ABSTRACT
Many Gram-negative bacteria deploy a type VI secretion system (T6SS) to inject toxins into target cells to promote their survival and replication in complex environments. Here, we report that Acinetobacter baumannii uses its T6SS to kill fungi and that the effector TafE (ACX60_15365) is responsible for such killing. Although ectopically expressed TafE is toxic to both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, deletion of tafE only affects the antifungal activity of A. baumannii. We demonstrate that TafE is a DNase capable of targeting the nuclei of yeast cells and that an Ntox15 domain is essential for its ability to degrade DNA. Furthermore, our findings show that A. baumannii is protected from the toxicity of TafE by elaborating the immunity protein TaeI (ACX60_15360), which antagonizes the activity of the effector by direct binding. The discovery of A. baumannii T6SS effectors capable of killing multiple taxonomically distinct microbes has shed light on a mechanism of the high-level fitness of this pathogen in environments characterized by scarce nutrients and the potential presence of diverse microorganisms.
KEYWORDS: type VI secretion system, anti-fungal effector, interkingdom competition, polymicrobial niches
INTRODUCTION
Bacteria have evolved various mechanisms to survive in their ecological niches by establishing mutualistic and/or competitive relationships with other microbes living in the same environment. For example, commensal interactions have been documented in which Acinetobacter sp. strain C6 enables the partner organism Pseudomonas putida to grow on benzyl alcohol as a sole carbon source (1, 2). In many other scenarios, the relationship among microbes in a given niche is competition for space and resources. A number of antagonistic strategies used by bacteria have been described, including effective assimilation of key nutrients (e.g., sequester of iron by siderophores), modification of the microenvironmental conditions to make them less suitable for other bacteria to live, and the production of antimicrobials that eliminate or slow the growth of proximal microbes (3).
The type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a widely distributed nanomachine employed by many bacteria to kill competitors in polymicrobial communities (4). The antimicrobial activity of these machines is mediated by toxic effectors injected into prey cells (5, 6). Although most characterized T6SS effectors are weapons elaborated to target Gram-negative bacteria (7), some have been shown to promote virulence by directly interfering with host cellular processes (8–10) or by suppressing immunity (11). In addition, effectors that facilitate bacterial growth by assimilating scarce metal ions have also been reported (12, 13).
The cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria was previously believed to be impenetrable by T6SS spears due to its thick peptidoglycan layers and the presence of teichoic acid polymers. The plant pathogen Acidovorax citrulli utilizes its T6SS to kill both Gram-positive bacteria and fungi (14), which have a cell wall that is made of polymers of mannose, glucose, and N-acetylglucosamine and is thicker than that of Gram-positive bacteria (15). Antifungal activity has also been documented for Serratia marcescens (16), Klebsiella pneumoniae (17), and Myxococcus xanthus (18).
Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative aerobic short bacillus that poses grave challenges in hospital environments as an important nosocomial pathogen. As one of the “ESKAPE” pathogens (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species) (19), A. baumannii is notorious for its ability to cause deadly hospital-acquired infections, which are difficult or even impossible to treat due to its extensive acquisition of resistance against multiple antibiotics (20). A. baumannii is also known for its ability to survive for long durations on dry surfaces, such as medical equipment, and in niches of scarce nutrients in a range of temperatures and pH conditions (21, 22). These features suggest that this bacterium has evolved mechanisms to effectively assimilate nutrients from the environment and to outcompete other microbes. Indeed, A. baumannii is equipped with mechanisms to effectively acquire nutrients, such as essential metals, from the environment, including its hosts (23).
Bioinformatics analysis has revealed that A. baumannii codes for a T6SS and a large cohort of putative effectors that are conserved among different isolates (24–26). In strain 17978 (27) and some recently isolated multidrug resistance strains, the expression of the T6SS is repressed by two TetR-like proteins harbored on the large plasmid pAB3, suggesting coordination between plasmid conjugation and the activation of the competitor-killing machine (28). A recent study found that the T6SS of A. baumannii mediates killing of Gram-positive bacteria by a unique mechanism involving the secretion of d-lysine, which modulates the extracellular pH to potentiate the peptidoglycanase activity of the effector Tse4 (29).
Here, we report that A. baumannii kills fungi via its T6SS effector TafE (ACX60_15365), which is a DNase harboring nuclear localization signals for yeast cells. We also demonstrate that the toxicity of TafE against A. baumannii is prevented by the immunity protein TaeI (ACX60_15360), which blocks its enzymatic activity by direct protein-protein interactions.
RESULTS
Derepression of T6SS enables A. baumannii to kill bacteria and fungi.
A. baumannii strain 17978 has been shown to carry a large plasmid called pAB3, which harbors two TetR-like regulatory proteins that inhibit the expression of its T6SS genes (28). Consistent with this notion, the wild-type strain harboring pAB3 (designated the wild type [WT]) did not detectably express or secrete the hemolysin-coregulated protein (Hcp) (Fig. 1A). In contrast, curing of pAB3 generated a strain (designated WTR−) (Table S1 in the supplemental material) that robustly expressed and secreted Hcp into the culture supernatant (Fig. 1A). To further determine the role of the T6SS in the secretion of Hcp, we created a mutant lacking tssM (Table S1), which codes for an essential component of the T6SS belonging to the IcmF (intracellular multiplication protein F) protein family (30, 31). As expected, the ΔtssM mutant completely lost the ability to secrete Hcp (Fig. 1A).
The T6SS of A. baumannii strain 17978 functions to kill nonkin bacteria in polymicrobial niches (28–30). We thus examined the ability of the WTR− strain to kill Escherichia coli and Enterobacter cloacae, two Gram-negative bacteria, as well as the Gram-positive bacterium S. aureus. Coincubation of the WTR− strain with E. coli or E. cloacae led to significant reduction of viable cells of both bacteria, and such killing did not occur when the ΔtssM mutant was used in similar experiments (Fig. 1B and C). Interestingly, although at a detectably lower efficiency, A. baumannii also killed S. aureus (Fig. 1B and C). The lower killing efficiency against Gram-positive bacteria is consistent with the fact that this group of microorganisms are more recalcitrant to T6SS-mediated killing, due at least in part to their thicker cell wall.
Because of their powerful metabolic capacity in degrading polymers not consumable by most bacteria, fungi often are the first colonizers in niches originally less suitable for prokaryotes (32). Byproducts of fungal metabolism then attract bacteria to form polymicrobial communities where the latter may need to outcompete the eukaryote in order to succeed in establishing its niche (33). A. baumannii has the ability to survive in nutrient-scarce environments, such as the surface of medical instruments. We therefore examined whether it could kill fungal cells. Relevant strains of A. baumannii were mixed with the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as Candida albicans and Candida glabrata, two fungal pathogens frequently found in nosocomial environments. The A. baumannii strain WTR− with an active T6SS killed each of these three fungal species to varying degrees. Again, deletion of tssM abolished its ability to compete against fungal cells (Fig. 1D and E). These results indicate that A. baumannii utilizes its T6SS to attack a wide range of microbial competitors, including bacteria and fungi.
The T6SS effector TafE is required for the antifungal activity of A. baumannii.
The valine glycine repeat G (VgrG) proteins are a family of secreted T6SS components that are essential in the assembly of the nanomachine’s baseplate (34, 35). Another important role of VgrGs is their involvement in the delivery of cognate effectors encoded by proximal genes (36). These proteins also exert effector function through activity conferred by their carboxyl domains (35, 37, 38). Bioinformatics analysis revealed that A. baumannii strain 17978 codes for four VgrG clusters, each linked to a putative effector encoded by an immediately downstream gene. These putative effectors are Tle (ACX60_17660), TafE (ACX60_15365), Tse (ACX60_11695), and Tae (ACX60_00605) (Fig. S1A). We first determined the toxicity of these effectors to E. coli by introducing plasmids expressing each of them into strain BL21(DE3). Induction of protein expression by IPTG (isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) arrested the growth of strains expressing Tle, TafE, or Tae (Fig. S1B and C). Intriguingly, although its expression was readily detectable, Tse did not display discernable toxicity to E. coli (Fig. S1C), suggesting that this effector has only a very subtle impact on the bacterium or it plays another role in the biology of A. baumannii (Fig. S1B).
Next, we set out to identify the effector responsible for the antifungal activity by expressing each of these four putative effectors in S. cerevisiae on a vector harboring the galactose-inducible promoter Pgal. Growth experiments using serially diluted cells of the relevant yeast strains on medium containing glucose or galactose revealed that only TafE exhibited toxicity (Fig. 2A). In contrast, although each was expressed at high levels, Tle, Tse, and Tae did not detectably inhibit yeast growth (Fig. 2A).
To determine whether TafE contributes to the antifungal activity of A. baumannii, we constructed a panel of mutants and used the killing assay to probe the effector directly responsible for the antifungal activity. Deletion of the gene coding for Tle, Tse, or Tae did not detectably impact the ability of A. baumannii to kill S. cerevisiae (Fig. 2B and C). Importantly, yeast cells that had been mixed with the ΔtafE mutant survived at levels comparable to the survival of those that had been mixed with the ΔtssM mutant, indicating that TafE is the effector that targets fungal cells (Fig. 2B and C). Each of the mutants lacking a specific effector gene still expressed and secreted Hcp at levels comparable to those in the WTR− strain (Fig. 2B), indicating that the T6SS is functional in these mutants. Taken together, these results suggest that TafE is the key effector utilized by A. baumannii in fighting against fungi.
We also validated T6SS-mediated secretion of TafE by inserting the gene into pJL03, which allows the expression of Flag-tagged proteins in A. baumannii (39), and the resulting plasmid, pJL03-TafE, was introduced into the WTR−, ΔtssM, and ΔvgrG2 strains. Secreted Flag-TafE could be readily detected in the culture supernatant of strain WTR−(pJL03-TafE) (Fig. 2D). Although the protein was similarly expressed, secretion of Flag-TafE by the ΔtssM(pJL03-TafE) or ΔvgrG2(pJL03-TafE) strain was not detectable. As expected, the expression and secretion of Hcp were not affected by overexpression of TafE or by vgrG2 deletion (Fig. 2D). These results indicate that TafE is secreted by the T6SS of A. baumannii in a VgrG2-dependent manner.
TafE is a Mg2+-dependent DNase.
TafE was annotated as a hypothetical protein, and it is predicted by the Pfam database to harbor an Ntox15 domain with an H458XXD461 (X, any amino acid) catalytic motif that is present in a wide variety of nucleases (Fig. 3A) (40). Further analysis by PSI-BLAST revealed that the carboxyl end of TafE has a high probability of having structural features similar to those found in Atu4350 from Agrobacterium fabrum (41), N643_13510 from Salmonella bongori, VPUCM_2729 from Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and NM96_04490 from Neisseria mucosa (Fig. 3A and Fig. S2).
To gain a more complete appreciation of the relationships of TafE within the Pseudomonadota phylum, we performed phylogenetic analysis of TafE proteins from the phyla Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, orders Alteromonadales, Vibrionales, Pseudomonadales, and Moraxellales, and several species from the Acinetobacter genus (Fig. S3). TafE proteins from each of the classes Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, and Gammaproteobacteria formed three different phyloclades. Interestingly, TafE proteins from Acinetobacter did not form a monophyletic group. Instead, TafE proteins from Acinetobacter dispersus, Acinetobacter seifertii, and Acinetobacter bereziniae together with the TafE proteins from Pseudomonadales formed a monophyletic group. This distribution may result from convergent evolution or from gene transfer events between the orders before the speciation of members of Pseudomonadales.
To determine the biochemical activity of TafE, we purified E. coli His6-TafE, as well as His6-TafEH458A and His6-TafED461A, two mutants in which the highly conserved residues His458 and Asp461 in the predicted Ntox15 domain were each replaced with alanine (Fig. 3A and Fig. S4A), and examined their nuclease activities with DNA from different organisms. The inclusion of His6-TafE in reaction mixtures containing DNA from E. coli, A. baumannii, or S. cerevisiae led to complete destruction of the large DNA molecules after 60 min of incubation (Fig. 3B). Similar degradation occurred in reaction mixtures containing single-stranded DNA isolated from salmon sperm (Fig. 3B). Both His6-TafEH458A and His6-TafED461A had completely lost the ability to degrade DNA (Fig. 3B), indicating that the H458XXE461 motif is essential for its nuclease activity. As DNases often require specific metal ions for their activity, we first treated His6-TafE with EDTA, which abolished its ability to degrade DNA, likely by chelating the metal ion critical for its enzymatic activity. The addition of exogenous Mg2+ but not of Ca2+ restored its ability to degrade DNA (Fig. 3C). Thus, TafE is a Mg2+-dependent DNase. Furthermore, deletion of tafE did not detectably impact the ability of A. baumannii to outcompete E. coli, E. cloacae, or S. aureus (Fig. S4B and C), suggesting that the bacterium codes for other effectors to target bacteria.
Unlike bacteria, genomic DNA of fungi is packed in the nucleus, which is surrounded by bilayer membranes with pores that only allow efficient passage of proteins less than about 40 kDa (42). TafE has a predicted molecular weight of approximately 60 kDa and, thus, cannot efficiently enter the nucleus by diffusion. To determine whether TafE can be targeted to the nuclei of yeast cells, we introduced a plasmid expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP)-TafEH458A into yeast strain W303 (43), stained fixed cells with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), and assessed the distribution of the GFP signals under a confocal microscope. In cells expressing GFP-TafEH458A, green fluorescence signals perfectly colocalized with those of DAPI, with few green signals being detected in the cytoplasm, whereas GFP-eEF1A, the protein translation elongation factor, was mainly cytosolic, as previously described (Fig. 3D) (44). Intriguingly, GFP-TafE was almost completely localized in the cytoplasm in HeLa cells (Fig. 3D), suggesting that TafE can only be recognized by the nuclear import machine of yeast cells or that the protein can exploit a nuclear translocation mechanism specific to yeast. The cytosolic localization of GFP-TafE is consistent with the observation that this fusion protein was not detectably toxic to HeLa cells, likely due to its inability to reach the substrate in the nucleus (Fig. 3E). These observations suggest that TafE has acquired nuclear localization signals that facilitate its targeting to the nucleus of yeast but not mammalian cells.
The DNase activity of TafE is essential for A. baumannii to attack fungi.
We further analyzed the role of the DNase activity in the interactions between A. baumannii and fungi. Mutations in His458 or Asp461 did not affect the stability of TafE in yeast, but both abolished its yeast toxicity (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, because the DNase activity of TafE will cause DNA fragmentation, we examined the presence of DNA termini in yeast cells expressing different alleles of tafE using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay (45). In cells expressing TafE, a population of cells were TUNEL positive. In contrast, DNA labeling did not detectably occur in cells expressing the TafEH458A or TafED461A mutant (Fig. 4B). These results further validate the DNase activity of TafE.
We next assessed the importance of the DNase activity of TafE in the fungus-killing activity of A. baumannii. Plasmids that direct the expression of TafE, TafEH458A, or TafED461A were introduced into the ΔtafE strain, and the ability of the resulting strains to kill yeast was examined. Whereas the expression of TafE fully restored the ability of the ΔtafE mutant to kill yeast, neither of the two mutants had such activity (Fig. 4C and D). Thus, the DNase activity of TafE is required for A. baumannii to kill fungi.
A small fraction of clinical isolates of A. baumannii harbor tafE.
The A. baumannii strain 17978 used in our study was isolated in 1951 from a meningitis patient in the United States (27). T6SS effectors are known to be highly diverse in a given bacterial species, which reflects the evolution of the microorganism in its natural habitats (46). We thus set out to determine the distribution of tafE in clinical isolates of A. baumannii collected by our hospital. We examined a total of 78 isolates for the tafE gene by PCR, using primers corresponding to its 5′ and 3′ ends. Only 3 isolates (no. 11, no. 12, and no. 32) appeared to harbor a tafE gene that had sufficient sequence similarity to be detectable by this method (Fig. S5A). Intriguingly, among the three strains, no. 12 and no. 32 expressed and secreted Hcp similarly to strain WTR−, a derivative of 17978 lacking pAB3 (Table S1). In contrast, Hcp expression was not detectable in strain no. 11 (Fig. S5B). These results suggest that the T6SS is constitutively expressed in isolates no. 12 and no. 32 but is repressed in isolate no. 11.
We next examined the antifungal activity of the three strains using S. cerevisiae as prey. Consistent with the status of Hcp expression and secretion, strains no. 12 and no. 32 efficiently killed yeast cells at rates comparable to the killing by the WTR− strain derived from strain 17978. The antifungal activity of strain no. 11 is akin to that of the ΔtssM mutant, suggesting that its T6SS is not active under our experimental conditions (Fig. S5C and D). We also sequenced the tafE gene in clinical isolates of A. baumannii, and the results showed that these genes are highly homologous to ACX60_15365, each harboring the HXXD motif (Fig. S6). Thus, the presence of TafE endows A. baumannii with the capability to outcompete fungi. Whether any isolate lacking TafE has antifungal activity and, if so, whether such activity is mediated by effectors structurally similar to TafE needs further investigation.
The immunity protein TaeI prevents self-destruction of A. baumannii by TafE.
The indiscriminate DNase activity of TafE against DNA from different organisms, including A. baumannii itself, immediately suggests the presence of an immunity protein that functions to prevent self-destruction by TafE. Such immunity proteins, which often are encoded by genes next to those of the effectors, have been described for many lethal T6SS effectors (47, 48). In strain 17978, the open reading frame ACX60_15360 immediately downstream from tafE that is predicted to code for a protein of 286 residues is a good candidate for the immunity protein against TafE (Fig. S1). We first determined whether TaeI could suppress the yeast toxicity of TafE. Coexpression of TaeI with TafE abolished the toxicity of the effector and allowed yeast to grow (Fig. 5A). The expression of mCherry-TaeI in yeast revealed that the protein occupies the entire cell with a clear concentration in the nucleus (Fig. S7A), suggesting that TaeI may engage TafE before and after it has reached the nuclei of target fungal cells. Furthermore, yeast cells harboring a plasmid expressing TaeI became resistant to the WTR− strain of A. baumannii, which killed a control strain carrying the empty vector (Fig. 5B and C). These results indicate that TaeI antagonizes the toxicity of TafE in A. baumannii and protects the bacterium from the lethal effect of the indiscriminate DNase activity.
We further explored the mechanism of action of TaeI by examining its effect on the DNase activity of TafE. Glutathione S-transferase (GST)-tagged TaeI was purified from E. coli (Fig. S7B), and the inclusion of TaeI in reaction mixtures at a 1:1 molar ratio to TafE effectively abolished its DNA degradation activity (Fig. 5D). Most immunity proteins block the activity of the cognate effectors by direct protein-protein interactions (47), and thus, we examined binding between TafE and TaeI. In solutions containing GST-TaeI and His6-TafE, the latter could be captured by GST beads together with GST-TaeI, which did not occur in reaction mixtures containing GST and His6-TafE (Fig. 5E), indicating that these two proteins form a stable complex. In addition, coexpressed TaeI also suppressed the bacterial toxicity of TafE in E. coli (Fig. S7C and D). Together, these results indicate that TaeI is the immunity protein of TafE, which protects A. baumannii from the toxicity of the effector by direct binding.
DISCUSSION
The ability of A. baumannii to thrive in nutrient-scarce niches and to outcompete other microbes in polymicrobial communities depends on its mechanisms for effective nutrient assimilation and killing of competitors. The discovery of TafE as a weapon against fungi and Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria by A. baumannii further underpins its success in harsh environments. More importantly, effectors with potent toxicity to the bacterium itself, such as TafE, may be exploited to develop novel and specific antibiotics by eliminating the immunity proteins using technologies such as BacPROTACs (49).
Tse4 of A. baumannii has both lytic transglycosylase and endopeptidase activities that attack the cell wall of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (29). In addition, Tae and Tle are likely antibacterial effectors, given their strong toxicity toward E. coli (Fig. S1). Thus, A. baumannii utilizes multiple effectors to attack bacteria, which is a common phenomenon among different bacteria (5). The cell wall is considered the major barrier for the penetration of the T6SS spear. The cell wall of yeast (>110 nm) is considerably thicker than that of Gram-positive bacteria (<80 nm) (15, 50), and thus, the ability to kill fungi suggests that A. baumannii’s T6SS is more penetrative than those of bacteria lacking this ability. Given the nonspecific targeting of DNA by TafE, it may also contribute to the killing of bacteria. At the same time, this effector appears to have evolved to target fungal cells because of its targeting to the nuclei of yeast but not mammalian cells, probably by nucleus localization signals specific for the former (Fig. 3). Whether TafE provides advantages to A. baumannii for its infections in humans and animals remains to be investigated.
Although their biochemical activities remain elusive, Tfe1 and Tfe2 from S. marcescens cause fungal cell death by inducing the formation of abnormally large vacuoles and by disruption of fungal metabolism, respectively (16). In addition, M. xanthus utilizes the proline-alanine-alanine-arginine (PAAR) protein to kill plant-pathogenic fungi (18). Despite the apparent importance of killing yeast in its competition for space and nutrients, it is surprising that only 3 of the 78 A. baumannii clinical isolates detectably carry the tafE gene (Fig. S5). Other isolates may employ effectors with activities distinct from that of TafE to kill fungi. It is important to note that not all bacteria that code for effectors with nuclease activity can kill yeast or Gram-positive bacteria, suggesting that the penetrative power of the T6SS differs among bacterial species. Alternatively, for bacteria that can kill fungi, other yet-unknown factors may facilitate the penetration of their T6SS across the thick cell wall.
The antimicrobial function of T6SS is critically important in overcoming the resistance to colonization by pathogens that need to establish a niche in polymicrobial environments like the gut (5). A. baumannii clearly will encounter other microbes when it attempts to establish a niche, whether on the surface of medical devices, the skin, or a wound. It is not clear how the T6SS and its effectors impact A. baumannii virulence under natural conditions when other microbes are present. Better infection models that can more closely recapitulate the infection process in the presence of other microbes are needed to assess the role of the T6SS and its effectors in interactions between A. baumannii and its hosts. Such information will drive further research to explore strategies to inactivate the T6SS to prevent and treat infections caused by this increasingly challenging pathogen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
The bacterial and yeast strains used in the study are listed in Table S1. With the exception of the 78 clinical isolates used to probe the distribution of the tafE gene, all A. baumannii strains were derived from strain 17978 (27). Strains of E. cloacae, S. aureus, C. albicans, and C. glabrata were isolates recovered from patients in the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun City, Jilin Province, China. Each was verified by next-generation sequencing (NGS). Unless otherwise noted, bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani medium. For E. coli, antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 100 μg/mL, and kanamycin, 30 μg/mL. For A. baumannii, the concentrations were gentamicin, 10 μg/mL, and streptomycin, 100 μg/mL.
For S. cerevisiae, strain W303 (43) was used. The yeast strains and clinical fungal isolates were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose) or Sabouraud dextrose (SD) minimal medium containing nitrogen base, glucose, and amino acid drop-out mix for selection of transformed plasmids as described previously (51). To induce gene expression from the galactose promoter, 2% galactose was included in synthetic medium.
Isolation of a derivative of A. baumannii strain 17978 lacking plasmid pAB3.
A. baumannii strain 17978 harbors pAB3, a large conjugative plasmid that codes for two tetR-like genes that repress the expression of the chromosomal T6SS (28, 52). This plasmid is known to be unstable and can be cured as the bacterium propagates (28). We randomly tested 200 colonies of strain 17978 by PCR using primer pairs pSL1041/pSL1042 and pSL1043/pSL1044 to amplify two fragments on pAB3 (accession no. CP012005), from which one strain negative for these two genes was obtained. After verification with the third primer pair, pSL1045/pSL1046, the strain that had lost pAB3, designated WTR−, was chosen for subsequent experiments.
Construction of plasmids and bacterial mutants.
Bioinformatic analysis of strain A. baumannii 17978 revealed the presence of four VgrG clusters, each associated with a putative effector, Tle, TafE, Tse, and Tae, respectively (Fig. S1). The genes encoding Tle, TafE, Tse, and Tae were each deleted from the genome of strain 17978 as described previously (53). Briefly, the deletion plasmid was constructed by amplifying 0.8-kb DNA fragments upstream and downstream from each gene and ligating them into SacI-/SalI-digested pSR47s, an R6K-based suicide plasmid (54). This manipulation replaced the gene to be deleted with an open reading frame that encoded a 15-residue polypeptide composed of the first 15 and last 15 amino acids of the original protein. The resulting gene deletion plasmid was introduced into a streptomycin-resistant derivative of strain 17978 (39) by triparental mating with the help of E. coli strain MT607 (pRK600) (55). Transconjugants were streaked onto LB agar containing 5% sucrose to select cells in which the second event of recombination had occurred. Mutants with the appropriate deletion were identified by primer pairs corresponding to the gene of interest by PCR. The integrity of all plasmids was verified by sequencing analysis. The sequences of all primers used in this study are in Table S1.
Protein expression and purification.
The full-length gene for TafE was amplified from A. baumannii genomic DNA using the appropriate primers (Table S1), and the PCR product was digested with BamHI/SalI and inserted into pETSumo (Thermo Fisher) to produce sumo-His6-tagged fusion proteins. The gene coding for TaeI, an immunity protein that antagonizes the activity of TafE, was cloned into pGEX-6P-1 to express GST-TaeI. When needed, substitution mutations were introduced using the QuikChange kit (Agilent) and fusion PCR. E. coli strain BL21(DE3) was used as the host for expression and purification of recombinant proteins.
Amounts of 20 mL of overnight cultures were transferred to 500 mL LB broth supplemented with 100 μg/mL of ampicillin or 30 μg/mL of kanamycin. Cultures were grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6 in a shaker (200 rpm) at 37°C. The expression of the fusion protein was induced at 16°C by adding 0.2 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside) for 18 h. The harvested cell pellets were resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole) and were lysed by using a cell homogenizer (JN-mini; JNBio, Guangzhou, China). The supernatant of lysed cells was mixed with Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) or glutathione beads at 4°C for 1 h. Ni2+-NTA resin was extensively washed with washing buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole) following protein binding. Glutathione beads were washed with 20× the column volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Bound His6-sumo-tagged proteins were eluted five times with the same buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. GST-tagged proteins were eluted with 10 mM glutathione. His6-Hcp and His6-TafE fusion proteins were similarly purified with Ni2+-NTA beads. The purity of the proteins was evaluated by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie brilliant blue staining, and only proteins purer than 95% were used in subsequent experiments. Proteins were dialyzed in a storage buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol) at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method.
Yeast manipulation.
The yeast strains used in this study were derived from strain W303 (43), which was grown at 30°C in YPD medium. For maintenance of plasmids, yeast cells were cultured in an appropriate amino acid dropout synthetic medium supplemented with 2% glucose or galactose as the sole carbon source (56). For assessment of yeast toxicity, each of the putative A. baumannii T6SS substrates or TafE mutants was cloned into pYES2/NTA (Invitrogen), which harbors a galactose-inducible promoter controlling its expression (57). The plasmids were introduced into yeast cells using the lithium acetate method (58). Overnight cultures were serially diluted (5-fold), and 10 μL of each dilution was spotted onto selective plates containing glucose or galactose. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 2 days before image acquisition.
Bacterial and fungal competition assay.
To determine the bacterial killing activity of A. baumannii, interbacterial competition assays were performed between A. baumannii and E. coli, E. cloacae, or S. aureus as described previously (29). Briefly, the bacterial cells were grown overnight in LB broth at 37°C. Cells washed 2× with sterile PBS were resuspended with fresh LB broth. A. baumannii and the prey bacteria with kanamycin resistance were mixed at a ratio of 1:1 (A. baumannii/E. coli or A. baumannii/E. cloacae) or 1:10 (A. baumannii/S. aureus), and 10 μL of the mixture was spotted on LB agar and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The number of viable cells was determined by plating serially diluted cells on LB agar with kanamycin and culturing for another 18 h before image acquisition and colony counting. The number of input cells in each case was similarly determined using diluted cells that never met the predator strain. To evaluate the antifungal activity of A. baumannii, the yeast strain W303 and clinical isolates C. albicans and C. glabrata were used as the prey organisms. Similar procedures were used for the A. baumannii-and-fungal-prey competition assays, except that the cell mixtures were coincubated at a ratio of 10:1 (predator/prey) at 37°C for 6 h and grown on YPD plates containing 30 μg/mL kanamycin for 3 days before image acquisition and CFU counting.
Bacterial growth inhibition assay.
To test the potential bacterial toxicity, each of the indicated putative T6SS substrates of A. baumannii was introduced into the pET-sumo plasmid, which was introduced into E. coli strain BL21(DE3). To assess the effects of taeI on the bacterial toxicity of TafE, the gene coding for the immunity protein was cloned into pGEX-6p1 and the resulting plasmid was transformed into BL21(DE3) harboring pET-sumo-TafE. Cells were grown in LB medium at 37°C overnight. After being adjusted to the same OD600 value, the cultures were serially diluted (10-fold) and 10 μL of each dilution was spotted onto selective plates with or without 0.2 mM IPTG. The uninduced plates were cultured at 37°C for 18 h, and the plates containing IPTG were incubated at 25°C for 2 days due to IPTG induction potentially influencing bacterial growth at 37°C.
TUNEL staining and flow cytometry analysis.
Yeast strains derived from W303 and harboring a plasmid expressing TafE or its derivatives were grown at 30°C in selective liquid medium with 2% raffinose overnight. After washing twice with PBS, the yeast cells were resuspended in medium containing 2% galactose and continuously cultured at 30°C for another 8 h. A TUNEL staining assay was performed to determine the DNA damage in yeast according to a previously reported procedure (59). Briefly, collected cells were fixed with 3.7% (vol/vol) formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature and washed with PBS 3 times. After being digested with Zymolyase (MP Biomedicals) at 37°C for 1 h, cells were rinsed and incubated with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 5 min, followed by staining using a one-step TUNEL cell apoptosis detection kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Then, the collected cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Beckman CytoFLEX) at a 515- to 565-nm excitation wavelength and a 450- to 500-nm emission wavelength.
Antibodies and immunoblotting.
Purified His6-Hcp and His6-TafE were used to immunize rabbits by standard procedures (Jiaxuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). We used rabbit anti-Hcp (1:2,000), rabbit anti-isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICDH) (1:2,000) (39), mouse anti-Flag (1:3,000) (catalog number F1804; Sigma), and mouse anti-phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) (1:2,500) (catalog number ab113687; Abcam) antibodies in standard immunoblotting procedures. Briefly, proteins extracted from cells with Laemmli buffer were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Pall Life Sciences), and the membranes were first blocked with 5% nonfat milk (Bio-Rad) and then incubated with the appropriate primary antibodies at 4°C for 14 h. After being washed 3 times, the membranes were incubated with appropriate IRDye- or horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-labeled secondary antibodies, and the signals were detected and analyzed by using an Odyssey CLx system (LI-COR) or ChemiDoc MP system (Bio-Rad).
Immunoprecipitation.
To test the T6SS-dependent secretion by A. baumannii, TafE was cloned into pJL03 (39) to express Flag-TafE, and the plasmid was introduced into the WTR−, ΔtssM, and ΔvgrG2 strains. Cultures of each strain induced by 1% arabinose for 6 h were centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Beads coated with Flag-specific antibody (catalog number F2426; Sigma) were washed twice with PBS and then mixed with the prepared cell supernatant. The mixture was incubated on a rotatory shaker at 4°C for 14 h. After 5 washes with PBS, the resin was boiled in Laemmli buffer at 95°C for 10 min to release the bound proteins.
Transfection and fluorescence imaging.
To determine the subcellular localization in mammalian cells, GFP-TafE was expressed in HeLa cells by transfection using Lipofectamine 3000 (catalog number L3000150; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (1:5,000) (catalog number H3570; Invitrogen) to label the nuclei. Fluorescence images of the samples were acquired using an Olympus IX-83 fluorescence microscope.
To assess its distribution in yeast, the gfp-tafEH545A fusion protein gene was inserted into p425GPD (60), and the resulting plasmid was introduced into yeast strain W303. Amounts of 333 μL of cells of the strain harboring the plasmid were mixed with 666 μL of ethanol, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature (25°C) for 1 h. The yeast cells were spun down, and the pellet was suspended with PBS. After staining with Hoechst 33342 (1:2,000), samples were observed under a fluorescence microscope for image acquisition.
CCK8 assay for assessing cell viability.
To assess the toxicity of TafE to mammalian cells, the CCK8 assay was performed in HeLa cells expressing GFP or GFP-TafE, as described previously (61). Briefly, HeLa cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 2,000 cells/well and cultured for 14 h. An amount of 10 μL of CCK8 solution (Beyotime Biotechnology) was added into each well, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. The absorbance of cells was measured at 450 nm using the BioTek Synergy H1 microplate reader to determine cell viability.
DNase activity assay.
Genomic DNA isolated from bacterial or yeast cells using the TIANamp DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech, China) and salmon sperm DNA procured from Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), were used as the substrates in the DNase activity assay. One microgram of DNA was incubated with purified TafE or its derivatives (1 μg) in 50 μL of reaction buffer (20 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol) for 1 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of 2 mM MgCl2. The integrity of DNA was analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and images were taken using the Tanon mini space series gel image analysis system.
GST pull down and immunoprecipitation.
GST pulldown assays were performed as described previously (62). Briefly, 50 μg His6-TafE was added into PBS containing 50 μg GST or GST-TaeI, and the proteins were gently mixed and incubated at 4°C for 4 h. An amount of 50 μL of GST beads was added to the reaction mixture and incubated for 1 h. The beads were then separated and washed 5 times with PBS containing 500 mM NaCl to remove unbound proteins. Before SDS-PAGE separation and detection, proteins associated with beads were solubilized in 50 μL of Laemmli buffer. Retained proteins were detected by immunoblot coated with the His6-specific antibody after SDS-PAGE.
Bioinformatics analysis.
Toxin_43 domain-containing proteins were identified using the Pfam database, and multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of the toxin_43 domain-containing proteins (Atu4350, N643_13510, VPUCM_729, and NM96_04490) from different species were performed using Jalview (63). TafE homologs were identified with tBLASTn using the TafE protein (ACX60_15365) from strain ATCC 17978 as the query sequence. The TafE homologs obtained from Alphaproteobacteria (genera Methylobacterium, Vannielia, Tritonibacter, Paracoccus, Jannaschia, Loktanella, and Rhodovulum), Betaproteobacteria (genera Paraburkholderia and Burkholderia), and Gammaproteobacteria (genera Vibrio, Pseudoalteromonas, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas) were aligned by using ClustalX 2.1, and phylogenies were constructed using MEGA 7.0 (64) with 1,000 replicates using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method. The Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) was used for visualization of the phylogenetic tree (65).
Statistical analyses.
Quantitative data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 software (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t test was used to compare the mean levels between two groups, each with at least three independent samples.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study was funded in part by Jilin Science and Technology Agency grant number 20200403117SF (L.S.) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province grant number YDZJ202201ZYTS025 (X.C.).
L.S., Z.-Q.L., and D.L. conceived the project. J.L., X.C., J.J., Y.S., and L.S. performed the experiments. Q.G. performed the bioinformatic analysis. L.S., D.L., and Z.-Q.L. analyzed data. L.S. and Z.-Q.L. drafted the first version of the manuscript, and Z.-Q.L. revised the manuscript with input from all authors.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Zhao-Qing Luo, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Tao Dong, Southern University of Science and Technology, and Xihui Shen, State Key Lab Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University.
Contributor Information
Dan Li, Email: li_dan@jlu.edu.cn.
Zhao-Qing Luo, Email: luoz@purdue.edu.
Lei Song, Email: lsong@jlu.edu.cn.
Matthew Parsek, University of Washington.
REFERENCES
- 1.Christensen BB, Haagensen JA, Heydorn A, Molin S. 2002. Metabolic commensalism and competition in a two-species microbial consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2495–2502. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.5.2495-2502.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hansen SK, Rainey PB, Haagensen JA, Molin S. 2007. Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community. Nature 445:533–536. doi: 10.1038/nature05514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feichtmayer J, Deng L, Griebler C. 2017. Antagonistic microbial interactions: contributions and potential applications for controlling pathogens in the aquatic systems. Front Microbiol 8:2192. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Mekalanos JJ. 2006. Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1528–1533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510322103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Coulthurst S. 2019. The type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology (Reading) 165:503–515. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Basler M, Ho BT, Mekalanos JJ. 2013. Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell 152:884–894. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Russell AB, Peterson SB, Mougous JD. 2014. Type VI secretion system effectors: poisons with a purpose. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:137–148. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hachani A, Wood TE, Filloux A. 2016. Type VI secretion and anti-host effectors. Curr Opin Microbiol 29:81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ma AT, Mekalanos JJ. 2010. In vivo actin cross-linking induced by Vibrio cholerae type VI secretion system is associated with intestinal inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4365–4370. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915156107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Revel AT, Sturtevant D, Mekalanos JJ. 2007. Type VI secretion system translocates a phage tail spike-like protein into target cells where it cross-links actin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15508–15513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706532104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhu L, Xu L, Wang C, Li C, Li M, Liu Q, Wang X, Yang W, Pan D, Hu L, Yang Y, Lu Z, Wang Y, Zhou D, Jiang Z, Shen X. 2021. T6SS translocates a micropeptide to suppress STING-mediated innate immunity by sequestering manganese. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2103526118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103526118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang T, Si M, Song Y, Zhu W, Gao F, Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhang W, Wei G, Luo ZQ, Shen X. 2015. Type VI secretion system transports Zn2+ to combat multiple stresses and host immunity. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005020. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Si M, Zhao C, Burkinshaw B, Zhang B, Wei D, Wang Y, Dong TG, Shen X. 2017. Manganese scavenging and oxidative stress response mediated by type VI secretion system in Burkholderia thailandensis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E2233–E2242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pei T, Kan Y, Wang Z, Tang M, Li H, Yan S, Cui Y, Zheng H, Luo H, Liang X, Dong T. 2022. Delivery of an Rhs-family nuclease effector reveals direct penetration of the gram-positive cell envelope by a type VI secretion system in Acidovorax citrulli. mLife 1:66–78. doi: 10.1002/mlf2.12007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dupres V, Dufrene YF, Heinisch JJ. 2010. Measuring cell wall thickness in living yeast cells using single molecular rulers. ACS Nano 4:5498–5504. doi: 10.1021/nn101598v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Trunk K, Peltier J, Liu YC, Dill BD, Walker L, Gow NAR, Stark MJR, Quinn J, Strahl H, Trost M, Coulthurst SJ. 2018. The type VI secretion system deploys antifungal effectors against microbial competitors. Nat Microbiol 3:920–931. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0191-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Storey D, McNally A, Astrand M, Sa-Pessoa Graca Santos J, Rodriguez-Escudero I, Elmore B, Palacios L, Marshall H, Hobley L, Molina M, Cid VJ, Salminen TA, Bengoechea JA. 2020. Klebsiella pneumoniae type VI secretion system-mediated microbial competition is PhoPQ controlled and reactive oxygen species dependent. PLoS Pathog 16:e1007969. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu Y, Wang J, Zhang Z, Wang F, Gong Y, Sheng DH, Li YZ. 2021. Two PAAR proteins with different C-terminal extended domains have distinct ecological functions in Myxococcus xanthus. Appl Environ Microbiol 87:e00080-21. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00080-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rice LB. 2008. Federal funding for the study of antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial pathogens: no ESKAPE. J Infect Dis 197:1079–1081. doi: 10.1086/533452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee CR, Lee JH, Park M, Park KS, Bae IK, Kim YB, Cha CJ, Jeong BC, Lee SH. 2017. Biology of Acinetobacter baumannii: pathogenesis, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, and prospective treatment options. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:55. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Juni E. 1978. Genetics and physiology of Acinetobacter. Annu Rev Microbiol 32:349–371. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.32.100178.002025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jawad A, Seifert H, Snelling AM, Heritage J, Hawkey PM. 1998. Survival of Acinetobacter baumannii on dry surfaces: comparison of outbreak and sporadic isolates. J Clin Microbiol 36:1938–1941. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.7.1938-1941.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mortensen BL, Skaar EP. 2013. The contribution of nutrient metal acquisition and metabolism to Acinetobacter baumannii survival within the host. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3:95. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weber BS, Miyata ST, Iwashkiw JA, Mortensen BL, Skaar EP, Pukatzki S, Feldman MF. 2013. Genomic and functional analysis of the type VI secretion system in Acinetobacter. PLoS One 8:e55142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lewis JM, Deveson Lucas D, Harper M, Boyce JD. 2019. Systematic identification and analysis of Acinetobacter baumannii type VI secretion system effector and immunity components. Front Microbiol 10:2440. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Repizo GD, Espariz M, Seravalle JL, Salcedo SP. 2019. Bioinformatic analysis of the type VI secretion system and its potential toxins in the Acinetobacter genus. Front Microbiol 10:2519. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Piechaud M, Second L. 1951. Studies of 26 strains of Moraxella iwoffi. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 80:97–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Weber BS, Ly PM, Irwin JN, Pukatzki S, Feldman MF. 2015. A multidrug resistance plasmid contains the molecular switch for type VI secretion in Acinetobacter baumannii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:9442–9447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502966112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Le NH, Pinedo V, Lopez J, Cava F, Feldman MF. 2021. Killing of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria by a bifunctional cell wall-targeting T6SS effector. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2106555118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106555118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Repizo GD, Gagne S, Foucault-Grunenwald ML, Borges V, Charpentier X, Limansky AS, Gomes JP, Viale AM, Salcedo SP. 2015. Differential role of the T6SS in Acinetobacter baumannii virulence. PLoS One 10:e0138265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li L, Wang YN, Jia HB, Wang P, Dong JF, Deng J, Lu FM, Zou QH. 2019. The type VI secretion system protein AsaA in Acinetobacter baumannii is a periplasmic protein physically interacting with TssM and required for T6SS assembly. Sci Rep 9:9438. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45875-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Benocci T, Aguilar-Pontes MV, Zhou M, Seiboth B, de Vries RP. 2017. Regulators of plant biomass degradation in ascomycetous fungi. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:152. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0841-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.de Menezes AB, Richardson AE, Thrall PH. 2017. Linking fungal-bacterial co-occurrences to soil ecosystem function. Curr Opin Microbiol 37:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lopez J, Ly PM, Feldman MF. 2020. The tip of the VgrG spike is essential to functional type VI secretion system assembly in Acinetobacter baumannii. mBio 11:e02761-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02761-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zoued A, Brunet YR, Durand E, Aschtgen MS, Logger L, Douzi B, Journet L, Cambillau C, Cascales E. 2014. Architecture and assembly of the type VI secretion system. Biochim Biophys Acta 1843:1664–1673. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cianfanelli FR, Alcoforado Diniz J, Guo M, De Cesare V, Trost M, Coulthurst SJ. 2016. VgrG and PAAR proteins define distinct versions of a functional type VI secretion system. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005735. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bondage DD, Lin JS, Ma LS, Kuo CH, Lai EM. 2016. VgrG C terminus confers the type VI effector transport specificity and is required for binding with PAAR and adaptor-effector complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E3931–E3940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600428113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hachani A, Allsopp LP, Oduko Y, Filloux A. 2014. The VgrG proteins are “a la carte” delivery systems for bacterial type VI effectors. J Biol Chem 289:17872–17884. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.563429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jie J, Chu X, Li D, Luo Z. 2021. A set of shuttle plasmids for gene expression in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS One 16:e0246918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang D, de Souza RF, Anantharaman V, Iyer LM, Aravind L. 2012. Polymorphic toxin systems: comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol Direct 7:18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ma LS, Hachani A, Lin JS, Filloux A, Lai EM. 2014. Agrobacterium tumefaciens deploys a superfamily of type VI secretion DNase effectors as weapons for interbacterial competition in planta. Cell Host Microbe 16:94–104. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Timney BL, Raveh B, Mironska R, Trivedi JM, Kim SJ, Russel D, Wente SR, Sali A, Rout MP. 2016. Simple rules for passive diffusion through the nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 215:57–76. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201601004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fan HY, Cheng KK, Klein HL. 1996. Mutations in the RNA polymerase II transcription machinery suppress the hyperrecombination mutant hpr1 delta of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 142:749–759. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.3.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Oliveira DL, Nakayasu ES, Joffe LS, Guimaraes AJ, Sobreira TJ, Nosanchuk JD, Cordero RJ, Frases S, Casadevall A, Almeida IC, Nimrichter L, Rodrigues ML. 2010. Characterization of yeast extracellular vesicles: evidence for the participation of different pathways of cellular traffic in vesicle biogenesis. PLoS One 5:e11113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Crowley LC, Marfell BJ, Waterhouse NJ. 2016. Detection of DNA fragmentation in apoptotic cells by TUNEL. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2016:pdb.prot087221. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot087221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jurėnas D, Journet L. 2021. Activity, delivery, and diversity of type VI secretion effectors. Mol Microbiol 115:383–394. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hersch SJ, Manera K, Dong TG. 2020. Defending against the type six secretion system: beyond immunity genes. Cell Rep 33:108259. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Robitaille S, Trus E, Ross BD. 2021. Bacterial defense against the type VI secretion system. Trends Microbiol 29:187–190. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Morreale FE, Kleine S, Leodolter J, Junker S, Hoi DM, Ovchinnikov S, Okun A, Kley J, Kurzbauer R, Junk L, Guha S, Podlesainski D, Kazmaier U, Boehmelt G, Weinstabl H, Rumpel K, Schmiedel VM, Hartl M, Haselbach D, Meinhart A, Kaiser M, Clausen T. 2022. BacPROTACs mediate targeted protein degradation in bacteria. Cell 185:2338–2353.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Mai-Prochnow A, Clauson M, Hong J, Murphy AB. 2016. Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria differ in their sensitivity to cold plasma. Sci Rep 6:38610. doi: 10.1038/srep38610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gan N, Zhen X, Liu Y, Xu X, He C, Qiu J, Liu Y, Fujimoto GM, Nakayasu ES, Zhou B, Zhao L, Puvar K, Das C, Ouyang S, Luo ZQ. 2019. Regulation of phosphoribosyl ubiquitination by a calmodulin-dependent glutamylase. Nature 572:387–391. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1439-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Di Venanzio G, Moon KH, Weber BS, Lopez J, Ly PM, Potter RF, Dantas G, Feldman MF. 2019. Multidrug-resistant plasmids repress chromosomally encoded T6SS to enable their dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:1378–1383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812557116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Geisinger E, Mortman NJ, Vargas-Cuebas G, Tai AK, Isberg RR. 2018. A global regulatory system links virulence and antibiotic resistance to envelope homeostasis in Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007030. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Andrews HL, Vogel JP, Isberg RR. 1998. Identification of linked Legionella pneumophila genes essential for intracellular growth and evasion of the endocytic pathway. Infect Immun 66:950–958. doi: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.950-958.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Finan TM, Kunkel B, De Vos GF, Signer ER. 1986. Second symbiotic megaplasmid in Rhizobium meliloti carrying exopolysaccharide and thiamine synthesis genes. J Bacteriol 167:66–72. doi: 10.1128/jb.167.1.66-72.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Song L, Luo J, Wang H, Huang D, Tan Y, Liu Y, Wang Y, Yu K, Zhang Y, Liu X, Li D, Luo ZQ. 2022. Legionella pneumophila regulates host cell motility by targeting Phldb2 with a 14-3-3zeta-dependent protease effector. Elife 11:e73220. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Song L, Xie Y, Li C, Wang L, He C, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Luo J, Liu X, Xiu Y, Li H, Gritsenko M, Nakayasu ES, Feng Y, Luo ZQ. 2021. The Legionella effector SdjA is a bifunctional enzyme that distinctly regulates phosphoribosyl ubiquitination. mBio 12:e02316-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02316-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gietz RD, Schiestl RH, Willems AR, Woods RA. 1995. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 11:355–360. doi: 10.1002/yea.320110408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ribeiro GF, Corte-Real M, Johansson B. 2006. Characterization of DNA damage in yeast apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, and hyperosmotic shock. Mol Biol Cell 17:4584–4591. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e06-05-0475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk M. 1995. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156:119–122. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00037-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Bai X, Zhu Y, Jie J, Li D, Song L, Luo J. 2022. Maackiain protects against sepsis via activating AMPK/Nrf2/HO-1 pathway. Int Immunopharmacol 108:108710. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xu L, Shen X, Bryan A, Banga S, Swanson MS, Luo ZQ. 2010. Inhibition of host vacuolar H+-ATPase activity by a Legionella pneumophila effector. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000822. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. 2009. Jalview version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Letunic I, Bork P. 2019. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W256–W259. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.