of cilia, 3D beat pattern, cilia length etc? Is manual tracking of cilia shape possible say from light-sheet recordings (figure S3 showed this was at least possible in some cases)?

As mentioned above in point 9, we have not observed any statistically significant difference between cells in the left and in the right noses. It would be wonderful to compare cilia beat waveform from various cells taken from the right and the left nose. Tracing methods are currently not suitable for making a conclusive statement as small differences in cilia waveform will be missed. Moreover, individual cells show high level of diversity, which may further mask differences between left and right nose.

High-precision tracking of cilia waveform is well established only for single cilia and planar beat patterns (Geyer, Howard, and Sartori, 2022), but remains a challenge for three-dimensional beat patterns and cilia in dense cilia carpets.

We trust that future technological advances will allow high-precision tracking also for individual cilia on multiciliated cells, thus allowing to address these questions in the future.

14) The viscosity experiments – when viscosity is increased, the improvement in local coherence is not surprising. The increase is coherence was only slight and restricted mainly to ~20um. The results also didn't pick up any changes in the direction or wavelength of the metachronal waves – so what should be the main take-home message from these experiments?

We thank the reviewers for this comment.

We manipulated and quantified ciliary synchronization of an in vivo ciliary carpet to experimentally address the impact of viscosity on synchronization. However, we find that changing viscosity does not matter much. The limited increase in synchronization is consistent with predictions from simple theories of hydrodynamically coupled cilia. (The physical reason behind is that a change in fluid viscosity re-scales hydrodynamic forces but does not change the relative magnitude of hydrodynamic interactions.)

Any effect of viscosity on cilia synchronization should be indirect due to a slight change in cilia beat pattern by the changed viscosity (Brokaw, 1966). Unfortunately, we could not observe these changes directly due to the difficulty of measuring waveforms of individual cilia on multiciliated cells.

Notably, there are important differences between a ciliated epithelium in zebrafish exposed to high- viscosity fluid, and ciliated epithelium in mammalian airways transporting mucus. Still, our result in the viscosity experiments adds support to the generalizability of our model system.

15) There is some subtlety in the spatial phase mapping technique, e.g. in the segmentation of space into equal-frequency patches, in the treatment of time signals etc – if this technique can be applied successfully to a different system, a more careful discussion of these details and the level of systematic vs real biological noise in the system would be helpful. E.g. What's the optimal choice of patch size? What are the criteria for extracting phases – what is the tolerance in frequency variation across regions? Are 30s recordings ideal for this method?

We thank the reviewer for acknowledging the complexity of our spatial phase mapping approach.

While we indeed optimized the parameters of our algorithm for our data, we emphasize that our algorithm is reasonably robust and, based on our experiences, would also give satisfactory results if these parameters were changed. See below for further details.

To highlight the robustness of our methods, we have run our spatial phase map analysis also on another multiciliated tissue, i.e., the ependymal layer of the tela choroida in the zebrafish brain. Results for the tela choroida are now included in Figure 2 – supplement 4 for the coherence data and Figure 4 – supplement 2 for the metachronal wave directions. These results are discussed further below in the point 15.3.

Below we provide a detailed explanation of the choice of algorithm parameters.We invite the reviewers and future users to interactively explore our code, which is available on GitHub (https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination) and which automatically generates plots from our deposited data ( https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006). We have included all information below in a README file on github. We deposited all our codes and data on public repositories upon acceptance of our manuscript (URL https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006).

1. How are frequency maps segmented in space into equal-frequency patches?

We realized early on that the power spectrum has a higher frequency resolution than necessary (0.1Hz) and that small variations in frequency could represent noise rather than cilia beating at different frequencies. Hence, we decided to bin the power spectrum (using a bin width of 0.54Hz).

The precise choice of bin widths had only a small impact on the CBF segmentation (note that the spatial distribution of CBF remain similar). For bin widths grossly outside of this range, too few or too many CBF values result (see Author response image 3 for a visual example).

Author response image 3. Impact of the binning of the power spectrum on CBF values shown on CBF heatmaps (top) and histograms (bottom).

Author response image 3.

We used a binning of 0.54Hz for all our analysis due to their minimal impact and good coverage of CBF values.

Based on our experiments with the multiciliated epithelium in the nose and brain of the zebrafish we would recommend using a frequency binning of circa 0.5Hz

2. How are time signals treated?

Time signals were not altered by our analysis. Binning was performed in the frequency domain.

The only threshold applied in our analysis was for the CBF analysis. CBF were identified between 15Hz and half of the frequency of acquisition (Fs = 100Hz; Nyquist (1/2Fs) = 50Hz), based on the Nyquist formula. We used 15Hz as a threshold for the CBF based on the analysis of n=130 fish nasal epithelia (Reiten et al., 2017; shown in Author response image 4), which identified 15Hz as the lowest frequency in the nasal multiciliated epithelium.

Author response image 4. Histogram showing the average CBF of multiciliated cells in the nose of the zebrafish larvae (n=130 animals).

Author response image 4.

From Reiten et al., 2017.

This value needs to be adapted by future users to the tissue of interest based on their CBF. For instance, a cut-off of 10Hz was used for the ependymal cells of the zebrafish brain based on our earlier work (D'Gama et al., 2021).

We recognize that by imaging with a frame rate of approximately 100Hz, we miss out on higher frequencies. That is a technical limitation of the setup, which allowed us to image the entire nose rather than few cells with higher frequencies of acquisition. Nevertheless, selected control experiments with higher frequency of acquisition and smaller field of view (data not shown), revealed similar findings.

3. How do the subtleties compare in a different system?

We have now performed additional experiments on a different multiciliated tissue, i.e., the ependymal cells of the adult zebrafish brain (shown now in Figure 4-supplement 2). We have previously shown that the ependymal tissue is more sparsely populated by ciliated cells as compared to the nasal epithelium (D'Gama et al., 2021; Jeong, Hansen, Wachten, and Jurisch-Yaksi, 2022). Moreover, ciliated cells have different properties with regard to their CBF, apical size and numbers of cilia. Hence, we needed to optimize parameters for this particular tissue and we recommend experimenters to adapt these values for each ciliated system. Similarly, these parameters should be adapted to each acquisition system, and reflect the spatial resolution of the recordings. As a note, the experiments on the zebrafish brain and the new set of experiments on the zebrafish nose including fluid flow measurements were performed on a different microscope with a different camera. Since the results are highly comparable, we argue that our analysis tools are robust and can easily be adapted across recording setups and ciliated tissues.

4. What is the optimal choice of patch-size?

For quantification of wave direction and wavelength, we opt for frequency patches that are as large as possible but display sufficiently homogeneous CBF.

To this end, we choose the patch-size by:

1. Binning the frequencies (as described above)

2. Setting a minimum patch size of 400 pixels, which corresponds to circa 9µm2, roughly corresponding to the area swept over by one cilium. We have also used higher minimum patch size, eg 800pixel but as shown in Author response image 5, this was too stringent.

Author response image 5. Segmentations into frequency patches with or without binning and with a minimum patch size of 400 or 800 pixels.

Author response image 5.

Note that a binning of 0.54Hz and minimum size of 400 pixels (9 µm2) provides the best segmentation of the ciliated epithelium with a reasonable number of patches.

5. What are the criteria for extracting phases? – What is the tolerance in frequency variation across regions?

Phases were extracted from the Fourier transform of the intensity time series of each pixel evaluated at the binned frequency of the segmented patch of that pixel. Using the same evaluation frequency for each pixel in a frequency patch is important to ensure that extracted phases are comparable across the patch. We tested this algorithm extensively on synthetic data of simulated coupled/uncoupled noisy phase oscillators and confirmed that we can robustly estimate their phase from time-series of finite length.

We note a trade-off between precision and accuracy: using longer time series will increase the precision of phase estimation at the expense of reduced temporal resolution and accuracy.

We additionally tested an alternative algorithm to extract cilia phase based on the Hilbert transform of intensity time series which gave results that were consistent with the Fourier-based algorithm (but were not chosen for the present manuscript as results from this alternative algorithm were slightly noisier and less easy to interpret).

6. Are 30s recordings ideal for this method?

For consistent results, the same duration of time series should be used for extracting phases and calculating coherence scores.

The choice of optimal time duration of time series for the analyses represents a trade-off between increasing precision (longer duration of time series) versus accuracy (shorter time series). As a rule of thumb, time series should comprise a sufficient number of oscillation cycles (~500 in our case). For very long time series, additional post-processing steps can become necessary to reduce drift.

As shown in Author response image 6, using a time duration of 10-20s instead of 30s gave consistent results for the coherence score but background values were higher. Conversely, using a longer time duration of up to 240s did not improve the results for the coherence score. As longer recording time require a perfectly stable recording with zero drift which is very difficult to achieve, we recommend the users to select a time window of 30 sec for the coherence score to minimize background and impact of potential drift.

Author response image 6. Coherence analysis for 3 reference pixels for different recording lengths (10-240s).

Author response image 6.

Note that increasing recording length reduces the background values, but do not changes the overall coherence patterns. We recommend a duration of 30s to increase signal-to-noise ratio of the coherence score.

References

Bouderlique, T., Petersen, J., Faure, L., Abed-Navandi, D., Bouchnita, A., Mueller, B.,... Adameyko, I. (2022). Surface flow for colonial integration in reef-building corals. Curr Biol, 32(12), 2596- 2609.e2597. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.054

Brokaw, C. J. (1966). Effects of increased viscosity on the movements of some invertebrate spermatozoa. J Exp Biol, 45(1), 113-139. doi:10.1242/jeb.45.1.113

D'Gama, P. P., Qiu, T., Cosacak, M. I., Rayamajhi, D., Konac, A., Hansen, J. N.,... Jurisch-Yaksi, N. (2021). Diversity and function of motile ciliated cell types within ependymal lineages of the zebrafish brain. Cell Rep, 37(1), 109775. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109775

Ferreira, R. R., Pakula, G., Klaeyle, L., Fukui, H., Vilfan, A., Supatto, W., and Vermot, J. (2018). Chiral Cilia Orientation in the Left-Right Organizer. Cell Rep, 25(8), 2008-2016.e2004. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.069

Jeong, I., Hansen, J. N., Wachten, D., and Jurisch-Yaksi, N. (2022). Measurement of ciliary beating and fluid flow in the zebrafish adult telencephalon. STAR Protoc, 3(3), 101542. doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101542

Kanale, A. V., Ling, F., Guo, H., Fürthauer, S., and Kanso, E. (2022). Spontaneous phase coordination and fluid pumping in model ciliary carpets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(45), e2214413119. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.2214413119

Meng, F., Bennett, R. R., Uchida, N., and Golestanian, R. (2021). Conditions for metachronal coordination in arrays of model cilia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(32), e2102828118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2102828118

Nawroth, J. C., Guo, H., Koch, E., Heath-Heckman, E. A. C., Hermanson, J. C., Ruby, E. G.,... McFall-Ngai, M. (2017). Motile cilia create fluid-mechanical microhabitats for the active recruitment of the host microbiome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), 9510-9516. doi:10.1073/pnas.1706926114

Reiten, I., Uslu, F. E., Fore, S., Pelgrims, R., Ringers, C., Diaz Verdugo, C.,... Jurisch-Yaksi, N. (2017).Motile-Cilia-Mediated Flow Improves Sensitivity and Temporal Resolution of Olfactory Computations. Current Biology, 27(2), 166-174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.036

Solovev, A., and Friedrich, B. M. (2022a). Synchronization in cilia carpets and the Kuramoto model with local coupling: Breakup of global synchronization in the presence of noise. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 32(1), 013124. doi:10.1063/5.0075095

Solovev, A., and Friedrich, B. M. (2022b). Synchronization in cilia carpets: multiple metachronal waves are stable, but one wave dominates. New Journal of Physics, 24(1), 013015. doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/ac2ae4

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Jurisch-Yaksi N. 2023. Analytical tools to measure cilia synchronization by Ringers et al. NIRD Research Data Archive. [DOI]
    2. Jurisch-Yaksi N. 2023. Analytical tools to measure cilia synchronization by Ringers et al. NIRD Research Data Archive. [DOI]

    Supplementary Materials

    Transparent reporting form

    Data Availability Statement

    All codes and a large set of experimental data is published at the following URL https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006. Matlab codes for analysis is available on github https://github.com/Jurisch-Yaksi-lab/CiliaCoordination (and archived at https://doi.org/10.11582/2023.00006) Python packages are available on github to (i) reconstruct 3D curves from orthogonal 2D projections: https://github.com/icemtel/reconstruct3d_opt, (ii) create triangulated surface meshes and solve hydrodynamic Stokes equation: https://github.com/icemtel/stokes, and (iii) study systems of coupled oscillators https://github.com/icemtel/carpet.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Jurisch-Yaksi N. 2023. Analytical tools to measure cilia synchronization by Ringers et al. NIRD Research Data Archive.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES