Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Soil Ecol. 2023 Jan 31;186:104813. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104813

Progressive belowground soil development associated with sustainable plant establishment during copper mine waste revegetation

Lia Q R Ossanna a, Karen Serrano a, Lydia L Jennings a, Jesse Dillon b, Raina M Maier a, Julia W Neilson a,*
PMCID: PMC9956965  NIHMSID: NIHMS1870527  PMID: 36844191

Abstract

Critical to the environmental sustainability of hard rock mining is the reclamation of disturbed lands following mine closure through revegetation. Improved understanding of associations between above- and belowground processes that characterize successful plant establishment is critical to the implementation of more efficient revegetation strategies for nutrient-poor mine waste materials. The specific objective of this five-year temporal study was to identify progressive biotic and abiotic indicators of primary soil development on mine waste rock (WR) on a slope hydroseeded with native plant species and to quantify comparative effects of plant lifeform on soil development. Aboveground plant diversity and belowground substrate properties were measured annually at 67 m intervals along transects following the slope contour. Seeded WR was compared to unseeded WR and the adjacent native ecosystem. A temporal increase in WR microbial biomass was observed in seeded WR relative to unseeded areas. Microbial community analysis found the unseeded WR to be defined by oligotrophic microbes, whereas targeted grass and shrub root zones samples demonstrated significant increases in specific cellulose and lignin degrading and N-cycling phylotypes. More extensive chemical and biological fertility development was observed in shrub root zones relative to grass. Ten chemical and biological indicators increased significantly in shrub WR relative to unseeded WR, whereas grass WR was only enriched in bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number/g substrate and bacterial/archaeal and fungal diversity. In addition, the shrub root zone had significantly higher nitrogen-cycling potential than grass root zones or unseeded WR. Thus, both grasses and shrubs improve belowground WR development; however, shrub establishment had greater fertility outcomes. Concurrent belowground fertility development is critical to sustainable plant establishment. Coupled evaluation of above- and belowground metrics provides an improved quantitative assessment of revegetation progress and a valuable tool to guide management decisions.

Keywords: mine reclamation, ecosystem regeneration, semiarid, microbial soil development, soil health/quality

1.0. Introduction

Metals sourced from hard rock mining, such as copper, are critical for building infrastructure and advancing technology. Indeed, copper consumption in the United States alone is projected to increase 17% by 2070 (He and Small, 2022). Although crucial to our society, hard rock mining radically disturbs natural ecosystems and degrades thousands of hectares of land following mineral extraction and waste material storage (Borden, 2011). Environmentally sustainable mining practices advocate for revegetation of the vast waste disposal areas following mine closure. Revegetating waste piles is a valuable and widely accepted strategy to reintegrate mine sites into the surrounding environment (Sheoran et al., 2010; Tordoff et al., 2000). Establishment of native plants reduces sediment erosion from wind and water; controls dust emissions; stabilizes waste dumps; and transforms disturbed land to productive ecosystems (Gil-Loaiza et al., 2016; Sheoran et al., 2010; Tordoff et al., 2000). However, in arid and semiarid regions, revegetation outcomes following hard rock mining can be unpredictable. Improved understanding of coupled above- and belowground quantitative indicators associated with sustainable plant establishment on semiarid degraded lands is critical to guide management practices that enhance revegetation success.

Waste rock (WR), a vast component of mineral mine waste, is generated from blasted rock that is discarded in large piles (dumps) due to mineral concentrations too low for economic extraction (Borden, 2011; Orman et al., 2011). WR dumps typically lack heavy metals and acid-generating contaminants. WR revegetation is distinctly challenging due to the coarse particle size and low organic matter levels of the materials which limit moisture-holding capacity and reduce nutrient storage (Bradshaw, 1997). In addition, WR lacks a developed microbiome to facilitate the nutrient cycling that is essential to the development of a healthy ecosystem (Borden and Black, 2005). As such, WR revegetation provides an excellent opportunity to characterize primary stages of soil development that are associated with successful plant establishment.

Common methods for revegetating WR dumps include application of a cover-soil cap or directly seeding the waste material (Gil-Loaiza et al., 2016; Tordoff et al., 2000). The cover-soil cap enhances revegetation efforts because soil has greater fertility than WR (Kneller et al., 2018; Muñoz-Rojas et al., 2016); however, this technology is more expensive and environmentally destructive than direct seeding because the soil must be sourced from elsewhere (Gil-Loaiza et al., 2016; Honeker et al., 2017) or stockpiled during mine development. Additionally, the fine particles of cover soils (comprised of fines) are likely to erode quickly when applied to the steep slopes of WR dumps, rendering the soil cover ineffective (Leavitt et al., 2000; Williams, 2001). Hence, mining companies are increasingly interested in developing methods for directly seeding WR. The long-term success of direct seeding is dependent on accelerated incipient soil development of poor-quality WR material. Target soil properties must also be identified that define ecosystem resiliency: the presence of a soil matrix capable of sustaining a diverse, stable ecosystem under the environmental stresses of semiarid regions (i.e., frequent drought and extended wet-dry climate cycles).

Transitions in soil microbiome development that associate with plant establishment (Blackmore et al., 2018; Fierer et al., 2013; Garris et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Honeker et al., 2019) during degraded land recovery are poorly understood. Soil quality indicators have traditionally been disproportionately skewed towards chemical and physical indicators such as soil texture, pH, electrical conductivity, total nitrogen, total organic carbon, macronutrients and micronutrients (Ca, S, Cu, Zn, Mn) (Asensio et al., 2013; Blecker et al., 2012; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2016). Recent reviews have emphasized the need for improved understanding of the association between substrate microbiome development and plant growth and productivity (Bandyopadhyay and Maiti, 2019; Coban et al., 2022 doi.org/10.1126/science.abe0725). Previous research has used fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) (Mummey et al., 2002) and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) extraction (Blecker et al., 2012; Dangi et al., 2012) biotic indicators during ecosystem restoration, along with general metrics such as heterotrophic plate counts (Gil-Loaiza et al., 2016); however, these indicators provide limited understanding of the microbial community structural development that associates with successful plant establishment. Mghazli et al. (2021) characterized the structure and composition of bacterial and archaeal communities in phosphate mine waste but were unable to identify associations between microbial community composition and plant establishment. Such analyses have been traditionally associated with plant establishment in acid mine waste (Honeker et al., 2019, 2017; Moynahan et al., 2002; Tordoff et al., 2000). In addition, most studies capture a single time point in the process of reclamation (Blecker et al., 2012; Moynahan et al., 2002; Mukhopadhyay et al., 2016; Mummey et al., 2002) or use a chronosequence approach (Asensio et al., 2013; Dangi et al., 2012), both of which do not capture critical changes in mine waste development.

The specific aim of this research is to (1) identify specific belowground biological, chemical, and physical substrate properties that associate with self-sustaining plant establishment as indicators of soil development; and (2) analyze the relative impacts of grass and shrub establishment on indicators of soil development. We hypothesize that successful plant establishment over five years is correlated with significant increases in specific indicators of belowground soil quality. In this study, we compare the development of hydroseeded WR to both unseeded WR and undisturbed native soil. Abiotic and biotic substrate properties were quantified through soil chemistry and microbiome analysis. Microbiome development was assessed through quantification of total soil DNA biomass, bacterial abundance (16S rRNA gene qPCR), bacterial nitrification potential (amoA bacterial gene qPCR), and microbial community diversity analysis using amplicon sequencing of bacterial/archaeal 16S rRNA and fungal ITS genes.

2.0. Materials and methods

2.1. Site description

This study was conducted at a copper mine located near Miami, Arizona, USA (elevation 1036 m). The region is classified as a semiarid desert (AI = 0.218; Trabucco and Zomer, 2019) with an average annual temperature of 16.5°C (Fick and Hijmans, 2017). The natural ecosystem is a shrub/grassland desert chaparral with vegetation dominated by Eragrostis intermedia (plains lovegrass) and Hilaria belangeri (curly mesquite) grasses and shrubs including Gutierrezia sarothrae (broom snakeweed), Quercus turbinella (Sonoran scrub oak), Juniperus monosperma (Oneseed juniper) and Prosopis velotina (velvet mesquite). The copper mine waste rock (WR) stockpile is composed of friable dacite that is graded to a 3:1 slope angle. This study focuses on the west and southwest aspects of the WR slopes, which were divided into an unseeded upper portion and a lower portion hydroseeded in 2012 (Figure S1). The seed mix was composed of perennial grasses (6 species; 67% of seed mix by seeds/m2), perennial forbs (3 species; 28% of seed mix by seeds/m2) and shrubs (4 species; 5% of seed mix by seeds/m2) (Table S1).

2.2. Experimental design

The experiment includes two components: 1) the temporal study and 2) the comparative root zone study of grass versus shrub establishment. For the temporal study, the WR slope was monitored annually for five years (2014-2018), beginning two years after hydroseeding in 2012. Annual sampling occurred during mid-May to early June (undisturbed soil, n = 4; seeded WR, n = 11; unseeded WR, n = 10) as described below. Unseeded WR and seeded WR areas were sampled at regular intervals along transects following the slope contour. Sample sites were located 67 m apart along parallel transects. Two transects were established for the seeded WR portion of the slope, one on the upper seeded slope and a parallel transect on the lower portion of the seeded slope (Figure S1). One transect bisected the unseeded WR slope and was parallel to the seeded WR transects. Four reference plots were randomly selected in native vegetation areas undisturbed by mining activity located adjacent to the WR dump. The mine is located in a mountainous region; thus, all reference sites were located on rocky slopes surrounding the WR dump. Sites one and two were located at the north end of the WR dump on southwest-aspect slopes; site three was located at the south end of the WR dump on a southeast aspect slope; and site four was on the crest of a hill east of the WR dump with a western aspect. Native soil properties are compared to the WR substrate in Table 1.

Table 1.

Temporal study: initial 2014 conditions of undisturbed soil, seeded WR, and unseeded WR (mean ± SD). Letters across rows indicate significant differences between substrate type (ANOVA and Tukey HSD for normally distributed metrics; Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn for non-normally distributed metrics; p < 0.05).

Undisturbed Seeded Unseeded
pH 6.83 ± 0.32 b 9.22 ± 0.44 a 9.28 ± 0.184 a
EC 0.251 ± 0.157 0.144 ± 0.031 0.162 ± 0.053
TN 1.562 ± 0.644 a 0.065 ± 0.033 b 0.049 ± 0.015 b
DNA 6822 ± 2628 a 31 ± 84 b 11 ± 20 b
Percent fines 34 ± 8 30 ± 7 29 ± 7
Percent pebbles 37 ± 13 41 ± 8 43 ± 9
Percent cobbles 29 ± 6 31 ± 7 28 ± 13

Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests used to determine significant differences between means.

EC, electrical conductivity (dS/m); TN, total N (mg/g), DNA, DNA biomass (ng/g). Fines are defined as particles <2 mm in diameter; pebbles, 2-16 mm; and cobbles, 64-256 mm.

Each sample site was marked with rebar to ensure annual sampling occurred at the same location. A 1-m2 quadrat was placed on the ground at each sample site centered on the rebar marker. Grab samples of substrate (soil or WR) were collected to a depth of 15 cm at two opposite corners of the quadrat. The substrate from the two holes within the quadrat was combined, sieved (2 mm), and dried at 45°C prior to chemical analysis. Following sample collection for chemical analysis, samples for microbial analysis were collected from the same two holes within the quadrat along the 15 cm depth of the soil hole using sterile technique. Microbial samples were transported at 4°C and then stored at −80°C. The gravimetric moisture content was determined on each microbial sample prior to storage at −80°C.

The comparative root zone study was conducted in May 2018. This study targeted root zone samples from dominant grasses and shrubs along the transects to compare the capacity of plant lifeforms as drivers of substrate fertility development. The objective of this study was to quantify the total plant lifeform effect on root zone substrate development; the plant lifeform effect included cumulative effects of aboveground plant biomass, plant litter, and the root architecture. The relative contributions of litter and plant root and shoot structure to soil development were not evaluated separately for this study. Plant leaf litter and roots were removed from the substrate prior to analysis. A subset of the seeded and unseeded WR transect sites was retained for this analysis to relate the biogeochemistry of targeted root zone substrate to the transect sites of the temporal study. Undisturbed soil data from 2016-2018 (n = 9) were included in the analysis to capture the annual variability of the natural ecosystem in the temporal study. In summary, sample sites for this study were labeled as undisturbed soil (n = 9), seeded WR (n = 10), grass WR (n = 10; collected from grass-associated root zones), shrub WR (n = 6; collected from the shrub-associated root zones), and unseeded WR (n = 5). The seeded WR samples reflect both bare and vegetated areas along the seeded WR transect. Shrub WR samples were collected to a depth of 15 cm under the plant canopy and close to the stem. Grass WR samples were collected immediately beneath the grass stem within the root zone to a depth of 15 cm. The shrub and grass WR samples consisted of a composite of root-zone substrate from two 15 cm deep holes within the quadrat at each site; two grass plants were sacrificed for grass root-zone samples, and two samples were collected beneath a single plant canopy for shrub root-zone samples. Leaf litter was scraped away prior to collection of the root zone samples to quantify plant effect on root zone substrate fertility. The samples were collected, processed, and stored using the same methods as those employed for the temporal study described above.

2.3. Soil chemical analysis

Substrate pH and electrical conductivity (EC) were measured in a 1:2 slurry of soil to dH2O following 30 minutes of mixing, according to the method described by Honeker et al., (2017). Samples were milled prior to analysis for total organic carbon content (TOC; McGee et al., 1999) and total nitrogen (TN). Prior to TOC analysis, carbonates were removed using HCl fumigation following the protocol outlined by Harris et al., (2001), with the following modifications: samples were fumigated in ceramic crucibles instead of Ag-foil capsules, and 1-1.5 g of sample was used instead of 30 mg. Acid fumigated samples were then combusted with a Vario Max Cube to measure carbon content, in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Elementar, Hesse, Germany). Bioavailable phosphorus (P) was measured using the Olsen P Method (Olsen et al., 1954) with modifications for extraction with buffered alkaline solution (Kuo, 1996).

TN was measured by dry combustion of milled, solid samples concurrent with the Dumas method (Bremmer, 1996) using an Elemental Combustion System 4010 CHNSO Analyzer in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (Costech Analytical Technologies, Valencia, CA). The standard curve for TN analysis was generated using LECO soil standards (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI) at seven concentrations. Ammonium content (NH4+-N) was measured by colorimetric detection with ammonia salicylate and ammonia cyanurate HACH reagents (Hach Company, Loveland, CO) in a 1:2 weight/volume ratio using KCl (Kushwaha et al., 2020). Absorbance readings were completed with an Epoch 2 Microplate Spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT). Nitrate content (NO3-N) was measured using a 1:5 weight to volume ratio in KCl according to the cadmium reduction technique (Dorich and Nelson, 1984); nitrate analysis was completed by Motzz Laboratory, Inc. (Phoenix, AZ).

2.4. Soil microbial analysis

DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of substrate using the FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA), with modifications to increase DNA yield as described in Kushwaha et al., (2020), and with further modifications during the initial lysis step: cells were lysed using a vortex at high speed for 15 min. DNA extraction samples were quantified using a Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and Qubit® dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay Kit (Life Technologies, NY, USA). A reagent blank was run with all DNA extractions, and only DNA extractions performed with a reagent blank that registered below the fluorometer DNA detection limit of 0.015 ng/μl were used in further analysis. Technical replicates were processed by two different technicians to determine the coefficient of variation (CV) for the soil biomass quantification by DNA extraction using the FastDNASpin Kit for Soil. The average % CV was 10%.

Total bacterial abundance and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) were quantified using qPCR to amplify the 16S rRNA gene and amoA functional gene, respectively. qPCR was carried out using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The 10 μl reactions consisted of 5 μl of SsoFast EvaGreen Supermix, 1 μl of DNA template, and 0.4 μM or 0.45 μM concentration of 16S rRNA or amoA primers, respectively. Samples and standards were run in triplicate. Interplate calibration was performed to normalize for plate variations in amplification efficiencies between separate runs (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Amplification specificity was confirmed by melt-curve analysis and gel electrophoresis of qPCR products. qPCR details (primers, reaction conditions, and standard curve) are summarized in Table S2.

Paired-end amplicon sequencing was performed by the Microbiome Core at the University of Arizona’s Steele Children’s Research Center using Illumina MiSeq (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). The V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using 515F and 806R primers for bacteria and archaea, and the ITS1 region of the rRNA operon was amplified using ITS1-F and ITS2 primers for fungi (Walters et al., 2015). Amplicon sequence reads were demultiplexed using idemp (https://github.com/yhwu/idemp), and analyzed using dada2 (Callahan et al., 2016) and taxonomy databases SILVA v138 for bacteria/archaea (Quasi et al., 2013) and UNITE for fungi (UNITE, 2019) according to the workflow outlined in Kushwaha et al., (2020). For bacteria/archaea, 4,644,329 sequence reads remained after quality filtering, with an average of 119,085 ± 79,203 reads per sample and a median sequence length of 233 bp; for fungi, 3,973,599 sequence reads remained after quality filtering, with an average of 101,887 ± 81,320 reads per sample and a median sequence length of 213 bp. After removing contaminants, a total of 26,075 ASVs for bacteria/archaea and 5,064 ASVs for fungi were used for analysis.

2.5. Plant cover and diversity analysis

Plant cover at each sampling site was determined using a point-intercept methodology. A laser point bar was situated above and parallel to the ground at the sampling site to record ten readings along ten rows (total of 100 readings) within a 3 x 3 m quadrat centered on the sample site location. Intercepted laser hits were recorded as vegetation (classified by species), litter, rock (>5 mm), or bare soil. One hundred readings were taken per quadrat at each sample site; thus, each intercept reading represented one percent of ground cover.

A complete diversity survey of all the sample sites included in the targeted sample study was conducted in 2018, wherein every plant individual present within a 9 m2 area was identified by species. Plant species richness was recorded.

2.6. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were completed in R v4.0 (R Core Team, 2020). Plant and substrate values for each site were evaluated for normal distribution using a Shapiro-Wilk test. Means were compared using a one-way ANOVA test and post-hoc Tukey HSD test for data with normal distribution, and the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-hoc Dunn’s test for non-normally distributed data (p < 0.05). Spearman’s correlation was used to quantify associations between above- and belowground indicators at four significance levels from p < 0.0001 to p < 0.05; significance was corrected for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg test to control the false discovery rate. Shannon diversity of the bacterial/archaeal and fungal communities were analyzed using the vegan package in R (Oksanen et al., 2019). Community similarity patterns between different sampling locations were analyzed using Bray-Curtis distance non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination. A linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) method (Segata et al., 2011) was used to identify taxa that explained the variability in microbial community composition between substrate-types. Data were visualized with R packages ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016) and corrplot v0.90 (Wei and Simko, 2021).

2.7. Data Availability

Raw sequence data for the 16S rRNA gene and ITS were submitted to the NCBI BioProject under the accession number PRJNA796645.

3.0. Results

3.1. Plant establishment

The average plant cover for the undisturbed sites surrounding the mine WR was 45 ± 14% for the five-year period of this study. Plant communities were dominated by perennial shrubs and grasses. The grass and shrub distributions varied by site and year with changes in annual precipitation patterns. Over the five-year period, the dominant grass species included Eragrostis intermedia (plains lovegrass) and Hilaria belangeri (curly-mesquite) and dominant shrubs/trees included Gutierrezia sarothrae (broom snakeweed) and Quercus turbinella (Sonoran scrub oak). Broom snakeweed cover progressed from 7.2% to 14% from 2014 to 2017, then decreased to 1.4% in 2018. Total plant cover of seeded WR averaged 15 ± 6% in 2014 and 28 ± 18% in 2018; however, the increase was not significant (ANOVA, p = 0.073) due to the high variability in plant establishment across the slope. The seeded WR plant community composition was characterized by early increases in grass cover (2014-2016) followed by slower growth in shrub cover; shrub and grass cover were comparable by 2017. Concurrently, the plant cover of annual plants on the seeded WR decreased significantly within this period (Figure 1). The high variability in cover was associated with a plant community structure that followed the fertility island pattern typical of arid ecosystems, described as vegetation patch and gap formation. Thus, the sampling transects captured and averaged both vegetated and unvegetated patches along the sampling transects. Plant cover of unseeded WR remained below 10% for all five years and the community was dominated by annual forbs (Figure 1). No significant change was observed in the plant community composition (by plant lifeform and duration) for the undisturbed sites and unseeded WR from 2014 to 2018.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Temporal study from 2014-2018: plant cover over time by lifeform as forb, grass or shrub (A), and annual or perennial (B) for undisturbed soil, seeded WR, and unseeded WR. Letters in seeded WR column of (B) indicate significant difference in plant cover of annual species between years (ANOVA and Tukey HSD, p < 0.05).

Plant diversity of seeded WR was assessed in 2018 to characterize 1) the establishment of seeded species; and 2) the plant community composition at the conclusion of the study. Of the species included in the original seed mix, the following were detected in 2018: four of the six perennial grasses, two of the three perennial forbs, and two of the four shrubs (Table S1). The dominant grasses of the seeded WR slope were Bouteloua curtipendula (sideoats grama; perennial; hydroseeded), and Aristida purpurea (purple threeawn; perennial; hydroseeded), which were present at eleven and thirteen of the sampling sites, respectively, from a total of sixteen sampling sites. The dominant shrub species were Atriplex canescens (fourwing saltbush; hydroseeded), and Baccharis sarothroides (desert broom; volunteer), which were present at five and eleven of the sites, respectively. The dominant forb species were Baileya multiradiata (desert marigold; perennial; hydroseeded), Eriogonum polycladon (sorrel buckwheat; annual; volunteer), and Heterotheca subaxillaris (camphorwood; annual; volunteer), which were present at seven, eight, and nine of the sampling sites, respectively. The dominant grasses and shrubs on the seeded slopes differed from the dominant plant species found at the undisturbed sites because the seed mix specifically incorporated common restoration plant species for semiarid ecosystems. Both total plant species richness and perennial plant richness of the undisturbed sites were significantly greater than either the seeded WR or the unseeded WR (ANOVA, p < 0.01) (Figure S2). Annual species richness was significantly higher on unseeded WR than seeded WR (ANOVA, p < 0.01), but was similar to the undisturbed sites.

3.2. Temporal study

In the first year of the study (2014), no significant differences in belowground biogeochemistry were observed between seeded WR and unseeded WR (Table 1; recall that the WR slope was hydroseeded in 2012). The undisturbed site soils, however, were significantly different than WR. The undisturbed soil pH (pH = 6.83 ± 0.32) was significantly lower than that of the seeded and unseeded WR (pH > 9). Average undisturbed soil total nitrogen (TN) was 27-fold greater than WR sites, and DNA biomass (DNA) was over 300-fold greater than the average WR value (Table 1). During the five years monitored, TN was highly variable for seeded WR (Figure 2a and b) with a range from 0.044-0.154 mg N g/WR. Average seeded WR TN values did not change significantly (0.065 ± 0.033 mg N g/WR in 2014 to 0.081 ± 0.031 mg TN g/WR in 2018). The average unseeded WR TN was 0.053 ± 0.015 mg N g/WR. Average TN values for undisturbed soils also did not change significantly and ranged from a minimum of 1.30 ± 0.361 mg N/g WR in 2018 to a maximum of 1.58 ± 0.387 mg N/g WR in 2017. In contrast, DNA biomass of seeded WR increased significantly from 2014 to 2018 with a final average value of 509 ± 447 ng DNA g/WR (Figure 2), a change not observed for unseeded WR. Interestingly, DNA for undisturbed soil revealed significant annual fluctuation, but no significant difference was observed between the initial (2014) and final (2018) levels. Gravimetric soil moisture content for all samples ranged from 2.04% to 5.64% (Table S3). The average value across all sites was lowest in 2014 (2.78%) and highest in 2017 (5.36%). Average moisture content across treatments did not vary significantly from 2015 to 2017; however, in 2014 and 2018, the average soil moisture for the unseeded slope was significantly higher than the other substrate types (Table S3). This could be due to the lack of transpiration from the unvegetated WR.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Temporal study from 2014-2018: total N of seeded and unseeded WR (A), and undisturbed soil (B); and DNA biomass of seeded and unseeded WR (C), and undisturbed soil (D). Letters indicate significant difference of DNA biomass between years of seeded WR (C), and undisturbed soil (D) (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn, p < 0.05).

3.3. Comparative root zone study

In 2018, a targeted plant study was conducted to better elucidate plant effects on the coupled above- and belowground ecosystem development. The comparative root zone study quantified a suite of fourteen belowground abiotic and biotic soil properties to 1) identify significant associations between plant establishment and belowground soil quality and 2) evaluate differential effects of plant lifeform on the belowground metrics. Plant cover (PC) correlated most strongly and significantly with belowground total organic carbon (TOC), TN, and DNA biomass (DNA; Figure 3, Table S4). Strong and significant correlations were also observed between plant cover (PC) and bacterial abundance (16S), fungal and bacterial/archaeal community ASV richness (FR, BAR) and diversity (FS, BAS), and abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB; amoA). Of particular significance was that DNA biomass (DNA) correlated strongly and significantly (ρ > 0.6; p < 0.001) with bacterial abundance (16S), bacterial/archaeal and fungal richness and diversity (BAR, FR, BAS, FS), and AOB abundance (amoA), demonstrating that DNA biomass is a good indicator of overall microbiome development in WR material. In addition, strong positive correlations were observed between TN and other biochemical metrics: strong and significant correlations between TN, TOC, DNA, 16S, and amoA are especially noteworthy with ρ ≥ 0.6 and significance levels of p < 0.001.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparative root zone study: Significant spearman’s correlations between plant cover, chemical and microbial substrate metrics for WR samples only (seeded, grass, shrub, and unseeded WR). PC, plant cover; TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen; FR, fungal richness; FS, fungal Shannon diversity; DNA, DNA biomass; 16S, bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number; BAR, bacterial and archaeal richness; BAS, bacterial and archaeal Shannon diversity; EC, electrical conductivity; P, bioavailable phosphorus; amoA, bacterial amoA gene copy number. Color represents strength of positive (blue) or negative correlation (red); **** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05.

The comparative root zone study revealed that shrub WR was significantly enriched in comparison to unseeded WR for ten of the biotic and abiotic soil properties measured in this study (TOC, TN, P, DNA, 16S, amoA, BAR, BAS, FR, and FS; Table 2). In contrast, grass WR enrichment relative to unseeded WR was documented for just five of the properties (16S, BAR, BAS, FR, and FS), all of which were biotic metrics. Properties in which shrub WR enrichment was significantly greater than grass WR included TN, DNA, amoA, and BAR. Further, shrub WR attained levels comparable to the undisturbed soils for TOC, 16S, amoA, BAR, and BAS (p > 0.05). An important difference was noted between the bacterial/archaeal and fungal microbiome development: whereas BAR and BAS were comparable in shrub WR and undisturbed soil, FR and FS were significantly higher in undisturbed soil relative to shrub WR. FR and FS were comparable in shrub and grass WR, and both were significantly higher than unseeded WR.

Table 2.

Comparative root zone study: chemical and microbial fertility metrics of undisturbed soil, seeded WR, shrub WR, grass WR, and unseeded WR. Letters across rows indicate significant differences between substrate type (ANOVA and Tukey HSD for normally distributed metrics; Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn for non-normally distributed metrics; p < 0.05).

Undisturbed Seeded Shrub Grass Unseeded
pH 6.62 ± 0.39 c 8.58 ± 0.31 ab 8.31 ± 0.50 ab 8.19 ± 0.30 b 8.76 ± 0.08 a
EC 0.156 ± 0.096 ab 0.106 ± 0.022 b 0.481 ± 0.279 a 0.111 ± 0.063 b 0.119 ± 0.014 ab
TOC 14.16 ± 3.13 a 1.37 ± 0.55 c 7.52 ± 3.07 ab 1.73 ± 0.41 bc 0.78 ± 0.22 c
P 22.52 ± 5.45 a 3.19 ± 1.25 c 7.83 ± 3.06 b 3.26 ± 1.58 bc 1.98 ± 0.88 c
TN 1.300 ± 0.398 a 0.091 ± 0.047 c 0.586 ± 0.194 b 0.120 ± 0.037 c 0.050 ± 0.011 c
NH4-N 0.861 ± 0.925 ab 0.790 ± 0.148 b 0.400 ± 0.349 b 1.020 ± 0.793 ab 1.875 ± 0.752 a
NO3-N 6.7 ± 2.5 ab 4.1 ± 1.2 b 20.0 ± 13.9 a 4.2 ± 1.7 b 4.5 ± 0.8 ab
DNA 9250 ± 2123 a 671 ± 529 c 4162 ± 2780 b 1610 ± 548 c 28 ± 29 c
16S 8.53 ± 0.32 a 7.36 ± 0.54 bc 8.24 ± 0.42 a 8.11 ± 0.20 ab 5.20 ± 1.88 c
amoA 5.15 ± 2.17 ab 3.34 ± 2.38 c 6.52 ± 0.82 a 4.52 ± 1.62 bc 0.91 ± 2.03 c
BAR 2761 ± 488 a 1293 ± 564 b 2190 ± 491 a 2080 ± 555 b 221 ± 177 c
BAS 7.14 ± 0.19 a 6.41 ± 0.44 a 6.66 ± 0.17 a 6.85 ± 0.27 a 4.40 ± 1.40 b
FR 634 ± 157 a 164 ± 109 bc 262 ± 143 b 280 ± 72 b 12 ± 6 c
FS 4.74 ± 0.35 a 3.53 ± 0.58 b 3.73 ± 0.61 b 3.94 ± 0.22 b 1.57 ± 0.70 c

Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests used to determine significant differences between means.

EC, electrical conductivity (ds/m); TOC, total organic carbon (mg/g substrate); P, bioavailable phosphorus (μg/g substrate); TN, total nitrogen (mg/g substrate); NH4-N, ammonium (mg/g substrate); NO3-N, nitrate (mg/g substrate); DNA, DNA biomass (ng/g substrate); 16S, bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number (log copies/g substrate); amoA, bacterial amoA gene copy number (log copies/g substrate); BAR, bacterial and archaeal richness; BAS, bacterial and archaeal Shannon diversity; FR, fungal richness; FS, fungal Shannon diversity.

Interestingly, ammonium content (NH4-N) and nitrate content (NO3-N) followed a distinct pattern: NH4-N was highest in unseeded WR and lowest in shrub WR, and NO3-N was highest in shrub WR, but not significantly different between undisturbed soil and unseeded WR. pH was highest in unseeded WR and lowest in undisturbed soil.

The microbial community composition was analyzed to characterize plant effects on the development of the belowground microbiome. Bray-Curtis NMDS ordination revealed that substrate type explained 33% and 24% of the differences in community composition of bacteria/archaea and fungi, respectively (Figure 4). The unseeded WR relative abundance profiles for both bacterial/archaeal and fungal communities clustered separately from all vegetated sites indicating a significant impact of vegetation on the community structure of both communities. Specifically, for the bacterial/archaeal community the greatest difference was observed between the unseeded WR and the undisturbed soils. WR shrub and grass bacterial/archaeal community profiles were intermediate to these two extremes and distinct from each other. Taken together, the data indicate that shrub and grass establishment have distinct, but positive impacts on bacterial/archaeal community development relative to the unseeded WR sites. In contrast, the fungal profiles for all vegetated areas were similar. Thus, grass and shrub establishment have similar impacts on fungal community development.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Targeted sample study: Bray-Curtis distance, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot of bacteria and archaea (A), and fungi (B) for undisturbed soil, seeded WR, shrub WR, grass WR, and unseeded WR. Substrate type explained 33% of variation in bacteria and archaea communities, and 24% of variation in fungi community.

Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in all substrates; however, their comparative relative abundances varied by substrate type (Figure S3). Actinobacteria relative abundance was highest in the undisturbed soils (35.6%), whereas Proteobacteria relative abundance was highest in shrub WR (41.1%). Interestingly, both phyla had the same relative abundance in the unseeded WR; Protobacteria (29.2%) and Actinobacteria (28.8%). The unseeded WR was also distinguished by a significantly greater relative abundance of Firmicutes (9.3%) relative to the grass, shrub, and seeded WR communities (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.0001). Other phyla present in all substrate types with relative abundances greater than 3% include Bacteroidetes, Acidobacteria, and Chloroflexi. Within the fungal communities, Ascomycota had the greatest relative abundance in all substrate types, followed by Basidiomycota.

The observed differences in microbial community composition were further explored using a linear discriminant effect size (LEfSe) analysis to identify taxa that explained significant differences between each substrate community (Figure S4). The phylogenetic distribution of these indicator taxa varied considerably with substrate type. The undisturbed soil community was defined by eight phylotypes belonging to five phyla. Two phylotypes were associated with each of Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria; one phylotype belonged to Planctomycetes and one to Gemmatimonadetes. In contrast, shrub and grass WR specific phylotypes were both dominated by Proteobacteria (seven of thirteen and seven of ten LEfSe-identified taxa, respectively), with the remaining phylotypes belonging to Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, Gemmatimonadetes, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi. In particular, LEfSe-identified genera for shrub WR included Bacteroidetes phylotypes, Ferruginibacter and Edaphobaculum, which belong to the Chitinophagaceae family; and Pedobacter, which belongs to the Sphingobacteriaceae family. Specific Proteobacteria included Caulobactor and Brevundimonas, which belong to the Caulobacteraceae family; and Devosia, which belongs to the Devosiaceae family. Notable LEfSe-identified genera for grass WR included Segetibacter, a Bacteroidetes which belongs to the Chitinophagaceae family; and Rhodoplanes, which is a Proteobacteria that belongs to the Xanthobacteraceae family. Unseeded WR was characterized by twelve phylotypes associated with six phyla. Half of the phylotypes were associated with Actinobacteria, and the others were distributed between Armationadetes, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Nitrospira and Proteobacteria.

Eight well characterized N-cycling phylotypes were selected to evaluate the distribution of N-cycling phylotypes in each substrate type. These bacterial and archaeal phylotypes were classified to the family level and included four N-fixing bacteria (Azospirillaceae, Devosiaceae, Frankiaceae, and Rhizobiaceae); two ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB; Nitrosococcaceae and Nitrosomonadaceae), one ammonia-oxidizing archaeon (AOA; Nitrososphaeraceae), and one nitrite-oxidizing bacterium (NOB; Nitrospiraceae). The total relative abundance of all eight phylotypes was significantly higher in shrub WR than in grass, seeded, and unseeded WR (Figure 5). Of significance was the fact that the shrub WR N-cycling phylotype relative abundance increased to the level of the undisturbed soils. The significant differences in amoA gene abundance between treatments (Figure 6) were the same as those observed for the relative abundance of N-cycling phylotypes.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Targeted sample study: sum of relative abundance of eight common N-cycling bacterial and archaeal families in undisturbed soil, seeded WR, shrub WR, grass WR, and unseeded WR. Letters indicate significant difference in sum of relative abundance between substrate types (ANOVA and Tukey HSD, p < 0.05)

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Targeted sample study: amoA gene log copy number/g substrate in undisturbed soil, seeded WR, shrub WR, grass WR, and unseeded WR. Letters indicate significant difference in amoA gene abundance between substrate types (Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn, p < 0.05)

When the putative N-cycling phylotypes were separated into distinct N-cycling functional groups a different pattern was observed. The cumulative relative abundance of the N-fixing bacteria was significantly greater in shrub WR than undisturbed soil, and grass, seeded, and unseeded WR (ANOVA, p < 0.0001). The relative abundance of AOB phylotypes was not significantly different between substrate types (ANOVA, p = 0.65), but the relative abundance of AOA phylotypes was significantly higher in undisturbed soil than all types of WR (Kruskal-Wallis, p < 0.001). Of interest, is the fact that the significant differences observed for the amoA gene abundance between substrate types (Figure 6) were not observed for the putative AOB phylotypes. This result suggests there are novel phylotypes in the plant associated WR with amoA genes that have not been previously characterized as AOB. The relative abundance of NOB was not significantly different between undisturbed soil and unseeded WR.

4.0. Discussion

To our knowledge, this study is the first analysis of coupled above- and belowground early ecosystem development on mine waste rock (WR) during revegetation. The temporal analysis facilitated identification of belowground indicators associated with substrate fertility development that associate with progressions in plant establishment. Mine-site reclamation aims to restore lands disturbed by mine operations to self-sustaining ecosystems that support biological diversity, nutrient-cycling capacity, and dust and water erosion control; however, metrics are needed to 1) quantify progress in the early stages of ecosystem development; and 2) define properties of a resilient soil matrix to be used as target metrics. The results confirm that sustainable plant establishment is coupled with belowground substrate development of both biotic and abiotic substrate properties. In contrast, unseeded WR revealed no above- or belowground ecosystem development for the five-year duration of this study. Plant cover remained below 10% and was generally limited to annual species. Similarly, no significant changes were observed in belowground soil fertility or microbiome development. The only belowground metric that changed consistently in unseeded WR was pH, which decreased from 9.28 ± 0.18 in 2014 to 8.76 ± 0.08 in 2018. We contend that the observed decrease in pH was driven by mineral weathering. Thus, unseeded WR did not demonstrate fertility improvement sufficient to support sustainable plant establishment under semiarid climatic conditions.

For the seeded WR, specific metrics were identified to define coupled associations in above- and belowground processes of ecosystem regeneration. Sustainable ecosystem target values were identified based on analysis of undisturbed sites surrounding the WR dump. Aboveground metrics include plant community structure and percent plant cover. The undisturbed-site plant community structure was dominated by perennial species with an even distribution between perennial grasses and shrubs. Plant cover of the seeded WR slope transitioned from predominantly annual plant cover in 2014 (two years after hydroseeding) to plant cover dominated by perennial species in 2015 and onward; a statistically significant decrease in annual cover was observed from 2014 to 2018. This shift in community composition from annual grasses and forbs to perennial grasses and shrubs is well-documented in the literature (Bonet, 2004; Lesschen et al., 2008), with the greatest changes in both the belowground microbial community and aboveground plant community occurring during the first fifteen years of revegetation (Bonet, 2004; Dangi et al., 2012; Martínez-Ruiz and Fernández-Santos, 2005). Total plant cover for seeded WR was characterized by high variability on an annual basis. This variability was partially driven by annual and seasonal inconsistencies in bimodal precipitation patterns characteristic of the southwestern US (summer monsoons and winter rains). In addition, plant establishment followed a fertility island pattern that is typical of semiarid ecosystems in which well-established plant islands are separated by large unvegetated spaces (Alday et al., 2014). Taken together, the results indicate that self-sustaining plant community establishment is possible on hydroseeded WR in the absence of a soil cap; however, environmental conditions require more effective seeding techniques to reach a sustainable percent cover comparable to undisturbed areas.

Belowground development coupled with aboveground plant establishment was document for biotic and abiotic indices through analysis of the rootzone for seeded WR. Final plant cover correlated most strongly and significantly with TN, TOC, and DNA biomass. The temporal transect study demonstrated a significant increase in DNA biomass over the five-year sampling period, but TN did not increase significantly. Thus, this analysis revealed that the DNA biomass response preceded abiotic increases in TN and TOC. Further, recall that DNA biomass correlated strongly with diverse microbiome metrics including bacterial abundance (16S), bacterial/archaeal and fungal richness and diversity (BAR, FR, BAS, FS), and AOB gene abundance (amoA), demonstrating that DNA biomass is a good indicator of overall microbiome development, and specifically the development of key nitrogen nutrient cycling capacity.

The comparative root zone analysis facilitated a more specific investigation of the specific coupled associations between perennial grass and shrub species and belowground microbiome development. Both grasses and shrubs significantly impacted bacterial abundance, richness and diversity, and fungal richness and diversity. NMDS analysis of the microbial community composition documented a significant, but distinct shift in the grass- and shrub-WR microbiomes relative to the unseeded WR microbiome. The twelve specific taxa defining the unseeded WR communities were predominantly oligotrophic and autotrophic phylotypes, many of which were previously identified in extreme deserts such as hyperarid regions of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Among the Actinobacteria, two phylotypes belonged to the class Acidimicrobiia, one to the order 0319-7L14, and one each to the families Euzebyaceae and Sporichthyaceae. These phylotypes were previously found to represent 36%, 45%, 15%, 11%, and 9% relative abundance, respectively, of the soil communities in five distinct hyperarid locations of the Atacama Desert (Neilson et al., 2017). The Nitrospira phylotype belonged to the genus Nitrospira, a group of autotrophic nitrite-oxidizers, also known to survive under extreme, oligotophic desert conditions (Neilson et al., 2017, 2012).

In contrast, LEfSe analysis revealed that both shrub and grass plant lifeforms were associated with microbiome development leading to enhanced nutrient cycling capacity. LEfSe-identified taxa that characterized grass and shrub WR nutrient cycling capacity included phylotypes belonging to the following families: Chitinophagaceae (shrub and grass) described as cellulose degraders; Sphingobacteriaceae (shrub) characterized as cellulose and lignin degraders (Bailey et al., 2013; Eichorst and Kuske, 2012; Wilhelm et al., 2019); Caulobacteraceae (shrub), described as lignin degraders (Wilhelm et al., 2019); and Devosiaceae (shrub) and Xanthobacteraceae (grass), which are nitrogen fixers (Franche et al., 2009; Oren, 2014). Thus, both grass and shrub WR establishment were associated with statistically significant increases in C- and N-cycling bacteria that enhanced the nutrient cycling potential of these microbiomes relative to that of unseeded WR.

Amplicon sequencing analysis of the belowground bacterial, archaeal, and fungal communities enabled the characterization of the coupled association between plant establishment and the WR microbiome transition from an oligotrophic, autotrophic community to one with cellulose and lignin degradation and broad N-cycling potential. The relative abundance of the specific C- and N-cycling phylotypes identified in this study can be used to track improved belowground ecosystem functional potential. This approach improves on previous studies using phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis (Blecker et al., 2012; Dangi et al., 2012), or fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis (Mummey et al., 2002) that documented belowground microbial community changes associated with revegetation, but lacked the taxonomic resolution (Chen et al., 2019; Nkongolo and Narendrula-Kotha, 2020; Schwab et al., 2017) to characterize the coupled development of microbial nutrient-cycling capacity associated with different plant lifeforms during mine waste revegetation.

The study also revealed that shrub establishment is associated with greater belowground fertility development than grasses. Shrubs enriched all chemical and microbial metrics relative to unseeded WR, whereas grass driven WR enrichment was limited to select microbial metrics. Shrubs also developed a greater belowground potential for N cycling than grasses, as indicated by the significantly higher relative abundance of common N-cycling bacterial and archaeal phylotypes detected in this study, the higher TN and nitrate (NO3-N) content; and the greater total abundance of bacterial ammonia-oxidation potential as measured by amoA gene quantification. This is of notable importance because nitrogen is typically the most limiting nutrient in terrestrial systems and controls net primary production. In semiarid and arid deserts, nitrogen limitations are second only to water scarcity (Vitousek and Howarth, 1991). AOB gene abundance, rather than ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) gene abundance was selected as a microbial indicator of ammonia oxidation potential in this study because AOA can access the ammonium substrate in the soil at lower concentrations than AOB. Studies have shown AOB abundance increased following soil nitrogen enrichment, whereas AOA abundance did not (Di et al., 2010, 2009), suggesting that AOB responses to nitrogen levels are a better indicator of plant nitrogen availability than AOA responses. In our study, quantification of AOB using amoA gene abundance was more informative than assessing the relative abundance of the putative ammonia-oxidizers, Nitrosococcaceae and Nitrosomonadaceae (two bacterial families that contain the amoA functional gene).

Previous research has similarly reported that shrubs enhance soil fertility by forming microsites with increased organic matter and moisture (Alday et al., 2014) that offer protection from UV rays and cool the soil (Call and Roundy, 1991). Indeed, Rodríguez Rodríguez et al. (2005) found that areas where shrubs have been removed through human intervention and disturbance are more degraded than those with higher shrub abundance in the arid climate of the Canary Archipelago. Maestre et al. (2001) demonstrated that grasses facilitate shrub establishment on degraded drylands, but Pierce et al. (2019) found that in the Chihuahuan Desert grasses and shrubs compete for belowground nutrients and that grasses growing near shrubs have lower productivity than grasses growing alone. It is unclear in this study whether the early establishment of grass cover with the associated grass-driven enrichment of the soil microbiome enhanced successful shrub establishment.

The coupled analysis of above- and belowground plant establishment revealed a progressive pattern in belowground substrate development that began with microbial community development. Significant increases in both biotic and abiotic substrate fertility were only observed in the shrub root zone. Plant community establishment over five years was characterized by an initial rapid establishment of perennial grasses in 2014 followed by a gradual increase in shrub cover by 2017. We contend that this plant establishment pattern explains the observed progression in belowground substrate development, in which early grass establishment was coupled with a significant increase in DNA biomass. Significant increases in TN and TOC were coupled with shrub rather than grass establishment. Variability was also observed in bacterial/archaeal vs fungal community development. By 2018 bacterial abundance and diversity for both grass and shrub WR attained levels comparable to the undisturbed soils, whereas fungal richness and diversity remained significantly lower for all vegetated WR than in undisturbed sites. Similarly, shrub WR TOC reached undisturbed soil levels, whereas TN and P did not. Taken together, the results suggest that bacterial indicators can serve as more sensitive indicators of early substrate fertility development, whereas FR and TN can function as stable, long-term belowground development indices that indicate resilient substrate development. Previous research also determined that chemical fertility indicators represent later stages in soil development (Mummey et al., 2002). Data from the undisturbed sites also found TN to be a more stable native-soil metric, whereas biomass was more variable and highly sensitive to annual fluctuations in plant cover. Despite the observed fluctuation in the DNA biomass for the undisturbed soil, no significant difference was observed between the initial and final average values, suggesting that DNA biomass fluctuation is part of stable ecosystem dynamics. In fact, the decrease in biomass from 2017 to 2018 was associated with an observed broom snakeweed die off.

5.0. Conclusions

This study demonstrated coupled plant establishment and belowground fertility development under semiarid conditions without the addition of a soil cap. Importantly, the data emphasize the need to assess revegetation as a continuous progression in metrics of above- and belowground ecosystem development. As the plant structure matures from annual to perennial plant communities and grass to grass-shrub cover, a parallel progressive development occurs belowground. Early bacterial community development characterized by increases in total DNA biomass, bacterial/archaeal abundance and richness, and the relative abundance of specific cellulose and lignin degrading and N-cycling bacterial phylotypes is succeeded by fungal and chemical fertility enrichment. Heavily disturbed sites in arid and semiarid regions can lag behind their natural and undisturbed equivalents even after 40 years of recovery, as demonstrated by underdeveloped plant communities (Lesschen et al., 2008), thus the use of belowground metrics of ecosystem development is critical to assessing the progress of distinct revegetation management strategies. Deviations from positive trajectories in either the biotic or abiotic belowground metrics identified by this study can alert land managers of the need for interventions such as re-seeding, alternative seed mixes, or additional amendments. Utilization of the comprehensive suite of belowground metrics identified in this study enables the quantification of the rate and degree of ecosystem development and provides tools that allow practitioners to fine tune revegetation practices for more effective land reclamation.

Supplementary Material

1

Highlights.

  • Successful revegetation requires coupled above- and belowground development

  • Plant cover correlated with substrate microbe biomass, nitrogen, and organic carbon

  • Unvegetated waste rock microbiome was characterized by oligotrophic Actinobacteria

  • Cellulose/lignin degrading and N-fixing phylotypes defined root zone microbiomes

  • Shrub root zones developed greater nitrogen-cycling potential than grass root zones

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the University of Arizona Center for Environmentally Sustainable Mining Industry-Academic Revegetation Research Cooperative, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [grant P42ES004940], and the Arizona Technology and Research Fund. Special thanks to the undergraduate students who joined the field sampling campaigns and processed soil samples in the lab including Ben Rivera and Catherine Gullo. Thanks also to Daniel Lubitz at the Microbiome Core, University of Arizona Steele Children’s Research Center for providing exceptional quality control and technical support for the amplicon sequencing of DNA extracts with extremely low DNA concentrations.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Jesse Dillon is the owner of Cedar Creek Associates, an ecological consulting firm with contracts with the mining industry focused on environmental permitting, regulatory compliance, and closure.

Research for this manuscript was conducted at a copper mine that is a contributing member to the University of Arizona Center for Environmentally Sustainable Mining Industry-Academic Revegetation Research Cooperative as described in the Acknowledgements.

References

  1. Alday JG, Santana VM, Marrs RH, Martínez-Ruiz C, 2014. Shrub-induced understory vegetation changes in reclaimed mine sites. Ecol. Eng 73, 691–698. 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asensio V, Guala SD, Vega FA, Covelo EF, 2013. A soil quality index for reclaimed mine soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem 32, 2240–2248. 10.1002/etc.2315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey VL, Fansler SJ, Stegen JC, McCue LA, 2013. Linking microbial community structure to β-glucosidic function in soil aggregates. ISME J. 7, 2044–2053. 10.1038/ismej.2013.87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandyopadhyay S, Maiti SK, 2019. Evaluation of ecological restoration success in mining-degraded lands. Environ. Qual. Manag 29, 89–100. 10.1002/tqem.21641 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blackmore S, Vriens B, Sorensen M, Power IM, Smith L, Hallam SJ, Mayer KU, Beckie RD, 2018. Microbial and geochemical controls on waste rock weathering and drainage quality. Sci. Total Environ 640–641, 1004–1014. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blecker SW, Stillings LL, Amacher MC, Ippolito JA, Decrappeo NM, 2012. Development of vegetation based soil quality indices for mineralized terrane in arid and semi-arid regions. Ecol. Indie 20, 65–74. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonet A, 2004. Secondary succession of semi-arid Mediterranean old-fields in south-eastern Spain: Insights for conservation and restoration of degraded lands. J. Arid Environ 56, 213–233. 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00048-X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Borden R, 2011. Waste Disposal and Contamination Management, in: Darling P (Ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Southfield, MI, pp. 1733–1751. [Google Scholar]
  9. Borden RK, Black R, 2005. Volunteer Revegetation of Waste Rock Surfaces at the Bingham Canyon Mine, Utah. J. Environ. Qual 34, 2234–2242. 10.2134/jeq2004.0476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bradshaw A, 1997. Restoration of mined lands - Using natural processes. Ecol. Eng 8, 255–269. 10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00022-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bremmer JM, 1996. Nitrogen-Total, in: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnson CT, Sumner ME (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3-Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 1085–1121. 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Call CA, Roundy BA, 1991. Perspectives and processes in revegetation of arid and semiarid rangelands. J. Range Manag 44, 543–549. 10.2307/4003034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP, 2016. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583. 10.1038/nmeth.3869 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen H, Zhao X, Lin Q, Li G, Kong W, 2019. Using a combination of PLFA and DNA-based sequencing analyses to detect shifts in the soil microbial community composition after a simulated spring precipitation in a semi-arid grassland in China. Sci. Total Environ 657, 1237–1245. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dangi SR, Stahl PD, Wick AF, Ingram LJ, Buyer JS, 2012. Soil Microbial Community Recovery in Reclaimed Soils on a Surface Coal Mine Site. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 10.2136/sssaj2011.0288 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen JP, Winefield CS, O’Callaghan M, Bowatte S, He JZ, 2010. Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea grow under contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 72, 386–394. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00861.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Di HJ, Cameron KC, Shen JP, Winefield CS, Ocallaghan M, Bowatte S, He JZ, 2009. Nitrification driven by bacteria and not archaea in nitrogen-rich grassland soils. Nat. Geosci 2, 621–624. 10.1038/ngeo613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dorich RA, Nelson DW, 1984. Evaluation of Manual Cadmium Reduction Methods for Determination of Nitrate in Potassium Chloride Extracts of Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 48, 72–75. 10.2136/sssajl984.03615995004800010013x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Eichorst SA, Kuske CR, 2012. Identification of cellulose-responsive bacterial and fungal communities in geographically and edaphically different soils by using stable isotope probing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 78, 2316–2327. 10.1128/AEM.07313-ll [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ, 2017. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol 37, 4302–4315. 10.1002/joc.5086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Fierer N, Wood SA, Bueno de Mesquita CP, 2013. How microbes can, and cannot, be used to assess soil health. J. Chem. Inf. Model 53, 1689–1699. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.10811123800267 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Franche C, Lindström K, Elmerich C, 2009. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil 321, 35–59. 10.1007/sl1104-008-9833-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Garris HW, Baldwin SA, Van Hamme JD, Gardner WC, Fraser LH, 2016. Genomics to assist mine reclamation: A review. Restor. Ecol 24, 165–173. 10.1111/rec.12322 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gil-Loaiza J, White SA, Root RA, Solís-Dominguez FA, Hammond CM, Chorover J, Maier RM, 2016. Phytostabilization of mine tailings using compost-assisted direct planting: Translating greenhouse results to the field. Sci. Total Environ 565, 451–461. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo H, Nasir M, Lv J, Dai Y, Gao J, 2017. Understanding the variation of microbial community in heavy metals contaminated soil using high throughput sequencing. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf 144, 300–306. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Harris D, Horwath WR, van Kessel C, 2001. Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 65, 1853–1856. 10.2136/sssaj2001.1853 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. He R, Small MJ, 2022. Forecast of the U.S. copper demand: A framework based on scenario analysis and stock dynamics. Environ. Sci. Technol 56, 2709–2717. 10.1021/acs.est.lc05080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Honeker LK, Gullo CF, Neilson JW, Chorover J, Maier RM, 2019. Effect of Reacidification on Buffalo Grass Rhizosphere and Bulk Microbial Communities during Phytostabilization of Metalliferous Mine Tailings. Front. Microbiol 10, 1–17. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Honeker LK, Neilson JW, Root RA, Gil-Loaiza J, Chorover J, Maier RM, 2017. Bacterial rhizoplane colonization patterns of Buchloe dactyloides growing in metalliferous mine tailings reflect plant status and biogeochemical conditions. Microb. Ecol 74, 853–867. 10.1007/s00248-017-0998-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kneller T, Harris RJ, Bateman A, Muñoz-Rojas M, 2018. Native-plant amendments and topsoil addition enhance soil function in post-mining arid grasslands. Sci. Total Environ 621, 744–752. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.ll.219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kuo S, 1996. Phosphorous, in: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnson CT, Sumner ME (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 3-Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp. 895–897, 909–911. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kushwaha P, Neilson JW, Barberán A, Chen Y, Fontana CG, Butterfield BJ, Maier RM, 2020. Arid Ecosystem Vegetation Canopy-Gap Dichotomy: Influence on Soil Microbial Composition and Nutrient Cycling Functional Potential. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. AEM 02780–20. 10.1128/AEM.02780-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Leavitt KJ, Fernandez GCJ, Nowak RS, 2000. Plant establishment on angle of repose mine waste dumps. J. Range Manag 53, 442–452. 10.2307/4003758 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lesschen JP, Cammeraat LH, Kooijman AM, van Wesemael B, 2008. Development of spatial heterogeneity in vegetation and soil properties after land abandonment in a semi-arid ecosystem. J. Arid Environ 72, 2082–2092. 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.06.006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maestre FT, Bautista S, Cortina J, Bellot J, 2001. Potential for using facilitation by grasses to establish shrubs on a semiarid degraded steppe. Ecol. Appl 11, 1641–1655. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1641:PFUFBG]2.0.CO;2 [Google Scholar]
  36. Martínez-Ruiz C, Fernández-Santos B, 2005. Natural revegetation on topsoiled mining-spoils according to the exposure. Acta Oecologica 28, 231–238. 10.1016/j.actao.2005.05.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. McGee EA, Vohman DD, White SA, Thompson TL, 1999. Rapid method for fine grinding soils for organic nitrogen and 15nitrogen analysis. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 30, 419–426. 10.1080/00103629909370213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mghazli N, Sbabou L, Hakkou R, Ouhammou A, Adnani M. El, Bruneel O, 2021. Description of Microbial Communities of Phosphate Mine Wastes in Morocco , a Semi-Arid Climate , Using High-Throughput Sequencing and Functional Prediction. Front. Microbiol 12. 10.3389/fimicb.2021.666936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Moynahan OS, Zabinski CA, Gannon JE, 2002. Microbial community structure and carbon-utilization diversity in a mine tailings revegetation study. Restor. Ecol 10, 77–87. 10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.10108.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE, Yadav A, George J, Ram LC, Shukla SP, 2016. Soil quality index for evaluation of reclaimed coal mine spoil. Sci. Total Environ 542, 540–550. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Mummey DL, Stahl PD, Buyer JS, 2002. Microbial biomarkers as an indicator of ecosystem recovery following surface mine reclamation. Appl. Soil Ecol 21, 251–259. 10.1016/S0929-1393(02)00090-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Muñoz-Rojas M, Erickson TE, Dixon KW, Merritt DJ, 2016. Soil quality indicators to assess functionality of restored soils in degraded semiarid ecosystems. Restor. Ecol 24, S43–S52. 10.1111/rec.12368 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Neilson JW, Califf K, Cardona C, Copeland A, van Treuren W, Josephson KL, Knight R, Gilbert JA, Quade J, Caporaso JG, Maier RM, 2017. Significant Impacts of Increasing Aridity on the Arid Soil Microbiome. mSystems 2, 1–15. 10.1128/msystems.00195-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Neilson JW, Quade J, Ortiz M, Nelson WM, Legatzki A, Tian F, LaComb M, Betancourt JL, Wing RA, Soderlund CA, Maier RM, 2012. Life at the hyperarid margin: Novel bacterial diversity in arid soils of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Extremophiles 16, 553–566. 10.1007/s00792-012-0454-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nkongolo KK, Narendrula-Kotha R, 2020. Advances in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and function. J. Appl. Genet 61, 249–263. 10.1007/s13353-020-00549-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H, 2019. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-6. Cran R. [Google Scholar]
  47. Olsen S, Cole C, Watanabe F, Dean L, 1954. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Circular 939. [Google Scholar]
  48. Oren A, 2014. The Family Xanthobacteraceae, in: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (Eds.), The Prokaryotes: Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 709–726. 10.1007/978-3-642-30197-l_258 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Orman M, Peevers R, Sample K, 2011. Waste Piles and Dumps, in: Darling P (Ed.), SME Mining Engineering Handbook. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Southfield, MI, pp. 667–679. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pierce NA, Archer SR, Bestelmeyer BT, James DK, 2019. Grass-Shrub Competition in Arid Lands: An Overlooked Driver in Grassland–Shrubland State Transition? Ecosystems 22, 619–628. 10.1007/sl0021-018-0290-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO, 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596. 10.1093/nar/gks1219 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. R Core Team, 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
  53. Rodríguez Rodríguez A, Luis Mora J, Arbelo C, Bordon J, 2005. Plant succession and soil degradation in desertified areas (Fuerteventura, Canary Islands, Spain). Catena 59, 117–131. 10.1016/j.catena.2004.07.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schwab VF, Herrmann M, Roth VN, Gleixner G, Lehmann R, Pohnert G, Trumbore S, Küsel K, Totsche KU, 2017. Functional diversity of microbial communities in pristine aquifers inferred by PLFA- and sequencing-based approaches. Biogeosciences 14, 2697–2714. 10.5194/bg-14-2697-2017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C, 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60. 10.1186/gb-201l-12-6-r60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P, 2010. Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: A review. Int. J. Soil, Sediment Water 3, 13. [Google Scholar]
  57. Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ, 2000. Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 41, 219–228. 10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00414-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Trabucco A, Zomer R, 2019. Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration (ET0) Climate Database v2. CGIAR Consort. Spat. Inf 10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. UNITE, 2019. UNITE general FASTA release for Fungi. Version 18.11.2018. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vitousek PM, Howarth RW, 1991. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13, 87–115. 10.1007/BF00002772 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, Gilbert J. a, Jansson JK, 2015. Transcribed Spacer Marker Gene Primers for Microbial Community Surveys. mSystems 1, e0009–15. 10.1128/mSystems.00009-15.Editor [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Wei T, Simko V, 2021. R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wickham H, 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  64. Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW, 2019. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 13, 413–429. 10.1038/s41396-018-0279-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Williams DJ, 2001. Prediction of erosion from steep mine waste slopes. Environ. Manag. Heal 12, 35–50. 10.1108/09566160110381913 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

Data Availability Statement

Raw sequence data for the 16S rRNA gene and ITS were submitted to the NCBI BioProject under the accession number PRJNA796645.

RESOURCES