Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2023 Mar 2. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.vacun.2023.02.001

An immunoinformatics approach to study the epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 helicase, Nsp13

Enfoque inmunoinformático Para estudiar los epítopes de la helicasa de SARS-CoV-2, Nsp13

Sushant Kumar 1, Khushboo Kumari 1, Gajendra Kumar Azad 1,
PMCID: PMC9977615  PMID: 37362836

Abstract

Introduction and objective

Vaccines are administered worldwide to control on-going coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Vaccine efficacy is largely contributed by the epitopes present on the viral proteins and their alteration might help emerging variants to escape host immune surveillance. Therefore, this study was designed to study SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 protein, its epitopes and evolution.

Methods

Clustal Omega was used to identify mutations in Nsp13 protein. Secondary structure and disorder score was predicted by CFSSP and PONDR-VSL2 webservers. Protein stability was predicted by DynaMut webserver. B cell epitopes were predicted by IEDB DiscoTope 2.0 tools and their 3D structures were represented by discovery studio. Antigenicity and allergenicity of epitopes were predicted by Vaxijen2.0 and AllergenFPv.1.0. Physiochemical properties of epitopes were predicted by Toxinpred, HLP webserver tool.

Results

Our data revealed 182 mutations in Nsp13 among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates, which were characterised by secondary structure and per-residue disorderness, stability and dynamicity predictions. To correlate the functional impact of these mutations, we characterised the most prominent B cell and T cell epitopes contributed by Nsp13. Our data revealed twenty-one epitopes, which exhibited antigenicity, stability and interactions with MHC class-I and class-II molecules. Subsequently, the physiochemical properties of these epitopes were analysed. Furthermore, eighteen mutations reside in these Nsp13 epitopes.

Conclusions

We report appearance of eighteen mutations in the predicted twenty-one epitopes of Nsp13. Among these, at least seven epitopes closely matches with the functionally validated epitopes. Altogether, our study shows the pattern of evolution of Nsp13 epitopes and their probable implications.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Nsp13, B cell epitopes, T cell epitopes, Mutations, Indian geographical area, Immunoinformatics

Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disease was first reported from Wuhan province, China in the late 2019.1., 2., 3. The causative agent of this disease was identified as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Corona Virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which shares considerable similarity with previously known coronavirus, SARS-CoV.4 Coronaviruses are a group of RNA viruses, which can infect diverse animals, including humans.5 Earlier reports have shown that at least six different coronaviruses are known to infect humans, including CoV-229E, CoV-OC43, CoV-NL63, CoV-HKU1, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV.6 Four of them do not cause any serious health implication on humans including CoV-229E, CoV-OC43, CoV-NL63, and CoV-HKU1 but serious respiratory issues have been linked to SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infection.7 The SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus to infect humans and also causes mild to severe respiratory illness in the infected individuals and reported to cause severe symptoms in immune-compromised patients. The SARS-CoV-2 rapidly spread worldwide within a few months and become one of the worst pandemic ever reported in human history.8 Still this virus is spreading and already triggered second and third wave of infections in several countries. More than 671 million cases of COVID-19 have been reported worldwide with approx 6.72 million deaths till 15th Jan 2023.

SARS-CoV-2 genome is comprised of a positive sense single stranded RNA of approximately 29 kb.9 Its genome encodes four structural, sixteen non-structural and nine accessory proteins.10 The non-structural proteins (NSPs) are involved in the maintenance of functional integrity of the virus and also required for infection and virus particle formation. The NSPs including RNA helicase Nsp13, the primase (Nsp8) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase RdRp (Nsp12) are present in a complex known as replication and transcription complex (RTC) that mediates an essential role in the completion of virus life cycle. Numerous RNA viruses have been found to encode their own RNA helicases, which are usually indispensable components of the RNA replication complexes11 , 12 and recognised as an ideal targets for developing antivirals.13 Nsp13, an RNA helicase, plays an important role in the folding of its RNA elements or unwinding of double stranded RNAs. Previous studies have shown that SARS-CoV Nsp13 has an NTPase and helicase activity belonging to helicase superfamily-1.14 The SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 helicase shares a 99.8% sequence identity to SARS-CoV (SARS) Nsp13 helicase.15 Nsp13 helicase is a critical component for viral replication and shares the highest sequence conservation across the CoV family, highlighting their importance for viral viability. RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and Nsp13 are required for viral replication, therefore, both of these vital enzymes represent a promising target for anti-SARS-CoV-2 drug development.16 Apart from helicase activity, NSP13 also possesses RNA 5′ triphosphatase activity and mediates the processing of viral 5’ mRNA.17 More importantly, the inhibition of NSP13 activity by pharmacological agents drastically reduces the viral replication indicating its role in viral life-cycle.18 , 19

NSP13 has been reported to act as an important modulator of host immune response. A study revealed that the presence of NSP13 reduces the expression as well as nuclear translocation of NF-kB.20 Another study shows that Nsp13 interacts with TLE1, a known NF-κB signalling interactor21 to target this signalling. Furthermore, NSP13 also supresses IFN-1 signalling by inhibiting STAT1/2 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation.22 Moreover, NSP13 also targets host deubiquitinase USP13 to counteract host antiviral immune response.23 Altogether, it seems that NSP13 possesses a strong immune activity that has been substantiated by mutagenesis studies. Several NSP13 mutants including P77L, Q88H, D260Y, E341D, and M429I, present in different variants of SARS-CoV-2 exhibits evasion from host immune response.24 Therefore, it is possible that with the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants more immune evading mutants will appear in near future.

With the appearance of new variants and their ability to evade immune system of host prompted us to carry out this study. In order to understand the host response towards SARS-CoV-2, we performed in-silico study to characterise Nsp13 protein. In silico methods are fast, reliable, and has very low-cost. The epitope predictions help us to target specific areas of the proteins for wet-lab based experiments and save a lot of time. Thus, in silico methods can be effective way to accelerate the understanding of virus evolution and host immune response. Several recent studies have been conducted to predict SARS-CoV-2 epitopes by immunoinformatics approaches.[25.], 26., 27., 28. In this study, we used bioinformatic tools to predict potential epitopes of Nsp13 and characterised them by analysing immunological parameters. Further, we systematically characterised the mutations in Nsp13 reported from India and their impacts on epitopes are discussed.

Materials and methods

Retrieval of Nsp13 mutations among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates

We used freely accessible CoVal database (https://coval.ccpem.ac.uk/) to retrieve mutations of SARS-CoV-2 reported from India as described earlier.29 CoVal database has been recently developed and serve as a repository of amino acid replacement mutations identified in the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences reported from different countries worldwide. Furthermore, we analysed all SARS-CoV-2 isolates sequences (50217) reported from India till September 2021 and our data revealed that a total 182 mutations have occurred in this protein. The Protein accession number: YP_009724389 reported from Wuhan, China was used as wild type for mutational analysis by CoVal webserver.

B cell epitope prediction

Linear B cell epitopes were predicted using IEDB (Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource),30 an online server tool based on Bepipred linear epitope prediction method (at the threshold value of 0.350). IEDB prediction tool was also used to predict the Nsp13 immunological parameters including the antigenicity, accessibility, flexibility, hydropathicity and beta turn. These standard parameters were estimated by Chou and Fasman beta-turn prediction algorithm, Emini surface accessibility server tool, Karplus and Schulz flexibility prediction tool, Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity and Parker hydrophilicity prediction algorithms, respectively.31 , 32 The DiscoTope 2.0 was used for prediction of Discontinuous B cell epitope using threshold value set at − 5.5 and its three dimensional structure were represented by discovery studio software. Antigenicity and allergenicity of B cell epitopes were predicted by Vaxijen 2.033 and AllergenFP v.1.034 servers, respectively.

T cell epitope prediction

On the surface of antigenic presenting cell, T cell epitopes are presented where they are attached to Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecule. MHC class I and class II molecules were predicted as follows-MHC class I molecule: IEDB webserver based on NetMHCpanEL 4.1 was used for prediction of MHC class I molecules.35 For this prediction, we selected HLA reference alleles (a total of 54 alleles) having epitope lengths of 9 or 10 mers. We finally sorted 9 mers conserved epitopes that show maximum binding interaction at IC50 < 200 nm. Antigenicity of all selected epitopes was predicted from Vaxijen 2.0 webserver, whereas allergenicity was predicted by AllergenFP v.1.0.

MHC class II molecules: IEDB recommended 2.22 prediction method was used to predict MHC class II epitopes. For this prediction, we selected the seven standard reference alleles having a maximum length of 11 mers. Subsequently, we sorted the most conserved 9 mers epitopes that exhibited maximum binding interaction with other alleles. Antigenicity of all selected epitopes was predicted from Vaxijen 2.0 webserver, whereas allergenicity was predicted by AllergenFP v.1.0.

Physiochemical profiling of T cell epitopes

The characterisation of selected MHC class I and MHC class II epitopes were performed by several webservers. The toxicity parameters were analysed through Toxinpred webserver tool.36 This method comprises of designing peptides (based on SVM score, first generate mutants and then predict toxicity), Batch submission (virtual screening of peptides to select best toxicity), Protein Scanning (this module first generates all possible overlapping peptides and subsequently server predicts toxicity of each overlapping peptides) and QMS calculations (peptide to get maximum/minimum/desired toxicity based upon the QM-based position specific scores). The physiochemical parameters including toxicity, hydrophobicity, hydropathicity, charge PI and molecular weight were calculated by Toxinpred tool.36 Another webserver tool HLP37 was used to predict half-life, surface accessibility, flexibility and polarity of the selected epitopes.

Structure modelling and stability predictions

The structural representation of Nsp13 protein was performed by DynaMut webserver.38 The protein stability and dynamicity was predicted by DynaMut webserver following standard methods as described earlier.39., 40., 41. For DynaMut analysis the recently reported structure of Nsp13 (RCSB-ID: 6ZSL) was used. The position of each predicted epitope on the 3D structural surface of Nsp13 was denoted using Biovia Discovery Studio.42

Results

Identification of Nsp13 mutations using CoVal Webserver among Indian isolates

In order to identify mutations in Nsp13 protein of SARS-CoV-2 from India, we used CoVal database that compared Nsp13 sequences reported from India (50,217 samples) with first reported sequence from Wuhan province, China. Our analysis using CoVal webserver revealed 182 mutations in Nsp13 among Indian isolates (Table 1 , complete list shown in supplementary table 1). Furthermore, our data revealed that P77L is the most frequent mutation observed among India isolates because it is present in 2639 samples followed by M429I (934 samples) and G206C (580) samples. We also analysed the polarity change and charge alteration due to the mutation in Nsp13. Our data show that most of mutation (132 out of 182) does not lead to any change (neutral to neutral). At two positions it changed from neutral to acidic (G87E and G170D) and acidic to basic at two positions (E420K, D119H) Similarly, basic to neutral occurred at 7 positions, neutral to basic (6 positions) and acidic to neutral (15 positions) as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

The table show the identity and properties of Nsp13 protein mutants identified among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The frequency of each mutant along with polarity and charge changes are also indicated. The table also show the ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCoM values of the mutants observed in Nsp13.

Serial Number Mutation Polarity Change Charge Change Mutation Frequency ΔΔG (kcal/mol) ΔΔSVib ENCoM (kcal.mol-1.K-1)
1 A4S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 2 0.083 − 0.59
2 A18T NP to P Neutral to Neutral 14 0.702 − 0.223
3 A18V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 8 0.69 − 0.227
4 L43F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 8 1.032 − 0.33
5 P47L NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 8 0.673 − 0.292
6 P53S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 10 0.024 0.504
7 G54V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 3 − 1.177 0.147
8 V57F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 6 − 1.148 0.448
9 S80G P to NP Neutral to Neutral 23 − 0.725 0.189
10 D105Y P to P Acidic to Neutral 2 1.156 − 0.227
11 A110S NP to Neutral to Neutral 5 − 0.733 − 0.137
12 A117T NP to P Neutral to Neutral 2 0.267 − 0.788
13 T127N P to P Neutral to Neutral 36 − 0.722 0.138
14 T141N P to P Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.806 0.088
15 E156D P to P Acidic to Acidic 6 − 0.611 0.188
16 H164Y P to P Basic (weakly) to Neutral 69 0.975 − 0.375
17 E168Q P to P Acidic to Neutral 4 0.749 − 0.176
18 V169F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 24 − 0.956 0.088
19 G170D NP to P Neutral to Acidic 4 − 1.281 0.095
20 P172S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 17 − 0.885 0.203
21 L176F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 9 0.972 − 1.067
22 G184C NP to p Neutral to Neutral 3 1.155 − 1.053
23 T199N P to P Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.687 0.525
24 E201A P to NP Acidic to Neutral 3 0.04 0.672
25 D207G P to NP Acidic to Neutral 3 − 0.314 4.814
26 V210F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 5 0.881 − 0.311
27 V210G NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 − 1.402 0.786
28 T214I P to NP Neutral to Neutral 6 0.881 − 0.339
29 V226L NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 12 0.528 − 0.236
30 S236I P to NP Neutral to Neutral 11 0.75 − 0.37
31 A237T NP to P Neutral to Neutral 8 0.924 − 0.424
32 A237V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 5 1.122 − 0.434
33 A237S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 2 0.648 − 0.311
34 S259L P to NP Neutral to Neutral 14 0.854 − 0.167
35 E261D P to P Acidic to Acidic 15 − 1.366 0.275
36 M274I NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 11 − 0.653 0.389
37 M274V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 3 − 0.69 0.441
38 Y277C P to P Neutral to Neutral 25 − 0.969 0.578
39 H290Y P to P Basic(weakly) to Neutral 3 0.562 0.896
40 A296S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 26 − 1.135 − 0.128
41 A296V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 3 0.567 − 0.275
42 P300S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 8 0.775 − 0.285
43 R303C P to P Basic (strongly) to Neutral 2 − 1.637 0.774
44 E319D P to P Acidic to Acidic 11 − 0.572 0.249
45 L325F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 7 0.689 − 0.542
46 I334V NP to NP Acidic to Acidic 2 − 1.076 0.206
47 E341D P to P Acidic to Acidic 20 − 0.88 0.088
48 T351I P to NP Neutral to Neutral 17 0.654 − 0.204
49 V356F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 3 0.181 − 0.807
50 A368S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 18 − 1.24 − 0.003
51 A368V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 12 1.718 − 0.385
52 I370V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 4 − 1.067 0.04
53 A379T NP to P Neutral to Neutral 3 − 0.564 − 0.377
54 A379S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.854 − 0.309
55 L391S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 3 − 3.418 0.484
56 K394R P to P Basic to Basic 3 − 0.946 0.579
57 H395R P to P Basic (weakly) to Basic (strongly) 2 − 0.598 − 0.002
58 P402S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 9 − 1.075 0.119
59 P402L NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 0.876 − 0.88
60 P419S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 6 0.693 − 0.661
61 L428F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 6 0.51 − 0.169
62 D435Y P to P Acidic to Neutral 3 − 0.179 − 0.541
63 A446V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.296 − 0.636
64 D466Y P to P Acidic to Neutral 10 − 0.58 0.118
65 V484F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 9 − 0.125 − 1.078
66 V484I NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 0.705 − 0.835
67 V496L NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 0.512 − 0.173
68 R502H P to P Basic (strongly) to Basic (weakly) 2 − 1.513 0.512
69 P504L NP to NP Neutral to basic 7 0.601 − 0.05
70 A509S NP to P Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.595 − 0.015
71 Q518H P to P Neutral to Basic (weakly) 3 − 0.3 0.501
72 A520V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 4 0.195 − 0.671
73 V521A NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 − 1.276 0.549
74 Y541C P to P Neutral to Neutral 2 − 0.863 0.482
75 D542Y P to P Acidic to Neutral 3 0.622 − 0.379
76 I575M NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 − 1.607 − 0.019
77 I575V NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 2 − 1.317 0.131
78 D578Y P to P Acidic to Neutral 6 − 0.111 − 0.837
79 L581F NP to NP Neutral to Neutral 19 0.57 − 0.573
80 Q586H P to P Neutral to basic(weakly) 2 0.775 − 0.128

Mutations cause alteration in dynamic stability of Nsp13

We used DynaMut program to predict the effect of mutations on the stability of the protein by calculating the differences in free energy (ΔΔG) and change in vibrational entropy energy (ΔΔSVibENCoM) between wild type and Nsp13 mutants. The positive ΔΔG corresponds to increase in stability while negative ΔΔG corresponds to decrease in stability. Similarly, positive ΔΔSVibENCoM corresponds to increase in flexibility while negative ΔΔSVibENCoM denotes decrease in flexibility of the mutant protein. Our data revealed the noticeable increase or decrease in free energy as well as vibrational entropy energy in various mutants as shown in Table 1 (list only those mutants whose ∆∆G and ∆∆S change is more than ± 0.500). The highest positive ΔΔG was obtained for A368 V (1.718 kcal/mol) and the maximum negative ΔΔG was observed for L391S (− 3.418 kcal/mol) (Table 1). Similarly, the highest positive ΔΔSVibENCoM was obtained for D207G (4.814 kcal.mol-1.K-1) and most negative ΔΔSVibENCoM was observed for V484F (− 1.078 kcal.mol-1.K-1) (Table 1).

Altogether, the data obtained from ΔΔG and ΔΔSVibENCoM analysis suggests that Nsp13 mutations can influence protein stability and dynamicity.

Prediction of B cell epitope contributed by Nsp13

IEDB webserver tool was used for predicting the continuous B-cell epitopes of Nsp13 (Fig. 1A). Our analysis revealed seven best epitopes that were more than 8 amino acid residues in length (Fig. 1B). Subsequently, these epitopes were further characterised by analysing various parameters, including vaxijen score, allergenicity, and toxicity (Fig. 1B). Our prediction data revealed that all of them are non-toxic however, five peptides (CNAPGCDVT, CVGSDNVT, VGKPRPPLN, TFEKGDYGDA and GDPAQLPAP) possess alleregenicity properties and two peptides are non-allergen (TQTVDSSQGSEY and STLQGPPGTGKS). Similarly, three of them exhibited antigenic property while four are non-antigenic (Fig. 1B). Subsequently, we predicted the B cell epitopes of Nsp13 based on its three dimensional structure using DiscoTop 2.0 webserver tool.43 Our analysis revealed the eleven discontinuous epitopes of Nsp13 having high score. The location of these epitopes are highlighted on the 3D structure of Nsp13 (Fig. 1C) and their additional details are shown in Fig. 1D. We observed four clusters that include few amino acids that are adjacent to each other in the 3D structure. Namely, cluster 1 (V169, G170), cluster 2 (H245, T246, V247, R248), cluster 3 (L256, N257) and cluster 4 (H482, V484). These clusters are highlighted in figure (Fig. 1C). The structural location of each discontinuous epitopes is also shown in supplementary Fig. 1 (A-K).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Prediction of B-cell epitopes of Nsp13. Linear continuous epitopes, A) The Y-axis of the graph corresponds to BepiPred score, while the X-axis depicts the Nsp13 residue positions in the sequence. The yellow area of the graph corresponds to the area of the protein having higher probability to generate epitope. B) The top seven peptides of Nsp13 having at least 8 amino acids are shown with vaxijen score. The red font shows the location of mutant residues in the epitope sequence. C) Prediction of discontinuous B-cell epitopes. The position of each predicted epitope on the 3D structural surface of Nsp13 was denoted using Biovia Discovery Studio.42 The discontinuous B-cell epitopes and its position is depicted in the 3D structure of Nsp13 protein. We observed four clusters that include few amino acids that are adjacent to each other in the 3D structure. Namely, cluster 1 (V169, G170), cluster 2 (H245, T246, V247, R248), cluster 3 (L256, N257) and cluster 4 (H482, V484). These clusters are highlighted in fig. D) The location and identity of each discontinuous epitopes of Nsp13. E) Analysis of mutation density of each continuous B cell epitope. We calculated the mutation density of epitopes by using the formula: Mutation density = No. of total mutations/length of the epitope. The values were normalised to 1 as the highest possible value and 0 as the lowest possible value. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Supplementary Fig. 1.

Supplementary Fig. 1

The structural details of discontinuous B cell epitopes of Nsp13.(A-K) The position of predicted epitope on the 3D structural surface of Nsp13 is shown in each panel and the amino acid residue is denoted by green stick. This structural data was obtained from DynaMut webserver. The colour definition of contacts is shown in the bottom right of the figure.

Subsequently, we compared the B-cell epitope sequences with the list of Nsp13 mutations observed among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The comparison revealed that eighteen of the identified mutations reside in those epitopes (Fig. 1B and D, highlighted in red font). Next, we measured the mutation density of each continuous B cell epitope. We calculated the mutation density of epitopes by using the formula: Mutation density = No. of total mutations/length of the epitope. The values were normalised to 1 as the highest possible value and 0 as the lowest possible value. Our analysis revealed that peptide 2 has the highest mutation density while peptide 5 has the lowest (Fig. 1E). This comparison also suggests that the newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 variants have changes in their epitopes from the wild type SARS-CoV-2. Altogether, our data revealed B –cell epitopes contributed by Nsp13.

Analysis of essential parameters of B cell epitopes

All essential parameters of B cell epitopes including Beta turn, accessibility of surface, flexibility, antigenicity and hydrophilicity were also calculated for Nsp13 (Fig. 2 ). Chou and Fasman's beta-turn prediction algorithm (with threshold 0.984) resulted in a minimum score of 0.677 and a maximum score of 1.384, and our selected peptide showed a propensity score of 1.164 (Fig. 2A). Emini surface accessibility prediction tool (with threshold 1.000) resulted in a minimum score of 0.036 and a maximum score of 4.888, and our selected peptide scored 1.33 in surface accessibility (Fig. 2B). Karplus and Schulz's flexibility prediction tool (with threshold 0.989) resulted in a minimum score of 0.904 and a maximum score of 1.150, and our selected peptide showed 1.033 in flexibility score (Fig. 2C). Kolaskar and Tongaonkar antigenicity scale (with threshold 1.052) resulted in a minimum score of 0.893 and a maximum score of 1.284, and our selected peptide showed an antigenicity score of 1.0163 (Fig. 2D). The parker hydrophilicity prediction algorithms (with threshold 1.325) resulted in a minimum score of − 3.714 and a maximum score of 7.000, and our selected peptide showed 1.33 in hydrophilicity score (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Recognition of B cell epitopes. A) β variants of structural polyproteins as predicted by Chou and Fasman β metamorphosis prediction, B) Surface accessibility analysis shown on Emini surface accessibility scale, C) Flexibility analysis on Karplus and Schultz flexibility scale, D) Antigenic determinants of Nsp13 were predicted using Kolaskar and Tongaonkar, E) Hydrophilicity of Nsp13 was predicted by Parker hydrophilicity.

Prediction of T cell epitopes contributed by Nsp13 protein

The IEDB webserver tool was used for prediction of Cytotoxic T- Lymphocyte epitopes and its interaction with MHC class I molecules. Our analysis with Nsp13 revealed 8 potential T cell epitopes (Table 2 ). NetMHCpanEL 4.1 MHC-class I binding prediction tools was used to predict the binding of these epitopes with MHC class I molecules with high affinity are listed in Table 2. The peptide FAIGLALYY from start (11) to end (19) had highest immunogenicity and affinity to interact with 9 alleles (HLA-B*35:01, HLA-A*26:01, HLA-B*53:01, HLA-A*01:01, HLA-A*30:02, HLA-B*58:01, HLA-B*15:01, HLA-A*68:01, HLA-B*57:01) and also showed allergenicity (Table 2). The allergenicity of these epitopes was predicted by Allergen FP tool, which categorises peptides into allergen/non-allergen based on the Tanimoto coefficients. The peptide HVISTSHKL (33–41) was predicted to be non-allergen while the rest of them are categorised as an allergen (Table 2). Furthermore, we also measured the population coverage of these HLA alleles, which is shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

The table show the details of T cell epitopes of Nsp13 related to MHC-I and MHC-II molecules. The MHC-I and MHC-II interaction with top most alleles (affinity IC50 value of < 200) are mentioned in the table along with Vaxijen score and allergenicity and population coverage.

List of MHC-class I molecules
Epitopes Start-End Position MHC-I allele with an affinity IC50 value of < 200 Vaxijen score Allergenicity Population coverage (in India)
HVISTSHKL 33–41 HLA-A*68:02,HLA-A*02:06,HLA-A*26:01, HLA-A*32:01,HLA-A*02:03,HLA-B*35:01, HLA-A*02:01 0.6850
(probable antigen)
probable
non-allergen
27.05%
DVTDVTQLY 56–64 HLA-A*26:01,HLA-B*35:01,HLA-A*68:01,
HLA-A*01:01,HLA-A*30:02,HLA-B*53:01
0.9181
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 26.79%
QLYLGGMSY 62–70 HLA-B*15:01,HLA-A*03:01,HLA-A*30:02,HLA-B*35:01,HLA-A*26:01,HLA-A*32:01,HLA-A*01:01,HLA-A*11:01 0.6598
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 29.82%
KSHKPPISF 73–81 HLA-B*57:01,HLA-B*58:01,HLA-A* 32:01,HLA-B*15:01,HLA-A*30:01,HLA-A*
30:02,HLA-A*24:02,HLA-A*23:01,HLA-B*07:02
0.9349
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 42.71%
KVQIGEYTF 192–200 HLA-A*32:01,HLA-B*57:01,HLA-B*58:01,
HLA-B*15:01,HLA-A*24:02,HLA-A*23:01
0.8369
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 26.97%
FAIGLALYY 291–299 HLA-B*35:01,HLA-A*26:01,HLA-B*53:01,
HLA-A*01:01,HLA-A*30:02,HLA-B*58:01,HLA-B*15:01,HLA-A*68:01,HLA-B*57:01
1.1890
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 41.19%
AQLPAPRTL 403–411 HLA-A*02:06, HLA-B*15:01,HLA-B*40:01,HLA-A*32:01, HLA-A*02:01, HLA-A*02:03,HLA-B*44:03 − 0.3560
(probable non-antigen)
probable allergen 35.37%
AVASKILGL 420–428 HLA-A*02:03,HLA-A*02:06,HLA-A*02:01,HLA-A*68:02,HLA-A*32:01,HLA-B*08:01,HLA-A*30:01 0.4971
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 50.91%



List of MHC-class II molecules

Epitopes Start –End Position MHC-II allele with an affinity IC50 value of < 200 Vaxijen score Allergenecity Population coverage (in India)
HKLVLSVNP 39–47 HLA-DRB1*15:01,HLA-DRB1*03:01,HLA-DRB1*07:01,HLA-DRB3*01:01,HLA-DRB5*
01:01
0.5001
(probable antigen)
probable allergen 53.93%
ERLKLFAAE 128–136 HLA-DRB1*15:01,HLA-DRB1*07:01,HLA-DRB5*01:01,HLA-DRB1*03:01,
HLA-DRB3*01:01
− 0.0539
(probable non-antigen)
probable allergen
ETFKLSYGI 143–151 HLA-DRB1*07:01,HLA-DRB1*15:01,
HLA-DRB3*01:01,HLA-DRB5*01:01,
HLA-DRB1*03:01
0.2915
(probable non-antigen)
probable allergen
EHYVRITGL 244–252 HLA-DRB5*01:01,HLA-DRB1*15:01,
HLA-DRB4*01:01,HLA-DRB1*07:01
0.5647
(probable antigen)
probable
non-allergen
ACSHAAVDA 308–316 HLA-DRB1*07:01,HLA-DRB4*01:01,
HLA-DRB1*03:01,HLA-DRB1*15:01
0.1368
(probable non-antigen)
probable allergen
QCFKMFYKG 470–478 HLA-DRB1*15:01,HLA-DRB5*01:01,
HLA-DRB1*07:01,HLA-DRB3*01:01,
HLA-DRB1*03:01
0.4573
(probable antigen)
probable
non-allergen

Similarly, the prediction of Helper T-Lymphocyte epitopes of Nsp13 and its interaction with MHC Class II molecules was predicted by IEDB webserver (based on IEDB recommended 2.22 method). We selected top 6 epitopes that exhibited maximum binding affinity with MHC class II molecules (Table 2). Our analysis revealed that only one epitope (HKLVLSVNP) possesses both antigenicity and allergenicity properties and affinity to interact with 5 alleles as shown in Table 2 (HLA-DRB1*15:01, HLA-DRB1*03:01, HLA-DRB1*07:01, HLA-DRB3*01:01, HLA-DRB5*01:01). The epitopes EHYVRITGL had highest immunogenicity and affinity to interact with 4 alleles (HLA-DRB5*01:01, HLA-DRB1*15:01, HLA-DRB4*01:01, HLA-DRB1*07:01) (Table 2). The allergenicity of these epitopes was also predicted based on Tanimoto coefficients. The data show that peptides EHYVRITGL and QCFKMFYKG were predicted to be non-allergen while the rest of them are categorised as allergen (Table 2). The population coverage of these HLA alleles are also shown in Table 2.

Subsequently, we examined several vital physiochemical features of these promising B and T cell epitopes. The half-life of MHC class I and II and B cell epitopes were calculated and our data revealed that the maximum half-life was observed for HVISTSHKL (MHC class I) and ETFKLSYGI for MHC class II molecule (Table 3 ). The toxicity prediction was performed by ToxinPred tool show that all analysed molecules were non-toxic (Table 3). We further analysed hydrophobicity, hydropathicity, hydrophilicity, polarity, charge, flexibility, pI, molecular weight and surface accessibility of both MHC class I and II molecules (Table 3). We also compared the MHC-I, MHC-II and B-cell epitopes to identify the most immunodominant epitope. Our data revealed that peptide 403–408 is the most immunodominant because its six amino acids (403–408) are present in both B-cell epitope and MHC-I peptide (Table 3).

Table 3.

The table shows the physiochemical properties of B-cell, MHC-I and MHC-II molecules. Several parameters were obtained using different webserver and tools as mentioned in methods section. The immunodominance was identified by comparing the B-cell, MHC-I and MHC-II peptides. If a peptide is present in any one of them then One ‘+’ is assigned; however, when it is present in two of them then two ‘++’ is assigned. In this way the immunodomiance of all peptides were measure and shown in table. * represents the most immunodominant epitope (peptide 403–408, its six amino acids are present in both B-cell epitope and MHC-I peptide).

Class Peptide (Start-End Position in Nsp13 sequence) Immuno-dominance Half-life
(sec)
Toxi-city Hydrop-hobicity Hydrop-athicity Hydrop-hilicity Charge pI Mol Wt Surface accessibility Flexibility Polarity
MHC-class I HVISTSHKL (33–41) ++ 2.582 NT − 0.09 − 0.01 − 0.32 2.00 9.1 1021.32 45.278 3.780 158.430
DVTDVTQLY (56–64) ++ 1.221 NT − 0.10 − 0.11 − 0.19 − 2.00 3.5 1053.26 45.567 3.950 90.570
QLYLGGMSY (62–70) + 0.182 NT 0.08 0.20 − 1.00 0.00 5.8 11.773 39.867 3.930 10.750
KSHKPPISF (73–81) + 1.759 NT − 0.21 − 0.94 0.20 2.50 10.0 1040.35 54.667 4.070 157.600
KVQIGEYTF (192–200) ++ 1.489 NT − 0.06 − 0.20 − 0.26 0.00 6.3 1084.37 48.511 4.020 106.840
FAIGLALYY (291–299) + 1.107 NT 0.34 1.72 − 1.50 0.00 5.8 1030.36 32.667 3.590 4.620
AQLPAPRTL (403–411) ++ 2.292 NT − 0.13 0.41 − 0.20 1.00 10.1 966.27 46.911 3.920 61.250
AVASKILGL (420–428) + 0.792 NT 0.18 1.64 − 0.51 1.00 9.1 871.22 36.311 3.810 53.830
MHC-Class II HKLVLSVNP (39–47) ++ 1.371 NT − 0.04 0.33 − 0.40 1.50 9.1 1006.35 45.544 3.770 108.890
ERLKLFAAE (128–136) + 2.445 NT − 0.21 − 0.16 0.54 0.00 6.5 1076.38 52.267 3.750 202.570
ETFKLSYGI (143–151) + 2.489 NT − 0.01 0.06 − 0.28 0.00 6.3 1057.34 45.978 4.010 105.300
EHYVRITGL (244–252) + 1.466 NT − 0.11 − 0.12 − 0.26 0.50 7.1 1087.38 45.822 3.960 157.510
ACSHAAVDA (308–316) + 0.944 NT 0.02 0.71 − 0.19 − 0.50 5.1 844.01 33.744 3.520 95.580
QCFKMFYKG (470–478) + 1.386 NT − 0.13 − 0.33 − 0.38 2.00 9.2 1151.53 50.489 3.650 107.750
B cell epitopes CNAPGCDVT (50–58) ++ 0.589 NT − 0.06 0.14 − 0.13 − 1.00 5.3 879.08 36.022 3.910 50.410
CVGSDNVT (97–104) + 0.594 NT − 0.06 0.25 − 0.11 − 1.00 5.3 793.95 36.888 3.590 49.150
VGKPRPPLN (169–177) + 6.347 NT − 0.28 − 1.01 0.32 2.00 6.7 977.30 54.233 4.280 110.200
TFEKGDYGDA (199–208) ++ 0.035 NT − 0.21 − 1.26 0.63 − 2.00 5.3 1102.25 49.490 4.600 184.430
STLQGPPGTGKS(278–289) + 0.589 NT − 0.15 − 0.92 0.10 1.000 6.2 1129.410 45.817 5.860 63.300
GDPAQLPAP (400–408) ++* 0.594 NT − 0.05 − 0.53 0.04 − 1.000 5.7 865.070 43.500 4.150 49.420
TQTVDSSQGSEY (530–541) + 0.59 NT − 0.26 − 1.28 0.23 − 2.00 3.7 1301.45 46.220 4.830 56.220

Discussions

In this study, we examined the predicted B cell epitopes of Nsp13, a non-structural protein of SARS-CoV-2. We studied the high rank B cell and T cell epitope candidates based on the immunoinformatics tools to identify Nsp13 epitopes that could regulate host immune responses. The immunoinformatics approaches have been used to study the epitopes from several viruses and those information's were used to understand the immune response of viruses.44 , 45 We used several physiochemical parameters including structural protrusion, antigenicity, flexibility, surface accessibility, hydrophilicity of Nsp13 were assessed to predict potential B-cell epitopes. IEDB resource tool was used to predict B-cell linear epitopes of at least eight amino acid residues. Our analysis revealed that under these conditions, seven linear B-cell epitopes were predicted that are at least 8 amino acids in length and are of non-toxic in nature. The discontinuous epitopes comprised of the residues that might be separated in linear sequence, however, in 3D structure they are in close proximity.46 Subsequently, the candidate epitopes were further characterised by the tools that can predict various physicochemical properties. Our data revealed that among B-cell epitopes the ‘TFEKGDYGDA’ peptide exhibited a strong stable immunogenic property as shown by its highest vaxijen score (0.9707) and non-toxic. Furthermore, eight MHC class-I and six MHC class-II binding T-cell epitopes assessed as highly antigenic and also predicted to interact with several HLA alleles. Detailed analysis revealed that the best vaxijen score of 1.18 was found for ‘FAIGLALYY’ peptide for MHC class-I molecule, and for MHC class-II molecules, ‘HKLVLSVNP’ has a maximum vaxijen score of 0.50 epitopes. Moreover, the SARS-CoV-2 genome is continuously changing due to the occurrence of random mutations during its replication inside the host cells. More importantly, if the mutated viruses have better fitness than its counterparts they get selected by natural selection and led to appearance of new variants. Therefore, genomic surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 is needed to understand the evolution and future course of pandemic. Towards this, bioinformatical approaches play key role by predicting the impact of mutations on viral protein structure and function. Bioinformatics has enabled researchers to systematically study the impact of large number of mutations on B and T cell epitopes. Furthermore, these in silico analyses have drastically reduced cost of study with faster and reliable output compared to the conventional experimental methods. However, there are several limitations, such as the validation of predicted in silico data should be complemented by functionally validated in vivo experiments. Furthermore, the immunoinformatics based epitope prediction is highly dependent on the quality of sequencing data provided by different participating labs as well as on the robustness of the algorithms used in those predictions. Sometimes the raw data of sequencing has few errors; in such cases the downstream analysis are also incorrect and misleading. Therefore, proper care should be taken by the researchers during analysis of genome wide data. Another limitation of our study is that we have analysed all SARS-CoV-2 isolates sequences (50217) reported from India till September 2021. Since, this virus is rapidly changing and continuous genome sequencing is being conducted worldwide; therefore, similar study should be conducted at regular intervals to understand the evolution of this virus. Moreover, the trends observed in the last two years of pandemic indicate that the new variants of SARS-CoV-2 will keep appearing and bioinformatical study will play important role in understanding their impact on virus fitness and evolution.

It has been well established that the replication of coronaviruses are error-prone that lead to creation of highly diverse genotype variants. Our study revealed a considerable alteration in stability and dynamicity due to mutations at various positions of Nsp13 that might alter its function. In-silico analyses were performed to identify and characterise the mutations occurring in Nsp13. Our data demonstrate that eighteen of the identified mutations reside in those epitopes (Fig. 1), which can help the SARS-CoV-2 variants to elicit distinct immune responses compared to the wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Our data also revealed that peptide 403–408 is the most immunodominant epitope of Nsp13 observed in this study (Table 3). These proposed consequences due to the variations in Nsp13 epitopes are substantiated by several findings with similar observations.47., 48., 49. The continuously growing body of literature shows rapid progress in the experimentally validated epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 proteins, which is required for drug discovery and vaccine development. Several recent studies have reported B and T cell epitopes observed in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals identified by mass spectrometry studies.50., 51., 52., 53., 54. Interestingly, the predicted epitopes from our study partially matches with these functionally validated epitopes. One such study by Pan et al.52 in which the mass spectrometric identification of immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes were conducted are showing close resemblance of the Nsp13 epitopes from our study. The Nsp13 epitopes VYIGDPAQL and IVDTVSALVY identified by Pan et al. matches with our predicted MHC class I peptides. Similarly, epitopes KLFAAETLK, TLVPQEHYV and TLVPQEHYV observed by Pan et al. also matches with our predicted MHC class II peptides. Another study by Saini et al.55 identified ILGLPTQTV as Nsp13 epitope also resembles with our predicted MHC class I epitope. Furthermore, the predicted B cell epitope peptide 4 (TFEKGDYGDA) and peptide 5 (STLQGPPGTGKS) from our study is present in the vicinity of the experimentally validated epitope identified by Snyder et al.51 and Nelde et al.50 respectively. Altogether, the predicted epitopes of Nsp13 from this study closely matches with the experimentally validated epitopes.

In this work, we have computationally identified and characterised the epitopes of NSP13 protein and their interaction with MHC class I and II alleles were also predicted. Both MHC class I and class II molecules are part of two distinct antigen processing pathways that targets multiple antigens including viral peptides. The MHC class I and II genes code for proteins that are involved in antigen-specific responses and plays central role in neutralising viral infections. MHC class I molecules process intracellular peptides from viruses and present them to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) that monitors cell surface MHC class I molecules for peptides derived from viral proteins and eliminate such infected cells.56 Similarly, surface of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), including dendritic cells, B cells, macrophages and thymic epithelial cells presents the antigenic peptide-loaded MHC class II molecules that are recognised by antigen-specific CD4+ T cells.57 The high affinity of CD4+ T-cells to the antigen/MHC class II complex trigger inflammatory58 , 59 responses, which in turn keep the infection under check. The data from the present study show that the thirteen epitopes of NSP13 that interacts with MHC I and II alleles. Interestingly, most of these epitopes of NSP13 have mutations (Table 1 and Table 2) as observed from the analysis of SARS-CoV-2 sequences. It is possible that NSP13 epitopes will affect its interaction with MHC I and II alleles and could even disrupt their interactions leading to evasion from the immune cells. However, there are several limitations of these studies including the lack of full repertoire of epitopes by all proteins of SARS-CoV-2 is not known. Furthermore, how these epitopes varying among emerging variants requires periodic investigations, which is a tedious work. In future, a comprehensive full epitope mapping of SARS-CoV-2 should be conducted, which will be critical for understanding the B cell and T cell response of host cells against this virus. In short, these results could provide some insights in the understanding of Nsp13 epitopes, which is essential for evaluating the immunogenicity and virulence of SARS-CoV-2.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Supplementary material

: Supplementary table 1: The table show the identity and properties of Nsp13 protein mutants identified among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The frequency of each mutant along with polarity and charge changes are also indicated. The table also show the ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCoM values of the mutants observed in Nsp13. The DynaMut programe predicts ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCOM for those residues only, whose structure has been solved. Therefore, the mutations that reside in the unmodeled region of Nsp13 do not have ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCoM values.

mmc2.docx (54.7KB, docx)

Fund information

No funding was used to conduct this research.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Sushant Kumar: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Khushboo Kumari: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. Gajendra Kumar Azad: Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interests

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the Department of Zoology, Patna University, Patna, Bihar (India) for providing infrastructural support for this study.

References

  • 1.Lai C.C., Shih T.P., Ko W.C., Tang H.J., Hsueh P.R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): The epidemic and the challenges. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rothan H.A., Byrareddy S.N. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rabi F.A., Al Zoubi M.S., Al-Nasser A.D., Kasasbeh G.A., Salameh D.M. Sars-cov-2 and coronavirus disease 2019: What we know so far. Pathogens. 2020 doi: 10.3390/pathogens9030231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lu R., et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhou P., et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cui J., Li F., Shi Z.L. Origin and evolution of pathogenic coronaviruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0118-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Weiss S.R. Forty years with coronaviruses. J Exp Med. 2020 doi: 10.1084/jem.20200537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bchetnia M., Girard C., Duchaine C., Laprise C. The outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): A review of the current global status. J Infect Public Health. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu F., et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khailany R.A., Safdar M., Ozaslan M. Genomic characterization of a novel SARS-CoV-2. Gene Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jain R., Coloma J., García-Sastre A., Aggarwal A.K. Structure of the NS3 helicase from Zika virus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016 doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shu T., et al. Ebola virus VP35 has novel NTPase and helicase-like activities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li T.-F., et al. Human norovirus NS3 Has RNA helicase and chaperoning activities. J Virol. 2017 doi: 10.1128/jvi.01606-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.K.A. Ivanov, V.Thiel, J. C. Dobbe, Y. van der Meer, E. J. Snijder, and Ziebuhr, J.Multiple enzymatic activities associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus helicase, J Virol (2004), doi:10.1128/jvi.78.11.5619-5632.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 15.White M.A., Lin W., Cheng X. Discovery of COVID-19 inhibitors targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp13 helicase. J Phys Chem Lett. 2020 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen J., et al. Structural basis for helicase-polymerase coupling in the SARS-CoV-2 replication-transcription complex. Cell. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shu T., et al. SARS-coronavirus-2 Nsp13 possesses NTPase and RNA helicase activities that can be inhibited by bismuth salts. Virol Sin. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00242-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zeng J., et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2 antiviral compounds by screening for small molecule inhibitors of nsp13 helicase. Biochem J. 2021 doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Perez-Lemus G.R., Menéndez C.A., Alvarado W., Byléhn F., De Pablo J.J. Toward wide-spectrum antivirals against coronaviruses: MOLECULAR characterization of SARS-CoV-2 NSP13 helicase inhibitors. Sci Adv. 2022 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj4526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vazquez C., et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins NSP1 and NSP13 inhibit interferon activation through distinct mechanisms. PLoS One. 2021 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramasamy S., et al. Tle1 tumor suppressor negatively regulates inflammation in vivo and modulates NF-κB inflammatory pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511380113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xia H., et al. Evasion of Type I Interferon by SARS-CoV-2. Cell Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo G., et al. SARS-CoV-2 non-structural protein 13 (nsp13) hijacks host deubiquitinase USP13 and counteracts host antiviral immune response. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00509-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rashid F., et al. Structural analysis on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 non-structural protein 13 mutants revealed altered bonding network with tank binding kinase 1 to evade host immune system. Front Microbiol. 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.789062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Naz, A., Shahid, F., Butt, T. T., Awan, F. M., Ali, A., and Malik, A., Designing multi-epitope vaccines to combat emerging coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by employing immuno-informatics approach. Front Immunol. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mukherjee S., Tworowski D., Detroja R., Mukherjee S.B., Frenkel-Morgenstern M. Immunoinformatics and structural analysis for identification of immunodominant epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 as potential vaccine targets. Vaccines. 2020 doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang D., et al. Immunoinformatic analysis of T-and B-cell epitopes for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design. Vaccines. 2020 doi: 10.3390/vaccines8030355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kiyotani K., Toyoshima Y., Nemoto K., Nakamura Y. Bioinformatic prediction of potential T cell epitopes for SARS-Cov-2. J Hum Genet. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s10038-020-0771-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar S., Kumari K., Azad G.K. Emerging genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) alters its B-cell epitopes. Biologicals. 2022 doi: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2021.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vita R., et al. The Immune Epitope Database (IEDB): 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jespersen M.C., Peters B., Nielsen M., Marcatili P. BepiPred-2.0: Improving sequence-based B-cell epitope prediction using conformational epitopes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Koehl P., Levitt M. Structure-based conformational preferences of amino acids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.22.12524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Doytchinova I.A., Flower D.R. VaxiJen: A server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines. BMC Bioinformat. 2007 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dimitrov I., Naneva L., Doytchinova I., Bangov I. AllergenFP: Allergenicity prediction by descriptor fingerprints. Bioinformatics. 2014 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Reynisson B., Alvarez B., Paul S., Peters B., Nielsen M. NetMHCpan-4.1 and NetMHCIIpan-4.0: improved predictions of MHC antigen presentation by concurrent motif deconvolution and integration of MS MHC eluted ligand data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.S. Gupta, P. Kapoor, K. Chaudhary, A. Gautam, R. Kumar, G.P.S.Raghava, In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins, PLoS One (2013), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 37.Sharma A., Singla D., Rashid M., Raghava G.P.S. Designing of peptides with desired half-life in intestine-like environment. BMC Bioinformat. 2014 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Rodrigues C.H.M., Pires D.E.V., Ascher D.B. DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Azad G.K., Khan P.K. Variations in Orf3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 alter its structure and function. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021;26 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Azad G.K. The molecular assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid phosphoprotein variants among Indian isolates. Heliyon. 2021;7 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Azad G.K. Identification of novel mutations in the methyltransferase complex (Nsp10-Nsp16) of SARS-CoV-2. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Studio D. accelrys; 2008. Discovery Studio. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kringelum J.V., Lundegaard C., Lund O., Nielsen M. Reliable B Cell Epitope Predictions: Impacts of Method Development and Improved Benchmarking. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chauhan V., Rungta T., Goyal K., Singh M.P. Designing a multi-epitope based vaccine to combat Kaposi Sarcoma utilizing immunoinformatics approach. Sci Rep. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39299-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Finco O., Rappuoli R. Designing vaccines for the twenty-first century society. Front Immunol. 2014 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ansari H.R., Raghava G.P. Identification of conformational B-cell Epitopes in an antigen from its primary sequence. Immunome Res. 2010 doi: 10.1186/1745-7580-6-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Letko M., Marzi A., Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Majumdar P., Niyogi S. ORF3a mutation associated higher mortality rate in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Epidemiol Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Azad G.K., Khan P.K. Variations in Orf3a protein of SARS-CoV-2 alter its structure and function. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nelde A., et al. SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition. Nat Immunol. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Snyder T.M., et al. Magnitude and dynamics of the T-Cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection at both individual and population levels. medRxiv Prepr Serv Heal Sci. 2020 doi: 10.1101/2020.07.31.20165647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pan K., et al. Mass spectrometric identification of immunogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes and cognate TCRs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111815118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kared H., et al. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + T cell responses in convalescent COVID-19 individuals. J Clin Invest. 2021 doi: 10.1172/JCI145476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Smith C.C., et al. Landscape and selection of vaccine epitopes in SARS-CoV-2. Genome Med. 2021 doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00910-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saini S.K., et al. SARS-CoV-2 genome-wide T cell epitope mapping reveals immunodominance and substantial CD8 + T cell activation in COVID-19 patients. Sci Immunol. 2021 doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abf7550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Da Silva J., Hughes A.L. Conservation of cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes as a host strategy to constrain parasite adaptation: Evidence from the nef gene of human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) Mol Biol Evol. 1998 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Li P., et al. Disruption of MHC Class II-restricted antigen presentation by vaccinia virus. J Immunol. 2005 doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.10.6481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Radke J.R., Cook J.L. Human adenovirus infections: Update and consideration of mechanisms of viral persistence. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018 doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Deng J., et al. Influenza A virus infection-induced macroautophagy facilitates MHC class II-restricted endogenous presentation of an immunodominant viral epitope. FEBS J. 2021 doi: 10.1111/febs.15654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

: Supplementary table 1: The table show the identity and properties of Nsp13 protein mutants identified among Indian SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The frequency of each mutant along with polarity and charge changes are also indicated. The table also show the ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCoM values of the mutants observed in Nsp13. The DynaMut programe predicts ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCOM for those residues only, whose structure has been solved. Therefore, the mutations that reside in the unmodeled region of Nsp13 do not have ΔΔG and ΔΔSvib ENCoM values.

mmc2.docx (54.7KB, docx)

Articles from Vacunas are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES